Hubbry Logo
Pay televisionPay televisionMain
Open search
Pay television
Community hub
Pay television
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pay television
Pay television
Pay television
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Pay television, also known as subscription television, premium television or, when referring to an individual service, a premium channel,[1][2][3][4] refers to subscription-based television services, usually provided by multichannel television providers, but also increasingly via digital terrestrial and streaming television. In the United States, subscription television began in the late 1970s and early 1980s in the form of encrypted analog over-the-air broadcast television which could be decrypted with special equipment. The concept rapidly expanded through the multi-channel transition and into the post-network era.[5] Other parts of the world beyond the United States, such as France and Latin America have also offered encrypted analog terrestrial signals available for subscription.

The term is most synonymous with premium entertainment services focused on films or general entertainment programming such as, in the United States, Cinemax, HBO, MGM+, Showtime, and Starz, but such services can also include those devoted to sports, as well as adult entertainment.

Business model

[edit]

In contrast to most other multichannel television broadcasters, which depend on advertising and carriage fees as their sources of revenue, the majority of pay television services rely almost solely on monthly subscription fees paid by individual customers. As a result, pay television outlets are most concerned with offering content that can justify the cost of the service, which helps to attract new subscribers, and retain existing subscribers.[5]

Many pay television services consist of multiple individual channels, referred to as "multiplex" services (in reference to multiplex cinemas), where a main flagship channel is accompanied by secondary services with distinct schedules focusing on specific genres and audiences (such as multiplexes focusing more on "classic" films, or family-oriented programming), time shifting, or brand licensing deals (such as channels focusing specifically on Disney films, or content from American pay television brands if they do not specifically run their own network in a specific market). Typically, these services are bundled together with the main channel at no additional charge and cannot be purchased separately.

Depending on local regulations, pay television services generally have more lenient content standards because of their relatively narrower distribution, and not being subject to pressure from sponsors to tone down content. As a result, programming is typically aired with limited to no edits for time or, where applicable, mature content such as graphic violence, profanity, nudity, and sexual activity.[6]

As premium television services are commonly devoid of traditional commercial advertising, breaks between programming typically include promotions for upcoming programs, and interstitial segments (such as behind-the-scenes content, interviews, and other feature segments). Some sports-based pay services, however, may feature some commercial advertising, particularly if they simulcast sporting events that are broadcast by advertiser-supported television networks.

In addition, most general interest or movie-based pay services do not adhere to the common top and bottom of the hour scheduling of other cable channels and terrestrial broadcasters. As such, programs often air using either conventional scheduling or have airtimes in five-minute increments (for example, 7:05 a.m. or 4:40 p.m.); since such channels broadcast content without in-program break interruptions, this sometimes leads to extended or abbreviated breaks between programs, depending on when the previous program concludes and when the start time of the next program is. The only universal variation to this is prime time, where the main channel in each pay service's suite usually schedules films to start on the hour.

Programming

[edit]

Films comprise much of the content seen on most pay television services, particularly those with a general entertainment format and those that focus exclusively on films. Services often obtain rights to films through exclusive agreements with film distributors. Films acquired during the original term of license agreements with a distributor may also be broadcast as "sub-runs", in which a service holds rights to film long after the conclusion of a distribution agreement (under this arrangement, the pay service that originally licensed the rights to a particular film title, or one other than that which had held rights, may hold the broadcast rights through a library content deal).

Many general interest premium channels also produce original television series. Due to the aforementioned leniency in content standards, they too can contain content that is more mature than those of other cable channels or television networks. These series also tend to be high-budget and aim for critical success in order to attract subscribers: notable premium series, such as Cinemax's Banshee, The Knick, Strike Back, Jett, HBO's Curb Your Enthusiasm, Game of Thrones, Sex and the City, and The Sopranos, and Showtime's Dexter, Homeland, and Weeds, have achieved critical acclaim and have won various television awards. Some premium channels also broadcast television specials, which most commonly consist of concerts and concert films, documentaries, stand-up comedy, and in the past, theatrical plays.[5]

Sports programming is also featured on some premium services; HBO was historically known for its broadcasts of boxing, while Showtime and Epix also carry mixed martial arts events. Some general interest premium channels have aired other professional sporting events in the past: HBO for example, carried games from the National Hockey League (NHL), National Basketball Association (NBA) and American Basketball Association (ABA) in its early years, and from 1975 to 1999 aired the Wimbledon tennis tournament. Specialty pay sports channels also exist—often focusing on international sports considered niche to domestic audiences (such as, in the United States, cricket), and are typically sold at a higher expense than traditional premium services. Out-of-market sports packages in North America are multi-channel pay services carrying professional or collegiate sporting events which are sold in a seasonal package. They are typically the most expensive type of pay services, generally running in the range of $35 to $50 per month.

Some pay services also offer pornographic films; Cinemax was, initially, well known for carrying a late-night block of softcore films and series known as "Max After Dark"—a reputation that led to the network often being nicknamed "Skinemax" by viewers. This reputation, however, largely died out by the beginning of the mid-90s, as Cinemax had already established a reputation for popular movies and shows, such as Goodfellas being an exclusive premiere on the network in the early 90s. Cinemax eventually phased out the programming completely in the 2010s, citing that it did not align with its current focus on action programming, and that internet porn and the amount of sexual content in other mainstream premium series (such as Game of Thrones) made a specific block for such content redundant.[7][8][9] Specialized channels dedicated to pornographic films also exist, that carry either softcore adult programs (such as Playboy TV), or more hardcore content (such as The Erotic Network and Hustler TV).

Pricing and packaging

[edit]

Pay television channels come in different price ranges. Many channels carrying advertising combines this income with a lower subscription fee. These are called "mini-pay" channels (a term also used for smaller scale commercial-free pay television services) and are often sold as a part of a package with numerous similarly priced channels. Usually, however, the regular pricing for premium channels ranges from just under $10 to near $25 per month per suite, with lower prices available via bundling options with cable or satellite providers, or special limited offers which are available during free preview periods or before the launch of a network's prestige series. However, some other channels, such as sports and adult networks may ask for monthly pricing that may go as high as near $50 a month. There are also premium television services which are priced significantly higher than the mini-pay channels, but they compensate for their higher price by carrying little or no advertising and also providing a higher quality program output. As advertising sales are sensitive to the business cycle, some broadcasters try to balance them with more stable income from subscriptions.

Some providers offer services owned by the same company in a single package. For example, American satellite provider DirecTV offers the Encore channels along with the Starz multiplex (both owned by Starz Inc.) in its "Starz Super Pack";[10] and The Movie Channel, Flix (owned by Paramount, and the latter of which continues to be sold in the DirecTV package despite Showtime Networks no longer owning Sundance TV, that channel is now owned by AMC Networks) along with Showtime in its "Showtime Unlimited" package;[11] Cinemax and its multiplex networks, in turn, are almost always packaged with HBO (both owned by Warner Bros. Discovery).

Though selling premium services that are related by ownership as a package is common, that may not always be the situation: for example, in the United States, Cinemax and Encore are optionally sold separately from or in a single package with their respective parent networks HBO and Starz, depending on the service provider. The Movie Channel and Flix meanwhile, are usually sold together with Showtime (all three channels are owned by Paramount Global); though subscribers are required to purchase Showtime in order to receive Flix, The Movie Channel does not have such a restriction as a few providers optionally sell that service without requiring a Showtime subscription.

Unlike other cable networks, premium services are almost always subscribed to a la carte, meaning that one can, for example, subscribe to HBO without subscribing to Showtime (in Canada, there are slight modifications, as most providers include American superstations – such as WAPA-TV – with their main premium package by default). However, subscribing to an "individual" service automatically includes access to all of that service's available multiplex channels and, in some cases, access to content via video-on-demand (in the form of a conventional VOD television service, and in some cases, a companion on-demand streaming service as well). Most pay television providers also offer a selection of premium services (for example, the HBO, Showtime and Starz packages) in one bundle at a greatly reduced price than it would cost to purchase each service separately, as an inducement for subscribers to remain with their service provider or for others to induce subscribers into using their service. Similarly, many television providers offer general interest or movie-based premium channels at no additional charge for a trial period, often one to three months, though there have been rare instances of free trials for pay services that last up to one year for newer subscribers to that provider's television service.

Distribution

[edit]

Pay television has become popular with cable and satellite television. Pay television services often, at least two to three times per year, provide free previews of their services, in order to court potential subscribers by allowing this wider audience to sample the service for a period of days or weeks; these are typically scheduled to showcase major special event programming, such as the pay cable premiere of a blockbuster feature film, the premiere (either a series or season premiere) of a widely anticipated or critically acclaimed original series or occasionally, a high-profile special (such as a concert).

Subscription services transmitted via analogue terrestrial television have also existed, to varying degrees of success. The most known example of such service in Europe is Canal+ and its scrambled services, which operated in France from 1984 to the 2011 closedown of analogue television, Spain from 1990 to 2005 and Poland from 1995 to 2001. Some American television stations launched pay services (known simply as "subscription television" services) such as SuperTV, Wometco Home Theater, PRISM (which principally operated as a cable service, only being simultaneously carried over-the-air for a short time during the 1980s, and unlike other general-interest pay services accepted outside advertising for broadcast during its sports telecasts), Preview, SelecTV and ON TV in the late 1970s, but those services disappeared as competition from cable television expanded during the 1980s.

In Australia, Foxtel, Optus Television and TransACT are the major pay television distributors, all of which provide cable services in some metropolitan areas, with Foxtel providing satellite service for all other areas where cable is not available. Austar formerly operated as a satellite pay service, until it merged with Foxtel and SelecTV. The major distributors of pay television in New Zealand are Sky Network Television on satellite and Vodafone on cable.

In the 2010s, over-the-top subscription video on demand (SVOD) services distributed via internet video emerged as a major competitor to traditional pay television, with services such as Amazon Video, Hulu, and Netflix gaining prominence. Similarly, to pay television services, their libraries include acquired content (which can not only include films, but acquired television series as well), and a mix of original series, films, and specials. The shift towards SVOD has resulted in increasing competition within the sector, with media conglomerates having launched their own services (such as Disney+, Paramount+, Peacock, and Disney's acquisition of the majority of Hulu) to compete, and existing premium networks such as HBO (HBO Now)[12] and Showtime launching direct-to-consumer versions of their existing services to appeal to cord cutters. HBO and Showtime later absorbed their DTC offerings into wider services with a focus on their parent companies' libraries, with HBO Now replaced by HBO Max (now Max) in 2020 (which adds content from other Warner Bros. properties and third-parties, and would also be included with existing HBO subscriptions via television providers), and Showtime formally merging with Paramount+ in 2023.[13][14] Canadian premium service The Movie Network similarly merged with the CraveTV service owned by parent company Bell Media in 2018.[15]

Ambiguities

[edit]

Pay-per-view

[edit]
Main article: Pay-per-view

Pay-per-view (PPV) services are similar to subscription-based pay television services in that customers must pay to have the broadcast decrypted for viewing, but usually only entail a one-time payment for a single or time-limited viewing. Programs offered via pay-per-view are most often movies or sporting events, but may also include other events, such as concerts and even softcore adult programs. In the U.S., the initial concept and technology for pay-per-view for broadcast television was first developed in the early 1950s, including a crude decrypting of the over-the-air television signal and a decoding box, but never caught on for use at that time. It took another four decades when cable broadcasters started using pay-per-view on a widespread basis.[16]

Free-to-view

[edit]
Main articles: Free-to-view and Free-to-air

"Free" variants are free-to-air (FTA) and free-to-view (FTV); however, FTV services are normally encrypted and decryption cards either come as part of an initial subscription to a pay television bouquet – in other words, an offer of pay-TV channels – or can be purchased for a one-time cost. FTA and FTV systems may still have selective access. ABC Australia is one example, as much of its programming content is free-to-air except for National Rugby League (NRL) games, which are encrypted.

Over-the-air subscription television

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pay television

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pay television, also known as subscription television or premium television, is a system of delivering television content to viewers who pay a recurring , typically monthly, for access to channels and programs not available through broadcast signals. This model contrasts with traditional over-the-air television by providing a wider array of channels, including premium movies, sports, and original programming, distributed primarily through cable, , or (IPTV) networks. Originating in experimental forms during the mid-20th century, pay television has evolved into a multibillion-dollar industry that dominates multichannel video programming in many countries, though it faces ongoing challenges from digital streaming alternatives, with subscriber declines continuing into 2025. The history of pay television dates back to the 1940s, when Zenith Electronics introduced Phonevision, an early subscription system that used a decoder box to unscramble paid programming broadcast over standard airwaves in test markets like Chicago. Regulatory resistance from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and free broadcasters delayed widespread adoption, as concerns arose over the potential siphoning of popular content from free TV; it was not until 1968 that the FCC fully authorized subscription TV services. A pivotal moment came in 1972 with the launch of Home Box Office (HBO), the first national premium cable network, which delivered uncut movies and live events via satellite to cable systems, ushering in the modern era of pay TV and spurring the growth of multichannel services. Key aspects of pay television include its technological infrastructure, such as cables for local distribution and for national reach, which enable the carriage of dozens to hundreds of channels. , cable operators historically controlled over 95% of the pay TV market by the early , before providers like entered and diversified options. plays a central role, with the FCC overseeing aspects like rate controls, rules for local broadcasts, and competition to prevent monopolies, as established in the Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. Globally, pay TV penetration varies, with high adoption in and due to diverse content offerings, and in emerging African markets like Rwanda, where there were approximately 570,021 registered pay TV subscribers in 2024 according to the Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority (RURA), reflecting growth yet facing competition from streaming platforms like Netflix, but the industry has seen subscriber declines since the 2010s amid , where viewers shift to on-demand streaming platforms like and for more flexible, ad-free viewing; as of 2025, the global pay TV market is valued at USD 207.42 billion, while U.S. subscribers have fallen to approximately 68.7 million.

Introduction and History

Definition

Pay television, commonly referred to as subscription or premium television, is a television service model that requires viewers to pay a —typically through recurring subscriptions, purchases, or one-time transactions—to access programming, in contrast to funded primarily by advertisements. This system delivers premium, often exclusive content such as recent , live events, and original scripted series via controlled distribution channels that restrict access to authorized paying customers. Key features of pay television include the use of or access controls to scramble signals and prevent unauthorized viewing, ensuring that only subscribers with compatible decoders or can receive clear broadcasts. Payments are structured as monthly fees for ongoing access to channel packages or per-event charges for specific content, emphasizing high-value programming that appeals to niche audiences seeking alternatives to standard network fare. By 2025, the terminology and scope of pay television have expanded beyond traditional cable and delivery to incorporate protocol-based streaming services, reflecting the convergence of linear and on-demand video consumption where subscribers pay for bundled or ad-free access to multichannel content. This evolution has driven widespread global adoption, with streaming services alone penetrating 96% of U.S. households and video subscriptions reaching 78% of European households, underscoring pay television's dominance in premium entertainment delivery. Technically, pay television relies on signal methods, such as analog in early implementations to distort video and audio signals, and contemporary (DRM) systems that employ cryptographic keys to protect content across IP networks and prevent . Legally, these services operate under frameworks requiring subscriber agreements and compliance with laws to enforce and access restrictions.

Historical Development

The origins of pay television trace back to the in the United States, where broadcasters and inventors explored subscription-based models to deliver premium content beyond free over-the-air signals. Radio Corporation pioneered one of the earliest systems, Phonevision, which used scrambled over-the-air broadcasts decoded via a monthly subscription and key device. The first public trial occurred in in 1951, involving 300 selected households who accessed recent films for a $2 monthly fee plus 10 cents per program, demonstrating technical feasibility but facing opposition from theaters and regulators. Further experiments, such as a planned three-year test in , announced in 1960 by and , aimed to expand on these concepts but were delayed by regulatory scrutiny. Public interest was evident in a 1955 Gallup survey of television owners, where 52% expressed a preference for viewing current movies at home for a fee over attending theaters, with many willing to pay up to $1.50 per film. The 1960s and 1970s brought regulatory battles that shaped pay television's trajectory, as the (FCC) initially imposed restrictions to protect free broadcast networks and local theaters from competition. These policies, rooted in concerns over audience fragmentation, limited subscription services until the late , when mounting pressure from the film industry prompted the FCC to authorize experimental pay TV operations in 1969 and issue rules in 1970 permitting pay programming on cable systems. This paved the way for the launch of () on November 8, 1972, as the first commercial pay TV network, initially delivering uncut movies and events via microwave relay to a single cable system in , serving 365 subscribers. In the , early experiments with wired pay services emerged in the , such as a 1966 trial by British Relay Wireless offering movies for a subscription, though widespread adoption lagged until the 1970s with localized cable expansions. Technological enablers like geostationary satellites, first demonstrated commercially by () in 1965, began facilitating broader distribution by relaying signals across continents. The 1980s and 1990s marked a global expansion of pay television, driven by satellite technology and deregulation. In the US, the satellite TV boom accelerated with the launch of DirecTV on June 17, 1994, which introduced direct-to-home digital broadcasting with over 175 channels, quickly amassing millions of subscribers and challenging cable dominance. In Europe, Sky Television debuted in 1989 via the Astra satellite, evolving into a multi-channel pay service that merged with British Satellite Broadcasting in 1990 to form BSkyB, reaching 3.5 million UK households by the mid-1990s. Africa's pay TV landscape emerged with MultiChoice's M-Net in 1986, South Africa's first subscription channel beamed via satellite, expanding continent-wide and adding SuperSport in 1986 to capitalize on sports demand. The digital transition during this era, including compression techniques, enabled hundreds of channels and spurred international growth, with pay TV subscribers worldwide surpassing 100 million by 2000. From the 2000s onward, pay television evolved toward (IPTV) and on-demand streaming, amid rising trends. Netflix's streaming service launch in 2007 allowed unlimited access to movies and shows over for a flat fee, accelerating the shift from linear cable to à la carte digital viewing and pressuring traditional providers. By 2010, gained momentum as high-speed proliferated, with pay household penetration falling from 88% to 64% by 2023 and further to 50% by late 2025, and an estimated 66 million households (50%) identifying as cord-cutters as of November 2025. This decline, with traditional pay households dropping to around 65 million in the as of 2025, has led to hybrid models blending linear pay with streaming apps, including major consolidations such as Canal+'s acquisition of in September 2025, reflecting ongoing adaptation to consumer preferences for flexibility and lower costs.

Business Model

Programming

Pay television distinguishes itself through premium and exclusive content that broadcasting typically cannot offer, focusing on high-production-value originals, timely access to films, major live events, and global offerings. Original series like HBO's , which premiered in 1999 and ran for six seasons, exemplify this by delivering complex, cinematic storytelling about a mob boss, elevating pay TV's reputation for prestige drama. Live sports packages, such as available via providers like and , provide comprehensive access to out-of-market games, drawing subscribers with exclusive broadcasts of professional football. Recent theatrical movies are secured through post-release windows, while international imports include channels in languages like Spanish, Hindi, Korean, and Arabic, offering news, dramas, and cultural programming from regions such as , , and the via services like DIRECTV's international packages. Content acquisition in pay television relies on strategic licensing agreements with major studios, often involving "pay-one" windows that grant exclusive rights to air films after their theatrical run but before broader distribution. For instance, studios like Universal and Paramount employ staggered pay-one deals, allowing pay TV networks to premiere titles in a defined exclusivity period, sometimes shared among platforms to maximize reach. Co-productions with independent creators further diversify offerings, while enables seamless control over assets; Disney, for example, owns and integrates its sports content with , bundling linear networks like and into a direct-to-consumer service launched in 2025 for $29.99 monthly, alongside for unified entertainment and sports delivery. Production investments underscore pay TV's commitment to quality, with prestige dramas often budgeted at $10 million to $30 million per episode to attract top talent and achieve cinematic production values. Shows like Netflix's exemplify this, costing around $30 million per episode as of 2023, reflecting broader trends in 2025 where high-end series drive subscriber retention. Historically, pay TV licensing has served as a vital funding mechanism for Hollywood, providing studios with stable ancillary revenues alongside theatrical and sales to support film and series development. Curation and scheduling in pay television emphasize targeted viewer experiences, with themed channels like focusing exclusively on movies and action series, delivering Hollywood hits and originals in high definition to complement HBO's broader lineup. On-demand libraries allow anytime access to vast catalogs, while in the streaming era, algorithmic recommendations personalize content discovery; as of 2025, 26% of viewers rely on streamer algorithms for TV and choices, surpassing word-of-mouth at 23%. A key challenge for pay television programming is content fragmentation amid the "streaming wars," intensified by launches like Disney+ and Apple TV+ in 2019, which splintered audiences across platforms and reduced the exclusivity of traditional pay TV libraries. This proliferation forces providers to navigate overlapping exclusives, complicating curation and increasing churn as subscribers juggle multiple services for desired content.

Revenue Streams

Pay television operators primarily generate revenue through subscriber fees, which account for the majority of in traditional models. In the United States, these fees formed the core of the industry's approximately $62 billion in pay TV revenue in 2025, driven by monthly or annual subscriptions for access to premium channels and content packages. contributes a smaller but growing portion, particularly in hybrid models that combine subscriptions with ad-supported tiers; for instance, platforms like Hulu's SVOD service generated an (ARPU) of $12.52 per month in the first quarter of 2025, with ads comprising 10-20% of overall streaming video revenue in such setups. Ancillary , including the resale of syndication rights for programming, further bolsters earnings, as networks license content to other broadcasters or platforms after initial runs. To diversify beyond core streams, pay television entities pursue international licensing deals, exporting U.S.-produced shows to global markets for additional royalties. For example, American series like those from major studios are licensed to overseas pay TV providers, contributing to the rise of international television markets amid declining domestic viewership. Merchandise tie-ins from popular programs also provide supplementary revenue, with global licensed merchandise sales—including those tied to TV content—reaching $369.6 billion in 2024, a 3.7% increase from the prior year. Additionally, sales of viewer analytics data from usage patterns enable operators to monetize insights for and partnerships, enhancing revenue through data-driven services in connected TV ecosystems. Economic metrics highlight the scale and challenges of these streams. (ARPU) for U.S. cable pay TV exceeded $100 monthly in 2025, reflecting bundled services but facing pressure from competition. has significantly impacted revenues, with U.S. pay TV income declining by approximately 41% from its 2015 peak of around $105 billion to about $62 billion in 2025 due to shifts toward streaming alternatives. Vertical integration offers cost savings and enhanced revenue capture by aligning content production with distribution. Comcast's ownership of NBCUniversal, for instance, has boosted its Peacock streaming service by internalizing content costs and directing viewer traffic, allowing direct monetization without third-party distributor fees. Looking ahead, the shift to direct-to-consumer (DTC) models is reducing reliance on traditional distributors, enabling studios to retain a larger share of subscription and ad revenues. This trend is projected to drive overall pay TV and OTT video consumer spending growth to $318.5 billion globally by 2029, though traditional pay TV subscribers are expected to decline by around 7% in the U.S. in 2025 as DTC platforms prioritize profitability. As of November 2025, pay TV penetration in the US has fallen below 50% of households, accelerating subscriber losses.

Pricing and Packaging

Subscription Models

Pay television subscription models primarily revolve around recurring fees that grant ongoing access to channels and content, distinguishing between basic and premium tiers to cater to varying consumer preferences. Basic subscriptions typically offer a flat monthly fee for a core package of channels, often ranging from $90 to $140 as of 2025 for expanded bundles including over 100 channels such as local networks, , and general . Premium subscriptions, in contrast, add specialized content like movies or sports for higher fees, with comprehensive packages reaching $160 to $220 monthly as of 2025, reflecting added value from exclusive programming. In 2025, many providers implemented price hikes of 5-12%, such as HBO Max's standard plan rising to $18.49 and cable averages reaching $108 monthly. Standalone options allow subscribers to access individual premium channels without a full bundle, such as 's Max service at $18.49 per month for its standard ad-free plan. Contract terms in pay television vary by provider and delivery method, often including annual commitments for traditional cable or services to lock in rates, alongside auto-renewal clauses that continue billing unless canceled. Early termination fees can apply to fixed-term contracts, capped at 30% of remaining payments in regions like under new regulations effective 2026. Streaming-based pay TV models emphasize flexibility, typically offering month-to-month subscriptions without long-term contracts, enabling easier cancellation amid heightened consumer demand for adaptability. Global variations in subscription models reflect local market dynamics and regulations, with tiered access common in developing regions to accommodate affordability. In , providers like offer basic sports packages starting at approximately ₹136 monthly, focusing on essential and regional matches to appeal to budget-conscious viewers. In the , anti-monopoly rules under prevent excessive fee structures by prohibiting dominant providers from abusing , as seen in fines against tech giants for restrictive practices that indirectly influence pay TV pricing. Key metrics highlight industry challenges, with annual churn rates in pay television averaging 15-25%, driven by cord-cutting and competition from free alternatives. Post-2020, subscription fees have risen 5-10% yearly on average, outpacing general rates of around 3-4% and attributed to rising content acquisition costs and operational expenses. These trends underscore the need for retention strategies, as subscription remains a core pillar of pay TV despite pricing pressures. Consumer protections emphasize billing transparency to safeguard subscribers, with the U.S. Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, as amended by the 2018 Television Viewer Protection Act, requiring clear disclosure of all fees and prohibiting charges for unrequested services. rules further mandate "all-in" pricing displays for cable and satellite bills, ensuring consumers see the total cost upfront without hidden add-ons.

Bundling and Tiers

Pay television providers structure their services into tiered packages to accommodate varying customer needs, balancing affordability with revenue maximization. Basic tiers generally encompass local broadcast channels, essential news networks, and limited entertainment options, often serving as an entry point for subscribers seeking core programming without extensive add-ons. Expanded tiers build upon this foundation by incorporating premium movie channels, sports networks, and additional entertainment, appealing to households desiring more diverse content. Since the , options have emerged as a flexible alternative, exemplified by Sling TV's model, which allows users to subscribe to individual channels or customizable packages, with Sling Orange and Blue starting at $45-46 per month, and a slim Sling Select option at around $20-25 per month. Cross-service bundling integrates pay television with complementary utilities such as high-speed and phone services, creating comprehensive packages that enhance . For instance, Comcast's offerings frequently combine TV tiers with and mobile plans, with total costs exceeding $100 per month for premium configurations that include access to over 200 channels alongside speeds up to 1 Gbps. In the streaming domain, add-on bundles like the Disney Bundle—encompassing , Disney+, and ESPN+—provide an economical entry at approximately $15 per month for ad-supported tiers, enabling seamless access across devices and appealing to families with multifaceted viewing habits. These bundles often reference basic subscription fees as a baseline, layering additional value without requiring separate payments for each service. Providers employ strategic tactics to promote higher-tier adoption and long-term loyalty, including default enrollment in expanded packages to facilitate and introductory promotions such as the first month free to lower . Personalization plays a key role, with AI-driven algorithms analyzing viewing patterns to recommend tailored bundles, thereby increasing engagement and reducing churn rates. However, these practices have drawn criticism for limiting through mandatory inclusions, prompting the development of "skinny bundles" as a compromise—smaller, lower-cost packages with 30-50 channels focused on popular genres, designed to address demands for greater flexibility amid trends. Antitrust concerns have intensified in the , with the FCC launching probes into relationships with local affiliates, such as those involving Comcast's arrangements with TV stations, to scrutinize potential anti-competitive effects on market access and pricing. By 2025, the pay television sector has seen a surge in super-bundles amid consolidation efforts, exemplified by ongoing integration talks between and , which could yield expansive packages merging , Max, Paramount+, and content at competitive rates around $21 per month. These developments aim to counter fragmentation in streaming while navigating regulatory scrutiny, fostering larger ecosystems that prioritize profitability through scaled subscriber bases.

Distribution Methods

Cable and Satellite

systems utilize and fiber-optic networks to distribute pay television signals from central headends to subscribers' homes, enabling the delivery of over 100 channels simultaneously. In the United States, major providers like and operate extensive infrastructures that pass approximately 100 million households combined, though actual video subscriptions for cable have declined to around 66 million as of mid-2025 due to trends. These networks aggregate programming at headends, where signals are modulated using (QAM) standards, such as 256-QAM, to encode efficiently over the physical cabling. Satellite delivery for pay television relies on geostationary orbiting at approximately 35,786 kilometers above the , with providers like employing a fleet positioned primarily at 101° West to beam signals across wide areas. Reception requires a parabolic dish antenna to capture the downlink and a for processing, making it particularly advantageous in rural and underserved regions where wired infrastructure is impractical; as of mid-2025, and Dish Network's satellite services together served about 16 million subscribers, many in such areas, following the abandonment of a proposed merger announced in 2024. Signals are modulated using Digital Video Broadcasting-Satellite (DVB-S) standards, typically with Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK), to ensure robust transmission over long distances. Both cable and satellite systems employ modules (CAMs), which integrate smart cards to decrypt encrypted content and enforce subscription controls, preventing unauthorized viewing. Deploying these infrastructures demands substantial capital expenditures, with cable buildouts costing hundreds to thousands of dollars per connection due to trenching, cabling, and installation, while systems involve lower per-subscriber upfront costs but require ongoing maintenance and operations. reception faces unique maintenance challenges, such as signal from heavy rain or snow—known as —which can temporarily disrupt service in affected areas. Since 2015, traditional pay TV via cable and has experienced a 25-30% subscriber decline in the , driven by the shift to streaming, prompting operators to invest in hybrid upgrades like IP gateways that blend legacy signals with delivery for enhanced flexibility.

Internet Protocol and Streaming

Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) delivers pay television content over internet connections using (IP) technology, distinguishing it from traditional broadcast methods by leveraging managed networks for transmission. In this system, video s are sent efficiently to multiple viewers simultaneously via , reducing bandwidth usage compared to delivery. For example, AT&T's U-verse service employs over its fiber-to-the-node network to provide live TV channels and on-demand content, ensuring reliable delivery within a controlled environment. To support high-definition (HD) viewing, IPTV typically requires a minimum speed of 5-10 Mbps per , though overall household connections often need 25 Mbps or more to accommodate multiple devices and services without buffering. Over-the-top (OTT) streaming represents a broader evolution of IP-based pay television, bypassing traditional cable infrastructure to deliver content directly via public to end-user devices. Platforms such as and exemplify OTT services, offering subscription-based access to movies, series, and live events through apps on various devices. These services utilize protocols like (HLS) developed by Apple and (DASH), a MPEG standard, to dynamically adjust video quality based on available bandwidth, ensuring smooth playback during network fluctuations. This approach encodes content at multiple bitrates and resolutions, allowing seamless switches—such as from HD to standard definition—without interrupting the viewer experience. Global adoption of OTT and IPTV has surged, with subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) subscriptions projected to exceed 1.8 billion worldwide by the end of 2025, driven by increasing penetration and affordable data plans. The region leads this growth, accounting for a significant portion of new subscribers due to rapid digital infrastructure expansion; for instance, in had approximately 101 million paid subscribers as of 2023, the last reported figure, fueled by localized content and mobile-first strategies. Technical requirements for these services include compatible devices like smart TVs, streaming sticks, and mobile apps, alongside stable broadband connections—HD streaming demands 5-10 Mbps, while requires at least 25 Mbps to maintain quality. Bandwidth challenges persist in rural or congested areas, often leading to buffering, and providers counter piracy through (DRM) systems like Google's , which encrypts content and verifies device integrity across browsers, Android devices, and OTT apps. Integration trends are blurring lines between IPTV and OTT, with hybrid applications now embedded in cable set-top boxes to combine linear TV with streaming services—for example, Comcast's X1 platform integrates and apps directly into its interface for unified access. Additionally, networks enhance mobile pay TV by providing ultra-low latency (under 10 ms) and speeds up to 10 Gbps, enabling high-quality on-the-go streaming of live events and personalized content without traditional dependency. These advancements support emerging use cases like overlays in sports broadcasts, further expanding pay television's reach on portable devices.

Pay-per-View

Pay-per-view (PPV) is a transactional model in pay television where viewers pay a one-time fee to access specific, often live, events such as sports matches or concerts, distinct from recurring subscriptions. This system enables broadcasters to monetize premium content by charging per event, typically ranging from $20 to $100, with access granted through cable, set-top boxes, or streaming platforms. Viewers order events via impulse pay systems, allowing direct selection from the TV menu using a on digital receivers, which confirms the purchase and unlocks the broadcast in real-time. Common applications of PPV include high-profile combat sports, where it drives significant viewership for exclusive bouts. In and (MMA), events like vs. in 2015 generated 4.6 million buys, exceeding $400 million in revenue, while vs. in 2017 achieved 4.3 million buys. UFC fights, such as vs. at , have also capitalized on this model for major paydays. , notably pay-per-views, historically relied on PPV for marquee shows, though integration with streaming services like has expanded access for boxing and MMA events. Concerts and special performances further utilize PPV for limited-time exclusivity. The for PPV emphasizes high per-view margins, with typical splits allocating 10% to the , 45% to the cable or provider, and 45% to the event promoter after costs. This structure benefits promoters through direct shares of gross receipts, often yielding substantial returns for blockbuster events; for instance, Mayweather's PPV bouts amassed over $1.6 billion in total revenue. Historical peaks occurred in the boxing era, exemplified by Mike in 1996, which sold 1.99 million units and underscored PPV's profitability for mega-fights during cable television's expansion. Technically, PPV employs (DRM) to secure content and enforce access controls, preventing unauthorized viewing through and license verification on set-top boxes or apps. For live events, access is time-bound to the broadcast duration, while on-demand replays may offer 24- to 48-hour windows post-event, ensuring revenue protection via automated revocation after expiration. As of 2025, traditional PPV has declined amid the shift to streaming bundles. has transitioned major events to subscription-inclusive models, with a deal announced in August 2025 making all premium live events available on platforms starting in 2026 without additional fees beyond the subscription. UFC major events remain on with an extra PPV fee beyond the base subscription, though discussions of further bundling continue, reducing standalone buys overall. However, niche sectors like show growth, with global viewership projected to exceed 640 million and services like incorporating PPV for premium fights, adapting the model to digital delivery.

Free-to-View

Free-to-view (FTV) television refers to broadcast services that are often encrypted but accessible without any ongoing subscription fees, typically requiring only basic reception equipment such as a or digital tuner, in contrast to fully unencrypted (FTA) signals. These services provide a selection of channels, including broadcasters, shopping networks, and religious programming, that can be received using standard set-top boxes without the need for a paid decoder to unlock premium content. Prominent examples include Freesat in the United Kingdom, which delivers over 100 channels via satellite with no monthly fees after initial setup, encompassing a mix of entertainment, news, and lifestyle content. In Australia, Freeview offers more than 30 free-to-air channels through digital terrestrial broadcasting, including major networks like ABC, SBS, Seven, Nine, and Ten, all accessible via an antenna without subscription costs. In the United States, there is no direct equivalent to structured FTV services like Freesat, as free television is primarily accessed via unencrypted over-the-air (OTA) broadcasts or FTA satellite channels using antennas or larger dishes; examples include NASA TV, Retro TV, and various PBS affiliates, providing educational, classic, and public service programming. FTV services typically feature fewer channels—often 20 to 50 compared to over 200 in full pay TV packages—and lack comprehensive on-demand or interactive features, relying instead on linear schedules. Content within these tiers is generally ad-supported, with commercial breaks funding the free access model, though this can result in more frequent interruptions than in subscription-based services. These options appeal particularly to cord-cutters and low-income households seeking alternatives to expensive pay TV, with upfront setup costs ranging from $50 to $200 for antennas, dishes, or compatible receivers, but zero recurring fees thereafter. In the , for instance, nearly 23 million households (as of 2023) use over-the-air antennas for TV access, highlighting the appeal for budget-conscious viewers. Amid declining pay TV subscriptions, FTV and services have seen growth, with pay TV households dropping to 58 million in 2023 as more consumers shift to free options. Worldwide, direct-to-home TV penetration is projected to expand, driven by trends and the appeal of no-cost access.

Over-the-Air Subscription Television

Over-the-air subscription television (STV), also known as broadcast pay television, delivers premium programming via scrambled terrestrial signals broadcast over the airwaves, typically in the ultra-high frequency (UHF) band. Subscribers access the content using a set-top decoder box that descrambles the signal upon payment of a recurring , distinguishing it from broadcasting and wired distribution methods like cable. The Federal Communications Commission's Fourth Report and Order in 1968 authorized STV services across the , effective from 1969, following years of regulatory debate over potential impacts on free television. Commercial launches followed in the early , with services offering uncut movies, sports events, and specials not available on broadcast networks. Notable examples include ON TV, which began operations in 1977 in markets such as and , charging subscribers approximately $10–20 monthly and peaking at around 700,000 users by the early 1980s. Other systems, like SelecTV and Preview, operated in various U.S. cities until the mid-1980s. Internationally, similar services emerged, such as Teleglobe in starting in 1972. Technically, STV systems scrambled the video and audio signals at the transmitter using methods such as gated-sync suppression, carrier inversion, or polarization shifting to render the broadcast unwatchable without decoding. The decoder, often rented from the , synchronized with the signal to restore clarity, with authorization managed monthly or per event via lines or manual keys. These systems leveraged existing broadcast infrastructure, avoiding the need for physical cabling. By the late 1980s, STV largely declined due to competition from expanding cable networks, , and cassette recorders, which offered greater channel variety and flexibility. Most U.S. services, including ON TV, ceased by 1989, though isolated operations persisted briefly into the 1990s. As of November 2025, over-the-air STV remains obsolete in major markets, overshadowed by internet-based streaming services.

References

  1. https://www.symphonyai.com/glossary/media/pay-tv/
  2. https://www.fcc.gov/media/engineering/cable-television
  3. https://www.thehenryford.org/explore/blog/phonevision-the-forgotten-story-of-how-pay-tv-began
  4. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3776&context=uclrev
  5. https://textbooks.whatcom.edu/mediaandculture/chapter/9-1-the-evolution-of-television/
  6. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1070&context=klj
  7. https://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RURA/Documents/Sectors/ICT/Statistics/Quarterly_publication/ICT_Sector_Statistics_Report_of_as_the_Fourth_Quarter_of_the_Year_2024_.pdf
  8. https://www.newtimes.co.rw/article/27485/news/technology/can-pay-tv-survive-the-streaming-onslaught
  9. https://com.miami.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/mma_2017_firstplace.pdf
  10. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5792947/pay-tv-market-report
  11. https://www.cablecompare.com/blog/us-cable-subscriber-statistics
  12. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/pay-television
  13. https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/pay-tv
  14. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-pay-tv-services-uses-how-works-top-lsjjf/
  15. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/drm-and-the-challenge-of-securing-content
  16. https://sqmagazine.co.uk/streaming-statistics/
  17. https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2024/apr/europe-video-subscription-boom.html
  18. https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/CITI/Articles/978-0-387-79978-0_15.pdf
  19. https://www.smecc.org/the_pay-tv_issue.htm
  20. https://www.nytimes.com/1960/04/01/archives/hartford-paytv-test-planned-by-zenith-and-rko-general.html
  21. https://news.gallup.com/vault/190079/gallup-vault-birth-pay-television.aspx
  22. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/film/pay-television
  23. https://cordcuttersnews.com/53-years-ago-today-hbo-first-launched-changing-cable-tv-for-ever/
  24. https://www.scienceandmediamuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/sky-wars-satellite-broadcasting
  25. https://www.intelsat.com/intelsat-history/
  26. https://www.directv.com/insider/corporate/company/
  27. https://www.skygroup.sky/about/our-company/history
  28. https://www.multichoice.com/our-history.php
  29. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/060815/how-netflix-changing-tv-industry.asp
  30. https://www.statista.com/topics/4527/cord-cutting/
  31. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/parks-nearly-half-of-all-u-s-internet-households-are-now-cord-cutters
  32. https://thedesk.net/2025/11/madison-wall-analyst-cord-cutting-pay-tv-penetration/
  33. https://www.sportspro.com/news/canal-plus-multichoice-supersport-takeover-approved-africa-september-2025/
  34. https://www.npr.org/2024/09/06/g-s1-21051/celebrating-25-years-of-the-sopranos-the-series-that-changed-tv
  35. https://tv.youtube.com/learn/nflsundayticket/
  36. https://www.directv.com/international/
  37. https://www.3vision.tv/news-insights/studios-keep-selling-movies-after-vertically-integrated-pay-one
  38. https://espnpressroom.com/us/press-releases/2025/08/espn-launches-new-direct-to-consumer-service-enhanced-espn-app/
  39. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1249573/most-expensive-netflix-original-series-production-cost-per-episode/
  40. https://www.mediaplaynews.com/ampere-streaming-algorithms-power-tv-movie-content-selection/
  41. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2019/11/14/disney-plus-apple-tv-plus-streaming-wars-ruining-tv/2516655001/
  42. https://www.precedenceresearch.com/pay-tv-market
  43. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095077/hulu-average-revenue-per-subscriber-us/
  44. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/u-s-pay-tv-revenue-to-drop-to-56-billion-in-2025-study-4074396/
  45. https://www.indexbox.io/blog/us-pay-tv-penetration-drops-below-50-in-2025/
  46. https://cordcuttersnews.com/cable-tv-costs-soar-average-customer-pays-over-100-a-month-many-pay-over-150-a-month-just-for-tv-in-2025/
  47. https://www.cablecompare.com/blog/cable-tv-vs-streaming-costs
  48. https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/hbo-max-prices-increases-plans-2025-1236557671/
  49. https://help.hbomax.com/US/Answer/Detail/000002547
  50. https://calawyers.org/business-law/california-introduced-new-regulations-on-early-termination-fees-in-fixed-term-installment-contracts/
  51. https://www.pearlcohen.com/important-developments-in-subscription-auto-renewal-rules-across-the-u-s/
  52. https://www.gadgets360.com/dth-recharge-plans/tata-play-sports-99551
  53. https://www.promarket.org/2025/06/18/eu-and-us-antitrust-is-converging-on-anti-monopoly/
  54. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/06/30/2023-13971/all-in-pricing-for-cable-and-satellite-television-service
  55. https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2024/3/klobuchar-statement-following-fcc-vote-to-require-cable-and-satellite-tv-pricing-transparency
  56. https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/streaming/best-live-tv-streaming-services
  57. https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/best-live-tv-streaming-service-for-cord-cutters/
  58. https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics-computers/streaming-media/guide-to-streaming-video-services-a4517732799/
  59. https://www.cabletv.com/blog/streaming-bundles
  60. https://deloitte.wsj.com/cmo/driven-to-tiers-streaming-services-aim-to-increase-profitability-with-viewers-240be535
  61. https://cordcutting.com/blog/what-is-a-skinny-bundle/
  62. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/30/fcc-probes-comcast-relationships-with-tv-affiliates.html
  63. https://observer.com/2025/11/paramount-warner-bro-potential-merger-streaming-impact/
  64. https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/paramount-plans-keep-warner-bros-largely-intact-after-merger-bloomberg-news-2025-10-28/
  65. https://www.barrons.com/articles/cable-tv-streaming-competition-stocks-01f6939e?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqexswIeoy0Tbx6Rf3EsnRC21iwfgD6zbL73UDXBSgj56UAjmQtw_J99&gaa_ts=690fb32c&gaa_sig=YShYN6gCGM_ttFMl_HLcc-mUChn2fXrLajMcAUY9-BkMQVaz2WiOBcPe-Fm8f5D3DVtU3a8inj1cZ9SkYW_CoA%253D%253D
  66. https://thorbroadcast.com/t/qam-modulator
  67. https://blog.solidsignal.com/tutorials/directv-uses-one-satellite-fleet-dish-uses-two-why-is-that/
  68. https://www.streamtvinsider.com/video/dish-loses-253k-pay-tv-subscribers-plans-integrate-video-other-services
  69. https://www.videostrong.com/news-show/dvb-digital-tv-systems
  70. https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bt/R-REC-BT.1852-1-201701-I%21%21PDF-E.pdf
  71. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300429/01.02.01_40/en_300429v010201o.pdf
  72. https://aerialman.com/2022/01/08/effects-of-rain-on-satellite-tv-signals/
  73. https://techjury.net/industry-analysis/cable-tv-subscribers/
  74. https://www.lightreading.com/cable-technology/huh-charter-loses-more-broadband-subs-than-video-subs-in-q3
  75. https://www.att.com/Common/about_us/files/pdf/IPTV_background.pdf
  76. https://www.theiptvguide.com/iptv-bandwidth-requirements/
  77. https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/video/what-is-mpeg-dash/
  78. https://ottverse.com/hls-vs-mpeg-dash-video-streaming/
  79. https://www.streamingmediaglobal.com/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/Streaming-Year-in-Review-2025-Online-Video-Is-Now-an-Advertising-Led-Business-168635.aspx
  80. https://www.widevine.com/solutions/widevine-drm
  81. https://www.gumlet.com/learn/widevine-drm/
  82. https://www.xfinity.com/support/articles/x1-flex-paid-movies-apps
  83. https://www.harmonicinc.com/insights/blog/mobile-streaming/
  84. https://promwad.com/news/5g-tv-streaming-future
  85. https://www.vplayed.com/blog/what-is-pay-per-view/
  86. https://www.muvi.com/wiki/pay-per-view-ppv/
  87. https://www.itvdictionary.com/definitions/impulse_pay-per-view_ippv_definition.html
  88. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4755872A/en
  89. https://www.givemesport.com/biggest-earning-boxing-ppvs-in-history-ranked/
  90. https://www.tapology.com/search/mma-event-figures/ppv-pay-per-view-buys-buyrate
  91. https://dazngroup.com/press-room/dazn-revolutionises-pay-per-view-model-with-ultimate-pricing-plan-that-includes-pay-per-view-events/
  92. https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/business-of-boxing-how-does-the-pay-per-view-deal-work/
  93. https://www.apostlesportsmedia.com/2025/05/05/the-business-behind-boxing-ppv-who-really-gets-the-money/
  94. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-57-best-selling-pay-per-view-fight-nights-in-us-history
  95. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-aopacndyibvi2
  96. https://castr.com/blog/digital-rights-management-drm/
  97. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/wmformat/live-drm
  98. https://espnpressroom.com/us/press-releases/2025/08/espn-wwe-reach-landmark-rights-agreement-as-espn-platforms-become-exclusive-u-s-domestic-home-of-all-wwe-premium-live-events-including-wrestlemania-starting-in-2026/
  99. https://www.demandsage.com/esports-statistics/
  100. https://media.sportbusiness.com/news/dazn-puts-boxings-ppv-model-on-the-ropes/
  101. https://www.aerialforce.co.uk/free-to-air-vs-free-to-view-whats-the-difference/
  102. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/factsheets/ebu_tech_fs_fta_for_psm.pdf
  103. https://www.freesat.co.uk/
  104. https://www.freeview.com.au/
  105. https://www.nab.org/documents/resources/cband/default.asp
  106. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/uncategorised/7953-700mhz/associated-documents/secondary-documents/future-of-free-to-view-tv.pdf
  107. https://www.nielsen.com/insights/2024/beyond-big-data-the-audience-watching-over-the-air/
  108. https://www.statista.com/topics/1309/pay-tv/
  109. https://www.statista.com/statistics/268721/fta-dth-tv-penetration-rate-worldwide/
  110. https://medium.com/@madmedic11671/the-story-of-over-the-air-subscription-tv-ebe675d0eff7
  111. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3788&context=clr
  112. https://wearethemutants.com/2019/09/24/great-movies-no-cables-on-tv-subscription-television-1977-1985/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.