Hubbry Logo
McClellan saddleMcClellan saddleMain
Open search
McClellan saddle
Community hub
McClellan saddle
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
McClellan saddle
McClellan saddle
from Wikipedia
M1859 McClellan saddle of the Civil War period, displaying its rawhide seat covering. Fort Kearny State Park and Museum, Nebraska

The McClellan saddle is a riding saddle that was designed by George B. McClellan, after his tour of Europe as the member of a military commission charged with studying the latest developments in engineer and cavalry forces including field equipment.[1] Based on his observations, McClellan proposed a design that was adopted by the US Army in 1859.[1] The McClellan saddle was a success and continued in use in various forms until the US Army's last horse cavalry and horse artillery was dismounted late in World War II. Today, the McClellan saddle is used by ceremonial mounted units in the US Army. The saddle was used by several other nations, including Rhodesia and Mexico, and to a degree by the British in the Boer War. The saddle came in various seat sizes that predominantly ranged from approximately 11 to 12 ½ inches.[2]

Origin and development

[edit]

In April 1855, six years before the start of the Civil War, Captain George B. McClellan sailed to Europe as part of a military commission to study developments in European tactics, weaponry, and logistics. McClellan's focus was the organization of engineer troops and cavalry. After the one-year tour, during which time McClellan observed several battles of the Crimean War, McClellan brought back almost 100 books and manuals. These he read before writing his report, which concluded with his proposed manual for American cavalry adapted from existing Russian cavalry regulations. He also proposed a cavalry saddle that he claimed was a modification of a Hungarian model used in the Prussian service. The saddle was almost certainly a modification of the Spanish tree saddle in common use in Mexico during this period, and which had become common in some parts of the US.

The McClellan saddle was adopted by the US War Department in 1859 and remained standard issue, in various models, for the remaining history of the horse cavalry. The original M1859 version was the form used during the Civil War, and the design saw subsequent modifications. The saddle always remained recognizable as McClellan's design, which included cavalry and artillery models. In addition, a model for packers was introduced as the M1913.

Confederate variants in the Civil War

[edit]

During the American Civil War, many Confederate cavalrymen provided their own horses and civilian saddles. In time, the Confederacy issued the Jenifer saddle. But when Southerners' horses grew thin because of inadequate food supply, the Jenifer saddle became painful to the bony withers of the horses. In 1863, the Confederate army issued the lighter and better-contoured McClellan saddle to its cavalry. Because leather was scarce in the South during the Civil War, many of the McClellan saddles had skirts of painted canvas. The Confederate Army also used some British saddles as well.

McClellan saddle in black leather, post-Civil War period. Fort Kearny State Museum
M1904 McClellan saddle in russet-brown leather, World War I period. Fort Kearny State Museum

Influences on McClellan's design

[edit]

The design was based on the Spanish tree saddles in wide use in the United States at the time, and which had seen US Army use, although McClellan claimed that it was based on Hussar saddles he had observed in use in the Crimean War. While McClellan did go overseas and observe the Crimean War for the US, the saddle does not closely duplicate any pattern in use by the armies in that conflict, but is very close to the widely used Spanish tree saddle, which was originally a saddle in common use in Mexico. The design underwent modifications over time, although in many ways it remained remarkably unchanged. The saddle was simple and less expensive than existing saddles, light enough not to burden the horse, but sturdy enough to give good support to the rider and his gear. It supported a rawhide-covered open seat, a thick leather skirt, wooden stirrups, and a girth strap of woolen yarn.[1] Added accessories to the saddle sometimes included a nose bag for horse feed, a curry comb to groom the horse, a picket pin and lariat to tether the horse while grazing, saddlebags, and a "thimble" that held the muzzle of the cavalryman's carbine. The McClellan saddle was placed on top of a saddlecloth, shabrack, or saddle blanket.

Service and rivals in the US Army

[edit]

As noted above, the McClellan saddle served, and has continued to serve, for an extraordinarily long time in the U.S. Army. The saddle has been in uninterrupted use since 1859.

The saddle did see some modification over time. Perhaps the most significant alterations occurred in the 20th century, when the rigging was changed twice. The first time, an adjustable rigging was adopted, leading to the M1904 McClellan. That pattern is the most common of all McClellan saddles, and continued in use throughout World War I and World War II.

However, increased emphasis on equitation in the US Army also lead to the M1928, which was an M1904 with English rigging and fenders. This variant, the final one in US service, fit closer than other McClellan saddles, and is still used by the US Army in ceremonial uses.

The saddle, while passing the test of time, has not been without its rivals or critics. The first significant challenger was the Whitman saddle, named after a former US Army officer who designed it. The Whitman had many of the McClellan's features and is often mistaken for the McClellan. While not supplanting it, it was approved for use by officers and remained an approved officers' saddle throughout World War I. In later years, it incorporated so many McClellan features that it became known as the "Whitman-McClellan."

In the 20th century, a serious effort was made to replace the McClellan through tests of the US Army's M1912 equipments. The M1912 saddle proved to be unsuccessful in the Punitive Expedition, but it demonstrated a great departure from the McClellan design, resembling in some ways the British Universal Pattern saddle. Subsequently, the Army tested the M1917 saddle, but it was not adopted.

Enormous quantities of M1904 McClellans were purchased by the US Army in World War I, effectively preventing any new saddle from being adopted for general use for decades. The US Army did approve a saddle of the English saddle type prior to World War I for officers, and after the war approved another, with the adoption of the Philip's saddle for officers.

Use and service outside the United States

[edit]

The saddle also saw considerable civilian use, and was made for civilian sale by a variety of manufacturers. It was widely used in the United States by mounted policemen. It was adopted by Mexico, in a Mexican-made version, for their army. At least some were sold to the Dominion forces in the Boer War, and the North-West Mounted Police in Canada obtained at least a few for test purposes. The saddle was adopted by Rhodesia in the 1970s for use by the Grey's Scouts. South Africa used some quantities for mounted game wardens in the 1980s in South West Africa.

Legacy and continued use

[edit]

While the McClellan saddle was not perfect and had critics, it was one of the most enduring military saddles of all time, rivaled only by the British Universal Pattern saddle in its longevity. The saddle was used by every branch of the US Army, the US Marine Corps, and was widely used by mounted police units throughout the US.

The McClellan saddle continues to be made in the US, and was used by endurance riders at one time. It is made for use as a pleasure saddle for those few who like it for that purpose, and as a saddle for historical reenactors.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The McClellan saddle is a lightweight, durable riding designed for use, featuring an open wooden tree, leather skirting, and iron fittings to balance comfort for the rider and horse while minimizing weight and cost. Developed by Captain , a U.S. Army engineer officer, the saddle drew inspiration from European military designs observed during his 1855–1856 service on the Delafield Commission studying the , particularly emphasizing Hungarian influences for improved endurance on long marches. McClellan's 1857 report on European tactics and equipment directly led to the U.S. Army's adoption of his proposed manual and the saddle itself. Officially adopted by the U.S. War Department in 1859, the McClellan saddle became the standard issue for American troops, serving through the Civil War, Spanish-American War, , and into . Its simple construction allowed for and versatility, fitting various horse sizes with minimal adjustments, and it was often paired with accessories like rifle scabbards for practical field use. The saddle's design prioritized mobility and reliability, with a low pommel and cantle for secure seating during and travel. Production continued into the early by contractors such as the Rock Island Arsenal, ensuring supply for units like the 14th . Although phased out for active combat with the Army's in , the McClellan saddle was used in ceremonial roles, including by the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) for caisson-drawn funerals at until its replacement in 2025 with the Circle Y Cascade Crossover Saddle. Today, it symbolizes enduring military equestrian tradition and is preserved in collections like those of the .

Design and Origins

Historical Background and Initial Development

George B. McClellan, appointed captain in the newly formed First U.S. Cavalry Regiment in March 1855, was soon selected as a member of the Delafield Commission, a U.S. Army delegation tasked with observing European military operations during the Crimean War. The commission, led by Major General Richard Delafield, departed for Europe in June 1855 and remained until 1856, where McClellan focused on studying cavalry tactics, organization, and equipment, including saddles used by various armies. His observations highlighted the inefficiencies of existing U.S. cavalry gear compared to European designs, prompting recommendations for modernization upon his return. In early 1857, McClellan submitted a detailed to the Secretary of War based on his European findings, advocating for a redesigned to improve mobility and endurance for both horse and rider. The criticized the heavy, uncomfortable U.S. saddles and proposed a lighter model inspired by Hungarian styles, specifying an open wooden tree, broad skirts for weight distribution, and minimal padding to suit American horses and terrain. Following the , initial prototypes were developed in 1858 at U.S. Army facilities, incorporating McClellan's specifications to test feasibility and performance. McClellan prioritized core design principles in the new saddle, including lightweight construction to reduce fatigue on horses during extended marches, an open-tree frame that promoted air circulation and minimized pressure on the animal's back for greater comfort, and a low pommel and low cantle that offered the rider stability without hindering agile movements in combat or scouting. These features aimed to balance durability with practicality, reflecting lessons from European cavalry practices while adapting for diverse U.S. horse breeds. The U.S. Army formally adopted the Model 1859 McClellan saddle as standard equipment in 1859, marking a significant upgrade in mounted forces' capabilities just before the onset of major conflicts. This adoption stemmed directly from McClellan's report and prototype testing, establishing the saddle as a of American military equestrian gear for decades.

Key Design Influences

The McClellan saddle's primary design influence stemmed from the Hungarian hussar saddle, which observed during his 1855–1856 European tour amid the . This saddle incorporated a high pommel and high cantle to enhance rider stability during rapid maneuvers, along with forward-positioned stirrups that promoted balanced weight distribution and reduced fatigue in extended riding. These elements were adapted to suit American cavalry requirements for mobility and endurance, with McClellan lowering the pommel and cantle relative to the hussar model and retaining the lightweight, open-frame structure used by Hungarian and Prussian forces. Secondary influences came from French and Prussian light cavalry saddles, which McClellan studied for their emphasis on ventilation and equitable to minimize horse soreness during prolonged campaigns. The open seat and channeled of the McClellan allowed air circulation beneath the rider, while the broad skirts and padded panels spread pressure across the 's back, preventing common in heavier American saddles of the era. These adaptations reflected observations of European equipment, including French cavalry gear encountered in the , prioritizing horse welfare for sustained operations. Unique to the McClellan were modifications like a rawhide-covered wooden available in three sizes—light (size 1 for narrower breeds), medium (size 2), and heavy (size 3 for broader )—ensuring a custom fit across diverse stock. Integrated saddlebags and a valise compartment further distinguished the design, providing secure storage for , rations, and personal supplies without compromising balance. The U.S. conducted field trials under McClellan's oversight to validate these features, confirming their suitability for marches of up to 30 miles per day with reduced rider and strain.

Early Models and Adoption

The experimental prototype of the McClellan saddle, known as the Model 1857 or "Mac" saddle, was developed following Captain George B. McClellan's 1857 report on European military equipment, which recommended adaptations for U.S. use. This early version featured a wooden tree covered in thin, varnished black leather, hoodless stirrups also covered in varnished leather, and polished brass hardware, with rawhide quarter straps for initial rigging. The design aimed to balance lightness and support, drawing briefly from Hungarian influences for its open seat and low cantle to reduce pressure on the horse's spine. Following trials by the U.S. Army Ordnance Department in 1858–1859, which confirmed the saddle's durability across varied Western terrains including rocky and arid conditions, the refined Model 1859 was officially adopted by the War Department in September 1859 as the standard saddle. Key specifications included a rawhide-covered wooden tree for added strength, full-grain harness skirts screwed to the sidebars, hooded wooden (typically or oak) sheathed in , iron stirrup irons for everyday use, and hardware including D-rings and pommel fittings. The open seat measured approximately 11 to 12.5 inches, supporting a girth strap and allowing for sweat leathers to prevent chafing. Production commenced immediately through contracts with leatherworking firms, emphasizing sturdy, low-maintenance construction suitable for service. Initial adoption faced logistical hurdles from 1859 to 1861, as the small U.S. Army—numbering around 16,000 troops, many dispersed across remote posts—experienced supply shortages exacerbated by limited manufacturing capacity and transportation challenges over vast distances. By the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861, a limited number of Model 1859 saddles had been produced and distributed, providing a foundational stock for expanding forces though distribution remained uneven in isolated garrisons. These early models established the McClellan as a reliable, versatile piece of equipment, prioritizing endurance over luxury in pre-war .

Civil War Era Use

Union Army Implementation

The McClellan saddle, building on the Model 1859 base design, served as the standard equipment for Union cavalry during the from 1861 to 1865. Adopted by the U.S. War Department just prior to the conflict, it was widely issued to Union cavalry troopers, equipping the mounted forces that grew to comprise a significant portion of the army's striking power. These saddles proved key in pivotal campaigns, including the in July 1863, where Union cavalry under generals like utilized them for screening and reconnaissance roles, and Philip Sheridan's campaign in 1864, supporting aggressive pursuits and raids against Confederate supply lines. The saddle's offered practical advantages by enabling rapid maneuvers and extended operations across varied , a critical factor in the evolving role of Union from to . This design was integrated with other standardized gear, including bits and bridles, as specified in McClellan's manual and subsequent regulations, ensuring uniformity in horse handling and reducing logistical variability across units. Despite these benefits, the McClellan saddle faced reported issues in field use, particularly discomfort on long rides from the rigid and lack of padding, often requiring additional modifications like blankets. Logistically, the saddle's production saw a significant ramp-up to meet wartime demands through contracts with Northern manufacturers, supporting the Union Army's mounted operations, though early shortages in prompted temporary use of alternative saddles until full-scale manufacturing stabilized.

Confederate Adaptations and Variants

During the , Confederate cavalry units initially depended heavily on captured Union McClellan saddles to equip their horsemen, as domestic production capabilities were limited at the war's outset. These captured pieces were highly valued for their lightweight design and durability, allowing Southern forces to maintain mobility in early campaigns despite industrial disadvantages. As the conflict progressed, the Richmond Arsenal emerged as the primary Confederate production center for saddle manufacturing, producing copies of the McClellan model using imported from Britain through blockade runners. This importation was critical, as the Union naval severely restricted access to raw materials, forcing reliance on transatlantic shipments that arrived sporadically via ports like Wilmington and Charleston. Key Confederate variants adapted the McClellan design to address resource constraints and operational needs. The Jenifer saddle, introduced in 1862 and named after its designer Walter H. Jenifer, featured a modified wooden tree that reduced overall weight compared to the original, making it suitable for underfed Southern horses strained by wartime forage shortages. By 1863, production shifted toward direct copies of the McClellan saddle, often incorporating Texas-style rigging—wide rear D-rings attached directly to the tree—for enhanced stability during long rides and rough terrain common in Southern campaigns. These adaptations prioritized simplicity and local materials, with the Richmond Arsenal outputting an estimated 69,418 cavalry saddles of various patterns over the war, though McClellan copies represented only a fraction due to ongoing shortages. Production challenges were acute, with the limiting total output and prompting the use of substitute materials such as bark-tanned hides and painted skirts in place of full leather coverings. This resulted in saddles of inferior quality that were prone to faster wear but still functional for guerrilla-style operations. Notably, these adapted saddles equipped prominent units like J.E.B. Stuart's during raids, including the 1864 Chambersburg incursion led by elements under John McCausland, where their lightweight construction supported rapid maneuvers and evasion tactics despite material limitations.

Later US Military Service

Post-War Evolution and Modifications

Following the basic design established during the Civil War, the McClellan saddle evolved through targeted modifications to meet the demands of extended frontier campaigns during the Indian Wars. In the , the U.S. Army introduced the Model 1874, which featured padded seats for improved rider comfort over long distances and steel arches to enhance structural durability against the rigors of rough terrain and combat. These changes addressed wear issues observed in earlier patterns, allowing the saddle to better support operations in arid and mountainous regions. A significant redesign occurred with the adoption of the Pattern saddle, which incorporated an articulated tree for greater flexibility and wool-nailed skirts to reduce chafing on horses. This model reflected lessons from overseas deployments, prioritizing adaptability without altering the core lightweight, open-frame principle. During , the McClellan saddle remained in active use from 1917 to 1918. In , it persisted briefly for remaining horse-mounted elements, but the saddle was phased out in 1942 as the U.S. accelerated , replacing equine transport with motorized vehicles across all and roles. Hundreds of thousands of McClellan saddles had been produced by , with nearly half a million during the Civil War alone and the majority manufactured at to standardize output and ensure for active-duty forces.

Rivals and Comparative Performance

During the post-Civil War period, the McClellan saddle encountered significant competition from alternative designs in U.S. Army service, particularly as roles shifted toward patrols and pack in the 1870s and 1890s. The primary rival was the or Hope saddle, a rugged variant influenced by Mexican traditions and popular among ranchers and Confederate forces earlier in the . This saddle featured a rear cinch that enhanced its utility for carrying packs and supplies, making it suitable for extended expeditions, but it was heavier than the lighter McClellan design. The Model 1904 McClellan incorporated improved rigging while retaining the core tree structure for versatility in artillery and cavalry units. Performance comparisons highlighted the McClellan saddle's strengths in mobility for light cavalry operations, owing to its lightweight frame and open design that reduced fatigue on the animal. However, it was limited in pack applications compared to rivals. Trials of the Hope saddle demonstrated exceptional endurance, with one evaluation supporting a 265-pound rider over 2,400 miles without significant horse soreness, underscoring its superior protection for the mount in long-haul scenarios. U.S. Army evaluations, particularly board reports from the 1880s, praised the McClellan for its efficiency in tactics but critiqued its pack limitations, leading to recommendations for hybrid models like the Whitman saddle—briefly selected in for testing before existing McClellan stocks were depleted—or adaptations incorporating Texas-style elements for frontier service. These assessments emphasized the need for balanced designs that combined the McClellan's speed with rivals' load-handling capabilities, influencing later modifications such as the 1904 model and the Model 1912 pack saddle.

International and Civilian Applications

Adoption Outside the United States

The McClellan saddle saw adoption beyond U.S. borders, particularly in and among some colonial forces in , due to its lightweight construction and ventilated design that promoted airflow beneath the rider, making it suitable for extended campaigns in warmer climates. In , the design was adapted and produced locally for the national army, reflecting its perceived reliability for mounted troops in varied terrains. It was also adopted as a standard saddle by the Mexican army. Additional adoptions included testing for mounted police in , use by Grey's Scouts in (1975–1980), and by game wardens in during the 1980s. During the Second Boer War (1899–1902), British forces utilized McClellan saddles to a limited extent, often through contingents, valuing the saddle's balance and durability for long-distance patrols in arid conditions.

Civilian and Non-Military Uses

The McClellan saddle transitioned to civilian applications following its long military service, particularly after when the U.S. Army mechanized and surplus equipment became available for public purchase, facilitating its adoption in non-military equestrian pursuits. This shift allowed the saddle's lightweight design and open seat, originally intended for prolonged mounted operations, to appeal to civilian riders seeking durability and horse comfort during extended use. In western ranching contexts, the McClellan saddle proved valuable for tasks involving long-distance travel and cattle management, as evidenced by its employment in U.S. Forest Service operations during the early . Forest rangers utilized it for patrols, , and cattle roundups in rugged terrains, highlighting its suitability for ranch-like duties requiring endurance and minimal weight. Its secure pommel and balanced structure supported practical ranch activities, including roping and , making it a practical choice for stock work in arid, demanding environments akin to those faced by cowboys during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. For recreational riding, the McClellan saddle gained traction among U.S. and forest service personnel in the , who adopted it for trail patrols and oversight in expansive wilderness areas, benefiting from its ventilation and stability on uneven paths. By the mid-20th century, it emerged as a favored option in events, prized for distributing rider weight evenly to prevent equine fatigue over long courses; it has been used in events like the Tevis Cup. Today, it serves as a pleasure saddle for trail enthusiasts, offering a historical yet functional alternative to bulkier Western models. The saddle's global civilian dissemination included adaptations by outback stockmen in during the early , where its simple construction suited vast stations and long musters in harsh conditions, influencing local designs for work. In , modern clubs have incorporated refurbished McClellan models for recreational outings, as seen in Bulgarian equestrian programs emphasizing historical authenticity and comfort over extended terrain. Post-WWII surplus availability further accelerated its worldwide spread, enabling affordable access for civilian riders in ranching and leisure sectors across continents.

Legacy and Modern Relevance

Enduring Military Influence

The McClellan saddle's emphasis on lightweight construction and rider mobility left a lasting imprint on U.S. equestrian well into the . As the standard-issue saddle for the horse , it shaped training manuals and operational guidelines through the 1940s, promoting designs that prioritized speed and endurance over heavy padding or elaborate features. This doctrinal focus proved particularly relevant during in the Pacific theater, where the M1928 McClellan model equipped limited units for and transport in rugged terrain, underscoring the value of light in maintaining operational tempo amid challenging environments. Post-World War II, the McClellan tree influenced derivative designs in U.S. Army equipment, notably the 1913 riding adapted for pack animals. This variant retained the core tree structure for stability while incorporating modifications for load-bearing, extending the 's utility beyond riding and demonstrating its versatility in logistical roles even as advanced. In the contemporary U.S. military, the McClellan remains integral to ceremonial traditions, particularly in the 1st Cavalry Division's Horse Detachment at Fort Cavazos, . There, modified 1885 models with 1904 quarterstraps are used in mounted drills, parades, and demonstrations, preserving doctrinal elements of precision and historical authenticity for events like presidential inaugurals. In 2025, the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) partially replaced the McClellan with the Circle Y Cascade Crossover model for caisson-drawn funerals at , while retaining elements of the traditional design. Archival recognition further cements the McClellan saddle's enduring influence, as it has been designated a key artifact in the Smithsonian Institution's collections since the mid-20th century. This placement underscores its role in shaping American military equestrian standards and serves as a tangible link to heritage.

Contemporary Reproductions and Collectibility

In the , several manufacturers produce reproductions of the McClellan saddle, adapting the original design for contemporary horses and riders while maintaining historical accuracy. Companies like C&C Sutlery offer the 1859 model crafted from high-quality American leather with a rawhide-covered wood tree suited to wider modern breeds, priced at $985 as of November 2025. Similarly, Royal King saddlery creates hand-sewn replicas on trees with drop-ring rigging, available for $293 (sale price from $503.80) as of November 2025, emphasizing durability for extended use. Carrico Leatherworks specializes in custom 1859, 1872, and 1874 variants using period-correct materials like russet oak-tanned leather, priced from $1,250 to $1,699 as of November 2025, catering to enthusiasts seeking authentic builds. Original McClellan saddles hold significant collectibility among military history aficionados, with values determined by condition, , and markings such as those from early makers like Grimsley Saddlery for Civil War authenticity. At auctions, well-preserved 1859 officer's models from the Civil War era have sold for $800, reflecting demand for complete outfits including stirrups and girths. Collectors prioritize saddles stamped with arsenal dates or inspector marks, often displaying them alongside related accouterments to highlight their role in 19th-century . Reproductions find niche applications in reenactments, such as Civil War events at sites like Gettysburg, where participants use them to replicate trooper gear accurately. In , adapted versions support long-distance events up to 100 miles by distributing weight forward near the , reducing back strain on horses during trail competitions. These modern uses preserve the saddle's lightweight, open-seat design principles while incorporating adjustments like padded bars for comfort on varied terrain.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.