Hubbry Logo
Newtonian potentialNewtonian potentialMain
Open search
Newtonian potential
Community hub
Newtonian potential
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Newtonian potential
Newtonian potential
from Wikipedia

In mathematics, the Newtonian potential, or Newton potential, is an operator in vector calculus that acts as the inverse to the negative Laplacian on functions that are smooth and decay rapidly enough at infinity. As such, it is a fundamental object of study in potential theory. In its general nature, it is a singular integral operator, defined by convolution with a function having a mathematical singularity at the origin, the Newtonian kernel which is the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation. It is named for Isaac Newton, who first discovered it and proved that it was a harmonic function in the special case of three variables, where it served as the fundamental gravitational potential in Newton's law of universal gravitation. In modern potential theory, the Newtonian potential is instead thought of as an electrostatic potential.

The Newtonian potential of a compactly supported integrable function is defined as the convolution

where the Newtonian kernel in dimension is defined by

Here is the volume of the unit d-ball (sometimes sign conventions may vary; compare (Evans 1998) and (Gilbarg & Trudinger 1983)). For example, for we have .

The Newtonian potential of is a solution of the Poisson equation

which is to say that the operation of taking the Newtonian potential of a function is a partial inverse to the Laplace operator. Then will be a classical solution, that is twice differentiable, if is bounded and locally Hölder continuous as shown by Otto Hölder. It was an open question whether continuity alone is also sufficient. This was shown to be wrong by Henrik Petrini who gave an example of a continuous for which is not twice differentiable. The solution is not unique, since addition of any harmonic function to will not affect the equation. This fact can be used to prove existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Dirichlet problem for the Poisson equation in suitably regular domains, and for suitably well-behaved functions : one first applies a Newtonian potential to obtain a solution, and then adjusts by adding a harmonic function to get the correct boundary data.

The Newtonian potential is defined more broadly as the convolution

when is a compactly supported Radon measure. It satisfies the Poisson equation

in the sense of distributions. Moreover, when the measure is positive, the Newtonian potential is subharmonic on .

If is a compactly supported continuous function (or, more generally, a finite measure) that is rotationally invariant, then the convolution of with satisfies for outside the support of

In dimension , this reduces to Newton's theorem that the potential energy of a small mass outside a much larger spherically symmetric mass distribution is the same as if all of the mass of the larger object were concentrated at its center.

When the measure is associated to a mass distribution on a sufficiently smooth hypersurface (a Lyapunov surface of Hölder class ) that divides into two regions and , then the Newtonian potential of is referred to as a simple layer potential. Simple layer potentials are continuous and solve the Laplace equation except on . They appear naturally in the study of electrostatics in the context of the electrostatic potential associated to a charge distribution on a closed surface. If is the product of a continuous function on with the -dimensional Hausdorff measure, then at a point of , the normal derivative undergoes a jump discontinuity when crossing the layer. Furthermore, the normal derivative of is a well-defined continuous function on . This makes simple layers particularly suited to the study of the Neumann problem for the Laplace equation.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Newtonian potential, also known as the in , is a that quantifies the gravitational influence of a distribution at any point in space. It is defined mathematically for a continuous ρ(r)\rho(\mathbf{r}') as Φ(r)=Gρ(r)rrd3r\Phi(\mathbf{r}) = -G \int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}')}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}'|} d^3\mathbf{r}', where GG is the , and the integral extends over all space. For a point MM at the origin, this simplifies to Φ(r)=G[M](/page/Mass)[r](/page/R)\Phi(\mathbf{r}) = -\frac{G[M](/page/Mass)}{[r](/page/R)}, with r=rr = |\mathbf{r}|. This potential arises from Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation, formulated in his 1687 work , which posits that every mass attracts every other with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The potential formulation provides a convenient way to describe this force field, as the gravitational acceleration g\mathbf{g} on a is given by g=Φ\mathbf{g} = -\nabla \Phi, reflecting the conservative nature of gravity. It satisfies 2Φ=4πGρ\nabla^2 \Phi = 4\pi G \rho, which links the potential directly to the mass density and enables solutions via superposition for multiple masses. In applications, the Newtonian potential underpins , such as orbital motion in the solar system, and serves as the weak-field limit of for low velocities and weak gravitational fields. Its properties, including linearity and the ability to expand in multipoles for distant sources, facilitate calculations in , from planetary perturbations to galactic dynamics. However, it assumes instantaneous , diverging from the finite-speed propagation in relativity.

Fundamentals

Definition

In Newtonian gravity, the potential is defined as a scalar function ϕ(r)\phi(\mathbf{r}) that encapsulates the gravitational influence at a point r\mathbf{r} in space. The gravitational on a test at that point is derived from the negative of this potential, yielding the g=ϕ\mathbf{g} = -\nabla \phi. This scalar nature simplifies the description of gravity compared to the g\mathbf{g}, allowing superposition for multiple sources. Physically, the Newtonian potential represents the energy per unit , such that the total UU for a mm is given by U=mϕU = m \phi. In this framework, work done against corresponds to changes in ϕ\phi, providing a for conservative gravitational forces. The standard sets ϕ<0\phi < 0 for attractive interactions, with ϕ0\phi \to 0 as the distance from the attracting approaches infinity, ensuring the potential energy is negative for bound systems. This definition presupposes the inverse-square law of universal gravitation, where forces diminish proportionally to the inverse square of distance.

Historical Context

The concept of the Newtonian potential emerged from Isaac Newton's formulation of universal gravitation, introduced in his seminal work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica published in 1687, where he described gravity as an attractive force between masses proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of their distance, without explicitly developing the notion of a potential function. Newton's emphasis remained on the direct action of this force, establishing the foundational inverse-square law that would later underpin potential theory. The concept of gravitational potential was introduced in the 18th century. Daniel Bernoulli connected it to the conservation of vis viva around 1738–1747. Joseph-Louis Lagrange made extensive use of it in celestial mechanics from the 1770s to 1780s, applying it to astronomical perturbations and mutual interactions of masses. In the 19th century, the formalization of potential theory advanced significantly through the efforts of mathematicians such as Pierre-Simon Laplace and Siméon Denis Poisson, who extended Newtonian gravitation into a mathematical framework treating gravity analogously to electrostatic forces. Laplace, in his Mécanique Céleste (1799–1825), demonstrated that the gravitational potential satisfies in regions free of mass, providing a differential equation for harmonic functions in celestial mechanics. Poisson built on this in 1823 by deriving , which relates the Laplacian of the potential to the mass density, enabling the analysis of gravitational fields due to distributed masses. A pivotal milestone came with George Green's self-published An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism in 1828, where he introduced potential functions and , offering integral-based methods to solve for potentials in bounded domains and drawing direct parallels between gravitational and electrostatic phenomena. Green's work, initially overlooked, was rediscovered in the 1840s by William Thomson (later ), who applied it to link gravitational potentials with principles of energy conservation, emphasizing the potential's role in describing conservative force fields. This period also marked a conceptual shift from Newton's action-at-a-distance to field-based descriptions in the 1800s, with contributions from and who developed boundary-value problems and spherical harmonics for potential representations. Gauss's 1839 Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus formalized global potential field analysis, while Dirichlet's mid-19th-century work on boundary conditions solidified the mathematical rigor of potential theory for gravitational applications.

Mathematical Formulation

Potential for Point Masses

The Newtonian potential for a point mass originates from the law of universal gravitation, which describes the attractive force F\mathbf{F} between two point masses MM and mm separated by distance rr as F=GMmr2r^\mathbf{F} = -\frac{G M m}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}, where GG is the gravitational constant and r^\hat{\mathbf{r}} is the unit vector from MM to mm. The gravitational field g\mathbf{g} due to MM is then g=F/m=GMr2r^\mathbf{g} = \mathbf{F}/m = -\frac{G M}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}. The scalar gravitational potential ϕ(r)\phi(\mathbf{r}) is defined such that g=ϕ\mathbf{g} = -\nabla \phi, with the boundary condition ϕ()=0\phi(\infty) = 0 to ensure the potential vanishes at infinite separation. For the spherically symmetric case of a point mass at the origin, the gradient reduces to a radial derivative, yielding dϕdr=GMr2\frac{d\phi}{dr} = \frac{G M}{r^2}. Integrating from infinity to rr gives: ϕ(r)=rGMs2ds=GMr,\phi(r) = \int_{\infty}^{r} \frac{G M}{s^2} \, ds = -\frac{G M}{r}, valid for r>0r > 0. This explicit formula represents the work per unit mass required to bring a test mass from infinity to distance rr against the gravitational force. The 1/r1/r form of the potential extends to spherically symmetric mass distributions through Newton's shell theorem, which states that a uniform spherical shell of mass exerts no net force inside it and the same force outside as a point mass at its center. Consequently, for a uniform sphere of total mass MM and radius RR, the potential at distances r>Rr > R from the center is identical to that of a point mass MM at the center: ϕ(r)=GMr\phi(r) = -\frac{G M}{r}. This equivalence holds for any spherically symmetric density profile when evaluated outside the distribution. At r=0r = 0, the potential for a true point mass is singular, diverging to -\infty, reflecting the infinite and energy required to approach the mass itself. For extended spherical bodies, the singularity is avoided inside RR, where the potential remains finite, but the section focuses on the exterior point-mass-like behavior.

Potential for Distributed Masses

The Newtonian potential for a continuous mass distribution characterized by a density function ρ(r)\rho(\mathbf{r}') is obtained by integrating the point-mass contribution over the volume of the distribution: ϕ(r)=Gρ(r)rrdV,\phi(\mathbf{r}) = -G \int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}')}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}'|} \, dV', where the integral extends over all space occupied by the mass, GG is the gravitational constant, and r\mathbf{r} is the position at which the potential is evaluated. For a discrete collection of point masses mim_i at positions ri\mathbf{r}_i, the potential reduces to a summation: ϕ(r)=Gimirri.\phi(\mathbf{r}) = -G \sum_i \frac{m_i}{|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_i|}. These expressions arise from the superposition principle of Newtonian gravity, which states that the total potential at any point is the linear sum of the potentials produced by each infinitesimal mass element dm=ρdVdm = \rho \, dV' (or each discrete mass), treating each as an independent point source. To illustrate the application of the integral form, consider simple geometries with uniform mass distributions. For an infinite straight line (or rod) with constant linear mass density λ\lambda (mass per unit length), the potential can be derived using cylindrical coordinates, where rr is the perpendicular distance from the line. The gravitational field strength first follows from Gauss's law for gravity applied to a cylindrical Gaussian surface: the radial field magnitude is g(r)=2Gλ/rg(r) = 2 G \lambda / r. Integrating the field to obtain the potential (with g=ϕg = -\nabla \phi and a reference such that ϕ0\phi \to 0 as rr \to \infty, though strictly logarithmic divergence requires a cutoff) yields ϕ(r)2Gλlnr\phi(r) \propto -2 G \lambda \ln r. Similarly, for an infinite plane (or lamina) with uniform surface mass density σ\sigma (mass per unit area), applied to a Gaussian pillbox yields a constant field magnitude g=2πGσg = 2 \pi G \sigma, directed toward the plane and independent of the perpendicular distance zz from the plane. The potential is then found by integrating: ϕ(z)2πGσz\phi(z) \propto 2 \pi G \sigma |z|, reflecting the linear increase away from the plane (again, the absolute sign and reference are conventional due to the absence of a natural zero at )./05:_Gravitational_Field_and_Potential/5.04:_The_Gravitational_Fields_of_Various_Bodies/5.4.04:_Infinite_Plane_Laminas) For complex mass distributions where direct integration is impractical, numerical approximations are often employed, particularly in the far field (large distances compared to the source size). A common method is the , which decomposes the potential into a series of terms based on the source's moments: the leading (monopole) term is ϕ(r)G[M](/page/M)/r\phi(r) \approx -G [M](/page/M) / r, where [M](/page/M)[M](/page/M) is the total , followed by higher-order , , and so on, which decay faster with distance. This expansion facilitates efficient computation for systems like planetary rings or clusters by capturing the dominant long-range behavior.

Physical Properties

Relation to Gravitational Field

The Newtonian gravitational field g(r)\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{r}) at a position r\mathbf{r} is defined as the negative of the gravitational ϕ(r)\phi(\mathbf{r}), expressed as g(r)=ϕ(r)\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{r}) = -\nabla \phi(\mathbf{r}), where \nabla denotes the operator. This mathematical relation underscores the conservative nature of the , which satisfies ×g=0\nabla \times \mathbf{g} = 0. As a result, the of g\mathbf{g} along any path between two points is path-independent, depending solely on the initial and final positions. The work done by the gravitational field on a test mass of unit mass moving from an initial point A to a final point B is given by ABgdr=ϕ(A)ϕ(B)\int_A^B \mathbf{g} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = \phi(A) - \phi(B). In Cartesian coordinates, this relation manifests in the component form: gx=ϕxg_x = -\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}, gy=ϕyg_y = -\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}, and gz=ϕzg_z = -\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}. For the specific case of spherical symmetry around a point mass MM, where the potential is ϕ(r)=GMr\phi(r) = -\frac{GM}{r} with GG the gravitational constant, the field simplifies to g(r)=GMr2r^\mathbf{g}(r) = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \hat{r}, directed radially inward.

Equipotential Surfaces and Lines of Force

In Newtonian , surfaces are defined as the loci of points in space where the ϕ\phi remains constant. These surfaces represent regions of equal energy per unit , and their shape depends on the underlying distribution. For instance, in the vicinity of a point MM, the surfaces are concentric spheres centered on the , with the potential given by ϕ=GMr\phi = -\frac{GM}{r}, where GG is the and rr is the radial from the . Gravitational field lines, also known as lines of force, are the integral curves that are everywhere tangent to the direction of the g\mathbf{g}. These lines indicate the path a would follow under the influence of alone, originating from and terminating at the attracting , without crossing or forming closed loops in static fields. For a point , the field lines are straight and radial, emanating outward from the and perpendicular to the surrounding spheres. In general distributions, the lines converge toward regions of higher density, reflecting the field's vector nature. A key geometric property is that gravitational field lines are always perpendicular to equipotential surfaces, as the field g\mathbf{g} points in the direction of the steepest decrease in potential. This orthogonality arises because the field has no component tangent to a surface of constant ϕ\phi. The spacing between adjacent equipotential surfaces further encodes the field's magnitude: closer surfaces indicate stronger fields, while wider spacing denotes weaker ones. For the point-mass case, this results in denser equipotentials near the mass, where the radial field strength g=GMr2g = \frac{GM}{r^2} is largest. Physically, motion along an surface requires no work against the , since the potential difference is zero, making these surfaces "level" in a gravitational sense. Conversely, the acceleration of a test mass follows the direction of the field lines, with magnitude given by g|\mathbf{g}|, determining the local free-fall behavior. This framework provides a visual and conceptual tool for understanding gravitational dynamics, emphasizing the conservative nature of the Newtonian .

Applications and Extensions

In Celestial Mechanics

In celestial mechanics, the Newtonian potential plays a central role in modeling the motion of two interacting bodies under mutual gravitational attraction, reducing the problem to an equivalent one-body orbiting a fixed center. For two point masses m1m_1 and m2m_2 separated by distance rr, the is described using the μ=m1m2m1+m2\mu = \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2}, with the relative motion governed by the equation μr¨=Φ\mu \ddot{\mathbf{r}} = -\nabla \Phi, where Φ=G(m1+m2)r\Phi = -\frac{G(m_1 + m_2)}{r} is the Newtonian potential. To solve this, the motion is separated into radial and angular components, conserving L=μr2ϕ˙L = \mu r^2 \dot{\phi}. This leads to an effective ϕeff(r)=GMr+L22μr2\phi_{\text{eff}}(r) = -\frac{GM}{r} + \frac{L^2}{2\mu r^2}, where M=m1+m2M = m_1 + m_2, transforming the radial equation into a one-dimensional problem analogous to motion in this effective potential. The shape of orbits depends on the total EE: for E<0E < 0, bound elliptical orbits occur; for E=0E = 0, parabolic; and for E>0E > 0, hyperbolic trajectories, all conic sections with the focus at the center of mass. These orbital solutions directly imply Kepler's three laws as consequences of the inverse-square Newtonian potential. The first law—planets in ellipses with the Sun at one focus—arises from the conic section form of the in the , where the 1/r1/r term dominates the centrifugal barrier. The second law, equal areas swept in equal times, follows from conservation of in the central potential, yielding constant dA/dt=L/(2μ)dA/dt = L/(2\mu). The third law, relating TT to semi-major axis aa via T2a3T^2 \propto a^3, emerges from for elliptical orbits, where the period is T=2πa3/(GM)T = 2\pi \sqrt{a^3 / (GM)}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.