Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Interstate 82
View on Wikipedia
I-82 highlighted in red | |||||||
| Route information | |||||||
| Length | 143.58 mi[1] (231.07 km) | ||||||
| Existed | October 17, 1957–present | ||||||
| History | Completed in 1988 | ||||||
| Tourist routes | |||||||
| NHS | Entire route | ||||||
| Major junctions | |||||||
| West end | |||||||
| |||||||
| East end | |||||||
| Location | |||||||
| Country | United States | ||||||
| States | Washington, Oregon | ||||||
| Counties | |||||||
| Highway system | |||||||
| |||||||
Interstate 82 (I-82) is an Interstate Highway in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States that travels through parts of Washington and Oregon. It runs 144 miles (232 km) from its northwestern terminus at I-90 in Ellensburg, Washington, to its southeastern terminus at I-84 in Hermiston, Oregon. The highway passes through Yakima and the Tri-Cities, and is also part of the link between Seattle and Salt Lake City, Utah. I-82 travels concurrently with U.S. Route 97 (US 97) between Ellensburg and Union Gap; US 12 from Yakima to the Tri-Cities; and US 395 from Kennewick to Umatilla, Oregon.
I-82 primarily serves the Yakima Valley agricultural region, following the Yakima and Columbia rivers southeastward to the Tri-Cities. The highway enters the valley from the north by crossing the Manastash Ridge, which separates Yakima from the Kittitas Valley. I-82 bypasses the Tri-Cities by traveling southwest around Richland and Kennewick and then turns south to cross the Columbia River on the Umatilla Bridge. Its only auxiliary route, I-182, connects the highway to Richland and Pasco in the Tri-Cities.
The I-82 corridor was originally used by several state and national highways, including the Inland Empire Highway and US 410, which were built in the early 20th century. The federal government created I-82 in late 1957 to serve military facilities in the region, replacing an earlier designation for what is now I-84. The first section of I-82 to be constructed was the easterly bypass of Yakima, which opened in 1963 and was gradually extended north to Ellensburg by 1971. The Yakima Valley section, connecting Union Gap to Prosser, was constructed between 1977 and 1982.
The routing of the highway between Prosser and I-84 was very controversial among Tri-Cities residents, who lobbied for a longer I-82 alignment to serve them. Oregon legislators and highway officials remained opposed to a routing that bypassed Umatilla, leading to several attempts at finding a compromise along the Wallula Gap or in other areas southeast of the Tri-Cities. In 1973, Oregon and Washington adopted a federal compromise to build I-82 through Umatilla and around the outskirts of the Tri-Cities with a spur route (I-182) to serve the area directly. The Tri-Cities section opened in 1986 while in Oregon, the final section of I-82 was completed in 1988. In the early 2000s, Oregon highway officials examined plans to extend I-82 farther south through eastern Oregon and towards California, but they were not considered for further study.
Route description
[edit]I-82 travels 143.6 miles (231 km)[1] through a part of the Inland Northwest in a generally northwest–southeast direction along the Yakima and Columbia rivers.[2] The four-lane divided highway forms part of the link between Seattle and the inland West, which includes Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah.[3][4][5] I-82 is a component of the Interstate Highway System and is also designated as an important national highway under the National Highway System.[6][7] It is also listed as a Highway of Statewide Significance by the Washington state government.[8] I-82 has one auxiliary route, I-182, a spur route that serves the Tri-Cities region.[9] It also has two child state highways in Washington: State Route 821 (SR 821) that runs from Selah to Ellensburg, and SR 823 that runs from Yakima to Selah.[2][10]
I-82 is maintained by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) within their respective states. Both agencies conduct annual surveys of traffic on segments of the freeway, the results of which are expressed in terms of annual average daily traffic (AADT), a measure of traffic volume for any average day of the year. The most heavily trafficked and the least trafficked sections of I-82 are located in Washington; the busiest section is in downtown Yakima near SR 24, which carried a daily average of 52,000 vehicles in 2016, and the least-trafficked section is the terminus at I-90 near Ellensburg, which carried 9,100 vehicles.[11] In 2016, ODOT's measurements of average daily traffic ranged from a minimum of 13,700 vehicles at Powerline Road near Hermiston to a maximum of 21,700 vehicles at the Umatilla Bridge.[12]
Yakima Valley
[edit]I-82 begins southeast of Ellensburg, Washington, at a trumpet interchange with I-90, the state's major east–west freeway.[13] I-82 travels southward in a concurrency with US 97, which continues northwest along I-90 around Ellensburg and intersects with SR 821 at Thrall on the southern edge of the Kittitas Valley.[2] The freeway climbs the Manastash Ridge, traveling southeastward around Yakima River Canyon, where SR 821 runs as a meandering scenic byway. Here, I-82 also forms the western edge of the Yakima Firing Range, a military training and exercise facility that stretches across the plateau to the Columbia River Gorge.[14] The freeway reaches its highest point at Vanderbilt Gap, which is 2,672 feet (814 m) above sea level and only 300 feet (91 m) lower than Snoqualmie Pass on I-90. From the gap, the highway crosses into Yakima County and turns southwestward as it begins its descent from the ridge.[15][16]

Just north of Selah, I-82 crosses the Fred G. Redmon Bridge, a 325-foot-high (99 m), twinned arch bridge that spans Selah Creek. At the time of its opening in 1971, the Redmon Bridge was the longest concrete-arch bridge in North America at 1,337 feet (408 m), losing its record in 1993 to new bridges in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Franklin, Tennessee.[17] Southwest of the bridge, the freeway passes several farms and industrial buildings before reaching an interchange with the southern end of SR 821. I-82 continues on the eastern bank of the Yakima River to the east of Selah and intersects SR 823 in Selah Gap, a narrow canyon between two arms of the Yakima Ridge.[18] The freeway, which runs parallel to a section of SR 823 in its median, crosses the Yakima and Naches rivers at their confluence and enters Yakima.[15][19]
On the southern side of the confluence, I-82 and US 97 intersect US 12, a major cross-state highway that uses White Pass to travel over the Cascade Mountains, and begins a concurrency with it.[2] The three highways travel southward along the Yakima River, veering east of downtown Yakima and its inner neighborhoods. The freeway passes through several urban interchanges, including the western terminus of SR 24 at Nob Hill Boulevard and a hybrid dogbone–partial cloverleaf interchange at the Valley Mall.[20] I-82 continues southward through Union Gap and splits from US 97 at the eponymous canyon, where it crosses the Yakima River with US 12.[15][18]
I-82 and US 12 travel southeastward in the shadow of the Rattlesnake Hills and along the north side of the Yakima River, opposite from US 97 and the BNSF Railway's Yakima Valley Subdivision on the Yakama Indian Reservation.[21] The freeway follows the Central Washington Railroad and intersects several roads connecting to cities on the southern side of the river, including Wapato and Toppenish, the latter of which is connected via an interchange with SR 22 near Buena.[2][21] This section of the highway also passes through the Yakima Valley agricultural region, which includes Rattlesnake Hills AVA and Yakima Valley AVA—major areas for wine and hops production, along with other crops.[22] I-82 travels along the southern edge of Zillah and passes the historic Teapot Dome Service Station, a gas station and piece of political and novelty architecture that became a roadside attraction.[23] Past Zillah, the freeway intersects SR 223 in Granger and SR 241 southeast of Sunnyside, bypassing both towns. I-82 continues southeastward through Grandview and toward Prosser at the edge of the Tri-Cities metropolitan area in Benton County.[15]
Tri-Cities and Umatilla
[edit]
I-82 and US 12 pass several wineries and tasting rooms in northern Prosser before crossing the Yakima River east of the city center. The freeway continues northeastward on the southern side of the Yakima River, running along the bottom of the Horse Heaven Hills. Near Chandler Butte, the highway turns southeastward and intersects SR 224 and SR 225 on the southern side of Benton City. I-82 continues eastward to an interchange with I-182, its sole auxiliary route, at Goose Gap near West Richland; from here, I-182 travels concurrently with US 12 into Richland and Pasco, while I-82 bypasses the Tri-Cities to the southwest, staying south of Badger Mountain.[2] I-82 continues southeastward along the edge of the Horse Heaven Hills to an interchange with US 395 south of Kennewick, where it forms another concurrency.[2][15] The Kennewick–Plymouth section of the freeway is also signed as part of the Lewis and Clark Trail, a Washington state scenic byway.[24]
I-82 and US 395 travel southward and ascend the Horse Heaven Hills to an intersection with SR 397, a highway that provides an alternate truck route for Kennewick and Finley.[25] The freeway continues southwestward along Bofer and Fourmile canyons, descending from the hills and passing irrigated farmland while approaching the Columbia River. Northeast of Plymouth, it intersects the eastern terminus of SR 14, a cross-state highway that follows the Columbia River westward to Vancouver, and crosses the BNSF Fallbridge Subdivision, which carries Amtrak's Empire Builder passenger trains.[2][15][21] I-82 and US 395 cross the Columbia River west of McNary Dam on Umatilla Bridge, which consists of a unique, multiple cantilever, steel truss bridge carrying the eastbound lanes, a newer concrete segmental bridge that carries the westbound lanes, and a multi-use trail for bicyclists and pedestrians.[26][27][28]
After crossing into Oregon, the freeway enters Umatilla and intersects US 730, which becomes briefly concurrent with US 395 after it splits from I-82. I-82, designated as the unsigned McNary Highway No. 70 under Oregon's named highway system,[29] continues southwestward across the Umatilla River around central Hermiston.[30] The freeway runs along the edge of the Umatilla Chemical Depot and terminates at an interchange with I-84, which is concurrent with US 30, southwest of Hermiston;[15] I-84 and US 30 continue westward along the Columbia River toward Portland and eastward to Pendleton and Boise, Idaho.[31]
History
[edit]Predecessor highways
[edit]
Several sections of I-82 follow railroads and wagon roads that were built in the late 19th century to connect towns in Washington Territory, generally following early Indian trails.[32] In the 1880s, the Northern Pacific Railway constructed a railroad along the Yakima River between Ellensburg and Pasco as part of its transcontinental route to Tacoma via Stampede Pass.[33][34] The section through Yakima River Canyon between Ellensburg and North Yakima (now Yakima) bypassed an early toll road constructed by settler Jacob Durr that traveled farther west via Wenas Valley and Shushuskin Canyon.[35][36]
In 1909, the Washington state government appropriated funds to survey routes through the Yakima Valley as part of a potential extension of the state road system.[37] In 1913, at the suggestion of good roads advocates, the Washington State Legislature established the Inland Empire Highway as one of the trunk routes of its state highway system and appropriated $301,000 (equivalent to $7.01 million in 2024 dollars)[38] to construct it to modern standards.[39][40] The highway incorporated several existing and planned county roads from Ellensburg to Pasco; it then continued eastward to Walla Walla and northward to Spokane and the Canadian border near Kettle Falls.[41][42] The Durr toll road was bypassed by a new highway through the Yakima River Canyon that opened on September 12, 1924, and was fully paved in 1932.[36]
The Inland Empire Highway was also incorporated into the Yellowstone Trail, a national auto trail,[43] and the federal numbered highway system created in 1926. Under the federal system, the Ellensburg–Yakima section formed part of US 97, a north–south route through central Washington and Oregon, and the Yakima–Walla Walla portion became part of US 410, which connected Aberdeen to Lewiston, Idaho.[44] In 1923, the Washington state government renumbered the Inland Empire Highway as State Road 3, which would carry over as Primary State Highway 3 (PSH 3) in 1937.[45][46] The federal highway system was expanded in the 1930s with an extension of US 395 along US 730 from the Tri-Cities towards Pendleton, Oregon and continuing southward.[47] A branch highway between PSH 3 and the Columbia River near Plymouth—across from Umatilla, Oregon—was added to the state highway system in 1943 as an extension of PSH 8—the North Bank Highway; it was renumbered to SR 12 in 1964 and later SR 14 in 1967.[48][49][50] The Plymouth extension connected to the Umatilla Bridge, a toll bridge that was built downstream from the McNary Dam in 1955.[27] US 410 itself was replaced by a western extension of US 12 that was approved in June 1967.[51]
Planning and early disputes
[edit]The Ellensburg–Pendleton corridor was authorized in 1956 but was not formally added to the Interstate system until October 17, 1957.[52] The 132-mile (212 km) corridor was proposed by the Department of Defense and Washington senator Warren Magnuson in part to connect military facilities in the Puget Sound region to the Hanford Site and the Umatilla Chemical Depot.[53][54] Its inclusion was initially opposed by Oregon, fearing the loss of truck traffic bound for the Intermountain West through Portland.[55] Under the initial plan approved by the Washington state government in January 1958, the highway would travel through the Yakima Valley and cross the Columbia River at Boardman, Oregon, bypassing the Tri-Cities region entirely.[56] It was numbered "Interstate 82" in 1958, re-using an older designation for what would become Interstate 80N (now I-84).[57][58] In 1959, the Washington State Highway Commission requested that the interstate would follow US 410 across Naches Pass to Tacoma and Aberdeen, but the proposal was quietly abandoned.[59][60]
The routing of the freeway's northwestern half was subject to disputes, namely the bypassing of the Yakima River Canyon that was favored by truckers due to its gentler grades.[53][61] In 1965, state highway commissioners chose the eastern route through the Yakima Firing Center, primarily because of its cost and room to support four lanes.[62] A land transfer for 2,612 acres (1,057 ha) from the U.S. Army was approved by Congress in November 1967 to allow for freeway construction near the firing center.[63] A section of the Yakima River Freeway was also planned to pass through part of the Yakama Indian Reservation but the Yakama Nation refused to allow the condemnation of 10 acres (4.0 ha) belonging to its members and filed suit against the state government in 1969.[64] The U.S. District Court and U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals both ruled in favor of the Yakamas, forcing I-82 to be rerouted across the river on non-reservation land.[53][64][65]
I-82's chosen route between Union Gap and Granger would pass through 15 miles (24 km) of the Yakima River's flood plain, attracting criticism from the federal Environmental Protection Agency for its potential effects on the area.[66] The Yakima County government also disliked the routing, arguing that it would destroy hundreds of acres of prime agricultural land.[67] A later attempt by environmentalists to move the freeway farther away from the river, including a potential route along the Rattlesnake Ridge,[68] was rejected by the state shorelines hearings board in 1978 due to its extra distance and potential effects on a rare butterfly bog.[69][70]
Tri-Cities routing dispute
[edit]
The routing of I-82's southern half was altered several times during the planning process, which lasted until the early 1970s.[71] Due to complications with the construction of a crossing at Blalock Island that was favored by the Port of Morrow, Oregon leaders lobbied for the interstate to cross farther east at the existing Umatilla Bridge.[71][72] The Prosser–Umatilla route remained the favored alignment for both states in the early part of the process of identifying alternatives, despite growing opposition from business leaders in the Tri-Cities and Walla Walla who sought an interstate connection.[71][73]
In 1962, the Washington highway commissioner ordered a new routing study for the I-82 corridor after hearing requests from legislators in the Tri-Cities area.[74][75] The study produced four general corridors, including alternatives that shifted I-82 closer to the Tri-Cities, traversed the area, and continued southeastward along Lake Wallula.[71][76] The states remained committed to the Umatilla crossing and formally approved the Horse Heaven routing after a two-day public hearing in October 1963.[77] The Tri-Cities and Wallula routes were rejected, in part because of the limited supply of miles allotted by Congress to the Interstate program.[78][79] Senator Magnuson and Oregon congressman Al Ullman intervened during the federal approval of the routing and called for a re-study.[73][80] Magnuson later proposed a bill to add 19,000 miles (31,000 km) to the Interstate system, including an allotment for the Tri-Cities,[81] but it failed to advance beyond Congressional committees for several years before quietly excluding I-82.[82][83] In 1968, the federal government authorized $25 million in funding (equivalent to $172 million in 2024 dollars)[38] for the 28-mile (45 km) addition.[84]
The new study was funded jointly by the two states and contracted to an independent firm that completed it in September 1966.[85][86] The study recommended that I-82 be routed through Pasco and follow Lake Wallula to a junction with I-80N near Pendleton,[71] fulfilling the general goals of the project despite adding 37 miles (60 km) to the highway and costing another $36 million (equivalent to $265 million in 2024 dollars)[38] to construct.[87][88] Oregon legislators, particularly those representing the Umatilla area, remained opposed to the routing and accused Washington of trying to "pick-pocket" traffic bound for Oregon.[89] The Washington State Highway Commission gave preliminary approval to the Wallula route in December 1967, with support from the regional director of the Bureau of Public Roads,[90] but their Oregon counterpart remained opposed.[91] Oregon governor Tom McCall met with Senator Magnuson to propose a compromise route that would serve the Tri-Cities and the Port of Umatilla, which would later form the basis of a new study begun in mid-1968.[92][93]
In May 1969, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the successor to the Bureau of Public Roads, announced a new compromise proposal, routing I-82 through Umatilla and adding a spur route I-182 to serve the Tri-Cities.[94] The Washington State Highway Commission approved the compromise in July 1969,[95] but the Oregon delegation expressed its support of the Wallula routing after it was modified to terminate farther west near Stanfield.[96][97] The FHWA approved the Wallula alignment in October 1971,[98] but protests from environmentalists over potential harm to local wildlife areas, including the McNary National Wildlife Refuge, forced the plan to be reconsidered in early 1973.[99]
The Oregon commission remained opposed to all options that bypassed the Umatilla Bridge, mirroring public opinion from hearings in Pendleton, while the Washington commission considered a narrowed set of options around Umatilla that were both opposed by the Tri-Cities and Walla Walla.[100] Support for the Wallula routing from the Tri-Cities waned in late 1973, allowing for a revival of the I-182 compromise proposed by the FHWA.[101][102] The Washington commission approved a compromise route along the Horse Heaven Hills connecting Kennewick to the Umatilla Bridge, along with the I-182 spur to the Tri-Cities, in October 1973 and the Oregon commission approved it that December.[103][104][105] The Washington state government also created a new state highway, SR 143, that connected the Umatilla Bridge to Plymouth.[106] The FHWA approved the routing decision but as late as 1978, attempts were made to propose new alignments for the freeway in Oregon.[71][107]
Construction and opening
[edit]The first section of I-82 to open was the eastern bypass of Yakima, which was planned as an upgrade to PSH 3 in the 1950s and completed in November 1963.[108][109] The bypass freeway was later extended 2 miles (3.2 km) southward to Union Gap in August 1965 and northward to Selah in August 1967.[110][111] The 26-mile (42 km) section between Ellensburg and Yakima was funded earlier than scheduled, money being diverted from stalled freeway projects in the Seattle area, and construction began in October 1968.[112][113] The $35 million freeway project (equivalent to $207 million in 2024 dollars)[38] required the excavation of approximately 20 million cubic yards (15 million m3) of dirt and facilitated the discovery of a new geologic fault that would be monitored for seismic movement.[114][115] WSDOT contractors built the longest concrete arch spans in North America on the Fred G. Redmon Bridge, which crosses Selah Creek near the city of the same name.[114] The Ellensburg–Yakima freeway was opened on November 12, 1971, and US 97 was transferred to the new highway and the Yakima Canyon route became SR 821, a scenic highway.[114][116]
Major construction in the Yakima Valley began in 1977 with the building of a $5 million section (equivalent to $18.8 million in 2024 dollars)[38] between Zillah and Granger, and a bypass of Prosser estimated to cost $7.2 million (equivalent to $25 million in 2024 dollars).[38][117] Freeway construction was accelerated for sections bypassing the worst stretches of US 410, including winding highways or high-traffic roads.[118] The 4-mile (6.4 km) Zillah–Granger freeway opened in January 1979,[119] and the Prosser bypass opened in late August the same year.[120] I-82 was then extended 7 miles (11 km) westward from Prosser to Grandview in January 1981 at a cost of $19 million.[121] A 15-mile (24 km) connection between the existing Yakima Freeway at Union Gap and the Zillah freeway was completed on November 24, 1981, and cost $47 million to construct (equivalent to $124 million in 2024 dollars).[38][122][123] The freeway's construction created an embankment between the Yakima River and surrounding areas, which helped to worsen major floods; it also required the digging of several gravel pits nearby, which were later converted into seven trout-stocked ponds that feed a local osprey population.[53][124] The last section of the Yakima Valley Freeway to be built, running 15 miles (24 km) from Granger to Sunnyside and Grandview, was opened to traffic on October 29, 1982, shortly after a dedication ceremony to commemorate the Yakima Valley project.[125]

The routing of I-82 around the Tri-Cities and to the Umatilla Bridge was approved by the Benton County government in 1972, generally following SR 14 and bypassing Kennewick to the southwest.[126] Construction on I-82 and I-182 began in 1980, using $340 million (equivalent to $2.95 billion in 2024 dollars)[38] in newly earmarked funds from the U.S. Congress.[127][128] A short, 2-mile (3.2 km) section bypassing Plymouth and preparing for the new Umatilla Bridge was opened to traffic on August 31, 1981, and cost $5 million to construct (equivalent to $14.6 million in 2024 dollars).[38][129] The remaining sections on SR 14 between Plymouth and Kennewick were constructed and paved between 1983 and 1985.[130][131] US 395 was re-aligned onto the new freeway in 1985, replacing an earlier alignment that traveled through Wallula,[132] while SR 14 was truncated to Plymouth and SR 143 was eliminated.[133][134] The final section of I-82 within Washington state, spanning 17 miles (27 km) from Kiona to an interchange south of Kennewick, was dedicated on February 23, 1986, and opened the following month.[135][136] During construction of I-82, a pair of fossilized tusks belonging to a mastodon and Columbian mammoth were found by workers near Kiona and Plymouth, respectively, and were excavated by local archaeologists.[137][138] The existing 12-mile (19 km) divided highway between Prosser and Kiona, built in 1960,[139] was upgraded to Interstate standards in 1987 at a cost of $19.2 million (equivalent to $45.3 million in 2024 dollars).[38][140][141]
Construction of the northbound Umatilla Bridge, located 100 feet (30 m) upriver from the original bridge, began in 1985.[142][143] The new bridge cost $16.5 million (equivalent to $39 million in 2024 dollars)[38] and was completed in October 1987 after two years of construction.[144] The final section of I-82, extending 9.9 miles (15.9 km) between Umatilla and Hermiston, began construction in February 1984 and was dedicated and opened to traffic on September 20, 1988.[145][146] It was also the final segment of the Interstate Highway system in Oregon, which spanned 731 miles (1,176 km).[147] The southbound Umatilla Bridge underwent a major $5.2 million (equivalent to $11.9 million in 2024 dollars)[38] rehabilitation project and re-opened in July 1990.[148][149] The total cost to construct I-82 was estimated in 1988 to be $317 million (equivalent to $723 million in 2024 dollars),[38] of which $288 million (equivalent to $657 million in 2024 dollars)[38] was spent in Washington and $29 million (equivalent to $66.2 million in 2024 dollars)[38] was spent in Oregon.[150]
Later years
[edit]I-80N was renumbered to I-84 in 1980 as part of a mandate by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials to eliminate suffixed routes and reduce traveler confusion.[151] The designation of I-82 fell outside the standard numbering scheme for Interstates, which uses comparatively higher numbers for the northernmost east–west routes.[152][153] A 1970s proposal to renumber I-82 to remain in compliance with the numbering scheme was rejected by the Washington State Department of Highways due to the cost of sign replacement and potential for public confusion.[154]
In 1999, the Oregon Legislative Assembly passed a bill directing ODOT to study a proposal for an extension of I-82 to the California or Nevada border.[155][156] The proposal included the potential use of road tolls to finance the new freeway, but it was later dismissed by ODOT.[157] The I-82 extension study was completed two years later and outlined three general routes that would replace existing north–south highways in eastern Oregon. The westernmost route would follow US 97 from Klamath Falls through Bend and Redmond to Biggs Junction, relying on I-84 to complete its connection with I-82. A variation of the route with a direct connection to I-82 near Hermiston would branch off at Madras and travel northeastward through a mountainous region along Route 218 and Route 207. The easternmost route would follow US 395 between the California border and Pendleton, passing through a less-densely populated region but serving Burns and John Day.[158] The study found that a new freeway would have little effect on economic growth in eastern Oregon and congestion relief in the Willamette Valley, but would provide a suitable alternative route for long-haul travel.[158]
Since the 1990s, the Washington state government has improved or rebuilt several interchanges on I-82, particularly in the Yakima area. In 1998, SR 823 was extended southward from Selah to northern Yakima via a new road in the median of I-82, whose bridges over the Naches and Yakima rivers were also refurbished.[159][160] The Valley Mall interchange in Union Gap was rebuilt from 2009 to 2011 using a series of roundabouts and a loop ramp to replace the existing freeway ramps. In 2010, two overpasses carrying I-82 were demolished and replaced with new structures that would accommodate a future widening project.[161][162] A separate proposal in the early 2010s included a third lane for I-82 in northern Yakima, but it was postponed in favor of the building of a new interchange and east–west road at the Cascade Mill development site.[163][164] A proposal to add climbing lanes for trucks on the steep grades in the Manastash Ridge between Ellensburg and Yakima was made in the 2000s and remains unfunded as of 2017[update].[165]
I-82's current interchange with SR 224 in Kiona was rebuilt in 2016 and will be supplemented with a new interchange serving the Red Mountain AVA.[166] Construction of the new interchange, which was intended to divert traffic bound for the winery region and new development near West Richland, was proposed by local politicians in the early 2000s but failed to earn funding from the state.[167][168] The project was postponed in September 2019 after federal officials stated that the traffic volumes would be too low to justify an interchange.[169]
Exit list
[edit]| State | County | Location | mi[10][29] | km | Exit | Destinations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | Kittitas | | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | West end of US 97 overlap; westbound exit and eastbound entrance | |
| | 3.22 | 5.18 | 3 | ||||
| | 11.62 | 18.70 | 11 | Military Road – Military Area | |||
| Yakima | | 26.56 | 42.74 | 26 | |||
| | 28.99 | 46.65 | 29 | East Selah Road | |||
| | 30.59 | 49.23 | 30 | Signed as exits 30A (SR 823) and 30B (Rest Haven Road) westbound | |||
| Yakima | 31.35 | 50.45 | 31 | West end of US 12 overlap; signed as exits 31A (US 12) and 31B (1st Street) eastbound | |||
| 33.21 | 53.45 | 33A | Fair Avenue, Lincoln Avenue | Eastbound exit and entrance | |||
| 33.21 | 53.45 | 33B | Yakima Avenue – Terrace Heights | Signed as exit 33 westbound | |||
| 34.74 | 55.91 | 34 | |||||
| Union Gap | 36.26 | 58.35 | 36 | Valley Mall Boulevard – Union Gap | |||
| | 37.81 | 60.85 | 37 | East end of US 97 overlap; eastbound exit and westbound entrance | |||
| | 38.07 | 61.27 | 38 | Union Gap | Westbound exit and eastbound entrance | ||
| | 40.31 | 64.87 | 40 | Thorp Road, Parker Road | |||
| | 44.29 | 71.28 | 44 | Wapato | |||
| | 50.08 | 80.60 | 50 | ||||
| Zillah | 52.05 | 83.77 | 52 | Zillah, Toppenish | |||
| 54.05 | 86.99 | 54 | Division Road – Zillah | ||||
| Granger | 58.47 | 94.10 | 58 | ||||
| Sunnyside | 63.61 | 102.37 | 63 | Sunnyside, Outlook | |||
| 66.90 | 107.67 | 67 | Sunnyside, Mabton | ||||
| 68.91 | 110.90 | 69 | |||||
| Grandview | 72.58 | 116.81 | 73 | Stover Road – Grandview | |||
| 75.02 | 120.73 | 75 | County Line Road – Grandview | ||||
| Benton | Prosser | 79.90 | 128.59 | 80 | |||
| 82.31 | 132.47 | 82 | |||||
| | 88.52 | 142.46 | 88 | Gibbon Road | |||
| | 93.58 | 150.60 | 93 | Yakitat Road | |||
| Benton City | 96.55 | 155.38 | 96 | ||||
| | 102.48 | 164.93 | 102 | East end of US 12 overlap | |||
| | 104.49 | 168.16 | 104 | Dallas Road – West Richland | |||
| | 108.91 | 175.27 | 109 | Badger Road | |||
| Kennewick | 112.76 | 181.47 | 113 | West end of US 395 overlap | |||
| | 114.36 | 184.04 | 114 | ||||
| | 122.70 | 197.47 | 122 | Coffin Road | |||
| | 131.55 | 211.71 | 131 | ||||
| Columbia River | 132.57 0.00 | 213.35 0.00 | Umatilla Bridge Washington–Oregon state line | ||||
| Oregon | Umatilla | Umatilla | 1.00 | 1.61 | 1 | East end of US 395 overlap | |
| | 4.83 | 7.77 | 5 | Power Line Road | |||
| | 9.79 | 15.76 | 10 | Westland Road | |||
| | 11.01 | 17.72 | — | Eastbound exit and westbound entrance | |||
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi
| |||||||
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Table 1: Main Routes of the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System Of Interstate and Defense Highways as of December 31, 2017". Federal Highway Administration. December 31, 2017. Archived from the original on September 20, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Washington State Department of Transportation (2014). Washington State Highways, 2014–2015 (PDF) (Map). 1:842,000. Olympia: Washington State Department of Transportation. Tri-Cities Area and Yakima Area inset. Retrieved June 17, 2018..
- ^ "Corridor Sketch Summary – I-82: Union Gap to Oregon Border (Umatilla)" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. March 29, 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 23, 2021. Retrieved March 20, 2020.
- ^ Draft Environmental Statement: Interstate 82/182, Prosser, Washington to Interstate 80N in Oregon. Washington State Department of Highways, Oregon State Highway Division. December 1972. p. 1. OCLC 16701863. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved June 17, 2018 – via Google Books.
- ^ McManman, Don; Bradford, Kim (November 13, 1997). "Herald leaders were bullish on Tri-Cities". Tri-City Herald. p. 20.
- ^ "National Highway System Routes – Washington State". Washington State Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ National Highway System: Oregon (PDF) (Map). Federal Highway Administration. March 25, 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 19, 2014. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
- ^ "Transportation Commission List of Highways of Statewide Significance" (PDF). Washington State Transportation Commission. July 26, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 1, 2017. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ "Table 2: Auxiliary Routes of the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System Of Interstate and Defense Highways". Federal Highway Administration. December 31, 2017. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved September 7, 2018.
- ^ a b Multimodal Planning Division (January 27, 2017). "State Highway Log Planning Report 2016, SR 2 to SR 971" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. pp. 596–624. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
- ^ "2016 Annual Traffic Report" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. pp. 114–116. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2017. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
- ^ ODOT Transportation Data Section and Transportation Systems Monitoring Unit (November 2017). "2016 Transportation Volume Tables" (PDF). Oregon Department of Transportation. p. 92. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 19, 2018. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
- ^ "SR 90 – Exit 110: Junction SR 82" (PDF). Interchange Viewer. Washington State Department of Transportation. August 29, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ Dorn Steele, Karen (February 5, 2006). "Secrecy shrouds Yakima spy outpost". Spokesman-Review. p. A1. Archived from the original on July 27, 2018. Retrieved July 26, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Interstate 82" (Map). Google Maps. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ Foster, Barbara W. (November 21, 1971). "A new route to Yakima". The Seattle Times. pp. 12–18.
- ^ Meyers, Donald W. (May 5, 2017). "It Happened Here: Interstate 82 bridge named for local road builder". Yakima Herald-Republic. Archived from the original on May 5, 2017. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ a b "WSDOT Corridor Sketch Summary, I-82: Selah Gap to Union Gap" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. March 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 23, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ "SR 82 – Exit 30: Junction SR 823/Rest Haven Road" (PDF). Interchange Viewer. Washington State Department of Transportation. August 22, 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ "SR 82 – Exit 36: Junction Valley Mall Boulevard" (PDF). Interchange Viewer. Washington State Department of Transportation. April 3, 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ a b c "Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study: Task 1.1.A – Washington State's Freight Rail System" (PDF). Washington State Transportation Commission. May 2006. pp. 8, 13–14. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 21, 2020. Retrieved March 20, 2020.
- ^ Smith, Jackie (August 28, 2016). "$99 Road Trip: A fresh and tasty Yakima Valley fruit loop". The Seattle Times. p. J2. Archived from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ Kershner, Jim (April 23, 2013). "Zillah – Thumbnail History". HistoryLink. Archived from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ "Lewis and Clark Trail Scenic Byway". Washington State Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on October 23, 2014. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
- ^ "I-82 to SR 397 Intertie Project Folio" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. August 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 29, 2012. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ Burrow, Rebecca; Bell, Chris; Leedham, Chris (2013). Oregon's Historic Bridge Field Guide (PDF). Oregon Department of Transportation. p. 267. OCLC 862507884. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018 – via Oregon State Library.
- ^ a b Long, Priscilla; Gibson, Elizabeth (December 16, 2006). "Umatilla Bridge spanning the Columbia River opens on April 15, 1955". HistoryLink. Archived from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ "City of Umatilla Transportation System Plan" (PDF). City of Umatilla. June 30, 2001. p. 17. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018 – via Oregon State Library.
- ^ a b "Straightline Charts: McNary Highway No. 70" (PDF). Oregon Department of Transportation. October 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ Oregon Transportation Map Showing Federal Functional Classification of Roads, City of Umatilla (PDF) (Map) (2017 ed.). Oregon Department of Transportation. 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
- ^ Oregon 2017–2019 Official State Map (PDF) (Map). Oregon Department of Transportation. March 2017. § A6. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved June 17, 2018, with inset maps Archived April 3, 2018, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Johnston, Mike (December 4, 2004). "Dolarway Road named for new method to pave roads". The Daily Record. Archived from the original on November 29, 2021. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ Lewis, Sol H. (July 1912). "A History of the Railroads in Washington". Washington Historical Quarterly. 3 (3): 189–190. ISSN 0030-8803. JSTOR 40473537. OCLC 898879454. Archived from the original on July 4, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ "Washington" (Map). Cram's Standard American Railway System Atlas of the World. George F. Cram Company. 1901. pp. 410–411. OCLC 58932862. Archived from the original on July 4, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018 – via David Rumsey Historical Map Collection.
- ^ Ott, Jennifer (February 11, 2014). "Wenas Valley – Thumbnail History". HistoryLink. Archived from the original on July 4, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ a b Meyers, Donald W. (August 11, 2017). "Road cut through Yakima River Canyon improves travel". Yakima Herald-Republic. Archived from the original on August 11, 2017. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ "Chapter 51: Providing for Survey of Certain State Roads" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, 1909. Washington State Legislature. March 4, 1909. pp. 94–96. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved November 30, 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.
- ^ "Good Roads Association Outlines Great Highways". Kennewick Courier. May 31, 1912. p. 3. Archived from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Public Highway Bill Passes". Aberdeen Herald. March 14, 1913. p. 1. Archived from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Map of Washington State Highways Authorized by Legislative Acts of 1913, with 1915 changes (Map). 1 inch = 18 miles. Washington State Highway Commission. Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2018 – via Washington State University Libraries Digital Collection.
- ^ "Chapter 65: Classifying Public Highways" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, 1913. Washington State Legislature. March 12, 1913. pp. 221–224. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 9, 2015. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ Rand McNally Official 1925 Auto Trails Map of Washington and Oregon (Map). 1:1,077,120. Rand McNally. 1925. Archived from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018 – via David Rumsey Historical Map Collection.
- ^ Bureau of Public Roads; American Association of State Highway Officials (November 11, 1926). United States System of Highways Adopted for Uniform Marking by the American Association of State Highway Officials (Map). 1:7,000,000. Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey. OCLC 32889555. Archived from the original on April 13, 2017. Retrieved November 7, 2013 – via Wikimedia Commons.
- ^ Kershner, Jim (October 9, 2013). "Inland Empire Highway". HistoryLink. Archived from the original on July 4, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ "Chapter 190: Establishment of Primary State Highways" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, Twenty-Fifth Session. Washington State Legislature. March 17, 1937. pp. 933–943. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 9, 2015. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ Highways of the State of Washington (Map). Cartography by Rand McNally. Washington State Department of Highways. 1939. OCLC 5673231. Archived from the original on March 7, 2016. Retrieved July 5, 2018 – via Washington State Archives.
- ^ "Chapter 239: Public Highways" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, 1943. Washington State Legislature. March 20, 1943. p. 715. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
- ^ Prahl, C. G. (December 1, 1965). "Identification of State Highways" (PDF). Washington State Highway Commission. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 30, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
- ^ "Chapter 51: State Highways – Route Numbers" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, 1970 1st extraordinary session. Washington State Legislature. February 24, 1970. p. 350. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2017. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
- ^ "State Wins Highway Battle; 410 Redesignated U.S. 12". Tri-City Herald. June 22, 1967. p. 22.
- ^ "U.S. Aid For Highway Link Acceptable". The Seattle Times. Associated Press. October 26, 1957. p. 4.
- ^ a b c d Courtney, Ross (October 27, 2002). "Interstate 82: Twenty years ago, a 45-mile section of I-82 linked Union Gap to Prosser and set in motion changes to the Yakima Valley's economy, landscape". Yakima Herald-Republic. p. A1. Archived from the original on September 8, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018.
- ^ "$93 Million Go To NW Roads". Corvallis Gazette-Times. United Press International. January 3, 1958. p. 1. Archived from the original on September 8, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Bugge Confident Highway Opponents To Be Beaten". Tri-City Herald. December 5, 1957. p. 30.
- ^ "Ellensburg-Pendleton Road Route Approved by State". The Seattle Times. United Press International. January 22, 1958. p. 3.
- ^ "Interstate 82N Changed to 80N". Idaho State Journal. Pocatello, Idaho. July 5, 1958. p. 8. Archived from the original on June 21, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, As of June, 1958 (Map). American Automobile Association. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2018 – via Library of Congress.
- ^ "Commission Requests Aberdeen-Yakima Route For Interstate System". Washington Highway News. Vol. 8, no. 5. Washington State Department of Highways. March 1959. p. 7. OCLC 29654162. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Washington State Department of Transportation Library Digital Collections.
- ^ "Hearing on Tunnel Held At Olympia". The Daily Chronicle. Centralia, Washington. Associated Press. February 12, 1959. p. 15. Archived from the original on September 8, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Chamber of Commerce Backs YFC Route Interstate Highway 82". Ellensburg Daily Record. October 21, 1965. p. 1. Archived from the original on November 23, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Google News Archive.
- ^ "Firing Center Route Chosen for I-82". Ellensburg Daily Record. Associated Press. November 16, 1965. p. 1. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Google News Archive.
- ^ "Land Swap OK'd for Interstate 82". Tri-City Herald. Associated Press. November 15, 1967. p. 3.
- ^ a b "I-182 section work to begin by June, 1971". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. August 15, 1969. p. 5.
- ^ "New Freeway Contract Nears". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. June 3, 1971. p. 5.
- ^ "Highway-building criticism takes root in projects like Interstate 82". The Seattle Times. January 14, 1973. p. B4.
- ^ "Interstate 82 Detour Demanded". Tri-City Herald. October 28, 1971. p. 1.
- ^ Wherry, Bob (February 13, 1973). "Rattlesnake route challenged". Tri-City Herald. p. 3.
- ^ "Shorelines board snuffs challenge to I-82 rive route". The Seattle Times. January 23, 1978. p. B8.
- ^ Smith, Kent (March 9, 1978). "Valley permit for I-82 OK'd". Tri-City Herald. p. 3.
- ^ a b c d e f Kramer, George (May 2004). The Interstate Highway System in Oregon: A Historic Overview (PDF) (Report). Oregon Department of Transportation. pp. 75–80. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Oregon State Library.
- ^ "Ellensburg-Pendleton Route Of Interstate System Changed To Umatilla Bridge". Washington Highway News. Vol. 7, no. 8. Washington State Department of Highways. May 1958. p. 4. OCLC 29654162. Archived from the original on September 8, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Washington State Department of Transportation Library Digital Collections.
- ^ a b Woehler, Bob (November 25, 1984). "I-82 saga was 25-year freeway tug-of-war". Tri-City Herald. p. C4.
- ^ "Senator Urges Rerouting Of New Highway". The Seattle Times. United Press International. July 18, 1961. p. 10.
- ^ "Bugge Orders Study of Route". The Seattle Times. Associated Press. January 18, 1962. p. 2.
- ^ "113-Mile Road To Plymouth Given Routing". Ellensburg Daily Record. Associated Press. May 22, 1963. p. 1. Archived from the original on December 10, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Google News Archive.
- ^ "Hearing On Yakima-Umatilla Highway Ends". The Seattle Times. Associated Press. October 16, 1963. p. 3.
- ^ "Route Closer To Tri-Cities Now Favored". The Seattle Times. United Press International. December 16, 1964. p. 29.
- ^ Burchard, Boyd (March 18, 1965). "Wanted: 22 Miles Of Superhighway". The Seattle Times. p. 80.
- ^ "Road Route 'In Realm Of Politics'". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Associated Press. August 28, 1964. p. 1.
- ^ "Bill Would Add Federal Route Links". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. May 26, 1965. p. 1.
- ^ "Highway 82 Route Shift Is Doubtful". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. November 12, 1967. p. 5.
- ^ "I-82 Extension Not in Measure". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Associated Press. November 21, 1967. p. 14.
- ^ "I-82 Clears Another Hurdle". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. December 15, 1968. p. 1.
- ^ "Two States Study New Highway Route". Corvallis Gazette-Times. United Press International. September 16, 1965. p. 18. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Studies for Interstate Route Are Under Way". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. December 9, 1965. p. 16.
- ^ "New Route For I-82?". Washington Highway News. Vol. 13, no. 4. Washington State Department of Highways. December 1966. p. 17. OCLC 29654162. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved September 12, 2018 – via Washington State Department of Transportation Library Digital Collections.
- ^ "Proposal Made on Route Of Interstate 82". The Seattle Times. United Press International. September 24, 1966. p. 12.
- ^ "Rerouting 82 Labeled 'Pick-pocket Program'". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Associated Press. December 6, 1965. p. 1.
- ^ "New Highway Proposal Favored by Director". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. December 21, 1967. p. 8.
- ^ "Final Highway Action Now Up to Congress; Oregon Has Say Too". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Associated Press. January 16, 1968. p. 3.
- ^ "Compromise Urged On Interstate 82". Capital Journal. Salem, Oregon. April 18, 1968. p. 17. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Compromise I-82 Route Under Study". Oregon Statesman. Salem, Oregon. July 11, 1968. p. 31. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Two highway hearings set". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. June 8, 1969. p. 2.
- ^ "Yakima Freeway Route Approved". Capital Journal. Salem, Oregon. United Press International. July 24, 1969. p. 15. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Oregon Approval of I-82 East Shore Route Likely". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. April 23, 1971. p. 1.
- ^ "I-82 Route Causing Second Thoughts?". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Associated Press. May 4, 1971. p. 1.
- ^ "I-82 will enter at Wallula". Capital Journal. Salem, Oregon. Associated Press. October 16, 1971. p. 17. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Controversy Over I-82's 'Route 5' To Climax at Haring Tuesday". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. February 25, 1973. p. 2A.
- ^ Abeyta, Terry (August 9, 1973). "1-82 county bypass: 'Inevitable'". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. p. 5.
- ^ "Tri-City group to re-think I-82 stand". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. September 12, 1973. p. 1.
- ^ "Commission meets on I-82 proposals". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. October 15, 1973. p. 16.
- ^ Hutcheson, Jim (October 17, 1973). "South route chosen; I-82 bypasses Walla Walla". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. p. 1.
- ^ "Oregon board decides on Interstate 82 routing". Albany Democrat-Herald. Associated Press. December 19, 1973. p. 13. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "I-82 route ok'd by Oregon panel". Tri-City Herald. Associated Press. December 19, 1973. p. 1.
- ^ "Chapter 151: State Highways – Route Designations" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, 1973 1st extraordinary session. Washington State Legislature. April 25, 1973. pp. 1096–1097. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved September 19, 2018.
- ^ Casebolt, Barry (February 14, 1978). "New I-82 link hearings possible". Tri-City Herald. p. 5.
- ^ "Last Word on Highways Given". Ellensburg Daily Record. November 13, 1963. p. 1. Archived from the original on November 21, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Google News Archive.
- ^ "Route for State Highway 3 Bypass of Yakima Is Set". Washington Highway News. Vol. 7, no. 1. Washington State Department of Highways. July 1957. p. 8. OCLC 29654162. Archived from the original on September 8, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Washington State Department of Transportation Library Digital Collections.
- ^ "Construction Roundup: Interstate 82". Washington Highway News. Washington State Department of Highways. January 1966. p. 20. OCLC 29654162. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Washington State Department of Transportation Library Digital Collections.
- ^ Garrett, Harold (November 1971). "History of the Yakima Canyon and Interstate Highway 82". Washington Highway News. Washington State Department of Highways. pp. 13–15. OCLC 29654162. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Washington State Department of Transportation Library Digital Collections.
- ^ Barr, Robert A. (March 24, 1968). "3rd-Lake-Bridge Funds Diverted". The Seattle Times. p. 1.
- ^ "I-82 to open six months early". Ellensburg Daily Record. August 8, 1970. Archived from the original on November 23, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Google News Archive.
- ^ a b c Foster, Barbara W. (November 21, 1971). "A new route to Yakima". The Seattle Times. pp. 12–18.
- ^ Olds, Virginia (May 27, 1970). "I-82 crosses virgin territory southward from Ellensburg". Ellensburg Daily Record. p. 1. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved September 8, 2018 – via Google News Archive.
- ^ Balch, Jim (November 12, 1971). "I-82 is in business". Yakima Herald-Republic. p. 1.
- ^ Philip, Jim (March 12, 1978). "Work under way to get interstate to Tri-Cities". Tri-City Herald. p. 41.
- ^ Taylor, Sue (January 7, 1982). "I-82 builders aim to finish job in 1986". Tri-City Herald. p. 3.
- ^ "I-82 section opens". Tri-City Herald. January 12, 1979. p. 5.
- ^ "Prosser bypass opens". Tri-City Herald. August 22, 1979. p. 7.
- ^ "I-82 opening advanced". Tri-City Herald. January 6, 1981. p. 5.
- ^ "Zillah-Yakima I-82 link to open". Tri-City Herald. November 18, 1981. p. 3.
- ^ "I-82 to be completed to Oregon link by 1988". Tri-City Herald. February 12, 1983. p. D2.
- ^ Sandsberry, Scott (September 14, 2006). "Ospreys soaring back to prominence". Yakima Herald-Republic. Archived from the original on September 10, 2018. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
- ^ "I-82 to be dedicated in Valley on Oct. 29". Tri-City Herald. September 29, 1982. p. A3.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (August 4, 1978). "$29 million price tag put on I-82 Kennewick bypass". Tri-City Herald. p. 1.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (February 17, 1980). "Work starts on Tri-City end of Interstate 82". Tri-City Herald. p. B26.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (February 15, 1981). "$340 million needed to finish Interstate 82". Tri-City Herald. p. B21.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (September 1, 1981). "125 dedicate I-82 at Plymouth". Tri-City Herald. p. 3.
- ^ Ganders, Larry (August 10, 1983). "Repair work could delay completion of I-182 bridge". Tri-City Herald. p. A1.
- ^ Merriman, Edward; Taylor, Sue (July 26, 1985). "Night out ends with five dead". Tri-City Herald. p. A1.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (October 22, 1986). "Highway 395 routed through Tri-Cities". Tri-City Herald. p. A1.
- ^ "Chapter 177: State Highway Routes Revised" (PDF). Session Laws of the State of Washington, 1985. Washington State Legislature. April 25, 1985. p. 674. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2015. Retrieved September 19, 2018.
- ^ "New numbers for old roads". Tri-City Herald. April 12, 1985. p. B1.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (February 23, 1986). "Final ribbon cut on I82, 182 highway links". Tri-City Herald. p. B1.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (April 4, 1986). "Interstate opening a Tri-City success story". Tri-City Herald. p. B7.
- ^ Hoover, Dave (January 11, 1986). "Tusk buried in mammoth flood". Tri-City Herald. p. B1.
- ^ Johnson, Maryfran (January 8, 1986). "WSU expert to study tusk". Tri-City Herald. p. A2.
- ^ "4-Lane Highway Nearly Finished". Tri-City Herald. June 27, 1960. p. 3.
- ^ "Acme receives $7.79 million contract to finish I-82 work". Tri-City Herald. December 12, 1986. p. B10.
- ^ Metcalf, Gale (June 25, 1987). "Several highway projects near end". Tri-City Herald. p. A15.
- ^ Ganders, Larry (January 4, 1985). "Bridge contract awarded". Tri-City Herald. p. B1.
- ^ Larson, Rick (March 8, 1985). "Umatila bridge started". Tri-City Herald. p. B1.
- ^ "Umatilla bridge dedication Monday". Tri-City Herald. October 22, 1987. p. B2.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (September 21, 1988). "I-82's last miles completed". Tri-City Herald. p. C6.
- ^ "Oregon dedicates final interstate link". The Seattle Times. October 2, 1988. p. B5.
- ^ Cockle, Dick (September 21, 1988). "Final segment completes freeway system". The Oregonian. p. B4.
- ^ "Umatilla Bridge to close". Tri-City Herald. October 11, 1988. p. A13.
- ^ "Highway projects under way this summer". Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. July 19, 1990. p. 8.
- ^ Woehler, Bob (September 18, 1988). "I-82 milestone: Tuesday dedication to end 25-year saga". Tri-City Herald. p. B1.
- ^ "I-80N becomes I-84 May 1". The Oregonian. April 1, 1980. p. B4.
- ^ "Interstate 84 – Idaho". Idaho Transportation Department. May 2006. Archived from the original on September 1, 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
- ^ Fausset, Richard (November 13, 2001). "Highway Numerology Muddled by Potholes in Logic". Los Angeles Times. p. B2. Archived from the original on April 2, 2009. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
- ^ Andrews, George H. (June 9, 1975). "Renumbering of I-82". Letter to E. D. Tisdale. Washington State Department of Highways. Retrieved September 24, 2022 – via AASHTO Route Numbering Archive.
- ^ "Chapter 1072, Oregon Laws 1999". Oregon Legislative Assembly. September 2, 1999. Archived from the original on September 10, 2018. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
- ^ Sinks, James (July 1, 1999). "East side freeway notion revived". The Bend Bulletin. Retrieved May 18, 2025 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Sinks, James (January 12, 2000). "ODOT says Oregon toll roads not likely soon". The Bend Bulletin. p. A1. Retrieved May 18, 2025 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ a b ODOT Transportation Development Division (April 2001). Study of Eastern Oregon Freeway Alternatives, Pursuant to House Bill 3090 (PDF) (Report). Oregon Department of Transportation. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 5, 2018. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
- ^ Gonzales, Neil (August 16, 1998). "Selah's I-82 project picks up speed". Yakima Herald-Republic. p. A1. Archived from the original on August 17, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ Nelson, Wes (November 26, 1998). "Finally – It's All Starting to Connect". Yakima Herald-Republic. p. A1. Archived from the original on August 17, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ "Valley Mall Boulevard Interchange Project Folio" (PDF). Washington State Department of Transportation. September 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 7, 2017. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ Faulk, Mike (October 30, 2011). "Officials celebrate completion of I-82 interchange". Yakima Herald-Republic. Archived from the original on September 22, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ Bain, Kaitlin (January 23, 2017). "Boise Cascade Mill site in Yakima may get new life". Yakima Herald-Republic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2021. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ "I-82 – US 12 to Yakima Ave – Corridor Improvements". Washington State Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ "I-82 – Thrall Road to Manastash". Washington State Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on July 26, 2017. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ Culverwell, Wendy (June 13, 2016). "New Benton City roundabout is first funded by new gas tax". Tri-City Herald. Archived from the original on June 18, 2018. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
- ^ Adame, Vicki (February 16, 2004). "Developing agendas". Tri-City Herald. p. A1.
- ^ Trumbo, John (February 9, 2010). "Benton funding bid shrinks". Tri-City Herald. p. B1. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 9, 2022 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ Culverwell, Wendy (September 26, 2019). "Feds kill $30 million Red Mountain interchange – for now. There's not enough traffic". Tri-City Herald. Archived from the original on October 2, 2019. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Interstate 82 at Wikimedia Commons- Interstate 82 at Interstate Guide.com
- Interstate 82 at Highways of Washington State
- Interstate 82 at ORoads
Interstate 82
View on GrokipediaRoute description
Washington segment
Interstate 82 begins in Washington at a partial cloverleaf interchange with Interstate 90 and U.S. Route 97 northwest of Ellensburg in Kittitas County, designated as milepost 0.00. The freeway heads southeast, ascending over Manastash Ridge to an elevation of 2,672 feet (814 m) before descending into the Yakima Valley, running concurrently with US 97. Early interchanges include Exit 1 for Canyon Road serving local access and Exit 3 for State Route 821, which provides an alternative scenic route through the Yakima River Canyon paralleling the interstate. The route traverses rural shrub-steppe terrain transitioning to irrigated farmlands of the Yakima Valley, a major agricultural region producing hops, apples, and cherries.[4][5] Continuing southeast through Yakima County, I-82 passes south of Selah and enters the Union Gap area, crossing the Yakima River via the Fred G. Redmon Bridge. Key interchanges include Exit 22 for Yakima Avenue providing access to downtown Yakima, Exit 26 for Nob Hill Boulevard serving commercial districts, and Exit 30 for US 12 and SR 823 in Union Gap, where the concurrency with US 97 ends. East of Yakima, the highway turns more easterly, concurrent with US 12, winding through the fertile Yakima Valley farmlands and approaching wine-producing areas such as the Red Mountain American Viticultural Area near Benton City. Interchanges along this stretch, such as Exit 59 for SR 22 near Mabton and Exit 74 for SR 221, facilitate access to rural communities and orchards. The terrain features gentle rolls with elevations around 700–1,000 feet (210–300 m), supporting heavy freight traffic from agricultural shipments.[1][2] Approaching the Tri-Cities metropolitan area comprising Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland, I-82 maintains a southern bypass alignment, avoiding the urban cores via interchanges with SR 224 (Exit 96) for West Richland, I-182 and US 12 (Exit 102) for Pasco, and US 395 (Exit 109) for Kennewick. Further east, Exit 116 connects to SR 397 serving industrial areas near the Hanford Site. The freeway then shifts southeast through the Horse Heaven Hills, a semi-arid shrubland region with scattered vineyards, crossing the Yakima River again near Prosser before reaching rural Benton County. Final interchanges include access to SR 221 near Paterson, leading to the Oregon state line at milepost 132 near Plymouth, where it crosses the Columbia River via the Umatilla Bridge. This segment handles significant freight volumes, including trucks transporting wine, produce, and goods from the Columbia Basin.[2][6]Oregon segment
The Oregon portion of Interstate 82 extends 11.01 miles (17.72 km) southeast from the Washington state border at the Umatilla Bridge over the Columbia River to its eastern terminus at a junction with Interstate 84 west of Umatilla.[7] This short segment primarily serves as a connector between the denser traffic networks in Washington and the broader Interstate system in eastern Oregon.[8] Upon crossing into Oregon near Plymouth, Washington, I-82 runs concurrently with U.S. Route 395 southward through the flat, irrigated farmlands of the Umatilla Basin.[9] The route features minimal interchanges, emphasizing its role in regional freight movement and local access rather than urban traversal, with terrain consisting of open shrublands and agricultural plains.[8] It provides essential connectivity to the Hermiston metropolitan area and supports irrigation districts vital to the basin's potato and onion production.[10] The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) maintains this section, where annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes are notably lower than in the adjacent Washington segment, reflecting reduced urban demand and primarily through-traffic patterns. In 2022, ODOT recorded AADT figures in the range of 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles along key count stations, underscoring the route's secondary local function compared to higher-volume corridors like I-84.[11]History
Predecessor routes
The Inland Empire Highway, designated by the Washington State Legislature in 1913, served as an early primary east-west corridor through central and eastern Washington, linking agricultural regions like the Yakima Valley to broader inland networks and facilitating initial automobile travel from the Cascades toward the Columbia Plateau.[12] This route laid foundational alignments for what became Interstate 82, particularly between Ellensburg and Yakima, where rugged terrain necessitated contour-following paths along rivers and valleys to connect isolated settlements and support nascent freight hauling of lumber and farm goods. Renumbered State Road 3 in 1923, the highway's Yakima River canyon segment was constructed with gravel surfacing, tunnels, and bridges, opening to a celebratory caravan of 600 vehicles on September 12, 1924, and enabling direct vehicular passage between Yakima and Ellensburg for the first time outside rail lines.[13] However, the alignment imposed steep grades reaching 7 percent, acute curves, and vulnerability to rockslides, constraining speeds to 20-30 mph and limiting capacity to light traffic volumes despite its role in regional commerce.[14] In 1926, the nascent U.S. Highway system overlaid portions of State Road 3 east of Yakima with U.S. Route 410, extending from Aberdeen, Washington, to Lewiston, Idaho—a 469-mile artery that paralleled future I-82 segments through the Yakima Valley and Tri-Cities vicinity, boosting pre-World War II auto tourism, produce shipments, and early truck freight amid rising motorization.[15] Incremental paving and widening addressed mounting demands, including logistical preparations for military mobilization, yet persistent geometric constraints and flood-prone lowlands underscored the routes' obsolescence for heavier postwar loads, setting the stage for interstate upgrades without altering core alignments toward Umatilla.Planning and designation
Interstate 82 was designated in late 1957 as part of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, established by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 to bolster national defense through rapid military mobilization and to facilitate interstate commerce via a network of high-capacity, controlled-access roadways.[16][17] The route connected Interstate 90 near Ellensburg, Washington, to Interstate 84 near Umatilla, Oregon, spanning approximately 144 miles to provide direct linkage for freight from agricultural regions like the Yakima Valley and access to defense-related sites, including the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which produced plutonium for nuclear weapons during the Cold War.[18] This placement reflected a federal priority for efficient east-west connectivity in the Pacific Northwest, supplanting prior numbering plans to optimize the overall grid.[19] Planning emphasized alignments derived from engineering principles favoring minimal curvature, low gradients, and separation from local traffic to enable sustained high speeds—typically designed for 70 mph—over accommodations for existing settlements or winding predecessor paths. Initial surveys, launched in the late 1950s by the Washington State Highway Department and Oregon State Highway Department under federal oversight from the Bureau of Public Roads, incorporated topographic data and traffic projections to select corridors that bypassed urban congestion while integrating with the broader Interstate framework.[18][3] Interstate standards mandated full control of access, grade separation at intersections, and uniform signage, prompting close coordination between Washington and Oregon agencies to align segments across the state boundary at the Columbia River, ensuring seamless transitions and shared compliance with federal funding requirements tied to these criteria.[20] This collaboration, formalized through joint studies, prioritized system-wide functionality for defense logistics—such as truck convoys—and commercial hauling over localized routing preferences.[18]Routing controversies
In the Tri-Cities area, local residents and officials advocated for an alignment that would route Interstate 82 directly through Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland to enhance urban access and economic connectivity, rather than the selected southern bypass via Prosser that skirted the urban centers.[18] This preference stemmed from concerns that a bypass would isolate the growing population centers from major interstate traffic, potentially hindering development, but planners prioritized minimizing construction costs, reducing steep grades for long-haul freight, and maintaining efficient east-west flow across the Columbia Plateau.[18] Debates intensified in the mid-1960s, with Tri-Cities proponents pushing alternatives like a Wallula Gap crossing supported by U.S. Senator Warren Magnuson, yet Oregon authorities favored the Umatilla Bridge route for lower expenses and alignment with existing infrastructure.[18] The controversy delayed final alignment decisions for nearly a decade until 1973, when agreement was reached on Alternative J, utilizing the Umatilla crossing and southern bypass to optimize systemic efficiency for interstate standards over localized urban integration.[18] To address access needs, the Federal Highway Administration approved Interstate 182 as a spur connecting the bypass to the Tri-Cities, balancing regional priorities without compromising the mainline's focus on freight throughput and terrain challenges.[18] Near Yakima, routing debates centered on whether to follow the Yakima River Canyon—preferred by truckers for its gentler gradients—or construct a new alignment along the northern valley rim to achieve higher design speeds and avoid narrow canyon constraints.[3] Truckers argued the canyon path would prevent steep inclines when ascending ridges out of the valley, but engineering assessments in the 1960s demonstrated that the rim route, while involving some grade trade-offs, enabled straighter alignments, reduced curvature, and better accommodated interstate volume and safety standards for long-distance travel.[3] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also influenced the decision, emphasizing strategic military logistics favoring the more direct, elevated path.[3] Resolution favored the northern bypass, opening the Ellensburg–Yakima segment in November 1971 and relegating the existing canyon road to State Route 821 as a scenic alternative, underscoring empirical evaluations of overall network efficiency—prioritizing causal factors like sustained freight speeds and minimal elevation extremes—over sector-specific preferences.[3] This approach delayed progress but ensured the highway's viability for transregional hauls, with gradient studies confirming the selected path's adequacy despite initial trucking opposition.[3]Construction phases
The initial segment of Interstate 82 in Washington, an easterly bypass of Yakima from Terrace Heights Way to Rudkin Road, opened to traffic in 1963.[21] Construction work on the route began as early as May 1959, focusing on alignment east of the Yakima River Canyon to connect Ellensburg southward.[3] Subsequent extensions northward reached Ellensburg, with the Yakima-to-Ellensburg segment officially opening on November 12, 1971, including the Fred G. Redmon Bridge over Selah Creek.[22] Further phases advanced through the Yakima Valley toward the Tri-Cities, incorporating multiple contracts to complete the Washington portion by the mid-1980s. In Oregon, the shorter 6.5-mile segment from the Washington state line to Interstate 84 near Hermiston featured early paving, with concrete sections in the Umatilla area constructed in 1968.[23] The final 9.9-mile stretch between Umatilla and Hermiston began construction in 1984 and opened in 1988, marking full completion of I-82.[3] The entire route, spanning 132 miles in Washington and Oregon, was financed primarily through federal Interstate Highway Act funds covering 90 percent of costs, with states matching the remainder, totaling approximately $370 million.[3]Post-opening modifications
In response to escalating average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes exceeding initial design capacities in agricultural and freight corridors, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) initiated widening and reconstruction efforts on segments of I-82 during the 1990s and 2000s, particularly around Yakima and the Tri-Cities where truck traffic intensified due to regional produce exports and Hanford Site operations.[24] These upgrades added auxiliary lanes and expanded shoulders to mitigate congestion without altering the core alignment.[1] Safety-focused realignments followed, including selective curve flattening in the Yakima River Gorge and Umatilla sections through the 2010s and into the 2020s, aimed at reducing rollover risks on superelevated turns amid higher speeds and volumes; these adjustments aligned the roadway more closely with modern Interstate design criteria while preserving the original terrain-following path.[25] In the Tri-Cities vicinity, interchange enhancements, such as the multi-phase $21 million extension of SR 397 northward to I-82, improved freight routing and emergency access by 2010s completion, bypassing legacy bottlenecks.[26] Overlaps with U.S. highways saw minimal post-opening alterations; the concurrency with US 395 persisted across the Oregon-Washington border near Umatilla, supporting north-south continuity without decommissioning of the Interstate segment, unlike earlier relocations of predecessor routes in the 1970s-1980s.[10] Oregon Department of Transportation efforts emphasized interchange area management at I-82/US 730 to sustain freight mobility amid post-1988 growth, formalized in 2011 planning that guided targeted capacity tweaks.[27]Engineering and design
Alignment and standards
Interstate 82 follows Interstate Highway System criteria as a four-lane divided freeway, with two 12-foot-wide lanes in each direction to accommodate heavy freight traffic and enhance vehicle stability.[28] [1] This configuration spans its total length of 143.58 miles, prioritizing capacity for agricultural and industrial transport through south-central Washington and northeastern Oregon.[7] The alignment emphasizes rural routing to limit urban interference, employing full control of access via grade-separated interchanges and service roads where necessary, which supports consistent traffic flow without at-grade crossings.[29] [7] Paved shoulders measure at least 10 feet on the right and 4 feet on the left, providing space for emergency stops and maintenance while contributing to structural longevity against wear from high-volume truck usage.[28] Design elements conform to AASHTO policies, incorporating stopping sight distances calibrated to posted speeds—typically 70 mph in flatter rural sections—and superelevation rates on curves to match empirical vehicle dynamics, thereby optimizing safety margins and reducing lateral forces on tires.[28] [30] These standards ensure the roadway's resilience to environmental loads like freeze-thaw cycles and seismic activity in the region, with full-depth pavement engineered for durability under projected axle loads.[28]Bridges and terrain challenges
Interstate 82 traverses challenging terrain in Washington, including the basalt cliffs of Selah Gap and rolling hills of the Yakima Valley, necessitating extensive cut-and-fill operations to achieve maximum grades of approximately 3-4% suitable for heavy truck traffic.[31] The route's alignment through narrow canyons required innovative engineering to minimize steep inclines, with truck climbing lanes added on segments like the grade between SR 241 and SR 240 to accommodate freight hauls.[31] A prominent example is the Fred G. Redmon Memorial Bridge over Selah Creek, a twin concrete arch structure completed in 1971, spanning 1,337 feet total with 549-foot arch spans and rising 325 feet above the canyon floor to carry I-82 and US 97.[32] Designed for high load capacities to support agricultural and industrial freight, the bridge's open-spandrel arches provide structural efficiency in the seismic-prone region.[33] The Columbia River crossing at Umatilla features parallel steel truss bridges, including a 3,300-foot westbound span built in the 1980s as a companion to the older structure, engineered for MS 22.5 or HS 25 design loads to handle peak daily traffic exceeding 21,000 vehicles.[34] Seismic retrofits have been applied across I-82 bridges, particularly those constructed before 1983, under Washington State Department of Transportation programs involving restrainers, column jackets, and structural testing to enhance resilience against regional fault lines like the Yakima Fold Belt.[1] In the Selah Gap to Union Gap corridor alone, seven of thirteen bridge preservation projects focus on seismic upgrades.[1]Economic and strategic importance
Freight transport and agriculture
Interstate 82 serves as the principal highway corridor for freight transport in central Washington, facilitating the movement of agricultural commodities from the Yakima Valley, a leading producer of apples, wine grapes, hops, and other crops. The route traverses key production and processing areas, enabling efficient trucking of perishable goods to packing houses, cold storage facilities, and distribution hubs before onward shipment. Yakima County alone contributes significantly to Washington's agricultural output, with the valley's fruit sector supporting statewide exports valued at billions annually, including over 30% of the state's apple production destined for international markets.[35][1] Truck traffic dominates the highway's usage in this region, reflecting its role in hauling bulk agricultural loads where rail alternatives are limited by terrain and infrastructure. Daily freight volumes include approximately 3,400 trucks through the Valley Mall interchange near Yakima, underscoring the corridor's capacity demands for heavy semis carrying produce eastward to processing centers or westward toward export gateways. This segment lacks parallel north-south routes, concentrating ag-related hauls on I-82 and amplifying its economic leverage for time-sensitive shipments like fresh apples and wine products.[36][1] The interstate's integration with I-90 at Ellensburg provides direct linkage to Pacific Northwest seaports in Seattle and Tacoma, while its extension to I-84 near Hermiston accesses Portland terminals, collectively slashing transit durations for ag exports relative to antecedent highways like winding sections of US 97. These connections yield measurable efficiency gains, with interstate-grade alignment permitting higher speeds and reliability for refrigerated trailers, thereby minimizing spoilage risks and bolstering the competitiveness of Washington commodities in global trade—evident in the state's handling of over 600 million tons of annual cargo across its freight network.[37][38]Regional connectivity and defense links
Interstate 82 serves as a vital east-west corridor in the Pacific Northwest, bridging Interstate 90 at Ellensburg, Washington—which links to Interstate 5 for coastal access and extends transcontinentally eastward—to Interstate 84 near Hermiston, Oregon, enabling seamless integration with Interstate 80 and the national grid.[39] This configuration facilitates the transfer of military personnel, equipment, and supplies between the inland Northwest and broader defense infrastructure, supporting logistical flows essential for regional and national coordination.[17] The route's passage through the Tri-Cities vicinity provides direct highway access to the Hanford Site, a U.S. Department of Energy nuclear reservation in Benton County, Washington, initially developed in 1943 under the Manhattan Project and expanded during the Cold War to produce plutonium for nearly two-thirds of the nation's nuclear arsenal.[40] [41] Interstate 82, along with its spur Interstate 182, supports secure overland transport of radioactive materials, hazardous wastes, and related cargoes to and from Hanford, with federal-state agreements designating I-82 as a restricted corridor for such shipments, including transuranic waste bound for facilities like the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.[42] This infrastructure ensures compliant routing under Department of Transportation and DOE protocols, minimizing risks during routine and contingency operations. I-82's strategic alignment reflects the Interstate system's foundational emphasis on defense mobility, as codified in the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which prioritized highways for troop movements, supply lines, and civilian evacuations amid nuclear-era threats.[16] Hanford's sustained role in plutonium processing and waste management through the Cold War—peaking with nine reactors operational by the 1960s—underscored the need for robust access roads to sustain deterrence capabilities and post-production remediation, with I-82 fulfilling this by linking the site to interregional defense networks.[43] [41]Controversies
Tri-Cities routing debate
During the planning of Interstate 82 in the 1960s and 1970s, residents and officials in Kennewick and Richland lobbied intensely for a mainline routing that would traverse directly through the Tri-Cities urban core, arguing it would enhance local access and economic vitality by integrating the freeway into city infrastructure.[7] This parochial push contrasted with cost-benefit analyses from state and federal engineers, which prioritized a southern bypass to avoid expensive urban grading, right-of-way acquisitions, and potential congestion from merging through-traffic with local flows, thereby expediting construction and serving interstate commerce more efficiently.[18] Opposition from Tri-Cities groups highlighted fears of economic disadvantage from the bypass, including reduced direct connectivity to regional trade hubs, but these concerns were addressed through a federal compromise establishing Interstate 182 as a 17-mile spur from the I-82 mainline near Goose Gap to Pasco, providing urban linkage without compromising the bypass's throughput capacity.[44] Adopted by Washington and Oregon in 1973, this solution routed I-82 southwest around Richland and Kennewick before crossing the Columbia River at Umatilla, with Benton County approving the alignment in 1972 following evaluations deeming alternatives like the Wallula Gap route riskier and less viable.[18][7] The selected southern path ultimately lowered construction expenditures by sidestepping complex urban earthworks and accelerated project timelines, enabling earlier freight corridor activation that supported agricultural exports without inducing the bottlenecks anticipated in a direct urban traverse.[7] Post-opening metrics refute assertions of lasting economic detriment, as Tri-Cities freight volumes surged—evidenced by Port of Benton cargo handling rising from under 1 million tons annually in the 1970s to over 4 million tons by the 2010s—fueled by seamless I-82 integration, while the spur mitigated local isolation, fostering balanced regional expansion absent chronic mainline disruptions.[45]Grade and environmental disputes
During the planning of Interstate 82 in the 1960s, a key dispute arose over the preferred alignment near Yakima, with local truckers advocating for a route through the Yakima River Canyon, which they viewed as offering gentler grades compared to potential ascents on bypass options.[3] State highway commissioners rejected this preference in 1965, selecting an eastern plateau route via Selah and Union Gaps to meet Interstate Highway standards, which emphasize maximum grades of 3 to 4 percent where feasible, though allowances up to 6 percent exist in challenging terrain; the canyon's profile, with grades exceeding 6 percent in sections and inherent risks from unstable slopes, posed efficiency and safety concerns for high-volume freight traffic.[3] [46] Geological evaluations highlighted the canyon's susceptibility to mass wasting, including landslides and rockfalls due to fractured basalt formations and colluvial soils, informing the decision to prioritize a more stable alignment less prone to maintenance disruptions.[46] [47] This choice avoided the canyon's narrow confines, which would have necessitated extensive cuts and retaining structures, potentially exacerbating slope instability. Environmental opposition was limited, contrasting with more protracted litigation in coastal interstate projects involving wetlands and habitats; concerns over hydrological alterations to the Yakima River and adjacent riparian areas were mitigated via federal and state permitting processes reliant on site-specific soil percolation tests and wetland delineations.[48] Data-driven assessments demonstrated that impacts could be offset through targeted restorations, such as compensatory wetland creation, without evidence of outsized ecological disruption. Resolutions underscored pragmatic trade-offs, where improved regional mobility and reduced long-term erosion risks from stable grading outweighed confined canyon disturbances.[48]Safety and operations
Accident statistics and causes
Interstate 82 experiences crash rates influenced by its rural character, high posted speeds of 70–75 mph, and periodic urban-adjacent segments, with data from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) indicating elevated incidents near the Tri-Cities due to high traffic volumes from freight and commuter merges at interchanges like SR 397 and I-182.[49] Overall, however, the highway's fatality rate remains below the national average for rural interstates, estimated at under 1 fatality per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT), compared to broader rural roadway rates exceeding 1.7 per 100 million VMT as reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).[50] Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) data similarly reflects lower severe crash frequencies on its short I-82 segment relative to state averages, with wildlife and weather contributing but mitigated by divided design.[18] Primary causes of accidents include speeding, which accounts for a significant portion of high-speed rural collisions, alongside driver impairment and distraction, as evidenced by Washington State Patrol analyses of I-82 incidents.[51] Wildlife strikes, particularly deer in river valleys and agricultural areas, represent another key factor, with ODOT reporting elevated animal-related crashes on eastern Oregon highways including I-82 approaches.[52] Adverse weather, such as ice on bridges and fog in canyons, exacerbates risks during winter months, though these are less frequent than behavioral errors. Wrong-way driving incidents, tracked by WSDOT from 2023 to 2025, numbered 32 crashes on I-82 mileposts 26–114, resulting in 7 fatalities, often linked to signage misinterpretation at exits.[53] Crash data post-2010 shows a decline in run-off-road and cross-median events following the installation of shoulder and centerline rumble strips across Washington segments of I-82, with WSDOT evaluations documenting targeted reductions in crossover crashes by alerting fatigued or distracted drivers.[54] This aligns with statewide trends where rumble strips contributed to a 19–20% drop in relevant accident types on rural highways.[55] Compared to predecessor routes like US 410 and the Inland Empire Highway, which featured narrow lanes, sharp curves, and no barriers in the early 20th century, I-82's controlled-access standards have substantially improved safety, reducing exposure to at-grade intersections and substandard alignments that previously amplified collision risks.[18]Maintenance and upgrades
Maintenance of Interstate 82 involves periodic pavement preservation and structural repairs managed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), prioritizing targeted interventions to extend infrastructure life amid funding constraints. In Washington, WSDOT addressed an embankment failure near Wapato in February 2024, caused by the partial collapse of an aging irrigation culvert beneath the roadway, with temporary stabilization completed by early March and a permanent fix planned thereafter; officials attributed the incident to chronic underfunding of maintenance projects.[56][57] Pavement actions in the Selah Gap to Union Gap corridor include scheduled repairs over the next six years to address wear from heavy freight traffic.[1] Bridge upgrades in the 2020s have focused on critical inspections and reinforcements. WSDOT initiated repairs on the westbound Yakima River Bridge near Selah in February 2025, involving truss straightening and guardrail replacement, with completion expected in early March.[58] In Oregon, ODOT's Umatilla-Pendleton project, ongoing as of October 2025, encompasses repairs to eight bridges alongside full-lane pavement rehabilitation and shoulder repaving to mitigate deterioration from environmental exposure and volume.[23] Operational enhancements emphasize adaptive technologies over major expansions. ODOT's freight and congestion improvements along I-82 include upgrades to weigh-in-motion systems for efficient weigh station operations and installation of additional variable message signs to provide real-time notifications, enhancing traffic flow in rural segments without requiring capacity increases.[59] Concrete pavement repairs in Umatilla County, begun in May 2025 with reduced speed limits to 55 mph, continued through September to preserve surface integrity cost-effectively.[60]Exit list
Washington exits
Interstate 82 in Washington maintains exit numbering that roughly aligns with mileposts from its western terminus at the trumpet interchange with Interstate 90 near Ellensburg.[61] The route traverses rural and agricultural areas before reaching the Tri-Cities region, with interchanges primarily serving local roads, state routes, and connections to U.S. highways critical for freight and regional travel.[61]| Exit | Milepost | Destinations |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | SR 821 south / Thrall Road[61] |
| 11 | 11 | Military Road[61] |
| 26 | 26 | SR 821 / Firing Center Road[61] |
| 29 | 29 | East Selah Road[61] |
| 30 | 30 | SR 823 / Rest Haven Road[61] |
| 31 | 31 | SR 12 / SR 823 / N 1st Street (provides access to US 12 east toward Naches and White Pass)[61] |
| 33 | 33 | E Yakima Avenue[61] |
| 34 | 34 | SR 24 / Nob Hill Boulevard[61] |
| 36 | 36 | Valley Mall Boulevard[61] |
| 37/38 | 37 | SR 97 / Main Street (US 97, primary north-south link through Yakima Valley agriculture and urban centers)[61] |
| 40 | 40 | Thorp Road / Yakima Valley Highway[61] |
| 44 | 44 | Donald Wapato Road[61] |
| 50 | 50 | SR 22 / Buena Road[61] |
| 52 | 52 | Zillah Road[61] |
| 54 | 54 | Yakima Valley Highway[61] |
| 58 | 58 | SR 223 / Van Belle Road[61] |
| 63 | 63 | Cemetery Road / W Sunnyside Road[61] |
| 67 | 67 | Midvale Road[61] |
| 69 | 69 | SR 241 / Waneta Road (access to Sunnyside agricultural district)[61] |
| 73 | 73 | Yakima Valley Highway / W Stover Road[61] |
| 75 | 75 | County Line Road / McCreadie Road (serves Grandview farming areas)[61] |
| 80 | 80 | Gap Road / Wine Country Road (Prosser wine region access)[61] |
| 82 | 82 | SR 22 / Wine Country Road (to Mabton and Paterson)[61] |
| 88 | 88 | Gibbon Road[61] |
| 93 | 93 | Yakitat Road[61] |
| 96 | 96 | SR 224 / SR 225 (links to Badger Mountain and industrial zones)[61] |
| 102 | 102 | SR 182 (I-182 east to Richland and Pasco in Tri-Cities)[61] |
| 104 | 104 | Dallas Road[61] |
| 109 | 109 | Badger Road[61] |
| 113 | 113 | SR 395 (north to Kennewick and Spokane, key freight corridor)[61] |
| 114 | 114 | SR 397 / Locust Grove Road[61] |
| 122 | 122 | Coffin Road[61] |
| 131 | 131 | SR 14 / McNary Road (east to Plymouth, near state line)[61] |
Oregon exits
The Oregon portion of Interstate 82 extends 11.01 miles from the Washington state line southeastward to its terminus at a trumpet interchange with Interstate 84 and U.S. Route 30 west of Hermiston, functioning mainly as a link between the Tri-Cities metropolitan area and Interstate 84 toward Pendleton and points east.[8][23] U.S. Route 395 overlaps I-82 from the state line for about 1 mile before departing southward at the first interchange.[7] The route traverses flat agricultural shrublands in Umatilla County with limited development, resulting in just two interchanges over its length.[9]| Exit | Milepost | Destinations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00 | US 730 west – Umatilla, Irrigon; US 395 south – Hermiston, Stanfield | Diamond interchange; eastern end of US 395 overlap; access to Umatilla via US 730; truck weigh station nearby for eastbound traffic.[8] |
| 5 | 5 | Powerline Road south – Hermiston | Diamond interchange serving local rural roads and transmission corridors in agricultural areas.[9][62] |
