Hubbry Logo
TiananmenTiananmenMain
Open search
Tiananmen
Community hub
Tiananmen
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Tiananmen
Tiananmen
Tiananmen
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Tian'anmen in 2020
Tian'anmen
"Tiān'ānmén" in Simplified (top) and Traditional (bottom) characters
Chinese name
Simplified Chinese天安门
Traditional Chinese天安門
Hanyu PinyinTiān'ānmén
Literal meaning"Gate of Heavenly Peace"
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinTiān'ānmén
Bopomofoㄊㄧㄢ   ㄢ   ㄇㄣˊ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhTian'anmen
Wade–GilesTʻien1-an1-mên2,
Tʻien1-an1 Mên2
IPA[tʰjɛ́n.án.mə̌n]
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationTīn'ōnmùhn
JyutpingTin1on1mun4
IPA[tʰin˥.ɔn˥.mun˩]
Southern Min
Hokkien POJThian-an-mn̂g
Manchu name
Manchu scriptᠠᠪᡴᠠᡳ
ᡝᠯᡥᡝ
ᠣᠪᡠᡵᡝ
ᡩᡠᡴᠠ
Möllendorffabkai elhe obure duka
(video) Two shots of the gate followed by a shot of inside Tiananmen Square next to the gate, 2017.

The Tiananmen /ˈtjɛnənmən/,[1] also Tian'anmen,[2] is the entrance gate of the Forbidden City imperial palace complex and Imperial City in the center of Beijing, China. It is widely used as a national symbol.

First built in 1420 during the Ming dynasty, Tiananmen was the entrance to the Emperor's residence, through which all visitors to the palace walked. In 1949, Mao Zedong proclaimed the People's Republic of China from the balcony, which now features a large portrait of him. Tiananmen is located to the north of Tiananmen Square, and is separated from the plaza by Chang'an Avenue.

Name

[edit]

The Chinese name of the gate (天安门/天安門), is made up of the Chinese characters for "heaven", "peace" and "gate" respectively, which is why the name is conventionally translated as "Gate of Heavenly Peace". However, this translation is somewhat misleading, since the Chinese name is derived from the much longer phrase "receiving the mandate from heaven, and pacifying the dynasty". (受命于天，安邦治國).[3] The Manchu translation, Abkai elhe obure duka, lies closer to the original meaning of the gate and can be literally translated as the "Gate of Heavenly Peacemaking".[4] The gate had a counterpart in the northern end of the imperial city called the Di'anmen (地安門, Dì'ānmén; Manchu: Na i elhe obure duka), which may be roughly translated as the "Gate of Earthly Peace".

Gate

[edit]

History

[edit]

The gate was originally named "Chengtianmen" (traditional Chinese: 承天門; simplified Chinese: 承天门; pinyin: Chéngtiānmén), or "Gate of Accepting Heavenly Mandate" in the Ming dynasty. It has subsequently been destroyed and rebuilt several times. The original building was first constructed in 1420, and was based on an eponymous gate of an imperial building in Nanjing. The gate was completely burned down by lightning in July 1457. In 1465, the Chenghua Emperor ordered Zigui (自圭), the Minister of Works, to rebuild the gate. Thus, the design was changed from the original paifang form to the gatehouse that is seen today. It suffered another blow in the war at the end of the Ming dynasty, when in 1644 the gate was burnt down by rebels led by Li Zicheng. Following the establishment of the Qing dynasty and the Manchu conquest of China proper, the gate was once again rebuilt, beginning in 1645, and was given its present name upon completion in 1651. The gate was reconstructed again between 1969 and 1970. The gate as it stood was by then 300 years old, and had badly deteriorated, partly due to heavy usage in the 1950s and 1960s. As the gate was a national symbol, Zhou Enlai ordered that the rebuilding was to be kept secret. The whole gate was covered in scaffolding, and the project was officially called a "renovation". The rebuilding aimed to leave the gate's external appearance unchanged while both making it more resistant to earthquakes and installing modern facilities such as an elevator, water supply, and heating system.[5]

  • Tiananmen in 1901
    Tiananmen in 1901
  • Tiananmen in 2006
    Tiananmen in 2006
  • A close-up of the rooftop
    A close-up of the rooftop
  • Tiananmen at night
    Tiananmen at night
  • Tiananmen from the side, in June 2011
    Tiananmen from the side, in June 2011
  • Map including Tian'anmen (labeled as T’ien-an Men ) (1950s)
    Map including Tian'anmen (labeled as T’ien-an Men 天安門) (1950s)
  • Room inside the gate
    Room inside the gate

Description

[edit]
Stone column (huabiao) with depiction of dragons and phoenixes decorates the surroundings of the Tiananmen gate.

The building is 66 meters (217 ft) long, 37 meters (121 ft) wide and 32 meters (105 ft) high. Like other official buildings of the empire, the gate itself has unique imperial roof decorations.

Two lions stand in front of the gate, and two more guard the bridges. In Chinese culture, lions are believed to protect humans from evil spirits.

Two stone columns, called huabiao, each with an animal (hou) on top of it, also stand in front of the gate. Originally, these installations were designed for commoners to address their grievances by either writing or sticking petitions on the columns. However, the examples in front of the Imperial City were purely decorative, and instead connoted the majesty of the imperial government.

The western and eastern walls have giant placards; the left one reads "Long Live the People's Republic of China" (中华人民共和国万岁; Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó wànsuì), while the right one reads "Long Live the Great Solidarity of the World's Peoples" (世界人民大团结万岁; Shìjiè rénmín dà tuánjié wànsuì). The right placard used to read "Long Live the Central People's Government"[6] (中央人民政府万岁; Zhōngyāng Rénmín Zhèngfǔ wànsuì) for the founding ceremony of the PRC, but later it was changed to "Long Live the Great Solidarity of the World's Peoples". Both placards were changed to use simplified Chinese instead of traditional Chinese characters in 1964. The phrasing has significant symbolic meaning, as the phrase used for long live, like the Imperial City itself, was traditionally reserved for Emperors of China, but is now available to the common people.

The reviewing stands in the foreground are used on International Workers' Day (May 1) and on the National Day (October 1) of the People's Republic of China.

In front of the stands is the Imperial City's moat, still filled with water but now containing decorative illuminated fountains.

In ancient times, the Tiananmen was among the most important gates encountered when entering Beijing's Imperial City along with the Yongdingmen, Qianmen, the Gate of China. Proceeding further inward, the next gate is the 'Upright Gate', identical in design to the Tian'anmen; behind it is the southern entrance of the Forbidden City itself, known as the Meridian Gate.

Portrait

[edit]
See also: Portraits overlooking Tiananmen

History

[edit]

Because of the gate's position at the front of the Imperial City, and the historical events that have taken place on Tiananmen Square, the gate has great political significance. In 1925, when China was ruled by the Nationalist government, a large portrait of Sun Yat-sen was hung at the gate after his death. In 1945, to celebrate the victory over Japan, Chiang Kai-shek's portrait was hung.[7]

On July 7, 1949, portraits of Zhu De and Mao Zedong were hung to commemorate the Second Sino-Japanese War.[8] Since the founding date of the People's Republic of China on October 1, 1949, a singular portrait of Mao has been hung on the gate. The portrait is replaced annually before National Day. On only one occasion, on March 9, 1953, it was temporarily replaced by a portrait of Joseph Stalin to commemorate his death.[8]

In 2011, Alexander Pann Han-tang, chairman of the Asia Pacific Taiwan Federation of Industry and Commerce, and a close friend of Taiwanese president Ma Ying-jeou, proposed that the picture of Sun Yat-sen be displayed at Tiananmen Square instead for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Republic of China.[9] However, this proposal was rejected.[9]

Incidents

[edit]

The portrait weighs 1.5 metric tons (2 short tons), and is replaced by a spare whenever it is vandalized.[10] In 1989, three dissidents, including Yu Dongyue, attacked the portrait with eggs during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. Yu was sentenced to life imprisonment but was released on bail 17 years later in 2006. On May 12, 2007, the portrait of Mao caught fire. A 35-year-old unemployed man from Urumqi was arrested for the incident. About 15% of the portrait was damaged, and had to be repaired later.[11] On April 5, 2010, a protester threw ink in a plastic bottle and hit a wall near the portrait. He was then arrested.[citation needed]

National symbol

[edit]

Due to its historical significance, Tiananmen is featured on the National Emblem of the People's Republic of China. It has also been featured in the designs of stamps and coins issued by the People's Republic of China.

Public access

[edit]
Route 1 bus passing Tiananmen

Tiananmen is open to the public each day of the week from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.[12] Tickets must be booked online through the Weixin (Wechat) Mini Program at least one day before; it is not possible to buy tickets on the day or on-site.

Line 1 of the Beijing Subway has stops at Tiananmen West and Tiananmen East, on each side of Tiananmen.

City buses 1, 2, 5, 52, 82, 120, 观光1, 观光2, 夜1, 夜2, and 夜17 stop near Tiananmen.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tiananmen

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tiananmen (Chinese: 天安门; pinyin: Tiān'ānmén; literally "Gate of Heavenly Peace") is a monumental gate located in central , , forming the primary southern entrance to the imperial palace complex and overlooking to the south. Originally constructed in 1420 during the under the as Chengtianmen, it was renamed Tiananmen in 1651 during the and has undergone multiple reconstructions due to fires and wars. The gate's balcony has historically served as a platform for imperial proclamations and state announcements, most notably when declared the founding of the on October 1, 1949, from atop its structure facing the square. Symbolizing imperial and later communist authority, Tiananmen features a large portrait of on its central facade and has been adorned with images of other leaders, including during the Republic of China era and in the 1950s, reflecting shifts in political symbolism. The adjacent , expanded in the 1950s to become the world's largest public square, has hosted massive rallies, military parades, and political events central to modern Chinese governance.

Name and Etymology

Origins and Meaning

The name Tiananmen (Chinese: 天安门; : Tiān'ānmén) derives from three : 天 (tiān), meaning "" or "sky"; 安 (ān), meaning "peace" or "safety"; and 门 (mén), meaning "gate." This literal translation, "Gate of Heavenly Peace," reflects imperial cosmology linking the emperor's authority to celestial order. Originally built in 1417 during the Ming dynasty's Yongle era as the southern entrance to the Imperial City, the gate was named Chengtianmen (承天门; "Gate Receiving the "), emphasizing the dynasty's claim to divine legitimacy as successors to prior rulers. A fire destroyed the wooden structure in 1457, leading to reconstruction in 1465 under Ming Emperor Tianshun, after which it retained the Chengtianmen name. In 1651, Qing Emperor Shunzhi ordered a full rebuild at the original site following another fire, renaming it Tiananmen to signify "heavenly peace" amid the dynasty's consolidation of Manchu rule over Han territories. This shift from "receiving mandate" to "heavenly peace" aligned with Qing propaganda portraying stability and harmony under the new imperial order, distinct from Ming-era succession rhetoric. The name has endured, with the adjacent square adopting it to denote its position south of the gate. ![Tiananmen in Chinese characters](./assets/Tiananmen_ChinesecharactersChinese_characters

Location and Physical Description

Geographical Position

Tiananmen Square is situated in the Dongcheng District of central , , at geographic coordinates approximately 39°54′16″N 116°23′29″E. This positioning places it on the , at an elevation of about 48 meters above sea level. The square lies along 's historic north-south central axis, serving as the southern forecourt to the . To the north, it is bordered by Tiananmen Gate, which separates it from the imperial palace complex, while runs along its southern edge, connecting to key eastern and western thoroughfares. The site's urban centrality underscores its role in the city's spatial organization, with surrounding areas including the to the east and the to the west. Beijing's municipal boundaries encompass the square within a densely populated exceeding 21 million residents as of recent censuses.

Layout and Key Structures

Tiananmen Square features a rectangular layout aligned along Beijing's central north-south axis, measuring 880 meters from north to south and 500 meters from east to west, encompassing an area of 440,000 square meters. The surface consists of uniformly paved flagstones, facilitating large-scale gatherings and parades. At the northern edge stands the Tiananmen Gate (Gate of Heavenly Peace), a historic imperial structure serving as the primary entrance to the and the symbolic frontispiece of the square. To the south lies the , constructed in 1977 to house Mao Zedong's preserved body and attract millions of visitors annually. Flanking the western side is the , completed in 1959 as the site for meetings and state banquets, spanning over 170,000 square meters. On the eastern perimeter, the occupies a vast building renovated in 2011 to exhibit Chinese history and revolutionary artifacts across 400,000 square meters of floor space. Centrally positioned is the , an erected in 1958 commemorating revolutionary martyrs, standing 37.94 meters tall on a 3-meter-high stone base inscribed with key historical events from 1840 to 1949. This underscores the square's role as a monumental civic space, with surrounding structures emphasizing political and historical themes.

Historical Development

Imperial Period

Tiananmen Gate was initially constructed in 1420 during the as Chengtianmen, or "Gate of Accepting the ," under the reign of Yongle as the main entrance to the newly built imperial palace complex. The gate symbolized the emperor's divine authority and connection to heaven, with its central passageway reserved exclusively for the , while officials used side gates and commoners were prohibited from entering. Fires destroyed the structure multiple times, leading to a major reconstruction in 1465 under Ming Xianzong, which established much of its enduring architectural form featuring a triple-roofed design with yellow-tiled roofs and red walls emblematic of imperial power. During the transition to the in 1644, the gate sustained further damage but was rebuilt in its current style by 1651 under Emperor Shunzhi, who renamed it Tiananmen, or "Gate of Heavenly Peace," to reflect themes of imperial stability and heavenly favor following the dynasty's conquest. This renaming underscored the Qing rulers' assertion of legitimacy through continuity with Ming cosmology while adapting to their Manchu heritage. The gate continued to serve as the ceremonial threshold to the , where emperors occasionally appeared on its balcony for proclamations, imperial exams, or to receive , reinforcing its role in state rituals that affirmed the . The forecourt area before Tiananmen, though not yet the expansive modern square, functioned within the Imperial City's outer enclosures for official gatherings, examinations, and punitive displays such as executions of high officials, maintaining a controlled space that separated sacred imperial space from the profane outer world. Throughout the Ming (1368–1644) and Qing (1644–1912) eras, Tiananmen's strategic position and symbolic weight made it a focal point for dynastic legitimacy, with repairs and renovations periodically undertaken to preserve its grandeur amid Beijing's role as the empire's political heart.

Republican and Early Communist Era

During the Republican era (1912–1949), Tiananmen Square emerged as a key site for political mobilization and public gatherings in . The area, previously more restricted, began accommodating larger crowds for demonstrations against foreign influence and domestic governance failures. Most prominently, on May 4, 1919, thousands of students assembled in the square as part of the , protesting the Chinese government's acceptance of Japanese territorial demands in the and calling for national rejuvenation, , and democracy. This event marked the square's role in fostering intellectual and anti-imperialist activism, influencing broader cultural and political reforms. The gate itself symbolized Republican authority, with portraits of national leaders displayed above its entrance. For instance, a portrait of was hung on Tiananmen Gate to commemorate China's victory over in , reflecting the Nationalist government's use of the site for propaganda and ceremonial purposes. Following the Communist victory in the , Tiananmen Square transitioned to serve the new regime's symbolic needs. On October 1, 1949, stood on the rostrum of Tiananmen Gate and proclaimed the establishment of the before an audience of approximately 300,000 people, initiating annual parades that reinforced the site's centrality to state power. In the immediate post-1949 years, the square hosted mass rallies and ideological displays, including the temporary erection of a portrait of on the gate following his death on March 5, 1953, underscoring Sino-Soviet alignment during the early period. These events established Tiananmen as the focal point for communist legitimacy and public spectacles before major physical expansions.

Post-1949 Transformations

On October 1, 1949, proclaimed the establishment of the from the rostrum of , initiating its role as the central stage for communist political ceremonies. Following the founding of the , underwent significant physical transformations to symbolize the new regime's power and accommodate mass gatherings. Construction of the began in 1952 and concluded in 1958; this 37.94-meter obelisk, composed of over 17,000 granite and marble pieces, commemorates revolutionary martyrs and stands at the square's center. A major expansion commenced in November 1958, enlarging the square to approximately 440,000 square meters—four times its pre-1949 size—and paving it with numbered granite flagstones for precise assembly organization; the project was completed in August 1959 to mark the PRC's tenth anniversary. This redesign, directed by , removed imperial-era enclosures to create an open public plaza capable of holding over a million people for parades and rallies. In 1959, as part of the "Ten Great Buildings" initiative, the and the Museum of Chinese History (now the National Museum) were constructed on the square's western and eastern flanks, respectively, further integrating monumental architecture into the site's layout. After Mao's death in 1976, the was built from 1976 to 1977 on the southern end, enshrining his preserved body and reinforcing the square's function as a site of state reverence. These developments shifted Tiananmen from a confined imperial forecourt to a vast, controlled arena for proletarian symbolism and governance displays.

Architectural and Monumental Features

Tiananmen Gate

Tiananmen Gate, literally "Gate of Heavenly Peace," functions as the main southern entrance to the Forbidden City in Beijing. Originally constructed in 1420 during the Ming dynasty under the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424), it was initially designated Chengtian Gate, meaning "Gate of Accepting Heavenly Mandate." The gate exemplifies traditional Chinese imperial architecture, featuring a double-eaved hip-and-gable roof covered in yellow-glazed tiles reserved for imperial structures, supported by wooden bracketing systems (dougong) and flanked by vermilion walls symbolizing joy and authority. The structure spans 66 meters in length, 37 meters in width, and rises 32 meters in height, with a base elevated 10 meters on a white marble foundation pierced by five arched gateways. Constructed primarily from massive bricks and timber, the gate tower overlooks a spanned by seven white marble bridges known as the Golden Water River Bridges, of which the central bridge was reserved exclusively for the emperor's passage. Flanking the main are paired watchtowers, enhancing its defensive and ceremonial role as the threshold to the imperial palace. The has undergone multiple reconstructions due to and conflicts. Destroyed by in 1457, it was rebuilt in 1465, establishing the essential design persisting today. Further devastation occurred in 1644 amid the Ming collapse, prompting Qing (r. 1643–1661) to rebuild it in 1651 and rename it Tiananmen to signify the new dynasty's heavenly mandate. Additional in 1780 and 1849 necessitated repairs, while the Boxer Rebellion in 1900 caused near-total destruction, followed by restoration efforts in the early . These renovations preserved Ming-style proportions, including nine bays in width for the main hall, adhering to cosmological where nine represented the emperor's supreme status.

Mao Zedong Portrait

The Mao Zedong Portrait is an oversized oil painting affixed to the northern facade of Tiananmen Gate, overlooking Tiananmen Square in Beijing. Measuring 6 meters in height by 4.5 meters in width and weighing up to 1.5 metric tons, it depicts Mao Zedong in a formal pose, gazing forward. The portrait serves as a monumental emblem of the Chinese Communist Party's founding leader and the People's Republic of China (PRC). First installed on October 1, 1949, during Mao's proclamation of the from the gate's balcony, the portrait replaced earlier images of figures like that had hung there under the Republic of . A preliminary version appeared in February 1949 following the Communists' capture of , but the October installation marked its formal debut as a state symbol. Initially temporary for ceremonial occasions, it became a permanent fixture thereafter. The undergoes annual replacement with a newly hand-painted version, a maintained to preserve its appearance amid Beijing's and weathering. This process occurs in September, prior to celebrations on October 1. Various state-commissioned artists have executed the paintings; Wang Guodong produced versions from 1964 until 1976, after which others, including Ge Xiaoguang, continued the task. Following Mao's death on , 1976, the colorful portrait was briefly substituted with a black-and-white photographic enlargement as a gesture, the only such deviation in its history. Notable incidents include defacement attempts, such as during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests when protesters hurled paint at it on May 23, prompting immediate restoration and replacement. The portrait's construction incorporates durable materials like fiberglass reinforcements to withstand environmental exposure and public scrutiny. Despite Mao's responsibility for policies resulting in an estimated 40-80 million deaths through famine, purges, and campaigns like the Great Leap Forward (1958-1962), the image remains unaltered in its idealized depiction, reflecting the Chinese Communist Party's official veneration of Mao as 70% right and 30% wrong in historical assessments.

Other Monuments and Structures

The stands at the center of as a granite obelisk rising 37.94 meters high, constructed between 1952 and 1958 to honor martyrs of China's revolutionary struggles from the through the founding of the . Its base, styled after Buddhist architecture and covering 3,000 square meters, features eight massive relief panels depicting pivotal events such as the and the founding of the Republic, surrounded by inscriptions from and others extolling revolutionary sacrifices. The structure was designed by architect and others, with construction overseen by the government to symbolize national unity and historical continuity amid post-1949 efforts. South of the monument lies the Mausoleum of , built on the site of the former Gate of China and opened to visitors in May 1977, less than a year after Mao's death on September 9, 1976. The two-story edifice, spanning 44 large halls, houses Mao's embalmed body in a crystal within the central Viewing Hall, flanked by statues and exhibits of his personal effects, drawing millions annually under strict security protocols. Construction, completed in November 1976 at a cost reflecting rapid mobilization of labor and resources, reflects the Communist Party's emphasis on perpetuating Mao's legacy despite internal debates over his policies. On the western flank of the square, the Great Hall of the People was erected in under ten months and completed on September 24, 1959, as one of ten major projects marking the tenth anniversary of the People's Republic of China. This Soviet-influenced structure, covering 170,000 square meters with a 76-meter-wide facade and capacity for 10,000 seated, serves as the primary venue for National People's Congress sessions and state banquets, embodying centralized authority through its monumental scale and functional austerity. Opposite it on the east stands the National Museum of China, whose current building resulted from a 2003 merger of prior institutions and a 2011 renovation, housing over 1.4 million artifacts focused on ancient to modern Chinese history, though its placement reinforces the square's role in state-sanctioned narratives. Additional features include ten flagpoles at the southern perimeter, installed in the 1990s, symbolizing provincial unity under central rule.

Political and Symbolic Significance

Role in Chinese Governance

Tiananmen Gate, as the southern entrance to the , historically embodied the imperial center of governance in . During the Ming (1368–1644) and Qing (1644–1912) dynasties, the gate's rostrum served as the platform from which emperors issued edicts, conducted rituals, and appeared before officials and the public, reinforcing the and monarchical authority. This ceremonial function underscored Tiananmen's role in legitimizing rule through public displays of power and divine sanction, with access strictly controlled to maintain the emperor's mystique and hierarchical order. Following the establishment of the in 1949, Tiananmen retained and adapted this governance function under the (CCP). On October 1, 1949, ascended the rostrum to proclaim the founding of the PRC to an assembled crowd of 300,000, including military personnel and citizens, signaling the CCP's seizure of state power and the onset of socialist governance. This act transformed the gate into a symbol of , where party leaders continue to deliver pronouncements to , echoing imperial traditions while framing them in Marxist-Leninist ideology. In contemporary PRC , the Tiananmen rostrum facilitates key state ceremonies that project CCP authority and national cohesion. Paramount leaders, such as during the 70th anniversary of the PRC in 2019, use it to review military parades on (October 1), inspecting formations of the to demonstrate military loyalty and regime stability. These events, broadcast nationwide, serve to cultivate public allegiance, deter internal dissent, and assert China's global standing, with the square accommodating up to one million participants in choreographed displays of unity. Daily flag-raising and -lowering ceremonies at the square's mast further ritualize state sovereignty, drawing crowds to witness the rise of the at dawn, symbolizing the perpetual vigilance of the central government. Through these mechanisms, Tiananmen functions not as an administrative hub but as a theatrical stage for , where the CCP perpetuates its narrative of historical continuity and unchallenged rule.

Major State Events and Proclamations

On October 1, 1949, Mao Zedong stood on the rostrum of Tiananmen Gate and proclaimed the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) before an assembled crowd of approximately 300,000 soldiers and civilians in Tiananmen Square. This event marked the formal conclusion of the Chinese Civil War, with Mao declaring the central people's government as the sole legal government representing all Chinese people, and designating Beijing as the national capital. The ceremony included the first raising of the PRC's five-star red flag atop the flagpole in the square, accompanied by a military parade and artillery salutes. Following the 1949 proclamation, Tiananmen Square became the central venue for annual National Day celebrations on October 1, commemorating the PRC's founding through flag-raising ceremonies, mass gatherings, and, in select years, large-scale military parades. From 1950 to 1959, these events featured grand military parades with thousands of troops, tanks, aircraft flyovers, and civilian formations displaying slogans and models symbolizing state achievements. For instance, the 1950 parade involved over 10,000 troops marching past Tiananmen Gate, reviewed by PRC leaders, to affirm military readiness amid the ongoing Korean War. Subsequent decades saw scaled-back annual observances focused on flag-raising at dawn and fireworks, with elaborate parades reserved for milestone anniversaries, such as the 35th in 1984, 50th in 1999, 60th in 2009, and 70th in 2019, each involving up to 15,000 participants and advanced weaponry displays to project national strength. These events served as platforms for state leaders to deliver speeches reinforcing ideological continuity, economic progress, and territorial claims, often broadcast nationwide. The ceremonies underscore Tiananmen's role as a site for official narratives of unity and sovereignty, with restricted access protocols ensuring controlled symbolism.

The 1989 Protests and Government Response

Prelude and Initial Demonstrations

The prelude to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests was shaped by underlying economic and political tensions in during the late , including double-digit surpassing 18 percent in due to price reforms, widespread among officials, and disillusionment with the pace of political under Deng Xiaoping's leadership. These issues built on earlier student unrest in 1986–1987, which had led to the resignation of , the reform-oriented General Secretary of the from 1982 to 1987, after he was blamed for insufficiently suppressing demands for and free speech. Hu's forced ouster in January 1987 symbolized to many intellectuals and students the limits of intra-party reform efforts. Hu Yaobang's death from a heart attack on April 15, 1989, triggered an immediate wave of public mourning that rapidly politicized. Students at universities, including and , began posting wall posters lamenting his passing and implicitly criticizing the conservative faction within the leadership for his downfall. This expression of grief provided a focal point for broader discontent, as Hu was perceived as a proponent of openness and anti-corruption measures stifled by hardliners like and . Initial demonstrations commenced on April 17, when several thousand students marched from university campuses to to deposit wreaths at the , transforming the site into a venue for protest. By April 18, gatherings had swelled to tens of thousands in , with participants articulating demands for press freedom, official accountability for , increased funding for education, and dialogue with party elders. These early actions remained largely peaceful, focused on symbolic mourning, and received initial tolerance from authorities, though police removed some wreaths overnight. Protests began spreading to other cities like and , incorporating workers concerned with inflation's erosion of living standards. A pivotal moment occurred on , coinciding with Hu's official memorial service in the . Over 100,000 students assembled in , kneeling in a of to present a seven-point to Premier , seeking recognition of their movement as patriotic, rescission of the 1987 verdict against the earlier protests, and a meeting with top leaders—requests that were ignored. Students escalated by declaring a boycott of classes starting April 20 and forming autonomous federations, such as the , to coordinate activities independently of official student unions. These developments marked the transition from spontaneous mourning to organized dissent, drawing sympathy from some reformist officials like while alarming conservatives.

Escalation and Demands

Following the death of former Communist Party General Secretary on April 15, 1989, university students in began gathering in to mourn him, initially framing their assemblies as tributes but quickly articulating grievances against official corruption and restrictions on political expression. By April 17, tens of thousands of students had converged, explicitly demanding press freedom and broader political reforms to address perceived failures in addressing , , and ideological rigidity under Deng Xiaoping's leadership. On , representatives presented a formal list of seven demands to the government, including an official reassessment of Hu Yaobang's legacy as correct and positive, admission that the student movement's aims were patriotic rather than subversive, public disclosure of top officials' incomes and assets to combat , of independently funded newspapers, termination of , allocation of 10% of government spending to with corresponding tuition reductions, and guarantees against further violence toward protesters. These demands emphasized institutional transparency and limited rather than outright abandonment of the one-party system, though they challenged the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) monopoly on discourse. Protests escalated after Hu's state funeral on April 22, when over 100,000 students assembled outside the , boycotting classes and establishing autonomous student unions deemed illegal by authorities, while petitions reiterated calls for direct dialogue with senior leaders like . Tensions intensified on April 26 with the editorial labeling the movement a "turmoil" orchestrated by a small anti-party clique, prompting over 150,000 students to breach police lines and occupy en masse, broadening participation to include workers voicing economic complaints such as wage stagnation amid rising prices. By April 27, demonstrations involved up to one in ten residents, marking a shift from campus-centric mourning to citywide unrest. The decisive escalation occurred on May 13, when approximately 160 students—frustrated by the government's refusal to engage in substantive talks—initiated a in to compel recognition of their demands and coincide with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev's impending visit, which drew international scrutiny. Participant numbers swelled rapidly to over 3,000 by May 16, galvanizing public sympathy and worker , as the action highlighted student resolve against perceived intransigence on issues like and speech freedoms. This tactic transformed the protests into a sustained occupation, with nearly one million citizens marching in support on May 17–18, amplifying calls for democratic mechanisms such as increased accountability and press independence while straining CCP internal debates between reformers like and hardliners. The hunger strike's visibility underscored causal pressures from economic disparities and ideological disillusionment post-Cultural Revolution, though government sources later portrayed it as manipulative escalation undermining social stability.

Crackdown and Casualties

On the night of June 3–4, 1989, the (PLA) launched a coordinated to clear and surrounding areas in , following the declaration of on May 20. Troops from multiple PLA units advanced along major avenues such as Chang'an Boulevard, encountering human barricades formed by protesters, workers, and residents who blocked their path with buses, debris, and their bodies. Soldiers fired live ammunition, including automatic weapons and tanks, into crowds to disperse them, resulting in intense primarily west of the square. By the early hours of June 4, PLA forces had penetrated central Beijing, reaching around 4–5 a.m., where an estimated 5,000–10,000 protesters remained camped. Negotiations led by PLA commander Xu Qinxian and student leaders allowed most demonstrators to evacuate peacefully via the southeast exit, though some reports indicate isolated gunfire and beatings during the dispersal. Tanks and armored vehicles then demolished makeshift structures, including the 10-meter "" statue erected by protesters, symbolizing their push for reform. The operation extended beyond the square, with continued clashes in adjacent neighborhoods until June 5, involving arson against military vehicles by some civilians and retaliatory shootings. Casualty figures from the crackdown remain contested, with most deaths occurring during confrontations on approaches to the square rather than within it. The Chinese government, via Mayor Chen Xitong's June 30 report, stated that 241 people died, including 36 university students, 23 soldiers and officers, and over 7,000 wounded, attributing losses to "turmoil" involving armed civilians who killed or injured hundreds of troops. Independent estimates, drawn from hospital records, eyewitness accounts, and diplomatic cables, suggest higher civilian tolls: cited preliminary findings of at least several hundred unarmed killings by mid-1990, while declassified British diplomatic reports referenced a Chinese State Council estimate of up to 10,000 deaths, though such figures lack independent verification and may include broader unrest. U.S. declassified documents indicate around 400–800 civilian fatalities based on intelligence, emphasizing that no large-scale massacre occurred inside the square itself but that gunfire targeted blockers en route.

Differing Accounts and Viewpoints

The government of the maintains that the 1989 events constituted a " " instigated by a small group of agitators exploiting student mourning for to foment disorder, necessitating military intervention to restore order and prevent national destabilization. released in June 1989 by Chen Xitong, then Mayor of , reported 241 deaths, including 218 civilians and 36 students, alongside 23 soldiers and 13 killed, with over 5,000 soldiers reportedly injured; the government emphasized that troops were fired upon first, with protesters blocking roads, burning over 100 military vehicles (some with soldiers trapped inside), and killing at least 20-30 troops in ambushes, particularly along routes to the square. authorities assert no shots were fired indiscriminately in itself, with clearance achieved peacefully by dawn on after protesters dispersed voluntarily following student leader announcements, and attribute most casualties to urban clashes elsewhere, such as at Muxidi bridge, where armed civilians attacked advancing columns. In contrast, Western governments, organizations, and exiled dissidents describe as a deliberate of peaceful pro-democracy demonstrators, with estimates of deaths ranging from several hundred to over 10,000, often citing unverified eyewitness reports of tanks and gunfire mowing down unarmed crowds in and around the square. A declassified British cable, based on statements from a Chinese State Council member, claimed at least 10,000 fatalities, while and groups like the (relatives of victims) allege systematic killings, including executions and hospital cover-ups, framing the protests as largely non-violent calls for corruption reform and political liberalization suppressed to preserve rule. These accounts highlight iconic images like "" as evidence of unarmed resistance against aggression, though they frequently omit documented protester violence, such as the of soldiers and that preceded major troop movements. Disputes center on the locus and nature of violence: multiple foreign journalists embedded in , including BBC's James Miles and Washington Post's Jay Mathews, reported observing no mass shootings or deaths within the square proper on June 3-4, with troops advancing cautiously and protesters evacuating amid chaos, suggesting the "Tiananmen Square massacre" label misattributes casualties—estimated by U.S. embassy cables at potentially 180-500 for June 3 alone, far exceeding initial media figures but still contested. Declassified U.S. documents note army units suffered heavy losses from "mobs" hurling Molotov cocktails and using hijacked vehicles as weapons, complicating narratives of one-sided brutality, while Chinese and internal reports underscore protester coordination with "hooligans" to provoke confrontation. Analyses from outlets scrutinizing primary evidence, including leaked cables and on-site dispatches, indicate official Chinese figures may undercount civilian deaths (potentially 400-800 total, per some diplomatic extrapolations) but align more closely with verified eyewitness data than inflated claims lacking forensic backing, amid acknowledged incentives for to minimize and for Western sources to maximize numbers amid Cold War-era tensions. The persistence of divergent tolls stems partly from restricted access to hospitals and morgues, suppression of victim lists, and reliance on rumor-chains, with no independent autopsy tallies emerging despite decades of .

Aftermath and Legacy

Immediate Consequences

Following the military crackdown on June 4, 1989, Chinese authorities launched a widespread suppression campaign, detaining thousands of protesters and bystanders in and across the country in the ensuing days and weeks. Estimates from organizations indicate at least 10,000 arrests nationwide by mid-June, with many held without trial on charges of counter-revolutionary activities or rioting. , declared on May 20, persisted in until January 11, 1990, enabling security forces to conduct house-to-house searches and monitor dissent. On June 9, 1989, addressed senior military officers, framing the intervention as essential to end "turmoil" instigated by a "small number of people" and praising the for upholding stability, while calling for the eradication of "remnants" of the unrest. This speech signaled the leadership's intent to consolidate power through force, leading to internal party purges targeting reformist elements perceived as lenient toward the demonstrations. Zhao Ziyang, the Communist Party General Secretary who had advocated dialogue with protesters, was stripped of his positions on June 24, 1989, and placed under for opposing and the crackdown; Jiang Zemin, then Shanghai Party Secretary, was elevated as his successor to signal a shift toward harder-line control. At least a dozen executions of designated "ringleaders" occurred by late June, often following swift trials broadcast to deter further unrest. State media initiated a effort labeling the events a "counter-revolutionary rebellion," censoring foreign reporting and enforcing domestic silence on casualties or grievances.

Long-Term Impacts on China

The 1989 crackdown on protests solidified the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) aversion to political , effectively halting the reformist momentum of the and prioritizing regime survival through centralized control. Following the events, the CCP purged reform-oriented officials and elevated hardliners, reshaping leadership to emphasize ideological conformity and suppress dissent. This shift entrenched a where "stability maintenance" (weiwen) became the overriding policy imperative, with local authorities held accountable for preventing protests—often through quotas and performance evaluations tied to unrest metrics—fostering a nationwide apparatus of and preemptive repression. By the 2000s, weiwen expenditures reportedly surpassed defense budgets in some years, reflecting its institutionalization as a core governance mechanism. Economically, the immediate post-1989 slowdown prompted a strategic pivot: after a brief contraction, Deng Xiaoping's 1992 southern tour restarted market-oriented reforms, decoupling economic openness from political demands and enabling rapid growth that averaged over 9% annually from 1990 to 2010. This prosperity, lifting hundreds of millions from , provided the CCP with performance-based legitimacy, reducing public tolerance for instability and justifying authoritarian controls as prerequisites for continued development. The model—high , export-led expansion without electoral —contrasted with contemporaneous democratic transitions elsewhere, attributing China's avoidance of Soviet-style to the crackdown's reinforcement of . Socially, the events engendered a legacy of enforced amnesia, with the CCP implementing comprehensive to erase public memory of , 1989, including filters that block related terms and educational curricula that omit the incident entirely. By 2024, surveys indicated that many urban youth under 30 were unaware of the massacre's details, a outcome of decades-long suppression that has waned collective recollection while producing "silent dissidents" who privately harbor resentment toward state violence. Under , who interprets Tiananmen as a warning against elite decay, repression has intensified, integrating digital tools for mass monitoring and elevating stability over broader social reforms, though underlying tensions from inequality and persist in localized protests numbering tens of thousands annually.

International Reactions and Ongoing Debates

The government, under President , issued a strong condemnation of the Chinese government's use of force on June 5, 1989, suspending arms sales, halting high-level military exchanges, and opposing new loans from like the World Bank. enacted further measures via the Tiananmen Square Sanctions Resolution on June 29, 1989, banning exports of crime control equipment and restricting technology transfers deemed sensitive for proliferation risks. Similar responses came from European nations; the European Community imposed an on June 20, 1989, prohibiting lethal weapons and equipment with military potential, a restriction that persists as of 2025 despite periodic calls for lifting it. , a major economic partner, condemned the crackdown and froze official development assistance loans, resuming them only in 1990 after bilateral talks. In contrast, several communist and developing nations expressed support for China's actions, framing the crackdown as necessary to maintain stability against unrest. , , and endorsed the government's response, with the under issuing a muted criticism while prioritizing ongoing normalization of relations. actively courted , portraying Western sanctions as interference in internal affairs, which garnered backing from many African and Asian states wary of superpower meddling. These divergent reactions highlighted a geopolitical divide, with Western democracies emphasizing violations and authoritarian regimes prioritizing order amid fears of similar domestic upheavals. Ongoing debates center on the events' factual interpretation, particularly the death toll and nature of the violence, amid conflicting accounts and source limitations. The Chinese government officially reported 241 deaths on June 6, , including 218 civilians (among them 36 university students) and 23 personnel, attributing most casualties to mob violence against troops rather than systematic killing in itself. Western estimates, drawn from declassified cables, eyewitness reports, and hospital data, range from several hundred to approximately killed, with a British diplomatic assessment citing a Chinese official's claim of deaths citywide, though this figure remains unverified and contested due to restricted access to primary evidence. Skeptics of the dominant Western narrative, including some analysts reviewing troop movements and video footage, argue that no occurred within the square proper—where protesters were dispersed peacefully before dawn on June 4—but rather on surrounding avenues, with protester-initiated attacks on soldiers contributing to the chaos; this view challenges media portrayals amplified by outlets with potential incentives to highlight authoritarian excess while downplaying reformist elements in the protests. These disputes persist due to China's , which prohibits domestic discussion and commemoration, versus annual Western observances framing the events as a pro-democracy . Debates also encompass the crackdown's justification: Chinese authorities maintain it averted national disintegration akin to the Soviet collapse, enabling subsequent , while critics contend it entrenched one-party rule and stifled political , influencing global perceptions of China's model. Empirical challenges include reliance on partisan sources—Western often uncritically adopting activist estimates, while official Chinese data lacks independent audit—underscoring the need for declassified archives to resolve causal sequences of violence.

Access, Security, and Modern Usage

Public Access Policies

Tiananmen Square remains open to the public under strict access controls managed by municipal authorities, requiring advance reservations for all visitors since December 15, 2021, to regulate crowd flow and enhance security. Reservations are free and must be booked 1 to 7 days prior through official apps or websites such as the Beijing Tourism Administration platform, providing details like name, number, and preferred entry time; failure to reserve results in denial of entry. Upon arrival, entrants undergo rigorous security screenings at designated gates, primarily in the southeast or north, including verification, metal detectors, bag scans, and manual inspections; physical are mandatory, with photocopies insufficient, and prohibited items such as lighters, knives, or flammable substances lead to immediate exclusion. Multiple checkpoints, including subway exits and entry queues, enforce these measures, contributing to wait times of 30 minutes to over an hour during peak periods. Operating hours align with sunrise to sunset, typically allowing access from around 5:00 AM for the flag-raising to 10:00 PM for flag-lowering, though tourist visits are often restricted to 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM with final check-in by 2:30 PM to accommodate patrols and closures. Tickets do not permit re-entry after exit, and the square may close entirely for national events, holidays, or maintenance without prior public notice. These policies, intensified post-1989, prioritize order in a site of national symbolism, with no differential treatment for foreigners beyond standard requirements.

Security Arrangements

Tiananmen Square maintains extensive security infrastructure managed by the Municipal Public Security Bureau and the , featuring permanent barriers installed after 1989 to restrict vehicle and pedestrian access and channel crowds through controlled entry points. These include multiple layers of checkpoints with metal detectors, baggage scanners, and manual inspections by uniformed officers, applied to all visitors regardless of reservation status. Entry requires advance booking via official apps or websites, limiting daily visitor numbers and enabling pre-screening, though on-site verification remains mandatory. The square is under constant from fixed and mobile cameras integrated into Beijing's broader network, which ranks among the world's most dense for public monitoring, supplemented by patrolling units equipped for rapid response to disturbances. On anniversaries of the 1989 events, such as , measures escalate with additional police vehicles, temporary roadblocks, and heightened personnel deployment to deter assemblies, often resulting in partial closures or restricted hours. These protocols prioritize prevention of unauthorized protests while facilitating routine under state oversight.

Contemporary Events and Restrictions

In the years following the 1989 events, Chinese authorities have imposed stringent restrictions on public gatherings and commemorative activities in , particularly around the anniversary, prohibiting any form of remembrance of . This includes bans on protests, vigils, or discussions, with online references systematically censored and removed from domestic platforms. Security measures intensify annually on the anniversary, with access to the square further limited beyond routine protocols; for instance, on , 2023, entry was tightened with additional checkpoints and . Visitors face multiple police inspections, including bag searches and identity verifications, to deter unauthorized assemblies. Similar escalations occurred in , with heightened presence of around Beijing's central areas to preempt any commemorative actions. Public access to the square remains controlled in everyday operations, requiring advance ticket reservations via official apps or platforms, followed by queues and mandatory security screenings with metal detectors and X-ray machines at multiple stages. These protocols, implemented post-1989 and expanded with advanced surveillance technologies like facial recognition cameras, ensure that only approved state-sponsored events—such as flag-raising ceremonies or parades on October 1—occur without interference. Spontaneous or dissenting activities are effectively precluded, with authorities monitoring and detaining individuals suspected of planning them, as seen in preemptive arrests ahead of the 35th anniversary in 2024. No significant unauthorized events have taken place in the square since , reflecting the Chinese Communist Party's policy of historical erasure to prioritize social stability and regime legitimacy. This approach extends to broader prohibitions on disseminating related information, enforced through laws that criminalize perceived threats to state narratives.

References

  1. https://www.chinesehistorydigest.com/historic-sights/tiananmen-gate/gate-heavenly-peace
  2. https://postalmuseum.si.edu/exhibition/pacific-exchange-china-and-us-mail-commerce/commerce-the-peoples-republic-of-china
  3. https://www.travelchinaguide.com/attraction/beijing/tianan.htm
  4. https://kids.kiddle.co/Tiananmen
  5. http://www.china.org.cn/english/features/beijing/30801.htm
  6. https://www.silkroadtrips.com/beijing/attraction/tiananmen-square.html
  7. https://en.chinaculture.org/chineseway/2013-10/30/content_492742_2.htm
  8. https://chinaonthemap.com/stories/Gate-of-Heavenly-Peace
  9. https://mapcarta.com/24883152
  10. https://factsanddetails.com/china/cat15/sub94/item430.html
  11. https://www.idcpc.org.cn/english2023/chinadelights/arts/architecture/202307/t20230727_157789.html
  12. https://latitude.to/articles-by-country/cn/china/1234/tiananmen-square
  13. https://www.thechinajourney.com/tiananmen-square/
  14. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-24730028
  15. https://www.klm.com/travel-guide/inspiration/a-square-of-extraordinary-proportions
  16. http://www.morningsun.org/stages/tsquare/spence_gate.html
  17. https://www.chinabeijingprivatetour.com/attractions/show/tian-anmen-square.htm
  18. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-tiananmen-became-synonymous-with-authoritarian-crackdown-11559317657
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629808000401
  20. https://fee.org/articles/the-deep-historical-background-of-the-tiananmen-square-massacre/
  21. https://www.intotravelchina.com/en/attractions/beijing_attraction/Tiananmen_Square.html
  22. https://chinachannel.larbpublishingworkshop.org/2018/07/03/forbidden-portrait/
  23. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/chinese-rev
  24. https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/a-forbidden-history-of-tiananmen-square
  25. http://www.tsquare.tv/chronology/
  26. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tiananmen-Square
  27. https://hellobeijing.wordpress.com/attractions/the-tiananmen-square/
  28. https://arthistory.uchicago.edu/faculty/publications/remaking-beijing-tiananmen-square-and-creation-political-space
  29. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/symbolism-in-the-forbidden-city-the-magnificent-design-distinct-colors-and-lucky-numbers-of-chinas-imperial-palace/
  30. http://rw-1.com/tiananmen_square/index.html
  31. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/world/asia/28iht-mao.1833289.html
  32. https://www.bookbrowse.com/mag/btb/index.cfm/book_number/4643/red-memory
  33. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/weekinreview/28barboza.html
  34. https://www.insightguides.com/destinations/asia-pacific/china/northern-china/beijing/historical-highlights/maos-portrait
  35. https://news.cgtn.com/news/3445444e78597a6333566d54/index.html
  36. https://artreview.com/news/news_2_sep_2019_wang_guodong_painted_mao_zedong/
  37. https://theharvardadvocate.com/content/portraits-of-mao
  38. https://chineseposters.net/sites/default/files/resources/landsberger-faces-of-mao.pdf
  39. https://www.travelchinaguide.com/attraction/beijing/tiananmen-square/people-heroes-monument.htm
  40. https://www.mausoleums.com/mausoleum-of-mao-zedong/
  41. https://www.ourchinastory.com/en/15724/The-Great-Hall-of-the-People-in-Beijing-was-completed
  42. http://en.npc.gov.cn.cdurl.cn/2021-10/21/c_669932.htm
  43. https://www.eastchinatrip.com/national-museum-of-china-guide/
  44. http://www.tsquare.tv/links/spence.html
  45. https://www.chinaodysseytours.com/beijing/beijing-tiananmen-square.html
  46. https://origins.osu.edu/read/establishment-peoples-republic-china
  47. https://news.sky.com/story/the-rise-of-china-how-70-years-of-the-prc-is-shaping-all-our-futures-11821722
  48. https://www.chinajourneyguide.com/tiananmen-square/
  49. https://en.chnmuseum.cn/collections_577/collection_highlights_608/objects_of_chinese_modern_history_611/201911/t20191121_172657.html
  50. https://www.ourchinastory.com/en/15756/The-founding-ceremony-of-the-People%27s-Republic-of-China
  51. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-7/mswv7_003.htm
  52. https://www.ourchinastory.com/en/15563/How-many-military-parades-have-been-held-in-Tiananmen-Square?
  53. https://chineseposters.net/themes/1-october
  54. https://www.cgtn.com/special/china-celebrates-70th-national-day-with-grand-parade.html
  55. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/timeline-tiananmen-square/
  56. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1989-1992/tiananmen-square
  57. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-27404764
  58. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/china_1950_tiananmen_timeline.htm
  59. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/april-22/chinese-students-begin-protests-at-tiananmen-square
  60. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/blog/us-attitudes-toward-china-over-25-years-start-tiananmen-square-protests
  61. https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/chinese-pro-democracy-movement-1987-1989/
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-48445934
  63. https://www.voanews.com/a/east-asia-pacific_voa-news-china_timeline-chinas-tiananmen-square-demonstrations-and-crackdown/6206598.html
  64. https://u.osu.edu/mclc/2017/12/27/chinese-official-said-10000-died-in-1989/
  65. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2025/05/what-is-the-tiananmen-crackdown/
  66. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-42465516
  67. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB16/index.html
  68. https://www.hamptonthink.org/read/debunking-the-tiananmen-square-massacre
  69. https://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
  70. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/china-1989-tiananmen-square-protests-demonstration-massacre
  71. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/04/world/crackdown-beijing-troops-attack-crush-beijing-protest-thousands-fight-back.html
  72. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/CASI/Display/Article/4198468/tiananmen-square-the-declassified-history-w-postscript-2025/
  73. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-157
  74. https://factsanddetails.com/china/cat2/sub7/entry-4298.html
  75. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/deng-xiaoping/1989/5.htm
  76. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50097221
  77. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/june-4-1989-a-personal-recollection/
  78. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/30-years-after-tiananmen-the-meaning-of-june-4th/
  79. https://yuhuawang.scholars.harvard.edu/file_url/180
  80. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/30-years-after-tiananmen-memory-in-the-era-of-xi-jinping/
  81. https://time.com/5600363/china-tiananmen-30-years-later/
  82. https://www.gmfus.org/news/1989-chinese-characteristics
  83. https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/tiananmen-square-30th-anniversary-avery-goldstein-china
  84. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/tiananmen-square-tank-man-china/
  85. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/The%2520Tiananmen%2520Legacy_3.pdf
  86. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/06/04/asia-pacific/politics/tiananmen-crackdown-35th-anniversary/
  87. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/30-years-after-tiananmen-square-a-look-back-on-congress-forceful-response/
  88. https://www.sipri.org/databases/embargoes/eu_arms_embargoes/china
  89. https://www.nbr.org/publication/the-impact-of-tiananmen-on-chinas-foreign-policy/
  90. https://chinachange.org/2024/06/11/how-the-1989-tiananmen-massacre-shaped-chinas-approach-to-international-human-rights/
  91. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1208&context=aujh
  92. http://english.beijing.gov.cn/latest/news/202111/t20211124_2543664.html
  93. https://wildgreatwall.com/make-reservation-tiananmen-square/
  94. https://theabroadguide.com/beijing-tiananmen-square-entry-reservation/
  95. https://www.tripsavvy.com/tiananmen-square-in-beijing-1458254
  96. https://ct-by.com/tiananmen-square-tickets-opening-times-highlights-and-tips/
  97. https://www.lonelyplanet.com/articles/guide-to-tiananmen-square-beijing
  98. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/15/nx-s1-5162319/china-security-tiananmen-square
  99. https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g294212-d311533-r334132184-Tiananmen_Square_Tiananmen_Guangchang-Beijing.html
  100. https://www.reddit.com/r/beijing/comments/1e5ykwb/tiananmen_square_access_hours/
  101. https://chinaexplorertour.com/2025/blog/tiananmen-square-travel-tips-for-first-time-visitors-beijing/
  102. https://jordanandemily.com.au/visiting-tiananmen-square/
  103. https://www.quora.com/Do-foreigners-need-special-permission-to-visit-Tiananmen-Square-the-Great-Wall-and-the-Forbidden-Palace
  104. https://apnews.com/article/china-beijing-tiananmen-crackdown-e5dcd3454ecb7e0ce558681da020afe0
  105. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/04/1180045103/china-tiananmen-square-memorial-hong-kong-arrests-protests
  106. https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-06-04/china-tightens-access-to-tiananmen-square-24-detained-in-hong-kong-on-anniversary-of-1989-protests.html
  107. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/tiananmen-square-anniversary-shows-chinas-ability-to-suppress-history
  108. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/06/02/china-closing-memory-tiananmen-massacre
  109. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/06/04/tiananmen-june-protest-china-censorship-online/
  110. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/04/china-tightens-access-to-tiananmen-square-on-anniversary-of-1989-pro-democracy-protests-00100097
  111. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/security-tight-china-hong-kong-tiananmen-crackdown-anniversary-2024-06-04/
  112. https://www.opb.org/article/2024/06/04/heavy-security-in-china-and-hong-kong-on-35th-anniversary-of-tiananmen-crackdown/
  113. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/06/03/china-address-tiananmen-massacre-36-years
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.