Hubbry Logo
Islamic ethicsIslamic ethicsMain
Open search
Islamic ethics
Community hub
Islamic ethics
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Islamic ethics
Islamic ethics
from Wikipedia

Islamic ethics (Arabic: أخلاق إسلامية) is the "philosophical reflection upon moral conduct" with a view to defining "good character" and attaining the "pleasure of God" (raza-e Ilahi).[1][2] It is distinguished from "Islamic morality", which pertains to "specific norms or codes of behavior".[1]

It took shape as a field of study or an "Islamic science" (ʿIlm al-Akhlaq), gradually from the 7th century and was finally established by the 11th century.[3] Although it was considered less important than sharia and fiqh "in the eyes of the ulama" (Islamic scholars) "moral philosophy" was an important subject for Muslim intellectuals.[4] Many scholars consider it shaped as a successful amalgamation of the Qur'anic teachings, the teachings of Muhammad, the precedents of Islamic jurists (see Sharia and Fiqh), the pre-Islamic Arabian tradition, and non-Arabic elements (including Persian and Greek ideas) embedded in or integrated with a generally Islamic structure.[3] Although Muhammad's preaching produced a "radical change in moral values based on the sanctions of the new religion ... and fear of God and of the Last Judgment"; the tribal practice of Arabs did not completely die out. Later Muslim scholars expanded the religious ethic of the Qur'an and Hadith in immense detail.[3]

Terminology

[edit]

A number of related terms refer to the right way to behave in Islam: Akhlaq, Adab, Ihsan.

Akhlaq

[edit]

Akhlaq (Arabic: أخلاق, /æxˈlɑːk/, plural of (Arabic: خلق khulq which means disposition), is the practice of virtue, morality and manners in Islamic theology and falsafah (philosophy). Akhlaq is the most commonly used Islamic term for morality.[5]

The science of ethics (`Ilm al-Akhlaq) teaches that through practice and conscious effort man can surpass their natural dispositions and natural uncorrupted state (Fitrah) to become more ethical and well mannered. Akhlaq is a kind of normative ethical system known as "virtue ethics", which is based on "virtues, or moral character", rather than "conceptions of the right (as in Kantian ethics) or the good (as in utilitarianism)".[6]

Akhlaq is not found in the Quran, but its root – kh-l-q – is shared by khaliq (Creator) and makhluq (creature), which are found throughout the Quran. It is most commonly translated in English-Arabic dictionaries as: disposition, nature, temper, ethics, morals or manners or in general a person who has good manners, and behaves well.[7][8]: 470 

Adab

[edit]

Adab (Arabic: أدب) in the context of behavior, refers to prescribed Islamic etiquette: "refinement, good manners, morals, decorum, decency, humaneness" (according to the book Religion and Law).[9] While interpretation of the scope and particulars of Adab may vary among different cultures, common among these interpretations is regard for personal standing through the observation of certain codes of behavior.[10] To exhibit Adab would be to show "proper discrimination of correct order, behavior, and taste."[10]

A description of the difference between Akhlaq and Adab is:

  • Aklaq is ethics, the 'moral philosophy'; Ethics/ morality. Islamic behaviour, disposition, good conduct, nature, temper, ethics, morals or character of a person.
  • Adab is "the actual practices of moral philosophy"; Manner, attitude, behaviour and the etiquette of putting things in their proper place[11] "a culture of refined behavior [that] shaped the ethical outlook of urban Muslims" There were writings setting forth "the virtues for different classes and groups to honor, including the ulama, rulers, bureaucrats, merchants and craftsmen".[4]

Furthermore, according to one source (Abdulmajeed Hassan Bello), sharia (usually defined as Islamic law) is not just concerned with concerned "with legal rules and regulations indicating "what man is entitled or bound to do, ... but also what he ought, in conscience, to do or refrain from doing. Thus, shari’ah ... embraces both private and public activities."[citation needed]

Ihsan

[edit]

Iḥsān (also Ihsaan, Arabic: إحسان), is an Arabic term meaning "beautification", "perfection" or "excellence", but is also defined in Islam (by Malcolm Clark) as ethics/morality "literally virtue, including right living", and (according to Ruqaiyyah Waris Maqsood) is a matter of taking one's inner faith and showing it in both deed and action.[12]

Other terms

[edit]

Other terms found in the Quran that "denote the concept of moral or religious goodness"[13] are:

  • al-khayr (goodness),[13]
  • al-birr (righteousness),[13]
  • al-qisr,[13]
  • al-iqsat (equity),[13]
  • al-adl (justice),[13]
  • al-haqq (truth and right),[13]
  • al-ma’ruf (known and approved),[13] and
  • al-taqwa (piety).[13]
  • "Pious actions" are "normally referred to" as salihat; "impious or sinful actions" as sayyi’at.[14]

Ethics v. morality

[edit]

Juan E. Campo describes the difference between Akhlaq/ethics and morality in Islam as :

Ethics means philosophical reflection upon moral conduct, while morality pertains to specific norms or codes of behavior. Questions of ethics, therefore, involve such subjects as human nature and the capacity to do good, the nature of good and evil, motivations for moral action, the underlying principles governing moral and immoral acts, deciding who is obliged to adhere to the moral code and who is exempted from it, and the implications of either adhering to the moral code or violating it. Morality encompasses the values and rules that govern human conduct ...[1]

Scriptural sources

[edit]

Quran

[edit]

The Quran, which Muslims believe to be the verbatim word of God, serves as the primary source of moral teachings in Islam.[15] Verse 2:177 declares:

  • "Righteousness is not in turning your faces towards the east or the west. Rather, the righteous are those who believe in Allah, the Last Day, the angels, the Books, and the prophets; who give charity out of their cherished wealth to relatives, orphans, the poor, ˹needy˺ travellers, beggars, and for freeing captives; who establish prayer, pay alms-tax, and keep the pledges they make; and who are patient in times of suffering, adversity, and in ˹the heat of˺ battle. It is they who are true ˹in faith˺, and it is they who are mindful ˹of Allah˺."

Another verse states:

  • "Believers are those … who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex except with their wives, or whom their right hands possess. Thus they’re free from blame, but those whose desires exceed those limits are transgressors. Believers faithfully observe their trusts and covenants and keep their prayers. They will be the heirs, who will inherit Paradise, where they will dwell." (Q.23:3–11)[16]

However, the Quran offers "more in the way of general principles"—justice, goodness, kindness, forgiveness, honesty, and piety – "than specific rules".[5]

The Ten Commandments In Quran

[edit]

Quran provides the Ten Commandments which is believed to be as originally revealed to Moses: [17][18][19][20]

151. Say, "Come, I will recite what your Lord has prohibited to you. [He commands] that you not associate anything with Him, and to parents, good treatment, and do not kill your children out of poverty; We will provide for you and them. And do not approach immoralities - what is apparent of them and what is concealed. And do not kill the soul which Allāh has forbidden [to be killed] except by [legal] right. This has He instructed you that you may use reason."

152. And do not approach the orphan's property except in a way that is best [i.e., intending improvement] until he reaches maturity. And give full measure and weight in justice. We do not charge any soul except [with that within] its capacity. And when you speak [i.e., testify], be just, even if [it concerns] a near relative. And the covenant of Allāh fulfill. This has He instructed you that you may remember.

153. And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous.[21]

Evidence for these verses having some relation to Moses and the Ten Commandments is from the verse which immediately follows them:

Then, We gave Musa (Moses) the Book, to complete (Our Favour) upon those who would do right, and explaining all things in detail and a guidance and a mercy that they might believe in the meeting with their Lord.[22]

According to a narration in Mustadrak Hakim, Ibn Abbas, a prominent narrator of Israiliyat traditions said, "In Surah Al-An`am, there are clear Ayat, and they are the Mother of the Book (the Qur'an)." He then recited the above verses.[23]

Also in Mustadrak Hakim is the narration of Ubada ibn as-Samit:

The Messenger of Allah said, "Who among you will give me his pledge to do three things?"

He then recited the (above) Ayah (6:151–153).

He then said, "Whoever fulfills (this pledge), then his reward will be with Allah, but whoever fell into shortcomings and Allah punishes him for it in this life, then that will be his recompense. Whoever Allah delays (his reckoning) until the Hereafter, then his matter is with Allah. If He wills, He will punish him, and if He wills, He will forgive him."[23]

Ibn Kathir mentions a narration of Abdullah ibn Mas'ud in his Tafsir:

"Whoever wishes to read the will and testament of the Messenger of Allah on which he placed his seal, let him read these Ayat (6:151–153)."[24]

Order Commandment in the Quran Surat Al-An'am Surat Al-Isra Corresponding in the Bible
First Commandment Do not associate others with God (151) (22) Do not put other gods before me
Second Commandment Honour your parents (23–24) Honour thy father and thy mother
Third Commandment Do not kill your children for fear of poverty (26–31) Do not murder
Fourth Commandment Do not come near indecencies, openly or secretly. (32) Do not covet thy neighbour's wife, Do not commit adultery
Fifth Commandment Do not take a life except justly (33) Do not murder
Sixth Commandment Do not come near the property of the orphan except to enhance it (152) (34) Do not covet his slaves, or his animals, or anything of thy neighbour
Seventh Commandment Give full measure and weigh with justice (35) Does not exist, instead there is Remember the sabbath day
Eighth Commandment Whenever you testify, maintain justice even regarding a close relative (36) Do not bear false witness against thy neighbour
Ninth Commandment Fulfil your covenant with God (34) Do not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain
Tenth Commandment Follow God's path and not any other (153) (37–39) Do not make unto thee any graven image or idols neither kneel before them nor worship them

Hadith

[edit]

Hadith, which are based on reports of the teachings, deeds and sayings, silent permissions (or disapprovals) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, as well as various reports about Muhammad's companions, also serves as an important source for Islamic moral teachings.[15] Some hadith cited expressing good conduct, deeds, morals in Islam, and the importance of these include:

  • Narrated 'Aishah: the Messenger of Allah said: "Indeed among the believers with the most complete faith is the one who is the best in conduct, and the most kind to his family" (Jamiʽ al-Tirmidhi 2612)[25]
  • "Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that the Messenger of Allah, ... 'I was sent to perfect the ethical conduct'." (Muwatta Malik)[26][27]

A "famous" hadith[28] "Hadith of jibril" describes the angel Jibril (Gabriel) questioning Muhammad about "what is faith?" "what is Islam?" and "What is Ihsan (perfection or virtue)?", where in reply Muhammad lists the "Five Pillars of Islam", the "Six Articles of Faith", and describes Ihsan (which Clark defines as ethics, or "virtue and including right living") thusly:

  • "To worship Allah as if you see Him, and if you cannot achieve this state of devotion then you must consider that He is looking at you."[29][30]

Other sources

[edit]

Besides the Quran and hadith, there are a number of other sources, (not all universally followed in Islam):

  • the works of Islamic scholars and philosophers;[15]
  • Arabic virtues that predate Islam, (such as "honor, courage, loyalty, hospitality, self-control", etc.;[15]
  • the moral examples set by important Islamic personalities (such as the four rightly guided caliphs for Sunni Muslims);[15]
  • works on Adab (i.e. etiquette, manners);[15]
  • "philosophical reflection" by the school of Islam known as the Mu`tazilites and others;
  • "works of Greek ethicists", (which were translated into Arabic);[15]
  • the 99 names of God, which among other qualities/attributes include names based on virtues – "the gentle, the grateful, the just, the giver, the equitable, the loving", etc.;[15]
  • Ethical values from Sufism "including humility and poverty".[15]

Contrast with other faith-based systems

[edit]

One perspective holds that Islamic ethics place less emphasis on original sin and asceticism than Christian ethics, and to a lesser extent, Jewish ethics. Unlike the doctrine of inherent sinfulness found in some Christian traditions, Islam is said to view human beings as born in a state of natural purity, capable of moral choice. Although the Qur’an contains over a hundred references to hell and judgment, it also emphasizes trust in God, gratitude, and life-affirming values such as generosity and moral stamina. Islamic ethical teachings, including the concept of vicegerency (khalifah) and obligatory acts like zakat, are often framed in terms of social responsibility and active moral conduct. This view contrasts with what has been described as the more ascetic or sin-focused tendencies in other Abrahamic traditions.[31][32]

History

[edit]

Some of the most important scholars who contributed to the area of moral philosophy during the Middle Ages were

Also influential were

Moral philosophy as a topic of Muslim scholarly discussion "declined after the 12th century", but underwent a revival in the 19th and 20th centuries.[4]

Codification of Islamic ethics

[edit]

Islamic ethics was codified, based on the Qur'an and practices of Muhammad, over a period of time and in context of the practices of the Muslim community (ummah). The Quran commands every human being, in all spheres of life, to "command the good and forbid evil", as spelled out by Muhammad. Another key factor in the field of Islamic ethics is the belief (as described in the Qur'an) that all mankind has been granted the faculty to discern God's will (fitrah), and thus the moral responsibility to submit to His will by following Islam, regardless of their environment.[33][34]

This natural inclination to obey God, is, according to the Qur'an, in conflict with another human inclination, the desire for material possessions and comforts; first for basic survival or security, then for status in society. Ultimately, this desire results in a state of jahiliyya, "heedlessness", or ignorance of mankind's responsibility to obey God.[34]

The establishment of Islam brought a great transformation in the society, moral order of life, world view, and the hierarchy of values in the Arabian Peninsula.

  1. The division of Arabs into varying tribes (based upon blood and kinship), was confronted by the ideal of a unified community, an "ummah", based upon Islamic piety.
  2. The acceptance of the worship of a multitude of deities besides Allah – a view challenged by strict Islamic monotheism, which dictates that Allah has no partner in worship nor any equal;
  3. The trait of muruwwa (manliness), which Islam discouraged, instead emphasizing on the traits of humility and piety;
  4. The focus on achieving fame or establishing a legacy, which was replaced by the concept that mankind would be called to account before God on the day of resurrection;
  5. The reverence of and compliance with ancestral traditions, was challenged by Islam's assignment of primacy to submitting to God and following revelation.

But although pre-Islamic Arabia exemplified "heedlessness", it was not entirely without merit, and certain aspects—such as the care for one's near kin, for widows, orphans, and others in need and for the establishment of justice—would be retained in Islam, re-ordered in importance and placed in the context of strict monotheism.[34]

Politics and public policy

[edit]

According to Lenn Goodman, many medieval Muslim thinkers pursued humanistic and rational approaches in discourses regarding values.[35] On the other hand, Roderick Hindery finds it difficult to find "humanistic values that have not been later affirmed" by Muslim (and Christian) "theologians and religious ethicians", as they "reexamine and rewrite" their religion's "history to make it coincide with a humanistic history".[36]

Human rights

[edit]

Some scholars and activists have esteemed "the Islamic tradition as the highest manifestation of human right", while others have criticized the concept of "human rights" as a "western colonial invention used to oppress Muslims by making them conform to certain western norms".[37] In 1990, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) issued the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights (CDHR), in reply to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The CDHR is based on traditional sharia law ("shari‘a is mentioned throughout the entire document as the most authoritative source of law"), and guarantees some human rights, while denying some articles from the UDHR "dealing with gender, the family, religious freedom, and importantly, self-determination".[37]

Ash'arism, one of three orthodox theological schools of Sunni Islam generally denies that there are universal moral truths. Ethics are based solely on God's command, which might align with human rights by coincidence, but this is not necessary. Therefore, many conservative Muslims doubt that human rights are beyond cultural ties or universal.[38]

Maturidism, another orthodox theological school of Sunni Islam, however, overshadowed by Ash'arism in the last centuries, yet still prominent in Central Asia, adheres to the belief of objective morality, which can be deducted through reason.[39] Thus, Muslims adhering to Maturidi theology, might possibly agree on human rights.[40]

Religious pluralism

[edit]

While religious minorities were not granted equality with Islam, classical Sharia, allowed the functioning of the religious laws and courts of Christians, Jews and Hindus in lands ruled by Islam. These were usually accommodated within the Islamic legal framework, as seen in the early Caliphate, Al-Andalus, the Indian subcontinent, and the Ottoman Millet system.[41][42] Non-Muslims were allowed to engage in religious practices that were forbidden to Muslims by Islamic law. In a notable example, Zoroastrian practice of incestuous "self-marriage" where a man could marry his mother, sister or daughter, was to be tolerated according to Ibn Qayyim (1292–1350). He based his opinion on the precedent that Muhammad had knowledge of their practices, coming in contact with them, but did not forbid such self-marriages.[43] Religious minorities were also free to do whatever they wished in their own homes, provided they did not publicly engage in illicit sexual activity in ways that could threaten public morals.[44]

Freedom of expression

[edit]

In classical Islamic law, public expression was subject to legal and ethical limits shaped by principles of justice (ʿadl), public interest (maṣlaḥa), and the prevention of harm (darʾ al-mafāsid).[45] Among the most serious offenses that could involve public expression were blasphemy (insulting Islam or its sacred symbols) and apostasy (renouncing the religion after professing it), though jurists differed on definitions and legal procedures. In some historical periods, apostasy laws were applied in ways that did not fully follow the procedures outlined in classical Islamic legal texts. While enforcing religious orthodoxy and protecting public order were recognized roles of Islamic authorities, some applications of these laws were influenced by political motives or lacked proper legal process. This pattern was not unique to Islam and can be found in other major religious traditions as well.[46]

In the medieval Arab Muslim world, literary expression was shaped by a range of informal controls. Zoltan Szombathy notes that there was no formal censorship system in the pre-modern Islamic world like those found in modern states. Instead, expression was shaped by social expectations, courtly manners, and personal discretion. Offensive speech could prompt responses ranging from social disapproval to imprisonment or, in rare cases, execution. These responses were driven more by political and social circumstances than by consistent legal rules. Controversial or irreverent poetry often circulated widely, with authors relying on rhetorical skill and indirect language to avoid backlash. The boundaries of acceptable speech were not fixed, but shaped by the ethical values and power dynamics of the time.[45]

During the Abbasid period, Caliph al-Mahdi (r. 775–785 CE) led a campaign against individuals labeled as Zindiqs—a term applied to Manicheans, dualists, and some freethinkers—which involved arrests, executions, and the commissioning of refutations. such campaigns were more common in the early period of Islamic history, whereas later practice generally tolerated heterodox beliefs so long as they remained private.[47]

On the other hand, Amira Nowaira writes that

Islamic thinkers of the early medieval period expressed ideas and engaged in debates that would appear strangely enlightened in comparison with the attitudes and views adopted by modern Islamic scholarship.[48]

An example being the toleration of medieval physician, philosopher and alchemist Abu Bakr al-Razi (865–925 CE), who argued that the Quran was "illogical and self-contradictory".[48]

Islamic literature also includes charming anecdotes of tolerance towards non-Muslims and others lacking in power. Imad-ad-Dean Ahmad quotes a letter by a cousin of Caliph al-Ma'mun, in which he gives permission to a Christian he was attempting to convert to speak his mind freely, as evidence that in Islam even religious controversies were not exempt from open discussion.[49] In a letter written by the fourth Rashidun Caliph and first cousin of Muhammad, Ali ibn Abi Talib to his governor of Egypt, Malik al-Ashtar. The Caliph advises his governor on dealings with the poor masses thusly:

Out of your hours of work, fix a time for the complainants and for those who want to approach you with their grievances. During this time you should do no other work but hear them and pay attention to their complaints and grievances. For this purpose you must arrange public audience for them during this audience, for the sake of Allah, treat them with kindness, courtesy and respect. Do not let your army and police be in the audience hall at such times so that those who have grievances against your regime may speak to you freely, unreservedly and without fear. Nahjul Balaagha letter 53

Health and medical peer review

[edit]

Because Islam views itself as a total system governing all areas, Islamic medical ethics view the patient as a whole. Classical texts speak more about "health", than "illness", showing an emphasis on prevention rather than cure.[50]

The first documented description of a peer review process is found in the Ethics of the Physician by Ishaq ibn 'Ali al-Ruhawi (854–931) of al-Raha, Syria, where the notes of a practising Islamic physician were reviewed by peers and the physician could face a lawsuit from a maltreated patient if the reviews were negative.[51][52]

Animal welfare

[edit]

Concern for the treatment of animals can be found in the Qur'an and in the teachings of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, which inspired debates over animal rights by later medieval Muslim scholars. The 10th-century work, "Disputes Between Animals and Man", part of the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity, has been considered a classic in this regard. Inspired by the Qur'anic verse: "All living beings roaming the earth and winged birds soaring in the sky are communities like yourselves." (6:38), the Shafi'i jurist 'Izz al-Din Ibn 'Abd al-Salam al-Sulami (d. 1262) formulated the first full-fledged charter of the rights of livestock and animals in his legal treatise Rules for Judgement in the Cases of Living Beings (Qawa'id al-ahkam fi masalih al-anam) which was based on the stories and sayings of Muhammad.[53][54][55]

Environmentalism

[edit]

A number of sources assert the benevolent attitude of Muhammad and Islam towards natural resources, conservation and wildlife. Tom Verde writes in Aramco World that in early Islam, after Muslims established themselves in Medina, Muhammad surveyed the natural resources in the region—the wadis (riverbeds); the rich, black volcanic soil; the high rangelands—and decreed that they be preserved and set aside as a hima ("protected place").[56] Ibrahim Ozdemir writes that[Note 1] "approximately 200 verses" in the Quran are concerned with the environment—such as one stating "greater indeed than the creation of man is the creation of the heavens and the earth".[57][Note 2]

Traditional Akhlaq ethical system

[edit]

Akhlaq is described as a system of "Virtue ethics" that emphasize the virtues, or moral character of the human actor involved. Virtue ethics are one of "three major approaches in normative ethics" in human societies—the other two being "deontology", which emphasizes duties or rules, and "consequentialism", which emphasizes the consequences of actions of the human actor.[6] Another source, (Technical University Darmstadt), describes "virtue theory" ethics as emphasizing moral education to "develop good habits of character based" on "rules like 'do not steal'," etc.[60]

Virtue and good character

[edit]

Moral Character primarily refers to the assemblage of moral qualities (virtues and vices) in an individual. Promotion of good/virtuous character is found in the canonical texts of Islam. The Quran describes Muhammad as being 'on exalted quality of character' (Q 68:4), and refers to him as 'an excellent example' (Q33:21) which ultimately means that the religious and moral examples, set by Muhammad, are to be followed and cultivated by the Muslims in order to construct a morally good character.[61] In addition, numerous sayings of Muhammad highlighted the importance of good character:

  • Anas ibn Malik reported that the Prophet said: The one with good morals and character already owns the best of this world and the Hereafter (Tabarani and Abu Dawud).[62]
  • Abu Hurayrah reported that the Prophet said: I have been sent for the perfection of character (Imam Ahmad and Bayhaqi).[62]
  • Anas ibn Malik reported that the Messenger of Allah said: A person reaches the best and most honored levels in the Hereafter as a result of good character.... And bad character condemns a person to the lowest depths of Hell (Tabarani).[62]
  • One can repent for any sin but bad character – because with bad character, before a person can attempt to ask forgiveness for one sin, he commits a worse (Tabarani, Isfahani).[62]

There was a debate among the early Islamic moralists as to whether character could be changed to promote virtue and diminish vices.[61] They recognized the dual aspect of character – innate and acquired – and thus noted that with conscious practice it could be changed to a certain degree. "Just as a muscle grows stronger with exercise, character grows strong with practice ... the good act becomes easier to us each time we do it."[61]

Muslim moralists have discussed the importance of having a good character as well as the ways of acquiring it. Imam Birgivi, a 16th-century Muslim scholar and moralist, says that 'To cure yourself of a bad feature of character is an obligation'.[63] Continuous practice of moral virtues and a conscious effort to internalize those qualities can lead to the formation of a morally good character.[61][64] Al-Isfahani says that purification of soul means the control, not the elimination, of desires. He taught that character meant not only obeying the laws of Islam but internalizing them in your soul.[61] According to Birgivi, changing of character depends on such things as 'a person's wish' and 'the strength of one's understanding', and the preservation of a good character requires the avoidance of the company of evil-charactered people who indulge into indecent activities, drunkenness, and meaningless gossip.[62]

Theory

[edit]

Ethics or "Disposition" is a "faculty" (malakah),[65] "a property of the soul" (nafs), "which comes into existence through exercise and repetitive practice" is not easily destroyed. A particular malakah may appear because of one of the following reasons:

  1. Fitrah (natural state): The original state in which humans are created by Allah. Muslims believe Allah determined certain aspects of their lives for which they are not accountable (e.g., their place of birth and physical appearance)[66]
  2. 'Āda (habit): Formed by continual repetition of certain acts and creates a certain disposition.
  3. Practice and conscious effort: Which if persistent will eventually produce a disposition.

Although fitra produces certain dispositions, (it is thought) man can surpass nature through free will and effort. While dispositions caused by mental faculties (i.e., intelligence, memory, mental agility etc.) are not alterable, others dispositions can change. Man's capacity to change his dispositions need not mean destroying instincts of reproduction or self-preservation, but avoiding extremes so they (the dispositions) perform their functions properly.

  • "Indeed I have been sent to complete the best of character (akhlaq)." (Hadith of Muhammad narrated by Abu Hurairah)[67]
  • "The most complete of believers in iman (faith) are those who are best in character." (Hadith narrated by Anas, the brother of Abu Dharr)[68]

'Ilm al-Akhlaq

[edit]

ʿIlm al-Akhlaq is translated in English as "ethics, moral science, morals" (ʿIlm being science or study).[69] Al-Ghazali defined Ilm al-Akhlaq as "the way to acquire the well being of the soul and to guard it against the vices".[70]

The science also dwells on how the level of human virtue is determined by discipline and effort;[71] the movement between the extremes of human behavior, "the lowest is below beasts and the highest surpasses even the angels;"[72] how 'knowledge is the thickest of veils', preventing man from seeing reality (haqiqah when ethics and purification (tazkiyah) have not been mastered; and how by improving their akhlaq, the Muslims improve their Ibadah (worship).[citation needed]

Tazkiyah al-Nafs

[edit]

Tazkiyah al-nafs, "is the purification of the soul from inclination towards evils and sins, and the development of its fitrah (natural unsocialized state) towards goodness, which leads to its uprightness and its reaching ihsaan [perfection or at least excellence]", according to Anas Karzoon.[73] Scholars (such as Mulla Muhammad Mahdi Naraqi) teach that "moral virtues bring eternal happiness, while moral corruption leads to everlasting wretchedness", so that blameworthy traits (akhlāq madhmūma) must be purged.[72] God will help those seeking purification: "And those who strive for Us – We will surely guide them to Our ways. And indeed, Allah is with the doers of good." (Q.29:69)

Malakah of the Soul: effects & characteristics

[edit]

The soul is created devoid of traits. As one progresses through life, he develops malakat related to his lifestyle. The soul becomes accustomed to repeated behavior, which then determines actions. Noble faculties manifest moral and wise behaviour, while evil faculties manifest immorality. These faculties determine the fate in the Akhira.

The Quran says:

  • We have bound every human’s destiny to their neck. And on the Day of Judgment We will bring forth to each ˹person˺ a record which they will find laid open. ˹And it will be said,˺ "Read your record. You ˹alone˺ are sufficient this Day to take account of yourself."[74]
  • And the record ˹of deeds˺ will be laid ˹open˺, and you will see the wicked in fear of what is ˹written˺ in it. They will cry, "Woe to us! What kind of record is this that does not leave any sin, small or large, unlisted?" They will find whatever they did present ˹before them˺. And your Lord will never wrong anyone.[75]
  • ˹Watch for˺ the Day when every soul will be presented with whatever good it has done. And it will wish that its misdeeds were far off. And Allah warns you about Himself. And Allah is Ever Gracious to ˹His˺ servants.[76]

Goodness and happiness

[edit]

The aim of tazkiyah and moral development is to attain felicity and happiness. Tazkiyah causes self-knowledge and knowledge of God.[77] Man's most consummate felicity is reflecting divine attributes. According to Qatada ibn al-Nu'man, the content soul (an-nafs al-mutma'inna) is, "the soul of the believer, made calm by what Allah has promised. Its owner is at complete rest and content with his knowledge of Allah's Names and Attributes..."[78]

Norms/codes

[edit]

"Practical guidelines"[79] or "specific norms or codes of behavior" for good doing[1][80] based primarily on the Quran and the Hadith[15] are primarily "commonly known moral virtues" whose major points "most religions largely agree on".[79] They include kindness (to people and animals), charity,[81] forgiveness, honesty, patience, justice, respecting parents and elders, keeping promises, and controlling one's anger.[82]

Ethical education and behavior

[edit]

Drawing on a cross-sectional study of Muslim youths in southern Thailand and other sources, academic Kasetchai Laeheem found that the "common behavioral problem" of a lack of Islamic ethics within Muslim societies, often leads to Muslim youths committing "sin openly" and "as a habit without shame". However, high levels of Islamic ethical behavior among Muslim youth, are often correlated with "the Islamic way of upbringing, knowledge of the religion, participation in Islamic activities, and practicing Islamic principles".[83]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Islamic ethics, known as akhlaq in Arabic, constitutes the moral framework derived principally from the as divine revelation and the as the recorded practices and sayings of Prophet Muhammad, directing Muslims toward actions that cultivate virtuous character and fulfill obligations to God () and fellow humans. This system integrates personal piety, , and legal prescriptions into a holistic code, emphasizing intention () in deeds and accountability in the , where ethical conduct determines or damnation. At its core, Islamic ethics prioritizes principles such as justice (adl), compassion (rahma), and stewardship (khilafah), mandating equitable treatment, charity (zakat), and prohibition of harms like theft, adultery, and false witness, with the Quran providing foundational commands and the Sunnah offering practical exemplars. These derive from an innate moral disposition (fitra) refined by revelation, rejecting secular autonomy in favor of divine sovereignty, wherein good and evil are objectively defined by God's attributes rather than human consensus. Historical development saw early integration of pre-Islamic Arabian virtues with prophetic reforms, evolving through medieval synthesis with Greek philosophy by thinkers like al-Farabi and Ibn Miskawayh, who framed ethics as soul purification toward divine likeness, though revelation remained paramount over rationalism. Defining characteristics include the inseparability of ethics from law (Sharia), encompassing hudud punishments—fixed penalties like amputation for theft or execution for highway robbery and adultery—intended as deterrents and expiations rooted in Quranic texts, alongside discretionary rulings (tazir) for other offenses. Controversies arise from applications such as the traditional penalty of death for apostasy (riddah), justified by some scholars as protecting communal order based on prophetic precedents, though debated in scope (e.g., immediate vs. probationary execution) and increasingly challenged in modern contexts for conflicting with individual liberty. Gender-differentiated ethics, prescribing distinct roles and inheritance shares (e.g., sons receiving double daughters' portions), reflect perceived natural complementarities but draw criticism for entrenching inequalities absent empirical justification beyond scriptural literalism. Despite variations between Sunni and Shia traditions—e.g., emphasis on imam-guided ethics in the latter—Islamic ethics endures as a prescriptive system prioritizing orthopraxy over abstract philosophy, influencing governance in historical caliphates and contemporary Islamist movements.

Terminology and Key Concepts

Akhlaq

Akhlaq, derived from the root kh-l-q meaning "to create" or "form," refers to the innate disposition or character traits that govern an individual's actions and attitudes. Linguistically, it is the plural of khuluq, denoting a person's natural temperament upon which they are created, encompassing both praiseworthy virtues and blameworthy vices that manifest habitually without deliberate reflection. In Islamic ethics, akhlaq constitutes the foundational framework for behavior, emphasizing the refinement of the soul to align with divine rather than mere external compliance. The highlights akhlaq through its commendation of Prophet Muhammad's sublime character, stating, "And indeed, you are of a great " (Quran 68:4), positioning him as the exemplar for to emulate in cultivating ethical excellence. Early Islamic scholars, such as (d. 944 CE), defined akhlaq as "a state of the soul which causes it to perform its actions without thought or deliberation," underscoring its role in automatic, ingrained ethical conduct shaped by spiritual discipline. This internal orientation distinguishes akhlaq from outward etiquette (adab), as akhlaq pertains to core virtues like truthfulness, , , , and toward , self, family, and society, while actively suppressing vices such as arrogance, , and deceit. Islamic akhlaq developed systematically from the 7th century onward, integrating Quranic imperatives with prophetic example to form a comprehensive moral psychology aimed at holistic character perfection. A well-known hadith attributed to the Prophet states, "I have been sent to perfect good moral character," reflecting the religion's emphasis on akhlaq as a primary objective of divine guidance. Acquisition of noble akhlaq (akhlaq karimah) involves self-purification (tazkiyah), emulation of prophetic sunnah, and rational reflection (ijtihad) to balance natural inclinations with revealed principles, fostering societal harmony through individual virtue. Scholars like al-Ghazali (d. 1111 CE) expanded its scope in works such as Ihya Ulum al-Din, classifying akhlaq into duties toward the divine, interpersonal relations, and self-control, thereby linking personal ethics to cosmic order. In practice, akhlaq demands vigilance against moral , where unchecked dispositions lead to ethical lapses; thus, it prioritizes proactive cultivation via , , and to embed virtues durably. Empirical observations in Islamic tradition, such as biographical accounts (sira) of companions exhibiting amid , illustrate akhlaq's causal role in resilience and of , independent of legalistic enforcement. This character-centric approach critiques purely deontological systems by rooting ethics in existential purpose—submission to the Creator—yielding measurable outcomes like reduced conflict in early Muslim societies.

Adab

Adab, in Islamic ethics, denotes the cultivation of refined conduct, , and social propriety, encompassing both personal refinement and interpersonal interactions guided by religious principles. Derived from the Arabic root d-y-b, implying gentleness or inclination toward , adab emphasizes outward manifestations of inner moral disposition, such as politeness, , and , as articulated in classical Islamic . Unlike akhlaq, which pertains to intrinsic and virtues like and temperance, adab focuses on situational and behavioral norms that reflect those virtues in daily life, serving as their practical expression. This distinction underscores adab's role in harmonizing individual piety with communal harmony, where lapses in adab can undermine ethical integrity despite sound akhlaq. The foundational sources of adab are the and , which prescribe specific protocols for speech, dress, greetings, and relations with kin, neighbors, and authority figures. Quranic injunctions, such as prohibiting (49:12), insulting others (49:11), and wasting resources (17:26), form core tenets, while collections elaborate practical applications, including lowering one's gaze in modesty and speaking truthfully or remaining silent (Bukhari, as cited in prophetic traditions). Imam al-Bukhari's (compiled circa 870 CE), a dedicated of approximately 1,329 hadiths on manners, systematizes these teachings into categories like parental , kinship ties, and neighborly duties, positioning adab as a comprehensive code derived solely from prophetic example. Adab literature, including works advising on proper conduct in scholarly and medical contexts, extends this framework to professional spheres, stressing before and ethical restraint in . Key principles of adab include deference to elders—manifested in yielding seats, initiating greetings, and seeking permission before entering spaces—and moderation in speech, avoiding excess or harshness to preserve social bonds. In familial settings, adab mandates kindness to parents (Quran 17:23-24) and equitable treatment of children, while in public interactions, it prohibits spying, envy, or ostentation, fostering communal trust. Prophetic hadiths elevate adab's spiritual dimension, equating it with half of faith, as the Prophet Muhammad reportedly stated that superior believers excel in character, with good manners securing paradise alongside prayer and fasting. Classical scholars like integrated adab into ethical pedagogy, viewing it as essential for moral education, where refinement in conduct reinforces (God-consciousness) and counters base impulses. Historically, adab evolved as a blending with during the Abbasid (8th-13th centuries), influencing courtly and scholarly norms, yet its essence remained tethered to scriptural authenticity rather than cultural accretions. In contemporary applications, adab adapts to modern contexts like digital communication, urging restraint against or discord, though traditionalists caution against diluting its prophetic roots with secular . Empirical observance of adab correlates with reported enhancements in social cohesion within Muslim communities, as evidenced by hadith-based studies linking courteous conduct to reduced conflict.

Ihsan

Ihsan denotes the pinnacle of Islamic spiritual and ethical practice, characterized by excellence, perfection, and sincerity in worship and deeds, performed with the awareness of God's constant observation. It forms the highest tier in the triadic framework of faith outlined in the , surpassing the external submission of and the belief of iman, to embody an internalized, qualitative depth in religious life. The definitive exposition of appears in the authentic narration from , where the Prophet Muhammad, responding to the angel Gabriel's inquiry in human guise, declared: "Ihsan is that you worship as if you see Him, for if you do not see Him, then truly He sees you." This , transmitted by , emphasizes a state of perpetual and intentionality, transforming routine actions into acts of profound devotion and moral refinement. In ethical terms, it prescribes ihsan across all endeavors, as corroborated by another prophetic tradition: " has written ihsan upon everything," urging believers to execute tasks—whether prayer, commerce, or interpersonal conduct—with meticulous care and benevolence. Quranic injunctions reinforce ihsan as a behavioral imperative, appearing over 190 times in forms denoting "goodness" or "doing what is beautiful." Verses such as Al-Baqarah 2:195 command, "And do good [ihsan]; indeed, Allah loves the doers of good," linking it to self-preservation and charitable expenditure, while An-Nahl 16:90 mandates "justice and ihsan" alongside aid to kin, framing it as a societal ethic of beneficence beyond mere obligation. These scriptural bases position ihsan not as optional virtue but as integral to moral integrity, countering superficial compliance by demanding actions that reflect divine attributes of compassion and precision. In the broader scope of Islamic ethics, cultivates a disposition of non-maleficence and proactive , extending to neighborly relations and communal , where ethical excellence manifests in habitual selflessness and avoidance of harm. This principle, rooted in primary sources rather than interpretive schools, demands empirical alignment of intent and outcome, prioritizing observable sincerity over ritualistic formalism, and has historically inspired ethical treatises emphasizing personal accountability under divine scrutiny.

Other Core Terms

Taqwa, often translated as piety or God-consciousness, represents a foundational ethical imperative in , denoting a state of vigilant awareness of divine oversight that motivates adherence to moral obligations and restraint from transgression. This concept emphasizes internal self-protection against immoral acts through fear of accountability to , as articulated in Quranic verses such as Al-Baqarah 2:197, which links taqwa to righteous conduct in . Scholars describe taqwa as encompassing both avoidance of prohibitions and proactive pursuit of virtues, distinguishing it from mere ritual observance by requiring continuous moral vigilance in private and public spheres. Birr, signifying comprehensive righteousness or benevolence, complements taqwa by outlining the positive dimensions of ethical behavior, including , charity, and just dealings, as exemplified in Surah Al-Baqarah 2:177, which defines it through , prayer, and aid to the needy. Unlike narrower virtues, birr integrates with action, serving as a holistic measure of excellence that extends to interpersonal relations and . It is frequently juxtaposed with taqwa in scriptural , where birr embodies outward manifestations of inner , such as upholding trusts and speaking truthfully. Additional terms include tauba (repentance), which entails sincere regret and reformation following ethical lapse, enabling restoration of moral standing through divine forgiveness, as emphasized in Quranic injunctions like Surah 66:8. Amanah (trustworthiness) and sidq (truthfulness) form twin pillars of personal , mandating fulfillment of covenants and veracity in speech and deed, critical for societal trust in Islamic moral . These concepts, rooted in prophetic example, underscore as divinely ordained duties rather than subjective preferences.

Ethics vs. Morality in Islamic Context

In Islamic tradition, the concepts of and are intimately intertwined, with minimal demarcation akin to Western philosophical separations where denotes systematic inquiry into moral principles and refers to prescriptive norms of conduct. The term akhlaq (plural of khulq, meaning innate disposition or character trait) serves as the foundational concept, encompassing both the inherent moral qualities of the and their practical manifestation in virtuous behavior. This disposition governs actions performed effortlessly, without external , and is evaluated by its alignment with divine will rather than subjective preference. The discipline of 'ilm al-akhlaq (the science of ethics) systematically analyzes these dispositions, prescribing methods to elevate virtues—such as , , and temperance—to their optimal state while suppressing vices like greed or envy, always subordinate to theological imperatives from the and . Unlike secular ethical theories that may prioritize human autonomy or , Islamic ethics views moral perfection as emulation of prophetic character (khuluq al-karim), as exemplified by Muhammad's statement: "I was sent to perfect good character" (reported in , 1162). , in this framework, is not optional personal ethics but obligatory conformance to objective divine commands, where deviation constitutes (ithm) and virtue yields eternal reward. Sources of Islamic moral discernment include al-fitra (innate intuitive recognition of right and wrong, as in Quran 30:30), al-'aql (rational faculty for discerning harm from benefit, per Quran 8:29), and al-wahy (divine revelation via prophets, culminating in the Quran). These integrate to form a holistic system where ethical reasoning (ijtihad) refines but never overrides revealed morality, rejecting relativism in favor of theocentric realism—actions are moral insofar as they promote human flourishing (maslaha) under God's sovereignty. Scholarly treatments, such as those by al-Ghazali in Ihya' Ulum al-Din (11th century), emphasize this unity, critiquing purely rationalist approaches for lacking revelatory anchorage. This convergence reflects Islam's rejection of dualism between theory and practice; ethical (usul al-akhlaq) directly informs moral (furu' al-akhlaq), fostering societal order through institutions like hisba (moral oversight). Empirical observations of historical Muslim societies, from the Abbasid era onward, demonstrate akhlaq's role in governance, where rulers were accountable for upholding moral equity, as in the (7th century), which codified ethical treatment of non-Muslims. Modern interpretations, while varying by school (e.g., Sunni vs. Shia), preserve this inseparability, cautioning against Western imports that dilute divine authority.

Scriptural and Foundational Sources

Quran as Primary Ethical Guide

The , revealed to the Prophet Muhammad between 610 and 632 CE, serves as the foundational and infallible source of Islamic ethics, comprising approximately 6,236 verses that outline moral imperatives directly attributed to divine command. regard it as the verbatim word of , transmitted via the angel Gabriel, providing comprehensive guidance on human conduct, societal relations, and accountability to the divine, with ethical principles derived from its emphasis on (the oneness of ) as the unifying axiom for all moral obligations. Unlike secondary sources such as , the Quran's directives are considered absolute and non-negotiable, forming the basis for virtues like , , and of creation. Central to Quranic ethics is the principle of justice (adl), mandated as an objective standard even when personally disadvantageous, as in Quran 4:135: "O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for , witnesses in , and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to ." This verse, among 85 addressing , underscores impartiality in judgment and social equity, prohibiting favoritism toward kin or self, and linking ethical action to fear of divine reckoning. Complementing is benevolence (), which extends to charitable acts like (obligatory almsgiving) and (voluntary giving), with Quran 2:177 defining as belief in God coupled with "spending of your substance... for your kin, for orphans, for the needy," emphasizing sacrifice from one's cherished possessions. These injunctions, reiterated in verses like 57:18 urging secret charity to erase sins, frame as proactive rather than mere compliance. Quranic ethics also govern interpersonal and communal spheres, prohibiting usury (riba) in Quran 2:275-279 to prevent exploitation and promote economic fairness, while enjoining contracts fulfilled with honesty (Quran 5:1) and forbidding oaths that harm kin (Quran 2:224). Personal virtues such as truthfulness, patience in adversity (Quran 2:153), and modesty (haya) are intertwined with accountability in the afterlife, where deeds are weighed on Judgment Day, incentivizing ethical consistency over situational expediency. This framework prioritizes intentionality (niyyah) in actions, rendering ethics not ritualistic but rooted in conscious alignment with divine will, as ethical lapses constitute rebellion against God's sovereignty. Scholarly analyses, drawing from classical exegeses, affirm that while the Quran articulates broad principles over detailed casuistry, its ethical scope encompasses governance, warfare (with rules against treachery, Quran 2:190), and environmental trusteeship, rejecting anthropocentric excess.

Hadith and Sunnah

The consist of narrated reports preserving the sayings (aqwal), actions (af'al), tacit approvals (taqrir), and physical attributes of the Prophet Muhammad, serving as a primary textual basis for the , which encompasses his exemplary way of life and normative practices. In Islamic ethics, the and function as the second foundational source after the , offering practical elaboration on moral principles where the Quran provides general imperatives. For instance, Quranic commands on and benevolence are instantiated through prophetic exemplars, such as directives on interpersonal conduct and self-restraint, emphasizing virtues like , , and as integral to spiritual purification (). The ethical import of the derives from Muhammad's role as the "living Quran," embodying (divine unity) in daily affairs, with detailing scenarios like , familial duties, and to guide believers toward (excellence in worship and conduct). Key teachings include the qudsi where states, "My mercy prevails over My wrath," underscoring divine compassion as a model for ethics, and narrations prioritizing good character, such as "The most perfect believer in respect of faith is he who is best of them in manners." These extend ethics into actionable norms, influencing (jurisprudence) on issues like charity and , while cautioning against excess or harm. Authentication of Hadith, known as 'ilm al-hadith, emerged systematically by the 2nd century AH (8th century CE), involving scrutiny of isnad (transmission chains) for continuity and narrator reliability—assessing memory, piety, and precision via biographical dictionaries (kutub al-rijal)—alongside matn (textual content) for consistency with Quran and established Sunnah. This yielded classifications: sahih (authentic), hasan (good), da'if (weak), or mawdu' (fabricated), with Sunni scholars rejecting thousands deemed unreliable to preserve ethical integrity. Major compilations include Sahih al-Bukhari (d. 256 AH/870 CE), containing approximately 7,563 narrations after rigorous filtering from 600,000 reviewed, and Sahih Muslim (d. 261 AH/875 CE), with around 9,000 including repetitions but about 4,000 unique texts; both are deemed mutawatir in authenticity by orthodox consensus, forming the core of Kutub al-Sittah (Six Books). Despite this methodology's emphasis on empirical verification through historical chains, modern critiques highlight potential for cultural accretions or biases in early transmissions, though traditionalists maintain the process's causal efficacy in filtering for prophetic fidelity, as evidenced by cross-corroboration across independent narrators. In ethics, reliance on authenticated ensures causal links between prophetic precedent and moral outcomes, such as prohibitions on or mandates for truthfulness, fostering societal stability grounded in observed prophetic efficacy rather than abstract theory.

Secondary Sources: Ijma and Qiyas

In Sunni Islamic , known as usul al-fiqh, secondary sources such as * (consensus) and * (analogical reasoning) serve to derive rulings, including ethical prescriptions, when primary sources—the Quran and Sunnah—are silent or require extension to novel circumstances. These tools emerged in the classical period to address practical ethical dilemmas, ensuring continuity with divine revelation while adapting to human contexts, though their application demands rigorous scholarly competence to avoid subjective distortion. Critics within Islamic thought, including some modern reformers, question the historical verifiability of * claims and the potential for * to overextend rulings beyond textual intent, highlighting tensions between textual fidelity and interpretive expansion. Ijma', or scholarly consensus, ranks as the third source of Sharia after the Quran and Sunnah, binding upon subsequent generations due to prophetic traditions such as "My community will never agree in an error." It typically refers to the unanimous agreement of qualified mujtahids (independent jurists) from a given on a legal or ethical issue, rather than mere majority opinion, with historical examples including the consensus on the of in 632 CE or the ethical impermissibility of in non-Quranic forms. In ethical contexts, ijma' reinforces virtues like justice and communal welfare; for instance, the agreement among early scholars that rebellion against a legitimate constitutes disorder, barring extreme tyranny, underscores its role in stabilizing social ethics. However, establishing definitive ijma' requires exhaustive documentation, a criterion often unmet in later claims, leading traditionalists like to limit it to the companions' while permitting broader applications only with clear evidence. Shi'a jurisprudence subordinates ijma' to the Imams' authority, viewing Sunni formulations as potentially fallible due to the absence of infallible guidance post-Prophet. Qiyas, analogical reasoning, extends an established ruling (hukm) from a textual (asl) to a new case (far') sharing the same effective cause ('illah), such as the prohibition of intoxicants in the applied to narcotics via their shared capacity to impair reason. This method, formalized by Imam and refined by in the 8th-9th centuries, requires identifying a verifiable 'illah—e.g., or benefit—rooted in objectives (), ensuring ethical derivations align with broader principles like preserving life and intellect. In , addresses emerging issues, as seen in classical extensions of theft prohibitions to intellectual property violations based on the 'illah of unjust deprivation, though disputes arise over 'illah selection, with literalists rejecting metaphorical analogies to prevent dilution of divine commands. All four Sunni schools accept qiyas, but its scope narrows in Hanbali literalism, prioritizing texts over extensive to mitigate interpretive errors. Empirical challenges include verifying shared causes in complex modern , such as bioethical dilemmas, where qiyas must yield to explicit prohibitions if analogies falter.

Historical Development

Pre-Islamic Arabian Ethics and Prophetic Foundations

In pre-Islamic Arabia, ethical conduct was primarily governed by tribal customs and the unwritten code of muruwwah, which embodied the ideal of manliness and honor among Bedouin Arabs from roughly the 5th to early 7th centuries CE. This code prized virtues such as bravery in warfare, generosity toward guests and allies, loyalty to one's kin group (asabiyyah), and the obligation to avenge wrongs through blood feuds, all of which reinforced tribal survival in a harsh desert environment. Hospitality (diyafa) was particularly sacrosanct, with hosts bound to protect travelers even at personal risk, while poetry served as a medium to celebrate these ideals and shame deviations. Yet, muruwwah tolerated practices deemed immoral by later standards, including the exposure of female infants (wa'd al-banat), motivated by fears of poverty, tribal dishonor, or capture in raids, as evidenced in pre-Islamic poetry and corroborated by Quranic critiques. Usury (riba) flourished in caravan trade, exacerbating inequalities, and polytheistic rituals intertwined with ethics, often justifying intertribal conflicts over sacred wells or idols. The prophetic mission of Muhammad, commencing with revelations in 610 CE, established Islam's ethical foundations by critiquing and reforming these Jahiliyyah norms while retaining compatible elements under a monotheistic framework (tawhid). The Quran positioned ethics as divine imperatives for human flourishing, condemning infanticide explicitly—"And when the girl [who was] buried alive is asked for what sin she was killed" (Quran 81:8-9)—and prohibiting it outright to affirm the sanctity of life regardless of gender (Quran 17:31). Tribal exclusivity yielded to universal brotherhood, as Muhammad's teachings emphasized justice (adl) over vengeance, with hadiths urging forgiveness to break feud cycles, such as "The best revenge is to forgo it." Riba was banned to curb exploitation, redirecting economic ethics toward equitable exchange and charity (zakat). Muhammad's Sunnah—his exemplary conduct as recorded in authentic hadith collections like Sahih al-Bukhari (compiled circa 846 CE)—served as the practical foundation, modeling virtues like trustworthiness (amanah), patience (sabr), and mercy (rahma), often amplifying pre-Islamic positives such as hospitality into religious duties. In his Farewell Sermon at Arafat in 632 CE, shortly before his death, he declared: "All mankind is from Adam and Eve; an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab, nor a non-Arab over an Arab... except by piety and good action," dismantling asabiyyah in favor of ethical equality before God. This prophetic example, rooted in Meccan revelations against polytheism and Medinan applications amid community-building, integrated causal accountability—actions judged on the Day of Resurrection—with soul purification (tazkiyah), forming the bedrock for subsequent Islamic ethical theory. While some Jahiliyyah practices like limited raiding for survival were curtailed, core traits of generosity and courage were reframed as submission to divine will, prioritizing communal harmony over individual or tribal honor.

Classical Period: Philosophical Integration (8th-12th Centuries)

During the 8th to 12th centuries, known as the , Muslim intellectuals, particularly the falasifa (philosophers), sought to integrate —chiefly Aristotelian and Neoplatonic ethics—with Islamic scriptural sources, aiming to establish a rational framework for moral conduct that aligned human virtue with divine will. This synthesis emphasized (happiness or felicity) as the ultimate ethical goal, achieved through intellectual perfection and virtuous habits, but subordinated reason to revelation to avoid conflict with (divine unity). (c. 801–873 CE), dubbed the "Philosopher of the Arabs," initiated this by translating and commenting on Aristotle's , arguing that elucidates prophetic truths without contradicting the . Al-Farabi (c. 870–950 CE) advanced this integration by fusing Aristotle's with Platonic political ideals, positing that true happiness arises from the soul's harmony via theoretical knowledge of the , which mirrors divine emanation. In works like The Virtuous City, he described an ideal society ruled by a philosopher-prophet who cultivates —prudence, courage, temperance, and —to foster communal ethics grounded in rational demonstration of Islamic principles such as justice (adl) and benevolence (ihsan). Similarly, Ibn Sina (, 980–1037 CE) systematized ethics in The Healing (al-Shifa), viewing moral perfection as the soul's ascent through purgative, illuminative, and unitive stages toward conjunction with the divine intellect, where ethical actions stem from rational necessity rather than mere obedience, yet affirm Quranic accountability. He contended that virtues counteract vices through balanced faculties, enabling proximity to God as the Necessary Existent. This philosophical optimism faced critique from theologians, culminating in Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (1058–1111 CE), who in The Incoherence of the Philosophers (Tahafut al-Falasifa, c. 1095 CE) rejected the falasifa's overreliance on Aristotelian causality and eternal emanation as undermining miracles and divine voluntarism central to Islamic ethics. Al-Ghazali argued that true ethical knowledge requires experiential certainty via Sufi purification (tazkiyah) and adherence to Sharia, deeming pure rationalism insufficient for virtues like humility and detachment from worldly attachments. Ibn Rushd (Averroes, 1126–1198 CE) countered in The Incoherence of the Incoherence (c. 1180 CE), defending philosophy's compatibility with Islam by interpreting Aristotle's ethics as demonstrative truths accessible to elites, while prophecy provides imaginative equivalents for the masses, thus preserving rational virtue as obligatory for ethical fulfillment. This debate highlighted tensions between demonstrative reason and revealed command, influencing subsequent ethical thought toward greater theological synthesis.

Medieval Synthesis and Decline (13th-19th Centuries)

The Mongol sack of Baghdad in 1258 CE disrupted major intellectual centers, yet the 13th century witnessed efforts to synthesize earlier philosophical ethics (akhlaq) with theological and mystical traditions. Nasir al-Din Tusi (1201–1274 CE), a Persian polymath under Ilkhanid patronage, composed the Akhlaq-i Nasiri (Nasirean Ethics) circa 1235 CE, a seminal Persian treatise that adapted Aristotelian virtue ethics to Islamic frameworks, incorporating Shi'i theology, Sufi purification of the soul (tazkiyah), and practical governance advice for rulers. Tusi classified virtues into rational, moral, and domestic spheres, positing that ethical perfection aligns human disposition with divine order through habituation and divine grace, influencing subsequent Persian ethical literature. In the Sunni sphere, Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328 CE), a Hanbali scholar amid Egypt's turmoil, critiqued philosophical rationalism's overreach while advancing a revelation-centered ethics. He defended moral objectivism, asserting that are intrinsic realities known primarily through and , with reason serving as a subordinate tool; social context, including community welfare and scriptural adherence, shapes ethical application. Ibn Taymiyyah rejected excessive speculation and Sufi , advocating a balanced tazkiyah grounded in prophetic example to counter bid'ah (innovation), thereby synthesizing orthodoxy with practical moral reform. From the onward, original rational inquiry in waned, supplanted by commentaries on canonical texts amid political fragmentation and the institutionalization of four Sunni madhhabs. The effective closure of (independent reasoning) by the 13th century, following Abbasid decline, entrenched (imitation of forebears), rigidifying ethical derivations in over dynamic philosophical synthesis. Ash'arite theology's occasionalism, building on al-Ghazali's legacy, prioritized divine command over autonomous rational , diminishing falsafa's influence and correlating with broader shifts where ulema favored religious sciences. In the 16th–19th centuries, under Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires, ethics instruction in madrasas relied on standardized akhlaq works like Tusi's, emphasizing virtues for statecraft and personal piety but yielding few innovations. Isolated revivalist efforts, such as Shah Waliullah Dehlawi's (1703–1762 CE) integration of Quranic societal ethics with character reform to foster communal harmony, highlighted stagnation's costs, critiquing exclusivity for moral ossification. This era's , exacerbated by external pressures like European encroachment, limited adaptation of ethical norms to socioeconomic changes, setting the stage for 19th-century reformist critiques.

Modern Revival and Reforms (20th-21st Centuries)

In the early 20th century, Islamic reformers responded to colonial domination and internal stagnation by advocating the revival of —independent reasoning from primary sources—to reinvigorate ethical frameworks. Muhammad ʿAbduh (1849–1905) and his student Rashīd Riḍā (1865–1935) critiqued blind adherence (taqlīd) to medieval , promoting a rationalist approach that integrated Quranic principles with modern and to foster moral and social progress. ʿAbduh emphasized ethical purification through direct scriptural engagement, arguing that true Islamic ethics demanded compatibility with scientific reason while rejecting Western materialism, influencing subsequent calls for educational reforms in and beyond. Mid-century thinkers shifted toward more assertive ethical reconstruction amid decolonization and secular nation-states. Abū al-Aʿlā Mawdūdī (1903–1979), founder of Jamāʿat-i Islāmī, envisioned ethics as encompassing all life spheres under divine sovereignty (ḥākimiyya), critiquing and for violating justice (ʿadl) and (khalīfa). Sayyid Quṭb (1906–1966), in works like Maʿālim fī al-Ṭarīq (1964), diagnosed modern societies as jahīliyyah—pre-Islamic ignorance—redefined ethically as rebellion against God's commands, urging believers to pioneer communities bound by Quranic morality over positivist laws. These ideas, while inspiring political , prioritized causal accountability to divine will over utilitarian reforms, though Quṭb's framework has been linked to rigid applications by later extremists. By the late 20th and early 21st centuries, ethical revival extended to specialized domains through institutional ijtihad. Fazlur Raḥmān (1919–1988) advocated "double movement" in interpretation: returning to Quranic ethical cores while contextualizing them for modernity, influencing debates on gender equity and pluralism without diluting tawḥīd (divine unity). In , scholars addressed reproductive technologies and ; for instance, the Islamic Fiqh Council rulings from the 1980s onward permitted if it preserved life without commodifying the body, balancing harm prevention (la ḍarar wa lā ḍirār) with dignity. Economic ethics saw renewed emphasis on and prohibition of ribā (), underpinning the growth of Sharia-compliant finance as a moral alternative to debt-based systems. These reforms, often via bodies like the Organization of Islamic Cooperation's Fiqh Academy, demonstrate ongoing adaptation, though tensions persist between literalist revivals and modernist reinterpretations amid globalization.

Theoretical Foundations

Virtue-Centered Approach

In Islamic ethics, the virtue-centered approach, known as akhlaq, focuses on the cultivation of enduring moral traits and habits that align the soul with divine purpose, drawing primarily from Quranic injunctions and the Prophet Muhammad's exemplary conduct. This framework emphasizes character formation over mere rule adherence, positing that virtues such as and benevolence emerge from habitual practice and self-purification, enabling individuals to achieve equilibrium in their rational, appetitive, and irascible faculties. The Quran underscores virtues like kindness and equity, as in the directive to "render trust to whom it is due, and judge between people with justice" (Quran 4:58), which fosters (justice) as a foundational trait balancing excess and deficiency. Similarly, the Muhammad's mission is framed as perfecting moral excellence, per the hadith: "I have been sent to perfect good character," reported by , highlighting husn al-akhlaq (noble disposition) as central to faith. The Quran praises the Prophet's own virtues: "And verily, you are upon an exalted standard of character" (Quran 68:4), positioning him as the ultimate model for emulating traits like patience () and generosity (). Classical syntheses integrated these scriptural imperatives with philosophical insights, identifying cardinal virtues— (hikmah), (shuja'ah), temperance ('iffah), and ('adl)—as means to harmonize the , per the Platonic division adapted in Islamic thought. Ahmad ibn Muhammad Miskawayh (d. 1030) in Tahdhib al-Akhlaq detailed character refinement through education and habituation, arguing virtues lead to supreme happiness (sa'ada) via rational moderation and divine orientation. Abu Hamid (d. 1111) expanded this by defining akhlaq as safeguarding the from vices like and , prioritizing as the absence of while subordinating virtues to (divine unity), ensuring they serve spiritual ascent rather than worldly ends. This approach extends to subsidiary virtues such as (tawadu'), ('afw), and (qana'ah), derived from hadiths like "The best among you are those who have the best manners and character" (Sahih al-Bukhari 6029), which promote social harmony and personal accountability. Unlike deontological systems, it stresses internal disposition: a virtuous act absent good intent lacks ethical weight, as virtues habituate the self towards (excellence in worship and conduct), culminating in soul purification ( al-nafs). Empirical observation in Islamic tradition links virtuous communities to stability, as seen in early caliphates where prophetic emulation reduced tribal vendettas, though later philosophical dilutions risked secularizing virtues away from scriptural primacy.

Divine Command and Tawhid

In Islamic ethics, the divine command theory posits that moral obligations are fundamentally derived from the commands of as revealed in the and exemplified in the of Prophet Muhammad. According to this view, what is morally good or obligatory is precisely what has willed and commanded, while what is evil or prohibited aligns with His explicit or implicit prohibitions. This framework, prominent in traditional Sunni theology particularly among Ash'ari scholars, maintains that ethical norms do not exist independently of divine decree but are established by God's sovereign will, reflecting His infinite wisdom rather than arbitrary fiat. Critics within Islamic intellectual history, such as the Mu'tazila, argued for an objective good discernible by human reason prior to , yet the prevailing orthodox position subordinates reason to , ensuring that divine commands serve as the ultimate arbiter of right and wrong. Tawhid, the doctrine of Allah's absolute oneness and uniqueness, forms the theological cornerstone integrating divine command into every aspect of ethical life. By affirming that Allah alone possesses sovereignty over creation, tawhid establishes a singular source for moral authority, precluding any dualistic or polytheistic dilution of ethical standards. This monotheistic principle demands total submission (islam) to divine will, where moral actions are expressions of worship ('ibadah) oriented solely toward Allah, without intermediaries or competing imperatives. In practice, tawhid transforms ethical obligation into a unified pursuit of aligning human conduct with God's unity, such that violations like associating partners with Allah (shirk) extend metaphorically to ethical disobedience, undermining the holistic integrity of moral life. The synergy between divine command and underscores a causal realism in Islamic : moral truths originate from God's eternal attributes, not contingent human constructs or naturalistic derivations. For instance, Quranic injunctions, such as the command to establish ( 4:135), derive their binding force from Allah's unified essence, compelling believers to internalize as an extension of divine unity rather than contractual or utilitarian arrangements. This approach critiques secular moral relativism by grounding accountability in the judgment by a singular, omniscient , fostering virtues like (God-consciousness) as direct outcomes of tawhid-informed obedience. Historical developments, from early caliphal applications to medieval juristic refinements, consistently reinforced this paradigm, with deviations often labeled as (innovation) threatening tawhid's ethical purity.

Tazkiyah al-Nafs and Soul Purification

Tazkiyah al-nafs, or the purification of the soul, constitutes a foundational principle in Islamic ethics, emphasizing the disciplined refinement of the lower self (nafs) to align human inclinations with divine will and moral virtue. This process involves combating innate tendencies toward vice, such as greed, envy, and heedlessness, through self-examination and spiritual discipline, enabling ethical conduct rooted in sincerity rather than mere ritual observance. Classical scholars like Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (d. 1111 CE) positioned tazkiyah as essential for true ethical maturity, arguing that unpurified souls distort intentions and actions, rendering even obligatory deeds spiritually barren. Al-Ghazali's Ihya' Ulum al-Din details how purification fosters ihsan—excellence in worship as if beholding God—drawing from prophetic traditions that prioritize inner reform over external forms. The Qur'an establishes tazkiyah's centrality, declaring success for "he who purifies it [the soul]" and failure for "he who corrupts it" (Qur'an 91:9-10), underscoring the soul's inherent potential for either elevation or degradation based on individual effort. Prophetic mission itself is framed as encompassing purification, as in "reciting to them His verses and purifying them and teaching them the Book and wisdom" (Qur'an 62:2), indicating that ethical guidance requires cleansing the soul from polytheistic residues and moral impurities prevalent in pre-Islamic Arabia. Authentic hadith reinforce this, with the Prophet Muhammad stating, "I have been sent to perfect good character," linking moral excellence to self-purification practices like muhasabah (self-accounting) and mujahadah (striving against base desires). These sources emphasize causal efficacy: unaddressed vices propagate unethical behaviors, while purification cultivates virtues like patience (sabr) and gratitude (shukr), yielding observable outcomes in personal integrity and social harmony. Sufi traditions, building on Qur'anic typology, delineate stages of the nafs to guide tazkiyah: the nafs al-ammara (inciting to evil, Qur'an 12:53), prone to unchecked appetites; the nafs al-lawwama (self-reproaching, Qur'an 75:2), marked by remorse and struggle; and the nafs al-mutma'inna (tranquil, Qur'an 89:27-28), achieving contentment in divine obedience. Later elaborations by figures like al-Ghazali extend to seven stages, incorporating mulhamah (inspired) and mardiyya (pleasing to God), but core progression remains anchored in scriptural self-reproach leading to serenity. Practices include dhikr (remembrance of God), voluntary fasting, night prayers (tahajjud), and ethical introspection to eradicate rancid traits like pride (kibr), with empirical parallels in reduced impulsivity observed among practitioners. Scholarly analyses note al-Ghazali's integration of these with rational ethics, cautioning against excesses in asceticism that neglect social duties, ensuring tazkiyah supports communal justice rather than isolation. In broader Islamic ethics, underpins accountability (hisab), where purified souls anticipate divine reckoning with equanimity, fostering proactive virtue over reactive compliance. This contrasts with secular ethical frameworks by positing soul states as causally determinant of , verifiable through introspective disciplines yielding heightened and , as evidenced in biographical accounts of early ascetics like (d. 728 CE). Failure to pursue risks ethical , as external without inner purity invites , a critique echoed in prophetic warnings against "diseases of the heart" like (hasad). Thus, al-nafs elevates ethics from rule-following to transformative alignment with (divine unity), prioritizing empirical self-mastery for enduring moral efficacy.

Pursuit of Goodness, Happiness, and Accountability

In Islamic ethics, the pursuit of goodness centers on achieving falah, defined as comprehensive success that integrates spiritual fulfillment, moral integrity, and socio-economic prosperity in the present world alongside eternal salvation in the hereafter, attained through obedience to divine commands and ethical conduct. This concept underscores a balanced approach where material endeavors are subordinated to virtuous deeds aligned with human fitrah (innate disposition toward righteousness), as reflected in Quranic directives emphasizing righteous actions for prosperity (Quran 4:125). Ethical texts portray falah not as subjective self-actualization but as objective alignment with tawhid (divine unity), where goodness manifests in practices like justice, charity, and self-restraint, yielding both immediate societal benefits and deferred divine recompense. Happiness, or sa'adah, diverges from hedonistic or utilitarian conceptions by equating true felicity with the soul's purification (tazkiyah) and proximity to God, encompassing tranquility amid trials and ultimate bliss in paradise rather than fleeting sensory gratification. Quranic semantics frame sa'adah as the outcome of ethical perseverance, where believers experience inner peace through moral actions and faith, as in descriptions of the successful as those enlightened by divine balance (Quran 23:1-11). This pursuit demands moderating worldly attachments, with prophetic traditions affirming that moral excellence (ihsan)—performing deeds as if witnessing God—elevates human character toward enduring contentment, distinct from ephemeral joys. Accountability forms the eschatological backbone of these pursuits, embodied in hisab (reckoning) on the Day of Judgment (Yawm al-Din), where every intention, action, and even unspoken thought undergoes precise divine scrutiny, with deeds weighed on scales determining eternal fate ( 18:49). This doctrine instills ethical vigilance, as humans serve as khalifah (vicegerents) entrusted with , answerable for upholding and trust ( 3:161; 4:58), thereby deterring negligence and promoting proactive righteousness. Prophetic reinforce this by prioritizing scrutiny of as the initial accountability metric, with supererogatory acts potentially atoning for lapses, thus linking personal to cosmic . These dimensions interconnect causally: awareness of hisab propels the disciplined chase for falah and sa'adah, transforming from optional virtue to obligatory preparation for , where success hinges on cumulative righteous works amid frailty. This framework, rooted in , contrasts with secular by grounding flourishing in unerring divine standards, evidenced in historical Muslim emphasis on self-accounting (muhasabah) to preempt final reckoning.

Personal and Social Norms

Individual Character Development

In Islamic ethics, individual character development centers on akhlaq, the cultivation of inner moral dispositions that align the soul with divine will, emphasizing self-purification (tazkiyah al-nafs) through disciplined practices to overcome base desires and foster virtues like (ikhlas), (tawadu'), and (hilm). This process views the self as comprising rational, appetitive, and spirited faculties, requiring ongoing struggle (mujahada) to subordinate the lower soul (nafs al-ammara) to the higher (nafs al-lawwama and nafs mutma'inna), as outlined in Quranic stages of soul maturation ( 12:53, 75:2, 89:27-28). Early Muslim scholars, such as Al-Mubasibi (d. 857 CE), integrated Quranic and to prescribe and as mechanisms for ethical refinement, prioritizing internal transformation over mere ritual observance. Central to this development is emulation of Prophet Muhammad's exemplary character, described in hadith as encompassing mercy, truthfulness, and patience, with the Prophet stating, "I was sent to perfect good character" (Sunan al-Tirmidhi 1162). Practices include regular self-accounting (muhasaba), where individuals review daily actions against ethical standards to identify vices like envy or anger, and replace them with virtues through habitual worship such as prayer (salah) and fasting, which build self-control and empathy. Al-Ghazali (d. 1111 CE), in Ihya' Ulum al-Din, structures character building into quarters: doctrinal foundations, worship, destructive vices (e.g., pride, greed), and salvific virtues (e.g., repentance, gratitude), arguing that moral vices corrupt the heart like diseases, treatable via spiritual remedies like seclusion (khalwa) and remembrance of God (dhikr). He lists four traits elevating character—hilm, tawadu', modesty (haya'), and detachment from worldly excess—even amid limited knowledge or deeds. Quranic principles underpin this by mandating traits like restraining anger (Quran 3:134), speaking gently (3:159), and fulfilling trusts (4:58), fostering personal accountability before on the Day of . Modern interpretations, drawing from classical sources, apply to contemporary self-development, such as integrating ethical reflection in to counter , though empirical studies on efficacy remain limited and often anecdotal within Muslim contexts. Success in character development yields ihsan—worship as if seeing —enhancing and societal harmony, but requires sustained effort against innate inclinations toward vice, as human nature (fitra) is malleable yet prone to deviation without guidance.

Family, Gender, and Interpersonal Relations

Islamic ethics posits the as the foundational unit of , structured patriarchally with men designated as qawwamun (maintainers and protectors) over women, entailing primary financial responsibility and in household decisions. This derives from Quranic injunctions, such as 4:34, which states that men are maintainers of women due to what God has preferred in them and their expenditure from their wealth. Complementary roles emphasize men's provision and protection alongside women's nurturing and obedience within , fostering mutual rights and duties rather than strict equality. Marriage constitutes a core ethical imperative, described in hadith as half of faith, requiring mutual consent, dowry from the husband, and equitable treatment. Polygyny is permitted for men up to four wives, conditional on maintaining justice in provision and emotional equity, as per Surah An-Nisa 4:3, originally contextualized to protect orphans and war widows but not obligatory. Divorce (talaq) is allowable by either party under regulated procedures, with women retaining rights to maintenance during the waiting period (iddah) and child custody preferences for mothers in early years, aiming to preserve family stability while permitting dissolution for irreconcilable harm. Inheritance laws reflect gender-differentiated responsibilities, allotting sons twice the share of daughters (Surah An-Nisa 4:11), justified by sons' obligations to support parents and siblings post-marriage, whereas daughters receive maintenance from husbands or brothers without reciprocal duties. This system, implemented since the , contrasts with pre-Islamic practices denying women inheritance, though contemporary surveys indicate varied Muslim support for equal shares where not legally mandated. Interpersonal relations within the family prioritize silat al-rahm (maintaining kinship ties), with promising extended life, increased provision, and paradise for those who uphold them, even unilaterally, while severing ties invites divine disfavor. Ethical conduct mandates kindness to parents, spousal compassion, and child-rearing focused on moral inculcation, with classical texts entangling deeply with gendered socialization to cultivate piety and social harmony.

Community Obligations and Justice

In Islamic ethics, community obligations emphasize collective responsibility towards , the global Muslim community, through practices like , which mandates an annual 2.5% levy on eligible wealth to redistribute resources and alleviate poverty, as stipulated in Quran 9:60 specifying recipients such as the poor, needy, and wayfarers. This obligation extends beyond mere charity to (voluntary giving) and infaq (expenditure in God's way), fostering social welfare and economic equity by purifying wealth and preventing hoarding, with historical implementations in early Islamic states providing rudimentary social safety nets. Another core duty is amr bil ma'ruf wa nahi anil munkar—enjoining good and forbidding evil—regarded as a communal imperative derived from Quran 3:104, requiring to promote virtue and deter vice through advice, , or, in extreme cases, intervention, though classical jurists like outlined conditions to avoid greater harm. Justice (adl) forms the ethical bedrock for community interactions, rooted in Quranic commands to uphold fairness in judgments, transactions, and governance, as in Quran 4:135 urging believers to stand firm for justice even against kin or self. This principle manifests in legal equality before Sharia, where hudud punishments for crimes like theft or adultery aim to deter societal harm through proportionality, such as qisas (retaliation in kind) for murder to balance deterrence with mercy via options for diyah (blood money). Islamic ethics prioritizes restorative justice, prohibiting oppression (zulm) and excess, with hadiths attributing to the Prophet Muhammad statements like "The just will be on pulpits of light near God," underscoring adl as both individual virtue and communal stabilizer. Social justice in the ummah context integrates these obligations, viewing wealth disparities as moral failures addressable through zakat's redistributive mechanism, which classical scholars calculated to potentially cover if fully implemented, promoting interdependence over . However, enforcement varies across madhabs (schools of jurisprudence), with Sunni traditions emphasizing collective kifayah (sufficient communal fulfillment) for public welfare duties, while practical outcomes in modern states often fall short due to institutional weaknesses rather than doctrinal deficits. Punitive measures balance retribution with rehabilitation, as seen in Sharia's emphasis on tawbah (), aiming for societal harmony grounded in divine equity rather than egalitarian uniformity.

Economic and Environmental Ethics

Principles of Islamic Finance and Trade

Islamic finance operates under principles that emphasize , equity, and real economic activity, distinguishing it from conventional systems by prohibiting exploitative practices and promoting shared . Core tenets derive from Quranic injunctions and prophetic traditions, mandating that financial transactions avoid harm and align with ethical conduct. Transactions must involve tangible assets or services, ensuring value creation rather than mere money multiplication. A foundational prohibition is , defined as any predetermined excess in a or exchange of like commodities, encompassing on loans. The explicitly condemns riba in verses such as Surah Al-Baqarah 2:275-279, equating it to injustice that favors lenders over borrowers, and collections reinforce its ban as exploitative. This extends to all forms of guaranteed returns without risk, leading Islamic finance to favor profit-and-loss sharing (PLS) models over debt-based instruments. Interpretations vary slightly among schools of , but consensus holds riba as , with modern applications rejecting conventional bonds or savings . Islamic finance also bans gharar, excessive uncertainty or ambiguity in contracts that could lead to deception, such as vague terms in sales or derivatives lacking clear deliverables. Rooted in prohibiting sales of what is not possessed or defined, gharar ensures transparency and mutual consent, excluding options, futures, or with unknown payouts unless mitigated. Similarly, maysir—gambling or zero-sum —is forbidden, as in 5:90, promoting effort-based gains over chance. These prohibitions eliminate short-selling, casino-like trading, and high-frequency , fostering stability over volatility. In contrast to conventional finance's risk transfer via fixed-interest debt, Islamic systems emphasize risk sharing, where parties bear outcomes proportionally, as in musharakah (partnerships) or mudarabah (). This aligns incentives, reducing and encouraging productive investment over leverage. Financing must be asset-backed, tying funds to real goods or projects, and exclude haram sectors like alcohol, , or arms, per screens applied by bodies like AAOIFI. , a 2.5% wealth tax on savings above thresholds, integrates social welfare, redistributed annually to the needy. Trade ethics prioritize and fulfillment of contracts, including in dealings with non-Muslims, as mandated in Quran 5:1 ("O you who have believed, fulfill [all] contracts") and prohibiting fraud like cheating in weights and measures (Quran 83:1-3), with Hadith urging truthful dealings. Fraud, hoarding for price manipulation, or adulteration voids transactions, with emphasis on fair pricing via mutual agreement rather than monopoly gains. Contracts require clear offer, , and witnesses, prohibiting forward sales without possession to avert disputes. These norms, upheld in classical , aim at market equity, where profit arises from value addition, not exploitation.

Resource Stewardship and Animal Welfare

In Islamic ethics, humans are designated as khalifah (vicegerents or stewards) of the , entrusted with managing natural resources responsibly without causing corruption or imbalance, as articulated in Quran 2:30, where informs the angels of appointing a successor on . This role implies sustainable use of resources, prohibiting actions that lead to , such as excessive exploitation or , which are viewed as violations of the divine trust (amanah). Quran 30:41 warns that corruption has appeared on land and sea due to human actions, underscoring accountability for . The principle of avoiding israf (wastefulness or extravagance) extends this ethic to conservation, mandating moderation in consumption of water, food, and other resources; Quran 7:31 instructs believers to eat and drink but not to transgress, as God disapproves of excess. Prophetic traditions reinforce this by prohibiting the squandering of water even at abundant sources like rivers, emphasizing efficiency in agriculture, herding, and to preserve ecological balance (), as referenced in Quran 55:7-9. These teachings frame resource use as a moral duty tied to accountability on the Day of Judgment, prioritizing long-term viability over short-term gain. Regarding animal welfare, Islamic ethics regards animals as communities (umam) with rights to mercy and humane treatment, per 6:38, which states that no creature on earth or flying with wings exists except as nations like humans. The Prophet emphasized rewards for kindness to animals, declaring in a narrated by Abu Hurairah that acts of compassion toward living beings, including beasts of burden, earn divine reward, as reported in and . He condemned cruelty, such as overburdening animals or neglecting their needs, and prescribed swift, precise slaughter (dhabh) to minimize , invoking God's name to acknowledge the sanctity of life. Specific hadiths illustrate accountability: a woman was condemned to for imprisoning a until it starved, highlighting neglect as a grave sin, while a man gained Paradise for quenching a thirsty dog's thirst. Practices like slaughter require sharpening knives and avoiding preliminary , distinguishing ethical killing for sustenance from wanton harm, which is forbidden. These norms apply universally, prohibiting , branding in sensitive areas, or using animals for sport involving pain, as the banned inciting animals to fight. Overall, integrates with broader (rahma), viewing mistreatment as antithetical to God's compassionate creation.

Governance, Sharia, and Public Policy

Islamic governance, as informed by ethical imperatives in the and , posits sovereignty as belonging to God (), with human rulers acting as stewards (khalifah) obligated to enforce divine law for societal order and moral upliftment. , the corpus of Islamic jurisprudence, integrates ethical principles into , deriving rulings from primary sources including the —containing approximately 500 legal verses—and the , comprising authenticated hadiths detailing Prophet Muhammad's practices and sayings, such as those compiled in (completed circa 846 CE). Secondary methodologies like ijma' (scholarly consensus) and (analogical deduction) enable application to novel circumstances, as seen in historical fatwas on taxation during the (750–1258 CE). This framework prioritizes justice ('adl), mandating equitable treatment and prohibiting oppression, as articulated in 4:135: "O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for ." Central to Sharia-based is (consultation), an ethical duty for rulers to seek advice from knowledgeable representatives, rooted in the 's practice and Quranic endorsements in verses 3:159 and 42:38, which praise communities resolving affairs through mutual counsel. Public policy under this paradigm incorporates (public interest), allowing flexibility to safeguard essentials like religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property—maqasid al-sharia—provided it aligns with revealed texts; for instance, Ottoman sultans (1299–1922) invoked to adapt land tenure laws for agricultural productivity without contradicting core prohibitions. Economic policies emphasize (obligatory alms, fixed at 2.5% of wealth annually) for wealth redistribution, as implemented in early under the (622–632 CE), fostering social welfare without state coercion beyond scriptural mandates. In contemporary applications, shapes public policy variably across Muslim-majority states. , adhering to Hanbali since its founding in 1932, codifies as the , enforcing penalties—such as for theft under 5:38—in criminal policy; between 1981 and 1992, at least 100 such amputations were recorded, though executions for offenses like (, per some hadiths) numbered 345 in 2022 alone. 's post-1979 , blending Shiite with velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the ), integrates into policy via the Council, which vets laws for Islamic compliance, resulting in restrictions on gender mixing and media; for example, the 1983 Penal Code prescribes ta'zir (discretionary punishments) for moral crimes, contributing to over 800 executions in 2023, predominantly for drug and security offenses interpreted through lenses. Empirical assessments reveal challenges: and rank 150th and 155th respectively out of 167 in the 2023 Human Freedom Index, reflecting constraints on expression and assembly under -enforced laws, which punish with death in 13 countries per USCIRF data as of 2022. These implementations highlight tensions between ethical ideals of mercy (Quran 21:107 describes the Prophet as a "mercy to the worlds") and rigid enforcement, often yielding authoritarian outcomes; for instance, Iran's theocratic oversight has sustained low scores in governance indicators, with the World Bank's 2022 Worldwide Governance Indicators placing it in the bottom quartile for voice and accountability. Critics, including reformist scholars like Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im, argue that historical Sharia evolved contextually, urging ijtihad for modern rights compatibility, though purist regimes prioritize textual literalism over adaptive maslaha. In contrast, partial applications in Malaysia and Indonesia incorporate Sharia family courts alongside civil codes, balancing ethics with pluralism but facing inconsistencies, such as dual legal tracks leading to uneven enforcement of inheritance shares favoring males (Quran 4:11). Overall, Islamic ethical governance seeks holistic societal flourishing under divine ordinance, yet real-world policies frequently prioritize doctrinal purity, correlating with empirical deficits in individual liberties and economic dynamism per cross-national studies.

Human Rights and Religious Pluralism

Islamic ethics frames human rights as divinely ordained obligations rather than secular entitlements, emphasizing the sanctity of life, property, and justice for believers who adhere to Sharia. The Quran asserts that killing one innocent is akin to killing all humanity (Quran 5:32), establishing a basis for protections against unjust murder, while rights to fair trials and prohibition of usury derive from prophetic traditions in the Sunnah. However, these rights are contingent on submission to Allah's sovereignty, with violations of divine law—such as apostasy or rebellion—potentially forfeiting protections, as articulated in classical fiqh texts where human dignity serves communal order under Islamic governance. Religious pluralism in Islamic ethics permits coexistence with Jews and Christians as "People of the Book," granting dhimmis protected status in exchange for tax and loyalty oaths, historically restricting proselytization, public worship, and political authority to prevent subversion of the Islamic polity. 2:256 declares "no compulsion in religion," interpreted by scholars as prohibiting but allowing enforcement of social order, such as barring apostates from inheritance or testimony. Yet, 9:29 mandates fighting non-Muslims who refuse submission until they pay "while they are humbled," reflecting a hierarchical tolerance rather than equality, where non-Muslims enjoy security but subordinate status. In practice across Muslim-majority countries, this manifests in legal systems where curtails freedoms aligned with Western standards. remains punishable by death under penal codes in at least 10 countries, including , , and , with enforcement documented in cases like the 2014 execution in and ongoing fatwas. Pew surveys indicate majority support for as state law in regions like (84% in ) and the (74% in ), with 76% in favoring its application to non-Muslims, underscoring limited pluralism. Blasphemy laws, rooted in protecting prophetic honor, prevail in 70 Muslim-majority countries, often leading to mob violence or executions, as in Pakistan's 2023 Jaranwala riots displacing over 100 Christian homes. Empirical data from Pew's Global Restrictions Index highlight high government interference in religion in 2015-2022, with and scoring maxima due to policies mandating Islamic orthodoxy and penalizing deviations. These patterns reveal tensions between doctrinal tolerance and enforcement of orthodoxy, where pluralism yields to preservation of Islamic supremacy, contrasting universalist frameworks that prioritize individual autonomy over collective religious fidelity.

Freedom, Expression, and Apostasy

In Islamic ethics, freedom of expression is affirmed as a means to promote and truth but is strictly delimited to prevent to the , society, or divine sanctities. Classical jurists derive this from Quranic injunctions against fitnah (sedition or trial) and mockery of religion, such as in Surah al-Tawbah 9:65-66, which condemns those who ridicule and His Messenger, implying that expressions inciting disbelief or division undermine communal harmony. Sources like the International Islamic Academy emphasize that speech must not aggress against religious rites, sacred symbols, or the ummah's cohesion, positioning unrestricted critique of core doctrines as ethically impermissible. This framework prioritizes collective moral order over individual autonomy, contrasting with secular models by subordinating expression to Sharia's preservation of (hifz al-din). Blasphemy, encompassing insults to , the Prophet Muhammad, or Islamic tenets, represents a core prohibition in Islamic ethics, often equated with existential threats warranting severe response. Juridical texts across Sunni and Shia schools classify blasphemy as a form of (waging war against God and society), punishable by death if unrepented, rooted in such as Sahih al-Bukhari's narration: "Whoever changes his religion, kill him." Empirically, as of 2019, 79 countries enforced blasphemy laws, with 32 majority-Muslim states criminalizing it, including death penalties in nations like , , and where convictions have led to executions, such as Asia Bibi's 2010 death sentence (later overturned) or Junaid Hafeez's ongoing imprisonment. These laws frequently overlap with prosecutions, reflecting a causal link in where verbal defiance equates to rebellion against divine sovereignty. Apostasy (riddah), the renunciation of , constitutes the ultimate curtailment of religious freedom in traditional Islamic ethics, treated not merely as personal disbelief but as treason against the divine covenant and . While the mentions apostasy repeatedly—e.g., Surah al-Baqarah 2:217 warning of its gravity without specifying worldly penalty—and affirms "no compulsion in religion" (2:256), it defers judgment to the , lacking explicit endorsement of execution. However, prophetic provide the basis for capital punishment, mandating a repentance period (typically three days) before enforcement, as codified in major compendia like those of the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools. Classical scholars, including Ibn Humam, justify this to deter societal upheaval, viewing apostasy as akin to wartime rather than private belief change. Contemporary applications reveal tensions: at least 13 Muslim-majority countries, including , , and , retain apostasy as a capital offense in law or practice as of 2023, with documented executions, such as Iran's 2022 hanging of four for "enmity against God" tied to . Reformist voices, like those from the Yaqeen Institute or select Sunni scholars, argue the penalty applies only to belligerent apostasy (e.g., public incitement), citing the Prophet's non-execution of private apostates during his lifetime, though this minority view conflicts with predominant consensus and empirical enforcement patterns. Such debates underscore a meta-issue: apologetic interpretations often prioritize Quranic emphasis on personal accountability over Hadith-derived (fixed punishments), yet state practices in Sharia-influenced systems affirm the restrictive ethic, prioritizing communal fidelity to revelation over unfettered individual exit from faith.

Bioethics and Contemporary Applications

Medical Ethics and End-of-Life Issues

Islamic medical ethics derives from the Shariah's primary objectives, particularly the preservation of (hifz al-nafs), which mandates seeking beneficial treatment while prohibiting or actions that hasten . Physicians are obligated to provide care aligned with , informed by Quranic injunctions such as "do not throw yourselves into destruction" ( 2:195) and prophetic traditions emphasizing cure-seeking. Fatwas from bodies like the Council of emphasize patient autonomy in consenting to procedures, provided they do not violate core prohibitions, and require disclosure of risks to uphold (). Organ transplantation is deemed permissible under necessity (darurah), allowing retrieval from deceased donors whose has been medically confirmed, as this equates to true cessation of vital functions in rulings from the and similar councils. Living donations are restricted to non-vital organs like kidneys, with donor safety prioritized to avoid undue harm. is generally forbidden after 120 days post-conception, when ensoulment occurs per , though early-stage termination may be allowed to save the mother's life, reflecting the of preserving existing life over potential. End-of-life care prioritizes palliative measures to alleviate suffering without accelerating death, as active and physician-assisted are unanimously prohibited across Sunni and Shia , equated to or forbidden by 4:29 and 5:32. Withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatments, such as ventilators in irreversible terminal cases, is permitted to allow natural death, provided no intent to kill exists; this aligns with fatwas from the International Islamic Academy permitting discontinuation when recovery is impossible. criteria, involving irreversible loss of whole-brain function, are accepted by major councils like the Council of since 1986 and the Islamic Academy of the OIC in 1986, facilitating while respecting post-mortem. Debates persist on brain death's equivalence to cardiac cessation, with some traditionalists insisting on heartbeat stoppage for , potentially limiting donations; however, empirical medical consensus on irreversibility has swayed most contemporary scholars toward acceptance to fulfill the duty of saving lives. Do-not-resuscitate orders are valid for terminally ill patients if treatments offer no benefit, emphasizing in dying without prolonging agony artificially. Family involvement in decisions reflects communal ethics, but ultimate rulings defer to qualified muftis applying to specific cases.

Technology, AI, and Emerging Challenges

Islamic ethics views technological advancement as permissible and even encouraged when it aligns with principles, such as facilitating worship, knowledge-seeking, and societal benefit, drawing from Quranic injunctions to reflect on creation and pursue useful sciences. However, innovations must not contravene core objectives like preserving , life, intellect, progeny, and property (maqasid al-shari'ah), prohibiting applications that promote deception, harm, or moral corruption. Regarding artificial intelligence, mainstream scholarly consensus holds that AI qualifies as a permissible tool for auxiliary tasks, such as or reference organization, akin to other mechanical aids, provided it adheres to ethical boundaries like transparency and avoidance of harm. Yet, fatwas uniformly reject reliance on AI for issuing religious rulings (fatwas), citing its deficiency in religious qualification, contextual nuance, , and discernment—qualities essential for (independent reasoning). For instance, Jordanian and Egyptian scholars, including those from Al-Azhar, emphasize that AI-generated or opinions often fabricate unsubstantiated content, undermining doctrinal integrity and clerical authority. Emerging challenges from AI include its potential for systemic deception, such as deepfakes or manipulative algorithms, which conflict with Islamic imperatives for truthfulness (sidq) and justice ('adl), as humans bear trusteeship (khalifah) over creation without altering divine order. Privacy erosion via surveillance technologies raises concerns over unlawful intrusion (ghasb), echoing Sharia protections for personal sanctity, while autonomous systems in warfare demand human oversight to ensure proportionality in jihad, avoiding indiscriminate harm forbidden by prophetic traditions. Scholars applying trusteeship ethics argue AI must remain subordinate to human accountability, rejecting transhumanist enhancements that blur natural human limits or invite idolatry by mimicking divine attributes like omniscience. These positions, rooted in textual sources rather than utilitarian expediency, prioritize causal safeguards against unintended moral decay over unchecked adoption.

Comparisons with Other Systems

Differences from Western Secular Ethics

Islamic ethics derives its moral authority from divine revelation, primarily the and , positing as the ultimate source of objective moral truths that transcend human opinion or cultural variation. In contrast, Western , rooted in Enlightenment and humanistic traditions, grounds in human reason, empirical experience, or societal consensus, often rejecting supernatural foundations. This divergence leads to Islamic ethics viewing moral norms as absolute and unchanging—ta'abbudi obligations directly commanded by —while secular frameworks frequently incorporate or , allowing adaptation based on outcomes or . A core distinction lies in the treatment of moral objectivity: Islamic ethics asserts universal absolutes derived from prophetic example, such as prohibitions on () or , enforceable through without deference to majority will. Secular Western ethics, exemplified by or Rawlsian , prioritizes individual and harm minimization, potentially permitting practices like or if deemed to maximize welfare or equality, absent divine veto. Empirical surveys, such as those from the in 2013, indicate that 88% of Muslims in surveyed countries view as the official law reflecting divine immutability, whereas secular ethicists like advocate unbound by revelation. Reason's role further differentiates the systems: in Islam, intellect ('aql) supports but subordinates to revelation, preventing innovations like interest-based finance that contradict explicit texts, as affirmed in fatwas from bodies like the Islamic Fiqh Academy since 1985. Secular ethics elevates reason as primary, as in Kantian deontology or secular humanism's manifestos, which derive imperatives from rational universals without theological anchors, leading to debates over moral foundations like the is-ought problem highlighted by in 1739. Consequently, Islamic ethics integrates spiritual accountability—actions judged in the afterlife—fostering duties to community (ummah) over isolated individualism, whereas secular variants emphasize personal rights, as in the UN's 1948 , which omits religious pluralism mandates found in Quran 2:256. In applied domains, such as bioethics, Islamic prohibitions on surrogacy stem from lineage preservation and divine disposal over progeny (Quran 42:49-50), rejecting utilitarian trade-offs common in secular analyses. Secular ethics permits such interventions if consensual and beneficial, as in guidelines from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine updated in 2020, prioritizing reproductive liberty. Similarly, on apostasy, Islamic tradition prescribes penalties based on Hadith collections like Sahih Bukhari (circa 846 CE), viewing it as communal betrayal, while secular ethics safeguards it under free expression principles, as enshrined in Article 18 of the 1948 UDHR. These contrasts underscore Islam's holistic integration of ethics with law and theology versus secularism's compartmentalization, where ethics operates independently of metaphysics.

Contrasts with Judeo-Christian Ethics

Islamic ethics, derived primarily from the and , form a comprehensive legal-moral system known as that governs all aspects of personal, social, and political life through divine commands emphasizing submission () to Allah's will. In contrast, , while sharing monotheistic foundations, diverge fundamentally: center on covenantal obedience to () as a relational partnership with , and prioritize grace, redemptive love through Christ, and internal moral transformation over rigid legalism, viewing the Mosaic Law as preparatory and fulfilled in the . This leads to Islamic ethics being externally oriented toward observable compliance and communal uniformity, whereas approaches stress personal , , and ethical imitation of divine character—such as love in —allowing greater interpretive flexibility outside strict theocratic enforcement. A stark ethical contrast appears in responses to apostasy and religious freedom. Traditional Islamic , based on such as 9:84:57, prescribes for leaving , viewing it as against the ummah (community) that warrants penalties to preserve social order, though some modern scholars debate its applicability absent . Judeo-Christian traditions reject worldly execution for apostasy; the imposes no death for mere disbelief (e.g., Deuteronomy 13 targets , not private doubt), and Christianity emphasizes spiritual accountability to God alone, with teachings like Matthew 13:24-30 advocating tolerance of "weeds" until judgment, fostering ethical norms of persuasion over coercion. Similarly, treatment of non-believers differs: classifies them as dhimmis subject to tax and subordinate status (Quran 9:29), reflecting an ethics of hierarchical protection under Muslim rule, while Mosaic Law mandates fairness to strangers (Leviticus 19:33-34) and extend universal neighborly love (Luke 10:27), prohibiting based on faith. Family and social structures highlight further divergences, particularly in marriage ethics. Islam permits polygyny up to four wives provided equitable treatment ( 4:3), framing it as a pragmatic solution to societal needs like widow care, rooted in the Prophet Muhammad's practices. enforce monogamy: post-biblical restricted polygamy by the 11th century (e.g., Rabbenu Gershom's ban), and mandates it explicitly (1 Timothy 3:2,12), viewing as a sacred, exclusive union mirroring Christ's bond with the church (Ephesians 5:31-32), with deemed ethically disruptive to equality and . Salvation ethics also contrast: Islamic accountability weighs deeds against faith on ( 101:6-9), incentivizing ritual and moral performance without a redemptive mediator, whereas posits salvation by grace through faith in Christ's (Ephesians 2:8-9), and through and covenant , prioritizing relational restoration over meritorious balance. In martial ethics, jihad encompasses defensive and offensive struggles to expand dar al-Islam, often as a communal duty (fard kifaya) with fewer restraints on proportionality when advancing faith, as seen in historical conquests justified by Quran 9:33. Judeo-Christian just war theory, developed by Augustine and Aquinas, requires strict criteria like legitimate authority, just cause, last resort, proportionality, and right intention aimed at peace restoration, not territorial or religious dominance, reflecting an ethics of restraint derived from love of enemy (Matthew 5:44) and limited Mosaic campaigns confined to Canaan. These differences underscore Islam's integration of ethics with political expansionism versus Judeo-Christian tendencies toward moral universalism decoupled from state enforcement.

Criticisms and Controversies

Internal Islamic Debates on Ethics

Within Islamic scholarship, a foundational debate concerns the of moral values, particularly between the Mu'tazilites and Ash'arites. The Mu'tazilites, active from the 8th to 10th centuries, maintained that possess objective reality discernible through human reason prior to divine revelation, emphasizing ethical realism where acts like justice are intrinsically obligatory regardless of God's command. In contrast, the Ash'arites, founded by in the 9th century, advocated , asserting that moral distinctions arise solely from God's will as expressed in revelation, with reason unable to independently establish ethical norms. This disagreement, rooted in differing epistemologies— versus scriptural voluntarism—profoundly shaped Sunni orthodoxy, where Ash'ari views predominated after the , marginalizing Mu'tazilite as heterodox. Methodological debates in deriving ethical rulings center on ijtihad (independent reasoning) versus taqlid (emulation of authorities). Ijtihad involves qualified scholars (mujtahids) exerting effort to extract rulings from primary sources like the Quran and Sunnah using tools such as qiyas (analogy) and istihsan (juristic preference), enabling adaptation to new ethical contexts. Proponents argue it preserves Sharia's dynamism, as seen in historical applications by figures like Abu Hanifa (d. 767 CE). Opponents of widespread ijtihad, favoring taqlid, contend that post-classical closure of the "gates of ijtihad" around the 10th century prevented unqualified innovation, requiring non-experts to follow established madhabs (schools of jurisprudence) to avoid error in ethical judgments. This tension persists, with modern reformists invoking ijtihad for contemporary issues like bioethics, while traditionalists uphold taqlid to maintain doctrinal stability. Sectarian divides, notably Sunni-Shia, yield ethical divergences in jurisprudence (). Sunnis rely on the , , consensus (), and , leading to unified principles but varied applications across four madhabs (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali) on issues like retaliation punishments or contractual ethics. Shia, particularly Twelver, incorporate infallible Imams' guidance as a fifth source, permitting practices like temporary marriage (mut'a), deemed ethically illicit by Sunnis as facilitating . Shia ethics also emphasize (divine justice) more prominently, influencing views on human and moral accountability, contrasting Sunni Ash'ari occasionalism where divine omnipotence supersedes secondary causes. Within Shia, the Usuli-Akhbari debate mirrors -, with Usulis (dominant since the 19th century) advocating rational inference from sources, while Akhbaris restrict to literal , affecting ethical rulings on and personal conduct. These debates underscore Islam's pluralism in ethical methodology, where usul al-fiqh (principles of jurisprudence) frameworks prioritize revelation's supremacy but allow interpretive latitude, fostering ongoing scholarly contention over moral application without a centralized . Historical syntheses, like al-Ghazali's (d. 1111 CE) integration of philosophy and , attempted reconciliation, yet core tensions between reason, tradition, and sectarian endure in Islamic ethical discourse.

External Critiques: Compatibility with Modernity

Critics, including historian , contend that Islamic ethics, as codified in , fundamentally conflict with modern due to divergent conceptions of . In Islamic , ultimate authority resides with derived from the and , precluding the central to democratic systems where laws reflect human consensus rather than immutable . Lewis observes that among the world's Muslim-majority states as of the early , only a handful approximated , attributing this to theological barriers rather than mere historical contingencies. Ex-Muslim author argues that Sharia's ethical framework inherently undermines protections standard in modernity, such as and freedom from . Provisions for penalties—including amputation for theft and stoning for —violate international norms like the Universal Declaration of , which emphasize rehabilitation over retribution. Warraq further highlights laws, enforced in countries like and as of 2018, where leaving can incur death penalties, stifling individual autonomy and essential to secular societies. Gender roles prescribed in Islamic ethics draw scrutiny for incompatibility with egalitarian modernity. Quranic injunctions granting men double inheritance shares over women (Quran 4:11) and valuing female testimony as half that of males in financial matters ( 2:282) perpetuate disparities critiqued by reformers like , who in 2015 advocated a Muslim to align with contemporary standards of equality. Polygamy's permissibility for men ( 4:3), absent reciprocal rights for women, exacerbates these tensions, as evidenced by ongoing debates in nations like where such practices persist despite modernization efforts. Blasphemy and freedom of expression represent another flashpoint. Islamic ethics' prohibition on insulting the , leading to mob violence or state prosecutions in countries like —where over 1,500 blasphemy accusations were filed between 1987 and 2023—clashes with modernity's prioritization of open discourse. Critics like Hirsi Ali assert this suppresses critical inquiry, hindering scientific and ethical progress akin to Europe's post-Reformation enlightenment. Empirical data reinforces these critiques: As of 2020, secular Muslim-majority states like and scored higher on personal freedom indices than Sharia-influenced ones like , per analyses, suggesting ethical rigidities impede adaptation to pluralistic governance. Nonetheless, proponents of compatibility, such as selective reformers, argue reinterpretations () could bridge gaps, though skeptics like Lewis view such efforts as marginal against orthodoxy's dominance.

Specific Issues: Slavery, Jihad, and Violence

Islamic scriptures permit the and sexual use of , primarily obtained as captives from warfare, without mandating abolition. The regulates slave treatment, such as prohibiting of female slaves while allowing owners to marry them or seek their consent for ( 24:33), and references slaves in and expiation contexts, treating as a normative institution ( 58:3). collections reinforce this, with the Prophet Muhammad owning slaves and directing humane treatment, though sexual relations with female slaves ("those your right hands possess") are explicitly sanctioned ( 4:3, 23-24). Classical across major schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali) viewed as lawful, sourced mainly from spoils, with meritorious but voluntary, reflecting an ethical framework that improved pre-Islamic Arab practices yet embedded by divine decree rather than equality. Historically, persisted in Muslim polities for over a millennium, with the Arab-Muslim trade networks enslaving an estimated 10-18 million Africans and Europeans from the 7th to 19th centuries, far exceeding the duration of the Atlantic trade, often involving of males and of females. Empires like the (750-1258 CE) and Ottoman (1299-1922 CE) integrated slaves into military (e.g., Mamluks) and domestic roles, with no doctrinal push for eradication until colonial pressures; abolition occurred piecemeal, such as Egypt's 1895 decree and Saudi Arabia's 1962 proclamation, often without addressing scriptural tensions. This endurance underscores causal realism in Islamic ethics: slavery's permissibility stemmed from wartime economics and tribal norms, gradually eroded by global norms rather than internal reform, with contemporary apologists reinterpreting texts to align with abolition while traditionalists maintain its theoretical validity in end-times scenarios. Jihad, meaning "struggle" or "striving," bifurcates in Islamic ethics into greater (spiritual self-purification) and lesser (armed) forms, with the latter entailing violence against perceived threats to . The mandates defensive fighting—"Fight in the way of those who fight you but do not transgress" (2:190)—yet escalates to offensive imperatives, such as 9:5's "sword verse," directing to "kill the polytheists wherever you find them" after a , abrogating prior truces per classical tafsirs like Ibn Kathir's. 9:29 further commands fighting "those who do not believe in ... until they pay the jizyah with willing submission," framing subjugation of non-Muslims as ethical duty. Classical codifies offensive (jihad al-talab) as communal obligation to expand dar al-Islam, authorizing preemptive campaigns against non-Muslim lands absent treaty violations, as affirmed by major jurists like (d. 820 CE) and averaged across schools. This militaristic ethic propelled conquests from 632-750 CE, encompassing the , Persia, and Iberia, with rules minimizing civilian harm (e.g., no killing women, children) but permitting enslavement and jizyah extraction as alternatives to conversion or death. Modern reformists downplay offensive aspects as contextual to 7th-century Arabia, yet jihadist groups invoke these sources for global violence, highlighting interpretive schisms where textual literalism clashes with state sovereignty. Violence in Islamic ethics manifests through —fixed, corporal penalties for Quranic crimes against divine order—prioritizing deterrence and retribution over rehabilitation. For , Quran 5:38 prescribes hand for the guilty after , applicable to non-lethal takings above a minimum value (, e.g., 3 dirhams). () incurs 100 lashes for unmarried offenders (Quran 24:2), with for married ones derived from ( 1691), though evidentiary hurdles (four eyewitnesses) render rare application. () warrants , , or (Quran 5:33), targeting societal disruption. These punishments, enforced in states like (e.g., 2019 amputations reported) and historical caliphates, embody () equating harm reciprocity, with forgiveness optional but irrevocable once proven, reflecting a where yields to communal . Critics note hudud's incompatibility with , as empirical outcomes in (1979 onward) include disproportionate female punishment for amid lax evidence, while proponents argue strict proofs (e.g., confession retraction voids) mitigate abuse, though historical records show uneven enforcement favoring elites. This framework causally links ethics to : violence serves as sacred boundary-maintenance, persisting where holds sway despite international abolition trends since the .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.