Hubbry Logo
MetaldehydeMetaldehydeMain
Open search
Metaldehyde
Community hub
Metaldehyde
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Metaldehyde
Metaldehyde
Metaldehyde
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Metaldehyde
Skeletal formula
Names
IUPAC name
2,4,6,8-tetramethyl-1,3,5,7-tetroxocane
Other names
metaldehyde
metacetaldehyde
ethanal tetramer
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChEBI
ChEMBL
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.003.274 Edit this at Wikidata
EC Number
  • 203-600-2
KEGG
UNII
UN number 1332
  • InChI=1S/C8H16O4/c1-5-9-6(2)11-8(4)12-7(3)10-5/h5-8H,1-4H3 ☒N
    Key: GKKDCARASOJPNG-UHFFFAOYSA-N ☒N
  • InChI=1/C8H16O4/c1-5-9-6(2)11-8(4)12-7(3)10-5/h5-8H,1-4H3
    Key: GKKDCARASOJPNG-UHFFFAOYAG
  • CC1OC(C)OC(C)OC(C)O1
  • O1C(OC(OC(OC1C)C)C)C
Properties
C8H16O4
Molar mass 176.212 g/mol
Density 1.27 g/cm3
Melting point 246 °C (475 °F; 519 K)
Boiling point sublimes at 110 to 120 °C (230 to 248 °F; 383 to 393 K)
Hazards
GHS labelling:[1]
GHS02: FlammableGHS06: ToxicGHS08: Health hazard
Danger
H228, H301, H361f, H412
P203, P210, P240, P241, P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P316, P318, P321, P330, P370+P378, P405, P501
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
☒N verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Metaldehyde is an organic compound with the formula (C8H16O4). It is used as a pesticide against slugs and snails.[2] It is the cyclic tetramer of acetaldehyde.[3]

Production and properties

[edit]

Metaldehyde is flammable, toxic if ingested in large quantities, and irritating to the skin and eyes. It has a white crystalline appearance with a menthol odor.[4]

Metaldehyde is obtained in moderate yields by treatment of acetaldehyde with chilled mineral acids. The liquid trimer, paraldehyde is also obtained. The reaction is reversible; upon heating to about 80 °C, metaldehyde and paraldehyde revert to acetaldehyde.

The D2d stereomer

Metaldehyde exists as a mixture of four stereoisomers, molecules that differ with respect to the relative orientation of the methyl groups on the 8-membered ring. The stereoisomers have respectively the molecular symmetries Cs (with symmetry of order 2), C2v (order 4), D2d (order 8), and C4v (order 8). All have at least one plane of reflexion, so none of them is chiral.

Uses

[edit]

As a pesticide

[edit]
Granules of metaldehyde (trade name Limacide)

It is sold under various trade names as a molluscicide, including Antimilice, Ariotox, Blitzem (in Australia), Cekumeta, Deadline, Defender (in Australia), Halizan, Limacide, Limatox, Limeol, Meta, Metason, Mifaslug, Namekil, Slug Fest, and Slugit. Typically it is applied in pellet form, but it is also found as a liquid spray, granules, paste, or dust. Often the pesticide includes bran or molasses to attract pests, making it attractive to household pets as well.[5]

Metaldehyde is effective on pests by contact or ingestion and works by limiting the production of mucus in mollusks making them susceptible to dehydration.[6]

Metaldehyde products were used to control the invasive African land snail population in Miami-Dade County in Florida. Experimental use permits from the U.S. Environmental Protect Agency authorized the application amount and usage in residential areas.[6]

Due to the contamination of drinking water by metaldehyde's use in agriculture, a specialist organisation was established in 2008 called "The Metaldehyde Stewardship Group (MSG)".

On 19 December 2018, the British government banned the use of metaldehyde slug pellets outdoors from spring 2020; after this date it would only be legal to use it in permanent greenhouses.[7] In July 2019, the ban was overturned after the High Court in London agreed with a challenge to its legality. Metaldehyde pellets returned to the UK market until 18 September 2020, when the British government banned the use of metaldehyde slug pellets outdoors after 31 March 2022.[8]

Other uses

[edit]

Metaldehyde was originally developed as a solid fuel.[9] It is still used as a camping fuel, also for military purposes, or solid fuel in lamps. It may be purchased in a tablet form to be used in small stoves, and for preheating of Primus type stoves. It is sold under the trade name of "META" by Lonza Group of Switzerland; it can be included in the field ration of some nations.

Safety and toxicity to pets and humans

[edit]

Metaldehyde has a toxicity profile identical to that for acetaldehyde, being mildly toxic[10] and a respiratory irritant at the 50 ppm level. In terms of water safety, during periods of rainfall metaldehyde pellets become agitated and can seep into natural water courses. The European Commission restricts metaldehyde levels to 0.1 μg/L in drinking water.[11]

Metaldehyde-containing slug baits are banned in some countries as they are toxic to dogs and cats and disturb the natural ecosystems.[2][12] There is no antidote or specific treatment plan for metaldehyde poisoning. Symptoms of poisoning in dogs and cats vary and are very similar to poisonings by other substances, however they can include tremors, drooling, hyperthermia, vomiting, and restlessness. If left untreated, symptoms will proceed to seizures and death within days. Severity of symptoms and speed of onset depend on the quantity ingested and the other contents of the stomach which affect absorption.[13]

A diagnosis can be made by an analysis of stomach contents, which tend to have an apple cider vinegar odor, as well as a history of exposure to the chemical. Treatment includes IV fluids, sedation, lowering body temperature, and purging of stomach contents with charcoal. Prompt and aggressive medical attention after a poisoning may make a full recovery possible within 2–3 days.[13]

Due to this toxicity, pet owners may want to investigate alternatives which are not as toxic to pets, such as ferric sodium EDTA or aluminium sulfate.[14] The metaldehyde tablets resemble candies and do not taste bad, making accidental ingestion possible by children or even by adults unaware of their true nature. Their use was popular during the interwar period and several cases of poisoning resulted.[15] Baits may contain a bitterant to prevent accidental consumption by pets or children.

Oral ingestions of metaldehyde have been described in adults attempting suicide; amongst them, the majority experienced gastrointestinal or neurological symptoms. When compared to humans with accidental ingestion of metaldehyde, those attempting suicide tend to be symptomatic (for example reduced concentrations of GABA causing seizures) and often require care in an intensive care unit and/or long-term hospitalization.[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Metaldehyde

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Metaldehyde is the cyclic tetramer of acetaldehyde, an organic compound with the molecular formula C₈H₁₆O₄, appearing as a white crystalline solid that is insoluble in water and highly flammable. It is commercially produced by the polymerization of acetaldehyde and serves primarily as a molluscicide, disrupting mucus production in slugs and snails to impair their mobility and digestion, thereby controlling these pests in agricultural and horticultural settings. While effective against target gastropods, metaldehyde exhibits moderate acute toxicity to mammals upon ingestion, inducing neurological symptoms such as tremors, ataxia, seizures, and potentially death at doses exceeding 400 mg/kg, with particular risks documented in dogs from bait exposure. Environmentally, its stability under hydrolysis and photolysis contributes to persistence in soil and water, posing hazards to aquatic organisms and leading to regulatory scrutiny, including mitigation requirements by agencies like the EPA to curb runoff into water supplies. Historically also used as a solid fuel in portable heaters, its pesticide applications dominate, though incidents of non-target poisoning and ecological concerns have prompted bans or restrictions in regions prioritizing water quality over pest control efficacy.

Chemical Identity and Synthesis

Molecular Structure

Metaldehyde possesses the molecular formula C₈H₁₆O₄ and constitutes the cyclic tetramer of (CH₃CHO), formed by the of four acetaldehyde units linked through acetal-like ether bonds. Its systematic IUPAC name is 2,4,6,8-tetramethyl-1,3,5,7-tetraoxocane, reflecting the eight-membered heterocyclic ring (1,3,5,7-tetraoxocane) substituted with methyl groups at the even-numbered positions. The core structure comprises an alternating sequence of four oxygen and four carbon atoms in a ring, where each ring carbon bears a , yielding a symmetric, crown-ether-like arrangement that favors or conformations for stability. This configuration distinguishes metaldehyde from the trimeric , which forms a six-membered ring, and contributes to its relatively high and volatility compared to monomeric . The molecule exhibits no defined stereocenters in its standard depiction, though can yield mixtures of stereoisomers.

Production Methods

Metaldehyde is synthesized industrially via the acid-catalyzed of , forming a cyclic tetramer under controlled low-temperature conditions to favor the tetrameric product over the more common trimeric . The process typically employs chilled mineral acids, such as or , or in combination with halides like , at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 15°C. In one established method, acid-free is diluted with C4-C8 n-hydrocarbons prior to to enhance selectivity and yield. Yields of metaldehyde are generally moderate, as the reaction concurrently produces significant quantities of paraldehyde, requiring separation techniques such as or to isolate the solid tetramer. Alternative catalytic approaches, including rare earth metal halides or , have been explored to optimize tetramer formation, though methods remain predominant in commercial production.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Appearance and Solubility

Metaldehyde is a white crystalline solid at , often exhibiting a powdery texture and possessing a mild, menthol-like . In commercial formulations, it is commonly processed into pellets, granules, or powders to facilitate handling and application as a . The compound demonstrates low solubility in water, with reported values ranging from 0.02% w/w (approximately 200 mg/L) at 20°C to 260 mg/L at 30°C, rendering it practically insoluble under typical environmental conditions. This limited aqueous solubility contributes to its persistence in and reduced leaching potential compared to more hydrophilic pesticides. In contrast, metaldehyde exhibits moderate to good solubility in select organic solvents, including , , ethyl alcohol (soluble), (530 mg/L at 20°C), and (1730 mg/L), while showing insolubility or sparing solubility in acetone, acetic acid, ether, and .

Stability and Reactivity


Metaldehyde is chemically stable under normal storage and handling conditions at ambient temperatures but undergoes upon heating, occurring slowly at elevated temperatures and rapidly above 80 °C to yield . Moisture induces very slow of the compound. The material is light-sensitive, which may contribute to gradual degradation over time. As a flammable solid, metaldehyde poses fire hazards, with autoignition occurring at approximately 580 °C; ignition produces irritating fumes including . It can react with strong oxidizing agents, potentially leading to vigorous reactions or . Hazardous decomposition products include , , and further acetic acid under prolonged heating or in the presence of acids. Conditions to avoid encompass ignition sources, dust generation, excessive heat, and contact with incompatibles such as oxidizers.

Historical Development

Discovery and Early Research

Metaldehyde, the cyclic tetramer of with the formula (CH₃CHO)₄, was first synthesized and characterized by the German chemist in 1835 through the acid-catalyzed of acetaldehyde. This discovery occurred during Liebig's investigations into aldehyde chemistry, where he observed the formation of white, crystalline prisms from acetaldehyde treated with , distinguishing it from the monomeric form. Early structural analysis confirmed its tetrameric nature, though full elucidation of its cyclic configuration awaited later spectroscopic advancements. In the early , metaldehyde's practical utility emerged beyond pure chemistry, with its adoption as a under the trade name "Meta-fuel" by around 1928, leveraging its high and clean-burning properties for applications like portable stoves. for its industrial-scale production, such as those filed by Emil Lüscher and Theodor Lichtenhan in the 1920s, detailed optimized polymerization methods using concentrated to yield coherent blocks suitable for . These developments focused on efficiency rather than novel biological applications, reflecting metaldehyde's initial inertness in non-combustive contexts. The shift toward pesticidal research began in the amid agricultural needs for and control, with British researchers F. S. Gimingham and W. H. Newton proposing its molluscicidal potential in 1937 after observing lethal effects on gastropods via and neuromuscular disruption. Initial field trials in the late demonstrated efficacy against species like Agriolimax agrestis, where metaldehyde acted as both a contact and stomach , prompting its commercial introduction as a in 1936 and widespread adoption in slug pellets by the early . Early toxicity studies emphasized its selectivity over broad-spectrum alternatives, though concerns about secondary poisoning in wildlife emerged from these foundational experiments.

Commercial Introduction and Adoption

Metaldehyde's potential as a was first systematically explored and proposed in 1937 by researchers Gimingham and Newton, who identified its efficacy against slugs through early toxicity tests. This followed its chemical discovery as a cyclic tetramer of in 1835 by , though initial applications focused on non-pesticidal uses like . Commercial development accelerated in the late , with production involving the polymerization of under acidic conditions to yield the stable tetrameric form suitable for formulation into baits. By the early 1940s, metaldehyde entered the market as pelletized slug baits, marking its transition to widespread agricultural application. Lonza, a key manufacturer, commercialized it under the brand Meta®, targeting pests in crops vulnerable to gastropod damage such as cereals, oilseed rape, and . Its adoption surged in temperate regions like , where slug pressures necessitated reliable control measures; in the , it quickly became the dominant due to superior field performance over alternatives like arsenicals or lime-based treatments. In the United States, federal registration occurred in 1967, enabling labeled use on turf, ornamentals, berries, , and , which broadened its uptake in North American and . Global adoption peaked mid-century, with formulations typically at 1-5% in bran- or grain-based pellets to enhance and dispersal. Despite early enthusiasm for its contact and stomach poison action, usage patterns emphasized targeted applications to minimize non-target exposure, though its persistence in and runoff later prompted programs.

Primary Applications

Molluscicidal Use in Agriculture and Gardening

Metaldehyde is employed as a contact and stomach in pelleted baits, typically containing 1-5% , to control slugs and snails that damage crops such as cereals, oilseed rape, , and ornamentals in fields and home . These baits are broadcast onto surfaces during periods of high pest activity, often in moist conditions when molluscs are most active, attracting them via incorporated food lures like or bran derivatives. Application rates vary by and pest pressure, commonly ranging from 5-40 kg/ha in agriculture, with lower doses (e.g., 2.5 g/m²) tested in garden settings for against species like the brown garden snail (). Field trials have demonstrated metaldehyde's effectiveness in reducing slug and snail damage, with applications achieving up to 100% mortality in controlled tests against pests like the giant African and common garden s. For instance, in moderately infested areas, doses of 120 kg/ha controlled snail densities exceeding 2000/m² in both dry and wet conditions, outperforming some iron phosphate alternatives under frequent irrigation. delivery systems, such as Baitchain—metaldehyde pellets strung on cords tied to tree trunks—have shown comparable or superior control of climbing snails in orchards compared to traditional surface , even at reduced concentrations. However, efficacy depends on environmental factors like rainfall, which can dilute baits or enhance mollusc foraging, and repeated applications may be needed for persistent infestations. Regulatory restrictions have curtailed metaldehyde's availability in certain regions due to concerns over runoff into water sources and non-target toxicity, despite its proven benefits. In , outdoor use was banned effective March 31, 2022, following detections in raw exceeding safety thresholds, with no emergency extensions granted as of 2025; possession or use of pre-ban stocks imported illegally remains prohibited. In the , approvals persist in multiple member states for agricultural applications, diverging from the UK's post-Brexit policy, while in the United States, metaldehyde baits like Deadline remain recommended for slug control in field crops and gardens by extension services. Growers in restricted areas have shifted to alternatives like ferric phosphate, though studies indicate metaldehyde often provides faster and more reliable knockdown.

Non-Pesticidal Applications

Metaldehyde was originally developed and marketed as a , known as "solid alcohol," for portable heating applications prior to its recognition as a in . It burns cleanly with a steady , producing no , ash, or residue, which makes it advantageous for use in confined spaces. In tablet form, metaldehyde serves as fuel for stoves, field equipment, fire starters, and small portable heaters, often as a substitute for liquid alcohols. Concentrations in such products can reach up to 100% metaldehyde in solid fuel or fire starter pellets. These applications leverage its low odor, lightweight nature, and ease of ignition, though usage has declined with the availability of alternative fuels. Rarely, metaldehyde is incorporated into novelty products designed to colorize flames, comprising up to 90% of the formulation in some cases. This pyrotechnic-like use exploits its properties to produce , but it remains a minor application compared to its fuel role.

Mechanism of Action and Efficacy

Biochemical Effects on Target Pests

Metaldehyde exerts its molluscicidal effects primarily through contact and ingestion by target pests such as slugs () and snails (, ), inducing symptoms including excessive excretion, paralysis, and eventual death. The compound damages mucus-producing cells in the foot, mantle, and other tissues, leading to hypersecretion that exhausts the mollusc's resources rather than causing direct . Upon ingestion, metaldehyde is rapidly hydrolyzed to , which stimulates uncontrolled production and contributes to the pest's demise. Neurotoxic actions are evident in electrophysiological studies, where metaldehyde induces bursting activity and paroxysmal depolarizing shifts in identified motoneurons of the feeding system in snails like Lymnaea stagnalis, disrupting normal neural function and leading to immobilization. At higher concentrations, it acts as a nerve poison, causing excitation or depression of the central nervous system, which manifests as behavioral changes such as hyperactivity followed by paralysis. Biochemical analyses reveal dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity, including oxidative damage that activates antioxidant enzymes (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase) in response to lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species generation in snail tissues. Enzyme activity alterations further underscore metaldehyde's impact: in exposed snails, inhibition occurs alongside elevated levels of stress-related enzymes like S-transferase, indicating interference with neurotransmission and pathways. Histopathological examinations confirm cellular damage, including vacuolation and in mucus glands and neural tissues, supporting both cytotoxic and mechanisms. Despite these observations, the precise molecular targets remain incompletely elucidated, with ongoing research emphasizing metaldehyde's specificity to molluscan over broad-spectrum neurotoxicity seen in vertebrates.

Field Efficacy Data and Comparisons to Alternatives

Field trials in agricultural settings, such as apple orchards in , have demonstrated that metaldehyde applications at concentrations of 40 g/kg—whether via traditional soil-surface pellets or novel bait chains—achieve significant mortality in target snails like , with effects observable by day 14 and persisting through day 28 post-application. In greenhouse simulations approximating field conditions, metaldehyde pellets significantly reduced slug (Arion vulgaris) herbivory and biomass compared to untreated controls (p < 0.001), with efficacy enhanced under less frequent watering regimes that limit moisture availability. Potato field trials using multi-application programs (e.g., three treatments timed to canopy closure and rainfall events) confirmed metaldehyde's role in effective slug management, reducing damage to levels comparable to integrated programs. Comparisons to iron phosphate (ferric phosphate) reveal metaldehyde's advantages in speed and consistency under drier or moderate moisture conditions, where it induces rapid paralysis and dehydration in slugs within hours, outperforming iron phosphate's slower mechanism that relies on ingestion and may take days to kill. Both compounds reduce slug herbivory and weight significantly versus controls in controlled environments, but metaldehyde's performance declines more in high-humidity or low-temperature scenarios, while iron phosphate maintains viability as an alternative in potato systems with repeated applications, albeit with potentially lower immediate mortality rates. Biological alternatives like nematodes (Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita) show negligible impact on slug damage or populations (p > 0.05), rendering them inferior for standalone field control.
MolluscicideKey Efficacy MetricConditions/NotesSource
Metaldehyde>80% snail mortality by day 14 at 40 g/kgApple orchard, combined application methods
MetaldehydeSignificant herbivory reduction (p < 0.001)Less frequent watering enhances effect
Iron PhosphateComparable damage control in multi-appsViable metaldehyde substitute in potatoes
Iron PhosphateSlower kill (days vs. hours); effective in cold/wetLess reliable in rain-prone fields
NematodesNo significant reduction (p > 0.5)Ineffective alone vs. chemical baits
Contact toxicity data from lab assays supporting field use indicate metaldehyde's low-dose potency (LD50 as low as 6.87 μg/g at 72 hours against snails), enabling targeted applications like sprays or low-concentration baits that minimize environmental spread while achieving high pest mortality. Overall, metaldehyde's field efficacy supports its utility in high-pressure scenarios, though alternatives like iron phosphate offer trade-offs in safety and persistence at the cost of reduced speed.

Toxicology Profile

Effects on Human Health

Metaldehyde exhibits moderate to humans, primarily manifesting through , with reported cases largely stemming from accidental or intentional exposure. typically induces initial gastrointestinal disturbances, including , , and , occurring in approximately 78% of documented incidents. These symptoms often precede neurological effects such as tremors, , , convulsions, and seizures, which develop within hours and are observed in the majority of affected individuals. Doses of 100–150 mg/kg are associated with the onset of and convulsions, while ingestions exceeding 400 mg/kg carry a high of due to severe central nervous system depression and . The mechanism involves inhibition of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synthesis in the , leading to excitatory . Suicidal ingestions, which constitute many reported cases, elevate the incidence of seizures compared to accidental exposures. or dermal contact can cause irritation to the , eyes, or skin, though these routes are less likely to produce systemic effects unless exposure is prolonged or massive. Chronic or low-level exposure risks, such as from dietary residues or environmental contamination, are considered low based on regulatory assessments, with no established evidence of carcinogenicity, , or long-term neurological deficits in humans at typical exposure levels. Occupational handling may result in mild irritation but lacks documented chronic health impacts when is used. Poisoning remains rare, with outcomes dependent on rapid and supportive care to mitigate and secondary to .

Toxicity to Domestic Animals

Metaldehyde, a common in molluscicidal baits, poses significant risks to domestic animals, particularly dogs and cats, through accidental ingestion of pellets that are often palatable to pets. Clinical signs typically emerge 1–4 hours post-ingestion and include gastrointestinal distress such as vomiting and , followed by neurological manifestations like , anxiety, tremors, , , and seizures due to its neurotoxic effects on the , including GABA antagonism and potential metabolism to . Severe cases can progress to , multiple organ failure, , and death, with reported fatality rates of 14–17% in treated dogs. The oral median lethal dose (LD50) for metaldehyde is approximately 100 mg/kg in dogs and 207 mg/kg in cats, though clinical toxicity and severe effects can occur at substantially lower doses, such as 10–50 mg/kg, with as little as less than one teaspoon of bait per 10 pounds of body weight sufficient to induce poisoning in dogs. Dogs are more frequently affected than cats due to their scavenging behavior, but both species exhibit similar symptom profiles, with cats potentially showing heightened sensitivity in some reports. Ingestion often occurs in gardens or yards where baits are applied, and while birds and other wildlife can also be impacted, domestic pets represent the primary veterinary concern. There is no specific antidote for metaldehyde poisoning; management focuses on early decontamination via emesis induction (if within 2 hours) or activated charcoal administration, alongside supportive care including intravenous fluids, thermoregulation, antiemetics, and anticonvulsants like diazepam or barbiturates for seizure control. Prognosis improves with prompt intervention, but delayed treatment correlates with higher mortality, emphasizing the need for pet owners to store baits securely and seek immediate veterinary attention upon suspected exposure.

Acute and Chronic Exposure Risks

Acute exposure to metaldehyde, typically via of baits, poses significant risks of and gastrointestinal distress in humans and animals. In humans, symptoms onset rapidly and include , , , salivation, , , , and convulsions, with seizures occurring in up to 70% of suicidal cases reported in clinical studies. Dermal or inhalational contact can cause to skin, eyes, and , though remains the primary route for severe outcomes. Oral LD50 values indicate moderate , ranging from 227–690 mg/kg in rats and 207 mg/kg in cats, with dogs showing similar sensitivity leading to tremors, , salivation, and often within 3 hours of exposure. Chronic exposure data are limited, primarily derived from and occupational scenarios, revealing potential reproductive and organ toxicities. Prolonged administration in male rats has induced and prostate gland damage, suggesting endocrine-disrupting effects at doses above 100 mg/kg/day. Repeated dermal contact may result in , while eye exposure can lead to ; overexposure is noted to exacerbate pre-existing liver, , and conditions. Regulatory evaluations, including those by the USEPA, estimate chronic dietary risks from residues in food and as low, occupying less than 70% of the chronic population-adjusted dose, though in tissues raises concerns for long-term in sensitive . Human chronic effects remain understudied, with no widespread epidemiological evidence of carcinogenicity or developmental toxicity at environmental levels.

Environmental Fate and Impacts

Persistence, Degradation, and Mobility in Ecosystems

Metaldehyde exhibits variable persistence in soil, with reported half-lives (DT50) ranging from 3 to 4150 days depending on environmental conditions such as soil moisture, temperature, and application concentration. High soil moisture and low temperatures prolong dissipation, while elevated concentrations can inhibit degradation processes. In aerobic soils, metaldehyde primarily undergoes microbial biodegradation, mineralizing to acetaldehyde and ultimately to carbon dioxide and water, with some soils demonstrating high degradation potential even under challenging conditions. Abiotic degradation is minimal; metaldehyde shows stability against , with calculated half-lives exceeding 10 years across ranges of 5 to 9, and against photolysis under typical environmental exposure. Microbial consortia, including soil-derived capable of for degradation enzymes, contribute to its breakdown, though efficacy varies by microbial community and soil type. Due to its low organic carbon-water partition coefficient (Koc) of 34–240 L/kg and limited adsorption (Kf values of 0.10–0.44 across soils), metaldehyde displays high mobility, facilitating leaching through profiles. Field studies in documented vertical movement to depths of 6–36 inches post-application, contributing to detections in and surface waters. Its low (Kow) further limits sorption to , enhancing transport potential in aquatic systems via runoff or subsurface flow.

Effects on Non-Target Wildlife and Water Quality

Metaldehyde exhibits moderate acute oral toxicity to birds, with reported LD50 values ranging from 190 mg/kg body weight in species such as the bobwhite quail. It is similarly moderately toxic to mammals, including non-target like and carnivores, with LD50 values around 398 mg/kg body weight in rats and lethal doses of 100–600 mg/kg across various avian and mammalian species depending on factors such as age and exposure route. formulations pose secondary risks to predators and , including dogs and birds, due to attraction to treated pellets, leading to documented cases of and fatalities in and domestic animals. In aquatic ecosystems, metaldehyde shows low to moderate toxicity to most non-target macroinvertebrates, with limited community-level effects observed even at environmentally relevant concentrations following field applications; however, bivalves demonstrate greater sensitivity than gastropods, requiring higher exposure levels (e.g., >1 mg/L) for significant impacts. European Food Safety Authority assessments classify metaldehyde as harmful to aquatic organisms, including non-target gastropods, based on ecotoxicity data indicating potential disruption to sensitive invertebrate populations. It is generally considered practically non-toxic to fish and most bees at typical exposure levels, though indirect effects via prey contamination remain possible. Regarding , metaldehyde's high (approximately 200 mg/L at 20°C) facilitates leaching and runoff from treated , contributing to its detection as a recurrent in surface waters, often exceeding the EU limit of 0.1 μg/L in agricultural catchments during autumn application periods. In aquatic environments, it exhibits semi-persistence, with degradation slowed compared to (half-lives >100 days under certain conditions), leading to accumulation in slow-moving waters and challenges for facilities. Studies in catchments, such as the River from 2008–2018, report variable fluxes tied to rainfall and , underscoring its mobility and potential to compromise sources despite efforts.

Regulatory History and Controversies

Global and Regional Restrictions

The outdoor use of metaldehyde has been prohibited in since March 31, 2022, following announcements by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs citing risks to and quality from runoff contamination. This ban applies to agricultural and garden applications, with limited permission retained for use within permanent greenhouses, reflecting prior stewardship programs that failed to sufficiently mitigate environmental detections exceeding regulatory thresholds. The decision diverged from policy, where metaldehyde remains approved for use under plant protection regulations, though subject to maximum residue limits and monitoring requirements under Directive 2000/60/EC. In the United States, metaldehyde is federally registered by the Environmental Protection Agency for applications on various crops, with tolerances established for residues on commodities such as leafy greens and brassicas as of 2016, and an interim registration review decision issued in December 2021 confirming continued eligibility under risk mitigation measures like buffer zones and application restrictions to protect . No nationwide ban exists, though state-level variations may impose additional handling or use limits based on local environmental assessments. Elsewhere, restrictions are sporadic and less stringent; for instance, has imposed partial bans on certain formulations, while petitions for prohibition in highlight ongoing debates over pet and toxicity without enacted federal bans as of 2025. In regions like and , metaldehyde remains widely available for agricultural without broad prohibitions, though usage is influenced by import regulations and emerging concerns over non-target impacts in tropical ecosystems. No global treaty under frameworks like the lists metaldehyde for prior informed consent, indicating its persistence in despite localized environmental pressures.

Debates on Bans, Efficacy, and Economic Trade-offs

The implemented a nationwide ban on the outdoor use of metaldehyde-containing products effective , 2022, following repeated exceedances of the 0.1 μg/L limit in surface waters, primarily attributed to runoff from agricultural applications despite industry-led stewardship initiatives that reduced usage by over 30% between 2012 and 2019. data indicated that metaldehyde accounted for a disproportionate share of treatment costs, with companies like reporting annual expenditures exceeding £1 million on advanced filtration to mitigate contamination risks, prompting calls for to safeguard and reduce operational burdens. Critics, including farming organizations such as the National Farmers' Union (NFU), contended that the ban overlooked the pesticide's targeted application and the inefficacy of mitigation measures in heavy rainfall events, arguing that detections were often trace levels posing negligible actual risk after treatment, while emphasizing metaldehyde's role in preventing widespread crop devastation by slugs. Efficacy debates center on metaldehyde's superior performance in rapidly immobilizing and killing slugs through mucus hypersecretion and , often achieving 80-100% mortality in field trials under optimal conditions, compared to alternatives like ferric , which induces sublethal feeding cessation but exhibits slower kill rates (3-6 days versus 1-2 days for metaldehyde) and reduced effectiveness in wet or due to pellet dissolution. Peer-reviewed studies, such as those evaluating bait formulations, confirm metaldehyde's reliability in protecting high-value crops like and oilseed rape, where slug damage can reduce yields by 20-50% without control, whereas ferric requires higher application rates and shows variable results, with some trials reporting only 50-70% slug reduction and potential recovery of affected pests. Proponents of the ban highlight environmental trade-offs, noting metaldehyde's lower non-target impact on earthworms relative to some iron-based baits, but acknowledge that no single alternative matches its speed and consistency, raising concerns over emerging resistance in slug populations reliant on fewer chemical options post-methiocarb withdrawal. Economic trade-offs underscore tensions between regulatory costs and agricultural viability, with the ban projected to increase grower expenses by £10-20 per through pricier ferric formulations and potential yield shortfalls of 0.2-0.5 tonnes per in slug-vulnerable cereals, exacerbating pressures amid volatile input prices and climate-driven pest surges. While water utilities benefit from curtailed remediation outlays—estimated at £5-10 million annually industry-wide—farmers face uncompensated losses from diminished efficacy, with NFU analyses warning of broader disruptions and higher if fails to fully substitute, as evidenced by pre-ban trials showing 10-15% higher damage incidence with non-chemical methods alone. These debates reflect causal priorities: environmental persistence driving despite metaldehyde's localized application, versus empirical needs for robust defense against biotic threats that could otherwise inflate production costs by 5-10% across mollusc-prone regions.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Metaldehyde
  2. https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/446.htm
  3. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/home-and-landscape/pesticide-active-ingredients-database/active-ingredient-details/?uaiKey=33
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9209800/
  5. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=2284&sectionid=248384801
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8434416/
  7. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0649-0049/content.pdf
  8. https://nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/1197.pdf
  9. https://ccmedia.fdacs.gov/content/download/32845/file/metaldehyde-for-controlling-snails-and-slugs-faq-2022.pdf
  10. https://www.inchem.org/documents/pims/chemical/pim332.htm
  11. https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/iupac/Reports/446.htm
  12. https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/A15292.18
  13. https://precision.fda.gov/ginas/app/ui/substances/0c1f855d-4d7a-498c-ab64-57c4f86f1420
  14. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB9852756.htm
  15. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3403168A/en
  16. https://www.freepatentsonline.com/3403168.html
  17. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/9225/1/Max_Bullock_Thesis_2014.pdf
  18. http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/metaldeh.htm
  19. https://www.fishersci.co.uk/shop/products/metaldehyde-99-thermo-scientific/10637621
  20. https://www.simsonpharma.com/us/blog-details/what-is-metaldehyde-used-for
  21. https://pim-resources.coleparmer.com/sds/50562.pdf
  22. https://www.chemicalbook.com/msds/metaldehyde_2.pdf
  23. https://pestweb.com/assets/files/productdocuments/MetaldehydeGranules7.5%2520msds.pdf
  24. https://www.fishersci.com/store/msds?partNumber=AC271860050&productDescription=METALDEHYDE%2B99%2525%2B5G&vendorId=VN00032119&countryCode=US&language=en
  25. https://assets.greenbook.net/M117924.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/metaldehyde
  27. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/ew/c7ew00039a
  28. https://ucanr.edu/sites/default/files/2010-10/54211.pdf
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5658602/
  30. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1555223A/en
  31. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1467733A/en
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219408002172
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1952.tb01023.x
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/metaldehyde
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5894430/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238088550_The_relative_toxicity_of_metaldehyde_and_iron_phosphate-based_molluscicides_to_earthworms
  37. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.6359
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8230794/
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342889226_Efficacy_of_a_Novel_Metaldehyde_Application_Method_to_Control_the_Brown_Garden_Snail_Cornu_aspersum_Helicidae_in_South_Africa
  40. https://www.researchtrend.net/bfij/pdf/168%2520Evaluation%2520of%2520Bioefficacy%2520of%2520Metaldehyde%25202.5Dry%2520Pellet%2520against%2520Snails%2520in%2520Cabbage%2520and%2520its%2520Phytotoxicity%2520Badari%2520Prasad%2520P.R.pdf
  41. https://journals.flvc.org/flaent/article/download/82299/79376/
  42. https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/abstracts/2022_AP26_Hosseini.pdf
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219498000714
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39585-5
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7411606/
  46. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/3/301
  47. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/outdoor-use-of-metaldehyde-to-be-banned-to-protect-wildlife
  48. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/news/government-announces-ban-on-outdoor-use-of-metaldehyde-from-march-2022
  49. https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/garden/2012775/gardeners-urged-check-sheds-legal
  50. https://www.fwi.co.uk/arable/metaldehyde-ban-is-a-massive-blow-for-growers
  51. https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/ENTO/ENTO-178/ENTO-401.pdf
  52. https://www.stz-oekotox.de/Henderson.pdf
  53. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3195&sectionid=266329688
  54. https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/metaldehyde-toxicity-slug-bait-poisoning
  55. https://pnwhandbooks.org/insect/ipm/slug
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0048357592900717
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8070404/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11200788/
  59. https://potatoes.ahdb.org.uk/11120025-evaluation-of-the-efficacy-and-timing-of-molluscicide-treatments
  60. https://www.gardenmyths.com/slug-bait-metaldehyde-iron-phosphate/
  61. https://fpnotebook.com/ER/Toxin/MtldhydPsng.htm
  62. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/03/04/2015-04277/metaldehyde-pesticide-tolerances
  63. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0649-0008/content.pdf
  64. https://www.petmd.com/dog/conditions/neurological/c_dg_metaldehyde_poisoning
  65. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/toxicology/metaldehyde-poisoning/metaldehyde-poisoning-in-animals
  66. https://www.pethealthnetwork.com/dog-health/dog-toxins-poisons/metaldehyde-poisoning-dangers-snail-and-slug-bait
  67. https://www.vpisglobal.com/2020/06/02/metaldehyde-poisoning-in-dogs/
  68. https://vetmeds.org/pet-poison-control-list/metaldehyde/
  69. https://www.aspcapro.org/sites/default/files/m-toxbrief_0303.pdf
  70. https://vetfolio-vetstreet.s3.amazonaws.com/02/c1ce3076b511e286eb005056ad4735/file/VT0313_Kitagaki_CE-TB.pdf
  71. https://veterinarypartner.vin.com/doc/?id=4951893&pid=19239
  72. https://assets.greenbook.net/M117912.pdf
  73. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2008/pmra-arla/H113-27-2008-15E.pdf
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321070719_METALDEHYDE_TOXICITY_A_BRIEF_ON_THREE_DIFFERENT_PERSPECTIVES
  75. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1856
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653521016374
  77. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/85179/1/2022BalashovaNPhD.pdf
  78. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0558-0010/content.pdf
  79. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/16946/8/JCThomas%2520biotic%2520deg%2520of%2520metaldehyde%2520FINAL2.2.pdf
  80. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/33059/1/Cooke_205024628_CorrectedThesisClean.pdf
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259556914_Using_water_industry_data_to_assess_the_metaldehyde_pollution_problem
  82. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0649-0024/content.pdf
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Physical-properties-of-metaldehyde-15_tbl1_352680627
  84. https://www.msdvetmanual.com/toxicology/metaldehyde-poisoning/metaldehyde-poisoning-in-animals
  85. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2008/pmra-arla/H113-28-2008-34E.pdf
  86. https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/44856/1/1495832_Gething.pdf
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026974912030470X
  88. https://www.fdacs.gov/content/download/93873/file/metaldehyde-faq-english.docx
  89. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f4c5/d894e52f783e26d01be960df968cf90294a4.pdf
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318493370_Review_of_the_molluscicide_metaldehyde_in_the_environment
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969721039309
  92. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-022-05986-y
  93. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/restrictions-on-the-use-of-metaldehyde-to-protect-wildlife
  94. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/10/18/2016-25166/metaldehyde-pesticide-tolerances
  95. http://www.kisanswaraj.in/wp-content/uploads/Annexure-1-List-of-Bannable-Pesticides.pdf
  96. https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN7144
  97. https://www.pic.int/Procedures/FinalRegulatoryActions/Database/tabid/1368/language/en-US/Default.aspx
  98. https://www.nfu-cymru.org.uk/news-and-information/the-end-of-metaldehyde/
  99. https://www.fwi.co.uk/arable/crop-management/pests/metaldehyde-slug-pellets-to-be-banned-from-spring-2022
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2013/jul/10/slug-pesticides-metaldehyde-drinking-water
  101. https://www.pomais.com/metaldehyde-insecticide-effective-slug-and-snail-control/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6393454/
  103. https://www.nfus.org.uk/news/news/metaldehyde-ban-presents-huge-challenge-to-scottish-growers
  104. https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/files/7077920/Review_of_the_molluscicide.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.