Hubbry Logo
search
logo
Paravar
Paravar
current hub

Paravar

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Paravar/Bharathavar
பரவர்
ReligionsChristianity (Predominantly Catholicism)
LanguagesTamil
CountryIndia, Sri Lanka
Populated statesTamil Nadu
RegionSouth India
Related groupsBharathas

Paravar (also known as Bharathar) is a predominantly Catholic Tamil maritime community, mainly living in the state of Tamil Nadu, and in Sri Lanka. Historically, they were inhabitants of the Neithal (coastal) lands of Tamil Nadu, and find mention in various ancient Tamil literary works.[1][2][3]

In modern India, Paravars are concentrated along the coastal belt extending along the Gulf of Mannar, from Kilakarai to Kanyakumari (Cape Comorin). They also live in some pockets along the Arabian Sea coast in Kanyakumari District as well as central Kerala. Paravars have been significant among the population of the port city of Thoothukudi and Ramanathapuram, since the 1580s.[4] Apart from Thoothukudi and Ramanathapuram, Paravars also live in many of the big cities and towns in South Tamilnadu like Tuticorin, Nagercoil, Tirunelveli, Rameshwaram, Thiruchendur and Madurai where they are into diverse professions.

In Sri Lanka, the Paravas (called Bharathas in Sri Lanka) have been a more affluent, merchant community since the British colonial times.[5][6] Today, they are found in significant numbers in the cities of Negombo and Colombo.[5][6] A section of the Bharathakula community in Sri Lanka has been classified as a separate ethnic group since 2001,[7] whereas another section which identifies itself as Sri Lankan Tamil live in towns such as Vankalai in Mannar District and Puttalam.[8]

The Paravars have a rich history, starting from their major economic contributions to the coffers of the ancient Pandya kings through their pearl-harvesting and trade,[9] to their later interactions with the Portuguese in the 16th century and later.[10] The arrival of Portuguese soldiers and missionaries in their midst, including the great missionary St. Francis Xavier, resulted in their conversion to the Catholic faith, adoption of Portuguese surnames and also protection against marauding enemies.[10]

Etymology

[edit]

The name Paravar literally means "dwellers on seacoast" and is derived from the Old Tamil word paravai meaning "sea" or "expanse".[11] The Paravars may have been the Paradavar mentioned in Sangam literature, who are mentioned in the Pattinappaalai.[12][13] They were maritime inhabitants of the littoral Sangam landscape known as Neithal, who were involved in pearls-harvesting, boat-building, salt-making, fishing, among other maritime activities. Professor Subramaniam says, they were “ferocious warriors” and constituted the most part of Tamil Navy at all times [14][15] The name Parathavar may have been derived from the Tamil root word paravai.[11]

The Paravars prefer to call themselves Parathar, also written Bharathar, which may be a corrupted form of the Tamil word padavar meaning "boat men".[16] Another theory proposes that the community originated from ancient Ayodhya and are descendants of the Bharatas clan from the Hindu epic Mahabharata, who were the ancestors of the heroes in the epic.[17][18]

History

[edit]

Pandyan dynasty

[edit]

The Pandya kings, eventually, moved their capital to Madurai. Pandyas were rulers with fish on their flag.[19] There is also a theory that the etymology of the name Meenakshi, for whom the great Meenakshi Temple, Madurai was built, is derived from the Tamil words meen (fish) and aatchi (rule).[20][21] Thus, some researchers point to the fact that the Pandyans may have been from the Neithal lands of ancient Tamil country, which were then mostly occupied by the Bharathars. Also, in the ancient Tamil epic Cilappatikaram, the Pandyan king is referred to as Korkai Pandyan by Kannagi,[22][23] which gives credence to the theory that the Pandyas were originally from Korkai, where the Bharathars lived.[24] The Cilappatikaram praises Bharathavars as one who sails high seas, killed whales, one who did pearl and valampuri shell diving, one who runs world’s famous kingdom and city, and kings.[19]

Pearls were major exports from the Pandya Kingdom by the first century AD, and was a major source of revenue for the kingdom.[25][26] (The pearl diving season usually lasted 20 – 30 days, around March).[27] The Paravas were skilled in diving and in the harvesting of pearls, which were done scientifically.[28][29] Thus, the control of the Paravas and the Pearls trade led to many skirmishes in the region, right from the ancient Pandyas to the friction between the Muslims, the Portuguese and the Dutch, in later centuries.[30]

The Pandyan kings allowed the Paravars to manage and operate the pearl fisheries because of their already ancient skills in that activity, which required specialist seamanship abilities, knowledge of how to tend the oysterbeds and also knowledge of their location. The Pandyan kings exempted the Paravars from taxation and allowed them to govern themselves in return for being paid tribute from the produce extracted.[4]

Cave engravings from the third century BC, found in 2003, reinforce this view as they suggest that the Paravars were the chieftains (Velirs) of the coastal region during this period, ruling as subordinates of the Pandyas.[31] Previously, in the 1920s, Iyengar had noted that the caste name was used in ancient scripts to mean both boatmen and chiefs of the Madurai country.[32] A report written in 1669 made it clear that in so far as they were kings, they were only kings of their own people and not of any wider constituency; furthermore, that these "kings" were referred to as such only by the Paravars.[33] However, in the Sangam work Mathuraikkanci, the author Mankudi Maruthanar, refers to his patron, the Pandya sovereign Talaiyanganam Nedunjeliyan, as the Lord of Korkai and the Warlord of the southern Parathavar (Then Parathavar por yere).[34][35]

The community was also involved in sea salt production,[36] which was a relatively easy task on the Indian coast as the hot temperatures evaporated the water without the need for firewood.[37]

The 1901 Madras Census noted that the Tamil-speaking Paravars "claim" to be kshatriyas (warriors) serving under the Pandyan kings, the word used suggesting some official doubt regarding the issue.[38]

Little is known about the Paravas during the Middle Ages. Indeed, Donkin has argued that with one exception, "there are no native literary works with a developed sense of chronology, or indeed much sense of place, before the thirteenth century", and that any historical observations have to be made using Arab, European and Chinese accounts.[39] Southern India came under the control of the Cholas in the ninth century but reverted to Pandyan control around the mid-1200s following a series of battles. They maintained control, despite several challenges, until the 16th century.[40]

Arab arrival

[edit]

Regardless of any doubt regarding their claims to be warriors under the liege of Pandyan kings, the Paravars certainly did have armies at a later time, these being created to protect the fisheries and their people from attack.[41]

The Arab Muslim invasion began in 712 AD at the Sindh Valley and by around 1300 AD they had taken over the entire northern India. However, even prior to the invasion there were Arabs in southern areas such as Calicut, Quilon and Malabar, chiefly traders interested in the spices, pearls, precious stones and cottons which were available there. Another advantage of the location was that it was on a major sea trade route running through south-east Asia and on to China.[42] Some of these Arabs were also pearl divers, having gained their experience in the waters of the Persian Gulf.[40] Some Paravars adopted Islam, whose women also were married off to Muslim traders. These claimed to be descendants of the biblical figure Noah.[43] The descendants of these Muslim people became known as the Lebbais and their main settlement was the town of Kayal, a presence which was noted by Vasco da Gama and Duarte Barbosa by the early sixteenth century.[44][45]

There is some ambiguity regarding this town: there was a harbour on the Tamraparani River in Pandyan times which was known as Korkai and when the river at this point became too silted to use (it is situated approximately 8 km inland nowadays), it was replaced by a port called Kayal, thought to be situated variously either at the mouth of the river or at the village of Palayakayal which was 4 km downstream of Korkai but is itself nowadays about 3 km inland. Marco Polo described Kayal as a bustling port and the centre of the pearl trade in 1292 but by the mid-16th century this too had probably ceased to operate and was replaced by another port, Punnaikayal (new Kayal) under the influence of the Portuguese colonists. Punnaikayal was again at the mouth of the river, which as part of an estuary was under constant change, around 4 km from Palayakayal. It is difficult to determine with any consistency which of these locations is being referred to at various times by various authors but what does appear to be a common factor is that this was until modern times a major port for the pearl trade.[26] Kayal is the Tamil and Malayalam word for a backwater.[46]

The 1901 Madras Census noted three groups who called themselves Paravars. It speculated that their common root were the mostly Christian Tamil-speaking Paravars, The other groups were the Canarese-speaking Paravars, who were umbrella makers and devil-dancers and the Malayalam-speaking Paravars, who were lime burners, gymnasts, midwives and shell collectors. It has been further speculated that the splitting of the latter two groups from the first may have been as a consequence of a desire to move away from the ancient tribal area when faced with the arrival of Muslims.[38]

The Paravar belief of being the Paravaims of the biblical scriptures and the lost tribes of Israel added to the differences with the Arabs, which is acknowledged by Fr.Henrique Henriques by his claim of kinship.[47]

Arrival of the Portuguese and Catholicism

[edit]
Conversion of the Paravas by St Francis Xavier, in a 19th-century coloured lithograph

There are differences of opinion regarding events up to the early 1500s. Donkin and Ray believe that the Muslims gained influence over the Paravars to the point that the latter became at best hired labour and at worst enslaved,[40][48] and Neill has claimed that there was a belief among Paravars that the Muslims sought completely to exterminate them following various squabbles.[44] However, Mannar and Chandrasekaran have said that up to the 16th century the Paravars had held almost a monopoly of the rights to exploit the pearl fisheries, having negotiated with successive kings to achieve this.[49]

By this time, Maynard has claimed, the south Indian coastal areas around Kanyakumari were "the greatest pearl fishery in the world", and that the Hindu people who fished for oysters there " ... were known as the Paravas". He says that the Hindus were essentially peaceful in nature and temperamentally unsuited to counter physical threat,[50] although Frykenberg has described them as a "... proud and venturesome seafaring folk engaged in fishing, pearl diving, trading, and piracy."[51] Hastings has pointed out that the piracy (and some smuggling) was only an occasional activity and that their more normal occupations demanded courage, strength and stamina, which made them "hardened adventurers".[52]

From 1527 the Paravars were being threatened by Arab fleets offshore, headed by the Muslim supporting Zamorin of Calicut,[52] and also by an onshore campaign of the Rajah of Madura to wrest control of Tirunelveli and the Fishery Coast from the hands of the Rajah of Travancore.[51][53] This continuing situation, and the desire to be relieved of the rivalry from Lebbai divers, caused the Paravars to seek the protection of Portuguese explorers who had moved into the area. A delegation led by Vikirama Aditha Pandya visited Goa to seek talks to this end in 1532.[Notes 1] The protection was granted on the condition that the leaders were immediately baptised as Catholics and that they would encourage their people also to convert to Catholicism; the Portuguese would also gain a strategic foothold and control of the pearl fisheries. The deal was agreed to and Vikrama Aditya Pandya baptised as Joao de Cruz became the first subject of the king of Portugal and some months later 20,000 Paravars were baptised en masse, and became subjects of Portugal, during the visit of Pedro Gonsalves, Vicar of Cochin. By the end of 1537 the entire community had declared itself to be Catholics, according to Hastings, and the Portuguese proceeded to destroy the Arab fleet when they met fortuitously at Vedalai on 27 June 1538.[50][51][52] The Portuguese state began to claim rights over the economic resources in the area due to its patronage of the Paravars.[54][55][56] From that point the Paravar people as a whole enjoyed renewed prosperity. Their declaration of acceptance of the Catholic faith did not prevent them from continuing to worship in the manner which they had done previously because there were no translators to spread the Catholic message and also because the conversion was seen by the Paravar people as being merely a convenient arrangement to obtain protection, not a statement of belief.[50][51] Bayly describes the situation as being "... really a declaration of tactical alliance rather than religious conversions as the term is usually understood."[57]

St Francis Xavier, then a Jesuit priest, had been working in Goa prior to his journey to Kanyakumari, where he arrived in October 1542. He took with him some interpreters with the intention of spreading the Gospel and bringing about further religious conversions.[58] Maynard claims that a further 10,000 Paravars were baptised during the first month of his mission, and 30,000 in total by its end; and that "His conversion of the Paravas, as is pointed out by Père Lhande, is the only instance of an entire caste being brought into the Church."[59] More modest figures have been proposed, such as 15,000 people including re-baptisms.[57] Xavier also brought about the conversion of members of other castes living in the area, for example Mukkuvars and Paraiyars.[51] His methods of conversion were sometimes forceful; for example, it is recorded that he burned down a hut which had been used to house non-Christian religious symbols.[60]

Xavier appointed catechists in the Paravar villages up and down the 100 miles (160 km) of coastline to spread and reinforce his teachings, the method for much of which was to recite repetitively (and in poorly translated Tamil)[4] rhythmic phrases of the Creed, Pater Noster and other standard Catholic teachings regardless of whether the content was actually understood.[52][57][61] These appointments necessitated that he obtained funds with which to pay them, the primary source being money granted to him by the Queen of Portugal.[60]

Violence had not been completely removed from Paravar society, despite the Portuguese intervention. There were a series of bloody skirmishes involving the Badage tribe, raiding from the neighbouring area of Madura in the ongoing struggle between the rajahs. Some of the Portuguese protectors themselves were involved in duplicitous dealings with such tribes, or simply took advantage of the mayhem to make personal gains. Xavier intervened on several occasions in an attempt to right these wrongs and in March 1544 wrote a letter stating that the behaviour of the Portuguese was in fact the biggest hurdle he faced in promoting the Catholic message. In 1545 he wrote that "I have never ceased wondering at the number of new inflexions they have added to the conjugation of the verb to rob." He left India some time in the late 1540s or early 1550s but the precise year is disputed.[62] There is at least one source which believes that Francis Xavier briefly visited again in 1548, when he was paraded through Tuticorin by the Paravars.[52] It has been suggested that his status among the Paravars was one of "cult worship".[63] There is a shrine to him, in a cave, which is still venerated today as the place they believe to have been his principal residence during his time among them.[64] Vikirama Aditha Pandya was rewarded by the Portuguese for his actions of 1532, when as part of the arrangement for protection he had offered to manage the pearl diving on behalf of the Portuguese. He became known as Senhor dos Senhores ("first among notables") Dom João da Cruz (but see Note 1) and was recognised as headman and official intermediary by the Portuguese from 1543 until 1553. (1543 was the year that the Portuguese first settled in Tuticorin, and the point from which that port began to expand until it eventually became the hub of the pearl fishery).[26] His title of jati thalavan (head of the caste) was passed down through 21 other members of his family. Caste elders in the various villages were also among the early beneficiaries of Portuguese recognition, perhaps because they were the first to be converted. The consequence was that a formal system of hierarchical control, based on religious authority and economic standing and extending from the jati thalavan through to the elders and then to the villagers, became established in the eyes of Paravars and non-Paravars alike. It remained in existence until the 1920s, with the elders extracting payments from villagers which were then passed on to the jati thalavan, and the latter in return managing affairs (including the fishery operations)[65] and adjudicating in both internal and external disputes involving the community. Kaufmann has commented that these "highly organised caste institutions" including hereditary headmen and councils of elders holding sway, was a rare thing in the agrarian economy of southern India and both lasted longer and was more elaborate than most equivalent Hindu systems of the area.[4] Another writer has said that " ... by the beginning of the eighteenth century the Tamil Paravas had emerged as one of south India's most highly organised specialist caste groups",[25] and adds that the hierarchical system had its origins in times prior to the Portuguese intervention.[41]

Their conversion may have enabled them to participate more significantly in religious ceremonies than was the case when they were Hindus; this being because their fishing and related occupation (that is, the taking of life) would have prevented any central contribution in Hindu religious rituals.[66] This was certainly the outcome following Pope Clement XIV's dissolution of the Society of Jesus in 1773, which resulted in a dearth of Catholic misisonaries and priests in the area, enabling the jati thalavan and his fellow caste notables to assume the role of solemniser for rituals such as marriage.[67]

Paravar Christianity, with its own identity based on a mixture of Christian-Catholic religious belief and Hindu caste culture, remains a defining part of the Paravar life today, the early work of missionaries and in the 1540s having been reinforced by others who succeeded them and by the jati thalavan, the latter also being known as the "little king".[41][52] Kaufmann explains this Christianity as being "in effect a 'caste lifestyle' for the Paravas",[4] whilst Zupanov gives an example of how the missionaries modified Catholic teaching to suit the Paravars by citing the example of Henrique Henriques, who told them that "in the beginning there were no Muslims, only Jews and Tamils".[68]

There are also evidences to show that the Portuguese used some Paravars in their maritime exploitations overseas.[69]

Dutch control

[edit]
Pearl Fishery at Tuticorin camp, 1662, by Johan Nieuhof.

A report written in 1622 stated that the fisheries had been moribund for many years due to the poverty of the Paravars; it is uncertain as to what period this refers or the cause of the poverty.[65] Xavier had recorded that the oyster beds seemed to have an uneven cyclical pattern, with a few good years of production alternating with a rather longer period of poor production.[70] Similarly, around 1490 Ahmad ibn Mājid wrote that the fisheries "flourish in some years, but appear dead in others." One contemporary explanation for these changes was that the beds became covered by the shifting sea sands.[71] A study of the period 1666–1916 showed that while the good harvests did tend to alternate between the Indian and the Sri Lankan sides of the Gulf, the latter side was more than twice as productive.[42]

Control of the fisheries passed from the Portuguese to the Dutch from 1658, along with sovereignty over the Paravars. The new rulers, who were Protestant, tried unsuccessfully to convert the Paravars to their own faith. One example of this attempt was the banning of the feast of Our Lady of Snows as a consequence of the Dutch taking over all the Catholic churches, many of which were turned into warehouses. This event had originated when a wood statuette of the Virgin Mary was moved by the Portuguese to the church of Our Lady of Mercy at Tuticorin in 1582, its installation being celebrated with a nine-day feast which was subsequently repeated annually and much enjoyed by the Paravars. The feast halted with the Dutch takeover but was reinstated from 1709, and three years later permission was granted for the building of a new church.[62] It was the right of the jati thalavan always to make the first tug of the rope which was attached to a chariot containing the statuette and which marked the start of the festival.[66] The veneration of the statuette has been called a "cult" and continues into modern times, although few outside the caste have such regard for it.[72]

During the period of Catholic repression the Dutch East India Company also expelled all Catholic priests and outlawed Catholic baptisms and other rituals. Indeed, there are no surviving records to suggest that there was any evangelism at all, although they did build Tuticorin's first Protestant church in 1750.[62] When told by the Dutch that they must become Calvinists, the Paravar responded:

"You say your religion is better than the religion which our great padre taught us. Well then, you must perform more miracles than he. Resurrect at least a dozen dead persons, for Xavier restored to life five or six here; heal all our sick; increase the number of fishes in our sea; and then we shall see what answer we will give you."[73]

During their period of control the Dutch also established a cloth factory in Tuticorin and this was a much appreciated venture — at some point the Paravars had also become traders in cloth.[74]

British control

[edit]

The British took over control in 1796,[26] after a period of gradual usurpation of Dutch authority along the coast and elsewhere by the East India Company. They had seized Tuticorin in 1785. Both sides had attempted to influence the Paravars, seeking to have their support to exploit the riches of the fishery waters.[67] The new government continued to recognise the Paravar's hierarchical social structure, as the Dutch and Portuguese had done before them.[75] However, until 1813 the Company did not officially allow Christian missionaries to operate in the areas under its control, bowing only then due to pressure from religious organisations in Britain. The company was suspicious of any potential political undertones spread by the missionaries and was eager to keep trade running smoothly by operating a policy of non-interventionist conservatism in matters religious and cultural.[76]

Bayly has examined why it was that some among the low-ranking Paravars were able to rise to work in occupations that were both more prestigious and more financially rewarding than had been the case before the conversion to Christianity, She points out that the Paravars held much the same rank as the Mukkavars, who were also a maritime caste of the area and were converted but did not demonstrate the same subsequent socio-economic mobility.[77] (It has, however, been argued that the Mukkavars were "a sub-class of the Parava[r] community" and formed the largest group of those converted to Christianity during Xavier's time).[78] Robinson has said

Far more prosperous than the Mukkuvar, their access to wealth, and then to education, after conversion ensured that they could attempt to spread out, urbanize, acquire new skills and enter different professions. All these aided in the process of upward social mobility."[79]

When the Jesuit missionaries returned in the 1830s, following the revival of their Society, they were shocked at the lapse in formal religious observance and in general Christian morality, as well as the opulent lifestyle being led by the Paravar elite which contrasted with the dilapidated state of the churches.[80] Around that time some of the Paravar elite, along with some other groups such as Nadar traders, were making significant amounts of money from a surge in export demand for processed cotton, using their existing wealth from the pearl fisheries as a means to expand their interests into this booming sector. By 1845 Tuticorin was the location of the main cotton export activities in southern India and by the end of the century it was the fifth largest port in the entire of India.[81]

In 1841, the Jesuits' attempt to re-assert their authority over the elite by supporting the aspirations of a rising group of lesser Paravars who had also managed to gain from the Cotton trade and boom and had hopes of validating their success with an appropriate rank in the hierarchy. These people were traders, often spending long periods of time away from home in such places as Goa and Sri Lanka. Even lower down the ranks, the rise in ship and cargo movements, the continued development of Tuticorin harbour and town, and similar consequences of the boom (including the requirement for food by those who had moved away from working directly in fishing or on the land) was providing increasingly profitable work. The Paravar elite continued their traditional role, organising this labour as they had done for the pearl fisheries. They also absorbed into their ranks those members of the caste who had profited from independent trading, this being achieved by requiring the newcomers to pay a fee and swear allegiance to the jati thalivan. However, there were people who had been cast aside from the elite as a consequence of falling out with the jati, and others who wanted recognition more quickly than the system allowed. These disaffected people were the target of the Jesuit actions, which consisted primarily of providing them with status symbols such as the offer of additional Te Deums and bells at marriage ceremonies. The end result of this attempt to foment a new hierarchy, however, was a riot and a successful move by the jati to replace the Jesuits with Goan Padroados as ministers to his people and officiators at the church of Our Lady of Snows. The Jesuits continued trying to split the caste for a further thirty years but rarely had more than temporary successes: the ranks of the disaffected were swollen by new arrivals but also diminished by those who left as a consequence of having obtained satisfaction from the elite.[82]

The Jesuits had gone so far as to establish an alternative cathedral, the Sacred Heart, in the hope of drawing worshippers from Our Lady of Snows. That, too, failed in its purpose.[83] There were also several instances where the disputes — often relating to rights in regard to religious buildings and their precincts — were taken through the court system, and also more occasions when riots between the factions occurred.[84]

The death of the jati thalavan in 1889 without a male heir gave rise to a power vacuum and so presented a new opportunity for the Jesuits. Combined with this was another boom in maritime trading, this time involving the plantations of Ceylon, which served to swell the ranks of those aspiring for recognition as members of the elite. The Jesuits employed various measures intended to drive a wedge between the two groups and to limit the subservience displayed towards the jati and other senior caste members which, the Jesuits believed, infringed on the true worship of God because offerings of money and goods were made to those people as part of Paravan church rituals. They went so far as to attempt to install an alternative jati and the battle for control continued for several years.[85]

The Jesuits were not helped in their aim by the British government, who in 1891 renegotiated the arrangements for sharing the fishery catches with the new, non-Jesuit appointed jati thalavan. This deal, in which it was agreed that the jati should receive the output of one boat for that of every thirty which went to the government, once again confirmed the support of the ruling power for the caste hierarchy.[65] The new jati was himself controversial among the Paravars: his appointment to the role, being the son of the previous headman's daughter, was thought by some to be invalid because the succession had passed through the female line.[85]

In the late nineteenth century the Paravar elite tried to reconcile with the Muslim seafarers in their area, seeking to claim kinship. This went as far as the then jati thalivan declaring that the elite among these Marakkar Muslims, from towns such as Kilakarai, were in fact related to him by blood as they shared common antecedents. There was a tactical purpose to these decisions as by these actions he wanted to assert that he had authority over them. Furthermore, it was in the economic interests of the Paravars to foster these relationships because under British rule it was often the Marakkar who were granted the licences to operate the fisheries. Simultaneously, the Paravars were attempting to dissociate themselves from other Christian castes, whom they thought to be of a lower standing than themselves, such as the Nadars.[86] Although they regarded the Nadar Christians as their equal in the past.[87] The Nadars had been enthusiastic in their conversion to Christianity but did so much later than the Paravars, with surges of conversion — both to Catholicism and Protestantism — taking place in 1802–1803, the 1840s and the late 1870s/early 1880s. Dyron Daughrity has said that the conversions were "largely because of the increase in social status that could be effected" but adds that

there are occasions when the Christian community would become out-cast. The issues were complex. If the new converts could convince the entire caste to convert, the social status of the group could actually increase. Individuals who converted were often forced to abandon their community and move in order to find Christian support. The often difficult situations regarding conversion and caste exist to this day."[76]

However, the combination of Jesuit pressure and then also that of the Goan Padroados, who came to agree that the ritual role of the jati was detrimental to belief, caused the gradual erosion of the jati's powers of patronage and organisation. This situation was assisted by the growing number of people aspiring to be members of the elite and those who disputed the validity of the succession as a consequence of the female lineage. The ceremonial role of the jati in religious observance and ceremony was gradually reduced, including the removal of status symbols such as the special seat that he occupied for Mass, and with these actions went much of his influence over the caste. By 1900 there were strikes taking place among the pearl and chank divers, often for frivolous reasons; the jati was unable to impose the discipline upon them which once had been a primary role.[88]

As the caste hierarchy disintegrated, becoming a range of groups each seeking to assert their position, the role of the jati thalavan became more and more impossible and was eventually abandoned, the last occupant of the post having been installed in 1926. The introduction of new technologies in the post-World War II era such as such as nylon fishing nets, refrigeration and motorisation made fishing more lucrative as an occupation in its own right which removed the economic differences between those who laboured and those who either traded or lived off the organisation of labour. With this difference gone, the distinction between the Paravar elite and the majority of the community lost its basis and became obsolete, and the hierarchy within the community disappeared.[89]

Post-independence

[edit]

In 1947, the fisheries became a monopoly of the new independent Indian government.[49] In the 1970s the power of the jati thalaivan and the Paravar elite was shattered by the repatriation of Tamil traders from Sri Lanka. In the present-day, the ritual significance of the jati thalaivan has been replaced by some of the more prosperous families involved in export of seafood. It is usually one of these families who pulls first at the Golden Carriage during Our Lady of Snows festival and is the chief donor for the associated rites.[89]

As of 2011, Paravars were classified as a Most backward caste in most of Tamil Nadu by the Government of Tamil Nadu. Until 2009, Christian Paravars were classified as a Backward Caste.[90]

In 2009 the government of Tamil Nadu issued an order designating Christian Paravars within its jurisdiction as being of the Most Backward Classes (MBC), a designation regarding their socio-economic status which entitles them to various assistance measures, primarily in the form of positive discrimination, if they should require it. These designations are flexible and subject to change at various times, according to determined need.[91][92]

Occupations

[edit]

Historically, the Paravars were involved in sea-related activities such as pearl diving, fishing, navigation, boatbuilding and the making of salt.[25][26][36]

It is known that during the visit of Francis Xavier the Paravars were using two different types of boat for net fishing, which he called the vallam and the toni. The latter was also used for trips to other coastal settlements and for trading journeys as far away as the Maldives. They were both large, open vessels with masts as well as oars; the sails were made with cotton, stiffened by boiling with roots and cow dung, and the fishing nets were made from coconut fibre.[26] However, Iyengar believes that the toni was a hide-covered wicker basket similar to a coracle.[36]

There is uncertainty regarding whether or not the present boats called vallam are similar to the ones described 500 years ago. Hornell's report of 1920 described the single-masted vallam in use around that time at being about 9 metres (30 ft) long and with a cargo capacity of around 2 tons. In 1914 he had described a larger three-masted boat, called the dhoni, which was used for pearl fishing and ferrying between anchored ships and Tuticorin harbour, as well as coastal journeys. The dhoni may owe its origin to Arab designs but could equally be indigenous.[26] Today, most boats are motorized and many fishermen have trawler boats.

The Paravars also used boats similar to catamarans and, indeed, that word comes from the Tamil katturmaran (tied tree). It would seem that the design was developed independently of those used in Polynesia.[citation needed] An 1895 traveller describes them as a hollowed-out tree trunk up to 20 feet (6.1 m) long which is connected to a smaller trunk acting as an outrigger using lashes and two arched lengths of bamboo.[93] The voyager and explorer William Dampier had described seeing them in 1699.[94]

The Bharathas of Sri Lanka

[edit]

During the cotton boom in the mid 19th century, some of the Paravars took to the textile trade. Starting in the 1860's, some of the entrepreneurs and merchants among the Paravars started setting up businesses in Ceylon (present-day Sri Lanka).[95] Many flourished in businesses in Sri Lanka that the Paravas (known as Bharathas in Sri Lanka) are widely recognised as a merchant community in Sri Lanka, known for their business acumen and also for their charity.[95] The Bharatha businessmen donated large parcels of land to various Catholic religious societies to build schools and places of worship in Sri Lanka.[95][96]

Some Bharathas in Sri Lanka also made a mark in business, politics, sports, etc. Bharatha merchant icons like M.P Gomez, J.L. Carwallio & F.X Pereira started Sri Lanka's first departmental stores.[96]

F.X. Pereira's son, I. X. Pereira, was elected to the legislative council of ceylon, and later became Minister of Labour, Industry and Commerce in the government. During World War II, he was appointed to the War Council, by the British. A postal stamp was issued by the Sri Lankan government in his honour, in 1988.

Former English cricketer Dimitri Mascarenhas was born to Bharatha parents in London, England. He holds the record for most runs in an over in a One Day International for England, with 30, scored off Yuvraj Singh of India on 5 September 2007.

Family names

[edit]

The Paravars were probably a primarily endogamous society[97] until the arrival of the Portuguese, marrying only within their own caste and so keeping the tribal ties strong. Subsequently, they became exogamous and from this came the use of names based on Portuguese origin. Family names such as Fernando, Costa, da Cruz and Roche are a direct consequence of these marriages, and familiar names, such as Susai (a Tamil translation of Joseph), reflect both the marriages and the general Portuguese influence.[4] Robinson offers a different thesis, claiming that they remained endogamous even after conversion, that these family ties strengthened their ability to ascend socially and that the use of Christian family names was in fact a privilege granted to them by the Portuguese and deemed to be a sign of their superiority over other castes such as the Mukkuvars.[98]

There are four family names of non-Christian origin still in common use, these being Kalingarayan, Villavarayan, Poobalarayan and Rayan. These names are thought possibly to have their origin in arayan, which was used by Tamil fishing groups as a caste title. Arayan is claimed by some modern descendants of the Paravars to be itself derived from rayya (rajah, king) and "MOTHA" is the surname of all jatithalavas who ruled and it is also followed till now.[66]

Contributions

[edit]

The first Tamil booklet was printed in 1554 (11 February) in Lisbon - Cartilha em lingoa Tamul e Portugues in Romanized Tamil script by Vincente de Nazareth, Jorge Carvalho and Thoma da Cruz, all from the Paravar community. [99] It was financed by the Paravars who also helped with scholarly assistance. Later, after the arrival of printing press in India, Henrique Henriques, a Portuguese missionary, had acknowledged the support and financial assistance provided by the community in printing his books such as;

  • Confessionary (Confessionairo,1580)
  • Lives of Saints (Flos Sanctorum, 1586)

The books were printed at Punnaikayal, the first Tamil printing press, which was set up in the year 1579.

Notable people

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Paravars are a Tamil-speaking fishing caste primarily inhabiting the coastal regions of southern India, centered around Tuticorin (Thoothukudi) in present-day Tamil Nadu, where they have historically dominated pearl diving, shell collection, and maritime navigation in the Gulf of Mannar.[1] In the early 16th century, following subjugation by Muslim traders who seized control of the lucrative pearl fisheries, the Paravars petitioned the Portuguese for military protection, leading to the baptism of over 20,000 individuals around 1532 as a prerequisite for alliance and restoration of their economic rights.[1][2] The arrival of Saint Francis Xavier in 1542 marked a turning point, as he systematically instructed the nominally converted Paravars in Christian doctrine, destroyed idols, baptized additional multitudes, and established catechists and churches across some 45 villages in the region, transforming their superficial adherence into a more entrenched faith despite ongoing challenges from pagan practices and external opposition.[2][3] This strategic conversion not only secured Portuguese dominance over the pearl trade but also elevated the Paravars' status within colonial hierarchies, granting them surnames and privileges, though it later exposed them to shifts in European powers such as the Dutch, who assumed control of Tuticorin.[1]

Origins and Terminology

Etymology and ancient references

The term Paravar originates from the classical Tamil word paravai, denoting "sea" or "ocean expanse," which underscores the community's longstanding association with maritime activities such as fishing and navigation along the southern Indian coast.[4][5] This etymological root aligns with descriptions in South Dravidian linguistic sources, where paravar refers to inhabitants of maritime tracts and fishing tribes.[6] Sangam literature, composed between circa 300 BCE and 300 CE, provides the earliest textual references to Paravars as skilled coastal dwellers engaged in seafaring and fishery pursuits.[7] Works including Ettuthokai, Pathupaattu, Ahananuru, and Maduraikkanci portray them leading prosperous lives on the pearl fishery coast, often as navigators and fishers integral to the regional economy.[8][9] Ancient Tamil inscriptions further connect Paravars to pearl-harvesting operations under Pandya oversight, emphasizing their practical economic contributions through tribute payments for diving rights.[9] One such inscription records Parava pearl fishers rendering tribute to Alli Arasani, daughter of a Pandya ruler, highlighting their role in sustaining royal revenues from marine resources without reliance on legendary or unsubstantiated accounts.[10]

Historical Timeline

Ancient Pandyan involvement

The Paravars served as the principal divers and harvesters of pearls and chanks in the Gulf of Mannar, directly supplying the Pandya kingdom's economy from at least the Sangam period (circa 300 BCE to 300 CE). Their expertise in free-diving to depths of up to 10-15 meters enabled the extraction of oysters from seasonal banks, particularly between February and May when pearl formation peaked, generating substantial royal revenue through controlled fisheries at ancient ports like Korkai and early Tuticorin.[1][11] Tamil Sangam literature, such as the Maduraikkanji, portrays Korkai as the chief settlement of the Parathavars, emphasizing its role as the epicenter of pearl diving operations under Pandya oversight, where divers operated fleets of catamarans to rake oyster beds. An ancient inscription references Parava pearl fishers paying tribute to Alli Arasani, daughter of a Madurai Pandya ruler, underscoring their status as a subordinate service group bound by obligations to the crown in exchange for access to fishing rights. Archaeological surveys in the Gulf of Mannar reveal pre-colonial shell middens and tools consistent with sustained oyster harvesting, linking Paravar labor to the kingdom's pearl export trade.[1][10][12] This extraction system causally bolstered Pandya maritime dominance, as pearl and chank revenues—chanks valued for ritual objects and currency—financed naval expansions and trade networks extending to Rome and Southeast Asia, evidenced by Roman coins found at Korkai sites. However, the labor dynamics were inherently exploitative: divers faced high mortality from drowning, shark attacks, and decompression sickness without advanced equipment, with yields unevenly distributed to enrich Pandya treasuries while Paravars received fixed shares or protections. The kingdom's control over fisheries, rather than Paravar autonomy, concentrated wealth upward, preventing independent accumulation and tying community prosperity to royal stability.[11][12]

Pre-colonial interactions with Arabs

From the 7th to the 15th centuries, Arab traders exerted significant control over the pearl trade in the Gulf of Mannar, leveraging their naval superiority and established Indian Ocean networks to dominate export routes to the Persian Gulf and beyond.[10] The Paravars, primarily local divers and fishers skilled in harvesting oysters from the shallow banks off Tuticorin and adjacent coasts, found their economic autonomy curtailed as Arabs, often through intermediaries like the Muslim Kayalar merchants of Kayalpattinam, monopolized the procurement and shipment of pearls.[13] This arrangement stemmed from the Paravars' reliance on small coastal vessels ill-suited for long-haul voyages, contrasted with Arab dhows capable of transporting high-value cargoes across vast distances, enabling the latter to dictate terms and extract surpluses.[10] Contemporary accounts, such as those from Ibn Battuta's travels in the 1340s, describe Kayal (modern Kayalpattinam) as a thriving Muslim-dominated port exporting pearls alongside horses, underscoring Arab-influenced networks that bypassed local intermediaries.[14] Paravars were effectively subjugated through economic coercion, compelled to deliver catches at undervalued rates or pay tributes to Kayalar overseers backed by Arab trading interests, fostering dependency on these external actors for market access.[4] This dynamic disrupted traditional Pandyan royal monopolies on fisheries, as Arab commercial leverage shifted power toward coastal Muslim enclaves, reducing Paravar yields to subsistence levels after obligatory payments.[13] Such interactions bred persistent resentment among Paravars toward Arab-supported Kayalars, rooted in disputes over fishery rights and perceived exploitation during seasonal harvests.[4] Historical records indicate no large-scale Paravar naval resistance due to technological disparities—Arab fleets outmatched local catamarans in firepower and range—but this coercion prompted informal alliances among Paravar villages against shared threats, heightening communal tensions that persisted into later eras.[10] The pearl trade's value, with Gulf of Mannar banks yielding thousands of oysters per dive season under optimal conditions, amplified these stakes, as Arab control funneled revenues away from local economies toward distant markets.[14]

Portuguese arrival and mass conversion to Catholicism

In the early 16th century, Portuguese explorers established a presence along the Pearl Fishery Coast of southern India, where the Paravars, traditional pearl divers and fishermen centered around Tuticorin (Thoothukudi), faced raids from Moorish (Arab and Muslim) traders seeking to monopolize the lucrative pearl trade.[15] These attacks intensified after 1505, disrupting Paravar access to fishing grounds and prompting community leaders to seek alliances for survival.[16] In 1532, under headman Parangusanayagam, approximately 20,000 Paravars petitioned Portuguese captains for military aid, offering conversion to Christianity and fealty to the Portuguese crown in exchange for arms, naval protection, and restoration of fishery rights.[17] The Portuguese responded pragmatically, viewing the Paravars as strategic allies against regional Muslim powers; by 1537, mass baptisms had enrolled nearly the entire community—estimated at tens of thousands—into the Catholic fold, granting them status as Portuguese subjects entitled to defense.[18] This en masse adherence preserved Paravar social structures and economic roles, as conversion was framed not as individual spiritual transformation but as collective bargaining for security, evidenced in contemporary Portuguese trade records prioritizing fishery control over doctrinal purity.[15] Claims of pre-Portuguese Christian origins, such as descent from St. Thomas the Apostle's disciples, lack contemporary documentation and appear as later apologetic traditions unsubstantiated by archaeological or epigraphic evidence from the region.[17] Francis Xavier arrived in 1542, finding the Paravars nominally Catholic but largely uninstructed; he conducted widespread baptisms—particularly of children—and catechesis, baptizing over 10,000 in his initial visits while advocating for Portuguese enforcement of protections against ongoing harassment.[18] Xavier's letters highlight the converts' reliance on Portuguese arms for defense, underscoring the conversion's causal link to geopolitical incentives rather than isolated evangelism, as the community's cohesion endured through unified adoption of the faith amid existential threats.[19] By the mid-1540s, this alliance had stabilized Paravar dominance in pearl diving, with Portuguese factors overseeing fisheries under Catholic oversight.[16]

Colonial transitions under Dutch and British rule

The Dutch East India Company seized control of Tuticorin and surrounding Paravar coastal territories from the Portuguese in 1658, initiating a period of religious and economic reconfiguration. Immediately upon conquest, Dutch authorities expelled Catholic priests, prohibited Catholic rituals, and repurposed churches in Thoothukudi and Manappadu into warehouses and Calvinist schools, aiming to eradicate Portuguese-influenced Catholicism among the Paravars.[20] Paravar resistance was fierce, with the community's caste head enforcing adherence to Catholicism, including the execution of defectors, which preserved religious cohesion despite persecution.[20] By the late 17th century, Dutch policy softened, permitting Jesuit missionaries to return and facilitating renovations to the Church of Our Lady of Snows, with foundations laid on April 4, 1712, and completion in 1714.[20] Economically, the Dutch imposed a monopoly on pearl and chank fisheries, requiring Paravar divers to sell exclusively to company agents, which marginalized the community by curtailing independent trade and initially exacerbating impoverishment after the destruction of boats in prior conflicts.[20] Despite providing new boats and materials, the VOC's control—evident in the appointment of a Paravar caste head as "lord of the seven seas" to oversee operations—reinforced dependency, with 4,760 Christian divers participating in the 1708 fishery under strict regulation.[20] Religious suppression prompted population displacements, as Paravars migrated to interior villages and forests for refuge, fostering insular caste solidarity and adaptations in leadership structures while diversifying into limited alternative coastal labors amid enforced textile procurement and slave trading activities by the Dutch.[20] British acquisition of Dutch holdings in the region culminated around 1795, with the East India Company organizing its inaugural pearl fishery near Tuticorin in 1784, marking a shift toward liberalized auctions that alleviated some monopolistic constraints.[21] This policy enabled broader Paravar participation and restored partial prosperity, as evidenced by the 1822 central pearl banks fishery yielding £13,000 in revenue post-occupation, allowing divers greater agency in sales compared to Dutch exclusivity.[22] However, British administration transformed pearl diving into formalized government-contracted labor, introducing competitive pressures from emerging mechanized techniques and external traders, which gradually eroded traditional advantages.[23] Paravars demonstrated resilience through diversification into ancillary coastal occupations, such as conch processing and salt production, mitigating displacements and sustaining community presence amid these transitions until 1947.[24]

Post-independence adaptations and migrations

The adoption of mechanized trawlers by Paravar fishermen in Tamil Nadu accelerated after the 1960s, enhancing catch volumes from traditional catamaran-based methods but intensifying resource competition and prompting state interventions for sustainability.[25] The Tamil Nadu Marine Fishing Regulation Act of 1983 formalized restrictions on mechanized operations, including vessel registration and operational zones, to mitigate conflicts between artisanal and industrial fishers while curbing overexploitation.[25] These measures, coupled with annual breeding bans—typically 45 to 61 days prohibiting mechanized trawling to safeguard fish stocks—have reduced seasonal yields for dependent communities like the Paravar, though compliance has varied and contributed to stabilized marine populations over time.[26][27] In Sri Lanka, Bharatha Paravar, the local variant of the community, encountered disruptions from the 1983 Black July anti-Tamil pogroms, which ignited the civil war and displaced coastal Tamil groups through targeted violence against their livelihoods and settlements. This event precipitated a broader Tamil exodus, with over 304,000 Sri Lankan Tamils, including maritime subgroups, fleeing to India by 2012, many resettling in Tamil Nadu camps and integrating via familial ties to indigenous Paravar networks.[28] Refugee inflows strained local fisheries but spurred adaptive shifts, such as skill transfers in boat-building and net-mending, amid protracted conflict that persisted until 2009. Socio-economic adaptations in India have leveraged state reservations, classifying Hindu Paravar under Most Backward Classes and Christian Paravar under Backward Classes, which allocate quotas for educational institutions and public sector jobs to address historical maritime caste disadvantages.[29] These policies have facilitated higher enrollment in technical courses and civil service roles, diminishing reliance on seasonal fishing and fostering intergenerational mobility, as evidenced by community advocacy for sustained caste-specific benefits to consolidate gains beyond subsistence economies.[29] Such mechanisms contrast with narratives of stasis, highlighting empirical progress in human capital development post-1947.

Demographics and Distribution

Presence in India

The Paravar community maintains its core settlements along the southern coastal stretches of Tamil Nadu, primarily in the districts of Thoothukudi (Tuticorin), Ramanathapuram, and Kanyakumari, spanning from Tuticorin eastward along the Gulf of Mannar to Muttom near Cape Comorin.[30][31] These habitats align with historical maritime zones, including the fishery coasts of the Gulf of Mannar and adjacent areas of the Coromandel Coast region.[32] In Tamil Nadu, Paravars are recognized as an Other Backward Class (OBC) community, inclusive of Christian converts except in specified districts like Kanyakumari and parts of Tirunelveli, reflecting their socioeconomic status in state classifications.[33] Population estimates for Paravans in India derive from ethnographic surveys rather than comprehensive caste censuses, with Joshua Project reporting approximately 25,000 Christian Paravans in Tamil Nadu and smaller numbers in other states.[34] In Kerala, an estimated 12,000 Christian Paravans reside, concentrated in southern coastal districts such as Thiruvananthapuram.[34] These figures suggest a community size in the tens of thousands, though official census data lacks granular caste breakdowns beyond Scheduled Castes and Tribes. Coastal concentrations persist due to longstanding ties to marine environments, yet economic pressures including fluctuations in fishery resources have prompted migrations to inland areas and urban centers like Chennai and Coimbatore within Tamil Nadu. Such shifts are evidenced by broader patterns of rural-to-urban movement among coastal communities seeking diversified livelihoods amid sustainability challenges in traditional sectors.[1] Overall, Paravar demographics underscore a resilient presence rooted in southern India's littoral zones, with adaptations reflecting modern economic dynamics.

Communities in Sri Lanka and diaspora

The Bharatha community in Sri Lanka, originating from Paravar migrants across the Palk Strait, numbers over 10,000 individuals and is concentrated along the western and northern coasts, particularly in Mannar, Negombo, and Colombo, with historical ties to the Gulf of Mannar fisheries.[35] These groups traditionally pursued fishing and pearl diving, supplemented by roles as seafaring mercenaries recruited by pre-colonial Sinhalese kings for their warrior expertise in maritime conflicts.[36] Colonial administrations from the Portuguese period onward reshaped their identity through policies favoring Catholic loyalty and economic specialization, leading to the adoption of the Bharatha label distinct from broader Tamil castes, while some transitioned from coastal labor to urban mercantile activities amid Dutch suppression of Catholicism and British administrative classifications.[37] Endogamy and close-knit family networks have empirically sustained Bharatha cohesion against assimilation into Sinhalese or general Tamil populations, as evidenced by community self-reports of preferential intra-group marriages and bilingual proficiency facilitating integration without full cultural dilution.[38] The 1983 anti-Tamil pogroms, which displaced over 100,000 Tamils including Catholic subgroups, prompted localized Bharatha migrations and reinforced community insularity in affected northern areas, though their western enclaves experienced less direct targeting due to prior socioeconomic blending.[39] Smaller Bharatha diasporas persist in Malaysia and Singapore, numbering in the low thousands collectively, stemming primarily from 19th-century British labor recruitments to plantation and port economies alongside other Tamil maritime castes, with limited post-1983 refugee augmentation via familial networks.[40] These overseas groups maintain fishing-derived trades or commerce, often navigating host-country ethnic quotas while upholding Catholic rituals to counter dispersion pressures.[35]

Occupations and Economic Roles

Traditional maritime activities

The Paravars engaged primarily in pearl diving and chank harvesting along the Gulf of Mannar, particularly near Tuticorin, where they free-dived to depths of up to 12 meters using weighted stones for descent and ropes for ascent, often in teams of 20 divers per boat during seasonal fisheries in March.[4] These activities yielded significant quantities of pearl oysters and conch shells, with historical records indicating that Paravar divers contributed to the Pandya kingdom's economy through pearl exports from over 16 ports dating back to the 3rd century BCE, though exact pre-colonial yields varied due to natural oyster bank cycles.[4] Risks included shark attacks, stingray strikes, decompression sickness, and drowning, mitigated partially by traditional knowledge of marine behaviors but resulting in frequent casualties among divers.[41] In parallel, fishing formed a staple occupation, employing beach seine nets known as vala valai or kara valai, which required 10 to 50 laborers to deploy and haul from shore, targeting species such as trevally, barracuda, and prawns using cotton nets on catamarans that yielded approximately 22.5 to 30 kilograms per day in pre-modern catches.[41] Chank harvesting complemented this, involving dives for conch species like Xancus pyrum on sandy seabeds for use in trade and artisanal products, sustaining economic exchanges with inland communities through ports where Paravars supplied marine goods to agricultural castes in return for staples, though this interdependence was pragmatic rather than harmonious, often mediated by local rulers' monopolies on fisheries.[42][41] Navigation skills enabled seasonal trade voyages, with Paravars piloting catamarans and dhoni boats for long-distance commerce in pearls, chanks, and dried fish to Arab and Southeast Asian markets, leveraging intimate knowledge of currents and winds while facing perils from monsoons and piracy.[4] Boatbuilding and salt production from seawater further supported these pursuits, integrating Paravar labor into regional maritime networks under pre-colonial oversight that licensed divers and allocated fishing grounds via systems like the padu to regulate access and prevent overexploitation.[41]

Evolution in modern contexts

The introduction of mechanized trawling in Tamil Nadu's coastal fisheries during the 1960s and 1970s transformed traditional practices among communities like the Paravar, who predominantly operate in districts such as Tuticorin and Ramanathapuram. Experimental trawling began in the early 1960s, with commercial adoption accelerating after the discovery of export markets for shrimp, leading to widespread use of bottom trawlers by the mid-1970s in areas like Palk Bay, where mechanized vessels entered operations around 1974.[43][44] This shift enabled access to demersal resources in deeper waters, increasing average catches per vessel from traditional catamaran levels of under 10 kg to hundreds of kilograms daily for trawlers, thereby elevating household incomes in fishing-dependent villages.[45] However, mechanization strained marine resources through overexploitation and habitat damage from bottom trawling, contributing to declining fish stocks in overfished zones like the Gulf of Mannar by the 1980s. Aquaculture emerged as a complementary adaptation post-1980s, with Paravar fishers in Tamil Nadu adopting brackish-water shrimp farming in coastal ponds, supported by state subsidies; national shrimp production rose from negligible levels in the 1970s to 0.8 million tonnes by 2020, providing seasonal income diversification amid seasonal marine bans.[46][45] Resource pressures prompted regulatory measures, including 45-60 day annual trawling bans enforced since 1982, which reduced juvenile catches but initially disrupted livelihoods until supplemented by pond-based culture.[47] Government initiatives have further shaped this evolution, with the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY), launched in 2020, allocating over ₹20,000 crore for infrastructure like mechanized boat upgrades and aquaculture clusters in Tamil Nadu, targeting a national fish production increase to 22 million tonnes by 2024-25 from 13.7 million tonnes in 2018-19. Success metrics include a 7-8% annual growth in fisheries GDP contribution since 2016-17, with Tamil Nadu's marine landings reaching 7.5 lakh tonnes in 2022-23, though implementation challenges like uneven subsidy distribution have limited penetration in smaller Paravar cooperatives.[48][49] Diversification into ancillary trades, such as fibreglass-reinforced boat construction and repair, has gained traction since the 1990s, with Paravar artisans in Tuticorin contributing to the production of over 500 mechanized vessels annually by local yards, leveraging traditional woodworking skills amid rising demand for trawler maintenance.[50] The Bharathas represent a subgroup of the Paravar community that migrated from southern India to Sri Lanka, primarily as seafaring warriors and fishermen, with arrivals documented as early as the 1400s.[35] This migration transformed their identity, adopting the term "Bharatha" to emphasize Indian origins, distinct from local Sri Lankan groups, while retaining maritime skills in fishing and security roles.[16] Historical accounts indicate they were recruited by Sinhalese kings as mercenaries prior to Portuguese arrival, providing military services in exchange for settlement privileges along the western coast.[36] Colonial policies from the 16th to 20th centuries further shaped this evolution, with Portuguese rule facilitating mass conversions to Catholicism among the Paravar-derived groups, including Bharathas, mirroring events in India but leading to integrated roles in Sri Lanka's security apparatus.[37] Under Dutch and British administrations, Bharathas shifted from primary fishing and mercenary duties toward merchant activities, establishing networks for importing onions from India and later distributing petroleum products, including kerosene exports back to India by the early 20th century.[51] This adaptation created empirical distinctions from mainland Paravars, who remained more tied to coastal pearl fisheries and local trade, whereas Sri Lankan Bharathas leveraged colonial ports like Colombo for broader Indo-Sri Lankan commerce.[35][36] Their mercenary heritage persisted in limited forms during transitions between colonial powers, with Bharathas serving in auxiliary forces, but economic diversification reduced reliance on warfare, fostering resilience through trade monopolies granted by British authorities.[37] By the early 20th century, this subgroup had coalesced into a compact, endogamous community of approximately 1,288 individuals, concentrated in urban centers, underscoring a path of selective assimilation distinct from the agrarian or purely extractive occupations of their Indian Paravar kin.[52]

Social Organization

Family structures and surnames

The Paravar community organizes kinship along patrilineal lines, with descent, inheritance, and clan affiliation traced through males, a pattern aligning with predominant Tamil social structures that emphasize male authority in family decision-making and resource allocation.[53] This system fosters extended family units where elder males oversee maritime occupations and community affairs, contributing to the group's historical cohesion amid coastal livelihoods. Endogamous marriages within the caste or subclans reinforce these ties, limiting unions to preserve shared heritage and occupational skills, though inter-subcaste alliances occur occasionally under modern influences.[54] Surnames among Paravars reflect dual influences: pre-colonial Tamil roots and Portuguese colonial impositions following 16th-century conversions. Non-Christian lineages retain names like Kalingarayan, Villavarayan, Poobalarayan, and Rayan, derived from ancient regional titles linked to fishing and warrior clans.[54] Post-conversion, Portuguese surnames such as Fernando, Fernandez, De Cruz, De Souza, Mascarenhas, and Lobo became prevalent, adopted en masse during baptisms by missionaries like Francis Xavier to signify Christian identity and integration into colonial patronage networks; equivalents like Rodriguez appeared via Spanish interactions.[8][54] These nomenclature shifts, numbering over 100 variants, mark clan distinctions while underscoring the community's adaptive resilience to external rule.[31]

Caste dynamics and community resilience

The Paravars historically occupied a middling position in the South Indian caste hierarchy as a maritime service community, deriving practical authority from navigation, pearl diving, and trade skills that elevated their economic leverage despite ritual impurities associated with fishing occupations.[1] Their pre-colonial influence stemmed from alliances with regional powers, such as the Pandyas, where they served as coastal guardians, though they ranked below land-owning castes like Vellalars in purity-based rankings.[55] Mass conversion to Catholicism in the 16th century altered this dynamic: while Hinduism enforced occupational pollution and endogamy tied to varna exclusions, Christianity's doctrinal egalitarianism theoretically loosened ritual barriers, allowing group-level mobility and escape from untouchability-like restrictions through collective petitions for protection.[4] However, caste-like endogamy persisted within Christian Paravar subgroups, with communities maintaining distinct identities via surnames and marriage preferences, as evidenced by certifications of "decent" caste standing required for social legitimacy.[53] In modern Tamil Nadu, Paravars are designated a Scheduled Caste for reservations, except in Kanyakumari and parts of Tirunelveli where fishing-specific subgroups like Parathavar receive similar benefits, reflecting enduring socioeconomic marginalization despite claims of Kshatriya descent.[56][1] Community resilience manifested through robust internal governance, centered on headmen known as Talavan or Pattangatti, who led village councils (panchayats) in enforcing resource rules, resolving intra-community disputes, and negotiating with outsiders.[1][20] These structures, often intertwined with Catholic parish authorities, imposed sanctions for violations like unauthorized fishing, promoting self-regulation and cohesion that buffered against external exploitations such as trade monopolies or raids.[57] This adaptive organization—evident in sustained endogamous networks and leadership hierarchies—countered dependency by enabling proactive defense of communal interests, as Paravars leveraged collective action for patronage alliances rather than individual submission.[53]

Religion and Cultural Practices

Shift to Catholicism and its implications

The Paravas, pearl divers along the southern Indian coast near Tuticorin, experienced systemic raids and economic displacement by Muslim traders in the early 16th century, prompting them to petition Portuguese captains for armed assistance around 1535. In response, Portuguese authorities conditioned military support on collective conversion to Catholicism, leading to initial group baptisms of Parava leaders and, subsequently, entire villages. This pragmatic alliance, documented in Portuguese colonial records, enabled the Paravas to regain control of lucrative pearl fisheries previously dominated by rivals.[58][19] Francis Xavier arrived in the region in October 1542, intensifying evangelization efforts amid these conversions; his letters recount baptizing thousands of Paravas in mass ceremonies, often involving up to 10,000 individuals per event, while emphasizing communal adherence to Catholic doctrine without disrupting existing social hierarchies. These group baptisms preserved Parava kinship structures, as entire families and villages converted together, fostering unified community identity under Portuguese patronage. Xavier's accounts highlight the conversions' role in establishing catechists from within the Parava ranks to sustain doctrinal practice, countering potential lapses observed in earlier Franciscan efforts.[59][58] Causally, the shift empowered Paravas against existential threats, as Portuguese naval forces repelled Moorish incursions—such as after Paravas killed a Moorish tax collector in 1536—restoring fishery access and generating revenue streams that offset tribute demands. This bolstered socioeconomic agency, transforming vulnerable fishers into protected allies capable of resisting subjugation, rather than passive subjects. Long-term, the alliance integrated Paravas into a transoceanic network, enhancing navigational skills and trade resilience, though reliant on Portuguese goodwill amid rival imperial pressures.[58][60]

Retention of pre-Christian elements

Despite the mass conversion to Catholicism in the 16th century, Parava communities in coastal Tamil Nadu have preserved syncretic elements from pre-Christian Tamil maritime traditions, particularly in rituals venerating the sea. These practices often integrate Catholic saints with indigenous beliefs in sea spirits and protective forces, as seen in folk customs where fishermen invoke saints like St. Anthony or St. Francis Xavier during voyages, echoing earlier Tamil animistic reverence for oceanic deities and guardians. Ethnographic observations note that such rituals blend Catholic processions with pre-conversion taboos, such as avoiding fishing during storms or offering symbolic libations to the sea, which served practical purposes for survival in hazardous pearl-diving and fishing activities.[4][61] Oral traditions among Paravas retain Tamil-rooted narratives of ancestral sea heroes and environmental omens, transmitted through songs and stories that coexist with Christian hagiography without doctrinal conflict. These elements, including beliefs in guardian spirits associated with coastal landmarks like banyan trees, reflect utility-driven customs for risk mitigation rather than overt polytheism, allowing their persistence alongside Catholic exclusivity. Jesuit encouragement of the St. Francis Xavier cult, for instance, facilitated this accommodation by overlaying saintly intercession on existing veneration patterns, though full erasure of adaptive folk practices did not occur due to their embedded role in community resilience.[15][4] This retention highlights the limits of conversion's doctrinal impact: while Paravas adopted Catholic theology and sacraments, empirical ethnographic evidence shows selective continuity of pre-Christian customs tied to ecological and occupational necessities, unsubordinated to ecclesiastical oversight in daily life. Such syncretism is not unique to Paravas but typifies South Indian Catholic fishing groups, where local agency preserved cultural substrates amid religious change.[62][61]

Contributions and Impacts

Economic and navigational legacies

The Paravar community's pearl harvesting in the Gulf of Mannar generated substantial revenue for the Pandya kingdom from pre-Christian times through the mid-9th century, with pearls serving as a primary export commodity traded to the Roman Empire between the 1st century BCE and 4th century CE via ports such as Korkai and Kayal.[10] [63] This trade extended to Arab merchants from the 7th century CE, bolstering regional economies through Paravar expertise in diving and initial processing.[10] Paravars demonstrated navigational proficiency in pre-colonial voyages, employing catamarans to traverse the shallow, reef-laden waters of the Gulf of Mannar and facilitating trans-Indian Ocean exchanges along established routes to the Persian Gulf and beyond.[10] Their hereditary knowledge of pearl banks (paars), derived from oral traditions and sensory cues, enabled precise location of oyster beds at depths around 6 meters, supporting seasonal migrations and trade expeditions under Chola rule from 985 to 1250 CE.[10] [64] Traditional Paravar fishing methods, emphasizing community-regulated seasonal harvesting and reliance on natural regeneration cycles, sustained pearl oyster populations in the Gulf of Mannar for millennia, offering lessons in avoiding overexploitation through localized knowledge of marine ecosystems.[41] These practices contrasted with later colonial intensities that depleted beds, as evidenced by the extraction of 21 million oysters in a single 1907 season leading to fishery decline.[64]

Broader societal roles

The Paravars historically provided mercenary services and military support in regional conflicts, particularly after aligning with Portuguese forces in the 16th century. Following conflicts with Muslim groups in 1532, which prompted mass conversions for protection, Paravar communities supplied warriors to Portuguese campaigns, including plans to mobilize over 10,000 soldiers from the Fishery Coast for an assault on Jaffna in 1546 and 5,000 from Mannar in 1591.[16] This role extended their influence beyond coastal enclaves, as they participated in broader power struggles involving local rulers like those of Jaffna and Madura, where attacks on Paravar settlements, such as the devastating raid by Visvanatha of Madura in August 1560, underscored their strategic value as allied fighters.[16] Through maritime activities, Paravars facilitated cultural exchanges across the Indian Ocean, connecting South Indian coastal societies with distant civilizations via long-distance seafaring. Their proficiency in navigation and presence along trade routes enabled interactions that transmitted elements of religious practices, technologies, and social customs, notably accelerating the adoption of Christianity following Portuguese contact in the early 1500s.[4] These exchanges were not merely incidental but integral to their identity as a mobile littoral group, influencing hybrid cultural formations in regions like the Gulf of Mannar.[16] Paravar social structures exemplified empirical models of community cohesion, organized under patangatin chiefs who mediated internal disputes and external threats, fostering resilience amid conversions and conflicts. By the 1540s, over 50,000 conversions unified disparate settlements into a protected Christian bloc reliant on Portuguese oversight, yet retaining caste hierarchies and leadership roles that certified member standing and enforced collective discipline.[16] This adaptive solidarity, evident in Jesuit-brokered peaces during clashes like those with Karava Christians in 1571–1572, offered a template for other marginalized maritime groups navigating imperial pressures while preserving endogamous and ritual authority.[16]

Challenges and Criticisms

Historical vulnerabilities and exploitations

Prior to European intervention, the Paravas endured raids and economic coercion from Muslim corsairs, including Moors based in Ceylon, who targeted their coastal settlements and pearl-diving activities along the Gulf of Mannar. These incursions, documented in colonial-era accounts, capitalized on the Paravas' reliance on small, unarmored catamarans ill-suited for defense against larger, weaponized vessels employed by the attackers. Such disparities in naval technology and armament rendered the community vulnerable to enslavement and plunder, prompting strategic appeals for external alliances rather than reflecting inherent organizational frailties.[63][65] The quest for protection culminated in overtures to the Portuguese in the 1530s, leading to mass conversions under Francis Xavier starting in 1542. This shift imposed dependencies on missionary oversight, where ecclesiastical authority intertwined with colonial enforcement; for instance, Xavier leveraged Portuguese military support to suppress local practices deemed sorcerous, burning accused individuals and consolidating control over community norms. While securing temporary respite from external threats, this arrangement exposed the Paravas to internal power imbalances, as spiritual directives carried the weight of imperial coercion, subordinating local autonomy to foreign patrons.[59][66] Subsequent Dutch ascendancy after ousting the Portuguese in 1658 intensified exploitations in the pearl fisheries. The Dutch East India Company asserted monopolistic claims, imposing taxes and labor demands on Parava divers while curtailing traditional practices to prioritize commercial yields. By the late seventeenth century, these policies fostered resentment, as the Dutch prioritized trade revenues over community welfare, further straining the Paravas amid shifting colonial priorities and resource depletion from overharvesting.[20][67]

Contemporary socioeconomic hurdles

The fisheries in the Gulf of Mannar, a primary livelihood source for Parava communities in Thoothukudi district, have undergone severe depletion due to overexploitation by mechanized bottom trawlers, which indiscriminately harvest juvenile fish and damage benthic habitats. Studies assessing marine resource vulnerability indicate high risk levels driven by excessive fishing pressure, with trawl nets contributing to a collapse in sustainable yields for small-scale artisanal fishers reliant on traditional methods like catamarans.[68][69] Tamil Nadu government-imposed seasonal trawling bans, such as the annual 61-day prohibition from April 15 to June 14, aim to allow stock recovery, yet persistent encroachment and illegal fishing have led to reported catch reductions of up to 30-50% in recent decades for coastal operators.[70] This resource scarcity has intensified poverty, with many Parava households facing income instability and limited diversification options amid rising fuel and gear costs. Social discrimination persists for Paravas despite their near-universal adoption of Catholicism since the 16th century, manifesting as caste-like exclusion in inter-community marriages, access to communal resources, and employment networks within Tamil Nadu's coastal societies. Reports document ongoing biases against Christian fishing groups, including segregated church practices and economic marginalization by dominant castes, even as legal equality under Christianity is professed.[71][34] Such hurdles compound economic vulnerabilities, with Paravas often overlooked in non-fishing sector opportunities due to perceived lower status. Classification as a Most Backward Class (MBC) affords Paravas 20% reservation in education and government jobs under Tamil Nadu's 69% quota system, facilitating improved access to schooling and skill development.[72] State-wide policies have elevated gross enrollment ratios in higher education to 47% overall, with backward communities benefiting from scholarships and free tuition, enabling partial mitigation of poverty cycles through professional migration and diversified livelihoods.[73] This progress counters narratives of unrelieved marginalization, as evidenced by rising literacy and occupational shifts away from sole dependence on depleting fisheries.

Notable Individuals

J.P. Rodriguez (1891–unknown), born in Thoothukudi, was a prominent leader in India's independence movement, joining the freedom struggle in 1921 following Mahatma Gandhi's call during his visit to Tirunelveli; he participated in key activities including the Non-Cooperation Movement and Salt Satyagraha, earning the moniker "Thoothukudi Netaji" for his organizational role in district-level protests.[74] Joseph Panimayadas Chandrababu Rodriguez (1927–1974), known professionally as J.P. Chandrababu, was an influential Tamil film comedian, actor, singer, and director from a Christian Paravar family in Tuticorin; he starred in over 200 films, pioneered unique comedic styles blending mimicry and music, and commanded high fees as one of South India's earliest top-paid comedians, though his career ended in financial hardship.[75][76] S.M. Diaz (1919–2000), born in Manapad—a historic Paravar coastal village—was the first Director of the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel National Police Academy and served as Inspector-General of Police for Tamil Nadu; educated in mathematics at St. Joseph's College, Trichy, he later taught economics and contributed to police training reforms in post-independence India.[77] Lourdammal Simon (1912–2002), a fisherfolk leader from Kanyakumari's coastal communities, became Tamil Nadu's first female cabinet minister (1957–1962) under Chief Minister K. Kamaraj, overseeing Local Administration and Fisheries; she introduced tilapia breeding programs to boost protein supply and rural economies, marking a milestone for women in regional governance.[78][79]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.