Hubbry Logo
Interim managementInterim managementMain
Open search
Interim management
Community hub
Interim management
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Interim management
Interim management
Interim management
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Interim management is the temporary provision of management resources and skills. Interim management can be seen as the short-term assignment of a proven heavyweight interim executive manager to manage a period of transition,[clarification needed] crisis or change within an organization. In this situation, a permanent role may be unnecessary or impossible to find on short notice. Additionally, there may be nobody internally who is suitable for, or available to take up, the position in question.[1]

History

[edit]

Historical antecedents come from ancient Roman times, with ancient Roman publicans (Latin: publicanus, plural: publicani) or "Roman contractors" being engaged to erect or maintain public buildings, supply armies overseas, or collect certain taxes (such as tithes and customs). This system for letting contracts was well established by the 3rd century BC.[2]

The modern practice of interim management started in the mid to late-1970s, when permanent employees in The Netherlands were protected by long notice periods and companies faced large costs for terminating employees. Hiring temporary managers seemed like an ideal solution.

Interim Management was introduced for the first time in Europe by the Dutch consulting firm Boer and Croon, as an operational completion and implementation of the recommendations contained in the strategy projects managed by the firm. Facing extreme rigidity in hiring and firing managers and the need for extreme flexibility and speed, the solution of being able to dispose top management skills on short notice and for limited periods of time seemed to be the ideal one.

As a consequence of the success of this service in the Netherlands, Boer and Croon signed, in February 1987, a Joint Venture with the Executive Search firm Egon Zehnder International and with the Private Equity fund Euroventures, to start a new business initiative "EIM - Executive Interim Management" which its scope was to spread the Interim Management service around the world thanks to the network international of Egon Zehnder offices.

Since the 1980s, the concept and use of interim managers as a resourcing tool for organisations has received attention from academic researchers and policy makers as well as practitioners. In 1984, Atkinson postulated the emergence of an organisation design comprising both a core and a peripheral workforce, using differing forms of contractual relationship (flexibility) on an international basis.[3] Examples of further study include Kalleberg (2000),[4] looking at temporary, contract and part-time work; and Bosch (2004)[5] looking at Western European "employment" relationships.

A good example of interim management benefitting from a geo-political change was its use by the German privatization agency after reunification of East and West, post 1989. The demand was created for interim managers in Eastern Germany to apply the required management and leadership competencies necessary to re-structure the formerly state owned companies. Demand continued to grow in the 1990s in Germany as the economy struggled to deal with unification, recession and resultant ambitious economic forecasts for the 'new' economy. One prominent example, mentioned by Bruns (2006)[6] was the appointment of Helmut Sihler as interim CEO of German Telekom AG in 2001.

Value proposition

[edit]

There are several factors that make the interim management offering increasingly popular and cost-effective to client organisations. These factors are characterised as a 'value proposition' that interim managers offer to their clients.

Although there is some variation at the margins of interim management (with temporary workers, freelancers, contractors and consultants) the following factors are typical of the interim management value proposition:.[7]

  1. Interim managers can be in place within days as opposed to weeks or months, which is essential when time constraints are paramount. Being practiced in engaging promptly with the situation, they become effective quickly upon joining a client organisation. Because of their experience and expertise, interim managers also conduct and complete assignments effectively and with due speed.
  2. Interim managers typically operate at a senior level in the client organisation, often being sensibly over-qualified for the roles they take on. They often bring skills and knowledge not otherwise in place, to address a specific skills gap or problem. Their experience and expertise enables them to be productive and make a noticeable impact from the outset, maximising the likelihood of success.
  3. Unencumbered by company politics or culture, interim managers provide a fresh perspective and are able to concentrate on what is best for the business. Being independent operators, they are able to contribute honestly without constituting a threat to the incumbent management team. Not being part of a larger business they are not pressured to unnecessarily extend their assignment.
  4. Rather than taking on a purely advisory role, interim managers are managers responsible for managing a particular business or project. They are accountable for results.
  5. Operating at or near board-level gives interim managers the authority and credibility to effect significant change or transition within a company. Unlike a 'temp', they are not just there to 'hold the fort'. They actively add value to the client organisation as a result of their expertise and approach, even when the work and the decisions to be made are difficult.
  6. Interim managers add value by using their skills and expertise to help deliver an outcome, solution, service or mitigate risk that provides a meaningful 'return on investment' to a client. Interim managers are paid on the understanding of goals and objectives being performed and delivered, and not simply on the basis of attendance.
  7. Interim managers maintain high professional standards because their future work relies upon referrals and a successful track record. They therefore have a stake in the success of the assignments that they undertake. This contrasts favourably with other 'temporary workers' who may also be seeking 'permanent employment' or simply motivated by a day rate or extending their tenure.
  8. Interim managers are available to work on a fractional or part-time basis. Especially in smaller organizations their skills may only be required for one or two days per week. The fractional executive saves companies money as they only pay for what they need.

Assignment lifecycle

[edit]

Interim assignments vary in scope and requirements, encompassing change management, 'gap' assignments, project management and turnaround management. The following stages of the 'assignment lifecycle' are typical of how interim managers enter into an assignment, reach and carry out the actual implementation, and finally exit the assignment. The assignment should include a plan for making resources available to meet the longer-term goals.[1]

The early stages have much in common with consultancy, as do later stages with project management, but the accountability and responsibility that interim managers have for successful analysis and delivery of a fitting solution, is what makes these stages uniquely typical of the interim management approach.[8][9]

  1. Entry. The prospective client and Interim make initial contact and explore the requirement sufficiently for the client to be able to decide to engage the interim manager (or not) to address the situation. This is likely to involve a 'preliminary' assessment of what the client thinks they want and the scope of the interim manager's contribution. It is also likely to involve a due diligence and interview process to make sure the interim manager is the right fit for the business.[10] Typically the entry stage takes place over one or more initial meetings and results in the interim manager's provisional engagement.
  2. Diagnosis. The interim manager researches the current situation in order to understand it, how it came about, what are the requirements of the varying stakeholders. At this stage a more detailed understanding of 'what the situation is' is formed as well as approaches to address it. Differing issues or problems may come to light at this stage than initially highlighted by the client. On a 'gap' assignment this diagnosis may run concurrently with the handling of immediate issues. Typically the diagnosis stage takes a few days.
  3. Proposal. The interim manager presents a more detailed proposal that serves as an interim assignment objectives and plan. If this differs significantly from the preliminary plans determined at 'entry', the solution may involve different requirements from the interim manager or possibly the ending of the assignment. It is common that this 'proposal' may challenge the client's understanding of the situation, on the basis of the interim manager's expertise. The interim manager takes the responsibility to propose a solution most likely to be effective, not automatically the one originally requested. In the case of a 'gap assignment' such a proposal may simply outline how the interim manager is a 'safe pair of hands'.
  4. Implementation. The interim manager manages the intervention, project, or solution, tracking progress and conducts periodic feedback reviews with the client. During this stage, interim managers particularly exemplify their expertise, accountability and effectiveness. Depending on the assignment, they get as close to the situation as is necessary, whilst remaining an independent practitioner. They may manage teams and projects, deal with crises and changes, or simply 'holding the fort'.
  5. Exit. The interim manager, approaching project end, ensures that objectives have been met, that the client is satisfied. This stage may involve 'knowledge handover and training', determining and sourcing 'business as usual' successors, and 'sharing lessons learnt' in the process. The interim manager is focused on the success of the assignment and not simply the length of his/her own tenure, which means that this stage can be carried our professionally and objectively. Often this is the end of the interim manager/client relationship. Sometimes interim managers may continue to give occasional 'ad hoc' consultancy. Sometimes the interim manager is re-engaged on a follow-on or further assignment, starting the 'lifecycle' again.[11]

Uses

[edit]

There are a number of different business situations that could result in the need for an interim manager. Typically these could be situations such as crisis management, sudden departure, illness, death, change management, managing change or transition, start-up and scale-up businesses, sabbaticals, MBOs and IPOs, mergers and acquisitions, and project management. The functions of an interim manager are almost endless, thus the scope of an interim manager's skill set is quite unique.

The interim management concept has taken root in the UK, Germany, and Belgium, and is spreading elsewhere, most notably in Australia, the US, France, and Ireland. In Spain recruitment increased by 68% in 2011, according to Michael Page Interim management, and since 2013 there is a first association called "Association Interim Management Spain". In Nigeria, the Institute Of Corporate and Interim Management has been approved by The Federal Ministry Of Education and established under Federal Government Decree No. 1 of 1990, to promote Corporate and Interim Management practice in Africa.[12]

Fractional Executive

[edit]

One type of interim executive is a fractional executive.[13] Fractional executives are professionals who offer their management services to organizations on a part-time contract basis, also known as fractional work.[14][15] These executives usually have extensive experience in the business environment in roles such as chairman, owner, CEO, senior vice president, vice president, or director. Their skills may be focused in one discipline or more broad, depending on their experience.

Fractional executives can work as independent contractors or as part of a fractional firm.[16] However, they are not consultants because they take an active leadership role in the company that hires them, implementing changes and guiding the organization just as their full-time colleagues would.[17][18][19] They are typically hired on a long-term basis and usually with some form of retainer, but they do not work full-time for any specific organization.[20][21]

This concept is gaining increasing popularity[22] as companies seek to optimize resource utilization and bring in highly skilled executives as needed.

The popularity of the "fractional" executive model is expected to continue to grow as companies aim to optimize their resources and engage specialists on a flexible basis. With the support of major investors and the emergence of global communities, "fractional" executives are set to play an increasingly important role in the business world in the coming years.[23]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Interim management

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Interim management refers to the short-term assignment of independent, senior-level executives with substantial prior experience to organizations confronting crises, transitions, structural changes, or skill gaps, enabling rapid implementation of solutions without long-term employment commitments. Originating in the Netherlands during the 1970s amid demands for managerial flexibility in dynamic business environments, the practice spread to the United Kingdom by the late 1980s, evolving from earlier freelance models into a structured response to economic volatility and organizational needs for external expertise. These interim managers typically possess over 15 years of hands-on leadership in relevant sectors, exhibit high adaptability to ambiguous situations, prioritize results-oriented decision-making, and maintain objectivity unencumbered by internal politics or loyalty to permanent staff. Empirical studies in public sector contexts demonstrate their contributions to performance improvements, such as enhanced governance and staff support during urgent reforms, though broader private-sector data on long-term ROI remains context-dependent and tied to precise matching of manager skills to organizational demands. Distinct from consulting, which often emphasizes advisory roles, interim management embeds executives in operational leadership to execute changes directly, fostering continuity and injecting fresh perspectives that mitigate risks from leadership vacancies.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

Interim management entails the temporary deployment of independent, high-caliber executives to assume operational roles within an , typically to address urgent challenges, execute transformations, or stabilize operations during voids in permanent . These professionals, often with decades of C-suite , are contracted for discrete periods to deliver measurable outcomes, such as restoring profitability or integrating post-merger functions, before transitioning out and handing over to internal successors. Distinguishing interim management from consulting or fractional executive services, interim managers embed directly into the executive team, wielding and for results rather than providing detached recommendations. This operational immersion enables swift action in high-stakes environments, leveraging their external perspective to bypass entrenched internal biases or inertia. Sources from executive firms emphasize that such managers are selected for their proven track records in multiple sectors, ensuring adaptability and minimal time. Core attributes include a results-oriented , hands-on execution capabilities, and resilience in ambiguous or crisis-driven contexts, with assignments commonly spanning 6 to 12 months to align with the urgency of the mandate. Empirical observations from practitioner analyses highlight their as a safeguard against short-termism, as they lack incentives tied to long-term , fostering candid strategic interventions grounded in pragmatic over consensus-building.

Distinguishing Features

Interim management differs from permanent executive appointments primarily through its fixed-term , typically lasting 6 months, designed to immediate operational challenges such as crises, transitions, or transformations without committing to indefinite tenure. This structure enables organizations to inject senior expertise swiftly while maintaining flexibility for future hiring decisions. A core distinction from lies in the interim manager's hands-on operational integration and : they assume full of functions, make binding decisions, lead teams directly, and drive , rather than offering detached strategic recommendations. Consultants focus on and advisory reports, often without execution responsibility, whereas interim managers prioritize rapid results in volatile environments, signing off on actions and managing day-to-day operations. Interim managers are typically seasoned professionals at C-suite or senior levels, selected for their independence, objectivity, and lack of internal political entanglements, providing fresh perspectives unburdened by legacy biases. Essential traits include high adaptability to ambiguity, resilience under pressure, strategic decision-making, and strong stakeholder influence, enabling them to navigate complex change scenarios like turnarounds or restructurings effectively. Their task-oriented mindset emphasizes measurable outcomes over prolonged tenure, often in industries requiring specialized recovery or stabilization efforts.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Adoption

The modern practice of interim management emerged in the during the 1970s, driven by stringent labor protections that imposed long notice periods and high severance costs on employers dismissing permanent staff. This structural rigidity prompted companies to seek temporary, high-level managerial expertise without committing to indefinite employment, allowing flexibility amid economic uncertainties such as the crises of the era. Dutch firms initially engaged external consultants for short-term roles in or scenarios, marking a shift from executive searches to a more formalized model of deployable specialists. The concept gained traction in the United Kingdom shortly thereafter, where similar economic pressures and a growing acceptance of freelance professional services facilitated its adoption by the late 1970s and into the 1980s. UK businesses, facing industrial decline and the need for rapid operational turnarounds, began utilizing interim managers for tasks like cost-cutting and mergers, often drawing from a pool of retired or semi-retired executives willing to take on project-based assignments. By the early 1990s, dedicated interim management associations and networks formed in the UK, reflecting institutionalization as demand grew from sectors including manufacturing and finance, where permanent hires proved too slow or risky. Early adopters were predominantly medium-to-large enterprises in Western Europe confronting acute voids, such as those triggered by sudden executive departures or market disruptions, rather than startups or routine operations. Multinational corporations from and the also experimented with the model in the 1980s, importing it to stabilize overseas subsidiaries, though widespread penetration outside the and lagged until the 1990s due to cultural preferences for internal promotions and skepticism toward external "mercenaries." Empirical accounts from this period highlight success rates in achieving predefined objectives, with interim tenures averaging 6-18 months, underscoring the approach's in high-stakes, time-bound interventions over permanent .

Modern Expansion and Globalization

The practice of interim management, initially concentrated in during the late , underwent significant expansion in the 1990s as multinational corporations from the , , , , and the introduced it to (CEE) amid post-communist market transitions. These firms leveraged interim executives to navigate rapid , regulatory reforms, and cultural shifts, with adoption accelerating as local economies integrated into global supply chains. By the early , the model had diffused beyond Europe, gaining traction in where businesses adapted it to address gaps in dynamic sectors like and . Globalization further propelled interim management's reach through the 2000s and 2010s, as technological advancements and cross-border mergers increased demand for agile, specialized leadership unburdened by permanent hiring cycles. In Europe, the industry consolidated with professional associations like the Institute of Interim Management forming in 2001 to standardize practices, while utilization rates stabilized at around 69% by 2023, reflecting sustained demand across functions such as general management, operations, and IT. Worldwide, the market reached an estimated $25 billion annually by the mid-2020s, driven by 67% of interim managers engaging with firms having international operations and 57% handling cross-border assignments. Emerging markets in Asia and Latin America saw gradual uptake from the 2010s onward, often via Western consultancies embedding interim roles in joint ventures and digital transformations, though penetration remained uneven due to varying labor regulations and cultural preferences for long-term hierarchies. Post-2020 economic disruptions amplified globalization, with interim hiring rising 24% in response to supply chain volatility and talent shortages, underscoring its role in enabling rapid scalability without geopolitical hiring barriers. This expansion has been empirically linked to higher organizational resilience, as firms using interims report faster turnaround in crises compared to traditional recruitment.

Operational Processes

Assignment Lifecycle

The assignment lifecycle in interim management follows a structured sequence designed to ensure rapid impact and sustainable handover, typically spanning five phases from initial engagement to completion. Entry Phase
The entry phase begins with initial contact between the client organization and the interim manager, involving a preliminary assessment of the assignment's scope, organizational needs, and operational boundaries. This stage often includes one or more introductory meetings to align expectations and confirm provisional engagement terms, allowing the manager to evaluate fit before full commitment. Effective entry minimizes risks of mismatch, with managers reviewing contracts, company profiles, and key challenges to prepare for immersion. Diagnosis Phase
Following entry, the diagnosis phase focuses on in-depth analysis of the current situation, where the interim manager investigates root causes of issues, stakeholder dynamics, , and evolving requirements. This investigative work, which may run parallel to addressing urgent priorities, typically lasts several days and relies on gathering, interviews, and site visits to build a comprehensive understanding without premature action. The output informs subsequent planning, often revealing misalignments in the client's initial brief. Proposal Phase
In the proposal phase, the interim manager synthesizes diagnostic findings into a detailed , defining clear objectives, timelines, resources, and metrics while potentially challenging the client's original assumptions for more effective outcomes. This emphasizes collaborative refinement with the sponsoring executive to secure buy-in and adjust scope as needed. Proposals are typically finalized within the first few weeks, incorporating input from key personnel to foster ownership. Implementation Phase
The phase constitutes execution, where the interim manager leads the intervention, directs teams, tracks against the proposal, and conducts regular feedback sessions with the sponsor to adapt to emerging challenges. This hands-on period, often the longest in the lifecycle, leverages the manager's expertise to drive results, fill capability gaps, and instill processes for continuity. Communication remains critical, with bi-weekly updates to maintain alignment and . Exit Phase
The exit phase ensures objective fulfillment through evaluation of outcomes, to permanent staff or successors, and of to embed lasting changes. This handover-focused may involve sourcing replacements or providing post-assignment support, concluding the assignment once stability is achieved. Proper exit mitigates risks, with the manager stepping back to allow internal .

Selection and Implementation

The selection of interim managers typically begins with organizations defining precise project requirements, such as the need for or , to align candidates with strategic objectives. Key criteria emphasize proven expertise, including C-suite experience in 56% of roles and functional skills like in 54% of C-suite interim needs, alongside a of results from diverse spanning 20 or more years. Additional factors include industry-specific for tailored solutions, flexibility to adapt to new environments, strong communication abilities, immediate availability, and verifiable references from prior clients to confirm reliability and past successes. Sourcing often occurs through specialized platforms or firms that provide shortlists of pre-vetted candidates within 48 hours, enabling rapid interviews focused on scenario-based assessments and cultural fit. Structured interviews with multiple candidates, combined with reference checks, help mitigate risks of mismatched hires, as empirical gaps in selection methodologies can lead to suboptimal outcomes without rigorous evaluation. Contracts must specify objectives, duration, fees, and exit conditions to ensure , with best practices recommending avoidance of vague terms that could hinder performance. Implementation commences with , which leverages the interim manager's external perspective to build trust and grasp operations in 2-3 weeks, contrasting with 100 days for permanent hires. This phase involves defining scope, integrating the manager with existing teams through alignment with top leadership, and establishing clear, measurable goals such as or . Execution follows with rapid action plans, as evidenced by cases where occurred in two weeks, yielding 20% gains or 15% savings over 8 months. Monitoring progress via predefined metrics ensures objective evaluation, with adjustments for evolving project needs emphasizing the interim's flexibility. Successful deployment culminates in handover, transferring knowledge and sustained improvements to permanent staff, as seen in transformations saving $150,000 through targeted interventions. Demand for such roles, particularly interim CFOs, has risen 46% year-over-year, underscoring the efficacy of structured implementation in delivering immediate, verifiable impacts.

Strategic Applications

Common Scenarios

Interim managers are frequently deployed during sudden executive vacancies, such as the abrupt departure of a CEO or C-suite leader due to , , or termination, where continuity of operations is essential to prevent disruption. In these cases, organizations seek experienced professionals to stabilize without committing to a permanent hire, often for periods of 6-18 months while a search for a successor proceeds. Crisis and turnaround situations represent another prevalent application, particularly in underperforming or distressed companies facing financial distress, market shifts, or operational failures requiring rapid intervention. Interim executives, such as chief restructuring officers, provide the bandwidth and objectivity to implement cost-cutting measures, renegotiate debts, or pivot strategies, as evidenced by their use in complex restructurings where internal teams lack the requisite expertise. Mergers, acquisitions, and post-deal integrations commonly necessitate interim management to harmonize operations, cultures, and systems between entities, mitigating risks of value during the transitional phase. These roles often involve interim CFOs or COOs who oversee follow-through, realization, and regulatory compliance, with engagements typically lasting until integration milestones are achieved. Organizational transformations, including digital upgrades, supply chain overhauls, or strategic pivots, frequently employ interim leaders for their to drive change in time-bound projects where permanent staff may face resistance or skill deficits. Such scenarios arise in rapid growth phases or when specialized is needed temporarily, allowing companies to execute initiatives without long-term overhead.
  • Leadership gaps from leaves or sabbaticals: Interim placements cover extended absences, such as or , ensuring continuity in sectors like healthcare.
  • Project-specific expertise: For initiatives like IT implementations or market expansions, interims bridge skills shortages without altering core .
  • Pre-IPO or funding rounds: Interim CFOs stabilize finances and prepare for in high-stakes preparations.

Empirical Case Studies

In English local authorities facing poor performance, interim managers have facilitated measurable turnarounds. A study of underperforming councils under the Comprehensive Performance Assessment regime revealed that interim appointments, often in finance or operations roles, correlated with rapid improvements in performance indicators, including CPA scores rising from "poor" to "fair" or better within 12-18 months, through actions like cost controls and structural reforms. This evidence underscores interim management's utility in public sector crises, where permanent hires may face bureaucratic delays. Howard Schultz's reinstatement as CEO of Starbucks on January 7, 2008, served as an effective interim intervention amid a sharp decline, with fourth-quarter profits down 97% year-over-year and stock prices halved. Schultz, drawing on prior experience, orchestrated a restructuring that closed 600 U.S. stores, eliminated 12,000 positions, and refocused on core coffee operations, yielding a 20% stock rebound within days and full-year profitability restoration by fiscal 2009, with revenues climbing 7% to $10.7 billion. The approach emphasized operational resets over incremental changes, causal to sustained recovery despite the 2008 financial crisis. In manufacturing expansions, interim executives have enabled timely execution. For a midsized firm pursuing Eastern European market entry in the early , an interim export manager with cross-regional expertise oversaw and compliance, achieving phases on and securing 15% growth from new operations within the first year. Similarly, a government-owned enterprise's , stalled by shortages, succeeded under an interim with three prior completions, delivering the and within budget by mid-2010s, avoiding projected €2 million overruns. Crisis continuity cases highlight interim teams' stabilizing effects. After a listed company's CEO, CFO, and investor relations head perished in a 2010s traffic accident, two interim executives and a specialist maintained investor communications and financial reporting, enabling permanent hires within six months and averting a 20-30% market cap drop seen in comparable disruptions. Cross-sector empirical patterns inform selection efficacy. An analysis of 1,200 managerial hires found interim-like outsiders from different industries achieved 68% success (retention past 12 months with performance goals met) versus 35% for same-sector peers, linked to innovative practices reducing entrenched errors, as in Louis Gerstner's 1993 IBM turnaround from mainframes to services, boosting revenues 10-fold by 2002. Failures, comprising 32% in cross-sector cases, often stemmed from cultural mismatches, underscoring the need for rigorous vetting. Overall, these studies indicate interim management's causal impact on recovery when aligned with organizational needs, though outcomes vary by fit and execution.

Advantages and Supporting Evidence

Primary Benefits

Interim management offers organizations swift deployment of experienced leaders to fill critical gaps, often commencing assignments within days or weeks, in contrast to the extended timelines—typically 3-6 months—for permanent hires. This immediacy mitigates operational disruptions during executive vacancies, crises, or transformations, as by systematic reviews highlighting interim leaders' in addressing urgent needs without protracted . Empirical surveys, such as the 2024 of Interim Management , sustained , with 69% utilization rates among European interims reflecting their practical in maintaining business continuity. A core advantage lies in the independence and objectivity interims provide, unburdened by entrenched internal dynamics or loyalty conflicts, which facilitates unbiased assessments and decisive actions. Research on interim assignments posits this detachment as a driver for cultural shifts and learning, with interims acting as temporary catalysts who implement changes that permanent staff might resist. Literature reviews further note that interims' external vantage enables risk-averse organizations to test bold strategies short-term, reducing exposure compared to committing to unproven permanent leaders. The model's flexibility aligns costs with duration, averting the overhead of indefinite salaries or severance for mismatches, while assignments average 9.5 months—sufficient for stabilization or projects without long-term entrenchment. This temporality also fosters knowledge transfer, as interims document processes and mentor successors, enhancing handover success in transitions. Peer-reviewed analyses affirm these outcomes, linking interim interventions to improved adaptability in volatile environments, though benefits accrue most where mandates are clearly defined to leverage interims' specialized expertise.

Data and Research Findings

A systematic of 61 studies spanning 45 years identifies interim as contributing to organizational adaptability during transitions, though it highlights a critical gap in empirical quantification of effectiveness, with most evidence remaining theoretical or anecdotal. Success factors emphasized include rapid selection, into the role, achievement of short-term objectives, and smooth , but aggregated metrics such as success rates or ROI are absent across the reviewed works. In public sector applications, of English authorities demonstrated that deploying interim managers facilitated turnarounds from poor to improved outcomes, particularly in underperforming entities facing operational crises between 2000 and 2010. This suggests causal links between interim interventions and measurable recovery in structured environments, though generalizability to private firms requires further validation. Studies on interim CEOs reveal mixed results; a 2024 examination of firms from 2002 to 2016 found that permanent CEOs following interim tenures often presided over poorer subsequent firm performance due to transitional disruptions, yet interim periods mitigated penalties when successor selection was inherently challenging, better . Conversely, on 1,443 Chinese A-share listed companies (2009–2019) reported a statistically significant negative impact on (ROA coefficient = -0.013, p<0.05), attributed to diminished agency efficiency, with less severe effects for interim CEOs possessing strong incentives or oversight. Market surveys provide indirect indicators of perceived value, with European interim managers maintaining high utilization rates of 69% in , up from prior years, reflecting sustained employer demand amid volatility. In higher education contexts, 94% of interim leaders surveyed reported substantial enhancement from such roles, often leading to permanent appointments, underscoring developmental benefits. Overall, while peer-reviewed empirical data on broad ROI remains sparse—prioritizing project-specific or sectoral analyses—available findings support interim management's utility in stabilizing and advancing outcomes during acute needs, contingent on contextual fit.

Criticisms and Empirical Challenges

Key Limitations

Interim management often encounters the "liability of outsiderness," where external appointees face resistance from internal stakeholders due to their lack of historical organizational knowledge and established relationships, complicating rapid implementation of changes. This outsider status manifests in specific on-the-job challenges, such as the need to quickly communicate contract limitations and tenure, which can undermine authority and slow decision-making processes. Empirical studies on professional interim managers highlight that these hurdles persist even for experienced executives, with limited research confirming successful mitigation strategies across diverse contexts. A core limitation stems from the short-term orientation inherent to interim roles, which prioritizes immediate stabilization over long-term strategic embedding, potentially leading to superficial fixes that fail to address underlying structural issues. For instance, interim executives may focus on resolution without fostering enduring cultural or operational shifts, increasing the risk of reversion post-tenure. This temporal constraint is exacerbated by high financial costs, including premium fees for specialized expertise and expenses, which can strain resources in non- scenarios and question overall . Frequent reliance on interim leadership signals deeper weaknesses, such as inadequate , where boards opt for temporary solutions amid leadership vacuums, perpetuating instability rather than resolving root causes. Case analyses indicate that without rigorous selection and clear mandates, interim appointments can amplify risks like team disengagement or misaligned priorities, particularly when appointees lack sector-specific depth or motivational alignment due to semi-retired status. Broader empirical gaps in underscore that while interim management suits volatile environments, its paradoxical detachment from permanent limits applicability in contexts requiring sustained or loyalty-building.

Evidence of Risks and Failures

Interim CEO successions have been associated with inferior financial outcomes compared to direct permanent appointments, as interim periods introduce prolonged that hampers strategic and stakeholder . A study analyzing firms from 1992 to 2007 found that companies undergoing interim CEO transitions experienced significantly lower subsequent returns on assets and values, attributing this to heightened internal power struggles and delayed recovery efforts. Professional interim managers, as organizational outsiders, face the "liability of outsiderness," which manifests in challenges securing legitimacy, navigating informal networks, and accessing , often resulting in stalled initiatives or suboptimal implementations. This outsider status can exacerbate employee resistance, particularly when interims push rapid changes without established , leading to higher turnover among key staff or reversion of reforms post-tenure. Internal interim appointments carry distinct risks, including diminished objectivity due to prior relationships, reluctance to enforce unpopular decisions for fear of relational fallout, and skill gaps in crisis leadership, which can perpetuate inefficiencies rather than resolve them. In nonprofit contexts, such promotions have correlated with elevated staff attrition rates—up to 20-30% in some documented transitions—and stalled performance metrics, as acting leaders prioritize stability over bold interventions. Sector-mismatched interim hires amplify failure probabilities, with empirical data indicating success rates dropping to 32% for intra-sector placements versus 68% for cross-sector ones, due to overlooked operational nuances and integration hurdles. Additionally, the temporary nature fosters short-termism, where interims favor quick fixes over sustainable strategies, potentially undermining long-term viability; a review of 61 studies across domains noted recurrent post-interim reversals in up to 25% of cases, linked to inadequate knowledge transfer.

Comparative Analysis

Versus Permanent Management

Interim management differs from permanent management primarily in tenure, selection criteria, and operational focus. Interim managers are typically engaged for 6-18 months to address acute challenges such as turnarounds, mergers, or leadership voids, bringing external expertise without long-term to the . Permanent managers, by contrast, are hired for indefinite roles, fostering deeper institutional knowledge and alignment with long-term strategy, though recruitment processes often extend 3-6 months or more. In terms of deployment speed and flexibility, interim managers offer advantages in volatile environments. Organizations can onboard them within weeks, leveraging their experience across sectors to implement rapid changes without the sunk costs of or severance for mismatches. Permanent hires, while enabling sustained relationship-building and cultural integration, risk prolonged vacancies during searches, potentially exacerbating performance dips in crises. Empirical data indicates interim executives often excel in short-term execution; for instance, a study found interim CEOs facilitate quicker operational stabilization in transitions compared to permanent successors, though this benefit diminishes beyond 12 months. Performance outcomes show mixed results. Research on CEO successions reveals that firms appointing permanent leaders directly after a departure experience no long-term underperformance relative to those using interim bridges, suggesting interims serve as neutral stabilizers rather than value creators. However, other analyses link interim tenures to negative short-term firm and elevated bankruptcy , attributed to limited accountability and insider resistance to transient . Permanent managers, with vested interests, may drive superior long-term , as evidenced by higher post-succession growth in firms avoiding interims during stable periods. Cost structures further delineate the approaches. Interim rates average 1.5-2 times permanent salaries on a daily basis but avoid benefits, pensions, and recruitment fees, yielding net savings in durations under 12 months for high-impact roles. Permanent roles incur higher lifetime costs through stability premiums like equity grants, yet correlate with lower turnover expenses over 3-5 years. favors interims for high-uncertainty scenarios, where their objectivity mitigates entrenchment risks inherent in permanent promotions.
AspectInterim ManagementPermanent Management
Tenure6-18 months, project-specificIndefinite, career-oriented
Expertise FocusBroad, cross-industry; crisis resolutionDeep, organization-specific over time
Cost ModelHigher daily rate; no long-term liabilitiesLower ; includes benefits and equity
Performance EvidenceShort-term stabilization; potential long-term risksSustained growth; slower
Ultimately, interim management suits disequilibrium states requiring detached decision-making, while permanent management aligns with equilibrium phases emphasizing continuity, with empirical variances underscoring context-dependent efficacy over universal superiority.

Versus Consultants and Fractional Executives

Interim management differs from consulting engagements primarily in the level of operational authority and execution responsibility. Interim managers are deployed full-time on a temporary basis, typically for 6-18 months, to lead teams, make binding decisions, and drive implementation during crises, transitions, or turnarounds, functioning as de facto executives with direct accountability for results. In contrast, consultants provide expert advice, diagnostics, and strategic recommendations without assuming day-to-day leadership or decision-making power, focusing on project-specific deliverables such as process optimization or market analysis, often on an hourly or fixed-fee basis. A 2023 survey of 100 senior directors indicated that 78% viewed interim managers as offering superior advantages over consultants due to their hands-on execution capabilities. Fractional executives, unlike interim managers, provide part-time strategic oversight on an ongoing basis, often committing 10-20 hours per week to C-suite functions like or CMO roles in scaling companies that lack the budget or need for full-time hires. This model emphasizes sustained guidance for stable growth phases, with engagements lasting years rather than the short-term, intensive interventions of interim roles, which prioritize rapid stabilization or . Fractional arrangements can reduce costs by 60-70% compared to full-time equivalents, but they may lack the immersive authority required for high-stakes operational overhauls.
AspectInterim ManagementConsultantsFractional Executives
DurationShort-term (3-18 months) for specific crisesProject-based (weeks to months)Ongoing (1+ years), part-time
Authority/RoleFull operational and executionAdvisory, no decision-making authorityStrategic input, day-to-day ops
FocusTurnarounds, transitions, , , recommendationsLong-term guidance in growth phases
Cost StructureDaily rate, full-time immersionHourly/project feesReduced (60-70% savings vs. full-time)
AccountabilityDirect P&L responsibilityDeliverable-oriented, indirectPerformance-linked, advisory
These distinctions arise from the causal need for immediate, authoritative action in disruptions—where interim managers excel—versus advisory or scaled support in routine scaling, though empirical studies on relative ROI remain , with preferences often anecdotal from executive recruiters.

Industry Ecosystem

Networks and Providers

Interim management networks consist of professional associations and platforms that connect experienced executives with client organizations, enforce quality standards, and promote best practices. The Institute of Interim Management (IIM), established in 2001 as a not-for-profit entity, functions as the United Kingdom's principal body for independent interim professionals, providing , resources, and annual surveys on market trends. It ranks service providers into four tiers—Platinum, , Silver, and Bronze—evaluating 60 firms in 2025 based on criteria such as placement , client feedback, and interim manager satisfaction. On the international level, the International Network of Interim Manager Associations (INIMA) coordinates 11 partner associations across and beyond, united by a common emphasizing ethical practices, , and result-oriented assignments. Similarly, the IXPA network links 19 global partners to supply interim executives for roles in , , and market expansion, facilitating cross-border deployments. These networks mitigate risks in interim placements by vetting candidates' track records and ensuring alignment with organizational needs, though their depends on member adherence to self-regulated standards rather than mandatory oversight. Providers in the interim management ecosystem are specialized firms or divisions within executive search companies that source, assess, and deploy temporary leaders, often drawing from proprietary databases of vetted executives with sector-specific expertise. In 2025, prominent providers include , which integrates interim services with its broader leadership advisory, emphasizing rapid onboarding for C-suite gaps; , focusing on interim executives for strategic turnarounds; and , known for placing interims in high-stakes transformations. Other key players, such as Wilton & Bain (ranked in IIM's top 5 for 2025) and , prioritize fractional and project-based interims, with placement times averaging 2-4 weeks for urgent needs. Dedicated boutiques like InterimExecs specialize in revenue-focused interims for growth-stage firms, while larger entities like extend interim offerings into finance and operations roles.
ProviderFocus AreasNotable Recognition (2025)
C-suite leadership, transformationsTop interim executive firm
Strategic interim searchSpecialized on-demand talent services
High-level turnaroundsRanked among leading executive search with interim capabilities
Wilton & BainRapid deployments for changeIIM top 5 survey ranking
These providers typically charge success-based fees of 20-30% of the interim's first-year compensation, with networks influencing selection through endorsements and directories, though empirical on placement success rates remains limited to self-reported surveys from bodies like IIM.

Standards and Regulation

Interim management operates primarily without formal government or mandatory licensing requirements, distinguishing it from professions like or . Instead, the industry relies on self-regulation through professional associations that establish voluntary standards, codes of conduct, and best practices to competence and ethical . Key international and national bodies include the International Network of Interim Manager Associations (INIMA), which unites 11 partner associations across and promotes shared principles such as independence, objectivity, and high professional standards via a common . In the UK, the Institute of Interim Management (IIM) serves as the primary professional body for independent interims, offering guidance on contracting, performance metrics, and ethical guidelines without enforcing compulsory membership. Similar organizations, such as the Interim Managers Association (SIM) in , emphasize professionalization through training and adherence to core competencies like result-oriented leadership and . Certifications are available but not required, focusing on specialized skills rather than universal . Examples include the SIM Certified Interim Manager® credential, earned via mandatory modules and exams covering interim-specific methodologies, and the Certified Interim Manager (CIM) designation from programs like those offered by GOiNTERIM, which prepare participants for roles emphasizing agility and sector expertise. In the nonprofit sector, the Interim Executives Academy provides a national-standard certificate through on , transition , and , with over 1,000 alumni placed since . These voluntary programs aim to signal to clients, though empirical evidence of their impact on remains limited to self-reported association . Interim managers must comply with general employment, contract, and data protection laws applicable to executives, such as those under the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or U.S. labor standards, but sector-specific regulations (e.g., compliance in pharmaceuticals) impose additional obligations without unique interim frameworks. Associations advocate for robust contracts outlining scope, liability, and non-compete clauses to mitigate risks, reflecting the industry's emphasis on contractual self-governance over statutory oversight.

Post-2020 Developments

The catalyzed a surge in interim management demand as companies grappled with disruptions, declines, and the need for operational adjustments. In , interim utilization rates dipped initially to around 57% before rebounding to 67% by year-end, reflecting heightened reliance on flexible expertise for and . Organizations increasingly deployed interim executives for targeted interventions, such as cash preservation and digital , with European markets like showing the highest utilization at 73% by . Post-pandemic recovery amplified this trend amid persistent economic , talent shortages, and accelerated CEO turnover. Through 2025, 33% of newly appointed CEOs served in interim capacities, up from 9% in comparable prior periods, driven by a record 1,235 CEO exits in the first half of the year—a 12% increase from 2024. Nearly 25% of early 2025 CEO appointments were interim, signaling deeper challenges and a preference for proven, short-term leaders over prolonged searches. Demand for interim roles expanded 310% in high-end independent talent markets, particularly in transformation-intensive sectors like consumer goods and technology, where platforms facilitate rapid sourcing. By 2025, the interim management ecosystem has matured into a "gig economy" for executives, with average career tenure in such roles reaching 10.4 years, underscoring professionalization and repeat engagements. This evolution supports agile responses to geopolitical tensions, inflation, and AI-driven shifts, though it faces pressures from fee competition and utilization variability across regions. Interim leaders now emphasize strategic outcomes over mere stabilization, contributing to sustained growth in assignments for digital, sustainability, and supply chain overhauls.

Emerging Prospects and Uncertainties

The integration of (AI) into interim management practices represents a key emerging prospect, enabling interim executives to leverage for , optimization, and rapid in volatile environments. For instance, AI-driven tools are increasingly applied by interim leaders to enhance in supply chain disruptions and digital transformations, allowing for data-informed strategies that permanent teams may lack the bandwidth to implement swiftly. This trend aligns with broader organizational shifts, where economic pressures accelerate AI to cut costs and boost , with 88% of executives citing macroeconomic conditions as a top influence on AI strategies. Market projections indicate sustained growth for interim services, with the global sector valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025 and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7%, fueled by demand in crisis response and technological pivots. In regions like DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland), the market stabilized at €3.09 billion in 2024, reflecting professionalization and resilience amid sector-specific recoveries. Interim roles are also expanding beyond mere gap-filling to proactive leadership assurance, such as pre-planned continuity for family-owned businesses facing succession risks. However, economic uncertainties pose significant risks, including projected global GDP slowdowns from 3.3% in 2024 to 3.2% in 2025, exacerbated by policy shifts, trade tensions, and tariff hikes that could diminish demand for non-essential interim engagements. The rising prevalence of interim CEOs—often a response to post-pandemic transition spikes driven by delayed board decisions and performance shortfalls—signals potential governance weaknesses rather than a robust solution, with critics arguing it masks failures in succession planning. Additionally, ambiguities in interim role scopes, such as undefined authority or long-term career repercussions, introduce operational hazards, particularly in hybrid post-pandemic work models that strain leadership adaptation. These factors underscore a tension: while interim management thrives on disruption, prolonged volatility may erode its perceived value if outcomes fail to materialize amid broader AI and economic flux.

References

  1. https://nmsconsulting.com/what-is-the-meaning-of-interim-management/
  2. https://www.boyden.com/media/what-is-interim-management-6149786/
  3. https://ceinterim.com/interim-management-vs-management-consulting/
  4. https://www.interimmanager.ch/en/the-history-of-interim-management/
  5. http://www.adventum.co.uk/interim.htm
  6. https://www.eim.com/how-to-become-an-interim-manager/
  7. https://www.odgersinterim.com/uk/who-we-are/intelligence/the-key-competencies-found-in-great-interim-managers-5079/
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540962.2013.744890
  9. https://www.porstmann.net/en/insights/what-is-interim-management/
  10. https://www.hrlineup.com/what-is-interim-management/
  11. https://nmsconsulting.com/the-5-most-important-benefits-of-interim-management/
  12. https://insights.morganphilips.com/en/interim-management-vs-consulting-which-one-to-choose
  13. https://im-resourcing.eu/en/2024/07/19/know-the-difference-between-a-management-consultant-and-an-interim-manager-smw/
  14. https://interimexecs.com/interim-executives-vs-consultants-the-complete-comparison-guide/
  15. https://www.managementangels.com/en/what-distinguishes-interim-management/
  16. https://www.taplowgroup.com/insights/blogs/interim-management
  17. https://ceinterim.com/manager-characteristics-interim-leadership/
  18. https://consultport.com/interim-management/a-complete-guide-to-interim-managers-their-role-and-impact/
  19. https://www.michaelpage.com.au/advice/career-advice/work-life-balance/4-essential-qualities-interim-managers-companies-recovery
  20. https://www.fup-ag.com/en/interim-management/what-is-interim-management/
  21. https://sea.peoplemattersglobal.com/article/talent-acquisition/interim-management-a-novel-route-to-talent-acquisition-15488
  22. https://www.inima.management/blog/a-brief-history-of-uk-interim-management
  23. https://interimmanagementworldwide.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/White-Paper-How-executive-search-is-meeting-new-and-emerging-needs-in-the-business-world.pdf
  24. https://ceinterim.com/interim-management-in-germany/
  25. https://www.toolshero.com/management/interim-management/
  26. https://mf.ag/en/articles/the-evolution-of-interim-management-in-central-and-eastern-europe-a-cross-cultural-perspective/
  27. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/evolution-interim-management-central-eastern-europe-bohuslav-lipovsky-6lj0f
  28. https://www.xnorthgroup.com/insight/leadership-as-a-service-the-growth-of-interim-management
  29. https://www.execcapital.co.uk/the-rise-of-interim-executives-transforming-leadership-strategies-for-london-businesses/
  30. https://iim.org.uk/about/history-of-the-iim/
  31. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonyounger/2024/04/01/interim-management-in-europe-making-great-progress/
  32. https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/reports/interim-management-service-54580
  33. https://interimmanagementworldwide.com/the-interim-executive-workforce-global-interim-management-survey-by-smw/
  34. https://www.taplowgroup.com/insights/blogs/what-does-the-future-of-interim-management-look-like
  35. https://www.xnorthgroup.com/insight/the-future-of-interim-management-in-the-current-climate
  36. https://nordicinterim.com/articles/continued-growth-of-interim-management-in-europeankey-insights/
  37. https://iim.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IIM-Guide_to-Interim-Management_Oct20.pdf
  38. https://www.ceo-worldwide.com/blog/different-phases-of-an-interim-management-assignment/
  39. https://www.fup-ag.com/en/interim-management/criteria-for-selecting-an-interim-manager/
  40. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HRMID-09-2020-0168/full/html
  41. https://www.lhh.com/en-gb/insights/5-stratetic-scenarios-when-you-should-hire-an-interim-executive
  42. https://ceriusexecutives.com/3-business-situations-where-interim-management-makes-sense-cents/
  43. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/transformation/our-insights/when-do-you-need-a-chief-restructuring-officer
  44. https://useshiny.com/blog/what-is-interim-management/
  45. https://voma.io/en/interim-management-when-does-it-make-sense-for-companies/
  46. https://www.coremedicalgroup.com/healthcare-employer-insights/4-situations-that-call-for-interim-healthcare-management
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263565064_The_role_of_interim_managers_in_performance_improvement_Evidence_from_English_local_authorities
  48. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2014/08/25/starbucks-reinvented/
  49. https://www.businessinsider.com/howard-schultz-turned-starbucks-around-2011-6
  50. https://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/lbs-case-study/story/how-starbucks-survived-the-financial-meltdown-of-2008-136126-2014-09-22
  51. https://hbr.org/podcast/2010/06/howard-schultz-on-starbucks-tu
  52. https://www.ims-interim.com/en/case-studies/
  53. https://interimmanagementworldwide.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Managers-from-different-sectors-double-the-likelihood-of-success.pdf
  54. https://research.tue.nl/files/3024219/644313.pdf
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228359193_Leadership_in_organisational_change_Rules_for_successful_hiring_in_interim_management
  56. https://www.[sciencedirect](/page/ScienceDirect)/science/article/pii/S0001879124000150
  57. https://iim.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/_pda/2024/07/IIM-Interim-Management-Survey-Report-2024_v15.0.pdf
  58. https://www.[forbes](/page/Forbes)/sites/jonyounger/2024/04/01/interim-management-in-europe-making-great-progress/
  59. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TLO-11-2021-0133/full/html
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879124000150
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342899675_Effective_interim_leadership_and_management_development_of_a_cyclical_model_of_interim_assignments
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325221929_Interim-Management_A_Paradox_for_Leadership_Research
  63. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2022.16837
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11472958/
  65. https://acad.org/resource/interim-leadership-navigating-challenges-and-seizing-opportunities-in-higher-education/
  66. https://www.emerald.com/joepp/article/12/5/24/1267459/The-liability-of-outsiderness-professional-interim
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381186567_The_liability_of_outsiderness_professional_interim_managers_and_their_on-the-job_challenges
  68. https://cowenpartners.com/interim-leadership-beneficial-or-a-problem-in-the-making/
  69. https://huntscanlon.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-hiring-interim-executives/
  70. https://www.forbes.com/sites/solangecharas/2025/05/31/interim-ceos-a-symptom-of-deeper-governance-failures/
  71. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/01/14/corporate-governance-failures-and-interim-ceos/
  72. https://grahampelton.com/the-hidden-dangers-of-internal-interim-appointments-for-nonprofits/
  73. https://brileyfarber.com/articles/the-pitfalls-of-internal-interim-executives-why-hiring-externally-yields-better-results/
  74. https://www.ferovalo.com/news/exploring-different-types-of-interim-management
  75. https://sciendo.com/2/v2/download/article/10.2478/emj-2024-0004.pdf
  76. https://vmagroup.com/permanent-or-interim-which-is-the-best-way-to-go-when-hiring-for-change-management/
  77. https://www.fdcapital.co.uk/interim-vs-permanent-choosing-the-right-financial-leadership-for-your-business/
  78. https://ren-network.com/permanent-hiring-vs-interim-hiring/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092911991830172X
  80. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/many-companies-arent-prepared-replace-underperforming-ceos
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255703845_The_impact_of_CEO_turnover_on_firm_performance_around_interim_successions
  82. https://www.thehrdirector.com/interim-vs-permanent-deciding-whats-right-organization/
  83. https://godfreygroup.com.au/permanent-vs-contract-and-interim-management-roles-which-is-best/
  84. https://voma.io/en/management-consulting-vs-interim-management-what-are-the-differences/
  85. https://hireconsulting.com/what-is-an-interim-manager/
  86. https://www.zrgpartners.com/insights/interim-vs-fractional/
  87. https://resources.businesstalentgroup.com/btg-blog/fractional-vs-interim-executives
  88. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/consultant-fractional-interim-executivechoose-wisely-kyle-c-murphy-vm0rc
  89. https://maexecsearch.com/interim-vs-fractional-vs-full-time-choosing-the-right-leadership-mode-for-the-c-suite/
  90. https://iim.org.uk/
  91. https://iim.org.uk/service-providers/
  92. https://wilton-bain.com/wilton-and-bains-interim-management-iim-2025/
  93. https://www.inima.management/
  94. https://www.ixpa-interim.com/
  95. https://www.hrlineup.com/top-interim-executive-search-firms/
  96. https://www.heidrick.com/en/services/on-demand-talent/interim-executives
  97. https://interimexecs.com/
  98. https://ceinterim.com/faqs-for-interim-manager/
  99. https://iim.org.uk/interim-international/
  100. https://stowarzyszenieim.org/en/
  101. https://stowarzyszenieim.org/en/training-and-certification/certification/
  102. https://www.gointerim.com/en/interim-management-course-cim/
  103. https://interimexecutivesacademy.com/
  104. https://im-advisor.com/imlegal-and-ethical-considerations/
  105. https://iim.org.uk/knowledge_hub/guide-to-interim-management/
  106. https://iim.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Interim-Management-Survey-2020_v11.2.pdf
  107. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonyounger/2021/05/25/interim-management-is-having-its-moment/
  108. https://fortune.com/2025/07/29/ceo-gig-economy-turnover-highest-in-decades/
  109. https://maexecsearch.com/2025s-ceo-shuffle-why-interim-leadership-is-booming-right-now/
  110. https://resources.businesstalentgroup.com/high-end-independent-talent-report/talent-trends-2025
  111. https://resources.businesstalentgroup.com/btg-blog/why-interim-management-consumer-sector
  112. https://iim.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/_pda/2025/07/IIM-Interim-Management-Survey-Report-2025_v16.1.pdf
  113. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/five-key-trends-shaping-independent-interim-management-vxcwe
  114. https://etonbridgepartners.com/blog/the-sharp-rise-of-interim-ceos-whats-behind-it-and-why-its-more-than-a-trend/
  115. https://ceinterim.com/ai-in-interim-management-trends-applications/
  116. https://www.cfo.com/news/economic-uncertainty-drives-increased-ai-investments-kpmg-ai-quarterly-pulse-survey-/743520/
  117. https://www.gointerim.com/en/aimp-study-2025-interim-management-in-the-dach-region-remains-stable-and-professional/
  118. https://brileyfarber.com/articles/strategic-pre-planning-the-role-of-interim-executives-in-business-continuity-and-crisis-management-for-family-owned-businesses/
  119. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-outlook-interim-report-september-2025_67b10c01-en.html
  120. https://www.boyden.com/media/whats-behind-the-recent-spike-in-ceo-transition-51161762/
  121. https://www.bundle.app/en/finance/the-rise-and-risks-of-interim-ceo-roles-7C05D45A-3A6E-489F-90A1-64821CBE5BF5
  122. https://www.centraltest.com/blog/challenges-modern-leader-navigating-post-pandemic-era
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.