Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Television advertisement
View on WikipediaThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|

A television advertisement (also called a commercial, spot, break, advert, or ad) is a span of television programming produced and paid for by an organization. It conveys a message promoting, and aiming to market, a product, service or idea. Advertisers and marketers may refer to television commercials as TVCs.[1]
Advertising revenue provides a significant portion of the funding for most privately owned television networks. During the 2010s, the number of commercials has grown steadily, though the length of each commercial has diminished.[2][3] Advertisements of this type have promoted a wide variety of goods, services, and ideas ever since the early days of the history of television.[4] The viewership of television programming, as measured by companies such as Nielsen Media Research in the United States, or BARB in the UK, is often used as a metric for television advertisement placement, and consequently, for the rates which broadcasters charge to advertisers to air within a given network, television program, or time of day (called a "day-part").[5]
In multiple countries, including the United States, television campaign advertisements are commonplace in a political campaign. In other countries, such as France, political advertising on television is heavily restricted,[6] while some countries, such as Norway, completely ban political advertisements.
The first official paid television advertisement came out in the United States on July 1, 1941, at 2:30 p.m., over New York station WNBT (subsequently WNBC) before a baseball game between the Brooklyn Dodgers and Philadelphia Phillies. The announcement for Bulova watches, for which the company paid anywhere from $4.00 to $9.00 (reports vary), displayed a WNBT test pattern modified to look like a clock with the hands showing the time. The Bulova logo, with the phrase "Bulova Watch Time", appeared in the lower right-hand quadrant of the test pattern while the second hand swept around the dial for one minute.[7][8][9] The first TV ad broadcast in the UK went on air on ITV on September 22, 1955, advertising Gibbs SR toothpaste. In Asia, the first TV ad broadcast appeared on Nippon Television in Tokyo on August 28, 1953, advertising Seikosha (subsequently Seiko); it also displayed a clock with the current time.[10]
The television market has grown to such an extent that it was estimated to reach $69.87 billion for TV ad spending in the United States for 2018.[11]
General background
[edit]Television advertising involves three main tasks: creating a television advertisement that meets broadcast standards, placing the advertisement on television to reach the desired customer and then measuring the outcomes of these ads, including the return on investment.[12]
To accomplish the first step means different things to different parts of the world depending on the regulations in place. In the UK for example, clearance must be given by the body Clearcast. Another example is Venezuela where clearance is governed by a body called El Centro Nacional Autónomo de la Cinematografía (CNAC).[13] The clearance provides a guarantee to the broadcasters that the content of the advertisement meets legal guidelines. Because of this, special extended clearance sometimes applies to food and medical products as well as gambling advertisements.
The second is the process of TV advertising delivery and usually incorporates the involvement of a post-production house, a media agency, advertising distribution specialists and the end-goal, the broadcasters.
At New York's TV Week in November 2018, the TV advertising model was described by Turner Broadcasting System as broken.[14]
TV advertisement trends
[edit]Internet and digital
[edit]
However, with the emergence of over-the-top media services, the Internet itself has become a platform for television, and hence TV advertising.[16] TV attribution is a marketing concept whereby the impact television ads have on consumers is measured.[17]
Addressable television is where targeted advertising is used on digital platforms,[18] so two people watching the same show receive different ads.
Digital television recorders and advertisement skipping
[edit]
After the video cassette recorder (VCR) became popular in the 1980s, the television industry began studying the impact of users fast-forwarding through commercials. Advertising agencies fought the trend by making them more entertaining.[19] The introduction of digital video recorders (also known as digital television recorders or DTRs), such as TiVo, and services like Sky+, Dish Network and Astro MAX, which allow the recording of television programs into a hard drive, also enabled viewers to fast-forward or automatically skip through advertisements of recorded programs.
At the end of 2008, 22% of UK households had a DTR. The majority of these households had Sky+ and data from these homes (collected via the SkyView[20] panel of more than 33,000) shows that, once a household gets a DTR, they watch 17% more television. 82% of their viewing is to normal, linear, broadcast TV without fast-forwarding the ads. In the 18% of TV viewing that is time-shifted (i.e. not watched as live broadcast), viewers still watch 30% of the ads at normal speed. Overall, the extra viewing encouraged by owning a DTR results in viewers watching 2% more ads at normal speed than they did before the DTR was installed.
The SkyView evidence is reinforced by studies on actual DTR behaviour by the Broadcasters' Audience Research Board (BARB) and the London Business School.
Product placement
[edit]Other forms of TV advertising include product placement advertising in the TV shows themselves. For example, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition advertises Sears, Kenmore, and the Home Depot by specifically using products from these companies, and some sports events like the Monster Energy Cup of NASCAR are named after sponsors, and race cars are frequently covered in advertisements.Today's sports advertisements frequently push boundaries or test out innovative methods using digital advances, depending less and less on the "spots and dots", the conventional 30-second commercials on television and radio. Additionally, companies are becoming more closely associated with sports content, particularly if it connects them to a digital audience made up mostly of highly sought-after men and women between the ages of 18 and 34.[21] A number of major sporting venues in North America are named for commercial companies, dating back as far as Wrigley Field. Television programs delivered through new mediums such as streaming online video also bring different opportunities to the traditional methods of generating revenue from television advertising.
Overlay advertisements
[edit]Another type of advertisement shown increasingly, mostly for advertising TV shows on the same channel, is an ad overlay at the bottom of the TV screen, which blocks out some of the picture. "Banners", or "Logo Bugs", as they are called, are referred to by media companies as Secondary Events (2E). This is done in much the same way as a severe weather warning is done, only these happen more frequently. They may sometimes take up only 5 to 10 per cent of the screen, but in the extreme, they can take up as much as 25 per cent of the viewing area. Subtitles that are part of the programme content can be completely obscured by banners. Some even make noise or move across the screen. One example is the 2E ads for Three Moons Over Milford, which was broadcast in the months before the TV show's première. A video taking up approximately 25 per cent of the bottom-left portion of the screen would show a comet impacting into the moon with an accompanying explosion, during another television programme. Another example is used in Poland to use any premieres of new shows/new seasons of the same show. TVP has taken a step further, overlaying on screen not only the channel on which the show is premiered, but also on a sister channel.
Interactive advertisements
[edit]Online video directories are an emerging form of interactive advertising, which help in recalling and responding to advertising produced primarily for television. These directories also have the potential to offer other value-added services, such as response sheets and click-to-call, which enhance the scope of the interaction with the brand. Researchers have found that For some consumer types and for specific ad types, that the standard linear advertising format is really superior to interactive advertising. Particularly, they have discovered that a cognitive "matching" of the system's (predominantly visual or verbal) characteristics and the demands of the customer group (preferring their information to be delivered in a visual or verbal fashion) appears to be crucial.[22]
Shorter commercial breaks
[edit]During the 2008–09 TV season, Fox experimented with a new strategy, which the network dubbed "Remote-Free TV". Episodes of Fringe and Dollhouse contained approximately ten minutes of advertisements, four to six minutes fewer than other hour-long programs. Fox stated that shorter commercial breaks keep viewers more engaged and improve brand recall for advertisers, as well as reducing channel surfing and fast-forwarding past the advertisements. However, the strategy was not as successful as the network had hoped and it is unclear whether it will be continued in the future.[23]
In May 2018, Fox Networks Group said its channels would try one-minute commercial breaks, mainly during sports events, but also on some shows on Fox Broadcasting Company. Ads during these breaks would cost more and fewer advertisers would be willing to pay that much.[24] Also in 2018, NBC used one-minute commercial breaks after the first block in multiple shows.[25] These "prime pods" are intended to keep viewers who are watching live, and advertisers pay more for the NBC spots.[26]
Children with advertisement
[edit]Children can be impacted by advertising in a variety of ways, and how they respond to it will depend on a number of factors, including their age, background knowledge, and level of experience. Youngsters under two years old are unable to distinguish between television programs and advertisements; however, children between the ages of three and six can. Children between the ages of 7 and 11 can grasp that they are being sold something, can identify sales tactics, and are willing to buy items with poor selling points, therefore they could also not be able to understand what they are being marketed. Teenagers between the ages of 12 and 13 can typically understand what they are being sold and decide whether they want to purchase it based on what they were told. However, they may not be able to recognize products with tricky placement or understand that celebrities are being paid to endorse a product. Over 14-year-olds could not have the necessary judgment abilities to make a decent purchase and may not comprehend how the market operates.[27]
TV advertisements by country
[edit]Characteristics
[edit]Advertising agencies often use humor as a tool in their creative marketing campaigns. Some psychological studies have attempted to demonstrate the effects of humor and their relationship to empowering advertising persuasion.
Animation is often used in advertisements. The pictures can vary from hand-drawn traditional animation to computer animation. By using animated characters, an advertisement may have a certain appeal that is difficult to achieve with actors or mere product displays. Animation also protects the advertisement from changes in fashion that would date it. For this reason, an animated advertisement (or a series of such advertisements) can be long-running, several decades in multiple instances. Notable examples are the series of advertisements for Kellogg's cereals, starring Snap, Crackle and Pop and also Tony the Tiger. The animation is often combined with real actors. Animated advertisements can achieve lasting popularity. In any popular vote for the most memorable television advertisements in the UK, such as on ITV[28] or Channel 4,[29] the top positions in the list invariably include animations, such as the classic Smash and Creature Comforts advertisements.
Other long-running advertising campaigns catch people by surprise, even tricking the viewer, such as the Energizer Bunny advertisement series. It started in the late 1980s as a simple comparison advertisement, where a room full of battery-operated bunnies was seen pounding their drums, all slowing down except one, with the Energizer battery. Years later, a revised version of this seminal advertisement had the Energizer bunny escaping the stage and moving on (according to the announcer, he "keeps going and going and going..."). This was followed by what appeared to be another advertisement: viewers were oblivious to the fact that the following "advertisement" was actually a parody of other well-known advertisements until the Energizer bunny suddenly intrudes on the situation, with the announcer saying "Still going..." (the Energizer Battery Company's way of emphasizing that their battery lasts longer than other leading batteries). This ad campaign lasted for nearly fifteen years. The Energizer Bunny series has itself been imitated by others, via a Coors Light Beer advertisement, in motion pictures, and by current advertisements by GEICO Insurance.
Use of popular music
[edit]Many television advertisements feature songs or melodies ("jingles") or slogans designed to be striking and memorable, which may remain in the minds of television viewers long after the span of the advertising campaign. Some of these ad jingles or catch-phrases may take on lives of their own, spawning gags that appear in films, television shows, magazines, comics, or literature. These long-lasting advertising elements may be said to have taken a place in the pop culture history of the demographic to whom they appeared. An example is the enduring phrase, "Winston tastes good like a cigarette should", from the eighteen-year advertising campaign for Winston cigarettes from the 1950s to the 1970s. Variations of this dialogue and direct references to it appeared as long as two decades after the advertising campaign expired. Another example is "Where's the Beef?", which grew so popular it was used in the 1984 presidential election by Walter Mondale. Another popular catch-phrase is "I've fallen and I can't get up", which still appears occasionally, over two decades after its first use. Some advertising agency executives have originated more than one enduring slogan, such as Mary Wells Lawrence, who is responsible for such famous slogans as "Raise your hand if you're Sure", "I♥New York" and "Trust the Midas touch."
Prior to the 1970s, music in television advertisements was generally limited to jingles and incidental music; on some occasions lyrics to a popular song would be changed to create a theme song or a jingle for a particular product. An example of this is found on the recent popular Gocompare.com advert that utilises "Over There", the 1917 song popular with United States soldiers in both World Wars and written by George M. Cohan during World War I. In 1971 the converse occurred when a song written for a Coca-Cola advertisement was re-recorded as the pop single "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony)" by the New Seekers, and became a hit. Additionally songwriter Paul Williams composed a piece for a Crocker Bank commercial which he lengthened and The Carpenters recorded as "We've Only Just Begun". Some pop and rock songs were re-recorded by cover bands for use in advertisements, but the cost of licensing original recordings for this purpose remained prohibitive in certain countries (including the U.S.) until the late 1980s.[citation needed]
The use of previously recorded popular songs in American television advertisements began in earnest in 1985 when Burger King used the original recording of Aretha Franklin's song "Freeway of Love" in a television advertisement for the restaurant. This also occurred in 1987 when Nike used the original recording of The Beatles' song "Revolution" in an advertisement for athletic shoes. Since then, multiple classic popular songs have been used in similar fashion. Songs can be used to concretely illustrate a point about the product being sold (such as Bob Seger's "Like a Rock" used for Chevy trucks), but more often are simply used to associate the good feelings listeners had for the song to the product on display. In some cases the original meaning of the song can be irrelevant or even opposite to the implication of the use in advertising; for example Iggy Pop's "Lust for Life", a song about heroin addiction, has been used to advertise Royal Caribbean International, a cruise ship line. Music-licensing agreements with major artists, especially those that had not previously allowed their recordings to be used for this purpose, such as Microsoft's use of "Start Me Up" by the Rolling Stones and Apple Inc.'s use of U2's "Vertigo" became a source of publicity in themselves.
In early instances, songs were often used over the objections of the original artists,[citation needed] who had lost control of their music publishing, the music of the Beatles being perhaps the most well-known case; more recently artists have actively solicited use of their music in advertisements and songs have gained popularity and sales after being used in advertisements. A famous case is Levi's company, which has used several one hit wonders in their advertisements (songs such as "Inside", "Spaceman", and "Flat Beat").[30] In 2010, research conducted by PRS for Music revealed that "Light & Day" by The Polyphonic Spree is the most performed song in UK TV advertising.[31]
Sometimes a controversial reaction has followed the use of some particular song on an advertisement. Often the trouble has been that people do not like the idea of using songs that promote values important for them in advertisements. For example, Sly and the Family Stone's anti-racism song, "Everyday People", was used in a car advertisement, which angered some people.[who?][citation needed]
Generic scores for advertisements often feature clarinets, saxophones, or various strings (such as the acoustic/electric guitars and violins) as the primary instruments.
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, electronica music was increasingly used as background scores for television advertisements, initially for automobiles,[32] and later for other technological and business products such as computers and financial services. Television advertising has become a popular outlet for new artists to gain an audience for their work, with some advertisements displaying artist and song information onscreen at the beginning or end.
Advertisement controversies
[edit]Several advertisements were banned shortly after being televised due to their controversial nature. In 2005, the notorious "Blood on the Carpet" commercial for Mortal Kombat: Shaolin Monks was pulled for its depicted mutilation.[33] The Snickers commercial featuring Mr. T shooting Snickers at a feminine speed walker was quickly pulled for being homophobic.[34] The Cocoa Pebbles commercial featuring a caricature based on Hulk Hogan was removed after Hogan filed a lawsuit against Post for plagiarizing his image.[35] In 2020, a Match.com commercial depicting a woman dating Satan was only shown once before it was withdrawn; being deemed religiously insensitive.[36] [citation needed] Some advertisements are refused to be shown to the public, such as the risqué AGFA underwater camera commercial that was never televised.[37] In 2012, the Burger King commercial featuring rapper Mary J. Blige received backlash by African-American reviewers after it was previewed on the internet. Yet, it was shelved before being televised.[38]
Controversial advertisements have been observed to be subject to change during the advertised product's lifespan. The slogan for Dr Pepper Ten "It’s not for women" was no longer used for subsequent ads after it was deemed too sexist.[39] The slogan for Kotex "Kotex fits. Period." (later advertisements featured the CG anthropomorphic "Red Dot") was terminated from subsequent ads as of 2005 due to the slogan's term "period", referring to both punctuation and menstruation, was taken as a result of verbal abuse due to being publicized in front of children, which harmed sales of the product.[40] Commercials on children's underwear, such as Underoos, featuring clad child models had since gained criticism by parents due to concerns of child sexual exploitation, resulting in children no longer being used for advertisements in that matter,[41] not limited to advertisements for baby diapers. The Bud Light mascot, Spuds MacKenzie, was removed from the advertisements after their two-year lifespan in 1989 due to the accusations of their negative influence by using a bull terrier to advertise alcoholic beverages.[42] The Mac Tonight mascot made minimal appearances before retiring from the McDonald's commercials due to the theme song "Mack the Knife" infringing upon the likeness of Bobby Darin, and being sued by his son, Dodd Mitchell Darin, in 1989.[43] Additionally, the long-time McDonald's mascot, Ronald McDonald, was retired from advertisement after 53 years in 2016, not only due to the wake of the clown scare,[44] but also since it had been suggested by 550 physicians five years earlier that Ronald should retire from the advertisements. They stated that "a clown mascot targeting children for fast food is unethical".[45]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Mahfooz, Yasser; Mahfooz, Faisal (2013). "8: Consumer Behavior Perspective for Fairness Creams: A Case of 'Fair & Lovely'". In Jham, Vimi (ed.). Cases on Consumer-Centric Marketing Management. Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services (AMCRMES) Book Series. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global. p. 99. ISBN 9781466643581. Retrieved November 4, 2016.
The association of achievement by lightening one's skin is a message conveyed in the TeleVision Commercial (TVC).
- ^ Luckerson, Victor (May 12, 2014). "Here's Exactly Why Watching TV Has Gotten So Annoying". Time. Archived from the original on August 14, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
- ^ Flint, Joe (May 12, 2014). "TV networks load up on commercials". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
- ^ Steinberg, Brian (January 19, 2016). "If The 30-Second TV Ad Is Dying, TV Networks Are Helping To Kill It". Variety. Archived from the original on August 6, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
- ^ Gregory, Thomas (January 4, 2022). "The First TV: A Complete History of Television". Retrieved November 1, 2022.
- ^ Fritz Plasser,Global Political Campaigning, p226
- ^ "Imagery For Profit" R.W. Stewart, The New York Times, July 6, 1941.
- ^ [1] Archived October 9, 2008, at the Wayback Machine WNBT/Bulova test pattern
- ^ "Novel Commercials in Video Debut" (PDF). Broadcasting. July 7, 1941. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
- ^ ja:コマーシャルメッセージ
- ^ "US TV Ad Spending to Fall in 2018 - eMarketer". eMarketer. Archived from the original on July 31, 2018. Retrieved July 31, 2018.
- ^ How Are Large Companies Measuring the ROI of Their TV Campaigns? Published by marketingcharts.com, November 19, 2015. Retrieved November 13, 2018
- ^ cnac.gob.ve. "CNAC – Ente rector de la Plataforma del Cine y Medios Audiovisuales de Venezuela". cnac.gob.ve. Archived from the original on February 20, 2015. Retrieved January 20, 2015.
- ^ Thoughts on TV Week Published by deductive.com, November 7, 2018. Retrieved November 12, 2018
- ^ Nakamura, Leonard I. (FRB); Samuels, Jon (BEA); Soloveichik, Rachel H. (BEA) (October 24, 2017). "Measuring the "Free" Digital Economy Within the GDP and Productivity Accounts" (PDF). SSRN.com. Social Science Research Network publishing working paper 17-37 of the Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. p. 37 (Fig. 3). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 20, 2021.
- ^ Ad-Supported OTT Keeps Growing, And Advertisers Would Be Wise To Take Note Archived November 13, 2018, at the Wayback Machine Published by Forbes, July 26, 2018.Retrieved November 13, 2018
- ^ What is TV Attribution? Archived November 14, 2018, at the Wayback Machine February 28, 2017, retrieved November 13, 2018
- ^ Overcoming the 7 challenges of implementing addressable TV advertising May 18, 2023 Published by Viaccess-Orca
- ^ De Atley, Richard (September 7, 1985). "VCRs put entertainment industry into fast-forward frenzy". The Free Lance-Star. Associated Press. pp. 12–TV. Retrieved January 25, 2015.
- ^ "SkyView". Skymedia.co.uk. Archived from the original on September 3, 2013. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
- ^ Biddiscombe, Ross (May 25, 2018). "Sports advertising: A whole new ballgame". IBC. Retrieved November 1, 2022.
- ^ Bezjian-Avery, Alexa; Calder, Bobby; Iacobucci, Dawn (July 1998). "New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising" (PDF). Journal of Advertising Research: 23–32. Retrieved October 8, 2024.
- ^ Brian Stelter (February 12, 2009). "Fox TV's Gamble: Fewer Ads in a Break, but Costing More". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 12, 2013. Retrieved February 13, 2009.
- ^ Disis, Jill (May 17, 2018). "Is the 1-minute commercial break the future of TV?". CNN Business. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- ^ Hill, Michael P. (October 5, 2018). "NBC forgoes complete brand overhaul, but does add new vanity card". NewscastStudio. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- ^ Owen, Rob (February 27, 2020). "TV Q&A: 'The Bachelor,' 'A Million Little Things,' 'The Sinner,' 'Lego Masters'". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
- ^ "Advertising: how it influences children and teenagers". Raising Children Network. Retrieved November 1, 2022.
- ^ "thinkbox – Classic Ads". Thinkbox.tv. Archived from the original on March 5, 2009. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ "Explore". Channel 4. Archived from the original on April 3, 2010. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ "Levi's TV Advert Music – Sounds-Familiar". Archived from the original on November 12, 2018. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
- ^ "Sainsbury's song tops adverts playlist". The Daily Telegraph. April 19, 2010. Archived from the original on September 2, 2013. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
- ^ The Changing Shape of the Culture Industry; or, How Did Electronica Music Get into Television Commercials?, Timothy D. Taylor, University of California, Los Angeles, Television & New Media, Vol. 8, No. 3, 235–258 (2007) Archived December 3, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Non-broadcast Adjudications". December 21, 2005. Archived from the original on March 26, 2008. Retrieved July 28, 2024.
- ^ "Mr. T on His Snickers Ad Being Yanked Over Gay Controversy". Fox News. August 7, 2008.
- ^ Cassens Weiss, Debra (May 28, 2010). "Hulk Hogan Challenges Post Foods to a Lawsuit, Cites Humiliating Defeat in Cartoon Ad". ABA Journal. Retrieved July 28, 2024.
- ^ "Match.com ad depicts a woman's relationship with Satan". Los Angeles Times. December 3, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2024.
- ^ "Banned Commercials You Won't Be Seeing Anytime Soon". May 8, 2017.
- ^ "Mary J. Blige blasted for hawking chicken in Burger King ad". Today. April 4, 2024. Retrieved July 28, 2024.
- ^ Nátalie Zmuda (February 21, 2011). "Can Dr Pepper's Mid-Cal Soda Score a 10 With Men?". Advertising Age. Archived from the original on March 12, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
- ^ "Kotex: From Silent Purchase to New Freedom". Chicago Tribune. March 30, 2005. Retrieved May 20, 2025.
- ^ "Calvin Klein Cancels Ads With Children Amid Criticism". The New York Times. February 18, 1999.
- ^ "Teetotaler Thurmond Raps Spuds McKenzie". Associated Press. November 13, 1987. Retrieved October 2, 2025.
- ^ Brock Walsh (January 21, 2022). "A Delicious Oral History of 'Mac Tonight'". Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
- ^ "The untold truth of McDonald's". Mashed. June 20, 2017. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved May 22, 2025.
- ^ "It's Time for McDonald's To Retire Ronald". CBS News. May 19, 2011. Archived from the original on December 23, 2021. Retrieved May 22, 2025.
Further reading
[edit]External links
[edit]- AdViews – Duke University Libraries Digital Collections: A Digital Archive of Vintage Television Commercials
Television advertisement
View on GrokipediaHistory
Origins and Early Experiments (1920s-1940s)
Television experiments in the 1920s centered on technological development rather than commercial applications, with inventors like Philo Farnsworth demonstrating the first working electronic television system in 1927 by transmitting an image of a dollar sign.[11] Mechanical television systems, pioneered by figures such as Charles Francis Jenkins in the United States and John Logie Baird in the United Kingdom, enabled limited transmissions, leading to approximately fifteen experimental mechanical stations operating in the U.S. by the late 1920s.[12] These efforts produced no paid advertising, as broadcasts remained confined to laboratories and small audiences without public receivers or commercial infrastructure.[13] The 1930s marked a transition to electronic television, with Vladimir Zworykin's iconoscope camera tube enabling improved image capture, and companies including RCA, Philco, and Allen B. DuMont conducting mid-decade tests for potential commercial viability.[14] NBC initiated experimental broadcasts from a transmitter atop the Empire State Building in 1930, while CBS and others followed with event coverage, such as the 1939 New York World's Fair where RCA launched regular programming demonstrations.[15] [16] Although these transmissions occasionally featured sponsor mentions akin to radio practices, no formal paid advertisements aired, as all U.S. stations held experimental licenses prohibiting commercial operations until the National Television System Committee standard was finalized.[17] The advent of paid television advertising occurred on July 1, 1941, when WNBT (an NBC station in New York) broadcast the first legal commercial: a 10-second Bulova Watch Company spot costing $9, displaying a simple clock over a U.S. map with the tagline "Bulova Watch Time."[3] [18] Aired before a Brooklyn Dodgers-Philadelphia Phillies baseball game, it reached fewer than 7,000 television sets in the New York area.[11] World War II curtailed expansion, halting set production from 1942 to 1945 while prioritizing military uses, though limited experimental broadcasts persisted, setting the stage for postwar commercialization.[14]Post-War Boom and Standardization (1950s-1960s)
Following World War II, television ownership in the United States surged, from approximately 9% of households in 1950 to over 85% by 1959, driven by economic prosperity and technological affordability.[19][20] This expansion fueled a rapid increase in advertising expenditures, with national TV ad spending rising from $12.3 million in 1949 to $128 million by 1951, establishing television as the dominant medium over radio and print.[20] Advertisers capitalized on the medium's visual appeal and broad reach, particularly for consumer goods like automobiles and household appliances, as networks expanded programming to prime-time hours.[11] Initially, the advertising model relied on single-sponsor formats, where one company fully funded and controlled an entire program, such as Texaco's sponsorship of The Milton Berle Show in the late 1940s.[14] This structure gave sponsors direct influence over content but proved unsustainable amid rising production costs and the 1950s quiz show scandals, which eroded public trust in sponsor-driven programming.[14] By the mid-1950s, networks shifted to the "magazine" or spot advertising model, inserting multiple short commercials from various sponsors within shows, which diversified revenue streams and reduced individual advertiser risk.[11] This transition, accelerated by the Federal Communications Commission's oversight on ad volumes, allowed for more flexible scheduling and broader participation by smaller advertisers.[11] Standardization emerged as networks and agencies codified commercial practices to maximize efficiency and viewer tolerance. Commercials typically lasted 60 seconds, featuring jingles, celebrity endorsements, and direct product demonstrations, often filmed in black-and-white to match early TV capabilities.[11] The National Association of Broadcasters imposed voluntary guidelines in the 1950s limiting ad time to about 10-15% of programming hours, aiming to prevent overload amid growing viewer complaints.[11] By the 1960s, the 30-second spot began gaining traction as a cost-effective alternative, laying groundwork for modern formats, while audience measurement tools like Nielsen ratings, introduced in 1950, enabled precise targeting based on demographics.[20] This era's innovations prioritized persuasive storytelling over mere announcements, reflecting advertisers' adaptation to television's intimate, living-room presence.[14]Maturation and Diversification (1970s-1990s)
The 1970s marked a period of regulatory maturation for television advertising, as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed stringent limits on commercials directed at children, including potential bans on ads for high-sugar foods viewed by young audiences.[21] These initiatives reflected concerns over deceptive practices and undue influence on minors, with the FTC developing guidelines for clear and conspicuous disclosures in ads to ensure effective communication.[22] However, by 1980, congressional amendments to the FTC Act explicitly curtailed the agency's authority to promulgate rules banning or restricting children's advertising, shifting focus toward voluntary industry self-regulation.[23] This regulatory pivot under the Reagan administration facilitated broader advertising freedoms, enabling diversification into new formats and audiences.[24] Cable television's expansion in the late 1970s and 1980s fragmented the dominance of broadcast networks, introducing niche channels that supported targeted advertising based on demographics rather than mass appeal.[25] Cable advertising revenue surged from $53 million in 1980 to $1.5 billion by 1989, driven by subscriber growth and specialized programming.[26] The launch of MTV on August 1, 1981, exemplified this shift, providing brands direct access to the influential 12-to-34-year-old demographic through music videos and youth-oriented content, which influenced viral-style marketing techniques.[27] [28] Concurrently, Super Bowl commercials emerged as high-stakes cultural events, with 30-second spots commanding $222,000 in 1980—up from $78,200 a decade earlier—due to the game's massive viewership.[29] The 1980s deregulation of broadcast rules by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) spurred the rise of infomercials, extending ad formats to 30-minute segments that combined product demonstrations with direct-response calls-to-action.[30] Cable networks like the Home Shopping Network (launched 1982) and QVC capitalized on this, pioneering around-the-clock shopping channels that blurred lines between programming and promotion.[31] By the 1990s, audience fragmentation accelerated, with over 60% of U.S. households subscribing to cable by 1992 and non-network programming capturing more than 30% of total viewership.[32] Advertisers responded with sophisticated storytelling in spots, integrating emotional narratives and celebrity endorsements to differentiate brands amid channel proliferation, while agencies began offering holistic campaigns across TV, print, and emerging digital platforms.[33] This era solidified television's economic maturity, with ad revenues supporting creative experimentation despite regulatory and competitive pressures.Digital Disruption and Adaptation (2000s-Present)
The proliferation of high-speed internet access in the early 2000s enabled the launch of platforms like YouTube in 2005 and Netflix's streaming service in 2007, which fragmented television audiences and accelerated the decline of traditional linear TV viewership.[34] By 2010, over 105 million U.S. households subscribed to pay-TV, representing over 90% penetration, but cord-cutting began eroding this base as consumers shifted to on-demand video.[35] Cable and satellite providers lost approximately 25 million subscribers since 2012, with total pay-TV households dropping to 68.7 million by 2025.[36][37] This exodus reduced linear TV's share of total television consumption to 59% by September 2024, while streaming reached 41%, up from 37.5% in 2023.[38] Traditional television advertising revenues correspondingly declined amid these shifts, with the U.S. sector losing $12 billion in combined subscription and ad revenue in 2024 alone.[39] Networks reported sharp drops, such as Discovery's 13% fall in TV ad revenue to $1.71 billion in Q3 2023 and Paramount Global's 14% decline in the same period.[40] Globally, linear TV ad spending stagnated or contracted while total ad markets grew, contributing to TV's share of U.S. media ad spend falling below digital channels, which captured 77.7% or $302.77 billion in 2024.[41][42] Digital video ad spend reached $63 billion in 2024, surpassing linear TV and growing 16% year-over-year, driven by platforms offering measurable, targeted alternatives.[43] In response, the industry adapted by embracing connected TV (CTV) and over-the-top (OTT) services, which integrate internet delivery with television screens via smart TVs, streaming devices, and apps.[44] CTV adoption surged in the 2010s, with over 70% of U.S. households using these platforms by 2023, fueling ad spend growth to $23.6 billion in 2024—a 16% increase—and projections for further expansion.[45][46] Programmatic advertising, initially dominant in digital display during the 2000s, extended to TV in the 2010s through automated buying on CTV inventories, enabling real-time bidding, data-driven targeting, and reduced waste compared to broad linear schedules.[34][47] This evolution allowed advertisers to leverage household-level data for addressable ads, improving precision and accountability, though challenges like audience fragmentation and data privacy regulations persisted.[48] Broadcasters and streamers introduced hybrid models, such as ad-supported tiers on platforms like Netflix (launched 2022) and Hulu, blending subscription revenue with commercials to recapture advertising dollars.[49] These adaptations mitigated some losses, with CTV emerging as the primary growth engine for TV advertising, though linear TV's structural decline continued due to viewer preferences for on-demand content and measurable digital alternatives.[50] By 2024, global ad revenue exceeded $1 trillion, underscoring the sector's pivot toward integrated digital-television ecosystems amid ongoing fragmentation.[51]Production Techniques and Formats
Commercial Lengths, Structures, and Scheduling
The predominant length for television commercials has historically been 30 seconds, with approximately half of all aired spots adhering to this duration to balance message delivery and cost efficiency.[52] Shorter variants, such as 15-second spots, have increased in prevalence since the early 2000s due to rising ad clutter and advertiser preferences for concise messaging, comprising a growing share alongside 10-, 20-, and 60-second formats.[53] In the medium's early decades post-World War II, 60-second commercials were more common, but by the 1970s, economic pressures including the loss of tobacco sponsorships shifted norms toward the 30-second standard, which remains a benchmark despite fragmentation into shorter bursts.[54] Regulatory constraints influence lengths, particularly for children's programming under U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules, which cap commercial time at 10.5 minutes per hour on weekends and 12 minutes on weekdays for content aimed at viewers aged 12 and under, enforced to mitigate over-commercialization.[55] For general audience programming on broadcast stations, no federal cap exists following the rollback of 1980s-era guidelines that once limited ads to about 12 minutes per hour; stations now average 15-18 minutes hourly, driven by revenue needs, though networks impose internal limits to preserve viewer tolerance.[56] Commercial structures typically follow a modular format emphasizing attention-grabbing openings, core messaging via demonstration or narrative, and calls-to-action, with variations like testimonial endorsements—featuring real or scripted user stories—or problem-solution arcs that highlight product benefits resolving consumer pain points.[57] Other prevalent structures include slice-of-life scenarios depicting everyday use for relatability, comparison ads juxtaposing brands to underscore superiority, and analogy-based narratives using metaphors for memorability, each tailored to evoke emotional or rational responses within time constraints.[58] Direct-response structures, often longer at 60-120 seconds in infomercial hybrids, prioritize urgency with toll-free numbers or QR codes, contrasting shorter brand-image spots focused on awareness over immediate sales.[57] Scheduling optimizes reach and frequency through dayparting, dividing the broadcast day into segments like early fringe (5-8 a.m.), daytime (9 a.m.-4 p.m.), prime time (8-11 p.m.), and late night, with prime slots commanding premiums due to higher viewership—e.g., U.S. prime access rates can exceed daytime by factors of 5-10.[59] Strategies include continuity for consistent exposure in low-seasonality categories, pulsing for seasonal bursts combining steady and intensive flights, and counterprogramming to target underserved audiences in off-peak slots, balancing gross rating points (GRPs) against frequency caps to avoid viewer fatigue, typically aiming for 3-7 exposures per target per week.[60] Ads cluster in "pods"—sequential breaks of 2-6 minutes housing multiple spots—positioned for first or last placement to minimize zapping, with broadcasters allocating 12-15 minutes of pods per hour in linear TV to sustain economics amid cord-cutting.[61]Creative Elements: Storytelling, Music, and Visuals
Storytelling in television advertisements employs narrative structures to engage viewers emotionally and cognitively, often drawing on archetypal plots such as problem-solution resolutions or character-driven arcs to convey brand messages. Empirical studies indicate that narrative ads enhance persuasion by inducing "narrative transportation," where viewers become immersed, leading to higher recall and positive brand attitudes compared to non-narrative formats.[62] [63] For instance, Apple's "1984" commercial, aired during Super Bowl XVIII on January 22, 1984, depicted a dystopian rebellion inspired by George Orwell's novel, positioning the Macintosh computer as a tool for individual empowerment and generating widespread cultural discussion that boosted sales.[64] Similarly, the Always "#LikeAGirl" campaign, launched in 2014, used a narrative challenging gender stereotypes through real-life testimonials, resulting in increased brand favorability and social media shares exceeding 50 million.[65] Music serves as a core emotional amplifier in TV commercials, with estimates showing it appears in 75% to over 90% of spots to evoke moods, reinforce messages, and aid memorability.[66] Jingles, short custom-composed tunes linking lyrics to brand names, originated prominently in the 1940s radio era but proliferated in TV during the 1950s-1960s, such as the "I'm Lovin' It" jingle for McDonald's introduced in 2003, which improved implicit learning and word-image recall in viewers per experimental findings.[67] [68] Background music, often licensed popular tracks, influences attitudes toward brands and endorsers, with congruence between music tempo/energy and ad content heightening emotional responses; a 2021 Texas A&M study found participants exposed to energetic music in a shoe ad reported stronger positive emotions than those without.[69] [70] However, over-reliance on incongruent or overly familiar music can reduce effectiveness by distracting from the core message.[71] Visual elements, including cinematography and computer-generated imagery (CGI), construct persuasive imagery that captures attention and symbolizes product benefits. Techniques like dynamic camera angles, lighting contrasts, and slow-motion shots heighten emotional involvement, as evidenced by production analyses showing high-visual-impact ads sustain viewer engagement longer than static ones.[72] CGI, advancing since the 1990s, enables cost-effective creation of surreal or hyper-realistic scenes impossible in live-action, such as the immersive product integrations in Nike's "Just Do It" campaigns from 1988 onward, which leverage VFX for aspirational visuals boosting consumer engagement.[73] [74] In modern ads, generative AI-enhanced CGI further refines visuals for cross-media consistency, with 2024 industry reports noting improved brand loyalty through emotionally resonant, tailored imagery.[75][76] These elements must align with narrative and auditory components to avoid dilution, as mismatched visuals can undermine overall ad persuasion per viewer processing models.[77]Specialized Formats: Infomercials, PSAs, and Hybrids
Infomercials represent a long-form variant of television advertising, typically spanning 30 minutes or more, designed to promote products or services through extended demonstrations, testimonials, and direct-response calls to action. These formats emerged in the late 1940s with early examples like promotions for kitchen appliances such as the Vita-Mix blender, but gained widespread traction in the 1980s following the Federal Communications Commission's deregulation in 1984, which lifted prior bans on program-length commercials.[30][78] Prior to this, such extended ads were restricted to prevent overcommercialization of broadcast time, reflecting regulatory concerns over distinguishing programming from advertising. By the mid-1990s, approximately 90% of U.S. television stations aired infomercials, often during late-night slots to target niche audiences with high-intent buyers.[79] The structure of infomercials emphasizes persuasive storytelling, including problem-solution narratives, celebrity endorsements, limited-time offers, and urgency tactics like countdown timers, which aim to drive immediate purchases via toll-free numbers or online orders. Effectiveness varies, with direct-response metrics showing conversion rates influenced by repetition and content length; studies on commercial duration indicate that longer formats can enhance recall and persuasion for complex products but risk viewer fatigue if not engaging.[80] Unlike standard 15- or 30-second spots, infomercials generate revenue through backend sales rather than upfront ad fees, with the industry contributing billions annually to direct-to-consumer marketing, though success depends on production quality and regulatory compliance with disclosure rules.[81] Public service announcements (PSAs) differ fundamentally as non-commercial messages aired at no cost to promote public welfare, such as health awareness, safety, or civic education, often produced by government agencies, non-profits, or coalitions. Defined by the FCC as content for which stations donate airtime without charge, PSAs trace their television prominence to the 1950s and 1960s, leveraging visual and auditory impact to influence behaviors like anti-smoking campaigns or disaster preparedness.[82][83] Funding typically comes from non-profits (e.g., American Cancer Society) or government entities (e.g., Department of Health and Human Services), with production costs covered by donors while broadcasters provide slots to fulfill public interest obligations under the Communications Act.[82] In recent years, U.S. stations have donated over 1 million PSA airings monthly, though placement favors low-viewership times, limiting reach compared to paid ads.[84] Empirical assessments of PSA effectiveness highlight mixed outcomes: while emotional appeals in video formats can boost awareness and short-term attitude shifts, sustained behavioral change requires complementary efforts, as standalone PSAs often underperform without broader campaigns.[83] Stations prioritize PSAs from established 501(c)(3) organizations, distributing them via networks that receive millions in donated time annually, but competition is fierce, with acceptance rates depending on production polish and alignment with station demographics.[85] Hybrid formats blend elements of infomercials and PSAs, such as sponsored long-form content that educates while subtly promoting aligned causes or products, or paid placements masquerading as donated PSAs to meet public interest mandates. These evolved as broadcasters shifted from mandatory free PSAs to "hybrid" options post-1980s deregulation, allowing corporate funding through non-profits for messages on issues like drunk driving prevention.[86] Examples include extended segments combining testimonials with public health demos, resembling infomercials but framed for social good, often scrutinized for transparency to avoid deceptive practices. Such hybrids enable non-profits to access paid media efficiencies while retaining donor appeal, though they raise concerns over commercial influence diluting messaging integrity.[87] Regulatory oversight by the FCC emphasizes clear sponsorship identification to distinguish them from pure PSAs or ads.[88]Technical and Delivery Mechanisms
Broadcasting Technologies and Evolution
Television broadcasting originated with analog over-the-air transmission using amplitude modulation for video and frequency modulation for audio, with the first commercial broadcasts in the United States commencing on July 1, 1941, via stations WCBW and WNBT in New York.[17] This terrestrial system operated on VHF (channels 2-13) and later UHF (channels 14-83) bands, supporting limited channel capacity due to spectrum constraints and analog inefficiency, which restricted advertising to broad, non-targeted national or local insertions during fixed program breaks.[89] The adoption of color television marked a significant advancement, as the Federal Communications Commission approved the NTSC standard on December 17, 1953, enabling compatible color signals overlaid on black-and-white broadcasts and improving ad visual impact through enhanced production values.[90] Cable television, initially developed in 1948 as community antenna systems to amplify weak over-the-air signals in rural areas, evolved in the 1970s into wired distribution networks offering dozens of channels via coaxial cable, fragmenting audiences and expanding ad inventory while allowing operators to insert localized commercials.[35] Satellite broadcasting complemented this by launching geostationary relays like Canada's Anik 1 in 1972, which facilitated national signal distribution and later direct-to-home services in the 1990s, further multiplying channels and enabling premium ad buys on specialized networks.[91] The shift to digital broadcasting, culminating in the U.S. full transition from analog to digital terrestrial signals on June 12, 2009, introduced compression standards like MPEG-2 and later MPEG-4, permitting high-definition formats, multicasting of multiple subchannels per frequency, and efficient spectrum reuse.[92] This enabled dynamic ad insertion technologies, such as server-side stitching of tailored commercials into live streams, and addressable advertising, where households receive differentiated ads during the same programming—pioneered in national live broadcasts by CBS in December 2020—enhancing precision over analog-era uniformity.[93] These developments, driven by IP convergence in hybrid systems, have sustained linear TV's ad relevance amid fragmentation by supporting data-integrated targeting without fully supplanting traditional scheduling.[94]Targeting, Measurement, and Data Integration
Traditional television advertising targeting relied on broad demographic segmentation derived from audience panels, such as those maintained by Nielsen, which estimate viewership based on a sample of households equipped with meters to track tuning habits and demographics like age, gender, and income.[95] These methods allowed advertisers to select time slots and programs aligned with desired viewer profiles, but precision was limited by reliance on aggregated data rather than individual or household-level granularity.[96] The advent of addressable television advertising, particularly through connected TV (CTV) platforms, has enabled more granular targeting by delivering distinct ads to specific households within the same program, using data sources including set-top box telemetry, automatic content recognition (ACR) technologies, and third-party behavioral signals.[97] This approach integrates viewer data—such as past purchases, online activity, and household composition—to segment audiences beyond basic demographics, achieving match rates often exceeding 70% for multi-video program distributors (MVPDs).[98] For instance, advertisers can target based on life stage or interests via programmatic platforms, with CTV ad buys increasingly incorporating cross-device tracking to follow users across screens.[99][100] Measurement of TV ad performance traditionally centers on Nielsen's ratings, which combine panel data with big data from census-level sources like cable operator logs to estimate impressions, reach, and frequency, though critiques highlight undercounting of non-panel households and streaming viewership, prompting industry shifts toward hybrid "Big Data + Panel" methodologies launched in 2025 for national accreditation.[96][101] Complementary metrics include ad completion rates, which averaged 51.5% for CTV in recent analyses, and lift studies assessing incremental sales or search volume spikes post-exposure.[102] Tools like iSpot.tv provide second-by-second attention tracking and creative effectiveness scores by cataloging ads and correlating exposure with outcomes such as brand recall.[103] Data integration in modern TV advertising fuses first-party household data from providers with cross-platform signals, enabling attribution models that link ad exposure to downstream actions like website visits or purchases, as seen in geo-experimental designs isolating causal effects.[104][105] This convergence, accelerated by CTV's rise, allows for real-time optimization but faces challenges in data privacy compliance and signal loss from cookie deprecation, with studies emphasizing the need for verifiable match quality to avoid inflated targeting claims.[106][98] Empirical evaluations, including those using incrementality tests, indicate addressable formats yield higher ROI through reduced waste, though linear TV's scale remains unmatched for mass awareness.[107]Viewer Avoidance: DVRs, Skipping, and Ad-Blocking
Digital video recorders (DVRs) have enabled widespread fast-forwarding of commercials since their commercial introduction in the late 1990s, with adoption driving non-live viewing shares upward: national broadcast prime time non-live viewing increased from 6% in 2006 to 36% by 2018, while national cable prime time reached approximately 20%.[108] Around 70% of DVR users routinely fast-forward through ads, though 29% view them at normal speed for specific content such as scripted dramas; overall, roughly 50% of ads associated with the approximately 20% of linear TV viewing done via DVRs are skipped.[108][109] This behavior prompted the industry to adopt C3 metrics, which measure commercial ratings from live viewing plus DVR playback within three days, as a standard for ad buying and evaluation.[110] Skipping extends beyond DVRs to live broadcasts and includes channel surfing or physical avoidance, with empirical observation showing nearly one-third of TV ads airing to empty rooms as viewers leave during commercial breaks—four times more likely than changing channels.[111] In streaming contexts, skippable ad formats exacerbate this, particularly on platforms offering fast-forward options for recorded or on-demand content, though some services embed unskippable segments to enforce exposure. Ad avoidance rates remain high, with over half of DVR households historically skipping more than 50% of primetime commercials among younger demographics.[112] Ad-blocking technologies, while more established for web browsing, increasingly affect television via connected TVs and streaming apps, where device-level blockers or privacy tools circumvent targeted ads; as of 2023, 31% of U.S. adult consumers reported using ad blockers primarily for privacy protection across devices, including those accessing streaming TV.[113] In free ad-supported streaming television (FAST) services, 64% of consumers intentionally avoid ads through skipping or other actions, contributing to a broader shift where 59% express willingness to pay for ad-free tiers to eliminate interruptions entirely.[114] These mechanisms collectively erode traditional ad exposure, pressuring advertisers to adapt via shorter formats, contextual relevance, or integrated content to retain viewer attention.[114]Economic Role and Impact
Market Revenue and Spending Trends
Global television advertising revenue has experienced stagnation and fragmentation since the early 2020s, driven by the migration of viewer attention and advertiser budgets toward digital platforms and connected television (CTV). In 2024, worldwide linear television ad spending totaled approximately $143.9 billion, representing just 12.4% of total global advertising expenditure, a sharp decline from prior decades when linear TV dominated media consumption.[115] This contraction reflects causal shifts in consumption patterns, where streaming services have eroded linear viewership, prompting advertisers to reallocate funds to platforms offering better targeting and measurability.[116] In the United States, a key market for TV advertising, total television ad spending reached about $60.6 billion in 2024, but projections indicate a 9.3% decline from 2023 to 2027, equating to a $5.6 billion reduction over the period. Linear TV has borne the brunt of this downturn, with ad sales in prime-time slots dropping $1.2 billion since the 2023-24 upfronts, while streaming video ad commitments rose by $5 billion in the same timeframe.[117][118][119] Conversely, CTV ad spending has surged, hitting $23.6 billion in the US in 2024—a 16% year-over-year increase—and comprising a growing share of video ad dollars, projected to reach 44.7% of traditional broadcast TV advertising by 2029.[46][120] Broader video advertising, encompassing both linear and streaming, shows modest resilience, with North American TV and video ad spend forecasted at $162 billion in 2025, up from $155 billion in 2024, though global growth for TV-inclusive formats lags at around 2.4% annually. This dichotomy underscores a transition where advertisers prioritize addressable, data-driven formats over mass-market linear broadcasts, with digital channels capturing 72.7% of worldwide ad investment in 2024, exceeding $790 billion.[121][122][123]| Year | US Linear TV Ad Spend (USD Billion) | US CTV Ad Spend (USD Billion) | Global Linear TV Share of Total Ad Spend (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ~66 (pre-decline baseline) | ~20.5 | ~15 (estimated pre-2024 drop) |
| 2024 | ~60.6 (total TV, incl. decline) | 23.6 | 12.4 |
| 2025 | Projected ~55-58 (continuing drop) | ~27 (forecast growth) | <12 (further erosion expected) |