Hubbry Logo
Shuttle Radar Topography MissionShuttle Radar Topography MissionMain
Open search
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Community hub
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission model
SRTM Shaded Relief Anaglyph of Zagros Mountains.
The SRTM was flown on an 11-day mission of the Space Shuttle Endeavour in February 2000.[1]
This NASA image used Landsat data to texture-map the surface created using SRTM Elevation data. The Cape Peninsula and Cape of Good Hope, South Africa, are visible in the foreground.[1]

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) is an international research effort that obtained digital elevation models on a near-global scale from 56°S to 60°N,[2]: 4820  to generate the most complete high-resolution digital topographic database of Earth prior to the release of the ASTER GDEM in 2009. SRTM consisted of a specially modified radar system that flew on board the Space Shuttle Endeavour during the 11-day STS-99 mission in February 2000. The radar system was based on the older Spaceborne Imaging Radar-C/X-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SIR-C/X-SAR), previously used on the Shuttle in 1994. To acquire topographic data, the SRTM payload was outfitted with two radar antennas.[2] One antenna was located in the Shuttle's payload bay, the other – a critical change from the SIR-C/X-SAR, allowing single-pass interferometry – on the end of a 60-meter (200-foot) mast that extended from the payload bay once the Shuttle was in space.[2] The technique employed is known as interferometric synthetic aperture radar. Intermap Technologies was the prime contractor for processing the interferometric synthetic aperture radar data.[citation needed]

The elevation models are arranged into tiles, each covering one degree of latitude and one degree of longitude, named according to their south western corners. For example, "n45e006" stretches from 45°N 6°E to 46°N 7°E and "s45w006" from 45°S 6°W to 44°S 5°W. The resolution of the raw data is one arcsecond (30 m along the equator) and coverage includes Africa, Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Australia.[3] A derived one arcsecond dataset with trees and other non-terrain features removed covering Australia was made available in November 2011; the raw data are restricted for government use.[4] For the rest of the world, only three arcsecond (90 m along the equator) data are available.[2]: 4821  Each one arcsecond tile has 3,601 rows, each consisting of 3,601 16 bit bigendian cells. The dimensions of the three arcsecond tiles are 1201 x 1201. The original SRTM elevations were calculated relative to the WGS84 ellipsoid and then the EGM96 geoid separation values were added to convert to heights relative to the geoid for all the released products.[5]

The elevation models derived from the SRTM data are used in geographic information systems. They can be downloaded freely over the Internet, and their file format (.hgt) is widely supported.

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission is an international project spearheaded by the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Defense, and the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA transferred the SRTM payload to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in 2003; the canister, mast, and antenna are now on display at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia.[6]

Versions

[edit]

The USGS SRTM data is based on NASA's SIR-C instrument. It is available in at the following versions:

  • Version 1 (2003–2004) is almost the raw data.[7]
  • Version 2.1 (~2005) is an edited version of v1. Artifacts are removed, but voids are not yet filled. There are 1-arcsecond data over the US.[8]
  • Version 3 (2013), also known as SRTM Plus, is void-filled with ASTER GDEM and USGS GMTED2010. This release is available in global 1-arcsecond (30 meter) resolution since 2014.

The SRTM also carries the X-SAR instrument operated by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and Italian Space Agency (ASI). The resulting dataset is usually called SRTM/X-SAR, or SRTMX for short. The grid resolution is high at 25 meters, but it has many gaps. The data was made public in May 2011.[9][10]

The terminology regarding versions and resolutions can be confusing. "SRTM1" and "SRTM3" refers to the resolutions in 1 and 3 arc-seconds, not the versions of the format. On the other hand, "SRTM4.1" refers to a specific filled version by CGIAR-CSI. It is recommended to add a "v" in front of the version number to disambiguate.

No-data areas

[edit]
SRTM void filling with spline interpolation in GRASS GIS.

The elevation datasets are affected by mountain and desert no-data areas. These amount to no more than 0.2% of the total area surveyed,[11] but can be a problem in areas of very high relief. They affect all summits over 8,000 meters, most summits over 7,000 meters, many Alpine and similar summits and ridges, and many gorges and canyons. There are some SRTM data sources which have filled these data voids, but some of these have used only interpolation from surrounding data, and may therefore be very inaccurate. If the voids are large, or completely cover summit or ridge areas, no interpolation algorithms will give satisfactory results.

Void-filled SRTM datasets

[edit]
Relief map of Sierra Nevada, Spain
Example of relief map from SRTM1 (central Nevada)

Groups of scientists have worked on algorithms to fill the voids of the original SRTM (v2.1) data. Three datasets offer global coverage void-filled SRTM data at full (3-arcsecond) resolution:

  • The CGIAR-CSI version 4 provides the best global coverage using interpolation.[12]
  • The USGS HydroSHEDS dataset was generated for hydrological applications and is suitable for consistent drainage and water flow information. References are provided[13] on the algorithms used and quality assessment.[14]
  • The void-filled SRTM data from Viewfinder Panoramas by Jonathan de Ferranti[15] are high quality at full SRTM resolution. The data is filled using local survey maps and photographs. The OpenTopoMap website uses this fill. It has been partially updated for the 1-arcsecond release in the US.

In November 2013, LP DAAC released[16] the NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Version 3.0 (SRTM Plus) Product collection with all voids eliminated. Voids were filled primarily from ASTER GDEM2, and secondarily from USGS GMTED2010 – or USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) for the United States (except Alaska) and northernmost Mexico according to the announcement.

Highest resolution global release

[edit]

A 1-arc second global digital elevation model (30 meters) is available from the United States Geological Survey web site.[17] The United States Government announced on September 23, 2014 over a United Nations Climate Summit that the highest possible resolution of global topographic data derived from the SRTM mission will be released to public.[18] Before the end of the same year, a 1-arc second global digital elevation model (30 meters) was released. Most parts of the world have been covered by this dataset ranging from 54°S to 60°N latitude except for the Middle East and North Africa area.[17] Missing coverage of the Middle East was completed in August 2015.[19]

Users

[edit]

In early June 2011, there were 750,000 confirmed users of SRTM topography dataset. Users in 221 countries have accessed the site.[20]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) was a groundbreaking joint project between , the (NGA, formerly the National Imagery and Mapping Agency), the (DLR), and the (ASI), conducted aboard the from February 11 to 22, 2000, to create the first near-global (DEM) of Earth's land surface using (SAR) interferometry. The mission deployed a 60-meter (200-foot) mast to separate two radar antennas—one fixed in the shuttle's payload bay and the other at the mast's end—operating in both C-band and X-band wavelengths to measure terrain heights through phase differences in signals, achieving a horizontal resolution of approximately 30 meters (1 arc-second) over nearly 80% of Earth's landmass between 60°N and 56°S latitudes. The primary objective of SRTM was to produce a high-resolution topographic database that would enable unprecedented analysis of global landforms, supporting applications in scientific research, environmental monitoring, resource management, and disaster response, such as flood control, navigation, and volcano monitoring. The radar system, designed and managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), collected over 8.6 terabytes of raw C-band data during the 11-day flight, with the C-band providing broad coverage for the main DEM while the higher-resolution X-band captured detailed interferograms over select areas. This interferometric approach allowed mapping even in cloudy or vegetated regions, where optical methods would fail, resulting in vertical accuracies of about ±16 meters for most terrains. SRTM's legacy endures as a foundational for geospatial sciences, with processed DEMs archived and freely distributed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, influencing fields from climate modeling and to and worldwide. The mission's data have been cited in thousands of studies and integrated into global mapping projects, demonstrating the value of for comprehensive .

Mission Background

Objectives and Development

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) aimed to produce a near-global (DEM) covering approximately 80% of Earth's land surface between 60°N and 56°S latitude, utilizing single-pass to generate consistent data with high resolution and accuracy. This objective addressed critical gaps in existing global datasets, which were often inconsistent due to varying mapping techniques, limitations in optical methods, and high costs of ground-based surveys. Key motivations included supporting applications in , , and , such as modeling , flooding, and impacts, while marking the first space-based effort to achieve uniform high-resolution coverage across vast, inaccessible regions. Initiated in the mid-1990s as an evolution of NASA's earlier Shuttle Imaging Radar missions (SIR-A, SIR-B, and SIR-C/X-SAR from the 1980s and 1994), SRTM's development emphasized leveraging synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry advancements for efficient DEM generation. Planning formally began around 1996, with engineering tests including a 1996 AIRSAR campaign to validate interferometric techniques and preflight calibrations to ensure system performance. The project represented a collaborative international effort led by NASA in partnership with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA, formerly NIMA), the German Aerospace Center (DLR), and the Italian Space Agency (ASI), where DLR and ASI contributed the X-band radar hardware. The development phase spanned from approximately 1997 to 1999, encompassing four years of flight segment design and integration, culminating in the payload's incorporation into the mission aboard . This timeline reflected a focused seven-year progression from concept to operational readiness, prioritizing innovative single-pass to overcome the limitations of multi-pass methods used in prior missions.

Launch and Operations

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) launched on February 11, 2000, at 17:44 GMT (12:44 p.m. EST) aboard (STS-99) from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's in . The mission, commanded by Kevin R. Kregel with a crew of six including pilot Dominic L. Gorie and mission specialists , , Mamoru Mohri, and Gerhard P. J. Thiele, was designed for an 11-day duration to acquire topographic data over Earth's land surfaces between 60°N and 56°S latitude. Shortly after reaching a 224 km inclined at 57°, the crew initiated on-orbit checkout procedures, successfully deploying the 60-meter mast assembly in approximately 20 minutes to position the secondary antenna for interferometric operations. This deployment occurred on the first full day in , followed by system verifications that confirmed the mast's structural integrity despite initial oscillations up to 10 cm induced by shuttle thruster firings. In-orbit activities proceeded with continuous radar mapping using the SIR-C/X-SAR system, divided into Red and Blue teams for 24-hour coverage across 149 orbits. Over 222 hours of operation, the mission completed 765 data takes, capturing 12.3 terabytes of raw interferometric data on 332 high-density tapes and achieving 99.98% coverage of the targeted terrestrial area, with 94.6% imaged twice for enhanced accuracy. Minor challenges included a failed on the mast, which doubled consumption and required maneuvers such as "flycasting" to stabilize the shuttle's attitude, alongside careful management of power and loads from the 's high-energy demands during extended mapping sessions. These issues did not significantly impact , as the antennas maintained operational alignment throughout. Endeavour landed successfully on February 22, 2000, at 22:22 UTC (6:22 p.m. EDT) on Runway 33 at after 11 days, 5 hours, 39 minutes, and 181 orbits, having traveled approximately 6.6 million kilometers. The data tapes were immediately offloaded for preliminary downlink and validation at , with initial processing workflows beginning in late February and extending into March 2000 to assess data quality and prepare for transfer to the . This phase marked the transition from flight operations to ground-based analysis, enabling the generation of the first near-global digital elevation models within months.

Technical Specifications

Radar Instrumentation

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) utilized a modified version of the Spaceborne Imaging Radar-C (SIR-C) and X-SAR systems, originally developed for earlier shuttle missions, to enable high-resolution topographic mapping through (SAR) interferometry. The primary radar operated at C-band with a frequency of 5.3 GHz and of 5.6 cm, provided by NASA's (JPL), while an additional X-band system, contributed by the (DLR) and (ASI), operated at 9.6 GHz with a 3.1 cm for enhanced resolution in select areas. These modifications from the 1994 SIR-C/X-SAR flights removed L-band capabilities to focus on dual-frequency suited for elevation derivation. The interferometric configuration featured two antenna arrays: a main transmitting and receiving antenna mounted in the shuttle's payload bay and a receive-only outboard antenna positioned at the end of a deployable 60-meter mast, creating a fixed baseline for single-pass interferometry. The mast, known as the Able Deployable Articulated Mast (ADAM), consisted of a lightweight graphite-epoxy truss structure with 87 bays, weighing 360 kg alone and 1,700 kg including the outboard antenna assembly. This setup allowed simultaneous imaging from slightly separated viewpoints, capturing phase differences to infer surface heights without requiring repeat passes. Key operational specifications included a 10 MHz bandwidth for both C- and X-band radars, enabling along-track resolutions of approximately 10-25 meters after processing, though the X-band offered potentially finer detail due to its shorter . The C-band swath width reached 225 km per orbit, covering broad areas efficiently, while the X-band was limited to 50 km for higher precision but with gaps in global coverage. Radar power output was approximately 1.2 kW per polarization for C-band and 1.7 kW for X-band, drawn from the shuttle's electrical systems to support continuous operation over 11 days. The integrated SRTM payload weighed about 13,600 kg and occupied the full length of the shuttle's cargo bay, with the main antenna measuring roughly 12 meters long by 4 meters wide. This compact yet robust design, refined from the 1994 Space Radar Laboratory missions (STS-59 and ), ensured compatibility with the Space Shuttle Endeavour's configuration during STS-99.

Interferometric Techniques

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) employed single-pass , a technique that utilizes two antennas separated by a 60-meter baseline to simultaneously (SAR) images of the Earth's surface. This configuration allows the measurement of phase differences between the signals received by the two antennas, which encode variations in the line-of-sight distance to the terrain, enabling the derivation of elevation data without the temporal decorrelation issues common in repeat-pass systems. The phase difference arises from the slightly different paths the radar waves take to and from each antenna, reflecting topographic height variations relative to a reference surface. To convert these phase differences to height, the interferometric geometry incorporates the baseline length, radar wavelength, incidence angle, platform altitude, and slant range. The fundamental height equation, derived from the interferometric phase and baseline projection, is given by: h=ϕ⋅λ⋅B⊥4πρsin⁡θh = \frac{\phi \cdot \lambda \cdot B_{\perp}}{4\pi \rho \sin\theta} where hh is the height difference, ϕ\phi is the interferometric phase difference (in radians), λ\lambda is the radar wavelength (5.6 cm for C-band), B⊥B_{\perp} is the effective baseline length perpendicular to the line of sight (approximately 60 m), ρ\rho is the slant range (approximately 250 km for SRTM), and θ\theta is the incidence angle. This relation stems from the geometric projection of the baseline onto the range direction, where small phase changes correspond to height ambiguities scaled by the system's sensitivity; for SRTM's C-band configuration at an orbital altitude of about 250 km, the absolute vertical accuracy achieved was approximately 10 meters at the 90% confidence level, surpassing the mission's 16-meter design goal. Data collection occurred simultaneously in multiple polarizations to enhance signal interpretability and support phase estimation: horizontal transmit-horizontal receive (HH), vertical transmit-vertical receive (VV), and horizontal transmit-vertical receive (HV) for certain sub-swaths. Due to the 2π ambiguity in the wrapped phase (with height ambiguities ranging from 125 to 325 meters depending on incidence angle), resolution required phase unwrapping algorithms, such as the branch-cut method, applied after multi-looking the data to average multiple independent samples and reduce noise-induced errors. A key advantage of this active radar approach is its all-weather and day-night operational capability, as it penetrates clouds and does not rely on solar illumination. Baseline stability was ensured through precise navigation, with GPS providing 1-meter positioning accuracy and star trackers maintaining attitude knowledge to within 4 microradians, minimizing errors in the interferometric geometry.

Data Coverage and Characteristics

Geographic Extent

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) provided digital elevation data covering approximately 80% of Earth's surface, encompassing all continental landmasses between 60°N and 56°S . This extensive swath, achieved through the mission's imaging from Endeavour's orbit at 57° inclination and 233 km altitude, targeted a total area of about 119 million km², excluding polar regions beyond the specified latitudes, open ocean surfaces, and small remote islands not reachable by the shuttle's orbital path. The coverage prioritized contiguous areas, enabling near-global mapping of major topographic features across continents such as North and South America, , , , and , while deliberately omitting high-latitude zones like much of , , , and due to orbital constraints. Data acquisition focused on large, continuous landmasses, achieving a success rate of 99.96% for the targeted at least once, with 94.59% covered multiple times for improved interferometric . Although urban areas and densely vegetated regions were included in the coverage, they often exhibited phase decorrelation in signals, affecting in those locales without outright exclusion from the . The mission's swath width of approximately 225 km for the C-band ensured broad overlap in mid-latitudes, facilitating complete tiling over primary land targets. SRTM data are organized into 1° × 1° geographic tiles, centered on degrees of , totaling 14,549 such tiles for the primary . Each tile is distributed in a standard 16-bit signed binary raster format (.hgt), named according to its southwest corner coordinates—for example, the file N45_E006.hgt represents the tile with its southwest corner at 45°N, 6°E. This tiling scheme supports efficient global dissemination and user access, with files georeferenced to the WGS84 ellipsoid and referenced to the EGM96 .

Resolution and Accuracy

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) produced digital elevation models (DEMs) with a global posting interval of 1 arcsecond, equivalent to approximately 30 meters at the for the primary C-band data, which underwent resampling from the radar's intrinsic along-track resolution of approximately 25 meters to this coarser grid for efficient global distribution. The X-band data, acquired simultaneously but with more limited coverage of about 50% of the C-band swaths, featured a finer of 25 meters at mid-latitudes, enabling higher-detail mapping in targeted regions. These resolutions reflect the (InSAR) system's design, where C-band served as the backbone for the near-global DEM due to its broader 225-kilometer swath width, while X-band supported complementary high-resolution products in select areas, such as those processed by the (DLR) for parts of . Vertical accuracy for SRTM data targeted an absolute of 16 at 90% (LE90), corresponding to a (RMSE) of approximately 9.7 , with relative vertical accuracy achieving around 6 in areas of consistent . In low-relief regions like deserts, validation studies reported RMS below 10 , often as low as 2.7 when compared to swath mapping (ALSM), demonstrating superior performance where phase coherence is high. Approximately 90% of the global dataset meets the 16-meter LE90 standard, though accuracy varies by ; the elevations are referenced to the EGM96 for orthometric heights, with horizontal positioning tied to the WGS84 . Key error sources in the raw SRTM dataset include from uncompensated motion and instabilities, which introduce high-frequency vertical speckling, as well as baseline effects that degrade coherence over vegetated canopies and water bodies, shifting the phase center above the bare-earth surface. These factors primarily impact relative accuracy in complex terrains, where vegetation-induced volume can bias heights upward by several meters, though the single-pass of SRTM minimized temporal compared to repeat-pass systems. Band-specific differences highlight C-band's robustness for global coverage despite its longer (5.6 cm) leading to greater penetration and potential underestimation in dense , whereas X-band (3.1 cm ) offered improved resolution for refinement but suffered more from in non-urban areas due to its shorter baseline.

Gaps and Limitations

The original Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) dataset contained approximately 0.7% no-data areas globally, equivalent to about 800,000 km² of voids out of the total surveyed land surface of roughly 119 million km² between 60°N and 56°S. These voids, numbering around 3.3 million in total, were predominantly small, with most covering less than 625 m², though larger gaps occurred in specific regions. The primary causes of these gaps stemmed from inherent limitations in the radar interferometry technique employed by SRTM. In high-relief zones, such as the and , radar signals experienced and shadowing effects, where steep terrain caused overlapping returns or blocked illumination from the side-looking antenna . Additionally, phase due to baseline and surface properties led to signal loss over dynamic surfaces like water bodies and dense , reducing coherence in the interferometric pairs. Specular reflections from calm water or smooth sands, as seen in desert regions, further contributed by scattering radar energy away from the receiver, resulting in low signal-to-noise ratios. These voids had notable initial impacts on the usability of the raw (DEM), particularly disrupting continuity in high-relief and fringe areas. For instance, gaps in parts of Alaska's rugged terrain and the southern fringes near 56°S latitude, including coastal zones, interrupted seamless topographic representation, leading to inaccuracies in derived products like and aspect calculations essential for geomorphometric analyses. Such discontinuities hindered early applications in and terrain modeling, where abrupt no-data regions could propagate errors in flow accumulation or simulations. Later reprocessing, such as the NASADEM dataset released in , has filled most voids and enhanced accuracy using modern algorithms and additional data sources. Early assessments of these gaps were conducted during the post-mission data processing phase from 2000 to 2003, involving collaborative efforts by , the (JPL), and the (NGA). Teams identified and cataloged the voids through seam and hole composite mapping, revealing their concentration in mountainous and vegetated areas, with initial void-filling attempted via simple for smaller features during this period. This processing timeline underscored the mission's challenges in achieving complete coverage despite its near-global scope.

Data Processing and Releases

Initial Data Handling

Following the conclusion of the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) in February 2000, raw (SAR) data—totaling approximately 12.3 terabytes, including 8.6 terabytes from the C-band system and 3.7 terabytes from the X-band—were downlinked via the Ku-band antenna to NASA's Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRS) and subsequently to ground stations at the (JPL) in , and the Payload Operations Control Center (POCC). This initial data transfer occurred at rates up to 45 megabits per second, with selected subsets downlinked in real-time during the mission and the full recovered from onboard high-rate recorder tapes post-landing. The raw data consisted of echoes captured by the dual-antenna interferometric system, requiring immediate handling to preserve phase information critical for topographic reconstruction. Primary processing of the C-band data took place at NASA's JPL using the dedicated Ground Data Processing System (GDPS), a workflow that began in March 2000 and spanned about nine months to generate preliminary digital elevation models (DEMs). Meanwhile, the German Aerospace Center (DLR) managed initial processing of the X-band data, leveraging its expertise in higher-resolution interferometry to produce complementary DEM products in Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) format. Key steps in this pipeline included orbit refinement, achieved through integration of Global Positioning System (GPS) data from the GPS Inferred Positioning System (GIPSY) and Differential GPS corrections, yielding sub-meter horizontal and vertical accuracies of about 1 meter. Radiometric calibration followed, utilizing reference targets such as the Amazon rainforest for C-band (achieving 3 dB absolute and 1 dB relative accuracy) and ocean surfaces for absolute height control, to correct for amplitude variations and ensure consistent signal strength across swaths. Subsequent stages focused on interferogram formation by correlating and aligning tile pairs from the two antennas, accounting for spacecraft motion compensation to create phase difference maps. These interferograms underwent phase unwrapping using algorithms like the branch-cut method applied to overlapping patches, converting wrapped phase values into absolute while mitigating speckle through multi-look averaging (typically 2-3 looks per ). estimation then derived surface elevations from the unwrapped phase via the interferometric baseline and wavelength, refined through incorporating ground control points and block mosaicking of 1° × 1° tiles continent-by-continent to minimize systematic errors. The resulting raw interferometric phase data informed the baseline DEMs, with adaptive applied to achieve effective resolutions of 45-60 meters for C-band products at a 1 arc-second (~30 m) grid posting. By 2003, JPL and DLR had produced Version 1 raw DEMs, covering approximately 90% of the targeted land surfaces between 60°N and 56°S after accounting for unedited voids from phase unwrapping failures, , and water bodies. These initial outputs were processed at 1 arc-second (~30 m) posting for C-band but publicly released at 3 arc-second (~90 m) resolution globally, with 1 arc-second available only for the , and finer resolution for the partial X-band swaths (about 40% coverage). They were unprocessed for artifacts like spikes or absolute biases, serving as the foundation for subsequent refinements while enabling early scientific validation. Voids were flagged with no-data values (e.g., -32,768), highlighting areas requiring further intervention, though the DEMs demonstrated global relative height accuracies of 6-16 meters in non-vegetated terrains.

Void-Filling Methods

The primary void-filling approach for the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data in Version 2, released in 2005 by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), involved multi-source integration to address gaps primarily caused by layover and shadowing effects in steep terrain. For regions above 60°N latitude, elevation data from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) were incorporated to fill voids where SRTM coverage was limited. In the United States, voids were filled using Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) Level 1 and Level 2 products, which provided higher-resolution auxiliary elevation information derived from various sources including stereo imagery and lidar. Small voids, typically under 1 km², were addressed through local interpolation techniques such as spline interpolation or kriging, which estimate missing values based on surrounding SRTM data points while preserving local topographic trends. Building on these efforts, Version 3 (also known as SRTM Plus), released in 2014 by and the (JPL), employed more advanced multi-source weighted averaging to achieve near-complete coverage. This involved blending the original SRTM Version 2.1 data with ASTER Global (GDEM) Version 2 as the primary fill source, supplemented by the Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010) for residual gaps, particularly in areas lacking ASTER data. The filling process used a modified Delta Surface Fill (DSF) , which computes differences (deltas) between auxiliary datasets and SRTM to create a smooth "rubber sheet" , prioritizing SRTM values where available and propagating errors through models that account for source uncertainties. For large voids exceeding 1 km², external digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from ASTER's PRISM sensor were integrated to ensure topographic continuity, while specific algorithms like constrained least-squares optimization maintained phase consistency in interferometric residuals during the merging. Error propagation models were applied to flag filled areas with potentially higher uncertainty, based on the known vertical accuracies of input datasets. These methods significantly improved data completeness, reducing voids to less than 1% in the final filled products across global coverage between 60°N and 56°S. However, accuracy in filled regions experienced degradation up to 20 m relative to the native SRTM data, primarily due to inconsistencies in auxiliary sources like ASTER GDEM, which can exhibit biases in vegetated or rugged areas.

Global Release Versions

The evolution of SRTM data products began with Version 1, released in 2003 by NASA and the USGS, which provided raw, near-global digital elevation models (DEMs) at 3 arc-second resolution (approximately 90 meters) derived directly from the mission's C-band interferometric observations, though these contained substantial voids due to unprocessed areas. This initial release covered latitudes from 60°N to 56°S and was distributed in 1° × 1° tiles, enabling early applications in topography mapping despite the data gaps. Version 2.1 followed in 2005, offering an edited and improved iteration of the 90-meter global DEMs with artifacts removed and some preprocessing enhancements, including initial void-filling efforts using ancillary datasets to produce a more usable product for broader scientific distribution. These updates addressed quality issues in the raw data while maintaining the 3 arc-second posting, and the void-filled variants became a standard reference for global analysis until higher-resolution options emerged. A major advancement occurred in 2014 with the release of Version 3.0, which delivered a fully void-filled global DEM at 1 arc-second resolution (approximately 30 meters) through NASA's SRTM Plus processing , incorporating refined interferometric techniques and auxiliary data to eliminate gaps across the entire coverage area. This version was rolled out in phases via the USGS EarthExplorer portal, achieving complete global availability by 2015, including high-resolution releases for the and at the same 30-meter scale to support regional studies with enhanced detail. Complementing the C-band products, the (DLR) made SRTM X-SAR data publicly available starting in 2011, providing 25-meter resolution DEM subsets for limited regions including and parts of , derived from the mission's higher-frequency X-band for applications requiring finer spatial detail in those areas. All SRTM releases, from Versions 1 through 3 and including X-SAR, have been freely accessible since inception through NASA's Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC) and the USGS EarthExplorer, facilitating widespread use in research and mapping without restrictions. In the 2020s, no new SRTM acquisitions have occurred, but data maintenance has continued with metadata updates in 2025 to enhance catalog integration and interoperability across earth observation platforms. Additionally, SRTM datasets have demonstrated compatibility with later missions like TanDEM-X, enabling the creation of hybrid DEM products in research contexts by blending SRTM's historical baseline with TanDEM-X's updated elevations for improved temporal analysis.

Applications and Impact

Scientific and Research Uses

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) has played a pivotal role in advancing earth sciences by providing consistent, high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) that enable detailed terrain analysis across global scales. These data have facilitated breakthroughs in understanding geomorphic processes, environmental dynamics, and natural hazards, serving as a foundational dataset for interdisciplinary research since its release in the early . In and , SRTM DEMs have been instrumental for mapping fault lines and assessing hazards through automated lineament detection and topographic offset measurements. For instance, researchers utilized SRTM data to delineate tectonic features along the Kunlun Fault in , revealing surface deformations associated with seismic activity by comparing profiles. Similarly, slope derivatives derived from SRTM were applied to analyze co-seismic rock damage and fault scarring from the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman , identifying a ~1 km wide band of elevated damage indicators centered on the main fault trace, which informed models of rupture propagation and hazard zoning. SRTM data have enhanced hydrological research by supporting and flood modeling. In complex terrains, SRTM-derived elevations were used to achieve up to 87% similarity in compared to higher-resolution reference DEMs, enabling better predictions of runoff and inundation extents. This approach has been applied to simulate dynamics in diverse basins. In climate studies, SRTM serves as a critical baseline for quantifying volume changes and ice mass loss, especially in high-mountain regions. of Himalayan glaciers using SRTM DEMs from 2000 revealed accelerated mass loss rates of approximately -0.225 m equivalent per year between 2000 and 2020, with debris-covered ice comprising up to 13.8% of total volume and contributing to regional water resource assessments. These baselines, when differenced with later DEMs, have documented increased retreat rates post-2000 in central Himalayan basins, highlighting climate-driven thinning. SRTM's topographic variables have supported research by enabling modeling and assessment of influences on distributions. In lowland Amazonian forests, integration of SRTM-derived with Landsat data mapped edaphic and floristic patterns, correlating and aspect with tree diversity gradients to predict suitability. Such applications underscore SRTM's utility in thousands of peer-reviewed papers, emphasizing its role in scaling analyses from local to global levels. A notable example in involves DEM differencing with SRTM to track lava flow volumes and topographic changes. This method has proven effective for monitoring active flows at various volcanoes.

Broader Societal Applications

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data has served as a foundational base layer for geographic information systems (GIS) and navigation tools, notably integrated into in the mid-2000s to provide global elevation visualization and terrain context. This integration enabled users worldwide to explore three-dimensional landscapes with unprecedented detail, supporting applications from to recreational mapping. In , particularly in developing countries, SRTM-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) have facilitated for , such as assessing flood-prone areas and optimizing land use in regions like and where local topographic data is scarce. In disaster management, SRTM elevation data has been instrumental in modeling inundation zones following major events, including the , where it combined with to map coastal flooding extents and run-up elevations along affected shorelines in and . For instance, analyses overlaid SRTM DEMs with ASTER images to delineate tsunami impact areas north of Phuket, aiding post-event recovery planning and future . Similarly, SRTM has supported risk assessments by providing topographic inputs for susceptibility models, such as slope and aspect derivations used in Engine workflows to predict fire spread in vegetated terrains across the and Mediterranean regions. The void-filled versions of SRTM data have enhanced these models' usability by minimizing gaps in coverage. SRTM's topographic details have advanced through slope analysis, enabling farmers to optimize , , and crop placement on undulating fields; for example, DEM-derived slope maps help delineate management zones in hilly farmlands of and , improving yield efficiency without excessive soil disturbance. In infrastructure development, the data informs and bridge design in rugged terrains by simulating drainage patterns and stability risks, as seen in engineering projects across the and where SRTM guides alignment to avoid landslide-prone areas. For defense applications, the (NGA), a key partner in the SRTM mission, utilizes the dataset for tactical mapping, generating elevation products that support mission planning and terrain analysis in operational theaters worldwide. In resource exploration, SRTM aids site evaluations by detecting topographic changes indicative of opencast operations, as demonstrated in automated detection methods integrating SRTM with spectral imagery to monitor large-scale pits in arid and forested regions. The open availability of SRTM data has democratized access through open-source tools, including QGIS plugins like SRTM-Downloader, which allow users to fetch and process tiles directly for custom analyses without . By 2025, SRTM's influence underpins societal benefits from local governance in low-resource settings to international efforts, fostering equitable geospatial capabilities globally, with versions like NASADEM (released in 2020) further improving accuracy for contemporary applications.

Legacy and Modern Context

Influence on Future Missions

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) significantly influenced subsequent global topography mapping efforts by demonstrating the feasibility of spaceborne (InSAR) for generating near-global digital elevation models (DEMs). It paved the way for the TanDEM-X mission, launched in by the (DLR), which employed bistatic InSAR—a refinement of SRTM's monostatic approach—using two satellites in close formation to achieve higher resolution (12 m) and absolute vertical accuracy (better than 2 m relative height error at 90% confidence). SRTM's success also inspired the ALOS World 3D project by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency () from 2006 to 2011, which utilized stereo from the Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping () to produce a 30 m global DSM, addressing SRTM's resolution limitations for detailed topographic analysis. Technologically, SRTM's innovative 60 m deployable mast, which created a fixed baseline for , evolved into satellite in missions like TanDEM-X, where adjustable baselines between two satellites enabled flexible single-pass acquisitions without mechanical structures. Additionally, SRTM's single-pass InSAR techniques were refined for radar altimetry in CryoSat-2, launched in 2010 by the , where the Synthetic Aperture Interferometric (SARIn) mode uses a 50 m baseline across-track interferometer to measure elevations with swath widths up to 5 km, improving upon SRTM's nadir-only coverage for polar regions. Methodologically, SRTM established standardized protocols for DEM validation, including the use of ground control points, kinematic GPS surveys, and cross-comparisons with datasets, which became benchmarks for assessing vertical accuracy in later missions as outlined in the National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP) guidelines. Its policy, releasing near-global DEMs freely to the public, served as a model for subsequent missions, including the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission launched in 2022 by and , which adopts unrestricted data access to support hydrological and oceanographic research. Key examples of SRTM's legacy include its use in calibrating the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (), launched in 2018 by , where SRTM DEMs provided reference terrain data for validating and adjusting the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) photon-counting measurements during post-launch processing. Similarly, SRTM contributed to the design of the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission, also launched in 2018 on the , by highlighting penetration limitations in vegetated areas, prompting GEDI's focus on full-waveform to accurately resolve canopy vertical structure and biomass above SRTM-derived ground elevations.

Ongoing Relevance and Updates

In 2025, SRTM remains integrated with more recent radar-derived digital elevation models, such as those from the TanDEM-X mission, to produce hybrid DEMs that enhance overall accuracy and reduce errors in challenging terrains. For instance, fusion techniques combining SRTM with TanDEM-X have been applied to improve elevation estimates in regions like the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, leveraging TanDEM-X's 90 m resolution released in 2018 for finer detail where SRTM's native 30 m resolution falls short. Similarly, SRTM serves as a foundational legacy layer in global products like the Copernicus DEM, released in 2021, which uses it to support phase unwrapping alongside TanDEM-X-derived surfaces to provide consistent coverage for surface modeling. Recent updates to SRTM datasets in 2025 include the release of Version 3.0 (SRTM Plus) by on June 2, which features improved processing algorithms for enhanced accuracy, and a metadata catalog refresh by the USGS, updating version 2 records as of October 30 to support modern data workflows, including compatibility with AI-driven tools. No new acquisitions have occurred since the original 2000 mission, but ongoing reprocessing efforts have focused on refining SRTM for integration into climate archives, such as void-filled versions used in long-term environmental modeling. SRTM's persistent value lies in its role as a baseline for detecting long-term topographic changes, including assessments of sea-level rise from 2000 to 2025, where it provides a consistent historical reference against newer observations. The dataset underscores its widespread utility in global analyses through cloud platforms like Google Earth Engine and Earthdata. Despite these strengths, by 2025, SRTM has been largely superseded by higher-resolution missions in polar regions and vegetated areas, where its coverage is absent beyond 60°N and 56°S latitudes and where vegetation-induced biases affect accuracy up to several meters. Newer datasets like TanDEM-X and Copernicus GLO-30 offer improved resolution and bias corrections in these domains, yet SRTM endures as a cost-free global standard for baseline topography. Looking ahead, SRTM is poised to contribute to upcoming Earth observation constellations, such as NASA's data harmonization services and the ESA's SAR mission planned for launch in 2029, providing essential topographic baselines for integrating multi-sensor observations in dynamic surface monitoring.

References

  1. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm/
  2. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-digital-elevation-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-1
  3. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/instruments/srtm
  4. https://eospso.nasa.gov/missions/shuttle-radar-topography-mission
  5. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2005rg000183
  6. https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/srtm
  7. https://www.nasa.gov/mission/sts-99/
  8. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2005RG000183
  9. https://www.nasa.gov/history/25-years-ago-sts-99-the-shuttle-radar-topography-mission/
  10. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/179/SRTM_User_Guide_V3.pdf
  11. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2002GL016643
  12. https://geoservice.dlr.de/web/dataguide/srtm/
  13. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1127/srtm.html
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5296860/
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003442570600349X
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270558871_Validation_of_SRTM_Elevations_Over_Vegetated_and_Non-vegetated_Terrain_Using_Medium_Footprint_Lidar
  17. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003JF000113
  18. https://smap.jpl.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/285_043_dig_elev_mod.pdf
  19. https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/files/Reuteretal2007.pdf
  20. https://community.esri.com/ccqpr47374/attachments/ccqpr47374/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/4661/1/Filling-SRTM-voids.pdf
  21. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/nasadem_hgtv001/
  22. https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/2006journal/march/2006_mar_237-247.pdf
  23. https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/2006journal/march/2006_mar_249-260.pdf
  24. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2002GL016643
  25. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-digital-elevation-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-void
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220650064_An_Evaluation_of_Void-Filling_Interpolation_Methods_for_SRTM_Data
  27. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1073/pdf/of2011-1073.pdf
  28. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog/lpcloud-srtmgl1-003
  29. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2003/0071/report.pdf
  30. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-digital-elevation-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm
  31. https://cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/concepts/C1220566612-USGS_LTA.html
  32. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/nasa-shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-version-3.0-global-1-arc-second-data-released-over
  33. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-images
  34. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023JG007672
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924271611000918
  36. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/2608/topography-of-the-kunlun-fault
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X09002384
  38. https://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/9/4747/2012/
  39. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/joc.7873
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167492782300093X
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/glacier-inventory-and-glacier-changes-19942020-in-the-upper-alaknanda-basin-central-himalaya/572315E2F0654C50F99EB11C72CCC10A
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/4/8/2401
  43. https://www.thegpsc.org/sites/default/files/caribou-space_gaf_esa-eo-for-urban_v1.pdf
  44. https://science.nasa.gov/photojournal/tsunami-inundation-north-of-phuket-thailandaster-images-and-srtm-elevation-model/
  45. https://www.frames.gov/catalog/65232
  46. https://geopard.tech/blog/topography-and-relief-analytics-for-agricultural-fields/
  47. https://archive.cbts.edu/fetch.php/08jc6G/418827/Elevation-Maps.pdf
  48. https://earth-info.nga.mil/index.php?dir=elevation&action=elevation
  49. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/9/1451
  50. https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/SRTM-Downloader/
  51. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog/nasadem
  52. https://www.dlr.de/en/latest/news/2025/how-a-space-shuttle-mission-revolutionised-earth-observation
  53. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9364685
  54. https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLI-B4/157/2016/
  55. https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/cryosat-2
  56. https://it.nc.gov/documents/files/national-digital-elevation-program-guidelines/download?attachment
  57. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/feature-articles/nasas-surface-water-ocean-topography-swot-mission-data-release
  58. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/trainings/spaceborne-lidar-monitoring-vegetation-structure-biomass-using-gedi
  59. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2024.2391036
  60. https://opentopography.org/news/nasadem-and-copernicus-dem
  61. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/alerts-outages/shuttle-radar-topography-mission-version-3-0-srtm-plus-product-release
  62. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/shuttle-radar-topography-mission-srtm-version-2
  63. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/news/ai-improving-usgs-science-and-efficiency
  64. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-02917-w
  65. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/societal-benefits-higher-resolution-srtm-products
  66. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425716301821
  68. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/tools/nasa-harmony
  69. https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/harmony
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.