Hubbry Logo
Internet celebrityInternet celebrityMain
Open search
Internet celebrity
Community hub
Internet celebrity
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Internet celebrity
Internet celebrity
Internet celebrity
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Internet celebrities Connor Franta, Trevi Moran, Kian Lawley, JC Caylen and Ricky Dillon at VidCon, a convention for YouTubers, in 2014

An Internet celebrity, also referred to as an Internet personality, is an individual who has acquired or developed their fame and notability on the Internet. The growing popularity of social media provides a means for people to reach a large, global audience, and internet celebrities are commonly present on large online platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube,[1] which primarily rely on user-generated content. Some Internet celebrities are known as social media influencers, or simply influencers, due to their social influence online.

Certain internet celebrities may function as lifestyle gurus promoting a particular lifestyle or attitude. In this capacity they act as key amplifiers of trends across various genres including fashion, cooking, technology, travel, video games, movies, esports, politics, music, sports, and entertainment.[2] As part of influencer marketing, companies and organizations may enlist internet celebrities to advertise their products to their fan base and followers on their respective platforms.

History

[edit]
Further information: Influencer § History

In 1991, the Internet and the World Wide Web became widely available, leading to the creation of numerous websites dedicated to shared interests. These forums allowed users to seek advice and help from experienced individuals in their field, increasing the availability of information beyond mainstream print media and corporate websites.[3] Dedicated social media platforms emerged from these developments, providing users with the ability to create profiles and connect with others. SixDegrees.com pioneered this concept in 1997.[4] Additionally, websites supporting blogging emerged around the same time, allowing users to publish long-form articles and stories.[3] Since then forums, social media and blogging have transformed into integral components of communication, social interaction, business and journalism. Popular social media platforms include Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Snapchat, TikTok, Twitter, Discord, Viber, WeChat, and WhatsApp.[5]

Types

[edit]

Depending on their rise to fame, internet celebrities may reach their audiences in different ways. Some people write journals or blogs, some make YouTube or TikTok videos, others post frequently on Instagram or Twitter (X). The Internet has made fame accessible to and attainable for the general public.[6] In some cases, people might rise to fame through a single viral event or viral video, and become an Internet meme. For example, Zach Anner, a comedian from Austin, Texas, gained worldwide attention after submitting a video to Oprah Winfrey's "Search for the Next TV Star" competition.[7] Viral videos from internet celebrities could entail a funny event happening in the moment, a popular new dance, or even a post on Twitter.[8][9]

Influencers

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt from Influencer.[edit]

A social media influencer,[10][11][12] also known as an online influencer,[13][14][15] or simply influencer,[16][17][18] is a person who builds a grassroots online presence through engaging content such as photos, videos, and updates. This is done by using direct audience interaction to establish authenticity, expertise, and appeal, and by standing apart from traditional celebrities by growing their platform through social media rather than pre-existing fame.[19][20] The modern referent of the term is commonly a paid role in which a business entity pays for the social media influence-for-hire activity to promote its products and services, known as influencer marketing.[21] Types of influencers include fashion influencer, travel influencer, and virtual influencer, and they involve content creators[22][23][24] and streamers.[25][26][27]

Some influencers are associated primarily with specific social media apps such as TikTok,[28] Instagram,[29][30] or Pinterest; many influencers are also considered internet celebrities. As of 2023, Instagram is the social media platform businesses spend the most advertising money towards marketing with influencers.[31] However, influencers can have an impact on any social media network.

Usenet Personalities

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt from Usenet personality.[edit]

A Usenet personality was a particular kind of Internet celebrity, being an individual who gained a certain level of notoriety from posting on Usenet, a global network of computer users with a vast array of topics for discussion. The platform is usually anonymous,[32] although users can get celebrity status, usually by being deemed different from other posters in some way.

Since its inception, Usenet newsgroups have attracted a wide variety of people posting all manner of fact, fiction, theories, opinions, and beliefs. Some Usenet posters achieved a certain amount of fame (or infamy) and celebrity within Usenet circles because of their unusual, non-mainstream ideas, or because their writings and responses are considered especially humorous or bizarre.

YouTubers and vloggers

[edit]
Further information: YouTuber and Vlog
PewDiePie is an internet celebrity and the fourth most subscribed individual YouTuber. Overall, he has the ninth-most subscribed YouTube channel.

YouTube has risen as one of the biggest platforms for launching internet celebrities. YouTube creators (known as YouTubers), regardless of the genres or types of videos they make, have created an industry that can generate revenue from video views and online popularity. For example, Swedish internet celebrity PewDiePie uploads gaming and comedy videos on YouTube. As of October 2024, he has around 110 million subscribers and is the fourth most-subscribed non-corporation YouTuber.

Every minute, 300 hours of videos are uploaded to YouTube, and 5 billion videos are watched every day.[33] In August 2014, Variety wrote that YouTubers are more popular than mainstream celebrities among U.S. teens.[34] Advertisers, in an effort to reach teenagers and millennials who do not watch regular television and movies, have started contacting YouTubers and other internet celebrities.[35]

YouTube's AdSense program enables creators to earn money from advertisements. AdSense has certain requirements—a YouTuber must have more than 1,000 subscribers, live in an eligible country, and have more than 4,000 hours of watch time within a year to be eligible.[36]

Lifecasters

[edit]
Further information: Lifestreaming § Lifecasting

Lifecasting is streaming continuous live video of a person's daily life. This often is in the form of first-person video from a wearable camera but can also be from cameras directed at the person or ubiquitous cameras where the person lives.

The first person to do lifecasting was Steve Mann whose experiments with wearable computing and streaming video in the early 1980s led to Mann continuously transmitted his everyday life 24 hours a day, seven days a week starting in 1994. Jennifer Ringley's JenniCam (1996–2004) attracted mass media attention, as noted by Cnet: "JenniCam, beginning in 1996, was the first really successful 'lifecasting' attempt."[37] In early 2007, Justin Kan founded Justin.tv, a platform for live video streaming online. By the fall of 2007, Justin.tv had expanded to nearly 700 channels, generating 1,650 hours of daily programming.[38]

Micro-celebrities

[edit]

A micro-celebrity, also known as a micro-influencer, is a person famous within a niche group of users on a social media platform. Micro-celebrities often present themselves as public figures.[39] The concept of the micro-celebrity was originally developed by Theresa Senft and P. A. Poitier in their 2008 book, Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks.[40] According to Senft and Poitier, the concept of the micro-celebrity "is best understood as a new style of online performance that involves people 'amping up' their popularity over the Web using technologies like video, blogs and social networking sites".[41] A micro-celebrity is also known as "a form of identity linked almost exclusively to the internet, characterizing a process by which people express, create and share their identities online".[42] However, micro-celebrities differ from more traditional forms of celebrities associated with Hollywood stars because a micro-celebrity's popularity is often directly linked to their audience, and the audience comes to expect a certain degree of authenticity and transparency.[41]

The Internet allows the masses to wrest control of fame from traditional media, creating micro-celebrities with the click of a mouse.

— David Weinberger of the Harvard Berkman Center for Internet and Society[43]

A micro-celebrity within the furry fandom is called a popufur.[44]: 224 [45]: 55  Similarly, a micro-celebrity within the brony fandom is called horse famous.[46]

Viral video star

[edit]
Further information: Viral video

A viral video star is a person (or people) who became well known primarily through their being in a video that went viral. Viral videos[47][48] are videos that become popular through a viral process of Internet sharing, primarily through video sharing websites such as YouTube as well as social media and email.[49][50] For a video to be shareable or spreadable, it must focus on the social logics and cultural practices that have enabled and popularized these new platforms.[51] Examples of viral video stars are the CPDRC Dancing Inmates (best known for their Thriller video) and Star Wars Kid.

Wanghong

[edit]

Wanghong (Chinese: 网红; pinyin: wǎnghóng; lit. 'Internet fame') is the Chinese version of Internet stardom. The wanghong economy is a Chinese digital economy based on influencer marketing in social media.[52] Some wanghong celebrities generate profits via retail or e-commerce, through attracting the attention of their followers. Internet celebrities have become a popular phenomenon in China. For example, Sister Furong (Fúróng Jiějiě, 芙蓉姐姐) received worldwide notoriety and fame for her self-promotion efforts through online posts.[53] According to CBN Data, a commercial data company affiliated with Alibaba Group, the Chinese internet celebrity economy was estimated to be worth CN¥58 billion (US$8.4 billion) in 2016, more than China's total cinema box office revenue in 2015.[54]

There are two main business models in the wanghong economy: social media advertising, and online retail. In the online retailing business model, e-commerce-based wanghong use social media platforms to sell self-branded products to potential buyers among followers via Chinese customer-to-customer (C2C) websites, such as Taobao. Internet celebrities may promote their products by modeling for their shops by posting pictures or videos of themselves wearing the clothes or accessories they sell, or giving makeup or fashion tips.[55]

Zhang Dayi (张大奕)—one of China's best-known wanghong according to BBC News, with 4.9 million followers on Sina Weibo—has an online shop on Taobao, reportedly earning CN¥300 million (US$46 million) per year.[56] This is comparable to the US$21 million made by Fan Bingbing (范冰冰), a top Chinese actress. Li Ziqi (李子柒), a celebrity food blogger with more than 16 million followers on Weibo, has inspired many bloggers to post similar content on traditional Chinese cooking and crafts.[57]

Censorship in China has created an independent social media ecosystem that has become successful in its own way.[58] For every Western social media platform, there is a comparable Chinese version; Chinese social media platforms, however, generate revenue differently. The greatest difference between Chinese internet celebrities and their Western counterparts is that the profits generated by Chinese celebrities can be immense. Unlike YouTube, which takes 45% of advertising revenue,[59] Sina Weibo, one of the largest Chinese social media platforms, is not involved in advertising, which allows internet celebrities to be more independent. The monthly income of Chinese influencers can exceed CN¥10 million (US$1.5 million).[60]

Net idols

[edit]
See also: Japanese idol and List of net idols

In Japan, a specific type of internet celebrity is known as a net idol (ネットアイドル, Netto aidoru), a sub-category of the idol industry in Japan. Net idols first emerged in the 1990s through personal websites and blogs when internet became more accessible, with some selling personal merchandise such as photo books through their websites.[61] Around March 2007, dance covers (known as odottemita (踊ってみた; lit. "I tried dancing")) became popular in video-sharing websites such as Niconico, which in turn led people into performing choreographed dances from anime series and idol groups.[62] Notable creators of dance covers, known as odorite (踊り手), who later debuted as idols include Kozue Aikawa from Danceroid,[63] Beckii Cruel,[64] and Keekihime.[65]

VTubers

[edit]
Kizuna AI, the first VTuber

VTubers or virtual YouTubers are entertainers that use digital 3D model avatars that are computer generated. VTubers originated from Japan, beginning in the early 2010s, and have risen in popularity in the 2020s. The first virtual YouTuber was Ami Yamato,[66] who debuted on May 18, 2011; the first VTuber who had used the phrase "virtual Youtuber" is Kizuna AI,[67] who began entertaining in 2016. The appeal of VTubers is similar to a real person, except the entertainer may choose to remain anonymous through their VTuber persona. The 2D anime virtual avatars appealed to many Japanese fans and popularity began to spread internationally. In October 2021, there has been reported to be 16,000[68] VTubers around the world.

VTubers function in a similar fashion to YouTubers and streamers, with some VTubers being music artists. These VTubers that were music artists or broadcast their musical talent would be dubbed "VSinger" (virtual singer).[69] Agencies such as Hololive and VShojo, scout and hire these VTubers to aid in marketing and build popularity. Their trademark character being the VTuber avatar or a 2D anime form of that character on the album covers, allowing recognition of the avatar and for the agency.[70]

Income

[edit]
Chiara Ferragni is a fashion influencer and blogger known for her sponsored fashion posts.
This section is an excerpt from Influencer § Income.[edit]

In 2023 in the United States, 27 million people were paid content creators.[71][72] Of those,[71] 12 million did content creation as their full-time profession.[72] 8 million did it as part-time work, and 7 million did it as a hobby.[72] Influencers can make money in various ways, but most of them earn money from endorsements or sponsorships. Social media influencers can use their fame to promote products or experiences to their followers, as a method of providing credibility to products.[73]

Influencers can also expand their source of revenue by creating their own products or merchandise to sell.[74] By doing this, and by using their platform to promote their products to an established audience, influencers can earn money by developing their own reputable brands. Bloggers can feature sponsored posts in social media to make profits.[75] For instance, fashion blogger Chiara Ferragni started as an online blogger, and then gained millions of followers on Instagram. She later created her brand, the Chiara Ferragni Collection. Like many other Instagram celebrities, Ferragni started by charging money per post for promoting brands. She earns revenue from promotional Instagram posts and the sale of her own products.[76] In 2020, a report by venture-capital firm SignalFire stated that the economy spawned by internet creators was the "fastest-growing type of small business".[77]

Cancel culture

[edit]

Cancel culture is a form of ostracism where an individual is no longer watched and excluded from social or professional circles because of certain past or present actions or allegations. The act may occur on social media platforms or in person. Cancel culture is a common term among internet celebrities where they may lose their source of income, fans, or reputation because of their controversial actions. For example, Beauty Guru YouTuber Jeffree Star has faced many allegations of misconduct in his career, which include cyberbullying and vocally expressing racist remarks. On July 10, 2020, the makeup brand Morphe cut ties and ceased all makeup collaborations with Jeffree Star because his problematic past had resurfaced.[78] The year before that, Kuwaiti celebrity Sondos Alqattan was "cancelled" for criticising Filipinos. As a result of this, some brands cut ties with her.[79]

Interacting with fans

[edit]
VidCon 2017

Meetups are often a way internet celebrities interact with fans in real life. Occasionally, an internet celebrity might organize a meetup and invite fans to meet them at a certain place and time without proper organization. This can attract crowds of fans, causing disorderly or even unsafe situations. For example, Tanacon was an organization produced in collaboration with talent manager Michael Weist[80] involving a group of internet celebrities who were set to meet paying fans, but did not follow through. Because of the disorganized setup, the meetup resulted in chaos.[81]

Alternatively, events can be organized at a venue with security personnel. VidCon is an annual organized video conference designed for people interested in online videos. It invites internet content creators to participate in events for paying fans, such as performances, panels, and meet-and-greets.[82]

Effect on fans

[edit]

Internet celebrities can draw in a devoted crowd of fans whether their reach is small or wide. A scholarly article published from Thammasat University in Thailand explains that the younger generation is becoming more attracted to the path of fame compared to the typical intellectual development and financial security route.[83]

Fans at the 2014 VidCon event where hundreds of individuals wait to see their favorite internet celebrity YouTubers

Those who closely follow the lives of internet celebrities are more likely to develop psychological difficulties such as anxiety, depression, and dissociation.[84] Although many internet celebrities appreciate the support and loyalty of their viewers and fans, the dedication to their lives can sometimes be intense. Fans may develop extreme behaviors or attitudes towards their favorite celebrities that can be identified as obsessive or may sometimes result to criminal behavior.[84] The younger crowd are also being impacted through seeing their internet celebrities on different social media platforms. The Journal of Behavioral Addictions published by Akademiai Kiado evaluates a study that was done on Hungarian adolescents demonstrate these effects. The research found that the desire for fame on the internet was negatively associated with self-acceptance and potentially result to materialism and the desire for social recognition.[84]

Internet celebrities are also able to influence fans through creating parasocial relationships with their audiences. For example, Kim Kardashian frequently creates the appearance of authenticity through harnessing the emotions of her audience. In Lueck's (2012) study they find that 60% of her Facebook advertising contains an "embedded emotional/transformational story".[85]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Internet celebrity

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An is an individual who attains prominence and a large primarily through and sharing on digital platforms, such as and video sites, where visibility emerges from user engagement rather than institutional endorsement. This distinguishes itself from conventional fame by emphasizing direct, unmediated connections with followers, often cultivated via authentic-seeming narratives and iterative content strategies that leverage platform algorithms for dissemination. Internet celebrities typically exhibit characteristics like sustained output of niche-specific material, responsiveness to feedback, and adaptability across multiple sites to maintain metrics such as views, likes, and shares. The proliferated in the mid-2000s alongside accessible and platforms fostering user-generated media, enabling ordinary users to scale audiences exponentially through viral mechanics. Notable achievements encompass transitioning to lucrative endorsements, merchandise empires, and mainstream crossovers, exemplified by creators amassing tens of millions of subscribers via consistent, engaging videos. However, defining controversies arise from authenticity erosion, undisclosed promotions spurring irrational , and correlations between follower idolization and maladaptive behaviors like excessive online immersion.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Attributes

The term "internet celebrity" is known in Chinese as "網紅" (wǎng hóng), which translates to internet celebrity or cyberstar. Internet celebrities are individuals who attain fame and notability primarily through digital platforms, amassing audiences via self-produced content rather than traditional media gatekeepers. This self-made status enables rapid ascent, often driven by algorithmic recommendations and viral sharing on sites like , , and , where metrics such as views and shares quantify influence. Paths to this status typically involve selecting a niche aligned with personal interests or expertise, producing consistent original content, and engaging directly with early followers to build momentum, which algorithms then amplify through increased visibility. A defining attribute is a substantial online following, typically measured in millions for top figures, which correlates with perceived network popularity and amplifies their reach. High distinguishes them, as they engage directly with fans through comments, live streams, and personalized responses, fostering parasocial relationships that enhance and . Perceived underpins their influence, encompassing trustworthiness—which can be amplified by grassroots backgrounds providing relatability through shared ordinary experiences such as day jobs and financial realities—expertise in niche topics, and physical or social attractiveness, which identifies as key to shaping attitudes and behaviors. Transparency in personal finances further supports this trust by demonstrating openness. Content consistency and creativity further characterize them, with successful internet celebrities producing original, relatable material tailored to platform algorithms and preferences. Their fame often remains platform-dependent and volatile, tied to ongoing rather than enduring institutional endorsement.

Distinctions from Traditional Fame

Internet celebrities ascend through decentralized, user-driven platforms that prioritize algorithmic virality and engagement metrics over institutional gatekeeping, in contrast to traditional celebrities who rely on vetted channels like film studios, record labels, or broadcast networks requiring substantial capital and professional intermediaries. This shift enables rapid, bottom-up fame—often sparked by a single viral post or video reaching millions via shares and recommendations—without prerequisites like formal training or agent representation, democratizing access but amplifying competition amid billions of content creators. For instance, platforms such as and have propelled individuals to stardom in days, as seen with creators amassing follower counts exceeding those of established actors through consistent niche output. A core distinction lies in audience dynamics: internet celebrities cultivate intimate parasocial relationships via real-time interactions, live streams, and personalized responses, fostering perceptions of authenticity and relatability that traditional stars, mediated by publicists and scripted appearances, seldom match. This proximity yields higher trust in endorsements, with showing influencers outperforming celebrities in due to niche expertise and perceived genuineness rather than aspirational allure. Traditional fame, conversely, emphasizes a polished, larger-than-life sustained by narratives, often prioritizing broad appeal over community-specific loyalty. Sustainability further diverges, as internet fame proves more transient, vulnerable to fluctuations, trend exhaustion, and platform policy shifts that can erase visibility overnight, unlike the archival endurance of traditional celebrities backed by industry contracts and cultural . Data from creator analytics reveal that over 90% of viral sensations fail to maintain peak beyond six months without diversification, highlighting the causal fragility of metric-dependent renown absent structural safeguards. While some internet figures parlay online traction into lasting careers, the majority experience boom-bust cycles driven by short attention spans and content oversupply.

Historical Development

Origins in Early Internet Culture (1990s–Early 2000s)

The concept of internet celebrity originated in the mid-1990s as the enabled individuals to create personal homepages, sharing unfiltered aspects of their lives with a growing online audience, distinct from traditional media gatekeepers. This shift was facilitated by accessible web authoring tools and increasing internet adoption, with U.S. household penetration rising from about 18% in 1997 to 51% by 2000. Early adopters leveraged these platforms for self-expression, attracting niche followings through raw authenticity rather than polished production. A pioneering figure was Justin Hall, who in January 1994 launched "Justin's Links From The Underground," one of the earliest personal websites, while a student at ; the site featured daily updates on his thoughts, links, and personal experiences, amassing a dedicated readership and influencing the development of blogging as a medium for individual voice. Similarly, Jennifer Ringley initiated JenniCam in April 1996, streaming unedited webcam footage of her daily life from her apartment, which by 1998 drew up to 4 million daily visitors and generated revenue through donations and merchandise, marking an early experiment in lifecasting and voyeuristic online appeal. These efforts predated structured social platforms, relying on manual linking and word-of-mouth in nascent online communities like and , where users hosted over 1 million personal sites by 1999. By the early 2000s, accidental virality amplified this phenomenon, as broadband expansion and file-sharing tools enabled rapid dissemination of user-generated videos. A notable case was Ghyslain Raza's "" video, leaked in 2002 after he filmed himself wielding a golf ball retriever as a ; it garnered over 1 billion views across platforms like , thrusting Raza into unwanted global attention and highlighting the internet's power for unintended fame. Such incidents underscored causal dynamics: low barriers to combined with network effects in sharing created proto-celebrities, though most early figures like Hall and Ringley faded as attention fragmented, lacking monetization infrastructure.

Rise with User-Generated Content Platforms (Mid-2000s–2010s)

The mid-2000s marked the emergence of user-generated content (UGC) platforms that democratized fame by allowing ordinary individuals to produce and distribute media without traditional gatekeepers. YouTube, founded on February 14, 2005, by former PayPal employees Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim, launched publicly in December 2005 and quickly became central to this shift, enabling video uploads that could reach global audiences. By 2006, following Google's $1.65 billion acquisition, YouTube's user base exploded, with daily video views surpassing 100 million. Early adopters leveraged these platforms for viral success, distinguishing internet celebrities from prior web figures reliant on static sites or forums. , created by Ian Hecox and , began uploading videos in late 2005 and emerged as one of YouTube's top original channels by 2006, amassing millions of views through accessible, humorous content. Similarly, the fictional series , debuting in March 2006, became YouTube's most-subscribed channel by early 2007, drawing over 100 million views before its scripted nature was revealed, highlighting how narrative-driven UGC could simulate authenticity and foster dedicated followings. Platforms like , peaking in 2006 with over 100 million users, complemented this by allowing musicians and personalities such as to build fanbases through customizable profiles and direct interaction, prefiguring influencer dynamics. Into the 2010s, subscriber metrics underscored accelerating growth, with channels like nigahiga () surpassing 1 million subscribers by 2009 through comedy parodies, outpacing early music or TV clips. This era saw the first Partner Program expansions in , formalizing ad for creators and incentivizing full-time content production. By 2010, the inaugural convention, organized by YouTubers Hank and , drew 1,400 attendees to foster among online video creators, signaling institutional recognition of fame as a viable cultural force. These developments transitioned UGC from niche experimentation to a scalable pathway for , where audience metrics directly correlated with influence and .

Mainstream Integration and Platform Dominance (2020s)

In the 2020s, solidified its dominance among platforms fostering internet celebrities, driven by its algorithm prioritizing short-form videos and achieving 1.4 billion monthly active users by 2023. This growth outpaced rivals, with capturing 51.6% of marketers' preference for influencer collaborations, compared to Instagram's 57.1%, due to engagement rates averaging 10.53% for accounts exceeding 1 million followers. The platform's appeal lay in its capacity to propel niche creators to global fame rapidly, as evidenced by accumulating 11.6 billion likes across videos by 2024. The broader influencer economy underscored this platform shift, with the global market expanding from $9.7 billion in 2020 to $24 billion by 2024, fueled by brands integrating digital natives into strategies for higher authenticity and ROI. Projections indicated further acceleration to over $30 billion by 2025, reflecting causal links between algorithmic virality and via sponsorships, where 65% of marketers partnered with influencers. However, dominance bred vulnerabilities, including regulatory scrutiny over data practices and potential bans in markets like the U.S., which pressured creators to diversify across and . Mainstream integration marked a pivotal evolution, as internet celebrities leveraged platform fame for traditional media forays, blurring boundaries between digital and legacy entertainment. , a TikTok originator with millions of followers, transitioned to acting with lead roles in Netflix's (2021) and Eli Roth's (2023), demonstrating how viral metrics translated to Hollywood casting decisions. Similarly, voiced a character in the animated (2020), starred in Hulu's reality series (2021–present), and guest-appeared as herself in Apple TV+'s The Studio (2025). MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson) exemplified scaled integration by expanding beyond into branded content and potential studio partnerships, advising Hollywood on creator-stake models while amassing billions of views that rivaled traditional TV metrics. These crossovers, often initiated by streaming services seeking younger demographics, highlighted empirical advantages of internet fame—lower entry barriers and direct audience data—over conventional gatekeeping, though critics noted acting critiques and short-lived appeal in scripted formats. ![VidCon attendees](.assets/VidCon_attendees_(14350632799) Events like facilitated this convergence, drawing millions to hybrid conventions where digital stars networked with industry executives. Overall, platform dominance in the not only amplified internet celebrities' reach but catalyzed their embedding in cultural institutions, reshaping fame's through data-driven causality rather than serendipitous discovery.

Typology

Influencers and Content Specialists

Influencers and content specialists form a core typology of celebrities, distinguished by their deliberate cultivation of audiences through niche expertise or value on platforms such as , , and . Influencers primarily exert influence via personal authority, relationships, or perceived trustworthiness to shape opinions and purchasing decisions, often across , , or consumer goods domains. Content specialists, by contrast, prioritize the creation of in-depth, skill-demonstrating material—such as tutorials, reviews, or analyses—that establishes them as subject-matter authorities, with less emphasis on broad and more on content quality and utility. This distinction arises from differing incentives: influencers optimize for engagement and endorsements, while specialists focus on sustained value delivery to retain loyal, niche followings. These figures typically amass followings ranging from nano-influencers (1,000–10,000 followers) to mega-influencers (over 1 million), with micro- and nano-level creators often yielding higher engagement rates due to perceived authenticity and targeted relevance. Niche specialization—encompassing areas like gaming, fitness, tech unboxings, or culinary techniques—enables differentiation in saturated markets, as platforms' algorithms favor consistent, specialized output that fosters community retention over viral spectacle. The proliferation of such specialists accelerated in the mid-2010s with algorithmic shifts on YouTube and TikTok prioritizing long-form expertise or short-form demonstrations, leading to exponential growth in subcultural audiences. By 2025, an estimated 50 million creators operated in this ecosystem, contributing to a global creator economy valued at $250 billion, projected to reach $480 billion by 2027 through diversified revenue like sponsorships and ad integrations. Monetization underscores their professionalization: influencers often secure brand deals based on audience reach, with average U.S. earnings around $44,000 annually, though top specialists in high-value niches like or tech can exceed $74,500 via affiliate links and premium content. Events like , launched in 2010, exemplify their communal infrastructure, drawing thousands of creators and fans for networking and content ideation. Unlike transient viral stars, these celebrities sustain fame through iterative content strategies, adapting to platform changes—such as TikTok's 2020s emphasis on authentic, niche hooks—that reward expertise over generality, though saturation risks diluting individual impact without innovation.

Viral Phenomena and One-Off Stars

Viral phenomena represent a subset of internet celebrity characterized by rapid, algorithm- or share-driven dissemination of content, often propelling ordinary individuals to temporary stardom without established platforms or production infrastructure. These events typically hinge on novelty, humor, absurdity, or relatability, achieving peak viewership in days or weeks—such as the 2006 "Evolution of Dance" video by , which accumulated over 300 million views by 2010 and secured him paid speaking gigs but yielded no enduring media presence beyond motivational circuits. Unlike sustained influencers, one-off stars rarely transition to long-term careers, as their fame derives from rather than repeatable skills or audience loyalty; empirical analyses of viral trajectories indicate that 90% of such peaks fail to sustain beyond initial buzz cycles due to audience fatigue and platform saturation. Early examples include Gary Brolsma's 2004 "Numa Numa" video, a lip-sync performance to the Eurodance track "Dragostea Din Tei" that garnered 40 million views by 2006, spawning parodies and brief merchandise sales but confining Brolsma to niche online obscurity thereafter. Similarly, Tay Zonday's "Chocolate Rain" in 2007, featuring his deep voice critiquing racial issues over piano, exploded to 130 million views and earned him a Def Jam signing plus national TV spots, yet follow-up tracks like "Chocolate Rain 2" failed commercially, highlighting how virality often amplifies quirks over artistic depth. Rebecca Black's "Friday," uploaded on February 10, 2011, via Ark Music Factory, amassed 167 million views amid widespread mockery as an auto-tuned vanity project, briefly charting on Billboard but resulting in Black's pivot to acting and lesser music ventures without recapturing equivalent scale. More recent cases underscore the pattern's persistence across platforms. In 2018, the "Kombucha Girl" (Brittany Broski) clip from a grocery store reaction video went viral on , leading to brand deals and podcasting, but her mainstream traction waned by amid content oversupply. Caite Upton, Teen USA, endured perpetual recirculation of her 2007 pageant response on U.S. since 2015, parlaying it into modeling but not evading its status as a career anchor. These trajectories reveal causal factors like algorithmic and public , where initial virality boosts metrics (e.g., Zonday's video hit 1 million views in weeks) but erodes without strategic adaptation, often leaving participants with psychological tolls including isolation or .

Niche and Subcultural Figures

Niche and subcultural internet celebrities achieve prominence within specialized online communities, where their influence stems from content tailored to particular interests such as virtual idols, anthropomorphic , or gaming subgenres, rather than broad appeal. These figures often foster dedicated followings through platforms like , Twitch, and , enabling subcultural cohesion but limiting crossover to mainstream audiences. Their rise reflects the internet's capacity to amplify insular groups, with fame metrics like subscriber counts or view hours concentrated in echo chambers of shared enthusiasm. In the virtual YouTuber (VTuber) subculture, intertwined with and communities, avatars powered by motion-capture technology have produced notable figures since the mid-2010s. , debuting on in November 2016, became the archetype, blending animated personas with live-streamed interactions to attract fans seeking escapist, character-driven content. By 2021, the VTuber ecosystem expanded to over 10,000 performers, generating 1.5 billion monthly views on as of October 2020, with agencies like Hololive and dominating through akin to idol industries. In 2023, VTubers accounted for 1.4% of active Gaming streamers yet captured 9.6% of viewer hours, underscoring disproportionate engagement within niche demographics. The exemplifies another subculture sustaining internet celebrities via anthropomorphic character art, fursuiting, and conventions. Emerging from 1980s sci-fi circles, the community proliferated online through sites like FurAffinity and , where creators like digital artists and suit makers garner thousands of followers for commissions and storytelling. Mark Merlino, a co-founder who passed in 2024, influenced early conventions blending furry and elements, fostering a self-sustaining economy of fan-driven content. These figures often monetize via or merchandise, with subcultural events drawing thousands annually, though external perceptions vary due to the niche's thematic focus on animal-human hybrids. Gaming subcultures yield figures like or modders celebrated in forums such as Speedrun.com or . For instance, communities around titles like series host influencers who dissect mechanics or create expansive modifications, amassing dedicated audiences through technical expertise rather than entertainment spectacle. This typology highlights how subcultural celebrities prioritize depth over virality, sustaining loyalty via expertise and community rituals, yet face challenges from platform algorithm shifts favoring broader content.

Economic Framework

Revenue Streams and Business Models

Internet celebrities primarily generate through platform-based , brand partnerships, merchandise sales, and subscription services, often diversifying across multiple streams to mitigate platform dependency. Ad from platforms like constitutes a foundational model, where creators earn shares of income based on views and ; for instance, YouTube's Partner Program distributes approximately 55% of ad to creators, contributing to the platform's $36.1 billion total in 2024. High-profile examples include , estimated to earn $600,000 to $800,000 monthly across streams including ads, and , who garners over $3 million monthly from YouTube ads alone amid broader of $50 million to $120 million per month from combined sources. Brand partnerships and sponsored content form another core stream, leveraging audience trust for paid promotions, with the global influencer marketing industry valued at $32.55 billion in 2025, reflecting a 35% year-over-year increase. Creators negotiate deals directly with brands or via agencies, earning flat fees, commissions, or performance-based payments; nano-influencers (under 10,000 followers) may command $10 to $100 per post, while mega-influencers exceed $10,000. complements this by providing commissions on sales driven through unique links, often integrated into content for . Merchandise and product sales enable direct-to-consumer models, where celebrities sell branded apparel, digital goods, or courses, bypassing intermediaries for higher margins; MrBeast's brand exemplifies scaling from content fame to physical products. Subscription platforms like and support recurring revenue through exclusive content tiers, with facilitating $800 million in creator payouts approaching 2024 and distributing $5.3 billion to creators in 2023 from $6.3 billion gross platform revenue. Nearly 70% of creators operate multiple streams, including licensing and live donations, to sustain operations amid volatile algorithms and audience shifts.

Scale, Growth, and Market Realities

The , which includes internet celebrities monetizing online audiences, was valued at $149.4 billion globally in 2024, with forecasts projecting expansion to $1,072.8 billion by 2034 at a (CAGR) of 21.8%. expenditures, a key revenue driver, reached $24 billion worldwide in 2024, up from $21.1 billion in 2023, and are expected to surpass $30 billion by 2025. This growth reflects brands' increasing allocation of budgets to creators, with U.S. spending alone projected to exceed $10 billion in 2025. Over 207 million individuals worldwide engaged in as of 2024, spanning platforms like , , and , though the majority operate at small scales with fewer than 1,000 followers. Participation has surged, with more than 165 million new creators joining since 2020, fueled by accessible tools and algorithmic amplification. Despite this scale, market realities underscore extreme income inequality: only 4% of creators earn over $100,000 annually, while 48% make less than $15,000 per year, and 88% view content production as a supplemental pursuit rather than a primary livelihood. Top-tier internet celebrities exemplify outlier success amid widespread modest returns; for instance, generated $85 million in 2024 through diversified ventures including revenue and brand deals, while others like earned $23.5 million. The median annual revenue for full-time creators stands at $50,000, with average per-post earnings ranging from $195 to $1,900 depending on audience size and platform. This Pareto-like distribution—where a small fraction captures disproportionate value—stems from platform dynamics favoring viral hits and established networks, leading to high entry barriers and churn rates for aspirants. Sustained expansion faces headwinds from platform shifts, algorithmic volatility, and oversaturation, as evidenced by stagnant for non-elite creators despite overall market growth. Empirical data from industry analyses indicate that while brands report positive ROI from influencer partnerships, the creator base's proliferation dilutes per-person opportunities, reinforcing a winner-takes-most economic structure.

Critiques of Sustainability and Exploitation

The of internet celebrity has faced for its inherent , with empirical data indicating that a majority of creators fail to achieve sustainable livelihoods. A 2025 study by Billion Dollar Boy revealed that over half (52%) of content creators experience burnout directly attributable to their careers, with 37% contemplating exit from the industry due to relentless content production demands and performance pressures. Similarly, a NeoReach analysis found that more than 50% of full-time creators earn below the U.S. threshold, despite the sector's projected $250 billion valuation, highlighting plateaued growth for most beyond initial viral thresholds. These patterns stem from platform volatility, market saturation, and the necessity for constant output, which erode long-term viability without diversified revenue. Exploitation critiques extend to labor practices within the , particularly the absence of protections for vulnerable participants. Platforms and brands have been accused of leveraging creators' unpaid or undercompensated efforts through opaque algorithms that prioritize over fair , exacerbating ad where fake metrics inflate perceived value while creators bear production costs. In the case of "kidfluencers"—children featured prominently in family-oriented content—parents often control earnings without legal safeguards, leading to documented financial exploitation and psychological strain; for instance, U.S. states like have enacted limited Coogan-like s since 2023, but federal gaps persist, exposing minors to invasions and coerced labor indistinguishable from play. Academic analyses frame this as a regulatory void, where kidfluencer revenues—estimated to fuel an $8 billion subsector—bypass labor standards, prioritizing parental profit over minors' welfare. Broader industry dynamics amplify these issues, with creators facing , , and ethical lapses in deals absent robust oversight. Reports document systemic underpayment and selective deal access favoring demographics that align with advertiser preferences, underscoring a where entrepreneurial promise masks precarious, gig-like conditions without traditional labor recourse. Such critiques argue that the model's reliance on incentivizes exploitative self-commodification, yielding high dropout rates and tolls unsupported by platform interventions.

Societal Impacts

Beneficial Outcomes and Achievements

Internet celebrities have facilitated substantial charitable giving through direct donations and organized campaigns. For instance, YouTuber MrBeast, via his Beast Philanthropy initiative launched in 2020, has donated over $50 million to causes including building wells, schools, and homes in underserved areas, with all revenue from related content directed to philanthropy. His 2025 #TeamWater campaign alone raised $40 million for clean water access, partnering with organizations like The Ocean Cleanup. Similarly, PewDiePie directed $1.5 million from YouTube channel memberships between 2020 and 2021 to entities such as Save the Children for Lebanon relief and Winston's Wish for child bereavement support. These figures have amplified awareness and funding for global issues, often surpassing traditional nonprofit efforts in speed and scale due to viral dissemination. MrBeast's projects, for example, have provided prosthetics to over 1,000 individuals and supported environmental restoration with millions in tree-planting funds. Empirical analyses of platforms like show that influencer-led charity live streams positively influence viewer donations by enhancing perceived interactivity and , leading to measurable increases in contributions. In and awareness, internet celebrities deliver accessible content that promotes skill-building and destigmatization. influencers on and , such as clinical psychologists with millions of followers, produce videos addressing specific concerns like anxiety, with 30% of analyzed content focusing on educational explanations that encourage help-seeking behaviors. Educational influencers report fostering among peers, including improved and resource sharing, as evidenced by qualitative studies of their practices. Such efforts democratize information, enabling rapid dissemination of evidence-based tips on topics from to , though impacts vary by content quality and audience engagement. Overall, these achievements stem from leveraging large audiences for targeted mobilization, yielding tangible outcomes like funds raised and behaviors shifted, distinct from conventional endorsements due to direct, platform-native integration.

Adverse Consequences and Empirical Harms

Exposure to idealized portrayals by celebrities has been linked to heightened body dissatisfaction and symptoms among followers, particularly adolescents and young women. A 2023 scoping review of 36 studies found that influencers often promote thin-ideal or fit-ideal body standards, triggering concerns and exacerbating behaviors through mechanisms like upward social comparison and internalization of appearance ideals. Similarly, an experimental study published in 2024 involving 240 women showed that following accounts of nutritional influencers resulted in significantly higher scores for symptoms and body dissatisfaction compared to control groups, with effects persisting post-exposure. These findings align with broader from a 2024 indicating that -driven beauty ideals correlate with increased risks of , , and binge-eating disorder, as users emulate unattainable physiques filtered and curated for virality. Internet celebrities also contribute to followers' broader mental health declines, including anxiety, depression, and self-harm ideation, via parasocial relationships that foster unrealistic expectations and . A 2023 systematic review of 20 studies on adolescents and young adults reported consistent associations between influencer content consumption and elevated psychological distress, with passive scrolling amplifying and deficits through algorithmic reinforcement of envy-inducing narratives. In a 2024 field experiment on users, exposure to influencer-driven content intensified negative outcomes, including rumination and disruption, due to the platform's short-form, high-engagement format that prioritizes over substance. Peer-reviewed scoping reviews further highlight adolescents' heightened vulnerability, with influencer-promoted lifestyles correlating to risky behaviors like extreme dieting or substance use for aesthetic enhancement. Creators themselves face empirical harms from the demands of constant content production and public scrutiny, including burnout and . A 2024 study of 1,200 social media influencers revealed that popularity metrics (e.g., likes, views) inversely predict , with high-engagement creators reporting 2.5 times higher rates of burnout and creativity loss due to performative pressures and algorithmic dependency. This is compounded by erosion and ; data from 2023 surveys of content specialists indicate that 70% experience or doxxing, leading to chronic anxiety and isolation, as the "always-on" nature of online fame precludes recovery periods. In extreme cases, the validation economy exacerbates addictive behaviors, with influencers showing elevated dysregulation akin to disorders, per 2025 analyses of self-reported data from platforms like and . Societally, internet celebrities amplify dissemination, eroding public trust and fostering polarization through unchecked endorsements. A 2024 study analyzing 500 influencer posts found that deceptive health claims (e.g., unverified supplements) garnered 40% higher sharing rates than factual content, with followers' trust in celebrities overriding evidence-based scrutiny, resulting in measurable uptake of harmful practices like fad diets. This extends to consumerism harms, where drives impulsive purchases; empirical models from 2023 show over-endorsement reduces perceived authenticity, yet boosts short-term sales by 25-30%, contributing to debt accumulation and environmental strain from hauls without disclosing sponsorships. Regulatory gaps exacerbate these issues, as 2025 research identifies psychological manipulation risks in vulnerable demographics, including minors, underscoring causal links between influencer authenticity deficits and societal ethical erosion.

Key Controversies

Dissemination of Misinformation

Internet celebrities, leveraging platforms like , , and to reach audiences exceeding tens of millions, have amplified the dissemination of by prioritizing viral over factual verification. A 2024 UNESCO global survey of over 1,000 creators revealed that 62% do not assess the accuracy of content prior to sharing it with followers, often due to time pressures and algorithmic incentives that reward . This practice is exacerbated by influencers' frequent lack of subject-matter expertise, enabling the rapid propagation of unverified claims on topics ranging from to . In the health domain, empirical analyses highlight the scale of false information spread by such figures. A 2025 study examined nearly 1,000 Instagram and posts by influencers promoting five controversial medical screening tests, finding that the content was overwhelmingly misleading, with claims lacking scientific backing and reaching up to 200 million views collectively. Similarly, a 2024 NIH-funded survey of U.S. young women indicated that serves as a for advice, yet much of the platform's content on topics like and wellness includes unsubstantiated or pseudoscientific assertions from non-expert creators. During the , influencers on and contributed to by echoing unproven side-effect narratives, with studies documenting how their videos garnered higher engagement rates than corrective content from health authorities. Political and conspiracy-related has also proliferated via internet celebrities. Research from 2024 showed that and influencers' posts containing falsehoods—such as fabricated claims or historical distortions—exhibit greater virality, driven by users' emotional appraisals and sharing behaviors, often outpacing fact-checked alternatives. A analysis in 2024 linked influencers' promotion of partisan untruths to direct monetization gains, as platforms like reward high-interaction content regardless of veracity, with some creators earning thousands per misleading post. These dynamics persist despite platform moderation efforts, as bots and human amplifiers sustain the cycle, with diffusing 6-10 times faster than accurate information in networked environments. The causal role of celebrities in this phenomenon stems from their perceived authenticity and relatability, which lower audience skepticism compared to traditional media. Longitudinal from 2023-2024 indicates that follower trust in influencers correlates with reduced critical evaluation, particularly among younger demographics, fostering echo chambers where corrections struggle to penetrate. While some influencers self-correct or partner with fact-checkers, the structural incentives—view counts translating to ad revenue—predominate, underscoring a systemic in decentralized content ecosystems.

Personal Scandals and Ethical Failures

Logan Paul faced severe backlash in January 2018 after uploading a YouTube video filmed in Japan's Aokigahara forest, a notorious site for suicides, which captured and briefly displayed the body of an apparent suicide victim hanging from a tree. The video, viewed millions of times before removal, was criticized for exploiting tragedy for shock value and views, prompting Paul to issue an apology video claiming it was a "mistake" driven by poor judgment rather than malice. YouTube responded by suspending his ability to earn ad revenue and placing him in a "review" program, while brands like Pepsi distanced themselves, highlighting ethical lapses in prioritizing content virality over human dignity. Felix Kjellberg, better known as , drew widespread condemnation in February 2017 for a series of videos featuring anti-Semitic content, including one where he paid two men via $5 each to hold signs reading "Death to All Jews" and another incorporating Nazi imagery and swastikas in a gaming clip. These acts, presented by Kjellberg as edgy humor, led to terminate its Maker Studios partnership with him and to drop his show from its premium subscription service, amid accusations of normalizing . Kjellberg defended the content as satirical exaggeration not reflective of personal beliefs, though subsequent incidents, such as using slurs and associating with alt-right figures, fueled ongoing debates about his influence on young audiences. Beauty YouTuber James Charles admitted in April 2021 to exchanging sexually explicit messages with at least two 16-year-old boys via Snapchat and Instagram, following allegations from multiple minors of grooming and manipulation for encounters. Charles claimed the interactions were consensual flirtations without physical meetings and that he believed the recipients were of legal age in their jurisdictions, but the disclosures violated platform guidelines on predatory behavior toward minors, resulting in YouTube demonetizing his channel and suspending partnerships with brands like Morphe. Multiple accusers detailed patterns of solicitation, underscoring ethical failures in exploiting fame for personal gratification at the expense of vulnerable fans. These cases exemplify broader patterns of ethical lapses among internet celebrities, including insensitivity to real-world harms for and boundary-crossing interactions with underage admirers, often enabled by the absence of traditional oversight in digital fame. Viral gossip content on YouTube recurrently features themes such as personal revelations, family dramas, falls from grace, secrets of luxury or poverty, and hidden tragedies, which drive engagement and exemplify the scandals attracting public scrutiny to these figures. While some scandals lead to short-term repercussions, recoveries are common through apologies and fan , raising questions about sustained accountability in an industry driven by unfiltered .

Dynamics of Public Backlash and Accountability

Public backlash against internet celebrities typically initiates from a perceived ethical lapse, such as controversial statements or actions captured in viral content, which spreads rapidly via algorithms and commentary channels dedicated to "drama" or exposés. These channels, often monetized through sensationalism akin to , dissect scandals to attract views, amplifying outrage and encouraging coordinated boycotts or unsubscribe campaigns. For instance, in the YouTube beauty community, cancellations of high-profile creators like in 2021 stemmed from allegations amplified by peer influencers, leading to immediate subscriber losses exceeding 3 million within days, as data from channel analytics showed sharp viewership declines post-exposure. This dynamic reflects causal mechanisms where low barriers to sharing—retweets, clips, and hashtags—escalate minor infractions into perceived existential threats, often disproportionate to the offense's gravity, with empirical analyses indicating that unverified claims still inflict lasting reputational harm even if later debunked. Accountability mechanisms primarily involve platform interventions, sponsor severances, and self-initiated responses like apology videos, though their efficacy varies by creator scale and severity. YouTube's response to violations, such as temporary suspensions or demonetization, enforces partial accountability; for example, Logan Paul's 2018 video in Japan's forest prompted a one-month premium program suspension and forfeited ad , correlating with a 20-30% temporary drop in his channel metrics before partial recovery. Larger celebrities often mitigate damage through rapid, transparent apologies emphasizing remorse and behavioral change, which studies show can restore up to 70% of lost trust among forgiving audiences, particularly if the transgression aligns with transient cultural sensitivities rather than core ethical breaches. However, smaller influencers face steeper barriers, with cancellations frequently resulting in permanent growth stagnation or channel abandonment, as aggregated data from 2023 analyses reveal most affected creators experience sustained 40-60% viewership reductions without rebound. Critically, these dynamics expose limitations in , as high-profile figures like recovered from 2017 controversies—involving edgy content deemed anti-Semitic—through audience loyalty and platform reinstatement, retaining over 100 million subscribers despite sponsor losses, underscoring how economic incentives prioritize engagement over enduring penalties. Empirical reviews highlight that while backlash enforces social norms by deterring repeat offenses in 60-70% of cases per qualitative content analyses, it also fosters performative outrage, where ideological biases in media and activist circles selectively target figures, often overlooking similar lapses by aligned influencers. Regulatory efforts, such as FTC guidelines on disclosures or fines for misleading promotions (e.g., Italy's 2023 penalties against influencers), aim to institutionalize accountability but remain reactive, applying unevenly due to platforms' profit-driven moderation. Overall, backlash serves as a decentralized enforcement tool but risks overreach, with causal evidence showing net career hindrance for most without proportional societal benefit beyond heightened awareness.

Audience Relations

Methods of Fan Interaction

Internet celebrities engage fans predominantly through digital platforms that enable scalable, , such as responding to comments on posts and videos across sites like , , and . This method allows for direct feedback loops, where celebrities address specific fan questions or praise, fostering perceived personal connections despite the one-to-many scale. indicates that such interactive commenting correlates with higher fan satisfaction and , as it simulates conversational reciprocity. Live streaming represents a core real-time interaction strategy, utilized on platforms including Twitch, , and Instagram Live, where fans participate via chat overlays to pose questions, react to content, or request actions like song plays or game decisions. These sessions often last hours and can attract thousands of simultaneous viewers, with celebrities employing moderation tools to manage high-volume inputs. Empirical studies highlight live streams' role in cultivating parasocial relationships through immediacy and responsiveness. Structured Q&A formats, such as Reddit's "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) sessions or platform-specific polls and stories, provide focused opportunities for fans to submit pre-vetted or live queries on topics ranging from personal advice to creative processes. AMAs, popularized since Reddit's inception in 2005 but surging with internet celebrities in the , have hosted figures like , drawing tens of thousands of participants per event. Interactive challenges, giveaways, and campaigns further amplify engagement by incentivizing , such as fans recreating videos or entering contests for shoutouts or merchandise. Self-disclosure strategies, including sharing vlogs of daily routines or behind-the-scenes glimpses, complement these tools by building emotional investment without requiring constant live presence. Academic analysis frames this as a deliberate tactic to enhance perceived authenticity and relational depth, though it risks blurring boundaries and inviting overreach from obsessive followers. While digital methods dominate due to —reaching global audiences at low cost—select celebrities host in-person meetups at conventions, though these remain secondary to scalability.

Psychological and Behavioral Effects on Followers

Followers of celebrities frequently develop parasocial relationships, one-sided emotional attachments where individuals perceive intimacy and reciprocity from the celebrity despite no mutual interaction. These bonds can foster senses of companionship and emotional support, potentially aiding coping with stressors. Such relationships may yield positive psychological outcomes, including enhanced motivation for personal growth through self-expansion and identity exploration. Empirical data from followers of health-focused internet celebrities indicate higher reported , alongside increased vigorous exercise (150 minutes per week versus 90 for non-followers) and greater and consumption (5.68 servings per day versus 4.45). However, negative psychological effects predominate in much research, including reduced stemming from upward social comparisons that evoke and . Parasocial bonds can exacerbate issues via adverse self-comparisons, emotional distress upon perceived relationship "breakdowns," and heightened overall distress, particularly among followers of diet-related content (p < .001). Behaviorally, these dynamics drive and , as seen in teenagers who imitate influencers' lifestyles due to mimetic bias, , and needs for belonging, with trustworthiness and uniqueness of influencers significantly shaping and (p < .05 across hypotheses tested in a sample of 63 adolescents). Parasocial relationships also boost consumer behaviors, elevating trust, purchase intentions, and online buying through perceived and familiarity. In health domains, while promoting beneficial habits like exercise, such emulation correlates with elevated distress rather than uniformly positive outcomes.

Technological Shifts and AI Integration

Advancements in digital platforms and algorithms have transformed the pathways to internet celebrity status, shifting from static websites to dynamic, recommendation-driven ecosystems. The launch of smartphones like the in 2007 expanded mobile content consumption, while platforms such as , introduced in 2016, leveraged short-form video and algorithms to propel creators to viral fame through personalized feeds that prioritize high-engagement content. These shifts reduced , allowing niche creators to scale audiences globally without institutional support, as evidenced by the explosive growth in influencer numbers from platforms optimizing for virality. The integration of artificial intelligence has further evolved this landscape by enabling the creation of virtual influencers—fully digital personas that operate as autonomous internet celebrities. Virtual influencers, powered by AI-driven animation and , offer brands consistent availability and scandal-free endorsements, with the market valued at $6.06 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $45.88 billion by 2030 at a exceeding 40%. Pioneers like , a virtual debuting in 2016, and Lil Miquela, who has amassed over 2.3 million Instagram followers through AI-generated posts and interactions, demonstrated the viability of AI avatars in achieving celebrity status with millions of subscribers via interactive livestreams, scripted content, and algorithmic promotion, blending aesthetics with data-optimized engagement. In the AI era, becoming famous increasingly involves creating such non-human digital personalities or using AI tools for rapid content production and virality, with creators employing automated editing, trend analysis, and caption generation to accelerate audience growth and mimic successful formats efficiently. Empirical data underscores AI's efficacy in enhancing engagement and efficiency for both virtual and celebrities. Virtual influencers generate up to 3% higher interaction rates on platforms like compared to human counterparts, attributed to their optimized, data-tailored personas. Among creators, 79% report AI tools accelerate content production, enabling faster iteration on trending formats via automated editing and caption generation. mentions of AI influencers surged 50% in the first five months of 2025 alone, reaching over 114,000, reflecting growing audience acceptance despite concerns over authenticity. AI also facilitates digital resurrection and augmentation of existing celebrities, extending their influence beyond mortality or retirement. Technologies like deepfakes and digital twins, advanced by firms such as Soul Machines, recreate deceased figures for endorsements, as seen in plans to deploy an AI version of in a 2023 film project. For internet celebrities, this manifests in AI-enhanced avatars that simulate real-time interactions, blurring lines between human and synthetic fame while raising questions about long-term consumer trust, with surveys indicating 37% of users express heightened interest in brands employing AI influencers.

Regulatory and Cultural Evolutions

Regulatory frameworks for celebrities, particularly influencers, have intensified globally to address deceptive practices and ensure transparency in endorsements. , the (FTC) mandates clear disclosures of material connections, such as payments or free products, using conspicuous terms like "#ad" or "sponsored" at the outset of content, as outlined in its 2019 "Disclosures 101 for Influencers" guide and reinforced through ongoing enforcement. The FTC's 2024 rule banning fake reviews and testimonials further targets fabricated endorsements, with violations leading to civil penalties, reflecting empirical evidence of consumer deception in . , the (), effective from 2024, imposes obligations on platforms and very large online platforms (VLOPs) to mitigate systemic risks, including from influencer content that disseminates illegal material or harms minors, while requiring influencers to assume greater responsibility for posted content. Italy's AGCOM introduced a dedicated influencer framework on July 24, 2025, mandating ethical codes and protections against minors' exploitation, amid broader proposals like the Digital Fairness Act to curb misleading marketing. Globally, jurisdictions such as the , , and enforce similar disclosure rules, with comparative analyses highlighting convergence on prohibiting undisclosed sponsorships to protect consumers from causal harms like misguided purchases. Culturally, perceptions of internet celebrities have evolved from novelty disruptors of traditional fame to scrutinized figures embodying digital authenticity amid saturation. Social media has democratized celebrity, enabling micro-influencers and viral personalities to supplant elite Hollywood stardom through direct, personal engagement, as Generation Z prioritizes relatable digital interactions over manufactured personas. This shift fosters a culture of perceived intimacy, yet empirical studies link intense celebrity worship—prevalent in online fandoms—to problematic internet use and heightened desire for fame, indicating causal pathways to maladaptive behaviors among followers. Events like VidCon, originating in 2010, exemplify cultural consolidation, evolving into major conventions that blend creator-fan interactions with industry networking, signaling mainstream acceptance while highlighting tensions over authenticity in an era of algorithmic virality. Regulatory pressures have culturally reinforced demands for transparency, diminishing tolerance for curated facades and prompting influencers to emphasize genuine endorsements, though mainstream media's bias toward sensationalism often amplifies scandals over systemic industry maturation.

References

  1. https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2018/09/13/what-is-an-internet-celebrity-any-way/
  2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00913367.2021.1977737
  3. https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-02895-9
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6426373/
  6. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/10842c63-d376-4090-9bc3-db00a4032441/download
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11432869/
  8. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02512-1
  9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasminebrowley/2025/04/29/the-rise-of-the-relatable-creator-why-audiences-and-the-economy-are-shifting-toward-influencers-with-day-jobs/
  10. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241250122
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887568/
  12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cb.2074
  13. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1032&context=engl_176
  14. https://www.bu.edu/bhr/2021/10/04/influencer-marketing-a-comparison-of-traditional-celebrity-social-media-influencer-and-ai-influencer/
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361217716_The_development_of_reputational_capital_-_How_social_media_influencers_differ_from_traditional_celebrities
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12212533/
  17. https://www.pfeifferlaw.com/entertainment-law-blog/traditional-celebrities-vs-social-media-influencers
  18. https://www.fielding.edu/the-fragility-of-social-media-fame/
  19. https://www.bu.edu/bhr/2021/10/04/influencer-marketing-a-comparison-of-traditional-celebrity-social-media-influencer-and-ai-influencer
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8650705/
  21. https://www.theblogstarter.com/justin-hall-blogging-pioneer/
  22. http://digital-archaeology.org/the-first-web-celebrity-was-a-coffee-pot/
  23. https://interestingengineering.com/culture/youtubes-history-and-its-impact-on-the-internet
  24. https://www.vdocipher.com/blog/history-of-youtube/
  25. http://mediashift.org/2015/02/a-look-back-at-10-years-of-life-on-youtube/
  26. https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/Most-subscribed_YouTube_channels
  27. https://em360tech.com/tech-articles/what-happened-myspace-fall-worlds-first-social-media-giant
  28. https://depauliaonline.com/39046/opinions/from-top-8s-to-mutuals-myspaces-forgotten-influence-on-how-we-interact-with-the-internet/
  29. https://vandegraph.medium.com/the-top-youtubers-throughout-history-9f22ac4bee45
  30. https://www.officetimeline.com/blog/youtube-history-timeline
  31. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/vidcon-at-10-how-a-thrown-together-event-gave-rise-influencer-era-1224136/
  32. https://influencity.com/resources/studies/tiktok-influencer-marketing-study-statistics/
  33. https://landingi.com/social-media-marketing/statistics/
  34. https://www.agorapulse.com/blog/tiktok/tiktok-statistics/
  35. https://houseofmarketers.com/tiktok-users-statistics-demographic-data
  36. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/influencer-marketing-statistics/
  37. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report-2020/
  38. https://www.statista.com/topics/2496/influence-marketing/
  39. https://influencermarketinghub.com/tiktok-marketing-report/
  40. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11290905/
  41. https://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/addison-rae/credits/3030857313/
  42. https://www.ctinsider.com/entertainment/article/charli-damelio-seth-rogen-the-studio-apple-tv-20316984.php
  43. https://www.businessinsider.com/mrbeast-business-lessons-hollywood-media-future-tv-movies-creator-economy-2025-2
  44. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/article/these-social-media-stars-conquered-the-internet-they-still-wanted-more-120021941.html
  45. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jake-lee-2702869a_the-lines-between-mainstream-and-creators-activity-7310996432893759488-4mqk
  46. https://influencermarketinghub.com/what-is-an-influencer/
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696424000028
  48. https://nealschaffer.com/content-creator-vs-influencer/
  49. https://www.coursera.org/articles/content-creator-vs-influencer
  50. https://www.trend.io/blog/content-creators-vs-influencers
  51. https://vidpros.com/influencer-vs-content-creator-differences-and-overlaps/
  52. https://ninjapromo.io/types-of-social-media-influencers
  53. https://www.cmswire.com/digital-marketing/social-media-influencers-mega-macro-micro-or-nano/
  54. https://digiday.com/marketing/what-the-rise-of-the-niche-and-nano-creator-means-for-influencer-marketing/
  55. https://www.spiralytics.com/blog/content-creator-statistics-2025/
  56. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/services/consulting/articles/content-creator-economy-growth-and-future-challenges.html
  57. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lowes-creator/2025/06/16/how-the-creator-economy-is-reshaping-modern-marketing--and-why-brands-are-paying-attention/
  58. https://www.prsa.org/article/content-marketing-content-creators-ST-Aug24
  59. https://inbeat.agency/blog/creator-economy-statistics
  60. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/creator-economy/
  61. https://www.teleprompter.com/blog/content-creators-vs-influencers
  62. https://www.uscreen.tv/blog/creator-economy-statistics/
  63. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/12/10-viral-sensations-on-life-after-internet-fame.html
  64. https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/16/health/social-media-fame
  65. https://www.businessinsider.com/overnight-viral-internet-people-share-experience-2022-12
  66. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/08/24/nimcel-influencers-tiktok-youtube/
  67. https://restofworld.org/2021/vtubers/
  68. https://fortune.com/2021/09/23/virtual-youtuber-vtubers-japan-streaming-hololive-nijisanji-vshojo/
  69. https://blog.gamesight.io/vtuber/
  70. https://dogpatch.press/2024/02/22/remembering-mark-merlino/
  71. https://haenfler.sites.grinnell.edu/socialmediasubcultures/
  72. https://www.thewalkmag.com/blog-2-3/kdq7jf6nretgqhy9ol85q9x227l4l5
  73. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/youtube-statistics/
  74. https://milx.app/cases/how-much-do-popular-youtubers-earn-examples-stats
  75. https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/how-much-can-youtubers-make-78376/
  76. https://thunderbit.com/blog/influencer-marketing-stats
  77. https://www.clearvoice.com/resources/influencer-marketing-statistics/
  78. https://mobileecosystemforum.com/2025/08/19/creator-subscription-platforms-onlyfans-patreon-etc-are-redefining-monetisation-content-and-compliance-in-the-digital-economy/
  79. https://www.tubefilter.com/2024/09/12/onlyfans-digital-products-revenue/
  80. https://market.us/report/creator-economy-market/
  81. https://www.emarketer.com/press-releases/us-influencer-marketing-spending-will-surpass-10-billion-in-2025/
  82. https://www.demandsage.com/creator-economy-statistics/
  83. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/creator-economy-stats
  84. https://inbeat.agency/blog/creator-economy-statistics/
  85. https://www.businessinsider.com/social-media-influencer-salary-pay-part-time-job-nano-micro-2024-7
  86. https://hellopartner.com/2025/03/18/content-creation-is-still-a-side-hustle-for-an-astonishing-88-of-influencers/
  87. https://thetab.com/2024/10/29/the-10-most-successful-content-creators-in-2024-and-the-eye-watering-amounts-of-money-they-make
  88. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2024/10/28/top-creators-2024-the-influencers-turning-buzz-into-billions/
  89. https://www.demandsage.com/how-much-do-influencers-make/
  90. https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/how-much-do-influencers-make
  91. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/
  92. https://www.emarketer.com/content/influencer-marketing-agency-ecosystem-2024
  93. https://www.viralnation.com/resources/blog/the-creator-burnout-crisis-why-over-half-of-influencers-are-at-a-breaking-point
  94. https://www.netinfluencer.com/over-half-of-full-time-creators-earn-below-us-living-wage-despite-250b-industry-neoreach-finds/
  95. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gustavlundbergtoresson/2024/10/01/reality-check-building-a-profitable-career-in-the-creator-economy/
  96. https://www.businessinsider.com/influencer-industry-marketing-fraud-discrimination-unethical-deals-content-creators-brands-2024-4
  97. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2598&context=mjlr
  98. https://csgsouth.org/policies/from-likes-to-laws-state-legal-protections-for-child-influencers/
  99. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-025-05953-7
  100. https://www.humanium.org/en/kidfluencers-and-social-media-the-evolution-of-child-exploitation-in-the-digital-age/
  101. https://hbr.org/2024/05/why-the-influencer-industry-needs-guardrails
  102. https://www.welcometothejungle.com/en/articles/dark-side-influencer-economy
  103. https://martechedge.com/news/new-research-reveals-high-burnout-rates-among-content-creators-and-influencers
  104. https://www.beastphilanthropy.org/
  105. https://m.economictimes.com/magazines/panache/mrbeast-drops-long-list-of-philanthropic-deeds-funded-by-youtube-earnings-reveals-how-he-made-it-happen-while-still-in-his-20s/articleshow/122341960.cms
  106. https://www.nonprofitpro.com/article/mrbeasts-40m-teamwater-push-lessons-for-nonprofits-in-creator-led-fundraising/
  107. https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/pewdiepie-raises-1-5-million-for-charity-from-youtube-members-alone-1642092/
  108. https://gamerant.com/pewdiepie-15-million-donation-charities/
  109. https://www.businessinsider.com/mrbeast-philanthropy
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10642826/
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9706523/
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001848
  113. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10810730.2023.2234866
  114. https://www.beastphilanthropy.org/who-we-are
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10032524/
  116. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/16/2730
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11103119/
  118. https://www.cureus.com/articles/176889-the-impact-of-social-media-on-the-mental-health-of-adolescents-and-young-adults-a-systematic-review
  119. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-56578-1
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362300744X
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11504076/
  122. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377800207_The_Cost_of_Being_a_Celebrity_on_Mental_Health
  123. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mar.22173
  124. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14413582241273987
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924001279
  126. https://www.port.ac.uk/news-events-and-blogs/news/new-research-unveils-the-dark-side-of-social-media-influencers-and-their-impact-on-marketing-and-consumer-behaviour
  127. https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/26/media/social-media-influencers-verify-information-study
  128. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/02/27/--influencers-promoting--overwhelmingly--misleading-information-.html
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11150891/
  130. https://news.utdallas.edu/social-sciences/celebs-social-media-covid-19-2021/
  131. https://www.opb.org/article/2024/03/18/think-out-loud-uw-study-social-media-influencers-misinformation/
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8853081/
  133. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/how-effective-are-tiktok-misinformation-debunking-videos/
  134. https://harvardpublichealth.org/tech-innovation/to-combat-misinformation-social-influencers-need-the-right-tools/
  135. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42644321
  136. https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/youtube-star-logan-paul-apologizes-video-apparent-suicide/story?id=52095528
  137. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/14/515184619/disney-company-drops-youtube-star-pewdiepie-over-anti-semitic-jokes
  138. https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube-star-pewdiepie-after-anti-semitic-posts-1487034533
  139. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/09/magazine/PewDiePie-interview.html
  140. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56611614
  141. https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2021/apr/20/youtube-james-charles-demonetised-allegations-sexting-underage-minors
  142. https://subscribr.ai/p/celebrity-gossip-youtube-niche-ideas
  143. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-lists/internet-downfall-celebrity-social-media-disaster-1234730657/
  144. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03623319.2023.2175150
  145. https://www.businessinsider.com/cancel-culture-what-it-means-creators-on-youtube-2019-9
  146. https://researchportal.hkr.se/files/82585425/MastersThesis-VT24_Farquharson_Pavlova.pdf
  147. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989575.2025.2518671
  148. https://www.technologyformarketing.co.uk/news/rise-influencer-accountability-misrepresentation-fines-evolving-industry
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563220301722
  150. https://bbtv.com/blog/4-unique-ways-to-interact-with-fans-on-social-media
  151. https://www.greenfly.com/blog/social-media-in-sports/
  152. https://expert.taylors.edu.my/file/rems/publication/110713_9260_1.pdf
  153. https://www.ourmental.health/screen-time-sanity/inside-reddits-ama-how-celebrities-and-fans-connect-online
  154. https://www.multipostdigital.com/blog/exploring-the-role-of-social-media-in-celebrity-fan-engagement
  155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X22000082
  156. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/21597
  157. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444817750002
  158. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382177589_Social_Media_Influencers_as_Catalysts_A_Study_on_Para-_social_Relationships_and_their_Impact_on_Shaping_Online_Buying_Intentions_and_Behaviors
  159. https://www.statista.com/topics/12686/social-media-and-artificial-intelligence/
  160. https://digiday.com/marketing/in-graphic-detail-how-ai-is-going-to-shape-influencer-marketing-next-year/
  161. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/virtual-influencer-market-report
  162. https://blog.bit.ai/the-ai-takeover-an-era-of-virtual-influencers-digital-celebrities/
  163. https://www.cut-the-saas.com/ai/the-ai-behind-virtual-influencer-lil-miquela
  164. https://www.forbes.com/sites/esade/2024/10/30/ai-and-influencer-marketing-how-businesses-can-navigate-the-future/
  165. https://drainpipe.io/ai-in-social-media-going-viral-in-2025/
  166. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/ai-influencers-consumer-data
  167. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230718-how-ai-is-bringing-film-stars-back-from-the-dead
  168. https://www.businessinsider.com/sc/digital-twins-are-changing-how-fans-interact-with-celebrities
  169. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/virtual-influencers/
  170. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/plain-language/1001a-influencer-guide-508_1.pdf
  171. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/advertising-marketing/endorsements-influencers-reviews
  172. https://www.dejaoffice.com/blog/2025/08/14/federal-trade-commission-proposes-new-rules-for-influencer-marketing-disclosure-requirements/
  173. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-impact-platforms
  174. https://www.europe-consommateurs.eu/en/shopping-internet/influencers.html
  175. https://www.dlapiper.com/en-eu/insights/publications/2025/10/influencer-marketing-updates-in-2025
  176. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e9d5ad8a-eea2-4d40-8ce1-f4d975f7069b
  177. https://natlawreview.com/article/regulating-influencer-marketing-comparative-analysis-laws-across-world
  178. https://www.dlapiper.com/en-us/news/2025/09/dla-piper-unpacks-influencer-marketing-rules-with-updated-and-expanded-global-guide
  179. https://www.athensjournals.gr/media/2025-6497-AJMMC-MED-Hughes-02.pdf
  180. https://friendsinsight.org/2165/features/2165/
  181. https://bclawreview.bc.edu/articles/3177/files/679bb57b56f39.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.