Hubbry Logo
Beltrami–Klein modelBeltrami–Klein modelMain
Open search
Beltrami–Klein model
Community hub
Beltrami–Klein model
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Beltrami–Klein model
Beltrami–Klein model
from Wikipedia
Many hyperbolic lines through point P not intersecting line a in the Beltrami–Klein model
A hyperbolic triheptagonal tiling in a Beltrami–Klein model projection

In geometry, the Beltrami–Klein model, also called the projective model, Klein disk model, and the Cayley–Klein model, is a model of hyperbolic geometry in which points are represented by the points in the interior of the unit disk (or n-dimensional unit ball) and lines are represented by the chords, straight line segments with ideal endpoints on the boundary sphere.

It is analogous to the gnomonic projection of spherical geometry, in that geodesics (great circles in spherical geometry) are mapped to straight lines.

This model is not conformal: angles are not faithfully represented, and circles become ellipses, increasingly flattened near the edge. This is in contrast to the Poincaré disk model, which is conformal. However, lines in the Poincaré model are not represented by straight line segments, but by arcs that meet the boundary orthogonally.

The Beltrami–Klein model is named after the Italian geometer Eugenio Beltrami and the German Felix Klein while "Cayley" in Cayley–Klein model refers to the English geometer Arthur Cayley.

History

[edit]

This model made its first appearance for hyperbolic geometry in two memoirs of Eugenio Beltrami published in 1868, first for dimension n = 2 and then for general n, and these essays proved the equiconsistency of hyperbolic geometry with ordinary Euclidean geometry.[1][2][3]

The papers of Beltrami remained little noticed until recently and the model was named after Klein ("The Klein disk model"). In 1859 Arthur Cayley used the cross-ratio definition of angle due to Laguerre to show how Euclidean geometry could be defined using projective geometry.[4] His definition of distance later became known as the Cayley metric.

In 1869, the young (twenty-year-old) Felix Klein became acquainted with Cayley's work. He recalled that in 1870 he gave a talk on the work of Cayley at the seminar of Weierstrass and he wrote:

"I finished with a question whether there might exist a connection between the ideas of Cayley and Lobachevsky. I was given the answer that these two systems were conceptually widely separated."[5]

Later, Felix Klein realized that Cayley's ideas give rise to a projective model of the non-Euclidean plane.[6]

As Klein puts it, "I allowed myself to be convinced by these objections and put aside this already mature idea." However, in 1871, he returned to this idea, formulated it mathematically, and published it.[7]

Distance formula

[edit]

The distance function for the Beltrami–Klein model is a Cayley–Klein metric. Given two distinct points p and q in the open unit ball, the unique straight line connecting them intersects the boundary at two ideal points, a and b, label them so that the points are, in order, a, p, q, b, so that |aq| > |ap| and |pb| > |qb|.

The hyperbolic distance between p and q is then:

The vertical bars indicate Euclidean distances between the points in the model, where ln is the natural logarithm and the factor of one half is needed to give the model the standard curvature of −1.

When one of the points is the origin and Euclidean distance between the points is r then the hyperbolic distance is:

where artanh is the inverse hyperbolic function of the hyperbolic tangent.

The Klein disk model

[edit]
Lines in the projective model of the hyperbolic plane

In two dimensions the Beltrami–Klein model is called the Klein disk model. It is a disk and the inside of the disk is a model of the entire hyperbolic plane. Lines in this model are represented by chords of the boundary circle (also called the absolute). The points on the boundary circle are called ideal points; although well defined, they do not belong to the hyperbolic plane. Points outside the disk do not belong to the hyperbolic plane either, and they are sometimes called ultra ideal points.

The model is not conformal, meaning that angles are distorted, and circles on the hyperbolic plane are in general not circular in the model. Only circles that have their centre at the centre of the boundary circle are not distorted. All other circles are distorted, as are horocycles and hypercycles.

Properties

[edit]

Chords that meet on the boundary circle are limiting parallel lines.

Two chords are perpendicular if, when extended outside the disk, each goes through the pole of the other. (The pole of a chord is an ultra ideal point: the point outside the disk where the tangents to the disk at the endpoints of the chord meet.) Chords that go through the centre of the disk have their pole at infinity, orthogonal to the direction of the chord (this implies that right angles on diameters are not distorted).

Compass and straightedge constructions

[edit]

Here is how one can use compass and straightedge constructions in the model to achieve the effect of the basic constructions in the hyperbolic plane.

  • The pole of a line. While the pole is not a point in the hyperbolic plane (it is an ultra ideal point) most constructions will use the pole of a line in one or more ways.
For a line: construct the tangents to the boundary circle through the ideal (end) points of the line. the point where these tangents intersect is the pole.
For diameters of the disk: the pole is at infinity perpendicular to the diameter.
When the line is a diameter of the disk then the perpendicular is the chord that is (Euclidean) perpendicular to that diameter and going through the given point.
  • To find the midpoint of given segment : Draw the lines through A and B that are perpendicular to . (see above) Draw the lines connecting the ideal points of these lines, two of these lines will intersect the segment and will do this at the same point. This point is the (hyperbolic) midpoint of.[8]
  • To bisect a given angle : Draw the rays AB and AC. Draw tangents to the circle where the rays intersect the boundary circle. Draw a line from A to the point where the tangents intersect. The part of this line between A and the boundary circle is the bisector.[9]
  • The common perpendicular of two lines is the chord that when extended goes through both poles of the chords.
When one of the chords is a diameter of the boundary circle then the common perpendicular is the chord that is perpendicular to the diameter and that when lengthened goes through the pole of the other chord.
  • To reflect a point P in a line l: From a point R on the line l draw the ray through P. Let X be the ideal point where the ray intersects the absolute. Draw the ray from the pole of line l through X, let Y be another ideal point that intersects the ray. Draw the segment RY. The reflection of point P is the point where the ray from the pole of line l through P intersects RY.[10]

Circles, hypercycles and horocycles

[edit]
Circles in the Klein-Beltrami model of hyperbolic geometry.

While lines in the hyperbolic plane are straightforward to project into the Klein disk model, circles, hypercycles and horocycles are not.

Circles in the model that are not concentric with the model become ellipses, increasing in eccentricity near the edge. Angles, hypercycles, and horocycles in the Klein disk model are also deformed.

For constructions in the hyperbolic plane that contain circles, hypercycles, horocycles or non right angles it is perhaps more convenient to use the Poincaré disk model or the Poincaré half-plane model.

Relation to the Poincaré disk model

[edit]
Combined projections from the Klein disk model (yellow) to the Poincaré disk model (red) via the hemisphere model (blue)
The Beltrami–Klein model (K in the picture) is an orthographic projection from the hemispherical model and a gnomonic projection of the hyperboloid model (Hy) with the center of the hyperboloid (O) as its center.

Both the Poincaré disk model and the Klein disk model are models of the hyperbolic plane. An advantage of the Poincaré disk model is that it is conformal (circles and angles are not distorted); a disadvantage is that straight lines project to circular arcs orthogonal to the boundary circle of the disk.

The two models are related through a projection on or from the hemisphere model. The Klein model is an orthographic projection to the hemisphere model, while the Poincaré disk model is a stereographic projection.

Straight lines always intersect the circular boundary of the two models in the same place, regardless of which model is used. Also, the pole of the chord is the centre of the circle that contains the arc.

If P is a point a distance from the centre of the unit circle in the Beltrami–Klein model, then the corresponding point on the Poincaré disk model a distance of u on the same radius:

Conversely, If P is a point a distance from the centre of the unit circle in the Poincaré disk model, then the corresponding point of the Beltrami–Klein model is a distance of s on the same radius:

Relation of the disk model to the hyperboloid model and the gnomonic projection of the sphere

[edit]

The gnomonic projection of the sphere projects from the sphere's center onto a tangent plane. Every great circle on the sphere is projected to a straight line, but it is not conformal. Angles are not faithfully represented, and circles become ellipses, increasingly stretched as they get further from the tangent point.

Similarly the Klein disk (K, in the picture) is a gnomonic projection of the hyperboloid model (Hy) with as center the center of the hyperboloid (O) and the projection plane tangent to the hyperboloid.[11]

Distance and metric tensor

[edit]
The regular hyperbolic dodecahedral honeycomb, {5,3,4}

Given two distinct points U and V in the open unit ball of the model in Euclidean space, the unique straight line connecting them intersects the unit sphere at two ideal points A and B, labeled so that the points are, in order along the line, A, U, V, B. Taking the centre of the unit ball of the model as the origin, and assigning position vectors u, v, a, b respectively to the points U, V, A, B, we have that that av‖ > ‖au and ub‖ > ‖vb, where ‖ · ‖ denotes the Euclidean norm. Then the distance between U and V in the modelled hyperbolic space is expressed as

where the factor of one half is needed to make the curvature −1.

The associated metric tensor is given by[12][13]

Relation to the hyperboloid model

[edit]
Partial {7,3} hyperbolic tiling of the hyperboloid as seen in Beltrami-Klein perspective.
Animation of partial {7,3} hyperbolic tiling of the hyperboloid rotating into the Beltrami-Klein perspective.

The hyperboloid model is a model of hyperbolic geometry within (n + 1)-dimensional Minkowski space. The Minkowski inner product is given by

and the norm by . The hyperbolic plane is embedded in this space as the vectors x with x‖ = 1 and x0 (the "timelike component") positive. The intrinsic distance (in the embedding) between points u and v is then given by

This may also be written in the homogeneous form

which allows the vectors to be rescaled for convenience.

The Beltrami–Klein model is obtained from the hyperboloid model by rescaling all vectors so that the timelike component is 1, that is, by projecting the hyperboloid embedding through the origin onto the plane x0 = 1. The distance function, in its homogeneous form, is unchanged. Since the intrinsic lines (geodesics) of the hyperboloid model are the intersection of the embedding with planes through the Minkowski origin, the intrinsic lines of the Beltrami–Klein model are the chords of the sphere.

Relation to the Poincaré ball model

[edit]

Both the Poincaré ball model and the Beltrami–Klein model are models of the n-dimensional hyperbolic space in the n-dimensional unit ball in Rn. If is a vector of norm less than one representing a point of the Poincaré disk model, then the corresponding point of the Beltrami–Klein model is given by

Conversely, from a vector of norm less than one representing a point of the Beltrami–Klein model, the corresponding point of the Poincaré disk model is given by

Given two points on the boundary of the unit disk, which are called ideal points, the straight line connecting them in the Beltrami–Klein model is the chord between them, while in the corresponding Poincaré model the line is a circular arc on the two-dimensional subspace generated by the two boundary point vectors, meeting the boundary of the ball at right angles. The two models are related through a projection from the center of the disk; a ray from the center passing through a point of one model line passes through the corresponding point of the line in the other model.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Beltrami–Klein model, also known as the Klein-Beltrami model, is a projective model of two-dimensional hyperbolic geometry that represents the hyperbolic plane as the interior of an open unit disk in the Euclidean plane, where points of the hyperbolic plane correspond to points inside the disk, and hyperbolic lines are the open straight-line chords (excluding their endpoints on the boundary circle). This model embeds hyperbolic geometry within Euclidean space, allowing for the visualization of hyperbolic lines as straight segments while adhering to the axioms of hyperbolic geometry, such as the existence of multiple parallels through a point not on a given line. Developed in the late , the model originated with Italian mathematician Eugenio Beltrami, who introduced an early version in 1868 as part of his work demonstrating the consistency of non-Euclidean geometries by mapping them onto portions of the . German mathematician further refined and popularized the model in 1871, emphasizing its projective geometric foundations and its utility in relating to projective transformations, which draw from perspective techniques. Beltrami's contribution built on earlier explorations of constant negative curvature surfaces, such as the , while Klein's enhancements highlighted the model's pedagogical value in contrasting Euclidean and non-Euclidean structures. Key properties of the Beltrami–Klein model include its preservation of straight-line geodesics, making hyperbolic lines appear as Euclidean straight segments for intuitive visualization, though it distorts angles, rendering it non-conformal. Parallelism is defined such that two hyperbolic lines are parallel if their corresponding chords do not intersect within the disk, and perpendicularity involves projective concepts like the pole of a line—the intersection point of tangents at the chord's endpoints. The model is projectively equivalent to the via a mapping that projects chords onto circular arcs through , preserving distances and angles in the transformed space. Congruence of segments and angles is determined through perspectivities from a viewpoint outside the disk, ensuring transitivity across the geometry. These features make the Beltrami–Klein model particularly useful for studying incidence and collinearity in , despite challenges in measuring angles directly.

Historical Background

Origins in Non-Euclidean Geometry

The parallel postulate, the fifth axiom in Euclid's Elements, had provoked debate since antiquity, as mathematicians like Girolamo Saccheri in 1733 and in 1766 sought to derive it from the other axioms but instead uncovered inconsistencies that hinted at its independence. By the early , this longstanding challenge escalated into a crisis, with decrying it in 1767 as the "scandal of elementary geometry" and prompting a reevaluation of whether alternative geometries could exist without contradicting the remaining Euclidean axioms. In response, privately developed ideas negating the parallel postulate as early as the 1790s, concluding its independence by 1817 through explorations of geometries allowing multiple parallels, though he never published these findings. Independently, presented his in 1829, demonstrating through analytic methods that assuming infinitely many parallels through a point not on a line yielded a consistent with modified trigonometric relations. János Bolyai similarly outlined such a geometry in a 1832 appendix to his father's work, establishing 's internal logical coherence in the via rigorous calculations, yet the abstract nature of these constructs limited their intuitive grasp and broader validation. The absence of tangible representations fueled a demand for concrete models embedding hyperbolic space within Euclidean frameworks to visualize its properties and affirm its consistency relative to Euclidean geometry. Eugenio Beltrami met this need in his 1868 paper "Saggio di interpretazione della geometria non euclidea," where he pioneered projective models, including an initial disk representation that bounded the hyperbolic plane inside a Euclidean disk while interpreting geodesics as straight chords. Beltrami leveraged projective geometry to achieve this embedding without singularities, ensuring a seamless realization of hyperbolic axioms like multiple parallels and unique shortest paths between points, thus bridging the abstract theory to Euclidean propositions.

Contributions of Beltrami and Klein

In 1868, Eugenio Beltrami introduced the projective disk model as a representation of within the interior of a circle, where hyperbolic lines are depicted as straight-line chords in the . This model provided an embedding of into , demonstrating its consistency relative to by interpreting hyperbolic axioms through projective transformations. Beltrami's construction marked a pivotal step in visualizing without relying on pseudospherical surfaces, building on earlier 19th-century explorations of non-Euclidean axioms. Felix Klein advanced Beltrami's idea in his 1871 paper "Über die sogenannte nicht-euklidische Geometrie," where he renamed the model the "Klein model" and emphasized its projective nature, highlighting how absolute invariants under projective transformations define the geometry. Klein popularized the model by integrating it into the broader framework of , showing that hyperbolic lines as chords preserve the incidence properties essential to the axioms. His treatment transformed Beltrami's representation into a unified tool for studying non-Euclidean spaces. Klein's contributions extended the model to higher dimensions, generalizing the disk to projective balls in n-dimensional space, which allowed for analogous constructions of hyperbolic geometries beyond the plane. He further connected the model's symmetries to , identifying the group of orientation-preserving isometries with the projective PSL(2,ℝ) acting on the disk. This linkage underscored the model's role in classifying geometries by their transformation groups. The evolution from Beltrami's 1868 innovation to Klein's refinements culminated in a systematic treatment influenced by Klein's 1872 Erlangen program, which classified geometries based on their underlying symmetry groups, thereby embedding the Klein model within modern geometric theory.

Definition and Setup

The Unit Disk and Boundary

The Beltrami–Klein model represents the hyperbolic plane as the open unit disk in the Euclidean plane, where the interior points of the disk serve as the points of the hyperbolic space. This configuration embeds the non-Euclidean geometry within a familiar Euclidean setting, with each point inside the disk corresponding directly to a hyperbolic point. The model leverages the projective properties of the plane to capture the structure of hyperbolic geometry without altering the underlying Euclidean coordinates for points within the disk. The boundary of this unit disk, known as the unit circle, is excluded from the and functions as the circle at . This boundary comprises ideal points that represent the limiting directions in the hyperbolic plane, particularly where converge at . These ideal points provide a compactification of the space, allowing the model to handle asymptotic behaviors inherent to . Fundamentally projective in nature, the Beltrami–Klein model realizes the hyperbolic plane as a domain within the real , specifically the interior of the disk bounded by a conic. The projective extension across the entire disk—including the boundary—preserves the geometric incidences and allows for a unified treatment via projective transformations. The boundary conic consists of absolute points, which are the projective points at defining the hyperbolic metric in contrast to . These absolute points tie the model to core principles of , where the conic serves as the locus distinguishing finite hyperbolic points from their ideal counterparts.

Hyperbolic Lines as Chords

In the Beltrami–Klein model, hyperbolic straight lines, or geodesics, are represented as the open straight-line segments, known as chords, that connect two points within the interior of the unit disk and extend to meet the boundary circle. These chords exclude their endpoints on the boundary, which serve as ideal points at , ensuring that the remains within the open disk. Two such chords intersect inside the disk if and only if they cross at a point interior to the disk; otherwise, they are parallel if they share a common endpoint on the boundary , meaning they approach the same ideal point without meeting inside, or ultraparallel if they have no common boundary point and remain disjoint entirely. This configuration allows for infinitely many parallels through a given interior point to a given line, distinguishing the model from . A key advantage of this representation is that geodesics appear as straight Euclidean line segments, facilitating straightforward constructions using only a and simplifying visualizations compared to models where geodesics are curved arcs. This straight-line property stems from the model's projective nature, originally emphasized by . The boundary circle completes the model within the real , where it acts as the line at , incorporating the ideal points into a projective framework that unifies the hyperbolic plane with its boundary.

Metric and Geometry

Distance Formula

The hyperbolic distance d(x,y)d(x, y) between two points x,yx, y in the open unit disk of the Beltrami–Klein model is given by d(x,y)=\arccosh(1xy(1x2)(1y2)).d(x, y) = \arccosh\left( \frac{1 - x \cdot y}{\sqrt{(1 - \|x\|^2)(1 - \|y\|^2)}} \right).
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.