Hubbry Logo
Traffic lightTraffic lightMain
Open search
Traffic light
Community hub
Traffic light
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Traffic light
Traffic light
from Wikipedia

An LED 50-watt traffic light in Portsmouth, United Kingdom

Traffic lights, traffic signals, or stoplights – also known as robots in South Africa,[1][2] Zambia, and Namibia – are signalling devices positioned at road intersections, pedestrian crossings, and other locations in order to control the flow of traffic.[3]

Traffic lights usually consist of three signals, transmitting meaningful information to road users through colours and symbols, including arrows and bicycles. The usual traffic light colours are red to stop traffic, amber for traffic change, and green to allow traffic to proceed. These are arranged vertically or horizontally in that order. Although this is internationally standardised,[4] variations in traffic light sequences and laws exist on national and local scales.[5]

Traffic lights were first introduced in December 1868 on Parliament Square in London to reduce the need for police officers to control traffic.[6] Since then, electricity and computerised control have advanced traffic light technology and increased intersection capacity.[7] The system is also used for other purposes, including the control of pedestrian movements, variable lane control (such as tidal flow systems or smart motorways), and railway level crossings.

History

[edit]

In December 1868, the first system of traffic signals, which was a semaphore traffic signal, was installed as a way to replace police officer control of vehicular traffic outside the Houses of Parliament in London, England. This system exploded on 2 January 1869 and was taken down. This early traffic signal led to other parts of the world implementing similar traffic signal systems. In the first two decades of the 20th century, semaphore traffic signals like the one in London were in use all over the United States. These traffic signals were controlled by a traffic officer who changed the commands on the signal to direct traffic.[8]

In 1912, the first electric traffic light was developed by Lester Wire, a policeman in Salt Lake City, Utah.[9] In August 1914, it was installed by the American Traffic Signal Company on the corner of East 105th Street and Euclid Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio.[10][11][12] In 1920, the first four-way, three-colour traffic light was created by William Potts in Detroit, Michigan.[13] His design was the first to include an amber 'caution' light along with red and green lights.[14] Potts was Superintendent of Signals for the Police Department of Detroit. In 1921, he installed automatic four-way, three-colour traffic lights in 15 towers across Detroit.[15][14][13]

By 1922, traffic towers were beginning to be controlled by automatic timers more widely. The main advantage of the use of the timer was that it saved cities money by replacing traffic officers. New York City was able to reassign all but 500 of its 6,000 officers working on the traffic squad, saving the city $12,500,000.[16] In 1923, Garrett Morgan patented a design of a manually operated three-way traffic light with moving arms.[17]

The control of traffic lights changed with the rise of computers in America in the 1950s. One of the best historical examples of computerised control of lights was in Denver, Colorado in 1952. In 1967, Toronto, Canada was the first to use more advanced computers that were better at vehicle detection.[7] The computers maintained control over 159 signals in Toronto through telephone lines.[18]

Vehicular signals

[edit]
Traffic lights can have several additional lights for filter turns or bus lanes.
Road crossing of A970 with Sumburgh Airport's runway in Shetland. The movable barrier closes when an aircraft lands or takes off.
Horizontally-mounted signals in Japan

A set of lights, known as a signal head,[19]: 3.2.4  may have one, two, three, or more aspects. The most common signal type has three aspects facing the oncoming traffic: red on top, amber (yellow) below, and green below that. Additional aspects may be fitted to the signal, usually to indicate specific restrictions or filter movements.

Meanings of signals

[edit]

The 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals Chapter III provides international standards for the setup of traffic signal operations. Not all states have ratified the convention. A three-colour signal head should have three non-flashing lights which are red, amber, and green, arranged either horizontally (on the side opposite to the direction of traffic)[clarification needed] or vertically (with red on top). A two-colour signal head may be used in temporary operation and consists of red and green non-flashing lights. In both cases, all lights should be circular or arrow-shaped.[4] Permissible signals for regulating vehicle traffic (other than public transport vehicles) are outlined in Article 23:[4]

Standard meanings for traffic lights internationally (Vienna Convention, Article 23)
Light type Meaning
Non-flashing Red Traffic may not proceed beyond the stop line, or otherwise enter the intersection.
Red/Amber The signal is about to change, but the red light rule continues to apply.
Amber Traffic may not pass the stop line or enter the intersection, unless it cannot safely stop when the light shows.
Green Traffic may proceed, unless it would not clear the intersection before the next change of phase.
Flashing Red Traffic must not pass the stop line at a level crossing, approach to swing bridge or ferry landing stages, emergency vehicles entering the road, or on the approach to low-flying aircraft. In addition, to attract attention in these locations, it is also equipped with additional alarms and voice prompts.
Amber Traffic may proceed with caution.

Green arrows are added to signals to indicate that traffic can proceed in a particular direction while the main lights for that approach are red, or that traffic can only proceed in one particular direction. Alternatively, when combined with another green signal, they may indicate that turning traffic has priority over oncoming traffic (known as a "filter arrow").[19]: 3.5  Flashing amber arrows typically indicate that road users must give way (to other drivers and pedestrians) before making a movement in the direction of the arrow. These are used because they are safer, cause less delay, and are more flexible. Flashing amber arrows will normally be located below the solid amber.[20]

Green arrows

[edit]

Arrow aspects may be used to permit certain movements or convey other messages to road users. A green arrow may display to require drivers to turn in a particular direction only or to allow drivers to continue in a particular direction when the signal is red.[19]: 3.5  Generally, a green phase is illuminated at the beginning of the green phase (a "leading turn") or at the end of the green phase (a "lagging turn").[citation needed] An 'indicative arrow' may be displayed alongside a green light. This indicates to drivers that oncoming traffic is stopped, such that they do not need to give way to that traffic when turning across it. As right-turning traffic (left-side drive) or left-turning traffic (right-side drive) does not normally have priority, this arrow is used to allow turning traffic to clear before the next phase begins.[19]: 3.5 

Some variations of this setup exist. One version is a horizontal bar with five lights – the green and amber arrows are located between the standard green and amber lights. A vertical five-light bar holds the arrows underneath the standard green light. In this arrangement, the amber arrow is sometimes omitted, leaving only the green arrow below the steady green light, or possibly an LED-based device capable of showing both green and amber arrows within a single lamp housing.[21]

A third type is known as a "doghouse" or "cluster head" – a vertical column with the two normal lights is on the right side of the signal, a vertical column with the two arrows is located on the left, and the normal red signal is in the middle above the two columns. Cluster signals in Australia and New Zealand use six signals, the sixth being a red arrow that can operate separately from the standard red light.[citation needed]

In a fourth type, sometimes seen at intersections in Ontario and Quebec, Canada, there is no dedicated left-turn lamp per se.[22][23] Instead, the normal green lamp flashes rapidly, indicating permission to go straight as well as make a left turn in front of opposing traffic, which is being held by a steady red lamp. This "advance green", or flashing green can be somewhat startling and confusing to drivers not familiar with this system. This can cause confusion amongst visitors to British Columbia, where a flashing green signal denotes a pedestrian-controlled crosswalk.[24] For this reason, Ontario is phasing out the use of flashing green signals and instead replacing them with arrows.[25][26]

Countdown lights

[edit]

Popular in Vietnam and China, countdown lights are additional lights installed next to, or above or below, the main signal lights. The countdown light is displayed by a countdown number with different colours, usually red, yellow, green, matching the colour of the light on. When the light counts to "0" (or 1), the main light colour immediately changes.

Countdown lights may have zeros in the tens or none, some countdown lights may flash when getting ready to zero. Yellow lights can have countdown lights, but most lights do not. Usually the countdown light has 2 digits, in case the time of the main light (usually the red light, rarely the green light) is longer than 100 seconds, depending on the type of light, the following possibilities may occur:

  1. Lights have not counted down, when 99 seconds are left, start counting. During the standby time, the light may be displayed as "99", "00", "--" or not displayed.
  2. Last 2 digits count light of the timeout (the counter light is 15 while the time is 115 seconds, there are some types of lights that count as "-9" or "9-" when the time is 109 seconds)
  3. Tens digit on the displayer becomes a letter. Displaying A0 for 100 seconds, B0 for 110 seconds, so forth.
  4. Displaying only last 2 digits but with flashing to indicate it's more than 100.
A countdown light

Countdown lights are also used for both vehicular and pedestrian signals in the Philippines. However, since 2025, the use of countdown timers have been phased out in Metro Manila by the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority to adopt a volume-based traffic signalling system. As a result, instead a countdown timer that will count down to the next phase, green signals will blink five times before turning to yellow.[27]

Issue about yellow light dilemma zone in South Korea

[edit]

In South Korea, the yellow (amber) light dilemma zone is not legally recognised. In other words, when the amber light is on, traffic may not pass the stop line or enter the intersection, even if the traffic cannot safely stop when the light shows.

In May 2024, this was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of Korea ,[28][29] for a case where the driver was speeding at 62 km/h in a street limited up to 40 km/h, 55 % higher than the allowed speed.[30][unreliable source?]

Criticism in South Korea says that this is unrealistic and unreasonable. This can cause multiple collisions due to sudden braking.

In 2016, when speed limit was up to 60 km/h, proposed alternatives to this kind of collision were only roundabouts, speed compliance increase and speed practice reduction or elderly zones are also proposed solutions.[31]

Yellow trap

[edit]

Without an all-red phase, cross-turning traffic may be caught in a 'yellow trap'. When the signal turns yellow (amber), a turning driver may assume oncoming traffic will stop and a crash may result. For this reason, the US bans sequences that may cause a yellow trap.[32] This can also happen when emergency vehicles or railroads preempt normal signal operation. [33] In the United States, signs reading "Oncoming traffic has extended green" or "Oncoming traffic may have extended green" must be posted at intersections where the "yellow trap" condition exists.[34][35]

Variations

[edit]

The United States is not party to the Vienna Convention; rather, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) outlines correct operation in that country. In the US, a single signal head may have three, four, or five aspects. A single aspect green arrow may be displayed to indicate a continuous movement. The signals must be arranged red, amber, and green vertically (top to bottom) or horizontally (left to right).[36] In the US, a single-aspect flashing amber signal can be used to raise attention to a warning sign and a single-aspect flashing red signal can be used to raise attention to a "stop", "do not enter", or "wrong way" sign.[36] Flashing red or amber lights, known as intersection control beacons, are used to reinforce stop signs at intersections.[37] The MUTCD specifies the following vehicular signals:[36]

Standard meanings for traffic lights in the United States (MUTCD, Chapter 4)
Signal Meaning (steady) Meaning (flashing)

Circular green
Traffic can proceed in any permitted direction, yielding to pedestrians in a crosswalk or other vehicles when turning Not to be used

Green arrow
Traffic can proceed in the direction shown by the arrow, yielding to any pedestrians in a crosswalk or other vehicles in the intersection

Circular yellow
The green movement is being terminated and a red signal will soon be displayed Traffic can cautiously enter the intersection, yielding to pedestrians and other vehicles

Yellow arrow
The green or flashing arrow movement is being terminated Traffic can cautiously enter the intersection to make the movement displayed by the arrow, yielding to pedestrians and other vehicles

Circular red
Unless another signal permits, traffic shall not enter the intersection except to lawfully turn on red Traffic must stop before entering the intersection, but may then treat the signal by the same rules as a STOP sign.

Red arrow
Traffic shall not make the movement displayed by the arrow Traffic must stop before entering the intersection, but may then treat the signal by the same rules as a stop sign to make the movement displayed by the arrow.
A traffic signal in Halifax, Nova Scotia, with specially shaped lights to assist people with colour blindness

In the Canadian province of Quebec and the Maritime provinces, lights are often arranged horizontally, but each aspect is a different shape: red is a square (larger than the normal circle) and usually in pairs at either end of the fixture, amber is a diamond, and green is a circle. In many southern and southwestern U.S. states, most traffic signals are similarly horizontal in order to ease wind resistance during storms and hurricanes.[38]

Japanese traffic signals mostly follow the same rule except that the green "go" signals are referred to as 青 (ao), typically translated as "blue", reflecting a historical change in the Japanese language. As a result, Japanese officials decreed in 1973 that the "go" light should be changed to the bluest possible shade of green, bringing the name more in line with the colour without violating the international "green means go" rule.[39]

In the UK, normal traffic lights follow this sequence:[40]

  • Red – Stop, do not proceed.
  • Red and amber – Get ready to proceed, but do not proceed yet.
  • Green – Proceed if the intersection or crossing is clear; vehicles are not allowed to block the intersection or crossing.
  • Amber – Stop, unless it is unsafe to do so.

A speed sign is a special traffic light, variable traffic sign, or variable-message sign giving drivers a recommended speed to approach the next traffic light in its green phase[41] and avoid a stop due to reaching the intersection when lights are red.[42][a]

Pedestrian signals

[edit]

Pedestrian signals are used to inform pedestrians when to cross a road. Most pedestrian signal heads will have two lights: a 'walk' light (normally a walking human figure, typically coloured green or white) and a 'don't walk' light (normally either a red or orange man figure or a hand), though other variations exist.[43]

Pedestrian sequences in various countries
Country/ies Sequence Notes
Australia, New Zealand, Philippines Green man: safe to cross

Flashing red man: do not start to cross; if it appears during crossing, then continue to cross if unable to stop safely

Red man: do not cross

Several intersections in Wellington, New Zealand, have alternative green man figures. Eight intersections near Parliament Buildings have silhouettes of suffragette Kate Sheppard,[44] while four intersections along Cuba Street have silhouettes of drag performer and LGBT rights activist Carmen Rupe.[45]
China Green: safe to cross

Red: do not cross

Amber (steady, after green, before red): continue to cross only if unable to stop safely

Flashing amber: cross with caution (often used in low-traffic crossing or after midnight)

Japan Blue or green man: safe to cross (cyclists may cross or turn left)

Flashing blue or green man: do not start to cross; if it appears during crossing, then continue to cross if unable to stop safely

Red standing man: do not cross

Germany, Czechia, Central Europe Green: safe to cross

Amber: continue to cross only if unable to stop safely

Flashing amber: cross with caution, obey signage (used when lights are out of order or shut down)

Red: do not cross

Red and amber: do not cross, prepare for green

In Germany, Ampelmännchen pedestrian traffic signals have come to be seen as a nostalgic sign for the former German Democratic Republic.

In Germany, the fine for crossing a red light if caught is as of 2019 between €5 and €10.[46]

United Kingdom, Ireland, Hong Kong, Switzerland, Macao Green walking man: safe to cross

Flashing green man or no man: do not start to cross (only at mid-block crossings); if it appears during crossing, then continue to cross if unable to stop safely

Red standing man: do not cross

In the United Kingdom, there is no direct offence committed if a pedestrian fails to obey crossing signals and many lights commonly only use two still images – a green walking person and a red standing man, this being the general case where the crossing is at a road junction and the pedestrian signals are in combination with those controlling vehicular traffic.
United States, Canada, Mexico (Tijuana), Philippines (Makati, Davao) Formerly signals used the text:[47]

WALK

DONT WALK

Modern version:

White walking man: cross with caution

Flashing orange stophand: do not start to cross; if it appears during crossing, then continue to cross if unable to stop safely

Orange stophand: do not enter the intersection

The U.S. state of Massachusetts allows an unusual indication variation for pedestrian movement. At signalised intersections without separate pedestrian signal heads, the traffic signals may be programmed to turn red in all directions, followed by a steady display of amber lights simultaneously with the red indications. During this red-plus-amber indication, the intersection is closed to vehicular traffic and pedestrians may cross, usually in whatever direction they choose.
Israel Red standing man: do not cross; if it appears during crossing, then continue to cross if unable to stop safely

Green walking man: safe to cross

France green and light, traditionally and in compliance with the international conventions.

Red Man: Do Not Cross. If it appears during crossing, then continue to cross if unable to stop safely.

Green Man: Safe to Cross.

In 2023, a two year experiment was allowed to start on 8 intersections experimenting blinking yellow light and 7 other one frozen yellow light.[48]
Traffic light animation (pedestrians, cyclists and traffic) in Ljubljana, Slovenia

Where pedestrians need to cross the road between junctions, a signal-controlled crossing may be provided as an alternative to a zebra crossing or uncontrolled crossing. Traffic lights are normally used at crossings where vehicle speeds are high, where either vehicle or pedestrian flows are high or near signalised junctions.[19]: c.18  In the UK, this type of crossing is called a pelican crossing. More modern iterations are puffin and pedex crossings. In the UK, these crossings normally need at least four traffic signals, which are of a regular type (red, amber, and green), two facing in each direction. Pedestrians are provided with push buttons and pedestrian signals, consisting of a red and green man. Farside signals are located across the crossing, while nearside signals are located below the traffic lights, facing in the direction of oncoming traffic.[19]: c.18 

A HAWK beacon is a special type of traffic used in the US at mid-block crossings. These consist of two red signals above a single amber signal. The beacon is unlit until a pedestrian pushes the cross button. Then an amber light will show, followed by both red lights, at which point the 'Walk' symbol will illuminate for pedestrians. At the end of the crossing phase, the 'Don't Walk' symbol will flash, as will the amber traffic light.[49]

The Shibuya Crossing, in Tokyo, is a famous example of a pedestrian scramble with diagonal crossings.

Pedestrians are usually incorporated into urban signalised junctions in one of four ways: no facilities, parallel walk, walk with traffic, or all-red stages. No facilities may be provided if pedestrian demand is low, in areas where pedestrians are not permitted, or if there is a subway or overpass. No provision of formal facilities means pedestrians will have to self-evaluate when it is safe to cross, which can be intimidating for pedestrians.[19]: 71 

With a "parallel walk" design, pedestrians walk alongside the traffic flow. A leading pedestrian interval may be provided, whereby pedestrians get a "walk" signal before the traffic gets a green light, allowing pedestrians to establish themselves on the crossing before vehicles begin to turn, to encourage drivers to give way.[50]

A 'walk with traffic' facility allows pedestrians to go at the same time as other traffic movements with no conflict between movements. This can work well on one-way roads, where turning movements are banned or where the straight-ahead movement runs in a different stage from the turning movement. A splitter island could also be provided. Traffic will pass on either side of the island and pedestrians can cross the road safely between the other flows.[19]: 72 

An all-red stage, also known as a full pedestrian stage, a pedestrian scramble or a Barnes Dance,[b] holds all vehicular traffic at the junction to allow pedestrians time to safely cross without conflict from vehicles. It allows the use of diagonal crossings. This may require a longer cycle time and increase pedestrian wait periods, though the latter can be eased by providing two pedestrian stages.[19]: 71–72 

A diagram of a countdown timer in the US style

Pedestrian countdown timers are becoming common at urban signal-controlled crossings. Where a pedestrian countdown is shown, it is normally used in conjunction with the flashing hand signal (in the US and Canada) or blackout period (UK), showing the amount of time remaining in seconds until the end of the flashing hand or blackout.[19][51] Pedestrian countdown timers do not significantly increase or reduce the number of red- and amber-light running drivers. Studies have found that pedestrian countdown timers do significantly improve pedestrian compliance over traditional pedestrian signals; however, results are mixed.[51][52]

Smartphone Zombie ribbon

[edit]

As 12 to 45% of pedestrian deaths caused by 'pedestrian distraction' have been linked to cell phone usage,[53] some cities (including Sydney, Seoul, Augsburg, Bodegraven, Tel Aviv, and Singapore) have installed LED strips embedded in the sidewalk before crosswalks to warn distracted pedestrians of imminent pedestrian crossings.[54] This additional signal, which is synchronised with conventional signals, aims to decrease injury rates by telling distracted pedestrians when it is safe to cross the road without them having to lift their head.

Auditory and tactile signals

[edit]

In some jurisdictions such as Australia, pedestrian lights are associated with a sound device, for the benefit of blind and visually impaired pedestrians. These make a slow beeping sound when the pedestrian lights are red and a continuous buzzing or fast beeping sound when the lights are green. In the Australian States of Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia, the sound is produced in the same unit as the push buttons. In a circle above the button on a PB/5 crossing, the sound is produced and can be felt along with a raised arrow that points in the direction to walk.[55]

This system of assistive technology is also widely used at busy intersections in Canadian cities. In the United Kingdom, the Puffin crossings and their predecessor, the Pelican crossing, will make a fast beeping sound to indicate that it is safe to cross the road. The beeping sound is disabled during the nighttime so as not to disturb any nearby residents.[56]

In some states in the United States, at some busy intersections, buttons will make a beeping sound for blind people. When the light changes, a speaker built into the button will play a recording to notify blind people that it is safe to cross. When the signal flashes red, the recording will start to count down with the countdown timer. In several countries such as New Zealand, technology also allows deaf and blind people to feel when lights have changed to allow safe crossing. A small pad, housed within an indentation in the base of the box housing the button mechanism, moves downwards when the lights change to allow crossing. This is designed to be felt by anyone waiting to cross who has limited ability to detect sight or sound.

In Japan, a traffic light emits an electronic sound that mimics the sound of birdsong to help the visually impaired. Some traffic lights fix the order and type of sound so that they can tell which direction is a green light. In general, "Piyo" (peep) and "Piyo-piyo", which is a small bird call, and "Kakkō" and "Ka-kakkō", which is a cuckoo call, are associated with this system.[57] Some pedestrian crossings in Lithuania make a slow beeping sound indicating that the traffic light is about to turn off.

Cycle signals

[edit]
A busy daytime street scene, with both the bike signal and pedestrian signal glowing red. People and cars are everywhere. Many other traffic signals can be seen in the background as you look further down the street.
Traffic light for a bike lane, NYC
An advanced stop line at traffic lights in Liverpool

Where cycle lanes or cycle tracks exist on the approach to a signal-controlled junction, it must be considered how to incorporate cyclists safely into the junction to reduce conflict between motor vehicles and cyclists.

An advanced stop line can be placed after the stop line at traffic lights. This allows cyclists to position themselves in front of traffic at a red light and get a headstart.[58]

In the US, design advice typically advises that the cycle lane should continue through the junction to the left of the right-turn lane; however, this creates conflict where motor vehicles wish to enter the right lane, as they must cross the cycle lane at a bad angle.[59]

Under Dutch engineering principles, cyclists are instead kept to the right of the junction, with protected kerbs. This improves safety by putting cyclists into the eyeline of motor vehicles at the stop line, allowing cyclists a headstart over turning traffic. This design also allows cyclists to complete far-side turns without having to wait in the centre of the junction.[59] UK engineers have innovated on this design through the Cycle Optimised Protected Signals (CYCLOPS) junction, e.g. in Manchester. This places the cycle track around the edge of the signal junction and gives cyclists and pedestrians a single all-red phase, entirely separate from motor traffic and shortens pedestrian crossing times.[60]

Alternatively, cyclists can be considered pedestrians on approach to a junction, or where a cycle track crosses a road and combined pedestrian-cyclist traffic lights (known as Toucan crossings in the UK) can be provided.[61]

Public transport signals

[edit]

Traffic lights for public transport often use signals that are distinct from those for private traffic. They can be letters, arrows or bars of white or (an LED 100-watt typical) coloured light.

Transit signals in North America

[edit]
MUTCD Fig. 8C-3
Three-lens signal Two-lens signal

Single LRT route
Stop  
Prepare to stop (flashing) Stop
Go Go [i]
 

Two LRT route diversion
Stop  
Prepare to stop (flashing) Stop
Go [ii] Go [i][ii]
 

Two LRT route diversion
Stop  
Prepare to stop (flashing) Stop
Go [ii] Go [i][ii]
 

Three LRT route diversion
Stop  
Prepare to stop (flashing) Stop
Go [ii] Go [i][ii]
Notes
  1. ^ a b c d "Go" lens may be used in flashing mode to indicate "prepare to stop"
  2. ^ a b c d e f Could be in single housing

MUTCD specifies a standard vertically oriented signal with either two or three lenses, displaying white lines on a black background.[62]: Fig.8C-3 

Some systems use the letter B for buses and T for trams. The METRO light rail system in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the Valley Metro Rail in Phoenix, Arizona. The RTA Streetcar System in New Orleans use a simplified variant of the Belgian/French system in the respective city's central business district where only the "go" and "stop" configurations are used. A third signal equal to amber is accomplished by flashing the "go" signal.

Public transport signals in Europe

[edit]

In some European countries and Russia, dedicated traffic signals for public transport (tram, as well any that is using a dedicated lane) have four white lights that form the letter T.[citation needed] If the three top lamps are lit, this means "stop". If the bottom lamp and some lamps on the top row are lit, this means permission to go in a direction shown. In the case of a tram signal, if there are no tram junctions or turns at an intersection, a simpler system of one amber signal in the form of the letter T is used instead; the tram must proceed only when the signal is lit.

In North European countries, the tram signals feature white lights of different forms: "S" for "stop", "—" for "caution" and arrows to permit passage in a given direction.[63] In Sweden, All signals use white lighting and special symbols ("S", "–" and an arrow) to distinguish them from regular signals.

Tram signals in Netherlands (top), Belgium, Luxembourg, France, and Germany (bottom)

The Netherlands uses a distinctive "negenoog" (nine-eyed) design shown on the top row of the diagram.[64] Bottom row signals are used in Belgium, Luxembourg, France, and Germany. The signals mean (from left to right): "go straight ahead", "go left", "go right", "go in any direction" (like the "green" of a normal traffic light), "stop, unless the emergency brake is needed" (equal to "amber"), and "stop" (equal to "red").

Public transport signals in the Asia-Pacific region

[edit]

In Japan, tram signals are under the regular vehicle signal; however, the colour of the signal intended for trams is orange("yellow"). The small light at the top tells the driver when the vehicle's transponder signal is received by the traffic light. In Hong Kong, an amber T-signal is used for trams, in place of the green signal. At any tramway junction, another set of signals is available to indicate the direction of the tracks. In Australia and New Zealand, a white "B" or "T" sometimes replaces the green light indicating that buses or trams (respectively) have right of way.

Preemption and priority

[edit]

Some regions have signals that are interruptible, giving priority to special traffic, usually emergency vehicles such as firefighting apparatus, ambulances, and police cars.[65][66] Most of the systems operate with small transmitters that send radio waves, infrared signals, or strobe light signals that are received by a sensor on or near the traffic lights. Some systems use audio detection, where a certain type of siren must be used and detected by a receiver on the traffic light structure.

Upon activation, the normal traffic light cycle is suspended and replaced by the "preemption sequence": the traffic lights to all approaches to the intersection are switched to "red" with the exception of the light for the vehicle that has triggered the preemption sequence. Sometimes, an additional signal light is placed nearby to indicate to the preempting vehicle that the preempting sequence has been activated and to warn other motorists of the approach of an emergency vehicle. The normal traffic light cycle resumes after the sensor has been passed by the vehicle that triggered the preemption.

In lieu of preemptive mechanisms, in most jurisdictions, emergency vehicles are not required to respect traffic lights. Emergency vehicles must slow down, proceed cautiously and activate their emergency lights to alert oncoming drivers to the preemption when crossing an intersection against the light.[67][68]

Unlike preemption, which immediately interrupts a signal's normal operation to serve the preempting vehicle and is usually reserved for emergency use, "priority" is a set of strategies intended to reduce delay for specific vehicles, especially mass transit vehicles such as buses. A variety of strategies exist to give priority to transit but they all generally work by detecting approaching transit vehicles and making small adjustments to the signal timing. These adjustments are designed to either decrease the likelihood that the transit vehicle will arrive during a red interval or decrease the length of the red interval for those vehicles that are stopped. Priority does not guarantee that transit vehicles always get a green light the instant they arrive as preemption does.

Operation

[edit]
A staging diagram for a typical signalised T-junction

A variety of different control systems are used to operate signal cycles smoothly, ranging from simple clockwork mechanisms to sophisticated computerised control systems. Computerised systems are normally actuated, i.e. controlled by loop detectors or other sensors on junction approaches. Area-wide coordination can allow green wave systems to be set up for vehicles or cycle tracks.[69] Smart traffic light systems combine traditional actuation, a wider array of sensors and artificial intelligence to further improve performance of signal systems.[70] A traffic signal junction or crossing is typically controlled by a controller mounted inside a cabinet nearby.[71]

"Phases" (or "signal groups" in Australia and New Zealand) are indications show simultaneously, e.g. multiple green lights which control the same traffic approach. A "movement" is any path through the junction which vehicles or pedestrians are permitted to take, which is "conflicting" if these paths cross one another. A stage (or "phase" in ANZ) is a group of non-conflicting phases which move at the same time. The stages are collectively known as a "cycle".[72]

The time between two conflicting green phases is called an "intergreen period", which is set at an appropriate length for the junction to safely clear, especially for turning traffic which may be waiting in the centre of the junction. This often results in an all red stage, when all approaches are shown a red light and no vehicle can proceed. This all red is sometimes extended to allow a pedestrian scramble, where pedestrians can cross the empty junction in any direction all at once.[73] Some signals have no "all red" phase: the light turns green for cross traffic the instant the other light turns red.[c]

Many traffic light installations are fitted with vehicle actuation, i.e. detection, to improve the flexibility of traffic systems to respond to varying traffic flows. Detectors come in the form of digital sensors fitted to the signal heads or induction loops within the road surface. Induction loops are beneficial due to their smaller chance of breakdown, but their simplicity can limit their ability to handle some situations, particularly involving lighter vehicles such as motorcycles or pedal cycles.[74] This situation most often occurs at times of day when other traffic is sparse as well as when the small vehicle is coming from a direction that does not have a high volume of traffic.[75]

Timing

[edit]
A traffic light with a timer in Tehran, Iran

The timing of the intergreen is usually based on the size of the intersection, which can range from two to five seconds.[citation needed] Modelling programs include the ability to calculate intergreen times automatically. Intergreen periods are determined by calculating the path distance for every conflict point in the junction, which is the distance travelled to the conflict point by the movement losing right of way minus the distance travelled to the same conflict point by the movement gaining right of way using the possible conflict points (including with pedestrians) and calculating both the time it would take the last vehicle to clear the furthest collision point and the first vehicle from the next stage to arrive at the conflict point. At actuated junctions, integreens can be varied to account for traffic conditions.[19]

Engineers also need to set the amber timings (and red–amber, where appropriate), which is normally standardised by a traffic authority. For example, in the UK, the amber time is fixed nationally at three seconds and the red–amber time at two seconds, which results in a minimum intergreen time of five seconds (plus any all-red time).[19] The US also uses a minimum of three seconds, but local traffic authorities can make timings longer, especially on wider, suburban roads. This variation has resulted in controversy when municipalities with shorter amber times use red light cameras.[76] Where pedestrian signals are used, the timing of the "inivitation to cross" – the period where a steady walk signal shows – and clearance periods – time when the walk signal flashes or no signal is shown – need to be calculated. This is normally set against a design speed, e.g. 1.2 m/s (3.9 ft/s). Similarly, these can be made extendable using sensors, allowing slower-moving pedestrians more time to cross the street.[19]

Design guidance

[edit]

National or sub-national highway authorities often issue guidance documents on the specification of traffic signals and design of signalised intersections according to national or local regulations. For example, in the United States the Federal Highway Administration issues the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the Signalized Intersections Information Guide, which is a synthesis of best practices and treatments to help practitioners make informed decisions.[77]

Variable lane control

[edit]
An LED 50-watt typical lane control signal head
Lane control signals installed on the Montréal Old Champlain Bridge.
Lane control signals installed on the Old Champlain Bridge in Montréal, Canada

Variable lane control is a form of intelligent transportation systems which involve the use of lane-use control signals, typically on a gantry above a carriageway. These lights are used in tidal flow systems to allow or forbid traffic to use one or more of the available lanes by the use of green lights or arrows (to permit) or by red lights or crosses (to prohibit).[78] Variable lane control may be in use at toll plazas to indicate open or closed booths; during heavy traffic to facilitate merging traffic from a slip road.[78]

In the US, most notably the Southeastern, there often is a "continuous-flow" lane. This lane is protected by a single, constant-green arrow pointing down at the lane(s) permitting the continuous flow of traffic, without regard to the condition of signals for other lanes or cross streets. Continuous lanes are restricted in that vehicles turning from a side street may not cross over the double white line to enter the continuous lane. No lane changes are permitted to the continuous lane from an adjacent lane or from the continuous lane to an adjacent lane, until the double white line has been passed. Some continuous lanes are protected by a raised curb located between the continuous lane and a normal traffic lane, with white and/or amber reflective paint or tape, prohibiting turning or adjacent traffic from entering the lane.[citation needed]

Continuous-flow traffic lanes are found only at "T" intersections where there is no side street or driveway entrance on the right side of the main thoroughfare. No pedestrians are permitted to cross the main thoroughfare at intersections with a continuous-flow lane, although crossing at the side street may be permitted.

Intersections with continuous-flow lanes will be posted with a white regulatory sign approximately 500 ft (150 m) before the intersection with the phrase, "right lane continuous traffic," or other, similar, wording. If the arrow is extinguished for any reason, whether by malfunction or design, traffic through the continuous lane will revert to the normal traffic pattern for adjacent lanes, except that turning or moving into or out of the restricted lane is still prohibited.[citation needed]

Waterways and railways

[edit]

The three-aspect standard is also used at locks on the Upper Mississippi River. Red means that another vessel is passing through. Amber means that the lock chamber is being emptied or filled to match the level of the approaching vessel. After the gate opens, green means that the vessel may enter.

FE6453 railway signal in Beal, Northumberland, UK

Railroad signals, for stopping trains in their own right of way, generally use the opposite positioning of the colours; that is, for signals above the driver's eyeline, green on top and red below is the standard placement of the signal colours on railroad tracks. There are three reasons for this variation: there is no risk that railway signals will be masked by a tall vehicle between the driver and the signal; train speeds in fog are much higher than for road vehicles, so it is important that the most restrictive signal is closest to the driver's eyeline; and with railway signals often in exposed rural locations, there is a risk of any signal other than the bottom one being masked by snow building up on the hood of the signal below.

Rules

[edit]
California attempts to discourage red light running by posting the minimum fine.

Traffic lights control flows of traffic using social norms and legal rules. In most jurisdictions, it is against the law to disobey traffic signals and the police, or devices such as red light cameras, can issue fines or other penalties – and in some cases prosecute – drivers who break those laws.[79] US-based studies have found that the majority of drivers think that it is dangerous to run a red light at speed and the most common reason for red light running include inattentive driving, following an oversized vehicle or during inclement weather.[80][81]

The rules governing traffic light junctions for vehicles differ by jurisdiction. For example, it is common in North America that drivers can turn kerb-to-kerb (i.e. turning right at most junctions), even when a red light shows.[82][83] This turn on red rule is uncommon in Europe, unless an arrow signal or traffic sign specifically permits it.[84][85][86][87]

Design

[edit]

Bulbs

[edit]

Conventional traffic signal lighting, still common in some areas, uses a standard light bulb. The light then bounces off a mirrored glass or polished aluminium reflector bowl, and out through a polycarbonate plastic or glass signal lens. In some signals, these lenses were cut to include a specific refracting pattern. Traditionally, incandescent and halogen bulbs were used. Because of the low efficiency of light output and a single point of failure (filament burnout), some traffic authorities are choosing to retrofit traffic signals with LED arrays that consume less power, have increased light output, and last significantly longer.[citation needed]

In the event of an individual LED failure, the aspect will still operate albeit with a reduced light output. The light pattern of an LED array can be comparable to the pattern of an incandescent or halogen bulb fitted with a prismatic lens.

The low energy consumption of LED lights can pose a driving risk in some areas during winter. Unlike incandescent and halogen bulbs, which generally get hot enough to melt away any snow that may settle on individual lights, LED displays – using only a fraction of the energy – remain too cool for this to happen.[88][89] As a response to the safety concerns, a heating element on the lens was developed.[90][91]

Programmable visibility signals

[edit]
Traffic signals installed in Shelton, Washington, seen off-axis from the intended viewing area (top) and from the signal's intended viewing area (bottom).
From off-axis, these signals appear to be "off" or invisible to adjacent lanes of traffic during the daytime. Only a faint glow can be seen when viewed at night.

Signals such as the 3M High Visibility Signal utilise light-diffusing optics and a Fresnel lens to create the signal indication. The light from a 150 W PAR46 sealed-beam lamp in these "programmable visibility" signals passes through a set of two glass lenses at the back of the signal. The first lens, a frosted glass diffusing lens, diffuses the light into a uniform ball of light around five inches in diameter. The light then passes through a nearly identical lens known as an optical limiter (3M's definition of the lens itself), also known as a "programming lens", also five inches in diameter.[citation needed]

Using a special aluminium foil-based adhesive tape, these signals are "masked" or programmed by the programming lens so that only certain lanes of traffic will view the indication. At the front of these programmable visibility signals is a 12" Fresnel lens, each lens tinted to meet United States Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) chromaticity and luminance standards. The Fresnel lens collimates the light output created by the lamp and creates a uniform display of light for the lane in which it is intended.

In addition to being positioned and mounted for desired visibility for their respective traffic, some traffic lights are also aimed, louvered, or shaded to minimise misinterpretation from other lanes. For example, a Fresnel lens on an adjacent through-lane signal may be aimed to prevent left-turning traffic from anticipating its own green arrow. Intelight Inc. manufactures a programmable traffic signal that uses a software-controlled LED array and electronics to steer the light beam toward the desired approach.[92]

The signal is programmed unlike the 3M and McCain models. It requires a connection to a laptop or smartphone with the manufacturer's software installed. Connections can be made directly with a direct-serial interface kit, or wirelessly with a radio kit over WIFI to the signal. In addition to aiming, Fresnel lenses, and louvers, visors and back panels are also useful in areas where sunlight would diminish the contrast and visibility of a signal face. Typical applications for these signals were skewed intersections, specific multi-lane control, left-turn pocket signals, or other areas where complex traffic situations existed.

An animated GIF shows a traffic light in 3 reverted phases: red, yellow, then green

Size

[edit]

In the United States, traffic lights are currently designed with lights approximately 12 inches (300 mm) in diameter. Previously the standard had been 8 inches (200 mm); however, those are slowly being phased out in favour of the larger and more visible 12 inch lights. Variations used have also included a hybrid design, which had one or more 12 inch lights along with one or more lights of 8 inches (200 mm) on the same light.

In the United Kingdom, 12-inch lights were implemented only with Mellor Design Signal heads designed by David Mellor. These were designed for symbolic optics to compensate for the light loss caused by the symbol. Following a study sponsored by the UK Highways Agency and completed by Aston University, Birmingham, UK, an enhanced optical design was introduced in the mid-1990s.

Criticism[by whom?] of sunlight washout (cannot see the illuminated signal due to sunlight falling on it), and sun-phantom (signal appearing to be illuminated even when not due to sunlight reflecting from the parabolic mirror at low sun angles), led to the design of a signal that used lenslets to focus light from a traditional incandescent bulb through apertures in a matt black front mask. This cured both problems in an easily manufactured solution. This design proved successful and was taken into production by a number of traffic signal manufacturers through the engineering designs of Dr. Mark Aston, working firstly at the SIRA Ltd in Kent, and latterly as an independent optical designer.[citation needed]

The manufacturers took a licence for the generic design from the Highways Agency, with Dr. Aston engineering a unique solution for each manufacturer. Producing both bulb and LED versions of the signal aspects, these signals are still the most common type of traffic light on UK roads. With the invention of anti-phantom, highly visible Aston lenses, lights of 8 inches (200 mm) could be designed to give the same output as plain lenses, so a larger surface area was unnecessary. Consequently, lights of 12 inches (300 mm) are no longer approved for use in the UK and all lights installed on new installations have to be 200 mm (8 in) in accordance with TSRGD (Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions). Exemptions are made for temporary or replacement signals.[citation needed]

Mounting and placement

[edit]

The MUTCD identifies five types of traffic light mounts. On pedestals, signal heads are mounted on a single pole. This is the normal installation method for the UK.[94][19] On mast arms, signal heads are mounted on a rigid arm over the road protuding from the pole. On strained poles, signals are suspended over a roadway on a wire, attached to poles at opposite kerbs. This is the most common installation method in the United States. Unipoles are similar to strain poles, but a single structure over the road, rather than two poles linked with wire. Signals can be attached to existing structures such as an overpass.[94] Dummy lights are traffic signs located in the centre of a junction, which operate on a fixed cycle. These have generally been decommissioned due to safety concerns. A number remain due to historic value.[95]

Signals can either be placed nearside – between the stop line and the kerbline of the intersecting road – or farside – on the opposite side of the junction. In European countries, signals are often placed on the nearside.[96] In the UK, at least two signal heads are required, known as the primary and secondary heads, one of which is normally nearside and the other of which could be nearside or farside.[19] In the US, signals are normally located farside, though in some states, nearside signals are also used. Nearside signals can be beneficial to road safety, as drivers have more time to see a red light and are less likely to encroach on pedestrian crossings.[96]

Effects

[edit]

Drivers spend on average around 2% of journey time passing through signalised junctions.[97] Traffic lights can increase the traffic capacity at intersections and reduce delay for side road traffic, but can also result in increased delay for main road traffic.[98] Hans Monderman, the innovative Dutch traffic engineer, and pioneer of shared space schemes, was sceptical of their role, and is quoted as having said of them: "We only want traffic lights where they are useful and I haven't found anywhere where they are useful yet."[99]

A World Economic Forum study found that signalised junctions are linked to higher rates of localised air pollution. Drivers accelerate and stop frequently at lights and as such peak particle concentration can be around 29 times higher than during free-flow conditions. The WEF recommends that traffic authorities synchronise traffic signals, consider alternative traffic management systems and consider placing traffic lights away from residential areas, schools, and hospitals.[97]

The separation of conflicting streams of traffic in time can reduce the chances of right-angle collisions by turning traffic and cross traffic, but they can increase the frequency of rear-end crashes by up to 50%.[100] Since right-angled and turn-against-traffic collisions are more likely to result in injuries, this is often an acceptable trade-off. They can also adversely affect the safety of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Between 1979 and 1988, the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, removed signals at 199 intersections that were not warranted. On average, the intersections had 24% fewer crashes after the unwarranted signals were removed.[100] The traffic lights had been erected in the 1960s because of since-resolved protests over traffic. By 1992, over 800 traffic lights had been removed at 426 intersections, and the number of crashes at these intersections dropped by 60%.[101]

Justification

[edit]

Criteria have been developed to help ensure that new traffic lights are installed only where they will do more good than harm and to justify the removal of existing traffic lights where they are not warranted. They are most often placed on arterial roads at intersections with either another arterial road or a collector road, or on an expressway where an interchange is not warranted. In some situations, traffic signals can also be found on collector roads in busy settings.

United States

[edit]

The International Municipal Signal Association provides input as to standards concerning traffic signals and control devices. One example is the input the association provided for the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).[citation needed] The MUTCD is issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT).[102]

In the United States, the criteria for installation of a traffic control signal are prescribed by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which defines the criteria in nine warrants:[103]

  • Eight-hour vehicular volume. Traffic volume must exceed prescribed minima for eight hours of an average weekday.
  • Four-hour vehicular volume. Traffic volume must exceed prescribed minima for four hours of an average weekday.
  • Peak hour volume or delay. This is applied only in unusual cases, such as office parks, industrial complexes, and park and ride lots that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles in a short time, and for a minimum of one hour of an average weekday. The side road traffic suffers undue delays when entering or crossing the major street.
  • Pedestrian volume. If the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delays in attempting to cross it.
  • School crossing. If the traffic density at school crossing times exceeds one per minute which is considered to provide too few gaps in the traffic for children to safely cross the street.
  • Coordinated signal system. For places where adjacent traffic control signals do not keep traffic grouped together efficiently.
  • Crash experience. The volumes in the eight- and four-hour warrants may be reduced if five or more right-angle and cross traffic turn collisions have happened at the intersection in a twelve-month period.
  • Roadway network. Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organisation of traffic flow on a roadway network.
  • Intersection near a grade crossing. A traffic control signal is often justified at an intersection near a railroad crossing, in order to provide a preemption sequence to allow traffic queued up on the tracks an opportunity to clear the tracks before the train arrives.

In the US, an intersection is usually required to meet one or more of these warrants before a signal is installed. However, meeting one or more warrants does not require the installation of a traffic signal, it only suggests that they may be suitable. It could be that a roundabout would work better. There may be other unconsidered conditions that lead traffic engineers to conclude that a signal is undesirable. For example, it may be decided not to install a signal at an intersection if traffic stopped by it will back up and block another, more heavily trafficked intersection. Also, if a signal meets only the peak hour warrant, the advantages during that time may not outweigh the disadvantages during the rest of the day.

China

[edit]

In China, the standards for setting traffic signals is defined in GB 14886-2016: Specifications for road traffic signal setting and installation, published in 2016 and implemented in 2017. A signal shall be placed at intersections that meet the following criteria:[104]

  • Peak hour vehicular volume exceeds prescribed minima
  • A continuous eight-hour average vehicular volume exceeds prescribed minima
  • Accident history
    • On average, more than 5 accidents that could have been prevented with traffic signals per year in the past 3 years
    • On average, more than 1 fatal accidents
  • Any intersections that meet 80% of the two of the three criteria listed above
  • Entrance to one way streets for vehicular traffic
  • Pedestrian signals shall be placed at signalised intersections with crosswalk marks
  • Intersections with exclusive turning lanes and multiple signal phases shall use turning traffic signal
  • Reversible lanes, tunnels, and tollbooths
  • For bi-directional roads with more than three vehicular lanes, if vehicular and pedestrian traffic exceeds prescribed minima, a pedestrian signal and a vehicular signal shall be used

Additionally, the standard recommended a few situations, such as intersections within a coordinated light control systems, where signals may be placed.[104]

In other contexts

[edit]

The symbolism of a traffic light (and the meanings of the three primary colours used in traffic lights) are frequently found in many other contexts. Since they are often used as single spots of colour without the context of vertical position, they are typically not comprehensible to up to one in ten males who are colour blind.[citation needed]

Traffic lights have also been used in computer software, such as the macOS user interface, and in pieces of artwork, particularly Traffic Light Tree in London, UK.

Racing

[edit]

Automobile racing circuits can also use standard traffic signals to indicate to racing car drivers the status of racing. On an oval track, four sets may be used, two facing a straight-away and two facing the middle of the 180-degree turn between straight-away. Green would indicate racing is underway, while amber would indicate to slow or while following a pace car; red would indicate to stop, probably for emergency reasons.

Scuderia Ferrari, a Formula One racing team, formerly used a traffic light system during their pit stops to signal to their drivers when to leave the pits.[citation needed] The red light was on when the tires were being changed and fuel was being added, amber was on when the tires were changed, and green was on when all work was completed. The system is (usually) completely automatic. However, the system was withdrawn after the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix, due to the fact that it heavily delayed Felipe Massa during the race, when he was in the lead.

Usually, the system was automatic, but heavy traffic in the pit lane forced the team to operate it manually. A mechanic accidentally pressed the green light button when the fuel hose was still attached to the car, causing Massa to drive off, towing the fuel hose along. Additionally, Massa drove into the path of Adrian Sutil, earning him a penalty. He finally stopped at the end of the pit lane, forcing Ferrari's mechanics to sprint down the whole of the pit lane to remove the hose. As a result of this, and the penalty he also incurred, Massa finished 13th. Ferrari decided to use a traditional "lollipop" for the remainder of the 2008 season.

Another type of traffic light that is used in racing is the Christmas Tree, which is used in drag racing. The Christmas Tree has six lights: a blue staging light, three amber lights, a green light, and a red light. The blue staging light is divided into two parts: Pre-stage and stage. Sometimes, there are two sets of bulbs on top of each other to represent them. Once a driver is staged at the starting line, then the starter will activate the light to commence racing, which can be done in two ways. If a Pro tree is used, then the three amber lights will flash at the same time. For the Sportsman tree, the amber light will flash from top to bottom. When the green light comes up, the race officially begins but if a driver crosses the line before that happens, then a red light will come up and that will be a foul. [citation needed]

As a rating mechanism

[edit]

The colours red, amber, and green are often used as a simple-to-understand rating system for products and processes. It may be extended by analogy to provide a greater range of intermediate colours, with red and green at the extremes.[105]

In Unicode

[edit]

In Unicode, the symbol for U+1F6A5 🚥 HORIZONTAL TRAFFIC LIGHT is HORIZONTAL TRAFFIC LIGHT and U+1F6A6 🚦 VERTICAL TRAFFIC LIGHT is VERTICAL TRAFFIC LIGHT.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A traffic light, also known as a traffic signal or stoplight, is a power-operated signaling device that alternately directs traffic to stop and permits it to proceed at road intersections, pedestrian crossings, and other locations to manage competing flows of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. These devices use illuminated indications in standard colors—red to require a full stop, yellow to warn of an impending change to red, and green to allow safe progression—typically displayed in circular or arrow shapes to convey specific movements like straight-ahead or turns. In the United States, traffic lights are governed by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which establishes national standards for their design, placement, and operation to ensure uniformity and safety across roadways. The origins of traffic control signals trace back to manually operated semaphores introduced in in 1868, inspired by railway signaling to reduce collisions amid growing horse-drawn traffic. The first electric traffic signal was installed in , , in 1914, marking a shift from manual to automated control and using red and green lights initially. A significant advancement came in 1923 when inventor patented a three-position traffic signal, incorporating a yellow "all-stop" or caution phase to improve safety during transitions, which became a foundational element of modern systems. By the mid-20th century, traffic signals evolved to include actuated controls responsive to vehicle detection, and as of 2024, more than 330,000 signals operate in the U.S., handling volumes up to 100,000 vehicles per day at busy urban intersections. Contemporary traffic lights incorporate advanced technologies such as sensors, adaptive timing algorithms, and integration with intelligent transportation systems to optimize flow, reduce congestion, and enhance for vulnerable road users like . Features like flashing yellow arrows for permissive turns and accessible pedestrian signals with audible and tactile cues are now standard under MUTCD guidelines, reflecting ongoing improvements. These systems play a critical role in urban mobility, with coordinated allowing progressive signal timing across multiple intersections to minimize delays.

History

Early inventions

The first known traffic control system was developed by John Peake Knight, a British signaling , who patented a -based device in 1868 to manage horse-drawn carriage traffic near the Houses of Parliament in . Inspired by signals, Knight's design featured a pivoting wooden arm that could be raised horizontally to indicate "stop" during the day, supplemented by gas-powered red and green lanterns for nighttime visibility, with the red light signaling caution or stop and green permitting passage. The system was installed on December 9, 1868, at and operated manually by a , marking the initial attempt to automate traffic regulation beyond human direction. Gas-powered semaphores like Knight's proved unreliable due to the hazards of gas illumination, with installation failing dramatically on , 1869, when a caused an explosion that injured the operating officer and led to its immediate removal. This incident highlighted the dangers of flammable gas lines and poor weather resistance in early mechanical signals, delaying widespread adoption for over four decades as cities relied on police officers at intersections. The shift to electric prototypes began in the United States with , a police officer, who in 1912 constructed the first known electric traffic signal to address growing automobile congestion. Wire's device was a wooden box resembling a birdhouse, mounted on a 5-foot pole at the intersection of 200 South and , featuring and green lights visible on all four sides and powered by a battery, eliminating the need for gas or manual semaphores. Though not patented, Wire's invention demonstrated the feasibility of electric control but lacked a yellow caution phase, resulting in abrupt transitions that contributed to driver confusion and accidents. A practical implementation followed in , , where the first electric traffic signal was installed on August 5, 1914, at Euclid Avenue and East 105th Street, designed by local inventor James B. Hoge. Hoge's patented system used and lights with accompanying "stop" and "move" signs, controlled by a manual switch to coordinate four directions and prevent conflicting signals, representing an advancement over single-pole designs. Like Wire's, it omitted a yellow , leading to sudden stops and highlighting the need for transitional warnings in early electric versions. In 1920, Detroit police officer William L. Potts refined these concepts with the first four-way, three-color traffic signal. Potts' design, adapted from railway signals, allowed synchronized control at complex intersections but retained challenges like visibility in fog without amber intermediaries.

Evolution to modern systems

The introduction of the yellow or amber caution light marked a significant step in traffic signal standardization during the 1920s. In 1920, Detroit police officer William L. Potts designed and installed the world's first four-way, three-color traffic signal at the intersection of Woodward Avenue and Michigan Avenue, incorporating red for stop, green for go, and yellow to warn of an impending change. This innovation addressed the dangers of abrupt transitions in earlier two-color systems, improving safety at busy urban intersections. In 1923, Garrett Morgan patented a three-position traffic signal featuring a T-shaped arm with "stop," "go," and "all-stop" positions to provide a cautionary halt for all directions during phase changes, further enhancing safety. By the mid-1930s, the three-color configuration had become the standard across the United States, with nearly every major city installing electric traffic signals to manage growing automobile traffic. The spread of traffic lights extended globally in the interwar period, with adaptations to local needs. In the , electric traffic signals were adopted starting in 1919, evolving from earlier manual semaphore systems to support post-World War I urbanization, though full three-color installations occurred in by 1926. saw its first electric mechanical traffic light in 1923 at the Boulevard de Strasbourg and Grands Boulevards intersection, with further expansions by 1925 to handle the city's expanding boulevards and vehicle volume. In , the first traffic signals arrived in 1930 at Tokyo's Hibiya district, imported from the and featuring red, yellow, and a green (or blue-tinted) light, marking the beginning of regional adaptations in during the 1930s. Post-World War II advancements shifted traffic control toward automation and efficiency. In the , computerization emerged with the installation of the first computer-controlled traffic signal system in in 1952, using pressure-sensitive detectors to adjust timings based on real-time vehicle presence, reducing congestion in growing suburbs. In the 1960s, fully automated systems were implemented in cities like , coordinating multiple intersections via centralized computers to optimize flow across networks, a model that influenced U.S. cities including with its early interconnected setups from 1917. Key milestones in the and further modernized traffic networks through technological integration. The saw the incorporation of microprocessors into signal controllers, enabling programmable logic for more precise timing and fault detection, as exemplified by early deployments from companies like Eberle Design Inc. that replaced electromechanical relays. In the , pilot programs tested (LED) signals for their energy efficiency and longevity, with initiatives in cities like demonstrating up to 90% reductions in power consumption compared to incandescent bulbs, paving the way for widespread replacement.

Design and Components

Physical structure and mounting

Traffic lights, also known as traffic signals, are typically mounted using one of three primary configurations: mast arm, span wire, or pedestal mounting. Mast arm configurations involve a horizontal arm extending from a vertical pole, supporting signal heads over the roadway for overhead placement, which is common in high-traffic urban intersections to ensure visibility across multiple . Span wire mounting suspends signals from overhead wires stretched between poles, often used in areas with space constraints or where flexibility is needed for adjustments. Pedestal mounting places signals on short vertical posts along the roadside, suitable for lower-speed or suburban locations where overhead structures are unnecessary. These configurations adhere to national standards to optimize durability and . Signal heads generally feature lenses ranging from 8 to 12 inches in , with 12-inch lenses required for new circular indications and signals to enhance at greater distances. Placement rules emphasize height and positioning to balance and clear sightlines; , the bottom of overhead signal housings must be at least 15 feet above the pavement on roadways, with a minimum of 15 feet and typically up to 25 feet to accommodate vehicle heights while minimizing obstruction from trucks or buses. For side-mounted signals, the minimum height is 8 feet above sidewalks. Signals are spaced horizontally at least 8 feet apart to prevent confusion between adjacent approaches, and mid-block installations require placement at least from stop- or yield-controlled side streets to avoid interference with minor traffic flows. At intersections, signals are positioned 40 to 180 feet beyond the stop line, with supplemental near-side signals provided if exceeding 120 feet (guidance) for improved and turning visibility. Design standards for traffic lights include weatherproof housings constructed from materials like ultraviolet- and heat-stabilized or die-cast aluminum to withstand rain, snow, extreme temperatures, and wind loads. In the , the Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) mandates that signal supports be placed as far as practicable from the traveled way, with no concrete foundations exceeding 4 inches above ground, and lateral offsets of at least 2 feet from curbs for side-mounted units under 15 feet high. Equivalent guidelines in , influenced by the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals, focus on harmonized installation but vary by country; for example, in the UK, pole-mounted signals position the amber lens center between 2.4 and 4.0 meters above the ground, with a minimum horizontal clearance of 450 mm from the curb to protect against vehicle contact. These standards ensure signals remain operational and visible under diverse environmental conditions. Regional variations in mounting reflect local patterns and ; overhead mast arm or span wire setups predominate in high- urban areas worldwide for superior over queues, while side-mounted pedestal designs are more common in rural or low-volume settings to reduce costs and installation complexity. In dense urban environments, taller poles (up to 40 feet) support multiple signal heads, whereas rural installations often use shorter, simpler poles focused on long-distance . These adaptations prioritize and efficiency without compromising structural integrity.

Light sources and visibility features

Early traffic signals primarily utilized incandescent bulbs, which were standard from the early through the pre-1980s era. These bulbs operated by heating a filament to produce , consuming high energy—typically 100-150 watts per module—and offering a limited lifespan of around 1,000 hours, necessitating frequent replacements and contributing to elevated maintenance costs. The transition to more efficient lighting began in the late , with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) emerging as the dominant technology starting in the 1990s. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) published interim specifications for LED vehicle traffic control signal heads in 1998, followed by formal standards in 2005 and arrow supplements in 2007, facilitating widespread adoption. The U.S. further promoted LED use through energy efficiency mandates, leading to bulk replacements of incandescent signals around 2010; by 2014, most U.S. jurisdictions had achieved near-full conversion to LEDs. Modern LED modules offer significantly improved performance, with lifespans exceeding 50,000 hours (often 100,000+ hours or 15-20 years in field use) and power consumption of 10-20 watts per module—up to 90% less than incandescent equivalents—reducing operational costs and energy demands. To enhance visibility, traffic signals incorporate specialized optical features. Fresnel lenses, consisting of concentric grooves that refract light efficiently, are integrated into signal heads to focus and distribute illumination evenly over long distances, minimizing light loss and ensuring clear sighting from afar. Retroreflective borders, typically 2-3 inches wide and applied to signal backplates, reflect ambient light (such as headlights) back to drivers, improving conspicuity during low-light or adverse weather conditions and reducing intersection crashes by 11-19%. Additionally, programmable LED configurations allow for dynamic displays, such as flashing patterns or sequential arrows, enabling adaptive signaling for varying traffic needs without mechanical components. Standard designs ensure reliability and uniformity. Circular lenses typically measure 200 mm (8 inches) or 300 mm (12 inches) in diameter internationally for vehicular signals, with 300 mm common in the to provide optimal while fitting standardized housings. Arrow-shaped lenses, often 200-300 mm, indicate directional movements like left or right turns, with LED arrays forming the directional pattern. Housings achieve IP65 ratings for and resistance, protecting internals from environmental exposure in outdoor installations.

Signal Types and Meanings

Vehicular signals

Vehicular traffic signals primarily use three colors to direct movements at : , (or ), and . These colors are typically arranged vertically with red at the top, yellow in the middle, and green at the bottom to enhance visibility and standardize recognition. A steady requires drivers to come to a complete stop before the stop line and remain stopped until the signal changes. A steady serves as a caution, warning drivers to prepare to stop if it is safe to do so, but permits continuation through the if the cannot safely stop. A steady allows drivers to proceed straight or turn (where permitted) if the is clear of conflicting traffic. Flashing variants modify these meanings for specific conditions. A flashing red light functions like a stop sign, requiring drivers to come to a and yield before proceeding. A flashing yellow alerts drivers to proceed with caution, slowing down and yielding to other traffic or pedestrians as necessary. Green arrow indications provide protected turns for vehicles. A steady green arrow grants the right-of-way for left or right turns without yielding to oncoming traffic, often used in protected phases where opposing movements are stopped. These can occur in leading phases (early in the cycle) or lagging phases (later, after straight-through movements). , a circular green is permissive, allowing turns only when safe after yielding, contrasting with the exclusive protection of arrows. Countdown timers, displaying remaining seconds for the current phase, are common in to aid driver anticipation. In , these digital displays for red, yellow, and green phases help reduce rear-end collisions by informing decision-making. However, in , , countdown timers were phased out across 96 intersections in 2025 as of June 27, replaced by sensor-based systems for . Regional variations adapt signals to local contexts. In the , a red-and-amber combination means stop and prepare, prohibiting movement until green appears. Japan's green lights often appear bluish-green due to historical linguistic classification of blue-green hues under "ao," though they meet international green wavelength standards. In , the yellow light dilemma zone—where drivers must decide to stop or proceed—poses challenges.

Pedestrian and cyclist signals

Pedestrian signals typically use symbolic icons to indicate when it is safe or unsafe to cross. The "walk" indication is represented by a white of a walking figure, signaling that pedestrians may begin crossing the roadway. In contrast, the "don't walk" indication features an orange or red upraised hand, prohibiting pedestrians from starting to cross, while a flashing version of the hand allows those already in the crosswalk to complete their crossing but warns against entering. These symbols have become standardized in many jurisdictions to provide clear, intuitive guidance without relying solely on text. Many signals incorporate countdown timers that display the remaining time before the walk phase ends, helping users gauge safe crossing opportunities. These timers are implemented in numerous countries worldwide, including widespread adoption in and parts of , to enhance compliance and reduce . signals often employ dedicated icons, such as a green silhouette, to indicate when it is safe for cyclists to proceed through an intersection, distinct from vehicular lights. In the and several countries, advanced stop lines (ASLs), also known as bike boxes, mark reserved areas ahead of the main stop line where cyclists can position themselves safely before vehicular traffic at signalized junctions. The features CYCLOPS junctions, a cyclist-priority design that segregates cycle paths around a central roundabout-like structure integrated with car crossroads, allowing cyclists to navigate turns and straight paths with minimal conflict. To accommodate pedestrians with disabilities, signals include accessibility features such as auditory cues—a rapid ticking or beeping sound during the walk phase to alert visually impaired individuals that crossing is permitted—and locator tones that emit intermittent chirps to help locate the push button. Complementary aids encompass , consisting of raised, detectable warning surfaces at crosswalk edges to guide those with visual impairments via cane or foot detection, and vibrating push buttons that provide haptic feedback confirming activation or signaling the walk phase. In response to distracted pedestrians focused on smartphones, so-called "zombie ribbons" or LED light strips have been embedded in sidewalks near crossings to visually alert users to signal changes without requiring them to look up. Introduced in the in 2016 as part of the "+ Light Line" project in Bodegraven, these ground-level lights glow green for safe crossing and red to stop, with subsequent trials and implementations in various cities by the early , including adaptations .

Public transport signals

Public transport signals are specialized traffic control devices designed to facilitate the movement of buses, trams, and other mass transit vehicles sharing roadways with general traffic, enhancing efficiency and reliability of public transportation systems. These signals often feature distinct visual indicators that are exclusive to transit operators, allowing them to bypass or receive priority over standard vehicular phases at intersections. By integrating detection technologies, such signals minimize delays for high-capacity vehicles, supporting urban mobility goals without disrupting overall traffic flow. In , transit signals commonly employ lunar-style indicators, such as vertical bars, to denote permission for buses to proceed during queue jumps or dedicated phases. A vertical bar functions as a green light equivalent for buses at near-side stops, enabling them to merge ahead of general after boarding passengers, while a horizontal bar serves as a red stop signal. Pre-signal stops, positioned upstream of intersections, further aid buses in (BRT) corridors by allowing early detection and activation of these priority signals. or aspects may supplement these for cautionary transitions in some installations, though bars predominate for clarity in mixed-use environments. European systems, particularly in , utilize white bar configurations for at shared junctions, where a vertical white bar permits trams to advance and a requires stopping. These signals integrate with priority mechanisms at intersections to reduce dwell times and improve schedule adherence for vehicles navigating urban streets. For instance, advanced control like the SelTrac (CBTC) system supports tram priority by enabling real-time adjustments at signals, as deployed in various German urban rail networks. Such designs ensure trams receive precedence over automobiles during green phases, promoting seamless integration in dense cityscapes. In the region, variations emphasize detection and adaptive features tailored to local transit needs. employs dedicated signals for buses and trams, often displaying a white "T" or to authorize movement through intersections when activated, allowing these vehicles to proceed while other remains on red. relies on beacons installed on buses and at signal poles to detect approaching transit vehicles, triggering priority extensions to green phases and ensuring punctual operations in congested areas. In the , countdown timers were replaced with sensor-based, volume-responsive signals across 96 intersections in in 2025, with AI-driven enhancements implemented at select locations starting in 2025 to monitor real-time vehicle flows, including , and dynamically allocate green time to reduce delays for buses. Preemption for typically involves optical or triggers from equipped vehicles to request signal changes, such as extending greens or shortening reds, though detailed mechanics are addressed in operational control discussions. These systems use emitters for line-of-sight detection or radio signals for non-visual communication, enabling buses to interrupt normal cycles without compromising safety.

Operation and Control

Basic timing and sequencing

Traffic signal cycles consist of distinct phases designed to manage and movements safely and efficiently. The typical sequence of traffic light colors in a cycle is green (go) → yellow (prepare to stop) → red (stop) → back to green, with the green phase typically the longest at 15-60 seconds, yellow brief at 3-5 seconds, and red varying based on traffic conditions; these are standard approximations. The primary components include the phase, which grants right-of-way to specified traffic movements; the yellow change interval, typically lasting 3 to 6 seconds to warn drivers of the impending end of ; and the red clearance interval, which follows yellow to ensure vehicles clear the before conflicting movements receive . An all-red clearance interval, often 1 to 2 seconds in duration, may be incorporated within the red clearance to display red signals in all directions simultaneously, providing additional time for intersection clearance and reducing conflict risks. Two fundamental timing methods govern signal operation: fixed-time and actuated control. Fixed-time signals operate on predetermined cycle lengths and phase durations, independent of real-time , with common cycle lengths ranging from 60 to 120 seconds depending on complexity and . This method suits high-density urban areas where patterns are predictable. In contrast, actuated signals adjust phase timings dynamically using detection, primarily through inductive loop detectors embedded in the roadway to sense presence and extend intervals as needed, thereby minimizing delays during variable . Signal sequencing determines how phases are arranged to serve traffic movements. Concurrent phasing allows multiple compatible movements, such as through and right-turn traffic on the same approach, to proceed simultaneously, promoting efficient flow in balanced intersections. Exclusive phasing, however, dedicates a phase to a single movement, like a protected left turn, to avoid conflicts with opposing traffic. For unbalanced flows, split phasing sequences all movements from one approach consecutively before serving the opposing approach, which can increase cycle lengths but better accommodates heavy one-sided demand. Design of these timings relies on established guidelines from the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), which provides formulas for estimating capacity based on volumes and signal parameters. Capacity is calculated as c=s(gC)c = s \left( \frac{g}{C} \right), where cc is the capacity in vehicles per hour, ss is the saturation flow rate, gg is the effective green time, and CC is the cycle length. The HCM defines the base saturation flow rate as approximately 1,900 passenger cars per hour per under ideal conditions, serving as a key benchmark for phase allocation and overall signal performance.

Preemption and priority systems

Preemption and priority systems in traffic lights enable authorized vehicles to interrupt or modify standard signal operations, improving response times for critical services while minimizing disruptions to overall . These mechanisms differ from routine sequencing by providing on-demand overrides, often triggered by vehicle-mounted devices or sensors. preemption typically grants full control to , whereas transit priority offers conditional adjustments to support scheduled without fully halting other movements. Emergency vehicle preemption allows ambulances, fire trucks, and police vehicles to request immediate signal changes, such as extending greens or truncating reds in their path. A widely adopted system is Opticom, which uses infrared emitters mounted on vehicle roofs to transmit directional pulses detected by receivers at intersections; these emitters activate automatically with emergency lights and sirens, ensuring consistent performance day or night. Opticom systems, first deployed in the United States in the mid-1960s, are widely used and maintained through quarterly testing of emitters and detectors to verify reliability in many jurisdictions, such as Austin, Texas. Modern alternatives incorporate GPS-based detection, where vehicle positions are communicated via vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) protocols to preempt signals proactively, reducing reliance on line-of-sight emitters and enabling networked coordination across multiple intersections. As of 2024, advanced connected preemption platforms have facilitated over 4.3 million green lights for emergency vehicles, reducing travel times and enhancing safety. Transit signal priority focuses on buses and other , providing targeted modifications like green extensions or early greens to minimize delays without preempting the entire cycle. Conditional strategies extend the phase by 3 to 8 seconds if a bus is detected approaching on a green or near its end, preventing unnecessary holds for on-schedule vehicles while aiding late arrivals. These approaches integrate with dedicated signals to enhance efficiency. Implementation relies on various detection methods to initiate preemption or priority swiftly. Infrared and optical detectors, as in Opticom, respond in under one second to emitter signals, while radio frequency (RF) systems use wireless tags for non-line-of-sight activation. Audio detectors, which identify siren frequencies, serve as backups in some setups, though RF and GPS are increasingly preferred for their robustness in urban environments. Response times for emergency preemption are typically optimized to under one second from detection to signal change, ensuring minimal delay. In the United States, the National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol (NTCIP) standards, particularly NTCIP 1211, define protocols for both preemption and priority requests, enabling interoperable systems that preserve signal coordination post-event. In the , Urban Traffic Management and Control (UTMC) frameworks integrate priority functions across devices, supporting bus extensions and emergency overrides through centralized monitoring and SCOOT-based adaptive control. These regional standards facilitate scalable deployment while addressing local infrastructure variations.

Safety, Rules, and Impacts

The Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals (1968), adopted under the Economic Commission for , establishes standardized meanings for traffic lights to promote international uniformity in road safety. Under its provisions, a red light requires vehicles and pedestrians to stop and wait behind the stop line; a yellow or amber light signals preparation to stop unless already in the ; and a green light permits proceeding if the way is clear, with arrow variants restricting movement to indicated directions. As of 2024, the convention has 71 contracting parties across , , the , , and , binding these nations to implement compatible signal systems. In the United States, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), issued by the , provides national standards for the design, installation, and operation of traffic signals on all public roads to ensure consistency and . States must adopt the MUTCD as their legal standard, though they may supplement it with non-conflicting provisions; for example, California's Assembly Bill 413 (2023) enhances pedestrian at signalized intersections by prohibiting vehicle parking within 20 feet of marked or unmarked crosswalks to improve visibility and reduce conflicts. Compliance with traffic signals is enforced through fines and automated systems across jurisdictions. In the , penalties for running a red light typically range from $50 to $500, depending on the state and circumstances, with additional points added to driving records that may increase rates. ticketing, first implemented in in the early 1990s, uses automated photography to issue civil citations for violations, now operating in approximately 350 communities nationwide as of 2024 to deter non-compliance without direct officer intervention. Global variations in right-of-way rules at signals reflect national laws while aligning with convention principles. In the , mandates stopping at red or red-and-amber lights, proceeding only on green if safe, and yielding to pedestrians on green signals unless otherwise directed, with priority determined by signal phase. Japan's Road Traffic Act requires absolute obedience to signals, with drivers yielding to pedestrians at crosswalks and following priority based on signal indications or at intersections, prohibiting entry that obstructs straight-through or opposing traffic. In the United States, when traffic control signals are not functioning due to power failure or other malfunctions, resulting in dark signals with no flashing indications, drivers must treat the intersection as a four-way stop. This requires all vehicles to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection and yield the right-of-way to other vehicles and pedestrians according to standard rules, such as yielding to the vehicle on the right if arriving simultaneously from different approaches. This guidance aligns with state laws implementing MUTCD principles.

Common issues and safety effects

One common operational issue with traffic lights is the "yellow trap," which occurs in lead-lag protected-permissive left-turn (PPLT) phasing where opposing through traffic receives a green while left-turning vehicles face a yellow or red indication, potentially leading to rear-end collisions if drivers in the left-turn lane mistakenly believe they have protected clearance to proceed. This hazard is particularly prevalent in traditional signal displays without flashing yellow arrows (FYAs), and studies indicate that implementing FYAs can reduce injury crashes by up to 27% at such intersections by clarifying permissive phasing and eliminating the trap. Another frequent problem is the dilemma zone, a speed-distance region on approach to an where a driver cannot safely stop before the stop line upon onset nor clear the before the red phase begins, increasing the risk of rear-end or right-angle collisions due to inconsistent driver decisions. strategies, such as dynamic advance warning systems using sensors to extend green time or provide alerts, have demonstrated reductions in dilemma zone conflicts by up to 62% in evaluated setups. In high-speed environments, these zones contribute to about 10-20% of yellow-light-related violations, underscoring the need for precise timing based on approach speeds. Traffic lights generally enhance intersection safety compared to uncontrolled or stop-sign-only setups, with data showing signalized intersections experience lower crash rates per million entering vehicles—approximately 30% fewer severe crashes—due to regulated flow and reduced speeds. However, red-light running remains a key risk, accounting for about one-third of intersection fatalities, though post-2020 implementations of red-light cameras have reduced violation rates by 21-39% at equipped sites by deterring non-compliance through automated enforcement. Beyond timing flaws, traffic lights are susceptible to power failures and vandalism, which can cause signals to go dark or malfunction, reverting intersections to all-way stops but often leading to confusion and collisions if drivers fail to adapt. Power outages, frequently triggered by storms or grid issues, disrupt urban signals in vulnerable areas, while vandalism such as tampering with wiring or fixtures exacerbates downtime and elevates crash risks during recovery periods. To counter pedestrian safety challenges, the scramble phase—also known as an exclusive pedestrian interval—halts all vehicular traffic to permit crossings in , including diagonally, which can increase effective crossing time by 20-40% in high-volume areas by accommodating slower walkers and reducing mid-block . Evaluations show this phase improves perceived safety for 70% of users and lowers vehicle-pedestrian conflicts by providing dedicated clearance, though it may extend overall cycle lengths and delay for low-pedestrian volumes.

Justification and efficacy studies

Traffic signals have been justified primarily for their role in enhancing and managing at high-volume . Studies indicate that installing traffic signals at previously unsignalized intersections can reduce overall crash frequency by approximately 44%, based on analyses of state-level where new signals were implemented at high-crash locations. This reduction is particularly notable for angle and turning crashes, which account for a significant portion of intersection incidents, thereby improving overall road safety in urban and suburban settings. Additionally, traffic signals improve in areas with high vehicle volumes, minimizing conflicts and enabling more predictable movement for vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. Installation of traffic signals is guided by established warrants outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD; 11th edition, 2023), which specify criteria such as vehicular volume thresholds to ensure necessity and now serve as guidance emphasizing engineering judgment rather than strict requirements. For instance, under Warrant 1 (Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume), signals are recommended when the major street experiences at least 500 vehicles per hour (vph) for one approach or 600 vph for two or more approaches over eight hours of an average day, combined with sufficient minor street volumes (e.g., 150 vph for one lane). Cost-benefit analyses further support these installations, with typical costs ranging from $80,000 to $250,000 per , often offset by safety and operational savings. One found that the benefits from reduced crashes and delays could recover installation costs within about five years through decreased accident-related expenses and improved . Post-2020 research has emphasized the efficacy of optimized traffic signals in promoting urban mobility and . A 2023 simulation study demonstrated that systems at urban intersections could reduce CO2 emissions by 32% to 40% locally by minimizing idling and stop-start driving patterns. The World Health Organization's Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023 highlights interventions, including signals, as key to lowering road traffic deaths in urban areas, aligning with broader goals for . However, criticisms arise regarding overuse in low-traffic areas, where signals can increase delays and fuel consumption by forcing unnecessary stops, potentially raising emissions and driver frustration. Alternatives like roundabouts have shown superior safety outcomes, reducing injury crashes by 72% to 80% compared to signalized intersections in U.S. studies.

Advanced and Emerging Technologies

Smart and adaptive systems

Smart and adaptive traffic light systems leverage from integrated sensors and to dynamically adjust signal timings, improving responsiveness to varying conditions beyond traditional fixed or actuated controls. These systems use embedded technologies to detect presence, , and speed, enabling predictive adjustments that minimize delays and optimize flow at intersections. Sensor integration forms the foundation of these systems, incorporating inductive loops buried in roadways to detect vehicles via electromagnetic changes, cameras for visual traffic monitoring, and for precise 3D mapping of movement and occupancy. Inductive loops provide reliable detection of vehicle passage but require road disruptions for installation, while cameras and offer non-invasive, high-resolution data on multi-modal traffic including pedestrians and cyclists. Vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication further enhances this by allowing connected vehicles to transmit speed, position, and intent data directly to signals, facilitating coordinated responses across networks. Artificial intelligence, particularly , drives predictive timing by analyzing historical and real-time data to forecast traffic patterns and optimize cycle lengths. For instance, adaptive algorithms process sensor inputs to extend green phases during peaks or shorten them in low flow, reducing unnecessary stops. A seminal application occurred in , where a 2016 AI-based system using for signal coordination reduced travel times by 25% and idling by over 40% across tested corridors. Recent developments highlight global adoption of these technologies. In 2025, Metro Manila's Metropolitan Manila Development Authority deployed sensor-based adaptive signals at over 96 intersections, replacing fixed timers to adjust in real-time to traffic volumes and improve flow on major routes. The European Union's C-ROADS platform, an ongoing initiative since 2016, integrates connected traffic signals with V2I for services like green light optimal speed advisory (GLOSA), enabling cross-border harmonization in urban and highway settings. Post-2020, pilots incorporating AI and sensors have expanded in cities including Los Angeles, Austin, and San Francisco, focusing on real-time incident response and flow optimization. These systems yield significant benefits, including 15-30% reductions in congestion through enhanced throughput and fewer stops, as demonstrated in deployments. Integration with mobile apps allows drivers to receive signal status and speed recommendations via GLOSA, further cutting delays and fuel use in connected environments.

Environmental and sustainability aspects

Traffic lights, particularly those using (LED) technology, significantly reduce compared to traditional incandescent bulbs, with LEDs using up to 90% less for the same illumination output. This efficiency stems from LEDs converting a higher percentage of electrical into light rather than heat, lowering operational costs and associated with electricity generation. In remote or rural areas lacking reliable grid access, solar-powered traffic signals have emerged as a sustainable alternative; in , companies like Onnyx Electronisys and Aakriti Solar have deployed such systems in off-grid locations during the 2020s to support traffic management without dependency. The lifecycle environmental impacts of traffic lights extend beyond operation to include manufacturing and end-of-life phases. Production of LED units involves energy-intensive processes for materials, contributing to embodied carbon emissions that can double those of conventional due to extraction and fabrication. Recycling programs for traffic light electronics, classified as e-waste, are supported through municipal and manufacturer takeback initiatives that recover metals, plastics, and components to minimize and ; for instance, U.S. state programs like New York's e-waste ensure proper handling of signal controllers and ballasts. Sustainability efforts in traffic light deployment have intensified post-2020, aligning with frameworks like the European Union's Green Deal, which promotes green public procurement (GPP) criteria mandating energy-efficient designs such as maximum wattages of 7-12W for traffic signals to curb emissions. Adaptive traffic systems, by optimizing signal timing, can reduce vehicle idling and associated emissions by up to 25%, enhancing overall urban air quality. Despite these advances, challenges persist with legacy systems. Incandescent traffic lights generate substantial —up to 90% of input energy—exacerbating effects in densely populated areas by adding to localized temperature rises. Additionally, constant illumination from traffic signals contributes to , disrupting behaviors such as nocturnal foraging, migration, and by altering cycles and attracting and birds into hazardous urban environments.

Applications Beyond Roads

Railways and waterways

In railway systems, color-light signals employ red, yellow, and green lights to convey operational aspects to operators. Red indicates stop, requiring the to halt completely at the signal; yellow signifies caution, instructing the operator to proceed at a reduced speed in preparation for a potential stop at the next signal; and green means proceed, allowing the to continue at normal line speed, assuming the subsequent signal will also permit clear passage. These signals are integral to block signaling principles, which divide the track into discrete sections or blocks to prevent collisions by controlling occupancy. Railway block signaling differs from road traffic lights in its stricter enforcement of occupancy rules, particularly through absolute and permissive blocks. In an absolute block system, only one train is permitted within a block at any time, with signals enforcing a complete stop until the block clears, ensuring protection on high-speed lines. Permissive blocks, by contrast, allow following trains to enter an occupied block but only at restricted speeds with extreme caution, typically used for slower or secondary routes. This contrasts with road systems, where lights primarily sequence vehicle flow without such granular occupancy tracking. Railway signals often integrate with (ABS), where track circuits detect train presence and automatically adjust color-light aspects to maintain safe intervals between trains, enhancing capacity on busy corridors. For waterways, traffic lights adapted for vessel control appear at canal locks and bridges to manage navigation through constrained passages. At locks, such as those on the or , red lights signal vessels to stop and wait outside the chamber, while green lights authorize entry and passage under controlled conditions, preventing overcrowding and ensuring safe water level adjustments. For example, in the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, red and green traffic signal lights positioned on lock walls direct boat entry, with red prohibiting approach during filling or emptying operations. At bridges over navigable waters, marine traffic lights use red and green to indicate vertical clearance and passage status; fixed bridges employ red lights on piers and green for channel centers, while swing or lift bridges display multiple red lights when closed to traffic and green lights (often two or three) when fully open, signaling safe transit for vessels. These systems prioritize vessel safety in low-visibility conditions, differing from road applications by accounting for tidal influences and larger vessel maneuvers.

Non-transport uses

In motorsport, traffic light concepts are adapted for racing safety and timing. In Formula 1, the starting procedure uses a sequence of five red lights that illuminate one by one above , followed by all lights extinguishing to signal the race start, allowing drivers to accelerate immediately. Pit lane operations employ similar red and green signals; during pit stops, a traffic light system remains red to hold the car until mechanics signal readiness, turning green to release it safely, while the pit exit light turns green to indicate safe rejoining of the track. Rating systems in various fields borrow traffic light colors to denote levels of compliance or urgency. The UK's promotes color-coded hygiene practices in food preparation, where chopping boards and utensils are assigned colors—such as for , for cooked meat, for , and blue for —to prevent cross-contamination and maintain sanitary standards. In emergency medical triage, particularly under the START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) protocol, patients are categorized using color tags: for immediate life-threatening injuries requiring urgent care, for delayed but serious conditions that can wait, and for minor injuries needing minimal intervention. Traffic light motifs appear in cultural and digital symbols, extending their utility beyond physical signals. Unicode standardizes representations like the horizontal traffic light (U+1F6A5, 🚥), depicting a side-view signal for global digital communication, and the large red circle (U+1F534, 🔴), often evoking a stop light in icons and media. These symbols are widely used in software interfaces, animations, and films to convey caution or progression, such as in video games simulating urban navigation or movies illustrating regulatory themes. Other applications include cue systems in production environments and guidance. In studios and theaters, cue lights mimic traffic signals with for "stop" or warning, amber for standby, and for "go," alerting performers to timing without verbal cues. taxiway lighting uses blue edge lights to delineate paths, centerline lights to guide movement, yellow for caution zones, and stop bars to halt operations, ensuring safe ground navigation akin to signals.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.