Hubbry Logo
State Armed Police ForcesState Armed Police ForcesMain
Open search
State Armed Police Forces
Community hub
State Armed Police Forces
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
State Armed Police Forces
State Armed Police Forces
State Armed Police Forces
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The State Armed Police Forces of India are the police units established for dealing with serious law and order situations requiring a higher level of armed expertise than normal. The State Armed Police Forces exist in addition to the ordinary police services of the various states.

The various States have different titles for their armed police units. In addition to the general term "Armed Police", other titles in different states include Special Armed Police, Armed Constabulary, Provincial Armed Constabulary and State Military Police. Although the titles are different, their organisation, weapons, equipment and tasks are broadly the same. The central government of India now refers to these forces nationwide as the State Armed Police Forces and discourages use of the term "paramilitary". However, this terminology does not necessarily coincide with the existing terminology of the states of India; For example, the state of Bihar calls its state armed police force "Military Police", which clashes with central government definitions of "military" and "paramilitary". It is not yet clear whether such discrepancies will be resolved.

The State Armed Police act as a mobile armed reserve activated only on the orders from the Deputy inspector general of police or above. They are not usually in contact with the public except during public events, civil unrest, and natural disasters. They maintain key guard posts and participate in antiterrorist operations. Depending on the type of assignment, they may be or may not be carrying firearms.

Within states, each police district may maintain its own teams of policemen with higher firearms competence. Such teams, known as "District Armed Police or District Armed Reserve", are for purely local use led by commandant or deputy commandant, functions under the respective district police chiefs.

The State Armed Police Forces are headed by an Additional Director General of Police, who is the controlling authority and assisted by Inspectors General of police, Deputy Inspectors general of police, with the overall control of Director General of Police & State Police Chief. The SAPFs are typically organized into battalions or companies, each battalion is commanded by a "Commandant" of the rank of Superintendent of Police. The commandant is assisted by deputy commandants and assistant commandants. The structure of SAPFs are vary from state to state. The normal structure is given below;

Structure of State Armed Police Forces[1]

[edit]

The Armed Police battalions in the State will be led by an officer holding the rank of Additional Director General of Police. This officer will be responsible for the administration, training, operational preparedness, and welfare of personnel across all armed police units in the State. They will operate under the overall guidance and supervision of the Director General of Police.

A Commandant, equivalent in rank to Superintendent of Police, shall head each Armed Police Battalion. The Commandant may be assisted by a Second-in-Command also known as Deputy Commandant, equivalent in rank to Additional Superintendent of Police. Each Battalion may be divided into appropriate number of Companies and a Headquarters Company, each of which will be headed by an Assistant Commandant, equivalent in rank to Deputy Superintendent of Police.

Hierarchy of State Armed Police Forces

[edit]
  • Additional Director General of Police
  • Inspector General of Police
  • Deputy Inspector General of Police
  • Commandant (equivalent to the rank of SP)
  • Deputy Commandant/Second-in command (equivalent to the rank of Addl.SP)
  • Assistant Commandant (equivalent to the rank of DySP)
  • Armed Police Inspector
  • Armed Police Sub Inspector
  • Armed Police Assistant Sub Inspector
  • Havildar/Head constable
  • Armed Police Constable

Functions and duties

[edit]
  • To assist the district police in maintenance of law and order.
  • To guard vulnerable points and vital installations.
  • VIP security: to provide escorts, static guards, and gunmen to threatened persons.
  • To perform bank security duties.
  • To perform elections, law and order duties in other states.
  • To provide force for duties such as celebration of festivals/fairs and special operations against anti-social/terrorist elements.
  • Disaster management - natural & manmade.
  • To perform out of state duty whenever desired by the government.

Bihar Special Armed Police

[edit]

The Bihar Special Armed Police is the state armed police force for the Bihar Police with headquarters at Patna led by CAPFs officer on deputation. It is frequently involved in clashes with Maoist rebels. The force has been expanded since 2006 to deal with the Maoist insurgency. It has 16 Battalions with approximately 1,000 personnel in each, from BSAP 1 to BSAP 16.

BSAP1 Gorkha Battalion is a Reserved Battalion mainly compromising of Indian domiciled Gorkhas. They are used for high level security duties, protecting the governor and others. Its headquarters is in Patna with nearly 1,500 serving personnel. BSAP 16 is a battalion recruiting only retired Indian Army soldiers.

Chhattisgarh Armed Police

[edit]
  • District Reserve Guard was formed by recruiting local tribal boys to counter the Naxals.[4][5]
    • Danteshwari Ladake, women commando unit of District Reserve Guard.[6][7]
    • Bastar Fighter Force.[8]

Haryana Armed Police

[edit]

Haryana Armed Police, headquartered at Madhuban, is the state armed police force of Haryana Police for Haryana state. It has five battalions, each with a sanctioned strength of 903 headcount. Three battalions are based at Madhuban, one in Ambala and one in Hisar. On 1 November 1966, six armed battalions were transferred to Haryana from Punjab, four were absorbed into Border Security Force and Central Reserve Police Force, and two remained with Haryana. The Haryana Armed Police includes the State Police Band.[9]

  • 1st Battalion Haryana Armed Police, Ambala, transferred to Haryana in 1966 at the time of formation of Haryana.[9]
  • 2nd Battalion Haryana Armed Police, Madhuban, transferred in 1966.[9]
  • 3rd Battalion Haryana Armed Police, Hisar, raised in 1969.[9]
  • 4th Battalion Haryana Armed Police, Madhuban, raised on 14 Sept 1973, includes Mounted Armed Police (90 headcount).[9]
  • 5th Battalion Haryana Armed Police, Madhuban.

Jharkhand Armed Police

[edit]

Jharkhand Armed Police was created to counter Naxalism in the state led by IPS officer on deputation.[10]

Karnataka State Reserve Police

[edit]

In Karnataka, the state armed police of wing of Karnataka Police trace their origins to the erstwhile Mysore State Imperial Service led by CAPF officers on deputation.

The armed police of Karnataka are led by CAPFs officer on deputation:

  • District Armed Reserve for each district
  • City Armed Reserve in the four commissionerates in the State namely Bengaluru, Mysuru, Mangaluru and Hubli-Dharwad
  • Special Task Force
  • Karnataka Armed Reserve Mounted Police - headquarters at Mysuru
  • Coastal Security Police
  • Government Railway Police

The Karnataka State Reserve Police is headed by an officer of the rank of additional director general of police, who is assisted by an inspector general and two deputy inspectors general of police at the police headquarters. The Karnataka State Reserve Police consists of 10 battalions. Four Battalions have their headquarters at Bengaluru and one each at Mysuru, Belagavi, Kalaburgi, Mangaluru, Shivamogga and Shiggoan.

Training Schools:

  • Karnataka State Reserve Police Training School, Munirabad.
  • Armed Police Training School, Bengaluru.

The Coastal Security Police was established in the year 1999. The wing is headed by an officer of the rank of Inspector General of Police, followed by Superintendent of Police & other staff. The CSP exercises jurisdiction over the territorial coastal waters of Karnataka from Talapady in Dakshina Kannada District to Sadashivgad in Uttara Kannada District covering about 320 km.

Kerala Armed Police

[edit]

In Kerala, the Kerala Armed Police trace their origins to the early stages of the Kerala Police. Armed police battalions act as a reserve force for deployment whenever and wherever the District Police is short of manpower in maintaining law and order. There are 11 battalions spread over the state, with a combined strength of 6,755 personnel.[11]

The armed police battalions of Kerala are:

  • Malabar Special Police (MSP)
  • Kerala Armed Police Battalions (KAP) (numbered I to V)
  • Special Armed Police (SAP)
  • Rapid Response and Rescue Force (RRRF)
  • Kerala Armed Women Police Battalion
  • India Reserve Battalion (IRBn)
  • State Industrial Security Force (SISF)

The "Additional Director General of Police, Armed Police Battalions", is the controlling authority who is assisted by the "Deputy Inspector General of Police, Armed Police Battalions". Each Battalion is under the control of a "Commandant" with the rank of Superintendent of Police.

The Special Armed Police was formed in 1955 by the then Travancore-Cochin government with its headquarters at Thiruvananthapuram. Besides law and order duties in the southern range, Special Armed Police personnel are assigned to guard duties at the Raj Bhavan (Governor's House), Police Headquarters, etc. For the welfare of their personnel, the special armed police have a canteen, a gymnasium, a hospital with lab facilities and a nursery school. At present this battalion has a strength of seven companies.

Madhya Pradesh Special Armed Police

[edit]

The main objective of Madhya Pradesh Special Armed Police, the state armed wing of Madhya Pradesh Police, is to maintain Law and Order in the state of Madhya Pradesh led by CAPFs officers on deputation. The responsibility of this Special Armed Force to look after the law and arrangement and also to control the areas affected by Naxalites, Social Courtesies, removal of bandits. They are active in Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab and in the States of South in an anti-terrorism role. Other than this they are deployed in the event of natural disasters.

Mizoram Armed Police

[edit]

The Mizoram Armed Police, is the state armed police wing of Mizoram Police in Mizoram. It consist of three battalions with five Indian Reserve Battalion. All these components make up the Mizoram Armed Police. Each battalion is commanded by a Commandant of rank Superintendent of Police / Deputy Commissioner of Police / Commandant. Each battalion also has a special commando/SWAT unit.

Odisha Special Armed Police

[edit]

Odisha's state armed police are called the Odisha Special Armed Police. They were formed in 1946 as the Odisha Military Police, and the current name was adopted in 1980. There are currently 8 regular battalions and one reserve battalion. The headquarters of the SAP is at state Police Headquarters in Cuttack. The force is under the general control and direction of the Director General and the Inspector General of Police.

The Odisha Military Police was formed on 1 March 1946 by the Odisha Military Police Act (Odisha Act VII of 1946). Soon after its creation this force had to handle serious situations in places like Bhadrak, Ib, Barang, Rampur, Cuttack etc. Due to strenuous nature of work of the military police and need for more personnel its strength was increased in 1947 and 1948. The strength was further increased with the formation of a Gurkha Military Police unit. On 1 March 1948, after a merging of 27 princely states into the Province of Odisha, there was a re-organisation of the police organisation and the 2nd Battalion of the Odisha Military police was established. This battalion had both Gurkha and Odia companies. While the battalion headquarters was at Dhenkanal, two detachments of this battalion were stationed at Nayagarh and Jharsuguda. Subsequently, other battalions were formed in different parts of the state.

SOG (Special Operations Group) is the Specialist element of the Odisha Police. The SOG was formed in August 2004 on the orders of the Government of Odisha Home office with the objective of neutralising any terrorist, insurgent, extremist or illegal armed groups operating in Odisha. The SOG originally had 462 regular active posts which by 2009 had grown to 1,370 personnel. It does not recruit personnel directly, instead personnel are drawn from various state police units and the assignments are based on tenures with a maximum period of 3 years. It also allows hiring of operatives from the armed forces, central paramilitary forces and police units of other states. Operatives receive training at a special school in Chandaka and also from the Indian army based in Jabalpur. The main role of the SOG is counter-insurgency operations but handling hostage situations and hijackings also come under its responsibility. It works closely with the Special Intelligence Wing of the Odisha Police.

Punjab Armed Police

[edit]

The Punjab Armed Police is the state armed police wing of Punjab Police. PAP have their headquarters at Jalandhar in Punjab. This is where armed policemen of the Punjab are trained. Before the Border Security Force came into existence, PAP used to protect the most sensitive border of the country common with Pakistan. PAP Jawans have a number of international players in hockey, weight lifting, volleyball, kabaddi, etc. The campus is in a huge area and is complete in itself in the areas of housing, sports grounds, training equipment, halls, schools, hospital, swimming pool etc.

The operational PAP units are:

  • 7th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Jalandhar Cantt
  • 9th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Amritsar
  • 13th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Chandigarh
  • 27th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Jalandhar Cantt
  • 36th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Bahadurgarh, Patiala
  • 75th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Jalandhar Cantt
  • 80th Battalion, headquartered at PAP Jalandhar Cantt
  • 82nd Battalion, headquartered at PAP Chandigarh

Rajasthan Armed Constabulary

[edit]

The Rajasthan Armed Constabulary is the state armed police wing of Rajasthan Police in Rajasthan. Soon after the independence, the law and order situation along the newly formed 1070 km India-Pakistan border became a serious problem. Incursions and cattle lifting by Pakistani raiders was a regular feature and it became imperative to put an end to it. In 1949–50, the duty of guarding the border was assigned to the joint forces of the Central Reserve Police Force and the Provincial Armed Constabulary, which continued until 1952.

In 1952, the Government of Rajasthan decided to raise a temporary special force that could not only be deployed along the border but also assist the civil police in combating the armed banditry known as "dacoity". The first headquarters and training centre was established at Bharatpur in 1952 and five battalions were raised from ex-soldiers, police, and from other sources outside Rajasthan. Each battalion consisted of six mobile companies and one company remained at the battalion headquarters. These battalions were then dispatched to the border areas of Sriganganagar, Raisinghnagar, Barmer, and Jaisalmer. One unit was stationed at Ghat Gate, Jaipur to combat dacoity.

Within a year of its inception, the RAC proved its worth both on the border and within the State by successfully carrying out its various duties. The members of RAC displayed gallantry and a high sense of morale on occasions that required courage, perseverance, and devotion to duty. Its men battled against all odds, combating not only the enemy but also facing the rigours of the desert areas devoid even of the bare necessities of life.

The RAC continued as a temporary force until 1958, thereafter it was made permanent. In 1962, two companies were drawn from each unit, and the 6th Battalion was formed. From that year up to the late 1970s, more battalions of RAC were raised as demanded by the situation. India saw two wars with Pakistan and one with China and there was unrest in Jammu and Kashmir, NEFA, as well as Mizoram. RAC battalions were dispatched to these sensitive areas and earned accolades for their courage and efficiency. Later, seven of these RAC battalions were merged into the Indian Border Security Force and two into the Central Reserve Police Force.

The RAC has formed various specialist units along with its regular battalions.

In 1998, a Special Task Force, along the lines of the Rapid Action Force of C.R.P.F., was formed to maintain peace in the sensitive districts of Rajasthan. These companies are trained and fully equipped to handle mass riots.

The training imparted to the select RAC companies is decided as per requirements. There are 3 companies of RAC, which have drawn expert swimmers from various R.A.C. battalions and are being trained for flood relief work.

There are currently fifteen battalions of RAC including one special battalion formed of only female Constables called the Hadi Rani Mahila Battalion and one further battalion of MBC held as the States para-military force. Out of the 14 regular battalions of RAC, 11 battalions are deployed in Rajasthan while 3 are deployed to Delhi.

All units

[edit]
  • First Battalion-Jodhpur
  • Second Battalion- Kota
  • Third Battalion-Bikaner
  • Fourth Battalion-Jaipur
  • Fifth Battalion-Jaipur
  • Sixth Battalion-Dholpur
  • Seventh Battalion-Bharatpur
  • Eighth Battalion-Delhi
  • Ninth Battalion-Tonk
  • Tenth Battalion-Bikaner
  • Eleventh Battalion-Delhi
  • Twelfth Battalion-Delhi
  • Thirteenth Battalion-Jail Security
  • Fourteenth Battalion-Bharatpur

Special battalions

[edit]
  • Hadi Rani Mahila Ballation-Ajmer
  • Mewar Bhil Corps-Khairwara
  • State Disaster Response Force-Nareli, Ajmer
  • Mewar Bhil Corps II-Banswara
  • Maharana pratap battalion-Pratapgarh

Uttar Pradesh Provincial Armed Constabulary

[edit]
Main article: Uttar Pradesh Provincial Armed Constabulary

In Uttar Pradesh, the Provincial Armed Constabulary or Pradeshik Armed Constabulary is an armed reserve force maintained at key locations across the state and active only on orders from the deputy inspector general and higher-level authorities.[12] UPPAC consists of several battalions located in different cities across the state as a wing of Uttar Pradesh Police. Each battalion has seven to eight companies consisting of 150 to 200 Jawans headed by Commandant. It is usually assigned to VIP protection duties or to maintain order and assist during fairs, festivals, athletic events, elections, and natural disasters. They are also deployed to quell outbreaks of student or labor unrest, organized crime, and communal riots; to maintain key guard posts; and to participate in anti-terrorist operations. The Provincial Armed Constabulary usually carries only lathis and Light Machine Gun. The UPPAC is headed by the Director General Provincial Armed Constabulary. UPPAC was established in 1952 before that it was known as the United Provinces Military Force or Uttar Pradesh Military Force. In the Year 1952 UPPAC came into existence with its current name. UPPAC has pretty good firepower in terms of weapons or strength. In UP there are Three zones of the UPPAC. Western Zone, Central Zone, and Eastern Zone. Each Zone Headed by ADG/IG.

there are almost 30-35 Battalion in UP. in different locations.[13][14]

Uttarakhand Provincial Armed Constabulary

[edit]

The Uttarakhand Provincial Armed Constabulary, the state armed police wing of Uttarakhand Police was created in 2001, after the bifurcation of the state of Uttar Pradesh in 2000 that resulted in the formation of new state Uttarakhand.

In 1962–73, four new battalions of UPPAC were raised from the Garhwali and Kumaoni community. Apart from that, The 46th Battalion called the Task Force existed till 1998, with the special task to fight Dacoits and Insurgents. On achieving its goal, it was again converted to normal PAC Battalion, presently located at Rudrapur.

West Bengal Armed Police Forces

[edit]

The state of West Bengal has the most extensive armed police organisation and structure in the country. Unlike other states of India, the state of West Bengal has two separate police jurisdictions, that of the West Bengal Police, and that of the Kolkata Police Force. It therefore has two separate state armed police structures, one for each jurisdiction.

Special forces of West Bengal are:

Eastern Frontier Rifles

[edit]
Main article: Eastern Frontier Rifles

The Eastern Frontier Rifles is one of the state armed police force for the West Bengal Police, the other being the West Bengal Armed Police. (i.e. as opposed to the police in Kolkata).

History

[edit]

The Eastern Frontier Rifles were founded as the Frontier Protection Force by the East India Company at some point in the second half of the 18th century, and have had their current title since 1920. The Eastern Frontier Rifles fought in the Second World War, and, as the Bengal Military Police, in the First World War.

  • 18th century: Founded as Frontier Protection Force.
  • 1795: Renamed Ramgarh Local Battalion
  • 1861: Renamed Frontier Guards
  • 1891: Renamed Bengal Military Police, modernised, & given up-to-date weaponry (NB: An unrelated unit had previously used the same title)
  • 1920: Reorganised and renamed Eastern Frontier Rifles
  • 1947: The force was split between the Indian state of West Bengal, and Pakistan. The Pakistani part became the East Pakistan Rifles, which became the Bangladesh Rifles when Bangladesh became independent, and Border Guards Bangladesh in 2010. The West Bengal part retained its title of Eastern Frontier Rifles.

Recent events

[edit]

Many contingents of the Eastern Frontier Rifles are kept deployed in various disturbed areas of the state. However, in recent years the force has been used for day-to-day law and order duties. Their headquarters is at Salua, near Kharagpur.

Like the armed police forces of many states, the Eastern Frontier Rifles are currently challenged with the Naxalite insurgency. In February 2010 an Eastern Frontier Rifles camp called Silda was attacked and burnt down by Maoist rebels, resulting in 24 riflemen killed out of a detachment of about fifty. This resulted in condemnation of the state government by the unit's Special Inspector General, Benoy Chakraborty, who claimed his force was "mis-used" and "ill-treated". Morale in the force is believed to be low.[15]

Kolkata Armed Police

[edit]

The Kolkata Armed Police are West Bengal's state armed police force for operations in Kolkata. It is part of the Kolkata Police Force and consists of eight battalions, and three special units. The special units are the Rapid Action Force, the Special Action Force (approx. 160 members) and the Commando Force (approximately 200 members) and also have Combat Force.

Firearms

[edit]

The Indian Ordnance Factories controlled by the Ordnance Factories Board, Ministry of Defence, Government of India are the sole suppliers of firearms to all the State Armed Police Forces.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

State Armed Police Forces

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
State Armed Police Forces are the militarized of India's state-level police organizations, distinct from unarmed civil police and structured as battalions equipped with firearms for rapid deployment in scenarios exceeding routine , including suppression, industrial disputes, and internal security duties. These forces operate under state ministries, functioning as mobile reserves to bolster district-level policing when civil authorities require armed support to restore order or protect vital . Organized into battalions typically numbering 800 to 1,000 personnel each, State Armed Police Forces emphasize tactical in crowd control, cordon-and-search operations, and limited counter-insurgency roles, with a nationwide total exceeding 300 such units as documented in early assessments. Their evolution stems from post-independence restructuring of colonial-era armed police legacies, with dedicated battalions formed starting in 1947-1948 across states like and to address and regional unrest without over-relying on central assets. Provisions under acts like the State Armed Police Forces (Extension of Laws) Act enable inter-state deployments, enhancing their utility in federal responses to threats such as left-wing extremism. Key characteristics include their hybrid civil-military posture, which has enabled effective containment of civil disturbances and election security but has also prompted debates on over-militarization, with reports highlighting risks of excessive force in high-tension operations. Achievements encompass sustained contributions to internal stability, such as deployments against insurgency in regions like and ongoing support in zones, underscoring their role as a cost-effective alternative to central armed forces for state-specific threats.

History

Colonial Foundations and Early Development

The British colonial administration in India established armed police constabularies modeled on the Irish Constabulary system, which prioritized militarized control over potentially rebellious populations in foreign territories. These units were semi-military in organization, housed in barracks, and equipped with firearms to enforce order amid riots, famine-induced disturbances, and tribal uprisings on peripheral frontiers. Unlike civilian metropolitan policing, this approach treated indigenous society as inherently disorderly, necessitating armed reserves to suppress challenges to authority without reliance on deployments. The underscored the fragility of prior policing arrangements, as local forces proved unreliable or complicit in the uprising, prompting a reevaluation of internal security mechanisms. In its aftermath, the Indian Police Act of 1861 restructured provincial police into disciplined hierarchies with integrated armed wings, empowering them to handle civil disturbances and frontier threats independently. This legislation, informed by the Police Commission of 1860, expanded armed reserves across provinces to deter mutinies and maintain stability, shifting from ad hoc responses to institutionalized militarization. Provincial examples illustrate these foundations: in , following in 1849, armed police elements were incorporated into frontier defenses to counter Afghan border incursions, riots, and scarcity-driven unrest, forming enduring reserves for regional control. Similarly, in the northeast, units like the precursors to the —initially raised as the Bengal Military Police in the late —served as border guards against tribal raids, protecting colonial economic interests such as plantations while quelling local resistance. These formations emphasized rapid deployment and firepower to preserve administrative dominance without escalating to full military intervention.

Post-Independence Expansion and Reforms

Following in 1947, the integration of police forces into the new state frameworks addressed security gaps exacerbated by partition-related , which displaced over 14 million people and resulted in an estimated 1-2 million deaths. ' armed constabularies, previously operating under local rulers, were merged into provincial units through legislative adaptations, such as the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary Act of 1950, which formalized a unified armed force for the newly consolidated state comprising former princely territories. Similarly, the Uttar Pradesh Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Act of 1948 was modified via the Adaptation of Laws Order in 1950 to incorporate personnel and structures from integrated regions, enhancing state-level armed reserves for rapid response to internal disorders. The State Armed Police Forces (Extension of Laws) Act of 1952 further standardized disciplinary measures across states' armed units, facilitating amid the absorption of over 560 princely entities by the early 1950s. The 1956 States Reorganisation Act, which redrew boundaries along linguistic lines to form 14 states and 6 union territories, necessitated expansions in state armed police to maintain order during transitions and address localized unrest, including riots in Telugu and Tamil-speaking areas. This was compounded by the emergence of Naxalite insurgencies starting with the 1967 in , prompting states like , , and to augment armed battalions for counter-insurgency; by the 1970s, deployments of state armed police in affected regions increased significantly to suppress Maoist-led peasant revolts that spread to over 30 districts. These expansions involved raising additional battalions—such as in , where armed police strength grew to handle guerrilla tactics—and integrating them with central support, reflecting a shift toward specialized units for prolonged internal threats rather than mere . Reforms gained momentum with the Police Act of 1861's limitations exposed, leading to the Model Police Act drafted by the Committee, which advocated separating civil and armed police cadres to professionalize the latter through dedicated training and merit-based promotions. Circulated to states in , it influenced adaptations in over 17 states by emphasizing functional autonomy for armed wings, fixed tenures for leadership to reduce political interference, and accountability mechanisms like state police complaints authorities, aiming to transform ad hoc expansions into structured, rights-oriented forces responsive to evolving threats without diluting core roles.

Evolution in Response to Internal Threats

Since the , the intensification of Maoist —characterized by ideologically driven campaigns to overthrow the constitutional state through protracted —drove states to bolster their armed police forces with specialized units tailored to asymmetric threats like ambushes, rackets, and parallel administration in rural hinterlands. This evolution was precipitated by the merger of Naxalite factions into the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004, which expanded violence across 180 districts by the late 2000s, compelling states to shift from reactive policing to proactive grid-based containment strategies. In the 1990s, amid surging Maoist violence in resource-rich but underdeveloped regions, states such as and rapidly expanded state armed police battalions to establish anti-Naxal operational grids, enabling sustained area dominance and intelligence-led raids. , confronting the People's War Group's territorial control in forested areas, raised elite commando units within its armed police by the mid-1990s, which dismantled key insurgent formations through targeted operations that neutralized hundreds of cadres by decade's end. similarly augmented its forces to counter splinter groups, integrating local networks to disrupt supply lines and structures amid over 1,000 annual incidents. Following the 2004 Maoist unification, which amplified hybrid tactics blending with urban recruitment, state armed police integrated with central agencies like the Intelligence Bureau and Multi-Agency Centre for real-time fusion, facilitating joint area domination exercises and precision strikes against high-value targets. This post-2000 framework, formalized through the 2006 Left Wing Extremism Division, emphasized state-led ground augmented by central assets, reducing Maoist-affected districts from 96 in 2010 to 41 by 2023 via coordinated surrenders and eliminations exceeding 4,000 cadres. In the 2020s, the government's "Naxal-free India by 2026" mandate has positioned state armed police at the forefront of intensified ground offensives, leveraging fortified bases and drone surveillance to reclaim insurgent strongholds. A pivotal example occurred in May 2025, when , in collaboration with central forces, conducted a 21-day operation at Karreguttalu Hills on the Chhattisgarh-Telangana border, eliminating 31 Naxalites—including senior commanders—in the largest single anti-Maoist action to date, disrupting the insurgents' core logistics. This reflects a causal progression from defensive postures to offensive attrition, directly eroding the Maoists' ideological appeal by demonstrating state resilience against their revolutionary violence.

Organizational Framework

Hierarchical Structure Across States

The hierarchical structure of State Armed Police Forces in India adheres to a paramilitary-style command pyramid, with oversight from the state's (DGP) via the Home Department, ensuring centralized control over reserve battalions for internal security duties. At the state level, an (IGP) or (DIG) typically heads the armed police wing, coordinating operations across multiple battalions based on the state's size and threat profile; larger states may elevate this to Additional rank for expanded forces. Battalions form the core operational unit, each commanded by a equivalent to Superintendent of Police (SP), assisted by a at (Addl. SP) level. A standard comprises approximately six companies, led by Inspectors; each company divides into platoons under Sub-Inspectors (SIs), with platoons further segmented into sections headed by Assistant Sub-Inspectors (ASIs) or Head Constables, culminating in Constables as the frontline personnel. This structure emphasizes disciplined chain-of-command for swift assembly and deployment, distinct from the district-focused civil police . Variations occur across states, reflecting population, geography, and security demands. In , the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) exemplifies a dedicated, expansive model with battalions grouped into sectors under oversight, enabling sector-wise logistics and specialized rapid-response units separate from general reserves. Smaller states, such as , integrate armed reserves into a single under direct SP-level authority, lacking the multi-sector complexity of larger formations and relying on ad-hoc scaling for contingencies. These differences arise from , with populous states maintaining 20-30+ battalions for sustained operations, while compact ones consolidate into fewer, versatile units. State-level headquarters, often housed within the directorate, serve as the nerve center for armed police logistics, including equipment distribution and inter- transfers, while enabling rapid mobilization orders to units upon DGP directives. This central node facilitates real-time force assessment and redeployment, minimizing response delays in multi- scenarios without devolving full autonomy to commanders.

Recruitment, Training, and Deployment Protocols

Recruitment into State Armed Police Forces occurs primarily through direct entry at the level via state-level competitive processes managed by boards or commissions. Candidates, typically drawn from the meeting age (18-25 years) and educational (minimum 10th/12th pass) criteria, undergo preliminary screening including written examinations on , , and basic law, followed by rigorous physical efficiency tests such as running (e.g., 1600 meters in 6-7 minutes), , and to assess endurance and strength. Medical examinations and background verification, including character and loyalty checks against criminal records and political affiliations, ensure recruits' suitability for disciplined, high-stakes duties, with selections often quota-based for districts or categories. Training programs adopt a orientation, conducted at dedicated training schools or academies, with durations ranging from 9 to 12 months divided into indoor theoretical modules and intensive outdoor drills. The covers legal frameworks (e.g., , Code), , and police ethics alongside practical skills like weapon handling, marksmanship with rifles and pistols, formation drills for , unarmed combat, and scenario-based simulations for riot response; in states facing insurgencies, modules include tactics and survival training. Physical conditioning emphasizes endurance marches, obstacle courses, and team maneuvers to foster and readiness for prolonged operations. Deployment protocols mandate activation through directives from the state or government orders for scenarios requiring escalated force, with battalions or companies mobilized as cohesive units to designated zones for defined periods tied to threat assessments. To mitigate risks of local entanglements, , or diminished , personnel undergo periodic rotations across or duties, typically every 2-3 years in sensitive postings, ensuring sustained operational vigor while adhering to restrictions on routine use outside grave law-and-order exigencies.

Core Functions and Operational Roles

Maintenance of Public Order and

State Armed Police Forces in serve as a specialized reserve to civil police for restoring public order during civil unrest, including communal clashes, political demonstrations, and mass agitations where crowds exceed the capacity of unarmed personnel. Unlike civil police oriented toward routine , these forces are trained for mob management, deploying in battalions equipped for sustained operations to enforce curfews, disperse unlawful assemblies, and prevent escalation to widespread . Their role emphasizes rapid mobilization under state home department directives, often in coordination with magistrates, to contain disturbances without immediate resort to firearms. Operational protocols follow a graduated force model, prioritizing psychological deterrence through visible armed presence before non-lethal interventions such as lathi (baton) charges, shells, , and water cannons. Under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which authorizes executive magistrates to ban gatherings of four or more persons to avert imminent threats to tranquility, State Armed Police units position preemptively at flashpoints, hotspots, and assembly routes to enforce prohibitions and monitor compliance. This preemptive stance, supported by protective gear like helmets, shields, and riot control vehicles, aims to de-escalate tensions by signaling credible enforcement capacity.English.pdf) Deployments have been critical in historical episodes of unrest, such as the 1992-1993 riots triggered by the demolition on December 6, 1992, where Maharashtra's State Reserve Police Force battalions supplemented regular police, conducting patrols and firings that curbed some outbreaks amid over 900 fatalities and 2,000 injuries across the state. In more recent political agitations, Armed Police used and barricades at the Shambhu border during the 2020-2021 farmers' protests against agricultural laws, preventing breaches by thousands of demonstrators from and limiting confrontations to non-lethal dispersals. Empirical assessments highlight their comparative effectiveness in casualty minimization through deterrence and specialized non-lethal tactics, as under-equipped civil police often yield higher escalation risks in mob scenarios; for instance, Bureau of Police guidelines underscore that armed reserve deployment reduces lethal force needs by enabling controlled containment, though manpower shortages can strain outcomes in prolonged unrest.English.pdf)

Counter-Insurgency and Anti-Naxal Operations

State Armed Police Forces in states, including , , and , deploy specialized contingents to establish forward operating bases in remote, insurgent-dominated terrains, enabling intelligence-driven ambushes and sustained patrols against Maoist armed groups. These bases, often positioned deep within forested districts like in or in , facilitate rapid response to cadre movements and disrupt safe havens previously exploited by Naxalites for recruitment and logistics. Operations emphasize the neutralization of active combatants, with state forces conducting cordon-and-search missions that have yielded encounters eliminating key cadres, as seen in 's intensified drives in 2025 targeting supply caches on hills like Karregutta. Collaboration between State Armed Police and elite anti-Naxal units—such as 's C-60 commandos or equivalents inspired by Andhra Pradesh's Greyhounds—prioritizes offensive action to dismantle insurgent networks, focusing on cadre elimination rather than prolonged talks. In , these efforts contributed to a verified reduction in Maoist armed cadres from 550 in 2014 to 56 by 2024, alongside a broader 53% drop in Naxal-related incidents nationwide over the same period. Such units undergo specialized training for , integrating local intelligence to execute ambushes that exploit terrain familiarity, resulting in the neutralization of over 700 Maoist militants by central-state combined forces from 2020 to 2025, with providing critical ground support. Targeted force application severs Naxalite logistics chains, including arms smuggling and rackets, creating vacuums that permit infrastructure development and civilian access in formerly no-go zones. In cleared areas, this has enabled road construction and welfare schemes, eroding insurgent influence by addressing underlying grievances through security-enabled governance rather than concessions. The strategy's efficacy is evident in the contraction of affected districts from 120 in to 38 by , underscoring how persistent elimination operations degrade operational capacity and foster surrenders among remaining cadres.

Support to Central Forces and Border Security

State Armed Police Forces (SAPF) routinely augment (CAPF) through operations in areas blending internal security and peripheral threats, such as Naxal-affected hybrid terrains. In 's dense jungles, Jharkhand Armed Police (JAP) units collaborate with CRPF's battalions for patrols and targeted raids against Maoist groups. For example, on September 16, 2025, a operation by —including armed units—and CRPF eliminated three top Maoists, contributing to 29 such eliminations since January 1, 2025. Similarly, on October 13, 2025, and CRPF recovered weapons, Maoist uniforms, and documents during a search in Hazaribagh-Bokaro forests. These efforts leverage SAPF's local intelligence with CAPF's specialized capabilities to neutralize improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and insurgents, as seen in a July 21, 2025, recovery of 14 IEDs weighing nearly 2 kg each. In border regions, SAPF from states like provide critical assistance to CAPFs such as in countering smuggling networks that fund insurgencies. Mizoram Police armed units, operating alongside , conduct joint seizures near the frontier to disrupt arms and narcotics flows. On March 6, 2025, such coordination yielded 5,394 grams of No.4 valued at Rs 37.75 crores in the Melbuk Road area, targeting cross-border logistics for militants. This auxiliary role extends to area domination and intelligence sharing, enhancing CAPF patrols against infiltration and illicit trade in vulnerable peripheral zones. SAPF also surge deployments nationwide during elections to bolster CAPF-led security, focusing on volatile to deter booth capturing and ensure polling . State armed police, integrated with CAPF contingents, man critical polling stations and routes, preventing seizures of ballot papers or voter intimidation as defined under Section 135A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Their presence, often numbering thousands per state poll alongside central forces, has reduced incidents of electoral violence by maintaining static guards and rapid response, as evidenced in deployments recognizing SAPF's role in honorarium-eligible duties. In VIP protection, SAPF complement CAPF by providing escort details and static coverage at residences, freeing central units for in high-threat scenarios. This layered approach, where state forces handle proximate duties under CAPF oversight, ensures comprehensive coverage for dignitaries without duplicating core CAPF mandates.

Equipment and Armament

Standard Firearms and Non-Lethal Gear

State Armed Police Forces in are primarily equipped with the INSAS 5.56mm as a standard issue for individual roles, enabling effective engagement in public order maintenance and counter-insurgency scenarios requiring controlled bursts of fire. The 7.62mm (SLR), a semi-automatic weapon derived from the design, remains in use for its reliability in longer-range engagements and sustained within battalions. and variants in 7.62mm caliber supplement these, particularly in high-threat environments, due to their robustness and higher lethality for . Non-lethal gear emphasizes graduated response in , with the traditional lathi serving as the primary tool for physical dispersal of crowds, often in baton charges to minimize fatalities while asserting authority. , fired from riot guns or adapted service like INSAS or SLR, provide kinetic impact for incapacitation at 20-30 meters, though they carry risks of injury such as fractures or eye damage. Stun grenades and flashbangs, emitting disorienting light and sound bursts, are deployed for temporary in confined or escalating mob situations, allowing without direct contact. Ammunition logistics for these weapons are managed through state-level arsenals and from Ordnance Factories, with allocations varying by budget constraints that influence stock levels and training . Underfunded units, such as those audited in and , have faced shortages in weaponry and associated , impacting readiness for prolonged deployments and necessitating reliance on central support in crises. These variations underscore how fiscal priorities affect the balance between mobility—via lighter INSAS loads—and lethality in standard loadouts.

Modernization Initiatives and Challenges

The has driven modernization of State Armed Police Forces through the Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF) scheme, extended and restructured as Assistance to States & UTs for Modernization of Police (ASUMP), with objectives including infrastructure development to bolster internal security capabilities and reduce reliance on . In December 2024, 4,846 was approved under ASUMP for a five-year period to support equipment and technological upgrades across states. Funding utilization, however, varies significantly, with Naxal-affected states like and receiving allocations but facing delays in deployment. Post-2010s upgrades have emphasized surveillance technologies for counter-insurgency, particularly drones and night-vision devices in Naxal operations. In December 2023, Odisha Police initiated procurement of advanced drones equipped with night-vision for real-time monitoring in Maoist-affected terrains, extending operational range to 15 km. Similar integrations in states like Chhattisgarh have aided in tracking insurgent movements, funded partly through MPF/ASUMP, though primarily benefiting specialized units over general battalions. Persistent challenges include in , which erodes fund efficacy and leads to substandard acquisitions, as documented in evaluations of police practices. Uneven stems from logistical hurdles and poor utilization in Naxal regions, compounded by fiscal constraints and inefficient allocation. Resistance to adoption, especially among personnel in rural battalions reliant on conventional tactics, further impedes integration of tools like drones.

State-Specific Formations

Bihar Special Armed Police

The Bihar Special Armed Police (BSAP), formerly known as the Bihar Military Police, serves as the primary armed reserve force for the Bihar Police, tailored to address the state's persistent challenges with caste-driven conflicts and residual Maoist insurgencies. Enacted through the Bihar Special Armed Police Act on March 24, 2021, the renaming and restructuring empowered the force with enhanced operational autonomy, including warrantless arrests in specified scenarios to swiftly counter threats to public order. With a sanctioned strength of 27,537 personnel and approximately 21,468 available as of recent records, the BSAP maintains 22 battalions alongside one training center, reflecting its scaled response to Bihar's demographics marked by deep-seated caste rivalries and rural volatility. These units, including specialized anti-riot corps such as BSAP-6, BSAP-7, and a women's battalion, are headquartered across districts to enable rapid deployment. Historically rooted in units like the Gorkha Military Police formed in 1880, the force expanded post-independence to over 20 battalions, prioritizing containment of caste-based violence that has plagued since the 1990s, exemplified by clashes involving upper-caste militias like the . BSAP personnel have been integral to operations quelling such disturbances, including the 2008 arrest of leader by specialized police teams, which disrupted the militia's cycle of retaliatory killings against lower-caste groups and Naxalite sympathizers. In tandem, the force supports anti-Naxal efforts against Maoist remnants in 's forested and rural pockets, conducting joint patrols and targeted campaigns to dismantle hideouts, contributing to a broader decline in left-wing extremist incidents from 1,091 in 2014 to 374 nationwide by , with -specific reductions aided by state-level reinforcements. Recent initiatives have focused on bolstering capacity for urban unrest, including land allocations for battalion expansions—such as 32.38 acres granted to BSAP-6 in Muzaffarpur in August 2025—and integration of advanced training for scenarios like metro security in Patna. These measures, coupled with a 21% female composition in the force (around 4,400 women constables), aim to enhance resilience against mob violence and organized disruptions in growing urban centers, while maintaining disaster response roles. The 2021 Act's provisions have drawn scrutiny for potentially expanding police discretion, yet they underscore the BSAP's evolution into a more proactive entity amid Bihar's shifting security landscape.

Chhattisgarh Armed Police

The Chhattisgarh Armed Police, part of the state's framework established after 's formation on November 1, 2000, has prioritized the development of specialized battalions for to address Naxalite insurgency in the Bastar region. These units, drawn from the Chhattisgarh Armed Force (CAF) structure, receive intensive training at the Counter Terrorism and Jungle Warfare (CTJW) College in Kanker, operational since December 2004, focusing on anti-guerrilla tactics suited to dense forest terrains. This specialization emerged in response to escalating Maoist activities post-statehood, enabling sustained operations in remote areas like Abujhmad and Indravati. Integration with the District Reserve Guard (DRG), a dedicated counter-insurgency unit raised in , has amplified operational efficacy through localized intelligence networks. DRG personnel, often comprising ex-Naxals and tribal recruits familiar with Bastar's geography, provide real-time insights that guide CAF-led advances, facilitating ambushes and area dominance in Maoist strongholds. This has been evident in multi-force cordons that exploit terrain advantages, reducing reliance on external intelligence and minimizing casualties from improvised explosives. The 2025 Operation Black Forest in the Karreguttalu hills, spanning April 21 to May 11 along the -Telangana border, exemplified peak coordination and impact, with Chhattisgarh Armed Police units contributing to the elimination of 31 high-value Naxals, including commanders with substantial bounties. Conducted amid intensified campaigns, the operation cleared a longstanding Maoist , yielding arms caches and disrupting command structures in Bastar. Security assessments confirmed the deaths via recovered bodies and weapons, underscoring the units' role in eroding insurgent capabilities.

Haryana Armed Police

The Haryana Armed Police (HAP) serves as the state's primary reserve force for managing civil disturbances, with a structure comprising five battalions, three of which are headquartered at Madhuban in under the oversight of a Director and specialized superintendents. This formation emphasizes rapid deployment for law-and-order challenges unique to Haryana's agrarian economy and geographic position adjoining and the National Capital Region (NCR). HAP played a central role in containing the widespread farmer agitations of 2020-2021, which stemmed from opposition to central farm laws and involved mass mobilizations from into en route to . Deployments at key border points, such as Shambhu near , involved thousands of personnel equipped for , erecting multi-layer barricades and employing , , and water cannons to halt protesters from advancing toward the capital on multiple occasions, including 2021. Similar tactics were used in subsequent marches, such as the 2024 "Delhi Chalo" attempt, where forces dispersed assemblies at Shambhu and Khanauri, preventing breaches amid drone and fortified defenses. Haryana's shared border with positions HAP for collaborative security efforts against persistent Khalistani separatist threats, including monitoring cross-border smuggling of arms and explosives. In April 2025, following a attack claimed by International on a police post in near the Punjab frontier, HAP units bolstered patrols and checkpoints to counter such incursions linked to overseas-directed networks. operations in 2025 uncovered related terror modules spanning Haryana and , prompting joint state-level responses to dismantle financing and logistics for attacks. On a smaller scale relative to larger states, HAP prioritizes mobility for NCR perimeter duties, enabling swift reinforcement in urban fringes like and against protest spillovers or coordinated disruptions targeting Delhi's periphery. This focus ensures containment of agro-political volatility without escalating to broader internal security mandates.

Jharkhand Armed Police

The Jharkhand Armed Police (), as part of the state's internal security apparatus, expanded significantly after 's formation on November 15, 2000, to address the rising threats from left-wing extremist factions including the People's Liberation Front of India (PLFI) and remnants of the (MCCI), which engaged in rackets targeting operations and drives amid tribal unrest in resource-rich districts like West Singhbhum and . These groups, splintering from broader Maoist networks, disrupted and extraction through levies on contractors and violence against non-compliant locals, exacerbating insurgencies in tribal belts where economic grievances intertwined with ideological mobilization. JAP units, often deployed in reinforced battalions, focused on disrupting these networks by patrolling high-risk mining corridors and conducting intelligence-led arrests to curb funding streams that sustained armed cadres. In the Saranda forests of West Singhbhum, a dense Maoist spanning over 1,000 square kilometers, JAP has played a pivotal role in joint operations since at least November 2022 to dismantle supply lines and clear infiltration corridors linking to neighboring strongholds. These efforts intensified in 2025, with JAP alongside (CRPF) teams recovering caches of looted self-loading rifles (SLRs), 14 improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and substantial explosives in June and August, effectively fragmenting Maoist logistics in what was once their southeastern bastion. Operations like those in October 2025 targeted residual PLFI and CPI(Maoist) elements, neutralizing threats through area domination and camp establishments that restricted cadre mobility and extortion activities in adjacent mining zones. To counter cross-border spillovers, JAP maintains coordinated patrols and intelligence-sharing with along the shared frontier, particularly in blocking escape routes for Maoists fleeing Saranda into Odisha's Mayurbhanj and Keonjhar districts. In October 2025, this collaboration enabled the encirclement of approximately 65 Naxalites by 15,000 personnel from both states, establishing eight new forward camps to seal the Jharkhand-Odisha border and disrupt PLFI-Maoist alliances that exploited porous tribal terrains for arms smuggling and evasion. Such joint mechanisms have yielded arrests, including high-value targets at transit points like railway station, mitigating the resurgence of splinter factions preying on interests across state lines.

Karnataka State Reserve Police

The Karnataka State Reserve Police (KSRP) serves as the primary armed reserve wing of the , established under provisions of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, to reinforce civil policing during emergencies requiring heightened force. Comprising multiple battalions, the force specializes in rapid deployment for public order maintenance, including responses to industrial disputes that threaten economic stability. In Bengaluru, India's prominent technology hub hosting major IT firms and global investments, KSRP platoons have been routinely mobilized to secure critical zones against labor agitations and protests, preventing escalation into widespread disruptions as seen in garment sector clashes. KSRP units have played a pivotal role in managing anti-riot operations amid recurrent Cauvery water-sharing tensions between and , with deployments of up to 25 platoons in Bengaluru during peak flare-ups to contain violence targeting vehicles and businesses. These efforts, including over 500 personnel stationed at key protest sites like in 2023, underscore the force's capacity to enforce curfews and disperse mobs while minimizing property damage in urban settings. The legacy of such internal security expertise traces back to the 1990s anti-bandit campaigns against figures like along the - forests, where reserve police supported prolonged strategies, fostering institutional in handling elusive threats in rugged . In parallel, KSRP contributes to coastal security frameworks by addressing landward vulnerabilities in Karnataka's 320-kilometer shoreline, with leadership advocating for integrated defenses against and infiltration amid calls for dedicated marine units. Following the July 25, 2008, serial blasts in Bengaluru that killed one and injured several, the force intensified joint anti-terrorism drills, incorporating scenario-based training for urban threat neutralization and coordination with specialist squads to enhance readiness against low-intensity attacks. These exercises, emphasizing rapid response in high-density areas, reflect KSRP's evolution toward multifaceted reserve duties beyond traditional .

Kerala Armed Police

The Kerala Armed Police operates through specialized battalions, including the Special Armed Police Battalion formed in 1958 as the state's second armed unit, functioning as reserve forces for law and order maintenance under the Additional Director General of Police (Armed Police Battalions). These battalions, modeled after central reserve structures, emphasize rapid deployment to handle civil disturbances, with a historical role in quelling unrest such as deployments for security in external operations like in 1966. In , characterized by minimal insurgency threats, the armed police maintain a compact structure relative to states facing left-wing , with approximately eleven battalions serving primarily for VIP , escorts, and guard duties rather than prolonged . They are routinely mobilized to suppress violence during hartals—frequent political strikes prone to clashes—deploying alongside district forces to enforce order and prevent escalation, as in multiple incidents involving stone-pelting and arson during protests by groups like the in 2022. The force supports coastal vigilance through operational assistance in interdictions, contributing to police seizures of nearly 146 kg of and 185 registered cases since 2022 amid rising maritime smuggling routes. Additionally, Kerala Armed Police personnel undergo training exchanges with central agencies, such as National Disaster Response Force-conducted rescue programs; in 2013, two batches of 30 personnel each received specialized flood and emergency response drills, enhancing capabilities demonstrated in the 2018 statewide floods under Operation Jalaraksha.

Madhya Pradesh Special Armed Police

The Madhya Pradesh Special Armed Police (MPSAP), constituted under the Vishesh Sashastra Bal Adhiniyam, , functions as a specialized armed wing of the dedicated to preserving internal security and stability, with a primary emphasis on volatile tribal regions prone to insurgent activities. Comprising multiple , such as the 15th established in in November 1962 and later integrated into the provincial corps in 1973, and the 18th based in , the force is trained for rapid deployment in maintaining order amid ethnic tensions and spillover threats from adjacent states. Its mandate prioritizes countering disruptions in forested tribal belts, where historical grievances among communities like the Bhils—rooted in land disputes and resource access—intersect with modern security imperatives, though contemporary operations focus more on organized insurgencies than isolated historical revolts. In , a Naxal-affected area with dense serving as spillover corridors for Maoist cadres from neighboring , MPSAP units participate in joint operations alongside specialized teams like the Hawk Force and Special to neutralize armed insurgents. Notable engagements include the June 14, 2025, encounters in Balaghat's forests, where security personnel eliminated four Naxalites, including three women cadres carrying rewards totaling significant bounties, recovering weapons such as an rifle. These actions target Bhil-dominated tribal zones where Naxal influence exploits local discontent over forest rights and economic marginalization, contributing to broader efforts to secure the region's stability against ideological and tribal insurgencies. Logistical hurdles in these operations stem from Balaghat's rugged, forested terrain, which hampers mobility, supply lines, and intelligence gathering, necessitating the establishment of forward police camps to penetrate insurgent strongholds and disrupt supply networks. Such challenges are compounded by the need for coordinated deployments across tri-junction borders, where rapid response is critical yet impeded by limited road access and seasonal monsoons, underscoring the force's reliance on specialized training for prolonged patrols in hostile environments. Despite these constraints, MPSAP's tribal belt focus has yielded incremental gains in reducing active Naxal presence through sustained area domination.

Uttar Pradesh Provincial Armed Constabulary

The Uttar Pradesh Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) was established in 1948 via the amalgamation of the United Provinces Military Police and the United Provinces State Armed Constabulary under the United Provinces Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Act. This integration aimed to create a dedicated force for internal security, specifically to avert reliance on military intervention during severe law-and-order breakdowns, with an initial focus on maintaining order amid post-independence communal frictions. The PAC's structure emphasized rapid deployment capabilities, drawing from pre-existing military-style policing units raised as early as 1940 for internal stability during global conflicts. Comprising dozens of battalions, the PAC has historically prioritized communal harmony in Uttar Pradesh's volatile regions, including extensive deployments to to counter threats tied to the site, where it has thwarted planned terrorist attacks on the premises and Parliament-linked plots. In the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots, which claimed over 60 lives amid Hindu-Muslim clashes, the PAC dispatched six additional companies to reinforce local policing and quell escalating violence in the district. Similarly, the force conducted operations in to suppress gang activities and manage riot-prone situations, aligning with its mandate for anti-terrorist and disturbance-control duties. Following increased scrutiny over encounter killings in , where police actions—including those involving PAC units—drew human rights concerns and calls for adherence to guidelines on investigations and magisterial inquiries, the state implemented broader accountability measures such as mandatory reporting and independent probes for such incidents. These reforms, enacted amid a surge in encounters since 2017 (totaling over 15,000 operations resulting in 256 criminal deaths), sought to enhance transparency in the PAC's high-stakes engagements against hardened gangs and instigators, though critics attribute some cases to extrajudicial practices rather than verified .

West Bengal Armed Police Forces

The West Bengal Armed Police Forces comprise 12 State Armed (SAP) battalions and 3 battalions of the (EFR), functioning under the directorate to support district forces in , VIP protection, anti-extremist operations, and anti-dacoity efforts. These units provide armed contingents for rapid deployment during civil unrest and internal threats, distinct from civil police by their paramilitary organization and heavier armament. The trace their origins to the 18th-century Frontier Protection Force, evolving through colonial renamings including the Ramgarh Local Battalion in 1795 and Bengal Military Police in 1891, before formalization as the (West Bengal Battalion) via the 1920 Act, which regulated their structure for frontier duties. Post-1947 partition, the contingent retained the EFR designation, focusing on border vigilance and counter-insurgency while absorbing personnel from disbanded eastern units. The force participated in and II operations under its earlier Bengal Military Police guise, contributing to expeditionary efforts. In the wake of the 1967 Naxalbari peasant uprising—which ignited widespread leftist extremism across rural —EFR battalions were mobilized for suppression, executing cordon-and-comb operations that resulted in hundreds of militants subdued and over 1,000 arrests in the initial phase. These deployments marked a shift toward intensified internal security roles, with EFR units firing on demonstrators and conducting patrols to dismantle organized peasant seizures of land from landlords. The operations, coordinated with , contained the immediate revolt but highlighted the force's adaptation to asymmetric threats beyond traditional border patrols. The Armed Police, bolstered by SAP contingents, specializes in urban and riot management within the metropolitan area, drawing on reinforcements for escalated threats. During the 2021 post-election violence, which involved targeted attacks on opposition workers following assembly polls, these units were deployed to hotspots in districts like North , assisting in restoring order amid reports of over 50 deaths and thousands displaced. Subsequent investigations revealed instances of police inaction or delayed response, leading to judicial custody for officers in specific probes. Along the 2,217-kilometer border, EFR battalions support anti-infiltration drives, conducting joint patrols and intelligence-led operations to counter illegal crossings linked to and smuggling, with heightened vigilance reported since 2024 amid regional instability. , including EFR, have intercepted infiltrators in coordination with the , though primary border guarding remains a central mandate, contributing to a noted decline in successful entries post-August 2024 political shifts in .

Other Notable State Units

The Rajasthan Armed Constabulary (RAC), established in 1949 with five initial battalions each comprising six companies, serves as an armed reserve for internal security, including support for operations along the Indo-Pak and maintenance of order in arid regions prone to historical banditry. Odisha's Special Armed Police (SAP) battalions contribute to countering left-wing extremism in tribal and mining-affected districts, participating in encounters such as those in Kandhamal where neutralized Maoist cadres and seized arms in July 2025. During the 2008 Kandhamal riots, state police units, including armed contingents, were deployed amid that resulted in at least 11 deaths by late . In , the Provincial Armed Constabulary aids and limited in hilly terrains against sporadic Maoist incursions. Armed Police battalions have supported operations against ethnic insurgents, such as rounding up Hmar People's Convention militants during agitations in the .

Effectiveness and Achievements

Successes in Reducing Left-Wing

State Armed Police Forces (SAPF) have played a pivotal role in curtailing left-wing (LWE) through targeted operations that have yielded measurable reductions in violence and insurgent strength. Ministry of Home Affairs data records a 81% decline in LWE incidents nationwide, from 1,936 in 2010 to 374 in 2024, alongside an 85% drop in total deaths (civilians and security forces combined) from 1,005 to 150 over the same period. These gains stem partly from state-level enforcement, including SAPF-led neutralizations, arrests, and inducements for surrenders, which have eroded Maoist operational capacity and cadre numbers. In , the C-60 commando unit—specialized within the for anti-Maoist duties—has demonstrated the efficacy of intelligence-driven strategies. Operations by this force have halved and further diminished active armed cadres, reducing them from 550 in 2014 to 56 in 2024, while neutralizing key commanders and disrupting supply lines. Such precision targeting has not only inflicted direct losses but also deterred recruitment by demonstrating the risks of , thereby contracting the Maoist footprint in and surrounding districts. Chhattisgarh's District Reserve Guard (DRG), a SAPF-derived specialized unit, has similarly driven empirical progress through area dominance and proactive engagements. Intelligence-led DRG operations have eliminated top Maoist guerrillas and recovered substantial arms caches, contributing to cadre attrition estimated at 85% in core areas since intensified efforts began. This has facilitated over 1,000 surrenders in the state during 2025 alone, amplifying the pressure on remaining insurgents and linking sustained force application to the broader national decline in LWE violence. These state-specific outcomes underscore a causal mechanism wherein SAPF deterrence disrupts cycles and logistical sustainment, enabling territorial reclamation and correlating with verifiable drops in incident frequency and severity across LWE hotspots.

Case Studies of Major Operations

The Greyhounds, an elite counter-insurgency unit within the state's armed police framework, executed a series of precision operations from the early through the pre-2010s era, targeting Naxalite leadership in dense forest terrains. Between 2003 and 2012, these efforts resulted in the neutralization of over 800 Naxalites, including 50 senior commanders, through intelligence-driven ambushes and cordon-and-search tactics that exploited the unit's specialized training in . This systematic elimination disrupted command structures, compelling Maoist cadres to abandon strongholds in and relocate to border regions like and . In , a benchmark operation unfolded in April-May 2025 on the Karreguttalu Hills (KGH) along the state-Telangana border, where combined and central forces launched a 21-day offensive against entrenched Maoist positions. This hill terrain assault, involving drone and forward intelligence, culminated in the elimination of 31 Naxalites, including key operatives, while dismantling a major rebel base used for and recruitment. The operation highlighted coordinated tactical maneuvers in asymmetric environments, contributing to nine top Maoist leaders neutralized statewide that year. Bihar's armed police units have conducted sustained operations against fragmented left-wing extremist groups, including splinters tracing to CPI(ML) lineages, focusing on rural pockets where such elements enforced and disrupted . These efforts, emphasizing arrests and area dominance in central districts, correlated with a marked decline in Naxalite incidents and violence parameters post-2010, enabling surrenders—such as seven in 2019 alone—and gradual normalization of agrarian activities. By curbing localized insurgent control over villages, police actions facilitated the resumption of farming and through statutory mechanisms rather than enforcement.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Human Rights Violations

In the 1987 Hashimpura incident during communal riots in , personnel from the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) abducted 42 Muslim men from a locality in and executed them at multiple sites, an act later convicted as murder by the , which sentenced 16 former PAC officers to in 2018. Similar allegations of encounters arose in during the and early , including a 1991 case where police killed 10 Sikh youths in custody and fabricated it as an armed clash, leading to life sentences for 47 officers in 2016 following a judicial probe that exposed premeditated extrajudicial action. In Naxalite-affected regions, state armed police units have been accused of torture and summary executions of suspected insurgents, with documenting cases of disappearances and custodial killings by police in and other areas in the early 1990s, often in response to guerrilla activities. has similarly reported patterns of torture leading to deaths in police custody across India, including in conflict zones, though these accounts frequently emphasize security force conduct while underemphasizing parallel insurgent atrocities such as executions of villagers and informants. Such claims must be viewed against the backdrop of persistent insurgent ambushes on police, which have inflicted heavy losses; for instance, Terrorism Portal data records annual security force fatalities from Naxalite attacks averaging over 100 in the mid-2000s, including major strikes that killed dozens in single incidents, prompting aggressive counteroperations. Broader custodial death reports, as tracked by , indicate ongoing issues of by Indian police, with in many cases, though convictions remain rare and convictions in armed police-specific instances often follow prolonged legal scrutiny.

Debates on Excessive Force and Accountability

Debates surrounding the by State Armed Police Forces (SAPF) in center on the tension between legal mandates for proportionality and the exigencies of volatile operational environments. Under Section 46 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), , police may employ necessary force to effect arrests or disperse assemblies, but such actions must adhere to principles of and proportionality, as affirmed in judicial precedents emphasizing minimization of harm. Similarly, the (IPC) provisions on and public tranquility, such as Sections 96-106, permit force only to counter imminent threats, with courts requiring evidence that lesser means were infeasible. Critics, including organizations, argue that SAPF deployments in riots or insurgent areas often exceed these thresholds, citing lathi charges or as disproportionate; however, empirical assessments in high-threat scenarios reveal that restraint can escalate dangers, as armed agitators exploit delays to inflict casualties. The 2023 Manipur ethnic clashes exemplify these debates, where SAPF units were rapidly deployed amid violence erupting on between Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities, resulting in over 250 deaths and widespread arson by the year's end. , often outnumbered and facing improvised explosives and firearms from mobs, resorted to live rounds and non-lethal measures to contain breaches, with official reports justifying actions as proportional to immediate threats of mass killings and infrastructure destruction. Allegations of excess persist, particularly from affected communities claiming biased escalation, yet data indicate SAPF fatalities—over 10 personnel killed in ambushes—underscore the real-time perils where risks operational collapse. Proportionality analyses, drawing from international standards incorporated via directives, prioritize graduated responses but permit escalation against grave, proximate dangers, a threshold met in Manipur's armed confrontations rather than purely ideological critiques of "militarization." Accountability mechanisms face structural hurdles, evidenced by conviction rates below 1% for custodial deaths or involving armed units between 2019 and 2022, per from oversight bodies. Low rates stem from evidentiary gaps, including witness reluctance in conflict zones where militants intimidate informants to shield their own operations, complicating prosecutions against officers acting under duress. Internal inquiries and probes exist under CrPC Section 176, but judicial scrutiny often falters without corroborated testimony, fostering perceptions of while causal factors like threat-induced fear undermine systemic reform. Proposed reforms, such as mandatory body-worn cameras for SAPF personnel, aim to document encounters for verifiable proportionality reviews, potentially reducing disputes by providing objective footage of threats and responses. Pilot implementations in select states have shown promise in curbing false claims, yet nationwide rollout lags due to budgetary shortfalls—police modernization absorbs only 3% of state expenditures on average, with equipment costs straining underfunded units tasked with multi-theater duties. These constraints highlight a causal disconnect: while technology could enforce evidence-based restraint, fiscal realism tempers expectations, prioritizing core armaments over surveillance in resource-scarce environments.

Political and Operational Challenges

State armed police forces in India encounter persistent jurisdictional overlaps with central paramilitary units, such as the , which frequently delay responses to internal security threats. These overlaps arise in shared operational domains like countering left-wing , where states depend heavily on central deployments for routine law and order, fostering turf conflicts and inefficient coordination that hinder swift action. Manpower deficiencies further compromise efficacy, with national police vacancies at approximately 22% as of 2023 and higher rates—exceeding 25% in states like —leaving armed units understaffed for sustained deployments. This shortage, persisting across multiple states for over a decade, stems partly from underfunding and slow recruitment, reducing operational readiness in high-threat areas. Corruption in postings and transfers, often dictated by political rather than merit, erodes and exposes forces to undue influences that prioritize over competence. Such interference, including attempts by ideologically driven groups to embed sympathizers, amplifies vulnerabilities in ideologically contested regions, though institutional safeguards aim to mitigate infiltration. Overall, these systemic pressures—compounded by chronic under-resourcing—undermine the forces' and effectiveness against evolving threats.

References

  1. https://prsindia.org/policy/analytical-reports/police-reforms-india
  2. https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/publications/police/police_organisations.pdf
  3. https://wbpolice.gov.in/wbp/Common/Armed_Police.aspx
  4. http://police.gov.in/poi-internal-pages/state-union-territories
  5. https://apsp.ap.gov.in/History.html
  6. https://maharashtrasrpf.gov.in/history-of-srpf
  7. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/19246/1/a1952-63.pdf
  8. https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/programs/aj/police/papers/gpj/militarisation_of_the_indian_police.pdf
  9. https://sap.keralapolice.gov.in/page/history-of-sap
  10. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/armed-police-british-colonial-tradition-indian-perspective
  11. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-armed-police-in-the-British-colonial-tradition-Das-Verma/a8424d5c392031587b635f5ad4ea8a70bc037983
  12. https://harrisonakins.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/the-strategic-logic-of-policing-in-british-india.pdf
  13. https://ijlmh.com/wp-content/uploads/Critical-Analysis-of-Police-Administration-in-British-India-and-Modern-India.pdf
  14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44988336
  15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2024.2326179
  16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09592318.2020.1778213
  17. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/18507/1/rajasthan_armed_constabulary_act%252C_1950.pdf
  18. https://uppolice.gov.in/Site-Content/uploaded-content/Web_Page/15_7_2013_15_24_6_The%2520U.P.%2520Pradeshik%2520Armed%2520%2520Constabulary%2520Act%2C%25201948.pdf
  19. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA483734.pdf
  20. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/PoliceReforms%2528E%2529181013.pdf
  21. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/stratperspective/inss/Strategic-Perspectives-22.pdf
  22. https://www.orfonline.org/research/half-a-century-of-india-s-maoist-insurgency-an-appraisal-of-state-response
  23. https://jns.scholar.princeton.edu/document/123
  24. https://www.mha.gov.in/en/divisionofmha/left-wing-extremism-division
  25. https://bprd.nic.in/uploads/pdf/17-12-2024-Left-Wing%2520Extremism-%2520Vigilant%2520India%2C%2520%28%252016-30%2520Sep%2C2024%29%2520Year-2%2C%2520Volume%2520No-12%2520Low%2520File.pdf
  26. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2128736
  27. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2120771
  28. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?actid=AC_ML_123_384_00052_00052_1544784971111&orderno=28
  29. https://uppolice.gov.in/frmUnitOfficials.aspx?pac&cd=MQAxADEANQA%253D
  30. https://police.sikkim.gov.in/visitor/saps
  31. https://maharashtrasrpf.gov.in/recruitment
  32. https://www.keralapsc.gov.in/police-constable-armed-police-battalion-special-recruitment-scst-police-service-department
  33. https://odishapolice.gov.in/main/?q=node/3305
  34. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/ModelAct06_30_Oct_0.pdf
  35. https://devgan.in/crpc/section/144/
  36. https://www.hrw.org/reports/1996/India1.htm
  37. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/02/14/krve-f14.html
  38. https://www.orfonline.org/research/dealing-with-violent-civil-protests-in-india
  39. https://www.news18.com/opinion/opinion-how-pm-modi-amit-shah-scripted-end-of-red-corridor-ws-kl-9640711.html
  40. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/interview/story/20250317-we-will-free-india-of-the-naxal-threat-by-march-2026-home-minister-amit-shah-2690264-2025-03-07
  41. https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/govt-won-t-rest-till-all-naxals-surrender-are-caught-or-eliminated-shah-125090300450_1.html
  42. https://www.idsa.in/publisher/issuebrief/left-wing-extremism-in-maharashtra-counterinsurgency-strategies-and-current-challenges
  43. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/mumbai-news/maoist-movement-in-maharashtra-has-weakened-over-past-decade-shinde-101728360126948.html
  44. https://satp.org/other-data/india-maoistinsurgency/statement_2024
  45. https://crpf.gov.in/About-Us/Role-of-CRPF
  46. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/lwe-hit-districts-down-to-38-from-120-across-10-states-shah/articleshow/114022459.cms
  47. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ranchi/jharkhand-police-and-crpf-eliminate-three-top-maoists-in-major-anti-naxal-operation/articleshow/123907422.cms
  48. https://telanganatoday.com/jharkhand-police-recover-weapons-maoist-materials-during-joint-operation-in-hazaribagh-forests
  49. https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/14-ieds-hand-grenades-jharkhand-police-crpf-joint-operation-discovers-huge-cache-of-explosives-planted-by-maoists
  50. https://www.facebook.com/northeastlivetv/posts/major-blow-to-cross-border-insurgent-logistics-assam-rifles-recover-large-cache-/1182574980638665/
  51. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/assam-rifles-seize-arms-ammo-from-mizoram-forest/articleshow/124030834.cms
  52. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?actid=AC_CEN_3_81_00001_195143_1517807327542&sectionId=29741&sectionno=135A&orderno=162
  53. https://www.newslaundry.com/2016/09/16/how-are-security-deployment-plans-made-for-elections-in-india
  54. https://www.sriramsias.com/article/status-and-provisions-of-vip-security-in-india-201003150239/
  55. https://theprint.in/india/cm-yogi-lauds-up-pac-for-role-in-countering-2001-parliament-attack/1889841/
  56. https://wbpolice.gov.in/writereaddata/wbp/Poli2021370054.pdf
  57. https://bprd.nic.in/uploads/pdf/202010131134553658058StudyReportNonLethalWeapons.pdf
  58. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/crime-stories/story/20070618-riots-supressed-by-police-firings-748380-2007-06-17
  59. https://www.mha.gov.in/en/divisionofmha/police-modernisation-division/modernisation-of-state-police-forces-mpf-scheme
  60. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2082737
  61. https://www.idsa.in/system/files/OccasionalPaper7_Naxal.pdf
  62. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhubaneswar/odisha-police-to-procure-corner-shot-weapons-advanced-drones-to-fight-naxals/articleshow/106162530.cms
  63. https://www.svpnpa.gov.in/static/gallery/docs/7dc6ef9458fa449f8f4dbd52fc0425b5.pdf
  64. https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/india-police-modernization-market
  65. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/explained-bihar-special-armed-police-bill-2021/article34161667.ece
  66. https://police.bihar.gov.in/en/BSAP.aspx
  67. https://www.facebook.com/bsap1gb/
  68. https://satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/terroristoutfits/Ranvir_Sena.htm
  69. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2112250
  70. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/land-allocated-to-special-armed-police-at-2-places/articleshow/123192424.cms
  71. https://blog.ipleaders.in/analysis-bihar-special-armed-police-act-2021/
  72. https://cgpolice.gov.in/en/efforts-action
  73. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/combating-maoist-insurgency-a-spotlight-on-chhattisgarh-s-drg-model
  74. https://theprint.in/india/born-out-of-desperation-drg-is-first-line-against-maoists-in-bastar-tech-is-giving-them-an-edge/2661097/
  75. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2163233
  76. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/anti-naxal-operations-31-maoists-killed-karregutta-hills-crpf-dg-10005371/
  77. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/wont-rest-till-naxals-wiped-out-says-amit-shah/articleshow/123687661.cms
  78. https://haryanapolice.gov.in/Organization
  79. https://hap3rdbn.haryanapolice.gov.in/RTI_section_4%28B%29.pdf
  80. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/lessons-learned-from-2020-2021-protest-police-tighten-security-for-farmers-delhi-chalo-march/articleshow/107643765.cms
  81. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-are-farmers-protesting-again-explained/article67868515.ece
  82. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-politics/farmers-how-current-protest-differs-from-2020-21-9157982/
  83. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/02/29/india-protect-farmers-right-peaceful-protest
  84. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/anti-terror-agency-nia-raids-in-punjab-haryana-up-to-probe-khalistani-terror-network-8770505
  85. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/india-coal-conflict-minerals-maoist-insurgency
  86. https://redlanternanalytica.com/understanding-left-extremist-militancy-as-a-threat-to-indias-national-security/
  87. https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/indian-maoists-turn-plunderers
  88. https://satp.org/terrorist-activity/india-maoistinsurgency-Oct-2017
  89. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2025/Jun/19/security-forces-recover-14-ieds-huge-cache-of-explosives-from-jharkhands-saranda-forest
  90. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ranchi/slr-looted-from-cops-found-in-saranda-forest/articleshow/123336677.cms
  91. https://avenuemail.in/crpf-head-constable-martyred-two-injured-in-naxal-ied-blast-in-saranda-forest/
  92. https://organiser.org/2025/10/11/320385/bharat/jharkhand-crpf-head-constable-martyred-two-others-injured-in-twin-ied-blasts-triggered-by-naxals-in-saranda/
  93. https://www.etvbharat.com/en/bharat/saranda-battle-security-forces-surround-65-naxalites-jharkhand-odisha-border-blocked-to-seal-escape-route-enn25101600518
  94. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/3-maoist-bunkers-on-odishajharkhand-border-destroyed-in-major-operation-1896627
  95. https://www.facebook.com/otvnews/videos/2-maoists-arrested-from-rourkela-railway-station-odisha/665710832892235/
  96. https://finance.karnataka.gov.in/storage/pdf-files/The%2520Karnataka%2520Police%2520Act%2C%25201963.pdf
  97. https://ptckalaburagi.karnataka.gov.in/uploads/media_to_upload1656309333.pdf
  98. https://www.firstpost.com/india/bengaluru-central-forces-deployed-after-unrest-over-pf-issue-2739354.html
  99. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/trends/current-affairs-trends/-1848717.html
  100. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/karnataka-bandh-live-updates-normal-life-transport-services-disrupted-in-the-state/article67360071.ece
  101. https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30246170.ece
  102. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Mangalore/dedicated-force-for-coastal-security-need-of-the-hour-bhaskar-rao/article23622340.ece
  103. https://sap.keralapolice.gov.in/
  104. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/cm-says-hartal-violence-preplanned-as-oppn-slams-govt-for-police-failure/article65931595.ece
  105. https://www.newindianexpress.com/editorials/2024/Oct/01/probe-kerala-polices-gold-smuggling-nexus
  106. https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/2013/Aug/11/rescue-training-to-be-given-for-select-cops-505804.html
  107. https://keralapolice.gov.in/storage/pages/custom/ckFiles/file/Operation%2520Jalaraksha%2520I%2520&%2520II_1.pdf
  108. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/10055/1/mp_vishesh_shashatra_bal_adhiniyam_1968.pdf
  109. https://15battalion.com/about/
  110. https://www.18bnsaf.com/
  111. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00472336.2015.1034159
  112. https://balaghat.mppolice.gov.in/hawk-force-kills-two-naxalites-in-balaghat-forests/
  113. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2025/Jun/14/three-women-among-four-naxalites-killed-in-encounter-with-police-in-mps-balaghat
  114. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/4-maoists-killed-in-encounter-in-mps-balaghat-10067381/
  115. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/madhya-pradesh/four-maoists-including-three-women-killed-in-ongoing-encounter-in-mps-balaghat/article69695104.ece
  116. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/how-a-police-camp-broke-back-of-maoists/articleshow/98440605.cms
  117. https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/madhya-pradesh-special-task-force-naxals-clash-in-balaghat-forest/ar-AA1yHCj0
  118. https://www.newkerala.com/news/o/mp-cm-mohan-yadav-grants-out-turn-promotion-64-427
  119. https://uppolice.gov.in/article/en/about-us-prad-armed-constabulary-eng
  120. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/21078/1/40of1948_english.pdf
  121. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/in-light-of-hashimpura-recalling-pac-ups-controversial-armed-police-force-5430170/
  122. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/up-pac-foiled-terrorist-attacks-on-parliament-ram-janmabhoomi-cm-adityanath/articleshow/106062332.cms
  123. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/muzaffarnagar-riots-communal-violence-boys-killed-216054-2013-10-30
  124. https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/press-releases/chri-expresses-concern-at-encounter-killings-in-uttar-pradesh-seeks-strict-compliance-with-supreme-court-guidelines
  125. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/uttar-pradesh/over-15000-police-encounters-since-2017-256-hardened-criminals-eliminated-31960-criminals-arrested-in-uttar-pradesh/article70162995.ece
  126. https://www.wbpolice.gov.in/writereaddata/wbp/Abou2021350001.pdf
  127. https://www.wbpolice.gov.in/wbp/Common/Armed_Police.aspx
  128. https://www.latestlaws.com/bare-acts/state-acts-rules/west-bengal-state-laws/eastern-frontier-rifles-west-bengal-battalion-act-1920/
  129. https://www.asianage.com/india/all-india/250517/naxalbari-1967-the-uprising-that-changed-our-politics.html
  130. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/11/08/archives/the-naxalites-whose-extremism-knows-no-extremes-are-indian-indian.html
  131. https://frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30213105.ece
  132. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/west-bengal/2021-west-bengal-post-poll-violence-case-three-police-officers-sent-to-jail-for-bjp-workers-murder/article69831093.ece
  133. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/kolkata/post-poll-violence-9-held-in-bjp-mans-killing-last-year-says-cbi-7757858/
  134. https://www.thestatesman.com/bengal/bengal-police-have-tightened-security-to-counter-terrorism-and-infiltration-threats-1503381001.html
  135. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bsf-nabs-senior-bangladesh-cop-infiltration-attempt-foiled-handed-to-bengal-police/articleshow/123473328.cms
  136. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/no-increase-in-infiltration-post-august-2024-political-development-in-bangladesh-bsf-d-g/article69242975.ece
  137. https://police.rajasthan.gov.in/old/Rajpolice/Pdf_files/RacMbcIntro.pdf
  138. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/odisha/2025/Jul/01/odisha-police-guns-down-two-maoists-in-kandhamal-forest
  139. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/27/india.religion
  140. https://www.ritimo.org/Hmar-Struggles-for-Autonomy-in-Mizoram-India
  141. https://www.dhyeyaias.com/current-affairs/daily-current-affairs/decline-of-naxalism-india-security-governance-social-transformation
  142. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/1040-maoists-surrendered-in-2025-says-police-data-101760297350496.html
  143. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/andhra-pradesh-bifurcation-maoist-attack-anti-naxal-units-7268188/
  144. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/anti-naxal-operations-how-andhra-smoked-out-the-enemy/articleshow/5769728.cms
  145. https://www.reporters-collective.in/trc/the-claims-truth-and-body-bags-of-karregutta-op
  146. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2025/Sep/30/top-maoist-leaders-remain-prime-targets-for-forces-in-chhattisgarh-nine-leaders-eliminated-in-2025
  147. https://www.satp.org/terrorism-assessment/india-maoistinsurgency-bihar
  148. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/1987-hashimpura-massacre-delhi-hc-sentences-16-ex-pac-personnel-to-life/article61518791.ece
  149. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/47-policemen-get-life-term-for-fake-encounter-killings-in-uttar-pradesh/article8434134.ece
  150. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35965553
  151. https://www.hrw.org/reports/INDIA929.PDF
  152. https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa200361992en.pdf
  153. https://www.satp.org/datasheet-terrorist-attack/fatalities/india-maoistinsurgency
  154. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/12/19/india-killings-police-custody-go-unpunished
  155. https://www.policinglaw.info/country/india
  156. https://jilsblognujs.wordpress.com/2020/10/17/force-major-an-analysis-of-the-use-of-force-by-the-indian-police/
  157. https://thelaw.institute/human-rights-in-india/regulating-police-use-force-demonstrations/
  158. https://journals.rcmss.com/index.php/ijpamr/article/download/76/62/132
  159. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/14/india-renewed-ethnic-violence-manipur-state
  160. https://acleddata.com/update/regional-overview-asia-pacific-may-2023
  161. https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/india
  162. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/india/346-finding-way-out-festering-conflict-indias-manipur
  163. https://www.newindianexpress.com/web-only/2024/Sep/27/whos-watching-the-watchers-when-police-stations-themselves-become-crime-scenes
  164. https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/08/04/broken-system/dysfunction-abuse-and-impunity-indian-police
  165. https://blog.ipleaders.in/body-worn-cameras-and-police-transparency/
  166. https://qz.com/india/1878688/india-needs-more-than-money-to-prevent-cases-of-police-brutality
  167. https://prsindia.org/theprsblog/central-police-forces-overview-and-issues
  168. https://visionias.in/current-affairs/monthly-magazine/2024-02-15/security/policing-power-to-central-armed-police-forces-capf
  169. https://sabrangindia.in/a-system-under-strain-indias-police-and-prisons-in-crisis-shows-indian-justice-report-2025/
  170. https://factly.in/data-for-more-than-10-years-vacancies-in-police-forces-across-the-country-at-over-20/
  171. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/revamping-india-s-police-system
  172. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/politicisation-police-india-where-lies-blame
  173. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/the-interviews-blog/politician-police-criminal-nexus-flourishes-because-politicians-decide-on-posting-of-officers-at-police-stations/
  174. https://www.article-14.com/post/india-s-police-forces-turning-into-private-armies-of-elected-rulers
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.