Hubbry Logo
PasokificationPasokificationMain
Open search
Pasokification
Community hub
Pasokification
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pasokification
Pasokification
Pasokification
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The decline of PASOK's popularity in the 2010s led to the creation of the term Pasokification.

Pasokification is the decline of centre-left, social-democratic political parties in European and other Western countries during the 2010s, often accompanied by the rise of nationalist, left-wing and right-wing populist alternatives.[1][2] In Europe, the share of votes for centre-left parties was at its 70-year lowest in 2015.[3]

The term originates from the Greek party PASOK, which saw a declining share of the vote in national elections — from 43.9% in 2009 to 13.2% in May 2012, to 12.3% in June 2012 and 4.7% in 2015 — due to its perceived poor handling of the Greek government-debt crisis and implementation of harsh austerity measures.[4][5] Simultaneously, the left-wing anti-austerity Syriza party saw a growth in vote share and influence.[6] Since PASOK's decline, the term has been applied to similar declines for other social-democratic and Third Way parties.

In the early 2020s, the Social Democratic Party of Germany, Australian Labor Party and UK Labour Party won elections in each of their countries in 2021, 2022 and 2024 respectively. Additionally, PASOK-KINAL improved their performance in the 2023 Greek elections. This has resulted in discussions on the possibility of "de-Pasokification",[7] "reverse Pasokification", or "Kinalification."[8][needs update]

In Europe

[edit]

Austria

[edit]

The Social Democratic Party of Austria lost 5.7 percentage points in the 2019 Austrian legislative election, resulting in a share of 21.2%, the party's worst election result since World War II. In the same election, the conservative Austrian People's Party gained 6 percentage points, with a share of 37.5%, its best since 2002.

The 2024 Austrian legislative election saw the far-right FPÖ placing first, winning 28.8% of the vote and achieving its best result in the party's history. The governing ÖVP lost 19 seats, while its coalition partner, the Greens, lost 10 seats. The centre-left Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) won just 21.1%, marking its worst result ever in the National Council. The NEOS improved from 2019, rising from 15 to 18 seats.

Bulgaria

[edit]

The Bulgarian Socialist Party lost 12.2 percentage points and fell from 80 to 43 seats in the April 2021 Bulgarian parliamentary election. In the July 2021 Bulgarian parliamentary election the party lost another 1.6 percentage points, returning to parliament with just 36 seats. In the November 2021 Bulgarian general election, the BSP lost a further 3.27 percentage points and returned to parliament with 26 seats, their worst result since democratic reforms; however, the party joined the new coalition government.

Croatia

[edit]

The Social Democratic Party of Croatia had in the 2019 European Parliament election (18.7%) their worst EP election result, in the 2020 parliamentary election (24.9%) their worst parliamentary election result since 2003 and in the first round of the 2019–20 presidential election they had their worst result since 2000 but in the end they won the second round.

Czech Republic

[edit]

The Czech Social Democratic Party lost much of its support in the 2017 Czech legislative election, falling from 50 in the previous general election to just 15 seats out of 200. They did even worse in 2021, with its vote share falling below the 5% threshold required for representation in the legislature. KSČM also fell below the threshold in 2021. Meanwhile, ANO 2011 gained 31 seats, and the Civic Democratic Party gained 9 seats in 2017.

France

[edit]

The Socialist Party's decline since its victory in the 2012 presidential election has been described as an example of Pasokification.[9] By 2016, then-President François Hollande's approval rating was just 4%, and he became the first president in the history of the Fifth Republic not to run for re-election. In the 2017 presidential election, Socialist Party candidate Benoît Hamon suffered an historically poor result, placing fifth with 6.4% of the vote. In the 2017 legislative election a month later, the Socialist Party suffered the worst losses of any party, falling from 280 to 30 seats. The Socialist-led centre-left faction received 9.5% of the vote during the first round and only 45 seats overall.[10] In the 2019 European elections, the PS allied with a number of minor centre-left parties, but still placed only sixth. It became the smallest party to win seats, receiving 6.2% of the vote. It was surpassed by both Europe Ecology – The Greens and the left-wing populist La France Insoumise. In the 2022 French presidential election, Socialist Party candidate, Anne Hidalgo, received only 1.7% of the vote. In the legislative elections, the country's leftist forces combined into one electoral unit called NUPES, anticipating fallout from poor results in the years prior.

In the 2024 snap French legislative elections - called by Emmanuel Macron due to strong French far-right results in the 2024 European Parliament elections - NUPES was abandoned due to differences on foreign policy triggered by the Israeli invasion of Gaza.[11] A new similar alliance called the Nouveau Front Populaire (NFP) manifested comprising the main leftist parties in France, with the distinction that they did not declare a Prime Ministerial candidate.[12] While NFP did not win a majority, they surprisingly emerged as the single biggest party, having employed an informal cooperation agreement with Macron's renamed Renaissance party to defeat the apparently ascendant far-right.

Finland

[edit]

The Social Democratic Party of Finland began to lose votes in 2007 (3.03%) and achieved their worst results to date in 2011 (19.10%) and 2015 (16.51%). Although they managed to become the strongest force in 2019 for the first time in a decade, they also had their second worst success in their history, with just under 18%. Despite an increase in the vote share in 2023, the party lost power to a coalition of the NCP and Finns. Additionally, on the municipal level, the SDP have been declining for decades. The SDP used to be the party with the most seats of representation in the council as well as the top vote share from the 1950s to 2000, however following the 2008 municipal elections, the National Coalition Party became the strongest in terms of the vote share and the Centre Party has had the most individual representatives, partly due to dominance in agrarian and rural based municipalities. Additionally, the general decline of SDP's vote share in municipal elections can perhaps be explained by the overall decline of the number of municipalities from roughly 600 in the 1940s to about 500 in 1970 and the mid 300s in the early 2000s.[13][14][15]

The Åland Social Democrats halved their voting rates between 2011 and 2019.

Germany

[edit]

The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) has been cited as an example of Pasokification. Its popularity has waned since the late 2000s, particularly in the 2009 federal election, when it recorded its worst result since before the Second World War. The SPD's post-2005 decline has been attributed to its decision to enter into grand coalitions with its traditional rival, the conservative Christian Democratic Union. Despite a small recovery in 2013/14, the SPD's decline continued through the late 2010s, winning just 20.5% of the vote in the 2017 federal election.[9] Similarly poor results have been recorded in local and state elections across the country.[16] The SPD won just 15.8% of the vote in the 2019 European Parliament election in Germany, falling to third place in a national election for the first time in its history. This decline was somewhat halted however as the SPD won the most seats in the 2021 federal election with 25.7% of the vote (although this was the smallest vote share of a first-placed party in an election in the post-war period). The 2021 election also brought with it a much higher vote share for the Green party, and resulted in a left-liberal traffic-light coalition (SPD-GRÜNE-FDP) taking power.

In the 2025 German federal election, the SPD received just 16.4% of the vote, falling below 20% in one of the worst results in its history. This was a worse result than even in March 1933 (when Adolf Hitler had taken power) and only better than in 1887, during the German Empire.

Greece

[edit]

PASOK was once the dominant centre-left party in Greece. PASOK received just 4.8% and 6.3% of the vote in the 2015 January and September Greek legislative elections respectively, due to its enforcement of harsh austerity measures in the wake of the European debt crisis, which, along with the ensuing Great Recession, led to massive social unrest and economic collapse, with much of its former electorate going to the anti-austerity Syriza. Following a series of austerity and bailout packages, implemented despite rejection in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum, resulting in several splits within the party, Syriza was defeated in the 2019 legislative election while the social democratic alliance Movement for Change (KINAL, which includes PASOK and minor centre-left movements) rebounded to 8.1% and gained 22 seats.

Hungary

[edit]

The Hungarian Socialist Party lost significant support in the 2010 Hungarian parliamentary election after a series of corruption scandals affected Ferenc Gyurcsány's government. This resulted in a loss of 133 seats, falling from 192 to 59 seats. It suffered defeat again in the 2014 and 2018 parliamentary elections, falling from 29 to 16 seats in the latter. These election losses culminated in the rise of the right-wing Fidesz–KDNP alliance.

Iceland

[edit]

The Social Democratic Alliance (SDA) was formed in 1999 to unite the fragmented Icelandic left-wing. In its first decade it established itself as the second-strongest force behind the right-wing Independence Party, debuting at 26.8% in 1999 and improving to 31.0% in 2003. The SDA became the largest party in the country in the 2009 election with 29.8%. However, it suffered a major defeat in the 2013 election with 12.9%. They were reduced to just 5.7% in 2016, becoming the smallest of seven parties in parliament, and were surpassed by the Left-Green Movement as the strongest left-wing party in Iceland. This was the worst ever result for the SDA or its predecessor party the Social Democratic Party since they first ran for election in August 1916, when they won 6.8%. The SDA achieved a minor recovery in the 2017 election with 12.1%, though they remained a minor force behind the Left-Greens, whose leader Katrín Jakobsdóttir went on to become prime minister. However, this recovery was short-lived, with the party winning 9.9% in 2021. In the 2024 election, however, the party rebounded to 20.8% and managed to form a government with its leader Kristrún Frostadóttir as prime minister.

Ireland

[edit]

The Labour Party received 6.6% of the vote in the 2016 Irish general election and fell from 33 to 7 seats, down from 19.5% in the 2011 general election.[17] This fell further to 4.4% in the 2020 general election—their worst result since 1987—while the left wing nationalist Sinn Féin had its best result since 1922.[18]

Italy

[edit]

The Democratic Party (PD) started to lose support by the late 2000s in the Po Valley. The first election in which the Democratic Party lost to a more radical party was the 2010 Venetian regional election (20.34% of the vote, compared to the 35.16% obtained by Lega Nord). The party's 18.8% vote share in the 2018 Italian general election meant it lost 185 seats in the Chamber of Deputies and 58 seats in the Senate,[19] falling from the largest to the third-largest faction in the Italian parliament. This was particularly dramatic considering that the party received more than 40% of vote just four year prior, in the 2014 European Parliament election in Italy, and is commonly attributed to its enforcement of austerity measures, a poor economic recovery and a failed attempt to move towards a two-party system in the 2016 Italian constitutional referendum. However, the party still came in second place in the popular vote[20] and entered government in September 2019 with the Five Star Movement after the collapse of the previous Conte I Cabinet. After the collapse of the second Conte government in January 2021, the PD joined the new government of national unity led by Mario Draghi, former director of the European Central Bank. After the latter's crisis in summer 2022 and the general elections in October (which saw a landslide victory for right-wing parties), the Democratic Party returned to opposition but still remained the second most voted party.

Lithuania

[edit]

The Social Democratic Party of Lithuania received 9.59% of the vote in the 2020 Lithuanian parliamentary election, down from 15.04% in 2016 and 18.37% in 2012. The party rebounded to 19.32% in the 2024 election and formed a government led by it in the election’s aftermath.

Luxembourg

[edit]

The Luxembourg Socialist Workers' Party (LSAP) received 20.2% of the vote in the 2013 Luxembourg general election, their lowest support since the 1931 general election. This decreased further to 17.60% in the 2018 general election, ranking third for number of seats for the first time since 1999. However, the LSAP has been part of Luxembourg's coalition governments since the 2013 election.

Netherlands

[edit]

The social-democratic Labour Party received 5.7% of the vote in the 2017 Dutch general election, down from 24.8% in the 2012 general election.[9] This remained unchanged at the 2021 election.

Norway

[edit]

Before the 1997 parliamentary elections, Labour Party (Ap) leader Thorbjørn Jagland infamously promised that if, should his party get less than 36,9% of the votes, his government would step down.[21] The final results gave Ap merely 35,0%, and paved the way for a centrist minority government. This coalition government fell in March 2000 after a vote of no confidence, whereafter Ap again formed a government supported by the Centre Party and the Socialist Left Party. This government only lasted until the 2001 elections however, when they lost it to the same centrist coalition. In this election, Ap got only 24.3% of the votes, their worst electoral result since 1924.

Support for the party soon rebounded slightly, but has been steadily declining since the 2013 election. Despite their victory in the 2021 Norwegian parliamentary election, where they scored 26,3% of the votes, the party lost a seat and were briefly in third-place behind the Conservative Party and the Centre Party in pre-election polls. After forming a minority government with the Centre Party in October 2021, the support for Ap has dropped drastically in the polls, scoring as low as 15,5% in March 2023.[22] Parallel to this drop in support, the Norwegian radical left, represented by the Red Party and Socialist Left Party has seen increased support in the polls.[23] The Red Party also managed to break the electoral threshold of 4% for the first time since its formation in the 2021 elections, gaining 8 mandates in the Storting.

The 2023 local elections was the first local or national election since 1924 in which Ap was not the largest party in Norway.[24] Before the elections, Ap held the mayoralty in 37 out of the 50 most populous municipalities, a number which fell to 6 in the aftermath of the election.[25] They lost the governing mayors in Oslo and Bergen, as well as the mayors in major municipalities like Trondheim, Stavanger, Kristiansand, Drammen and Fredrikstad. They also lost the mayoralty in the traditional Labour stronghold of Sarpsborg, an office held by Ap since 1913.[26]

However, in the 2025 election, Labour made a stunning comeback having lagged in the polls for most of the previous term, increasing its vote share by 1.1% to 28%, and formed another minority government.

Poland

[edit]

The Democratic Left Alliance became only third during the rise of the liberal Civic Platform since 2003 following the Rywin affair. In 2015 they only got 7.55% and lost all seats but returned into the Sejm in 2019 and did not enter the government until 2023 when New Left (merger of Spring and the Democratic Left Alliance) entered Tusk's third cabinet as a junior coalition partner.

Spain

[edit]

The 2015 Spanish general election produced the worst results for the social-democratic Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) since the Spanish transition to democracy in the 1970s, as the party received 22% of the vote, losing support to Unidas Podemos. The PSOE returned to government following the 2018 vote of no confidence in the government of Mariano Rajoy and, in the April 2019 general election, became the largest party since 2008 and obtained its best result since 2011 with 28.7% of the vote. The party lost support in the November election, but increased their vote share to 31.7% in 2023.

Sweden

[edit]

The Swedish Social Democratic Party averaged 45.3% of the votes in half of all general elections between the mid-1930s and mid-1980s, making it one of the most successful political parties in the history of the liberal democratic world.[27] In the 1968 election, the Social Democrats even won an outright majority with 50,12% of the votes. In the late 1990s, the party began to receive just under 40% of the votes. After the 2010 Swedish general election, their vote share dramatically declined, some of these votes being lost to the right-wing populist party Sweden Democrats.[28][29][30] In the 2018 general election, the Social Democrats' only received 28.3% of the votes, its lowest level since 1908.

United Kingdom

[edit]
See also: Politics of Scotland

England (and national Westminster)

In 2015, the national Labour Party elected Jeremy Corbyn as their leader. Corbyn's leadership has been characterized as more left-wing than that of his predecessors of the New Labour era.[31] In 2017, Labour stalled their long decline by increasing their vote share for the first time since 2001, seemingly challenging the conception that a more radical leadership would be highly unsuccessful in elections.[32]

However, the 2019 general election resulted in a catastrophic defeat in which the governing Conservative Party — led by Boris Johnson — won many long-held Labour seats in the party's traditional English and Welsh heartlands (sometimes described as the 'Red Wall'). Brexit and the unpopularity of Jeremy Corbyn were listed as reasons for the defeat in subsequent polling.[33]

Corbyn was succeeded as party leader in April 2020 by Keir Starmer.[34] In May 2021, Starmer failed to improve on the party's fortunes in a 'bumper' set of local and devolved parliamentary elections (taking place due to Mayoral and local races being postponed due to COVID-19 in 2020). Among the failures was another loss in the 'Red Wall' Hartlepool by-election for the Westminster parliament to the Conservative candidate by nearly 7,000 votes. Hartlepool had previously been held by Labour under Corbyn twice in 2017 and 2019, considered low points for Labour. The Conservative victory has largely been attributed to large numbers of former Brexit Party and UKIP supporters switching to the Conservatives - rather than the 'successor' to the Brexit Party, the 'Reform' party - as well as many Labour supporters supporting third-party or independent candidates.[35]

Following a scandal known as 'Partygate' as well as a range of sleaze scandals, Boris Johnson stepped down as prime minister in 2022, marking the first UK government crisis of 2022. He was succeeded by Liz Truss who won out in a crowded field to succeed Johnson. Truss's libertarian economic policy set out in the September 2022 mini-budget was perceived to be quite radical. The budget was widely attributed as the cause for a subsequent significant rise in mortgage rates, and caused Liz Truss to leave her post after just 49 days in office. By this time, Labour had overtaken the Conservatives in polling quite dramatically,[36] but this did not lead to an immediate election.

Truss's successor and main competitor in the previous leadership election, Rishi Sunak, was selected by the 1922 Committee as prime minister and held out until July 2024 to call the by-then expected election, in which Labour were anticipated to win a very large majority. In that 2024 General Election, Labour did not significantly increase their vote share across the country as a whole, but they benefitted from two unusual factors which played in their favour: 1. more conservative stances from some Labour politicians relocated the vote towards rural and town areas which Labour struggled in beforehand, slightly increasing their vote share, 2. Nigel Farage rejoined and led the Reform Party, which subsequently won 14.2% (but just 5 seats) of the vote nationally (concentrated in rural and coastal areas), gifting many previously uncompetitive seats to Labour in England due to the SMDP electoral system. The result was a significant Labour Parliamentary victory all three British nations, winning 411 seats (63.23%), while the Conservatives held just 123 seats (18.2%).

While Labour currently hold a very large majority in Parliament, this does not mean that they are electorally secure or that they are immune from Pasokification in future. Labour won just 33.7% of votes in the 2024 election, while the Liberal Democrats won 12.2% (and won 72 seats), the Greens won 6.7% (and won 4 seats) and a range of Independent candidates won rhetorically significant races against Labour candidates. This included the victory of 4 candidates who campaigned heavily around the Israeli invasion of Gaza and Palestinian solidarity. The most notable of these was Shockat Adam, who unseated senior Labour spokesperson Jonathan Ashworth. Additionally, Wes Streeting was nearly unseated by Independent candidate Leane Mohamad, Independent Ahmed Yakoob won a significant vote share against now Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, and LSE economist Faiza Shaheen - who was previously a Labour candidate but was controversially deselected at the last minute - won a similar number of votes against Iain Duncan Smith as an Independent candidate to the 'parachuted-in' Labour candidate Shama Tatler. Jeremy Corbyn, former leader of the Labour Party, also won a significant victory against the opposing Labour candidate in Islington North. It has been floated that a group containing these five Independents could form in order to deploy a stronger voice in Parliament. During the King's Speech, the SNP also tabled an amendment demanding Labour repeal the two-child benefit cap (a policy widely acknowledged to be inevitable under a Labour government, but not included in initial proposals). Starmer's whipping team made this an unprecedented three-line whip and withdrew the whip from 7 elected Labour MPs who were associated with the left of the party. It has been theorised that this group could also comprise a left-wing nucleus of opposition against Labour.

Scotland

Scottish Labour held the majority of Scotland's Westminster seats from the 1964 United Kingdom general election until the 2015 United Kingdom general election in Scotland, where the Scottish National Party (SNP) won 56 of the 59 available seats. The SNP then fell to 35 seats at the 2017 general election in Scotland and rose to 48 in the 2019 general election in Scotland. Scottish Labour had lost support since the creation of the Scottish Parliament. The party got 33.6% of the votes in the 1999 Scottish Parliament election and 19.1% of the votes in the 2016 Scottish Parliament election. This allowed the SNP to overtake Scottish Labour by 2015. Labour won the majority of Scottish Westminster seats in 2024, winning 35% of the vote compared to the SNP's 30%.[37]

Wales

Pasokification has not taken place in Wales, where Welsh Labour have consistently held the Welsh devolved government derived from the Senedd (Welsh Assembly/Parliament) from when it was first established in 1999. It is practically impossible for any one party to win an outright majority in the Welsh electoral system - a combination of SMDP and an adjusted regional list vote known as AMS. However, Welsh Labour have won a working-majority (30/60 seats) a number of times, including in the May 2021 Senedd elections where their English and Scottish equivalents underperformed in local and national elections.[38] Though Welsh Labour has successfully retained control of the devolved administration, the share of Labour seats from Wales in the Westminster House of Commons has slightly declined since 1945. Labour lost some vote share in Wales in 2024, but gained 9 seats, mostly due to the Conservative-Reform split.[39]

Northern Ireland

The Social Democratic and Labour Party in Northern Ireland consistently lost votes between 1998 and 2022.

Dependent territories

The Manx Labour Party has been in decline since 2001, and even lost their representation in the House of Keys in 2016. It gained two seats in the 2021 elections. Most candidates on the Isle of Man are Independents.

Gibraltar has not undergone a process of Pasokification. The long-term alliance of the Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party and the Gibraltar Liberal Party has persisted since 2003. The GSLP was only founded in 1980, making it a relatively young social democratic party in Western Europe.

Few overseas British territories have active social democratic or labour movements. This may be because there are few distinct social cleavages among islanders for them to campaign on.

Outside of Europe

[edit]

Bolivia

[edit]

The once dominant Movimiento al Socialismo received just 3.17% of the vote in the 2025 Bolivian general election, their lowest support since the party's foundation. MAS was wiped out in the Chamber of Senators (Bolivia) and won just 2 seats in the Chamber of Deputies, losing 73 seats.

Israel

[edit]

The Israeli Labor Party and its predecessor Mapai were dominant in Israeli politics from the founding of the nation in 1948 to 1977. Since then, its popularity has been gradually decreasing, especially since the start of the 21st century. In the 2020 election the party only gained 3 seats as part of Labor-Gesher-Meretz coalition, being in acute danger of altogether disappearing, but slightly rebounded and got 7 seats in the 2021 election, which allowed it to join the multi-party government.

In 2022, the party barely passed the electoral threshold of 3.25% and gained 4 seats. The party would be dissolved by 2024, merging with Meretz to form The Democrats.

Sri Lanka

[edit]

The social-democratic Sri Lanka Freedom Party lost the 2015 Sri Lankan presidential election to party defector Maithripala Sirisena, who campaigned on a broad alliance led by the United National Party against the decade-long rule of the Freedom Party's leader Mahinda Rajapaksa, who faced allegations of corruption and nepotism. The following 2015 Sri Lankan parliamentary election saw the formation of a national government, which soon faced major infighting. Rajapaksa went on to form a new party, Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), and successfully contested several local government elections. gaining 40.47% of the votes; the Sri Lanka Freedom Party only gained 12.10%, while the United National Party gained 29.42%.

The SLPP nominated Rajapaksa's younger brother Gotabaya Rajapaksa for the 2019 Sri Lankan presidential election, who gained 52.25% against the United National Party candidate Sajith Premadasa (who gained 41.99%). Gotabaya Rajapaksa contested on a pro-nationalistic, economic development and national security platform. Sri Lanka Freedom Party had hoped to have its own candidate for the presidential election, but eventually opted to support the SLPP.[40]

South Africa

[edit]

South Africa is considered a dominant-party state, with the center-left African National Congress providing all of South Africa's presidents since 1994. However, the ANC's electoral majority has declined consistently since 2004, and in the 2021 local elections, its share of the national vote dropped below 50% for the first time ever.[41] The party has been embroiled in a number of controversies, particularly relating to widespread allegations of political corruption among its members. Following the 2024 general election, the ANC lost its majority in parliament for the first time in South Africa's democratic history. It still remains the largest party, with under 41% of the vote.[42] The party also lost its majority in Kwa-Zulu Natal, Gauteng and Northern Cape.

Latin America

[edit]

Following the pink tide, where left wing and center-left wing parties In Latin America were successful, a conservative wave happened from mid-2010s to the early 2020s as a direct reaction to the pink tide. Although the extent to which the Latin American leftist parties which have also suffered setbacks are located in the social democratic tradition is contested.[43]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pasokification

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pasokification denotes the phenomenon of abrupt electoral collapse suffered by traditional center-left or social democratic parties, typically after adopting fiscal policies during economic downturns, which erodes their core working-class support and drives voters toward radical leftist or conservative alternatives. The term originates from the trajectory of Greece's Panhellenic Socialist Movement (), a once-dominant socialist party that secured 43.9% of the vote in the parliamentary elections but plummeted to 13.2% in the May elections following the implementation of severe measures as part of EU-IMF programs amid the Greek sovereign . This decline, from governing party with over 160 seats to a marginal force polling in single digits by 2015, exemplified the risks of center-left parties prioritizing creditor demands over domestic constituencies, leading to a reconfiguration of political alignments where former supporters fragmented to parties like on the left and on the right. The concept has since been applied to analogous declines across Europe, such as the French Socialist Party's contraction under , which saw its 2012 presidential success give way to under 7% in the 2017 election, or the Dutch Labour Party's (PvdA) fall from 25% in 2012 to 5.7% in 2017 after coalition compromises. In each case, empirical patterns reveal causal links between policy shifts toward —often under external pressures like fiscal rules—and voter realignment, with working-class and youth demographics abandoning moderated for options promising systemic challenge or national sovereignty. Analyses grounded in electoral data underscore that such transformations stem not from transient but from the substantive failure to deliver on redistributive promises, prompting a broader of legitimacy for post-2008 social democratic formations.

Definition and Origins

Etymology and Core Concept

The term "Pasokification" derives from PASOK, the acronym for the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (Πανελλήνιο Σοσιαλιστικό Κίνημα), Greece's social democratic party that dominated national politics from 1981 to 2009. Coined around 2015 by journalist James Doran, it encapsulates the dramatic electoral collapse of PASOK, which secured 43.9% of the vote and 160 seats in the 2009 Greek legislative election but plummeted to 4.7% in the January 2015 election, relegating it to minor-party status. This nomenclature highlights PASOK's transformation from a governing powerhouse to a fringe entity, serving as a cautionary archetype for similar trajectories in other social democratic parties. At its core, Pasokification denotes the rapid erosion of a center-left party's traditional working-class and moderate voter base, often resulting in its marginalization amid economic crises and policy shifts perceived as betrayals of core principles. The phenomenon involves voters defecting to radical-left alternatives, populist-right movements, or abstention, driven by disillusionment with austerity measures, neoliberal convergence, and failure to address socioeconomic grievances. Unlike gradual declines, Pasokification implies a precipitous fall, as evidenced by PASOK's vote share dropping from over 40% to under 5% within six years, underscoring vulnerabilities in social democratic models when they prioritize elite consensus over constituency demands. This concept has transcended to describe parallel declines across , where parties like France's Socialist Party or Germany's Social Democrats have seen historic lows, prompting debates on whether it signals the obsolescence of or a realignment toward more authentic left-wing or culturally attuned platforms. Analysts attribute the pattern to systemic failures in maintaining electoral coalitions amid and migration pressures, though some contend it reflects adaptive transformations rather than outright demise.

The PASOK Prototype in Greece

The Panhellenic Socialist Movement () was established on September 3, 1974, by shortly after the collapse of the Greek , positioning itself as a radical socialist alternative to the conservative New Democracy party with pledges of social reform, national independence, and expansion of the . In the 1977 , PASOK secured 25% of the vote, establishing itself as a major force, and by the October 18, 1981, parliamentary , it won 48% of the votes to claim a and form 's first socialist . Under Papandreou's , PASOK governed from 1981 to 1989 and returned to power from 1993 to 2004 under both Papandreou and , enacting policies that included generous public sector hiring, pension expansions, and clientelist practices which boosted short-term popularity but fueled fiscal deficits and public debt accumulation exceeding 100% of GDP by the early . PASOK alternated dominance with New Democracy in the post-junta era, but its trajectory shifted dramatically after winning the October 2009 election with 43.9% of the vote under George A. Papandreou, who inherited a concealed burden from the prior administration. In October 2009, Papandreou's revealed the deficit at 12.7% of GDP—nearly double initial estimates—exposing years of statistical misrepresentation and triggering investor flight and a sovereign . To avert default, PASOK negotiated Greece's first in May 2010: a €110 billion package from the , , and , conditioned on measures such as 10% public sector wage cuts, pension reductions, VAT hikes to 23%, and labor market deregulations. These reforms, antithetical to PASOK's longstanding redistributive , ignited mass protests, strikes, and accusations of elite capitulation to foreign creditors, alienating its core working-class base. The electoral consequences epitomized pasokification: in the May 6, 2012, election amid deepening and 23% , PASOK's vote share cratered to 13.2%—a 70% drop from 2009—yielding just 41 seats and forcing it into diminished coalition roles. Voters defected en masse to the radical left , which surged by absorbing PASOK's disaffected supporters, while PASOK's subsequent performances dwindled to 4.7% in January 2015 and below 5% in later contests, reducing it from a hegemonic force to a marginal player. This collapse stemmed from perceived betrayal—implementing neoliberal-leaning despite campaigning on anti- populism—compounded by PASOK's historical role in debt buildup through unsustainable spending, highlighting how center-left parties' fiscal imprudence and can erode voter loyalty when core promises clash with economic realities.

Causal Mechanisms

Economic Policy Failures and Voter Betrayal

PASOK's economic governance exemplified the core mechanism of voter betrayal through policy reversals during crises. Upon winning the October 4, 2009, parliamentary election with 43.94% of the vote, PASOK campaigned on promises of enhanced social protections, public investment, and resistance to conservative fiscal orthodoxy, positioning itself as a bulwark against inequality. However, shortly after taking office, Prime Minister George Papandreou disclosed that the previous New Democracy government had understated the fiscal deficit at 15.4% of GDP and public debt at 127% of GDP, far exceeding eurozone stability thresholds. This revelation precipitated Greece's exclusion from bond markets, forcing PASOK to negotiate an €110 billion EU-IMF bailout in May 2010 conditioned on stringent austerity measures, including 10% public sector wage cuts, pension reductions averaging 20-30%, and value-added tax hikes from 19% to 23%. These policies directly contradicted PASOK's electoral pledges, as the implemented structural reforms prioritizing demands over domestic welfare, such as privatizing state assets and liberalizing labor markets to reduce rigidity. Empirical outcomes included a 25% contraction in real GDP between 2008 and 2013, with the deepest recession in 2011 at -9.1% growth, and surging from 9.5% in 2009 to a peak of 27.9% in 2013, disproportionately affecting youth at over 60%. Public discontent crystallized around perceptions of elite capitulation, with polls showing 77% distrust in Papandreou by 2011 amid widespread strikes and protests; PASOK's vote share plummeted to 13.18% in the May 2012 election and 12.28% in , reflecting working-class defection to radical alternatives. Broader pasokification dynamics reveal a pattern where social democratic parties, facing globalized fiscal constraints and integration, abandon expansionary commitments for neoliberal convergence, eroding their proletarian base. In , PASOK's earlier administrations (1981-1989, 1993-2004) had fostered clientelist spending—public employment rose 50% under , driving deficits without productivity gains—setting the stage for inevitable adjustment. Analogous failures in other contexts, such as Italy's Democratic Party under implementing the 2014 Jobs Act for labor deregulation amid post-2008 stagnation, underscore how crisis responses prioritize systemic stability over voter mandates, fostering realignments as electorates penalize perceived elitism. Left-leaning analyses often attribute declines solely to external shocks, yet data indicate internal policy shifts—fiscal consolidation totaling 4% of GDP in 2010 alone—amplified narratives, with social democrats losing 20-30% of core support in crisis-hit states per electoral studies.

Immigration and Cultural Disconnect

Social democratic parties across have experienced significant electoral erosion among their traditional working-class base due to divergences on policy and cultural integration, fostering a of detachment from voters' lived experiences with rapid demographic changes. of electoral trends indicates that working-class voters, who prioritize concerns such as community cohesion, public safety, and strain on amid high inflows, have increasingly defected to right-wing populist alternatives when social democrats maintained permissive stances favoring over assimilation. This shift reflects a broader realignment where emerges as a salient cleavage, with parties failing to address native populations' anxieties over integration failures—evidenced by rising crime rates in high-immigration areas and welfare competition—resulting in vote losses exceeding 10-20 percentage points in countries like and since the 2015 . Empirical data from panel studies underscore that individuals from working-class backgrounds are disproportionately likely to abandon social democratic support for anti-immigration parties when migration salience heightens, as seen in Germany's Socio-Economic Panel where such voters favored the AfD amid unchecked inflows straining low-wage sectors. In , the Socialist Party's (PS) embrace of open-border policies contributed to its 2017 collapse to under 7% nationally, with former strongholds in immigrant-heavy suburbs flipping to as voters cited cultural erosion and security threats; similar patterns in the saw the Labour Party (PvdA) plummet from 25% to 5% post-2017, correlating with public backlash against asylum overload. Exceptions, such as Denmark's Social Democrats regaining power in 2019 by adopting restrictive measures like "jewelry law" asset seizures for migrants and integration mandates, highlight how alignment with voter preferences on controlled inflows can stem Pasokification, contrasting with peers' ideological rigidity. This cultural disconnect manifests causally through by cosmopolitan values, where party leadership—often urban and higher-educated—prioritizes humanitarian framing over pragmatic enforcement, alienating peripheral, less-educated electorates facing direct impacts like housing shortages and parallel societies. Voter surveys across 13 Western European countries (2002-2018) reveal uniform class-based declines for social democrats, with attitudes as a key predictor of , as working-class respondents express stronger opposition to than party platforms allow. In the Greek prototype, while economic betrayal dominated the 2009-2012 implosion, subsequent migration surges post-2015 amplified residual distrust, as the party's fragmented remnants struggled to counter New Democracy's border fortifications amid over 1 million arrivals, underscoring how unresolved cultural rifts perpetuate voter hemorrhage even after fiscal recoveries. Such dynamics reveal not merely as a flashpoint but a litmus test for parties' attunement to causal realities of identity preservation versus elite-driven .

Electoral Realignment and Party Elitism

Electoral realignment in the context of Pasokification describes the pronounced shift of working-class and less-educated voters away from traditional social democratic parties toward radical right or populist alternatives across since the 1990s. This phenomenon is characterized by a decline in support among manual laborers and low-income groups, who once formed the core base of these parties; for instance, the vote share of social democrats among blue-collar workers in countries like and has fallen by 20-30 percentage points in national elections from the early to the 2020s. The realignment reflects a broader educational cleavage in , where higher education levels increasingly predict support for center-left parties, while lower education correlates with backing for culturally conservative or nativist options, driven by diverging priorities on issues like and . Party elitism exacerbates this realignment by fostering a leadership cadre within social democratic organizations that is disproportionately composed of urban, highly educated professionals, often detached from the socioeconomic realities of their former constituents. Data from party membership and candidate profiles in nations such as and the indicate that by the 2010s, over 70% of social democratic parliamentarians held university degrees, compared to under 30% in the general electorate, promoting policies aligned with cosmopolitan values—such as expansive and supranational integration—over protectionist or community-focused agendas valued by provincial workers. This elite-driven pivot, evident in the Third Way reforms of the 1990s and subsequent emphasis on fiscal post-2008 , has alienated traditional voters who perceive a betrayal of class-based in favor of alliances with affluent, progressive urbanites. The causal interplay manifests as a feedback loop: as working-class defections mount, parties double down on elite-preferred platforms to consolidate remaining high-education supporters, further eroding their broad appeal and accelerating the shift toward competitors who address voter grievances on cultural displacement and economic insecurity. Empirical analyses of election surveys from 2000-2020 across confirm that this dynamic accounts for up to 40% of social democrats' vote loss in deindustrialized regions, where populist right parties have captured former left strongholds by emphasizing and labor protections against . While some studies attribute the trend partly to economic moderation, the persistence amid varying fiscal policies underscores the primacy of identity-based disconnects rooted in intra-party .

Manifestations in Europe

France

In France, Pasokification is exemplified by the electoral collapse of the Parti Socialiste (PS), which transitioned from governing power in 2012 to marginal status by 2017, losing its traditional working-class and moderate left base due to policy reversals on economics and perceived cultural disconnects. François Hollande secured the presidency in 2012 with 51.64% in the runoff and the PS-led left alliance gained an absolute majority of 331 seats in the National Assembly. However, Hollande's administration shifted toward fiscal austerity to meet EU deficit targets, including a 2014 plan reallocating €50 billion from spending cuts to tax reductions favoring businesses, and the 2016 El Khomri labor reforms that eased hiring/firing rules and capped severance pay, sparking mass protests from unions and alienating core supporters who viewed these as neoliberal betrayals of campaign pledges for worker protections and higher taxes on the wealthy. This policy pivot eroded trust, with PS support plummeting in the 2017 presidential election where candidate received only 6.36% in the first round, as former economy minister Emmanuel Macron's new centrist movement absorbed moderate voters disillusioned by the PS's leftward candidate choice and record. In the ensuing legislative elections, the PS vote share fell to 7.44%, yielding just 30 seats out of 577, a near-total wipeout that reflected voter flight to Macron's La République En Marche (now ) on the center and the National Front (now ) on the right. The PS's endorsement of EU-driven and labor market liberalization, despite initial anti-austerity rhetoric, mirrored the Greek PASOK's fiscal capitulation, prioritizing elite consensus over base demands for redistribution and job security. Compounding economic grievances, the PS's pro- stance and reluctance to restrict inflows or address integration failures fueled cultural alienation among its historic electorate, particularly in deindustrialized regions where non-EU immigration correlated with higher (19.5% for non-European foreigners vs. 8% for natives in recent data) and strained social services. Traditional PS voters, facing globalization's wage suppression and community disruptions, increasingly defected to Marine Le Pen's , which capitalized on identity and border concerns the PS dismissed as xenophobic, while the party's urban, professionalized leadership appeared elitist and out of touch. This realignment echoed broader European patterns, with PS support in 2022 presidential polls hitting a historic low of 1.75% for , underscoring fears of full "Pasokification."
Election YearTypePS Performance
2012Presidential (Runoff)51.64% (Hollande victory)
2012Legislative331 seats (absolute majority with allies)
2017Presidential (1st Round)6.36% (Hamon)
2017Legislative30 seats (7.44% vote share)
2022Presidential (1st Round)1.75% (Hidalgo)
2024Legislative66 seats (within New Popular Front alliance of 182 seats)
By 2024, the PS survived via the New Popular Front alliance with far-left groups like , securing 66 seats but at the cost of ideological dilution and dependence on radicals, highlighting its transformation into a junior partner rather than a dominant force. Internal divisions, including a narrow 2025 reelection of leader amid pro- and anti-alliance factions, further signal persistent weakness, with the party's revival hinging on reconciling its elite base with alienated peripherals—a challenge unmet since the Hollande era's causal missteps.

Germany

The (SPD), once a dominant force in postwar politics, has undergone a pronounced decline akin to pasokification, with its national vote share falling from peaks above 40% in the late 1990s to 16.4% in the February 23, 2025, federal election—its worst result since 1887. This erosion reflects a broader pattern of center-left parties losing traditional working-class support due to perceived policy betrayals. The SPD's 2021 result of 25.7% represented a temporary rebound amid fatigue with Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), but subsequent state and federal outcomes revealed underlying weaknesses, including the loss of 1.7 million voters to the CDU/CSU bloc, 720,000 to the (AfD), and significant shifts to the Left Party and (BSW). A pivotal trigger was Gerhard Schröder's reforms, enacted in 2003, which deregulated labor markets, extended unemployment benefit durations under stricter conditions, and facilitated temporary contracts—measures credited with reducing unemployment from 11.3% in 2005 to below 5% by 2019 but widely viewed as a neoliberal pivot that undercut worker protections and fueled wage stagnation for low-skilled employees. These changes prompted a voter exodus, contributing to the SPD's drop to 23% in the 2009 federal election and the formation of splinter groups like the Electoral Alternative for Labor and Social Justice (WASG), which merged into the Left Party and siphoned left-wing votes. Repeated grand coalitions with the since 2005 further blurred the SPD's distinct identity, alienating core supporters who saw it as complicit in and market liberalization. Immigration policy exacerbated the disconnect, as the SPD's support for Angela Merkel's 2015 open-border stance—admitting over 1 million migrants amid the Syrian crisis—clashed with working-class anxieties over cultural integration, crime rates, and welfare strain, boosting the AfD's rise from 4.7% in 2013 to 12.6% in 2017. Public trust in the SPD on asylum plummeted to 14% by 2025, with 55% of voters perceiving it as favoring the unemployed over workers, particularly in eastern states where economic precarity intersects with migration concerns. This elitist misalignment, prioritizing cosmopolitan progressive stances over empirical voter priorities, mirrors pasokification's causal core: a shift from material redistribution to identity-focused policies that hollowed out the party's base, driving abstention and fragmentation rather than outright replacement by radicals.

United Kingdom

The Labour Party in the has exhibited elements of pasokification through a long-term erosion of its historic working-class base, accelerated by policy shifts on , , and cultural issues that alienated traditional voters. Formed in 1900 with strong ties to trade unions and manual workers, Labour dominated working-class support for much of the , achieving vote shares among manual workers exceeding 50% in elections like and 1974. However, , the party's embrace of neoliberal elements under Tony Blair's in the 1990s—such as and free-market reforms—and subsequent failures to address post-2008 austerity's impacts on low-wage sectors contributed to declining identification, with working-class voters increasingly viewing Labour as elitist and disconnected. By the , research indicated that class voting had weakened, with many manual workers no longer aligning strongly with Labour due to perceived neglect of their economic insecurities. This trend intensified around and immigration, where Labour's ambiguous stance under in 2017–2019—opposing a hard while downplaying border controls—led to massive losses in "Red Wall" constituencies, traditionally Labour strongholds in and the with high concentrations of white working-class voters. In the , Labour secured just 32.1% of the national vote, its worst result since 1935, with more low-income voters supporting the Conservatives than Labour for the first time, driven by concerns over uncontrolled migration and . These seats flipped to the Conservatives, reflecting a realignment where working-class electorates prioritized cultural and identity issues over traditional left-wing economics, a pattern akin to pasokification's voter betrayal dynamic. Under Keir Starmer's leadership from 2020, Labour shifted toward , emphasizing fiscal restraint and pragmatic policies, which facilitated a victory with 411 seats and a 174-seat . Yet, this triumph masked ongoing pasokification signals: Labour's vote share fell to 33.7%, the lowest for any postwar government, as working-class support fragmented further. , led by , captured 14.3% of the vote—disproportionately from C2DE socioeconomic groups (skilled and unskilled manual workers, routine occupations)—highlighting persistent alienation over issues like net migration exceeding 700,000 annually and cultural disconnection. Post-election polls in 2025 revealed Labour defectors among 2024 voters were disproportionately less educated and lower-income, citing unmet promises on cost-of-living relief and perceived prioritization of urban elites. Analysts attribute this to Labour's institutional capture by professional-class activists, reducing working-class ary representation to under 10% of MPs despite manual workers comprising about 40% of the electorate. While Labour retains strength among ethnic minorities and public-sector workers, the shift of native working-class votes to populist right-wing alternatives underscores a pasokification process not fully reversed by electoral math favoring first-past-the-post distortions.

Italy

In Italy, the Democratic Party (PD), the country's principal social-democratic organization formed in 2007 through the merger of Democratic Left and centrist Christian democratic factions, underwent pronounced electoral contraction akin to pasokification, shifting from a dominant centre-left force to a diminished player amid voter realignment toward and . The PD initially consolidated broad support, achieving roughly 33% in the 2008 general election as the core of the centre-left coalition, but subsequent leadership under emphasized market-oriented reforms that alienated traditional constituencies, culminating in a vote share drop to 18.8% in the parliamentary elections. This trend persisted, with the PD securing 19% in the 2022 general election within a broader centre-left totaling 26%, before a modest rebound to 24.1% in the 2024 European Parliament elections—still far below its pre-crisis peaks and reflecting ongoing marginalization. Key drivers mirrored broader pasokification dynamics, particularly economic policy divergences from social-democratic orthodoxy. Renzi's 2014 Jobs Act deregulated labor markets by easing firing protections and expanding temporary contracts, ostensibly to spur employment amid stagnation, yet it correlated with rising precarious work and hovering above 30% without commensurate growth, eroding trust among working-class voters who perceived it as neoliberal betrayal rather than empowerment. Complementary measures, such as reforms tightening eligibility, further strained the party's credibility on welfare commitments, as Italy's GDP stagnated post-2008 while public exceeded 130% of GDP. These shifts prompted defections to anti-establishment movements like the Five Star Movement, which captured disillusioned PD voters in 2013-2018 by pledging citizen income and anti-austerity stances. Immigration policy amplified cultural disconnects, with PD-led governments from 2013-2018 presiding over unchecked inflows—peaking at over 180,000 arrivals in 2016 via Mediterranean routes—without robust integration or controls, fostering perceptions of elite indifference to community strains in southern regions. The 2017 Italy-Libya memorandum, while reducing crossings by outsourcing interdiction, drew internal party criticism for compromising principles, yet failed to assuage public concerns over crime spikes and welfare pressures in migrant-heavy areas, where PD support eroded fastest. This misalignment, compounded by the party's urban, professional base prioritizing over local anxieties, facilitated right-wing gains, as evidenced by Brothers of Italy's ascent from 4.4% in 2018 to 26% in 2022. Electoral elitism exacerbated the PD's woes, as internal primaries and technocratic governance under Renzi distanced the party from bases, mirroring PASOK's in dismissing voter grievances as irrational. Post-2018 leadership instability, including the ousting of Renzi and fragmented coalitions, underscored ideological dilution—blending with fiscal restraint—yielding no cohesive alternative to populist critiques of and EU-imposed . While academic analyses attribute partial resilience to Italy's fragmented system preventing total collapse, the PD's trajectory substantiates pasokification's causal realism: policy reversals on and precipitated a durable rightward voter shift, with the party relegated to opposition amid Giorgia Meloni's centre-right dominance since 2022.

Spain

In Spain, the (PSOE), the country's primary social-democratic force, experienced a sharp electoral contraction following the , mirroring aspects of Pasokification through perceived policy betrayals on economic management. Under Prime Minister , who secured victories with 42.6% of the vote in 2004 and 43.9% in 2008, the PSOE initially pursued expansionary policies but reversed course amid the crisis, enacting labor market reforms in 2010 that eased hiring and firing rules, reduced , and prioritized fiscal consolidation under pressure. These measures, viewed by former supporters as a capitulation to neoliberal demands, contributed to a collapse in support, with the party's vote share plummeting to 28.7% in the 2011 general election, yielding only 110 seats in and ceding power to the center-right People's Party (PP). Youth unemployment peaked at over 50% by 2012, exacerbating perceptions of elite detachment from working-class realities. The PSOE's came in the 2015 and 2016 elections, where its vote share hovered around 22%, as anti-austerity sentiment fueled the rise of Podemos, a radical-left challenger that captured disaffected youth and urban voters alienated by the PSOE's compromises. This fragmentation echoed Pasokification's electoral realignment, with traditional socialist voters splintering toward insurgent parties amid stagnant wages and housing crises. However, under Pedro Sánchez's leadership from 2018, the PSOE partially recovered by shifting leftward, forming coalitions with and implementing progressive reforms like hikes (from €735 to €1,134 monthly by 2023) and a €140 billion EU recovery fund allocation. In the 2023 general election, the party garnered 31.9% of the vote and 121 seats, enabling Sánchez's re-election via pacts with regional nationalists and the left, despite the PP's plurality. Regional and local polls, however, revealed vulnerabilities, with heavy losses in May 2023 municipal elections prompting a snap national vote. Immigration policy has amplified cultural disconnects, contributing to working-class defection to the far-right Vox. Spain recorded over 56,000 irregular sea arrivals in 2023, primarily via the Canary Islands route from , straining public services in southern regions where PSOE historically dominated. Sánchez's administration initially emphasized regularization—granting residency to 600,000 undocumented migrants since 2022—and multicultural integration, but faced backlash for perceived lax enforcement, including delays in deportations and reliance on NGOs for migrant processing. This stance, coupled with Vox's anti-immigration platform emphasizing border security and , siphoned votes from PSOE's rural and Andalusian base; Vox surged from negligible support to 15.1% nationally in 2023, often at the expense of socialist-leaning demographics concerned with job competition and crime spikes in migrant-heavy areas. Empirical analyses link Vox's breakthrough in 2018 Andalusian elections—winning 12 seats amid PSOE's traditional stronghold—to voter frustration over unchecked inflows and elite prioritization of ideological commitments over socioeconomic stability. Despite avoiding PASOK's total obliteration, the PSOE's trajectory underscores Pasokification risks: reliance on volatile coalitions dilutes ideological coherence, while elitist pivots—such as Sánchez's 2023 for Catalan separatists—alienate core voters without recouping losses from economic populists. Party membership has halved since 2011 to around 400,000, signaling erosion, and polls indicate persistent underperformance among manual laborers, who shifted rightward post-crisis. Sources attributing PSOE resilience to adaptive often overlook systemic biases in academic commentary favoring interventionist narratives, yet data affirm causal links between policy reversals and voter exodus, with recovery hinging on short-term fiscal boosts rather than restored trust.

Netherlands

The Labour Party (PvdA), the ' primary social democratic party, underwent a severe electoral collapse in the 2010s, illustrating Pasokification through the erosion of its traditional working-class base. In the 2012 general election, the PvdA secured 38 seats in the 150-seat with 24.8% of the vote, capitalizing on anti-austerity sentiment amid the European debt crisis. However, following its entry into a grand coalition with the center-right People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) under Prime Minister , the party implemented fiscal consolidation measures, including labor market flexibilization and reductions in social spending, which alienated core supporters. By the 2017 election, the PvdA plummeted to just 9 seats and 5.7% of the vote—a loss of 29 seats—marking one of the most dramatic single-election declines in Dutch postwar history. The party retained only 9 seats in the 2021 election, with 5.8% support, as its vote share failed to recover despite opposition status. This downturn stemmed partly from perceived economic policy betrayals during the 2012–2017 Rutte II cabinet, where the PvdA endorsed neoliberal-leaning reforms such as easing dismissal protections and capping healthcare budgets, contradicting its campaign pledges against . These measures, justified as necessary for deficit reduction post-2008 , disproportionately affected lower-income and industrial workers, fostering disillusionment among voters who viewed the party as complicit in eroding the Dutch welfare model. Empirical analyses indicate that PvdA's embrace of centrism since the 1990s, prioritizing fiscal prudence over redistribution, accelerated the drift, with traditional strongholds in deindustrialized regions like and the registering the sharpest drops. Critics, including party insiders, attributed the 2017 rout to this "governing trap," where coalition compromises undermined credibility without yielding electoral dividends. Compounding economic grievances was the PvdA's disconnect on and cultural issues, as rising inflows—particularly from Muslim-majority countries—intensified public concerns over integration, , and identity in working-class communities. The party's support for open EU migration policies and clashed with voter anxieties, evidenced by surveys showing former PvdA supporters prioritizing nativist appeals. Significant portions of the party's blue-collar electorate defected to ' (PVV), which surged to 20 seats in by emphasizing anti-Islam rhetoric and welfare , capturing up to 20-30% of previous PvdA voters in some analyses. This realignment reflected a broader European pattern where social democrats ceded cultural terrain to the radical right, failing to reconcile progressive values with causal realities of rapid demographic change and labor market competition. In response, the PvdA merged electorally with (Greens) ahead of the 2023 election, forming a that garnered 25 seats and 15.0% of the vote, buoyed by urban progressive turnout but still far below historical peaks. This alliance mitigated further fragmentation but underscored persistent Pasokification, as the combined entity struggled to reclaim lost working-class support amid PVV's dominance on migration debates. Ongoing challenges include internal debates over repositioning toward economic , though systemic fragmentation in the Dutch proportional system perpetuates volatility.

Sweden

The (SAP), which governed continuously from 1932 to 1976 and shaped the country's model, has faced accelerating electoral erosion since the , with traditional working-class voters defecting to the anti-immigration (SD). This shift reflects voter perceptions of SAP's policy failures on immigration and economic protectionism, leading to a realignment where native blue-collar constituencies prioritize cultural and concerns over historical class loyalties. In the September 11, 2022, general election, SAP secured 30.3% of the vote and 107 of 349 seats, a decline from 40.6% in 2010, enabling a right-wing bloc—including SD with 20.5%—to form government under leader . SAP's long-term dominance relied on union-aligned voters, but high immigration inflows—peaking at 163,000 asylum applications in 2015 under an SAP-Green government—strained public services, fueled gang violence, and prompted backlash, with SD capitalizing on surveys showing 58% of Swedes viewing immigration as excessive by 2022. Native working-class support for SAP plummeted in rural and industrial areas, as voters cited integration failures and cultural disconnects, such as no-go zones and rising crime rates correlated with migrant-heavy neighborhoods; for instance, SD gained over 25% in some blue-collar municipalities like Uddevalla, where SAP's vote share halved since 1994. This mirrors Pasokification by eroding SAP's monopoly on labor representation, as SD absorbed disaffected LO trade union members who felt betrayed by SAP's multiculturalism over wage protection and community stability. Economic policy missteps compounded the decline, including SAP's post-1990s embrace of fiscal and EU-aligned , which critics argue diluted worker protections amid rising housing costs and welfare dependency—exacerbated by adding 1.5% annually to the population from 2010-2020 without commensurate job growth for low-skilled natives. By 2024, SAP polled below 30% in working-class districts, with party elites' focus on and gender issues alienating pragmatists; internal analyses attribute a 10-15% voter bleed to SD since , signaling a structural realignment where center-left yields to nationalist appeals on sovereignty and redistribution for citizens first.

Other European Cases

In , the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) underwent a notable erosion of support during the , with its vote share falling from 26.8 percent in the 2013 parliamentary election to 21.2 percent in 2019, as working-class voters increasingly defected to the Freedom Party (FPÖ). This shift mirrored broader Pasokification patterns, driven by dissatisfaction with policies and under governments, though the SPÖ stabilized around 21 percent in the 2024 election amid continued FPÖ gains. Analysts attribute the decline to the SPÖ's perceived and failure to address cultural anxieties, leading to a loss of traditional blue-collar constituencies. Finland's Social Democratic Party (SDP) exemplified Pasokification through a sustained drop in electoral performance, with its national vote share declining from 23.1 percent in 2007 to a low of 16.5 percent in 2015, coinciding with the rise of the anti-immigration . The SDP's support rebounded modestly to 19.9 percent by 2023, but the earlier losses reflected voter alienation over welfare reforms and EU-driven austerity measures post-2008 , fragmenting the center-left vote between Greens and the Left Alliance. This pattern underscores causal factors like policy convergence with center-right parties on fiscal restraint, eroding the SDP's distinct appeal to industrial workers. In , the Labour Party faced acute Pasokification, its vote share collapsing to 4.3 percent in the 2020 general election from highs of around 10.8 percent in 2002, rendering it a marginal force after participation in austerity-imposing coalitions following the banking crisis. The party's result marked its worst in over a century, with seats plummeting from 37 in 2011 (despite a modest 6.6 percent vote amid anti-incumbent swings) to just 7, as former supporters migrated to or abstained. Empirical data highlight Labour's disconnect from working-class concerns on housing and inequality, exacerbated by junior partnership roles that prioritized fiscal orthodoxy over redistributive priorities.

Manifestations Outside Europe

Australia

In Australia, the center-left Australian Labor Party (ALP) has not experienced the severe electoral collapse characteristic of pasokification in Europe, maintaining its status as one of two dominant parties and securing federal governments in 2022 and 2025 despite primary vote challenges. The ALP's primary vote dipped to 32.58% in the 2022 federal election—its lowest since 1934—but preferences from minor parties enabled a minority government formation. By the May 3, 2025, federal election, the primary vote recovered to 34.56%, a +1.98% swing, yielding a landslide majority with strong two-party preferred support exceeding 52%. This resilience stems from Australia's compulsory voting and preferential system, which concentrates power despite fragmented primaries, contrasting with systems that amplified declines elsewhere. Historical ALP primary votes fluctuated without collapse: 38.0% in 2010, 33.4% in 2013, 34.7% in 2016, 33.3% in 2019, and stabilization post-2022. The party governs or holds strong state-level positions in , Victoria, , and as of 2025, bucking broader Western trends of center-left erosion. Fragmentation poses ongoing risks, with the Greens capturing 10-13% of left-leaning votes on issues like and housing, and " eroding moderate urban support from both majors since 2010. ALP membership has declined alongside other parties, from over 50,000 in the early to around 40,000 by 2020, reflecting reduced engagement rather than ideological rejection. Critics, including some union factions, contend the ALP has shifted toward , alienating working-class voters to populists like One Nation, though empirical outcomes show sustained preference flows and no vote hemorrhage akin to PASOK's 40-point drop. Recent successes under , including economic management amid global pressures, have reversed earlier stagnation, with polls understating the 2025 margin. This suggests causal factors like policy adaptation—e.g., wage growth initiatives and —mitigated pasokification risks, though reliance on preferences underscores vulnerability to further minor-party surges.

Israel

The (HaAvoda), once the dominant force in Israeli politics as the heir to the party that led the pre-state Zionist labor movement and governed continuously from Israel's founding in 1948 until 1977, exemplifies Pasokification through its precipitous electoral collapse. In the 1992 election, Labor secured 44 seats under , forming a that pursued the . However, its representation dwindled to 26 seats in 1999, 19 in 2003 and 2006, 13 in 2009, and further to 6 seats in the April 2019 election, marking its worst result at the time. By the November 2022 election, Labor held only 4 seats, reflecting a loss of over 90% of its peak parliamentary strength and rendering it a marginal player unable to lead governments independently. This trajectory mirrors Pasokification in its rapid marginalization of a historic center-left following perceived failures, as noted in analyses comparing Labor's to PASOK's. The party's decline accelerated after the Oslo process's breakdown, with the Second (2000–2005) generating widespread public disillusionment over concessions that empirically correlated with heightened Palestinian terrorism and suicide bombings, eroding trust in Labor's security credentials. Unlike PASOK's economic triggers, Israel's case stems primarily from causal failures in state security—a core voter priority—where left-leaning territorial withdrawals preceded surges in violence, shifting voter allegiance toward right-wing parties emphasizing deterrence and settlement retention. Compounding this, Labor became associated with urban elites and dovish policies detached from working-class and peripheral voters' realities, including who historically resented the party's early dominance and cultural secularism. Internal fragmentation, leadership missteps, and competition from centrist alternatives like further diluted its base, while the far-left party—another center-left remnant—failed to cross the in 2022, securing zero seats after holding up to 12 in the . These dynamics underscore a broader center-left erosion, driven not by exogenous "" but by empirical outcomes: sustained and stalled peace prospects invalidated prior paradigms, prompting a durable rightward realignment in on defense and borders.

Latin America

In Latin America, pasokification manifested prominently during the decline of the "pink tide" of center-left governments that rose to power in the early 2000s amid high commodity prices, only to suffer sharp electoral reversals in the mid-2010s due to , scandals, and the end of the resource boom. Parties like Brazil's (PT), Argentina's Kirchnerist faction within , and Chile's coalition experienced vote share collapses as voters shifted toward right-wing or alternatives, often blaming incumbents for fiscal mismanagement and graft exposed by investigations such as Brazil's Lava Jato operation. This pattern echoed European social democratic declines, with center-left forces losing their status as dominant governing machines, though some later partial recoveries occurred without restoring prior hegemony. In Brazil, the PT, which secured presidencies from 2003 to 2016 under and , saw its national influence plummet after a 2014-2016 that shrank GDP by over 7% and rose above 12%. The party's congressional vote share fell from 13.7% in 2014 to 10.8% in 2018, enabling Jair Bolsonaro's victory with PT candidate garnering just 44.9% in the presidential runoff; locally, PT mayoral wins dropped from 656 in 2012 to 256 in 2016 amid Lava revelations implicating PT leaders in billions in kickbacks. This erosion stemmed from overreliance on exports and state interventionism that fueled debt without structural reforms, eroding middle-class support forged during earlier growth. Argentina's Kirchnerist movement, dominant from 2003 to 2015 under Néstor and , faced pasokification after inflation exceeded 25% annually by 2015 and foreign reserves dwindled, leading to Mauricio Macri's 51.3% runoff win over Peronist Daniel Scioli's 48.7% in the presidential election. The Frente para la Victoria's legislative seats declined from 152 in 2013 to 74 by 2017, reflecting voter fatigue with protectionist policies and corruption allegations, including unchecked public spending that ballooned deficits to 5.4% of GDP. In , the center-left and its successor , which governed continuously from 1990 to 2010 and held power until 2017, lost ground as inequality persisted despite growth; Sebastián Piñera's 2010 victory ended two decades of rule, and his 2017 reelection saw the coalition's presidential candidate Beatriz Sánchez poll under 20%, with municipal setbacks signaling voter disillusionment over pension reforms and education protests. These cases highlight causal factors beyond ideological shifts, including the 2014 commodity price crash that halved export revenues region-wide and exposed fiscal vulnerabilities in resource-dependent economies, compounded by institutional corruption that alienated pragmatic voters without delivering sustained beyond initial transfers. While some pink tide parties like Bolivia's MAS retained cores through charismatic leadership, the broader trend involved center-left fragmentation, with new left formations like Chile's emerging but struggling against entrenched distrust. This decline prompted a , though recent wins like Lula's 2022 return (50.9% vote) indicate cyclical volatility rather than reversal, underscoring pasokification's role in reshaping party systems toward polarization.

Other Global Instances

In South Africa, the African National Congress (ANC), long the dominant center-left party rooted in anti-apartheid liberation struggles, experienced a sharp electoral decline in the 2024 general election, securing only 40.18% of the national vote—down from 57.50% in 2019—and losing its parliamentary majority for the first time since 1994. This shift forced the ANC into a coalition government with the center-right Democratic Alliance (DA) and smaller parties, reflecting voter disillusionment with persistent corruption scandals, economic stagnation, and failures in service delivery such as electricity blackouts and high unemployment rates exceeding 32%. Analysts attribute the erosion to the ANC's governance shortcomings since taking power post-apartheid, with former supporters fragmenting toward populist alternatives like the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK) on the left and the DA on the right, mirroring patterns where entrenched ruling parties lose ground to ideological competitors amid unmet promises of socioeconomic transformation. In , the (INC), once the hegemonic center-left force that led the independence movement and governed uninterrupted from 1947 to 1977 and intermittently thereafter, underwent a profound contraction following the 2014 elections, plummeting from 206 seats in 2009 to just 44 in the , with marginal recovery to 99 seats in 2024 amid the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) dominance. The INC's vote share hovered around 19-20% in recent polls, a stark fall from its historical peaks above 40%, driven by perceptions of dynastic leadership under the Gandhi family, policy inertia on economic liberalization's inequities, and failure to counter the BJP's Hindu nationalist appeal to aspirational voters. This realignment saw former Congress strongholds in rural and minority communities shift rightward, exacerbated by internal factionalism and corruption allegations during its 2004-2014 tenure, leading commentators to draw parallels to the rapid evaporation of voter loyalty in other social democratic declines. Canada's (NDP), a social democratic entity positioned as the primary left-of-center alternative to the Liberals, faced significant setbacks in the April 2025 federal election, losing most of its seats and entering a after former leader Jagmeet Singh's tenure. The NDP's support dwindled to under 10% nationally, down from peaks around 20% in prior cycles, as progressive voters consolidated behind the Liberals amid anti-Trump backlash and economic anxieties, while working-class bases eroded toward Conservatives on issues like affordability and inflation. This contraction echoes broader center-left challenges, with the party's policy overlaps with the governing Liberals—such as pharmacare expansions—diluting its distinct identity and contributing to voter abstention or defection, though the Liberals under secured a .

Debates and Implications

Alternative Explanations and Critiques

Some analysts contend that the Pasokification narrative oversimplifies a more nuanced transformation in party systems, where center-left parties face evolving voter priorities rather than an irreversible collapse. For instance, shifts toward post-materialist values—emphasizing identity, environment, and lifestyle over traditional class-based economics—have prompted center-left adaptation, but this has fragmented coalitions without eliminating their viability. Empirical evidence from cases like the French Socialist Party's post-2017 decline highlights how internal divisions and leadership failures, such as François Hollande's approval rating dropping to 4% by 2017, exacerbated electoral losses more than systemic policy betrayal. Alternative explanations emphasize structural economic changes over deliberate ideological shifts to centrism. Deindustrialization and the rise of postindustrial economies have eroded the manual working-class base that once anchored social democratic support, as service-sector and knowledge workers prioritize different issues irrespective of party positioning. In Western Europe, social democratic vote shares averaged 30-40% in the mid-20th century but stabilized around 20-25% by the in many nations, reflecting this rather than voter defection solely to populists. Critiques of the economic-centrism thesis argue it underplays how external shocks, including the 2015 and events like , alienated voters on cultural grounds without parties fully abandoning left-wing economics. Voter fragmentation to green and radical-left alternatives provides another counter to narratives of wholesale rightward defection. In Germany, the Social Democrats (SPD) fell to 20.5% in the 2021 federal election—their lowest since 1949—but gains by the Greens (14.8%) and Die Linke absorbed former left-leaning support, diluting rather than erasing center-left influence. Similarly, in Scandinavia, Swedish Social Democrats maintained 30.3% in 2022 despite regional pressures, suggesting Pasokification is neither uniform nor total, with recoveries possible through coalition-building. These patterns critique overreliance on Greek exceptionalism, as PASOK's 43.9% in 2009 to 3.4% in 2019 drop reflected acute debt crisis austerity, not a universal model. In , the Social Democratic Party (SPD) continued its decline in the February 23, 2025, federal election, receiving 16.5% of the vote—its worst national result since —amid voter shifts toward the conservative (28.5%) and far-right AfD. This outcome reflected ongoing erosion of traditional center-left support, driven by dissatisfaction with and migration policies under the prior SPD-led coalition. France's Socialist Party (PS) experienced a partial rebound in the June-July 2024 legislative elections, nearly doubling its seats to around 65 as part of the left-wing New Popular Front alliance, which blocked a far-right majority despite garnering only 4.8% in isolated vote shares. However, the PS remained dependent on alliances with more radical left groups like , highlighting fragmentation rather than independent revival. In the UK, Labour's July 4, 2024, general election win—securing 411 seats with 33.7% of the vote—averted deeper Pasokification after its 2019 nadir, attributed by observers to Keir Starmer's centrist pivot on issues like migration and fiscal restraint. Nordic social democratic parties bucked broader European trends in the June 2024 elections, achieving record results: Sweden's Social Democrats held strong, Denmark's center-left gained seats, and Finland's Left Alliance surged to 17.3%, coinciding with far-right setbacks across the region. These gains stemmed from sustained welfare commitments paired with earlier migration restrictions, contrasting with continental counterparts' openness. Potential reversals remain tentative, as recoveries often involve policy shifts toward —such as border controls—to recapture working-class voters alienated by and , per analyses of Nordic and UK cases. Yet, in , lingered below 10% in 2025 polls, underscoring persistent challenges without such adaptations. Sustained empirical evidence of broader upticks is limited, with EU-wide left support hitting post-Cold War lows in 2024 national aggregates.

Lessons for Center-Left Parties

Center-left parties confronting the risk of Pasokification must prioritize reconnecting with their traditional working-class base by emphasizing over post-materialist cultural priorities, as the shift toward identity-focused agendas has alienated voters concerned with material welfare. and have eroded class-based solidarity, but parties that fail to offer protective policies—such as robust welfare expansions or safeguards—lose support to both populist right-wing alternatives and , as seen in the Greek PASOK's collapse from 43.9% of the vote in 2009 to 4.7% in 2015 amid implementation. A core lesson involves rejecting neoliberal convergence with center-right economics, including during crises, which exposes contradictions in social democratic models and erodes distinctiveness. Post-2008, parties like France's Socialists and Germany's SPD saw historic lows (e.g., SPD at 20.5% in the 2019 election) after adopting market-oriented reforms that increased inequality, such as Sweden's rising from 0.20 in 1980 to 0.32 by 2013. To counter this, center-left formations should pursue bold, redistributive policies tied to union rebuilding and mass membership drives, avoiding the internal divisions that plagued leadership under figures like UK's or France's . Addressing new cleavages, particularly and , requires balancing progressive with working-class anxieties rather than dismissing them, as unchecked inflows have fractured alliances between native laborers and urban s. Parties succeeding in staving off total decline, such as Spain's PSOE through left alliances yielding reforms, demonstrate that coalitions with radical left partners can pressure timid policies into tangible gains, provided they maintain coherent messaging against perceptions. Ultimately, revival demands innovative solutions that affirm commitment to "the " over abstract internationalism, lest further erosion undermines democratic stability as in interwar .

References

  1. https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=governance-unlv
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Greek-national-election-results-2009-and-May-and-June-2012_tbl2_263674458
  3. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/news/3693-between-the-scylla-of-pasokification-and-the-charybdis-of-syrizification
  4. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/07/10/is-social-democracy-facing-extinction-in-europe/
  5. https://jacobin.com/2021/02/europe-social-democracy-pasokification
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/who-benefits-from-the-social-democratic-march-to-the-middle/C51600C3CB024C0977166C63C50301BC
  7. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/a-p-b/18074.pdf
  8. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/downloadpdf/book/9781447332688/ch001.pdf
  9. https://www.socialeurope.eu/is-social-democracy-facing-extinction-in-europe
  10. https://novaramedia.com/2015/01/28/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-pasokification/
  11. https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2020/number/1/article/economic-crisis-poor-governance-and-the-rise-of-populism-the-case-of-greece.html
  12. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2017/dec/29/2017-and-the-curious-demise-of-europes-centre-left
  13. https://www.themarketforideas.com/did-the-pandemic-reverse-pasokification-are-the-left-wing-parties-in-europe-ready-for-a-comeback-a724/
  14. https://en.protothema.gr/2024/09/03/pasok-the-political-phenomenon-that-reshaped-greece-turns-50-its-rise-fall-and-undefined-future/
  15. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Panhellenic-Socialist-Movement
  16. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22025714
  17. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/061115/origins-greeces-debt-crisis.asp
  18. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/rise-and-fall-of-panhellenic-socialist-movement/
  19. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/greeces-debt-crisis-timeline
  20. https://www.npr.org/2012/05/01/150804420/george-papandreou-greece-had-to-make-changes
  21. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45245969
  22. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/a-new-left-in-greece-pasoks-fall-and-syrizas-rise/
  23. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/04/greece-election-pasok-party
  24. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/athen/21215.pdf
  25. https://www.esm.europa.eu/sites/default/files/esmdp9.pdf
  26. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr13156.pdf
  27. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-26171213
  28. https://mcimaps.com/how-greeces-economic-crisis-upended-its-party-system/
  29. https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2013/number/1/article/austerity-measures-in-crisis-countries-results-and-impact-on-mid-term-development.html
  30. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/06/21/explaining-the-electoral-debacle-of-social-democratic-parties-in-europe/
  31. https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/social-democracy-immigration-and-the-working-class/
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23745118.2021.1909806
  33. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11615-025-00604-y
  34. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2016/04/02/rose-thou-art-sick
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/24/magazine/denmark-immigration-policy-progressives.html
  36. https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/download/1161/930/7580
  37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-024-00330-0
  38. https://www.theconservative.online/has-social-democracy-dug-its-own-grave-with-mass-migration
  39. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/populism-and-the-decline-of-social-democracy/
  40. https://uk.fes.de/e/left-behind-by-the-working-class.html
  41. https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/education-as-a-new-political-divide/
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2025.2452789
  43. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2023/11/democracy-and-elitism-on-the-left-and-right/
  44. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/what-explains-the-electoral-crisis-of-social-democracy-a-systematic-review-of-the-literature/88538417C2898B69CF2F79D35B1DA855
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/rise-and-fall-of-social-democracy-19182017/4E96179FAF3D1C450072565C6B5DD103
  46. https://www.kai-arzheimer.com/extreme-right-working-class-centre-left-competition/
  47. https://www.simon-bornschier.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2023/04/the-populist-rig%25E2%2580%25A6f-class-politics.pdf
  48. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112812/1/europpblog_2021_10_12_has_economic_moderation_contributed_to_the.pdf
  49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2021.1916294
  50. https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-xpm-2012-jun-17-la-fg-france-election-20120618-story.html
  51. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41253-017-0053-6
  52. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/10/francois-hollande-pushes-through-labour-bill-with-special-decree
  53. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/governance-unlv/vol6/iss2/5/
  54. https://speri-blog.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/blog/2017/the-collapse-of-frances-socialist-party
  55. https://redflag.org.au/article/social-democracy-in-a-state-of-collapse
  56. https://inirnet.org/article-written-for-inir/the_disconcerting_economic_and_fiscal_results_of_frances_immigration_policy
  57. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09639489.2022.2137484
  58. https://feps-europe.eu/the-rise-and-fall-of-french-socialism-as-a-national-party-of-government/
  59. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2024/07/22/which-political-groups-make-up-france-s-new-assemblee-nationale_6694057_8.html
  60. https://www.politico.eu/article/france-socialists-elect-incumbent-leader-coalition-division-elections/
  61. https://www.dw.com/en/why-did-the-german-spd-party-performed-badly-in-the-election/a-71822146
  62. https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/where-the-spd-and-germany-would-stand-today-without-agenda-2010
  63. https://www.politico.eu/article/the-fall-and-fall-of-german-social-democracy-german-regional-elections-spd-malu-dreyer-sigmar-gabriel/
  64. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2018/02/germany-s-spd-has-signed-its-death-warrant
  65. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7529/
  66. https://dataspace.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp01w6634678j
  67. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2017-02-22-why-working-class-voter-may-be-turning-away-labour
  68. https://jacobin.com/2020/07/labour-party-brexit-corbyn-boris-johnson-tories
  69. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/keir-starmer-and-the-pasokification-of-labour/
  70. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10009/
  71. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10009/CBP-10009.pdf
  72. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4nglegege1o
  73. https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/52435-a-year-after-the-2024-election-which-voters-have-abandoned-the-labour-party-and-why
  74. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/09/27/labour-abandoned-working-class/
  75. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2024.2430915
  76. https://verfassungsblog.de/a-crisis-made-in-italy/
  77. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9629/
  78. https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/national-results/italy/2024-2029/
  79. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2018/05/italys-organic-crisis/
  80. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_140581_smxx.pdf
  81. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/23/zapatero-socialists-defeated-peoples-party
  82. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-13496038
  83. https://feps-europe.eu/spanish-left-faces-greatest-challenge/
  84. https://jacobin.com/2024/05/spain-sanchez-psoe-vox-eu-elections
  85. https://www.csis.org/analysis/whither-spain-july-2023-general-election-results-and-beyond
  86. https://www.politico.eu/article/pedro-sanchez-socialists-suffer-regional-municipal-elections/
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175778022500023X
  88. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/09/02/uabi-s02.html
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10081776/
  90. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.688130/full
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359824223_Between_a_rock_and_a_hard_place_in_Spain_the_PSOE
  92. https://academic.oup.com/book/58013/chapter/479032227
  93. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2021/03/15/what-happened-to-the-dutch-left/
  94. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2018.1448556
  95. https://feps-europe.eu/dutch-elections-2021-no-recovery-of-social-democracy/
  96. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23745118.2020.1739198
  97. https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/decline-of-the-dutch-left
  98. https://transform-network.net/blog/article/the-pasokification-of-the-dutch-labour-party/
  99. https://cise.luiss.it/2017/03/16/its-the-culture-stupid-issue-competition-in-the-2017-dutch-election-2/
  100. https://www.uu.nl/en/news/nativism-key-explanation-for-pvvs-electoral-success
  101. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/5955-the-radical-right-largely-ahead-in-the-dutch-general-election
  102. https://val.se/servicelankar/servicelankar/other-languages/english-engelska/election-results/election-results-2022.html
  103. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/1946-victory-for-the-rightwing-and-breakthrough-for-the-sweden-democrats-sd-are-now-the-second-largest-party-following-the-parliamentary-elections
  104. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/sweden-turns-welcoming-and-restrictive-its-immigration-policy
  105. https://www.politico.eu/article/sweden-social-democrats-struggle-in-traditional-blue-collar-heartlands/
  106. https://feps-europe.eu/you-want-it-darker-the-swedish-working-class-votes-but-social-democrats-lose/
  107. https://www.populismstudies.org/the-losers-are-winning-in-sweden-thanks-to-the-sweden-democrats/
  108. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62913356
  109. http://www.europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article48314
  110. https://wien.arbeiterkammer.at/interessenvertretung/wirtschaftswissenschaften/YEC_2024_Schmidtner_Slides.pdf
  111. https://europeelects.eu/elections/results/finland/
  112. https://www.statista.com/statistics/520827/finland-parliamentary-election-results-seats-by-party/
  113. https://nearfuturesonline.org/the-end-of-the-european-left-social-democracy-hope-disillusion-and-europe/
  114. https://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/about/people/michael_gallagher/Election2020.php
  115. https://www.thejournal.ie/labour-ireland-worst-election-ge16-2016-2629803-Mar2016/
  116. https://wpid.world/resources/en/pdf/Ireland.pdf
  117. https://theconversation.com/australian-labor-isnt-alone-parties-of-the-left-are-making-a-comeback-185484
  118. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/06/25/qukk-j25.html
  119. https://results.aec.gov.au/31496/Website/HouseStateFirstPrefsByParty-31496-NAT.htm
  120. https://antonygreen.com.au/fed2025-four-graphs-on-labors-landslide-victory/
  121. https://australianpolitics.com/elections/primary-votes/
  122. https://www.reddit.com/r/AustralianPolitics/comments/ujh8g5/what_are_the_primary_reasons_as_to_why_there_is/
  123. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-10/election-results-independents-rising-charts/105267162
  124. https://www.facebook.com/groups/unionsaustralia/posts/24166599486325791/
  125. https://theconversation.com/final-counting-shows-polls-understated-labor-in-2025-election-almost-as-much-as-they-overstated-it-in-2019-256981
  126. https://www.andrewleigh.com/a_more_competitive_labor_party_speech
  127. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Israel-Labour-Party
  128. https://jstribune.com/lerman-not-much-left/
  129. https://en.idi.org.il/israeli-elections-and-parties/parties/labor-party-haavoda/
  130. https://labourlist.org/2019/08/the-israeli-labor-partys-existential-crisis/
  131. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/the-not-so-strange-death-of-israels-labor-party/
  132. https://besacenter.org/the-decline-of-the-israel-labor-party/
  133. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-politics-labor-party-what-happened
  134. https://www.eurasiagroup.net/live-post/the-5-countries-that-illustrate-the-decline-of-the-latin-american-left
  135. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2019.1686614
  136. https://www.socialistworld.net/2016/10/11/brazil-local-elections-see-collapse-of-pt-workers-party-support/
  137. https://www.blackrosefed.org/brazil-in-context-workers-party/
  138. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/latin-americas-new-turbulence-the-end-of-the-kirchner-era/
  139. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii53/articles/maristella-svampa-the-end-of-kirchnerism.pdf
  140. https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/the-defeat-of-the-concertacion-coalition-and-the-alternation-of-power-in-chile-ari/
  141. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=14736&context=notisur
  142. https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/latin-americas-rightward-shift/
  143. https://fpa.org/pink-tide-latin-america/
  144. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/economic-optimism-meets-political-complexity-insights-brazils-2024-municipal-elections
  145. https://www.populismstudies.org/the-rise-of-populist-parties-in-south-africa-and-end-of-the-ancs-parliamentary-majority/
  146. https://africacenter.org/spotlight/south-africas-seismic-political-shift/
  147. https://thediplomat.com/2017/04/how-the-indian-national-congress-lost-india/
  148. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00219096241249988
  149. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hol6y3QwX2Y
  150. https://perspectivesjournal.ca/ed-broadbent-rebuilding-ndp/
  151. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2025/03/13/old-left-ideas-are-unlikely-to-revive-social-democracy/
  152. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-rise-of-european-populism-and-the-collapse-of-the-center-left/
  153. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/12/swedish-election-highlights-decline-of-center-left-parties-across-western-europe/
  154. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/02/26/germany-s-social-democrats-in-turmoil-after-historic-general-election-defeat_6738587_4.html
  155. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-german-election-results/
  156. https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-results-explained-in-graphics/a-71724186
  157. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2024/07/07/french-elections-on-the-left-the-socialists-win-almost-as-many-seats-as-melenchon-s-lfi_6677003_5.html
  158. https://www.politico.eu/article/france-election-results-2024-map-constituencies-emmanuel-macron-marine-le-pen-live-new-popular-front-national-rally/
  159. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/feb/23/german-election-2025-results-in-full-live
  160. https://rosalux.eu/en/2024/english-more-than-just-an-electoral-upwind-nordic-left-wing-parties-after-the-eu-elections/
  161. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/06/10/extreme-left-lost-but-gained-unexpectedly-in-the-north
  162. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/11/left-wing-nordic-nations-provide-ray-of-hope-in-europe
  163. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/06/10/european-elections-far-right-on-the-decline-in-nordic-countries_6674410_4.html
  164. https://www.ekathimerini.com/politics/1282691/stagnant-polls-fuel-griping-within-pasok/
  165. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-failure-of-europes-mainstream-parties/
  166. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-specter-haunting-europe-the-lost-left/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.