Hubbry Logo
NautilidaNautilidaMain
Open search
Nautilida
Community hub
Nautilida
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nautilida
Nautilida
Nautilida
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Nautilida
Temporal range: Devonian–Recent
Nautilus pompilius
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Cephalopoda
Subclass: Nautiloidea
Order: Nautilida
Agassiz, 1847
Type species
N. pompilius
Superfamilies

The Nautilida constitute a large and diverse order of generally coiled nautiloid cephalopods that began in the mid Paleozoic and continues to the present with a single family, the Nautilidae which includes two genera, Nautilus and Allonautilus, with six species. All told, between 22 and 34 families and 165 to 184 genera have been recognised, making this the largest order of the subclass Nautiloidea.

Classification and phylogeny

[edit]

Current classification

[edit]

The current classification of the Nautilida, in prevalent use,[1] is that of Bernhard Kummel (Kummel 1964) in the Treatise which divides the Nautilida into five superfamilies, the Aipocerataceae, Clydonautilaceae, Tainocerataceae, and Trigonocerataceae, mostly of the Paleozoic, and the later Nautilaceae. These include 22 families and some 165 or so genera (Teichert and Moore 1964)

Other concepts

[edit]

Shimansky 1962 (in Kummel 1964) divided the Nautilida into five suborders, the mostly Paleozoic Centroceratina, Liroceratina, Rutoceratina, and Tainoceratina, and the Mesozoic to recent Nautilina. These include superfamilies which are different from those of Kummel (1964) and of less extent. The Centroceratina are comparable to the Trigonocerataceae, the Liroceratina to the Clydonautilaceae, and the Nautilina to the Nautilaceae. The main difference is that the Rutoceratidae are included with the Aipocerataceae of Kummel (1964) in the Rutoceratina. The remaining Tainocerataceae are the Tainoceratina.

Rousseau Flower (1950) distinguished the Solenochilida, Rutoceratida, and Centroceratida, as separate orders, from the Nautilida, derived from the Barrandeocerida, which are now abandoned. Within the Nautilida, he placed 10 families, included in the Nautilaceae and the no longer considered ancestral Clydonautilaceae. Teichert's 1988 classification is an abridged version of Shimansky's and Flower's early schemes.

Derivation and evolution

[edit]

Both Shimansky and Kummel derive the Nautilida from the Oncocerida with either the Acleistoceratidae or Brevicoceratidae (Teichert 1988) which share some similarities with the Rutoceratidae as the source. The Rutoceratidae are the ancestral family of the Tainocerataceae and of the Nautilida (Kummel 1964) and of Shimansky's and Teichert's Rutoceratina.

The Tainocerataceae gave rise, probably through the ancestral Rutoceratidae, to the Trigonocerataceae and Clydonautiliaceae in the Devonian and to the Aipocerataceae early in the Carboniferous. The Trigonocerataceae, in turn, gave rise late in the Triassic through the Syringonautilidae to the Nautilaceae, which include the Nautilidae, with Nautilus. (Kummel 1964)

Diversity and evolutionary history

[edit]
Procymatoceras subtruncatus fossil

The Nautilida are thought to be derived from either of the oncocerid families, Acleistoceratidae or Brevicoceratidae (Kummel 1964; Teichert 1988), both of which have the same sort of shells and internal structure as found in the Devonian Rutocerina of Shimanskiy, the earliest true nautilids. Flower (1950) suggested the Nautilida evolved from the Barrandeocerida, an idea he came later to reject in favor of derivation from the Oncocerida. The idea that the Nautilida evolved from straight-shelled ("Orthoceras") nautiloids, as proposed by Otto Schindewolf in 1942, through transitional forms such as the Ordovician Lituites can be rejected out of hand as evolutionarily unlikely. Lituites and the Lituitidae are derived tarphycerids and belong to a separate evolutionary branch of nautilioids.

The number of nautilid genera increased from the Early Devonian to about 22 in the Middle Devonian. During this time, their shells were more varied than those found in species of living Nautilus, ranging from curved (cyrtoconic), through loosely coiled (gyroconic), to tightly coiled forms, represented by the Rutoceratidae, Tetragonoceratidae, and Centroceratidae.

Nautilids declined in the Late Devonian, but again diversified in the Carboniferous, when some 75 genera and subgenera in some 16 families are known to have lived. Although there was considerable diversity in form, curved and loosely coiled shells are rare or absent, except in the superfamily Aipocerataceae. For the rest, nautilids adapted the standard planispiral shell form, although not all were as tightly coiled as the modern nautilids (Teichert 1988). There was, however, a great diversity in surface ornamentation, cross section, and so on, with some genera, such as the Permian Cooperoceras and Acanthonautilus, developing large lateral spikes (Fenton and Fenton 1958).

Despite again decreasing in diversity in the Permian, nautilids were less affected by the Permian-Triassic extinction than their distant relatives the Ammonoidea. During the Late Triassic there was a tendency in the Clydonautilaceae to develop sutures similar to those of some Late Devonian goniatites. Only a single genus, Cenoceras, with a shell similar to that of the modern nautilus, survived the less severe Triassic extinction, at which time the entire Nautiloidea almost became extinct.

For the remainder of the Mesozoic, nautilids once again flourished, although never at the level of their Paleozoic glory, and 24 genera are known from the Cretaceous. Again, the nautilids were not as affected by the end Cretaceous mass extinction as the Ammonoids that became entirely extinct, possibly because their larger eggs were better suited to survive the conditions of that environment-changing event.

Three families and at least five genera of nautilids are known to have survived this crisis in the history of life. There was a further resurgence during the Paleocene and Eocene, with several new genera, the majority of which had a worldwide distribution. During the Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary, the Hercoglossidae and Aturiidae again developed sutures like those of Devonian goniatites. (Teichert 1988, pp. 43–44)

Miocene nautilids were still fairly widespread, but today the order includes only two genera, Nautilus and Allonautilus, limited to the southwest Pacific.

The recent decrease in the once worldwide distribution of nautilids is now believed to have been caused by the spread of pinnipeds.[2] From the Oligocene onward, the appearance of pinnipeds in the geological record of a region coincides with the disappearance of nautilids from that region.[3] As a result, nautilids are now limited to their current distribution in the tropical Indo-Pacific ocean, where pinnipeds are absent.[2] The genus Aturia seem to have temporarily survive regions where pinnipeds were present through adaptations to fast and agile swimming, but eventually went extinct as well.[3] Predation by short-snouted whales and the development of OMZs, preventing nautilids from retreating into deeper water, are also cited as other potential causes of extinction.[3]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Nautilida

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Nautilida is an order of cephalopods within the subclass Nautilia, characterized primarily by coiled (nautilicone) shells lacking internal deposits, pleuromyarian musculature, and a that facilitates regulation through gas-filled chambers. Originating possibly in the late or from ancestors such as the Lechritrochoceratidae or orthoceratids, this order encompasses a diverse array of forms that diversified extensively during the era, particularly in the and Permian periods, and persists today as the sole surviving lineage with eight extant in the family Nautilidae. The taxonomic hierarchy places Nautilida as the only order in subclass Nautilia (revised from traditional Nautiloidea classifications), under class Cephalopoda, phylum Mollusca, reflecting adaptations in shell morphology, septal sutures, and siphuncular structures that distinguish it from other nautiloid groups. Fossil records reveal high diversity, with seven suborders recognized overall, including Temnocheilina, Domatoceratina, Tainoceratina, Liroceratina, and Solenochilina prominent in Carboniferous and Permian strata, where species exhibited varied conch shapes, ontogenetic patterns, and ornamentation for ecological adaptation. This evolutionary trajectory underscores Nautilida's resilience, contrasting with the extinction of other nautiloid orders during major Paleozoic events, and highlights ongoing phylogenetic debates regarding multiple origins from Rutoceratidae or Oncoceratida. Living representatives, confined to the region, include the genera (six species, such as N. pompilius, the ) and (two species), which inhabit mesophotic to bathypelagic depths of 200–700 meters, exhibiting nocturnal behaviors, for locomotion, and diets of carrion, crustaceans, and polychaetes. These modern forms retain primitive traits, such as numerous tentacles without suckers and pinhole eyes, while their chambered shells—reaching up to 10 inches (25 cm) in diameter—provide protection and buoyancy, making Nautilida a key group for studying cephalopod evolution and conservation amid threats from and degradation.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Current classification

Nautilida is classified as an order within the subclass Nautilia (revised from the traditional Nautiloidea) of the class , phylum , kingdom Animalia. This placement reflects its position as the sole surviving order of nautiloid cephalopods, distinguished from the coleoid cephalopods by features such as a chambered external shell and numerous tentacles without suckers. Among extant taxa, Nautilida is represented solely by the family Nautilidae, which includes two genera: and , encompassing approximately 9 recognized as of 2023. These include Nautilus pompilius, N. macromphalus, N. stenomphalus, N. belauensis, N. vitiensis, N. samoaensis, and N. vanuatuensis in the genus , and Allonautilus perforatus and A. deepwater (also known as A. scrobiculatus) in . Classification of these relies on shell morphology, including coiling patterns, umbilicus width, and coloration, as well as soft tissue differences observed in live specimens. Historically, Bernard Kummel proposed a comprehensive classification in 1964, dividing Nautilida into five superfamilies—Aipocerataceae, Clydonautilaceae, Tainocerataceae, Trigonocerataceae, and —encompassing 22 families and 165 genera, primarily based on records from the to . This scheme emphasized shell coiling (typically nautiliconic or planospiral), position (dorsal to ventral marginal), and septal complexity (with simple, straight sutures). Earlier, V. N. Shimansky in 1962 outlined five suborders—Centroceratina, Liroceratina, Rutoceratina, Tainoceratina, and —focusing on shape, whorl profiles, and endosiphuncular deposits to differentiate forms. Recent revisions, such as the 2025 classification for and Permian Nautilida, recognize seven suborders—Temnocheilina, Domatoceratina (new), Tainoceratina, Liroceratina, Solenochilina, Rutoceratina, and —incorporating five superfamilies like Trigonoceratoidea, Grypoceratoidea, Tainoceratoidea, Liroceratoidea, and Aipoceratoidea, with new families such as Dasbergoceratidae and Epistroboceratidae. This update refines earlier schemes by integrating stratigraphic data, ontogeny, sculpture, and suture line morphology, while maintaining the core criteria of positioning and septal features for higher-level groupings.

Phylogenetic relationships

Nautilida occupies a basal position within the , serving as the sister group to , which encompasses all modern s except nautilids, such as squids and octopuses. This relationship is supported by phylogenetic analyses of fossil morphology, placing the divergence between Nautilida and in the Late Cambrian or Early , around 489 million years ago, based on the oldest known fossils like Plectronoceras cambria. The crown-group , defined by Nautilida and , emerged during this period, with Nautilida retaining plesiomorphic traits that highlight its primitive status among extant s. The order Nautilida is derived from earlier groups, specifically tracing its origins to the Oncocerida through transitional families such as Acleistoceratidae or Brevicoceratidae, with further via Rutoceratidae during the . This lineage is evidenced by morphological transitions in shell and structures, where forms like Ptenoceras alatum exhibit cyrtocochantic siphuncles as relict features from oncocerid ancestors, leading to the more coiled and stabilized morphologies characteristic of later Nautilida. Key synapomorphies defining Nautilida include the retention of an external chambered shell, orthostrophic (where the coiling direction aligns with the embryonic shell), and complex septal structures that form simple but robust sutures, distinguishing them from more derived groups. Molecular evidence from reinforces the close phylogenetic ties within Nautilida, particularly between the genera Nautilus and Allonautilus, with analyses of COI and 16S genes showing minimal divergence and shared haplotypes indicative of recent common ancestry. Studies reveal limited across populations, characterized by high F_ST values (0.888–0.975) and negative Tajima’s D scores suggesting population expansions, which point to a recent rather than ancient divergence. This low variability contrasts with the broader tree, underscoring Nautilida's isolated evolutionary trajectory. Nautilida is phylogenetically distinct from extinct Ammonitida, which features highly complex septal sutures adapted for enhanced buoyancy control, and from Belemnoidea, a coleoid subgroup with internalized phragmocones and reduced external shells. These differences highlight Nautilida's retention of ancestral external shell architecture, setting it apart from the more specialized internalizations seen in ammonoids and belemnoids.

Evolutionary history

The Nautilida originated in the mid- period, approximately 380 million years ago, evolving from rutoceratid ancestors such as those in the Rutoceratidae family, which exhibited transitional coiled shell morphologies from earlier oncocerid nautiloids. This emergence marked the beginning of a lineage characterized by increasingly planispiral shells and improved septal complexity. Early diversification in the involved key families like Trigonocerataceae and Clydonautiliaceae, leading to around 22 genera that adapted to a range of marine environments through variations in shell coiling and ornamentation. The period represented the zenith of Nautilida diversity, with roughly 75 genera distributed across 16 families, predominantly featuring tightly coiled planispiral shells that enhanced hydrodynamic efficiency. This radiation included suborders such as Tainoceratina and Domatoceratina, reflecting adaptive expansions in shell sculpture and positioning for better . The group demonstrated exceptional resilience, surviving four major mass extinctions—including the Late , Devonian-Carboniferous boundary, Permian-Triassic, and Cretaceous-Paleogene events—owing to their generalist ecology, which allowed exploitation of varied niches with low metabolic demands compared to more specialized cephalopods like ammonoids. A critical was the , a tubular structure enabling precise control of by regulating gas and fluid in shell chambers via osmotic processes. Post-Permian-Triassic recovery favored Nautilida over ammonoids, which suffered greater losses but later rebounded, as nautiloids maintained stable populations through their broad habitat tolerance. The saw a decline, with diversity dropping to about 24 genera by the , amid increasing competition from advanced coleoid cephalopods that outcompeted them in speed and predation efficiency. In the , further reduction occurred, potentially triggered by predation from expanding populations, prompting a shift to deeper-water refugia in the Indo-West Pacific and limiting their global distribution. These habitat changes, combined with ongoing ecological pressures, confined modern Nautilida to a fraction of their former range.

Morphology

Shell structure

The shell of Nautilida is characterized by a planispiral, tightly coiled external structure that provides protection and , with adult diameters typically ranging from 10 to 25 cm depending on the species. This coiled form, known as nautilicone, evolved from earlier stocks and is composed primarily of , a polymorph of , organized into distinct layers including an outer porcelaneous zone, an inner stratified aragonite region, and a nacreous inner lining that imparts the characteristic iridescent sheen. The nacreous layers, formed by thin sheets of aragonite crystals separated by organic matrices, contribute to the shell's mechanical strength and aesthetic appearance. Unlike some other groups, Nautilida shells lack internal cameral deposits, contributing to their simple chamber architecture. Internally, the shell is divided into approximately 30 to 40 chambers by thin, gently curved , creating a phragmocone that serves as the buoyant core. The outermost chamber, known as the living chamber, is located at the and houses the animal's soft body, while the earlier, more posterior chambers are gas-filled—primarily with —to provide and enable depth regulation in the . These attach to the shell wall along sutures that are simple and lobed in extant forms, forming a straightforward junction without complex folding seen in other cephalopods. A key feature is the , a tubular strand of vascularized tissue that extends through the center of each septum, connecting all chambers and facilitating buoyancy control. The siphuncle regulates the gas-to-fluid ratio within the chambers through osmotic pumping, where epithelial cells actively transport ions to create osmotic gradients that draw water out of the chambers, allowing gases to diffuse in and adjust overall . This mechanism enables the animal to maintain at varying depths, with the siphuncle's thin connecting rings and septal necks providing structural support. While extant Nautilida exhibit highly , tightly coiled shells for streamlined hydrodynamics, fossil representatives from and deposits display greater morphological variation, including (loosely coiled) and orthoconic (straight) forms that reflect adaptations to diverse ancient environments. In these fossils, such as Permian Stenopoceras, the shell often shows secondary replacement, altering the original aragonitic composition, though the fundamental chambered and siphuncular architecture remains conserved across the order.

Soft anatomy

The soft body of Nautilida exhibits a bilaterally symmetrical head-foot complex integrated with the shell. The head features 60 to 90 retractile tentacles arranged in a peripheral fringe around the ; these lack suckers but bear longitudinal ridges and grooved sheaths that enable firm to surfaces or prey. Positioned between the tentacles are simple pinhole eyes, which lack corneas or lenses and provide low-resolution, motion-sensitive vision through a fluid-filled chamber. At the center, a chitinous, parrot-like with sharply curved mandibles facilitates biting and initial food fragmentation, supported by a for rasping. The mantle forms a thin, extensible epithelial layer that secretes the shell and lines the pallial cavity, creating a spacious chamber for vital functions. This cavity contains two pairs of ctenidial gills attached to the mantle wall, where gas exchange occurs; blood is circulated through the gills by paired branchial hearts before reaching the systemic heart. A muscular funnel, or hyponome, extends from the ventral pallial cavity floor and enables locomotion via jet propulsion, drawing in and expelling water rhythmically. Key internal organs support , , and equilibrium. The digestive tract comprises a for initial , followed by a muscular for grinding and enzymatic breakdown. In females, paired nidamental glands produce gelatinous egg capsules. Statocysts, fluid-filled sacs posterior to the eyes, detect orientation and via an lined with 130,000 to 150,000 sensory hair cells embedded in a statolith matrix. Sexual dimorphism manifests prominently in reproductive structures. Males possess a specialized left pre-ocular modified as a , a slender, elongate organ that transfers spermatophores directly into the female's mantle cavity during copulation. This modification correlates with a broader shell in males, facilitating deployment of the . The forms an ortho- or sub-orthogon around the , comprising a of interconnected ganglia (cerebral, pedal, visceral, and optic) with cords extending to peripheral organs. This decentralized configuration is structurally simpler and less centralized than the fused, lobe-dominated brains of coleoid cephalopods.

Biology and

Reproduction and life cycle

Nautilida species are dioecious, with separate male and female individuals, and reproduction involves internal fertilization achieved when males use a specialized arm called the to insert into the female's mantle cavity. The male's reproductive anatomy includes the and spermatophoric glands for spermatophore production, while females possess the organ of Valenciennes for sperm storage. Females lay eggs singly or in small groups of a few leathery, opaque capsules, each measuring 25–35 mm in length, which are attached to hard substrates such as or rock at depths of 80–100 m, with females producing 10–20 eggs annually. Incubation lasts 8–14 months, depending on environmental conditions, with no provided after deposition. Hatchlings emerge as fully formed miniature adults with a shell diameter of 20–25 mm and 4–5 chambers, exhibiting direct development without a distinct planktonic larval stage, though they may disperse briefly before settling into benthic habitats. Growth in Nautilida is indeterminate and slow, with individuals reaching at 10–15 cm shell after 12–15 years, as determined by annual growth rings visible in the . Lifespan exceeds 20 years, with no post-reproductive observed. Fecundity is low, with females producing only 10–20 eggs per year and an estimated lifetime total of 100–200, reflecting a strategy without seasonal breeding patterns.

Behavior and feeding

Nautilida employ for locomotion, drawing water into the mantle cavity and expelling it forcefully through the , a muscular that directs the flow for controlled movement. This mechanism enables backward swimming as the primary mode, with the animal orienting its shell forward while the head and tentacles trail behind, supplemented by occasional anterior-first orientation for maneuvering. Maximum sustained speeds reach approximately 0.33 m/s, though burst yields lower —about one-eighth that of comparably sized squids—reflecting an adaptation for efficient, low-energy travel rather than rapid evasion. The numerous tentacles, numbering over 90 and lacking suckers but featuring adhesive ridges, assist in substrate manipulation and prey handling during movement. Activity patterns in Nautilida are predominantly nocturnal, characterized by diel vertical migrations that align with reduced predation risk. During daylight hours, individuals remain largely stationary at depths of 489–700 m, exhibiting minimal movement consistent with resting or ambush positioning. At , they ascend to shallower waters, typically 130–350 m, with continuous activity persisting through the night to depths as shallow as 100 m, before descending again at dawn to exceed 350 m en route to daytime haunts. Olfactory cues, detected via sensory anatomy, likely guide these migrations toward prey concentrations in the . Feeding in Nautilida combines carnivory and scavenging, targeting live crustaceans such as and , as well as fishes and carrion, with occasional conspecific predation observed. Prey is captured using the array of grooved tentacles, which adhere via secretion to grasp and transport items to the mouth without . A powerful, parrot-like then crushes or tears the food into fragments, while the —a chitinous, toothed —further scrapes and shreds material for ingestion, facilitating efficient processing of tough-shelled items like crustaceans. Nautilida exhibit a solitary , with individuals showing no evidence of group formation, cooperative , or complex social interactions in either wild or captive settings. Communication remains rudimentary, lacking visual signals, acoustic cues, or chemical messaging beyond basic olfactory prey detection, consistent with their isolated deep-sea existence. Predation avoidance relies on physical and behavioral defenses rather than chemical deterrents, as Nautilida lack an and cannot release obscuring clouds. The robust, chambered shell provides primary protection, resisting crushing pressures up to implosion depths of around 800 m, while daytime stasis at profound levels (489–700 m) minimizes encounters with visual predators active in shallower zones. Vertical migrations further enhance by timing surfacing to nocturnal low-light conditions, reducing detectability.

Habitat and distribution

Nautilida, the order encompassing modern nautiluses, exhibit a restricted geographic distribution confined to the tropical region. Their range spans from the and eastward to and , northward to southern , and southward to northern and northeastern , including areas around and . This distribution is patchy, resulting from limited larval dispersal capabilities that prevent widespread colonization across ocean basins. These cephalopods inhabit warm tropical waters with temperatures typically ranging from 20 to 25°C, though they can tolerate up to 30°C in some locales, and salinities between 30 and 35 ppt. They prefer steep fore-reef slopes and drop-offs at depths of 100 to 700 meters, where low light levels prevail, with juveniles often occurring in shallower waters closer to 100 meters. Nautilida demonstrate tolerance for oxygen minimum zones at these depths, allowing exploitation of hypoxic refuges without short-term physiological constraint. Within these environments, nautilids favor microhabitats featuring rocky substrates, to which gravid females attach eggs using a cement-like , while avoiding soft sediments that offer unsuitable anchorage. Key adaptations include the , which regulates by adjusting gas and fluid volumes in shell chambers to facilitate vertical migrations and depth changes, alongside shell structures capable of withstanding hydrostatic pressures exceeding 800 meters before implosion. Nautilida undertake diel vertical migrations, ascending to shallower depths at night and descending to deeper resting depths by day.

Diversity

Extant species

The order Nautilida is currently represented by eight extant species belonging to two genera, and , all confined to the region. The taxonomy remains unsettled, with some authorities recognizing up to nine species depending on whether certain forms (e.g., N. belauensis) are treated as distinct or synonymous. These species are characterized by their coiled, chambered shells and are the sole surviving members of the subclass Nautiloidea, highlighting their status as living fossils. The genus comprises six recognized species, each adapted to specific locales within the southwestern Pacific. Nautilus pompilius, the most widespread species, inhabits depths of 100–700 m across the , , and , with a shell diameter reaching up to 16–20 cm and featuring a closed umbilicus covered by a plug, along with variable iridescent color patterns of brown stripes on a white background. Nautilus macromphalus is endemic to deeper waters (300–500 m) around , distinguished by a wide, open umbilicus resembling a "bellybutton" and similar striped pigmentation to N. pompilius, with shells averaging 15–18 cm in diameter. Nautilus stenomphalus, found off the , has a narrower umbilicus and compared to its congeners, with a shell size of about 14–16 cm and subdued ribbing on the outer shell surface. The three recently described species include Nautilus vitiensis from Fiji's Harbour (shell 13.7–16.5 cm, 15–30% pigmentation with simple unbranched stripes, umbilical plug present), Nautilus vanuatuensis from Vanuatu's Mele Bay (shell 15–16.3 cm, 40–50% pigmentation with full-length stripes from venter to umbilicus), and Nautilus samoaensis from American Samoa's Taema Bank (shell 16.2–17.7 cm, 32–36% pigmentation with branching stripes curving toward the ). The genus includes two species, both occurring in deeper habitats (400–700 m) off and . Allonautilus perforatus, known from Indonesian waters including , features a shell up to 18 cm in diameter with prominent undulating radial ribs on the flanks and a relatively open umbilicus, lacking the smooth hood ornament of . Allonautilus scrobiculatus, restricted to the , inhabits even deeper slopes and is identifiable by its "crusty" shell surface with deep pits and scrobiculae (grooves), a wide umbilicus, and raised papillae on the hood, with shells reaching 20 cm. Identification of Nautilida species primarily relies on shell morphology, including umbilicus width (wide in N. macromphalus and Allonautilus spp., narrow or plugged in others), color patterns (e.g., branching vs. unbranched stripes), and surface ribbing (subdued in Nautilus, pronounced in A. perforatus). Genetic analyses reveal minimal distinctions among Nautilus species, with low divergence supporting close relatedness, though soft anatomy like hood structure aids differentiation. Population densities for extant Nautilida are generally low, ranging from 0.03 to 77 individuals per km² across surveyed sites, with higher values (13–77/km²) at unfished reefs like Osprey Reef, , and lower (0.03–0.34/km²) in heavily exploited areas such as the and . Total abundance estimates suggest around 2–3 million individuals for N. pompilius alone in key regions like western and the , implying a global total across all species on the order of several million, though fragmented distributions and ongoing declines complicate precise figures. Recent discoveries have expanded the known diversity of , with three new species—N. vitiensis, N. vanuatuensis, and N. samoaensis—formally described in 2023 based on shell , pigmentation, and genetic data from specimens collected in the Coral Sea and South Pacific. These additions, from , , and , represent the easternmost extent of the genus and underscore the need for targeted surveys in understudied habitats.
GenusSpeciesKey Shell FeaturesDistribution
NautilusN. pompilius16–20 cm diameter; closed umbilicus with plug; variable stripesPhilippines to northern Australia
NautilusN. macromphalus15–18 cm; wide open umbilicus; striped patternPapua New Guinea
NautilusN. stenomphalus14–16 cm; narrow umbilicus and aperture; subdued ribbingSolomon Islands
NautilusN. vitiensis13.7–16.5 cm; unbranched stripes; umbilical plugFiji
NautilusN. vanuatuensis15–16.3 cm; high pigmentation, full stripesVanuatu
NautilusN. samoaensis16.2–17.7 cm; branching stripesAmerican Samoa
AllonautilusA. perforatus18 cm; radial ribs; open umbilicusIndonesia (Bali)
AllonautilusA. scrobiculatus20 cm; pitted surface, wide umbilicusPapua New Guinea (Bismarck Sea)

Fossil record

The fossil record of Nautilida spans from the Period to the present, with the order first diverging during the around 400 million years ago. Major fossil sites include deposits in the United States and , such as the Finis Shale in and the formations in , where well-preserved specimens occur in and layers. Permian sites in , particularly in the western regions, yield diverse nautilid assemblages from marine carbonates, while occurrences are prominent in the Alpine regions of , including and , embedded in sedimentary sequences of the . Cretaceous fossils have been documented in , such as in the Bagh Beds of the Narmada Valley, preserving coiled shells in shallow marine s. Key fossil taxa include early forms like Trigonoceras from the , characterized by shells with wide umbilici that indicate a transition toward coiled morphologies in nautiloids. In the , genera such as Tainoceras exhibit diverse coiling patterns, ranging from tightly to forms, as seen in specimens from the Pennsylvanian Avilovka Formation in and the Graham Formation in , highlighting morphological experimentation during peak diversity. The Solenocheilus, also , is represented by globose or cyclostome shells in sites across (e.g., Parks Township, Pennsylvania) and (e.g., , ), often showing bite marks suggestive of predation. More recent extinct forms include Nautilus-like nautiloids from the Eocene, such as those newly reported in 2025 from the lower Eocene marine succession of India's Basin, featuring chambered shells adapted to shallow coastal environments. Overall diversity encompasses approximately 165 to 184 genera across the order's history, with a peak of around 75 genera in the Early belonging to 16 families, reflecting rapid radiation in post-Devonian seas. diversity declined sharply to about 24 genera, primarily in the and , before post-extinction recoveries in the led to renewed but limited speciation. Preservation is dominated by external shells, often as silicified or calcitized molds and casts in sedimentary rocks, due to the robust phragmocone structure. Soft parts are rarely preserved, but recent 2024 studies have identified phosphatized beaks in and Permian specimens, revealing unexpected morphological disparity and insights into feeding ecology distinct from modern nautilids. Nautilida demonstrated notable resilience during mass extinction events, surviving the end-Permian —which eliminated about 95% of marine species—through a few surviving lineages that repopulated oceans, unlike many contemporaneous cephalopods. At the end-Cretaceous , nautilids persisted while ammonoids vanished entirely, likely due to ecological differences such as deeper-water habitats and lower metabolic demands that buffered against surface ocean perturbations.

Conservation status

Threats

Nautilida populations face significant threats from , primarily through for their shells and meat, which has historically involved the harvest of over 100,000 individuals annually for , particularly to the , prior to their inclusion in Appendix II in 2017. This trade is driven by demand for decorative shells, jewelry, and curios, with major hotspots in the and where shells are crafted into inlays and ornaments, leading to localized depletions and collapsed fisheries. Despite regulations, domestic and illegal trade persists, with surveys in showing no reduction in shell sales post-CITES listing, exacerbating pressure on vulnerable populations. Bycatch in trawling fisheries and habitat loss further endanger Nautilida, as destructive bottom- practices damage coral reefs and deep-sea habitats essential for their foraging and shelter. compounds these issues by altering ocean temperatures, depths, and chemistry, including acidification that hinders shell formation and disrupts mesophotic zone where nautiluses reside. These environmental shifts, alongside from coastal runoff and , contribute to imbalances that may increase predation risks through changes in prey availability and predator-prey dynamics. The slow life history of Nautilida amplifies their vulnerability to these threats, with individuals reaching only after 10–15 years and producing just 10–15 eggs annually after a year-long incubation. This K-selected results in low resilience, as evidenced by up to 80% declines in catch per unit effort in Philippine populations over the past 30 years, equivalent to fewer than three generations, with continued depletion reported as of 2024.

Protection efforts

In 2017, all species in the family Nautilidae were listed under Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), requiring export permits to ensure that international trade does not threaten their survival. This listing covers all extant species in the family Nautilidae (currently nine taxa, including species and subspecies). At the national level, the listed the (Nautilus pompilius) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act following a 2016 petition, prohibiting import of wild specimens for commercial purposes while allowing limited exceptions for scientific research. In , no commercial harvest of nautiluses occurs due to strict environmental protections, with exports minimal and primarily for non-commercial purposes. The maintains an unregulated national fishery for nautiluses but enforces local prohibitions on harvest in select municipal areas, such as parts of Province and the Islands, to curb . Research efforts support conservation through standardized husbandry guidelines and population assessments. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) published a care manual for chambered nautiluses in 2025, providing protocols for aquarium maintenance, reproduction, and welfare to aid and public . The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) submitted assessments for nine taxa in 2024–2025, classifying most as Vulnerable or Endangered due to trade pressures and constraints, with Nautilus pompilius rated Endangered. Recent studies from 2023 to 2025 have addressed and distribution gaps, including the description of three new (Nautilus vitiensis, N. samoaensis, and N. vanuatuensis) using morphological and genetic analyses, and species distribution modeling that highlights core habitats in , the , and while identifying protection shortfalls. Conservation initiatives emphasize habitat safeguards and alternatives to exploitative practices. Marine protected areas in the , such as those around and parts of the in , overlap with nautilus habitats and restrict to preserve fore-reef slopes where the species resides. Efforts to promote include eco-resort developments and awareness campaigns that shift focus from shell souvenirs to non-invasive observation, reducing demand in key range countries like and the . programs face significant challenges, including the species' slow growth rates (reaching maturity in 10–15 years), low (10–20 eggs per year with high juvenile mortality), and difficulties replicating deep-water conditions, limiting scalability for population supplementation. Post-CITES outcomes show regulated international trade with varied domestic impacts; for instance, surveys in indicate no significant change in local shell sales from 2013–2014 to 2018–2024, underscoring needs, while global export data reflect increased permitting scrutiny. Ongoing monitoring involves NOAA Fisheries' remote underwater camera surveys in the to track abundance and distribution, supplemented by platforms like for opportunistic sightings that contribute to range mapping.

References

  1. https://sjpp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s13358-019-00186-4
  2. https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/view/3065
  3. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/84427/
  4. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=153112
  5. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=153046
  6. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/chambered-nautilus
  7. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=153046
  8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-019-00186-4
  9. https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/3065/13693/
  10. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.831.1871
  11. https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-022-01284-5
  12. https://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G204/lectures/204phylogeny.html
  13. https://www.palaeontologia.pan.pl/Archive/1984_45.pdf
  14. http://jurassic.ru/pdf/king1993_cephalopoda.pdf
  15. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2015.1036322
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4979717/
  17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-018-0169-0
  18. https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/3065/13693
  19. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10491525
  20. http://jurassic.ru/pdf/crick1988_bioyancy_cephalopods.pdf
  21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.14488
  22. https://australian.museum/learn/animals/molluscs/chambered-nautilus/
  23. https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/monographs/memoirs/downloads/13/Memoir-13.pdf
  24. https://earthlife.net/nautilus-anatomy/
  25. https://www.aquariumofpacific.org/onlinelearningcenter/species/chambered_nautilus
  26. https://asknature.org/strategy/siphuncle-controls-buoyancy/
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/286055a0
  28. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1965.0006
  29. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/109/1/253/4173/On-the-Visual-System-of-Nautilus-Pompilius
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255962915_Anatomy_of_living_Nautilus_Reevaluation_of_primitiveness_and_comparison_with_Coleoidea
  31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02143576
  32. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1997.0142
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/sexual-dimorphism-in-nautilus-from-palau/54E2C21B02452BABA3F658C744C7D648
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6712556/
  35. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1162735/full
  36. https://www.britannica.com/animal/nautilus-cephalopod
  37. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.170467
  38. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/154/1/383/5927/Speed-Jet-Pressure-and-Oxygen-Consumption
  39. https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/animals/animals-a-to-z/chambered-nautilus
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043052/
  41. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1867&context=gc_etds
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4052311/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226841689_Geographic_Distribution_of_Nautilus_Shells
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4067400/
  45. https://www.fao.org/4/a0150e/a0150e04.pdf
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X18302788
  47. https://assets.speakcdn.com/assets/2332/aza_chambered_nautilus_care_manual.pdf
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3037370/
  49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14671712/
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1313298923003968
  51. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016311
  52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1143.84427
  53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-016-0112-7
  54. https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/dam-migration/final_nautilus_status_review_508_compliant.pdf
  55. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179811
  56. https://www.scup.com/doi/full/10.18261/let.57.2.2
  57. https://tohoku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/137368/files/1346-2040-2022-21-1.pdf
  58. https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/carboniferous-nautiloid-d375a62f72e343cf9490ebb82d4a9519
  59. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/963787/mem41-0001.pdf
  60. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0250/report.pdf
  61. https://www.mindat.org/taxon-4624305.html
  62. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Tainoceras-luxaeterna-sp.-nov.%252C-a-new-Late-species-Dernov/2b5ba133d2b7b621289e9e372fedc2b3e50ee911
  63. https://fossil.15656.com/2020/03/20/solenochilus-ii/
  64. https://archive.org/download/crossref-pre-1923-scholarly-works/10.1144%25252Fgsl.jgs.1910.066.01-04.01.zip/10.1144%25252Fpygs.17.2.97.pdf
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871174X25001398
  66. https://tonmo.com/articles/nautiloids-the-first-cephalopods.36/
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195667116302191
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381935703_Nautilid_beaks_unsuspected_disparity_and_palaeoecological_interpretation
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263548518_Ammonite_extinction_and_Nautilid_survival_at_the_end_of_the_Cretaceous
  70. https://sciworthy.com/how-did-nautiloids-survive-the-end-cretaceous-mass-extinction/
  71. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/extinction-countdown/should-we-stop-selling-nautilus-shells/
  72. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44353-024-00018-8
  73. https://news.mongabay.com/2023/02/theyre-everywhere-out-there-three-new-nautilus-species-described/
  74. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/invertebrates/chambered_nautilus/
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783610001542
  76. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3//dam-migration/nautilus_factsheet_citescop17_508.pdf
  77. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/28/2018-21114/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-final-rule-to-list-the-chambered-nautilus-as
  78. https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/5771/an_investigation_into_the_trade_in_nautilus-1.pdf
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391216778_CREATED_BY_THE_AZA_Aquatic_Invertebrate_Taxon_Advisory_Group_CHAMBERED_NAUTILUS_Nautilus_spp_CARE_MANUAL_Chambered_Nautilus_Nautilus_spp_Care_Manual_Published_by_the_Association_of_Zoos_and_Aquariums_
  80. https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/2024-2025-iucn-ssc-mollusc-sg-report_publication.pdf
  81. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/17/4/243
  82. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/chambered-nautilus/science
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783625002309
  84. https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/17/InfDocs/E-CoP17-Inf-3.pdf
  85. https://videos.fisheries.noaa.gov/detail/videos/shellfish-other-invertebrates/video/3814028058001/nautilus-surveys-with-remote-underwater-cameras?autoStart=true
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.