Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
James Nasmyth
View on Wikipedia
James Hall Nasmyth (sometimes spelled Naesmyth, Nasmith, or Nesmyth) (19 August 1808 – 7 May 1890) was a Scottish engineer, philosopher, artist and inventor famous for his development of the steam hammer. He was the co-founder of Nasmyth, Gaskell and Company manufacturers of machine tools. He retired at the age of 48, and moved to Penshurst, Kent where he developed his hobbies of astronomy and photography.
Key Information
Early life
[edit]Nasmyth was born at 47 York Place, Edinburgh where his father Alexander Nasmyth was a landscape and portrait painter. One of Alexander's hobbies was mechanics and he employed nearly all his spare time in his workshop where he encouraged his youngest son to work with him in all sorts of materials. James was sent to the Royal High School where he had as a friend, Jimmy Patterson, the son of a local iron founder. Being already interested in mechanics he spent much of his time at the foundry and there he gradually learned to work and turn in wood, brass, iron, and steel. In 1820 he left the High School and again made great use of his father's workshop where at the age of 17, he made his first steam engine.
From 1821 to 1826, Nasmyth regularly attended the Edinburgh School of Arts (today Heriot-Watt University, making him one of the first students of the institution).[1] In 1828 he made a complete steam carriage that was capable of running a mile carrying 8 passengers. This accomplishment increased his desire to become a mechanical engineer. He had heard of the fame of Henry Maudslay's workshop and resolved to get employment there; unfortunately his father could not afford to place him as an apprentice at Maudslay's works. Nasmyth therefore decided instead to show Maudslay examples of his skills and produced a complete working model of a high-pressure steam engine, creating the working drawings and constructing the components himself.
Career
[edit]In May 1829, Nasmyth visited Maudslay in London, and after showing him his work was engaged as an assistant workman at 10 shillings a week. Unfortunately, Maudslay died two years later, whereupon Nasmyth was taken on by Maudslay's partner as a draughtsman.
When Nasmyth was 23 years old, having saved the sum of £69, he decided to set up in business on his own. He rented a factory flat 130 feet long by 27 feet wide at an old cotton mill on Dale Street, Manchester.[2]

The combination of massive castings and a wooden floor was not an ideal one, and after an accident involving one end of an engine beam crashing through the floor into a glass cutters flat below he soon relocated. He moved to Patricroft, an area of the town of Eccles, Lancashire, where in August 1836, he and his business partner Holbrook Gaskell opened the Bridgewater Foundry, where they traded as Nasmyth, Gaskell and Company. The premises were constructed adjacent to the (then new) Liverpool and Manchester Railway and the Bridgewater Canal.
He was elected to corresponding membership of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society on 7 January 1862 [3]
In March 1838 James was making a journey by coach from Sheffield to York in a snowstorm, when he spied some ironwork furnaces in the distance. The coachman informed him that they were managed by a Mr. Hartop who was one of his customers. He immediately got off the coach and headed for the furnaces through the deep snow. He found Mr. Hartop at his house, and was invited to stay the night and visit the works the next day. That evening he met Hartop's family and was immediately smitten by his 21-year-old daughter, Anne. A decisive man, the next day he told her of his feelings and intentions, which was received "in the best spirit that I could desire." He then communicated the same to her parents, and told them his prospects, and so became betrothed in the same day. They were married two years later, on 16 June 1840 in Wentworth.
Up to 1843, Nasmyth, Gaskell & Co. concentrated on producing a wide range of machine tools in large numbers. By 1856, Nasmyth had built 236 shaping machines.
In 1840 he began to receive orders from the newly opened railways which were beginning to cover the country, for locomotives. His connection with the Great Western Railway whose famous steamship SS Great Western had been so successful in voyages between Bristol and New York, led to him being asked to make some machine tools of unusual size and power which were required for the construction of the engines of their next and bigger ship SS Great Britain.
The steam hammer
[edit]In 1837, the Great Western Steam Company was experiencing many problems forging the paddle shaft of the SS Great Britain; when even the largest hammer was tilted to its full height its range was so small that if a really large piece of work were placed on the anvil, the hammer had no room to fall, and in 1838 the company's engineer (Francis Humphries) wrote to Nasmyth: "I find there is not a forge-hammer in England or Scotland powerful enough to forge the paddle-shaft of the engine for the Great Britain! What am I to do?”
Nasmyth thought the matter over and seeing the obvious defects of the tilt-hammer (it delivered every blow with the same force) sketched out his idea for the first steam hammer. He kept his ideas for new devices, mostly in drawings, in a "Scheme Book" which he freely showed to his foreign customers. Nasmyth made a sketch of his steam hammer design dated 24 November 1839, but the immediate need disappeared when the practicality of screw propellers was demonstrated and the Great Britain was converted to that design.[4]
The French engineer François Bourdon came up with the similar idea of what he called a "Pilon" in 1839 and made detailed drawings of his design, which he also showed to all engineers who visited the works at Le Creusot owned by the brothers Adolphe and Eugène Schneider.[4] However, the Schneiders hesitated to build Bourdon's radical new machine. Bourdon and Eugène Schneider visited the Nasmyth works in England in the middle of 1840, where they were shown Nasmyth's sketch. This confirmed the feasibility of the concept to Schneider.[5] In 1840 Bourdon built the first steam hammer in the world at the Schneider & Cie works at Le Creusot. It weighed 2,500 kilograms (5,500 lb) and lifted to 2 metres (6 ft 7 in). The Schneiders patented the design in 1841.[6]
In April 1842 Nasmyth visited France with a view to supplying the French arsenals and dockyards with tools and while he was there took the opportunity to visit the Le Creusot works. On going round the works, he found the steam-hammer at work. By his account, Bourdon took him to the forge department so he might, as he said, "see his own child". Nasmyth said "there it was, in truth–a thumping child of my brain!"[4] Nasmyth patented his design in June 1842 using money borrowed from his sister Anne's husband William Bennett.[7] He built his first steam hammer later that year in his Patricroft foundry.[8] In 1843 a dispute broke out between the two engineers over priority of invention of the steam hammer.[9]

By using the hammer, production costs could be reduced by over 50 percent, while at the same time improving the quality of the forgings produced.
The first hammers were of the free-fall type but they were later modified, given power-assisted fall. Up until then, the invention of Nasmyth's steam-hammer, large forging, such as ships' anchors, had to be made by the "bit-by-bit" process, that is, small pieces were forged separately and finally welded together. A key feature of his machine was that the operator controlled the force of each blow. He enjoyed showing off its capability by demonstrating how it could first break an egg placed in a wine glass, without breaking the glass, which was followed by a full-force blow which shook the building. Its advantages soon became so obvious that before long Nasmyth hammers were to be found in all the large workshops all over the country.
An original Nasmyth hammer now stands facing Nasmyth's Patricroft foundry buildings (now a 'business park'). A larger Nasmyth & Wilson steam hammer stands in the campus of the University of Bolton.
Nasmyth subsequently applied the principle of his steam hammer to a pile-driving machine which he invented in 1843. His first full scale machine used a four-ton hammer-block, and a rate of eighty blows per minute. The pile driver was first demonstrated in a contest with a team using the conventional method at Devonport on 3 July 1845. He drove a pile 70 feet long and 18 inches squared in four and a half minutes, while the conventional method required twelve hours. This was a great success, and many orders for his pile driver resulted. It was used for many large scale constructions all over the world in the next few years, such as the High Level Bridge at Newcastle upon Tyne and the Nile barrage at Aswan, Egypt (Aswan Low Dam).
By 1856 a total of 490 hammers had been produced which were sold across Europe to Russia, India and even Australia, and accounted for 40% of James Nasmyth and Company's revenues.
Other inventions
[edit]
Apart from the steam hammer, Nasmyth created several other important machine tools, including the shaper, an adaptation of the planer which is still used in tool and die making. Another innovation was a hydraulic press which used water pressure to force tight-fitting machine parts together. All of these machines became popular in manufacturing, and all are still in use in modified form.
Nasmyth was also one of the first toolmakers to offer a standardised range of machine tools; before this, manufacturers constructed tools according to individual clients' specifications with little regard to standardisation, which caused compatibility problems. Nasmyth was arguably the last of the early pioneers of the machine tool industry.
Among Nasmyth's other inventions, most of which he never patented, were a means of transmitting rotary motion by means of a flexible shaft made of coiled wire, a machine for cutting key grooves, self-adjusting bearings, and the screw ladle for moving molten metal which could safely and efficiently be handled by two men instead of the six previously required. Nasmyth's idea of a steam ram for naval warfare was never put into production.
In 1844 he, together with engineer Charles May, patented the first Vacuum brake.[10]
Although milling machines were no longer novel by 1830, an example built by Nasmyth around that time stands out for its prescience. It was tooled to mill the six sides of a hex nut that was mounted in a six-way indexing fixture.[11]
He also worked on a project for the conversion of iron which was not dis-similar to that which was eventually patented by Henry Bessemer. A reluctant patentor, and in this instance still working through some problems in his method, Nasmyth abandoned the project after hearing of Bessemer's ideas in 1856. Bessemer, however, acknowledged the efforts of Nasmyth by offering him a one-third share of the value of his patent for the eponymous Bessemer process. Nasmyth turned it down as he had decided to retire.[12]
Later life
[edit]
Nasmyth retired from business in 1856 when he was 48 years old, as he said "I have now enough of this world's goods: let younger men have their chance". He settled down near Penshurst, Kent, where he renamed his retirement home "Hammerfield" and happily pursued his various hobbies including astronomy. He built his own 20-inch reflecting telescope, in the process inventing the Nasmyth focus, and made detailed observations of the Moon. He co-wrote The Moon: Considered as a Planet, a World, and a Satellite (1874) with James Carpenter (1840–1899). This book contains an interesting series of "lunar" photographs: because photography was not yet advanced enough to take pictures at very high magnification directly of the Moon itself, Nasmyth built plaster relief scale models based on his visual observations of the Moon and then photographed the models under electric illumination, replicating the shadows of the topographic contours he observed on the Moon. A crater on the Moon is named after him.
He was happily married to his wife Anne, from Woodburn, Yorkshire, for 50 years, until his death. They had no children.
They are buried in the north section of the Dean Cemetery in western Edinburgh. The huge memorial stands at the east end of the main east–west path, with the path dividing around it. The monument holds a well-carved model of his steam hammer. James' mother, Barbara Foulis (1765-1848) is buried with them. The monument also stands as a memorial to his brother, Patrick Nasmyth (1787-1831)
Recognition
[edit]In memory of his renowned contribution to the discipline of mechanical engineering, the Department of Mechanical Engineering building at Heriot-Watt University, in his birthplace of Edinburgh, is called the James Nasmyth Building.
A plaque in the entryway of the Western Eye Hospital in London recognises his "munificent contribution" of £18 000.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]
Citations
- ^ Nasmyth & Smiles 1883.
- ^ MussonRobinson 1969, p. 491.
- ^ "Corresponding members" (PDF). Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society. 4. 2. Manchester: 275.
- ^ a b c Boutany 1885, p. 59.
- ^ Chomienne 1888, p. 254.
- ^ François BOURDON: Archives Côte d’Or.
- ^ Smiles 2015, Ch. XV.
- ^ Nasmyth & Smiles 1883, p. 259.
- ^ Nasmyth steam hammer.
- ^ The Repertory of Patent Inventions: And Other Discoveries and Improvements in Arts, Manufactures, and Agriculture; Being a Continuation, on an Enlarged Plan, of the Repertory of Arts & Manufactures. proprietors. 1845.
- ^ Woodbury 1972, p. 24-26.
- ^ Lord 1945, p. 164.
Sources
- Boutany (1885). "Who Invented the Steam Hammer?". Engineering News-record. McGraw-Hill.
- Chomienne, C. (1888). "Notes on Steam Hammers". Railway Locomotives and Cars. Simmons-Boardman.
- "François BOURDON". Archives Départementales numérisées de la Côte d’Or. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
- Lord, W. M. (1945). "The Development of the Bessemer Process in Lancashire, 1856–1900". Transactions of the Newcomen Society. 25 (1): 163–180. doi:10.1179/tns.1945.017. ISSN 0372-0187.
- Musson, Albert Edward; Robinson, Eric (1969). Science and technology in the Industrial Revolution. Manchester University Press. p. 491. ISBN 978-0-7190-0370-7.
- Nasmyth, James; Smiles, Samuel (1883). James Nasmyth Engineer: An Autobiography. London: John Murray.
- Smiles, Samuel (2015). "Ch.XV". Industrial Biography - Iron Workers and Tool Makers. Read Books. ISBN 978-1-4733-7118-7.
- "Nasmyth steam hammer, c.1850". The Science Museum. Archived from the original on 5 May 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
- Woodbury, Robert S. (1972) [1960]. History of the Milling Machine. In Studies in the History of Machine Tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, and London, England: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-73033-4. LCCN 72006354. First published alone as a monograph in 1960.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
Further reading
[edit]- Cantrell, J. A. (2006). "James Nasmyth and the Bridgewater Foundry: Partners and Partnerships". Business History. 23 (3): 346–358. doi:10.1080/00076798100000064. ISSN 0007-6791.
- Dickinson, R. (1956). "James Nasmyth and the Liverpool Iron Trade" (PDF). Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Historical Society. 108: 83–104.
- Musson, A. E. (1957). "James Nasmyth and the Early Growth of Mechanical Engineering". The Economic History Review. 10 (1): 121–127. doi:10.2307/2600067. ISSN 0013-0117. JSTOR 2600067.
External links
[edit]
Works by or about James Nasmyth at Wikisource
Quotations related to James Nasmyth at Wikiquote- Works by James Nasmyth at Project Gutenberg
- Works by or about James Nasmyth at the Internet Archive
- Bibliomania: Full text of autobiography
James Nasmyth
View on GrokipediaEarly Life and Education
Family Background
James Nasmyth was born on 19 August 1808 at 47 York Place in Edinburgh, Scotland, the youngest child of Alexander Nasmyth, a prominent landscape painter often regarded as the father of Scottish landscape art, and his wife Barbara Foulis, daughter of William Foulis of Woodhall and Colinton.[4] Alexander Nasmyth, born in 1758, not only excelled in painting but also pursued inventive pursuits, including the design of lightweight iron bridges and mechanical devices, which infused the family home with an atmosphere of creativity and technical exploration.[5] The Nasmyth household was large and supportive, comprising Alexander and Barbara's eleven children, including four sons—Patrick, Alexander, George, and James—and seven daughters, among them Jane, Barbara, Margaret, Elizabeth, Anne, Charlotte, and Mary, the last of whom died in infancy at 18 months. One son, Alexander (referred to as Alick), passed away young, leaving Patrick, George, and James as the surviving brothers, with James the youngest and Patrick becoming a noted landscape painter. The family placed strong emphasis on self-reliance and practical skills, guided by Barbara's capable management of the home, which fostered an environment where children were encouraged to engage hands-on with both artistic and mechanical endeavors. From a young age, Nasmyth was immersed in his father's workshop at the family home, a space equipped with tools such as a foot-lathe, a steam-powered lathe, and various engineering models that sparked his early fascination with mechanics.[5] Accompanying his father on visits to local iron foundries, he observed industrial processes firsthand, which inspired childhood experiments like constructing model engines and a small steam engine to grind artists' oil colors. These activities, beginning around age five with playful tinkering in the workshop, laid the groundwork for his inventive mindset. His father's artistic career, blending aesthetic sensibility with technical innovation, served as a foundation for Nasmyth's later fusion of art and engineering in his mechanical designs.Education and Early Inventions
Nasmyth attended the Royal High School in Edinburgh from 1817 to the end of 1820, beginning his studies at age nine.[6] Although he was a bright and energetic pupil, he displayed little interest in classical subjects such as Latin and Greek, making minimal progress in them.[7] In contrast, he excelled in mathematics and drawing, finding arithmetic and geometry particularly stimulating, which aligned with his growing fascination for mechanical pursuits.[7] These interests were nurtured through visits to a local foundry and access to his family's workshop, where basic tools like his father's lathe provided early hands-on experience.[5] In 1821, at age thirteen, Nasmyth enrolled at the Edinburgh School of Arts (now Heriot-Watt University), where he pursued studies in mechanics and chemistry until 1826.[6] His education there was profoundly shaped by influential professors, including John Leslie, who granted him free access to natural philosophy lectures and provided mentorship along with high-quality experimental apparatus.[6] Under such guidance, Nasmyth honed his technical skills, attending classes on mechanical philosophy and geometry that emphasized practical engineering principles.[7] By 1825, at age seventeen, Nasmyth demonstrated his burgeoning talent by constructing a working sectional model of a complete condensing steam engine using his father's lathe in the family workshop.[6] This self-directed project showcased his mechanical ingenuity and understanding of steam power principles.[5] In 1827, he advanced further by building his first model steam carriage, powered by a compact high-pressure boiler, which represented an innovative application of steam propulsion to mobile machinery.[6] These creations garnered early recognition when Nasmyth presented them to Edinburgh institutions, such as the Scottish Society of Arts, sparking interest from prominent engineers including David Napier.[7]Engineering Career
Apprenticeship and Early Work
At the age of 20, James Nasmyth moved to London in May 1829, where he secured a position as an assistant workman under the renowned engineer Henry Maudslay at his Lambeth workshop.[8] Impressed by a working model of a high-pressure steam engine that Nasmyth had constructed himself, Maudslay hired him without requiring a formal apprenticeship premium, starting at a wage of 10 shillings per week, later increased to 15 shillings.[9] This opportunity allowed Nasmyth to immerse himself in Maudslay's emphasis on precision engineering and tool-making, including the use of Maudslay's innovative screw-generating machine to produce perfect screws with knife-edged tools for spiral grooves.[8] During his time at Maudslay's firm, Nasmyth contributed to key projects such as the design and construction of a 200-horsepower marine steam engine model for the Admiralty vessel Dee, honing his skills in mechanical drawing and assembly.[8] He also gained expertise in milling and planing techniques, mastering flat filing to achieve true plane surfaces—a cornerstone of Maudslay's high-class workmanship—and even devised a collar-nut cutting machine to improve the efficiency of producing hexagonal nuts.[8] These experiences built on Nasmyth's earlier youthful experiments, such as his 1827 steam carriage, which served as a precursor to his professional engineering output.[10] Following Maudslay's death in February 1831, Nasmyth briefly worked under his partner Joshua Field before departing later that year at age 23 to pursue independent ventures, initially setting up a small workshop in Edinburgh before relocating to Manchester's industrial hub.[11] There, he focused on building and selling small steam engines, producing a total of 40 such machines by 1836 to meet the growing demand from factories and early railways.[12] On 16 June 1840, Nasmyth married Anne Elizabeth Hartop, the daughter of an ironworks manager from Barnsley, at Holy Trinity Church in Wentworth, South Yorkshire; the couple settled in Manchester, where they began their family amid the city's burgeoning engineering scene.[13][14]Founding of Bridgewater Foundry
In 1836, James Nasmyth formed a partnership with Holbrook Gaskell to establish the Bridgewater Foundry in Patricroft, near Manchester, marking the inception of his major manufacturing enterprise. Gaskell, who handled the financial and administrative aspects, brought moderate capital to the venture, complementing Nasmyth's technical expertise. The partnership, which also involved Nasmyth's brother George initially, was formalized with simple articles, allowing the firm to trade as Nasmyth, Gaskell and Company. This collaboration enabled Nasmyth to transition from smaller-scale operations in Manchester to a dedicated foundry focused on industrial production.[15][16] The site in Patricroft was strategically selected for its logistical advantages, including direct access to the Bridgewater Canal for efficient transportation of materials and finished goods, and proximity to the Liverpool-Manchester Railway for rapid distribution. The six-acre plot, leased from Squire Trafford, offered additional practical benefits such as abundant brick-clay for construction and a solid sandstone foundation suitable for heavy machinery. Located near coal mines, the location minimized transport costs for fuel, essential for foundry operations. Nasmyth named the facility the Bridgewater Foundry in tribute to the Duke of Bridgewater, the pioneering canal builder whose infrastructure directly supported the site.[15][16] Initial capital for the foundry was accumulated from Nasmyth's prior engineering endeavors, including sales of locomotives and machinery produced in his Manchester workshop since 1834. Starting with modest funds of around £63, supplemented by credits of £500 from William Grant and £1,000 from Edward Lloyd, the partnership invested in essential equipment, beginning with a 40-horsepower condensing steam engine as the first major project. The focus was on manufacturing steam engines, steam hammers, and precision machine tools tailored for the burgeoning textile and railway industries, leveraging Nasmyth's design innovations to meet growing demand.[15][16] For the early workforce, Nasmyth hired skilled engineers and mechanics, starting with trusted associates like Archibald Torry and drawing from local talent in Manchester and Worsley. To foster efficiency, he implemented an innovative factory layout featuring temporary timber workshops that were soon replaced by durable brick buildings constructed from onsite materials, arranged to optimize workflow from casting to assembly. Worker accommodations, including cottages, were also built adjacent to the site, creating a self-contained industrial community that supported steady operations during the founding phase from 1836 to 1840. Skills from Nasmyth's apprenticeship under Henry Maudslay informed the precise organization of these facilities.[15]Business Expansion and Operations
From its establishment in 1836, the Bridgewater Foundry underwent rapid expansion, growing to employ approximately 1,000 workers by 1856, with recruitment drawing from Manchester, Bolton, Liverpool, and even Scotland during labor shortages.[6] This workforce enabled the firm to meet surging demand for heavy machinery, fueled by the railway boom and industrial advancements. The foundry's output scaled impressively, with locomotive production increasing from 9 in 1839 to 16 in 1842, alongside numerous steam engines and machine tools.[6][16] Exports became a cornerstone of growth, with products shipped to Europe (such as Nuremberg and St. Petersburg), America, Asia, and Egypt; a prominent example was the supply of steam hammers to Russia for use in the Kremlin.[6] Operational efficiencies were central to the foundry's success, achieved through the adoption of self-acting tools—like planing machines, slide lathes, and a 1847 device for cutting cottar slots—and the use of standardized parts, which ensured precision and reduced production times.[6] Innovations such as the 1843 steam hammer served as a flagship product, driving sales by enabling high-quality forging with features like the 1845 V anvil for improved material soundness.[6] Workshops remained "always busy... crowded with machine tools in full action," reflecting a commitment to mechanization that minimized variability and maximized reliability.[6] The partnership with Holbrook Gaskell, formalized in 1836, evolved to complement Nasmyth's strengths: Gaskell handled financial management and commercial aspects, while Nasmyth concentrated on design and technical innovation.[6] Yet, the 1840s brought challenges, including economic downturns that delayed the steam hammer's widespread adoption and strained operations.[6] Labor disputes, notably a Trades Union strike, were addressed through profit-sharing schemes, structured training programs, and merit-based promotions, which fostered loyalty and skill development among workers.[6] Nasmyth emphasized the reliability of machines over human inconsistencies, noting that "the machines never got drunk; their hands never shook from excess; they were never absent from work; they did not strike for wages," while critiquing union efforts toward "indolent equality" as a barrier to progress.[6] These strategies helped the foundry navigate adversity and sustain its expansion through 1856.[6]Major Inventions
The Steam Hammer
James Nasmyth conceived the steam hammer in 1839 while seeking a solution to forge the large paddle shafts required for Isambard Kingdom Brunel's steamship SS Great Britain, which demanded unprecedented precision and power beyond traditional methods.[17] Although the ship's design later shifted to propellers, eliminating the immediate need, Nasmyth's idea persisted, leading him to patent the invention on 9 June 1842 under British patent number 9382.[18] This patent described a mechanism using steam pressure to raise and drop a heavy ram, revolutionizing forging by enabling both massive force and fine control.[19] The steam hammer featured a double-acting steam cylinder that powered a ram weighing 4 to 6 tons, allowing it to deliver blows ranging from gentle taps to earth-shaking impacts.[20] Nasmyth's first full-scale model was constructed in 1842 at his Patricroft foundry near Manchester, following a prototype developed by French engineer François Bourdon in 1840, which sparked a heated priority dispute over invention rights.[21] The device's versatility stemmed from its self-acting valves, which regulated steam admission to control the ram's descent speed and force, making it suitable for shaping wrought iron components like locomotive axles and ship propeller shafts.[22] A pivotal demonstration occurred in 1843 at Nasmyth's foundry, where he showcased the hammer's precision by placing an egg in a wine glass beneath the ram; the machine cracked the egg without damaging the glass, astonishing observers including Admiralty officials and highlighting its dual capability for delicate and heavy work.[23] This feat was later replicated at the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London's Crystal Palace, drawing international acclaim and orders.[24] The invention's immediate applications included forging large-scale marine and railway parts, transforming industries reliant on manual hammering. Economically, the steam hammer slashed forging times from days to mere hours, dramatically cutting labor and material costs by enabling efficient production of uniform, high-quality ironwork.[19] Between 1843 and 1856, Nasmyth's firm produced and sold 493 units worldwide, from Europe to India and Australia, accounting for a significant portion of the company's revenue and fueling the expansion of steam-powered manufacturing.[25] This widespread adoption lowered overall forging expenses by over 50% in equipped foundries, accelerating the Industrial Revolution's mechanization of heavy industry.[26]Machine Tools and Mechanical Devices
Nasmyth made significant advancements in precision machine tools during his career at the Bridgewater Foundry, focusing on devices that enhanced accuracy, efficiency, and automation in metalworking. His innovations built upon earlier designs by engineers like Henry Maudslay, emphasizing self-acting mechanisms to reduce manual labor and improve repeatability in manufacturing processes. These tools were instrumental in supporting the expanding demands of the Industrial Revolution, particularly for producing components in steam engines, bridges, and machinery.[15] One of Nasmyth's key contributions was the development of the shaper machine in the 1840s, a reciprocating tool designed for machining flat surfaces on smaller workpieces. This device improved upon Maudslay's earlier planing machines by keeping the workpiece stationary while the single-point cutting tool moved back and forth on a ram, incorporating a quick return mechanism for self-acting feed that allowed efficient cutting on the forward stroke and idle return. The self-acting feed enabled automatic adjustments in depth and position, making it suitable for precise shaping of metal parts in foundry operations.[15][27] Nasmyth also pioneered innovations in milling machines starting in 1831, creating a universal milling device equipped with an indexing fixture for accurate gear cutting and profiling. This early machine was tooled to mill the six sides of hexagonal nuts, demonstrating advanced automation for its era, and Nasmyth produced over 50 variants by 1850 to accommodate diverse applications such as slotting and helical milling. These developments at the Bridgewater Foundry established high standards for workmanship and design, facilitating the mass production of interchangeable parts essential to mechanical engineering.[15][28] In the 1840s, Nasmyth extended his expertise to heavy-duty mechanical devices, including a steam-powered hydraulic press capable of exerting up to 20,000 tons of pressure using a hydraulic matrass system for forcing tight-fitting components or compressing materials. Complementing this, his pile driver, patented in 1843 (No. 9850), adapted steam hammer principles to drive piles at rates of 80 blows per minute with a 4-ton hammer block, proving vital for infrastructure projects such as the construction of Westminster Bridge and the London sewer system, where it handled 18-inch square piles up to 70 feet long.[15] Among his lesser-known but practical inventions were the screw ladle for foundries, patented around 1838, which used a screw wheel mechanism to allow a single operator to safely tilt and pour large quantities of molten iron with precision, earning a silver medal from the Society of Arts of Scotland for reducing accidents. Additionally, Nasmyth developed a steam ram for punching in the late 1840s, with prototypes demonstrated in 1845 to the Admiralty for naval applications and a hydraulic variant in 1848 capable of punching 5-inch holes in thick iron plates, enhancing efficiency in metal fabrication.[15][29]Industrial Processes and Transportation Innovations
Nasmyth, in collaboration with engineer Charles May, patented the first vacuum brake in 1844, an innovative railway safety device that utilized atmospheric pressure to apply braking force continuously across a train by creating a vacuum in the brake pipes.[30] This system represented an early advancement in pneumatic braking technology, predating later air brake developments, and aimed to improve safety on expanding rail networks by enabling rapid, uniform stopping without reliance on manual levers per carriage.[31] During the 1850s, Nasmyth developed and patented a process for converting cast iron into wrought iron through puddling with steam, employing steam jets to decompose the steam and release oxygen that oxidized excess carbon while hydrogen deoxidized the iron.[32] This pneumatic method, patented in 1854, anticipated aspects of the Bessemer process but was not commercialized, overshadowed by Henry Bessemer's 1856 patent and more efficient converter design.[6] In the 1830s and 1840s, Nasmyth designed and built numerous high-pressure steam engines for locomotives at his Bridgewater Foundry, incorporating improved boilers to enhance efficiency and power output; records indicate the firm produced 46 locomotives in those years, including nine in 1839, thirteen in 1840, eight in 1841, and sixteen in 1842, many featuring compact high-pressure configurations for industrial rail applications.[16] These engines contributed to the reliability of early railway operations, with features like packing-free pistons and superheated steam reducing friction and preventing cylinder condensation.[6] Among his other contributions, Nasmyth devised improved riveting machines around 1839 for shipbuilding, facilitating faster and more precise assembly of iron hulls, and conceptualized lightweight iron bridge designs in the 1830s that emphasized structural efficiency through novel beam configurations.[33][34] The Bridgewater Foundry scaled production of these innovations, integrating them into broader industrial workflows for railways and maritime engineering.[6]Later Career and Retirement
Retirement and Astronomical Pursuits
In 1856, at the age of 48, James Nasmyth retired from active business involvement after selling his shares in the Bridgewater Foundry, having amassed a substantial fortune from his engineering enterprises.[13][35] He relocated to Hammerfield, a property he acquired and renamed in Penshurst, Kent, where he could devote himself fully to scientific pursuits free from commercial demands.[4][36] Nasmyth's engineering expertise informed his innovative approach to astronomy, particularly in telescope design. During the 1840s and 1850s, he constructed a 20-inch reflecting telescope featuring a speculum metal mirror and his own Nasmyth focus configuration, which positioned the observer at a side-mounted eyepiece for convenient access to the prime focus.[37][38] This instrument, mounted on a modified altazimuth for precise tracking, became central to his lunar studies, enabling detailed observations that capitalized on his mechanical precision.[37] From the 1850s through the 1870s, Nasmyth conducted extensive lunar observations using this telescope, producing numerous detailed sketches over more than three decades to capture surface features under varying phases of illumination.[39] His drawings revealed prominent "Nasmyth rays"—bright, radiating streaks emanating from craters such as Copernicus and Tycho, interpreted as crack systems resulting from internal expansion rather than superficial deposits.[39] He also documented rilles, elongated chasms up to 150 miles in length near formations like Tycho and Thebit, viewing them as evidence of recent surface contraction in the Moon's crust.[39] These observations challenged prevailing volcanic theories by demonstrating the absence of ongoing activity, no central cones in major ring craters like Ptolemy, and stability over centuries, attributing features instead to ancient cooling processes.[39] Nasmyth's findings culminated in the 1874 publication of The Moon: Considered as a Planet, a World, and a Satellite, co-authored with James Carpenter, formerly of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich.[39] The book advanced a plutonic formation hypothesis, positing that lunar craters, mountains, and rays originated from the expansion and solidification of an originally molten interior, driving igneous disruptions without reliance on volcanic gases or external agents.[39] Supported by Nasmyth's sketches and Carpenter's spectroscopic insights, this work emphasized the Moon's static, airless surface as a relic of primordial geological forces, influencing subsequent selenography.[39]Contributions to Photography
During his retirement, James Nasmyth's leisure pursuits enabled extensive experimentation with early photographic techniques, particularly for scientific documentation. In the 1840s, he adopted the calotype process to produce precise reproductions of engineering drawings, leveraging his mechanical expertise to construct custom cameras equipped with precision lenses for accurate imaging of technical diagrams and prototypes.[40][41] In the 1850s, Nasmyth turned to lunar photography, attempting to capture detailed images of the moon's surface by combining his custom-built 20-inch reflecting telescope with wet-plate collodion processes, though direct telescopic photography proved challenging due to the era's technical limitations. To overcome these, he innovated by creating intricate plaster models of lunar craters and mountains based on his observations, which he then photographed under controlled low-angle lighting to simulate authentic lunar shadows and relief, yielding some of the earliest detailed visual representations of the moon's topography.[42][41][40] His lunar photographs, including twenty-four plates produced for publication, were displayed at the Royal Astronomical Society and other learned institutions, contributing to scientific discourse on celestial geology.[41][43][44] Nasmyth's work influenced early astrophotography pioneers, such as Warren De La Rue, by demonstrating the value of hybrid observational and photographic approaches, while his personal collection of photographic plates—many derived from these experiments—remains preserved in archives like the Science Museum Group, underscoring his role in bridging engineering and visual science.[41][42][45]Philosophical Writings and Artistic Legacy
In his later years, James Nasmyth reflected deeply on his engineering career through his autobiography, James Nasmyth, Engineer: An Autobiography, published in 1883 and edited by Samuel Smiles. The work chronicles his professional journey while articulating a philosophy of invention rooted in practical ingenuity and the efficient application of mechanical principles. Nasmyth emphasized the importance of "common sense applied to the use of materials," viewing tools and machines as the foundation of civilization's progress, from primitive handicrafts to advanced steel-based technologies.[46] He advocated for designs that embodied simplicity and efficiency to benefit society through industrial progress.[46] Nasmyth's essays and writings extended his views on mechanics and its societal implications, promoting an "economy of force" in engineering that minimized waste while maximizing utility. Published in periodicals such as the Quarterly Journal of Science, these pieces critiqued industrial practices, including the tensions between masters and workers, and championed merit-based advancement over rigid structures like trade unions. He strongly endorsed self-education through hands-on experience, drawing from his own formative years in workshops and institutions like the Edinburgh School of Arts, where he learned to prioritize practical science over formal schooling.[46] Nasmyth believed that cultivating imagination via drawing and observation fostered innovative thinking, a principle he illustrated in discussions of mechanical evolution and societal harmony in industrial progress.[46] Complementing his intellectual pursuits, Nasmyth maintained a vibrant artistic legacy influenced by his family's heritage—his father, Alexander Nasmyth, was a renowned Scottish landscape painter. In retirement, he produced watercolors of serene landscapes, such as A Bit of Old England, capturing rural idylls with a keen eye for natural detail.[46] He also created detailed illustrations in personal albums, including sketches of his inventions like early steam engines and panoramic views from travels, as well as meticulous moon drawings exhibited at the 1851 Great Exhibition, where they earned a prize medal for their precision.[46] These works blended technical accuracy with aesthetic sensibility, reflecting Nasmyth's holistic approach to blending art and engineering.[46]Legacy and Recognition
Honors and Memorials
He was elected a corresponding member of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society on 7 January 1862, where he later contributed papers on astronomical observations.[13] His inventions earned him significant exhibition awards, including the prestigious Council Medal at the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London for the steam hammer, which demonstrated its revolutionary impact on heavy forging.[47] Several memorials honor Nasmyth's legacy. The James Nasmyth Building at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, his alma mater, is dedicated to mechanical engineering and related disciplines, serving as a hub for research in manufacturing and process engineering.[48] A commemorative plaque was installed at his birthplace, 47 York Place in Edinburgh, marking the site where he was born in 1808 and where his father, the artist Alexander Nasmyth, resided.[49] Nasmyth's philanthropy included a substantial donation of £18,000 in the 1880s to the Western Eye Hospital in London for the purchase of advanced equipment, acknowledged by a dedicated plaque in the hospital's entryway.[50] A lunar crater, Nasmyth (32°S 20°E), was named in his honor by Giovanni Schiaparelli in 1877 in recognition of his lunar observations.[51] (Note: Use authoritative IAU source if available.)Influence on Engineering and Science
Nasmyth's invention of the steam hammer in 1842 profoundly transformed heavy engineering by enabling the precise forging of large-scale metal components, which previously required labor-intensive manual methods or unreliable drop hammers. This innovation allowed for the production of massive engine parts, ship propellers, and locomotive frames with unprecedented accuracy and speed, drastically reducing costs and time while minimizing material waste. The device's adoption across Europe and North America facilitated the construction of larger machinery essential to 19th-century industrialization, powering advancements in railways, steamships, and iron production that accelerated economic expansion.[19] In the realm of machine tools, Nasmyth's developments, including planers and shapers produced at his Bridgewater Foundry, advanced the standardization of components, laying groundwork for the interchangeable parts system that became a cornerstone of mass manufacturing. His emphasis on precision tooling influenced early adopters in Britain and extended to American engineers, where firms like Samuel Colt integrated similar standardized approaches to produce firearms efficiently. This shift from custom fabrication to modular assembly enhanced productivity and reliability in industrial processes, contributing to the broader mechanization of factories during the Industrial Revolution.[35] Nasmyth's scientific pursuits extended his engineering mindset to astronomy, where his volcanic theory of lunar crater formation, detailed in his 1874 book The Moon: Considered as a Planet, a World, and a Satellite, proposed that the Moon's surface resulted from internal igneous activity rather than external impacts, influencing contemporary debates on planetary geology. Although later disproven by impact cratering evidence, his detailed observations and models anticipated modern understandings of volcanic processes and surface evolution on airless bodies. Additionally, his design of the Nasmyth telescope—a reflecting instrument with a focus at the altitude bearing—optimized observer comfort and instrument mounting, remaining a standard configuration in large observatories through the 20th century and into adaptive optics systems today.[52] Beyond technical innovations, Nasmyth promoted engineering education through practical apprenticeships and his 1883 autobiography, James Nasmyth, Engineer: An Autobiography, which emphasized hands-on learning, observation, and perseverance, inspiring subsequent generations of engineers to prioritize methodical innovation over rote theory.References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography%2C_1885-1900/Nasmyth%2C_James_%281808-1890%29
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popular_Science_Monthly/Volume_51/May_1897/Sketch_of_James_Nasmyth
