Hubbry Logo
Tidal accelerationTidal accelerationMain
Open search
Tidal acceleration
Community hub
Tidal acceleration
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tidal acceleration
Tidal acceleration
Tidal acceleration
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A picture of Earth and the Moon from Mars. The presence of the Moon (which has about 1/81 the mass of Earth), is slowing Earth's rotation and extending the day by a little under 2 milliseconds every 100 years.

Tidal acceleration is an effect of the tidal forces between an orbiting natural satellite (e.g. the Moon) and the primary planet that it orbits (e.g. Earth). The acceleration causes a gradual recession of a satellite in a prograde orbit (satellite moving to a higher orbit, away from the primary body, with a lower orbital speed and hence a longer orbital period), and a corresponding slowdown of the primary's rotation, known as tidal braking. See supersynchronous orbit. The process eventually leads to tidal locking, usually of the smaller body first, and later the larger body (e.g. theoretically with Earth-Moon system in 50 billion years).[1] The Earth–Moon system is the best-studied case.

The similar process of tidal deceleration occurs for satellites that have an orbital period that is shorter than the primary's rotational period, or that orbit in a retrograde direction. These satellites will have a higher and higher orbital velocity and a shorter and shorter orbital period, until a final collision with the primary. See subsynchronous orbit.

The naming is somewhat confusing, because the average speed of the satellite relative to the body it orbits is decreased as a result of tidal acceleration, and increased as a result of tidal deceleration. This conundrum occurs because a positive acceleration at one instant causes the satellite to loop farther outward during the next half orbit, decreasing its average speed. A continuing positive acceleration causes the satellite to spiral outward with a decreasing speed and angular rate, resulting in a negative acceleration of angle. A continuing negative acceleration has the opposite effect.

Earth–Moon system

[edit]

Discovery history of the secular acceleration

[edit]

Edmond Halley was the first to suggest, in 1695,[2] that the mean motion of the Moon was apparently getting faster, by comparison with ancient eclipse observations, but he gave no data. (It was not yet known in Halley's time that what is actually occurring includes a slowing-down of Earth's rate of rotation: see also Ephemeris time – History. When measured as a function of mean solar time rather than uniform time, the effect appears as a positive acceleration.) In 1749 Richard Dunthorne confirmed Halley's suspicion after re-examining ancient records, and produced the first quantitative estimate for the size of this apparent effect:[3] a centurial rate of +10″ (arcseconds) in lunar longitude, which is a surprisingly accurate result for its time, not differing greatly from values assessed later, e.g. in 1786 by de Lalande,[4] and to compare with values from about 10″ to nearly 13″ being derived about a century later.[5][6]

Pierre-Simon Laplace produced in 1786 a theoretical analysis giving a basis on which the Moon's mean motion should accelerate in response to perturbational changes in the eccentricity of the orbit of Earth around the Sun. Laplace's initial computation accounted for the whole effect, thus seeming to tie up the theory neatly with both modern and ancient observations.[7]

However, in 1854, John Couch Adams caused the question to be re-opened by finding an error in Laplace's computations: it turned out that only about half of the Moon's apparent acceleration could be accounted for on Laplace's basis by the change in Earth's orbital eccentricity.[8] Adams' finding provoked a sharp astronomical controversy that lasted some years, but the correctness of his result, agreed upon by other mathematical astronomers including C. E. Delaunay, was eventually accepted.[9] The question depended on correct analysis of the lunar motions, and received a further complication with another discovery, around the same time, that another significant long-term perturbation that had been calculated for the Moon (supposedly due to the action of Venus) was also in error, was found on re-examination to be almost negligible, and practically had to disappear from the theory. A part of the answer was suggested independently in the 1860s by Delaunay and by William Ferrel: tidal retardation of Earth's rotation rate was lengthening the unit of time and causing a lunar acceleration that was only apparent.[10]

It took some time for the astronomical community to accept the reality and the scale of tidal effects. But eventually it became clear that three effects are involved, when measured in terms of mean solar time. Beside the effects of perturbational changes in Earth's orbital eccentricity, as found by Laplace and corrected by Adams, there are two tidal effects (a combination first suggested by Emmanuel Liais). First there is a real retardation of the Moon's angular rate of orbital motion, due to tidal exchange of angular momentum between Earth and Moon. This increases the Moon's angular momentum around Earth (and moves the Moon to a higher orbit with a lower orbital speed). Secondly, there is an apparent increase in the Moon's angular rate of orbital motion (when measured in terms of mean solar time). This arises from Earth's loss of angular momentum and the consequent increase in length of day.[11]

Effects of Moon's gravity

[edit]
A diagram of the Earth–Moon system showing how the tidal bulge is pushed ahead by Earth's rotation. This offset bulge exerts a net torque on the Moon, boosting it while slowing Earth's rotation.

The plane of the Moon's orbit around Earth lies close to the plane of Earth's orbit around the Sun (the ecliptic), rather than in the plane of the Earth's rotation (the equator) as is usually the case with planetary satellites. The mass of the Moon is sufficiently large, and it is sufficiently close, to raise tides in the matter of Earth. Foremost among such matter, the water of the oceans bulges out both towards and away from the Moon. If the material of the Earth responded immediately, there would be a bulge directly toward and away from the Moon. In the solid Earth tides, there is a delayed response due to the dissipation of tidal energy. The case for the oceans is more complicated, but there is also a delay associated with the dissipation of energy since the Earth rotates at a faster rate than the Moon's orbital angular velocity. This lunitidal interval in the responses causes the tidal bulge to be carried forward. Consequently, the line through the two bulges is tilted with respect to the Earth-Moon direction exerting torque between the Earth and the Moon. This torque boosts the Moon in its orbit and slows the rotation of Earth.

As a result of this process, the mean solar day, which has to be 86,400 equal seconds, is actually getting longer when measured in SI seconds with stable atomic clocks. (The SI second, when adopted, was already a little shorter than the current value of the second of mean solar time.[12]) The small difference accumulates over time, which leads to an increasing difference between our clock time (Universal Time) on the one hand, and International Atomic Time and ephemeris time on the other hand: see ΔT. This led to the introduction of the leap second in 1972[13] to compensate for differences in the bases for time standardization.

In addition to the effect of the ocean tides, there is also a tidal acceleration due to flexing of Earth's crust, but this accounts for only about 4% of the total effect when expressed in terms of heat dissipation.[14]

If other effects were ignored, tidal acceleration would continue until the rotational period of Earth matched the orbital period of the Moon. At that time, the Moon would always be overhead of a single fixed place on Earth. Such a situation already exists in the Pluto–Charon system. However, the slowdown of Earth's rotation is not occurring fast enough for the rotation to lengthen to a month before other effects make this irrelevant: about 1 to 1.5 billion years from now, the continual increase of the Sun's radiation will likely cause Earth's oceans to vaporize,[15] removing the bulk of the tidal friction and acceleration. Even without this, the slowdown to a month-long day would still not have been completed by 4.5 billion years from now when the Sun will probably evolve into a red giant and likely destroy both Earth and the Moon.[16][17]

Tidal acceleration is one of the few examples in the dynamics of the Solar System of a so-called secular perturbation of an orbit, i.e. a perturbation that continuously increases with time and is not periodic. Up to a high order of approximation, mutual gravitational perturbations between major or minor planets only cause periodic variations in their orbits, that is, parameters oscillate between maximum and minimum values. The tidal effect gives rise to a quadratic term in the equations, which leads to unbounded growth. In the mathematical theories of the planetary orbits that form the basis of ephemerides, quadratic and higher order secular terms do occur, but these are mostly Taylor expansions of very long time periodic terms. The reason that tidal effects are different is that unlike distant gravitational perturbations, friction is an essential part of tidal acceleration, and leads to permanent loss of energy from the dynamic system in the form of heat. In other words, we do not have a Hamiltonian system here.[citation needed]

Angular momentum and energy

[edit]

The gravitational torque between the Moon and the tidal bulge of Earth causes the Moon to be constantly promoted to a slightly higher orbit and Earth to be decelerated in its rotation. As in any physical process within an isolated system, total energy and angular momentum are conserved. Effectively, energy and angular momentum are transferred from the rotation of Earth to the orbital motion of the Moon (however, most of the energy lost by Earth (−3.78 TW)[18] is converted to heat by frictional losses in the oceans and their interaction with the solid Earth, and only about 1/30th (+0.121 TW) is transferred to the Moon). The Moon moves farther away from Earth (+38.30±0.08 mm/yr), so its potential energy, which is still negative (in Earth's gravity well), increases, i. e. becomes less negative. It stays in orbit, and from Kepler's 3rd law it follows that its average angular velocity actually decreases, so the tidal action on the Moon actually causes an angular deceleration, i.e. a negative acceleration (−25.97±0.05"/century2) of its rotation around Earth.[18] The actual speed of the Moon also decreases. Although its kinetic energy decreases, its potential energy increases by a larger amount, i. e. Ep = -2Ec (Virial Theorem).

The rotational angular momentum of Earth decreases and consequently the length of the day increases. The net tide raised on Earth by the Moon is dragged ahead of the Moon by Earth's much faster rotation. Tidal friction is required to drag and maintain the bulge ahead of the Moon, and it dissipates the excess energy of the exchange of rotational and orbital energy between Earth and the Moon as heat. If the friction and heat dissipation were not present, the Moon's gravitational force on the tidal bulge would rapidly (within two days) bring the tide back into synchronization with the Moon, and the Moon would no longer recede. Most of the dissipation occurs in a turbulent bottom boundary layer in shallow seas such as the European Shelf around the British Isles, the Patagonian Shelf off Argentina, and the Bering Sea.[19]

The dissipation of energy by tidal friction averages about 3.64 terawatts of the 3.78 terawatts extracted, of which 2.5 terawatts are from the principal M2 lunar component and the remainder from other components, both lunar and solar.[18][20]

An equilibrium tidal bulge does not really exist on Earth because the continents do not allow this mathematical solution to take place. Oceanic tides actually rotate around the ocean basins as vast gyres around several amphidromic points where no tide exists. The Moon pulls on each individual undulation as Earth rotates—some undulations are ahead of the Moon, others are behind it, whereas still others are on either side. The "bulges" that actually do exist for the Moon to pull on (and which pull on the Moon) are the net result of integrating the actual undulations over all the world's oceans.

Historical evidence

[edit]

This mechanism has been working for 4.5 billion years, since oceans first formed on Earth, but less so at times when much or most of the water was ice. There is geological and paleontological evidence that Earth rotated faster and that the Moon was closer to Earth in the remote past. Tidal rhythmites are alternating layers of sand and silt laid down offshore from estuaries having great tidal flows. Daily, monthly and seasonal cycles can be found in the deposits. This geological record is consistent with these conditions 620 million years ago: the day was 21.9±0.4 hours, and there were 13.1±0.1 synodic months/year and 400±7 solar days/year. The average recession rate of the Moon between then and now has been 2.17±0.31 cm/year, which is about half the present rate. The present high rate may be due to near resonance between natural ocean frequencies and tidal frequencies.[21]

Analysis of layering in fossil mollusc shells from 70 million years ago, in the Late Cretaceous period, shows that there were 372 days a year, and thus that the day was about 23.5 hours long then.[22][23]

Quantitative description of the Earth–Moon case

[edit]

The motion of the Moon can be followed with an accuracy of a few centimeters by lunar laser ranging (LLR). Laser pulses are bounced off corner-cube prism retroreflectors on the surface of the Moon, emplaced during the Apollo missions of 1969 to 1972 and by Lunokhod 1 in 1970 and Lunokhod 2 in 1973.[24][25][26] Measuring the return time of the pulse yields a very accurate measure of the distance. These measurements are fitted to the equations of motion. This yields numerical values for the Moon's secular deceleration, i.e. negative acceleration, in longitude and the rate of change of the semimajor axis of the Earth–Moon ellipse. From the period 1970–2015, the results are:

−25.97 ± 0.05 arcsecond/century2 in ecliptic longitude[18][27]
+38.30 ± 0.08 mm/yr in the mean Earth–Moon distance[18][27]

This is consistent with results from satellite laser ranging (SLR), a similar technique applied to artificial satellites orbiting Earth, which yields a model for the gravitational field of Earth, including that of the tides. The model accurately predicts the changes in the motion of the Moon.

Finally, ancient observations of solar eclipses give fairly accurate positions for the Moon at those moments. Studies of these observations give results consistent with the value quoted above.[28]

The other consequence of tidal acceleration is the deceleration of the rotation of Earth. The rotation of Earth is somewhat erratic on all time scales (from hours to centuries) due to various causes.[29] The small tidal effect cannot be observed in a short period, but the cumulative effect on Earth's rotation as measured with a stable clock (ephemeris time, International Atomic Time) of a shortfall of even a few milliseconds every day becomes readily noticeable in a few centuries. Since some event in the remote past, more days and hours have passed (as measured in full rotations of Earth) (Universal Time) than would be measured by stable clocks calibrated to the present, longer length of the day (ephemeris time). This is known as ΔT. Recent values can be obtained from the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS).[30] A table of the actual length of the day in the past few centuries is also available.[31]

From the observed change in the Moon's orbit, the corresponding change in the length of the day can be computed (where "cy" means "century", d day, s second, ms millisecond, 10−3 s, and ns nanosecond, 10−9 s):

+2.4 ms/d/century or +88 s/cy2 or +66 ns/d2.

However, from historical records over the past 2700 years the following average value is found:

+1.72 ± 0.03 ms/d/century[32][33][34][35] or +63 s/cy2 or +47 ns/d2. (i.e. an accelerating cause is responsible for -0.7 ms/d/cy)

By twice integrating over the time, the corresponding cumulative value is a parabola having a coefficient of T2 (time in centuries squared) of (1/2) 63 s/cy2 :

ΔT = (1/2) 63 s/cy2 T2 = +31 s/cy2 T2.

Opposing the tidal deceleration of Earth is a mechanism that is in fact accelerating the rotation. Earth is not a sphere, but rather an ellipsoid that is flattened at the poles. SLR has shown that this flattening is decreasing. The explanation is that during the ice age large masses of ice collected at the poles, and depressed the underlying rocks. The ice mass started disappearing over 10000 years ago, but Earth's crust is still not in hydrostatic equilibrium and is still rebounding (the relaxation time is estimated to be about 4000 years). As a consequence, the polar diameter of Earth increases, and the equatorial diameter decreases (Earth's volume must remain the same). This means that mass moves closer to the rotation axis of Earth, and that Earth's moment of inertia decreases. This process alone leads to an increase of the rotation rate (phenomenon of a spinning figure skater who spins ever faster as they retract their arms). From the observed change in the moment of inertia the acceleration of rotation can be computed: the average value over the historical period must have been about −0.6 ms/d/century. This largely explains the historical observations.

Other cases of tidal acceleration

[edit]

Most natural satellites of the planets undergo tidal acceleration to some degree (usually small), except for the two classes of tidally decelerated bodies. In most cases, however, the effect is small enough that even after billions of years most satellites will not actually be lost. The effect is probably most pronounced for Mars's second moon Deimos, which may become an Earth-crossing asteroid after it leaks out of Mars's grip.[36] The effect also arises between different components in a binary star.[37]

Moreover, this tidal effect isn't solely limited to planetary satellites; it also manifests between different components within a binary star system. The gravitational interactions within such systems can induce tidal forces, leading to fascinating dynamics between the stars or their orbiting bodies, influencing their evolution and behavior over cosmic timescales.

Tidal deceleration

[edit]
In tidal acceleration (1), a satellite orbits in the same direction as (but slower than) its parent body's rotation. The nearer tidal bulge (red) attracts the satellite more than the farther bulge (blue), imparting a net positive force (dotted arrows showing forces resolved into their components) in the direction of orbit, lifting it into a higher orbit.
In tidal deceleration (2) with the rotation reversed, the net force opposes the direction of orbit, lowering it.

This comes in two varieties:

  1. Fast satellites: Some inner moons of the giant planets and Phobos orbit within the synchronous orbit radius so that their orbital period is shorter than their planet's rotation. In other words, they orbit their planet faster than the planet rotates. In this case the tidal bulges raised by the moon on their planet lag behind the moon, and act to decelerate it in its orbit. The net effect is a decay of that moon's orbit as it gradually spirals towards the planet. The planet's rotation also speeds up slightly in the process. In the distant future these moons will strike the planet or cross within their Roche limit and be tidally disrupted into fragments. However, all such moons in the Solar System are very small bodies and the tidal bulges raised by them on the planet are also small, so the effect is usually weak and the orbit decays slowly. The moons affected are: Some hypothesize that after the Sun becomes a red giant, its surface rotation will be much slower and it will cause tidal deceleration of any remaining planets.[38]
  2. Retrograde satellites: All retrograde satellites experience tidal deceleration to some degree because their orbital motion and their planet's rotation are in opposite directions, causing restoring forces from their tidal bulges. A difference to the previous "fast satellite" case here is that the planet's rotation is also slowed down rather than sped up (angular momentum is still conserved because in such a case the values for the planet's rotation and the moon's revolution have opposite signs). The only satellite in the Solar System for which this effect is non-negligible is Neptune's moon Triton. All the other retrograde satellites are on distant orbits and tidal forces between them and the planet are negligible.

Mercury and Venus are believed to have no satellites chiefly because any hypothetical satellite would have suffered deceleration long ago and crashed into the planets due to the very slow rotation speeds of both planets; in addition, Venus also has retrograde rotation.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tidal acceleration

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tidal acceleration refers to the secular changes in the orbital and dynamics of a planet-satellite system arising from , where differential gravitational forces create tidal bulges that, due to the planet's faster , lag behind the line connecting the two bodies, generating torques that transfer from the planet's to the satellite's . In the Earth-Moon system, this process primarily results from the Moon's gravitational influence on Earth's oceans and , dissipating energy through and . The primary effects include a deceleration of , which lengthens the day by approximately 2.3 milliseconds per century, and an of the Moon's orbital motion, causing it to recede from Earth at a rate of about 3.8 centimeters per year. These changes are driven by tidal dissipation, with the majority originating from terrestrial sources such as ocean tides, leading to a lunar deceleration of -25.97 ± 0.05 arcseconds per century squared and an increase in the Earth-Moon distance that has already expanded the lunar semimajor axis by roughly 38.3 millimeters annually. Over geological timescales, this has resulted in shorter days in the past—for instance, Earth's day was about 21.9 hours 620 million years ago—and the Moon's orbit was correspondingly closer. In addition to the dominant Earth-Moon interaction, tidal acceleration influences other systems, such as causing most moons in the solar system to become tidally locked, where their rotation periods match their orbital periods, as seen with the relative to . Long-term projections suggest that continued tidal evolution could lead to mutual tidal locking of and the in approximately 50 billion years, synchronizing with the . Observations from lunar laser ranging confirm these rates with high precision, aligning geophysical models of tidal dissipation within 1% accuracy.

Basic Principles

Definition and Mechanism

Tidal acceleration refers to the long-term, secular increase in a satellite's orbital resulting from tidal between the orbiting body and its primary, which causes the satellite's to expand gradually while slowing the primary's rotation. This process arises primarily from dissipative effects in the primary's deformable layers, such as oceans or solid mantle, leading to a net transfer of from the primary's spin to the satellite's . The underlying prerequisite for understanding tidal acceleration is the concept of tides themselves, which stem from differential gravitational forces exerted by the satellite on the primary. In the equilibrium theory of tides, first proposed by , these forces are assumed to produce static bulges aligned with the line connecting the two bodies, representing an idealized, non-dissipative response. In contrast, the dynamic theory accounts for the primary's rotation and frictional dissipation, which cause the tidal bulges to lag behind the equilibrium position, introducing energy loss and torque; this distinction is crucial, as tidal acceleration pertains only to these secular, dissipative effects rather than short-term, periodic tidal variations like daily ocean height changes. The basic mechanism begins with the 's gravity creating two tidal bulges on the primary: one facing the satellite due to stronger pull on the near side, and another on the far side due to inertial effects relative to the primary's . When the primary faster than the satellite orbits—as in the Earth-Moon system—this rotation drags the tidal bulges ahead of the satellite's position, generating a gravitational because the bulges are asymmetrically placed. This torque accelerates the satellite in its , increasing its distance and , while the reaction torque decelerates the primary's rotation. The theoretical recognition of tidal effects on orbits dates to Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), where he first described how gravitational attractions produce tides and qualitatively linked them to perturbations in celestial motions, though without quantifying the frictional acceleration.

Tidal Bulges and Gravitational Torque

Tidal bulges arise from the differential gravitational forces exerted by a satellite on a primary body, such as a planet, stretching it into an ellipsoidal shape aligned with the line connecting their centers of mass. This deformation creates two bulges: one on the near side facing the satellite, where gravitational pull is strongest, and one on the far side, where the primary's own gravity dominates over the weakened satellite pull, resulting in relative outward displacement. In bodies like Earth, these bulges manifest in both the solid crust and the oceans; the solid Earth deforms elastically by a few meters, while ocean tides can reach tens of meters due to water's lower rigidity and freer mobility. Friction and material dissipation prevent the bulges from perfectly aligning with the instantaneous sub-satellite point, introducing a phase lag. In the oceans, frictional drag against the seafloor and continents causes the tidal bulge to trail behind the equilibrium position as Earth's rotation overtakes the orbital motion. For the solid Earth, the viscoelastic response—where the mantle and crust behave as a viscous-elastic material—leads to a time-dependent deformation, characterized by a phase lag angle δ between the applied tidal potential and the resulting bulge. This lag, typically small (δ ≈ 0.01–0.1 radians for terrestrial bodies, e.g., ≈0.05 radians for Earth), quantifies energy dissipation efficiency, often related to the tidal quality factor Q via sin 2δ ≈ 1/Q for weak dissipation, where lower Q indicates higher frictional losses. The misaligned tidal bulges generate a gravitational on the primary, as the pulls more strongly on the leading bulge than the trailing one, creating a net rotational . To derive the tidal τ, consider the 's gravitational inducing a tidal deformation in the primary, modeled as a perturbed moment. The k₂ measures the ratio of the induced tidal to the perturbing , accounting for the body's rigidity; for a body, k₂ = 1.5, but it is reduced (k₂ ≈ 0.3 for ) by elastic resistance. The arises from the interaction energy between the and this lagged , yielding the standard formula: τ=3GMs2Rp5k2sin⁡2δ2a6\tau = \frac{3 G M_s^2 R_p^5 k_2 \sin 2 \delta}{2 a^6} Here, G is the gravitational constant, M_s the satellite mass, R_p the primary radius, and a the orbital semi-major axis. This expression is obtained by expanding the tidal potential in spherical harmonics (dominant l=2, m=2 mode for circular orbits), computing the phase-lagged response via the complex Love number k₂ e^{-i 2\delta} ≈ k₂ (1 - i \sin 2 \delta) for small δ, and integrating the resulting torque as the negative gradient of the mutual potential energy with respect to the angular misalignment. The derivation assumes a linear response and neglects higher-order eccentricity effects. This transfers from the primary's spin to the satellite's , slowing the primary's while expanding the orbit, while the phase lag dissipates orbital energy as heat through tidal friction in both oceanic and components. The 's magnitude scales inversely with the of the orbital (a^{-6}), making it highly sensitive to close-in configurations, and depends on the rate through the tidal (affecting δ in frequency-dependent models). Material properties influence it via k₂, which reflects rigidity, and the dissipation parameter sin 2δ (or ), where efficient dissipators (low ) produce stronger torques for given geometry.

Earth-Moon System

Historical Discovery and Evidence

The earliest recognition of the Moon's apparent acceleration in its dates to 1695, when compared ancient eclipse records with contemporary observations, noting discrepancies that suggested a long-term increase in the Moon's . This qualitative insight laid the groundwork for quantitative investigations into what would later be understood as tidal effects. In 1749, Richard Dunthorne provided the first numerical estimate, analyzing ancient s to quantify the secular acceleration at approximately +10 arcseconds per century², confirming Halley's suspicion through systematic comparison of historical timings. advanced the theoretical framework in 1786 by linking this acceleration to tidal interactions, proposing that perturbations from Earth's tides could account for the observed motion, though his initial model overestimated the effect. refined this in 1853, correcting the secular term to 8.85 arcseconds per century² by incorporating more precise data and orbital perturbations, isolating the tidal component from other influences. During the late , further refined tidal theory in the , developing viscous and elastico-viscous models that explained secular changes in and the Moon's orbit through frictional dissipation, predicting historical configurations where the day and were synchronized at shorter periods. In the , confirmation came from reanalysis of ancient records against modern ephemerides, revealing cumulative deviations consistent with tidal slowing of , while atomic clocks since the 1950s provided a stable reference to measure ongoing deceleration without relying on variable astronomical timings. Geological and paleontological evidence extends this timeline deep into Earth's history, with tidal rhythmites—layered sedimentary deposits known as tidalites—from the late Proterozoic era (~650 million years ago) in South Australia recording approximately 13.1 lunar months per year and solar days per lunar month of 30.5, implying a closer Moon at about 58 Earth radii and supporting gradual orbital recession. Fossil records, such as banded deposits from ~620 million years ago, indicate 21.9-hour days based on cyclic laminations influenced by tidal and rotational forces, including Coriolis effects preserved in sedimentary patterns. Post-2000 computational modeling has addressed gaps in these early theories by integrating high-resolution ocean tide simulations with orbital dynamics, reconstructing paleogeometries and varying rates (6–24 hours) to simulate the full 4.5 billion-year Earth-Moon evolution, revealing dynamic dissipation rates that refine historical estimates without assuming constant friction.

Effects on Rotation and Orbit

Tidal acceleration in the Earth-Moon system manifests primarily through the slowing of Earth's and the outward migration of the Moon's , driven by the gravitational interaction between the two bodies and Earth's deforming oceans. The Moon's pull on Earth's tidal bulges creates a that opposes the planet's spin, resulting in tidal braking that lengthens the day by +2.3 milliseconds per century. This secular increase in the length of day () arises from the dissipation of in the oceans and , making it the main long-term driver of changes in rate. Over time, this cumulative slowing contributes to the growing , the discrepancy between atomic time () and rotation-based (UT1), which has reached approximately 70 seconds since 1820 and requires periodic adjustments in global timekeeping to maintain synchronization with astronomical events. Conservation of transfers from to the 's , causing the to recede at a rate of 38.3 mm per year. This ongoing recession elongates the lunar , presently 27.3 days, as the spirals outward in a nearly circular path. The process will eventually stabilize in about 50 billion years, when period synchronizes with the expanded lunar , halting further changes and establishing a mutual tidal lock. These effects extend to broader geophysical and climatic consequences. The progressive lengthening of days alters diurnal cycles, potentially intensifying patterns through extended periods of solar heating and cooling, which could influence atmospheric dynamics and distribution over geological timescales. Moreover, the Moon's stabilizes Earth's obliquity at 23.4°, confining variations to 22.1°–24.5° and thereby preserving consistent seasonal climates; absent this lunar influence, greater obliquity fluctuations would trigger extreme climatic instability, including ice ages or hothouse conditions. Post-2015 observations reveal subtle variations in these dynamics, attributed to evolving tide patterns. Data from the satellites through 2023 indicate minor fluctuations in tidal energy dissipation, linked to climate-induced changes like sea-level rise and altered circulation, which slightly modulate both the rotational slowdown and recession rates. A 2025 study has detected a small climate-induced increase in the lunar recession rate due to enhanced tidal dissipation from global warming. In a hypothetical scenario where the Moon's orbit was retrograde—meaning it would circle Earth in the opposite direction to Earth's rotation (from east to west when viewed from above the north pole), unlike its current prograde orbit in the same direction as Earth's rotation—tidal friction would produce contrasting effects. The reversed relative motion would lead to a torque that accelerates Earth's rotation while causing the Moon's orbit to decay inward, spiraling toward Earth over long timescales, potentially resulting in orbital instability or capture. This is analogous to observed retrograde satellites like Neptune's Triton, where tidal interactions drive inward migration.

Angular Momentum and Energy Transfer

In the Earth-Moon system, tidal interactions ensure the conservation of total , which is the sum of the Earth's spin LspinL_{\text{spin}} and the Moon's orbital LorbitL_{\text{orbit}}. The gravitational arising from the misalignment of tidal bulges transfers from the Earth's rotation to the Moon's orbit at a rate where dLorbitdt=−dLspindt\frac{dL_{\text{orbit}}}{dt} = -\frac{dL_{\text{spin}}}{dt}, resulting in a gradual slowdown of Earth's rotation and an outward migration of the Moon. This transfer is accompanied by changes in the system's energy budget. The Moon's recession increases its orbital energy, given by Eorbit=−GMearthMmoon2aE_{\text{orbit}} = -\frac{G M_{\text{earth}} M_{\text{moon}}}{2a} where aa is the semi-major axis, making EorbitE_{\text{orbit}} less negative as aa grows; concurrently, the Earth's rotational kinetic energy decreases. The difference manifests as energy dissipation, primarily through frictional heating, at a rate of approximately 3.7 TW in the present-day system. The dissipation is partitioned such that about 80% occurs in the oceans due to turbulent flows and friction, while 20% takes place in the solid Earth via viscoelastic deformation in the mantle. The efficiency of this process is governed by the tidal quality factor QQ, which quantifies the ratio of energy stored to energy dissipated per tidal cycle; lower QQ values indicate higher dissipation rates. Over geological timescales, these dynamics drive the long-term evolution toward tidal locking, where Earth's rotation period would match the Moon's orbital period, projected to occur in about 50 billion years. The Sun's tidal influence currently perturbs the Earth-Moon momentum exchange and contributes to the observed imbalance.

Quantitative Models and Measurements

The quantitative modeling of tidal acceleration in the Earth-Moon system relies on secular perturbation equations derived from tidal torque and angular momentum conservation, assuming a constant phase lag or quality factor QQ for dissipation. The rate of change of the Moon's orbital semi-major axis aa, known as the orbital recession rate a˙\dot{a}, is given by a˙=3k2MmoonRearth5ΩearthQMeartha5,\dot{a} = \frac{3 k_2 M_\text{moon} R_\text{earth}^5 \Omega_\text{earth}}{Q M_\text{earth} a^5}, where k2k_2 is the tidal Love number of the second degree for Earth, MmoonM_\text{moon} and MearthM_\text{earth} are the masses of the Moon and Earth, RearthR_\text{earth} is Earth's radius, Ωearth\Omega_\text{earth} is Earth's spin angular velocity, and QQ is the tidal dissipation quality factor. This model captures the transfer of angular momentum from Earth's rotation to the lunar orbit, leading to a gradual increase in aa. Empirical determination from Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data, utilizing retroreflectors placed by Apollo missions and continued through modern observatories, yields a˙=38.30±0.08\dot{a} = 38.30 \pm 0.08 mm/yr as of analyses incorporating data up to 2024. The corresponding slowdown in Earth's rotation rate Ω˙earth\dot{\Omega}_\text{earth} arises from the reaction torque and is expressed as Ω˙earth=−3k2Mmoon2Rearth5QIeartha6,\dot{\Omega}_\text{earth} = -\frac{3 k_2 M_\text{moon}^2 R_\text{earth}^5}{Q I_\text{earth} a^6}, where IearthI_\text{earth} is Earth's moment of inertia. This results in a secular increase in the length of day (LOD) of approximately +2.3 ms per century due to tidal effects. The cumulative effect on timekeeping is modeled by the quadratic polynomial ΔT=31 s/cy2 t2\Delta T = 31 \, \text{s/cy}^2 \, t^2, where ΔT\Delta T is the accumulated difference between Earth's rotation-based time and uniform atomic time, and tt is time in centuries from a reference epoch such as J2000. Measurements of these parameters combine multiple techniques for precision. LLR provides direct ranging to the Moon's surface with millimeter accuracy, enabling and recession tracking over decades. Earth's rotation variations, including tidal contributions to LOD, are monitored via (VLBI), which achieves sub-millisecond resolution in and . Satellite altimetry missions, such as operating in the 2020s, map ocean tidal heights globally, revealing annual variations in tidal dissipation of about 0.5% that refine input parameters for the models. Refinements to these models since 2015 incorporate advanced ocean simulations and responses to address discrepancies between predicted and observed . The Finite Element Solution (FES) ocean model, updated from FES2014 to FES2022, integrates higher-resolution and assimilation of altimetry from multiple satellites, improving tidal loading estimates by up to 20% in coastal regions. Additionally, post-2015 studies on mantle anelasticity, using viscoelastic models constrained by seismic and tidal observations, quantify internal contributions that fill gaps in QQ variability, enhancing long-term simulations of the Earth-Moon .

Tidal Acceleration in Other Systems

Satellite-Planet Interactions

In satellite-planet systems, tidal acceleration primarily affects prograde satellites whose orbital is slower than the planet's spin rate, leading to a gravitational that transfers from the planet's rotation to the satellite's , causing gradual orbital . This process is most pronounced for satellites exterior to the planet's , where the tidal bulges lead the sub-satellite point. For example, most of Jupiter's prograde moons, such as the satellites, experience this acceleration due to Jupiter's rapid rotation (period ~10 hours) compared to their orbital periods (1.8–17 days). The recession rate scales inversely with the semi-major axis as a−11/2a^{-11/2}, reflecting the strong dependence of tidal on orbital distance. In the Jovian system, the inner —Io, Europa, and Ganymede—are locked in a 4:2:1 , which maintains their orbital eccentricities against tidal damping and prevents individual while allowing collective outward migration of the system. For Io, the closest moon, this resonance-induced eccentricity (e ≈ 0.004) drives intense , deforming the satellite by up to 50 m and generating frictional dissipation that powers widespread , with over 400 active volcanoes and a global of ~100 TW. Europa and Ganymede experience milder but significant tidal effects from the resonance, sustaining subsurface beneath their icy shells through ongoing dissipation in the and rocky mantles, with Europa's ocean decoupled from the shell to enhance heating efficiency. Unlike the Earth- system, where the Moon recedes at ~3.8 cm/yr, the Jovian resonance stabilizes the inner moons' configuration over billions of years. The Martian moons provide a contrasting example of tidal acceleration's varied impacts. Phobos, orbiting inside Mars' synchronous radius (~6 Mars radii), experiences tidal deceleration and inward spiral due to trailing bulges, with an orbital decay rate of ~1.8–21 cm/yr depending on models, potentially leading to ring formation or impact in 10–100 million years. In contrast, Deimos, exterior to synchronous orbit, undergoes slow outward recession at ~1–2 mm/yr, with negligible evolutionary changes over the solar system's age due to its small mass and distance (~6.3 Mars radii). Beyond the Solar System, tidal acceleration drives inward migration in close-in exoplanet-satellite analogs, particularly hot Jupiters, where disk migration halts at a tidal barrier (~0.03–0.05 AU) before stellar tides cause further . This process, combined with planetary , inflates by 10–20% through internal heating, as seen in TESS-detected worlds like WASP-121b (period ~1.3 days, radius ~1.9 R_J), where contributes significantly to observed bloating beyond irradiation effects. Recent TESS data from the reveal dozens of such inflated gas giants with eccentricities suggesting ongoing tidal . Modern numerical simulations of multi-moon systems incorporate coupled orbital-spin dynamics and variable dissipation to model long-term evolution, revealing instabilities like Laplace plane disruptions that can eject outer moons while accelerating inner ones' recession. For instance, in simulated warm systems (periods 10–200 days), moon-planet tides drive inward migration of satellites below the , altering planetary obliquity and spin equilibrium over Gyr timescales, with applications to both Solar System and extrasolar architectures.

Binary and Stellar Systems

In systems, tidal forces act mutually on both components due to their comparable masses, generating bulges that exert gravitational torques leading to orbital circularization and spin synchronization. Unlike hierarchical systems with a dominant primary, these equal dissipate through turbulent in stellar envelopes, transferring between the orbital motion and the stars' rotations until the system reaches equilibrium, where spins align with the . This process resolves aspects of the Algol paradox in binaries like (β Persei), where the formerly mass-losing secondary, now the more massive primary, achieves rapid rotation through combined mass accretion and tidal spin-up, preventing the expected slower spin from evolutionary expansion. Tidal torques in these systems drive orbital migration depending on the spin-orbit alignment: if stellar spins exceed the orbital , torques transfer from rotation to , causing expansion and recession; conversely, sub-synchronous spins lead to orbital . Energy from this dissipation is primarily absorbed in the convective zones of the stars' envelopes, heating them and potentially enhancing mass loss or activity. For close binaries, this migration can alter evolutionary paths, such as delaying mergers in pairs by circularizing eccentric and expanding separations through pseudo-synchronization, where spins lock to the orbital rather than the period. Observational evidence from space-based photometry confirms these effects, with Kepler and TESS missions (2010s–2020s) analyzing thousands of eclipsing binaries to measure rotation periods and orbital eccentricities, revealing widespread within ~10 days orbital periods and spin-up signatures in short-period systems. For instance, TESS data on over 1,000 eclipsing binaries show tidal quality factors (Q) constraining dissipation efficiency, with synchronized fractions increasing sharply for periods below 3 days, indicating torque-driven exchange. In binaries, such observations, combined with asteroseismology, demonstrate tidal delays in merger timelines, as circularization reduces gravitational wave-driven inspiral rates. Theoretical models describe these dynamics through the Darwin instability, which destabilizes close binaries when the orbital falls below three times the total spin , triggering rapid decay and merger if separations drop below a critical radius (a_Darwin ≈ √(3I/μ), where I is the and μ the ). This instability sets limits on stable configurations, particularly for mass ratios q < 0.072 for main-sequence stars. Recent gravitational wave detections by LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA, including post-2023 events in O4, constrain tidal dissipation via the quality factor Q in neutron star binaries, with GW170817 providing initial bounds on tidal deformability (Λ < 800) that inform Q values around 10^5–10^7, filling gaps in models for compact object tides.

Tidal Deceleration and Orbit Decay

Mechanisms of Decay

Tidal deceleration, or orbital decay, arises in systems where the satellite's orbital angular velocity exceeds the primary body's rotational angular velocity, or in cases of retrograde orbits, leading to a reversal in the direction of angular momentum transfer compared to the standard acceleration scenario. A retrograde orbit means the satellite circles the primary in the opposite direction to the primary's rotation (from east to west when viewed from the north pole), unlike the current prograde orbit of the Moon around Earth. In such configurations, the tidal bulge on the primary lags behind the line connecting the centers of the two bodies due to the primary's slower rotation, resulting in a gravitational torque that transfers angular momentum from the satellite's orbit to the primary's spin, thereby shrinking the orbit (da/dt < 0). For instance, if the Moon's orbit were retrograde, tidal friction would cause it to spiral inward toward Earth, accelerating Earth's rotation. This condition is met when the satellite is interior to the synchronous orbit radius, where the orbital mean motion n > Ω_primary, or for retrograde satellites where the relative motion enhances the lag. The responsible for this decay can be expressed through a modified form of the general tidal torque equation, where the magnitude remains proportional to the tidal dissipation rate, but the direction reverses based on the relative velocities: τ ∝ sign(Ω_primary - n_orbit) × (dissipation factor). Although energy is continuously dissipated through tidal friction in both acceleration and decay phases—converting into —the sign reversal ensures that the orbital energy loss dominates, causing the semi-major axis to decrease while the primary's rotation accelerates toward . This framework builds on the basic from tidal bulges but inverts its effect for sub-synchronous satellites. Tidal friction plays a central role in driving decay by providing the viscous dissipation necessary to maintain the lag angle of the tidal bulge, with enhanced in close, fast accelerating the inspiral process. As the orbit shrinks, intensifies due to increased strain rates, potentially leading to significant buildup in the primary or satellite until the system approaches the , where tidal disruption may occur. This dissipation is particularly pronounced in bodies with high tidal quality factors (low Q), amplifying the rate of transfer and orbital contraction. Theoretical models of tidal decay have evolved from classical viscoelastic treatments to more sophisticated frameworks incorporating frequency-dependent . For extreme cases involving high velocities or compact systems, post-Newtonian approximations account for relativistic corrections to the tidal field, modifying the and loss rates beyond Newtonian . Recent simulations from the 2020s emphasize refined models, such as turbulent in stellar or planetary envelopes, to better predict rates and orbital timescales, revealing dependencies on internal and composition that influence decay paths.

Examples in the Solar System

One prominent example of tidal deceleration in the Solar System is the Martian moon Phobos, which orbits at a distance of approximately 9,400 km from Mars with a of 7.65 hours. Tidal friction within Mars causes Phobos' orbit to decay inward at a rate of about 1.8 meters per century, driven by the gravitational interaction that transfers from the moon's orbit to the planet's rotation. This rapid , shorter than Mars' rotation, results in the moon rising in the west and setting in the east twice daily as viewed from the surface. Due to this ongoing decay, Phobos is expected to reach Mars' in 30 to 50 million years, where tidal forces will likely disrupt it into a around the planet. Another key case is Neptune's largest moon, Triton, which follows a retrograde inclined at about 157 degrees to Neptune's . This unusual trajectory, likely resulting from capture during the early Solar System, leads to strong tidal interactions that cause Triton's to spiral inward at a rate on the order of several centimeters per year, as modeled from flyby data and refined by subsequent astrometric observations through the early . The retrograde motion enhances tidal dissipation in , accelerating the decay and heating effects on Triton, which manifests in its cryovolcanic activity. Over billions of years, this process will bring Triton within Neptune's , leading to its tidal disruption and potential formation of new rings, estimated to occur in approximately 3.6 billion years. In the Pluto-Charon system, mutual tidal forces have resulted in synchronous rotation for both bodies, where and always present the same face to each other, with an of 6.4 days. This double synchronous state arose from intense tidal interactions following Charon's formation, likely from a giant impact, which rapidly circularized the and locked their rotations within about 1 million years. Similarly, Saturn's rings may trace their origin to the tidal disruption of ancient moons that decayed into the planet's , with debris from such events contributing to the current ring structure and inner moons like Pan and Atlas, as supported by dynamical models of past satellite instabilities. Recent observations from NASA's Juno mission, extending into 2021 and beyond, have illuminated tidal dynamics around , detecting subtle gravitational signatures from tidal bulges induced by its . These measurements indicate minor influences on moons like Io and Europa due to tidal dissipation within , though resonances maintain their eccentricities and limit net decay rates to negligible levels over human timescales.

References

  1. https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/celestial/Celestial/node54.html
  2. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2007/ph210/mccourt1/
  3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10569-016-9702-3
  4. https://science.nasa.gov/moon/tidal-locking/
  5. https://core2.gsfc.nasa.gov/ggfc/tides/intro.html
  6. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19890002733/downloads/19890002733.pdf
  7. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-principia/
  8. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_tides/tides03_gravity.html
  9. https://web.gps.caltech.edu/classes/ge131/notes2023/Chapter_18.pdf
  10. https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/celestial/Celestial/node53.html
  11. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2014/11/aa24211-14/aa24211-14.html
  12. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0803.3299
  13. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/26/pdf
  14. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1981JBAA...91..136S
  15. https://www.academia.edu/2361091/Dunthorne_Mayer_and_Lalande_on_the_Secular_Acceleration_of_the_Moon
  16. https://sailingissues.com/HistoireMarees.pdf
  17. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/XVII.-On-the-secular-variation-of-the-moon%27s-mean-Adams/ac4d5fafa7f63b949ddb659e2cc93406ea500acb
  18. https://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1908_TidalFriction_Vol.2_A1070.pdf
  19. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1468-4004.2003.44222.x
  20. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpe1952/38/6/38_6_475/_article
  21. https://www.earthdate.org/files/000/002/134/EarthDate_168_C.pdf
  22. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021JE006875
  23. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2016/pdf/1096.pdf
  24. https://www.universetoday.com/127263/when-will-earth-lock-to-the-moon/
  25. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993Natur.361..615L/abstract
  26. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/08/aa55498-25/aa55498-25.html
  27. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1973MNRAS.164...21W
  28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JB073i004p01497
  29. https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0308162
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285098/
  31. https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/dutc.html
  32. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/space-geodesy-techniques/slr/lunar-laser-ranging-data
  33. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1538-3873/acf787
  34. https://sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/jason-3/summary/
  35. https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/data/products/auxiliary-products/global-tide-fes/release-fes22.html
  36. https://www.kiss.caltech.edu/final_reports/Tidal_Heating_final_report.pdf
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46583661_Tidal_Evolution_of_Exoplanets
  38. https://www.lpl.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Tidal_Heating_122022.pdf
  39. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2021/11/aa41311-21/aa41311-21.html
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374131443_Comparative_Study_of_Tidal_Evolution_of_Mars-Phobos-Deimos_Based_on_Kinematic_Model_and_Based_on_Seismic_Model
  41. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/08/aa33486-18/aa33486-18.html
  42. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020JE006629
  43. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00161
  44. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8624
  45. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/329/4/897/1006568
  46. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2007/03/aa5776-06.pdf
  47. https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4870
  48. https://aasnova.org/2022/04/01/tidal-dissipation-makes-the-binary-go-round/
  49. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/adf10d
  50. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/524/4/5575/7227930
  51. https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0134
  52. https://themikelau.github.io/notes/darwin.pdf
  53. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
  54. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06155
  55. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.2270B/abstract
  56. https://www.space.com/20346-phobos-moon.html
  57. https://science.nasa.gov/resource/phobos-in-orbit-around-mars/
  58. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015JE004943
  59. https://burro.astr.cwru.edu/Academics/Astr221/Gravity/phobos.html
  60. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1989A%26A...219L..23C
  61. https://www.britannica.com/place/Triton-satellite-of-Neptune
  62. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/12/aa38858-20/aa38858-20.html
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001910352100508X
  64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21151108/
  65. https://aasnova.org/2021/04/21/raising-tides-on-jupiter-with-its-moons/
  66. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6cf9
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.