Hubbry Logo
Solar stillSolar stillMain
Open search
Solar still
Community hub
Solar still
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Solar still
Solar still
Solar still
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Solar still built into a pit in the ground
"Watercone" solar still

A solar still distills water with substances dissolved in it by using the heat of the Sun to evaporate water so that it may be cooled and collected, thereby purifying it. They are used in areas where drinking water is unavailable, so that clean water is obtained from dirty water or from plants by exposing them to sunlight.

Still types include large scale concentrated solar stills and condensation traps. In a solar still, impure water is contained outside the collector, where it is evaporated by sunlight shining through a transparent collector. The pure water vapour condenses on the cool inside surface and drips into a tank.

Distillation replicates the way nature makes rain. The sun's energy heats water to the point of evaporation. As the water evaporates, its vapour rises, condensing into water again as it cools. This process leaves behind impurities, such as salts and heavy metals, and eliminates microbiological organisms. The result is pure (potable) water.

History

[edit]

Condensation traps have been in use since the pre-Incan peoples inhabited the Andes.[citation needed]

In 1952, the United States military developed a portable solar still for pilots stranded in the ocean. It featured an inflatable 610-millimetre (24 in) floating plastic ball, with a flexible tube in the side. An inner bag hangs from attachment points on the outer bag. Seawater is poured into the inner bag from an opening in the ball's neck. Fresh water is taken out using the side tube. Output ranged from 1.4 litres (1.5 US qt) to 2.4 litres (2.5 US qt) of fresh water per day.[1] Similar stills are included in some life raft survival kits, though manual reverse osmosis desalinators have mostly replaced them.[2]

Today, a method for gathering water in moisture traps is taught within the Argentinian Army for use by specialist units expected to conduct extended patrols of more than a week's duration in the Andes' arid border areas.[citation needed]

Methods

[edit]
Solar Well

Pit still

[edit]

A collector is placed at the bottom of a pit. Branches are placed vertically in the pit. The branches are long enough to extend over the edge of the pit and form a funnel to direct the water into the collector. A lid is then built over this funnel, using more branches, leaves, grasses, etc. Water is collected each morning.

This method relies on the formation of dew or frost on the receptacle, funnel, and lid. Forming dew collects on and runs down the outside of the funnel and into the receptacle. This water would typically evaporate with the morning sun and thus vanish, but the lid traps the evaporating water and raises the humidity within the trap, reducing the amount of lost water. The shade produced by the lid also reduces the temperature within the trap, which further reduces the rate of water loss to evaporation.

A solar still can be constructed with two–four stones, plastic film or transparent glass, a central weight to make the funnel and a container for the condensate.[3] Better materials improve efficiency. A single sheet of plastic can replace the branches and leaves. Greater efficiency arises because the plastic is waterproof, preventing water vapour from escaping. The sheet is attached to the ground on all sides with stones or earth. Weighting the centre of the sheet forms the funnel. Condensate runs down it into the receptacle. One study of pit distillation found that angling the lid at 30 degrees angle captured the most water. The optimal water depth was about 25 millimetres (1 in).[4]

Transpiration

[edit]

During photosynthesis plants release water through transpiration. Water can be obtained by enclosing a leafy tree branch in clear plastic,[5] capturing water vapour released by the tree.[6] The plastic allows photosynthesis to continue.

In a 2009 study, variations to the angle of plastic and increasing the internal temperature versus the outside temperature improved output volumes.

Unless relieved the vapour pressure around the branch can rise so high that the leaves can no longer transpire, requiring the water to be removed frequently.

Alternatively, clumps of grass or small bushes can be placed inside the bag. The foliage must be replaced at regular intervals, particularly if the foliage is uprooted.

Efficiency is greatest when the bag receives maximum sunshine. Soft, pulpy roots yield the greatest amount of liquid for the least amount of effort.

Wick

[edit]
Wick basin solar still.

The wick type solar still is a vapour-tight glass-topped box with an angled roof.[7] Water is poured in from the top. It is heated by sunlight and evaporates. It condenses on the underside of the glass and runs into the connecting pipe at the bottom. Wicks separate the water into banks to increase surface area. The more wicks, the more heat reaches the water.

To aid in absorbing more heat, wicks can be blackened. Glass absorbs less heat than plastic at higher temperatures, although glass is not as flexible.

A plastic net can catch the water before it falls into the container and give it more time to heat.

Additives

[edit]

When distilling brine or other polluted water, adding a dye can increase the amount of solar radiation absorbed.

Reverse still

[edit]

A reverse still uses the temperature difference between solar-heated ambient air and the device to condense ambient water vapour. One such device produces water without external power. It features an inverted cone on top to deflect ambient heat in the air, and to keep sunlight off the upper surface of the box. This surface is a sheet of glass coated with multiple layers of a polymer and silver.[8]

It reflects sunlight to reduce surface heating. Residual heat that is not reflected is reemitted in a specific (infrared) wavelength so that it passes through the atmosphere into space. The box can be as much as 15 °C (27 °F) cooler than the ambient temperature. That stimulates condensation, which gathers on the ceiling. This ceiling is coated in a superhydrophobic material, so that the condensate forms into droplets and falls into a collector. A test system yielded 4.6 ml (0.16 US fl oz) of water per day, using a 10 cm (3.9 in) surface or approximately 1.3 L/m2 (0.28 gal/ft2) per day.[8]

Inclined Solar Still

[edit]
Sketch of an inclined basin-type solar still

An inclined solar still operates by allowing short-wave solar radiation to pass through a transparent glass plate while trapping the long-wave radiation emitted by the heated sand and water inside the still.[9] This trapped heat raises the water temperature, increasing the evaporation rate. The resulting water vapor condenses on the inner surface of the glass plate and is collected using a channel. This type of still is utilized to produce potable water from brackish sources and to examine its effectiveness for defluoridation. A variation of this method, known as earth–water distillation, involves using wet sand or soil to extract water in arid regions. Sand is used within the inclined still to retain a stable water layer, preventing overflow. Without sand, feed water would spill over if its free surface height exceeded that of the collection channel.[9]

Efficiency

[edit]

Condensation traps are sources for extending or supplementing existing water sources or supplies. A trap measuring 40 cm (16 in) in diameter by 30 cm (12 in) deep yields around 100 to 150 mL (3.4 to 5.1 US fl oz) per day.

Urinating into the pit before adding the receptacle allows some of the urine's water content to be recovered.

A pit still may be too inefficient as a survival still, because of the energy/water required for construction.[10] In desert environments water needs can exceed 3.8 litres (1 US gal) per day for a person at rest, while still production may average only 240 millilitres (8 US fl oz).[10][11] Several days of water collection may be required to equal the water lost during construction.[11]

Applications

[edit]

Remote sites

[edit]

Solar stills are used in cases where rain, piped, or well water is impractical, such as in remote homes or during power outages.[9] In subtropical hurricane target areas that can lose power for days, solar distillation can provide an alternative source of clean water.

Solar-powered desalination systems can be installed in remote locations where there is little or no infrastructure or energy grid. Solar is still affordable, eco-friendly, and considered an effective method amongst other conventional distillation techniques. Solar still is very effective, especially for supplying fresh water for islanders. This makes them ideal for use in rural areas or developing countries where access to clean water is limited. [12] [13]

Survival

[edit]

Solar stills have been used by ocean-stranded pilots and included in life raft emergency kits.[1]

Using a condensation trap to distill urine will remove the urea and salt, recycling the body's water.[14]

Wastewater treatment

[edit]

Solar stills have also been used for the treatment of municipal wastewater,[15] the dewatering of sewage sludge [16] as well as for olive mill wastewater management.[17]

Ion occurrence mechanism in distilled water from a solar still

[edit]

Research indicates that ions such as F⁻ and NO−3 can be present in distillates from solar stills. Imaging and distillation experiments were performed to investigate this phenomenon.[18] White dots were observed in the vapor space above the interface of hot water poured into containers. The concentrations of ions such as F⁻ and SO2−4 in distillates from both thermal and solar distillation experiments were found to be similar when using deionized water as well as fluoride solutions with concentrations of 100 and 10,000 mg/L. These findings suggest that aerosols enter the distillation system through leaks, acting as nuclei for water vapor condensation. The water-soluble components of aerosols dissolve in the forming droplets, some of which are carried into the distillate by buoyancy-driven convection.

Benefits and Disadvantages

[edit]

Benefits

[edit]
  • Utlizes free solar energy
  • Simple Design
  • Low Operational Cost
  • Improved water quality
  • Adaoptable

Disadvantages

[edit]
  • Very slow process
  • do not kill bacteria
  • larger space required
  • only work well in the presence of sun light

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Patents

[edit]
  • US 3337418, "Pneumatic solar still" 
  • US 4235679, "High performance solar still" 
  • US 4966655, "Plastic covered solar still" 
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Solar still

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A solar still is a simple, passive device that harnesses to desalinate or purify through and , typically consisting of a shallow basin containing saline, brackish, or contaminated covered by a transparent lid, such as or , where heated rises, cools, and collects as fresh distillate. This process mimics the natural hydrological cycle, utilizing the to trap solar radiation and achieve ranging from 25% to 50%, with typical daily yields of 2 to 5 liters per square meter under optimal sunny conditions. Solar stills have a long history, with evidence of solar evaporation techniques used over 2,000 years ago for salt production and documented methods emerging in the among Arab alchemists, evolving into large-scale installations like the 1872 greenhouse-style still in that supplied fresh water to a . During , over 200,000 inflatable solar stills were mass-produced for U.S. Navy life rafts to provide emergency potable water. Modern designs classify solar stills into passive types, which rely solely on direct ; active types, incorporating external sources like flat-plate collectors or solar dishes to boost ; and hybrid systems, such as those integrated with photovoltaic-thermal (PV/T) panels for simultaneous water production and . These devices are particularly valuable in addressing global , offering a low-cost, sustainable solution for remote rural areas, coastal regions, small islands, and relief scenarios where access to clean is limited, with applications extending to , hospitals, and battery maintenance. Recent advancements, including the use of phase-change materials (PCMs) for heat storage, nanotechnology-enhanced surfaces for improved absorption, and 3D interfacial heating to minimize losses, have increased productivity up to 24 L per square meter per day in some optimized prototypes. Despite their simplicity and minimal needs, challenges like low output in cloudy climates and material degradation continue to drive toward and broader adoption.

Principles of Operation

Basic Mechanism

A solar still is a simple device that harnesses to evaporate saline or impure water, subsequently condensing the vapor to produce . The fundamental process begins with solar radiation penetrating a transparent cover and heating the water contained in a basin, which raises its temperature and induces . The resulting , being lighter, rises toward the cooler cover—typically made of glass or plastic—where it condenses into droplets due to the temperature differential. These droplets then trickle down the inclined surface of the cover into a collection trough or channel for harvesting as . Key components of a basic solar still include the basin, which holds and absorbs for the ; the transparent cover, providing the condensation surface; insulation surrounding the basin to reduce losses to the environment; and the collection , which channels the condensate for storage. Heat transfer modes in the device encompass , which delivers through the cover to the basin and ; conduction, transferring from the basin to the ; and , facilitating the movement of humid air and vapor within the enclosed toward the cover. The core energy balance for evaporation is expressed as Q=m⋅LQ = m \cdot L where QQ represents the input to the system, mm is the of evaporated, and LL is the of vaporization of , approximately 2260 kJ/kg.

Thermodynamic Processes

The thermodynamic processes in a solar still involve intricate and mechanisms that govern the of through . The primary input is II, which is absorbed by the basin surface with absorptivity α\alpha, yielding useful αI\alpha I. This absorbed is balanced against various losses: convective to the inner cover surface with coefficient hch_c, evaporative with coefficient heh_e, radiative with coefficient hrh_r, and conductive to the basin base with coefficient hkh_k. These terms form the core of the balance equation for the body: αI=hc(Tw−Tgi)+he(Tw−Tgi)+hr(Tw−Tgi)+hk(Tw−Tb)\alpha I = h_c (T_w - T_{gi}) + h_e (T_w - T_{gi}) + h_r (T_w - T_{gi}) + h_k (T_w - T_b) where TwT_w is the basin water temperature, TgiT_{gi} is the inner glass cover temperature, and TbT_b is the basin temperature. This balance ensures that the net heat drives the phase change from liquid to vapor. Mass transfer occurs primarily through the diffusion of water vapor across the air gap between the evaporating water surface and the condensing cover, approximated by Fick's law of diffusion. The vapor flux is driven by the humidity gradient, which correlates with the partial pressure difference Pw−PgiP_w - P_{gi} (saturation pressures at TwT_w and TgiT_{gi}), leading to the evaporative heat transfer coefficient he≈0.0163hcPw−PgiTw−Tgih_e \approx 0.0163 h_c \frac{P_w - P_{gi}}{T_w - T_{gi}}. This process quantifies the rate at which water molecules migrate via molecular diffusion in the humid air layer, with the air gap thickness influencing the diffusion path length. The temperature difference Tw−TgiT_w - T_{gi} is crucial, as it establishes the vapor pressure gradient essential for sustained mass flow toward the cooler cover. During evaporation at the basin surface, sensible heat from the water is converted to latent heat of vaporization LL, facilitating the phase change to vapor without significant temperature rise. Conversely, at the cover's inner surface, the incoming vapor condenses, releasing latent heat that warms the cover through sensible heat transfer. This asymmetric phase change dynamic maintains the , with the daily distillate yield YY approximated as Y=heA(Tw−Tgi)LY = \frac{h_e A (T_w - T_{gi})}{L} integrated over the daylight hours, where AA is the basin area. Such models, rooted in foundational analyses, underscore the limits imposed by these coupled heat and mass transfers.

Historical Development

Early Inventions

Documented European interest in solar stills emerged in the , with contributions from Arab alchemists using methods and Italian scholar Giovan Battista della Porta describing one of the first designs in his 1589 treatise .[] Della Porta's apparatus involved wide earthen pots exposed to to evaporate or , with the vapor condensing on a sloped cover and collecting as fresh distillate; this marked a foundational step in conceptualizing solar-powered purification for practical use, such as salt production or . By the , similar evaporators appeared in European patents and descriptions, including adaptations for industrial salt extraction, though large-scale implementation remained limited by material constraints. A pivotal advancement occurred in the with the patent and construction of basin-style solar stills by Swedish engineer Carlos Wilson around 1870. In 1872, Wilson oversaw the erection of the world's first large-scale solar plant at Las Salinas, , comprising 64 interconnected basins totaling approximately 4,700 m² to desalinate for a remote mining community. This facility, which initially produced up to 23,000 liters of daily, demonstrated the viability of solar stills for sustained community supply in isolated, drought-prone areas and influenced subsequent adoptions in colonial outposts facing water shortages, such as mining operations in arid zones of and supply efforts during famines in . The technology also gained traction for maritime following notable 19th-century shipwrecks, where improvised evaporation methods in lifeboats underscored the need for portable amid prolonged sea ordeals. Key figures like Wilson highlighted the shift toward engineered solutions. These early inventions laid the groundwork for solar stills as a low-cost, passive technology, particularly impactful in colonial contexts where droughts exacerbated for settlers and indigenous populations alike.

Modern Evolution

In the early 20th century, solar still technology transitioned from experimental prototypes to practical military applications, particularly during . Hungarian-American inventor developed a portable solar still for the U.S. Navy in the 1940s, designed as an inflatable device using clear plastic to desalinate seawater for stranded sailors and airmen in the Pacific theater. These stills were integrated into life rafts and became standard emergency equipment, producing up to 0.95 liters of fresh water per day per unit under optimal conditions. Post-World War II, a boom propelled solar still development, driven by global concerns and international collaboration. These efforts emphasized cost-effective scaling, though operational challenges like in dusty environments limited widespread adoption. From the late 20th to early , material innovations reduced costs and improved durability. In the , a shift to sheeting and liners replaced and metal components in basin stills. By the , integration with greenhouses emerged as a key advancement, with designs incorporating solar still roofs to provide for hydroponic agriculture, as demonstrated in transient analysis studies showing enhanced year-round productivity in temperate climates. Key milestones included 2000s patents for multi-effect stills, such as diffusion-coupled systems that reused across stages to boost output by 2-3 times compared to single-effect models. In the 2010s to 2025, hybrid solar-thermal systems marked significant progress, combining photovoltaic panels with thermal for off-grid scalability. Amid pressures, focus shifted to sustainable materials, including bio-based polymers and recycled composites for absorbers, reducing environmental impact while improving heat retention in floating and wick-enhanced designs.

Types of Solar Stills

Basin and Pit Stills

The basin solar still represents one of the simplest passive designs for , consisting of a horizontal tray painted black to maximize solar absorption, positioned beneath a sloped transparent cover that allows to trickle down into a collection trough. Typical units feature a basin area of 1 to 2 and a depth of 5 to 10 cm to optimize while minimizing . In sunny conditions, such stills can produce 3 to 5 L of per per day, depending on solar insolation and ambient factors. Construction commonly employs durable materials like or galvanized metal for the basin liner to withstand corrosion from , with the cover inclined at 10 to 30 degrees for efficient condensate flow. The pit solar still, a below-ground variant suited for emergency or remote applications, involves excavating a approximately 0.5 to 1 m deep and 1 to 2 m wide, lining it with a waterproof sheet, and covering it with a transparent or sheet secured at the edges with or rocks to create a tight seal. Vegetation or moist placed in the pit enhances , while a central collection captures the condensate formed on the underside of the cover; local materials such as leaves can provide additional insulation around the edges. The surrounding acts as natural insulation, helping to retain heat and reduce nighttime losses compared to above-ground designs. These units typically yield 1 to 3 L of per day under optimal solar exposure, making them less productive but highly portable for individual use. Basin stills offer scalability for community-level deployment, as seen in early large-scale installations, while pit stills excel in portability for personal survival scenarios but suffer from lower yields and labor-intensive setup. Historically, basin stills gained prominence with the construction of pioneering plants in during the late , such as the 1872 Las Salinas facility producing up to 22.5 m³/day across 4,757 m², and interest in such designs revived globally in the for centralized efforts.

Inclined and Vertical Stills

Inclined solar stills feature a sloped transparent cover, typically at an of 15° to 30° relative to the horizontal, which facilitates gravity-assisted flow of condensed droplets toward a collection trough at the lower end. The basin liner is tilted at a similar to ensure even distribution of and minimize stagnant pooling, enhancing rates compared to flat basin designs where condensate may accumulate and reduce . This geometric adjustment can increase daily productivity by 20% to 40% over conventional horizontal basin stills by promoting faster drainage and reducing thermal losses from pooled . Vertical solar stills employ upright sidewalls paired with vertical glazing to create a compact evaporation chamber, allowing for efficient on the inner surfaces without relying on significant tilt. These designs are particularly suited for stacked multi-stage configurations, where multiple evaporation-condensation cycles are arranged vertically to amplify output in limited space, often integrated into rooftop systems for urban or remote applications. Construction of inclined stills commonly incorporates lightweight materials such as PVC sheets for the cover or fiberglass-reinforced plastic for the basin to reduce structural weight while maintaining durability against environmental exposure. Vertical stills, by contrast, favor modular aluminum frames with glazing for easy assembly and scalability in urban setups, enabling quick deployment on building rooftops or portable units. Despite these advantages, both inclined and vertical stills face challenges from higher wind-induced material stress, particularly on upright or angled surfaces, which can lead to deformation or misalignment over time. Precise sealing of joints and glazing is essential to prevent vapor leaks and contamination, requiring robust adhesives or gaskets that withstand prolonged solar exposure and temperature fluctuations.

Wick and Transpiration Stills

Wick solar stills utilize absorbent materials to enhance by increasing the exposed surface area of beyond the limitations of a simple basin. These designs employ porous fabrics such as or cloth, which are draped over the basin or suspended from the cover frame, allowing to be drawn upward through for continuous exposure to solar radiation. This configuration effectively enlarges the evaporation area by approximately 2-3 times compared to conventional basin stills, as the wick material spreads a thin film of that promotes rapid vaporization. The increased surface area typically boosts distillate yield by 30-50%, with experimental setups demonstrating daily outputs of 5-7 L/ under optimal conditions. In construction, the wick is typically black-dyed to absorb more and hung in a manner that keeps the lower end in contact with the basin water, ensuring sustained wetting via capillary rise while the upper portions remain exposed for . occurs on the inclined cover as in basic mechanisms, with droplets collecting in a trough. Wick stills were notably tested in experiments in arid zones, where they proved effective for low-water-volume scenarios by maximizing efficiency without requiring deep basins. Transpiration stills build on similar principles by using structures inspired by plant evaporation to facilitate water vapor generation, often incorporating biomimetic materials that mimic natural transpiration processes for enhanced efficiency in passive desalination. These designs leverage high surface area and capillary action akin to wicks but draw from biological evaporation mechanisms to improve vapor production without relying on living plants. Experimental prototypes have shown potential for improved yields through such nature-inspired enhancements.

Reverse and Multi-Effect Stills

The reverse solar still adopts an inverted configuration, where saline water trickles down the underside of a blackened transparent cover acting as the evaporator, while the underlying basin functions as the condenser. This upside-down setup minimizes the distance vapor must travel before condensing, thereby enhancing condensation rates. Developed in the mid-1990s, this design was first detailed by Badran and Hamdan, who demonstrated its operation through experimental testing under varying solar radiation and flow rates. The system employs insulated trays or channels to direct the thin water film along the cover, preventing premature dripping and ensuring efficient heat absorption from solar radiation passing through the transparent material. Compared to single-basin stills, the reverse configuration achieves productivity gains of approximately 18%, with daily yields reaching 2.8 L/day under optimal tilt angles of 47°. Multi-effect solar stills utilize a cascaded arrangement of multiple evaporation-condensation stages, where the latent heat released from condensation in one basin preheats the saline water in the subsequent stage, improving overall energy utilization. Common designs feature 2 to 5 stacked basins, with vapor from the upper stage transferring heat passively to the lower one via conduction or natural convection, often incorporating inter-stage partitions for separation. This passive approach, avoiding external energy inputs, typically yields 8-12 L/m²/day, as evidenced by analyses under arid conditions showing up to 10.7 L/m²/day for two-effect systems. Design elements include insulated stacking to minimize lateral heat loss and, in some variants, embedded heat pipes to facilitate inter-stage thermal transfer without mechanical components. Early concepts trace to the 1960s, but modern implementations in the 2020s, such as thermally localized multistage devices, have scaled to 10 stages with production rates exceeding 5 L/m²/hour under one-sun illumination, demonstrating potential for higher throughput in passive setups. Despite these advances, multi-effect stills face challenges in maintaining airtight seals between stages, which can result in 10-20% vapor leakage and reduced efficiency. Such issues necessitate precise fabrication, often using gaskets or welded joints, to preserve differentials essential for continuous operation. In regions like the Mediterranean, experimental plants incorporating multi-effect designs have achieved daily outputs up to several thousand liters through modular scaling, though commercial adoption remains limited by construction complexity.

Enhancements and Modifications

Additives and Materials

Additives such as are commonly introduced to the basin water of solar stills to enhance solar radiation absorption, thereby increasing the absorptivity of the water surface. Black ink, for instance, serves as an effective that darkens the water, significantly increasing solar radiation absorption and improving photothermal conversion, with reported productivity increases of up to 45%. Advanced materials, including nanoparticles, further augment the thermal performance of solar stills by improving within the basin. Aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) and (TiO₂) nanoparticles, when applied as coatings or dispersed in the water, boost thermal conductivity by up to 25% compared to base fluids, leading to higher basin temperatures and greater distillate yields. Phase change materials (PCMs), such as , are integrated to store excess solar heat during peak daylight hours and release it gradually, extending the process into the evening when solar input diminishes. These materials are typically applied through simple mixing or embedding techniques to ensure compatibility with passive solar still designs. For nanoparticles, concentrations of 0.1-1% by volume are mixed directly into the basin water, promoting uniform dispersion and avoiding agglomeration that could reduce efficacy. PCMs like paraffin are embedded in the basin walls or as thin layers beneath the absorber plate, leveraging their typical capacity of 150-250 kJ/kg to maintain elevated temperatures without external power. In the , innovations have focused on nanomaterial-enhanced surfaces, such as graphene-modified absorbers and covers that improve wettability and dynamics, potentially increasing efficiency by up to 49%. Recent anti-fouling coatings using nanoparticles have emerged to reduce in saline environments, maintaining performance for up to 3 months. The integration of PCMs has demonstrated particularly notable impacts, boosting daily distillate output by 25-40% in low-sunlight regions by prolonging effective operating hours beyond direct solar exposure.

Hybrid and Active Systems

Hybrid systems combine traditional passive solar stills with photovoltaic (PV) panels to power auxiliary mechanisms such as electric stirring devices, fans, or , thereby enhancing and circulation beyond reliance on natural alone. For instance, integrating a solar-electric to circulate in the basin can increase distillate yield by 50-100% compared to passive configurations, as demonstrated in experimental setups where PV-driven circulation raised productivity from baseline levels of 3-5 L/m²/day to 6-10 L/m²/day under similar conditions. Active solar stills incorporate optical or mechanical elements to intensify solar input or airflow, including mirrors and parabolic concentrators that focus onto the basin for a concentration gain factor of 2-5 times the direct . These systems often employ internal fans powered by small PV modules to induce , accelerating vapor removal and rates. Additionally, reflector arrangements in active designs can elevate effective on the surface to approximately 1000 W/m², even under variable weather, leading to improved gradients and higher output. In PV-hybrid designs, photovoltaic panels rated at 10-20 per of still area are commonly integrated to drive low-power components like 5-10 fans or pumps without exceeding the system's energy balance. Recent prototypes, such as the 2024 enhanced hybrid solar desalination system utilizing PV for augmented , have achieved daily yields of up to 15 L/ under optimized conditions, showcasing potential for scalable deployment in remote areas. As of 2025, further enhancements include integrated with stepped solar stills, improving yields by up to 50% in experimental setups. As of 2024, initial setup costs for hybrid and active systems are typically 20-50% higher than passive , with production costs around $0.009-0.09 per liter depending on configuration, enabling short payback periods through enhanced productivity.

Performance and Efficiency

Influencing Factors

The performance of solar stills is fundamentally driven by thermodynamic processes involving solar heating, , and , with various environmental and operational variables significantly impacting the yield of . Among environmental factors, serves as the input, typically reaching peak values of 800-1000 W/m² under clear skies, directly correlating with higher rates and overall productivity. Ambient also plays a crucial role, as rising from 20°C to 40°C can approximately double the distillate yield by enhancing the differential between the basin and the cover. contributes by promoting convective heat loss from the cover, potentially increasing yield by 10-20% per m/s through improved cooling and efficiency. Conversely, high diminishes the gradient essential for , reducing yield by up to 40%. Operational parameters further modulate ; for instance, maintaining depth at an optimal 1-5 cm balances absorption and without excessive storage that delays , while depths exceeding this can reduce yield by about 30% due to prolonged heating times. The cover tilt angle, when adjusted to match the site's , maximizes solar exposure year-round, optimizing the angle of incidence for incident rays. Material properties influence heat transfer dynamics, with basin surfaces exhibiting high absorptivity greater than 0.9—achieved through black coatings—maximizing solar energy capture and minimizing reflection losses. Similarly, an air gap spacing of 5-10 cm between the water surface and the condensing cover minimizes conductive and convective heat losses while facilitating vapor diffusion. Geographic location affects baseline performance, with equatorial regions benefiting from consistent high irradiance to achieve daily yields of 6-8 L/m², compared to 2-3 L/m² in temperate zones where seasonal variations limit solar input. These factors often interact; for example, elevated in humid equatorial areas can counteract the advantages of high , underscoring the need for site-specific considerations in deployment.

Measurement and Optimization

The performance of solar stills is quantified primarily through daily yield, expressed as the volume of produced per unit basin area (L/m²/day), which typically ranges from 2 to 5 L/m²/day for passive single-slope designs under standard conditions. (η) serves as a key metric, calculated as the ratio of the energy used for to the total incident , given by the formula: η=Y⋅L×1000I×86400\eta = \frac{Y \cdot L \times 1000}{I \times 86400} where YY is the daily yield in kg/, LL is the of vaporization (approximately 2257 kJ/kg), II is the average daily in W/, and the factors 1000 and 86400 account for unit conversions from kJ to J and seconds in a day, respectively. Measurements rely on instruments such as pyranometers to record solar irradiance with high accuracy (up to 1280 W/ range) and thermocouples to monitor temperatures of water, vapor, and surfaces, enabling precise data logging via multi-channel acquisition devices. Optimization of solar stills involves computational techniques like (CFD) modeling, which has become standard in the 2020s for simulating heat and flows, often yielding 10-20% improvements in productivity through virtual design iterations without physical prototypes. algorithms further enable site-specific predictions by training on local (e.g., and ) to forecast yields and recommend tailored parameters like basin depth or cover tilt, enhancing adaptability in diverse environments such as humid . Experimental setups for evaluation typically involve controlled outdoor or indoor tests, systematically varying factors like depth (e.g., 4-10 cm) and cover inclination (20-60°) to assess impacts on yield, with results validated using thermal modeling software such as TRNSYS for transient simulations of multi-effect systems. Studies from 2024-2025 have employed AI optimization for solar stills with storage, achieving improvements of up to 50%, while other designs integrated with textiles have attained efficiencies around 62%. Benchmarks indicate that passive basin solar stills generally attain efficiencies of 30-40%, while active hybrid systems, incorporating external inputs like flat-plate collectors, reach 50-80% under optimized conditions.

Applications

Desalination in Arid Regions

Solar stills have been deployed in arid regions of the as modular basin and multi-effect systems to desalinate and , providing a sustainable alternative to energy-intensive conventional methods. For instance, experimental multi-effect systems with capacities up to 10 m³/day (10,000 L/day) have been commissioned and tested, demonstrating feasibility for scaling in water-scarce areas like those in the Arab region. These modular designs allow for easy expansion, with units integrated into larger plants to address chronic water shortages in countries such as and , where solar irradiation exceeds 2,000 kWh/m² annually. In agricultural applications, greenhouse-integrated solar stills combine water production with crop cultivation in arid environments, utilizing the still's structure to capture solar heat for both evaporation and controlled humidity. Such systems reduce cooling loads by absorbing excess irradiance, enabling year-round farming in regions like Egypt's coastal deserts, where they produce irrigation water while minimizing evaporation losses from open fields. Case studies in remote Egyptian communities show these hybrids supporting sustainable plantations by desalinating brackish groundwater on-site, with outputs directed toward hydroponic setups. Process adaptations for arid desalination include pre-filtration stages to mitigate salt buildup on evaporation surfaces, ensuring consistent operation with seawater at 35 ppt salinity. Sedimentation and coarse filters remove particulates before feeding into the still, preventing scaling that could reduce efficiency by up to 30%. Yields typically range from 4 to 10 L/m²/day under high solar conditions, with advanced designs achieving 7.4 L/m²/day through enhanced heat transfer. In , particularly Gujarat's coastal villages, solar still projects from 2015 onward have provided community-scale for smaller groups by integrating stills into rural networks. The Awania plant in , operational since 1979, exemplifies long-term use, producing potable water for non-electrified areas facing brackish issues. A 2018 pilot initiative in Olpad, , leverages solar thermal to supply clean water to a village serving around 300 residents, with economic viability estimated at $0.01–0.02/L due to low capital and operational costs compared to grid-powered alternatives. The of these deployments stems from zero ongoing energy input, relying solely on passive solar heating, and low requirements, with systems lasting 5–10 years before major refurbishments like liner replacements. In arid settings, this eliminates fuel dependencies, reducing carbon emissions while providing reliable output with minimal intervention beyond periodic cleaning. Scale-up efforts involve transitioning from single units to large arrays covering up to km², as seen in conceptual modular expansions for MENA regions, incorporating automated cleaning mechanisms like brush systems or coatings to combat dust accumulation without halting production. These arrays enhance overall yield proportionally, with prototypes showing 20–50% efficiency gains through interconnected multi-effect configurations.

Survival and Emergency Use

Solar stills play a vital role in and situations, providing a simple, low-tech method for individuals or small groups to produce potable from limited or contaminated sources. Portable designs, such as pit and wick stills, emphasize ease of construction using readily available materials like tarps, bottles, or ponchos, requiring no specialized tools or . These devices leverage to evaporate and condense , yielding typically 0.5 to 2 liters per day per unit under optimal conditions, sufficient for basic hydration needs in crises. In desert survival scenarios, such as those faced by trekkers in arid environments like the , pit stills constructed by digging a shallow hole (approximately 1 meter wide and 0.5 meters deep), lining it with moisture-rich vegetation, and covering it with a clear sheet prove essential for extracting from or . A military poncho can serve as an improvised cover, secured with rocks and weighted in the center to create a drip point into a collection container, potentially producing 1-2 liters daily for one person when sunlight is abundant. Wick stills, using absorbent materials like cloth or sponges soaked in and draped over under sheeting, offer a compact alternative for mobile users, enhancing evaporation through . During disaster relief efforts, including the widespread flooding in during the that contaminated freshwater supplies, portable solar stills enable on-site purification for displaced populations. For instance, bottle-based wick designs—where a halved holds feedstock and a wick draws liquid to the sun-exposed surface—allow quick setup in camps or flooded areas, producing small volumes of clean water without fuel. Techniques involving or sap as feedstock are particularly useful; solar evaporation distills these into safe by leaving behind salts and toxins, while transpiration methods, such as enclosing non-toxic green vegetation in a sealed or pit, harness natural moisture for and yield up to 1 liter per day from sap-rich sources. Historically, solar stills have saved lives in maritime emergencies; during , inflatable lifeboat stills developed by engineer Maria Telkes provided U.S. Navy crews adrift in the Pacific with distilled seawater, yielding about 0.5 liters per unit daily and contributing to the survival of numerous stranded personnel. In modern contexts, compact units like the Aquamate solar still are included in emergency kits distributed by organizations akin to FEMA, as a long-established that produces 0.25 to 1.8 liters per day, ideal for individual backpacks or small-group packages. Despite their utility, solar stills have limitations in emergency use, with maximum outputs of 0.5-3 liters per day constrained by sunlight exposure—typically requiring 4-6 hours of direct sun for effective operation—and environmental factors like humidity or cloud cover, making them unsuitable as a sole long-term solution.

Wastewater Treatment

Solar stills have been adapted for wastewater treatment through designs such as multi-effect systems and wick-type configurations, often incorporating pre-sedimentation to remove suspended solids before evaporation. In these adaptations, contaminated water from domestic or industrial sources is first allowed to settle in a pre-treatment basin to minimize clogging and enhance evaporation efficiency, followed by solar heating in the still. The evaporation process effectively removes organics and heavy metals, achieving up to 99% purity in the distillate by leaving non-volatile contaminants concentrated in the basin for subsequent disposal. During operation, volatile compounds may evaporate alongside but can be separated through selective in multi-effect stages, where cooler surfaces promote pure droplet formation while volatiles remain in vapor form or are minimized by . Non-volatile residues, including salts, metals, and organics, accumulate in the basin, allowing for their concentrated removal and proper disposal, thus preventing environmental release. This phase-change mechanism ensures high contaminant rejection, with (TDS) reduced from levels exceeding 5000 ppm to potable or reusable standards below 100 ppm. In rural during the 2010s to 2025, solar stills have been deployed for treatment, yielding 3-5 L/m² of clean water daily from inputs with up to 5000 ppm TDS, supporting and agricultural reuse in water-scarce regions like . Similarly, pilot projects in Bangladesh's have utilized solar evaporative stills to treat garment , reducing (COD) by over 86% and enabling effluent reuse in non-critical processes. Solar exposure in these systems provides (UV) radiation that complements disinfection, further inactivating pathogens during . The resulting distillate is typically suitable for non-potable applications, such as or industrial cooling, meeting standards for limited human contact. Treatment efficiency for pathogens reaches 90-99% removal of coliforms and indicators, with studies confirming near-complete elimination of viruses and through combined heat and UV effects. For small-scale plants, operational costs are approximately $0.0165-0.05 per liter, making it viable for decentralized deployment in developing regions.

Remote and Off-Grid Deployment

Solar stills are particularly valuable in remote and off-grid environments where access to conventional is limited, such as isolated bases, expeditionary operations, and nomadic lifestyles. These devices operate passively or with minimal active enhancements, relying solely on without the need for fuel or electricity grids, making them ideal for locations with unreliable power supplies. In such settings, hybrid active solar stills integrate auxiliary components like flat-plate collectors or photovoltaic panels to boost rates, often paired with battery storage to power fans or pumps during low-sunlight periods. For instance, in polar regions like stations, renewable energy systems incorporating solar thermal technologies support off-grid energy needs, with water production via other methods supplementary to broader strategies. Portable designs, including inclined and wick-type models, enhance deployability in mobile scenarios. Inclined solar stills, which tilt the basin to optimize solar incidence, achieve yields of approximately 4.1 L//day in experimental remote setups, while wick variants using absorbent materials like or facilitate higher evaporation through , increasing productivity by up to 25% compared to basin types. These wick stills are lightweight and collapsible, suitable for patrols or nomadic groups, where no-fuel operation reduces logistical burdens in harsh terrains. Vertical stills, another compact option, yield around 2.6 L//day when augmented with reflectors, offering space-efficient solutions for temporary shelters. Overall, in variable climates, standard single-slope stills produce 2–6 L//day, providing sufficient potable for small groups without extensive maintenance. Integration with complementary off-grid technologies further extends utility. Solar stills can couple with solar cookers to preheat feedwater, elevating basin temperatures and boosting distillate output by expanding the absorption area, as demonstrated in experimental hybrids that enhance . In expeditionary contexts, these systems mount within shelters or alongside photovoltaic arrays for dual water and energy production. Logistics emphasize : kits like inflatable wick stills weigh under 1.5 kg and pack into compact volumes (e.g., 36 × 22 × 6 cm), enabling easy transport by hand or vehicle. Maintenance involves basic local on cleaning wicks and basins, using readily available materials to ensure longevity in isolated deployments, with daily yields scaling to 1–1.8 L per small unit for use.

Challenges and Limitations

Technical and Environmental Issues

One major technical challenge in solar stills is salt accumulation, which leads to and scaling on the evaporator surface. This buildup reduces the area and evaporation rate, causing a significant drop in overall productivity; for instance, in wick-based systems, solar-to-vapor conversion can fall below 60% due to . In prolonged operation, such can cause a significant decrease in yields over time without intervention, as salt crystals block vapor pathways and lower thermal conductivity. Maintenance requirements further complicate deployment, particularly in remote areas. Regular cleaning is essential to remove accumulated salt and dust from the basin and cover; dust deposition on the transparent cover can reduce solar transmittance, while salt requires manual scraping or flushing depending on salinity levels. Material degradation exacerbates these issues, as plastic covers commonly used in low-cost designs suffer UV-induced breakdown, leading to embrittlement and reduced lifespan of 2-5 years in intense solar exposure. Environmentally, solar stills have a modest land footprint, typically requiring about 1 to produce 5 L of per day under optimal conditions, though large-scale installations can compete with use. Some active systems may require additional for cooling in arid regions. variability poses additional hurdles, with cloudy conditions reducing solar and thus output compared to clear days, as productivity is directly tied to insolation levels. Recent reviews as of 2025 emphasize low productivity rates (typically 2-5 L//day) and increasing insolation variability due to as barriers to scalability. Mitigation strategies focus on design innovations to address these challenges. Anti-scale approaches promote better drainage and reduce by facilitating natural convection. Incorporating recyclable materials, like waste trays or sheets, enhances while minimizing from disposal. These measures, including wick-free structures with confined water layers, enable salt rejection up to 20 wt% without performance loss.

Contamination Mechanisms

Although solar stills produce through and , trace s can contaminate the output primarily via entrainment, where non-volatile salts from the feed water or ambient air are carried into the vapor phase as fine droplets or particles. These s enter through microscopic leaks in the still's seals or joints and serve as sites for , resulting in residual concentrations of 0.02–0.54 mg/L for and 0.04–0.25 mg/L for sodium in typical setups. Studies confirm that s such as Na⁺, Cl⁻, F⁻, NO₃⁻, and SO₄²⁻ appear in distillates due to this process, with revealing -induced droplets in the vapor space above the hot basin water. Mechanical carryover from splashing or bubbling in the basin can exacerbate this, entraining saline droplets into the rising vapor stream. Back-diffusion of ions across thin s at the water-vapor interface or through imperfect seals represents another pathway, driven by concentration gradients in the humid near the evaporating surface. High operating temperatures in the basin enhance this process. Cover material leaching contributes marginally. Mitigation strategies focus on minimizing entry points and post-processing to achieve potable quality. Sealing leaks with materials like or reduces ingress by up to 90%, while double —cascading output from one still into another—further purifies by an . Ion-exchange resins applied post- can remove residual traces. With proper seals and maintenance, solar stills can achieve potable .

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652621005096
  2. https://www.kaust.edu.sa/news/giving-old-technology-a-modern-update
  3. http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/En/education/k-12/curricula/use/documents/USE_6_SolarStill.pdf
  4. https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Energy/Solar/solar_distillation.pdf
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387181956_Solar_Stills_Review
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038092X22006958
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/solar-still
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11489398/
  9. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10136
  10. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=49573
  11. https://www.longdom.org/open-access/analysis-of-solar-still-combined-with-heat-pump-30392.html
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/heat-of-fusion
  13. https://apvi.org.au/solar-research-conference/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Djamal-B-Predicting-the-yield-of-a-single-slope-solar-still-A-comparison-of-models.pdf
  14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.054
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S136403211731064X
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/solar-distillation-plant
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223388643_Historic_background_of_desalination_and_renewable_energies
  18. https://www.nytimes.com/1996/08/13/us/maria-telkes-95-an-innovator-of-varied-uses-for-solar-power.html
  19. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/the-sun-queen-and-the-skeptic-building-the-worlds-first-solar-houses/
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/16/2222
  21. https://www.echocommunity.org/en/resources/a84705a9-92e6-48db-bb64-5cecb4b5317a
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0196890487900859
  23. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030033805A1
  24. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/119
  25. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/17/10/1515
  26. https://iwaponline.com/aqua/article/73/2/239/100032/Impact-of-various-design-parameters-on-solar-still
  27. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/how-build-your-own-solar-still
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361265350_REVIEW_OF_SOLAR_DISTILLATION_IN_CHILE_1872-2001
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0011916411002876
  30. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/23/1/5
  31. https://www.deswater.com/DWT_articles/vol_156_papers/156_2019_161.pdf
  32. https://www.appropedia.org/Solar_Pura:_High-efficiency_vertical_solar_still
  33. https://www.irjmets.com/uploadedfiles/paper/issue_4_april_2022/21862/final/fin_irjmets1651355254.pdf
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038092X22001232
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X20303003
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228701970_Performance_of_solar_still_with_a_concave_wick_evaporation_surface
  37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-022-04414-2
  38. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1285/1/012002/pdf
  39. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/3270/1/020212/3343949/Enhancing-solar-still-performance-with-jute-cloth
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251556018_An_experimental_wick-type_solar_still_system_Design_and_construction
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1383586624031526
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01425919508914288
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916404001584
  44. https://www.desware.net/sample-chapters/d06/D10-020.pdf
  45. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/ee/c9ee04122b
  46. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13766
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624082754
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11227497/
  49. https://www.jeeng.net/pdf-102966-35631?filename=Enhancing%2520the.pdf
  50. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2020.531049/full
  51. https://phys.org/news/2025-06-transparent-coating-growth-algae-underwater.html
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525003447
  53. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-023-12285-z
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0011916424001644
  55. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95098-4
  56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15422119.2024.2366879
  57. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10668
  58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-023-00341-y
  59. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.879591/full
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782325000221
  61. https://iwaponline.com/ws/article/22/1/945/83044/Experimental-study-of-a-solar-water-treatment
  62. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/water/articles/10.3389/frwa.2024.1436169/full
  63. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44292-025-00028-8
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010023001026
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Schematic-diagram-of-tilted-solar-still-experimental-setup_fig1_284771089
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174522000332
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431125026249
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-55948-z
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242198173_A_new_approach_to_solar_desalination_for_small-_and_medium-size_use_in_remote_areas
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038092X23003262
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196890422003089
  72. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Integrated-Solar-Green-House-For-Water-Desalination-And-Plantation-In-Remote-Arid-Egyptian-Communities-.pdf
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359496283_Design_and_analysis_of_a_renewable_energy_driven_greenhouse_integrated_with_a_solar_still_for_arid_climates
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420303362
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001202
  76. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/4/704
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0011916400885483
  78. https://thebetterindia.com/312826/engineer-helps-gujarat-villages-access-clean-drinking-water-solnc-technologies-sustainability/
  79. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/11/1/8/2363380
  80. http://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid10.0437
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025004293
  82. https://worldwaterreserve.com/how-to-make-a-solar-still/
  83. https://www.landfallnavigation.com/aquamate-solar-still.html
  84. https://www.beprepared.com/blogs/articles/diy-solar-still
  85. https://teachbesideme.com/simple-science-making-solar-still/
  86. https://www.instructables.com/Uncle-Johns-portable-solar-water-distiller-Fo/
  87. http://www.midcoastgreencollaborative.org/articles/solar_stills.html
  88. https://iwaponline.com/ws/article/24/2/329/99908/A-potential-solution-for-clean-water-supply-multi
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024013045
  90. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9452
  91. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0135973/16806325/050024_1_5.0135973.pdf
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940024000298
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096177/
  94. https://d-nb.info/1201541700/34
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212095523000299
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X1300131X
  97. https://www.scielo.br/j/ambiagua/a/bVPy96xVcGFPTy3J6Kkw8sD/?lang=en
  98. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/928/92860429009/html/
  99. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214714425014412
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238173098_Energy_efficiency_and_renewable_energy_under_extreme_conditions_Case_studies_from_Antarctica
  101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271564213_Wick_type_solar_stills_A_review
  102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221471442200914X
  103. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28457-8
  104. https://www.authorea.com/doi/full/10.22541/au.174581475.54838305/v1
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386421000102
  106. https://books.byui.edu/plastics_materials_a/environmental_resist
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024147822
  108. https://www.lenntech.com/abstracts/1302/solar-stills-made-from-waste-materials.html
  109. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2002022
  110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223879828_Distillate_water_quality_of_a_single-basin_solar_still_Laboratory_and_field_studies
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.