Hubbry Logo
Nonlinear opticsNonlinear opticsMain
Open search
Nonlinear optics
Community hub
Nonlinear optics
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nonlinear optics
Nonlinear optics
from Wikipedia
Structure of KTP crystal, viewed down b axis, used in second harmonic generation.

Nonlinear optics (NLO) is a branch of optics that studies the case when optical properties of matter depend on the intensity of the input light. Nonlinear phenomena become relevant only when the input light is very intense.[1] Typically, in order to observe nonlinear phenomena, an intensity of the electromagnetic field of light larger than 108 V/m (and thus comparable to the atomic electric field of ~1011 V/m) is required. In this case, the polarization density P responds non-linearly to the electric field E of light. In order to obtain an electromagnetic field that is sufficiently intense, laser sources must be used.[1] In nonlinear optics, the superposition principle no longer holds, and the polarization of the material is no longer linear in the electric field intensity. Instead, in the perturbative limit, it can be expressed by a polynomial sum of order n. Many different physical mechanisms can cause nonlinearities in the optical behaviour of a material, i.e. the motion of bound electrons, field-induced vibrational or orientational motions, optically-induced acoustic waves and thermal effects.[2] The motion of bound electrons, in particular, has a very short response timescale, so it is of particular relevance in the context of ultrafast nonlinear optics. The simplest way to picture this behaviour in a semiclassical way is to use a phenomenological model: an anharmonic oscillator can model the forced oscillations of a bound electron inside the medium. In this picture, the binding interaction between the ion core and the electron is the Coulomb force and nonlinearities appear as changes in the elastic constant of the system (which behaves similarly to a mass attached to a spring) when the stretching or compression of the oscillator is large enough.[3][4][5][2]

It must be pointed out that Maxwell's equations are linear in vacuum, so, nonlinear processes only occur in media. However, the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) predicts that, above the Schwinger limit, vacuum itself can behave in a nonlinear way.[3][4][5][6]

The description of nonlinear optics usually presented in textbooks is the perturbative regime, which is valid when the input intensity remains below 1014 W/cm2, which implies that the electric field is well below the intensity of interatomic fields. This approach allows to use a Taylor series to write down the polarization density as a polynomial sum.[2][3] It is also possible to study the laser-matter interaction at a much higher intensity of light: this field is referred to as nonperturbational nonlinear optics or extreme nonlinear optics and investigates the generation of extremely high-order harmonics, attosecond pulse generation and relativistic nonlinear effects.[2]

History

[edit]

The first nonlinear optical effect to be predicted was two-photon absorption, by Maria Goeppert Mayer for her PhD in 1931, but it remained an unexplored theoretical curiosity until 1961 and the almost simultaneous observation of two-photon absorption at Bell Labs[7] and the discovery of second-harmonic generation by Peter Franken et al. at University of Michigan, both shortly after the construction of the first laser by Theodore Maiman.[8] However, some nonlinear effects were discovered before the development of the laser.[9] The theoretical basis for many nonlinear processes was first described in Bloembergen's monograph "Nonlinear Optics".[10]

Nonlinear optical processes

[edit]

Nonlinear optics explains nonlinear response of properties such as frequency, polarization, phase or path of incident light.[8] These nonlinear interactions give rise to a host of optical phenomena:

Frequency-mixing processes

[edit]

Other nonlinear processes

[edit]
[edit]

In these processes, the medium has a linear response to the light, but the properties of the medium are affected by other causes:

Parametric processes

[edit]

Nonlinear effects fall into two qualitatively different categories, parametric and non-parametric effects. A parametric non-linearity is an interaction in which the quantum state of the nonlinear material is not changed by the interaction with the optical field. As a consequence of this, the process is "instantaneous". Energy and momentum are conserved in the optical field, making phase matching important and polarization-dependent.[18] [19]

Theory

[edit]

Parametric and "instantaneous" (i.e. material must be lossless and dispersionless through the Kramers–Kronig relations) nonlinear optical phenomena, in which the optical fields are not too large, can be described by a Taylor series expansion of the dielectric polarization density (electric dipole moment per unit volume) P(t) at time t in terms of the electric field E(t):

where the coefficients χ(n) are the n-th-order susceptibilities of the medium, and the presence of such a term is generally referred to as an n-th-order nonlinearity. Note that the polarization density P(t) and electrical field E(t) are considered as scalar quantities for simplicity. In a full treatment of nonlinear optics, both the polarization density and the field must be vectors, while χ(n) becomes an (n + 1)-th-rank tensor representing both the polarization-dependent nature of the parametric interaction and the symmetries (or lack of symmetries) of the nonlinear material.[2]

Wave equation in a nonlinear material

[edit]

Central to the study of electromagnetic waves is the wave equation. Starting with Maxwell's equations in an isotropic medium, containing no free charge, it can be shown that

where PNL is the nonlinear part of the polarization density, and n is the refractive index, which comes from the linear term in P.

Note that one can normally use the vector identity

and Gauss's law (assuming no free charges, ),

to obtain the more familiar wave equation

For a nonlinear medium, Gauss's law does not imply that the identity

is true in general, even for an isotropic medium. However, even when this term is not identically 0, it is often negligibly small and thus in practice is usually ignored, giving us the standard nonlinear wave equation:

Nonlinearities as a wave-mixing process

[edit]

The nonlinear wave equation is an inhomogeneous differential equation. The general solution comes from the study of partial differential equations and can be obtained by the use of a Green's function. Physically, one gets the electromagnetic wave solutions to the homogeneous part of the wave equation:

and the inhomogeneous term

acts as a driver/source of the electromagnetic waves. One of the consequences of this is a nonlinear interaction that results in energy being mixed or coupled between different frequencies, which is often called a "wave mixing".

In general, an n-th order nonlinearity will lead to (n + 1)-wave mixing. As an example, if we consider only a second-order nonlinearity (three-wave mixing), then the polarization P takes the form

If we assume that E(t) is made up of two components at frequencies ω1 and ω2, we can write E(t) as

and using Euler's formula to convert to exponentials,

where "c.c." stands for complex conjugate. Plugging this into the expression for P gives

which has frequency components at 2ω1, 2ω2, ω1 + ω2, ω1 − ω2, and 0. These three-wave mixing processes correspond to the nonlinear effects known as second-harmonic generation, sum-frequency generation, difference-frequency generation and optical rectification respectively.

Note: Parametric generation and amplification is a variation of difference-frequency generation, where the lower frequency of one of the two generating fields is much weaker (parametric amplification) or completely absent (parametric generation). In the latter case, the fundamental quantum-mechanical uncertainty in the electric field initiates the process.

Phase matching

[edit]
Most transparent materials, like the BK7 glass shown here, have normal dispersion: the index of refraction decreases monotonically as a function of wavelength (or increases as a function of frequency). This makes phase matching impossible in most frequency-mixing processes. For example, in SHG, there is no simultaneous solution to and in these materials. Birefringent materials avoid this problem by having two indices of refraction at once.[20]

The above ignores the position dependence of the electrical fields. In a typical situation, the electrical fields are traveling waves described by

at position , with the wave vector , where is the velocity of light in vacuum, and is the index of refraction of the medium at angular frequency . Thus, the second-order polarization at angular frequency is

At each position within the nonlinear medium, the oscillating second-order polarization radiates at angular frequency and a corresponding wave vector . Constructive interference, and therefore a high-intensity field, will occur only if

The above equation is known as the phase-matching condition. Typically, three-wave mixing is done in a birefringent crystalline material, where the refractive index depends on the polarization and direction of the light that passes through. The polarizations of the fields and the orientation of the crystal are chosen such that the phase-matching condition is fulfilled. This phase-matching technique is called angle tuning. Typically a crystal has three axes, one or two of which have a different refractive index than the other one(s). Uniaxial crystals, for example, have a single preferred axis, called the extraordinary (e) axis, while the other two are ordinary axes (o) (see crystal optics). There are several schemes of choosing the polarizations for this crystal type. If the signal and idler have the same polarization, it is called "type-I phase matching", and if their polarizations are perpendicular, it is called "type-II phase matching". However, other conventions exist that specify further which frequency has what polarization relative to the crystal axis. These types are listed below, with the convention that the signal wavelength is shorter than the idler wavelength.

Phase-matching types ()
Polarizations Scheme
Pump Signal Idler
e o o Type I
e o e Type II (or IIA)
e e o Type III (or IIB)
e e e Type IV
o o o Type V (or type 0,[21] or "zero")
o o e Type VI (or IIB or IIIA)
o e o Type VII (or IIA or IIIB)
o e e Type VIII (or I)

Most common nonlinear crystals are negative uniaxial, which means that the e axis has a smaller refractive index than the o axes. In those crystals, type-I and -II phase matching are usually the most suitable schemes. In positive uniaxial crystals, types VII and VIII are more suitable. Types II and III are essentially equivalent, except that the names of signal and idler are swapped when the signal has a longer wavelength than the idler. For this reason, they are sometimes called IIA and IIB. The type numbers V–VIII are less common than I and II and variants.

One undesirable effect of angle tuning is that the optical frequencies involved do not propagate collinearly with each other. This is due to the fact that the extraordinary wave propagating through a birefringent crystal possesses a Poynting vector that is not parallel to the propagation vector. This would lead to beam walk-off, which limits the nonlinear optical conversion efficiency. Two other methods of phase matching avoid beam walk-off by forcing all frequencies to propagate at a 90° with respect to the optical axis of the crystal. These methods are called temperature tuning and quasi-phase-matching.

Temperature tuning is used when the pump (laser) frequency polarization is orthogonal to the signal and idler frequency polarization. The birefringence in some crystals, in particular lithium niobate is highly temperature-dependent. The crystal temperature is controlled to achieve phase-matching conditions.

The other method is quasi-phase-matching. In this method the frequencies involved are not constantly locked in phase with each other, instead the crystal axis is flipped at a regular interval Λ, typically 15 micrometres in length. Hence, these crystals are called periodically poled. This results in the polarization response of the crystal to be shifted back in phase with the pump beam by reversing the nonlinear susceptibility. This allows net positive energy flow from the pump into the signal and idler frequencies. In this case, the crystal itself provides the additional wavevector k = 2π/Λ (and hence momentum) to satisfy the phase-matching condition. Quasi-phase-matching can be expanded to chirped gratings to get more bandwidth and to shape an SHG pulse like it is done in a dazzler. SHG of a pump and self-phase modulation (emulated by second-order processes) of the signal and an optical parametric amplifier can be integrated monolithically.

Higher-order frequency mixing

[edit]

The above holds for processes. It can be extended for processes where is nonzero, something that is generally true in any medium without any symmetry restrictions; in particular resonantly enhanced sum or difference frequency mixing in gasses is frequently used for extreme or "vacuum" ultra-violet light generation.[22] In common scenarios, such as mixing in dilute gases, the non-linearity is weak and so the light beams are focused which, unlike the plane wave approximation used above, introduces a pi phase shift on each light beam, complicating the phase-matching requirements.[22] Conveniently, difference frequency mixing with cancels this focal phase shift and often has a nearly self-canceling overall phase-matching condition, which relatively simplifies broad wavelength tuning compared to sum frequency generation.[22] In all four frequencies are mixing simultaneously, as opposed to sequential mixing via two processes.

The Kerr effect can be described as a as well. At high peak powers the Kerr effect can cause filamentation of light in air, in which the light travels without dispersion or divergence in a self-generated waveguide.[23] At even high intensities the Taylor series, which led the domination of the lower orders, does not converge anymore and instead a time based model is used. When a noble gas atom is hit by an intense laser pulse, which has an electric field strength comparable to the Coulomb field of the atom, the outermost electron may be ionized from the atom. Once freed, the electron can be accelerated by the electric field of the light, first moving away from the ion, then back toward it as the field changes direction. The electron may then recombine with the ion, releasing its energy in the form of a photon. The light is emitted at every peak of the laser light field which is intense enough, producing a series of attosecond light flashes. The photon energies generated by this process can extend past the 800th harmonic order up to a few KeV. This is called high-order harmonic generation. The laser must be linearly polarized, so that the electron returns to the vicinity of the parent ion. High-order harmonic generation has been observed in noble gas jets, cells, and gas-filled capillary waveguides.

Example uses

[edit]

Frequency doubling

[edit]

One of the most commonly used frequency-mixing processes is frequency doubling, or second-harmonic generation. With this technique, the 1064 nm output from Nd:YAG lasers or the 800 nm output from Ti:sapphire lasers can be converted to visible light, with wavelengths of 532 nm (green) or 400 nm (violet) respectively.[24]

Practically, frequency doubling is carried out by placing a nonlinear medium in a laser beam. While there are many types of nonlinear media, the most common media are crystals. Commonly used crystals are BBO (β-barium borate), KDP (potassium dihydrogen phosphate), KTP (potassium titanyl phosphate), and lithium niobate. These crystals have the necessary properties of being strongly birefringent (necessary to obtain phase matching, see below), having a specific crystal symmetry, being transparent for both the impinging laser light and the frequency-doubled wavelength, and having high damage thresholds, which makes them resistant against the high-intensity laser light.

Optical phase conjugation

[edit]

It is possible, using nonlinear optical processes, to exactly reverse the propagation direction and phase variation of a beam of light. The reversed beam is called a conjugate beam, and thus the technique is known as optical phase conjugation[25][26] (also called time reversal, wavefront reversal and is significantly different from retroreflection).

A device producing the phase-conjugation effect is known as a phase-conjugate mirror (PCM).

Principles

[edit]
Vortex photon (blue) with linear momentum and angular momentum is reflected from perfect phase-conjugating mirror. Normal to mirror is , propagation axis is . Reflected photon (magenta) has opposite linear momentum and angular momentum . Because of conservation laws PC mirror experiences recoil: the vortex phonon (orange) with doubled linear momentum and angular momentum is excited within mirror.

One can interpret optical phase conjugation as being analogous to a real-time holographic process.[27] In this case, the interacting beams simultaneously interact in a nonlinear optical material to form a dynamic hologram (two of the three input beams), or real-time diffraction pattern, in the material. The third incident beam diffracts at this dynamic hologram, and, in the process, reads out the phase-conjugate wave. In effect, all three incident beams interact (essentially) simultaneously to form several real-time holograms, resulting in a set of diffracted output waves that phase up as the "time-reversed" beam. In the language of nonlinear optics, the interacting beams result in a nonlinear polarization within the material, which coherently radiates to form the phase-conjugate wave.

Reversal of wavefront means a perfect reversal of photons' linear momentum and angular momentum. The reversal of angular momentum means reversal of both polarization state and orbital angular momentum.[28] Reversal of orbital angular momentum of optical vortex is due to the perfect match of helical phase profiles of the incident and reflected beams. Optical phase conjugation is implemented via stimulated Brillouin scattering,[29] four-wave mixing, three-wave mixing, static linear holograms and some other tools.

Comparison of a phase-conjugate mirror with a conventional mirror. With the phase-conjugate mirror the image is not deformed when passing through an aberrating element twice.[30]

The most common way of producing optical phase conjugation is to use a four-wave mixing technique, though it is also possible to use processes such as stimulated Brillouin scattering.

Four-wave mixing technique

[edit]

For the four-wave mixing technique, we can describe four beams (j = 1, 2, 3, 4) with electric fields:

where Ej are the electric field amplitudes. Ξ1 and Ξ2 are known as the two pump waves, with Ξ3 being the signal wave, and Ξ4 being the generated conjugate wave.

If the pump waves and the signal wave are superimposed in a medium with a non-zero χ(3), this produces a nonlinear polarization field:

resulting in generation of waves with frequencies given by ω = ±ω1 ± ω2 ± ω3 in addition to third-harmonic generation waves with ω = 3ω1, 3ω2, 3ω3.

As above, the phase-matching condition determines which of these waves is the dominant. By choosing conditions such that ω = ω1 + ω2 − ω3 and k = k1 + k2k3, this gives a polarization field:

This is the generating field for the phase-conjugate beam, Ξ4. Its direction is given by k4 = k1 + k2k3, and so if the two pump beams are counterpropagating (k1 = −k2), then the conjugate and signal beams propagate in opposite directions (k4 = −k3). This results in the retroreflecting property of the effect.

Further, it can be shown that for a medium with refractive index n and a beam interaction length l, the electric field amplitude of the conjugate beam is approximated by

where c is the speed of light. If the pump beams E1 and E2 are plane (counterpropagating) waves, then

that is, the generated beam amplitude is the complex conjugate of the signal beam amplitude. Since the imaginary part of the amplitude contains the phase of the beam, this results in the reversal of phase property of the effect.

Note that the constant of proportionality between the signal and conjugate beams can be greater than 1. This is effectively a mirror with a reflection coefficient greater than 100%, producing an amplified reflection. The power for this comes from the two pump beams, which are depleted by the process.

The frequency of the conjugate wave can be different from that of the signal wave. If the pump waves are of frequency ω1 = ω2 = ω, and the signal wave is higher in frequency such that ω3 = ω + Δω, then the conjugate wave is of frequency ω4 = ω − Δω. This is known as frequency flipping.

Angular and linear momenta in optical phase conjugation

[edit]

Classical picture

[edit]

In classical Maxwell electrodynamics a phase-conjugating mirror performs reversal of the Poynting vector:

("in" means incident field, "out" means reflected field) where

which is a linear momentum density of electromagnetic field.[28] In the same way a phase-conjugated wave has an opposite angular momentum density vector with respect to incident field:[29]

The above identities are valid locally, i.e. in each space point in a given moment for an ideal phase-conjugating mirror.

Quantum picture

[edit]

In quantum electrodynamics the photon with energy also possesses linear momentum and angular momentum, whose projection on propagation axis is , where is topological charge of photon, or winding number, is propagation axis. The angular momentum projection on propagation axis has discrete values .

In quantum electrodynamics the interpretation of phase conjugation is much simpler compared to classical electrodynamics. The photon reflected from phase conjugating-mirror (out) has opposite directions of linear and angular momenta with respect to incident photon (in):

Nonlinear optical pattern formation

[edit]

Optical fields transmitted through nonlinear Kerr media can also display pattern formation owing to the nonlinear medium amplifying spatial and temporal noise. The effect is referred to as optical modulation instability.[16] This has been observed both in photo-refractive,[31] photonic lattices,[32] as well as photo-reactive systems.[33][34][35][36] In the latter case, optical nonlinearity is afforded by reaction-induced increases in refractive index.[37] Examples of pattern formation are spatial solitons and vortex lattices in framework of nonlinear Schrödinger equation.[38][39]

Molecular nonlinear optics

[edit]

The early studies of nonlinear optics and materials focused on the inorganic solids. With the development of nonlinear optics, molecular optical properties were investigated, forming molecular nonlinear optics.[40] The traditional approaches used in the past to enhance nonlinearities include extending chromophore π-systems, adjusting bond length alternation, inducing intramolecular charge transfer, extending conjugation in 2D, and engineering multipolar charge distributions. Recently, many novel directions were proposed for enhanced nonlinearity and light manipulation, including twisted chromophores, combining rich density of states with bond alternation, microscopic cascading of second-order nonlinearity, etc. Due to the distinguished advantages, molecular nonlinear optics have been widely used in the biophotonics field, including bioimaging,[41][42] phototherapy,[43] biosensing,[44] etc.

Connecting bulk properties to microscopic properties

Molecular nonlinear optics relate optical properties of bulk matter to their microscopic molecular properties. Just as the polarizability can be described as a Taylor series expansion, one can expand the induced dipole moment in powers of the electric field: , where μ is the polarizability, α is the first hyperpolarizability, β is the second hyperpolarizability, and so on.[45]

Novel Nonlinear Media

Certain molecular materials have the ability to be optimized for their optical nonlinearity at the microscopic and bulk levels. Due to the delocalization of electrons in π bonds electrons are more easily responsive to applied optical fields and tend to produce larger linear and nonlinear optical responses than those in single (𝜎) bonds. In these systems linear response scales with the length of the conjugated pi system, while nonlinear response scales even more rapidly.[46]

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) chromophore p-hydroxybenzylideneimidazolinone (HBDI) used in nonlinear bioimaging is an example of a pi-conjugated donor-acceptor (D-π-A) chromophore.

One of the many applications of molecular nonlinear optics is the use in nonlinear bioimaging. These nonlinear materials, like multi-photon chromophores, are used as biomarkers for two-photon spectroscopy, in which  the attenuation of incident light intensity as it passes through the sample is written as .[45]

where N is the number of particles per unit volume, I is intensity of light, and δ is the two photon absorption cross section. The resulting signal adopts a Lorentzian lineshape with a cross-section proportional to the difference in dipole moments of ground and final states.

Similar highly conjugated chromophores with strong donor-acceptor characteristics are used due to their large difference in the dipole moments, and current efforts in extending their pi-conjugated systems to enhance their nonlinear optical properties are being made.[40]

Common second-harmonic-generating (SHG) materials

[edit]
Dark-red gallium selenide in its bulk form

Ordered by pump wavelength:

See also

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Nonlinear optics is the branch of that studies the interaction between and under conditions where the optical response of the material is not linearly proportional to the applied strength of the , leading to effects such as frequency mixing, harmonic generation, and . This nonlinearity arises when intense fields, typically from lasers, induce changes in the material's or absorption that depend on light intensity, allowing photons to interact with each other in ways impossible in linear . The field emerged in 1961 with the first observation of by Peter Franken and colleagues using a on a , marking the birth of practical nonlinear optical phenomena enabled by high-intensity coherent sources. Key principles of nonlinear optics are rooted in the expansion of the material's polarization as a power series in the electric field: P=ϵ0(χ(1)E+χ(2)E2+χ(3)E3+)\mathbf{P} = \epsilon_0 (\chi^{(1)} \mathbf{E} + \chi^{(2)} \mathbf{E}^2 + \chi^{(3)} \mathbf{E}^3 + \cdots), where χ(1)\chi^{(1)} governs linear effects and higher-order susceptibilities χ(2)\chi^{(2)}, χ(3)\chi^{(3)}, etc., enable nonlinear processes. Second-order processes (χ(2)\chi^{(2)}), prevalent in non-centrosymmetric crystals like lithium niobate (LiNbO₃), include second-harmonic generation (SHG), where two photons at frequency ω\omega produce one at 2ω2\omega, and optical parametric amplification, which generates tunable light via difference-frequency generation. Third-order effects (χ(3)\chi^{(3)}), occurring in all materials including centrosymmetric ones like silica fibers, drive phenomena such as the Kerr effect for self-phase modulation and four-wave mixing for supercontinuum generation. Phase matching is crucial for efficient nonlinear interactions, achieved through birefringence or quasi-phase matching to ensure momentum conservation. Notable applications of nonlinear optics span , laser technology, and . In conversion, SHG and parametric oscillators enable efficient generation of , visible, and wavelengths from near-infrared lasers, with efficiencies up to 70% in crystals like dihydrogen phosphate (KDP). Optical fibers exploit χ(3)\chi^{(3)} nonlinearities for supercontinuum sources used in spectroscopy and , while integrated nonlinear photonics on platforms like supports compact all-optical switching and . Recent advances integrate nonlinear optics with 2D materials like and intelligent control strategies for ultrafast in mode-locked lasers, enhancing applications in precision and biomedical imaging. The field continues to evolve, with emerging focuses on quantum nonlinear optics and topological effects for robust light manipulation.

Fundamentals

Linear versus Nonlinear Response

In linear optics, the polarization P\mathbf{P} induced in a medium by an applied E\mathbf{E} of an electromagnetic wave is directly proportional to the field strength, expressed as P=ϵ0χ(1)E\mathbf{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi^{(1)} \mathbf{E}, where ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the and χ(1)\chi^{(1)} is the tensor. This proportionality implies that optical properties such as the and absorption coefficient remain constant regardless of the light intensity, leading to effects that scale linearly with the input power. Common examples include , where light bends upon passing through a medium like a lens due to a constant , and linear absorption, where the fraction of light absorbed is independent of intensity and depends only on the material's absorption coefficient and path length. Nonlinear optics extends this description by accounting for higher-order contributions to the polarization when the is sufficiently strong, resulting in a power-series expansion: P=ϵ0(χ(1)E+χ(2)E2+χ(3)E3+)\mathbf{P} = \epsilon_0 \left( \chi^{(1)} \mathbf{E} + \chi^{(2)} \mathbf{E}^2 + \chi^{(3)} \mathbf{E}^3 + \cdots \right), where χ(2)\chi^{(2)}, χ(3)\chi^{(3)}, and higher-order susceptibilities characterize the nonlinear response. These nonlinear terms arise from the anharmonic motion of electrons and nuclei in the material, causing the medium's response to deviate from linearity and enabling phenomena where the output properties do not scale proportionally with input intensity. For instance, while linear produces a fixed deviation angle, nonlinear effects can induce intensity-dependent changes in the , such as self-focusing, which occurs only above certain field strengths. Nonlinear responses become observable under high-intensity conditions, typically requiring optical intensities exceeding 10610^6 W/cm², far beyond those of conventional light sources like the sun or incandescent lamps. The invention of the in provided coherent, high-peak-power beams capable of achieving these intensities, enabling the first experimental demonstrations of nonlinear effects and transforming the field from theoretical curiosity to practical science. Below this threshold, linear effects dominate, but above it, nonlinear processes can lead to efficient wave interactions, often necessitating phase matching to maximize conversion efficiency.

Nonlinear Susceptibility and Polarization

In nonlinear optics, the electric polarization P\mathbf{P} induced in a dielectric medium by an applied optical electric field E\mathbf{E} is generally nonlinear and can be expressed as a Taylor series expansion in powers of the field strength. The linear component is PL=ϵ0χ(1)E\mathbf{P}_L = \epsilon_0 \chi^{(1)} \mathbf{E}, while the nonlinear polarization is PNL=ϵ0[χ(2):EE+χ(3):EEE+]\mathbf{P}_{NL} = \epsilon_0 \left[ \chi^{(2)} : \mathbf{E}\mathbf{E} + \chi^{(3)} : \mathbf{E}\mathbf{E}\mathbf{E} + \cdots \right], where ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the vacuum permittivity, χ(1)\chi^{(1)} is the linear susceptibility tensor, and χ(n)\chi^{(n)} (for n2n \geq 2) are the higher-order nonlinear susceptibility tensors. This expansion assumes a perturbative regime where the field is weak enough that higher-order terms diminish rapidly, enabling the description of phenomena such as frequency mixing and self-phase modulation. The nonlinear susceptibilities are rank-n+1n+1 tensors, reflecting the vector nature of the fields; for instance, the second-order susceptibility χijk(2)(ω3;ω1,ω2)\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(\omega_3; \omega_1, \omega_2) relates the ii-th component of PNL\mathbf{P}_{NL} to fields with frequencies ω1\omega_1 and ω2\omega_2 such that ω3=ω1+ω2\omega_3 = \omega_1 + \omega_2. These tensors possess intrinsic permutation symmetry due to the commutative nature of the expansion, meaning χijk(2)(ω3;ω1,ω2)=χikj(2)(ω3;ω2,ω1)\chi^{(2)}_{ijk}(\omega_3; \omega_1, \omega_2) = \chi^{(2)}_{ikj}(\omega_3; \omega_2, \omega_1). Additionally, under the Kleinman symmetry condition—which holds when dispersion is negligible (i.e., all frequencies are far from electronic or vibrational resonances)—the tensor indices can be freely permuted without changing the value, further reducing the number of independent components from 27 to 10 for χ(2)\chi^{(2)} in non-centrosymmetric media. This symmetry arises from the real-valued nature of the dielectric response in the absence of absorption and is crucial for simplifying calculations in processes like second-harmonic generation. Nonlinear coefficients are typically quantified using the related tensor dijk=χijk(2)/2d_{ijk} = \chi^{(2)}_{ijk}/2, with units of pm/V (picometers per volt) in the electrostatic system, reflecting the susceptibility's dimension of m/V when normalized by ϵ0\epsilon_0. Measurements of these coefficients often involve techniques such as or electro-optic effects, where the effective value deffd_{\mathrm{eff}} is projected along the propagation direction using the tensor's symmetry-allowed components. For third-order processes, χ(3)\chi^{(3)} has units of m²/V², but practical quantification frequently uses the nonlinear n2n_2 (in m²/W) derived from it. The distinction between intrinsic and effective nonlinearities accounts for local field effects, where the microscopic field at a or atom differs from the macroscopic applied field due to neighboring dipoles. The intrinsic susceptibility describes the bare molecular response, while the effective (or macroscopic) susceptibility incorporates corrections via local field factors, such as the Lorentz-Lorenz expression extended to nonlinear orders: χeff(2)=f(ϵ)χint(2)\chi^{(2)}_{\mathrm{eff}} = f(\epsilon) \chi^{(2)}_{\mathrm{int}}, with ff depending on the linear dielectric constant ϵ\epsilon. These corrections can enhance or suppress the observed nonlinearity by factors of up to several times in dense media. Nonlinear susceptibilities exhibit strong dispersion, varying with the frequencies involved in the process, as denoted by χ(n)(ω;ω1,,ωn)\chi^{(n)}(\omega; \omega_1, \dots, \omega_n) where holds (ω=ωi\omega = \sum \omega_i). Near resonances (e.g., electronic transitions), the magnitude increases dramatically due to denominator terms in the quantum mechanical expressions, while off-resonance values follow dispersive tails. This frequency dependence necessitates careful selection of operating wavelengths to maximize efficiency and avoid absorption, as formalized in the early theoretical treatments of nonlinear interactions. Dispersion also underlies deviations from Kleinman close to resonances, where index permutations alter the tensor elements.

Historical Development

Early Observations

The earliest observations of nonlinear optical effects predated the invention of the laser and involved the interaction of electric fields with optical media. In 1875, Scottish physicist John Kerr discovered the Kerr effect, in which an applied electric field induces birefringence in isotropic materials such as glass and certain liquids, demonstrating a quadratic dependence of the refractive index on the field strength. This effect, now recognized as a manifestation of third-order nonlinear susceptibility, enabled early electro-optic modulation but was limited to low-frequency fields at the time. Similarly, in 1893, German physicist Friedrich Pockels identified the Pockels effect in non-centrosymmetric crystals like tourmaline and quartz, where the refractive index varies linearly with an applied electric field, providing the first evidence of second-order nonlinear response in solids. These pre-laser discoveries laid the groundwork for understanding nonlinear polarization, where the material's response to an electric field includes higher-order terms beyond simple proportionality. The advent of coherent light in 1960 dramatically intensified optical fields, enabling direct observation of frequency conversion effects. In 1961, Peter A. Franken and colleagues at the performed the seminal experiment by focusing a pulsed beam (wavelength 6943 Å) into a crystal, detecting radiation at 3470 Å—the second harmonic of the input frequency—marking the first demonstration of (SHG). This breakthrough, achieved just one year after Theodore Maiman's invention, confirmed theoretical predictions of nonlinear frequency mixing but yielded extremely low conversion efficiency, on the order of 10^{-8}, primarily due to phase mismatch between the fundamental and harmonic waves in the crystal. Concurrently, researchers at Bell Laboratories, including Robert W. Terhune, played a pivotal role in early development and nonlinear studies, contributing to the rapid exploration of these effects through high-intensity coherent sources and precise spectroscopic techniques. These initial post-laser observations highlighted the potential of nonlinear optics while underscoring the need to address inefficiencies for practical applications.

Key Milestones and Discoveries

The development of phase-matching techniques in 1962 by Armstrong, Bloembergen, Ducuing, and Pershan marked a pivotal advancement in nonlinear optics, providing a theoretical framework for compensating mismatches in nonlinear interactions and thereby enabling efficient (SHG) in crystals like . This work, grounded in quantum-mechanical , predicted that or quasi-phase matching could achieve high conversion efficiencies, transforming SHG from a weak, inefficient process into a practical tool for frequency doubling. In 1965, Giordmaine and Miller demonstrated the first (OPO) using , achieving tunable coherent output across visible wavelengths by exploiting parametric down-conversion under phase-matched conditions. This invention extended the utility of nonlinear crystals beyond frequency up-conversion to versatile tunable sources, laying the groundwork for mid-infrared generation and applications. During the 1970s, demonstrations of and phase conjugation expanded nonlinear optics into wave manipulation and imaging. Yariv's 1977 analysis of degenerate in transparent media showed how two pump waves could generate a phase-conjugate beam, correcting distortions for applications in . This process, relying on third-order nonlinearities, achieved amplified reflection and oscillation, influencing later developments in and beam cleanup. The 1980s and 1990s saw nonlinear optics integrate with fiber technologies, particularly through . Hasegawa and Tappert's 1973 theoretical prediction of stable optical in dispersive fibers, balancing and via the , anticipated distortion-free pulse propagation over long distances. Experimental confirmation came in with Mollenauer, Stolen, and Gordon's of picosecond narrowing and splitting in single-mode silica fibers, validating the theory and enabling high-bit-rate . These fiber-based solitons, demonstrated over 700 meters without significant degradation, highlighted nonlinear optics' role in overcoming dispersion limits. From the 2000s onward, nonlinear optics merged with , notably through for generating entangled photon pairs, advancing and computing protocols. pulse generation, via high-harmonic generation in , enabled real-time observation of electron dynamics, as recognized by the 2023 awarded to Agostini, L'Huillier, and Krausz for pioneering techniques that produce light pulses lasting mere attoseconds. Recent advances up to 2025 include metamaterials engineered for enhanced nonlinearities, such as nonlinear metasurfaces that boost second-order responses in non-centrosymmetric structures, facilitating compact frequency converters and on-chip devices. These developments underscore the field's maturation into integrated quantum and ultrafast technologies.

Theoretical Framework

Nonlinear Wave Equation

The nonlinear wave equation describes the propagation of electromagnetic fields in media where the polarization response includes nonlinear contributions, serving as the foundational equation for analyzing nonlinear optical interactions. Starting from Maxwell's equations in a non-magnetic, source-free medium, the curl equations ∇ × E = -∂B/∂t and ∇ × H = ∂D/∂t, with B = μ₀ H and D = ε₀ E + P, lead to the vector wave equation by taking the curl of the first equation and substituting the second. Assuming transverse fields where ∇ · E ≈ 0, this simplifies to the scalar form ∇²E - (1/c²) ∂²E/∂t² = (1/ε₀ c²) ∂²P/∂t², where c is the speed of light in vacuum. In nonlinear media, the polarization P splits into linear P_L = ε₀ χ^{(1)} E and nonlinear P_NL components, with the linear part absorbed into an effective refractive index n via n² = 1 + Re[χ^{(1)}]. The resulting nonlinear wave equation becomes ∇²E - (n²/c²) ∂²E/∂t² = (1/ε₀ c²) ∂²P_NL/∂t², where P_NL acts as the driving source term for nonlinear effects. In the frequency domain, under the Helmholtz form for monochromatic fields, this transforms to ∇²E(ω) + (ω²/c²) n²(ω) E(ω) = - (ω²/ε₀ c²) P_NL(ω), highlighting how nonlinear polarization induces field modifications at frequencies determined by the interaction. For pulsed or broadband fields, the (SVEA) simplifies analysis by representing the as E(r, t) = A(r, t) exp[i(k z - ω t)] + c.c., where the A varies slowly such that |∂²A/∂z²| ≪ |k ∂A/∂z| and temporal derivatives are small compared to the carrier . Substituting into the nonlinear and neglecting second-order spatial derivatives yields the paraxial form 2 i k ∂A/∂z + ∇⊥² A = -\frac{ω^2}{ε_0 c^2} \tilde{P}{NL}(r, t), where \tilde{P}{NL}(r, t) is the complex of the nonlinear polarization at ω (obtained under SVEA by approximating ∂²P{NL}/∂t² ≈ -ω^2 \tilde{P}_{NL} e^{i(k z - ω t)} + c.c.), enabling tractable solutions for evolution driven by P_NL. To describe interactions among multiple waves, the coupled mode equations are derived by applying SVEA to each field component E_j = A_j(z, t) exp[i(k_j z - ω_j t)] + c.c. for j = 1, 2, 3, assuming plane-wave propagation along z. The nonlinear polarization P_NL at frequency ω_3 = ω_1 + ω_2 (e.g., for sum-frequency generation) couples the amplitudes, resulting in the set: \begin{align} \frac{\partial A_1}{\partial z} + \frac{1}{v_{g1}} \frac{\partial A_1}{\partial t} &= i \kappa_1 A_3 A_2^* \exp(i \Delta k z), \ \frac{\partial A_2}{\partial z} + \frac{1}{v_{g2}} \frac{\partial A_2}{\partial t} &= i \kappa_2 A_3 A_1^* \exp(i \Delta k z), \ \frac{\partial A_3}{\partial z} + \frac{1}{v_{g3}} \frac{\partial A_3}{\partial t} &= i \kappa_3 A_1 A_2 \exp(-i \Delta k z), \end{align} where Δk = k_3 - k_1 - k_2 is the phase mismatch, v_{gj} is the at ω_j, and κ_j are coupling coefficients proportional to the nonlinear susceptibility and frequencies (e.g., κ_3 = -ω_3 d_{eff} / (c n_3), with d_{eff} the effective second-order nonlinearity). These equations govern energy transfer among waves under the plane-wave assumption of uniform transverse profiles and infinite extent. Dispersion and absorption are incorporated by allowing n(ω) to be frequency-dependent and complex, with the real part introducing via the Taylor expansion k(ω) ≈ k_0 + k' (ω - ω_0) + (1/2) k'' (ω - ω_0)^2, where k' = 1/v_g and k'' measures broadening. Absorption enters as an imaginary refractive index n'' or decay coefficient α, modifying the coupled equations to include terms like ∂A_j/∂z → - (α_j / 2) A_j + nonlinear source, ensuring realistic propagation losses. Boundary conditions typically specify input amplitudes A_j(z=0) at the medium entrance, with plane-wave solutions assuming no transverse variations (∇_⊥² = 0) and infinite medium extent for simplicity.

Phase Matching Conditions

In nonlinear optics, efficient interactions among optical waves require satisfaction of both and conservation laws. While dictates the relationships (e.g., ω3=ω1+ω2\omega_3 = \omega_1 + \omega_2), momentum conservation necessitates that the wave vectors align such that k3=k1+k2\mathbf{k_3} = \mathbf{k_1} + \mathbf{k_2}, where ki=ni(ωi/c)z^\mathbf{k_i} = n_i (\omega_i / c) \hat{\mathbf{z}} for collinear along the z-direction, with nin_i the at ωi\omega_i. Failure to meet this condition leads to a phase mismatch parameter Δk=k3k1k2\Delta k = k_3 - k_1 - k_2, causing the nonlinear polarization wave to dephase from the interacting fields over distance LL, thereby reducing conversion efficiency. Birefringent phase matching achieves Δk0\Delta k \approx 0 by exploiting the in non-centrosymmetric , where the ordinary index non_o (for polarized to the optic axis) differs from the extraordinary index nen_e (for polarization along the optic axis). In type I phase matching, the two input waves are both ordinary (or extraordinary) polarized, while the output is extraordinary (or ordinary), allowing the phase-matching angle inside the to be tuned such that ne(ω3,θ)=[no(ω1)+no(ω2)]/2n_e(\omega_3, \theta) = [n_o(\omega_1) + n_o(\omega_2)] / 2. Type II involves one ordinary and one extraordinary input, yielding ne(ω3,θ)=[no(ω1)+ne(ω2)]/2n_e(\omega_3, \theta) = [n_o(\omega_1) + n_e(\omega_2)] / 2. Common techniques include angle tuning, by rotating the relative to the beam direction, and temperature tuning, leveraging the thermo-optic coefficient to adjust , often in like KDP or BBO. The conversion efficiency for second-order processes under phase matching is proportional to ηsinc(ΔkL2)2\eta \propto \left| \mathrm{sinc}\left( \frac{\Delta k L}{2} \right) \right|^2
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.