Hubbry Logo
Identity document forgeryIdentity document forgeryMain
Open search
Identity document forgery
Community hub
Identity document forgery
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Identity document forgery
Identity document forgery
Identity document forgery
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

West German customs employee checking an alleged fake document.

Identity document forgery is the process by which identity documents issued by governing bodies are illegally copied and/or modified by persons not authorized to create such documents or engage in such modifications, for the purpose of deceiving those who would view the documents about the identity or status of the bearer.[1] The term also encompasses the activity of acquiring identity documents from legitimate bodies by falsifying the required supporting documentation in order to create the desired identity.[2]

Identity documents differ from other credentials in that they are intended to be usable by only the person holding the card. Unlike other credentials, they may be used to restrict the activities of the holder as well as to expand them.

Documents that have been forged in this way include driver's licenses (historically forged or altered as an attempt to conceal the fact that persons desiring to purchase alcohol are under the legal drinking age); birth certificates and Social Security cards (likely used in identity theft schemes or to defraud the government); and passports (used to evade restrictions on entry into a particular country). At the beginning of 2010, there were 11 million stolen or lost passports listed in the global database of Interpol.[3]

Such falsified documents can be used for identity theft, age deception, illegal immigration, organized crime, and espionage.[4]

Use scenarios, forgery techniques and security countermeasures

[edit]
Lee Harvey Oswald's fake service card with the name Hidell.

A distinction needs to be made between the different uses of an identity document. In some cases, the fake ID may only have to pass a cursory inspection, such as flashing a plastic ID card for a security guard. At the other extreme, a document may have to resist scrutiny by a trained document examiner, who may be equipped with technical tools for verifying biometrics and reading hidden security features within the card. To make forgery more difficult, most modern IDs contain numerous security features that require specialised and expensive equipment to duplicate. School IDs are typically easier to fake, as they often do not have the same level of security measures as government-issued IDs.

Fake ID cards can be ordered on the internet and some examples of these include the UK national identification card and a provisional motorcycle licence. There are a number of different types of false documents such as using another person's ID, a genuine document which has been altered, a form of ID that doesn't exist and a copy of an ID which has been made.

Modern fake ID cards almost invariably carry a picture of the authorized user, a simple and effective form of biometric identification. However, forgery of basic photographic ID cards has become simple in recent years with the availability of low-cost high-resolution printers, scanners and photo-editing software. Basic fake ID cards are commonly made using an inkjet or laser printer to print a replica document which is then laminated to resemble a real ID card. Most designs are made using computer programs, re-creating scanned copies of a license.

More complex ID cards are now being created by printing on a material called Teslin or Artisyn, which are paper-like materials that are actually micro-porous plastic sheets. When butterfly pouches and holograms are applied, the card is then run through a heat laminator, creating a professional-looking ID card.

Numerous security printing techniques have been used to attempt to enhance the security of ID cards. For example, many modern documents include holograms, which are difficult to replicate without expensive equipment not generally available. Though accurate recreation of these holograms is extremely difficult, using a mixture of pigments and base can create a similar shiny multi-colored look that may pass cursory inspection. Another form of document security is UV-light visible ink.[4]

In addition, some documents include a magnetic strip, which contains the similar information to that printed on the card. The data may thus be checked against other data on the card, such as printed information or a machine-readable barcode. Magnetic strips may also contain other secret identifying information. Although magnetic strips can also be faked, they provide another barrier to entry for the amateur forger. Other hidden security devices can also be added, including embedded secure cryptoprocessor chips which are designed to be very difficult to forge, and RFID tags⁠ ⁠—⁠ ⁠the two technologies may also be combined, in the case of contactless smart cards.

Another effective technique is the use of online verification of security information against a central database. In many cases, online verification can detect simple copying of a document by detecting attempted use in multiple places at the same time, or completely false IDs, as the information on the ID will be found to be invalid. A simple method of confirming that an ID is genuine is to print a serial number on it unique to the card and stored on a centralized database.[5] If checked, it will quickly become clear that the ID is false; either the number on the ID is not registered for the holder, or no ID has the number at all. Online verification also has the advantage that it allows easy revocation of lost or stolen documents.

Using digital signatures is another effective method of detecting ID forgery. The ID can include a copy of its data on an integrated circuit or barcode, digitally signed by the document issuer. The digital signature allows for easy authentication of the ID. If the digital signature of a fake ID is checked, it will immediately become evident that the ID is fake, because either the digitally signed copy of the holder's data does not match the data printed on the ID or the (possibly altered) copy of the ID's data is not signed by the document issuer.[6] The effectiveness of this security feature depends on the document issuer keeping the private key used to sign IDs secret,[7] as well as the strength of the cryptographic algorithm used for the ID's digital signature.

Many modern credentials now contain some kind of barcode. For example, many U.S. driving licences include a 2-dimensional code in PDF417 format, which contains the same information as on the front of the license. Barcodes allow rapid checking of credentials for low-security applications, and may potentially contain extra information which can be used to verify other information on the card.

Systemic attacks

[edit]

The combination of multiple high-security features, biometrics, and well-trained document inspectors with technical assistance can be very effective at preventing forged documents from being easily produced. Instead of acquiring the expensive specialized equipment needed to make fake documents, it may be more economical to produce a "genuine fake"⁠ ⁠—⁠ ⁠a legitimate document, but one which contains false information.

One way of doing this is to present the document issuing authority with false credentials, which they will then endorse by issuing a new document. In this way, false identities and credentials can be "bootstrapped" over a period of time.[8]

Another simpler way of generating false credentials is to suborn one of the officials involved in the document-issuing process through bribery or intimidation. This may also be combined with the bootstrapping process mentioned above to mount complex attacks.

Corruption in the document-issuing process is hard to counter, since as the value of a credential increases, the economic incentives for corruption also increase. This is particularly true in the case of fake ID cards that combine many functions in one document, and for documents which are issued in large numbers, thus requiring many thousands of people to have authorizing powers, thus creating a longer chain of people who can possibly be exploited. Detection of a "genuine fake" document is also a difficult process; as such a fake is a legitimate document, it will pass any tests for forgery. To detect such fakes, it is necessary to perform a background check on the individual in question to confirm the legitimacy of the document's information.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Identity document forgery

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Identity document forgery is the criminal production, alteration, or use of falsified documents intended to establish or misrepresent an individual's identity, including passports, driver's licenses, cards, and similar credentials. This illicit activity underpins diverse schemes, such as evading , enabling unauthorized border crossings, and supporting networks involved in human smuggling and . Traditional methods involve physical tampering, like overwriting security features or printing templates, while modern techniques leverage digital manipulation, including AI-driven s and synthetic , which have proliferated with accessible software tools. Document fraud attempts have surged, with digital forgeries comprising a growing share—rising 244% in the past year—and incidents occurring every five minutes globally in 2024, exacerbating vulnerabilities in verification systems across banking, , and sectors. Prosecution for identity document forgery typically results in severe penalties, classified as a under in the United States with fines ranging from $250 to $2,000 per document and possible , alongside state-level consequences that can include up to 20 years in prison for related federal offenses. International efforts, including operations, target rings, yet the adaptability of perpetrators continues to challenge forensic detection and border security measures.

Definition and Scope

Identity document forgery encompasses the unauthorized production, alteration, or possession of official documents intended to establish or verify an individual's identity, such as passports, cards, driver's licenses, and visas, with the purpose of misleading authorities or third parties regarding the holder's true identity. This includes creating replicas that mimic genuine documents, modifying authentic ones by changing details like names or dates, or employing stolen legitimate documents under false identities. The core legal elements typically require knowledge of the falsity and intent to defraud or deceive, distinguishing criminal from mere replication for non-deceptive purposes, such as personal records. Without intent to harm or mislead, actions like photocopying an ID for administrative use do not constitute . Internationally, standards set by the (ICAO) in Doc 9303 classify as the fraudulent alteration of a genuine to permit its use by an unauthorized person, influencing global practices to combat such threats through enhanced security features like holograms and . In the United States, federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 1028 criminalizes knowingly producing a false identification document without lawful authority, transferring or possessing such documents with intent to use them unlawfully, or trafficking in authentication features, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment up to 15 years depending on aggravating factors like links to or trafficking. In the , forgery of administrative documents, including identity papers, falls under national penal codes but is addressed transnationally by , which targets the production of fake passports and IDs often used as "breeder" documents for further . Legal boundaries vary by , but common prohibitions extend to importation, exportation, and use of forged documents, emphasizing the protection of public security and border integrity.

Affected Document Types

Identity document forgery affects government-issued papers that authenticate an individual's identity, nationality, or , including passports, cards, driver's licenses, visas, residence permits, and civil registry certificates. These documents are targeted due to their utility in , , , and access to services. Passports represent one of the most commonly forged types, comprising approximately 45% of detected fraudulent documents in analyses of verification data from , with British passports alone accounting for 55% of fakes in that . identifies passports as prime targets for counterfeiting and alteration, given their role in international border crossings and as de facto global identifiers. Variations in security features across issuing countries, such as polycarbonate construction in European passports, influence forgery rates, with less secure models more vulnerable. National identity cards and driver's licenses follow as frequent victims, often altered for domestic use or sold in bulk for schemes. In a global fraud analysis of over 500,000 attempts, U.S. driver's licenses ranked fourth among forged documents, while cards from countries like , , , , and (including electronic IDs) topped the list due to high demand and simpler replication. data showed driving licenses and ID cards at 18% of fakes, down from prior years amid improved verification. U.S. Customs and Border Protection seizures underscore driver's licenses' prevalence in cross-border . Visas, residence permits, and employment eligibility documents like U.S. Permanent Resident Cards (green cards) and Social Security cards are also heavily forged, particularly for unauthorized work or residency. Counterfeits often lack tactile engravings, holograms, or color-shifting inks present in genuine versions. Civil status certificates, such as birth, marriage, or death records, face forgery to fabricate identities , as tracked in Interpol's DISCS database. These types enable layered fraud, where initial vital records underpin subsequent document applications.

Historical Context

Pre-20th Century Origins

The earliest precursors to identity documents were royal seals and edicts in ancient civilizations, such as those used in around 2000 BCE to authenticate official permissions and prevent unauthorized actions, though counterfeiting of clay seals occurred as early as the Babylonian period to deceive authorities. In medieval Europe, from the 13th century onward, monarchs and feudal lords issued letters of —personalized warrants granting passage through territories and protection from harm—which relied on handwritten scripts, wax seals, and signatures for verification, making them vulnerable to through imitation of seals or alteration of text to enable illicit travel or evasion of . Such forgeries were facilitated by the decentralized nature of authentication, where local officials cross-checked documents against known seal designs or witness testimonies, but lapses allowed criminals and monks to produce fakes addressing land disputes or privileges, reflecting broader societal anxieties mirrored in contemporary records of monastic and noble deceptions. By the and , the term "" emerged in the from French "passe port," denoting permission to pass harbors or borders, and adventurers like reportedly forged such documents in the 18th century to facilitate escapes and assume false identities during travels across , as detailed in his memoirs where passport forgery was cited as a charge against associates. In parallel, during China's (1644–1912), particularly from 1700 to 1820, widespread of official seals and bureaucratic papers enabled commoners to impersonate state agents, extort funds, or gain unearned status, with cases prosecuted under the Qing Code for counterfeiting documents that served quasi-identity functions like verifying official roles or travel authorizations. The saw increased formalization of amid rising international mobility, prompting early anti-forgery measures; Britain standardized passport designs and watermarks in 1855 to combat counterfeits used by criminals and emigrants, while in the United States, decentralized processes by the late 1800s led to rampant in certificates, exploited by seeking legal status without eligibility. Similarly, in early republican post-1820s, nonprofessional forgers produced fake internal passports and diplomas to evade inspections and fines, highlighting how rudimentary bureaucratic controls amplified vulnerabilities in emerging state identity systems. These pre-20th century practices laid foundational patterns for identity forgery, driven by motives of evasion, impersonation, and opportunity in low-security document regimes.

Modern Evolution and Key Milestones

The proliferation of international travel following spurred a surge in identity document forgery, as standardized passports became essential for border crossings, with forgers initially relying on manual alterations like erasing and retyping data or substituting photographs using basic chemical processes. By the , networks exploited stolen blanks and rudimentary printing presses to produce fake passports en masse for and , exemplified by cases involving espionage during the where agencies like the fabricated documents to insert operatives into Western countries. A pivotal occurred in the with the adoption of machine-readable zones (MRZ) in passports under ICAO guidelines, which prompted forgers to adapt by using early color photocopiers and scanners to replicate or falsify MRZ data, enabling higher volumes of convincing counterfeits for financial crimes and evasion. The saw further evolution through software and printers, allowing precise photo substitutions and holographic overlays that mimicked features like watermarks, as counterfeiting shifted toward digital manipulation to bypass visual inspections. The September 11, 2001, attacks highlighted forgery's risks, as several hijackers employed altered or fraudulent identification to enter the U.S., accelerating global countermeasures but also driving forgers to target emerging biometric systems. By the mid-2000s, the rollout of e-passports with embedded chips—standardized by ICAO in 2006—led to new forgery techniques, including chip cloning and data skimming, though success rates declined due to encryption protocols like Basic Access Control. In the , the advent of affordable high-resolution scanners and editing tools facilitated page substitutions and UV ink replication, with major busts like the 2009 UK operation uncovering the largest passport forgery ring, producing over 200 fake British using stolen genuine blanks. Recent decades have witnessed AI-assisted forgeries, including alterations of biometric photos, contributing to a 244% rise in digital document cases from 2023 to 2025, underscoring forgers' ongoing adaptation to materials and laser-engraved features.

Forgery Techniques

Physical and Material Methods

Physical methods of identity document forgery primarily encompass alterations to genuine documents and counterfeiting through replication of materials and processes. Alterations involve mechanical or chemical modifications to existing documents, such as erasing or overwriting personal details like names or dates of birth using abrasives, solvents, or correction fluids, which often leave detectable residue or damage around the affected text. Photo substitution is a common technique, where the original photograph is removed via peeling, , or cutting, followed by insertion of a replacement image—often printed on paper or laminate—and reassembly, resulting in visible edges, misalignment, or glue marks under examination. Page substitution entails disassembling the document, swapping pages from another genuine source, and reassembling, which can cause binding irregularities or mismatched patterns. Counterfeiting relies on procuring or imitating specialized materials, such as with embedded fibers, watermarks, or substrates for data pages, often sourced from obsolete blanks or unscrupulous suppliers. Forgers replicate techniques like offset or intaglio using commercial equipment, producing guilloche patterns, microtext, or machine-readable zones (MRZ) with inferior quality—evident in dotted lines rather than ridges or non-standard fonts. Special inks, including optically variable or UV-reactive types, are simulated with generic alternatives, while holograms or security threads may be added via low-fidelity embossing or adhesive overlays lacking authentic depth or reactivity. Additional elements like visas or stamps are forged by or embossing on altered pages, sometimes after chemical erasure of originals, though such methods frequently fail to match substrate reactivity or absorption. These approaches exploit gaps in authenticity, with forgers prioritizing visual similarity over forensic , as seen in operations using stolen genuine components combined with fabricated personalization.

Digital and Technological Approaches

Digital forgery of identity documents primarily involves the use of software to scan, alter, and reprint physical documents, enabling modifications to photographs, text fields, and basic security elements like watermarks or seals. Techniques include erasing original data with cloning tools and algorithms to seamlessly insert fabricated details, often starting from high-resolution scans of genuine templates obtained via insider leaks or markets. Fraudsters exploit publicly available document layouts, such as those from expired or declassified formats, to recreate machine-readable zones (MRZ) and barcodes that pass initial optical scans by encoding matching . Advancements in have democratized high-fidelity document fabrication, allowing non-experts to produce convincing counterfeits rapidly. Tools like or GPT-4o variants generate photorealistic passport photos or full-page replicas that replicate , guilloche patterns, and color gradients with minimal input prompts describing official designs. In April 2025, demonstrations revealed that ChatGPT's image generation features could fabricate passport visuals indistinguishable from authentic ones under casual , bypassing traditional photo verification by embedding subtle artifacts only detectable via forensic AI. This AI-driven approach lowers entry barriers for forgery, as models trained on vast image datasets infer and mimic issuer-specific typographies and layouts without requiring specialized graphic skills. For electronic components in e-passports and smart IDs, technological methods focus on emulating or duplicating embedded RFID/NFC chips containing biometric hashes or digital certificates. Forgers use off-the-shelf readers to extract chip data from compromised documents, then reprogram blank chips with altered (PKI) elements to forge electronic signatures that validate against basic readers. Such cyber-physical hybrids often integrate deepfake-generated , like synthetic fingerprints or iris patterns derived from public photos, to align chip-stored data with the visible document face. However, these methods falter against public key directory (PKD) cross-checks, as synthetic keys rarely match global certificate authorities. Digital workflows extend to PDF-based documents, where tampering alters internal object streams or metadata without visible traces, using scripts to manipulate compression artifacts or layer histories. Open-source tools facilitate batch of digital visas or licenses by overlaying forged content onto encrypted templates, evading detection in low-security digital submission portals. These approaches thrive in environments with lax endpoint verification, contributing to a reported surge in AI-facilitated incidents exceeding traditional manual methods by orders of magnitude in accessibility.

Motivations and Applications

Facilitation of General Criminality

Forged identity documents enable criminals to assume false personas, thereby concealing their true identities and facilitating a range of illicit activities such as financial fraud, , and evasion of . By providing verifiable-seeming proofs of identity, these forgeries allow perpetrators to open bank accounts, secure loans, or conduct transactions under pseudonyms, which obscures the traceability of funds and actions. This utility stems from the reliance of financial institutions and service providers on identity verification, where a sophisticated forgery can bypass initial checks, enabling subsequent crimes like check fraud or unauthorized withdrawals. In money laundering schemes, forged passports and IDs are commonly employed to establish "mule" accounts for layering illicit proceeds. For instance, in 2020, a Nigerian national utilized at least two fake passports to open eight accounts, through which over $976,000 from business email compromise and romance scams was laundered. Similarly, Chinese money laundering organizations have been documented using counterfeit passports to open U.S. accounts, funneling hundreds of millions of dollars while evading anti-money laundering protocols. The U.S. (FinCEN) has highlighted the proliferation of counterfeit U.S. passport cards, created using stolen personally identifiable information, to enable such mules to deposit and transfer funds without arousing suspicion. Organized crime networks frequently procure and distribute forged documents to support broader operations, including drug trafficking and . In the , two master forgers were imprisoned in 2025 after generating over £1 million by supplying fake identity documents to high-profile criminals, allowing them to operate undetected in the . reports indicate that such groups routinely alter or fabricate administrative documents to enable activities like sexual exploitation and financial infiltration, with forgery rings embedded in legal business structures to launder profits. Balkan criminal syndicates have exploited stolen identities to obtain Bosnian passports, arming themselves with legitimate-appearing travel documents for cross-border crimes. Beyond finance, forged IDs aid in and synthetic fraud, where real and fabricated data are combined to create "ghost" profiles for repeated victimization. The FBI notes that these tools not only perpetuate individual scams but also scale to enterprise-level fraud, with false identities serving as foundational enablers for concealing perpetrators during investigations. Detection challenges persist due to the integration of advanced techniques, underscoring the causal link between authenticity and the containment of general criminality.

Role in Illegal Immigration

Forged identity documents, such as passports, visas, and national IDs, enable to circumvent controls by presenting themselves as legitimate travelers or residents from permitted countries. These forgeries facilitate initial entry at ports, airports, or land , as well as subsequent evasion of interior enforcement through assumed identities for employment or benefits. Migrant smuggling networks often procure and distribute these documents, charging migrants fees ranging from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars per , as seen in operations targeting routes from to and the to . In Europe, document fraud has been integral to large-scale smuggling, with networks providing falsified Schengen visas and passports to undocumented migrants from Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq to enable crossings into and within the EU. For instance, a 2017 Europol operation dismantled a gang that facilitated illegal entry for hundreds using forged documents, highlighting how such forgery sustains high-volume irregular migration flows. Similarly, Frontex reports indicate that fraudulent travel documents not only permit undetected border crossings but also allow migrants to blend into host societies, undermining internal security by enabling prolonged unauthorized stays. In the United States, forged documents support by aiding both entry and post-arrival integration; upon arrival, many undocumented individuals acquire Social Security cards and IDs to secure , with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement () investigations revealing widespread use in worksite schemes involving thousands of cases annually. A 2019 federal prosecution in charged 119 illegal aliens with and fraud, including misuse of U.S. citizens' Social Security numbers via forged documents to obtain jobs in poultry plants. The U.S. Department of State notes that visa counterfeiting and alteration are common tactics in undocumented immigrants, often linked to that exploits vulnerabilities in verification processes. Globally, the Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) links document forgery directly to migrant smuggling and , with forged passports recovered in operations like those in the illustrating how fraudsters replicate security features to evade detection during irregular crossings. Recent cases, such as a 2025 Spanish police bust of a ring using fake passports to smuggle migrants to and the , demonstrate ongoing adaptation by networks to target destinations with high demand for labor or asylum claims. These activities persist due to the high profitability and relatively low risk compared to physical smuggling routes, exacerbating unauthorized population movements despite enhanced border technologies. Forged identity documents enable terrorists to evade detection during international travel, cross borders undetected, and establish false identities for operational purposes, thereby amplifying vulnerabilities. Organizations such as and have systematically exploited document forgery to facilitate the movement of operatives, as genuine passports are often placed on watchlists, necessitating counterfeits that mimic security features like holograms and biometric chips. The has documented post-9/11 cases where terrorists employed stolen or falsified identifications to secure housing, bank accounts, and driver's licenses, underscoring forgery's role in sustaining covert networks. A prominent example involves , the Algerian operative in the 1999 "Millennium Plot" to bomb , who entered using a under the alias Benni Antoine Noris and later applied for refugee status with additional forgeries. affiliates have similarly relied on fake passports from countries like , , and to traverse and enter the , with investigators identifying a pattern of document fraud in the network's global logistics. While the 9/11 hijackers primarily used fraudulently obtained genuine U.S. identifications rather than outright forgeries to board , their preparatory identity manipulations highlighted the broader of document abuse that supports terrorist . The and (ISIS) developed an industrialized capacity for forging during its territorial phase, producing high-quality counterfeits of Syrian, Iraqi, and European documents to repatriate foreign fighters or infiltrate Western countries. By 2016, French intelligence officials reported ISIS operating a dedicated "passport industry" that supplied operatives with forgeries enabling undetected travel, contributing to plots in . Investigations revealed ISIS-issued fake Syrian used by jihadists to exploit refugee flows into the , with at least several dozen such documents linked to suspects by 2022. These practices exacerbate national security threats by allowing terrorists to bypass visa screening, biometric databases, and no-fly lists, as forged documents can replicate machine-readable zones and electronic chips that evade initial inspections. Europol assessments indicate that document forgery networks, often profit-driven, intersect with terrorist financing, providing customized forgeries tailored to evade specific border controls. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has linked such fraud to broader risks, including the potential for operatives to embed in host societies for extended periods before executing attacks. Countering this requires enhanced international data-sharing on stolen blanks and forgery trends, though proliferation via dark web markets sustains the threat.

Security Countermeasures

Traditional Anti-Forgery Features

Watermarks, embedded during manufacturing, create translucent images or patterns visible when the is held against light, deterring by requiring access to proprietary paper molds—a technique originating in Italian paper mills around 1282 and applied to passports by the . These multi-tonal designs, often incorporating national symbols or portraits, resist photocopying and scanning as they produce inconsistent shadows or absences in reproductions. Guilloché patterns consist of intricate, fine-line geometric designs printed as borders or backgrounds, generated by specialized machines that produce overlapping curves difficult for counterfeiters to match without distortion. First employed in for documents in the , these patterns exploit high-resolution offset or intaglio printing, where attempts at replication via consumer printers result in blurred or incomplete lines due to limited precision. Microprinting involves text or images rendered at scales below 1 mm, such as lines of fine script forming portraits or machine-readable zones, which appear solid to the but resolve under , revealing details that scanners and copiers render as illegible smudges. This feature, a staple in passports since the mid-20th century, demands professional printing equipment to achieve clarity without feathering. Holograms and optically variable devices (OVDs), introduced to passports in the following their in the , project three-dimensional or color-shifting images that alter appearance with viewing angle, impossible to duplicate using standard photographic methods without proprietary mastering equipment. The adopted the first passport hologram in the , with ICAO later endorsing them for overt verification. Special inks, including ultraviolet-fluorescent and infrared-absorbent varieties, remain invisible under normal light but reveal secondary images, threads, or data under specific wavelengths, as standardized in ICAO Document 9303 for machine-readable travel documents. UV-dull paper substrates further aid detection by absorbing rather than fluorescing under , contrasting with common copying papers that glow. Security threads, metallic or plastic strips woven into pages, often bear microprinted text or holographic elements visible only in transmission, enhancing tamper resistance since their integration in passports during the late . Intaglio printing produces raised, tactile ink deposits from engraved plates, allowing verification by touch or low-angle light, a method rooted in 15th-century banknote production and adapted for identity documents to detect flat reproductions. Embossed elements, such as seals or text, deform the substrate for a relief effect verifiable by friction, introduced in 18th-century passports to prevent flat alterations. These features collectively form layered defenses, where forgery requires replicating multiple interdependent elements, increasing costs and expertise barriers for illicit producers.

Advanced Biometric and Digital Innovations

The integration of into identity documents, particularly passports and national ID cards, represents a shift from static visual features to dynamic physiological verification, making substantially more challenging by linking the document to the holder's unique biological traits. Standardized by the (ICAO) in Document 9303, electronic Machine Readable Travel Documents (eMRTDs) embed (RFID) chips that store digitized biometric data, primarily facial images compliant with ISO/IEC 19794 standards, alongside optional fingerprints or iris scans. These chips employ (PKI) for digital signatures, ensuring and authenticity through cryptographic hashing that detects tampering. Access to sensitive biometric data is restricted via protocols such as Basic Access Control (BAC), which requires machine-readable zone (MRZ) data to unlock the chip, preventing skimming by unauthorized readers. Facial recognition serves as the primary biometric modality due to its non-intrusive nature and high deployment feasibility, with algorithms matching live captures against chip-stored templates at borders or checkpoints to confirm identity beyond photographic substitution. and iris provide supplementary layers in select implementations, such as extended (EAC) variants used in European ePassports, where fingerprints are encrypted and accessible only to authorized entities via extended PKI certificates. These features reduce success rates by requiring not only replication of physical elements but also real-time biological matching, as demonstrated in ICAO-compliant systems where over 150 countries had issued biometric passports by the mid-2010s, correlating with reported declines in document fraud incidents at automated gates. Digital innovations extend beyond to include contactless interfaces and emerging decentralized models. ePassports facilitate through ICAO's Public Key Directory (PKD), a global repository for certificate validation that cross-verifies signatures across issuing states, thwarting cloned or altered chips. Recent advancements, such as ICAO's Digital Travel Credentials (DTC) framework introduced in 2023, enable smartphone-based presentation of derived from ePassport data, incorporating zero-knowledge proofs to disclose minimal information while proving authenticity against forgery attempts like manipulation. In practice, these systems have been rolled out in phases; for instance, the European Union's biometric passports, mandated since 2006 with full EAC fingerprint integration by 2009, now underpin the (EES) launching October 12, 2025, which automates biometric enrollment and matching to replace manual stamping, enhancing detection of overstays and fraudulent reuse. Despite these advances, vulnerabilities persist, including chip cloning via side-channel attacks if access controls are bypassed, though ICAO-compliant designs mitigate this through tamper-evident substrates and UV-reactive inks integrated with chip verification. Ongoing innovations, like multi-modal combining face, voice, and in next-generation IDs, aim to address spoofing risks, with pilot programs in regions like the emphasizing liveness detection to distinguish real holders from high-fidelity replicas. Overall, these technologies have elevated forgery barriers, requiring sophisticated state-level resources for circumvention, as evidenced by reduced interception rates of fraudulent documents in ICAO-monitored facilitation data.

Detection and Forensic Methods

Investigative Techniques

Forensic document examiners employ visual and microscopic to identify alterations in identity documents, such as inconsistencies in alignment, ink distribution, or paper texture that deviate from genuine specimens. This involves comparing questioned documents against reference samples from issuing authorities to detect series of forgeries linked by shared anomalies. Non-destructive techniques, including and illumination, reveal hidden security features or erasures not visible under standard light, aiding in the of elements like watermarks and fluorescent threads. Chemical analysis of inks and substrates, when necessary, determines age or composition mismatches indicative of , though such methods risk document . Investigators leverage forensic intelligence to profile forgery patterns, correlating physical traces across cases to trace production networks or suppliers. Collaboration with international bodies like facilitates access to databases of known counterfeit templates and training on evolving forgery methods, enhancing cross-border case linkage. U.S. Investigations' forensic laboratory specializes in dissecting passports and visas, integrating with to dismantle forgery rings. Undercover operations and informant networks target markets, while trace electronic trails from scanned or altered digital files used in production. Interviews with suspects or seized individuals yield leads on fabrication techniques, corroborated by laboratory validation of recovered tools and materials.

Technological Detection Tools

Video spectral comparators (VSCs) represent a cornerstone technology in forensic document examination for detecting forgeries in identity documents, passports, and IDs by scrutinizing inks, substrates, and security features across multiple light spectra. These non-destructive devices, such as the VSC8000 or Regula 4308 series, utilize , , and visible light sources alongside to reveal alterations like erasures, additions, or substitutions invisible under standard illumination. For example, VSCs detect discrepancies in ink or absorption, enabling differentiation between genuine optically variable inks and approximations, as applied in examinations of banknotes, visas, and travel documents. In practice, Mexican forensic labs adopted the Regula 4308 in to enhance forgery detection in passports and IDs through integrated spectrometry for precise signal measurement. Biometric verification tools complement document analysis by cross-referencing embedded or printed against live subject data, thwarting forgeries where photos are swapped or . Electronic passports with ICAO-compliant RFID chips are interrogated via contactless readers to validate digital signatures, PKI certificates, and stored facial or templates against the presenter's , flagging mismatches indicative of tampering. Facial recognition systems incorporate liveness detection—analyzing micro-movements or 3D depth—to counter photo spoofs or deepfakes, with NIST guidelines from 2025 emphasizing detection algorithms that score blends based on inconsistencies. These tools achieve high precision in real-time border checks, reducing false accepts from forged visuals. Machine learning-based systems automate forgery detection by processing scanned or imaged documents for anomalies in , holograms, or guilloche patterns. Deep neural networks, such as convolutional models trained on datasets like SIDTD (synthetic ID and travel documents released in 2024), classify features and identify digital manipulations with accuracies exceeding 95% in controlled tests. For passports, frameworks like PSFNet employ edge-focused learning to spot printing irregularities or font deviations, outperforming traditional rule-based checks. AI-driven tools from vendors like Smart Engines, updated in 2024, scan global variants for forgery traces using unsupervised , integrating with mobile or desktop verifiers. Specialized software like INTERPOL's Dial-Doc, launched in and continually refined, aggregates spectral and to flag fraudulent travel documents against international databases, aiding frontline officers in automated authenticity scoring. These technologies, often combined in forensic workstations, enhance detection rates but require ongoing updates to counter evolving AI-assisted forgeries, as noted in DHS assessments of digital manipulation tools.

International Standards and Agreements

The (ICAO), a specialized agency of the , establishes global standards for machine-readable documents (MRTDs) under Document 9303, which includes specifications designed to deter and counterfeiting of passports, visas, and other identity-bearing documents used in international . These standards mandate features such as optically variable inks, holograms, , and machine-readable zones (MRZs) with algorithms to enable automated verification and detect alterations. Adopted by ICAO's 193 member states, these requirements facilitate while prioritizing security against fraudulent reproduction, with non-compliance risking exclusion from international air networks. In response to rising forgery threats, ICAO introduced electronic MRTDs (eMRTDs), or biometric passports, through updates to Doc 9303 starting in , incorporating contactless chips storing facial biometric data—and optionally fingerprints or iris scans—protected by (PKI) for digital signatures that verify document integrity during checks. The ICAO Public Key Directory (PKD) supports international validation of these signatures by enabling authorities to cross-check against issuing states' master lists, reducing reliance on bilateral data exchanges and minimizing success rates in cross-border movements. As of 2024, over 150 countries issue eMRTDs compliant with these standards, which emphasize resistance to cloning or tampering via basic (BAC) or extended (EAC) protocols. Beyond technical specifications, ICAO's standards are embedded in the 1944 ( Convention), Annex 9 on Facilitation, which obliges states to prevent the issuance of fraudulent documents and cooperate on detection, including sharing intelligence on counterfeits. Complementary efforts include the Organization for Security and Co-operation in (OSCE) guidelines aligning with ICAO for non-aviation documents, promoting secure issuance processes to curb in regional contexts. While no standalone UN convention exclusively targets identity document , the Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) addresses it within frameworks like the Convention against (UNTOC, 2000), which encourages states to criminalize document falsification as a facilitator of , including and . These agreements underscore multilateral commitments but rely heavily on ICAO's technical for practical , as national variations in non-travel identity documents limit broader .

Domestic Laws and Enforcement Challenges

In the United States, federal statutes criminalize the , transfer, possession, or use of forged identity documents under 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which prohibits related to identification documents and authentication features, with penalties including fines and imprisonment up to 15 years depending on aggravating factors such as ties to or drug trafficking. Additional penalties apply under 8 U.S.C. § 1324c for document in contexts, imposing civil fines of $250 to $2,000 per fraudulent document, alongside potential criminal sanctions. Aggravated under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A mandates a consecutive two-year term when forgery involves felonies like violations. falls primarily to agencies like Investigations (HSI) within , which targets identity linked to threats, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), though a 2025 DHS revealed that 47% of sampled files lacked documentation on fraudulent identity use, highlighting gaps in detection and record-keeping. Enforcement challenges in the U.S. stem from the sheer volume of forgeries, with surveys indicating that 69% of businesses encounter attempts annually, often involving sophisticated alterations undetectable by manual inspection. Criminal networks exploit online marketplaces and sales, outpacing law enforcement's capacity for proactive seizures, while emerging technologies like media complicate verification, as noted in a 2024 FinCEN alert on AI-generated fraud evading traditional checks. Resource constraints exacerbate these issues, with agencies like CBP facing limitations in biometric screening at high-traffic ports, leading to inconsistent application of anti-forgery protocols amid rising illegal entries. In the , domestic laws vary by member state but are harmonized through frameworks like the False and Authentic Documents Online () system, which facilitates sharing of data on forged identity documents across 27 countries since its inception in 2004, aiding national authorities in authenticity checks. For instance, Germany's Penal Code (§ 267 StGB) punishes document forgery with fines or up to five years' imprisonment, escalating for involvement, while EU-wide directives address forgery in travel documents under regulations like the (EES), implemented progressively from 2024 to combat repeat overstays via . Enforcement hurdles include cross-border jurisdictional overlaps, where domestic police struggle with intra-EU forgery rings, as reports organized groups using altered IDs for , with fees for fakes ranging from $100 to $3,000 per document in 2024 operations. Broader domestic challenges across jurisdictions involve an ongoing technological , where forgers leverage affordable printing and digital editing tools to mimic holograms and chips, overwhelming forensic labs and border agents trained on outdated methods. and insider threats further undermine enforcement, as seen in cases of complicit officials issuing genuine blanks for alteration, while underfunding limits training and equipment upgrades, perpetuating vulnerabilities in high-stakes sectors like employment verification where fraudulent IDs evade systems. These factors contribute to low prosecution rates relative to incidence, with many forgeries detected only post-incident, straining public resources and eroding trust in identity verification processes.

Notable Cases and Incidents

Historical Precedents

During , forgery of identity documents became a critical tool for resistance networks in Nazi-occupied Europe, enabling and others to evade and extermination by assuming false identities or claiming neutral foreign citizenship. In , , an 18-year-old Jewish resistance member, operated a clandestine laboratory in , producing up to 500 forged identity cards, passports, birth certificates, and ration cards per week by chemically removing "Jew" stamps and altering existing documents. His efforts, coordinated with underground networks, facilitated the hiding or smuggling of as many as 14,000 , including 1,500 to 3,000 children, out of harm's way. In , the Ładoś Group—comprising Polish diplomats in and Jewish collaborators at the embassy—forged approximately 10,000 passports from Latin American nations such as , , , and , using blank forms acquired through embassy contacts. These documents granted holders nominal foreign status, often redirecting them to detention camps like Bergen-Belsen rather than death camps, thereby saving thousands of lives amid . The operation's secrecy extended even to Polish government oversight, highlighting the improvised, high-stakes nature of such forgeries under wartime constraints. In the Netherlands, organizations like the Persoonsbewijzencentrale (PBC), founded in 1942 by artist Gerrit van der Veen, mass-produced hundreds of thousands of forged identity cards using techniques such as acetone vapors for photo swaps and custom tools for stamp replication. Complementing this, the Falsificatie Centrale, tied to aid networks for those in hiding, generated similar volumes of documents, including stamp catalogs for authenticity. These efforts supplied vital cover to resistance fighters and civilians in hiding, underscoring forgery's role in sustaining underground operations against systematic identity-based persecution. Such precedents revealed vulnerabilities in early 20th-century document security, prompting postwar advancements in anti-forgery measures like watermarks and holograms.

Recent Developments and Examples

In November 2024, European authorities executed dozens of raids across multiple countries targeting a criminal network producing fake identity documents, primarily used to fraudulently register beneficiaries for properties owned by deceased Romanian citizens, resulting in the seizure of forged IDs and related assets. In February 2025, Greek police dismantled a sophisticated forgery operation in , arresting a primary who manufactured high-quality passports sold to migrant smuggling rings for €600 to €900 each, with the lab equipped for advanced printing and data manipulation. A 2025 report detailed how the widow of leader , along with her children, exited Gaza using a forged to reach , where she subsequently remarried, underscoring the role of fake travel documents in evading conflict zones and . In the United States, a 2024 federal indictment in charged Jonathan De La Riva-Lorenzo and Fernando Minkes-Rodriguez, both undocumented noncitizens, with producing and distributing fake identification documents, including driver's licenses and border crossing cards, as part of a broader scheme targeting employment and benefits access. By October 2025, a U.S. investigation exposed a multi-year employee ID ring at the , involving dozens of workers who used phony badges to log fraudulent shifts, with participants averaging 1.3 to 2.7 times more overtime pay than non-involved colleagues, leading to millions in losses and ongoing disciplinary actions. In June 2025, Indian authorities at airport arrested ten Nepali nationals attempting to board flights to Gulf countries using forged passports and visas, part of a pattern of document tampering in regional migration routes.

Societal and Economic Impacts

National Security Ramifications

Identity document forgery poses significant risks to by enabling unauthorized individuals, including terrorists and foreign intelligence operatives, to circumvent controls, access restricted facilities, and establish covert presences within host nations. Criminals exploit forged passports, visas, and identification cards to obtain legitimate travel documents or benefits, creating vulnerabilities that facilitate the entry of threats who might otherwise be detected through standard vetting processes. For instance, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has documented limitations in detecting fraudulent documents at ports of entry, which a 2025 Department of Office of report identified as increasing the potential for inadmissible aliens, including those with concerns, to gain entry. In contexts, forged identities have repeatedly enabled operatives to infiltrate secure areas and execute attacks. The , 2001, hijackers, for example, used fraudulently altered identification and obtained state-issued driver's licenses under false pretenses to board and conduct . Similarly, , the "Millennium Bomber," entered Canada and attempted to cross into the using a fake in December 1999, highlighting how such forgeries allow terrorists to exploit lax document verification at borders. and ISIS have systematically relied on passports for operational mobility; a 2022 European Parliament inquiry noted ISIS members using forged Syrian and Iraqi documents to enter the , underscoring ongoing threats from non-state actors. These incidents demonstrate that forgery not only aids initial entry but also supports logistics, such as funding transfers masked through false identities, thereby amplifying terrorist capabilities. Espionage activities further exacerbate these risks, as state-sponsored actors deploy forged documents to embed agents long-term. Historical cases include Soviet intelligence operations during the , where spies adopted identities from deceased infants via gravestone data to obtain authentic credentials, a tactic that evaded detection for years. More recently, Chinese military personnel implicated in economic have leveraged alongside cyber intrusions, as detailed in U.S. Department of Justice indictments from 2014 and 2020, which linked hackers to broader efforts using falsified personas for . Such forgeries undermine by allowing operatives to blend into societies, access sensitive sectors like technology and defense, and exfiltrate information without triggering alerts. Overall, these ramifications erode the integrity of national identification systems, fostering environments where sleeper cells or hostile actors can operate undetected, as evidenced by Government Accountability Office undercover tests in 2010 that successfully obtained U.S. passports using counterfeit supporting documents. Mitigating this requires enhanced forensic capabilities and international cooperation, yet persistent gaps in detection—such as those noted in CBP operations—continue to heighten vulnerabilities to both asymmetric and state-directed threats.

Financial and Public Trust Costs

Identity document forgery imposes significant financial burdens on governments, businesses, and individuals by enabling widespread fraud, including unauthorized access to benefits, loans, and services. , —often facilitated by forged passports, driver's licenses, and other credentials—resulted in losses exceeding $47 billion for American adults in 2024, marking a $4 billion increase from the previous year. Federal agencies reported improper payments totaling $236 billion in 2023, with a portion attributable to fraudulent claims supported by documents, such as altered identities used in grant and relief programs. Overall, U.S. government fraud losses, including those tied to synthetic or forged identities, are estimated at $233 billion to $521 billion annually based on data from 2018 to 2022. Businesses face average annual direct costs of $7 million from , escalating to $13 million for organizations with over 5,000 employees, encompassing investigation, , and compliance expenses linked to bypassed verification processes vulnerable to document forgery. These economic impacts extend to mitigation efforts, as governments allocate resources to detection and prevention systems. For instance, forged documents underpin schemes like fake IDs in procurement fraud and social engineering, contributing to persistent vulnerabilities in federal spending despite anti-fraud measures. Internationally, countries with weaker security features in passports and IDs experience higher rates, amplifying costs for reissuance and border controls, though precise global figures remain elusive due to underreporting. Beyond direct monetary losses, identity document forgery erodes in institutional verification systems, fostering skepticism toward official credentials and . Successful forgeries undermine confidence in passports and IDs as reliable proofs of identity, leading to broader doubt in government-issued documents and mechanisms. This loss of faith can manifest in reduced compliance with identification requirements and heightened public wariness of identity-dependent processes, such as elections or financial transactions, as credentials facilitate crimes that expose systemic weaknesses. In turn, such erosion prompts stricter controls, potentially increasing administrative burdens and further straining resources while perpetuating a cycle of in affected populations.

References

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324c
  2. https://regulaforensics.com/blog/forged-documents/
  3. https://www.entrust.com/sites/default/files/documentation/reports/2025-identity-fraud-report.pdf
  4. https://cybersecurityasia.net/2025-identity-fraud-report-deepfake-attacks/
  5. https://www.keglawyers.com/federal-forgery
  6. https://www.bucherlawgroup.com/legal-articles/what-you-need-to-know-about-identity-document-forgery
  7. https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/forgery.html
  8. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/publications/DocSeries/9303_p2_cons_en.pdf
  9. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1028
  10. https://www.europol.europa.eu/crime-areas/forgery-and-trafficking-of-administrative-documents
  11. https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Counterfeit-currency-and-security-documents/Identity-and-travel-document-fraud
  12. https://www.trustid.co.uk/blog-trends-in-fraudulent-identity-documents-in-2022/
  13. https://sumsub.com/blog/most-forged-ids/
  14. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/over-19k-fraudulent-ids-seized-cbp-officers-chicago
  15. https://www.e-verify.gov/fraudulent-documents-awareness
  16. https://www.veriff.com/identity-verification/from-babylon-to-biometrics-the-epic-evolution-of-ids
  17. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v29/n20/natalie-zemon-davis/kingdoms-of-paper
  18. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history/passports-0019508
  19. https://news-archive.exeter.ac.uk/2021/may/articles/forgeryofofficialdocument.html
  20. https://medievalwritings.atillo.com.au/word/forged.htm
  21. https://www.thecollector.com/who-invented-the-passport/
  22. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/39306/39306-h/39306-h.htm
  23. https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/new-book-explores-forgery-and-impersonation-imperial-china
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-history-review/article/mark-mcnicholas-forgery-and-impersonation-in-imperial-china-popular-deceptions-and-the-high-qing-state-seattle-university-of-washington-press-2016-pp-280-5000-cloth-isbn-9780295995090/119F4657594ABDC325795059A2D4BEA7
  25. https://www.archives.gov/research/immigration/naturalization/history-cert-of-naturalization
  26. https://repositorio.uc.cl/dspace/bitstreams/afa10e40-1aad-4a7a-8052-4aeadceecef6/download
  27. https://www.passport-collector.com/passport-fraud-and-forgery-in-history/
  28. https://www.iai.nl/the-evolution-of-passports-a-century-of-progress/
  29. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/security-features-passports-century-evolution-future-trends-topol--qfk6c
  30. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/93255-largest-passport-forgery
  31. https://shuftipro.com/blog/combating-modern-id-document-forgery-threats-trends-and-solutions/
  32. https://vespia.io/blog/document-forgery
  33. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/recognising-fraudulent-identity-documents/guidance-on-examining-identity-documents-accessible
  34. https://regulaforensics.com/blog/photo-substitution-in-id-documents/
  35. https://www.inscribe.ai/fraud-detection/document-fraud
  36. https://www.caf.io/post/identity-document-forgery
  37. https://blog.hypr.com/ai-forgery-epidemic
  38. https://www.catonetworks.com/blog/cato-ctrl-chatgpt-image-generator-enables-creation-of-fake-passports/
  39. https://www.idmanagement.gov/playbooks/idfraud/
  40. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00827
  41. https://www.miteksystems.com/blog/ai-automated-document-fraud-detection-with-digital-manipulation-technology
  42. https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/fraudulent-identification-documents-and-the-implications-for-homeland-security
  43. https://apnews.com/general-news-1e5ca37bbfadefa596a5e1cd6fb373d6
  44. https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/china-based-syndicates-using-fake-passports-bribes-to-undermine-us-aml-programs/
  45. https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/shared/FinCEN_Notice_Counterfeit_US_Passport_FINAL508.pdf
  46. https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/news/master-forgers-gave-fake-identities-to-the-criminal-underworld
  47. https://www.occrp.org/en/investigation/using-stolen-identities-balkan-gangsters-armed-themselves-with-bosnian-passports
  48. https://www.frontex.europa.eu/publications/ara-2012-o9ohcz
  49. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a109438.html
  50. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2023/Two-year-investigation-leads-to-arrest-of-suspected-migrant-smuggler
  51. https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/criminal-network-involved-in-migrant-smuggling-and-document-fraud-dismantled
  52. https://www.ice.gov/about-ice/hsi/investigate/identity-benefit-fraud
  53. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdms/pr/119-illegal-aliens-prosecuted-stealing-identities-americans-falsifying-immigration
  54. https://2021-2025.state.gov/passport-and-visa-fraud/
  55. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/frontpage/2025/July/how-document-fraud-is-used-to-traffic-and-smuggle-people.html
  56. https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/spain-dismantles-smuggling-ring-moving-migrants-to-canada-with-fake-passports-police/
  57. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/trail/etc/fake.html
  58. https://abcnews.go.com/International/isis-fake-passport-industry-official/story?id=36505984
  59. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-000427_EN.html
  60. https://cj.msu.edu/_assets/pdfs/cina/CINA-White_Papers_Jin_Lee_Counterfeit_Identity_Documents_on_the_Open_and_Dark_Web.pdf
  61. https://adaptiverecognition.com/blog/identity-industry/the-security-of-ids-volume-4-optical-security-features/
  62. https://bestcitizens.com/2022/02/07/how-passport-security-evolved-over-the-years/
  63. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/publications/DocSeries/9303_p1_cons_en.pdf
  64. https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2017/01/high-tech-features-make-passports-secure/134728/
  65. https://www.ansi.org/impact-of-standards/standards-boost-business/secure-biometrics-icao-epassports
  66. https://www.icao.int/icao-pkd
  67. https://www.keesingtechnologies.com/blog/id-documents/what-is-an-epassport/
  68. https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/solutions-catalogue/public-security/civil-identity/security-features-identity-documents
  69. https://www.idemia.com/solution/identity-north-america
  70. https://www.regulaforensics.com/blog/what-the-id-may-look-like-in-future/
  71. https://www.entrust.com/blog/2023/06/icao-digital-travel-credentials-will-change-the-world-of-travel
  72. https://idtechwire.com/eu-to-launch-biometric-entry-exit-system-in-october-2025-for-schengen-borders/
  73. https://kinegram.digital/knowledge-base/reduce-fraud-with-advanced-id-verification-and-electronic-passports/
  74. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/2025-02/MRTD_Report_Vol7_No3.pdf
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030622001113
  76. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wfs2.1528
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016823010268
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655622/
  79. https://www.ice.gov/features/hsifl
  80. https://leppardlaw.com/federal/white-collar/advanced-technology-in-detecting-forged-documents/
  81. https://shuftipro.com/blog/forensic-document-forgery-analysis-a-landmark-approach-to-curb-identity-fraud/
  82. https://fosterfreeman.com/vsc-premiere-range-qde/
  83. https://saint-tech.lv/pdf/drosiba/Daudzfunkcion%25C4%2581ls%2520video%2520spektr%25C4%2581lais%2520komparators%2520VSC8000.pdf
  84. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240625261316/en/Mexican-Forensic-Experts-Implement-Regula-4308-Comparator-for-Advanced-Forgery-Detection
  85. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/08/nist-guidelines-can-help-organizations-detect-face-photo-morphs-deter
  86. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/23_0630_st_digital_forgeries_report_signed.pdf
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655557/
  88. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9961170/
  89. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/17/8/1208
  90. https://smartengines.medium.com/scientists-from-smart-engines-have-trained-ai-to-check-authenticity-of-passports-from-all-countries-092588b3422b
  91. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2013/INTERPOL-launches-new-technology-to-detect-fraudulent-travel-documents
  92. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/publications/DocSeries/9303_p7_cons_en.pdf
  93. https://www.osce.org/secretariat/107806
  94. https://www.unodc.org/documents/congress/background-information/Corruption/Handbook_on_Identity-related_Crime_ENG.pdf
  95. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=xviii-12&chapter=18&clang=_en
  96. https://www.federallawyers.com/what-is-document-fraud/
  97. https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2025-09/OIG-25-40-Sep25.pdf
  98. https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-issues-alert-fraud-schemes-involving-deepfake-media-targeting-financial
  99. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/combating-document-fraud-the-false-and-authentic-documents-online-system.html
  100. https://se-legal.de/criminal-defense-lawyer/document-forgery-under-german-law/?lang=en
  101. https://etias.com/articles/eu-entry/exit-system-everything-travelers-need-to-prepare-for
  102. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-partners-europol-combat-document-forgery-and-migrant-smuggling
  103. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-a-wwii-era-forger-saved-lives-one-fake-document-at-a-time/
  104. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/column-forged-passports-world-war-ii
  105. https://www.verzetsmuseum.org/en/kennisbank/forging-papers-1
  106. https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/dozens-of-raids-conducted-in-fake-id-network-case/
  107. https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/1260784/police-bust-hi-tech-passport-forgery-lab/
  108. https://www.timesofisrael.com/yahya-sinwars-widow-fled-gaza-using-fake-passport-to-turkey-and-remarried-report/
  109. https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/fake-id-producers-indicted
  110. https://www.newsday.com/long-island/transportation/lirr-time-fraud-analysis-ix5eypjo
  111. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/forged-passports
  112. https://www.dhs.gov/fraud-and-counterfeit
  113. https://www.state.gov/passport-and-visa-fraud
  114. https://www.voanews.com/a/us-russian-spy-case-raises-alarms-in-canada-98268284/163978.html
  115. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-charges-five-chinese-military-hackers-cyber-espionage-against-us-corporations-and-labor
  116. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/chinese-military-personnel-charged-computer-fraud-economic-espionage-and-wire-fraud-hacking
  117. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a125191.html
  118. https://www.aarp.org/money/scams-fraud/javelin-identity-theft-report-2024/
  119. https://www.gao.gov/blog/federal-government-made-236-billion-improper-payments-last-fiscal-year
  120. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-105833
  121. https://www.entrust.com/company/newsroom/identity-fraud-costs-organizations-an-average-of-7-million-annually-says-new-research-from-docusign-and-entrust
  122. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/reports/2022-government-fraud-waste-and-abuse-report-emerging-from-the-pandemic
  123. https://leppardlaw.com/federal/white-collar/how-forgery-impacts-national-security-and-us-federal-laws/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.