Hubbry Logo
Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist RepublicTuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist RepublicMain
Open search
Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic
Community hub
Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic
Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic
Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (Russian: Тувинская Автономная Советская Социалистическая Республика; Tuvan: Тыва Автономнуг Совет Социалистиг Республика), or the Tuvan ASSR (Russian: Тувинская АССР; Tuvan: Тыва АССР), was an autonomous republic of the Russian SFSR. It was created on 10 October 1961 from the Tuvan Autonomous Oblast.[1] Its territory measured 175,000 square kilometers and bordered Mongolia to the south, Buryat ASSR to the east, Gorno-Altai Autonomous Oblast to the west and Khakas Autonomous Oblast to the north.[2]

Key Information

History

[edit]

The Tuvan ASSR was awarded the Order of Lenin on 9 October 1964 to commemorate its 20th anniversary of its incorporation into the Soviet Union, as well as the Order of Friendship of Peoples on 29 December 1972 to honor the 50th anniversary of the USSR.[3] The highest organ of government in the Tuvan ASSR was the Supreme Soviet of the Tuvan ASSR, made up of 130 deputies on five-year terms.[3]

Dissolution

[edit]

1990 saw the beginning of ethnic clashes between minority Russians and majority Tuvans, although according to Estonian politician and writer Toomas Alatalu, the magnitude of these attacks were largely exaggerated by the Russian media.[4] This came as a result of numerous policies alienating the indigenous population in favor of the minority Russian population, such as the policy of the compulsory admittance of sons of cattle-raisers' children to Russian boarding schools.[4]

According to Alatalu, Tuva had become a bastion of Soviet Conservatism fueled by the strong partocracy which had grown within the small republic, despite ethnic tensions. The Tuvan elections of 1990 was the first time since the incorporation of Tuva into the USSR that all three positions of power within the Tuvan administration were held by ethnic Tuvans. The 1991 Russian presidential election saw Tuva being one of the few autonomous republics to overwhelmingly vote for the Communist Party candidate Nikolai Ryzhkov, with 65% of the vote going to Ryzhkov and 15% for Boris Yeltsin.[4] In 1991 a democratic coalition of forces, including youth leaders and intellectuals, initiated a hunger strike on 27 August, demanding the resignation of the republic's leadership. On 28 August, a meeting of Parliament was called, where Chimit-Dorzhu Ondar, then Chairman of the Supreme Soviet, resigned, and all property of the Communist Party was absorbed by the government.[5] This action led to the dissolution of the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. On 31 March 1992, its successor, the Tuva Republic, became a constituent member of the Russian Federation.

Economy

[edit]

The Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic's economy was mostly composed of two primary sectors, agriculture and mineral extraction, its principal crops were wheat and barley.[3] In contrast to largely indigenous agriculture, Tuvan industry was largely fueled by Russian immigrant labour.[4]

Demographics

[edit]

Despite Russian immigration and the education system both secondary and post-secondary being carried out almost exclusively in Russian by the 1990s, Tuvans remained the largest ethnicity in Tuva (approximately 206,000 residents were of Tuvan ethnicity, and 98,000 were of Russian ethnicity in 1990).[4] For much of its existence, the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was home to numerous prison camps as well as labor colonies.[4]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was an autonomous subdivision of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic within the Soviet Union, established on 10 October 1961 through the upgrading of the preceding Tuvan Autonomous Oblast and dissolved on 31 March 1992 amid the USSR's collapse, thereafter becoming the Republic of Tuva in the Russian Federation. Its territory encompassed the historical region of Tuva, a sparsely populated area of approximately 170,000 square kilometers centered on the upper Yenisei River basin, with Kyzyl as its capital. The republic's population, predominantly ethnic Tuvans—a Turkic-speaking people with roots in nomadic herding and shamanistic-Buddhist traditions—numbered around 300,000 by the late Soviet period, sustained largely by livestock rearing, forestry, and emerging mineral extraction industries such as asbestos and coal mining. The entity's origins trace to the 1944 annexation of the , a nominally independent state established in 1921 under heavy Soviet influence following the , which had functioned as a de facto providing resources like to during . This incorporation, formalized via a request from Tuva's pro-Soviet leadership without a popular referendum and initially kept secret from Western Allies, marked one of the Soviet Union's final major territorial expansions before the . Under Soviet administration, the region experienced rapid collectivization, cultural , and suppression of traditional practices, including the near-eradication of Buddhist monasteries, though Tuvan-language education and limited ethnic autonomy were nominally preserved within the ASSR framework. Key defining characteristics included its peripheral status in Soviet governance, with economic development lagging due to isolation and harsh , yet notable for unique cultural exports like Tuvan throat-singing and traditions, which persisted despite ideological pressures favoring in . In the late Soviet era, amid , the ASSR briefly pursued elevation to full union republic status in but failed, reflecting broader tensions in the USSR's federal structure; post-dissolution, retained its borders but grappled with economic stagnation and ethnic assertions independent of Moscow's orbit.

Historical Background

Origins in Tannu Tuva and Pre-Soviet Context

The region of , encompassing the territory that would later form the Tuvan ASSR, was inhabited primarily by Turkic-speaking nomadic herders organized into khoshuun tribal confederations, with economies centered on rearing, , and in furs and hides. In 1757, following the Qing Empire's military campaigns against the , Tannu Uriankhai was incorporated into Qing as part of , functioning under nominal tributary obligations to Chinese ambans in Uliastai and Khovd, though local noyon nobility retained significant autonomy in internal affairs. Chinese administrative control remained indirect, focused on extracting annual fur tributes such as and pelts, while shamanistic and emerging Buddhist practices persisted among the without substantial Han settlement or cultural imposition. Russian expansion into the area accelerated in the late , driven by commercial interests in timber, , and fur trade routes linking to . By the early , Russian merchants and Cossack outposts had established presence in northern , fostering economic dependencies and encouraging local elites to seek protection against potential Chinese or Mongolian encroachments. The Xinhai Revolution in disrupted Qing authority, prompting Tuvan noyons to convene a congress in January 1912 that affirmed alignment with Russian interests over residual Chinese claims or emerging Mongolian autonomy movements. This led to the short-lived declaration in 1911, effectively a separatist initiative backed by St. Petersburg to counter Beijing's influence amid the power vacuum. Formal Russian incorporation followed: in April 1914, Tsar Nicholas II approved the establishment of as a , redesignated , with Russian commissars administering justice, taxation, and foreign relations while preserving Tuvan for internal tribal matters. Russian motivations centered on securing strategic buffer zones against and , exploiting mineral resources, and integrating the into Siberia's administrative framework, evidenced by the construction of postal stations and influx of Russian settlers numbering around 5,000 by 1917. A agreement between Russian officials and Tuvan leaders further entrenched this status by routing all external negotiations exclusively through St. Petersburg, solidifying annexation as the final territorial gain of the Tsarist empire before . This phase, lasting until the 1917 revolutions, marked the transition from Qing-era nominal overlordship to direct European , setting the institutional precedents—such as centralized noyan councils and resource extraction—that would underpin the subsequent Tannu Tuva entity's origins under Bolshevik influence.

Establishment of the Tuvan People's Republic

The , also known as , was proclaimed on 14 August 1921 in the settlement of Khem-Beldyr (later renamed ) by the Tuvan Founding Khural, an assembly convened under Bolshevik influence. This followed a period of instability in the region, formerly , which had been under Russian imperial protection since the late and briefly sought after the . Soviet-backed Tuvan revolutionaries, organized through the newly formed Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party, overthrew the prior pro-Mongolian and Buryat-led administration that had declared independence in 1918, installing a communist aligned with Moscow's directives. The Khural's declaration emphasized socialist principles, including , nationalization of key resources, and suppression of feudal nobility, drawing directly from Leninist models while claiming from Chinese suzerainty—though China had lost effective control after 1911. The assembly included around 62 Tuvan delegates alongside Russian and Mongolian representatives, reflecting heavy Soviet orchestration; military aid from the had been crucial in quelling resistance from White Russian forces and local anti-communist elements during the preceding civil strife. The republic's 1921 established a under the Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party, with executive power vested in a that prioritized collectivization and cultural over time. From inception, the functioned as a Soviet satellite, receiving exclusive diplomatic recognition from the USSR and the , while lacking broader international acknowledgment. Soviet advisors embedded in the government ensured alignment with Moscow's , including border security against potential Chinese incursions and promotion of , though nominal independence allowed to issue its own stamps and until 1944. This establishment marked the culmination of Bolshevik in , transforming a , nomadic society of approximately 60,000 into a nominally entity geared toward Soviet integration.

Soviet Influence and Puppet Governance (1921–1944)

The (TPR), established on August 14, 1921, emerged from a Soviet-backed that overthrew the prior administration, installing the Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party (TPRP) as the sole ruling vanguard entity modeled on Bolshevik structures. This formation followed Soviet military and political assistance, including the involvement of units in suppressing local resistance, ensuring alignment with 's interests amid the Russian Civil War's aftermath and regional power vacuums. Initial governance under leaders like Donduk Kuular pursued nominal independence but leaned toward pan-Mongolist and Buddhist orientations, prompting Moscow to orchestrate a 1929 coup by pro-Soviet Tuvan communists trained at the Communist University of the Toilers of the East. This internal overthrow, supported by Soviet agents, executed Kuular and consolidated power under as TPRP general secretary, marking the onset of overt puppet governance where major policies required Soviet approval. Under Toka's uninterrupted leadership from 1929 until the 1944 annexation, the TPR functioned as a de facto Soviet satellite, with governance centralized in the Little Khural (parliament) and executive councils dominated by TPRP cadres enforcing Moscow-dictated directives. Political repressions intensified in the 1930s, mirroring Stalinist purges; preconditions traced to 1921 Soviet support evolved into mass arrests, executions, and deportations targeting perceived nationalists, lamas, and "counter-revolutionaries," with estimates of thousands affected to eliminate dissent and Buddhist influence. Cultural policies accelerated Russification, including the 1930 adoption of a Latin script (replaced by Cyrillic in 1943), suppression of traditional Tibetan-Mongol writing, and mandatory citizenship for ethnic Russian settlers dispatched by Moscow to dilute Tuvan demographics. Economic control was absolute: collectivization campaigns from 1929–1932 seized nomadic herds into state farms named after Soviet icons like "Road to Communism" and "Stalin," while mineral exploitation (e.g., asbestos, coal) and infrastructure like dams and electrification served USSR resource needs, rendering the TPR economically dependent without reciprocal development benefits. Militarily, Soviet dominance was maintained through informal garrisons and advisory oversight, with the Tuvan army—formed in the and expanded in —equipped via Soviet supplies and integrated into logistics by the early 1940s, often with units masquerading as native forces to obscure occupation. This setup ensured strategic buffering against and , with no independent ; the TPR received diplomatic recognition solely from the USSR and . During , following the June 25, 1941, declaration of war on , the TPR donated its entire reserves (approximately 30 million Soviet rubles), , and formed units that merged into Soviet forces, totaling over 8,000 troops by 1944, underscoring total subordination. These contributions, alongside Toka's petitions, facilitated the , 1944, into the Russian SFSR as the , ending the facade of sovereignty.

Formation and Soviet Integration

Annexation in 1944

On August 17, 1944, the of the Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party, led by General Secretary , adopted a resolution requesting formal incorporation into the , citing economic interdependence and strategic alignment during . This followed prior unaccepted requests in 1939, 1941, and 1943, reflecting Tuva's status as a Soviet-dependent entity since the , with Soviet military and political oversight ensuring compliance. The Little Khural, Tuva's nominal , convened its final session on October 1, 1944, and unanimously approved the petition on October 11, without a public or recorded dissent, amid the region's nomadic demographics and entrenched communist apparatus. The Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR decreed the acceptance that day, designating the territory as the within the Russian SFSR, effective immediately. Toka retained leadership as First Secretary of the local , maintaining continuity in governance. The timing capitalized on Tuva's wartime contributions to the USSR, including 82,000 horses, 630,000 sheep, and monetary gold shipments totaling over 100 kilograms from 1941 to 1944, alongside a declaration of war against on June 22, 1941, and deployment of units. Strategic motives included buffering the Kuzbass industrial basin from potential threats and securing mineral resources, notably deposits critical to the Soviet atomic program. Despite official narratives of voluntary union, the absence of genuine independence—evident in Soviet veto power over Tuva's foreign policy and economy—rendered the process a consolidation of existing control rather than mutual agreement.

Transition to Autonomous Oblast and Upgrade to ASSR in 1961

Following its annexation by the on August 17, 1944, Tuva was formally incorporated as the within the (RSFSR), with the change taking effect on November 1, 1944. This status positioned Tuva as a territorial unit with limited ethnic under direct RSFSR oversight, facilitating centralized control over its administration, , and political institutions while subordinating local governance to Moscow's directives. The oblast framework emphasized integration into the broader Soviet structure, including the imposition of Russian as an administrative alongside Tuvan and the alignment of local policies with Five-Year Plans for resource extraction and collectivization. During the period from 1944 to 1961, Tuva experienced accelerated socioeconomic transformation, marked by the expansion of livestock collectivization—reaching over 90% of herds by the mid-1950s—and the development of mining sectors such as and , which tied the region's economy tightly to Soviet industrial needs. These developments, coupled with from approximately 90,000 in 1944 to around 172,000 by 1959, demonstrated sufficient progress in Soviet-style modernization to justify elevated status, as per the USSR's national delimitation policies that rewarded ethnic territories for achieving socialist consolidation. Local leadership under figures like , who retained influence from the pre-annexation era, enforced ideological conformity, suppressing traditional nomadic practices and Buddhist elements in favor of Marxist-Leninist frameworks. On October 10, 1961, the of the USSR issued a decree elevating the to the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), thereby granting it formal institutions such as its own and , though real power remained vested in the apparatus aligned with central authorities. This upgrade reflected the Soviet leadership's assessment that Tuvans had formed a cohesive socialist , eligible for ASSR-level —higher than an but still subordinate to the RSFSR—amid Khrushchev-era reforms emphasizing administrative rationalization and nominal ethnic . The transition involved minimal structural overhaul, preserving existing borders and retaining as the capital, but it symbolized Tuva's deeper embedding in the union republic until the USSR's dissolution.

Administrative Evolution Until 1992

The Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic operated under the standard administrative framework of ASSRs within the Russian SFSR, featuring a as the primary legislative body and a handling executive functions. This structure emphasized centralized control from while granting nominal autonomy in cultural and local affairs. The capital, , served as the administrative hub, overseeing territorial subdivisions known as kozhuuns—traditional Tuvan units reorganized as raions equivalent to those in other Soviet regions. These divisions facilitated resource management and party oversight, with boundaries adjusted periodically for efficiency in livestock herding and operations, though major reorganizations were rare during the ASSR era. Administrative stability defined the period from to the late 1980s, aligning with broader Soviet policies that prioritized uniformity over regional innovation. in the mid-1980s introduced limited reforms, such as enhanced local planning councils, but these did not alter core institutions or territorial setups significantly. The , comprising deputies elected every five years, enacted decrees on economic quotas and , often mirroring RSFSR directives. No substantial evidence indicates widespread or status elevations until the USSR's unraveling; instead, focused on integrating into Soviet economic networks without deviating from ASSR subordination. As the faced dissolution, administrative evolution accelerated. In early , attempted but failed to upgrade to full union republic status, reflecting aspirations for greater amid Gorbachev's reforms. By October , the renamed the entity the of , dropping "Autonomous Soviet Socialist" to assert sovereignty while remaining within the RSFSR. This change preceded the USSR's formal end in December , paving the way for integration as a republic in the Russian Federation via the March 1992 Federation Treaty, which elevated former ASSRs to equal subject status. The transition marked the cessation of Soviet-era administrative constraints by mid-1992, though legacy structures persisted initially.

Government and Politics

Political Structure and Institutions

The political structure of the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR) conformed to the standard model of Soviet autonomous republics within the (RSFSR), emphasizing centralized control under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) while providing nominal autonomy in cultural and linguistic matters. The highest organ of state power was the unicameral of the Tuvan ASSR, comprising 130 deputies elected for five-year terms through universal, equal, and direct suffrage by . In practice, elections were non-competitive, with candidates nominated and vetted by CPSU organs, ensuring alignment with party directives rather than genuine multiparty contestation. The convened at least twice annually to adopt legislation, including the republic's on May 31, 1978, approve the state budget, and form executive bodies; between sessions, its exercised authority, electing members for five-year terms and handling routine governance. The executive branch was headed by the , the republic's government formed by the and responsible to it, which directed , social services, and administrative functions in accordance with RSFSR and USSR policies. Real decision-making power resided with the Tuvan Republican Committee of the CPSU, whose first secretary effectively controlled appointments and policy implementation, subordinating state institutions to Moscow's oversight on critical issues like security and . By , the CPSU had around 6,100 members in , with comprising 56% of the membership, reflecting partial but ultimate loyalty to central party structures. Local governance operated through (), city, settlement, and village soviets of people's deputies, elected for 2.5-year terms to manage grassroots administration, though these too were guided by party committees. Judicial institutions included the of the Tuvan ASSR, elected by the for five-year terms and divided into criminal and civil divisions, alongside a procurator's office appointed by the USSR Procurator General for five years to supervise legality and prosecute crimes. Despite formal separation, the judiciary functioned within the CPSU framework, prioritizing state interests over independent adjudication. The Tuvan ASSR's 11 deputies in the USSR 's provided token representation at the union level, but autonomy was constrained, with no independent or military control. This structure persisted from the ASSR's formation on October 10, 1961, until its dissolution on March 31, 1992, amid the USSR's collapse.

Key Leaders and Governance Practices

Salchak Toka (1901–1973), a Tuvan communist who had led the Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party since the 1920s, assumed the role of First Secretary of the Tuvan obkom of the CPSU upon in 1944 and retained it through the transition to status and the 1961 upgrade to ASSR, exercising control until his death on May 11, 1973. Under Toka's long tenure, governance prioritized alignment with Moscow's directives, including forced collectivization of nomadic herding economies, suppression of Buddhist institutions, and promotion of Russian-language education and settlement to integrate into the Soviet framework, often at the expense of traditional Tuvan social structures. Toka's wife, , held ceremonial roles such as chairwoman of the Little Khural pre- and later influenced local administration, exemplifying the personalization of power within the party elite. Toka's successor as First Secretary, installed in 1973, was Shirshin, who continued the obkom's oversight of and ideological conformity amid stagnation in the Brezhnev era. Other notable figures included D. Ondar, who served as chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, representing the nominal executive authority. The obkom First Secretary remained the paramount leader, directing the and ensuring policy execution through a network of party cells in enterprises and collective farms. Governance adhered rigidly to the Soviet one-party model, with the unicameral of 130 deputies—elected on five-year terms from party-approved slates—functioning primarily to ratify obkom decisions rather than deliberate independently. Non-competitive elections, lacking opposition candidates, underscored the absence of pluralism, while ethnic composition in bodies like the 1961 (69 , 28 , and others) reflected managed without diluting party control. Practices emphasized centralized resource allocation, surveillance of dissent via organs, and quotas for industrial output, yielding limited autonomy as vetoed deviations, such as local resistance to over-collectivization. This structure perpetuated authoritarian efficiency in policy enforcement but stifled initiative, contributing to economic underperformance relative to RSFSR averages.

Suppression of Dissent and Authoritarian Control

The Tuvan ASSR operated under a one-party system dominated by the Communist Party of Tuva, which enforced ideological conformity and suppressed political opposition through state security organs, including the local branches of the (later ), mirroring broader Soviet practices of surveillance and arrest for . Dissenters, including those advocating Tuvan nationalism or criticizing central policies, faced imprisonment, exile to labor camps, or execution, with repression intensifying during the late era even after formal in 1944. For instance, prominent Tuvan statesmen and intellectuals continued to be targeted in purges, as the regime prioritized loyalty to over local . Salchak Toka, who retained leadership from the pre-annexation period until his death on 11 May 1973, exemplified authoritarian consolidation, ruling with unchecked power and fostering a personal cult that stifled internal challenges and public criticism. Under his tenure, which spanned the transition to ASSR status in , mechanisms of control included rigged elections, of media and cultural expression, and the eradication of independent political groupings, ensuring alignment with CPSU directives. Estimates from archival reviews indicate that repressive campaigns in alone affected 1,200 to 1,700 individuals in , with similar tactics persisting into the ASSR era to preempt any revival of opposition. Religious suppression formed a core element of authoritarian control, targeting and as counter-revolutionary influences; monasteries were closed or destroyed, and thousands of lamas and shamans—out of an estimated 4,000 practitioners—were repressed, imprisoned, or killed, leaving few active religious figures by the mid-20th century. This policy, enforced rigorously post-1944 amid intensified sovietization, aimed to impose and cultural , with overt religious practice remaining criminalized until the late Soviet thaw. Even in the ASSR period, underground rituals persisted under threat of punishment, reflecting the regime's causal prioritization of ideological uniformity over traditional Tuvan spiritual practices.

Economy

Primary Economic Sectors and Resource Extraction

The economy of the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR) during its existence from 1961 to 1991 relied heavily on primary sectors, with forming the backbone of due to the region's arid steppes, mountains, and short growing seasons that limited cultivation to hay and production. Livestock rearing centered on sheep, goats, horses, yaks, and camels, supporting , , hides, and outputs essential for local sustenance and Soviet supply chains; by the late Soviet period, the sector employed a majority of the rural , reflecting continuity from pre-annexation nomadic traditions adapted to collectivized farms (kolkhozy). Mineral extraction emerged as a key driver of industrial development, prioritized by Soviet planners to integrate into the union's resource economy through state-directed investments in infrastructure like rail links to . mining, particularly from deposits near Ak-Dovurak, became the dominant activity, with production scaling up in the – to supply materials for Soviet and ; annual output reached tens of thousands of tons by the 1970s, exported primarily to RSFSR facilities. extraction from fields such as Kyzyl-Tashtyg provided local energy and contributed to national reserves, while smaller-scale operations targeted , , , and rare metals to bolster ferrous and non-ferrous industries. These sectors underscored Tuva's peripheral role in the Soviet command , where resource outflows to exceeded local reinvestment, fostering dependency on subsidies and hindering diversification; from and compounded inefficiencies, though official reports emphasized fulfillment of five-year plans through forced labor mobilization and .

Collectivization and Industrialization Efforts

Collectivization in the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, initially implemented as an following in , was delayed relative to other Soviet regions, beginning in earnest around 1948. By that year, over one-third of Tuvinian , predominantly nomadic herding, had been organized into collective farms (kolkhozy). In 1949, the territory featured 100 kolkhozy and 51 livestock-farming cooperatives, reflecting accelerated efforts to transform traditional pastoral economies into state-controlled production units. This process involved settling portions of the nomadic Tozhu-Tyva population into villages with newly constructed kolkhozy, disrupting longstanding migratory practices. Resistance to collectivization persisted among some Tuvan herders, who maintained extended family-based operations amid structures, though systemic pressures gradually eroded private ownership. The policy prioritized output for meat, wool, and hides, aligning with broader Soviet goals of self-sufficiency, but encountered challenges from the region's harsh and environments, leading to inefficiencies in supply and herd management. Industrialization efforts focused on resource extraction to integrate Tuva into the Soviet , with emerging as the primary sector. Russian settlers arrived post-1944 to develop , , and operations, including the establishment of facilities like the Tuvaasbest plant operational by the . By the , state farms in the Tuvan ASSR incorporated and agro-industrial techniques, such as improved feed and veterinary , to support alongside extractive industries. These initiatives relied heavily on imported labor and , given the sparse local industrial base, and aimed to exploit Tuva's potential—estimated as significant for large-scale development—while maintaining agricultural primacy.

Economic Shortcomings and Inefficiencies

The imposed on the Tuvan ASSR prioritized centralized planning and resource extraction, which exacerbated inefficiencies in a region dominated by . Collectivization, initiated post-annexation and intensified after , forced traditional cattle-breeders into state and collective farms (kolkhozy and sovkhozy), disrupting migratory herding patterns essential for sustainable livestock management in Tuva's arid and mountain terrain. This led to suboptimal productivity, as fixed-location farms struggled with , fodder shortages, and mismatched incentives, mirroring broader Soviet agricultural failures where output per hectare lagged behind pre-collectivization levels. Livestock numbers, the backbone of the local , experienced volatility and stagnation; while official reports claimed stabilization by the , underlying inefficiencies persisted, with perestroika-era analyses in like Mongun-Taiga highlighting the unsustainability of state farm operations due to poor resource distribution, bureaucratic mismanagement, and failure to adapt to environmental constraints. expanded during 1961–1991, reaching peaks in grain acreage, yet yields remained low owing to soil degradation and climatic challenges unaddressed by rigid quotas that favored quantity over quality. Industrial efforts focused narrowly on mining asbestos, coal, and minor gold deposits, supplying raw materials to the USSR without developing local processing or diversification, fostering dependency on subsidies and transport infrastructure deficits that inflated costs. By the 1980s, economic underperformance contributed to social decay, including rampant that eroded workforce productivity in herding and extraction sectors. Overall, the ASSR's GDP trailed national averages, reflecting systemic mismatches between ideological imperatives and Tuva's ecological-economic realities, with growth confined to extractive outputs rather than balanced development.

Demographics and Society

Ethnic Composition and Population Dynamics

The Tuvan ASSR's population grew from approximately 172,000 in 1959 to 308,557 by the 1989 census, driven primarily by natural increase among indigenous groups amid limited industrialization and migration. Ethnic Tuvans, a Turkic-speaking people with pastoral nomadic roots, consistently formed the majority, comprising roughly two-thirds of residents during the Soviet period despite policies encouraging Russian settlement for administrative and economic roles. Russians, the principal minority, peaked proportionally at 40% in the 1959 census following post-1944 influxes but declined to 32% by 1989 as Tuvan fertility rates outpaced those of settlers.
Census YearTotal PopulationTuvans (%)Russians (%)Other (%)
1959~172,000~5740~3
1989308,55764324
The relative stabilization and slight increase in the share stemmed from higher birth rates (typically 30-40 per 1,000 among versus 15-20 for in peripheral republics) and lower out-migration, countering Soviet-directed Russian inflows tied to and projects. Minor ethnicities, including (1-2%), , and , accounted for under 5% combined, often concentrated in border areas or urban centers like . These dynamics reflected broader Soviet patterns of titular nationality persistence in ASSRs through demographic momentum, though urban Russian concentrations fostered localized ethnic tensions by the late 1980s.

Urbanization and Migration Patterns

The Tuvan ASSR exhibited limited urbanization throughout its existence from 1961 to 1992, reflecting its remote geography, traditional nomadic pastoralism, and modest industrial base, with urban dwellers comprising approximately 40 percent of the total population by the late Soviet period. In 1959, shortly after incorporation into the USSR, the oblast's population stood at 172,000, predominantly rural, with Tuvinians forming 57 percent and Russians 40.1 percent, indicating early in-migration that began altering settlement patterns. By 1979, the population reached 268,000, with Tuvinians at 60.5 percent, yet urban growth remained constrained compared to the USSR average, as collectivization efforts failed to fully sedentarize herders, preserving a rural majority engaged in livestock rearing. Kyzyl, the administrative center, accounted for the bulk of urban development, expanding from a pre-1944 population of around 2,000–3,000 to approximately 40,000 by the 1980s, representing over two-thirds of the ASSR's urban total of about 60,000. This growth stemmed from Soviet investments in , , and , drawing limited from rural districts, though harsh and isolation deterred mass rural exodus. By the 1989 , urban areas housed 47 percent of Tuva's roughly 310,000 residents, with Kyzyl nearing 60,000, underscoring a centralized pattern where secondary towns like Ak-Dovurak emerged around but remained small. Migration patterns were dominated by net in-flows of non-indigenous specialists from other Soviet regions, particularly , recruited for ( and ), administration, and technical roles, which diluted the Tuvan share in urban zones. This influx, accelerating post-1944, elevated to 40 percent of the by 1959 and sustained urban ethnic diversity, as Tuvinians concentrated in rural collectives. Out-migration was minimal, confined to seasonal labor or elite education elsewhere in the RSFSR, with overall mobility low due to restricted travel permits and economic self-sufficiency in . Such patterns reinforced demographic imbalances, with urban centers becoming more Russified while rural areas retained Tuvan majorities, contributing to cultural tensions by the late .

Social Policies and Cultural Shifts

The Soviet administration in the Tuvan ASSR implemented policies aimed at rapid modernization of social structures, including and literacy eradication campaigns inherited from broader USSR initiatives. Prior to widespread Soviet influence in the , Tuvan literacy stood at approximately 20.9 percent, significantly lower than among resident at 59.9 percent. These efforts, part of the () program, targeted full literacy among adults by 1942 through establishment of schools and classes modeled on USSR standards. By the ASSR period (1961–1992), in Tuvan and Russian languages was enforced, fostering bilingualism while embedding Marxist-Leninist , though Russian proficiency became essential for . Gender policies followed Soviet patterns of , encouraging women's entry into the , , and political roles to dismantle patriarchal nomadic traditions. A prominent example was Baikara Dolchanmaa, who transitioned from shepherdess to chairwoman of the Tuvan ASSR in the post-1961 era, symbolizing state narratives of socialist equality for non-industrialized societies. Such advancements coexisted with collectivized labor demands that integrated women into collective farms, altering traditional gender divisions in herding and household roles, though enforcement often prioritized production quotas over equitable outcomes. Healthcare infrastructure was developed via Soviet medical expeditions starting in the phase and extending into the ASSR, introducing Western-style clinics, vaccinations, and to combat endemic diseases in remote areas. This shifted reliance from shamanistic healing to state-provided services, with facilities expanding in urban centers like , though rural access remained limited by geography and underfunding. Cultural shifts were profound, driven by collectivization from the onward, which compelled nomadic herders toward sedentarization and integration, eroding clan-based social organization and pastoral autonomy. Traditional practices like and faced systematic suppression through antireligious campaigns, reducing lamas and shamans while promoting and Russified cultural norms, such as Cyrillic-script Tuvan literature glorifying Soviet progress. While some benefited from improved literacy and medical care, these policies fostered dependency on directives, contributing to long-term erosion of indigenous social cohesion.

Culture and Religion

Traditional Tuvan Practices and Shamanism

Traditional Tuvan religious life revolved around , an animistic system rooted in Tengriism where practitioners believed in a tripartite cosmos comprising the upper world of benevolent sky deities led by Kaira Khan, the middle realm of humans and nature spirits, and the lower domain of malevolent entities. This worldview attributed spiritual essence to all natural phenomena, including animals, rivers, mountains, and celestial bodies, necessitating rituals to maintain harmony and avert misfortune. Shamans, termed kam, acted as intermediaries, possessing the ability to traverse these realms in trance states induced by drumming, chanting, and rhythmic dancing to negotiate with spirits for healing, , , or communal prosperity. Initiation into typically occurred through a profound , such as prolonged illness, visions, or ancestral summons, interpreted as a divine that demanded rigorous under an elder kam to master techniques like spirit invocation and with juniper smoke. During ceremonies, shamans donned costumes adorned with metal amulets that clanged rhythmically, wielded frame drums (dungur) or jaw harps (komuz) to emulate , and performed animal sacrifices or offerings to propitiate deities, often on sacred mountain summits to honor the sky. These rites addressed ailments attributed to spirit disequilibrium, ensured successful hunts or herds, and reinforced taboos against harming , reflecting a causal understanding that human actions directly influenced spiritual forces governing survival in Tuva's harsh and environments. Interwoven with shamanic traditions were secular cultural practices that preserved ethnic identity through oral arts, notably epic storytelling by bards known as olbun or sygytchy, who recited lengthy narratives like Boktu Kirish detailing heroic quests, cosmological myths, and moral lessons over sessions lasting days. These epics, transmitted verbatim across generations via mnemonic techniques, embodied Tuvan values of resilience, kinship, and harmony with the natural order. Complementing this was khoomei, overtone throat singing producing multiple pitches simultaneously to imitate wind, rivers, horse calls, and other environmental sounds, serving both ritualistic purposes in shamanic chants and everyday expressions of nomadic pastoralism. Such practices, performed at gatherings or during herding, underscored the Tuvans' auditory attunement to their landscape, where sound itself was perceived as a manifestation of animistic vitality.

Impact of Soviet Atheism and Russification

The Soviet Union's policy, enforced rigorously after Tuva's in 1944, targeted indigenous as a form of superstition antithetical to Marxist-Leninist ideology, leading to systematic suppression of religious practices among . Shamans, central to Tuvan spiritual life, were labeled "harmful elements" during collectivization drives in the late and , facing execution, imprisonment, or deprivation of civil rights such as voting eligibility, which isolated them from communal . This mirrored broader anti-religious campaigns across the USSR, where indigenous faiths were derided for reinforcing ethnic rather than proletarian unity, resulting in the destruction of ritual objects and the cessation of public ceremonies by the . Although overt violence subsided after the late , religious communities in the Tuvan ASSR remained under strict , with any revival of shamanic rituals risking accusations of anti-Soviet activity. Russification efforts compounded atheistic indoctrination by promoting Russian language and culture as vehicles for Soviet integration, accelerating demographic and linguistic shifts in the Tuvan ASSR. Following the 1944 incorporation, Russian migration surged to support administrative, industrial, and educational infrastructure, elevating the Russian population share from approximately 14% in the early post-annexation period to over 30% by the 1980s, diluting Tuvan ethnic dominance in urban centers like Kyzyl. Russian became the dominant language in higher education and party organs, with Tuvan Cyrillic script—standardized by Russian linguists—serving primarily in elementary schooling, fostering bilingualism that prioritized Russian proficiency for advancement. Cultural policies emphasized Soviet literature, holidays, and atheistic propaganda over Tuvan epics and throat-singing traditions, framing the latter as feudal remnants incompatible with modernization. These intertwined policies eroded traditional Tuvan worldview, where intertwined with and structures, contributing to intergenerational knowledge loss as elders faced and youth were steered toward atheism clubs. By the 1970s, overt shamanic practice had largely gone underground, surviving in clandestine rituals that preserved some oral traditions but at the cost of fragmentation and adaptation to evade detection. 's demographic footprint persisted, with mixed Russian-Tuvan families increasing and Russian surnames appearing in nomenclature, though Tuvan resilience—rooted in geographic isolation and cultural tenacity—limited full assimilation, as evidenced by the post-1991 resurgence of shamanism and Tuvan-language revival. Empirical data from Soviet censuses indicate that while advanced and (rising from near-zero to 99% by 1989), it correlated with declining birth rates among traditional herders and heightened , attributed by some analysts to cultural dislocation rather than solely economic factors.

Preservation and Suppression of Heritage

During the Soviet era, traditional Tuvan religious practices, including and , faced systematic suppression as part of broader atheistic policies aimed at eradicating "" and promoting scientific materialism. , viewed by authorities as primitive and incompatible with socialist ideology, was actively repressed, with shamans persecuted and rituals prohibited, leading to a sharp decline in open practice by the mid-20th century. Similarly, , which had gained influence among Tuvans alongside indigenous beliefs, was targeted through the closure of monasteries and restrictions on monastic orders, though some underground continuity persisted. Nomadic pastoralism, central to Tuvan heritage, underwent forced transformation via collectivization campaigns starting in the , which dismantled traditional herding economies and resettled populations into state farms, eroding clan-based social structures and traditions tied to mobility. policies exacerbated cultural dilution, with increased Russian settlement—reaching 40% of the by 1959—promoting education and administrative dominance, which marginalized Tuvan in official spheres until later reforms. Efforts to preserve ethnic heritage occurred within ideological constraints, including the standardization of the in and its introduction into schools, alongside documentation of folklore and epic poetry to foster a "socialist national culture." Traditional music, including (khoomei) and instruments like the , was adapted for state ensembles, allowing limited continuity of performative arts while suppressing religious contexts. By 1990, a language law designated Tuvan as the state language of the ASSR, reflecting partial recognition of cultural preservation amid pressures, though implementation remained uneven due to demographic shifts.

Controversies and Legacy

Debates on Legitimacy of Annexation

The incorporation of the (TPR) into the occurred on 11 October 1944, following a decision by the TPR on 7 August 1944 and endorsement by the 9th of the Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party on 15 August, after which it became the within the Russian SFSR effective 17 October. Soviet and official accounts emphasize the legitimacy of this act as a voluntary unification, initiated by Tuvan leaders including Premier , who had reportedly petitioned for annexation three times prior under the rationale of , during , and protection from external threats like Japanese expansionism. Proponents cite Tuva's substantial wartime contributions—such as donating over 600,000 head of , 420,000 sheep, and its entire gold reserves (estimated at 60 kg) to the Soviet between 1941 and 1945—as evidence of aligned interests and popular support among the Tuvan elite, facilitated by Toka's long-standing pro-Soviet orientation since the . Strategic imperatives, including buffering the industrial Kuzbass region and signaling to against claims on , further framed the move as mutually beneficial rather than coercive. Critics, including some Western historians and post-Soviet analysts, contest this narrative by highlighting the TPR's lack of genuine sovereignty from its inception, portraying it as a Soviet with persistent garrisons, economic subservience (e.g., resource transfers without reciprocity), and diplomatic isolation—recognized internationally only by the USSR and lacking formal ties with any other state. Toka's regime, while nominally Tuvan-led, suppressed internal dissent through purges aligned with Stalinist policies, including the execution of potential rivals and enforcement of collectivization that displaced nomadic herders, suggesting the 1944 reflected elite compliance under duress rather than autonomous choice. Certain viewpoints equate the process unequivocally to , aimed at quelling latent anti-socialist resistance and consolidating control over Tuva's mineral resources and strategic plateau, especially as wartime exigencies allowed bypassing broader international scrutiny. The absence of plebiscites or public referenda, combined with Tuva's prior status as a buffer under Soviet influence since the 1925 friendship treaty, underscores causal dependencies that undermine claims of voluntarism. In contemporary , debates remain subdued, with the incorporation embedded in narratives of historical reunification; Tuva's 1991 bid for Union status within the USSR—rejected amid the federation's collapse—reflected aspirations for elevated rather than outright or annulment of 1944. Nationalist stirrings, such as the 1989 Tuvan Popular Front's demands and sporadic post-1991 critiques in local media condemning the event as imposed unification, have not coalesced into sustained challenges, partly due to and federal subsidies. Among Tuvan intellectuals, views occasionally frame the pre-1944 era as nominal lost to , though empirical support for reversing the lacks traction, given Tuva's demographic stability (Tuvans comprising about 82% of the as of recent censuses) and alignment with Russian federal structures.

Extent of True Autonomy Under Soviet Rule

Despite its designation as an Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR) within the Russian SFSR from , 1961, the Tuvan ASSR exhibited limited substantive autonomy, with key decision-making powers residing in . The upgrade from status in 1944 to ASSR was decreed by the of the USSR, reflecting central initiative rather than local initiative, and maintained Tuva's subordination to RSFSR oversight without granting union-republic equality. The political apparatus, including a Supreme Soviet of 130 deputies elected on five-year terms and a , operated under the directive guidance of the Tuvan Regional Committee of the Communist of the Soviet Union (CPSU), a local branch fully integrated into the centralized CPSU . Party first secretaries, responsible for enforcing Moscow's policies, were often selected or influenced by central authorities, as evidenced by Kremlin-orchestrated leadership changes, such as the 1929 coup against local figures using Moscow-trained cadres. This structure ensured ideological conformity, with local bodies implementing five-year plans, collectivization drives, and industrialization projects dictated from the USSR (Gosplan), leaving economically dependent on central and unable to pursue independent fiscal or trade policies. Cultural and social policies further underscored central dominance, with efforts standardizing orthography under Russian linguists and prioritizing Russian in education and administration by the , diluting indigenous governance traditions. Suppression of and promotion of aligned with broader Soviet anti-religious campaigns, while resource extraction—such as transferring gold reserves to the USSR in the —highlighted extractive control without reciprocal local benefits. In practice, the ASSR's "autonomy" served as a nominal framework for ethnic representation within a unitary system, where deviations from central directives risked purges or dissolution, as seen in the broader Soviet treatment of non-compliant autonomies.

Long-Term Effects on Tuvan Identity and Independence Claims

The Soviet incorporation of Tuva as an Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic from 1961 to 1992 fostered a hybrid Tuvan identity, blending ethnic traditions with Soviet internationalism and Russian linguistic dominance, which persisted into the post-Soviet era through institutionalized bilingualism and administrative . While policies emphasized class solidarity over , the region's remoteness limited large-scale Russian in-migration, maintaining a Tuvan share above 80% by the 1989 , higher than in many other Soviet autonomies. This demographic stability mitigated deeper cultural erosion, allowing elements of Tuvan and folklore to survive underground despite official atheism. Post-1991, the dissolution of Soviet structures enabled a partial revival of Tuvan cultural markers, including throat-singing (xöömei) and shamanic practices, which became symbols of ethnic distinctiveness amid identity vacuums left by eroded communist ideology. However, economic dependency on Russian federal subsidies—Tuva remaining one of Russia's poorest republics with per capita GDP below national averages—reinforced integration, channeling nationalist energies into cultural preservation rather than political separatism. Tuvan language usage declined in urban and higher education contexts, with Russian as the de facto lingua franca, though post-Soviet reforms reaffirmed Tuvan as co-official, supporting limited media and schooling in the native tongue. Independence claims emerged prominently in the early amid perestroika-era ethnic tensions, exemplified by the anti-Russian riots that prompted thousands of ethnic to flee and spurred the Tuvan Democratic Movement's advocacy for sovereignty or Union Republic status. The movement, led by figures like Kadyr-ool Bicheldei, sought international recognition, including U.S. contacts, and influenced Tuva's constitution to include secession provisions via referendum, reflecting transient separatist momentum. Yet, these efforts dissipated without fruition; pragmatic considerations, including military infeasibility akin to Chechnya's conflicts and reliance on for infrastructure, subordinated claims to federal loyalty. Sporadic resentments persist, fueled by resource extraction and war mobilization disparities as of 2023, but lack organized viability, with Tuvan increasingly framed within Russian civic patriotism rather than irredentist aspirations.

References

  1. https://www.worldstatesmen.org/Russian_SFSR_rep.html
  2. http://www.hubert-herald.nl/RossTuva.htm
  3. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79-00976A000100110001-6.pdf
  4. https://www.academia.edu/81153500/Unknown_Asian_Russia_Nomadic_Turkic_speaking_Buddhist_Tuva_Facing_Modern_Challenges
  5. http://www.fotuva.org/misc/mcmullen.html
  6. https://beda.media/en/articles/exceptional-boon-eng
  7. http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/5fbc834185230.pdf
  8. https://abn.org.ua/en/history/chinese-view-on-the-rejection-of-tyva/
  9. https://stanford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.11126/stanford/9780804799966.001.0001/upso-9780804799966-chapter-005
  10. https://www.youngpioneertours.com/the-tuvan-republic/
  11. http://www.mar.umd.edu/chronology.asp?groupId=36537
  12. https://www.tannu-tuva.org/tannu-tuva
  13. https://doaj.org/article/bf75f2ffbcb64f429d64a639b1378dd9
  14. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2020/03/20/dreaming-of-tannu-tuva-soviet-precursors-to-russias-hybrid-warfare/
  15. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1939
  16. https://www.discoveraltai.com/tuvan-people/
  17. https://www.fotuva.org/misc/mcmullen.html
  18. https://russiancolonialism.com/the-tuvan-coup-detat/
  19. https://escholarship.org/content/qt7dv610gq/qt7dv610gq.pdf
  20. https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/2311/33648/1/02_Dorzhu.pdf
  21. https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/44011/why-did-the-ussr-annex-tannu-tuva
  22. https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/mrgi/2018/en/64985
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2642653
  24. https://www.hubert-herald.nl/RossTuva.htm
  25. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-the-republic-of-tuva.html
  26. https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Tuva+Autonomous+Soviet+Socialist+Republic
  27. https://www.everyculture.com/Russia-Eurasia-China/Tuvans-Sociopolitical-Organization.html
  28. http://www.baabar.mn/article/uryankhay-region-or-tuvans
  29. https://www.facebook.com/groups/ENTPAR/posts/2250245578623037/
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/152275
  31. https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Tuva%2BASSR
  32. https://windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2021/07/tyva-under-stalin-where-even-horses.html
  33. https://www.rbth.com/history/329662-tuva-republic-russia
  34. https://www.deviantart.com/sheldonoswaldlee/art/Chapter-193-Tuvan-ASSR-999073327
  35. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=td
  36. https://www.everyculture.com/Russia-Eurasia-China/Tuvans-Economy.html
  37. https://www.new-east-archive.org/features/show/10672/tuva-documentary-photography-russia-buddhist
  38. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/69/e3sconf_rseiii2024_02040.pdf
  39. http://www.council.gov.ru/en/structure/regions/TY/
  40. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000600370234-1.pdf
  41. https://www.eth.mpg.de/pubs/wps/pdf/mpi-eth-working-paper-0038.pdf
  42. https://factsanddetails.com/russia/Minorities/sub9_3e/entry-5125.html
  43. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/tuvans-0
  44. https://sputnikmediabank.com/media/5658026.html
  45. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/320/1/012006/pdf
  46. https://wikiwand.com/en/articles/Tuvan_People%27s_Republic
  47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3032697
  48. https://www.deseret.com/1989/11/16/18832583/wsc-professor-says-siberian-territory-is-plagued-by-alcohol-abuse-crime-bias/
  49. https://www.durham.ac.uk/media/durham-university/research-/research-centres/ibru-centre-for-borders-research/maps-and-databases/publications-database/boundary-amp-security-bulletins/bsb2-4_galeotti.pdf
  50. https://jamestown.org/program/ethnic-russians-sound-alarm-about-declining-russian-presence-in-tuva-2/
  51. https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Tuva%2BAutonomous%2BSoviet%2BSocialist%2BRepublic
  52. https://www.marxists.org/history/ussr/overview/presentdayethnicprocessesussr.pdf
  53. https://www.aup-online.com/content/papers/10.5117/9789048557820/ICAS.2022.037?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf
  54. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/102dzz3/why_and_when_did_russiaussr_take_over_tuva/
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251692316_THE_ORIGIN_OF_THE_EARLY_NOMADIC_POPULATIONS_OF_TUVA_CRANIOMETRICAL_EVIDENCE
  56. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/sites/default/files/knowledge-bank-article/the_problem_of_bilingualism_in_tuva.pdf
  57. https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/2311/1527/1/12_Mollerov.pdf
  58. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/between-national-tradition-and-western-modernization-soviet-woman-and-representations-of-socialist-gender-equality-as-a-third-way-for-developing-countries-19561964/D795A014379C2E370D01CDF5DDAE0C86
  59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26844324
  60. https://gce.unisg.ch/de/doi1055337/kggh4265/
  61. https://www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol4/hoppal.htm
  62. https://www.face-music.ch/bi_bid/tengerism_en.html
  63. https://shamanicdrumming.com/tuvanshamansarticle.html
  64. https://ahamkara.org/kamlanie
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374194067_The_Tuvan_Shamanism_and_Its_Features
  66. https://en.tuva.asia/143-it-takes-a-long-time-to-tell-a-tale-part-i.html
  67. https://www.swarthmore.edu/k-david-harrison/ethnography-documenting-epic-tales
  68. https://www.alashensemble.com/about_tts.htm
  69. https://paradigmuniversity.com/shamanism-3/
  70. https://windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-soviets-fought-shamanism-and-lost.html
  71. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/1680815/1710295
  72. https://kigiran.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/4828?locale=en_US
  73. https://besacenter.org/war-in-ukraine-and-the-potential-for-inter-ethnic-conflict-in-tuva/
  74. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/article/annexation-of-tannutuva-and-the-formation-of-the-tuvinskaya-assr/3FB87138E23C3B3355C4924874E1E69B
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/2/128
  76. https://www.soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/view/63/966
  77. https://mondediplo.com/2009/12/08tuva
  78. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tuvan-literary-language.pdf
  79. https://www.quora.com/Why-was-the-Republic-of-Tuva-annexed-by-the-Soviet-Unions-during-The-Great-Patriotic-War
  80. https://www.reddit.com/r/Historycord/comments/1nsrv9s/tannu_tuvas_first_delegation_to_the_ussr_in_june/
  81. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2020/03/20/dreaming-of-tannu-tuva%25EF%25BB%25BF-soviet-precursors-to-russias-hybrid-warfare/
  82. https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/marp/2003/en/46016
  83. https://www.academia.edu/6436578/The_Vertical_of_Shamanic_Power_the_Use_of_Political_Discourse_in_Post_Soviet_Tuvan_Shamanism
  84. https://www.academia.edu/89370912/Post_Soviet_Tuvan_Throat_Singing_X%25C3%25B6%25C3%25B6mei_and_the_Circulation_of_Nomadic_Sensibility
  85. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2348&context=honorstheses
  86. https://www.quora.com/Is-Russia-worried-that-Tannu-Tuva-will-declare-its-independence
  87. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WSwYISuvoM
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.