Hubbry Logo
Mohamed NaguibMohamed NaguibMain
Open search
Mohamed Naguib
Community hub
Mohamed Naguib
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mohamed Naguib
Mohamed Naguib
from Wikipedia

Major General Mohamed Bey Naguib Youssef Qutb El-Qashlan (Arabic: محمد بيه نجيب يوسف قطب القشلان; 19 February 1901 – 28 August 1984), known simply as Mohamed Naguib (Arabic: محمد نجيب), was an Egyptian military officer and revolutionary who, along with Gamal Abdel Nasser, was one of the two principal leaders of the Free Officers movement of 1952 that toppled the monarchy of Egypt and the Sudan, leading to the establishment of the Republic of Egypt.[2][3][4]

Key Information

A distinguished and decorated general who was wounded in action in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, he became the leader of the Free Officers Movement of nationalist army officers opposed to the continued presence of British troops in Egypt and Sudan, and the corruption and incompetence of King Farouk. Following the toppling of Farouk in July 1952, Naguib went on to serve as the head of the Revolutionary Command Council, the prime minister of Egypt, and later its first president, successfully negotiating the independence of Sudan (hitherto a condominium of Egypt and the United Kingdom), and the withdrawal of all British military personnel from Egypt. His tenure as president came to end in November 1954 due to disagreements with other members of the Free Officers, particularly Nasser, who forced him to resign and succeeded him as president.[2][5]

Early life and education

[edit]

Mohamed Naguib was born on 19 February 1901 in Khartoum, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan to Youssef Naguib and Zohra Ahmed Othman.[6] Zohra was from the esteemed Shaigiya tribe, while Youssef was a ranking officer of the Egyptian Armed Forces who had come from a notable Egyptian family of army officers.[7] Naguib was the eldest of nine children.

Naguib attended secondary and military school at Gordon Memorial College in Khartoum, graduating in 1918. He joined the Egyptian Royal Guard in 1923. In 1927, Naguib became the first Egyptian military officer to obtain a law license. In 1929 he earned a postgraduate degree in political economy, and then another postgraduate degree in civil law in 1931.[8]

Military career

[edit]
Naguib during the 1948 war

In December 1931, Naguib was promoted to the rank of captain. He moved to the border patrol in Arish in 1934. He was part of the military committee that carried out the terms of the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936. In Khartoum, he founded a newspaper for the Egyptian Armed Forces in 1937, and he was promoted to the rank of major on 6 May 1938.[9]

Naguib tendered his resignation in protest following the Abdeen Palace incident of 1942. Naguib wrote in his autobiography that he had resigned since he had broken his oath of allegiance to the King by failing to prevent the British siege of the palace, but that Abdeen Palace officials thanked him for his actions regardless and refused to accept his resignation.[10]

Naguib subsequently continued his upward trajectory through the hierarchy of the Egyptian military, achieving the rank of lieutenant colonel and the post of regional governor of the Sinai Peninsula in 1944. He took on leadership of the mechanized infantry of the Sinai in 1947, and was promoted to brigadier general in 1948.[9]

Naguib performed outstandingly during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, where he was wounded seven times. For his service he was awarded the first military star of Fuad as well as the title of Bey. He was also subsequently awarded with the directorship of the Egyptian Military Academy, where he would ultimately encounter the members of the Free Officers movement.[9]

Free Officers Movement

[edit]

Mohamed Naguib was first introduced to the Free Officers Movement by Abdel Hakim Amer during his tenure as the director of the Royal Military Academy in Cairo. The Free Officers were a group of nationalist army officer veterans of the unsuccessful nationalist uprisings of 1935–36 and 1945–46 as well as the 1948 Arab Israeli War, fiercely opposed to the continuing presence of British military personnel in Egypt and Sudan since 1882, and the attendant political role that the United Kingdom had in Egyptian affairs.[11] Additionally, they viewed the Egyptian and Sudanese monarchy as weak, corrupt, and incapable of protecting Egyptian and Sudanese national interests, particularly against the United Kingdom, and the State of Israel. In particular, they held King Farouk responsible for the poor conduct of the war in Palestine in which 78% of the former Mandate for Palestine was lost to the newly proclaimed State of Israel, and some three quarters of Palestine's Muslim and Christian population variously fled into exile.

The movement had been led originally by Gamal Abdel Nasser, and was composed exclusively of servicemen who were all under 35 years of age and from low-income backgrounds. Nasser, who like Naguib was a veteran of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, felt that the movement needed an older officer from a distinguished military background in order to be taken seriously. The highly respected and nationally famous Naguib was the obvious choice, and he was invited to assume leadership of the movement. While this proved successful in strengthening the Free Officers, it would later cause great friction within the movement, and an eventual power struggle between the elder Naguib and the younger Nasser. Historians have noted that whilst Naguib understood his position and duty as being the movement's bona fide leader, the younger Free Officers saw him as a figurehead who would yield to the collective decision-making of the movement, giving Naguib a more limited, symbolic role.[12]

Revolution of 1952

[edit]
Naguib saluting at the opening of the Suez Canal with Gamal Abdel Nasser

On 23 July 1952 at about 1 am, the Free Officers launched the revolution with a coup d'état to depose King Farouk. Naguib was immediately appointed as Commander in Chief of the Army in order to keep the loyalty of the Armed Forces firmly behind the Revolution.[2] His celebrated status as a hero of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, along with his jovial personality and elder statesmen demeanor also made him appear as a reassuring figure to the Egyptian public, who had not previously been exposed to Nasser and the other Free Officers.[13]

The Free Officers chose to govern at first via Aly Maher Pasha, a former prime minister who was known for his opposition to the United Kingdom's occupation of Egypt, and its interference in Egyptian affairs.[13] The next evening, Naguib met with British diplomat John Hamilton.[14] During the meeting Hamilton assured Naguib that the British government supported the abdication of King Farouk, that the Churchill government viewed the coup as an internal Egyptian matter, and that the United Kingdom would intervene only if it felt that British lives and property in Egypt were in danger.[14]

Naguib (left) and Nasser (right) during celebrations for the second anniversary of the revolution, July 1954
Muhammed Naguib colors
Naguib with Anwar Sadat in the background

The prospect of British intervention on behalf of Farouk was the biggest threat to the Revolution, and Hamilton's message to Naguib gave the Free Officers the reassurance that they needed to follow through with deposing the King.[14] On the morning of 26 July 1952, Maher arrived at the Ras El Tin Palace where Farouk was staying in order to present him with an ultimatum from Naguib: he was to abdicate his throne, and leave Egypt by 6 pm the following day, or the Egyptian troops gathered outside Ras El Tin would storm the palace and arrest him.[15] Farouk agreed to the terms of the ultimatum, and the following day, in the presence of Maher, and the United States Ambassador Jefferson Caffery, boarded the Royal yacht El Mahrousa, and left Egypt.[15] In his memoirs, Naguib described how his journey to the dock to meet the deposed Farouk before the former King departed the country was delayed by throngs of people celebrating the Revolution.[16] Caffery confirmed that Naguib was angry at missing the former King's departure.[15] Upon arrival at the dock, Naguib immediately took sail in a small vessel to meet Farouk on the Mahrousa, and formally bid him farewell.[16]

In September, Naguib was appointed prime minister, and a member of the Royal Regent Council, with Nasser serving as the minister of interior. Farouk's infant son succeeded him as Fuad II, and would be the last King of Egypt. The succession was designed to deny the United Kingdom a pretext for intervention, allowing the revolutionaries to maintain that they were opposed only to the corrupt regime of Farouk, and not to the monarchy itself. However, after consolidating their power, the Free Officers quickly moved to implement their long-held plans for abolishing the monarchy. Ali Maher's government resigned on 7 September 1952, and Naguib was appointed prime minister.[17] On 18 June 1953, almost 11 months after the revolution, the revolutionaries stripped the infant King Fuad II of his title, declared the end of the Kingdom of Egypt and the establishment of the Republic of Egypt.

Presidency

[edit]
Naguib at his office, 1953
Naguib with Chinese Muslim Kuomintang National Revolutionary Army General Ma Bufang

With the declaration of the Republic, Naguib was sworn in as its first President. Owing to the non-Egyptian ancestry of Muhammad Ali Pasha (the progenitor of the Muhammad Ali dynasty), and the earlier dynasties that had governed Egypt, Naguib was referenced in Western media as being the first native Egyptian ruler of Egypt since the Roman conquest of Egypt, or even earlier to Pharaoh Nectanebo II, whose reign ended in 342 BC.[18] Naguib himself objected to this characterisation, stating:

"It has been said in the foreign press that I am the first Egyptian to govern Egypt since Cleopatra. Such words flatter but they do not align with our knowledge of our own history. For the sake of glorifying our own Blessed Movement, are we to say that the Fatimads were never Egyptian despite their centuries in Egypt? Do we now deny our kinship with the Ayyubids because of their origin even as we join Saladin's eagle with the Liberation Flag as the symbol of our Revolution? And what of the members of the Mohammed Ali dynasty? Should our grievances against the former King and the flawed and corrupt rulers before him blind us to the nationalism of Abbas Hilmi II, whose devotion to Egypt against the occupiers cost him his throne, or the achievements of Ibrahim Pasha, the very best of the dynasty, who himself declared that the Sun of Egypt and the water of the Nile had made him Egyptian? Are we now to go through the family histories of all Egyptians and invalidate those born to a non-Egyptian parent? If so, I must start with myself. It is fairer and more accurate to say that we are all Egyptians, but I am the first Egyptian to have been raised from the ranks of the people to the highest office to govern Egypt as one of their own. It is an honour and a sacred burden great enough without the embellishments that foreign observers would add to it."[19]

Forced resignation

[edit]
Last declaration by Mohamed Naguib before his arrest, 1954

When Naguib began showing signs of independence from Nasser by distancing himself from the RCC's land reform decrees and drawing closer to Egypt's established political forces, namely the Wafd and the Muslim Brotherhood,[20] Nasser resolved to depose him.[21] In late 1953, Nasser accused Naguib of supporting the recently outlawed Muslim Brotherhood and of harboring dictatorial ambitions.[citation needed] A brief power struggle broke out between Naguib and Nasser for control of the military and of Egypt. Nasser ultimately won the struggle and managed to force Naguib to resign from the presidency of Egypt in November 1954. Nasser then placed Naguib under informal house arrest in a suburban Cairo villa owned by Zeinab Al-Wakil, the wife of former Prime Minister Mostafa El-Nahas.[citation needed] Naguib was released from house arrest in 1971 by President Anwar Sadat.[22][23]

Personal life and death

[edit]
Naguib with his sons
Naguib, in front of his portrait, in the last days of his life

Naguib was married and had four children, three sons and a daughter.[24] His sons were Farouk, Yusuf and Ali.[24] Life magazine reported shortly after the revolution in August 1952 that his eldest son Farouk, who was 14 years old, was planning to change his name.[24] His daughter died in 1951.[24]

On 28 August 1984, Naguib died from liver cirrhosis in Cairo, Egypt. He was 83.[25] Naguib had a military funeral that was attended by President Hosni Mubarak. Naguib's coffin, draped in Egyptian flag, was carried on a gun carriage drawn by six horses as brass bands played funeral music. Hundreds of mourners, including government officials, foreign dignitaries and family members, marched behind the carriage.[26]

Legacy

[edit]

Shortly before his death in 1984, Naguib published his memoirs under the title I Was a President of Egypt. The book was widely circulated and was also translated into English under the title Egypt's Destiny. A station of the Cairo Metro is named in his honor. A major road in the Al Amarat District of Khartoum is also named after him.[27][28]

In December 2013, Interim Egyptian President Adly Mansour posthumously awarded Naguib the Order of the Nile, the highest honor of the Egyptian state. The award was received by his son, Mohamed Yusuf.[29][30]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Mohamed Naguib (20 February 1901 – 28 August 1984) was an officer and politician who became the first president of the Republic of , serving from 18 June 1953 to 14 November 1954. Born in to Egyptian parents, Naguib graduated from the Egyptian Military Academy in 1918 and rose through the ranks, gaining prominence as a of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. As a senior figure in the Free Officers Movement, he co-led the 23 July 1952 revolution that toppled King Farouk, forcing the monarch's abdication and paving the way for the end of the after 150 years of rule. Naguib headed the Revolutionary Command Council, was appointed in September 1952, and oversaw the monarchy's formal abolition in 1953, positioning himself as a symbol of national liberation from British influence and royal corruption. His tenure, however, ended abruptly when and other officers forced his resignation in November 1954, citing alleged ties to the and dictatorial tendencies, though underlying tensions stemmed from Naguib's push for restoring the 1923 constitution and holding prompt elections versus Nasser's preference for prolonged military rule and reforms. Thereafter, Naguib endured until 1972, publishing memoirs in 1984 that critiqued the revolution's authoritarian turn.

Early Years

Birth and Family

Muhammad Naguib was born on 20 February 1901 in , . His father, Youssef Naguib, was an Egyptian civil servant employed in the postal service under the Anglo-Egyptian administration. His mother was Sudanese, though her name is recorded variably as Zohra Ahmed Othman in some accounts. As the eldest of nine children, Naguib grew up in a middle-class household shaped by his father's professional postings, which exposed the family to the colonial structures of the . The family's Egyptian paternal lineage placed them within communities that maintained cultural and national ties to despite residing in . Early family life involved relocation between and , reflecting the interconnected administrative and familial networks under British influence in the region.

Education and Early Influences

Naguib enrolled in the Egyptian Military College in April 1917 and graduated on January 23, 1918, as drew to a close, marking his initial formal entry into training. His , conducted at Gordon Memorial College in under the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium, combined general studies with instruction, culminating in his graduation that same year. Despite his father's position as a Sudanese urging a career, Naguib's insistence on pursuits reflected an early determination shaped by familial Egyptian roots and exposure to colonial administration in . Following graduation, Naguib briefly studied law for several months before recommitting to the , obtaining a baccalaureate degree in 1923 while advancing to . He later pursued advanced training at the Military Staff College after a period of instruction at the . These formative years, amid Britain's over and the monarchy's reliance on foreign influence, exposed him to systemic corruption and unequal power dynamics, nurturing a pragmatic focused on and rather than revolutionary upheaval.

Military Service

Initial Assignments and Training

Following his graduation from the Egyptian Military Academy's course in 1921, Muhammad Naguib was commissioned into the Egyptian Army and initially served in , then under Anglo-Egyptian administration, as part of the 17th Infantry Battalion. His early assignments included routine duties in this joint administrative territory, where Egypt maintained military contingents alongside British forces. Naguib advanced steadily under the , earning promotion to captain in December 1931 and subsequent transfer to the Egyptian in 1934, with postings including and . In , he established a for the armed forces, reflecting his growing administrative engagement within the officer ranks. These roles highlighted his competence in operational and frontier security tasks, amid the Egyptian Army's constraints under British influence and royal oversight.

World War II and Interwar Period

During World War II, Egypt adhered to a policy of neutrality declared in September 1939, though British forces effectively controlled key military and logistical operations from Egyptian soil, including preparations for campaigns in North Africa such as the Battle of El Alamein in 1942–1943. Egyptian army officers like Naguib operated under this framework of British oversight, with limited direct combat involvement for native units but emphasis on training and administrative roles to support Allied logistics. Naguib, who had earned a Staff College certificate in May 1939, was promoted to lieutenant colonel (Al-Bakbashi) on June 25, 1940, and subsequently appointed director of the Officer Training Department at the Egyptian Military College, where he focused on officer development amid wartime constraints. He also served with combat units of the British Army, gaining practical experience in operational environments dominated by foreign command structures. In the immediate postwar interlude before the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Naguib continued in staff and training capacities, rising to by the mid-1940s through routine promotions tied to seniority and administrative performance rather than field heroism. This period highlighted operational realities for the Egyptian army: underfunded equipment, reliance on British advisors for modernization, and growing internal politicization as King Farouk's regime prioritized palace loyalties over merit-based reforms, leading to widespread officer discontent over the monarchy's inability to assert full post-1945. Naguib's return from wartime duties elevated his profile among peers, positioning him for higher commands amid these systemic inefficiencies. Such frustrations stemmed from empirical observations of the army's subordination, including delayed and unequal resource allocation favoring royal favorites.

1948 Arab-Israeli War

During the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Muhammad Naguib led a machine-gun and regiment in 's campaign against the newly declared State of . He participated in frontline operations, including assaults on Israeli positions such as Negba and Hill 86, where Egyptian forces sought to advance but faced determined resistance. Naguib demonstrated personal valor, sustaining three wounds in combat, including a severe that left him temporarily presumed dead on the . For his bravery, he was decorated and hailed as a war hero upon returning to . Naguib witnessed firsthand the Egyptian army's systemic defeats, attributing them to widespread , inept leadership, and inadequate preparation under King Farouk's regime. The poorly equipped and poorly led troops suffered heavy losses, with advances stalled by logistical failures and command errors, exacerbating resentment among professional officers toward the monarchy's mismanagement. In response to official narratives that downplayed these shortcomings, Naguib twice tendered his to Farouk, protesting the blame shifted onto field commanders rather than higher echelons. Following the war, Naguib founded the of War Distorters, an officers' group dedicated to exposing inaccuracies in accounts of the campaign and demanding for the military's performance. This initiative reflected his commitment to reforming the armed forces by confronting the root causes of defeat, including favoritism and graft that undermined operational effectiveness. His actions positioned him as a vocal advocate for integrity within the officer corps, influencing subsequent efforts to purge corrupt elements.

Rise in Nationalist Politics

Joining the Free Officers Movement

In the aftermath of Egypt's humiliating defeat in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, where inadequate preparation, corruption, and political interference under King Farouk contributed to heavy losses—including Naguib's own wounding in combat—widespread discontent spread among army officers. This failure highlighted systemic failures in leadership and logistics, fueling grievances against the monarchy's profligacy and favoritism toward unqualified officers. Gamal Abdel Nasser, a mid-level who had founded the clandestine Free Officers Movement in the late among junior officers, approached Naguib for recruitment in 1949, recognizing his status as a decorated veteran and respected senior figure capable of providing legitimacy to the group. Naguib, then a , accepted the invitation, becoming the oldest and highest-ranking member, which elevated the movement's internal stature and potential for broader army support without alerting authorities. The Free Officers' early objectives centered on purging governmental and military corruption, curbing British colonial influence—particularly the 1936 treaty allowing British troops in the Zone—and restoring professional standards to the armed forces, rather than pursuing outright or sweeping social upheaval at the outset. Naguib's involvement bridged the gap between the movement's youthful radicals and more established military networks, positioning him as a moderating influence focused on disciplined reform.

Ideological Positions and Motivations

Naguib initially advocated for reforming Egypt's into a genuine constitutional system rather than outright abolition, viewing the king's corruption and interference as the primary ailments amenable to correction through restored parliamentary oversight and civilian rule. This stance positioned him as a moderate within the Free Officers Movement, where more radical elements pushed for total regime overthrow without immediate democratic restoration; he evolved toward supporting a only insofar as it facilitated a prompt handover to elected civilians, emphasizing the military's temporary role in purging inefficiencies. His ideology emphasized , aligning with the movement's purge of leftist influences in the armed forces and subsequent arrests of communist sympathizers during the early revolutionary period, which he endorsed as necessary to safeguard national from ideological . Naguib rejected socialism's expansive state control, favoring instead moderated Islamic principles to guide governance—rooted in his personal and opposition to atheistic doctrines—over pan-Arab secular experiments that risked overreach and internal division. At core, Naguib's motivations stemmed from pragmatic , prioritizing a professionalized rebuilt after the defeats, adherence to rule-of-law principles exemplified by his objections to the Command Council's arbitrary trials of politicians, and aversion to personality-driven rule in favor of institutional stability. These views contrasted sharply with radicals' preference for prolonged stewardship and transformative ideologies, reflecting his commitment to correcting systemic failures like monarchical excess and foreign influence through measured, principle-based reform rather than indefinite authoritarian consolidation.

The 1952 Egyptian Revolution

Planning and Key Events

The Free Officers Movement coalesced into a clandestine network of military cells following Egypt's defeat in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, fueled by widespread discontent among junior officers over the monarchy's corruption, military unpreparedness, and perceived betrayal of Arab forces. By 1949, nine officers formalized the group's structure as the Committee of the Free Officers' Movement, electing as chairman in 1950, while expanding recruitment among mid-level ranks disillusioned with King Farouk's regime. Major General Mohamed Naguib, a veteran of the 1948 war and critic of royal influence in the , secretly joined the movement in 1949, valued for his seniority, public stature, and lack of direct ties to radical factions that might alarm the establishment. In early 1952, the Free Officers backed Naguib's successful bid for presidency of the Egyptian Officers' Club against a favored by , solidifying his role as a symbolic elder leader to lend legitimacy to their operations. Preparations intensified amid events like the January 1952 riots, prompting the group to advance coup plans originally slated for later, targeting a swift seizure of power in to exploit political instability without broad civilian unrest. Although the Free Officers maintained peripheral contacts with Islamist groups like the —sharing anti-monarchical sentiments—Naguib harbored reservations about their ideological extremism and potential for vigilante actions, preferring a disciplined military-led transition over alliances that could invite chaos. On July 22, 1952, the plotters finalized coordination, assigning units to secure strategic assets; that night into July 23, Naguib directed the operation as forces quietly occupied key military installations in and surrounding areas, encountering negligible resistance due to precise timing and insider intelligence. The action involved approximately 300 officers and limited tank deployments, emphasizing bloodless efficiency to rally broader support and avert .

Overthrow of the Monarchy

The Free Officers Movement, led publicly by Mohamed Naguib, initiated the coup on the night of July 22–23, 1952, by securing control of key military installations in with approximately 300 officers from the Army and Air Force, executing a bloodless takeover of the armed forces. Naguib, as the senior officer, directed the arrests of high-ranking military and government officials implicated in , while avoiding direct confrontation with royal forces to minimize violence. Following the initial seizures, Naguib presented demands to King Farouk on , including the appointment of Ali Maher Pasha as , immediate parliamentary elections, and the abolition of , aiming to reform rather than immediately depose the . On , with Ras el-Tin Palace surrounded by revolutionary troops, Ali Maher delivered a final to Farouk, requiring his and departure from by 6:00 p.m. that evening. Farouk complied, signing a decree abdicating the throne in favor of his six-month-old son, Ahmad Fuad II, and appointing a three-member to govern during the infancy. Naguib personally oversaw the orderly exit, escorting the former king aboard the royal yacht Mahroussa for exile to , ensuring the transition occurred without significant casualties or resistance, marking a swift pivot from monarchical to military-dominated rule. The coup's success in rapid power transfer, with negligible bloodshed, underscored Naguib's strategic emphasis on over force.

Establishment of the Revolutionary Command Council

Following the successful military coup on July 23, 1952, the Free Officers Movement established the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) as the interim governing authority to administer pending a transition to civilian rule. The RCC comprised approximately nine to eleven senior military officers from the coup's core group, including figures such as as a key deputy influence. Mohamed Naguib was appointed chairman immediately after the seizure of power, serving as the public face of the council while real decision-making occurred collectively among the younger officers. The RCC's initial actions emphasized purging from the and political , targeting elements perceived as inefficient or self-serving from the prior . This included investigations into high-ranking officers and officials implicated in graft, aligning with the coup's stated aim to eliminate "thieves and traitors" within the armed forces. The council critiqued major parties like the Wafd for entrenched and favoritism, pressuring them to self-reform through internal purge committees, though such efforts ultimately failed to satisfy the officers' demands for systemic overhaul. In its early phase, the RCC positioned itself as a temporary body, publicly committing to expedite elections and restore parliamentary after stabilizing the country and drafting a new . These assurances distinguished the council's founding rhetoric from the prolonged military governance that ensued, reflecting an initial intent to avoid permanent authoritarian control amid widespread public support for the coup's mandate. Power dynamics within the RCC favored the activist Free Officers over Naguib's more ceremonial role, setting the stage for internal tensions.

Period of Leadership

Role as Head of the RCC

Following the success of the July 23, 1952 revolution, Mohamed Naguib was appointed chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC), the provisional governing body composed of Free Officers that held supreme authority in . As head, Naguib centralized decision-making to restore order amid post-revolutionary uncertainty, focusing on stabilization efforts from late 1952 through mid-1953. His approach emphasized moderation, advocating for greater transparency in RCC operations and a swift handover to civilian governance rather than prolonged military rule. Naguib's handling of domestic unrest exemplified this balanced leadership style. In response to riots, such as those involving textile workers in in August 1952, the RCC under his direction initiated military trials for participants accused of , yet Naguib publicly indicated the army was considering for political prisoners to avoid excessive repression. This measured response aimed to maintain public order without alienating the populace, reflecting his preference for restraint over harsh crackdowns during the transitional phase. Tensions within the RCC began to surface by early over the pace of transitioning to civilian rule. Naguib, aligned with moderates like Mohi el-Din, pressed for expedited elections and a return to constitutional life, viewing prolonged dominance as contrary to the revolution's nationalist goals. This stance clashed with more members who prioritized consolidating power, foreshadowing deeper rifts but underscoring Naguib's commitment to limiting the RCC's interim role.

Key Reforms and Policies

The Revolutionary Command Council (RCC), chaired by Mohamed Naguib from July 1952, enacted agrarian reform via Law No. 178 on September 11, 1952, limiting individual land ownership to 200 feddans (roughly 84 hectares or 208 acres) and requiring the state to expropriate and redistribute surplus holdings to tenant farmers and landless laborers at low-interest loans. This targeted Egypt's concentrated , where a small controlled over 80% of , aiming to curb rural inequality by enabling small-scale cultivation; initial redistribution affected approximately 12% of cultivable land, benefiting tens of thousands of families through state-managed allocations. However, the policy's rapid implementation strained administrative capacity, triggered legal challenges over compensation (set at seven times annual rental value), and fragmented efficient large estates into less productive plots, contributing to short-term agricultural output stagnation amid inadequate support for new owners' or credit access. Complementing land measures, the RCC launched drives immediately post-coup, forming committees to audit bureaucracy, military ranks, and royal-era officials, leading to dismissals, asset seizures, and public trials of figures implicated in and favoritism under King Farouk. Naguib personally advocated these s, issuing decrees for bureaucratic overhaul and prosecuting high-profile cases, such as those involving court cronies, which dismantled patronage networks but also entrenched military oversight in civilian administration, fostering favoritism toward Free Officers loyalists over merit-based appointments. These efforts enhanced regime legitimacy by addressing public grievances over pre-revolution graft—evident in scandals like black-market dealings during the 1948 war—but risked selective enforcement, as investigations spared RCC insiders and prioritized political consolidation over systemic judicial independence. RCC policies under Naguib adopted a nationalist framework respectful of Islamic norms without mandating , dissolving (many tainted by secular or corrupt associations) while upholding personal freedoms and avoiding Nasser's later aggressive laïcité; Naguib, a devout Muslim, emphasized moral drawing from but prioritized secular institutions for state functions, such as rural development ministries focused on pragmatic equity over doctrinal impositions. This balanced approach mitigated Islamist backlash initially but sowed tensions with ultraconservative elements, as reforms like land redistribution implicitly challenged endowments tied to religious hierarchies, though outright seizures were limited to promote stability. Overall, these domestic initiatives reduced feudal disparities—evidenced by rising rural and tenancy —but exacerbated economic inefficiencies through overreliance on military-led execution, delaying broader industrialization and perpetuating centralized control that hindered long-term gains.

Abolition of the Monarchy and Republic Declaration

On 18 June 1953, the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) proclaimed the establishment of the Republic of Egypt, formally abolishing the and terminating the , which had ruled since 1805. This declaration, issued in , canceled all royal titles and ended any lingering regency arrangements following King Farouk's in July 1952 in favor of his infant son, Ahmad Fuad II. Mohamed Naguib, as leader of the RCC, signed the document, positioning himself as the Republic's first President while continuing to serve as . The proclamation suspended the existing constitutional framework, including the 1923 Constitution—which Naguib had already formally suspended on 10 December 1952 to facilitate a transitional —and replaced it with an interim constitution granting broad authority to the RCC during the shift to republican rule. It outlined a temporary period leading to a popular vote on the Republic's form and the election of a permanent president, though the RCC retained control over in the interim. Naguib's earlier endorsement of a republican charter on 10 February 1953 had further centralized powers in the RCC, setting the stage for this formal republican transition. The abolition was justified by the monarchy's documented failures, including systemic , collaboration with British colonial interests, and incompetence in military affairs—most notably the humiliating defeats suffered by Egyptian forces in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, which exposed leadership deficiencies under Farouk's regime. These empirical shortcomings had eroded public trust, fueling the 1952 revolution's momentum toward ending hereditary rule. Naguib emphasized a bloodless, orderly shift, seeking to integrate rather than remnants of the old order, which contributed to initial broad acceptance. Public response was markedly positive, with large crowds in greeting Naguib enthusiastically shortly after the announcement, indicative of widespread disillusionment with monarchical governance. Yet, the vesting of extensive powers in Naguib and the RCC hinted at nascent authoritarian tendencies, as the interim structure deferred democratic processes indefinitely pending further reforms.

Presidency and Power Struggles

Inauguration and Initial Governance

On June 18, 1953, Egypt was declared a republic following the abolition of the monarchy, with Mohamed Naguib appointed as its first president. This marked the formal transition from the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) structure to a republican government, where Naguib served as head of state while retaining significant executive authority derived from the RCC's provisional powers. The inauguration emphasized continuity with the revolutionary goals of purging corruption and establishing national sovereignty, though governance remained centralized under military influence. Naguib's initial cabinet, formed in the post-republican phase, incorporated both Free Officers and civilian experts to signal broader representation beyond the military cadre. Figures such as Sulayman Hafez served as deputy prime minister, alongside military appointees like Gamal Abdel Nasser, reflecting an attempt to balance revolutionary oversight with administrative expertise. In February 1954, amid internal RCC tensions, Naguib briefly assumed the dual roles of president and prime minister following his temporary resignation and reinstatement, consolidating authority before transitioning the premiership. Early governance focused on implementing agrarian reforms initiated post-revolution, with distributions of confiscated land to peasants accelerating in 1953 under the 1952 limiting holdings to 200 acres per owner. For instance, in July 1953, Naguib personally oversaw the transfer of 700 acres from royal properties to 194 peasant families, aiming to redistribute approximately 1.2 million acres overall. These measures sought to address rural inequality but faced implementation challenges tied to compensation and productivity. Naguib pledged restoration of press freedoms as part of democratic overtures, lifting some imposed under the . However, selective curtailments targeted outlets perceived as threats, such as those linked to communists or monarchists, prioritizing regime stability over unrestricted expression. Economic indicators showed relative GDP stability in the immediate post-republican period, though rising expenditures amid regional tensions contributed to inflationary pressures on consumer goods.

Domestic Initiatives and Challenges

During his tenure as head of the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) and later president from 1952 to 1954, Mohamed Naguib oversaw initial domestic reforms aimed at addressing longstanding inequalities in land ownership and social access. In September 1952, the Naguib cabinet approved the Agrarian Reform Law, which imposed a of 200 feddans (approximately 210 acres) on individual landholdings, confiscating excess properties—particularly from the royal family and large estates—for redistribution to landless peasants and smallholders at low-interest rates. This measure, enacted shortly after the , broke up concentrated agricultural holdings that had dominated 's economy under the , enabling over 100,000 peasant families to receive plots by early 1954 and fostering short-term improvements in rural equity and . Complementary efforts included modest expansions in and military , such as increased funding for public schooling to boost rates among the fellahin and recruitment drives to professionalize the armed forces beyond their revolutionary role. These initiatives, however, encountered significant implementation challenges rooted in administrative inefficiencies and ideological frictions. The reform's redistribution process was hampered by bureaucratic delays, inadequate for new owners, and disruptions to mechanized farming on former large , which reduced overall in the initial years and foreshadowed longer-term stagnation from fragmented holdings. Critics, including some within the RCC, argued that the reforms lacked sufficient technical support for smallholders, leading to underutilized lands and dependency on state subsidies rather than sustainable yields. Economically, early statist interventions, such as and of select industries, aimed to curb but created bottlenecks by discouraging private investment and exacerbating shortages in urban goods. A major domestic challenge stemmed from Naguib's handling of , particularly tensions with the , which had initially supported the revolution against the . Naguib resisted full suppression of the Brotherhood, advocating for their reintegration into a multi-party framework and lifting restrictions on them in mid-1953, which clashed with secular elements in the Free Officers who viewed the group as a threat to centralized authority. This stance heightened internal divisions, as the Brotherhood's demands for influence in governance—amid their activities—fueled instability, including attempts and protests that undermined reform momentum. While Naguib's approach promoted pluralism over outright , it exposed the fragility of post-revolutionary consensus, balancing immediate social gains against risks of factional deadlock.

Clashes with Nasser and the Free Officers

Tensions between Mohamed Naguib and intensified in early 1954 over fundamental differences in governing post-revolution. Naguib advocated for a swift transition to multi-party democracy, including constitutional elections and a return to civilian rule by mid-1954, viewing the Free Officers' role as temporary. In contrast, Nasser and his faction in the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) sought to consolidate military authority, favoring a guided system under their control to prevent a return to perceived monarchical corruption or multiparty chaos. These ideological clashes reflected Naguib's moderation—rooted in his military career and skepticism of prolonged junta rule—against Nasser's vision of revolutionary permanence, with Naguib warning that extended military governance risked . The crisis erupted on February 25, , when the RCC announced Naguib's resignation as amid accusations of his dictatorial tendencies, installing Nasser as premier and briefly lifting the ban on to test public reaction. This maneuver sparked massive street protests across and other cities, with demonstrators—backed by some army units loyal to Naguib—demanding his full reinstatement and democratic elections, leading to clashes that resulted in at least 14 deaths. Naguib's supporters viewed the ouster as a Free Officers' power grab, while Nasser's group countered by portraying Naguib's popularity as manipulated by "imperialist" influences or reactionary forces, arresting thousands of protesters to suppress dissent. By March 1, public pressure forced Naguib's reinstatement as president, but Nasser retained the premiership and real power, dissolving the National Liberation Rally and maneuvering to sideline Naguib further. Accusations escalated as Nasser linked Naguib to the , claiming covert ties that undermined the revolution, despite evidence pointing to Naguib's independent moderation and opposition to Islamist overreach. This pretext allowed Nasser to frame Naguib's democratic push as subversive, culminating in the Free Officers' dominance during the March Crisis, though Naguib's resilience highlighted the regime's fragility.

Ousting and Immediate Consequences

Tensions between Mohamed Naguib and escalated in early 1954 over the direction of the revolution, with Naguib advocating for a return to parliamentary and elections, while Nasser and the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) sought to consolidate military control and suppress . On February 25, 1954, the RCC announced Naguib's forced resignation as president and commander-in-chief, citing his demands for absolute authority as unacceptable, and placed him under ; Nasser immediately assumed the role of . This ouster marked a pivotal within the Free Officers Movement, as Nasser, who had initially elevated Naguib as a leader, now sidelined him to prevent any dilution of RCC dominance. Public outrage erupted immediately, with widespread protests in and other cities demanding Naguib's reinstatement, leading to violent clashes that resulted in deaths and injuries; the unrest underscored Naguib's enduring popularity as the revolution's public face. In response to the chaos, the RCC briefly reinstated Naguib as president on March 5, 1954, but stripped him of real power, retaining Nasser's premiership and military command. This temporary reversal failed to quell underlying conflicts, prompting the RCC to dissolve definitively and initiate military trials against Naguib's allies accused of , including officers and civilians linked to pro-democracy agitation. The immediate aftermath solidified Nasser's grip, shifting Egypt from Naguib's envisioned transition to civilian rule toward unchecked RCC , as evidenced by the suppression of and centralization of power that precluded multiparty elections. Over 1,000 demonstrators were arrested during the unrest, and the trials of Naguib supporters, such as those involving alleged plots against the RCC, reinforced military loyalty to Nasser. This causal pivot entrenched authoritarian governance, abandoning the revolution's initial democratic rhetoric in favor of a framework under military oversight.

Post-Presidency Life

House Arrest and Isolation

Following his removal from power on , , amid allegations of his vague implication in an assassination attempt against , Mohamed Naguib was subjected to indefinite without formal charges or trial by the Revolutionary Command Council. This de facto punitive measure, enacted by Nasser's faction to neutralize a perceived rival, confined Naguib primarily to a in a suburb, severing his access to political influence and public engagement. The arrangement exemplified the Nasser regime's pattern of suppressing internal dissent through extralegal isolation rather than judicial process, prioritizing regime consolidation over . The conditions of confinement imposed severe restrictions, including monitored communications and prohibition from media or public appearances, effectively erasing Naguib from Egypt's political discourse for over 16 years until Nasser's death in 1970. Family access was limited and supervised, contributing to psychological strain and physical deterioration, as Naguib's health—already compromised by age and prior —declined amid inadequate medical oversight and the monotony of . Despite these constraints, Naguib maintained some private routines, such as tending a and raising animals, activities documented in his later reflections as coping mechanisms during enforced idleness. This prolonged isolation underscored the Nasser government's reliance on opaque authoritarian controls to maintain power, with Naguib's status as a founding figure offering no protection against systematic marginalization. Empirical accounts confirm no opportunities for rehabilitation or public rehabilitation were extended, reflecting a causal of over merit in post-revolutionary Egypt's power structure.

Release and Final Years

Following his release from in 1971 by President , Mohamed Naguib retreated to a subdued existence in , eschewing political engagement amid the regime's consolidation under Sadat's . Naguib maintained , supporting Sadat's from afar without seeking influence or public roles, a stance reflective of his disillusionment with post-revolutionary power dynamics. In 1984, shortly before his death, he published Egypt's Destiny: A Personal Statement, a detailing his experiences and critiquing the Free Officers' shift from revolutionary ideals toward authoritarian control, including his own ousting and the suppression of dissent.

Writings and Reflections

Naguib authored his primary literary work, the Kuntu Ra'isan li-l-Jumhuriya (I Was President of the Republic), published in Arabic and reflecting on his experiences during and after the 1952 Egyptian revolution. In this account, composed after his release from in the mid-1970s, Naguib portrayed himself as a reluctant revolutionary leader committed to restoring constitutional rather than establishing permanent military rule. He detailed early intentions to transition power to elected civilians within months of the monarchy's overthrow, arguing that prolonged involvement risked . Naguib's reflections critiqued the Free Officers Movement's shift under , recounting specific disputes such as his advocacy for returning the military to barracks post-revolution to enable civilian governance, which clashed with Nasser's consolidation of power. He described the 1954 power struggle as a betrayal of revolutionary ideals, emphasizing his opposition to suppressing and in favor of one-party dominance. Personal anecdotes underscored the regime's erasure of his contributions, including an incident where one of his sons returned from school distraught upon discovering Naguib's name absent from official lists of Egyptian presidents. Earlier, during his presidency, Naguib published Egypt's Destiny: A Personal Statement in 1955, outlining his vision for national independence, , and measures while still in power. Post-ouster writings remained limited due to , but his served as a defiant record against historical revisionism, prioritizing factual narration over ideological alignment with Nasser's narrative. Naguib's prose maintained a military officer's directness, focusing on causal sequences of events—such as the monarchy's failures in the Arab-Israeli War that fueled the coup—without embellishment.

Personal Aspects

Family and Relationships

Muhammad Naguib was born to Youssef Naguib, an Egyptian government official, and Zohra Ahmed Othman, a Sudanese woman, embodying a mixed Egyptian-Sudanese heritage that traced to his mother's Shaigiya tribal origins. This background occasionally surfaced in political but did not alter his identification as an Egyptian military leader. Naguib married Labib in August 1934, with whom he fathered three sons—Farouk, , and —and a daughter, Samiha, the latter dying in at age 16. He later wed following Aisha's death in 1971, though no additional children are recorded from the second union. His sons maintained low public profiles, with no prominent political or military roles documented in historical accounts. Naguib's ouster in November 1954 and ensuing until the early 1970s imposed isolation on his household, confining family life to limited quarters and restricting interactions amid the regime's purges of his supporters. Within the Free Officers cadre, Naguib functioned as the venerated senior officer, recruited by in 1949 to front the movement due to his , yet this elder status clashed with the assertive ambitions of younger colleagues who prioritized ideological consolidation over his moderating influence.

Health and Character Traits

Naguib was wounded during the 1948 War, suffering multiple injuries while leading forces in combat, for which he received the Star of King Fuad I and the title of . As a career officer, Naguib exhibited strict discipline shaped by his training at the and service in and . His personal character reflected religious piety, demonstrated by his secret affiliation with the prior to the 1952 . Critics within the Free Officers movement, including Nasser loyalists, portrayed Naguib as indecisive in navigating factional rivalries, attributing his reluctance to consolidate power ruthlessly to a preference for constitutional processes over authoritarian control.

Death and Burial

Mohamed Naguib died on 28 August 1984 in Cairo, Egypt, at the age of 83, after suffering from liver cirrhosis. He had been admitted to Maadi Military Hospital, where he entered a coma prior to his death. Naguib received a the following day, with his body transported to the Martyrs Cemetery (also known as the Tombs of the Martyrs of the Armed Forces) on Cairo's eastern outskirts for burial. The ceremony included full military honors and was attended by President .

Historical Legacy

Achievements and Positive Assessments

As chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) following the , 1952 coup, Mohamed Naguib symbolized the initial thrust of the Free Officers Movement, which targeted the perceived graft in the monarchy and military establishment. The coup purged corrupt elements from the armed forces and prosecuted politicians for , restoring public trust in governance structures tainted by King Farouk's regime. Naguib advocated for and oversaw the enactment of Egypt's first agrarian reform law on September 11, 1952 (Law 178), which capped individual landholdings at 200 feddans and redistributed excess acreage to tenants, agricultural laborers, and landless peasants, thereby diminishing the economic dominance of large landowners who controlled over 34% of pre-reform. This measure initiated a process that benefited smallholders by providing access to redistributed plots on favorable terms, fostering rural stability and reducing feudal inequalities in the initial phase of revolutionary reforms. His leadership post-1948 Arab-Israeli War defeat elevated military morale by leveraging his battlefield heroism—where he sustained wounds and earned decorations—to rally officers disillusioned by royal incompetence, positioning the army as a national redeemer rather than a defeated force. Naguib's prominence helped unify the Free Officers and prevented radical excesses in the revolution's early stages through a moderate approach emphasizing legal over vengeance. Historians and democratic advocates have praised Naguib's expressed intention to relinquish power to a civilian government promptly, viewing it as a commitment to transitional rule rather than perpetual military dominance, which aligned with the revolution's nominal goal of restoring popular sovereignty.

Criticisms and Failures

Naguib's leadership has been criticized for his perceived naivety in placing undue trust in the Free Officers Movement, particularly Gamal Abdel Nasser, which facilitated the entrenchment of military rule rather than a swift transition to civilian governance. As the nominal leader of the 1952 coup, Naguib initially commanded broad public respect due to his military record and calls for constitutional restoration, yet he failed to heed internal divisions or consolidate authority against the younger officers' ambitions, allowing Nasser to sideline him by February 1954. This oversight contributed causally to the revolution's evolution into a one-man dictatorship under Nasser, as Naguib's reluctance to purge rivals or institutionalize checks enabled the Revolutionary Command Council's dominance. His handling of the exemplified inconsistency, initially courting their support for the revolution while later facing accusations of undue sympathy amid tensions. Naguib released Brotherhood leaders imprisoned under the monarchy and tolerated their influence in early governance, viewing them as allies against royalist elements, but this leniency drew criticism for emboldening Islamist elements without decisive curbs. Nasser's faction later cited Naguib's alleged Brotherhood ties as a for his ouster following the 1954 assassination attempt on Nasser, highlighting how Naguib's wavering approach sowed discord without neutralizing the group's potential threat to secular military control. Economic initiatives under Naguib, including the September 1952 agrarian reform law limiting landholdings to 200 feddans per owner and redistributing excess to tenants, marked an early shift toward state interventionism that laid groundwork for subsequent statist policies. While aimed at addressing inequality, these measures centralized land redistribution through government committees and foreshadowed Nasser's expansive nationalizations, fostering dependency on bureaucratic oversight rather than market-driven reforms. Critics argue this overlooked the inefficiencies of coercive redistribution, contributing to long-term agricultural stagnation and the expansion of state economic control. From leftist perspectives, such as those of Egyptian communists aligned with the Free Officers, Naguib's advocacy for parliamentary elections by 1953 was derided as reactionary, preserving bourgeois elements and stalling socialist transformation in favor of a return to pre-coup politics. Conversely, conservative and anti-Islamist viewpoints faulted him for insufficient opposition to Brotherhood influence, perceiving his accommodations as a failure to prioritize secular over religious . These critiques underscore Naguib's transitional role as one marred by strategic missteps that prioritized personal integrity over pragmatic power consolidation.

Comparisons with Nasser and Counterfactual Debates


Mohamed Naguib envisioned a post-revolutionary transitioning to civilian governance with democratic elements, as evidenced by his March 1954 pledge to establish a civilian assembly endowed with full legislative powers, reflecting his push to limit involvement in politics and return power to elected bodies. In opposition, resisted such reforms, viewing them as diluting the Free Officers' revolutionary mandate; he orchestrated Naguib's ouster in a February-April 1954 power struggle, prioritizing consolidation over civilian handover. This divergence highlighted Naguib's preference for constitutional constraints on authority versus Nasser's trajectory toward authoritarian centralization, including the 1953 ban on and the imposition of one-party rule via the Liberation Rally.
Ideologically, Naguib leaned toward and pragmatic stability, advocating military withdrawal to barracks and avoidance of radical social engineering, while Nasser pursued , pan-Arab unification, and state-led industrialization, which entrenched a coercive apparatus suppressing , including mass arrests of members in . Nasser's policies fostered a and militarized society, contrasting Naguib's restrained leadership style, which sought broader political participation but was curtailed by internal RCC dynamics. These paths diverged sharply after , with Nasser's regime prioritizing ideological mobilization over institutional pluralism. Counterfactual debates among historians center on whether Naguib's prolonged leadership might have averted Egypt's descent into prolonged authoritarianism and one-party dominance. Scholars argue that Naguib's democratic inclinations could have facilitated multi-party elections and rule, potentially mitigating the overextension in foreign adventures and economic inefficiencies that culminated in the humiliating defeat of June 5-10, 1967, during the , where Egyptian forces lost control of the and to . Joel Gordon, in analyzing the Free Officers' era, notes the widespread March 1954 protests following Naguib's initial dismissal demanded a return to hands, indicating suppressed public support for his moderation that Nasser quashed, suggesting a viable alternate foreclosed by the coup. Nasserist narratives, dominant in official Egyptian historiography, depict Naguib as indecisive and a potential obstacle to revolutionary progress, justifying his removal as necessary for national unity. Conversely, liberal analysts portray Naguib's ouster as a pivotal "what if" moment, positing that his retention might have fostered institutional checks, avoiding the authoritarian ossification and 1967 debacle that discredited Nasser's adventurism. These interpretations reflect ongoing tensions between viewing the 1952 revolution as a democratizing thwarted by Nasser or as inherently geared toward his statist model.

Modern Reappraisals and Controversies

In the decades following Naguib's death on August 28, 1984, his historical role received partial rehabilitation during Hosni Mubarak's presidency (1981–2011), exemplified by a with full military honors that contrasted with his earlier marginalization under Nasserist . This gesture acknowledged Naguib's foundational contributions to the 1952 revolution, yet it coexisted with the enduring Nasser cult, which emphasized Nasser's pan-Arab vision and economic reforms while downplaying Naguib's emphasis on rapid civilian transition and constitutional governance. Under Abdel Fattah el-Sisi's rule since 2014, official narratives have reinforced military stewardship of the state, indirectly complicating full reappraisal of Naguib as a figure who advocated limiting armed forces' political dominance, though selective commemorations persist amid suppression of broader revolutionary critiques. Persistent controversies surround allegations of Naguib's sympathies toward the , initially leveled by Nasser in 1953 to justify his ouster and the group's subsequent crackdown after a failed attempt on Nasser in October 1954. Historians argue these claims served as pretexts for consolidating power rather than reflecting Naguib's actions, noting his prior bans on —including the Brotherhood—and conflicts with Islamist elements over secular republican foundations, with no substantive evidence of organizational affiliation. The 1952 revolution's authoritarian trajectory, initiated under Naguib's brief leadership but accelerated by Nasser, draws modern scrutiny for entrenching military rule and one-party dominance, diverging from Naguib's stated intent for multiparty elections by mid-1954. In the 2010s and 2020s, amid Arab Spring reflections, Naguib has emerged in dissident and academic discourse as a cautionary symbol against military overreach, invoked for his resistance to perpetuating revolutionary councils and push for parliamentary handover—parallels drawn to post-2011 debates on Supreme Council of the Armed Forces' interim role. This reappraisal contrasts with state-sponsored histories that prioritize Nasser's legacy of nationalization and anti-imperialism, sustaining a narrative where Naguib is relegated to a transitional interlude rather than a potential pivot toward liberal constitutionalism.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.