Hubbry Logo
Jane HarmanJane HarmanMain
Open search
Jane Harman
Community hub
Jane Harman
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jane Harman
Jane Harman
Jane Harman
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Jane Margaret Harman (née Lakes, June 28, 1945) is an American former politician who served as the U.S. representative for California's 36th congressional district from 1993 to 1999 and again from 2001 to 2011. A member of the Democratic Party, she was the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee (2002–2006), before she chaired the Homeland Security Committee's Intelligence Subcommittee (2007–2011). Harman was a conservative Blue Dog Democrat.[1]

Key Information

Resigning from Congress in February 2011, Harman became president and CEO of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.[2] She succeeded former U.S. representative Lee Hamilton and was the first ever woman to lead the organization. She stepped down in February 2021. She is also a distinguished scholar and president emerita.

Early life and education

[edit]

Harman was born Jane Margaret Lakes in New York City, the daughter of Lucille (née Geier) and Adolf N. Lakes.[3] She is Jewish.[4] Her father was born in Poland and escaped from Nazi Germany in 1935;[5] he worked as a medical doctor. Her mother was born in the United States and was the first in her family to receive a college education. Her maternal grandparents immigrated from Russia.[6] Harman's family moved to Los Angeles, California when she was 4 and there she attended Los Angeles public schools, graduating from University High School in 1962.[7] She received a bachelor's degree in government, magna cum laude, from Smith College in 1966 and served as president of the Smith College Young Democrats.[8] Harman continued her studies at Harvard Law School, where she earned her Juris Doctor degree in 1969.[9]

Career

[edit]

Early career

[edit]

After graduating from law school, Harman – then known as Jane Lakes – married future NOAA administrator Richard A. Frank in 1969, and they had two children. They spent a short time in Switzerland, and then she worked for two years as an associate with the law firm Surrey, Karasik and Morse in Washington, D.C. She began her political career by serving on the staff of Senator John V. Tunney, as his legislative assistant from 1972 to 1973. In 1973, Tunney named her his senior counsel and staff director for the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights in 1975. During this time she also taught at Georgetown. When Tunney lost re-election in 1976, Harman – then known as Jane Lakes Frank – joined the Carter White House where she served as Deputy Secretary of the Cabinet. She became a special counsel to the Department of Defense from 1979 to 1980.

U.S. House, 1993 to 1999

[edit]

Harman was first elected to Congress in 1992 and became the first Smith College graduate to be elected to Congress. From 1993 to 1999, Harman represented California's 36th district, serving in the 103rd, 104th, and 105th Congresses. In 1994, she barely survived reelection in a heavily Republican year, winning by 812 votes over Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor Susan Brooks.

1998 California gubernatorial campaign

[edit]
Main article: 1998 California gubernatorial election

Harman did not run for the 106th United States Congress in 1998, instead entering the 1998 California gubernatorial race.

After losing the Democratic nomination to Lieutenant Governor Gray Davis, she briefly taught public policy and international relations at UCLA as a Regents' Professor before running for and winning her old congressional seat in the 2000 election.

U.S. House, 2001 to 2011

[edit]
Harman's portrait during her second term as a U.S. representative (c. 2008)

Harman narrowly won her old seat in 2000, defeating Republican incumbent Steven T. Kuykendall, before she was easily re-elected in 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2010.

Representing the aerospace center of California during her nine terms in Congress, she served on all the major security committees: six years on Armed Services, eight years on Intelligence, and eight on Homeland Security. She made numerous congressional fact-finding missions to hotspots around the world, including North Korea, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Guantanamo Bay. During her long public career, Harman has been recognized as a national expert at the nexus of security and public policy issues. She received the Defense Distinguished Service Medal in 1998, the CIA Agency Seal Medal in 2007, and the CIA Director's Award, and the Director of National Intelligence Distinguished Public Service Medal in 2011.

Harman is a tenacious pro-Israeli, who used to have close ties to the U.S. intelligence community.[10] She resigned in February 2011, to head the Washington-based Woodrow Wilson Center, a foreign policy think tank.[10]

2009 wiretap/AIPAC allegations

[edit]

In 2009, it was revealed NSA wiretaps reportedly intercepted a 2005 phone call between Harman and an agent of the Israeli government, in which Harman allegedly agreed to lobby the Justice Department to reduce or drop criminal charges against two employees of AIPAC in exchange for increased support for Harman's campaign to chair the House Intelligence Committee. Harman denied the allegations, and called for the government to release the full transcript of the wire-tapped conversation, something they never did. In June 2009, Harman received a letter from the Justice Department and House Ethics Committee declaring her "neither a subject nor a target of an ongoing investigation by the Criminal Division." The espionage charges were later dropped on the two employees from AIPAC.[11][12][13][14]

Political positions

[edit]

Harman is on most issues a liberal, earning a 95% rating from the liberal group Americans for Democratic Action. On intelligence and defense issues, Ben Pershing described her as a centrist. For example, she was one of many Democrats who supported the Iraq War. Harman has combined a moderate stance on economic, trade, and foreign policy issues with liberal stances on social issues.

Armenian genocide

[edit]

Harman was a co-sponsor of the Armenian genocide recognition resolution bill in 2007. However, while still cosponsoring the bill, she wrote a letter to House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Tom Lantos urging him to delay a floor vote on the legislation.[15] Her argument was that while the genocide deserved recognition, it was not a good time to embarrass Turkey, given that country's role in moderating extremism in the Middle East.[16]

Other activities

[edit]
Harman during the MSC 2017

Harman served as a member of the Defense Policy Board, the State Department Foreign Affairs Policy Board, the Director of National Intelligence’s Senior Advisory Group, and the Homeland Security Advisory Council. She was a member of the CIA External Advisory Board from 2011 to 2013. Harman is a Trustee of the Aspen Institute and an Honorary Trustee of the University of Southern California. She also serves on the Presidential Debates Commission and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and is a member of the ReFormers Caucus of Issue One.[17]

She is a member of the Aspen Strategy Group, and serves on the Executive Committees of the Trilateral Commission and the Munich Security Conference.

Personal life

[edit]

Harman's first marriage was to Richard Frank, in 1969, with whom she had two children.[18] Her second marriage was to audio pioneer and multi-millionaire Sidney Harman,[10] who served from 1977 to 1979 as the Undersecretary of the Department of Commerce in the Carter administration before repurchasing the company he founded, Harman International Industries, and later taking it public.[19] She also had two children with him.[18] She has eight grandchildren.

Sidney Harman retired in 2008 from Harman Industries, purchased Newsweek magazine in 2010, and founded the Academy for Polymathic Study at USC before he died in April 2011.[19] Harman maintains her residence in Venice Beach, California, and has homes in Washington, D.C., and Aspen, Colorado.

Harman was a good friend of Senator Dianne Feinstein, and was among the last people to visit Feinstein prior to her death in 2023.[20]

Works

[edit]
  • Harman, Jane (2021). Insanity Defense: Why Our Failure to Confront Hard National Security Problems Makes Us Less Safe (First ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 9781250758774. OCLC 1236897967.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jane Harman

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Jane L. Harman (born Jane Margaret Lakes; June 28, 1945) is an American attorney and former Democratic politician who served nine terms as U.S. Representative for California's 36th congressional district from 1993 to 1999 and 2001 to 2011. Raised in Los Angeles after birth in New York City, she graduated magna cum laude from Smith College and earned a law degree from Harvard Law School. During her congressional tenure, Harman emerged as a leading expert on national security, serving as ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee in the years following the September 11 attacks and contributing to legislation on counterterrorism, cybersecurity, and homeland security. In February 2011, she resigned her seat to become the first woman director, president, and CEO of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a nonpartisan think tank, where she led until 2021 and now serves as president emerita and distinguished fellow. Post-Congress, she has chaired the bipartisan Commission on the National Defense Strategy, releasing a unanimous report in 2024 urging enhanced U.S. military preparedness amid global threats, and co-chairs the board of trustees at Freedom House. Her career includes authoring the 2021 book Insanity Defense: Why Our Failure to Confront Hard National Security Problems Makes Us Less Safe, critiquing institutional failures in addressing security challenges. A notable controversy arose in 2009 when reports emerged of a National Security Agency wiretap capturing Harman in a conversation with an American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) official, where she allegedly discussed intervening for lenient treatment of two AIPAC staffers accused of espionage in exchange for political support; Harman denied wrongdoing, no charges were filed, and the Justice Department closed the probe without action.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Jane Margaret Lakes was born on June 28, 1945, in to Dr. Adolf Lakes, a physician, and Lucille Geier Lakes. Her father, born in , had moved to , where he earned a in 1934 before immigrating to the to escape Nazi persecution. Her mother, a U.S.-born college graduate who was the first in her family to attend higher education, descended from Russian Jewish immigrants who arrived in America in the early 1900s. The Lakes family relocated to in 1949, where Jane grew up as the eldest of two children in a household shaped by her parents' experiences with and displacement. Her parents instilled values of freedom, , self-determination, self-reliance, and , drawing from their immigrant backgrounds and the post-World War II emphasis on democratic ideals over totalitarian threats. This environment fostered an early appreciation for American opportunities as a refuge from , influencing her worldview amid the era's tensions and debates. Harman's childhood in public schools exposed her to a diverse, urban setting reflective of mid-20th-century California's growing and political , though family discussions centered on personal resilience rather than partisan affiliations. The emphasis on stemmed directly from her father's flight from and her mother's family's adaptation to new circumstances, prioritizing individual agency and civic responsibility over reliance on state intervention.

Academic and Early Professional Training

Harman earned a degree in government from in 1966, graduating magna cum laude and as a member of . Her undergraduate studies emphasized and , providing foundational knowledge in political structures that later informed her approach to issues. She pursued advanced legal education at , receiving her Juris Doctor in 1969. At the time, women comprised a small minority of the student body, with approximately 22 female students in her class, reflecting the era's limited access for women to elite legal training. This rigorous curriculum exposed her to core principles of , , and legal reasoning, equipping her with analytical tools essential for oversight roles in government. Following graduation, Harman gained admission to the bar in the District of Columbia and , marking her formal entry into professional legal practice. These qualifications, rooted in her academic grounding, emphasized constitutional frameworks and legal precedents that shaped her pragmatic focus on without immediate application to specific roles.

Pre-Congressional Career

After earning her Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1969, Harman began her legal career as an associate at the Washington, D.C., law firm Surrey & Morse in 1970, where she practiced for approximately two years, focusing on regulatory and commercial matters. This early private practice provided foundational experience in federal law and policy advocacy, though specific case details from this period remain limited in public records. Transitioning to public service, Harman joined the staff of U.S. Senator (D-CA) in 1972 as chief legislative assistant, overseeing legal activities across multiple committees until . She advanced to chief counsel and staff director of the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights from to 1977, managing investigations into , government surveillance, and judicial oversight—roles that exposed her to early debates on intelligence practices and constitutional protections amid tensions. Concurrently, she served as an adjunct professor at from 1974 to 1975, teaching courses on . In the Carter administration, Harman held the position of deputy cabinet secretary from 1977 to 1979, reporting to Cabinet Secretary Hamilton Jordan and coordinating domestic policy implementation across agencies, including energy initiatives like the National Energy Plan amid the 1970s oil crises. This role facilitated interagency collaboration on national security-adjacent issues, such as resource security and regulatory reforms, without direct elected authority but influencing executive priorities through advisory counsel. She also briefly served as special counsel to the Department of Defense during this era, advising on legal aspects of defense policy. These positions honed her expertise in bipartisan policy execution, bridging legal practice with governmental operations prior to her electoral pursuits.

Initial Political Engagements

Harman's initial forays into politics occurred during her college years, when she served as president of the Young Democrats Club at from 1965 to 1966. This early leadership role introduced her to Democratic organizing at the grassroots level. Later, as a young attorney, she assisted in legislative matters for California Democratic Senator from 1972 to 1973, gaining exposure to senatorial campaigns and party operations in her home state. Throughout the 1980s, Harman deepened her engagement within Democratic Party structures, serving as counsel to the Democratic Platform Committee during the , where she contributed to drafting the party's policy positions under chair . She also chaired the Democratic National Committee's National Lawyers' Council from 1986 to 1991, advising on legal aspects of party strategy and operations. These national roles facilitated connections with Democratic leaders and donors, enhancing her visibility beyond . Harman participated in fundraising efforts that strengthened party infrastructure, co-chairing the 1987 Democratic Gala, which raised $2.2 million for the Democratic Party Victory Fund and presidential candidates. Additionally, as vice-chair of the Center for National Policy from 1981 into the early , she engaged in policy discussions emphasizing pragmatic Democratic approaches to and economic issues. Such activities in centrist-leaning Democratic networks, blending support for social priorities with advocacy for stronger defense postures, positioned her as a viable in California's competitive congressional primaries by the early .

Congressional Career

First Tenure: 1993–1999

Jane Harman was elected to the on November 3, 1992, to represent , encompassing parts of Los Angeles County including the South Bay area with its aerospace and defense industries; she defeated Republican Joan Milke Flores with approximately 56% of the vote in the general . Sworn in on January 5, 1993, for the 103rd , her representation emphasized protecting local economic interests tied to bases and technology sectors amid post-Cold War budget adjustments. Assigned to the House Armed Services Committee and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology in the 103rd Congress (1993–1995), Harman continued on Armed Services through the 105th Congress (1997–1999), focusing on research, technology, and military personnel subcommittees. These roles positioned her to influence defense procurement, , and base realignment decisions affecting her district's defense contractors and installations. Harman's legislative efforts centered on military modernization and fiscal restraint, including support for targeted defense spending reductions to achieve post-Cold War efficiencies while preserving capabilities in high-tech areas like . She advocated bipartisan measures balancing cuts with investments in , drawing from her district's reliance on firms such as Hughes Aircraft and TRW. Conservatives critiqued her as dovish for endorsing broader base closure processes under the (BRAC) commissions, though she successfully advocated to exempt the from the 1995 closure list, safeguarding local jobs. Following the February 26, 1993, World Trade Center bombing, she contributed to early discussions on enhancing domestic security precursors, including technology export controls to curb proliferation risks, aligning with her Science Committee oversight of dual-use technologies. Her approach emphasized pragmatic, evidence-based reforms over expansive spending, reflecting a centrist Democratic stance amid Republican-led Congresses after 1994.

1998 California Gubernatorial Campaign

Jane Harman formally entered the Democratic primary for the on February 4, 1998, positioning herself as a centrist alternative to frontrunner amid a crowded field that included self-funded businessman Al Checchi. Her campaign strategy targeted suburban voters, particularly women and professionals, by highlighting pragmatic solutions to state challenges, including tougher measures on , enhanced funding for K-12 education standards, and incentives for technology-driven economic expansion in 's and aerospace sectors. Harman leveraged her congressional experience and personal wealth to fund a competitive operation, raising contributions from business interests and defense industry executives who had previously supported her House campaigns, though she trailed Checchi's unprecedented $40 million self-financed effort. She secured endorsements from moderate Democrats and bipartisan figures, emphasizing crossover appeal in a state with a of female nominees, but faced criticism for her Washington ties and perceived in ads from rivals. In the June 2, 1998, Democratic primary, Harman captured 21 percent of the vote, placing third behind Davis's 57 percent and Checchi's 20 percent, as Davis consolidated party establishment support and benefited from lower turnout favoring organized labor-backed candidates. The outcome underscored the primacy of mobilization and insider networks over independent spending in California's reformed primary system under Proposition 208 contribution limits, prompting Harman to endorse Davis for the general while refocusing on federal issues. This bid, though unsuccessful, reinforced her reputation as a pragmatic moderate within a Democratic Party increasingly oriented toward base-driven priorities, influencing her subsequent emphasis on bipartisan governance in roles.

Second Tenure: 2001–2011

Following her unsuccessful 1998 campaign for , Jane Harman reclaimed her congressional seat in California's 36th district by narrowly defeating Republican incumbent Steven T. Kuykendall in the November 7, 2000, general election, with 49.3% of the vote to Kuykendall's 47.5%. She assumed office on January 3, 2001, for the 107th Congress, marking the start of her second tenure amid the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which shifted national priorities toward and intelligence reform. As a senior member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Harman ascended to ranking Democrat in January 2003, a position she held through significant post-9/11 legislative efforts, including oversight of intelligence community enhancements and support for extending provisions of the USA to bolster surveillance capabilities against terrorism. In 2004, her vote proved pivotal in preventing amendments that would have curtailed key measures, ensuring their continuation without substantial restrictions. She advocated for robust U.S. aid to , emphasizing strengthened bilateral security ties in response to regional threats, and highlighted the disproportionate risks faced by service members in and , stating in 2008 that "a in is more likely to be raped by a fellow than killed by enemy fire," urging improved protections and accountability within the military. Harman won re-election comfortably in subsequent cycles, including , , , , and , often exceeding 60% of the vote in her Democratic-leaning . Despite considerations for higher leadership roles, such as House Speaker, her ambitions faced obstacles, including being passed over for Intelligence Committee chair in when Democrats gained the majority. On February 28, , she resigned from to become the first female president and CEO of the International Center for Scholars, succeeding , amid reports of seeking a new platform for global policy influence. Her departure triggered a special election in California's 36th .

Key Committee Roles and Legislative Achievements

Harman served on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for eight years, including as ranking Democratic member from 2007 to 2009, on the House Committee on Armed Services for six years, and on the House Committee on for eight years, focusing her work on oversight and policy formulation. In these roles, she emphasized bipartisan approaches to intelligence reform, contributing to post-9/11 enhancements in capabilities while advocating for stricter guidelines on executive actions. Key legislative efforts included co-sponsoring the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which modernized foreign surveillance procedures to adapt to technological changes and evolving threats, incorporating oversight mechanisms to constrain warrantless programs. She also supported measures, such as the Iran Counter-Proliferation Act of 2007 (H.R. 1400), which passed the 397-16 and aimed to impose sanctions on entities aiding 's weapons programs, reflecting her focus on nonproliferation amid Iran's nuclear advancements. These initiatives demonstrated her role in bridging partisan gaps on Iran-related threats, where intelligence assessments informed consensus on sanctions and monitoring. Harman introduced amendments and bills to bolster cyber defenses, including advancing cybersecurity legislation as Intelligence Subcommittee chair in 2010 to enhance information sharing and threat response protocols. On detainee interrogations, she authored the Interrogation Procedures Act of 2005 (H.R. 3985), which sought to standardize and limit techniques to comply with , prohibiting cruel or degrading treatment regardless of detainee status or location. She further proposed the Lawful Interrogation and Detention Act in 2009 to close Guantanamo Bay within a year and restrict coerced evidence in military commissions. These measures quantified impacts through codified limits—e.g., explicit bans on and stress positions—but faced limitations, as executive resistance and legal challenges delayed full implementation. Her committee tenure drew bipartisan praise for fostering collaboration on immediate threats like but elicited criticisms: civil liberties groups, including the ACLU, faulted her FISA support for enabling bulk surveillance and insufficient safeguards, potentially expanding executive overreach without adequate warrants. Conservatives critiqued her for relative restraint on China policy, arguing it underrepresented emerging economic and military risks during a period of accelerating Beijing's assertiveness, though her later post-congressional work highlighted greater emphasis on such challenges.

Political Positions and Ideology

National Security and Intelligence Oversight

As ranking Democratic member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence from 2007 to 2011, Jane Harman played a central role in overseeing U.S. intelligence activities, including the evaluation of programs targeting terrorist threats and the balance between operational effectiveness and protections. During her tenure, she advocated for increased funding and technological enhancements for agencies, emphasizing the need for robust capabilities to counter evolving threats such as affiliates, based on empirical assessments of pre-9/11 intelligence failures that contributed to the 2001 attacks. Her oversight efforts prioritized measurable outcomes, including improved collection and tools, which she argued were essential for disrupting plots, as evidenced by the program's role in targeting communications post-9/11. Harman consistently supported expansions of (NSA) authorities, including the 2005-2006 debates over warrantless , which she described as "essential" for despite raising concerns among critics. In congressional briefings and public statements, she endorsed FISA modernization to enable faster responses to terrorist threats, co-sponsoring legislation like H.R. 5371 to authorize emergency NSA of suspected terrorists while incorporating oversight mechanisms. This stance reflected her view that empirical data on thwarted attacks—such as those linked to NSA intercepts—justified enhanced tools over stricter warrant requirements, even as she pushed for bipartisan congressional review to mitigate abuses. Following the 9/11 attacks, Harman contributed to joint congressional inquiries and bipartisan reports assessing intelligence shortcomings, including the House-Senate Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of , 2001, which highlighted failures in sharing information on jihadist networks motivated by ideological extremism. She co-authored recommendations for structural reforms, such as better interagency coordination, that informed the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, aiming to preempt threats through proactive intelligence rather than reactive measures. In these efforts, Harman balanced by advocating for oversight boards and judicial reviews, while grounding threat assessments in causal factors like radical Islamist ideologies driving recruitment and operations, as detailed in committee reports on counterterrorism priorities. Harman later critiqued leaks compromising intelligence methods, notably those by in 2013, arguing that the disclosures—encompassing over 1.7 million documents—forced the intelligence community into a defensive posture, enabling adversaries to adapt tactics and eroding operational efficacy without yielding verifiable public benefits. She maintained that such revelations damaged alliances reliant on shared intelligence and undermined preemptive capabilities, prioritizing evidence of real-world harms like disrupted operations over abstract gains, and suggested whistleblowers pursue internal or congressional channels rather than mass disclosures. This perspective aligned with her oversight philosophy, which favored sustaining capabilities proven effective against empirical threats like ongoing jihadist plots, as opposed to reforms driven primarily by leak-induced public backlash.

Foreign Policy Perspectives

Jane Harman has consistently advocated for a robust U.S.- alliance, emphasizing military aid and strategic cooperation as essential to countering regional threats. As ranking member and later chair of the House Intelligence Committee, she aligned closely with pro-Israel lobbying groups, including the , whose positions mirrored her support for annual U.S. military assistance to exceeding $3 billion during her tenure. Her ties to , which included campaign contributions and policy coordination, have drawn scrutiny for potentially influencing her legislative priorities, though Harman maintained these reflected her independent assessment of 's security needs amid threats from and . On the Armenian genocide recognition, Harman initially co-sponsored H. Res. 106 in 2007, affirming the World War I-era mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians as , but withdrew support shortly before the House Foreign Affairs Committee vote. In an October 3 letter to committee chair , she argued the resolution would destabilize U.S.- relations, endanger logistics reliant on Turkish bases, and provoke Turkish retaliation against U.S. forces, prioritizing geopolitical alliances over formal historical acknowledgment despite scholarly consensus on the 's scale and intent. This reversal drew criticism from Armenian-American groups, who accused her of subordinating moral imperatives to short-term military expediency, while defenders noted 's role in facilitating over 70% of U.S. air operations in at the time. Harman adopted a hawkish stance toward , pushing for stringent to curb its nuclear program and regional aggression. She voted for the 2010 Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act, which targeted Iran's energy sector and refined petroleum imports, aiming to impose economic pressure without immediate military action. In debates, she criticized opponents of unilateral sanctions as naive, arguing they failed to deter Tehran's support for militias in and , though some analysts contended such measures isolated the U.S. from European allies and hardened Iranian resolve. Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Harman endorsed a , supporting negotiated concessions such as phased Israeli withdrawals from settlements in exchange for security guarantees, as outlined in her post-congressional advocacy for renewed peace talks. Critics from the pro-Israel right viewed this as overly dovish, potentially emboldening Palestinian rejectionism, while her emphasis on dismantling Hamas's military capabilities underscored a realist approach linking concessions to verifiable denuclearization of threats like Iran's proxies. Her framework, blending deterrence against authoritarian regimes with selective , faced accusations from anti-interventionist Democrats of enabling proxy conflicts by underestimating Islamist ideological drivers, though empirical data on sanction efficacy showed mixed results in altering Iranian behavior.

Domestic Policy Stances and Criticisms

Harman consistently supported measures to restrict access, including backing a partial ban on semi-automatic weapons during her tenure. She voted against prohibiting lawsuits over product misuse associated with legal gun owners, indicating a targeted rather than sweeping approach to liability. Conservatives critiqued these positions as infringing on Second Amendment rights without addressing root causes of violence, such as cultural or factors, arguing they prioritized regulatory expansion over of efficacy in reducing crime rates. On , Harman voted in favor of protections for free-roaming and additional funding for vehicle efficiency programs like Cash for Clunkers, aligning with Democratic priorities for emissions reductions and preservation. She advocated stricter-than-federal state emission standards, contributing to California's regulatory framework. Right-leaning analysts faulted these stances for imposing economic costs on industries without proportionate global environmental gains, citing data on job losses in energy sectors and questioning the causal link between U.S. regulations and climate outcomes given emissions from developing nations. Harman displayed pragmatism on by earning an 83% rating from the Citizens' Alliance for Freedom for supporting independence measures, including service on the Energy and Commerce Committee. While favoring renewable incentives, she acknowledged the need for domestic production, as evidenced by her district's and tech interests tied to reliable energy supplies. Critics from conservative outlets argued her votes occasionally tilted toward restrictions that delayed drilling, undermining short-term independence goals despite long-term data showing U.S. shale advancements reducing import reliance post-2010. In advocating women's integration into roles, Harman opposed proposals to segregate basic training by , asserting that services were best positioned to manage without congressional . She highlighted risks—stating women in uniform faced higher odds of attack by comrades than enemy fire—but prioritized full inclusion over structural reforms like separation, which she viewed as penalizing victims. Conservative analysts criticized this approach for disregarding evidence on erosion, pointing to studies showing integration correlated with higher injury rates and lowered performance standards in , potentially compromising operational effectiveness. Harman backed comprehensive immigration reform, voting against border fencing and in favor of pathways for undocumented immigrants while emphasizing enforcement caveats tied to security screenings. Her record opposed mandatory reporting of hospital-treated illegal aliens, reflecting a balanced view on humanitarian access. Right-wing commentators lambasted these positions as enabling unchecked inflows, citing fiscal data on welfare costs exceeding contributions from low-skilled migrants and arguing they ignored enforcement failures' causal role in wage suppression for native workers. Harman's overall domestic voting aligned with centrist Democrats, including Blue Dog Coalition membership focused on fiscal restraint, though empirical analyses of her record reveal mixed support for entitlements expansion—opposing some Social Security benefit hikes while backing Medicare adjustments. Mainstream media often amplified her liberal social stances, overstating progressive alignment; conservative reviews, however, portrayed her as embodying diluted centrism that accommodated leftward drifts on guns and immigration without rigorous cost-benefit scrutiny.

Controversies and Criticisms

2009 NSA Wiretap and AIPAC Espionage Case

In April 2009, CQ Politics reported that a (NSA) wiretap conducted in 2005 or 2006 as part of an investigation captured then-Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) in a conversation with Richard Rosenzweig, a suspected Israeli agent and advocate. According to sources familiar with the transcript, Harman reportedly promised to "waddle into" the pending Justice Department case against two officials, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, by urging lenient treatment such as reduced charges or dropped prosecution, in exchange for AIPAC's assistance in securing her appointment as chairwoman of the House Intelligence Committee. The reported involved AIPAC leveraging influence over House Speaker through "California Jews" and Democratic donors to block Harman's rival, , from the Intelligence chairmanship—a position she held as ranking member at the time of the call. Harman, who was unaware of the wiretap until media reports surfaced, vehemently denied any improper quid pro quo, asserting that her advocacy for the AIPAC officials constituted standard constituent services and that she had urged only a fair process without intervening improperly. She described the surveillance as an "abuse of power" by the NSA and Justice Department, particularly given her role overseeing intelligence matters, and demanded the release of full transcripts to clear her name, writing to Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate the matter. Harman further claimed the leak of the wiretap details to CQ was politically motivated, timed to undermine Democrats amid Bush-era tensions over NSA surveillance programs, which she had publicly defended. No criminal charges were ever filed against Harman, and the Justice Department ultimately dropped the espionage case against Rosen and Weissman in without trial, citing insufficient to prove intent to harm U.S. interests. Internal deliberations reportedly considered prosecuting Harman but were halted by then-Attorney General and John , ostensibly to preserve the broader investigation and protect classified NSA methods, though critics from conservative outlets argued this reflected favoring pro-Israel influence. The incident fueled ongoing debates about foreign lobby sway over U.S. lawmakers, with right-leaning analysts citing it as of compromised oversight in and , paralleling broader concerns over and undue Israeli influence without formal registration under the . Despite the lack of prosecution, the unresolved transcript details left empirical questions about potential influence peddling lingering, as no public release of the full recording occurred to independently verify interpretations.

Allegations of Foreign Influence and Ethical Lapses

Harman participated in the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's () 2001 PowerTrip to , a sponsored congressional involving meetings with Israeli leaders and security briefings, funded by the pro-Israel lobby without disclosure as activities. Transparency organizations, including the Center for Public Integrity, have highlighted such trips as mechanisms for lobby influence on U.S. policy, particularly given AIPAC's exemption from (FARA) requirements despite advocacy aligned with Israeli government priorities. Critics from groups like the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy argue this structure enables unregistered coordination with foreign interests, potentially skewing lawmakers' views toward donor-favored outcomes, as evidenced by AIPAC's historical success in securing aid packages exceeding $3 billion annually to during Harman's tenure. In May 2008, a former staffer accused Harman of directing congressional employees to perform campaign tasks, such as coordination, on official time, violating House Rule XXIII prohibiting use of government resources for personal or political gain. The allegation emerged amid a broader Department of Justice review of Hill staff practices, prompted by the staffer's guilty plea to unrelated charges, which Harman cited to question the accuser's credibility. No formal sanctions resulted from the House Ethics Committee review, but the incident underscored ongoing concerns about lax enforcement of "revolving door" norms and staff allocation, with data from the Office of Congressional Ethics showing over 30 similar probes into resource misuse across in 2009. Following her 2011 departure from , Harman joined the board of in 2018, a provider holding over $1 billion in U.S. Department of Defense contracts for secure global communications. This role drew scrutiny for potential conflicts, as her prior legislative support for and defense appropriations—totaling hundreds of billions during her committee service—aligned with Iridium's interests, exemplifying dynamics where ex-officials monetize policy expertise. Analysts, including those at , noted such positions in her subsequent advisory capacities, like chairing the 2024 Commission on the National Defense Strategy advocating massive budget increases, risk entrenching industry-favored spending over fiscal restraint, though Harman maintained her recommendations stemmed from threat assessments rather than personal gain.

Post-Congressional Activities

Leadership at the Center

Jane Harman resigned from the U.S. on February 28, 2011, to assume the roles of Director, President, and CEO of the International Center for Scholars, becoming the first woman to lead the congressionally chartered, nonpartisan . Her appointment leveraged her congressional experience in and oversight to guide the Center's mission of connecting scholarly research with policy formulation on international affairs. Over her tenure from 2011 to 2021, Harman directed 's expansion of programming on global security challenges, including the 2020 report Managing Nuclear Risks, which analyzed post-Cold War dynamics and recommended renewed U.S.- engagement to mitigate proliferation threats amid eroding treaties. The institution under her leadership maintained a bipartisan orientation, convening dialogues among policymakers, scholars, and practitioners on topics such as deterrence and democratic resilience, while producing policy-relevant analyses on emerging threats like cyber vulnerabilities and great-power competition. These efforts positioned as a bridge between academia and government, drawing on its endowment and congressional funding to sustain independent scholarship despite broader scrutiny over donor influences on event programming. Harman concluded her leadership in February 2021 after a decade in the position, transitioning to the role of Distinguished Fellow and President Emerita, during which continued to emphasize nonpartisan policy outputs informed by empirical assessments of U.S. strategic interests. Her stewardship preserved the institution's reputation for rigorous, evidence-based contributions to public discourse on , though some observers noted potential tensions from selective event focuses amid funding dependencies common to policy institutes.

Recent Engagements and Advisory Roles (2011–Present)

Following her tenure in Congress, Harman chaired the bipartisan, congressionally mandated Commission on the National Defense Strategy from 2022 to 2024, culminating in a unanimous report released on July 16, 2024, that criticized the existing U.S. National Defense Strategy as outdated and insufficient against escalating threats from , , , and . The report urged a rapid military buildup, including increased defense spending to at least 5% of GDP, enhanced industrial base capacity, and renewed bipartisan consensus on deterrence to counter peer competitors' advances in conventional and . Harman has held advisory positions on several prominent boards and commissions, including co-chairing the board of since October 2022, where she contributed to assessments of global democratic backsliding and authoritarian challenges. She serves as a trustee of the , participating in its strategy group focused on U.S. security policy, and as a member of the Trilateral Commission's executive committee, engaging on transatlantic and transpacific cooperation amid geopolitical shifts. In academic roles, Harman was appointed Presidential Scholar-in-Residence at the University of Southern California's School of in January 2022, emphasizing and deterrence strategies, and serves as a distinguished fellow at Columbia University's Institute of Global Politics, where she addressed multifaceted threats including space domain vulnerabilities in discussions through 2024. In February 2025, she co-chaired a task force that recommended bolstering U.S. leadership in outer space through integrated military-civil capabilities to deter aggression and maintain technological edges over adversaries. These engagements underscore her emphasis on restoring deterrence amid eroding domestic consensus on defense priorities.

Personal Life

Marriage and Family

Jane Harman was first married to Richard A. Frank, a government administrator, from 1969 until their in 1978. The couple had two children: Brian Frank, born in 1973, and Hilary Frank, born in 1975. In 1980, Harman married , an audio equipment pioneer and founder of Industries, with whom she remained until his death from complications of on April 12, 2011, at age 92. They had two children together: Daniel Geier Harman and Justine Leigh Harman. Sidney Harman brought four children from his prior marriage to the blended family: Lynn, Barbara, Gina, and Paul. This structure provided personal support amid Harman's political career, though specific dynamics remain private. The family established the Harman Family Foundation, which Jane Harman serves as trustee and president, focusing grants on arts education, youth development programs, and enriching educational opportunities in regions including Washington, D.C., and . The foundation's assets exceed $36 million, directing funds to initiatives at the intersection of arts and community enrichment.

Philanthropy and Personal Interests

Harman serves as president of the Harman Family Foundation, a private philanthropic organization she co-founded with her late husband, , in 1985. The foundation supports programs at the intersection of arts and youth development, aiming to enhance educational opportunities for underserved middle and high school students from low-income communities, particularly in the , metropolitan area and . It also funds capacity-building for community-based nonprofits and initiatives promoting post-secondary and career success for youth up to age 26. Grants from the foundation, totaling approximately $2.2 million in 2023, are awarded exclusively to tax-exempt organizations by invitation, excluding other private foundations or political entities. These efforts prioritize direct programming in education and arts over broader ideological pursuits, focusing on verifiable improvements in youth outcomes through structured, arts-integrated interventions. Beyond the foundation, Harman has contributed to women's leadership initiatives by sharing practical insights drawn from her experiences, such as in a 2014 address at , her alma mater, where she emphasized mutual support among women as a core principle for advancement. Her philanthropic engagements underscore a preference for evidence-based support in cultural and educational spheres, including trusteeships at organizations like the , which convenes discussions on and societal issues.

References

  1. https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/14550
  2. https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/H000213
  3. https://www.congress.gov/member/jane-harman/H000213
  4. https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/p/fapb/185585.htm
  5. https://www.nasa.gov/people/the-honorable-jane-harman/
  6. https://priceschool.usc.edu/faculty/directory/jane-harman/
  7. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/person/jane-harman
  8. https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/distinguished-fellows/hon-jane-harman
  9. https://www.janeharman.com/
  10. https://hls.harvard.edu/today/jane-harman-69-we-havent-learned-that-when-we-work-together-we-overcome/
  11. https://www.npr.org/2009/04/21/103330280/harman-outraged-over-alleged-wiretapping
  12. https://fas.org/publication/harman_aipac_leaks/
  13. https://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/ssc/harman/early.html
  14. https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/harman-jane
  15. https://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/ssc/harman/education.html
  16. https://findingaids.smith.edu/repositories/2/resources/754
  17. https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/JANE-HARMAN-3091092.php
  18. https://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/ssc/harman/whitehouse.html
  19. https://today.usc.edu/usc-price-scholar-in-residence-jane-harman-reflects-on-jimmy-carter/
  20. https://www.smith.edu/news-events/news/smith-medalist-jane-lakes-harman-66-identify-your-dream
  21. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-10-25-me-917-story.html
  22. https://www.legistorm.com/person/bio/51415/Jane_Margaret_Lakes_Harman.html
  23. https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal95-1100771
  24. https://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/ssc/harman/congress.html
  25. https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/04/harman/
  26. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-feb-05-mn-15705-story.html
  27. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/04/13/socket-moms
  28. https://www.aei.org/articles/californias-wealth-of-lessons/
  29. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-may-11-mn-48617-story.html
  30. https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Harman-Wins-Backers-But-Raises-Eyebrows-She-s-3010499.php
  31. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-may-05-mn-46609-story.html
  32. https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=6&year=1998&f=0&off=5&elect=1
  33. https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Harman-Backs-Davis-All-the-Way-in-Governor-Race-3001363.php
  34. https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/06/03/rothenberg/
  35. https://laist.com/news/jane-harman-saves-the-patriot-act
  36. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alarming-sex-assault-rate-found-among-vets/
  37. https://www.politico.com/story/2011/02/harman-makes-her-exit-official-049113
  38. https://rollcall.com/2011/02/07/harmans-departure-tees-up-first-special/
  39. https://www.ndscommission.senate.gov/bio-jane-harman/
  40. https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117668/witnesses/HHRG-118-AS00-Bio-HarmanJ-20240918.pdf
  41. https://www.aei.org/research-products/speech/serious-intelligence-reform/
  42. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Chapter-19_Harman_Good-Intelligence-Is-a-Key-Ingredient.pdf
  43. https://irp.fas.org/congress/2008_cr/house-fisa.html
  44. https://votesmart.org/bill/5678/15928/418/iran-counter-proliferation-act-of-2007
  45. https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/447496-why-congress-needs-accurate-intelligence-on-the-iran-threat/
  46. https://broadbandbreakfast.com/cybersecurity-legislation-gains-traction/
  47. https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/3985
  48. https://votesmart.org/public-statement/149683/harman-urges-adoption-of-anti-torture-provision
  49. https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/374
  50. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/13/politics/white-house-fought-new-curbs-on-interrogations-officials-say.html
  51. https://www.aclu.org/documents/foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act-news-and-resources
  52. https://www.aclutx.org/en/news/secrecy-cancer-our-democracy
  53. https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/former-congresswoman-jane-harman-discusses-array-national-security-challenges
  54. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/people/jane-harman/
  55. https://irp.fas.org/news/2006/01/wh010406.html
  56. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/01/text/20060104-7.html
  57. https://www.aclu.org/documents/aclu-letter-congresswoman-jane-harman-supporting-her-bill-hr-5371-lawful-intelligence-and
  58. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/congress-granted-oversight-for-nsa-surveillance-program
  59. https://www.congress.gov/107/chrg/CHRG-107jhrg96166/CHRG-107jhrg96166.pdf
  60. https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/108th-congress/house-report/724/1
  61. https://www.foreign.senate.gov/download/transcript-counterterrorism-policies-and-priorities-addressing-the-evolving-threat-032013
  62. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/snowdens-ill-deserved-fifteen-minutes
  63. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/jane-harman-the-anniversary-the-edward-snowden-leaks
  64. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/HM/HM00/20140115/101631/HHRG-113-HM00-Wstate-HarmanJ-20140115.pdf
  65. https://publicintegrity.org/politics/harmans-aipac-ties-include-2001-israel-powertrip/
  66. https://www.latimes.com/news/la-oe-harman12oct12-story.html
  67. https://www.dailynews.com/2007/10/10/harmans-flip-flop-on-armenian-genocide-resolution-attacked/
  68. https://asbarez.com/la-times-editorial-condemns-harman-for-duplicity-on-genocide-resolution/
  69. https://truthout.org/articles/loose-lips-on-iran-can-sink-america/
  70. https://www.peaceaction.org/2010/04/27/harman-tries-to-use-peace-action-to-bolster-flimsy-progressive-record/
  71. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLhA9Zu-MIE
  72. https://www.politico.com/story/2010/05/harman-winograd-spar-over-iran-036761
  73. https://ontheissues.org/CA/Jane_Harman.htm
  74. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/18/us/bill-would-separate-men-and-women-in-basic-training.html
  75. https://www.startribune.com/jane-harman-serving-their-country-at-the-risk-of-being-raped/17202636
  76. https://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/ssc/harman/jane.html
  77. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/la-oew-harman5-2010apr05-story.html
  78. https://reason.com/2011/02/07/jane-harman-we-knew-ye-too-wel/
  79. https://www.npr.org/sections/politicaljunkie/2009/04/alleged_harmanaipac_chat.html
  80. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/us/politics/21harman.html
  81. https://www.politico.com/story/2009/04/harman-calls-out-nsa-021537
  82. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/spy-story-harman-saban-and-aipac/
  83. https://mondoweiss.net/2009/04/cq-says-suspected-israeli-spy-offered-to-lobby-nancy-pelosi-on-behalf-of-fellow-congresswoman-jane-h/
  84. https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/21/harman.wiretap/index.html
  85. https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2009/04/harman-denies-wiretap-report-017652
  86. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/national/2009/05/04/califs-harman-rails-against-wiretapping-that-ensnared-her/feb4f4d1-5b8c-4899-bece-740d54d97052/
  87. https://www.npr.org/sections/politicaljunkie/2009/04/harman_on_npr_im_outraged_over.html
  88. https://www.irmep.org/11-3-2009aipacfara.pdf
  89. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/national/2008/05/08/lawmakers-accused-of-flouting-rules-on-use-of-staff/335e9d9f-2930-4242-83bc-68b10f7e32b0/
  90. https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-now/2008/05/did-lawmakers-misuse-staff-for-campaigns-008830
  91. https://sunlightfoundation.com/2008/05/09/new-investigations-and-suitcases-of-money/
  92. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna33546194
  93. https://www.commondreams.org/war-profiteers-pentagon-spending
  94. https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving-door/jane-harman-d/summary?id=77736
  95. https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhartung/2024/07/30/new-strategy-commission-reflects-conflicts-of-interest-and-outmoded-thinking/
  96. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/representative-jane-harman-d-calif-to-lead-the-woodrow-wilson-international-center-for
  97. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/uploads/documents/Managing_Nuclear_Risks_final.pdf
  98. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/wilson-center-president-step-down-after-almost-decade-service
  99. https://cqpress.sagepub.com/cqresearcher/report/download/think-tanks-transition-cqresrre20170929
  100. https://www.aspenideas.org/speakers/jane-harman
  101. https://acrosskarman.wilsoncenter.org/video/jane-harman-steps-down-look-back-decade-leadership-and-achievement
  102. https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/nds_commission_final_report.pdf
  103. https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117668/witnesses/HHRG-118-AS00-Wstate-HarmanJ-20240918.pdf
  104. https://www.rand.org/nsrd/projects/NDS-commission.html
  105. https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3911815/commission-says-us-needs-more-different-resources-for-defense-strategy/
  106. https://freedomhouse.org/article/freedom-house-welcomes-new-board-chair-jane-harman-six-trustees
  107. https://www.aspensecurityforum.org/jane-harman/
  108. https://www.trilateral.org/about/members-fellows/
  109. https://priceschool.usc.edu/news/jane-harman-scholar-in-residence/
  110. https://www.cfr.org/news-releases/new-cfr-task-force-report-outlines-plan-maintain-us-leadership-outer-space
  111. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/event/strategic-shifts-insights-from-the-commission-on-the-national-defense-strategy/
  112. https://associates.caltech.edu/news/trustee-sidney-harman-92-1910
  113. https://harman-foundation.org/
  114. https://www.grantable.co/search/funders/profile/harman-family-foundation-us-foundation-456495102
  115. https://fconline.foundationcenter.org/fdo-grantmaker-profile?key=HARM012
  116. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/harman-family-foundation/
  117. https://www.instrumentl.com/990-report/harman-family-foundation-855847a2-70c3-4ffe-ad48-a8af2ecf42fc
  118. https://harman-foundation.org/grant-information/
  119. https://www.smith.edu/news-events/news/jane-harman-66-shares-lessons-womens-leadership
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.