Hubbry Logo
Superior CratonSuperior CratonMain
Open search
Superior Craton
Community hub
Superior Craton
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Superior Craton
Superior Craton
Superior Craton
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Superior Craton is a stable crustal block covering Quebec, Ontario, and southeast Manitoba in Canada, and northern Minnesota in the United States. It is the biggest craton among those formed during the Archean period.[1] A craton is a large part of the Earth's crust that has been stable and subjected to very little geological changes over a long time.[2] The size of Superior Craton is about 1,572,000 km2.[3] The craton underwent a series of events from 4.3 to 2.57 Ga. These events included the growth, drifting and deformation of both oceanic and continental crusts.[1]

Researchers have divided the Superior Craton into many different domains based on rock types and deformation styles.[4] These domains (grouped into western and eastern superior provinces), include the North Superior Superterrane and Wawa Terrane, among others[4] (shown in the table below).

Studies on the formation of the Superior Craton varied in progress between the western and the eastern part. For the western part, five major orogenies were involved. They include the Northern Superior Orogeny (2720 Ma), the Uchian Orogeny (2720–2700 Ma), the Central Superior Orogeny (2700 Ma), the Shebandowanian Orogeny (2690 Ma), and the Minnesotan Orogeny (2680 Ma).[4] For the eastern part, two models are suggested. The first model by Percival and Skulski (2000) focuses on the collision between the terranes.[5] The second model by Bédard (2003)[6] and Bédard et al. (2003)[7] focuses on the effect of an active anorogenic magmatic activity.

Location

[edit]
The western to the northeastern part of the craton is bounded by the Trans-Hudson orogens. The eastern and the southeastern side is neighbouring the Grenville orogens. The southern side is generally meeting the Keweenawan rift, while the southernmost tip of the craton in Minnesota is reaching the Central Plain orogen.

The Superior Craton covers central Canada; it occupies the northern and central part of Quebec, extending across the central and the southern part of Ontario, and also covers southeast Manitoba, with its tip reaching the boundary between the U.S. states of South Dakota and Minnesota.[8]

Tectonic setting

[edit]

The Archean Superior Craton extends over 1,572,000 km2 of the North American continent.[3] Forming the core of the Canadian Shield, the Archean Superior craton is encompassed by early Proterozoic orogens.[1] The western to the northeastern part of the craton is bound by the Trans-Hudson orogens.[9] To the eastern and the southeastern side are the neighbouring Grenville orogens.[4] The southern side meets the Keweenawan rift, while the southernmost tip of the craton in Minnesota reaches the Central Plain orogen.[10]

Regarding the faults, there are three major trends of subparallel faults slicing the craton into linear subprovinces. In the northwestern part, faulting occurs in a west–northwest direction. The northeastern part has northwest-trending faults.[8] The faults in the remaining southern part possess an east–west direction.[4]

Growth history of the terranes

[edit]

The craton-forming terranes are created from very diverse settings, such as oceanic arc, ancient forearc, oceanic tectonic melange, uplift within the craton, fold-thrust belt and extra. Common among them is that these features were mostly formed in a compression setting.

Some of the terranes were formed from the structures of a volcanic arc, including the volcanic arc chain and the forearc setting.

Oceanic arc setting

[edit]

Some terranes, such as the Western Wabigoon Terrane, are formed from the setting of an oceanic arc. An oceanic arc is a chain of volcanoes which formed above and parallel to the subduction zones. Due to tectonic activities in the Earth, the relevant continental and oceanic crusts collided before 2.70 Ga.[1] The denser oceanic crust subducted underneath the continental crust and melted into the mantle, which generated more magma. The huge amount of magma then rose up, penetrated through the crust above and erupted. The continuous eruption of volcanic material cooled down and accumulated around the centers of eruption, forming a chain of volcanoes in the shape of an arc.[11]

Ancient forearc basin setting

[edit]

Some terranes, such as the Quetico Terrane, were forearcs in the past. A forearc is the region between the volcanic arc and the subduction zone. It includes several components, including the subduction trench, the outer arc high of the oceanic crust, the accretionary wedges, and the sedimentary basin. The outer arc high is formed by the flexural upward motion of the oceanic crust edge before it enters the subduction zone. The accretionary wedges are formed from the accumulation of marine sediment scraped off from the oceanic crust before it is subducted. The sedimentary basin is formed from the accumulation of erosive material from the volcanoes, which lying flatly between the volcanoes and the topographic high of the accretionary wedge.[11]

Uplift setting

[edit]

Some terranes, such as the Kapuskasing Uplift, were formed from the uplifting of the crustal block. For example, during 1.85 Ga, the American Midcontinent and the Superior Craton collided. The collision between the two cratons triggered an Archean reverse fault, the Ivanhoe Lake fault. The upward movement of the hanging wall causes the uplift of a crustal block, known as the Kapuskasing Uplift.[12]

Some terranes, such as the Pontiac Terrane, were previously a fold-thrust belt. A fold-thrust belt is a zone consisting of a series of thrusts (reverse faults) and fault-bend folds separated by main thrust faults.

Fold-thrust belt setting

[edit]

Some terranes, such as the Pontiac Terrane, were previously a fold-thrust belt. A fold-thrust belt is a zone consisting of a series of thrusts (reverse faults) and fault-bend folds separated by main thrust faults. The fold-thrust belt is formed in a compression setting like crust collision. when the crust is compressed, thrusts dipping towards where the compression comes formed. The hanging walls of the thrusts slide up along the fault plane and stacks above the footwall, forming a ramp anticline or fault-bend fold.[13]

General composition

[edit]
This map shows the major domains of the Superior Craton. NSS: Northern Superior Superterrane; OSD Oxford-Stull Terrane; NCT: North Caribou Terrane; ERT: English River Domain; WRT: Winnipeg River Domain; WWT: Western Wabigoon Terrane; EWT: Eastern Wabigoon Terrane; MT: Marmion Terrane; QT: Quetico Terrane; WT: Wawa Terrane; MRVT: Minnesota River Valley Terrane; KU: Kapuskasing Uplift; AT: Abitibi Terrane; PT: Pontiac Terrane; OcS: Opatica Subprovince; AC: Ashuanipi Complex; OnS: Opinaca Subprovince; LG: La Grande Subprovince; BS: Bienville Subprovince; I: Inukjuak Domain; II Tikkerutuk Domain; IV: Lake Minto Domain; V: Goudalie Domain: VI Utsalik Domain; VII: Douglas Harbour Domain

The Superior Province can be divided into three parts. The first part is the northwestern region characterized by high-grade gneiss, such as Minto and Pikwitonei.[8][14] The second part is the northeastern region, which is characterized by pervasive metamorphic rocks of granulite-facies.[8] The last part is the southern region like the Minnesota River Valley, which are metavolcanic or metasedimentary subprovinces with an east–west orientation.[8][14]

The general geological characteristics of the terranes are listed below.

List of subprovinces and their dominating rocks

[edit]
Subprovince Age Dominating rock Possible tectonic event Mineral deposit
Western Superior Province
Northern Superior Superterrane (NSS) - Granitic and gneissic rocks[15]

- Mafic-intermediate volcanic rocks[4][16][17]

- Minor greywacke[4][16][17]

- Granitoid magmatism[18]

- Amphibolite-forming metamorphism caused by tectonic accretion[4]

- Lode gold deposits[19]

- Diamond-containing kimberlite pipes[19]

Oxford-Skull Domain (OSD) - Basalt (Hayers River Assemblage)[20]

- Volcaniclastic rocks (Oxford Lake assemblage)[20]

- Underlain by tonalitic, granodioritic, granitic pluton with mafic intrusion[4]

- Oceanic setting[4]

- Sealed the sediment after the collision of NSS and NCS[4]

- Lode gold deposits[21] (like Monument Bay gold deposit)
North Caribou Superterrane (NCS) - Plutonic base overlain by arc sequences[22]

- Pervasive granitic to tonalitic pluton in the central region[4]

- Dominating plutonism[4]

- Rifting in the southern margin[4]

- Gold deposits (like Red Lake Gold Camp)[4]

- Massive sulphide deposits[23]

English River Domain (ERT) - Sedimentary rocks like wackes[24]

- Amphibolite and low-pressure granulite[4][25]

- Migmatite and diatexite[26]

- Related to the suture of the NCS and WRT[26] /
Winnipeg River Terrane (WRT) - Gneiss and foliated tonalite[27][28][29]

- Granite[28]

- Tonalitic plutonism followed by granitic plutonism[4] - Iron deposits[4][30]

- Native silver deposits[4][30]

Wabigoon Terrane (WwT/EwT) - Mafic volcanic rocks and tonalitic pluton in the West[31]

- Greenstone belts intruded by granitoid pluton in the East[4]

- Oceanic arc setting in the West[32][33][34][35]

- Continental margin setting in the East[36]

/
Quetico Terrane (QT) - Mainly greywacke, migmatite, granite[4]

- Metarsedimentary successions intruded by tonalite,[4] nepheline, syenite, carbonatite[37] and granite[38]

- Ancient forearc[31][39][40] /
Wawa Terrane (WT) - Calc-alkalic to alkalic rocks[41]

- Sanukitoids[4]

- Oceanic tectonic mélange[42][43][44] - Michipicoten-Mishubishu belt (Fe, Au, Cu and minor Ni)[45]

- Shebandowan-Schreiber belt (Fe, Au,[45] VMS,[46] Ni)[47]

Kapuskasing Uplift (KU) - Tonalite, paragneiss and anorthosite - Intracratonic Uplift[48] /
Eastern Superior Province
Abitibi Terrane (AT) - North: Layered-intrusion-related volcanic rocks[4][49]

- Central: Plutonic rocks and minor volcanic rocks[50] - South: Younger greywackes, conglomerate and alkaline volcanic rocks[51]

/ - North: Massive sulphide deposits, Cu-Zn vein deposits, lode gold deposits[4]

- Central: Massive sulphide deposits and vein gold deposits[50] - South: Gold deposits, Cu-Zn massive sulphide deposits, intrusive Ni deposits, and minor porphyry deposits[4][52]

Pontiac Terrane (PT) - North: schists and paragneiss[53]

- South: volcanic rocks[53]

- Fold-thrust belt[54] - Quartz-vein-hosted gold deposits[4]

- Gabbroic-sill-hosted Ni-Cu sulphide deposits[4]

Opatica Subprovince (OcS) - Tonalite, granodiorite, granite and pegmatite[55][56][57] - West-verging shearing followed by south-vergent movement[57] - Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits, Cu-Au vein deposits, Intrusion-hosted Ni-Cu deposits and iron formation[4]
Opinaca Subprovince (OnS) - metagreywacke[58]

- massive leucogranite intrusion[59]

/ - Rare metals in peraluminous granites and pegmatites[4]
Ashuanipi Complex (AC) - Tonalite and diorite[60]

- Granulite[61] - Intrusion of diatexite,[61] syenite, granodiorite and granite[4][62]

/ /
La Grande Subprovince (LG) - Gneissic basement[63]

- komatiites[4]

/ - Porphyry and igneous mineralization[4]
Bienville Subprovince (BS) - North: granitic and granodioritic intrusions[64]

- South: massive granodioritic complex[64][65]

/ /
Northeastern Superior Province(NESP) - I: tonalite and tonalitic gneiss[4]

- II: pyroxene-bearing plutonic rocks[4] - IV: metasedimentary and pyroxene-bearing pluton[66] - V: pyroxene-bearing pluton with minor tonalite[4] - VI: magnetic pyroxene-bearing pluton[67] - VII: tonalitic complex[7][6]

/ - Syngenetic: Algoma-type iron formation, volcanogenic massive sulphide, Ni-Cu deposits, Fe-Ti-V deposits (hosted by mafic intrusions), and U-Th-Mo bearing porphyry deposits[4]

- Epigenetic: Cu, Ni, Ag, Au, rare earth elements (REE) and limited U deposits[4]

Development

[edit]

Research of the Superior Craton in the past focused on how the western part formed. This leaves uncertainties in the linkage between the west and the east.[68]

Western Superior Craton

[edit]

The western Superior Craton is formed by different terranes stitching with each other continuously during the Neoarchean period.[39][69][70][71] Such a progressive assembly can be explained by five discrete orogenies (mountain-building processes). They are, from the oldest event to the youngest event, the Northern Superior Orogeny, the Uchian Orogeny, the Central Superior Orogeny, the Shebandowanian Orogeny and the Minnesotan Orogeny.[71] These events show that the timeline of accretions starts from the north with a southward assembling direction.[68]

For these accretions, the North Caribou Terrane acted as the accretion nuclei onto which other terranes dock on its northern and southern side.

Northern Superior Orogeny (2720 Ma)

[edit]
Before 2720 Ma, there were many pieces of microcontinent fragments which E-W trending conduit-like ocean crusts (with unknown extent) separates them.[70]
Northern Superior Superterrane moves southward to dock onto the North Caribou Terrane.[70][71]

Before 2720 Ma, there were many pieces of microcontinent fragments which E-W trending conduit-like ocean crusts (with unknown extent) separates them.[70] During 2720 Ma, active subduction along the Northern Superior Superterrane and the North Caribou Terrane caused the southward drifting of the Northern Superior Superterrane. Over time, it united the North Caribou Superterrane and confined the Oxford-Stull domain, which contains rock assemblages related to the continental margin and oceanic crust.[70][71] The combination of the Northern Superior Superterrane and the North Caribou Superterrane by subduction marked the initiation of the Superior Craton formation. The southward movement of the Northern Superior Superterrane to the North Caribou Superterrane driven by subduction activity is evident by a) arc-related magmatism in Oxford-Stull domain during 2775-2733 Ma;[71] b) the south-over-north shearing zone at the contact between the two terranes.[72] The suture zone of the subduction is inferred to be the margin of the North Kenyon Fault.[71] The docking of the Northern Superior Superterrane is evident by the >3.5 Ga detrital zircons found in synorogenic (meaning that it forms during an orogenic event) sedimentary rocks aged <2.711 Ga.[71] The docking also initiated the eruption of shoshonitic volcanic rocks during 2710 Ma and the regional shortening. The regional shortening had undergone folding and foliation to form right-lateral, NW-trending shear zones.[70][71]

Uchian Orogeny (2720–2700 Ma)

[edit]
During this period, the Winnipeg River Terrane at the south docked northward onto the North Caribou Terrane.[71] The two terranes then sutured to form the English River belt, which was no earlier than <2705 Ma. Also, it marks the accretion of the younger Western Wabigoon terrane to the southwestern margin of the Winnipeg River Terrane.[71]

During this period, the Winnipeg River Terrane at the south docked northward onto the North Caribou Terrane. The two terranes then sutured to form the English River belt, which was no earlier than <2705 Ma.[71]

During the orogeny, at the south-central North Caribou Superterrane, rocks were deformed thoroughly (from 2718 to 2712 Ma). After the deformation, plutons were emplaced in the area after the tectonic movements and cooled by about 2700 Ma. Following the cooling of the pluton was the swift burial and melting of the rocks in the English River belt and Winnipeg River Terrane, as well as the overthrusting of the North Caribou Superterrane onto the English River Basin in a southward direction.[71] Arc-related magmatic activities sustained in other areas of the southern North Caribou Superterrane margin at <2710 Ma. What was following is the deformation penetrative in both eastern (occurred at 2714-2702 Ma) and western (occurred at <2704 Ma) margins, followed by ductile-brittle faults.[70][71]

Central Superior Orogeny (2700 Ma)

[edit]

The Central Orogeny is significant as it involves the accretion of the younger Western Wabigoon terrane to the southwestern margin of the Winnipeg River Terrane.[71]

Two types of models were proposed to illustrate the process accretion with distinctive subduction polarity: Sanborn-Barrie and Skulski (2006)[73] suggested that the accretion was achieved by the northeastward subduction of the Western Wabigoon Terrane underneath the Winnipeg River Terrane. This model is supported by evidence like the formation of the tonalitic and pyroclastic rocks in 2715-2700Ma and the deformation style of the Warclub turbidite assemblage which infers the over-riding of Winnipeg River Terrane on Western Wabigoon Terrane.[71]

Another type of Models was suggested by Davis and Smith (1991),[74] Percival et al. (2004a)[75] and Melnyk et al. (2006),[29] which suggested an opposite direction of subduction (Southwestward). These models are supported by the ductile rock textures in the lower plate of the Winnipeg River Terrane and the open folds in the Western Wabigoon Terrane, implying the overriding role of Western Wabigoon Terrane instead of Winnipeg River Terrane shown in the previous model.[71]

Shebandowanian Orogeny (2690 Ma)

[edit]
The Wawa-Abitibi terrane moved northward to collide with the growing craton.[1]

Shebandowanian orogeny marks the accretion of the Wawa-Abitibi terrane to the composite Superior superterrane at the southern margin of the Wabigoon terranes.[1]

The northward direction of the subduction is evident due to the ceased arc magmatism in Winnipeg River superterrane at about 2695 Ma. Apart from the ceased magmatism, the sanukitoid plutons formed in the area during 2695-2685 Ma (which inferred the breakoff of a subduction slab) also indicated the subduction towards the north. After the subduction, the two terranes were sutured under the Quetico belt. This also trapped the clastic sediments fluxing into the belt, marking its transition from an accretionary wedge to a foreland basin.[71] At the northern Wawa-Abitibi terrane, researchers identified two events of deformation occurred during the orogeny. The first one (D1 deformation event) is the intra-arc deformation accompanied by calc-alkaline magmatism during 2695 Ma. The second one (D2 deformation event) is the transpressive deformation at the margin between the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane and the Wabigoon terranes during 2685-2680 Ma.[71]

Minnesotan Orogeny (2680 Ma)

[edit]
Minnesotan River Valley Terrane moved northward to collide with the pre-mature craton.[71]

As the last significant accretion event, The Minnesotan Orogeny is associated with the accretion of the oceanic Minnesota River Valley Terrane and the composite Superior Craton. Subduction between the two terranes drove the Minnesota River Valley Terrane northward to meet the gigantic craton, which the two terranes sutured along the Great Lake tectonic zone.[71]

The northward direction of the subduction is proven by the peraluminous granitoid magmatism in the southern margin of the Abitibi terrane, as well as the isotopic signature of the ancient crust underneath it.[71]

The Minnesotan orogeny accounts for most of the deformation events in the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane and Minnesota River Valley Terrane. Research in the past regarded the Minnesota River Valley Terrane as a stiff crust with higher resistance relative to the weaker zones between the Minnesota River Valley Terrane and the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane, like a rigid "jaw" juxtaposing a weak zone in the "vice" models suggested by Ellis et al. (1998).[76] However, the study of seismic reflection images by Percival et al.[71] reveals that Minnesota River Valley Terrane positions at the bottom of a thrust sequence, providing evidence that it is an oceanic slab.[71]

Summary of the Western Superior Craton development

[edit]
Time Event Description
2720 Ma Northern Superior Orogeny Northern Superior Superterrane moves southward to dock onto the North Caribou Terrane.[70][71]
2700 Ma Uchian Orogeny Winnipeg River Terrane docked northward onto the North Caribou Terrane.[71]
2720-2700 Ma Central Superior Orogeny Sanborn-Barrie and Skulski (2006):[73] Western Wabigoon Terrane docked northeastward to the Winnipeg River Terrane.

Davis and Smith (1991),[74] Percival et al. (2004a)[75] and Melnyk et al. (2006):[29] The young craton moved southwestward to fuse with the Western Wabigoon Terrane.

2690 Ma Shebandowanian Orogeny The Wawa-Abitibi terrane moved northward to collide with the growing craton.[1]
2680 Ma Minnesotan Orogeny Minnesotan River Valley Terrane moved northward to collide with the pre-mature craton.[71]

Orogenesis in the northeastern Superior Craton

[edit]

The correlations of different building processes of the NE Superior Craton remains sophisticated. Still, there are two general understandings to unveil the relationships among the overlapping magmatic and metamorphic events.

The first one is suggested by Percival and Skulski (2000).[5] It is a collisional model which at 2700 Ma, the Rivière terrane from the east collided with the Hudson Bay terrane located at the west side. This collision leads to the high-grade metamorphism followed by a regional folding event. Apart from this, the model relates the collision with the Uchian orogeny concurrently happening at the south and the west.[71]

The second one is suggested by Bédard (2003)[77] and Bédard et al. (2003).[78] This model puts emphasis on the role of magmatic diapirism in the linear structure and metamorphism of the NE superior craton, implying an active anorogenic magmatism during the accretion of the southern Superior Craton.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Superior Craton

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Superior Craton is the largest on , comprising a stable block of ancient that forms the core of the Canadian Shield in . It underlies extensive regions of central and eastern Canada, including much of , , and , as well as portions of the northern United States such as , , , and the Dakotas. Primarily composed of rocks formed between approximately 3.0 and 2.7 billion years ago, the records a complex history of crustal growth and stabilization during the late eon. This vast geological province, spanning over 1.5 million square kilometers, is divided into numerous fault-bounded subprovinces, such as the Abitibi, Wabigoon, Uchi, and Quetico, which trend predominantly northeast-southwest. Its upper crust features prominent granite-greenstone belts—volcanic sequences interlayered with sediments and intruded by granitic plutons—while deeper levels include tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) gneisses and intrusions that reflect early magmatic arc accretion. The craton's assembly occurred through the collision and suturing of terranes, microcontinents, and island arcs, culminating in the Kenoran Orogeny around 2.7 billion years ago, which thickened the crust and established its stability against later tectonic deformation. Bordered by mobile belts like the Trans-Hudson Orogen to the north and west, the Superior Craton has remained largely intact since the , preserving a record of Earth's early geodynamic processes. Economically, the Superior Craton is a global hotspot for mineral resources, hosting world-class deposits of (e.g., in the Abitibi ), base metals, and nickel-copper sulfides associated with mafic intrusions. Its exposed rocks provide critical evidence for understanding the onset of , continental crust differentiation, and the evolution of the during the era. Ongoing research, including seismic imaging and geochemical studies, continues to reveal details of its deep structure, such as a cold, depleted lithospheric mantle extending to depths of over 200 kilometers beneath the craton's interior.

Location and Extent

Geographical Boundaries

The Superior Craton encompasses an area of approximately 1.5 million km², primarily situated in across the provinces of , , and , with southern extensions into northern , , the , and the Dakotas in the United States. This vast crustal block forms a key component of the Laurentian , representing one of the largest preserved segments of ancient continental lithosphere. Geographically, the craton spans from about 45°N to 60°N in latitude and 85°W to 110°W in longitude, as delineated in regional geological compilations. Its boundaries are defined by major orogenic belts that record the craton's stabilization and integration into the broader North American plate. The northern and western margins are bounded by the Trans-Hudson Orogen, a collisional zone that sutured the Superior Craton to the adjacent Churchill craton (including the Rae and Hearne cratons), facilitating the assembly of early . To the east, it abuts the Grenville Province, marking a zone of convergence and orogenesis. The southern limit is set by the Penokean Orogen, which reflects the accretion of juvenile arcs to the craton's margin around 1.85 Ga. The western boundary aligns with the Trans-Hudson Orogen, a extensive belt that sutured the Superior Craton to adjacent blocks such as the Wyoming Craton. While much of the craton's surface is exposed within the rugged terrain of the Canadian Shield, significant portions remain concealed beneath sedimentary sequences. Buried extensions underlie the Basin to the northeast, where seismic studies reveal cratonic at depths preserving structures. Similarly, the eastern flank projects beneath the cover of the , contributing to the basement architecture in this intracratonic depocenter. These subsurface continuations highlight the craton's role in influencing basin evolution and resource potential.

Major Geological Provinces

The Superior Craton is subdivided into more than 20 lithotectonic subprovinces, which are broadly grouped into western, central, and eastern domains reflecting their spatial arrangement and structural trends. These subprovinces alternate between granite-greenstone terrains, high-grade belts, and metasedimentary-dominated regions, forming a collage assembled during the . The classification stems from integrated geological and geophysical mapping, highlighting east-west to northeast-southwest linear patterns across the . The western domain constitutes the craton's western arm, extending from southeastern Manitoba through , and is dominated by subprovinces such as the Wabigoon, Uchi, and English River. This arm features prominent greenstone belts interspersed with plutonic complexes, with the Wabigoon and Uchi subprovinces adjacent along the Wabigoon-Uchi Fault Zone, a major shear boundary that delineates transitions in volcanic-plutonic assemblages. The central domain, positioned between the western and eastern arms, encompasses subprovinces like the Winnipeg River and Berens River, which serve as transitional zones with mixed gneissic and sedimentary elements. The eastern domain forms the craton's eastern arm, curving northward around and extending into northern , incorporating subprovinces including the Abitibi, Opatica, Wawa, and Pontiac. Here, the layout shows the Abitibi subprovince adjacent to the Opatica along tectonic contacts that reflect later accretionary margins, with the arm's curvature accommodating high-strain zones near the bay. Prominent among the craton's internal divisions are the North Caribou subprovince, interpreted as a central core nucleus with ancient continental affinities; the Sachigo subprovince, a metasedimentary belt flanking the North Caribou to the south and east; and the La Grande subprovince, a high-grade complex in the northeastern extension linking to the core via structural corridors. These key provinces anchor the domainal framework, with the North Caribou and its extensions, such as parts of La Grande, providing foundational stability within the broader Laurentian tectonic setting.

Tectonic and Lithospheric Structure

Current Tectonic Setting

The Superior Craton constitutes the core of , the foundation of the North American Craton, and has maintained tectonic stability with negligible deformation since its consolidation approximately 2.5 billion years ago (Ga). This enduring stability reflects the craton's resistance to post-Archean tectonic disruption, preserving its ancient crustal architecture as a key component of the continental interior. The craton's margins are delineated by surrounding orogenic belts, including the Trans-Hudson Orogen to the north and west, which records the collision of the Superior Craton with adjacent blocks during Laurentia's assembly, and the Grenville Orogen to the southeast, marking a later phase of continental margin modification. These orogens frame the Superior Craton's boundaries without significantly penetrating its interior, underscoring its role as a rigid, undeformed nucleus. Within the broader North American plate, the Superior Craton experiences an intraplate compressional stress regime, primarily induced by far-field forces from Pacific subduction zones to the west and ridge-push from the to the east, resulting in sparse and low-magnitude confined largely to reactivated ancient structures along its edges. This tectonic quiescence exemplifies the craton's integration into a stable continental shield, with seismic activity rates far below those of active margins. As a foundational element in continental evolution, the Superior Craton acted as the nucleus for early supercontinent cycles, forming a central component of around 2.7 Ga through the aggregation of cratonic fragments and later serving as the core of (also known as Columbia) around 1.8 Ga during the assembly of . These cycles highlight the craton's pivotal contribution to the periodic coalescence and dispersal of continental masses over billions of years.

Deep Crustal and Mantle Architecture

The deep crustal structure of the Superior Craton features a thickness ranging from 35 to 50 km, with the upper crust primarily composed of to intermediate rocks and the lower crust characterized by underplating that contributes to high seismic velocities (Vp > 7.0 km/s). This layer, formed through repeated magmatic intrusions during the , enhances the craton's overall density and stability, as evidenced by values indicating a significant component in regions like the central Superior . Seismic data further reveal a sharp Moho discontinuity at depths of 40-45 km in core areas, transitioning to more gradational boundaries at the margins where crustal thinning occurs. Beneath the crust, the lithospheric mantle exhibits pronounced lateral variations, with thicknesses exceeding 300 km in the core regions of the eastern and western arms, derived from joint inversions of dispersion and models. These thick roots thin to approximately 200 km toward the central portions and margins, reflecting partial or influenced by rifting events. The mantle composition is predominantly depleted (Mg# > 92.5), a residue of ancient melt extraction that imparts low densities and high shear wave velocities (Vs > 4.6 km/s at 150 km depth), promoting long-term and resistance to convective destabilization. Thermochemical modeling integrates surface heat flow and to confirm this depleted signature, contrasting with more fertile mantle in adjacent orogenic belts. Recent geophysical investigations from 2020 to 2025 have illuminated finer-scale features through advanced seismic imaging. Deep reflection profiles penetrating 35-48 km across the southern reveal folded and thrust-stacked greenstone belts extending to 10-20 km depth, indicative of intense shortening (up to 40 km north-south). These structures, imaged with high-resolution surveys, highlight strain partitioning during craton assembly. Concurrently, long-lived fault systems, such as the Porcupine-Destor and Cadillac-Larder Lake faults, are traced to mid-crustal depths (12-30 km) and potentially lower crust (30-40 km), often as low-angle thrusts (<35°) that facilitated episodic fluid migration. Magnetotelluric data show low-resistivity zones along these faults, attributed to -era mineral-bearing fluid infiltration that altered crustal rheology and supported later hydrothermal activity.

Geological Composition

Dominant Rock Types and Ages

The Superior Craton is characterized by a predominance of Archean rocks, forming the largest coherent exposure of such lithologies on Earth and representing the core of the North American continent. These rocks, exceeding 2.5 Ga in age for the vast majority of the craton's volume, include extensive greenstone belts, tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) gneisses, and supracrustal sequences. Greenstone belts, which comprise mafic to ultramafic volcanics such as tholeiitic basalts and komatiites, primarily formed between 2.9 and 2.7 Ga through episodic mantle-derived magmatism. TTG gneisses, sodic and silica-rich plutonic rocks that dominate the craton's felsic to intermediate components, range in age from 3.5 to 2.6 Ga and represent early crustal stabilization products. Supracrustal sequences interleave volcanic and sedimentary rocks, including clastic metasediments and banded iron formations, deposited in rift-like or arc settings during the same Archean intervals. The age distribution reflects a progression from Paleo- to Mesoarchean cores to Neoarchean expansions, with gneiss belts preserving the oldest components dated up to 4.16 Ga, as evidenced by recent Sm-Nd isochron dating of mafic intrusions in the , and generally ranging from 3.5 to 2.8 Ga as high-grade tonalitic orthogneisses derived from partial melting of hydrated basaltic crust. Neoarchean additions between 2.8 and 2.5 Ga occurred via widespread plutonism and volcanism, culminating in craton stabilization around 2.7 Ga. Overall, the craton's lithological composition is dominated by felsic to intermediate plutons such as TTGs, mafic volcanics in greenstones, and metasediments, though these proportions vary regionally. Isotopic analyses of zircon and whole-rock samples reveal positive εHf values (typically +2 to +8) for many Neoarchean units, signifying substantial juvenile crustal growth from depleted mantle sources rather than extensive reworking of older crust. These signatures underscore the craton's episodic expansion through mantle plume or subduction-related inputs, with minor negative εHf excursions indicating localized assimilation of Mesoarchean basement. Variations in rock types and ages occur across subprovinces, as detailed in subsequent classifications.

Subprovinces Classification

The Superior Craton is subdivided into approximately 20 subprovinces, primarily classified into three lithotectonic types: granite-greenstone (volcanic-plutonic), metasedimentary, and high-grade gneiss domains. These subprovinces are typically bounded by regional-scale shear zones that delineate their contacts. For instance, the Opatica subprovince consists predominantly of intrusive rocks, including tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suites and syn- to post-tectonic granites, forming a plutonic belt that borders the Abitibi subprovince to the north. Granite-greenstone subprovinces are characterized by volcanic-plutonic assemblages, featuring greenstone belts of mafic to ultramafic volcanics intruded by granitic plutons. The Abitibi subprovince exemplifies this type, dominated by volcanic arcs with 2.7 Ga tholeiitic basalts, calc-alkalic andesites, and associated sediments. Similarly, the Wabigoon subprovince includes komatiitic flows, tholeiitic basalts, and calc-alkalic to alkalic rhyolites within its greenstone belts, flanked by voluminous TTG batholiths. Metasedimentary subprovinces comprise deformed sedimentary sequences, often representing foreland or interarc basins, with minimal volcanic components. The English River subprovince is typified by greenschist- to amphibolite-facies turbidites and pelitic schists deposited around 2.72 Ga. The Sachigo subprovince features flysch-like sequences of wackes, argillites, and minor conglomerates, metamorphosed to greenschist facies. High-grade gneiss subprovinces consist of deeply metamorphosed, polyphase igneous and sedimentary protoliths, often preserving older crustal nuclei. The Minnesota River Valley subprovince is composed mainly of TTG orthogneisses and granitic gneisses dating to approximately 3.5 Ga, with amphibolite-facies metamorphism. The La Grande subprovince includes amphibolite- to granulite-facies gneisses derived from tonalitic and sedimentary precursors, intruded by late-stage granites.

Formation and Growth Mechanisms

Early Crustal Nuclei

The earliest components of the Superior Craton's crust are preserved in isolated gneissic terranes, such as the Minnesota River Valley gneisses with igneous protoliths as old as approximately 3.5 Ga, representing some of the oldest intact crustal fragments in the craton. Igneous protoliths in this region yield U-Pb zircon ages around 3.5 Ga, such as the 3524 ± 9 Ma Morton Gneiss and 3497 ± 9 Ma Montevideo Gneiss. Further north, the North Caribou and Winnipeg River terranes host Mesoarchean tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suites dated between 3.5 and 3.0 Ga, forming the foundational sialic basement of these proto-continental blocks. Formation of these early crustal nuclei occurred primarily through vertical tectonics or plume-driven processes, involving the partial melting of hydrated basaltic crust derived from mantle plumes, with minimal evidence for widespread horizontal accretion prior to 2.9 Ga. This model is supported by the predominance of TTG magmatism, which reflects dripping or delamination of dense mafic residues into the mantle, allowing buoyant felsic crust to stabilize at the surface. Lu-Hf and O isotope analyses of zircons from these nuclei, including sub-chondritic εHf values in >3.02 Ga grains from the Winnipeg River terrane and relatively primitive Hf signatures in the North Caribou superterrane, confirm derivation from juvenile mantle sources with limited of pre-existing crust. Key magmatic events around 3.0 Ga mark the maturation of these core nuclei, with widespread TTG emplacement in the North Caribou terrane (3.05–2.72 Ga) and associated blocks contributing to the sialic basement's expansion. These nuclei initially comprised small, dispersed blocks approximately 100 km in scale, as inferred from geophysical and geochronological mapping of gneissic domains. By 2.9 Ga, these blocks had begun coalescing into larger protocontinental masses, evidenced by unconformities and deposits overlying the amalgamated North Caribou and Winnipeg River terranes.

Terrane Accretion Settings

The accretion in the Superior Craton occurred primarily within oceanic arc settings, where island arcs developed featuring tholeiitic basalts interlayered with komatiites and calc-alkaline volcanics, as exemplified in the precursors to the Abitibi subprovince around 2.79–2.70 Ga. These sequences exhibit geochemical signatures suggestive of -related processes, including enrichment in fluid-mobile elements like Ba and Pb, though the operation of modern-style subduction remains debated due to the prevalence of plume-influenced magmatism. In the Wawa-Abitibi belt, such oceanic arcs formed juvenile crust through repeated volcanic episodes, contributing to the craton's lateral growth. Forearc basin settings played a key role in sediment accumulation along arc margins, with thick wedges of turbidites and clastic deposits preserved in regions like the Sachigo subprovince around 2.72 Ga. These basins hosted deep-marine derived from eroding and older crust, as seen in the Oxford-Stull domain where ophiolite-like assemblages include >2.73 Ga turbidites that were subsequently incorporated into the . Such environments facilitated the deposition of metasedimentary sequences up to several kilometers thick, bridging volcanic and continental fragments during convergence. Uplift and plateau settings emerged through the formation of granitic domes and underlying keels, driven by either upwelling or collisional thickening, particularly evident in the Berens River arc with 2.745–2.695 Ga plutons. Oceanic plateau fragments, such as those in the ~2.786 Ga Vizien belt, represent thickened basaltic crust that underwent to generate tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suites, forming high-grade metamorphic cores within the . These structures reflect vertical tectonic processes that stabilized accreted blocks by exhuming deep crustal levels. Compressional deformation in fold-thrust belt settings deformed greenstone sequences into linear belts, involving south-directed thrusting and ~10–20 km of horizontal , as documented in the Wawa-Abitibi region around 2.70 Ga. Greenstone belts were stacked and imbricated along low-angle detachments, with strain concentrated in upper crustal layers up to 10–20 km thick, preserving volcanic stratigraphy amid regional metamorphism. This deformation style integrated previously isolated arcs and basins into coherent terranes. The overall model for terrane addition involves north-to-south directed accretion of approximately 10–15 juvenile and reworked blocks between 2.75 and 2.68 Ga, mediated by plume-modified processes that combined arc with episodic plume-driven rifting and collision. This progressive assembly incorporated early crustal nuclei as stable backstops, resulting in a collage of over fifteen distinct s that stabilized the by ~2.60 Ga.

Major Orogenic Events

Western Superior Orogenies

The western Superior Craton was assembled through a series of orogenic events between approximately 2720 and 2680 Ma, involving the progressive accretion of terranes, arcs, and microcontinents via and collision processes. These orogenies, occurring along the craton's western and southern margins, transformed dispersed crustal fragments into a coherent protocontinent, with key sutures marked by remnants and shear zones. Deformation styles ranged from bulk shortening to dextral , accompanied by synorogenic sedimentation in foreland basins and widespread granitic plutonism. The Northern Superior Orogeny at ~2720 Ma initiated this assembly by colliding the North Caribou superterrane with northern domains such as the Island Lake and Oxford-Stull terranes, forming an initial cratonic core through south-directed beneath the Berens River arc. This event involved dextral shearing and greenschist-facies , with fragments like those in the Bird River and Mayville areas delineating the suture zone. The collision stabilized a nucleus spanning the northern Uchi and Sachigo subprovinces, setting the stage for subsequent southern accretions. Following closely, the Uchian Orogeny (2720–2700 Ma) accreted the Uchi domain to this northern core via north-directed , incorporating the Winnipeg River ribbon microcontinent and Berens River arc in a continent-arc collision. Widespread granitic plutonism accompanied the event, intruding deformed greenstone belts, while synorogenic turbidites accumulated in the English River basin after ~2705 Ma. Deformation included regional folding and thrusting, with late dextral faults reactivating sutures, contributing to the expansion of the protocraton southward. The Central Superior at ~2700 Ma further integrated the Winnipeg River and Sachigo subprovinces, involving the accretion of juvenile arcs in the western Wabigoon domain and approximately 100 km of north-south shortening across shear zones. This event reworked older crust through magmatic arcs and tectonic imbrication, with low-resistivity zones in the English River and Quetico subprovinces indicating fluid-involved deformation and graphite-rich metasediments. Plutonism peaked with sanukitoid intrusions, marking a transition to more mature continental margins. Subsequently, the Shebandowanian (~2690 Ma) deformed the Wabigoon-Shebandowan belt through thrust faulting as the Wawa-Abitibi oceanic collided northward with the amalgamated protocontinent. This led to the development of the Quetico , with synorogenic and cessation of arc magmatism by ~2695 Ma, followed by sanukitoid plutons (2695–2685 Ma). sheets imbricated greenstone sequences, localizing deformation in linear belts like the Beardmore-Geraldton, where structures facilitated later mineralization. The Minnesotan Orogeny (~2680 Ma) finalized the western arm's stabilization by closing the southern margin through collision of the Minnesota River Valley microcontinent with the Superior protocraton, involving northward-dipping subduction and widespread transpressional deformation. This event affected the Pontiac subprovince with turbidite deposition and metamorphism, marking the end of major assembly with post-orogenic cooling over ~10 Ma intervals. Collectively, these orogenies drove significant crustal growth in the western Superior Craton through terrane accretion and subduction-related magmatism, adding juvenile material equivalent to roughly 30% of the final cratonic volume while recycling older crust. High-grade metamorphism, reaching granulite-facies conditions up to 700°C, occurred post-collision (2690–2620 Ma), linked to crustal thickening, plutonism, and cratonization processes that enhanced lithospheric stability.

Northeastern and Eastern Orogenies

The Kenoran , spanning approximately 2.72 to 2.68 Ga, represents a pivotal phase of crustal assembly in the northeastern and eastern Superior Craton, characterized by major arc-continent collisions primarily in the Abitibi-La Grande region. This event involved the and accretion of juvenile volcanic arcs to older continental margins, leading to the formation of extensive volcanic-plutonic belts dominated by tholeiitic to calc-alkaline assemblages. These belts, such as those in the Abitibi Subprovince, exhibit stratigraphic sequences of volcanics overlain by clastic sediments, reflecting synorogenic basin development during docking. In the northeastern domains, particularly the Opatica and areas, the manifested as intense compressional deformation around 2.70 Ga, including the folding of greenstone sequences in the Abitibi Greenstone Belt. This phase (D1-D2) produced regional (S1), tight isoclinal folds, and strain localization along shear zones, such as the Nottaway River Shear Zone, under amphibolite-facies conditions. Greenstone belts experienced subsidence-driven convective overturn, resulting in east-west trending synclines with steep dips and associated schistosity (S2), marking a transition from volcanic arc construction to collisional . The eastern arm of the craton displays distinctive curvilinear geometries in its greenstone belts, attributed to oblique convergence during arc accretion, which imparted sinistral transpressional to structures like the Porcupine-Destor Shear Zone. This oblique regime facilitated the migration of metamorphic fluids through dilational jogs, contributing to the region's high endowment of orogenic-style mineralization via fluid-rock interactions in shear-hosted systems. Unlike the more linear western margins, this geometry reflects differential shortening and rotation of accreted terranes against the stable Superior core. The cumulative effects of these orogenies led to stabilization by approximately 2.67 Ga, with widespread peaking at 2.68-2.67 Ga and involving crustal thickening to 40-50 km, followed by exhumation and migmatization. Isotopic studies indicate juvenile input primarily through arc magmatism during this interval, while the remainder involved reworking of older (3.0-2.8 Ga) crust. This juvenile input enhanced the 's buoyancy and rigidity, contrasting with the multi-stage, northward-younging progression observed in western domains. Recent models from 2024 emphasize plume tectonics as a key driver of eastern growth, particularly in the southeastern subprovinces like La Grande and Opatica, where mantle upwelling episodes at 2.77-2.75 Ga and 2.72-2.70 Ga generated komatiitic and TTG magmatism. These plumes interacted with subducting slabs, promoting sagduction and , which facilitated prolonged crustal reworking until 2.60 Ga without requiring modern-style plate . Such hybrid plume-arc dynamics explain the vertical tectonism and rapid stabilization in the east.

Post-Stabilization History

Proterozoic Modifications

The era witnessed significant modifications to the margins of the Superior Craton through a series of collisional orogenies that added juvenile crust and induced shortening, while the craton's interior remained largely stable. The (1.85–1.78 Ga) involved the collision of the Superior Craton with the Hearne and cratons along its western margin, resulting in indentation of the craton through substantial crustal shortening and thrusting of juvenile volcanic arcs over basement. This event welded these blocks into the core of , with structural evidence of ophiolites and reworking of the margin up to several hundred kilometers inland. Along the southern margin, the Penokean Orogeny (1.875–1.835 Ga) formed a fold-and-thrust belt through the accretion of the Pembine-Wausau arc, involving northward thrusting of Paleoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary rocks onto the Archean Superior basement and subsidence of a foreland basin. This deformation metamorphosed and imbricated the margin, adding juvenile material and stabilizing the southern boundary via west Pacific-style accretionary processes. The eastern margin experienced overprinting during the Grenville Orogeny (1.30–0.95 Ga), a protracted continent-continent collision between Laurentia and Amazonia that caused northwest-directed thrusting and crustal imbrication, but with minimal penetration into the craton interior due to its strong Archean keel. Hudsonian events, broadly encompassing the and subsequent intracratonic adjustments around 1.8 Ga, led to the development of minor basins such as the (deposited ~1.7 Ga), filled with unmetamorphosed sandstones overlying the deformed margins. Associated with later rifting, intrusions (~1.1 Ga) occurred in the region, linked to thermal perturbations from the Midcontinent Rift and representing volatile-rich within the . Overall, these modifications thickened the margins by up to 20–30 km through tectonic stacking and magmatic underplating, yet preserved the stable core with limited interior disruption. Recent seismic reflection data from 2025 across the southern Superior Craton reveal detailed fault geometries, including reactivated structures at the margins that record shortening and suggest potential for ongoing tectonic adjustment.

Economic Significance

The Superior Craton hosts some of the world's most prolific mineral deposits, contributing significantly to global supplies of metals, , , and iron, with resources primarily controlled by structures such as greenstone belts and shear zones, with cover sequences adding uranium and iron endowments. deposits dominate the craton's economic output, particularly in the Abitibi , where orogenic-style mineralization linked to 2.7 Ga shear zones has yielded an endowment exceeding 200 million ounces. World-class examples include the Timmins-Porcupine camp, with over 70 million ounces produced since 1906, and the area, illustrating how late-stage deformation concentrated in quartz-carbonate veins within volcanic-sedimentary sequences. The broader Superior Craton's production surpasses 4,500 metric tons historically, underscoring its status as the leading craton for this commodity in the . Base metal deposits further enhance the craton's value, with at Sudbury formed by a 1.85 Ga impact on basement rocks, producing over 8 million tonnes of and over 8 million tonnes of since the late . In contrast, volcanogenic massive (VMS) systems like Kidd Creek in the Abitibi belt, dated to 2.7 Ga, have yielded more than 130 million tons of ore grading 2% and 6% , hosted in volcanic domes and controlled by synvolcanic faults. Diamonds occur in kimberlite pipes clustered in the northern Superior Craton, such as the Attawapiskat field in , where intrusions sampled eclogitic and peridotitic sources from approximately 200 km mantle depths, supporting mines like Victor, which produced over 8 million carats before closing in 2019. and iron resources lie mainly in cover rocks; the district's quartz-pebble conglomerates in the 2.25 Ga Huronian Supergroup produced about 135,000 tons of uranium metal, representing roughly 20% of global supply in the mid-20th century, while Superior-type iron formations in the 1.85 Ga Animikie Basin, including the , have historically output billions of tons of high-grade ore. Recent exploration from 2020 to 2025 has leveraged seismic reflection profiling to image deep faults, guiding drilling for concealed extensions below 2 km in the southern Superior Craton, as demonstrated by new profiles revealing shear zone geometries. Sustainable mining practices in the Canadian Shield, including geophysical prospectivity mapping and reduced-impact extraction, continue to target these resources while minimizing environmental effects in glaciated terrains.

References

  1. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GC011454
  2. https://merc.laurentian.ca/sites/default/files/superiormap_8x11_2018.pdf
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284309068_Geology_and_tectonic_evolution_of_the_Superior_Province_Canada
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301926817302401
  5. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/169/3/1043/623709
  6. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017TC004479
  7. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1904t/report.pdf
  8. https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2214/report.pdf
  9. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/184/1/65/608474
  10. https://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-w/contents/REPORTS/69_W_CH_2.pdf
  11. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/GC/article/view/3439
  12. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/csp/cjes/article/43/7/1085/54026/Tectonic-evolution-of-the-western-Superior
  13. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014JB011018
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824000421
  15. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/3/4/220/31158/Tectonic-model-for-the-Proterozoic-growth-of-North
  16. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GC011454
  17. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/203/chapter/6
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333266775_From_Kenorland_to_Modern_Continents_Tectonics_and_Metallogeny
  19. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AGUFM.T11D0193D/abstract
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012821X23005678
  21. https://se.copernicus.org/articles/16/785/2025/
  22. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL110244
  23. https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-390/egusphere-2025-390-ATC1.pdf
  24. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/elements/article/20/3/162/644471/Archean-Cratons-Time-Capsules-of-the-Early-Earth
  25. https://academic.oup.com/petrology/article/65/7/egae066/7693624
  26. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ads8461
  27. https://uca.hal.science/hal-03533779v1/document
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X24000935
  29. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1556/report.pdf
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136822003250
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X19302692
  32. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/books/edited-volume/894/chapter/4633317/Structural-geology-of-the-subprovince-boundaries
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301926822002479
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/a-Subprovince-map-of-the-Superior-Province-and-b-simplified-geological-map-of-the_fig1_248450634
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926825000312
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11053-024-10432-3
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824000548
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Superior-Province-showing-granite-greenstone-terranes-and-orogenic-flysch-terranes_fig1_289497874
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236030419_Structure_of_the_Archean_English_River_subprovince_Implications_for_the_tectonic_evolution_of_the_western_Superior_Province_Canada
  40. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/f04281f6-957e-4875-8283-f76c5e1aa971/content
  41. https://manitoba.ca/iem/geo/field/roa00pdfs/00gs-20.pdf
  42. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/e96-063
  43. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsabulletin/article/137/9-10/3941/653320/Contrasting-cooling-histories-in-the-Archean
  44. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/118/1-2/94/125251/SHRIMP-study-of-zircons-from-Early-Archean-rocks
  45. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019RG000689
  46. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr9513
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493720302371
  48. https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/science/G541A/GSATG541A.pdf
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012821X99000394
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9933457/
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926821000140
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772883822000401
  53. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/e06-062
  54. https://doi.org/10.1139/E06-062
  55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2003.07.003
  56. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/geocan/2015-v42-n4-geocan02322/1034682ar.pdf
  57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.04.006
  58. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/penokean-orogeny-lake-superior-region
  59. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/134/3-4/776/605893/Refining-the-Paleoproterozoic-tectonothermal
  60. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1139/E10-003
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301926825000622
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320329723_The_Victor_Diamond_Mine_Superior_Craton_Canada-A_new_paradigm_for_exploration_in_unconventional_settings
  63. https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-390/egusphere-2025-390.pdf
  64. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/rncan-nrcan/m183-2/M183-2-8317-eng.pdf
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354917098_Chapter_32_Gold_Deposits_of_the_Archean_Abitibi_Greenstone_Belt_Canada
  66. https://osdp-psdo.canada.ca/dp/en/search/metadata/NRCAN-GEOSCAN-1-315421
  67. https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1904m/report.pdf
  68. https://files.ontario.ca/ndmnrf-geotours-discovery-site-mining-camp-en-2021-12-13.pdf
  69. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/segweb/books/edited-volume/2126/chapter/116193602/The-Kidd-Creek-Volcanogenic-Massive-Sulfide
  70. https://en.israelidiamond.co.il/news/world/canada-victor-diamond-mine-is-now-a-lake/
  71. https://www.srk.com/en/publications/pele-mountain-resources-at-the-elliot-lake-project
  72. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/segweb/economicgeology/article/105/3/467/128197/Iron-Formation-The-Sedimentary-Product-of-a
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.