Hubbry Logo
MoinaMoinaMain
Open search
Moina
Community hub
Moina
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Moina
Moina
from Wikipedia

Moina
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Branchiopoda
Superorder: Diplostraca
Order: Anomopoda
Family: Moinidae
Genus: Moina
Baird, 1850 [1]
Type species
Moina brachiata
(Jurine, 1820) [2]

Moina is a genus of crustacean within the family Moinidae,[3][4] which are part of the group referred to as water fleas; they are related to the larger-bodied Daphnia species such as Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex, though not closely.[5] This genus was first described by W. Baird in 1850.

Moina demonstrates the ability to survive in habitats with adverse biological conditions, these being waters containing low oxygen levels and of a high salinity and other impurities; these habitats include salt pans but also eutrophic water bodies.[6] An example of such an extreme habitat is the highly saline Makgadikgadi Pans of Botswana, which support prolific numbers of Moina belli.[7] The genus is also known from bodies of water across Eurasia, where research indicated previously unknown species diversity in Northern Eurasia, including Japan and China;[8] the newly described groups includes a number of phylogroups were discovered from Northern Eurasia, four new Moina species from Japan, and five new lineages in China. According to genetic data, the genus Moina is divided into two genetic lineages: the European-Western Siberian and Eastern Siberian-Far Eastern, with a transitional zone at the Yenisei River basin of Eastern Siberia.[9][10]

At least four species of Moina are known to have been introduced to non-native waterways.[11]

Species

[edit]

Moina contains these species:[3][1]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Moina is a genus of small freshwater cladoceran crustaceans in the family Moinidae, belonging to the order Cladocera within the class Branchiopoda. Commonly known as water fleas, these organisms are distinguished from related genera like Daphnia by their open brood pouch and are typically 0.7 to 1 mm in adult length. Native to freshwater habitats worldwide, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, Moina species play a key role in aquatic ecosystems as grazers and are highly valued in aquaculture as nutritious live feed for fish larvae and fry due to their high protein content (around 50%) and small size suitable for newly hatched fish. The genus Moina, first described by William Baird in 1850, encompasses several , including Moina macrocopa, Moina micrura, Moina mongolica, and Moina rectirostris. These crustaceans exhibit both asexual and ; under favorable conditions, parthenogenetic females produce 4 to 22 eggs per brood every 1.5 to 2 days, while yields dormant resting eggs in response to environmental stress. Moina thrives in ponds, lakes, and even eutrophic or polluted waters, tolerating temperatures from 5°C to 31°C (with an optimum of 24°C to 31°C), and feeds primarily on , , , and . Their rapid and adaptability make them a dominant component in temporary or seasonal freshwater bodies, though populations can be affected by parasites such as Pasteuria ramosa and environmental toxins. In aquaculture, Moina cultures are straightforward to maintain on algae or yeast, contributing to high survival rates (95% to 99%) in fish fry like those of tilapia and ornamental species. Recent studies highlight cryptic diversity within the genus, with DNA barcoding revealing multiple undescribed lineages in North Eurasian populations and new species such as Moina heilongjiangensis described in 2025, underscoring its ecological complexity.

Taxonomy

Classification

The genus Moina is classified within the kingdom Animalia, phylum Arthropoda, class , superorder , order Anomopoda, family Moinidae. The genus was established by William Baird in 1850 in his work The Natural History of the British Entomostraca, where he initially placed it within the group Cladocera based on its branchiopod morphology. Baird's description highlighted Moina as a distinct of small entomostracans characterized by their bivalved and antennal locomotion. The of Moina is Moina brachiata (Jurine, 1820), designated as the name-bearing type under the principles of , which fixes the application of the name to this and its relatives. The Moinidae comprises small-bodied cladocerans, typically measuring 0.5–2 mm in length, that are distinguished from the closely related Daphniidae primarily by differences in setation patterns on the second antennae and trunk limbs, as well as the presence of an ocellus in some moinids and specific postabdominal structures. These features include heavy setation on the exopod of the second antenna extending from the second to fourth segments and a characteristic two-pointed tooth on the posterior angle of the postabdomen. Moinidae represents the to Daphniidae within Anomopoda, sharing a common ancestry but diverging in morphology adapted to diverse aquatic niches.

Phylogenetic position

Moina is placed within the order Anomopoda of the subclass Cladocera, specifically in the Moinidae, which forms a to the Daphniidae based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. The divergence of Moinidae from other anomopod lineages is estimated to have occurred during the era, supported by fossil records of anomopod ephippia dating to the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary in regions such as . Molecular evidence from subunit I (COI) gene sequencing has delineated two primary genetic lineages in Moina across : the European-Western Siberian lineage and the Eastern Siberian-Far Eastern lineage, with a transitional zone near the Yenisey River basin. These lineages reflect deep evolutionary splits, highlighting the genus's biogeographic structuring. While 28S rRNA has been used in broader cladoceran phylogenies, COI barcoding has been pivotal for resolving intraspecific relationships in Moina. Recent molecular studies have uncovered extensive cryptic diversity within Moina, with 21 phylogroups identified in Northern through analysis of over 300 COI sequences, encompassing complexes like brachiata-like, micrura-like, macrocopa-like, and salina-like clades. In , investigations have revealed seven species-level lineages, contributing to the recognition of previously undetected diversity in . In , COI-based analyses have identified 11 lineages across four species complexes, with five restricted to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, underscoring regional and hidden . In 2025, a new species, Moina heilongjiangensis, was described from a brackish lake in , further highlighting cryptic diversity in the genus. This cryptic diversity suggests that the accepted underestimates the true number of evolutionary independent units in the genus. At least four Moina species, including M. macrocopa, have become established outside their native ranges, often in eutrophic or temporary waters across the , , and , facilitated by human activities such as and waterfowl transport. Genetic markers, particularly COI barcodes, enable tracking of these invasions by distinguishing invasive lineages from native ones and revealing multiple introduction events, as seen in M. macrocopa populations in and .

Description

Morphology

Moina species exhibit a typical cladoceran , characterized by a transparent, bivalved that encloses the trunk and much of the , leaving the head and postabdomen partially exposed. The body is generally small, ranging from 0.5 to 2 mm in length, with an elongated, somewhat discus-shaped form that facilitates filter-feeding and locomotion in aquatic environments. The head is dome-shaped and narrowed, featuring a distinct supraocular depression and a shorter rostrum compared to related genera like ; it bears a single , often without an ocellus in many species, and long antennules that serve chemosensory functions. Locomotion is primarily driven by the second antennae, which are large, biramous appendages with a four-segmented ventral branch bearing four terminal filaments and branched setae, enabling the characteristic jerky swimming motion of cladocerans. The trunk houses five pairs of thoracic limbs, which are phyllopodous and equipped with setae for particle capture during filter-feeding; these limbs beat rhythmically to generate water currents. The postabdomen is elongated, terminating in a pair of long, stout claws armed with teeth, used for grooming and anchoring. Internally, Moina possess a specialized filter-feeding apparatus where the thoracic limbs' setae trap algal particles, directing them to the via mandibular and maxillary structures. The digestive includes a for , a for nutrient absorption tailored to diets, and a for waste expulsion, with the heart located dorsally in the to support efficient circulation. Sexual dimorphism is pronounced, with males typically smaller (0.6–0.9 ) than females (1–2 ) and featuring modified antennules for clasping during , as well as a copulatory hook on the first thoracic limb. Across the , morphological variations include slight differences in carapace ornamentation and appendage setation, though core traits like the postabdominal claws and antennal structure remain diagnostic. Larger sizes in certain lineages may correlate with , but anatomical features are broadly consistent.

Genetic diversity

Genetic studies of the genus Moina have revealed substantial cryptic speciation, where morphologically indistinguishable populations exhibit significant genetic divergence. Analysis of (mtDNA), particularly the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, has identified numerous undescribed phylogroups across various regions. For instance, in northern , 21 distinct phylogroups were delineated from 317 COI sequences, with genetic divergences ranging from 3.9% to 28.1%, indicating a level of hidden diversity comparable to that in the more extensively studied genus . In Asian populations, such as those in , mtDNA sequencing uncovered 11 lineages within four morphological complexes, including five previously unreported ones, despite conserved external morphology; these lineages often show and discordance with nuclear markers like ITS-1, suggesting ongoing hybridization or . A new , Moina heilongjiangensis, was described in 2025 from a brackish lake in , further illustrating the genus's cryptic diversity. This cryptic diversity underscores the genetic basis for adaptive traits in Moina species, particularly tolerance to environmental stressors like . In Moina brachiata, populations from temporary ponds in the Hungarian Great Plain display four cryptic lineages structured by habitat and depth, with one lineage strongly associated with shallower, more saline waters influenced by and hydroperiod variations; this divergence likely reflects selection on alleles enabling osmotic and resistance. Such genetic partitioning highlights how intraspecific variation facilitates to fluctuating aquatic conditions, though specific stress-response genes (e.g., those involved in ion transport or pathways) remain underexplored in Moina compared to related cladocerans. Population genetics within Moina reveals contrasting patterns of depending on . Cosmopolitan taxa like Moina micrura exhibit moderate connectivity within continental regions, such as , where some phylogroups span large areas (e.g., from to the ), implying ongoing dispersal via waterfowl or human activities; however, intercontinental barriers limit , as evidenced by deep mtDNA divergence (~8%) between European and Australian populations, rendering the latter a distinct lineage. In contrast, endemic species like Moina australiensis, restricted to Australian freshwater systems, show pronounced genetic isolation, with no evidence of gene exchange with counterparts, promoting localized but increasing vulnerability to loss. Key has refined our understanding of Moina diversity, with recent studies estimating around 10–11 valid (as of 2025) alongside multiple cryptic lineages, which has direct implications for conservation. A comprehensive study across northern not only confirmed high (e.g., several phylogroups confined to the Eastern Siberian-Far Eastern zone) but also highlighted risks from anthropogenic introductions that could hybridize native lineages, necessitating targeted protection of regional ponds and wetlands. Similarly, Oriental region surveys emphasize the role of molecular tools in resolving , as morphological criteria alone underestimate and overlook evolutionary units critical for ecosystem resilience.

Habitat and distribution

Preferred environments

Moina species thrive in a variety of dynamic and often harsh aquatic environments, particularly those characterized by fluctuating conditions. They are commonly found in temporary ponds, saline lakes, and eutrophic waters, where they can rapidly exploit short-lived opportunities for growth and reproduction. These habitats often feature high levels of and nutrients, supporting dense algal blooms that serve as a primary food source, though Moina's presence is more tied to the overall environmental instability than to specific biotic factors. A key adaptation enabling Moina to occupy ephemeral habitats is their tolerance to extreme abiotic conditions. They can endure low dissolved oxygen levels down to 0.5 mg/L, shifting metabolic pathways to anaerobic processes under hypoxia, which allows survival in oxygen-depleted, polluted, or stagnant waters. tolerance varies by species but extends up to 70 ppt in some, such as Moina mongolica, facilitating colonization of brackish and hypersaline lakes, while others like Moina macrocopa are limited to below 8 ppt. ranges from 5°C to 32°C are generally tolerated (with short-term tolerance up to 37°C), with optimal growth between 24°C and 31°C, enabling persistence across seasonal variations in temporary pools. Additionally, Moina prefer water with a neutral to alkaline of 7 to 9, aligning with the chemistry of nutrient-enriched, often sewage-influenced systems. The production of ephippial eggs is crucial for Moina's success in drying or intermittent habitats, as these drought-resistant resting stages can withstand prolonged —up to eight months in some cases—before hatching upon rehydration, allowing rapid recolonization of refilled ponds. In terms of microhabitat use, Moina are primarily planktonic in open water columns of larger temporary or eutrophic bodies, where they filter-feed efficiently, but they may shift to benthic or near-substrate positions in shallow, vegetated margins during low-water periods to avoid or predation. This behavioral flexibility enhances their resilience in unstable environments dominated by high nutrient inputs and variable .

Global range

The genus Moina exhibits a across freshwater and brackish water bodies worldwide, with native populations most prominent in , , and . In , species are widespread from through and into Asia, including extensive records in and the , often dominating communities in temporary ponds and fields. African occurrences include North African regions and West African sites such as , where Moina species contribute to local aquatic ecosystems. In , native halophilic taxa thrive in salt lakes of the central arid zones. Recent discoveries as of 2025, such as the Moina heilongjiangensis in brackish waters of northeastern , highlight ongoing expansion of known diversity in Asian habitats. Introduced populations of Moina have expanded globally through human-mediated dispersal, particularly via for use as live feed in . Moina macrocopa, for example, has established in and parts of beyond its native range, while Moina micrura appears rarely in the , with isolated records from near Green Bay. In , M. macrocopa was first documented in in 1994 and subsequently in northeastern by 1997, linked to anthropogenic water bodies like reservoirs and ponds. These introductions reflect broader patterns of spread in over 50 countries, facilitated by the genus's tolerance for varied conditions and its utility in tropical and subtropical systems. Biogeographically, Moina shows Holarctic dominance, with core native ranges in temperate extending into tropical and subtropical zones through both natural dispersal and human activity; endemics like Moina baylyi highlight regional specialization in Australian hypersaline environments. Genetic studies reveal cryptic diversity supporting this pattern, with distinct lineages in Palearctic, Afrotropical, and Australasian realms.

Reproduction and life cycle

Parthenogenetic reproduction

Parthenogenetic reproduction is the primary mode of asexual propagation in the genus Moina, enabling rapid clonal expansion under favorable environmental conditions. Females produce diploid eggs through ameiotic , a process in which oocytes undergo a modified that suppresses reduction division, resulting in unreduced diploid embryos without fertilization. These eggs are brooded internally within the marsupium, a ventral brood pouch formed by the , where they develop for approximately 3-5 days before release as juveniles. This reproductive strategy is triggered by optimal conditions such as high food availability and low , which favor the production of all-female broods and suppress the transition to . At 25°C, Moina generations typically cycle every 4-7 days, supporting rates of up to 0.5 per day, as observed in like Moina macrocopa. The developmental stages commence with egg formation in the , followed by transfer to the marsupium for incubation; upon hatching, neonates are released as miniature versions of adults, measuring about 0.34 mm in length and immediately resembling mature females in morphology, though smaller in size. The advantages of parthenogenesis in Moina include explosive proliferation in transient or resource-rich habitats, where all-female allow a single colonist to rapidly establish a large clonal . This mode facilitates quick exploitation of temporary water bodies, enhancing survival and dispersal in unpredictable environments characteristic of cladocerans.

Sexual reproduction

in Moina represents a stress-induced phase in its cyclical parthenogenetic life cycle, triggered by environmental stressors including high (crowding), food scarcity, or temperature fluctuations, which prompt parthenogenetic females to produce and mictic females. Males typically comprise a small proportion (around 10%) of the under these conditions, sufficient to facilitate . This shift contrasts with the parthenogenetic mode by enabling the production of genetically diverse, dormant propagules suited to survive adverse periods. Mating occurs when males use their modified antennules, armed with hooks, to grasp mictic females and transfer , fertilizing haploid eggs to form diapausing ephippia—resting eggs highly resistant to , freezing, and other harsh conditions. If fertilized, these eggs develop within a tough, chitinous dorsal case (ephippium) that incorporates part of the female's , typically enclosing 1-2 eggs. Ephippia enter a state of lasting from months to several years, allowing Moina populations to persist through unfavorable periods such as or winter. Hatching resumes upon rehydration and exposure to favorable cues, including optimal temperatures (around 20-25°C) and photoperiods, releasing amictic embryos that develop into active juveniles. This sexual phase promotes during , generating novel allelic combinations that enhance and enable Moina populations to adapt to variable and unpredictable habitats. Without periodic , clonal propagation alone would lead to reduced variability and increased vulnerability to environmental changes or pathogens.

Ecology

Feeding habits

Moina species are filter feeders that primarily consume microalgae such as Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus spp., along with bacteria, yeast, and detritus in the form of decaying organic matter. These organisms filter suspended particles ranging from 1 to 50 μm in size directly from the water column, enabling efficient exploitation of microbial and phytoplankton resources in nutrient-rich environments. The feeding mechanism relies on rhythmic beating of the thoracic limbs, which generate water currents that draw particles toward the region. Specialized setae on the endites of these limbs act as filters, trapping food particles that are then transported to the for . This process allows for continuous without active pursuit of prey. Moina exhibits high grazing efficiency, with clearance rates reaching up to 0.315 mL per individual per hour on preferred food sources, contributing to the control of algal populations in systems. Under optimal conditions, this filtration capacity helps mitigate excessive algal growth by removing substantial volumes of suspended matter. Selective feeding is evident in Moina's preference for like Monoraphidium contortum over such as Microcystis spp., where clearance rates on the latter can drop below 0.1 mL per individual per hour due to or poor nutritional quality. In response to or low food concentrations, and rates decrease, serving as an adaptive mechanism to conserve energy and trigger shifts in reproductive strategies.

Role in ecosystems

Moina species occupy the of primary consumers in aquatic food webs, primarily feeding on and while serving as a crucial link to higher trophic levels. As , they efficiently transfer energy from primary producers to predators such as larvae, amphibians, and various , thereby supporting secondary production in freshwater ecosystems. This role is particularly evident in their use as live feed for , where Moina's nutritional profile enhances larval growth and survival. In ephemeral pools, they also fall prey to macroinvertebrate predators and amphibians, influencing community structure through these interactions. Population dynamics of Moina exhibit characteristic boom-bust cycles, especially in temporary ponds where rapid reproduction leads to population peaks followed by declines due to resource depletion or drying. These cycles are facilitated by parthenogenetic reproduction under favorable conditions, allowing explosive growth. Ephippia, the dormant resting eggs produced during unfavorable periods, function as seed banks in sediments, enabling recolonization when ponds refill after drought. This dormancy strategy ensures persistence in intermittent habitats, contributing to the resilience of aquatic communities. Moina provides key ecosystem services through nutrient recycling, excreting bioavailable forms of (such as ) and (such as ) that stimulate growth and maintain cycling in freshwater systems. Their sensitivity to pollutants positions them as indicators of , with population declines signaling contamination from , , or . In terms of biotic interactions, Moina competes with other cladocerans like in shared habitats, where outcomes depend on factors such as ammonia levels or algal composition, often favoring under toxic conditions. Their exerts predation pressure on algal communities, controlling bloom formation and promoting diversity by selectively consuming , including large colonies in systems. This top-down control helps regulate and prevents dominance by harmful algae.

Human uses

Aquaculture applications

Moina species, particularly M. macrocopa and M. micrura, serve as valuable live feeds in due to their high nutritional content and suitability for larval and fry stages of various species. With a protein content averaging 50% of dry weight and fat levels of 4–27% depending on life stage, Moina provides essential and that support rapid growth in fry of freshwater species such as (Oreochromis niloticus), African catfish (), (Cyprinus carpio), and ornamental like angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). Their small size—adults at 0.7–1.5 mm and juveniles under 0.4 mm—matches the mouth gape of newly hatched fry, making them more accessible than larger feeds, and they outperform (Artemia) in freshwater systems where the latter exhibit high mortality. Cultivation of Moina typically employs batch or semi-continuous systems in tanks ranging from 38 L (10-gallon aquaria) for small-scale operations to 100–1000 L vats or ponds up to 1 m deep for commercial production, maintained at 23–28°C and pH 7.5–8.5. Recent studies as of 2025 have explored sustainable methods using wastewater from tilapia biofloc systems to culture M. macrocopa, promoting resource recycling. Inoculation starts with neonates at densities of 1000–6000 individuals per liter, fed suspensions of baker's yeast (0.3–0.5 g per 100 L initially, increasing over time), microalgae like Chlorella (4×10^6 cells/mL), or organic fertilizers such as chicken manure (5–20 g per 100 L) to promote bacterial and algal blooms. Water quality is monitored for dissolved oxygen above 3 mg/L, with partial renewals of 20–50% every few days; cultures peak in 4–7 days, allowing harvest via netting or sieving through 50–150 µm mesh every 7–10 days, yielding populations up to 109,000 individuals/L under optimized diets like yeast combined with Haematococcus pluvialis. Enrichment with emulsions of fish oil or defatted algal meals further boosts highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA) to 40% and carotenoids, enhancing feed quality without altering basic protocols. Compared to Daphnia species, Moina offers advantages including faster reproduction rates (maturity in 4–5 days versus 7–10), greater tolerance to low oxygen (down to 1 mg/L) and high organic loads, and higher achievable densities (up to 5000/L versus 500/L), resulting in superior biomass yields of 106–110 g dry weight per m³ per day under yeast-based feeding, or up to 375 g/m³/day with and . These traits enable cost-effective production in resource-limited settings, reducing reliance on more sensitive alternatives. Globally, Moina is widely adopted in Asian aquaculture, such as in for and shrimp () larviculture, and in for ornamental fish with survival rates of 95–99%, while in , introduced strains like M. macrocopa dominate feeds for and African catfish in semi-open pond systems, supporting sustainable fry production amid growing demand.

Research applications

Moina species are employed as model organisms in various biological and environmental fields due to their rapid reproduction, sensitivity to stressors, and cyclical parthenogenetic life cycle, which facilitates controlled studies. These attributes make them particularly valuable for investigating ecological impacts and physiological responses in aquatic systems. In , Moina is frequently used to evaluate the of environmental pollutants, including and pesticides, providing insights into their effects on freshwater . For instance, tests on Moina micrura have shown differential sensitivity to following the order Hg > Cu > > Zn > Cr. Similarly, exposure experiments with pesticides commonly used in agriculture, such as (LC50: 0.00008 mg/L), (0.00696 mg/L), (0.01044 mg/L), neem extract (0.1963 mg/L), and (3.043 mg/L), demonstrate M. micrura's role in ranking levels and informing regulatory guidelines for runoff. These studies underscore Moina's position as a standard test organism in standardized protocols like those from the for aquatic hazard assessment. Developmental biology research leverages Moina's parthenogenetic reproduction to explore genetic mechanisms underlying asexual and sexual transitions, as well as dormancy processes. Investigations into parthenogenesis genetics have identified transcriptional responses to environmental cues in Moina macrocopa, revealing key genes involved in stress perception and reproductive mode switching, which contribute to rapid population . Ephippial dormancy, the resistant stage formed during sexual reproduction, has been studied through experiments on hatching triggers; for example, in M. micrura, ephippia hatching rates increase under specific photoperiods (12:12 :) and light intensities (around 5000 ), while food density influences ephippia production and male induction, aiding understanding of regulation. Such work establishes Moina as a tractable system for dissecting the molecular basis of cyclical . In climate change modeling, Moina's tolerance to abiotic stressors like salinity and temperature is examined to predict responses to habitat alterations, such as salinization from rising sea levels or drought. Laboratory experiments simulating increased salinity show that M. macrocopa maintains viable populations up to 8 ppt but experiences reduced growth and reproduction at higher levels (e.g., 12-16 ppt), correlating with projected habitat loss in temporary ponds. Temperature-salinity interactions further reveal thresholds where survival declines, as in studies where combined warming and salinization halved population densities, informing ecological forecasts for cladoceran communities under global change scenarios. Historical research on Moina traces back to the late , with Weismann's studies in the 1870s on cladoceran life cycles, including observations of parthenogenetic and sexual phases in species like Moina, laying foundational insights into . Modern extensions include emerging applications of / gene editing in related cladocerans like , which demonstrate efficient targeted mutagenesis and hold promise for in Moina due to shared reproductive amenability.

Species

Accepted species

The genus Moina Baird, 1850, encompasses 18 accepted species according to the (ITIS), though molecular studies indicate potential cryptic diversity and ongoing taxonomic revisions that may adjust this number to 15–25 valid taxa. These species are primarily found in freshwater and occasionally brackish environments, often in temporary or eutrophic waters, with distributions spanning cosmopolitan to regional patterns. Validity is determined based on morphological and genetic criteria from authoritative databases like ITIS and the (WoRMS), excluding synonyms such as Moina weirzejskii Richard, 1895 (now a synonym of M. macrocopa). Recent additions include Moina heilongjiangensis Kotov & Sinev, 2025, described from brackish lakes in . The accepted species, with authorities and years, are listed below, along with brief characterizations of key traits, habitats, and distributions for representative examples:
  • Moina affinis Birge, 1893
  • Moina australiensis G.O. Sars, 1896: Australian endemic, typically in freshwater ponds and temporary waters; body length up to 1.5 mm.
  • Moina belli Gurney, 1904
  • Moina brachiata (Jurine, 1820): The of the genus, primarily Eurasian with a Palearctic distribution; inhabits temporary and semi-permanent ponds, tolerating varying salinities; adult size 0.8–1.2 mm.
  • Moina brachycephala Goulden, 1968
  • Moina flexuosa Sars, 1897
  • Moina hartwigi Welter, 1898
  • Moina hutchinsoni Brehm, 1937
  • Moina macrocopa (Straus, 1820): Cosmopolitan, widespread in nutrient-rich, eutrophic waters including ponds, lakes, and environments; highly tolerant of and temporary habitats; adult size 0.7–2.0 mm.
  • Moina micrura Kurz, 1875: Often in brackish and estuarine waters, considered invasive in some regions; prefers temporary ponds with organic decomposition in tropical/subtropical areas, though true M. micrura s.s. is restricted to parts of , , and ; adult size 0.6–1.2 mm.
  • Moina minuta Hansen, 1899
  • Moina mongolica Daday, 1901
  • Moina reticulata Daday, 1905
  • Moina salina Daday, 1888: Halophilic, in saline lakes and ponds, particularly in arid regions.
  • Moina tenuicornis Sars, 1896
  • Moina weismanni Ishikawa, 1897
  • Moina wierzejskii Richard, 1895 (accepted in ITIS, but synonymized with M. macrocopa in some recent works)
  • Moina heilongjiangensis Kotov & Sinev, 2025: Recently described from brackish soda lakes in Province, ; euryhaline, unable to survive in pure freshwater; adult size ~1.2 mm.
This taxonomy reflects consensus from morphological revisions (e.g., Goulden 1968) and studies revealing hidden diversity, particularly in species complexes like M. macrocopa.

Taxonomic controversies

The Moina (Cladocera: Moinidae) has been subject to significant taxonomic debate since its establishment by Baird in , primarily due to morphological similarities among species, historical misidentifications, and the cosmopolitan distributions initially ascribed to several taxa. Early descriptions often relied on limited diagnostic characters, such as antennal setation and limb morphology, leading to frequent synonymizations and subsequent revisions. For instance, Goulden (1968) consolidated seven species under M. macrocopa and related forms based on morphological analysis, while Smirnov (1976) further synonymized additional taxa, reducing the recognized species count but overlooking subtle variations that later proved significant. These revisions, though influential, have been criticized for underestimating cryptic diversity, as molecular studies have revealed hidden lineages within purportedly widespread species. A prominent controversy centers on Moina micrura Kurz, 1875, often described as one of the most poorly defined cladocerans due to the loss of type material and ambiguous original locality (terra typica in the ). Initially considered cosmopolitan, M. micrura has been conflated with multiple synonyms, including M. rapax and M. mongolica, resulting in erroneous global distributions in faunal lists. Integrative combining morphology and COI DNA has restricted the true M. micrura sensu stricto to the Western Palearctic (e.g., , , , and ), identifying it as part of a cryptic with at least nine divergent lineages. This redescription, establishing a neotype from Sádka , underscores how prior ecological studies likely aggregated data from distinct taxa, complicating assessments. DNA barcoding across North Eurasia has further highlighted controversies in Moina taxonomy, uncovering 21 phylogroups among 317 sequences and suggesting the genus ranks second in cladoceran species richness after . Species complexes are evident in M. macrocopa, M. brachiata, M. micrura, and M. salina, with genetic distances (Tamura 3-parameter model) indicating regional rather than broad —dividing populations into European-Western Siberian and Eastern Siberian-Far Eastern groups, with a transitional zone at the Yenisey River basin. These findings challenge traditional morphology-based keys, as diagnostic traits like head shape and postabdominal claw structure prove unreliable for delimiting lineages, necessitating ongoing revisions through combined genetic and morphological approaches to resolve misidentifications and refine species boundaries. A 2025 revision of the related formerly known as Moina rectirostris has transferred it to Lathonura rectirostris (O.F. Müller, 1785) in the family Macrothricidae, with East Asian populations described as a new species Lathonura bekkerae Dadykin & Pereboev, 2025.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.