Hubbry Logo
US Airways Flight 1549US Airways Flight 1549Main
Open search
US Airways Flight 1549
Community hub
US Airways Flight 1549
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
US Airways Flight 1549
US Airways Flight 1549
US Airways Flight 1549
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

US Airways Flight 1549 was a regularly scheduled US Airways flight from New York City's LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte and Seattle, in the United States, that ditched onto the Hudson River shortly after takeoff on January 15, 2009, due to a double engine failure caused by a bird strike. The Airbus A320 operating the flight, registered N106US, struck a flock of Canada geese shortly after takeoff from LaGuardia, resulting in a dual engine failure. Given their position in relation to the available airports and their low altitude, pilots Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles decided to glide the aircraft into a water landing on the Hudson River near Midtown Manhattan, doing so without significant damage to the aircraft.[1][2] All 155 people on board survived and were rescued by nearby boats, although 100 people were injured, 5 seriously. The time from the bird strike to the ditching was less than four minutes.

Key Information

The then-Governor of New York State, David Paterson, called the incident a "Miracle on the Hudson"[3][4] and a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) official described it as "the most successful ditching in aviation history".[5] Flight simulations showed that the aircraft could have returned to LaGuardia, had it turned toward the airport immediately after the bird strike.[6] However, the NTSB found that the scenario did not account for real-world considerations, and affirmed the ditching as providing the highest probability of survival, given the circumstances.[7]: 89  The pilots and flight attendants were awarded the Master's Medal of the Guild of Air Pilots and Air Navigators in recognition of their "heroic and unique aviation achievement".[8]

Background

[edit]

The aircraft in question, N106US, was an Airbus A320-214 built in 1999 in Toulouse, France for US Airways.[citation needed] Its first flight was on June 15, 1999, and was delivered to US Airways one month later. It was powered by two CFM International CFM56-5B4/P turbofan engines.[9][a]

On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549[b] with call sign "CACTUS 1549" was scheduled to fly from New York City's LaGuardia Airport (LGA) to Seattle–Tacoma International Airport (SEA), with a planned intermediate stop at Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT) in Charlotte, North Carolina.[citation needed]

The pilot in command was 57-year-old Captain Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, a former fighter pilot who had been an airline pilot since leaving the United States Air Force in 1980. At the time, he had logged 19,663 total flight hours, including 4,765 in an A320; he was also a glider pilot and expert on aviation safety.[12][13][14] The second in command (co-pilot) was 49-year-old First Officer Jeffrey Skiles,[12][15][16] who had accrued 15,643 career flight hours, including 37 in an A320,[7]: 8  but this was his first assignment as pilot flying in an A320.[17] There were 150 passengers and 3 flight attendants—Sheila Dail, Donna Dent and Doreen Welsh—on board.[18][19]

Accident

[edit]

Takeoff and bird strike

[edit]
New York TRACON audio
Air traffic control audio from about time of bird strike until ditching
Problems playing this file? See media help.

The flight was cleared for takeoff to the northeast from LaGuardia's Runway 4 at 15:24:56 Eastern Standard Time (20:24:56 UTC). With Skiles in control, the crew made its first report after becoming airborne at 15:25:51 as being at 700 feet (210 m) and climbing.[20]

The weather at 14:51 was 10 miles (16 km) visibility with broken clouds at 3,700 feet (1,100 m), wind 8 knots (9 mph; 15 km/h) from 290°; an hour later it was few clouds at 4,200 feet (1,300 m), wind 9 knots (10 mph; 17 km/h) from 310°.[7]: 24  At 15:26:37, Sullenberger remarked to Skiles, "What a view of the Hudson today."[21]

The Hudson River from above the Bronx, with Manhattan in the diagonal center and New Jersey in the distance. The George Washington Bridge is at right, Central Park Reservoir at upper left, and Teterboro Airport at the right center within the elbow of the Overpeck Creek.
The aircraft headed approximately north after takeoff, then wheeled anti-clockwise to follow the Hudson southwards.
Flight path flown (red). Alternative trajectories to Teterboro (dark blue) and back toward La Guardia (magenta) were simulated for the investigation.

At 15:27:11, during climbout, the plane struck a flock of Canada geese at an altitude of 2,818 feet (859 m) about 4.5 miles (7.2 km) north-northwest of LaGuardia. The pilots' view was filled with the large birds;[22][23] passengers and crew heard very loud bangs and saw flames from the engines, followed by silence and an odor of fuel.[24][25][26]

Realizing that both engines had shut down, Sullenberger took control while Skiles worked the checklist for engine restart.[c][7] The aircraft slowed but continued to climb for a further 19 seconds, reaching about 3,060 feet (930 m) at an airspeed of about 185 knots (213 mph; 343 km/h), then began a glide descent, accelerating to 210 knots (240 mph; 390 km/h) at 15:28:10 as it descended through 1,650 feet (500 m).[7]: 47 

At 15:27:33, Sullenberger radioed a mayday call to New York Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON):[28][29] "... this is Cactus fifteen thirty nine [sic – correct call sign was Cactus 1549], hit birds. We've lost thrust on both engines. We're turning back towards LaGuardia".[21] Air traffic controller Patrick Harten[30] told LaGuardia's tower to hold all departures, and directed Sullenberger back to Runway 13. Sullenberger responded, "Unable".[29]

Sullenberger asked controllers for landing options in New Jersey, mentioning Teterboro Airport.[29][31][32] Permission was given for Teterboro's Runway 1,[32] Sullenberger initially responded, "Yes", but then replied, "We can't do it ... We're gonna be in the Hudson."[31] The aircraft passed less than 900 feet (270 m) above the George Washington Bridge. Sullenberger commanded over the cabin address system to "brace for impact"[33] and the flight attendants relayed the command to passengers.[34] Meanwhile, air traffic controllers asked the Coast Guard to caution vessels in the Hudson and ask them to prepare to help with the rescue.[35]

Ditching and evacuation

[edit]

About ninety seconds later, at 15:30, the plane made an unpowered ditching, descending southwards at about 125 knots (140 mph; 230 km/h) into the middle of the North River section of the Hudson tidal estuary, at 40°46′10″N 74°00′16″W / 40.769444°N 74.004444°W / 40.769444; -74.004444[36] on the New York side of the state line, roughly opposite West 50th Street (near the Intrepid Museum) in Midtown Manhattan and Port Imperial in Weehawken, New Jersey.[citation needed]

According to FDR data, the plane impacted the river at a calibrated airspeed of 125 knots (140 mph; 230 km/h) with a 9.5° pitch angle, flight path angle of −3.4°, angle of attack between 13° and 14°, and a descent rate of 750 feet per minute (3.8 m/s).[7]: 48  Flight attendants compared the ditching to a "hard landing" with "one impact, no bounce, then a gradual deceleration".[31] The ebb tide then began to take the plane southward.[37]

Sullenberger opened the cockpit door and gave the order to evacuate. The crew began evacuating the passengers through the four overwing window exits and into an inflatable slide raft deployed from the front right passenger door (the front left slide failed to operate, so the manual inflation handle was pulled). The evacuation was made more difficult by the fact that someone opened the rear left door, allowing more water to enter the plane; whether this was a flight attendant[38] or a passenger is disputed.[7]: 41 [39][40][41] Water was also entering through a hole in the fuselage and through cargo doors that had come open,[42] so as the water rose the attendant urged passengers to move forward by climbing over seats.[d] One passenger was a wheelchair user.[44][45] Finally, Sullenberger walked the cabin twice to confirm it was empty.[46][47][48]

The air and water temperatures were about 19 °F (−7 °C) and 41 °F (5 °C), respectively.[7]: 24  Some evacuees waited for rescue knee-deep in water on the partially submerged slides, with some wearing life vests. Others stood on the wings or, fearing an explosion, swam away from the plane.[38] One passenger, after helping with the evacuation, found the wing so crowded that he jumped into the river and swam to a boat.[31][49][50]

Rescue

[edit]
  • Coast Guard video of the water landing, and rescue
  • First NY Waterway ferry arrives at the crash site
    First NY Waterway ferry arrives at the crash site
  • Rescue efforts and the Coast Guard, as well as Flight 1549 halfway sinking
    Rescue efforts and the Coast Guard, as well as Flight 1549 halfway sinking
  • Boats surround the tail of the sunken plane, visible just above the water line
    Boats surround the tail of the sunken plane, visible just above the water line

Two NY Waterway ferries arrived within minutes[51][52] and began taking people aboard using a Jason's cradle;[33] numerous other boats, including from the U.S. Coast Guard, were quickly on scene as well.[53] Sullenberger advised the ferry crews to rescue those on the wings first, as they were in more jeopardy than those on the slides, which detached to become life rafts.[33][failed verification] The last person was taken from the plane at 15:55.[54]

About 140 New York City firefighters responded to nearby docks,[55][56][57] as did police, helicopters, and various vessels and divers.[55] Other agencies provided medical help on the Weehawken side of the river, where most passengers were taken.[58]

Aftermath

[edit]
The partially submerged aircraft tied up alongside Battery Park City

Passengers and crew sustained 95 minor and five serious injuries,[e][7]: 6  including a deep laceration on flight attendant Welsh's leg.[31][60] 78 people received medical treatment, mostly for minor injuries[61] and hypothermia;[62] 24 passengers and two rescuers were treated at hospitals,[63] with two passengers kept overnight. Eye damage from jet fuel caused one passenger to need glasses.[49] No animals were being carried on the flight.[64]

Each passenger later received a letter of apology, $5,000 in compensation for lost baggage (and $5,000 more if they could demonstrate larger losses), and a refund of their ticket price.[65][66] In May 2009, they received any belongings that had been recovered. Passengers also reported offers of $10,000 each in return for agreeing not to sue US Airways.[67]

The plane being recovered from the river during the night of January 17

Many passengers and rescuers later experienced post-traumatic stress symptoms such as sleeplessness, flashbacks, and panic attacks; some began an email support group.[68] Patrick Harten, the controller who had worked the flight, said that "the hardest, most traumatic part of the entire event was when it was over", and that he was "gripped by raw moments of shock and grief".[69]

A few months after the crash, Captain Sullenberger, while being interviewed by AARP: The Magazine, was asked how he was able to execute a nearly perfect water landing. He replied, "One way of looking at this might be that for 42 years, I've been making small, regular deposits in this bank of experience, education and training. And on January 15, the balance was sufficient so that I could make a very large withdrawal."[70]

In an effort to prevent similar accidents, officials captured and exterminated 1,235 Canada geese at 17 locations across New York City in mid-2009 and coated 1,739 goose eggs with oil to smother the developing goslings.[71] As of 2017, 70,000 birds had been intentionally killed in New York City through programs instituted after the ditching.[72]

N106US, the accident aircraft, was purchased by the Carolinas Aviation Museum (since renamed to Sullenberger Aviation Museum) in Charlotte, North Carolina, where it (and the plane's engines) was put on display.[73][74][75]

Investigation

[edit]

The partially submerged plane was towed downstream and moored to a pier near the World Financial Center in Lower Manhattan, roughly 4 miles (6 km) from the ditching location.[34] On January 17, the aircraft was taken by barge[76][77] to New Jersey.[78] The left engine, which had been detached from the aircraft by the ditching, was recovered from the riverbed on January 23.[79]

The initial National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) evaluation that the plane had lost thrust after a bird strike[80][81][82] was confirmed by analysis of the cockpit voice and flight data recorders.[83]

It was found in the investigation that two days before the accident, the aircraft had experienced a compressor stall[84][85] on the right engine, but the engine had restarted and the flight was completed. A faulty temperature sensor was found to be the cause of the compressor stall. This sensor had been replaced and the inspection also verified the engine had not been damaged in that incident.[86]

A Canada goose brooding its eggs

On January 21, the NTSB found evidence of damage from a soft-body impact in the right engine along with organic debris including a feather.[87][88] The left engine also showed soft-body impacts, with "dents on both the spinner and inlet lip of the engine cowling. Five booster inlet guide vanes are fractured and eight outlet guide vanes are missing."[89] Both engines, missing large portions of their housings,[90] were sent to the manufacturer for examination.[89] On January 31, the plane was moved to Kearny, New Jersey. The bird remains[86][91] were later identified by DNA testing to be Canada geese, which typically weigh more than engines are designed to withstand ingesting.[86]

Since the plane had been assembled in France, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA; the European counterpart of the FAA) and the Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety (BEA; the French counterpart of the NTSB) joined the investigation, with technical assistance from Airbus and GE Aviation/Snecma, respectively the manufacturers of the airframe and the engines.[92][93][94]

Goose feather found in the left engine

The NTSB used flight simulators to test the possibility that the flight could have returned safely to LaGuardia or diverted to Teterboro; only seven of the thirteen simulated returns to La Guardia succeeded, and only one of the two to Teterboro. Furthermore, the NTSB report called these simulations unrealistic: "The immediate turn made by the pilots during the simulations did not reflect or account for real-world considerations, such as the time delay required to recognize the bird strike and decide on a course of action." A further simulation, in which a 35-second delay was inserted to allow for those, crashed.[7]: 50  In testimony before the NTSB, Sullenberger maintained that there had been no time to bring the plane to any airport and that attempting to do so would likely have killed those onboard and more on the ground.[95]

The Board ultimately ruled that Sullenberger had made the correct decision,[95] reasoning that the checklist for dual-engine failure is designed for higher altitudes when pilots have more time to deal with the situation, and that while simulations showed that the plane might have just barely made it back to LaGuardia, those scenarios assumed an instant decision to do so, with no time allowed for assessing the situation.[6]

On May 4, 2010, the NTSB issued its final report, which identified the probable cause as "the ingestion of large birds into each engine, which resulted in an almost total loss of thrust in both engines".[7]: 123  The final report credited the outcome to four factors: good decision-making and teamwork by the cockpit crew (including decisions to immediately turn on the APU and to ditch in the Hudson); that the A320 is certified for extended overwater operation (and hence carried life vests and additional raft/slides) even though not required for that route; the performance of the flight crew during the evacuation; and the proximity of working vessels to the ditching site. Contributing factors were good visibility and fast response times from the ferry operators and emergency responders. The report made 34 recommendations, including that engines be tested for resistance to bird strikes at low speeds; development of checklists for dual-engine failures at low altitude, and changes to checklist design in general "to minimize the risk of flight crewmembers becoming stuck in an inappropriate checklist or portion of a checklist"; improved pilot training for water landings; provision of life vests on all flights regardless of route, and changes to the locations of vests and other emergency equipment; research into improved wildlife management, and technical innovations on aircraft, to reduce bird strikes; research into possible changes in passenger brace positions; and research into "methods of overcoming passengers' inattention" during preflight safety briefings.[7]: 124 

Author and pilot William Langewiesche asserted that insufficient credit was given to the A320's fly-by-wire design, by which the pilot uses a side-stick to make control inputs to the flight control computers. The computers then impose adjustments and limits of their own to keep the plane stable, which the pilot cannot override even in an emergency. This design allowed the pilots of Flight 1549 to concentrate on engine restart and deciding the course, without the burden of manually adjusting the glidepath to reduce the plane's rate of descent.[54] However, Sullenberger said that these computer-imposed limits also prevented him from achieving the optimal landing flare for the ditching, which would have softened the impact.[96]

Crew awards and honors

[edit]

The reactions of all members of the crew, the split second decision making and the handling of this emergency and evacuation was "text book" and an example to us all. To have safely executed this emergency ditching and evacuation, with the loss of no lives, is a heroic and unique aviation achievement.

—Guild of Air Pilots and Air Navigators citation

An NTSB board member called the ditching "the most successful ... in aviation history. These people knew what they were supposed to do and they did it and as a result, no lives were lost."[78] New York State Governor David Paterson called the incident "a Miracle on the Hudson".[61][97][98] U.S. President George W. Bush said he was "inspired by the skill and heroism of the flight crew", and praised the emergency responders and volunteers.[99] President-elect Barack Obama said that everyone was proud of Sullenberger's "heroic and graceful job in landing the damaged aircraft". He thanked the crew, whom he invited to his inauguration five days later.[100][101]

The Guild of Air Pilots and Air Navigators awarded the crew the rarely bestowed Master's Medal on January 22, 2009, for outstanding aviation achievement, at the discretion of the Master of the Guild.[8] New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg presented the crew with the Keys to the City, and Sullenberger with a replacement copy of a library book lost on the flight, Sidney Dekker's Just Culture: Balancing Safety and Accountability.[102] Rescuers received Certificates of Honor.[103]

The crew received a standing ovation at the Super Bowl XLIII on February 1, 2009,[104] and Sullenberger threw the ceremonial first pitch of the 2009 Major League Baseball season for the San Francisco Giants.[105] His Giants jersey was inscribed with the name "Sully" and the number 155 – the count of people aboard the plane.[106][107]

On July 28, passengers Dave Sanderson and Barry Leonard organized a thank-you luncheon for emergency responders.[108][109]

Sullenberger was named Grand Marshal for the 2010 Tournament of Roses Parade in Pasadena, California.[110]

Sullenberger retired on March 3, 2010, after thirty years with US Airways and its predecessor, Pacific Southwest Airlines. At the end of his final flight he was reunited with Skiles and a number of the passengers from Flight 1549.[111]

On April 28, 2010, the entire flight crew were awarded the National Air and Space Museum Trophy for Current Achievement.[112] In 2013, they were also inducted into the International Air & Space Hall of Fame at the San Diego Air & Space Museum.[113]

In August 2010, aeronautical chart publisher Jeppesen issued a humorous approach plate titled "Hudson Miracle APCH", dedicated to the five crew of Flight 1549 and annotated "Presented with Pride and Gratitude from your friends at Jeppesen".[114]

[edit]
N106US on display at Sullenberger Aviation Museum

Sullenberger's 2009 memoir, Highest Duty: My Search for What Really Matters, was adapted into the feature film Sully, directed by Clint Eastwood.[115] It starred Tom Hanks as Sullenberger and Aaron Eckhart as Skiles. Vince Lombardi, the captain of the first ferry to reach the downed plane, appears as himself.[116] It was released by Warner Bros. on September 9, 2016.[117]

Irish composer Donnacha Dennehy wrote Hard Landing about the event. It was commissioned by the BBC, first performed by the BBC National Orchestra of Wales on 6 February 2025, and premiered on BBC Radio 3 on 29 March 2025.[118][119]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

US Airways Flight 1549

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
US Airways Flight 1549 was an Airbus A320-214 (registration N106US) operating a scheduled domestic passenger service from LaGuardia Airport in New York to Charlotte Douglas International Airport in North Carolina on January 15, 2009. Approximately two minutes after takeoff from runway 4, the aircraft encountered a flock of Canada geese at an altitude of 2,500 to 2,818 feet, resulting in the ingestion of multiple large birds into both engines and an almost total loss of thrust. Unable to reach LaGuardia or nearby airports, the flight crew executed a controlled ditching on the Hudson River approximately 8.5 miles north of LaGuardia, near the Port Imperial Ferry Terminal. The , carrying 150 passengers including one lap-held and five members, came to rest partially submerged with its intact, allowing evacuation through forward and overwing exits onto the wings. Nearby ferries and emergency vessels responded rapidly, rescuing all 155 occupants within 20 minutes; while five individuals sustained serious injuries, there were no fatalities. Captain Chesley Sullenberger, with extensive flight experience, and First Officer coordinated the response, including attempts to restart the engines and maintain glide control despite task saturation and checklist limitations. The National Transportation Safety Board determined the probable cause to be the bird ingestion exceeding engine certification standards for multiple large bird strikes, compounded by factors such as inadequate ditching training, high descent rate on impact, and radar systems unable to detect the flock due to filtering. Subsequent simulations confirmed the infeasibility of returning to an airport, validating the crew's decision to ditch. The incident prompted NTSB recommendations for improved engine bird ingestion testing, enhanced pilot training for dual-engine failures at low altitudes, and better wildlife hazard management at airports.

Flight Preparation

Aircraft Specifications

The aircraft operating Flight 1549 was an A320-214, registered N106US, powered by two CFM56-5B4/P high-bypass engines each producing approximately 27,000 pounds of . Built in 1999 with its first flight on June 15 of that year and delivered to on August 2, the had logged 25,241 total flight hours and 16,299 cycles by the time of the incident on January 15, 2009. The A320-214 incorporates a digital flight control system, which transmits pilot inputs electronically to , providing enhanced stability and envelope protection that limits excessive maneuvers and supports precise low-speed handling through automated adjustments. Its supercritical wing design, featuring a high and advanced high-lift devices such as leading-edge slats and trailing-edge flaps, contributes to a favorable during unpowered glides and enables controlled descent at minimum speeds around 150 knots. Engine certification under FAA standards (§33.76) requires demonstration of containment and continued operation following ingestion of single birds up to 4 pounds at critical speeds, though multiple large bird strikes, as occurred, can exceed these single-event tolerances and result in substantial damage. The aircraft's pre-flight inspection and maintenance records indicated compliance with regulatory requirements, with no unresolved discrepancies or recent major repairs noted. N106US had no recorded prior incidents involving engine failure or significant structural issues before the flight. The fuselage's aluminum structure with a circular cross-section provided inherent characteristics that supported flotation for several minutes post-impact, despite the model not being specifically certified for ditching operations.

Crew Qualifications

The captain, Chesley Sullenberger, possessed an Airline Transport Pilot certificate with type ratings for the Airbus A320, , DC-9, , and Avro RJ85, having accumulated 19,663 total flight hours, including 4,765 as pilot-in-command on the A320 as of January 2009. A former U.S. who flew the F-4 Phantom, Sullenberger also held glider pilot qualifications from his early aviation career, providing foundational experience in unpowered . Hired by in 1980, he had completed a line check on December 27, 2007, ground training on February 19, 2008, and a proficiency check on February 21, 2008, under the airline's Advanced Qualification Program, which incorporated dual-engine failure recognition at altitude and ditching procedures in simulator and classroom settings. His prior role as an expert involved consulting on risk analysis and prevention strategies, underscoring a focus on empirical threat mitigation. The first officer, , similarly held an Airline Transport Pilot certificate with type ratings for the A320, , and , totaling 15,643 flight hours with 37 hours as second-in-command on the A320 at the time of the incident. Employed by since 1986, Skiles had undergone a proficiency check on December 31, 2008, and a line check on January 8, 2009, including simulator sessions on engine-out emergencies that emphasized execution under time pressure. This recent aligned with federal requirements for recurrent qualification, enabling recognition of non-standard failure modes beyond routine checklists. The cabin crew of three flight attendants met 14 CFR Part 121 certification standards, with initial dating to 1970–1982 and extended overwater operations instruction in 1989–1990, supplemented by annual recurrent updates through 2008. Their curriculum included two-hour wet raft drills for flotation device handling and slide-raft inflation, alongside 20-minute A320-specific dry ditching exercises covering exit assessments for water ingress, obstructions, and passenger coordination. protocols mandated briefing passengers on bracing, life vests, and evacuation paths pre-flight, with emphasis on rapid door operation and slide deployment in water scenarios, though assuming some powered flight time for setup. NTSB review of records confirmed their through demonstrated procedural compliance in evaluations.

Passenger Manifest

US Airways Flight 1549 carried 150 passengers and 5 crew members, for a total of 155 people on board. The passengers represented a range of ages from infants to seniors, predominantly citizens, though specific nationalities were not detailed in official reports beyond the crew's American backgrounds. Professions among passengers varied, including travelers and families, consistent with a domestic route serving business hubs. The crew consisted of Captain Chesley Sullenberger (age 57), First Officer (age 49), and three flight attendants: Donna Dent (age 51), Doreen Welsh (age 28), and Sheila Dail. All crew members were experienced employees based in the United States. Boarding proceeded routinely at LaGuardia Airport's Terminal B on January 15, 2009, with the flight scheduled as a nonstop service to Charlotte Douglas International Airport; approximately 20 passengers held tickets connecting onward to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Weather conditions were clear with light winds and temperatures around 20°F (-7°C), facilitating standard pre-departure procedures without delays. No irregularities in passenger screening or loading were noted in investigative records.

Incident Sequence

Departure from LaGuardia

US Airways Flight 1549, an Airbus A320-214, departed from Runway 4 at 3:26 p.m. EST on January 15, 2009, bound for . The aircraft received clearance from for takeoff, with instructions to maintain a heading of 360 degrees (due north) after departure and climb to 5,000 feet. The departure followed standard procedures for a westbound flight from the east-facing runway, with the first officer as the pilot flying. At 3:25:51 p.m., the crew contacted the departure controller, reporting the aircraft at 700 feet and climbing toward the assigned altitude. The initial climb progressed routinely, with the aircraft gaining airspeed and altitude in accordance with normal operations. LaGuardia Airport's location in a densely urban area near the and places it along pathways frequented by bird flocks, including migratory Canada geese traveling from northern breeding grounds such as during winter periods. These patterns contribute to elevated bird activity at low altitudes over the airport vicinity, though specific real-time observations were not noted in communications prior to the flight's airborne phase.

Bird Strike Event


At 3:27:11 p.m. EST on January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549 encountered a flock of Canada geese (Branta canadensis) while climbing through an altitude of approximately 2,818 feet above ground level shortly after departing LaGuardia Airport. The aircraft, an Airbus A320-214, was maintaining an indicated airspeed of about 185 knots during the initial climb phase, with engines operating at roughly 80% fan speed. The flock consisted of multiple large-bodied Canada geese, each with a body mass exceeding 4 pounds and typical weights ranging from 7 to 9 pounds for adults, posing significant ingestion risks to turbine engines due to their size and mass. At least four birds were confirmed to have impacted the , with two ingested into each engine, as determined by subsequent forensic analysis. Immediate auditory cues captured on the cockpit voice recorder included loud bangs, thumps, thuds, shuddering, and rumbling sounds at the moment of collision, coinciding with instrument readings showing rapid deceleration of engine fan and core speeds, indicating near-total thrust loss in both engines. Radar data from Newark and John F. Kennedy air traffic control facilities recorded primary targets—consistent with a group of birds—intersecting the flight path at 3:27:01 p.m., providing empirical corroboration of the flock's presence though not visible to the controller in real time. Forensic evidence from the Smithsonian Institution's Feather Identification Laboratory confirmed Canada goose remains in both engines and the fuselage via morphological analysis and DNA barcoding, verifying the species and multi-bird ingestion event.

Loss of Thrust and Glide

Following the bird ingestion at approximately 3,200 feet above ground level, both CFM56-5B4/P engines suffered a near-total loss of thrust, with flight data recorder (FDR) parameters showing the left engine's N1 speed dropping from 82% to 35% and the right from 82% to 15% within seconds, confirming dual flameout by 15:27:15 Eastern Standard Time. Cockpit voice recorder (CVR) audio captured the captain's report of "both of 'em rolling back," reflecting the immediate mechanical damage to engine cores from at least two Canada geese per engine, each averaging 8 pounds, which prevented sustained combustion despite residual fan rotation. The crew promptly initiated engine restart procedures per the dual engine checklist, starting at 15:27:18.5 with ignition attempts and cycling the engine master switches—right to OFF at 15:28:31 (N2 below 15%) and left to OFF at 15:29:27 (N2 around 83%) then ON at 15:29:37 (N2 dropping to 39%). Thrust levers were retarded to by 15:28:01, but no relight occurred after 30–40 seconds per attempt, attributable to core damage, insufficient altitude for windmilling, and time constraints below 3,000 feet; CVR confirmed the at 15:29:44 with "no relight." With irrecoverable, the transitioned to unpowered glide dynamics, peaking at 3,060 feet at 15:27:30 before a controlled descent over about 3 minutes to at 15:30:43. FDR data revealed management at 185–193 knots (KCAS) during the majority of the glide, with an initial post-strike maximum of 214 knots decaying under aerodynamic drag and , and an average descent rate of approximately 1,600 feet per minute from 1,200 feet by 15:29:00 to 200 feet by 15:30:00. Angle of attack stabilized at 7°–9° to optimize in the system's normal law, transitioning to alpha-protection mode below 150 feet to prevent while maintaining pitch attitudes up to 9.5° at impact.

Ditching and Immediate Survival

Pilot Maneuvers

Following the bird strike at 15:27:10 EST on January 15, 2009, which resulted in loss of thrust in both engines by 15:27:13, Captain Chesley Sullenberger took control at 15:27:23 and began maneuvering the Airbus A320 towards LaGuardia Airport while the first officer initiated the dual engine failure checklist. At 15:27:33, Sullenberger declared a mayday to New York TRACON: "Mayday mayday mayday... hit birds, we've lost thrust in both engines. We're turning back towards LaGuardia." The aircraft's position—4.3 to 4.5 miles north-northwest of LaGuardia runway 22 at an altitude of 2,500 to 2,818 feet—necessitated a heading reversal, but the elapsed time for assessing engine status and attempting restarts rendered the glide distance insufficient for safe clearance of terrain and obstacles en route. Diversion to , suggested by ATC at 15:28:55 and located 9.5 miles east-northeast of the strike point, was similarly evaluated as unviable due to the extended distance exceeding the aircraft's unpowered glide capability, factoring in wind conditions and required turns. Sullenberger communicated this at 15:28:10 with "We're unable" regarding LaGuardia and at 15:29:21 with "We can't do it" for . These assessments stemmed from first-principles consideration of the A320's glide performance—approximately 2.5 nautical miles per 1,000 feet of altitude under optimal conditions—adjusted for real-time variables like decay, configuration drag from extended flaps, and the absence of thrust for maneuvering. By 15:28:28 to 15:29:27, the crew committed to ditching in the , executing a left turn to align southbound into the northerly along the river's widest section for maximal survivability. This controlled was prioritized over proximate land options, such as rail yards, where uneven surfaces and obstacles would elevate risks of airframe breakup and post-impact fire upon ground contact. The maneuver maintained a stable glide at flaps 2, achieving a descent angle of about -3.4 degrees to at 15:30:43–45 with a sink rate of 12.5 feet per second. Simulator recreations at the Training Center in April 2009 substantiated the infeasibility of airport returns under operational conditions: of 15 trials, only 53 percent reached LaGuardia or Teterboro when assuming immediate turns post-thrust loss, whereas incorporating a realistic 35-second delay for and led to consistent shortfalls in glide distance and safe landing parameters. The NTSB determined the crew's maneuvers and ditching selection provided the highest probability of survival, crediting professional judgment and despite high workload and non-ideal aircraft mode protections.

Impact and Evacuation

The A320-214 struck the surface at approximately 130 knots, with wings level and a nose-up pitch attitude of about 9.5 degrees, resulting in a sink rate of 13 feet per second. Water ingress occurred rapidly through the forward doors, emergency exits, a breach in the , and the underfuselage structure as the decelerated and settled tail-low. About 30 seconds prior to impact, Captain Chesley Sullenberger issued a "" command over the , which flight attendants relayed throughout the cabin to direct passengers into protective postures. Passengers were also instructed to don life vests, but pre-flight inattention to safety briefings contributed to low compliance, with only about one-third having vests inflated immediately after ditching; the 36°F water temperature exacerbated difficulties in manual inflation and retention during egress. Evacuation began within seconds of touchdown at 15:31 Eastern Standard Time, with overwing exits opened by passengers at 15:30:58 and forward doors by crew shortly thereafter, allowing access to the wings and deployment of slide-rafts. The process unfolded orderly over 2 to 4 minutes, as flight attendants directed passengers to exit via the safest available paths while inhibiting rear exits to prevent congestion; crew members remained aboard until all passengers had evacuated, with Sullenberger conducting two sweeps of the cabin to confirm no one remained trapped.

On-Site Rescue Efforts

The initial on-site rescue was spearheaded by nearby commercial ferries, which arrived within minutes of the aircraft's ditching in the Hudson River at 15:27 EST on January 15, 2009. The New York Waterway ferry Thomas Jefferson reached the scene around 15:34 EST, approximately seven minutes after impact, and rescued 56 occupants from the wings and doors. Additional New York Waterway vessels followed rapidly, with the Moira Smith saving 14 people and the Gov. Thomas Kean rescuing 24, including priority given to those on the wings as advised by the flight crew; collectively, these ferries evacuated 137 occupants. Law enforcement and emergency services mobilized concurrently, with the U.S. Coast Guard dispatching small boats by 15:32 EST and the New York Police Department (NYPD) launching vessels such as Harbor Charlie along with divers by 15:35 EST to assist in recovering any individuals from the water. The Fire Department of New York (FDNY) Marine Unit, including Marine 1A, arrived to help secure the sinking aircraft and support evacuations, while NYPD helicopters provided aerial oversight and potential hoist capabilities. The Circle Line ferry also contributed by ferrying first responders and establishing an initial point on its deck. All 155 passengers and crew were rescued from the aircraft and surrounding water by approximately 15:37 EST, just 10 minutes after the ditching, averting severe in the near-freezing conditions through prompt transfer to the heated interiors of vessels where blankets and warm fluids were provided. This coordinated effort among civilian ferries and official agencies ensured no fatalities occurred on site, with occupants subsequently transported to nearby piers for further assessment.

Human and Material Outcomes

Injuries and Medical Response

All 155 occupants of US Airways Flight 1549 survived the ditching on , 2009, with no fatalities reported. Five individuals sustained serious injuries requiring hospitalization: one with a deep laceration to the leg and four passengers with fractures or other significant trauma. An additional 95 occupants experienced minor injuries, primarily lacerations, sprains, and abrasions incurred during evacuation or impact. Immersion in the 36°F (2°C) waters contributed to widespread risks, particularly affecting vulnerable groups such as five children and several elderly passengers, who faced heightened susceptibility to cold stress despite brief exposure times averaging under 30 minutes. Most injuries were non-life-threatening, with no spinal or head trauma documented beyond minor contusions. Immediate medical response involved triage by New York City Fire Department Emergency Medical Services (FDNY EMS) personnel at Manhattan piers, where survivors were ferried ashore by responding vessels. Approximately 60 ambulances facilitated transport to at least eight facilities, including Bellevue Hospital Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and , prioritizing those with immersion-related symptoms for rewarming and wound care. Psychological was provided on-site and at hospitals to address acute stress reactions, though no formal PTSD diagnoses were immediately reported. Over 90% of treated individuals were released within 48 hours, reflecting the incident's low-severity injury profile.

Aircraft Damage Assessment

The A320-214 (N106US) sustained substantial damage during the ditching on January 15, 2009, primarily from the high-energy water impact and subsequent submersion, though the remained largely intact, enabling passenger evacuation. The descent rate at measured 12.5 feet per second with a flightpath angle of -3.4 degrees, exceeding the aircraft's ditching certification parameters of 3.5 feet per second and a shallower glideslope assumption. This overload compromised structural elements beyond design limits, with cabin pressures reaching an average of 15.1 psi and a maximum of 22.6 psi, compared to certification averages of 7.3 psi. Fuselage examination revealed forward section damage including gouges, dents, and punctures, such as a 6-by-12-inch dent between frames 11 and 12, and an 8-by-11-inch puncture between frames 21 and 22. Aft fuselage suffered progressive crushing of the subcargo from frames 50 to 56, loss of lower skin panels aft of frame 60, and shearing of the lower third of the , leading to significant breaching and rapid water ingress to seat-pan level within seconds. The frame 65 vertical beam punctured the cabin due to impact forces and water pressure, contributing to injuries, while the right-side belly fairing was missing from frames 37 to 51. Despite these breaches, no seats dislodged, and control surfaces along with stabilizers remained attached, preserving sufficient integrity for survival. Both CFM56-5B4/P engines experienced severe ditching-related damage, including fractured and bent fan blades from water contact while rotating. The left engine separated from the pylon, with an 8-by-9-inch dent in the lip, while the right engine remained attached but showed similar nacelle fracturing. Metallurgical of fractured components indicated overload failure without evidence of pre-existing defects. The aircraft was recovered from the bed after initially floating, with the left engine located separately on January 23, 2009, and the wreckage preserved at the NTSB laboratory for detailed post-accident examination. Cargo doors were found open during recovery, and components such as the showed no major deformation, facilitating comprehensive structural and systems analysis.

Causal Investigation

NTSB Methodology

The (NTSB) initiated its investigation into the ditching of US Airways Flight 1549 immediately after the event on January 15, 2009, dispatching a go-team to the site for on-scene evidence collection and coordination with recovery efforts. The methodology emphasized empirical data from recorders, prioritizing the recovery of the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR), which were extracted and analyzed in the NTSB's Vehicle Recorder Division. The CVR, recording from 15:00:32 to 15:30:43 Eastern Standard Time, captured audio of the bird encounter at 15:27:10.4, crew responses, and alerts, while the FDR provided 178 parameters, including the strike at 2,818 feet above ground level, rapid thrust decay starting at 15:27:13, and descent metrics such as at or below VLS and alpha-protection activation below 150 feet. Interviews formed a complementary data layer, conducted with the flight crew—Captain with 19,663 total flight hours and First Officer with 15,643 hours—along with cabin crew and air traffic controllers, to reconstruct decision timelines and operational inputs without inferring impairment, as confirmed by negative post-accident drug and alcohol tests at 22:05 and 22:21 on January 15. Wreckage documentation began on-site January 15-17, 2009, prior to full recovery on January 23, enabling metallurgical and structural analysis; engine inspections revealed fan blade distortion and core damage consistent with multiple large bird ingestions, with biological remnants identified via DNA as Canada geese (at least two per engine, each weighing about 8 pounds) by the Smithsonian Institution, achieving a 99% genetic match. Flight path recreation relied on simulator-based performance studies to test glide dynamics empirically, conducted April 14-16, , at the Training Center using FDR parameters to model the final 300 feet of descent, including a at 125 knots , 9.5° pitch attitude, and -3.4° flight path . These sessions quantified the aircraft's energy state post-thrust loss, showing immediate returns to LaGuardia or Teterboro airports succeeded in 53% of trials but failed with even brief delays, validating the Hudson ditching as the outcome aligned with available data. A public hearing from June 9-11, , integrated these findings for transparency. The process culminated in the final report adopted May 4, 2010, establishing the as ingestion of large birds into each engine, yielding an almost total loss of thrust and necessitating the controlled .

Engine Failure Analysis

The (NTSB) investigation determined that both CFM56-5B engines on US Airways Flight 1549 experienced compressor stalls following the ingestion of multiple large Canada geese during takeoff on January 15, 2009. Examination of the engines revealed extensive damage to fan blades and compressor stages, with soft-body impact marks consistent with birds weighing between 5.8 and 10.7 pounds each, far exceeding the 4-pound bird certification standard applicable to these engines at the time of their 1996 type certification. Teardown analysis confirmed no pre-existing mechanical defects or maintenance issues in either ; the failures stemmed directly from the strikes disrupting airflow and causing mechanical distortion in the sections. The geese, estimated at several individuals based on and tissue residues, entered the cores, leading to a cascade of stalls where incoming air was insufficiently compressed, resulting in and total thrust loss within seconds. This exceeded the engines' design resilience for single or smaller ingestions, as multiple large birds overloaded the fan and core components simultaneously. Crew attempts to restart the engines using the in-flight relight procedure failed due to persistent airflow disruptions from damaged blades and compressor vanes, preventing stable ignition and sustained operation despite adequate fuel flow. In contrast to prior CFM56 bird strike incidents, which typically involved smaller flocks or single birds allowing partial power recovery or successful restarts, the scale of in Flight 1549—occurring at low altitude with both engines affected—rendered recovery impossible within the available time and altitude margins. Such dual-engine total failures from remain exceedingly rare, with historical data indicating CFM56 engines have demonstrated robustness against lesser threats but vulnerability to oversized, multi-bird events.

Bird Hazard Evaluation

The bird strike involving US Airways Flight 1549 on January 15, 2009, was caused by a flock of Canada geese (Branta canadensis), confirmed through analysis of feather and tissue remains recovered from the aircraft's engines. These geese were identified as migratory individuals wintering in the New York area, originating from breeding grounds in the region rather than local resident populations, based on stable isotope analysis of feathers. Canada geese pose a significant due to their large size—adults weigh 3-6 kg with wingspans up to 1.8 meters—enabling them to cause substantial damage upon ingestion into engines, as evidenced by prior incidents at , including a 1990 Boeing 737-400 that ingested two greater Canada geese during takeoff, resulting in an aborted departure. LaGuardia Airport experienced elevated bird activity attributable to proximate habitats, including Flushing Bay, the , and surrounding urban wetlands that provide foraging and roosting sites for waterfowl. From 2004 to 2009, FAA-mandated wildlife hazard assessments at the airport documented geese, ducks, and gulls as primary species of concern, with Canada geese contributing to multiple strikes due to their prevalence in flight paths during low-altitude departures. Pre-incident mitigation efforts, such as a plan approved by the FAA in December 2003, relied on monitoring and limited but demonstrated inadequate control of goose populations, as subsequent data showed an 80% reduction only after intensified post-2009 measures like targeted and habitat alteration. Strike reporting deficiencies prior to 2009 hampered comprehensive hazard evaluation, with the FAA's National Wildlife Strike Database showing incomplete data collection despite a 1999 NTSB recommendation for mandatory reporting by operators. Underreporting obscured the true incidence of encounters at airports like LaGuardia, where resident and wintering migratory populations had been increasing since the due to federal protections under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and reduced hunting pressures on non-migratory flocks. From a causal perspective, the strike was preventable through enhanced ground-based interventions rather than exclusive reliance on design tolerances for bird ingestion. Improved wildlife hazard mapping, integrating surveillance and population surveys, could have identified high-risk flocks in departure corridors, enabling proactive dispersal via or border collies before takeoff. Inadequate pre-2009 culling and habitat management at LaGuardia failed to address root attractants, such as unmanaged grassy areas and water bodies, perpetuating a foreseeable despite known vulnerabilities of CFM56 engines to multiple large strikes.

Systemic Responses

Regulatory Reforms

The issued 34 safety recommendations following its investigation into the accident, primarily directed to the to address vulnerabilities exposed by the dual-engine bird ingestion event. These included directives to revise engine certification standards under 14 CFR § 33.76 for bird ingestion testing at reduced fan speeds approximating low-thrust climb conditions, rather than full power, to better simulate real-world failures like those on Flight 1549. In response, the FAA amended § 33.76 through Amendment 33-36, mandating engines ingest and contain one large (up to 8 pounds) plus multiple medium flocking birds (4 pounds each) while maintaining operation at climb settings below 100% speed, with tests reflecting post-ingestion surge and . This rulemaking, informed by an Aerospace Industries Association working group review of Flight 1549 data, was finalized on April 4, 2023, after reevaluation of the bird ingestion database incorporating incidents from 2000–2008. Additional recommendations targeted procedural safeguards, prompting the FAA to require operators to develop and validate concise checklists for low-altitude dual-engine failures, integrated into flight manuals without reliance on exceptional pilot skill. The agency issued Notice N8900.339 in 2016 to resolve discrepancies in emergency procedures and ensure applicability to scenarios like the rapid power loss at 2,977 feet altitude on January 15, 2009. Regulatory updates also extended to ditching certification under 14 CFR § 25.801, requiring demonstration of survivable water landings without engine or hydraulic power from engines, addressing limitations in pre-accident standards that assumed powered glides. While some recommendations, such as enhanced core ingestion tests for smaller engines, remained under ongoing FAA review via the bird ingestion database, these reforms prioritized empirical testing data from the CFM56-2B engines' failures to mitigate causal risks from large bird flocks.

Airport Wildlife Management Changes

In the aftermath of the January 15, 2009, bird strike involving US Airways Flight 1549, which ingested geese shortly after departing , federal and local authorities implemented expanded wildlife control measures targeting resident bird populations, particularly geese, in proximity to major airports. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services program, in coordination with agencies and the of New York and , initiated aggressive operations within a seven-mile radius of LaGuardia, , and Newark Liberty airports. These efforts included rounding up and euthanizing thousands of geese on city-owned properties, with approximately 2,000 geese removed from public parks in , , , and the Bronx in the summer of 2009 alone. By 2011, the program had entered its third year, demonstrating sustained commitment to reducing attractants like food sources and standing water while modifying habitats to deter nesting. Over the subsequent years through 2017, more than 70,000 geese were culled in the metropolitan area specifically to mitigate aviation risks. These interventions addressed prior shortcomings in wildlife management, where federal regulations under 14 CFR 139.337 required Wildlife Hazard Assessments only for certain certificated airports and limited responsibilities to on-airport areas, leaving off-site flocks—such as the one encountered by Flight 1549—largely unmanaged. The highlighted that the incident occurred beyond LaGuardia's jurisdictional range, underscoring the need for proactive, expansive deterrence rather than reactive measures confined to airport perimeters. In response, the enhanced integrated hazard programs at its facilities, incorporating habitat alterations like vegetation management and water drainage to minimize habitats, alongside increased harassment techniques using noise and visual deterrents. Empirical data indicate these changes yielded measurable reductions in low-altitude bird strikes at U.S. airports, with incremental mitigation strategies—including expanded culling and habitat modifications—correlating to fewer damaging encounters during critical takeoff and landing phases, despite overall national strike reports rising due to increased air traffic and bird populations. USDA Wildlife Services reported heightened collaboration with airport operators nationwide, providing research-backed advice on population control that prioritized causal factors like unchecked resident goose proliferation over less effective, localized patrols. At high-risk sites like LaGuardia, enhanced monitoring protocols, including radar-assisted detection where feasible, supported targeted interventions, though full off-airport coverage remained constrained by regulatory scope. Critics of pre-2009 approaches, including aviation safety analysts, argued that lax enforcement of population controls had allowed large flocking birds to thrive in urban-adjacent areas, amplifying strike probabilities; post-incident shifts toward systematic culling demonstrated greater efficacy in lowering encounter rates. ![Canada goose, representative of species involved in the Flight 1549 strike][float-right]

Aviation Training Enhancements

Following the ditching of US Airways Flight 1549 on January 15, 2009, the (NTSB) identified deficiencies in pre-incident training for low-altitude dual-engine failures, noting that no such specific scenarios were required or routinely simulated for A320 pilots. In response, the NTSB recommended that the (FAA) direct aircraft manufacturers to develop procedures for dual-engine power loss, including extended glide profiles and engine restart protocols, to integrate into pilot training programs. These recommendations, issued in 2010, prompted airlines to incorporate low-altitude bird-strike-induced dual-engine failure scenarios into simulator curricula, enabling crews to evaluate return-to-airport feasibility versus ditching options under compressed timelines. Post-accident simulator evaluations replicated Flight 1549's conditions, confirming that while a return to was theoretically possible in some configurations, the glide minimized risks given the actual aircraft state, thus validating Sullenberger's real-time assessment and informing scenario-based training updates. Airlines adopted these enhancements industry-wide, shifting from isolated engine-out drills to integrated simulations emphasizing causal sequencing—such as ingestion effects on decay—over sequential adherence alone, fostering adaptive in non-routine failures. Ditching procedures received heightened priority, with mandatory water-landing drills expanded in recurrent to address fuselage integrity, evacuation sequencing, and passenger briefing efficacy demonstrated during . Although some NTSB recommendations, including standardized dual-power-loss guidance, faced delayed full as of 2016, the overall adoption reduced simulated low-altitude failure mishap rates by prioritizing proactive glide and crew coordination. This evolution underscored a move toward in , where pilots weigh interdependent variables like altitude loss and restart viability rather than deterministic protocols.

Recognition and Long-Term Impact

Crew Honors

On January 22, 2009, the Guild of Air Pilots and Air Navigators awarded the entire crew of US Airways Flight 1549—Captain Chesley Sullenberger, First Officer , and flight attendants Donna Dent, Doreen Welsh, and Sheila Dail—the Master's Medal, a rare honor for exceptional skill and judgment in averting disaster. The medal recognized their coordinated response to the dual engine failure, including the precise ditching maneuver and orderly evacuation, based on cockpit voice recorder data and witness accounts reviewed by the guild. On February 9, 2009, Mayor presented the Keys to the City to all five crew members during a at City Hall, citing their actions in safeguarding 155 lives as a testament to professionalism. This civic recognition highlighted the crew's role in minimizing injuries during the and subsequent rescue, with only minor injuries reported among passengers and one serious injury to a , per initial emergency medical assessments. The full crew received the National Air and Space Museum's Trophy for Current Achievement on April 28, 2010, for demonstrating superior airmanship under extreme conditions, as evaluated through flight data recorder analysis and peer expertise. The National Transportation Safety Board's 2010 accident report further credited the crew's performance, noting their adherence to established emergency procedures and prior simulator training enabled the outcome, without evidence of deviation or superhuman feats beyond experienced execution. Post-incident, Sullenberger extended his pre-existing safety advocacy, testifying before congressional committees on and training protocols, and contributing to international standards via organizations like the , informed by forensic review of the Flight 1549 data. Skiles continued flying for (later ) until retirement in 2020, while the flight attendants received professional commendations from the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA for their evacuation leadership. These honors reflect merit assessed by authorities and officials, grounded in from the event's and procedural fidelity.

Public and Media Legacy

The emergency ditching of US Airways Flight 1549 on January 15, 2009, was promptly dubbed the "Miracle on the Hudson" by New York Governor , a label that captured widespread public awe at the survival of all 155 aboard amid the aircraft's dual engine failure from bird strikes. This framing emphasized the improbable nature of the in a major urban river, evoking immediate national relief and admiration for the flight crew's actions. Public discourse quickly divided over interpretations of the event, with some attributing survival to divine intervention, while aviation experts and analysts stressed causal factors like Captain Chesley Sullenberger's piloting proficiency, Airbus A320 redundancies, and crew coordination rather than elements. Sullenberger himself rejected mystical characterizations, crediting a "culture of " and procedural adherence honed through rigorous training, underscoring that the outcome stemmed from human and technological preparedness in response to the empirically verified bird ingestion damage. Critics of the "" narrative argued it obscured the deterministic role of safeguards and pilot experience, as evidenced by the rarity of successful dual-engine failures in similar aircraft, which occur far less frequently than implied by probabilistic claims. Media coverage amplified Sullenberger as a singular , with outlets portraying the incident through a lens of individual valor that sometimes overlooked broader systemic vulnerabilities like bird hazards, fostering a of over preventive . This hero-worship, as analyzed in journalistic studies, served as a cultural mechanism against aviation risk anxieties but drew criticism for prioritizing dramatic personal anecdotes—such as Sullenberger's calm communications—over scrutiny of lapses that enabled the strikes. While passenger and crew testimonies reinforced themes of composure under duress, some observers noted that mainstream reporting underemphasized how the event highlighted recurring bird strike data rather than isolated . Anniversaries have sustained the event's legacy in public consciousness, with the 15th in 2024 featuring reunions of survivors and crew, alongside media specials that reiterated aviation safety advancements while invoking the "miracle" shorthand to symbolize resilience. Coverage on this occasion, including CNN's retrospective and passenger reflections, focused on the ditching's role in elevating dialogues about emergency preparedness, though it continued to blend empirical survival factors with inspirational framing that risks diluting focus on preventable causal chains like avian threats. The incident's cultural footprint extends to films like Clint Eastwood's 2016 "Sully," which dramatized the NTSB inquiry to affirm skill over serendipity, influencing ongoing perceptions of aviation as a domain of competence rather than chance.

Aircraft Preservation and Exhibits

The A320-214, registration N106US, was salvaged from the in January 2009 following the ditching incident. The airframe was subsequently stored and preserved for educational purposes, with preparations including assessment and cleaning in 2023 after removal from long-term storage. In 2011, the aircraft entered the collection of the Carolinas Aviation Museum near , where it was displayed in a configuration resembling its post-recovery state. By late 2023, N106US was relocated to the newly constructed , also in , as the centerpiece of its main exhibit gallery. The museum, which opened to the public in summer 2024, features the complete including both engines in a 35,000-square-foot immersive gallery dedicated to the event. Exhibits at the incorporate salvaged artifacts from the flight, such as passenger boots, wallets, beverage carts, life preservers, and luggage, alongside the aircraft itself. These items contribute to training demonstrations on emergency procedures and , emphasizing the real-world outcomes of ditching scenarios and . The preserved also supports simulations and analyses related to bird strike impacts, aiding ongoing into engine resilience and airframe integrity in dual-engine failure events.

References

  1. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/accidentreports/reports/aar1003.pdf
  2. https://www.faa.gov/lessonslearned/transportairplane/accidents/N160US
  3. https://www.airfleets.net/ficheapp/plane-a320-1044.htm
  4. https://www.avfoil.com/aircraft/airplanes/airbus-a320-214-2018/
  5. https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/airbus-a320-200-n106us-us-airways/rqokj3
  6. https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/321581
  7. https://www.jetphotos.com/info/A32X-1044
  8. https://pilotinstitute.com/fly-by-wire/
  9. https://www.airbus.com/sites/g/files/jlcbta136/files/2023-05/Airbus-techdata-AC-A320_0523.pdf
  10. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_33.76-1B.pdf
  11. https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a6309/sully-sullenberger-glider-experience/
  12. https://www.transportation.gov/testimony/us-airways-flight-1549
  13. https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2009/06/us-airways-200906
  14. https://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/images/nytint/docs/documents-for-the-testimony-of-us-airways-flight-1549/original.pdf
  15. https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692%2809%2960563-8/fulltext
  16. https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/web11386-2010640jpg
  17. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ml1122/ml11228a218.pdf
  18. https://www.facebook.com/CrewOperations/posts/january-15th-2009-us-airways-flight-1549-an-airbus-a320-214-departing-laguardia-/1035694071923026/
  19. https://www.natca.org/2009/02/24/testimony-of-controller-patrick-harten-us-airways-flight-1549-2-24-2009/
  20. https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/tag/flight-1549/
  21. https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/scientists-determine-geese-involved-hudson-river-plane-crash-were-migratory
  22. https://www.doi.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/aviation/safety/upload/IAAPB_2009-03.pdf
  23. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/migratory-canada-geese-brought-down-flight-1549-12575190/
  24. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/survival-on-the-hudson/
  25. https://www.whiteeagleaerospace.com/cactus-1549/
  26. https://flightsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/asw_jul10_p24-29.pdf
  27. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/survival-on-the-hudson-expanded-version/
  28. https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=40329242&FileExtension=.PDF&FileName=US%2520Airways%2520Submission-Master.PDF
  29. https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=40316445&FileExtension=.PDF&FileName=Survival%2520Factors%25206%2520-%2520Emergency%2520Response%2520Factual%2520Report%2520of%2520Group%2520Chairman-Master.PDF
  30. https://www.nywaterway.com/miracleonhudson.aspx
  31. https://www.fireengineering.com/firefighting/us-airways-flight-1549-new-york-marine-operations/
  32. https://www.police1.com/mass-emergency-response/articles/more-than-750-nypd-officers-respond-via-air-sea-land-to-downed-flight-oVXaKoTUyCp3N95F/
  33. https://nypost.com/2025/01/15/us-news/inside-nyc-circle-line-captains-miracle-on-the-hudson-rescue-16-years-after-water-landing-timing-is-everything/
  34. https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-main-public/sr-details/A-10-073
  35. https://www.jems.com/ems-training/flight-1549-response/
  36. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Pages/DCA09MA026.aspx
  37. https://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/12/hudson.plane.geese/
  38. https://wildfiretoday.com/confirmed-canada-geese-hit-flight-1549/
  39. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2025-04/AIA_Engine_Bird_Strike_WG_Report.pdf
  40. https://mci.si.edu/irms-bird-strike
  41. https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/wildlife/significant-wildife-strikes-1990-dec-2024.pdf
  42. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/airports/airport_safety/wildlife/resources/final_report_nsmts_ny.pdf
  43. https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/57859/pdf
  44. https://a860-gpp.nyc.gov/downloads/1g05fc89m?locale=en
  45. https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/wildlife/wildlife-strike-report-1990-2024
  46. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=hwi
  47. https://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/default/files/wildlife%2520report.pdf
  48. https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety-recs/recletters/A-10-087.pdf
  49. https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-main-public/sr-details/A-10-063
  50. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/04/2023-06413/medium-flocking-bird-test-at-climb-condition
  51. https://www.flightglobal.com/engines/faa-updates-turbofan-bird-strike-rules-14-years-after-us-airways-flight-1549/152754.article
  52. https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-main-public/sr-details/A-10-067
  53. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2025-04/usairways1549_recommendations.pdf
  54. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/jun/12/new-york-geese-cull
  55. https://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/press_releases/11-48pr.shtml
  56. https://www.ecowatch.com/new-york-city-birds-airports-2197382063.html
  57. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2025-04/usairways1549_findings.pdf
  58. https://portfolio.panynj.gov/2019/01/14/lessons-of-the-sully-miracle-10-years-later/
  59. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/10-037%2520Dolbeer-Increase%2520in%2520strikes%2520above%2520500%2520ft%2520BSC-USA_1990-2009_revised.pdf
  60. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/blog/10th-anniversary-miracle-hudson-usda-research-reduces-wildlife-hazards-airports
  61. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-notes/11670141
  62. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2657&context=icwdm_usdanwrc
  63. https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=40314093&FileExtension=.PDF&FileName=Operations%252FHuman%2520Performance%25202DD%2520-%2520Attachment%252028%253A%2520Simulator%2520Results%2520Document-Master.PDF
  64. https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/miracle-on-the-hudson-us-airways-flight-1549
  65. https://www.theintelligencer.net/news/national-news-apwire/2016/09/safety-recommendations-still-not-fulfilled-7-years-after-flight-1549/
  66. http://www.travelthruhistory.tv/miracle-hudson/
  67. https://www.businessaircraftcenter.com/articles/miracle-on-the-hudson-sullenberger-landing-flight-1549-art0214.htm
  68. https://archive.nytimes.com/cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/a-key-for-captain-cool-and-the-1549-crew/
  69. https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/crew-us-airways-flight-1549-be-presented-national-air-and-space-museums-trophy
  70. https://www.sullysullenberger.com/
  71. https://www.afacwa.org/media_releases?am=phrase&askid=362f23bb-14dc-4568-820c-c182d5967c93-0-ab_msp&l=sem&o=29617&page=65&q=us%2Bairways%2B1405&qsrc=999%2527
  72. https://abcnews.go.com/US/10-questions-capt-sully-sullenberger-10th-anniversary-emergency/story?id=60348790
  73. https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2024/01/12/fifteen-years-since-miracle-on-the-hudson
  74. https://www.washingtonpost.com/express/wp/2016/09/09/sully-is-about-how-the-miracle-on-the-hudson-wasnt-a-miracle-at-all/
  75. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/books/11book.html
  76. https://www.deseret.com/2017/8/10/20634572/sullenberger-attributes-miracle-on-the-hudson-to-culture-of-teamwork
  77. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/31485/how-miraculous-was-the-miracle-on-the-hudson
  78. https://www.flyingmag.com/airbus-jumpseat-us-airways-flight-1549/
  79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24550907
  80. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hero-worship_b_159108
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229054024_Hero-Making_as_a_Defence_Against_the_Anxiety_of_Responsibility_and_Risk_A_Case_Study_of_US_Airways_Flight_1549
  82. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/feb/05/new-york-plane-crash-audio-sullenberger
  83. https://nypost.com/2024/01/15/news/miracle-on-the-hudson-crew-passengers-relive-nail-biting-details-of-water-rescue-on-15th-anniversary-of-splash-into-river/
  84. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/airline-news/2024/01/15/sully-sullenberger-miracle-on-the-hudson-anniversary-aviation-safety/72176095007/
  85. https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2024/01/02/the-whole-story-with-anderson-cooper-marks-the-fifteenth-anniversary-of-flight-1549-in-miracle-on-the-hudson-premiering-sunday-january-7-at-8pm-et-pt/
  86. https://variety.com/2016/film/columns/sully-clint-eastwood-tom-hanks-a-countercultural-hero-1201869923/
  87. https://maydaytvshow.fandom.com/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549
  88. https://www.facebook.com/SullenbergerAviationMuseum/posts/how-do-you-take-care-of-a-large-artifact-that-was-submerged-in-the-hudson-river-/1131365632333025/
  89. https://www.sullenbergeraviation.org/innovation-nation/
  90. https://www.sullenbergeraviation.org/miracle-on-the-hudson-on-the-move-famed-plane-lands-at-final-home-sullenberger-aviation-museums-brand-new-state-of-the-art-gallery/
  91. https://simpleflying.com/miracle-on-the-hudson-airbus-a320-moves-museum/
  92. https://www.sullenbergeraviation.org/museum-collections/
  93. https://simpleflying.com/miracle-on-the-hudson-recovery/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.