Hubbry Logo
Gold dollarGold dollarMain
Open search
Gold dollar
Community hub
Gold dollar
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gold dollar
Gold dollar
from Wikipedia

Gold dollar ($1)
United States
Value1 United States dollar
Mass1.672 g
DiameterFor Type 1, 12.7 mm. For Types 2 and 3, 14.3 mm (For Type 1, .500 inch. For types 2 and 3, .563 in)
EdgeReeded
Composition90% gold, 10% copper
Gold.04837 troy oz
Years of minting1849 (1849)–1889 (1889)
Mint marksC, D, O, S. Found immediately below the wreath on the reverse. Philadelphia Mint pieces lack mint mark.
Obverse
NNC-US-1849-G$1-Liberty head (Ty1).jpg
DesignLiberty wearing a coronet. Type 1.
DesignerJames B. Longacre
Design date1849
Design discontinued1854
NNC-US-1854-G$1-Indian head (Ty2).jpg
DesignLiberty as an Indian princess. Type 2 (small head)
DesignerJames B. Longacre
Design date1854
Design discontinued1856
NNC-US-1856-G$1-Indian head (Ty3).jpg
DesignType 3 (large head)
DesignerJames B. Longacre
Design date1856
Design discontinued1889
Reverse
NNC-US-1849-G$1-Liberty head (Ty1).jpg
DesignType 1
DesignerPeter Filatreu Cross
Design date1849
Design discontinued1854
NNC-US-1854-G$1-Indian head (Ty2).jpg
DesignTypes 2 and 3
DesignerJames B. Longacre
Design date1854
Design discontinued1889

The gold dollar or gold one-dollar piece is a gold coin that was struck as a regular issue by the United States Bureau of the Mint from 1849 to 1889. The coin had three types over its lifetime, all designed by Mint Chief Engraver James B. Longacre. The Type 1 issue has the smallest diameter (0.5 inch =12.7mm) of any United States coin minted to date.

A gold dollar coin had been proposed several times in the 1830s and 1840s, but was not initially adopted. Congress was finally galvanized into action by the increased supply of bullion caused by the California gold rush, and in 1849 authorized a gold dollar. In its early years, silver coins were being hoarded or exported, and the gold dollar found a ready place in commerce. Silver again circulated after Congress in 1853 required that new coins of that metal be made lighter, and the gold dollar became a rarity in commerce even before federal coins vanished from circulation because of the economic disruption caused by the American Civil War.

Gold did not again circulate in most of the nation until 1879; once it did, the gold dollar did not regain its place. In its final years, it was struck in small numbers, causing speculation by hoarders. It was also in demand to be mounted in jewelry. The regular issue gold dollar was last struck in 1889; the following year, Congress ended the series.

Damaged common date gold dollars tend to be worth anywhere from melt value to about US$180 (as of 2025); common dates of higher circulated grades sell for about US$200 while rarer coins in high grades can be worth up to many thousands.

Background

[edit]

In proposing his plan for a mint and a coinage system, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton in 1791 proposed that the one-dollar denomination be struck both as a gold coin, and as one of silver, representative of the two metals which he proposed be made legal tender.[1] Congress followed Hamilton's recommendation only in part, authorizing a silver dollar, but no coin of that denomination in gold.[2]

In 1831, the first gold dollar was minted, at the private mint of Christopher Bechtler in North Carolina. Much of the gold then being produced in the United States came from the mountains of North Carolina and Georgia, and the dollars and other small gold coins issued by Bechtler circulated through that region, and were now and then seen further away. Additional one-dollar pieces were struck by August Bechtler, Christopher's son.[3][4]

Soon after the Bechtlers began to strike their private issues, Secretary of the Treasury Levi Woodbury became an advocate of having the Mint of the United States ("Mint", when described as an institution) strike the one-dollar denomination in gold. He was opposed by the Mint Director, Robert M. Patterson. Woodbury persuaded President Andrew Jackson to have pattern coins struck. In response, Patterson had Mint Second Engraver Christian Gobrecht[a][3] break off work on the new design for the silver one-dollar coin and work on a pattern for the gold dollar. Gobrecht's design featured a Liberty cap surrounded by rays on one side, and a palm branch arranged in a circle with the denomination, date, and name of the country on the other.[3]

Consideration was given to including the gold dollar as an authorized denomination in the revisionary legislation that became the Mint Act of 1837. The Philadelphia newspaper Public Ledger, in December 1836, supported a gold dollar, stating that "the dollar is the smallest gold coin that would be convenient, and as it would be eminently so, neither silver nor paper should be allowed to take its place."[5] Nevertheless, after Mint Director Patterson appeared before a congressional committee, the provision authorizing the gold dollar was deleted from the bill.[6]

Inception

[edit]

In January 1844, North Carolina Representative James Iver McKay, the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means, solicited the views of Director Patterson on the gold dollar. Patterson had more of Gobrecht's pattern dollar struck to show to committee members, again advising against a coin that if issued would be only about a half inch (13 mm) in diameter. He told Treasury Secretary John C. Spencer that the only gold coins of that size in commerce, the Spanish and Colombian half-escudos, were unpopular and had not been struck for more than twenty years. This seemed to satisfy the committee as nothing more was done for the time, and when a gold dollar was proposed again in 1846, McKay's committee recommended against it.[7]

Even before 1848, record amounts of gold were flowing to American mints to be struck into coin, but the California Gold Rush vastly increased these quantities.[8] This renewed calls for a gold dollar, as well as for a higher denomination than the eagle ($10 piece), then the largest gold coin. In January 1849, McKay introduced a bill for a gold dollar, which was referred to his committee. There was much discussion in the press about the proposed coin; one newspaper published a proposal for an annular gold dollar; that is, with a hole in the middle to increase its small diameter. McKay amended his legislation to provide for a double eagle ($20 gold coin) and wrote to Patterson, who replied stating that the annular gold dollar would not work, and neither would another proposal to have dollar piece consisting of a gold plug in a silver coin.[9] Nevertheless, Gobrecht's successor as chief engraver, James B. Longacre, prepared patterns, including some with a square hole in the middle.[10]

McKay got his fellow Democrat, New Hampshire Senator Charles Atherton, to introduce the bill to authorize the gold dollar and the double eagle in the Senate on February 1, 1849—Atherton was chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. McKay introduced a version into the House on February 20; debate began the same day. The dollar was attacked by congressmen from the Whig Party, then in the minority, on the grounds that it would be too small, would be counterfeited and in bad light might be mistakenly spent as a half dime, the coins being similar in size. McKay did not respond substantively, but stated that if no one wanted these denominations, they would not be called for at the Mint, and would not be coined.[9] Pennsylvania Representative Joseph Ingersoll, a Whig, spoke against the bill, noting that Patterson opposed the new denominations, and that the idea had been repeatedly turned down, whenever considered. Another Whig, Massachusetts's Charles Hudson, related that Patterson had sent a real and a counterfeit gold dollar to his committee and the majority of members had been unable to tell the difference.[11] McKay made no answer to these claims, but others did, including New York Congressman Henry Nicoll, who assured the House that the counterfeiting allegations were greatly exaggerated. The point was, he indicated, that the double eagle and gold dollar were wanted by the public, and, in the case of the gold dollar could help money circulate in small communities where banknotes were not accepted. Connecticut Representative John A. Rockwell, a Whig, tried to table the bill, but his motion was defeated. The bill passed easily, and met only minimal opposition in the Senate, becoming law on March 3, 1849.[11]

Preparation

[edit]
James B. Longacre, self-portrait (1845)

The officers at the Philadelphia Mint, including Chief Coiner Franklin Peale, were mostly the friends and relations of Director Patterson. The outsider in their midst was Chief Engraver[b] James B. Longacre,[12] successor to Gobrecht (who had died in 1844). A former copper-plate engraver, Longacre had been appointed through the political influence of South Carolina Senator John C. Calhoun.[13]

When Longacre began work on the two new coins in early 1849, he had no one to assist him. Longacre wrote the following year that he had been warned by a Mint employee that one of the officers (undoubtedly Peale) planned to undermine the chief engraver's position by having the work of preparing designs and dies done outside Mint premises. Accordingly, when the gold coin bill became law, Longacre apprised Patterson that he was ready to begin work on the gold dollar. The Mint Director agreed, and after viewing a model of the head on the obverse, authorized Longacre to proceed with preparation of dies. According to Longacre,[14]

The engraving was unusually minute and required very close and incessant labor for several weeks. I made the original dies and hubs for making the working dies twice over, to secure their perfect adaptation to the coining machinery. I had a wish to execute this work single handed, that I might thus silently reply to those who had questioned my ability for the work. The result, I believe, was satisfactory.[14]

Original design

[edit]
The head of Liberty on the Type 1 dollar resembles that on Longacre's Liberty Head double eagle.

The Type 1 gold dollar depicts a head of Liberty, facing left, with a coronet or tiara on her head bearing her name. Her hair is gathered in a bun; she is surrounded by 13 stars representing the original states. The reverse features the date and denomination within a wreath, with the name of the nation near the rim.[15]

Contemporary reviews of the Type 1 design were generally favorable. The New York Weekly Tribune on May 19, 1849, described the new dollar as "undoubtedly the neatest, tiniest, lightest, coin in this country ... it is too delicate and beautiful to pay out for potatoes, and sauerkraut, and salt pork. Oberon might have paid Puck with it for bringing the blossom which bewitched Titania."[16] Willis' Bank Note List stated that "there is no probability of them ever getting into general circulation; they are altogether too small."[17] The North Carolina Standard hoped that they would be struck at the Charlotte Mint and circulated locally to eliminate the problem of small-denomination bank notes from out of state.[17] Coin dealer and numismatic author Q. David Bowers notes that the head of Liberty on the Type 1 dollar is a scaled-down version of that on the double eagle, and "a nicely preserved gold dollar is beautiful to behold".[18]

Modifications

[edit]
The 1849 gold dollar
Open wreath
Open wreath
Closed wreath
Closed wreath

Mint records indicate the first gold dollars were produced on May 7, 1849; Longacre's diary notes state instead that the first were struck on May 8. A few coins in proof condition were struck on the first day, along with about 1,000 for circulation.[19][20] There are five major varieties of the 1849 gold dollar from Philadelphia, made as Longacre continued to fine-tune the design. Mintmarked dies were sent by Longacre's Engraving Department at the Philadelphia Mint to the branch mints at Charlotte, Dahlonega (in Georgia), and New Orleans; coins struck at the branches resemble some of the types issued from Philadelphia, depending on when the dies were produced. Of the coins struck at the branch mints in 1849, only pieces struck at Charlotte (1849-C) exist in multiple varieties; most are of what is dubbed the "Closed Wreath" variety. Approximately five of the 1849-C Open Wreath are known; one, believed the finest surviving specimen, sold at auction for $690,000 in 2004,[21] remaining a record for the gold dollar series as of 2013.[22] One of the changes made during production was the inclusion of Longacre's initial "L" on the truncation of Liberty's neck,[23] the first time a U.S. coin intended for full-scale production had borne the initial of its designer.[24] All issues beginning in 1850 bear the Closed Wreath.[25] Beginning in 1854, the gold dollar was also struck at the new San Francisco Mint.[26]

The continued flow of gold from California made silver expensive in terms of gold, and U.S. silver coins began to flow out of the country for melting in 1849, a flow that accelerated over the next several years as the price of the metal continued to rise. By 1853, a thousand dollars in silver coin contained $1,042 worth of bullion. As silver coins vanished, the gold dollar became the only federal coin in circulation between the cent and the quarter eagle ($2.50 piece). As such, it was struck in large numbers and widely circulated. According to Bowers in his book on the denomination, "the years 1850 to 1853 were the high-water mark of the gold dollar, the glory years of the denomination when the little gold coins took the place of half dollars and silver dollars in everyday transactions."[27] This time came to an end in 1853 when Congress passed an act reducing the weight of most silver coins, allowing new issues of them to circulate.[28]

As early as 1851, New York Congressman William Duer alleged that Patterson had made the gold dollar too small in diameter on purpose to provoke criticism. Patterson retired that year after 16 years in his position, and under his successor, George N. Eckert, annular gold dollar and half dollar patterns were struck. Public Ledger reported that although gold dollars would not be struck in annular form, gold half dollars would be, to help fill the need for change. With the new Pierce administration, Thomas M. Pettit took office as Mint Director on March 31, 1853. In April, Treasury Secretary James Guthrie wrote to Pettit that there were complaints that the gold dollar was too small, often lost or mistaken for a small silver coin, and enquired about reports that the Mint had experimented with annular dollars. Pettit replied, stating that none had been preserved, but enclosed a silver piece of equivalent size. He noted that while there would be technical difficulties in the production of the annular dollar, these could be overcome. In a letter dated May 10, Pettit proposed an oval-shaped holed piece, or an angular-shaped coin, which would lessen the production problems. Pettit died suddenly on May 31; Guthrie did not let the issue fall, but queried Pettit's replacement, James Ross Snowden, concerning the issue on June 7. As U.S. coins were required to bear some device emblematic of liberty, the secretary hoped that artists could be found who could find some such design for an annular coin.[29]

Longacre's design for the three-dollar piece (above) was adapted for the Types 2 and 3 gold dollar.
Longacre's design for the three-dollar piece (above) was adapted for the Types 2 and 3 gold dollar.

The Act of February 21, 1853, that had lightened the silver coins also authorized a gold three-dollar piece, which began to be produced in 1854. To ensure that the three-dollar piece was not mistaken for other gold coins, it had been made thinner and wider than it would normally be, and Longacre put a distinctive design with an Indian princess on it. Longacre adapted both the technique and the design for the gold dollar, which was made thinner, and thus wider. An adaptation of Longacre's princess for the larger gold coin was placed on the dollar, and a similar agricultural wreath on the reverse. The idea of making the gold dollar larger in this way had been suggested in Congress as early as 1852, and had been advocated by Pettit, but Guthrie's desire for an annular coin stalled the matter.[19][30] In May 1854, Snowden sent Guthrie a letter stating that the difficulties with an annular coin, especially in getting the coins to eject properly from the press, were more than trivial.[31]

Nevertheless, the Type 2 gold dollar (as it came to be known) proved unsatisfactory as the mints had difficulty in striking the new coin so that all details were brought out. This was due to the high relief of the design—the three Southern branch mints especially had trouble with the piece. Many of the Type 2 pieces quickly became illegible, and were sent back to Philadelphia for melting and recoinage.[32] On most surviving specimens, the "85" in the date is not fully detailed.[33] The Type 2 gold dollar was struck only at Philadelphia in 1854 and 1855, at the three Southern branch mints in the latter year, and at San Francisco in 1856, after the design was designated for replacement.[26][32] To correct the problems, Longacre enlarged the head of Liberty, making it a scaled-down version of the three-dollar piece, and moved the lettering on the obverse closer to the rim. This improved the metal flow and design sharpness so much that early numismatic scholars assumed the reverse was also altered, though in fact no change was made and the Type 2 and Type 3 reverses are identical.[31][33]

Design of Type 2 and 3 dollars

[edit]

The Type 2 and 3 gold dollars depict Liberty as a Native American princess, with a fanciful feathered headdress not resembling any worn by any Indian tribe. This image is an inexact copy of the design Longacre had made for the three-dollar piece, and is one of a number of versions of Liberty that Longacre created based on the Venus Accroupie or Crouching Venus, a sculpture then on display in a Philadelphia museum. For the reverse, Longacre adapted the "agricultural wreath" he had created for the reverse of the three-dollar piece, composed of cotton, corn, tobacco, and wheat, blending the produce of North and South. This wreath would appear, later in the 1850s, on the Flying Eagle cent.[32][34]

Art historian Cornelius Vermeule deprecated the Indian princess design used by Longacre for the obverses of the Types 2 and 3 gold dollar, and for the three-dollar piece, "the 'princess' of the gold coins is a banknote engraver's[c] elegant version of folk art of the 1850s. The plumes or feathers are more like the crest of the Prince of Wales than anything that saw the Western frontiers, save perhaps on a music hall beauty."[34]

War years

[edit]

The gold dollar continued to be produced in the late 1850s, though mintages declined from the figures of two million or more each year between 1850 and 1854. Only about 51,000 gold dollars were produced in 1860, with over two-thirds of that figure at Philadelphia, just under a third at San Francisco, and 1,566 at Dahlonega.[35] Roughly a hundred are known of the last, creating one of the great rarities from Dahlonega in the series.[36]

The 1861-D dollar

The other candidate for the rarest from that mint is the 1861-D, with an estimated mintage of 1,000 and perhaps 45 to 60 known.[37] Two pairs of dies were shipped from Philadelphia to Dahlonega on December 10, 1860; they arrived on January 7, 1861, two weeks before Georgia voted to secede from the Union, as the American Civil War began.[38] Under orders from Governor Joseph E. Brown, state militia secured the mint, and at some point, small quantities of dollars and half eagles were produced. Records of how many coins were struck and when have not survived. Since dies crack in time, and all the mints were supplied with them from Philadelphia, coining could not last, and in May 1861, coins and supplies remaining at Dahlonega were turned over to the treasury of the Confederate States of America, which Georgia had by then joined. Gold coins with a total face value of $6 were put aside for assay. Normally, they would have been sent to Philadelphia to await the following year's meeting of the United States Assay Commission, when they would be available for testing. Instead, these were sent to the initial Confederate capital of Montgomery, Alabama, though what was done with them there, and their ultimate fate, are unknown. The rarity of the 1861-D dollar, and the association with the Confederacy, make it especially prized.[39]

Dahlonega, like the other two branch mints in the South, closed its doors after the 1861 strikings. It and the Charlotte facility never reopened; the New Orleans Mint again struck coins from 1879 to 1909,[40] but did not strike gold dollars again. After 1861, the only issuance of gold dollars outside Philadelphia was at San Francisco, in 1870.[41]

The outbreak of the Civil War shook public confidence in the Union, and citizens began hoarding specie, gold and silver coins. In late December 1861, banks and then the federal Treasury stopped paying out gold at face value. By mid-1862, all federal coins, even the base metal cent, had vanished from commerce in much of the country. The exception was the Far West, where for the most part, only gold and silver were acceptable currencies, and paper money traded at a discount. In the rest of the nation, gold and silver coins could be purchased from banks, exchange agents, and from the Treasury for a premium in the new greenbacks the government began to issue to fill the gap in commerce and finance the war.[42]

Final years, abolition, and collecting

[edit]
A 1851-P gold dollar next to a 1884-O Morgan dollar, both graded by NGC. Throughout its mintage years, the gold dollar was issued concurrently with the much larger silver dollars, which ultimately replaced the gold dollar upon its discontinuation.

Since gold did not circulate in the United States (except on the West Coast) in the postwar period, much of the production of coins of that metal in the United States was double eagles for export.[43] Accordingly, although 1,361,355 gold dollars were struck in 1862—the last time production would exceed a million—the mintage fell to 6,200 in 1863 and remained low for the rest of the coin's existence, excepting 1873 and 1874. The Mint felt it improper to suspend coinage of a coin authorized by Congress, and issued proof coins (generally a few dozen to the tiny numismatic community) from specially-polished dies, also producing enough circulation strikes so that the proof coins would not be unduly rare. In 1873 and 1874, old and worn gold dollars held by the government were melted and recoined, generating large mintages of that denomination. This was done in anticipation of the resumption of specie payments, which did not occur until the end of 1878. Once specie again circulated at face value, the gold dollar found no place in commerce amid large quantities of silver coinage, either released from hoarding or newly struck by the Mint.[41][44] The government expected that the resumption of specie payments would cause the dollar and other small gold coins to circulate again, but the public, allowed to redeem paper currency, continued to use it as more convenient than coins.[45]

In the 1870s and 1880s, public interest grew in the low-mintage gold dollar. Collecting coins was becoming more popular, and a number of numismatists put aside some gold dollars and hoped for increases in value. The Mint most likely channeled its production through some favored Philadelphia dealers, though proof coins could be purchased for $1.25 at the cashier's window at the Philadelphia facility. Banks charged a premium for circulation strikes. They were popular in the jewelry trade, mounted into various items. The coins were often exported to China or Japan, where such jewelry was made. The dollars were often damaged in the process; the Mint refused to sell into this trade and did its best to hinder it. Nevertheless, Mint officials concluded that jewelers were successful at getting the majority of each issue. Proof mintages exceeded 1,000 by 1884, and remained above that mark for the remainder of the series, numbers likely inflated by agents of jewelers, willing to pay the Mint's premium of $0.25 per coin.[46] Another use for the gold dollar was as a holiday gift; after its abolition the quarter eagle became a popular present.[47]

James Pollock, in his final report as Mint Director in 1873, advocated limiting striking of gold dollars to depositors who specifically requested it. "The gold dollar is not a convenient coin, on account of its small size, and it suffers more proportionately from abrasion than larger coins."[48] His successors called for its abolition, with James P. Kimball, before he left office in 1889, writing to Congress that except as jewelry, "little practical use has been found for this coin".[49] Later that year, the new director, Edward O. Leech, issued a report stating that the gold dollar "is too small for circulation, and ... [is] used almost exclusively for the purposes of ornament.[49] The last year in which the gold dollar was struck was 1889.[41] Congress abolished the gold dollar, along with the three-cent nickel and three-dollar piece, by the Act of September 26, 1890.[50]

A total of 19,499,337 gold dollars were coined, of which 18,223,438 were struck at Philadelphia, 1,004,000 at New Orleans, 109,138 at Charlotte, 90,232 at San Francisco and 72,529 at Dahlonega.[51] According to an advertisement in the February 1899 issue of The Numismatist, gold dollars brought $1.80 each, still in demand as a birthday present and for jewelry. That journal in 1905 carried news of a customer depositing 100 gold dollars into a bank; the teller, aware of the value, credited the account with $1.60 per coin. In 1908, a dealer offered $2 each for any quantity.[52] As coin collecting became a widespread pastime in the early 20th century, gold dollars became a popular specialty, a status they retain.[53] The 2014 edition of R.S. Yeoman's A Guide Book of United States Coins rates the least expensive gold dollar in very fine condition (VF-20) at $300, a value given for each of the Type 1 Philadelphia issues from 1849 to 1853. Those seeking one of each type will find the most expensive to be a specimen of the Type 2, with the 1854 and 1855 estimated at $350 in that condition; the other two types have dates valued at $300 in that grade.[54]

Mintage figures

[edit]
Mintage figures for Type 1 Liberty Head Gold Dollars (Circulation Strikes)[55]
Year Philadelphia Mint Charlotte Mint Dahlonega Mint New Orleans Mint San Francisco Mint
1849 688,567 11,634 21,588 215,000
1850 481,953 6,966 8,382 14,000
1851 3,317,671 41,267 9,882 290,000
1852 2,045,351 9,434 6,360 140,000
1853 24,076,051 11,515 6,583 290,000
1854 855,502 2,935 14,632
Mintage figures for Types 2 & 3 Indian Princess Gold Dollars (Circulation Strikes)[56]
Year Philadelphia Mint Charlotte Mint Dahlonega Mint New Orleans Mint San Francisco Mint Notes
1854 783,943 Type 2 (Small Head)
1855 758,269 9,803 1,811 55,000 Type 2 (Small Head)
1856 1,762,936 1,460 24,600 All are Type 3 (Large Head) except San Francisco (1856-S), which is Type 2 (Small Head)
1857 774,789 13,280 3,533 10,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1858 117,995 3,477 10,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1859 168,244 5,235 4,952 15,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1860 36,514 1,566 13,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1861 527,150 Estimated 1,250 Type 3 (Large Head)
1862 1,361,355 Type 3 (Large Head)
1863 6,200 Type 3 (Large Head)
1864 5,900 Type 3 (Large Head)
1865 3,700 Type 3 (Large Head)
1866 7,100 Type 3 (Large Head)
1867 5,200 Type 3 (Large Head)
1868 10,500 Type 3 (Large Head)
1869 5,900 Type 3 (Large Head)
1870 6,300 3,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1871 3,900 Type 3 (Large Head)
1872 3,500 Type 3 (Large Head)
1873 125,100 Type 3 (Large Head)
1874 198,800 Type 3 (Large Head)
1875 400 Type 3 (Large Head)
1876 3,200 Type 3 (Large Head)
1877 3,900 Type 3 (Large Head)
1878 3,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1879 3,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1880 1,600 Type 3 (Large Head)
1881 7,620 Type 3 (Large Head)
1882 5,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1883 10,800 Type 3 (Large Head)
1884 5,230 Type 3 (Large Head)
1885 11,156 Type 3 (Large Head)
1886 5,000 Type 3 (Large Head)
1887 7,500 Type 3 (Large Head)
1888 15,501 Type 3 (Large Head)
1889 28,950 Type 3 (Large Head)
Mintage figures for Gold Dollars (Proof Issues)[57]
Year Mintage Notes
1849 10 Type 1 (Liberty Head)
1850 2 Type 1 (Liberty Head)
1854 5 Type 2 (Indian Princess, Small Head)
1855 12 Type 2 (Indian Princess, Small Head)
1856 10 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1857 12 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1858 20 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1859 80 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1860 154 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1861 349 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1862 35 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1863 50 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1864 50 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1865 25 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1866 30 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1867 50 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1868 25 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1869 25 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1870 35 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1871 30 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1872 30 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1873 25 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1874 20 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1875 20 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1876 45 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1877 20 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1878 20 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1879 30 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1880 36 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1881 87 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1882 125 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1883 207 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1884 1,006 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1885 1,105 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1886 1,016 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1887 1,043 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1888 1,079 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)
1889 1,779 Type 3 (Indian Princess, Large Head)

Note: All gold dollar proof coins were minted at the Philadelphia Mint.

Gold Sacagawea dollar

[edit]

In 1999, the Philadelphia Mint struck 39 Sacagawea dollars (dated 2000 and the "W" mint mark of the West Point Mint) in 22 karat gold.[58] The Mint planned to sell gold Sacagawea dollars to collectors, but this plan was halted after Congressmen questioned the Mint's authority to strike dollars with a composition other than the one authorized.[59] Twenty-seven of these coins were destroyed soon after they were minted, and the remaining 12 flew on Space Shuttle Columbia during STS-93.[60] Afterwards the coins were displayed at various private events before being transferred to United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox.

The coins were publicly displayed for the first time at the American Numismatic Association's World's Fair of Money in 2007. Afterwards they were returned to Fort Knox.[61]

Commemorative gold dollars

[edit]

The gold dollar had a brief resurrection during the period of early United States commemorative coins. Between 1903 and 1922 nine different issues were produced, with a total mintage of 99,799. These were minted for various public events, did not circulate, and none used Longacre's design.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The gold dollar was a one-dollar United States gold coin minted from 1849 to 1889. Authorized by an act of Congress on March 3, 1849, alongside the double eagle, its creation responded to the California Gold Rush, enabling the monetization of small gold nuggets and dust that were impractical for larger denominations. Designed by Mint Chief Engraver James B. Longacre, the coin featured three distinct types over its production run, evolving from a diminutive Liberty Head obverse to refined Indian Princess motifs to address striking and wear issues inherent in its tiny size. At 13 millimeters in diameter for the initial Type 1, it holds the record as the smallest regular-issue coin in U.S. history, though later types enlarged to 15 millimeters for better usability. Minted primarily at but also at branch mints including Charlotte, Dahlonega, New Orleans, , and Carson City, gold dollars saw peak production in the , with over four million Type 1 pieces struck in 1853 alone. Civil War-era issues from Southern mints like the rare 1861-D are notable for their low mintages and , while post-war output declined sharply due to hoarding and reduced demand. Discontinued in 1889, the denomination's demise stemmed from its proneness to rapid wear, difficulty in handling, and redundancy amid a shift toward paper currency and larger coins. Today, gold dollars are prized by collectors for their scarcity in high grades, key date rarities such as the 1854-D, and embodiment of mid-19th-century American economic expansion driven by discoveries.

Origins and Early Production

Historical Background

Prior to the mid-19th century, gold coinage consisted solely of denominations valued at $2.50 (), $5 (), and $10 (eagle), established under the and subsequent legislation, which prioritized larger units suited to the limited domestic gold supply of the era. Smaller transactions relied on silver dollars and fractional silver coins, supplemented by foreign gold coins such as Spanish-reales fractions that circulated widely due to their convenience and the bimetallic standard's challenges in maintaining parity between gold and silver. The absence of a one-dollar gold coin stemmed from insufficient gold reserves to justify minting such small pieces, as early proposals—including Alexander Hamilton's 1791 vision for a comprehensive coinage system including a gold dollar—were deferred in favor of silver for the base unit. The discovery of gold at in on January 24, 1848, triggered the , unleashing an unprecedented influx of the metal that by 1849 had produced millions of ounces, equivalent to a positive monetary under the prevailing . This surge rendered existing coinage inadequate for handling raw gold dust and nuggets prevalent in frontier commerce, where private assayers in converted unrefined gold into makeshift ingots but lacked standardized small-denomination coins for everyday use. Economic pressures mounted as the flood of gold threatened to disrupt , inflate prices, and complicate trade, prompting demands for official minting of a lightweight gold dollar to absorb excess supply and facilitate minor transactions without reliance on cumbersome silver or foreign substitutes. By early 1849, the U.S. Mint faced urgent calls from merchants, miners, and policymakers to expand gold denominations downward, mirroring the simultaneous authorization of the $20 double eagle to accommodate larger holdings, as both reflected Congress's response to the gold rush's transformative scale—over 10 million ounces arriving in San Francisco alone by mid-century. This backdrop of abundant yet unmonetized gold underscored the practical limitations of prior coinage, setting the stage for legislative action to integrate the new wealth into the national economy without destabilizing the currency system.

Inception and Authorization

The inception of the United States gold dollar coin stemmed from the California Gold Rush, which commenced in early 1848 following the discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill, leading to an unprecedented influx of bullion that overwhelmed existing minting capacities and denominations. This surplus necessitated smaller gold coins to facilitate everyday transactions and efficiently monetize the new supply, reviving earlier unheeded proposals for a one-dollar gold piece. Although Alexander Hamilton had advocated for a gold dollar in his 1791 Report on the Mint, and legislative efforts persisted into the 1830s, opposition from U.S. Mint Director Robert Patterson—citing the coin's diminutive size as impractical—delayed authorization until the gold rush's economic pressures prevailed. On January 25, 1849, Representative James Iver McKay of North Carolina introduced House Bill 385 to authorize gold dollar coinage at the Philadelphia Mint. McKay amended the bill in February to include $20 double eagles for handling larger gold volumes, addressing both small-scale and bulk needs. The legislation passed Congress and was enacted as public law on March 3, 1849, by President James K. Polk just before the end of his term. The Act stipulated the gold dollar's composition as 25 grains 8/10 pure gold (equivalent to 25.5 grains at 900 fineness, alloyed with copper), declaring it legal tender for one dollar in all payments. This marked the first U.S. gold coin under one dollar, complementing the existing quarter eagle and enabling broader circulation of the nation's gold reserves.

Initial Preparation and Type 1 Design

The gold dollar was authorized by an act of Congress approved by President on March 3, 1849, amid the that flooded the economy with small-denomination gold dust unsuitable for larger coin denominations. The legislation aimed to create a small for everyday transactions, specifying a standard weight of 25.8 grains (1.672 grams) at 900 fineness—90% pure alloyed with 10% for durability—and a reeded edge to deter clipping. Preparation for minting began promptly at the under Chief Engraver James Barton Longacre, who assumed the role in 1844 and faced initial skepticism due to the coin's unprecedented small size of 12.7 millimeters in diameter—the smallest regular-issue U.S. coin ever produced. Longacre worked intensively to prepare the dies, creating them twice to achieve precision; he adapted elements from prior designs, including a reduced bust, and incorporated his initial "L" on the obverse truncation below Liberty's neck. The first strikes occurred in spring 1849 at , with production soon extending to branch mints in Charlotte (1849-C), Dahlonega (1849-D), and New Orleans (1849-O), totaling over 689,000 Type 1 coins across all mints by 1854. The Type 1 design featured an obverse with Liberty's head facing left, wearing a coronet inscribed "," surrounded by 13 six-pointed stars representing the original states, and the date below. The reverse depicted a enclosing "1 DOLLAR," with "" arched above and below, though early 1849 issues showed varieties: an open wreath with separated berry clusters and an initial gap at the base, later revised to a closed for better definition, alongside rare "No L" subtypes omitting Longacre's due to production oversights. These choices prioritized but highlighted early challenges, as the size complicated handling and stacking, prompting and eventual redesign mandates by 1853 to increase diameter without altering weight.

Design Modifications and Variants

Transition to Type 2

The Type 1 gold dollar's small 13 mm diameter contributed to its rapid wear in circulation and made it difficult to handle without loss, prompting a redesign to address these practical shortcomings. In 1854, under direction from Mint Director James Ross Snowden, Chief Engraver James B. Longacre enlarged the coin's diameter by approximately 15% to 15 mm while preserving the 1.672-gram weight and 90% gold fineness to maintain intrinsic value. This adjustment necessitated thinner planchets but aimed to enhance durability and usability in everyday transactions. Longacre adapted the obverse design from his recently approved motif for the three-dollar gold piece, depicting as an with a headdress, reducing to mitigate die wear issues observed in Type 1. The reverse featured a enclosing "1 DOLLAR" and the date, scaled to fit the expanded diameter and reusing elements from the three-dollar reverse for consistency. Type 2 coins were first struck at the in 1854, with mintages of 218,000 that year, marking the denomination's shift to a more practical form despite ongoing production challenges.

Type 3 Design and Refinements

The Type 3 gold dollar, minted from 1856 to 1889, represented the final major design iteration of the series, crafted by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver . The obverse depicted a larger of stylized as a Native American princess wearing a feathered headdress, with "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" inscribed around the rim and the date positioned below the bust. This was enlarged compared to the Type 2 version, maintaining the same 15 mm diameter but with reduced relief to facilitate better metal flow during striking. The reverse shifted from the laurel wreath of the Type 2 to a heraldic eagle clutching arrows in one talon and an in the other, with a shield on its breast, encircled by "1 DOLLAR" and a ring of stars. This eagle motif drew inspiration from larger U.S. denominations like the , providing a more consistent aesthetic across the Mint's coinage. Longacre adapted elements from his earlier three-dollar piece design for both Types 2 and 3, refining the obverse headdress and profile to enhance durability on the small flan. Key refinements addressed persistent striking issues inherent to the coin's diminutive size and 90% composition, which often resulted in weak details and incomplete impressions in earlier types. By repositioning the obverse head away from high- areas on the reverse and lowering overall relief, the design minimized die opposition problems, allowing more even metal distribution and sharper strikes across higher mintages. These modifications proved effective, as Type 3 coins exhibited improved quality and circulated widely without further substantive alterations through 1889, though minor die varieties emerged from routine hubbing and polishing processes at various mints.

Production Across Eras

Pre-Civil War Output

The pre-Civil War period marked the inception and peak production of the gold dollar, spanning to 1860, with output driven primarily by the influx of gold from following the . The Philadelphia Mint led production, striking millions of coins in peak years such as 1853, when it minted 4,076,051 Type 1 pieces alone. Branch mints contributed smaller but notable quantities, utilizing local gold sources in the Southeast and, from 1854, gold at . Total annual mintages often exceeded one million pieces through the mid-1850s, reflecting the denomination's role in facilitating small transactions amid abundant gold supply. Production encompassed Type 1 (Liberty Head, 1849–1854), Type 2 (Indian Head with , 1854–1856), and early Type 3 (Indian Head, 1856–1860) designs, with transitions aimed at improving strikability and reducing wear. Philadelphia's output dominated, accounting for over 90% of totals in many years, while Southern branch mints like Charlotte and Dahlonega produced rarities with mintages under 10,000, such as the 1854-D at 2,935 coins. New Orleans struck higher volumes, reaching 290,000 in both 1851 and 1853. San Francisco's inaugural 1854 mintage totaled 14,632, focusing on local circulation. By the late 1850s, mintages declined as economic preferences shifted toward larger gold denominations and paper currency, with producing only 39,042 in 1860—the lowest Philadelphia business strike prior to the war era. Southern branches continued low-output issues, including the scarce 1856-D (1,460) and 1860-D (1,566). Overall, pre-Civil War production exceeded seven million coins, establishing the gold dollar as a key component of the era's circulating medium before wartime disruptions curtailed federal minting at Confederate-controlled facilities.
YearPhiladelphia MintageNotable Branch Mintage Examples
1849688,567O: 215,000; C: 11,634; D: 21,588
18513,317,671O: 290,000; C: 41,267
18534,076,051O: 290,000; D: 6,583
1854855,502D: 2,935; S: 14,632
186039,042D: 1,566

Civil War and Reconstruction Impacts

The outbreak of the American Civil War in April 1861 prompted widespread hoarding of gold and silver coins amid economic uncertainty, causing these metals to vanish from domestic circulation by mid-1862. Gold dollar production persisted at the Philadelphia Mint, with 527,499 Type 3 coins struck in 1861 prior to the full escalation of hostilities. Southern branch mints at Charlotte and Dahlonega were seized by Confederate forces early in the war; the Dahlonega facility produced an estimated 1,000 to 1,500 gold dollars dated 1861-D under Confederate authority, marking the only U.S.-denomination circulating coin minted exclusively by the secessionist government. These Confederate issues utilized captured U.S. dies but lacked official Confederate mintmarks, reflecting the improvisational nature of rebel coinage efforts limited by scarce resources and machinery. Federal gold dollar mintages declined sharply during the war years as public confidence eroded and precious metals were premium-priced, with post-1862 output rarely exceeding 10,000 pieces annually at . Proof strikes, however, saw a temporary increase to 50 pieces in 1864, possibly to maintain institutional continuity despite wartime constraints. The phenomenon persisted, rendering gold dollars effectively absent from everyday transactions and confining their utility to or premium . During Reconstruction (1865–1877), the permanent closure of Southern mints eliminated branch production of dollars, concentrating output solely at amid subdued demand. Mintage figures reflected economic recovery challenges and lingering specie scarcity, plummeting to as few as 400 business strikes in 1875—the series' lowest—while greenback circulation and debates over resumption of specie payments delayed full reintegration of coinage into the economy. This era's low production volumes, coupled with prior hoarding, further diminished the dollar's role in domestic commerce, foreshadowing its eventual obsolescence as larger denominations and paper alternatives proliferated.

Final Production and Mintage Data

Following the Reconstruction period, strike mintages of gold dollars remained exceedingly low, reflecting negligible public demand amid the preference for larger denominations and paper currency. Annual production at the typically hovered between 1,000 and 3,000 coins from 1870 to 1888, with no output from branch mints. A notable exception occurred in 1873, when 123,300 Open 3 variety strikes were produced, alongside approximately 1,800 Closed 3 pieces, totaling over 125,000 for the year—likely driven by residual gold inflows from European markets and minor commercial needs. The nadir of business strike output came in 1875, with just 400 coins struck, underscoring the coin's for circulation. Proof coins, however, sustained annual production for collectors, with mintages rising from around 20–100 pieces in the to over 1,000 by the mid-1880s, as numismatic interest grew. Regular production concluded in 1889 with 28,950 business strikes at —the series' penultimate significant output and the last for circulation—after which the U.S. Mint discontinued the denomination due to its impracticality in an economy dominated by higher-value gold coins and fiat alternatives. No further issues were authorized, aligning with broader shifts away from small gold denominations under the gold standard.
YearBusiness Strikes (Philadelphia)Notes
1873125,100 (approx., incl. varieties)Highest late-series output; Open 3: 123,300; Closed 3: ~1,800
1875400Record low for business strikes
188928,950Final business strike issue

Economic Role and Controversies

Integration with the Gold Standard

The gold dollar coin, authorized under the Coinage Act of March 3, 1849, incorporated a standardized content of 25.8 grains at 900 fineness, yielding 23.22 grains of pure , which equated to exactly one-twentieth the pure in the $20 . This precise calibration ensured its intrinsic value aligned seamlessly with larger denominations, such as the $10 eagle (232.2 grains pure ), facilitating direct interchangeability and reinforcing the dollar's definition as a fixed weight of within the bimetallic system codified by the and adjusted in 1834 to a 16:1 -silver ratio. In practice, the gold dollar enhanced gold's circulatory role amid the bimetallic framework's inherent distortions, where the legal ratio overvalued silver relative to market prices (approximately 15:1), prompting effects that drove silver coins from circulation and elevated gold as the effective monetary base by the 1840s. The coin's small size addressed the need for fractional gold payments from inflows, promoting gold's usability in everyday transactions and indirectly bolstering the gold preference that characterized U.S. monetary operations before formal silver demonetization. The Coinage Act of February 12, 1873, which curtailed silver dollar coinage and eliminated silver's full status, marked a pivotal shift toward an explicit , occurring midway through Type 3 gold dollar production (1856-1889); these coins, retaining their unchanged gold specification, thus embodied the transitioning regime's core principle of gold convertibility. During the Civil War era (1861-1865), amid suspension of specie payments under the Legal Tender Act of 1862, gold dollars were largely withdrawn from circulation, trading at premiums exceeding 50% over greenbacks by 1864 to reflect their unyielding gold backing against fiat depreciation. Resumption of specie payments on January 1, 1879, per the Specie Resumption Act of 1875, restored dollars to par circulation alongside other coins, affirming their integration until minting halted in 1889 amid negligible demand for such minor denominations in a maturing . This period underscored the 's function in maintaining the dollar's parity, though its limited mintages—peaking at over 1 million annually pre-war but averaging under 500,000 post-resumption—highlighted constraints in scaling circulation for small values.

Practical Use and Advantages

The gold dollar coin, authorized by on March 3, 1849, was minted to absorb surplus from the into circulating currency, enabling smaller denominations for routine trade and payments where larger gold eagles proved cumbersome. Its compact dimensions—initially 13 mm in diameter for Type 1 examples—facilitated use as everyday pocket change, with millions entering circulation annually; for instance, the produced over 4 million Type 1 coins in 1853 alone to meet demand in expanding commerce. This role persisted prominently until the Civil War, when hoarding and economic disruptions reduced overall coinage flow, though surviving examples often exhibit circulation wear attesting to their transactional utility. Key advantages stemmed from the coin's and : its diminutive size enhanced portability for merchants and individuals handling minor exchanges, such as wages, rents, or goods under one dollar, without the bulk of silver or larger pieces. Composed of 90% (1.672 grams total weight, yielding 1.5059 grams pure), it carried intrinsic value tied to the prevailing price, offering durability against wear and a against in an era of , while standardization ensured uniform acceptability in . During silver shortages—exacerbated by or —the dollar provided reliable small-denomination , supporting regional economies like those in Southern mints (e.g., Charlotte's 1849-C issue of 11,634 pieces circulated locally in ). Subsequent Type 2 and 3 redesigns (from ) increased to 15-18 mm and refined relief for better handling and striking, mitigating early complaints about slippage in vending or counting.

Criticisms, Limitations, and Abolition

The gold dollar's diminutive size posed significant practical limitations from its inception, with the Type 1 variant measuring just 12.7 millimeters in and weighing 1.672 grams, rendering it prone to loss and difficult to handle in everyday transactions. This small profile also exacerbated wear and abrasion relative to larger gold denominations, as the coin's thin edges offered minimal protection against friction during circulation. Design modifications in Types 2 and 3 increased the to 15 millimeters for improved manageability, yet the coin remained cumbersome for users accustomed to heftier silver or higher-value gold pieces. Critics highlighted the gold dollar's limited utility in commerce, particularly after the Civil War, when hoarding and economic disruptions curtailed its circulation despite substantial mintages exceeding 10 million pieces annually in peak years like the 1850s. Public disfavor stemmed from its inadequacy for substantive payments, often relegating it to novelty or minor change-making roles rather than broad acceptance, a sentiment echoed in numismatic analyses noting its failure to supplant silver dollars effectively. By the 1870s, fluctuating gold values and the rise of paper currency further diminished its relevance, as larger gold coins like the $10 eagle better suited an expanding economy's needs. Congress terminated regular production of the gold dollar in 1889, citing its obsolescence amid low demand and the denomination's marginal role in post-Reconstruction monetary systems. The decision aligned with broader shifts away from small gold units, as economic maturation favored consolidated denominations and the gold standard's evolution prioritized stability over fractional coinage. Although sporadic proof strikes continued briefly, the series ended without revival, with remaining circulated examples persisting in limited pockets until the U.S. suspended gold convertibility in 1933.

Post-Abolition Developments

Modern Golden Dollar Coins

The , introduced by the in 2000, marked the revival of a circulating dollar coin with a distinctive golden appearance, though composed of base metals rather than . The coin features an outer layer of manganese brass alloy—88.5% , 6% , 3.5% , and 2% —over a pure copper core, providing the golden hue without intrinsic value. This design aimed to encourage greater use of dollar coins in everyday transactions by replacing the paper dollar bill, with production at the and mints yielding over 3.5 billion pieces in the first year alone. The obverse depicts , the woman who aided the , holding her infant son , sculpted by artist ; the inscription "Liberty" appears above, with the date below and "In God We Trust" to the left. The initial reverse, designed by Thomas D. Rogers Sr., shows an eagle in flight carrying an arrow and , symbolizing peace and war, encircled by "United States of America" and "$1". Production continued through 2008 for the Sacagawea reverse, with annual mintages ranging from hundreds of millions to over a billion, but circulation remained limited due to public preference for paper currency and incompatibilities. In 2009, the series transitioned to the Native American dollar, retaining the Sacagawea obverse while introducing annual reverse designs honoring Native American contributions and themes, authorized by the Native American $1 Coin Act of 2007. Examples include the 2009 reverse depicting three haudenosaunee () sisters sowing corn, beans, and squash (the "Three Sisters" agriculture system), and the 2019 design commemorating American Indians in the U.S. military with a soldier's profile and symbols. These reverses rotate yearly, with mintages typically in the tens to hundreds of millions, focusing on education rather than broad circulation; the series persists as of 2025, with production mandated for collector sets and institutional use. Despite promotional efforts, including edge-lettering for anti-counterfeiting (added in 2007 matching the Presidential dollar series), the golden dollars have seen minimal everyday adoption, hoarded by collectors or used primarily in transit systems and machines. Rare variants, such as the 2000 "" mule error with a stalk reverse or space-flown gold-plated proofs from missions, command premiums in , but standard issues hold face value absent exceptional condition or errors. The U.S. Mint continues limited striking for these coins, emphasizing their symbolic role over practical utility in a digital payment era.

Commemorative Issues

The Grant Memorial Gold Dollar was issued in 1922 to commemorate the centennial of Ulysses S. Grant's birth on April 27, 1822. Authorized by Public Law 67-137 enacted in 1921, the legislation permitted the U.S. Mint to strike up to 5,000 dollars and 20,000 silver half dollars, with proceeds benefiting the Grant Memorial Commission for projects such as community buildings in Georgetown and Bethel, Ohio, and a five-mile Grant Memorial Road linking New Richmond to Point Pleasant. The obverse design, by sculptor , depicts a right-facing profile of Grant in military attire, derived from an 1865 photograph by ; inscriptions include "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA," "ONE DOLLAR," "," and the dual dates "1822-1922." The reverse, also by Fraser, shows a representing Grant's birthplace in , with "IN GOD WE TRUST" above and "" below. The coin measures 14.30 millimeters in diameter, weighs 1.70 grams (containing 1.5315 grams of pure ), and consists of 90% alloyed with 10% for durability; it features a reeded edge. Struck solely at the , production yielded two varieties distinguished by the presence or absence of a below Grant's bust on the obverse—the star version allocated to subscribers who purchased sets including the companion silver . Mintage totaled 5,016 coins for the plain (no-star) variety and 5,016 for the star variety, with all released in 1922. No subsequent official commemorative issues in the gold dollar denomination were produced by the U.S. Mint, distinguishing the Grant coin as the sole example in this category following the cessation of regular circulation strikes in 1889.

Collecting, Value, and Legacy

Numismatic Appeal and Rarity

The numismatic appeal of the gold dollar stems from its historical association with the California Gold Rush, which prompted its introduction in 1849 as the smallest U.S. gold coin denomination, and its designs by engraver James B. Longacre, including the diminutive Liberty Head and Indian Princess motifs that challenge engravers and collectors alike. Collectors value complete sets for their representation of mid-19th-century minting technology and regional gold production, particularly from Southern branch mints, though the coin's small size often led to jewelry mounting and resultant wear, making pristine survivors especially desirable. Numismatic premiums arise from factors like condition, strike quality, and original surfaces, with eye appeal enhanced by luster and minimal marks despite frequent planchet flaws in many issues. Rarity is pronounced in branch mint issues and low-mintage Philadelphia dates, with Type 1 (1849–1854) coins featuring scarce Southern productions such as the 1849-C Open Wreath variety, estimated at fewer than 1,000 pieces and considered the rarest regular-issue U.S. gold dollar from any mint. Other key Type 1 dates include the 1850-D (mintage 19,000), 1851-D (8,000), and 1854-D (2,500), which are rare in all grades and exceptionally so above Extremely Fine due to circulation and melting. Type 2 (1854–1856) issues, with enlarged heads to combat counterfeiting, have overall low mintages, rendering high-grade examples scarce, while Type 3 (1856–1889) branch mint coins like the 1861-D (mintage ~2,000) are rare across grades, with survivors often showing Confederate marks from post-Civil War . Post-Civil War mintages plummeted, with the issue at just 400 business strikes—the lowest in the series—making it a key date despite modest pricing in lower grades due to availability in circulated condition. Uncirculated specimens are rare for all dates before , except high-mintage years like (375,000) and (1.2 million), where supply supports type set completion but gems remain elusive. Die varieties add to the appeal, notably the 1849 Type 1 Open versus Closed Wreath reverses, with the Open Wreath scarcer and the Charlotte Mint's Open Wreath iteration virtually unobtainable in any grade. Type 3 coins feature subtypes like Small versus Large Head, further differentiating rarities, while proofs from the era, often with mintages under 100, command significant premiums for their cameo contrast and historical proof sets context. Overall, the series rewards specialized study, as condition rarity and regional mint closures during the Civil War amplify value disparities beyond content.

Market Values and Investment Considerations

The market value of dollar coins (1849–1889) is determined primarily by rarity, condition, date, , and eye appeal, with prices significantly exceeding the intrinsic melt value of approximately 0.04837 ounces per . As of mid-2025, spot prices hover around $3,400 per , yielding a melt value of roughly $164 per , though numismatic premiums for even common circulated examples (e.g., Very Fine to Extremely Fine grades) typically range from $200 to $500 for Type 3 issues, while uncirculated specimens command $800 to $2,000 or more. Rarer dates, such as the 1855 Type 2, trade between $300 and $1,000 in average grades, reflecting consistent collector interest despite circulation wear common to these small-denomination pieces. Type 1 Liberty Head gold dollars (1849–1854) are available but scarce above Mint State-64, with values escalating rapidly for gems; for instance, an 1854 example in AU-58 fetched around $456 at auction. Type 2 Indian Princess small-head issues (1854–1856) are notably rare, with total mintage under 1.5 million and prices spanning $475 for lower-end Mint State examples to $288,000 for top-condition rarities, driven by low survival rates and design flaws like weak strikes. Type 3 large-head varieties (1856–1889) offer broader availability, with common Philadelphia-minted dates in MS-60 grading $1,000–$3,000, though branch mint proofs or low-mintage keys like certain Carson City issues can exceed $10,000 even in circulated states. High-grade survivors across all types remain elusive due to historical circulation and the coin's diminutive size (13 mm diameter), which facilitated wear and loss.
TypeApproximate Value Range (2025, VF-20 to MS-63)Key Rarity Factors
Type 1 (1849–1854)$250–$5,000Scarce in MS-65+; early dates prone to bag marks
Type 2 (1854–1856)$400–$50,000+Low mintage; weak strikes limit high grades
Type 3 (1856–1889)$200–$10,000More common, but proofs and branch mints premium-priced
Investment in gold dollar coins appeals to numismatists seeking diversification beyond , as their values correlate loosely with prices but derive substantial premiums from collector demand and historical . However, transaction costs—including dealer premiums of 7–10% over melt and fees for grading services like PCGS or NGC—erode returns compared to generic , which offers higher liquidity and lower spreads. These coins serve as a tangible and portfolio diversifier, particularly for long-term holders valuing rarity appreciation, but they carry risks from market volatility, authentication challenges (e.g., counterfeits in lower grades), and storage/ expenses disproportionate to their modest content. Investors should prioritize professionally graded specimens to mitigate condition disputes, though short-term is inadvisable given dependence on dynamics over intrinsic metal value; financial advisors recommend limiting numismatic exposure to 5–10% of precious metals allocations for balanced risk.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.