Hubbry Logo
PungmulPungmulMain
Open search
Pungmul
Community hub
Pungmul
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pungmul
Pungmul
Pungmul
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pungmul is a folk tradition steeped in music, dance, theater, and pageantry.

Pungmul (Korean: 풍물; Hanja: 風物; IPA: [pʰuːŋmul]) is a Korean folk music tradition that includes drumming, dancing, and singing. Most performances are outside, with dozens of players all in constant motion. Pungmul is rooted in the dure (collective labor) farming culture. It was originally played as part of farm work, on rural holidays, at other village community-building events, and to accompany shamanistic rituals, mask dance dramas, and other types of performance. During the late 1960s and 1970s it expanded in meaning and was actively used in political protest during the pro-democracy movement, although today it is most often seen as a performing art. Based on 1980s research, this kind of music was extensively studied in Chindo Island.[1]

Older scholars often describe this tradition as nongak (Korean: 농악; Hanja: 農樂Korean: [noŋak]), a term meaning "farmers' music" whose usage arose during the colonial era (1910–1945). The Cultural Heritage Administration of South Korea uses this term in designating the folk tradition as an Important Intangible Cultural Property. Opposition from performers and scholars toward its usage grew in the 1980s because colonial authorities attempted to limit the activity to farmers in order to suppress its use and meaning among the colonized. It is also known by many synonymous names throughout the peninsula.

Drumming is the central element of pungmul. Each group is led by a kkwaenggwari (RR- ggwaenggwari) (small handheld gong) player, and includes at least one person playing janggu (hourglass drum), one person playing buk (barrel drum), and one person playing jing (gong). Wind instruments (taepyeongso, also known as hojeok, senap, or nalari) sometimes play along with the drummers.

Pungmul was added to the UNESCO intangible cultural heritage list as "Joseonjok Nongak" by China in 2009 and South Korea in November 2014.[2]

Classification

[edit]
Pyeongtaek (utdari) nongakGangneung (yeongdong) nongakIri (honam udo) nongakImsil Pilbong (honam jwado) nongakJinju Samcheonpo (yeongnam) nongak

Pungmul was first recognized as an Important Intangible Cultural Property in 1966 under the title nongak sipicha (농악십이차, "twelve movements of farmers' music"). The designation was changed to simply nongak in the 1980s in order to accommodate regional variations.[3] The Cultural Heritage Administration currently recognizes five regional styles of the tradition, each named for its center of activity, under Important Intangible Cultural Property no. 11: Jinju Samcheonpo nongak, from South Gyeongsang province (designated in 1966); Pyeongtaek nongak, from Gyeonggi province (1985); Iri nongak, from North Jeolla province (1985); Gangneung nongak, from Gangwon province (1985); and Imsil Pilbong nongak from North Jeolla province (1988). Each style is unique in its approach toward rhythms, costuming, instrumentation, and performance philosophy: Jinju Samcheonpo for yeongnam (영남), Pyeongtaek for utdari (웃다리), Iri for honam udo (호남우도), Gangneung for yeongdong (영동), and Imsil Pilbong for honam jwado (호남좌도).[4]

Most scholarly works on pungmul focus on the two distinct styles present in the Honam region encompassing the two Jeolla provinces.[5] In this region, the designations jwado (left) for Imsil Pilbong and udo (right) for Iri are determined according to geomantic principles. Looking southward from the "center" (Seoul, the capital), udo indicates "right", and jwado indicates "left".[4] Comparative studies between the two styles brought about the development of stereotypes among professional groups. Honam jwado became known for its varying formations and rapid rhythmic patterns, while honam udo was generally seen as having slow but graceful rhythmic patterns.[6]

History

[edit]

Early development

[edit]

Suppression and unrest

[edit]

During the Joseon period, this folk tradition was the primary mode of musical expression for a majority of the population.[7] Many scholars and performers today claim that the term nongak (농악; 農樂) was introduced during the Japanese colonization era in order to suppress its broad use and meaning among the Korean population.[8]

Revival

[edit]

True public support for pungmul improved little in the decade following its recognition and financial backing from the government. There was a lack of interest among Koreans who abandoned their traditional customs after moving to the cities. This phenomenon was coupled with the introduction of Western-style concert halls and the growing popularity of Western classical and popular music.[9]

Samul nori, unlike traditional pungmul, is performed in a seated position.

In 1977, prominent architect Kim Swoo Geun designed the Konggansarang (공간사랑), a performance hall for traditional Korean music and dance located in the capital, and invited artists and scholars to organize its events.[10] During the performance center's first recital in February 1978, a group of four men led by Kim Duk-soo and Kim Yong-bae, both descendants of namsadang troupe members, performed an impromptu arrangement of Pyeongtaek (utdari) pungmul with each of its four core instruments. Unlike traditional pungmul, this performance was conducted in a seated position facing the audience and demonstrated a variety of rhythms with great flexibility. It was well received by audience members, and a second performance was soon held three months later. Folklorist Sim U-seong, who introduced both men to the Konggansarang club, named the group SamulNori (사물놀이; 四物놀이; lit. 'playing of four objects').[11] Samul nori eventually came to denote an entire genre as training institutes and ensembles were established throughout South Korea and Japan.[12] Usage of the term nongak was retained in order to distinguish traditional pungmul from this new staged and urbanized form.[13]

Components

[edit]

Instruments

[edit]
The majority of soe players today hold the instrument in the left hand by suspending it either with the first finger or the thumb.

In general, 5 major instruments are used for playing Pungmul: kkwaenggwari (RR- ggwaenggwari) (small handheld gong), janggu (hourglass drum), buk (barrel drum), and jing (gong) and sogo.

They all require a different style to play and have their own unique sounds.

The first person of each group to play instruments is called 'sue' or 'sang'. (like 'sang soe'(refers to the one who plays kkwaenggwari), 'sue janggu(same as sang janggu), 'sue buk ', 'sue bukku(who play with sogo)')

Dance

[edit]

In Pungmul, dance elements further deepen the artistic and aesthetic characteristics of Pungmul as an integrated genre.[14]

Pungmul dance does not deviate from the interrelationship and balance with the elements that make up the Pungmul but also harmonizes closely with music.

The dance has a system of individual body structure, such as Witt-Noleum (윗놀음, upper performance) and Bal-Noleum(발놀음, footwork), and a system of pictorial expression in which individuals become objects to complete a group.

Divide according to the form of the dance and the composition of the personnel.[15]

  • Group dance (군무; 群舞) : Jinpuri (진풀이, a variety of formations are presented during the performance)
  • Solitary dance (독무; 獨舞) : Sangsoe Noleum (상쇠놀음, lead small gong player's solo performance), Sangmonori (상모놀이; 象毛놀이; lit. 'hat-streamer twirling performance'), Suljanggu Noleum ('hourglass-shaped drum performance'), Sogo Noleum(소고놀음; 小鼓놀음; lit. 'small drum with handle performance')
  • Japsaek dance (잡색; 雜色; lit. 'mixed colors') : A member of the Pungmul troupe dressed as a certain character who acts out various skits. All expressions are the result of role-based self-analysis.

Costuming

[edit]
Brightly colored cloth sashes are often attributed to pungmul's roots in shamanism.

Following the drummers are dancers, who often play the sogo (a small drum without enough resonance to contribute to the soundscape significantly) and tend to have more elaborate—even acrobatic—choreography, particularly if the sogo-wielding dancers also manipulate the sangmo ribbon-hats. In some regional pungmul types, japsaek (actors) dressed as caricatures of traditional village roles wander around to engage spectators, blurring the boundary between performers and audience. Minyo (folksongs) and chants are sometimes included in pungmul, and audience members enthusiastically sing and dance along. Most minyo are set to drum beats in one of a few jangdan (rhythmic patterns) that are common to pungmul, sanjo, p'ansori (RR-pansori), and other traditional Korean musical genres.

Pungmul performers wear a variety of colorful costumes. A flowery version of the Buddhist gokkal is the most common head-dress. In an advanced troupe all performers may wear sangmo, which are hats with long ribbon attached to them that players can spin and flip in intricate patterns powered by knee bends.

Formations

[edit]
Choreography of the entire ensemble seldom receives the same attention or scrutiny as manipulation of the hats.

International exposure

[edit]

Pungmul is played in several international communities, especially by the Koreans living abroad.

Some dancing activities associated with pungmul performed by the ethnic Koreans living in China, known as the "farmer's dance of ethnic Korean" (조선족 농악 무; 朝鮮族農樂舞; Chosŏnjok nongak-mu), were submitted as a cultural heritage to UNESCO.

Pungmul also has been performed by the numerous Korean American communities in the United States, including Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York City, and Baltimore.[16]

College-based groups also exist at the University of California (Berkeley, Los Angeles, Davis, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Irvine), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Stony Brook University, Columbia University, New York University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Yale University, the University of Chicago, the University of Pennsylvania, Cornell University, California Institute of Technology, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Buffalo, Binghamton University, Syracuse University, Stanford University, The University of Toronto, Brown University, University of Oxford, etc.,[16] Far Eastern Federal University

Development of Pungmul in America

[edit]

First phase (1985–1989)

[edit]

P'ungmul's history in the United States is intimately linked to the history of Korean American activism. Numerous founders of these organizations were active in or sympathized with Korean political conflicts. It is critical to note that all of these Korean expressive styles were prevalent throughout the 1970s and 1980s Minjung Munhwa movement that swept South Korean college campuses. Many of the early p'ungmul organizations either originated as a cultural division of a larger organizational (usually political) or became part of one, shortly after formation. In 1985, Binari in New York was established and Sori, formed on the University of California in Berkeley. Il-kwa-Nori of the Korean American Resource and Cultural Center in Chicago, also an affiliate of NAKASEC, formed in 1988. Shinmyŏngpae of the communal organization Uri Munhwa Chatkihwe in 1990.[17]

In the 1970s and 1980s, a few Koreans stayed in the US for long periods of time to assist create p'ungmul organizations and spread its teachings. Kim Bong Jun, a Korean artist noted for his folk-inspired paintings and prints, was one such people. Many people were forced to reconsider their participation in the Korean-American connection due to issues like reunification and knowledge about the Kwangju Uprising.

Second phase (1990 - Present)

[edit]

Yi Jong-hun, a Korean minister who visited the United States in 1990 and 1991, is another figure seen as important by many long-time p'ungmul practitioners. Yi Jong-hun paid visits to Los Angeles, New York City, and KYCC in Oakland during his tour. He was involved in the formation of the Kutkori group at Harvard. He also provided reading and teaching materials on Pungmul, Minyo, and Movement Songs.[17] A normal college p'ungmul group has between 15 and 20 members on average, while some organizations have persisted with less than 10 and as many as 30 to 35 members. Hanoolim[18] (University of California/Los Angeles), Karakmadang (University of Illinois), Hansori (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), NyuRi (New York University), and Loose Roots (University of Chicago) are just a few of the early 1990s groups. Other forms of special-interest clubs have emerged in the United States, bringing more variety to the community of p'ungmul students. Groups have been founded by and for Korean adoptees and activists as well as seniors, kids, Catholic Church members, and people in their mid-thirties and forties, to name just a few.[17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pungmul

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Pungmul (풍물) is a traditional Korean folk performing art that integrates percussion , , , and communal rituals, originating from rural agrarian communities and typically enacted outdoors with ensembles using gongs, drums, and cymbals. Rooted in pre-industrial farming practices, it emerged from rites to invoke agricultural prosperity, dispel misfortunes, and strengthen social bonds among villagers during seasonal events like planting and harvesting. The tradition, also termed nongak or pungmulnori, features dynamic group formations, theatrical elements, and intergenerational transmission, reflecting Korea's historical emphasis on collective labor and harmony with nature. In 2014, nongak was inscribed on 's Representative List of the of Humanity, underscoring its enduring role in preserving cultural identity amid modernization.

Definition and Classification

Etymology and Core Characteristics

The term pungmul (풍물), rendered in as 風物, derives from "pung" (風, ) and "mul" (物, objects or things), originally denoting instruments used in pungak (風樂), ensembles featuring instruments alongside percussion for ceremonial and folk purposes. Over time, the designation shifted to emphasize the percussion-dominated rural performances, distinguishing it from courtly music while retaining the connotation of natural, elemental sounds. An alternative name, nongak (농악), meaning "farmers' music," emerged prominently during the Japanese colonial (1910–1945) to highlight its agrarian roots, though pungmul better captures the syncretic blend of instruments and communal expression predating that period. Pungmul constitutes a dynamic folk performing art form integrating percussion rhythms, synchronized dances, acrobatics, and chanted vocals, typically executed by groups of 10 to 40 participants in open-air settings such as village squares or fields. Core elements include four primary instruments—the kkwaenggwari (small hand gong for sharp accents), jing (large gong for sustained tones), buk (barrel drum for bass rhythms), and sogo (hourglass-shaped handheld drum for versatile beats)—which collectively evoke the sounds of labor, nature, and communal harmony. Performances follow structured cycles of tension and release, with formations shifting from processions to circles, enabling improvisation, call-and-response patterns, and physical feats like spins and leaps by lead drummers clad in colorful satja hats. Originating from pre-modern agricultural rituals and dure (collective labor) practices, pungmul's essential traits emphasize vitality, inclusivity across social strata, and ritual functions like warding off misfortune or celebrating harvests, evolving into a symbol of . In 2014, its variant nongak was inscribed on 's Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, recognizing it as a derived communal rite blending music, dance, and rustic entertainments central to Korean rural identity. Pungmul constitutes a primary genre within Korean folk music, specifically categorized under nongak (farmers' music), which denotes percussion-driven ensemble traditions emerging from agrarian communities during the Dynasty (1392–1897). This classification emphasizes its communal, outdoor performances tied to agricultural cycles, such as harvest rituals and village processions, contrasting with the formalized, indoor structures of court music like aak (ritual ensemble music) or hyangak (indigenous instrumental forms). Unlike court genres, which prioritize harmonic refinement and Confucian ceremonial precision, pungmul prioritizes rhythmic vitality, improvisation, and audience interaction, reflecting the labor-intensive motions of farming. In broader Korean musical taxonomy, folk traditions (minsok ak) divide into vocal-narrative forms (e.g., , epic with minimal percussion) and instrumental-ensemble types, with pungmul aligning firmly in the latter as a large-scale percussion band (p'ungmul madangnori). It incorporates core instruments like the kkwaenggwari (small gong), jing (large gong), buk (barrel drum), and (handheld drum), enabling polyrhythmic patterns that symbolize natural elements—metal, water, wood, and earth—distinct from the melodic dominance in string or wind-based folk variants such as sanjo (solo instrumental ). Regional subtypes within nongak, including Gyeonggi, Jindo, and Imsil styles, further delineate pungmul by variations and formations, yet all share its non-professional, hereditary transmission among rural performers. Pungmul is often conflated with nongak but technically represents a performative subset focused on itinerant or village-band execution, whereas nongak encompasses broader contexts like shamanic rites or seasonal festivals; this nuance arose in post- to highlight pungmul's emphasis on dynamic group over static . It diverges from samulnori, a adaptation by Kim Duk-soo that condenses pungmul to a format for stage concerts, stripping communal scale (dozens of participants) and integrating fixed arrangements unsuitable for pungmul's spontaneous, outdoor . Samulnori's global dissemination, via exports to ensembles in the U.S. and since the , has popularized a stylized variant, but lacks pungmul's integrated , vocal shouts (heol), and elements derived from pre-modern namsadang troupes. These distinctions underscore pungmul's rootedness in causal social functions—fostering community cohesion amid historical agrarian hardships—over theatrical abstraction.

Historical Origins and Evolution

Agricultural and Pre-Modern Roots

Pungmul, alternatively termed nongak or farmers' music, traces its origins to the collective labor systems of pre-modern Korean , particularly the dure practice where villagers cooperated in farming tasks such as planting, transplanting seedlings, and harvesting. Ensembles of percussion instruments provided rhythmic to synchronize movements, alleviate the monotony of repetitive labor, and encourage communal among workers. These performances often incorporated dynamic dances mimicking agricultural actions, reinforcing the music's functional ties to daily rural life. Documentary evidence from the Dynasty confirms nongak's established role by the mid-17th century, including a 1657 record by scholar An Yu-sin detailing its performance in rural settings. Earlier are inferred from oral traditions and the persistence of similar communal rites, suggesting from rudimentary percussion use in pest-repelling activities and seasonal work songs predating written accounts. Regional variations emerged across Korea's farming heartlands, adapting to local crops and topography while maintaining core elements like drum-led rhythms derived from labor motions. Beyond fieldwork, pungmul served pre-modern ritual functions, accompanying shamanistic ceremonies for rain invocation, prayers, and village against calamities, thereby blending with spiritual appeals for agricultural prosperity. These events, held during holidays or transitional seasons, strengthened social bonds in isolated farming communities, where the art form also facilitated informal and cultural transmission across generations.

Suppression Under Japanese Colonial Rule (1910-1945)

During Japanese colonial rule over Korea, established by the annexation treaty of August 25, 1910, and lasting until Japan's surrender on August 15, 1945, policies of systematically targeted traditional Korean to erode and impose Japanese norms. Authorities viewed indigenous folk practices, including music and dance forms linked to agrarian rituals and , as "uncivilized" obstacles to modernization and loyalty to the empire, leading to bans on public performances that could foster Korean ethnic cohesion or resistance. This cultural suppression intensified after , particularly during the wartime mobilization phase, when resources and expressions of Korean distinctiveness were redirected toward imperial goals. Pungmul, known interchangeably as nongak during this era—a term reportedly promoted by Japanese administrators to demean it as mere "farmers' music" and detach it from its ritualistic and communal roots—faced direct as part of broader efforts to dismantle shamanistic and folk religious elements in Korean society. Public performances were outlawed, depriving rural communities of their traditional role in agricultural rites, seasonal festivals, and social gatherings, which had historically reinforced village solidarity. Instruments central to pungmul, such as metal gongs (jing and kkwaenggwari), were confiscated en masse, often melted down to support Japan's war industries, resulting in a severe depletion of material resources for the tradition. The suppression extended to transmission and practice: colonial edicts restricted teaching Korean history and language in schools, indirectly curtailing the oral and performative passing of pungmul techniques, while promoted Japanese music and dances in educational and public settings. Consequently, pungmul troupes disbanded or went underground, with surviving performances limited to private or clandestine rural contexts, contributing to a generational loss of expertise and repertoire. Despite these measures, isolated figures, such as gong players in regions like , maintained elements of the form amid repression, preserving fragments for post-liberation revival. Overall, the era marked a for pungmul, with its communal vitality severely eroded by enforced assimilation, though the tradition's resilience foreshadowed its resurgence after 1945.

Post-Liberation Challenges and Initial Revival (1945-1960s)

Following the liberation from Japanese colonial rule in , pungmul faced immediate disruptions from the U.S. and Soviet occupations, which introduced political instability and shifted elite preferences toward Western cultural influences, marginalizing rural folk traditions like pungmul. The subsequent (1950–1953) exacerbated these challenges, devastating rural communities central to pungmul's performance, displacing practitioners, and halting systematic documentation amid widespread destruction and national trauma. Early postwar efforts at revival emerged sporadically, including a nongak festival organized under U.S. military auspices in 1946, reflecting initial attempts to reassert Korean cultural identity amid reconstruction. However, rapid and modernization in the 1950s eroded rural village structures (ture) essential for pungmul transmission, leading to a decline in skilled performers as many migrated to cities for economic opportunities. The enactment of the Cultural Properties Protection Law in 1962 marked a turning point, establishing a framework for safeguarding intangible heritage, including traditional music forms, through government sponsorship and designation of human cultural assets. In 1966, performer Yi Yongu was designated a human cultural asset to transmit nongak techniques, signaling official recognition and initial institutional support for revival amid concerns over fading expertise. Concurrently, university student groups, such as at in 1965, began adapting pungmul for cultural and social activities, laying groundwork for broader resurgence.

Integration into Political Movements (1970s-1980s)

In the 1970s, as opposition to President Park Chung-hee's authoritarian Yushin Constitution (enacted in 1972) intensified, pungmul was increasingly adopted by student activists and (people's culture) proponents as a performative medium for , symbolizing rural vitality against elite-driven modernization. This revival drew on pungmul's historical roots in communal labor and ritual to evoke an uncompromised Korean identity, contrasting with the regime's emphasis on Western-influenced development and suppression of traditional expressions deemed backward. Performances at university madang (open-air stages) integrated drumming with satirical skits and chants, fostering solidarity among protesters while evading direct as "folk entertainment." The movement, peaking in the mid-1970s through groups like the National Folk Arts Association (founded 1973), explicitly politicized pungmul by linking it to anti-imperialist and egalitarian narratives, with troupes performing at labor rallies and intellectual seminars to critique economic exploitation under rapid industrialization. These adaptations transformed pungmul from agrarian into a mobile tool, where synchronized rhythms and acrobatic displays disrupted official events and amplified calls for , as seen in sporadic campus occupations from 1974 onward. Following Park's assassination in 1979 and the 1980 under Chun Doo-hwan's regime, pungmul's role expanded in the democratization campaigns, with over 100 student and labor pungmul groups emerging by mid-decade to energize mass mobilizations. Drumming sequences, often featuring the hourglass-shaped kkwaenggwari for sharp calls-to-action, served practical functions in protests—drowning out police megaphones, coordinating marches, and sustaining morale during clashes, as documented in accounts of the 1987 June Democratic Struggle involving hundreds of thousands of participants. This era cemented pungmul's association with sonic resistance, though state crackdowns occasionally banned performances under emergency decrees, prompting underground adaptations. By the late , its integration had broadened to include urban workers and middle-class allies, shifting from niche to a widespread emblem of .

Core Performance Components

Percussion Instruments and Rhythmic Structures

Pungmul ensembles primarily utilize four to six s, reflecting a balance between metal gongs for accentuation and drums for sustained beats. The core metal instruments are the kkwaenggwari, a small hand-held gong about 19–22 cm in diameter with a thin rim, struck with a hard beater to produce sharp, high-pitched tones that mark rhythmic accents, and the jing, a larger flat approximately 50–60 cm across, played with a padded to deliver deep, resonant booms that delineate the primary pulse and structural boundaries of phrases. The leather-headed drums include the buk, a shallow barrel-shaped tensioned with adjustable ropes, beaten with a large padded stick on both heads for versatile tones ranging from bass thuds to brighter slaps, serving as the rhythmic backbone; the janggu, an hourglass with unequal heads producing high and low pitches via hand and stick techniques, often leading melodic-rhythmic variations; and occasionally the sogo, a small held in the hand and struck with a stick or the performer's hand for lighter, improvisational fills. These instruments interlock in polyrhythmic patterns, where the jing typically aligns with downbeats to unify the ensemble, while the kkwaenggwari punctuates off-beats for tension and release, creating a layered texture that evokes agricultural labor's repetitive yet dynamic motions. Rhythmic structures revolve around jangdan, standardized cycles of beats—often 4, 6, 8, or 12 units long—repeated with variations for endurance in communal settings, such as the moderate-tempo gutgeori pattern (12 beats) that supports processional marches and dances. Regional styles influence complexity: southern pungmul features rapid, intricate jangdan with acrobatic syncopations, contrasting slower, graceful northern cycles, all transmitted orally through village practice rather than notation. This fosters communal , with drummers adapting in real-time to maintain cohesion during extended performances lasting hours.

Dance Techniques and Acrobatic Elements

Pungmul performances integrate dance techniques that emphasize rhythmic synchronization between footwork and percussion beats, with performers executing coordinated marches, pivots, and circular formations while sustaining instrumental play. Front-line musicians, led by the kkwaenggwari player, incorporate dynamic body sways and emphatic head nods to signal rhythmic shifts, mimicking communal labor motions such as or harvesting to evoke agricultural vitality. Rear performers extend these into freer, theatrical s, often enacting skits with exaggerated gestures that portray social narratives like or ritual cycles. Acrobatic elements heighten the spectacle, primarily executed by specialized rear-line members known as mudong (dancing boys), who demonstrate feats integrated into the procession. These include constructing human towers, where base performers support stacked figures—typically an adult hoisting a youth on shoulders, extensible to five levels in advanced displays—allowing the apex figure to continue drumming or dancing. Such acrobatics, prominent in late Joseon-era namsadangpae troupes and southern Gyeonggi Province variants, blend physical prowess with musical continuity, underscoring the form's emphasis on communal endurance and display. Regional styles may incorporate additional stunts like spins or balances atop instruments, though core techniques prioritize group harmony over individual virtuosity.

Costuming, Formations, and Group Dynamics

Pungmul ensembles feature vibrant, symbolic costuming rooted in traditional Korean attire, often drawing from styles adapted for mobility and visual impact during performances. Garments typically incorporate five colors corresponding to the elemental philosophy—white for metal (east and autumn), red for fire (south and summer), blue or green for wood (east and spring), black for water (north and winter), and yellow for earth (center)—to evoke and the . Flowing fabrics in bright hues allow for dynamic movement, while accessories like sashes, vests, and such as the satgat (traditional ) for leaders or elaborate kkokkal (flowery Buddhist-style hats) enhance the ritualistic and theatrical elements. Advanced participants may don sangmo, feathered hats spun via head movements to create hypnotic patterns, symbolizing skill and vitality. Rear performers often adopt diverse, representational costumes and depicting social archetypes—such as artillerymen, aristocrats, brides, monks, or elders—to satirize or invoke roles, adding layers of and humor to the . These outfits prioritize functionality for and , contrasting with the plainer instrumentalists' garb to delineate roles within the troupe. Pungmul groups are hierarchically structured, typically comprising flag bearers at the lead, front-line instrumentalists (centered on the kkwaenggwari player who directs and cues), and rear-line dancers, actors, and acrobats who amplify the performance through physicality and . Dynamics emphasize communal , with call-and-response patterns between the leader's shouts (sori) and ensemble replies, fostering a sense of collective energy and adaptability to audience or environmental cues. Performances unfold in fluid formations that shift to underscore rhythmic intensity and thematic progression, including circular arrangements symbolizing unity and cyclical farm life, linear processions for processionals, and clustered groupings for interactive displays. Acrobatic elements, such as human pyramids with young dancers (mudong) atop shoulders or synchronized , integrate into these shifts, blending precision with spontaneity to heighten group cohesion and visual . Regional variations influence dynamics; for instance, Gyeonggi-do styles prioritize entertainment through rear-player skits, while Gangwon-do emphasizes ritualistic harvest invocations, reflecting localized social functions. Solos emerge periodically to showcase individual prowess within the collective framework, maintaining balance between hierarchy and egalitarian participation.

Vocal Traditions and Narrative Integration

In Pungmul performances, vocal elements, collectively referred to as sori, consist primarily of rhythmic shouts, chants, and exclamations that synchronize with percussion rhythms and movements. These vocals, often led by the kkwaenggwari (small ) player serving as the director, include interjections such as "eung-dori" or responsive cries from group members to maintain cohesion and signal transitions between rhythmic patterns like jjinmori or hwimori. The sori function not only as auditory cues but also as expressive bursts that amplify the energetic, communal spirit of the performance, drawing from agricultural work songs where laborers used calls to coordinate labor and boost morale. A key vocal tradition is gilgut (street rite), performed during processional segments of Pungmul nori, where troupes parade through villages reciting rhymed verses and invocations to invoke blessings or entertain audiences. These gilgut elements feature call-and-response patterns, with the leader improvising lines that may reference local events, seasonal changes, or ritual purposes, such as appeasing deities for bountiful harvests. In regional variants like Gochang or Imsil Pilbong nongak—closely allied forms to Pungmul—gilgut extends into exorcistic or celebratory rites, incorporating shamanistic chants that blend vocal melody with percussive intensity. Such practices underscore the tradition's roots in rural rituals, where vocals bridged music and communal dialogue. Narrative integration occurs through these improvised sori and gilgut, which embed folk stories, moral anecdotes, or historical references into the , transforming the into a theatrical vehicle. For instance, verses might recount agricultural hardships or heroic tales, fostering audience participation via cheers or responses, thus reinforcing social bonds and . This aspect distinguishes Pungmul from purely instrumental forms, aligning it with broader Korean folk arts like , though limited to concise, rhythmic delivery rather than extended epic . Empirical observations from preserved regional troupes confirm that narrative vocals adapt to context, such as festival exhortations documented in s since the early .

Traditional Cultural Functions

Role in Rural Communities and Rituals

In rural Korean communities, pungmul, also known as nongak, functioned as a vital element of agricultural life, accompanying collective farm labor known as dure to synchronize workers' movements, enhance enthusiasm, and foster communal solidarity. Performances during these labors, termed durepungjang, integrated rhythmic drumming and to alleviate the monotony of fieldwork and reinforce social bonds among villagers. This practice, deeply embedded in the of pre-modern Korea, extended to seasonal cycles, where spring performances prayed for abundant crops and autumn ones celebrated harvests, often reenacting farming processes in regions like Gangwon-do. Pungmul played a central role in village rituals, such as dangsan gut at tutelary god shrines held in the first lunar month or seasonally, where troupes performed to purify spaces and invoke divine protection. House-to-house rites called madangbapgi involved nongak to cleanse yards, kitchens, and wells, combining music with dramatic elements to ward off misfortune. Additionally, geollipgut performances supported community projects like building houses or bridges, blending , religious , and resource collection to unify village efforts. Shamanistic influences permeated pungmul's ritual applications, with performances aimed at appeasing gods, expelling evil spirits, and ensuring prosperity, often featuring symbolic flags like yongdanggi depicting dragons to invoke rain in areas such as Chungcheong-do and Jeolla-do. These elements, including acrobatic displays and skits on themes of and , linked nongak to broader mask dance traditions, providing spiritual reassurance amid rural hardships. Through such practices, pungmul not only entertained but also reinforced cultural continuity and collective resilience in village life.

Social Cohesion and Educational Transmission

Pungmul ensembles traditionally reinforced social cohesion in Korean rural villages by providing rhythmic accompaniment to dure—reciprocal labor exchanges during planting and harvesting seasons—where drumming synchronized group efforts, boosted collective morale, and symbolized interdependence among farmers. Performances during village holidays, shamanistic rituals, and community gatherings further solidified bonds, as participants engaged in synchronized dances and that embodied shared hardships and triumphs, fostering a sense of unity rooted in agrarian life. This communal participation extended to all ages and social strata, mitigating isolation in pre-industrial settings and promoting reciprocal obligations through celebratory pageantry. Educational transmission of pungmul occurred primarily through oral and experiential methods within village-based troupes, where novices apprenticed under elder masters by observing and imitating complex rhythms, formations, and improvisational elements during live performances. Lacking formal notation, mastery relied on repetitive practice in group settings, embedding technical proficiency alongside cultural values like perseverance and harmony, often spanning years of incremental involvement from childhood. This apprenticeship model, centered on lineages of performers, preserved regional variations—such as Pilbong or Imsil styles—while adapting to local needs, ensuring generational continuity amid oral traditions. By integrating youth into ritual and labor contexts, pungmul inadvertently inculcated social norms, historical narratives via vocal chants, and physical discipline, linking individual skill to collective heritage.

Modern Developments and Global Spread

Contemporary Adaptations in South Korea

In the late 1970s, pungmul underwent significant adaptation through the creation of samulnori, a condensed stage-oriented form performed by quartets using four core percussion instruments—kkwaenggwari, jing, puk, and janggu—derived from traditional nongak ensembles. Founded in 1978 by musicians including Kim Duk Soo in Seoul, samulnori shifted pungmul from rural outdoor rituals to structured indoor concerts, emphasizing rhythmic complexity and visual spectacle to appeal to urban audiences amid South Korea's rapid industrialization. This innovation revitalized interest in folk percussion, leading to the formation of professional groups like Samulnori Hanullim, which toured domestically and integrated amplified sound and choreography for theater settings. Contemporary pungmul performances increasingly incorporate fusions with and music genres, as seen in Liquid Sound's 2025 production "OffOn: Yeonhee Project 2," which deconstructs traditional rhythms and movements into abstract contemporary choreography while retaining percussive cores like the janggu beats. Similarly, ensembles such as Sangjaru blend pungmul elements with electronic and Western influences in live shows, performing innovative arrangements that draw younger participants and spectators to venues in and beyond. These adaptations maintain rhythmic authenticity but experiment with tempos and formations to align with global standards, evidenced by over 100 samulnori-derived groups active in by the 2010s. Pungmul has permeated popular culture through integrations in and media, with exhibitions in 2025 highlighting its influence on music videos and stage acts that fuse folk percussion with hip-hop and electronic beats, as in Topp Dogg's "Arario" where traditional instruments underscore modern tracks. Educational programs in universities and cultural centers, such as those at the National Gugak Center, teach adapted pungmul techniques to preserve transmission while adapting to urban youth interests, resulting in annual festivals like the Nongak Festival featuring hybrid repertoires since the 2000s. These efforts have expanded pungmul's domestic footprint, with participation in community events rising post-2014 recognition of nongak, though critics note risks of diluting rural origins for commercial appeal.

International Performances and UNESCO Recognition Efforts

Pungmul troupes, often under the broader designation of nongak, have been presented internationally through cultural exchange programs and communities to promote Korean heritage. For example, the staged a pungmul performance at the Street Arts Festival in Castle Square, , on July 2, 2022, as part of efforts to showcase traditional Korean arts abroad. In the United States, groups such as the San Diego Korean Pungmul have conducted public performances at events like the Poway Rotary Parade and Balboa Park's December Nights since the early 2000s, adapting the form for multicultural audiences while preserving core rhythmic and acrobatic elements. These outings emphasize pungmul's communal and rhythmic vitality, though they sometimes incorporate modern interpretations to appeal to non-Korean viewers. Efforts to secure UNESCO recognition culminated in the inscription of "Nongak, community band music, dance and rituals in the Republic of Korea" on the Representative List of the of Humanity in November 2014. This followed nominations by South Korea's Cultural Heritage Administration, highlighting nongak's role in fostering social cohesion through percussion ensembles, parades, and rituals derived from agrarian traditions. The committee noted that the designation would boost global visibility and encourage intergenerational transmission, countering risks of erosion from . Post-inscription, international performances have referenced this status to underscore authenticity, as seen in events like the Bupyeong Pungmul Festival's global zones, which invite foreign participants to engage with the tradition.

Establishment and Evolution in the United States (1980s-Present)

Pungmul arrived in the United States in the mid-1980s, primarily through Korean American activists connected to the cultural movement in , which emphasized folk arts as symbols of resistance against authoritarian rule. The earliest documented groups formed between 1985 and 1989 in major Korean immigrant hubs, including Binari in in 1985 as the cultural arm of what became the MinKwon Center for Community Action, and Sori at the , also in 1985. These pioneers, often political refugees or student activists protesting the n regime, adapted pungmul for demonstrations abroad, using its communal rhythms to foster solidarity and express diasporic identity amid U.S. waves post-1965 Hart-Celler Act. By the early 1990s, pungmul groups proliferated, with at least 35 active ensembles by 2001 concentrated in San Francisco Bay Area (e.g., Hanin Chôngnyun Munhwawon, founded 1987 in Oakland), Los Angeles (e.g., Minjung Munhwa Yongusô, 1986), Chicago (e.g., Il-kwa-Nori, 1988), New York, Boston, and Washington, D.C. The 1992 Los Angeles riots (Sa-i-gu), which highlighted tensions between Korean merchants and other communities, prompted a pivot from transnational Korean politics toward domestic multicultural engagement and community healing rituals like jishinbalbki ground-breaking ceremonies. In 1998, the National Pungmul Network (NPN) emerged under Hanin Chôngnyun Munhwawon leadership to coordinate exchanges, teacher training from Korea (e.g., visits by Kim Bong Jun and Yi Jung-hoon), and national festivals, enhancing technical proficiency and standardization. Into the 2000s and beyond, pungmul evolved from activist origins to a staple of cultural preservation and intergenerational transmission in Korean American communities, with university troupes like Oori at MIT (active by early 2000s) and Kutkori at Harvard (1990) introducing it to younger, U.S.-born participants. groups such as in , Korean Pungmul Institute (established post-2000s with ongoing classes), and Hana Center's ensemble in integrated pungmul into immigrant rights rallies, including DACA support in New Orleans and events in , blending heritage with contemporary advocacy. Performances expanded to multicultural festivals, schools, and events like the Korean Institute of Chicago's appearances at folk festivals, emphasizing pungmul's role in social cohesion over political protest, though ties to roots persist in group missions. Today, dozens of groups operate nationwide, sourcing instruments from Korea due to limited local availability, and sustaining pungmul as a dynamic marker of Korean American resilience amid assimilation pressures.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Debates

Politicization and Ideological Appropriation

During South Korea's democratization movement from the late 1960s through the 1980s, p'ungmul—traditionally a rural percussion ensemble linked to agricultural rituals—emerged as a tool for political dissent against authoritarian regimes under presidents Park Chung-hee and Chun Doo-hwan. Urban students and intellectuals revived and adapted the genre, transforming its communal rhythms into audible symbols of resistance that could overpower police sirens and project over distances during street protests. This shift aligned p'ungmul with the minjung (people's culture) ideology, which romanticized folk traditions as authentic expressions of the oppressed masses against elite and state-imposed modernity, often framing performers in colorful hanbok attire as embodiments of pre-industrial solidarity. The appropriation drew on p'ungmul's inherent loudness and to foster protester cohesion, but it overlaid ideological interpretations that diverged from its agrarian origins, such as portraying it as inherently subversive rather than ritualistic. Critics within Korean ethnomusicology argue this politicization manipulated the genre's "traditional" meanings to serve dissident , selectively emphasizing resistance motifs while downplaying apolitical communal functions like celebrations. By the 1987 June Democratic Uprising, p'ungmul troupes had become fixtures in labor and demonstrations, with performances integrating satirical skits mocking military rule, further entrenching its association with anti-authoritarian, often leftist-leaning . In the , particularly in the United States since the , immigrant communities have extended this politicization, using p'ungmul in rallies for immigrant rights and against perceived cultural erasure, as seen in groups like the Korean Resource Center's events. However, such uses have sparked debates over authenticity, with some practitioners viewing the infusion of contemporary political narratives—such as with global progressive causes—as a dilution of the form's rural , rooted in seasonal cycles rather than urban . Academic analyses highlight how these appropriations reflect broader tensions in postcolonial contexts, where are reinterpreted to assert identity amid rapid modernization, though empirical studies of performance contexts reveal variability, with not all groups endorsing the same ideological framing.

Commercialization Versus Cultural Authenticity

The adaptation of pungmul into samulnori in 1978 by performers from Seoul's National Gugak Academy and Minsok Kut folk theater company represented an early pivot toward commercialization, distilling mobile, communal rhythms into seated, virtuosic ensemble pieces suitable for urban stages and global audiences. This innovation facilitated professional troupes' international tours starting in the , recordings, and fusions with contemporary genres, generating and elevating Korean percussion's visibility, yet it diverged from pungmul's agrarian roots by emphasizing individual technical display over collective improvisation and integration. Critics, including ethnomusicologists, argue that such adaptations erode authenticity by severing ties to pungmul's original functions in rural farming rituals and social bonding, where performances involved spontaneous audience participation, acrobatic dances, and contextual narratives tied to seasonal labor and shamanistic elements. For instance, samulnori's faster tempos and fixed seating often preclude the interactive mobility central to traditional nongak troupes, transforming a participatory folk practice into a commodified akin to Western classical concerts, which some view as an reconfiguration disconnected from its proletarian origins. This tension intensified during the 1980s , when pungmul revivals emphasized political protest and communal authenticity against samulnori's perceived apolitical polish. Tourism-driven , evident in festivals like the annual Bupyeong Pungmul Festival (established in the 1990s and designated a event by 2024), further amplifies these debates by staging shortened, spectator-focused versions for visitors, often in urban or heritage sites such as folk villages. While proponents claim such events sustain practitioners— with government investments like Chuncheon's 1 billion won (approximately $750,000 USD as of 2025) for pungmul market development aiding preservation through economic viability— detractors highlight risks of simplification, where elaborate costumes and synchronized routines prioritize visual appeal over the variable, context-dependent authenticity of village nongak, potentially fostering superficial cultural consumption. Empirical observations from heritage studies note that while can fund transmission (e.g., via UNESCO-listed nongak's 2014 inscription emphasizing communal rituals), it often incentivizes adaptations that dilute causal links to pre-modern agrarian causality, favoring marketable uniformity. Proponents of moderated commercialization counter that rigid adherence to "pure" forms ignores historical —pungmul itself adapted across regions and eras—and that from professional and tourist outlets has enabled training academies and groups since the 1980s, preventing obsolescence amid . Nonetheless, ongoing scholarly discourse underscores the need for balanced , as unchecked market pressures risk prioritizing profit over the empirical integrity of pungmul's role in fostering social cohesion through unscripted, embodied expression.

Preservation Challenges Amid Innovation

The rapid of since the mid-20th century has eroded the rural village settings essential to pungmul's original performance contexts, where it served communal rituals, farming coordination, and social bonding, leading to disrupted transmission as elderly practitioners retire without sufficient successors in depopulated areas. This demographic shift, with rural populations declining from over 50% in 1960 to under 20% by , has confined pungmul increasingly to staged revivals, diluting its spontaneous, site-specific improvisations tied to agricultural cycles. Innovations like samulnori, pioneered in 1978 by the National Gugak Center's group extracting four core instruments (kkwaenggwari, jing, buk, pyeongyeong) into a compact ensemble for urban concert halls, have boosted global visibility and youth participation but sparked authenticity debates by prioritizing rhythmic abstraction over the full, variable instrumentation, acrobatic dances, and narrative songs of traditional pungmul troupes, which typically involved 10-30 performers in outdoor settings. Proponents view such adaptations as vital for survival amid competing modern entertainments, yet critics contend they commodify pungmul's communal ethos into individualistic spectacle, as evidenced by samulnori's fusion variants incorporating Western or pop elements that alter core polyrhythms and call-response structures. Commercial pressures exacerbate these tensions, with festival performances often simplifying pungmul to short, high-energy segments for tourist appeal, as seen in events like the where rhythmic displays overshadow ritualistic depth, prompting participant accounts of cultural dilution through overemphasis on visual flair at the expense of historical narratives. Government-backed preservation, including South Korea's designation since 1981 and UNESCO's inscription of nongak (encompassing pungmul variants) under representative list efforts, mandates technique documentation and master-apprentice , yet enrollment in traditional programs lags, with surveys indicating fewer than 10% of urban youth aged 18-24 engaging regularly due to preferences for and electronic genres. Balancing fidelity to empirical transmission methods—such as embodied learning through repetitive farm- drills—with innovative remains contentious, as hybrid forms risk eroding causal to pungmul's origins in agrarian resilience, while rigid may accelerate in a digital era favoring accessible media. Regional variants, like Gongju's nondeureongbatdeureong style, persist through specialized troupes branding localized authenticity, but broader scalability falters against globalization's homogenizing pull.

References

  1. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/nongak-community-band-music-dance-and-rituals-in-the-republic-of-korea-00973
  2. https://contents.history.go.kr/mobile/tz/view.do?levelId=tz_b59
  3. https://educalingo.com/en/dic-ko/pungmul
  4. http://www.koreanheritage.kr/feature/view_pc.jsp?articleNo=209
  5. https://sdkpi.org/pungmul/
  6. https://english.visitseoul.net/tours/traditional-korean-music-pungmullori8_/12998
  7. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/nongak-community-band-music-dance-and-rituals-in-the-republic-of-korea-00717
  8. https://urbangateways.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Harmony-of-Korean-Drumming-Dancing_In-Person.pdf
  9. https://uspungmul.wordpress.com/what-is-pungmul/
  10. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/rooted-korean-folk-music-tradition-samulnori-finds-home-21st-century-n706726
  11. https://folkency.nfm.go.kr/en/topic/detail/6486
  12. https://omeka-s.grinnell.edu/s/MusicalInstruments/page/korea
  13. https://musc102.blogs.wesleyan.edu/files/2021/03/Robert-C.-Provine-et-al._Korea.pdf
  14. https://journals.colorado.edu/index.php/coasianstudies/article/download/2963/kpop/11509
  15. https://www.danceus.org/style/pungmul-dance-in-korea/
  16. https://folkency.nfm.go.kr/EN/topic/detail/6479
  17. https://uspungmul.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bussell1997.pdf
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-society-for-american-music/article/musical-entanglements-ely-haimowitz-and-orchestral-music-under-the-us-army-military-government-in-korea-19451948/17D8749BDF516C255115C2278F803CCB
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259747282_The_Drumming_of_Dissent_during_South_Korea%27s_Democratization_Movement
  20. https://uspungmul.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/lee20091.pdf
  21. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/9f344156-774c-437b-ad1e-87b118aa9a17/download
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37689588_P%27ungmul_South_Korean_Drumming_and_Dance
  23. https://uspungmul.wordpress.com/instruments/
  24. http://www.koreanheritage.kr/feature/view.jsp?articleNo=209
  25. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11055&context=etd
  26. https://repository.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:1006720/datastream/PDF/download
  27. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3034930/1/Um_TheApro2012_Rediscovering%2520Traditional%2520Korean%2520Performing%2520Arts.pdf
  28. https://musc.cms.arts.ubc.ca/publications/rhythm-and-folk-drumming-pungmul-as-the-musical-embodiment-of-communal-consciousness-in-south-korean-village-society/
  29. http://www.koreanheritage.kr/feature/view.jsp?articleNo=212
  30. https://www.flickr.com/photos/cgs615/3905353293/
  31. https://sdkpi.org/performances/
  32. https://www.bostonpungmul.org/about
  33. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/26154.pdf
  34. https://folkency.nfm.go.kr/EN/topic/detail/6464
  35. https://folkency.nfm.go.kr/EN/topic/detail/6498
  36. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo3752861.html
  37. https://actaonline.org/profile/dohee-lee/
  38. https://www.esplanade.com/offstage/arts/samulnori-a-brief-history-from-village-to-stage
  39. https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/south-korean-percussion-genre-samul-nori-goes-global
  40. https://koreasociety.org/performing-arts/1483-samul-nori-dynamic-rhythms-from-korea
  41. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10539358
  42. https://sbstatesman.com/133242/arts/sangjarus-seamless-fusion-of-time-honored-korean-sounds/
  43. https://ngr.korean-culture.org/en/990/board/244/read/138067
  44. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLvbq2lrTks
  45. https://centerforworldmusic.org/event/festival-music-dance-korea_2022/
  46. https://www.korea.net/Events/Overseas/view?articleId=14497
  47. https://sdkpi.org/category/performances/
  48. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2014/11/27/socialAffairs/Nongak-makes-Unescos-intangible-heritage-list/2997868.html
  49. https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/brd/m_5676/view.do?seq=314588&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&multi_itm_seq=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=249&titleNm=
  50. https://bpfglobal.kr/
  51. https://uspungmul.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/kwon2001.pdf
  52. https://www.minkwon.org/binari
  53. https://news.mit.edu/2005/arts-oori-0126
  54. https://pungmulnori.wixsite.com/nori
  55. https://blockclubchicago.org/2022/07/13/how-a-north-side-immigrant-rights-group-is-using-korean-folk-drumming-to-build-community/
  56. https://www.richmondfolkfestival.org/2022-performers-b/2022/6/7/korean-performing-arts-institute-of-chicago-txhwf
  57. https://uspungmul.wordpress.com/pungmul-in-the-us/
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/ethnomusicology.56.2.0179
  59. https://www.drupal-krcla.org/en/post/3668
  60. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/bitstreams/6f337107-6d61-4afc-b9e7-011c06beef7b/download
  61. https://www.facebook.com/groups/756269998464517/posts/1853799225378250/
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308630367_New_Perspective_of_Korean_Social_Cultural_Diversity_and_Cultural_Development_Protection_and_Inheritance_of_Folk_Custom_and_Intangible_Cultural_Heritage
  63. https://www.koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2003/01/05/features/The-Beat-Goes-On-Samulnori-Contest-Unites-Culture-and-A-Desire-to-Drum/1896023.html
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334308409_Between_preservation_and_change_performing_arts_heritage_development_in_South_Korea
  65. https://www.academia.edu/27289502/Samul_nori_as_traditional_Preservation_and_innovation_in_a_South_Korean_contemporary_percussion_genre
  66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27302482
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276249675_Becoming_One_Embodying_Korean_P%27ungmul_Percussion_Band_Music_and_Dance_through_Site-Specific_Intermodal_Transmission
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370846544_The_Performance_Characteristics_and_Cultural_Significance_of_Nondeureongbatdeureong_Pungmul_in_Gongju_Region
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.