Hubbry Logo
United States Conference of Catholic BishopsUnited States Conference of Catholic BishopsMain
Open search
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
Community hub
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is the episcopal conference of the Catholic Church in the United States. Founded in 2001 after the merger of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) and United States Catholic Conference (USCC), the USCCB is a registered corporation based in Washington, D.C.

Key Information

As with all bishops' conferences, certain[which?] decisions and acts of the USCCB must receive the recognitio, or approval, of the Roman dicasteries, which are subject to the immediate and absolute authority of the Pope.

As of January 2025, the USCCB president is Archbishop Timothy Broglio of the Archdiocese of the Military Services, USA. The vice president is Archbishop William E. Lori of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.[2][3]

Structure

[edit]

The USCCB is composed of all active and retired members of the Catholic hierarchy in the United States and the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands. This includes archbishops, bishops, coadjutors, auxiliary bishops and the ordinary of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter. The other American territories and commonwealths are not part of the USCCB.[4]

The president is the chief executive officer of the USCCB and is in charge of the Administrative Committee. He also presides at the plenary sessions of the bishops. The vice president is the second highest official and is assigned certain duties by the president. The treasurer manages the USCCB finances and the secretary keeps the minutes of the plenary sessions.[3] These officials are all bishops serving three-year terms in office.

The USCCB normally holds two general assemblies per years. The assemblies are open to all bishops along with organizations and individuals who work with the USCCB. Voting on proposals are limited to active bishops of the Latin and Eastern Rite churches; emeritus bishops (retired bishops) do not have a vote. Proposals are passed either on majority votes or two-thirds votes.[5]

As of 2025, the USCCB has 19 standing committees. Seven of these committees have subcommittees.[6]

History

[edit]

During the 19th century, the bishops in the United States met periodically to discuss issues facing the American church and to set policies and rules for its operation, with approval from the Vatican. Three of these plenary councils were held in Baltimore, Maryland, in 1852, 1866 and 1884.[7]

As the American church grew and new circumstances arose, the need for more regular meetings soon became apparent.

National Catholic War Council

[edit]
See also: National Catholic Community Service

With the American entry into World War I in April 1917, the American Catholic hierarchy realized that it needed to provide chaplains and other services to Catholic soldiers serving in the United States and France. It would also need to raise funds from dioceses around the country to support these services.[8]

In August 1917, each bishop in the United States sent one priest and one lay person to meet at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. The organizers also invited members of the Catholic press and religious institutes.[8]The 1917 meeting at Catholic University ended with the founding of the first national organization of Catholic bishops in the United States, the National Catholic War Council (NCWC).[8] In December 1917, the American bishops decided to place the NCWC directly under their control.

National Catholic Welfare Council

[edit]
Pope Benedict XV (1915)
Main article: National Catholic Welfare Council

With the end of World War I, the general feeling among the American Catholic hierarchy was that they should create a new association of bishops to build on the successes of the NCWC. The American bishops met in February 1919 at Catholic University to discuss this new organization along with other matters. By the end of the meeting, they had decided to hold a yearly conference of what was now called the National Catholic Welfare Council (also known as NCWC)[9]

The bishops also created an administrative committee with seven members to manage the daily business of the NCWc between plenary meetings. Archbishop Edward Hanna of San Francisco was named as the first committee chair and the NCWC headquarters was established in Washington, D.C. The first meeting of bishops was set for September 1919.[8] In 1919, Pope Benedict XV urged the bishops to assist him in promoting the labor reforms first articulated by Pope Leo XIII in Rerum novarum.

National Catholic Welfare Conference

[edit]

However, the NCWC soon faced opposition. In February 1920, Archbishop William O'Connell, leader of one of the largest archdiocese in the nation, petitioned the Consistorial Congregation in Rome to ban the NCWC. He claimed that it reflected Gallicanism and diminished the authority of the bishops. Several NCWC members protested the suppression to Pope Benedict XV, saying that the dissolution of the NCWC would make the bishops look autocratic. The pope agree to lift the suppression, but asked the bishops to change the organization's name in 1922 to the National Catholic Welfare Conference.[8]

National Conference of Catholic Bishops and United States Catholic Conference

[edit]

In 1966, the American bishops decided to split the NCWC into two organizations with different focuses, but common goals.

  • The National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) was created to work on church affairs within the United States.
  • The United States Catholic Conference (USCC) would concentrate on the Catholic church and American society.[9]

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

[edit]

The bishops in 2001 decided to recombine the NCCB and the USCC into one organization, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).[10]

Sexual abuse crisis

[edit]
Main article: Catholic Church sex abuse cases in the United States

Starting in the 1980s and continuing into the 21st century, the American Catholic church was hit with a huge wave of revelations of sexual abuse of children by priests and bishops, along with revelations of coverups and mismanagement of the scandals by American bishops. The fact that bishops commonly reassigned clergy accused of abuse from their parish to another parish where they still had access to children was considered to have allowed the abuse to proliferate.[11] The initial USCCB response to the crisis was widely criticized, both within and outside the Catholic church.[12]

In June 2002, the USCCB unanimously passed the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People, known as the Dallas Charter.[13] The charter committed the American Catholic Church to providing a "safe environment" for all children and youth participating in church-sponsored activities. To accomplish this, the American bishops pledged to establish uniform procedures for handling sex-abuse allegations against priests, lay teachers in Catholic schools, parish staff members, coaches and other people who dealt with children.[14][15] It also adopted a "zero tolerance" policy towards these people for sexual abuse.[16][17] In 2004, the USCCB commissioned the John Jay College of Criminal Justice at the City University of New York to conduct an independent investigation to determine the scope of sexual abuse allegations from 1950 to 2002. The college produced the John Jay Report.[18]

Subsequent decades have seen the USCCB grappling with the fallout,[19] which included dozens of court cases resulting in financial settlements with the victims of almost $4 billion.[20] Numerous dioceses declared bankruptcy in an effort to manage the financial impact.[21] The USCCB continues to publish an annual report on its progress in addressing concerns.[22]

Gómez in November 2020 issued an apology on behalf of the USCCB to the sexual abuse victims of former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and to all victims of sexual abuse by clergy.[23]

Regions

[edit]
For a list of regions, see List of Catholic dioceses (structured view) § Episcopal Conference of the United States of America.
The dioceses and eparchies in the United States are grouped into 15 regions, each represented in a different color.

The American dioceses are grouped into 15 regions.

Committees

[edit]

National Right to Life Committee

[edit]
Main article: National Right to Life Committee

During the 1960s, the women's movement in the United States started working on the state level to legalize abortion rights for women. To combat these efforts, the NCCB in April 1967 appointed Reverend James T. McHugh during April 1967 to help coordinate a national Catholic counter-response.[24]

In 1968, the NCCB founded the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), headed by attorney Juan Ryan. Its goal was to coordinate information and strategy between Catholic anti-abortion groups. As of 2024, the NRLC has affiliates in all 50 states with over 3,000 local chapters.[24] These NRLC affiliate groups were forming in response to efforts to change abortion laws based on model legislation proposed by the American Law Institute (ALI) in Philadelphia. New Jersey.

The NRLC held its first national meeting of chapter leaders in Chicago in 1970 at Barat College. The following year, NRLC held its first convention at Macalester College in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Issues

[edit]

Abortion

[edit]

In 1990, the USCCB hired the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton in New York City to launch a campaign to persuade Catholics and non-Catholics to oppose abortion rights for women. This was part of a persuasive effect to educate the public on abortion as opposed to demonstrations at women's health clinics.[25]

In the November 2023 assembly, the bishops again stated that abortion was a greater threat to life than gun violence, racism, climate change and inequality in health care and was the preeminent priority of the American Catholic Church.[26]

Contraception

[edit]

In March 2012, regarding the contraception mandate issued as a regulation under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which required that employers who do not support contraception but are not religious institutions per se must cover contraception via their employer-sponsored health insurance. USCCB decided to "continue its 'vigorous opposition to this unjust and illegal mandate'".[27]

Ecumenicism

[edit]

As of 2021, the USCCB has been in ecumenical discussion with the Pentecostal/Charismatic Churches of North America (PCCNA), as well as discussing the possibility of future theological dialogue between Pentecostalism and Catholicism.[28]

The USCCB is a member of Christian Churches Together, an interdenominational fellowship of Christian denominations and organizations in the United States.

Religious liberty

[edit]

The USCCB in 2009 issued the revised Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services. These directives were first issued in 1971.[29][30] The main focus of these revisions was guidance for Catholic health care institutions in dealing with governments and non-Catholic organizations. It was sued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on the grounds that the directive in some cases caused doctors to refuse treatment of women in an emergency medical situation.[31]

From 2012 to 2018, the USCCB promoted Fortnight for Freedom, a campaign to protest government activities that the USCCB viewed as impinging on religious liberty. The USCCB replaced it in 2018 with Religious Liberty Week.[32]

Gun violence

[edit]

The USCCB filed an amicus brief in the 2024 US Supreme Court case of United States v. Rahimi. The USCCB argued that protecting the innocent "is a proper consideration" when regulating firearms:[33] "As the Church teaches, and this Nation's historical traditions demonstrate, the right to bear arms is not an unqualified license that must leave vulnerable family members to live in fear. Abused victims are precisely the people whom a just government is tasked with protecting. The Second Amendment does not stand as a barrier to their safety."[33]

Immigration

[edit]

In January 2017, Bishop Joe S. Vásquez, the chairman of the USCCB Committee on Migration, criticized Executive Order 13769, issued by the Trump Administration. The order restricted refugees from several predominantly Muslim nations from entering the United States; it also banned all refugees from the Syrian Civil War from entering the country.[34]

The USCCB in September 2017 condemned the Trump administration's cancellation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. DACA had allowed nearly 800,000 young people who arrived in the United States as children of undocumented immigrants to apply for protection from deportation.[35]

At the 2018 USCCB meeting in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, President Cardinal Daniel DiNardo criticized the Trump administration's policies of family separation of undocumented immigrants and the denial of asylum in the United States to women fleeing domestic violence in their home country.[36]

LGBTQ

[edit]

In June 2020, a USCCB committee praised the Trump Administration for changing a US Department of Health and Human Services ruling regarding sexual discrimination based on gender identity.[32]The statement said that it;

"...will help restore the rights of health care providers—as well as insurers and employers—who decline to perform or cover abortions or 'gender transition' procedures due to ethical or professional objections."[37]

In December 2023, the USCCB clarified Pope Francis' recent remarks on the blessing of same-sex couples and unmarried couples. They said that a priest could bless them, but not in the context of validating their union as a marriage.[38]

Politics

[edit]
Cardinal Blaise Cupich (2021)
Archbishop José Gómez (2015)

In 2020, some conservative American bishops complained to Gómez after he congratulated US Senator Joe Biden, a Catholic, on his election as president of the United States. In response, Gómez formed a working group to address the "confusion" that could be caused by Catholic politicians who support policies that contravene Catholic teaching.[39][40]

On January 20, 2021, inauguration day in the United States, Gómez sent Biden a congratulatory letter. The letter said that Gómez was "praying that God grant him wisdom and courage to lead this great nation and that God help him to meet the tests of these times. " However, Gómez also stated that some of Biden's policies,

"...would advance moral evils and threaten human life and dignity, most seriously in the areas of abortion, contraception, marriage, and gender. Of deep concern is the liberty of the Church and the freedom of believers to live according to their consciences."[41]

Several bishops, including Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago, objected to the Gómez letter. Cupich said that individuals within the USCCB drafted the Biden letter without first consulting with the Administrative Committee. He described the incident as an "institutional failure" of the USCCB; the bishops should have been allowed to approve the Biden letter first. In what America magazine called a "rare rebuke",[42]Cupich released two statements, one of which said,

"Today, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops issued an ill-considered statement on the day of President Biden's inauguration. Aside from the fact that there is seemingly no precedent for doing so, the statement, critical of President Biden, came as a surprise to many bishops, who received it just hours before it was released."[41][42]

On March 30, 2021, Gómez wrote to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) in Rome, telling them that the USCCB was drafting a new document on the worthiness of Catholic politicians to receive communion.

Cardinal Luis Ladaria, prefect of the CDF, replied to Gómez on May 7th. Ladaria cautioned the USCCB to preserve unity among its bishops in discussing anti-abortion issues. Ladaria also said that abortion and euthanasia were not the only grave issues of Catholic moral teaching.[43][44][45][46]He further stated that any new USCCB provision had to respect the rights of individual bishops in their diocese and the prerogatives of the Vatican.[47]In April 2021, the Gómez working group announced that it was drafting a new document on communion.[48]

Racism

[edit]

During the 2020 protests over the murder of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Archbishop José Horacio Gómez, the USCCB president, issued a statement condemning Floyd's death. He cited Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.'s words that "riots are the language of the unheard".[49]

Israeli–Palestinian conflict

[edit]
See also: Catholicism and Zionism

Following the official political stance of the Vatican, the USCCB endorses a two-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which it describes as "a secure and recognized Israel living in peace alongside a viable and independent Palestine."[50]

On 11 December 2024,[51] during the ongoing Gaza war, the USCCB and the American Jewish Committee (AJC) published a joint document that condemned antisemitism and anti-Zionism. It states that calling Zionism inherently racist is antisemitic; and that allegations about Zionism being settler-colonialism, or having as its goal the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, are antisemitic and false.

Later on 25 March, Kairos Palestine, an organization led by Catholic Patriarch Emeritus Michel Sabbah and composed of Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant Palestinians, sent a letter to the USCCB objecting to the document. Kairos Palestine particularly condemned the document's characterization of anti-Israel sentiment as antisemitic, stated that it ignored "overwhelming evidence" of the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and accused the USCCB of alienating Palestinian Christians.[52] The Catholic organization Pax Christi USA issued a statement backing Kairos Palestine.[53]

Archbishop Broglio's response to the letter on 31 March explained that the USCCB partnered with the AJC to combat rising antisemitism, but appeared to not directly respond to the specific objections of Kairos Palestine. On 14 April, Kairos Palestine sent another letter to the USCCB which called Broglio's response "unacceptable", accused the USCCB of sharing responsibility for the plight of Palestinians, and condemned the conflation of the Palestinian cause with antisemitism as "theologically and morally wrong".[52]

Funding

[edit]

Most funding for the USCCB is raised through national collections, government grants, and diocesan assessments.[54]

List of presidents and vice-presidents

[edit]

Presidents

[edit]

This lists the USCCB presidents, their dioceses or archdioceses and their dates of service:[55]

  1. Cardinal John Dearden, Archdiocese of Detroit (1966 – 1971)
  2. Cardinal John Krol, Archdiocese of Philadelphia (1971 – 1974)
  3. Archbishop Joseph Bernardin, later cardinal, Archdiocese of Cincinnati (1974 – 1977)
  4. Archbishop John R. Quinn, Archdiocese of San Francisco (1977 – 1980)
  5. Archbishop John Roach, Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis (1980 – 1983)
  6. Bishop James William Malone, Diocese of Youngstown (1983 – 1986)
  7. Archbishop John L. May, Archdiocese of St. Louis (1986 – 1989)
  8. Archbishop Daniel Edward Pilarczyk, Archdiocese of Cincinnati (1989 – 1992)
  9. Cardinal William H. Keeler, Archdiocese of Baltimore (1992 – 1995)
  10. Bishop Anthony Pilla, Diocese of Cleveland (1995 – 1998)
  11. Bishop Joseph Fiorenza, later archbishop, Diocese of Galveston–Houston (1998 – November 13, 2001)
  12. Bishop Wilton Daniel Gregory, later cardinal, Diocese of Belleville (November 13, 2001 – November 15, 2004)
  13. Bishop William S. Skylstad, Diocese of Spokane (November 15, 2004 – November 13, 2007)
  14. Cardinal Francis George OMI, Archdiocese of Chicago (November 13, 2007 – November 16, 2010)
  15. Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, Archdiocese of New York (November 16, 2010 – November 14, 2013)
  16. Archbishop Joseph Edward Kurtz, Archdiocese of Louisville (November 14, 2013 – November 15, 2016)
  17. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, Archdiocese of Galveston–Houston (November 15, 2016 – November 12, 2019)
  18. Archbishop José Horacio Gómez, Archdiocese of Los Angeles (November 12, 2019 – November 15, 2022)
  19. Archbishop Timothy Broglio, Archdiocese for the Military Services, USA (November 15, 2022–present)

Vice-Presidents

[edit]

This lists the USCCB vice-presidents, their dioceses or archdioceses and their dates of service:[55]

  1. Cardinal John Krol, Archdiocese of Philadelphia (1966 – 1971)
  2. Coadjutor Archbishop Leo Christopher Byrne, Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis (1971–1974)
  3. Cardinal John Carberry, Archdiocese of St. Louis (1974 – 1977)
  4. Archbishop John Roach, Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis (1977 – 1980)
  5. Bishop James William Malone, Diocese of Youngstown (1980 – 1983)
  6. Archbishop John L. May, Archdiocese of St. Louis (1983 – 1986)
  7. Archbishop Daniel Edward Pilarczyk, Archdiocese of Cincinnati (1986 – 1989)
  8. Archbishop William H. Keeler, later cardinal, Archdiocese of Baltimore (1989 – 1992)
  9. Bishop Anthony Pilla, Diocese of Cleveland (1992 – 1995)
  10. Bishop Joseph Fiorenza, later archbishop, Diocese of Galveston–Houston (1995 – 1998)
  11. Bishop Wilton Daniel Gregory, later cardinal, Diocese of Belleville (1998 – November 13, 2001)
  12. Bishop William S. Skylstad, Diocese of Spokane (November 13, 2001 – November 15, 2004)
  13. Cardinal Francis George OMI, Archdiocese of Chicago (November 15, 2004 – November 13, 2007)
  14. Bishop Gerald Frederick Kicanas, Diocese of Tucson (November 13, 2007 – November 16, 2010)
  15. Archbishop Joseph Edward Kurtz, Archdiocese of Louisville (November 16, 2010 – November 14, 2013)
  16. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, Archdiocese of Galveston–Houston (November 14, 2013 – November 15, 2016)
  17. Archbishop José Horacio Gómez, Archdiocese of Los Angeles (November 15, 2016 – November 12, 2019)
  18. Archbishop Allen Vigneron, Archdiocese of Detroit (November 12, 2019 – November 15, 2022)
  19. Archbishop William E. Lori, Archdiocese of Baltimore (November 15, 2022 – present)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is a permanent episcopal conference comprising the Catholic bishops of the United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and other territories, established to jointly exercise certain pastoral functions—such as sanctifying, teaching, and governing—for the Christian faithful in accordance with canon 447 of the Code of Canon Law. Tracing its roots to the National Catholic War Council formed in 1917 to coordinate Catholic efforts during World War I, the organization evolved through entities like the National Catholic Welfare Conference before the modern USCCB was constituted on July 1, 2001, via the merger of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (pastoral focus) and the United States Catholic Conference (social action focus). Headquartered in Washington, D.C., with a structure including approximately 17 bishop-led committees and collaborative staff of clergy and laity, the USCCB unifies Catholic activities nationwide, promotes evangelization, supports education and immigrant aid, and conducts charitable and social welfare initiatives. In public policy, it advocates for Catholic social teaching principles, including the sanctity of life from conception to natural death, religious freedom, and just immigration policies, while coordinating liturgical adaptations and doctrinal guidance approved by the Holy See. Notable efforts include the establishment of the National Review Board in response to the clerical sexual abuse crisis, which commissioned studies and implemented reforms like the Dallas Charter, though the conference has encountered criticism for perceived inconsistencies in addressing moral failings among leaders and divisions over engaging pro-abortion politicians.

Organizational Structure

Governance and Leadership

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is governed by the assembly of all active and retired Catholic bishops in the and the U.S. , who convene in biannual plenary assemblies to deliberate and vote on policies, statements, and initiatives. These assemblies, held in spring and fall, require a majority or two-thirds vote depending on the matter, with decisions implemented through elected officers and committees. The structure emphasizes collegial decision-making among bishops, subordinate to the authority of the , which approves the conference's statutes. Leadership is provided by four principal officers elected by the bishops: the president, , , and . The president serves as the , chairing the Administrative —which meets approximately four times annually to execute plenary decisions—and representing the conference in public and affairs. The assists the president, assuming duties in their absence, and is positioned to succeed them under longstanding custom. Both are elected for three-year terms from a slate of ten nominees selected by peers during a plenary assembly; the president is chosen first by simple majority vote, followed by the from the remaining candidates. The oversees financial matters, while the , elected for a five-year term, manages administrative operations and staff. chairmen, also elected for three-year terms, lead approximately twenty standing committees addressing specific pastoral, doctrinal, and social issues. As of October 2025, Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio of the Archdiocese for the Military Services, USA, serves as president, having been elected in November 2022, with Archbishop of as . This leadership duo continues a pattern where the vice president typically ascends to the presidency, ensuring continuity amid the bishops' diverse regional and ideological perspectives. The Administrative Committee's composition includes the officers, regional representatives, and committee chairs, facilitating governance between plenaries while maintaining accountability to the full episcopal body.

Committees and Departments

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) coordinates its activities through 16 standing committees, each addressing specific pastoral, doctrinal, administrative, or social mandates assigned by the bishops' plenary assembly. These committees are chaired by bishops elected to three-year terms, typically following a one-year term as chairman-elect, and they develop policy statements, guidelines, and programs for implementation at the diocesan level. Committee chairs, along with the conference officers, form the Administrative Committee, which functions as the executive board between biannual plenary sessions, handling urgent matters and preparing agendas. Key standing committees include the Committee on Doctrine, which reviews theological texts and addresses doctrinal questions; the Committee on Divine Worship, responsible for liturgical norms and translations; the Committee on Catholic Education, focused on advancing faith-based schooling and formation; and the Committee on Pro-Life Activities, which coordinates opposition to abortion, , and related issues through campaigns and advocacy. Other committees cover areas such as Evangelization and , Laity, Marriage, Family Life and Youth, Migration, Protection of Children and Young People, and Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, with subcommittees handling specialized tasks like health care issues or Hispanic ministry. Administrative departments, often organized as secretariats, provide operational support to these committees, including research, staff coordination, and resource development aligned with USCCB priorities. Examples include the Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities, which staffs anti-abortion initiatives; the , aiding family policy; and the Secretariat of Divine Worship, assisting liturgical implementation. The General Secretariat oversees overall administration, budgeting via the Committee on Budget and Finance, and strategic planning through the Committee on Priorities and Plans. This structure enables the USCCB to respond collectively to contemporary challenges while respecting episcopal authority.

Regional and Diocesan Coordination

The Conference of Catholic Bishops divides the Latin-rite archdioceses and dioceses into 14 geographic regions to enable coordinated and administrative efforts among bishops serving contiguous areas. A fifteenth region encompasses the Eastern Catholic eparchies and exarchates, allowing for distinct representation and collaboration within that rite. These regions group dioceses by proximity, such as Region I covering , , , , [Rhode Island](/page/Rhode Island), and , facilitating focused discussions on shared challenges like migration, , or natural disasters affecting multiple localities. Regional coordination occurs through periodic bishops' meetings, where participants address local implementation of national USCCB initiatives, exchange best practices, and prepare joint responses to regional issues. For instance, regions organize workshops on topics like or consultations, as seen in the USCCB's hosting of regional sessions for the National Eucharistic Revival and scouting programs. Bishops from each region also undertake collective ad limina apostolorum visits to every five years, reporting on diocesan conditions and receiving papal guidance as a group, which strengthens unified regional perspectives before national assembly. At the diocesan level, coordination with the USCCB emphasizes , wherein national policies and liturgical norms are adapted locally under episcopal oversight. Regional structures support this by electing proportional representatives to USCCB committees, ensuring diverse geographic input into decisions on doctrine, , and administration. Diocesan bishops implement USCCB programs—such as charitable campaigns or catechetical standards—often in alignment with regional consensus, promoting consistency while respecting canonical autonomy. This framework, rooted in post-Vatican II canonical provisions, balances national unity with regional and diocesan flexibility.

Historical Development

Origins During World War I: National Catholic War Council

The entry of the into on April 6, 1917, prompted American Catholic bishops to organize a coordinated response to demonstrate loyalty to the nation amid prevailing suspicions of divided allegiance due to ties to the . In July 1917, a call was issued for the formation of a national body to unify Catholic efforts, leading to a meeting at where representatives from 68 dioceses and 27 national Catholic organizations established the National Catholic War Council (NCWC). This marked the first voluntary national association of U.S. bishops to address a major public crisis, with the NCWC placed under their direct authority by December 1917. The NCWC's primary mandate was to "study, coordinate, unify and put in operation all Catholic activities incidental to the ," focusing on supporting U.S. troops through welfare services, , and personnel deployment while countering anti-Catholic by affirming patriotic commitment. An administrative committee of bishops, chaired by Peter J. Muldoon of , oversaw operations, with Paulist Father John J. Burke serving as executive secretary and driving its implementation. The council facilitated the mobilization of Catholic resources, including the oversight of approximately 700 organizations contributing to military support, such as chaplaincy programs, recreational services for soldiers, and the distribution of over five million religious items like prayer books and rosaries to troops. Beyond direct war aid, the NCWC liaised with federal authorities to integrate Catholic initiatives into broader national efforts, such as student army training camps and morale-boosting activities, thereby elevating the visibility and acceptance of U.S. Catholicism in public life. Its formation addressed dual imperatives: bolstering American military resolve and safeguarding Catholic institutional interests against wartime nativism. Though intended as a temporary wartime entity, the NCWC's administrative framework and collaborative model among bishops proved foundational for subsequent national Catholic coordination.

Interwar Expansion: National Catholic Welfare Council and Conference

Following the conclusion of , the National Catholic War Council transitioned into the National Catholic Welfare Council (NCWC) in 1919, prompted by 's appeals for peace and . Bishops convened at on September 24, 1919, with 95 prelates representing 87 of the nation's approximately 100 dioceses, to establish the NCWC as a permanent body for coordinating Catholic initiatives on national social issues. The meeting produced a 14-part pastoral letter on domestic and international matters, while the inaugural Administrative Committee issued the "Program of Social Reconstruction," proposing reforms in labor, housing, and economic policy based on . The NCWC set up headquarters in Washington, D.C., and appointed a general secretary in 1919 to handle operations between annual episcopal meetings, supported by a seven-member Administrative Committee. Expansion began in 1920 with the creation of the National Catholic News Service (precursor to Catholic News Service) for disseminating Catholic perspectives and the Bureau of Immigration to aid arriving Catholics. The Department of Social Action released "The Church and Labor," promoting fair wages, worker education, and harmonious grounded in Church doctrine. In 1922, the organization renamed itself the National Catholic Welfare Conference to emphasize its advisory role over any perceived authoritative "council" function. Throughout the interwar years, it protested anti-Catholic persecutions in from 1926 onward and responded to the with 1930–1931 statements on unemployment and economic distress, urging societal reforms. The Conference launched the 1933 Legion of Decency pledge against indecent films, issued 1933 warnings on global armament races, and in 1937 condemned religious suppressions in and while critiquing and . Further statements in 1938 highlighted greed's role in endangering peace, and by 1939, addressed Vatican peace appeals amid rising war threats.

Post-Vatican II Reorganization: NCCB and USCC

Following the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965), the U.S. Catholic bishops reorganized their national conference structure to align with the council's decree Christus Dominus, which urged episcopal conferences to enable bishops to "jointly exercise and more effectively fulfill [their] pastoral office toward the people" (no. 38). In 1966, the existing National Catholic Welfare Conference (NCWC), established in 1919, was restructured into two distinct entities: the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) and the Catholic Conference (USCC). This bifurcation allowed for specialized functions while maintaining unified leadership among the bishops, with shared administrative staff and a common secretariat in The NCCB served as the and arm, comprising only active and retired bishops as members, and focused on internal Church matters such as , , , and governance. It operated through bishops' committees supported by full-time secretariats, issuing statements, guidelines, and policies on , , and to implement Vatican II reforms like vernacular and lay involvement. The NCCB's decisions required a two-thirds vote for approval and aimed to foster without supplanting individual diocesan authority. In contrast, the USCC functioned as a civil corporation under District of Columbia non-profit statutes, enabling engagement in secular affairs like , , , and advocacy. Its committees included not only bishops but also , religious, and lay experts, broadening participation in addressing societal issues such as poverty alleviation and civil rights. The USCC coordinated charitable programs, lobbied on legislative matters, and managed operational departments, distinguishing it from the NCCB's purely scope while ensuring alignment with Catholic teaching. This dual structure persisted from to , reflecting a deliberate separation of Church-internal and society-facing roles to comply with distinctions between associations and civil entities, though practical overlap in personnel and resources facilitated coordinated action. The arrangement enhanced the bishops' collective voice post-Vatican II but later prompted discussions on streamlining due to administrative complexities.

Unification and Modern Era: Formation of USCCB in 2001

In the late 1990s, U.S. Catholic bishops undertook a review of their conference structures, identifying redundancies between the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB), which handled doctrinal, liturgical, and pastoral coordination since its 1966 establishment, and the Catholic Conference (USCC), focused on social welfare, advocacy, and ecumenical efforts formed concurrently. These parallel entities, created post-Vatican II to align with Roman directives limiting episcopal conferences' executive scope, had evolved with overlapping functions that complicated operations and resource allocation. After years of study, consultation, and deliberation—including proposals drafted by committees—the bishops approved a comprehensive restructuring to merge the organizations into a single body. The unification took effect on July 1, 2001, when the NCCB and USCC formally combined to establish the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), preserving continuity in leadership, staff, and ongoing programs. This new entity integrated the NCCB's emphasis on bishops' collegial teaching authority with the USCC's practical implementation of , enabling streamlined decision-making on issues spanning , , and . The USCCB's statutes emphasized , ensuring diocesan autonomy while fostering national coordination, and it maintained the dual focus without diluting either predecessor’s mandate. The formation marked a pivotal for the U.S. entering the , amid internal challenges like priestly formation reforms and external pressures from . By consolidating administrative offices in , the USCCB reduced duplication—such as in communications and finance departments—while expanding capacity for joint initiatives, including responses to emerging crises in Church governance. This structure has endured, supporting over 400 staff across committees addressing , migration, and pro-life as of the early .

Recent Initiatives: Mission Directive 2025-2028 and Jubilee Preparations

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) approved its Mission Directive for 2025-2028 on November 14, 2024, during the fall general assembly in , , by a vote of 225 to 7. The directive articulates the conference's focus as "Responding even more deeply to the call of Christ to proclaim and form Disciples, the Committees and Secretariat of the USCCB will prioritize evangelizing the unaffiliated, the disaffiliated, and youth." This three-year framework replaces prior thematic approaches with a broader mission statement intended to direct staff priorities amid documented declines in U.S. Catholic affiliation and practice, emphasizing formation of disciples capable of outreach. In parallel, the USCCB has coordinated preparations for the 2025 Jubilee Year, proclaimed by Pope Francis as a Holy Year of "Pilgrims of Hope" running from December 24, 2024, to January 6, 2026. To support U.S. dioceses, eparchies, parishes, and institutions, the conference issued a comprehensive information sheet outlining the official Jubilee prayer, hymn, logo, indulgence conditions, and logistical guidance for pilgrimages to Rome or designated U.S. sites such as the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C. Additional resources include customized packets for targeted Jubilee events—for instance, the Jubilee of Bishops on June 25-26, 2025, and the Jubilee of Teenagers—featuring engagement materials, liturgical aids, and celebratory prompts adaptable for local use. The USCCB further disseminated practical tools such as revised Mass formularies, scriptural readings, and an introductory video to foster spiritual renewal and hope amid contemporary challenges, while promoting domestic gatherings like the United States Jubilee Gathering of Youth and Young Adults. These efforts aim to integrate the Jubilee's themes of , , and pilgrimage into American Catholic life without requiring universal travel to Vatican events.

Core Activities and Programs

Pastoral and Liturgical Guidance

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) issues pastoral letters, frameworks, and guidelines to assist dioceses, clergy, and laity in applying Catholic doctrine to contemporary moral, social, and ministerial challenges. These documents emphasize fidelity to Church teaching while addressing specific pastoral needs, such as family life, health care ethics, and pro-life advocacy. For instance, the Pastoral Plan for Pro-Life Activities, promulgated in 2001 and reaffirmed in subsequent years, outlines a comprehensive campaign to defend human life from conception to natural death, including educational programs, prayer initiatives, and public advocacy. Similarly, the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, in its sixth edition approved in 2016, provides normative guidance for Catholic institutions on issues like end-of-life care, reproductive technologies, and patient rights, integrating theological principles with practical directives. More recently, in June 2024, the bishops approved Keeping Christ's Sacred Promise, a pastoral framework for ministry to Indigenous peoples, developed through consultations to promote cultural sensitivity alongside evangelization and sacramental life. In the realm of liturgical guidance, the USCCB's Committee on Divine Worship (CDW) holds primary responsibility for adapting and approving liturgical texts, music, and practices for the in the United States, in coordination with the International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL) and the . The committee reviews and grants recognitio or concordat cum originali for translations of the and other books, ensuring doctrinal accuracy and pastoral suitability; for example, it oversaw the implementation of the third edition of the on November 27, 2011, which introduced refined English translations of key prayers like the Gloria and . The CDW also issues complementary norms, such as the Guidelines for the Publication of Liturgical Books, which regulate the editing, imprimatur requirements, and inclusion of texts in ritual editions, participation aids, and devotional materials to prevent unauthorized adaptations. Additionally, the 2007 pastoral instruction Sing to the Lord: Music in Divine Worship establishes principles for sacred music, prioritizing and while permitting cultural adaptations, and directs that music enhance the liturgical action rather than serve as performance. These efforts intersect in documents blending pastoral and liturgical elements, such as guidelines for servers and televising the , which balance accessibility with reverence for the sacraments. The USCCB's approach prioritizes unity with universal Church norms while accommodating American contexts, as seen in ongoing reviews of musical settings and formation resources disseminated via the CDW's monthly newsletter.

Educational and Formation Efforts

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) coordinates educational initiatives through its Committee on Catholic Education, which advocates for federal policies aligning with Catholic principles, including parental rights in schooling and equitable access to public funding programs. This committee develops resources such as tool kits with fact sheets, lesson plans, and reports on s, while monitoring legislation on issues like , safety, and nutrition programs. It also operates the Federal Assistance Advisory Commission to maximize participation in federal aid and represent their interests during policy revisions. In K-12 Catholic education, the USCCB promotes integration of and doctrinal frameworks, issuing documents like the Doctrinal Elements of a Curriculum Framework for the Development of Catechetical Materials for Young People of High School Age to guide faith-based curricula. The committee supports over 6,000 Catholic elementary and secondary schools serving approximately 1.6 million students as of recent data, emphasizing cost efficiencies where Catholic per-pupil expenditures average below public school levels, saving taxpayers billions annually. Efforts include newsletters highlighting wins, such as expansions in parental choice, and resources for incorporating respect-life education into school counseling. For clerical formation, the USCCB's Committee on Clergy, Consecrated Life, and Vocations oversees the Program of Priestly Formation, sixth edition, approved by the bishops on November 12, 2019, which outlines training in human, spiritual, intellectual, and pastoral dimensions to prepare candidates for ordained ministry. Complementing this, the Basic Plan for the Ongoing Formation of Priests provides guidelines for post-ordination development, encouraging individualized plans for spiritual growth and ministerial effectiveness. Lay and adult formation receives attention through the Committee on Evangelization and , which fulfills the bishops' mandate for across all ages, including the use of the and stewardship education. Key publications include Our Hearts Were Burning Within Us: A Pastoral Plan for Adult Faith Formation in the United States, outlining goals for conversion, baptismal , and community engagement to foster lifelong discipleship. For lay ecclesial ministers, the USCCB promotes certification programs and surveys academic and diocesan offerings to standardize formation in , , and service. Additional resources address chaste living in catechetical curricula and the integration of in educational settings.

Charitable and Humanitarian Operations

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) coordinates charitable and humanitarian efforts primarily through national collections, grants, and oversight of affiliated agencies, emphasizing aid to the poor, migrants, refugees, and disaster victims in line with Catholic social teaching's "two feet of love in action"—immediate charitable works and advocacy for structural change. Domestically, the USCCB supports the network of 177 agencies and affiliates, which provide services to help individuals and families escape poverty, though these operate at diocesan and parish levels with national coordination via . The Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD), the USCCB's domestic anti-poverty initiative, funds grants to empower low-income communities, breaking cycles of poverty through local participation; in December 2024, the bishops approved nearly 500 grants totaling over $19.5 million for U.S. and overseas aid to the impoverished, vulnerable, and oppressed. Internationally, the USCCB's flagship agency is (CRS), established in 1943 as the official overseas relief and development arm of the U.S. Catholic community, delivering to address basic needs, protect vulnerable children, reunite families, and respond to crises in over 100 countries. The annual CRS Collection, promoted by the USCCB, funds these operations, assisting hundreds of millions affected by poverty, war, and disasters while adhering to Catholic principles. The Bishops' Emergency Disaster Fund further supports pastoral, reconstruction, and relief efforts for natural disasters and crises, such as hurricanes. In migration and refugee services, the USCCB's Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) historically resettled about 18-27% of U.S. refugees through partnerships, making it one of the largest such agencies, while providing aid to migrants via the National Catholic Fund for Migration and Refugee Assistance. These programs, heavily reliant on federal , faced significant cuts in 2025 following the suspension of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program under President Trump, leading to layoffs of about one-third of MRS staff by February 2025 and the termination of federal resettlement contracts by April 2025, impacting operations despite average annual surpluses in migrant services . MRS also addresses , noting that 25% of global victims are children under 18 and nearly 30% are subjected to sexual exploitation.

Doctrinal and Ethical Positions

Protection of Human Life from Conception to Natural Death

The USCCB maintains that every human life is sacred and inviolable from the moment of conception until natural death, grounding this position in the inherent dignity bestowed by God and reaffirmed in Catholic doctrine. Direct assaults on innocent life, including abortion and euthanasia, constitute grave moral evils that undermine the foundation of justice and human rights. The bishops emphasize abortion as the preeminent threat due to its scale, estimating it results in over 900,000 procedures annually in the United States alone, each representing the deliberate termination of an unborn child's life. This stance aligns with papal encyclicals such as Evangelium Vitae (1995), which the USCCB has integrated into its teachings, rejecting any purported right to choose death for the vulnerable. The Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities, operating under the USCCB's Committee on Pro-Life Activities, leads implementation through the Respect Life Program, launched in 1973 shortly after Roe v. Wade legalized abortion nationwide, and subsequent pastoral plans beginning in 1975 to foster a culture of life. These efforts include annual Respect Life Month observances in October, providing parishes with educational materials, prayer novenas, and action alerts to mobilize Catholics against permissive laws. Post the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision overturning Roe, the USCCB has advocated for state-level protections, such as heartbeat bills and support for crisis pregnancy centers, while promoting initiatives like Walking with Moms in Need to assist women facing unplanned pregnancies with material and emotional resources. The bishops also address end-of-life issues by opposing euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, which they classify as false compassion that hastens death rather than alleviating suffering, and by endorsing advance directives that prioritize ordinary care over extraordinary measures. In bioethical domains, the USCCB critiques practices like human embryonic stem cell research and , which involve the destruction of early human embryos, equating them to forms of and calling for ethical alternatives such as research, which has yielded treatments for over 70 conditions without ethical compromise. The bishops' Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship (updated 2023) instructs Catholic voters to prioritize candidates and policies that defend unborn life, while integrating broader pro-life concerns like opposition to the death penalty—viewed as unnecessary in modern society—and support for the disabled and elderly. These positions are disseminated via the Life Issues Forum, statements from committee chairs such as Bishop Daniel E. Thomas (2024–2027 term), and collaborations with dioceses to offer post- healing programs like Project Rachel, serving thousands annually.

Marriage, Family, and Human Sexuality

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) upholds the Catholic Church's doctrine that marriage is a lifelong covenant between one man and one woman, instituted by for the mutual good of spouses and the procreation and education of children. This understanding is rooted in Scripture, particularly Genesis 2:24, which describes spouses becoming "one flesh," and is reaffirmed in the USCCB's 2009 pastoral letter Marriage: Love and Life in the Divine Plan, which emphasizes marriage's dual unitive and procreative purposes. The bishops assert that sexual acts must be both loving and open to life, rejecting artificial contraception as contrary to the natural law inscribed in . Instead, they promote (NFP) as a morally licit method for responsible parenthood, supported by resources like the USCCB's Married Love and the Gift of Life document from 2006. The USCCB views the , structured around this marital union, as the foundational unit of , essential for human flourishing and the transmission of . In their 2021 pastoral framework Called to the Joy of Love, approved by the bishops, they outline ministries to strengthen families through every life stage, drawing on Pope Francis's while maintaining fidelity to unchanging doctrine on indissolubility and fidelity. Divorce and remarriage without are seen as grave moral failings, with the bishops encouraging and sacramental preparation to prevent breakdown, citing data that intact marriages correlate with higher child well-being and spousal happiness. They oppose laws for eroding marital permanence, as articulated in documents like Between Man and Woman (2003). On , the USCCB teaches that it is a divine gift ordered toward marital communion, integrating the powers of and life, and that is required outside while continence applies to the unmarried or celibate. are deemed intrinsically disordered, incapable of fulfilling the complementary, procreative nature of sexuality, though persons experiencing same-sex attraction are called to and respected as individuals made in God's image. The bishops reject the legal equivalence of same-sex unions to , arguing in Between Man and Woman that such redefinitions undermine the by detaching sex from its biological and social ends. Following the 2015 Supreme Court decision, the USCCB reaffirmed this stance, warning of threats to religious liberty and family integrity. They also critique gender ideology, insisting on the binary reality of as rooted in creation and , not subjective identity, as outlined in resources aligning with the Vatican's Male and Female He Created Them. The USCCB supports educational efforts to form consciences on these matters, including programs inspired by , which emphasize sexuality's role in self-gift and divine plan. They advocate against and sexual exploitation, viewing them as distortions that harm family bonds and individual dignity. Through initiatives like the Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage, the bishops engage to protect these principles, prioritizing from showing stable, opposite-sex marriages yield better outcomes for children and society.

Religious Freedom and Conscience Rights

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) asserts that religious liberty, enshrined in the First Amendment, serves as the foundational human right enabling the free exercise of faith in public and private spheres, and it has prioritized its defense against perceived encroachments by government policies. Through its Committee for Religious Liberty, established to coordinate , the USCCB issues annual reports identifying key threats, such as regulatory burdens on faith-based migrant services, compelled participation in procedures violating doctrinal tenets, and nondiscrimination laws that conflict with religious convictions on and . In October 2024, Bishop Timothy P. Broglio, then-president of the USCCB, and Bishop A. Elias Zaidan emphasized religious freedom as a basic human right, echoing Francis's global calls while highlighting domestic priorities like protecting Catholic institutions from mandates overriding . A of the USCCB's efforts is the annual Religious Freedom Week, evolving from the Fortnight for Freedom initiated in 2012 as a 14-day period of , , and public action spanning June 21 to July 4, coinciding with Independence Day and feasts of martyrs like Sts. and . This campaign, reframed in recent years to focus from June 22 to 29, encourages parishes to host homilies, discussions, and events underscoring threats to freedom, including restrictions on Catholic agencies due to opposition to same-sex placements and pressures on healthcare providers to facilitate sterilizations or abortifacients. The USCCB frames these initiatives as defenses of the Church's mission, arguing that erosion of religious liberty undermines societal pluralism by forcing conformity to secular norms over faith-based witness. On conscience rights, the USCCB advocates for legal protections permitting individuals, especially in healthcare and , to decline involvement in acts deemed morally illicit under Catholic teaching, such as providing contraception, , or gender-transition procedures. This stance gained prominence in opposition to the 2011 Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) contraceptive mandate under the , which required employer health plans to cover sterilizations, contraceptives, and drugs like ella-1 considered abortifacient by the bishops, without adequate exemptions for religious entities. The USCCB mobilized over 150 Catholic leaders in ads and legal briefs supporting challenges like that of the , who faced fines for refusing facilitation, and persisted in critiquing post-2012 revisions as insufficiently broad, leading to victories in cases such as Zubik v. Burwell (2016 remanded) and ultimately broader exemptions in 2017. In documents like Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship (updated 2015 and 2023), the bishops urge Catholics to prioritize protections in voting and , rejecting efforts to compel faith-based organizations to subsidize or perform actions contradicting their creedal commitments.

Social Doctrines on Justice, Poverty, and Work

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) articulates its social doctrines on justice, poverty, and work through the lens of , emphasizing the dignity of the human person as foundational to economic life. In the 1986 pastoral letter Economic Justice for All, the bishops apply principles derived from papal encyclicals such as (1891) and (1991) to the U.S. economy, insisting that economic systems must serve people rather than vice versa and be evaluated by their impact on human dignity and the . This framework critiques both unfettered , which can prioritize profit over persons, and , which undermines and —the principle that decisions should be made at the most local level possible. On justice, the USCCB holds that all economic choices and institutions must protect or undermine the life and dignity of the human person, with solidarity requiring pursuit of and peace across societal divides. The 1996 document A Catholic Framework for Economic Life distills this into ten principles, including that the economy exists for the person, supports families, and assigns complementary roles to free markets, , and voluntary associations without absolving any from . Economic policies are deemed just if they foster participation in the , uphold rights to and economic initiative, and ensure workers, owners, and consumers act as moral agents. Regarding poverty, the USCCB invokes the preferential and vulnerable as a core test of societal morality, rooted in scriptural mandates such as Matthew 25:31-46, where aid to the needy is equated with service to Christ. This option demands prioritizing the needs of the poor over desires of the affluent, enabling their full participation in rather than mere charity, and judging economies by how they address vulnerabilities like hunger and homelessness. The bishops advocate for policies ensuring basic rights to , , healthcare, and , while committing to combat domestic poverty through advocacy for tax credits, budget protections, and programs targeting joblessness. For work, the USCCB teaches that labor is not merely a means of livelihood but a continuation of God's creative act, as in Genesis 2:15, entitling workers to productive , just wages, safe conditions, and the right to organize unions without interference. Biblical precedents like Deuteronomy 24:14-15 underscore timely payment of wages, while policy calls include steady jobs for all and rejection of profit-driven layoffs that erode family stability. Individuals bear a to contribute through work where possible, aligning personal responsibility with societal structures that promote economic initiative and reject as a solution to .

Public Policy Advocacy

Domestic Policy Engagements

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) engages in domestic policy advocacy primarily through its Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, which coordinates efforts to influence federal legislation on issues affecting human dignity, including alleviation, healthcare access, , and . This work is supported by the USCCB's Office of Government Relations, which directs legislative activities to shape congressional actions while adhering to federal limits for tax-exempt organizations. In fiscal year 2026 appropriations discussions, for instance, the committee urged to prioritize funding for programs serving vulnerable populations, including increased resources for and anti- initiatives. In healthcare policy, the USCCB has advocated for expanded access to care for the underserved, such as supporting protections in a February 27, 2025, letter to the 119th signed by Borys Gudziak and others, emphasizing coverage for low-income families without endorsing procedures contrary to Church teachings on life issues. Additional efforts include backing the and Education and Training Act through letters dated August 13, 2025, and July 12, 2023, to promote alternatives, and a May 8, 2024, letter calling for improvements in programs. On economic justice and domestic poverty, the USCCB has pressed for reforms to welfare systems, including support for the SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act in a March 4, 2025, letter, and protections for nutrition and agriculture programs in Farm Bill advocacy on June 25, 2025, and budget reconciliation discussions on June 26, 2025. These positions draw from principles outlined in the USCCB's 1996 Catholic Framework for Economic Life, which prioritizes an economy serving human needs over unchecked , with calls for policies ensuring access to , , and opportunities for the poor. Housing advocacy similarly focuses on federal funding increases to address , as detailed in the August 8, 2025, appropriations letter. Criminal justice engagements emphasize rehabilitation and restorative approaches, with endorsements of the Second Chance Reauthorization Act on July 29, 2024, to aid reentry programs for former inmates, and the RESTORE Act on June 9, 2023, for victim-offender mediation. The USCCB supported the in June 2022 for prevention measures, the De-escalation Training Act in August 2022, and the EQUAL Act in August 2022 for sentencing disparities. Regarding , the committee maintains a campaign against the death penalty, declaring it "inadmissible" per updated teachings and issuing statements opposing federal executions, such as in 2019 and 2021 critiques of resumed practices under prior administrations. In , the USCCB promotes parental and equitable funding, welcoming executive actions on January 31, 2025, to expand options for families regardless of income, and advocating for federal programs like tax credits and scholarships to support Catholic and other schools. This includes backing legislation such as the Educational Choice for Children Act and provisions in the July 2025 "One Big Beautiful Bill" for nationwide scholarships, while urging protections for religious liberty in public funding mechanisms.

Immigration and Refugee Policies

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), through its Committee on Migration, promotes immigration policies aligned with , which recognizes the human right to migrate to sustain life and families while affirming nations' sovereign authority to regulate entry for the . This framework underpins advocacy for comprehensive reform addressing root causes like and , alongside legal pathways that prioritize family unity and labor protections. The USCCB has consistently endorsed bipartisan legislation incorporating secure borders, such as enhanced to prevent migrant deaths during crossings, paired with expanded legal options and a pathway to earned for long-term undocumented residents. practices, it argues, must respect family bonds, community integration, and religious freedoms, avoiding separations that undermine human dignity. In practice, this includes opposition to policies perceived as overly punitive, such as certain executive actions in January 2025 that revoked humanitarian protections, which the USCCB warned would endanger vulnerable families and children. On refugee policy, the USCCB's Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) operates the world's largest resettlement program, collaborating with the U.S. government to integrate individuals vetted abroad through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP). provides initial reception, housing, employment assistance, and cultural orientation, resettling thousands annually; for instance, in fiscal year 2023, the U.S. admitted over 60,000 from regions including the Democratic Republic of Congo, , and , with handling placements via local diocesan affiliates. The program, funded partly by federal grants, emphasizes self-sufficiency within months, though operations faced cuts in early 2025 following reduced admissions ceilings, leading to staff layoffs affecting one-third of migration personnel. Recent USCCB statements reflect heightened advocacy amid enforcement surges, as in June 2025 when President Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio pledged with affected migrants while supporting lawful measures for public order and security. Similarly, in January 2025, Bishop Mark J. Seitz reiterated that dignity transcends citizenship or status, urging protections against status-based discrimination. In November 2025, the USCCB issued a special pastoral message on immigration, opposing indiscriminate mass deportations, expressing solidarity with immigrants and their families, urging assistance to meet basic needs, and advocating for comprehensive immigration reform. These positions prioritize empirical humanitarian needs—such as family preservation amid 2023-2025 border encounters exceeding 2 million annually—over unrestricted entry, though critics from enforcement perspectives contend they underemphasize causal links between policy leniency and incentivized irregular migration.

International Affairs and Conflict Resolutions

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) addresses international affairs through its Committee on International Justice and Peace, which advises on issues including integral human development, , religious freedom, and . The committee promotes by advocating for policies that prioritize , , and the resolution of conflicts via and , while evaluating military actions under just war criteria such as legitimate authority, just cause, right intention, proportionality, and discrimination between combatants and civilians. In , the USCCB has issued statements urging and , such as a September 24, 2025, message expressing support for African bishops amid ongoing violence, emphasizing respect for human life and the need for ceasefires and aid. On the Israel-Palestine conflict, the USCCB commits to a just peace that protects civilians, promotes the Christian presence in the , and condemns cycles of violence, as reiterated in an October 27, 2023, statement calling for amid regional escalations. For the Russia-Ukraine war, José H. Gomez issued a February 24, 2022, call for national and fasting to end hostilities, aligning with broader appeals for diplomatic intervention. The USCCB advocates against arms proliferation, supporting restrictions on landmines, cluster munitions, drones, and the international arms trade to prevent escalation and civilian harm. It also backs U.S. foreign assistance for , , and development to foster stability, viewing such as essential for preventing conflicts rooted in and . Recent emphases include linking to peace, as in an October 24, 2025, joint statement by committee chairs asserting that undermines national stability and requires international advocacy. These efforts reflect a consistent framework prioritizing over geopolitical expediency, though critics from security-focused perspectives argue such positions sometimes overlook deterrence needs in asymmetric threats.

Electoral Guidance for Catholics

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) issues electoral guidance primarily through its document Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility, which outlines the moral framework for Catholic participation in U.S. elections. First promulgated in 2007 and revised in subsequent election cycles, including a 2015 update and a 2023 introductory note approved by the bishops' body, the document stresses that Catholics have a to engage in civic life while forming consciences aligned with Church doctrine on human dignity and the . It explicitly rejects partisan endorsements or candidate ratings by the USCCB, emphasizing instead personal moral discernment over allegiance to political parties or ideologies. Central to the guidance is the prioritization of issues threatening human life and , with direct attacks on innocent life—such as and —designated as "preeminent" among separable moral concerns. In November 2023, the USCCB voted 221-4 to reaffirm this stance in an updated doctrinal note, stating that the threat of "remains our preeminent priority" due to its scale—affecting over 900,000 unborn lives annually in the U.S. as of recent data—and its foundational role in Catholic . The document instructs voters that support for laws or policies permitting intrinsically evil acts, like the intentional destruction of embryos or , cannot be justified by appeals to broader goods such as alleviation or , as these latter issues involve prudential judgments rather than non-negotiable moral absolutes. Catholics are urged to evaluate candidates and platforms holistically but with life issues as the "first and fundamental" criterion, applying principles like (decisions at the most local effective level) and (mutual responsibility for the vulnerable). For instance, the guidance critiques both major U.S. parties: one for expansive rights and the other for insufficient commitment to family-supporting policies or just war doctrine. In practice, this has led the USCCB to promote voter education initiatives, such as bulletins and resources, encouraging registration and turnout—only 64% of eligible voters participated in 2012, per historical data—while prohibiting partisan campaigning in tax-exempt Catholic entities. The USCCB complements this with campaigns like "Civilize It: A Better Kind of ," launched to foster respectful amid polarization, drawing on papal teachings that political engagement must serve the without reducing faith to . While affirming democracy's value, the bishops warn against in voting, insisting that conscience formation precedes ballot choices and requires , scriptural reflection, and on doctrines like the sanctity of life from conception to natural death. This approach has drawn criticism from some progressive Catholics for overemphasizing , but the bishops maintain it reflects consistent magisterial teaching, as reiterated in Pope John Paul II's (1995) and Pope Francis's emphases on integral human development.

Response to Major Crises

Clergy Sexual Abuse Scandal

The clergy sexual abuse scandal in the gained national prominence in 2002 following investigative reporting by on systemic mishandling of abuse s in the Archdiocese of Boston, revealing patterns of priest reassignments without accountability. In response, the Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) convened an emergency meeting in Dallas, Texas, on June 14, 2002, where it unanimously adopted the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People. This document established a "zero-tolerance" policy mandating the permanent removal from ministry of any cleric with a substantiated of of a minor, alongside requirements for background checks, safe environment training, and immediate reporting to civil authorities. The USCCB also created the National Review Board, composed of lay experts, to oversee implementation and commissioned independent audits. To quantify the scope, the USCCB tasked John Jay College of Criminal Justice with analyzing diocesan records from 1950 to 2002, resulting in the 2004 John Jay Report: The Nature and Scope of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States. It identified 10,667 credible allegations against 4,392 priests and deacons—approximately 4% of the 109,694 active clergy during that period—with incidents peaking in the 1960s and 1970s before declining sharply by the 1980s. Victims were predominantly male (81%) and post-pubescent (78%), suggesting patterns more akin to ephebophilia than pedophilia in most cases. A follow-up 2011 Causes and Context study by the same researchers found no single predictor but highlighted contributing factors including seminary admissions of candidates with homosexual inclinations during a period of relaxed psychological screening (post-1950s to 1980s), alongside poor oversight and a culture of clericalism that prioritized institutional reputation over victim protection. These empirical findings underscore causal elements rooted in flawed personnel practices rather than doctrinal issues, though subsequent analyses have noted media amplification of the scandal often omits comparative data showing similar or higher abuse rates in secular institutions like public schools. Implementation of the has been monitored through annual audits by the USCCB's Secretariat of Child and Youth Protection, with the 2024 (covering July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024) documenting 902 allegations from 855 victims against — a decline from 1,308 allegations the prior year—and confirming 99% compliance among 176 dioceses/eparchies. Over 2 million adults and youth have received safe environment training since 2002, and dioceses report all allegations to authorities per civil law. The USCCB has also addressed , establishing a 2019 protocol under Vos estis lux mundi for investigating misconduct and creating a 2020 reporting mechanism for abuse by bishops. Later developments tested these reforms. The 2018 Pennsylvania report detailed over 300 abusive priests and more than 1,000 victims across six dioceses, primarily historical cases with cover-ups via reassignments. USCCB President Cardinal responded on August 14, 2018, expressing sorrow and pledging enhanced transparency, though critics argued the response lacked independent oversight. In the case, where the former cardinal faced substantiated abuse claims spanning decades leading to his 2019 laicization, the USCCB in 2018 advocated for a Vatican-led investigation and full disclosure, welcoming the 2020 Holy See report that confirmed institutional knowledge gaps but faulted inadequate prior handling. Criticisms persist, including from victim advocacy groups like SNAP, which contend the 's focus on minors excludes adult victimizations (e.g., seminarians) and lacks enforceable penalties for non-compliant bishops, potentially allowing residual risks. Empirical audits indicate sustained low incidence of new abuse post-2002, attributing effectiveness to mandatory reporting and , though some diocesan non-compliance in early years delayed full efficacy. Independent reviews, such as those in peer-reviewed journals, affirm the policies' role in containment but caution against over-reliance on self-audits amid historical trust erosion. The USCCB continues revisions, with discussions in 2025 exploring expanded safeguarding beyond the original framework.

COVID-19 Pandemic Challenges

During the early stages of the in March 2020, the USCCB supported diocesan decisions to suspend public Masses and sacramental celebrations in response to government-imposed lockdowns aimed at curbing viral spread, while providing resources such as online prayers, catechetical materials, and virtual Mass options to sustain the faithful's spiritual life. These measures, implemented variably across dioceses under individual bishops' authority rather than uniform USCCB mandate, addressed immediate public health risks but posed challenges in preserving communal worship, access, and Eucharistic participation, leading to widespread dispensations from Sunday obligation. The conference emphasized hygiene protocols and prudence, yet acknowledged emerging human costs of prolonged isolation, including heightened despair and disrupted parish operations, as noted by USCCB President José Gomez in his June 2020 address. The USCCB advocated for religious freedom amid uneven state restrictions, urging equitable treatment of churches comparable to secular gatherings like protests or retail operations, and supported legal challenges where bishops contested closures deemed discriminatory. By late 2020 and into 2021, as restrictions eased, the highlighted ongoing barriers to full sacramental recovery, with surveys indicating near-universal disruption to rites and finances among responding bishops. Internally, disparate approaches among bishops—some resuming in-person Masses earlier with safety protocols, others extending suspensions—strained coordination, reflecting the USCCB's non-binding advisory role on liturgical matters. Ethical dilemmas surrounding vaccines emerged as a prominent challenge, with the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine issuing December 2020 guidance affirming the moral permissibility of available vaccines ( and ) despite their remote connection to abortion-derived fetal cell lines used in testing, citing the gravity of the and absence of untainted alternatives as sufficient for proportionate reasoning under . However, the conference cautioned against complacency toward abortion's role in vaccine development, warning that widespread acceptance should not weaken opposition to such practices, and deemed the vaccine more problematic due to direct use of HEK-293 cells in production. Framing as an act of charity, the statements balanced imperatives with pro-life principles, though they faced criticism from some Catholics for insufficient emphasis on conscientious objection amid mandates. Additional strains included addressing healthcare rationing protocols, where USCCB chairmen in April 2020 rejected utilitarian frameworks prioritizing age or productivity over inherent human dignity, insisting on equitable treatment regardless of crisis resource scarcity. The also complicated advocacy for vulnerable populations, as seen in January 2021 calls for targeted relief funding to mitigate disproportionate impacts on the poor, while navigating policy shifts like temporary immigration halts affecting services. Overall, these challenges tested the USCCB's capacity to uphold doctrinal consistency, foster unity among autonomous dioceses, and interface with civil authorities without compromising core teachings on , , and charity.

Cultural and Ideological Pressures

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has encountered significant cultural and ideological pressures from secular relativism, gender theory, and progressive mandates that conflict with Catholic anthropology, which affirms the binary nature of human sexuality rooted in biological reality and divine creation. In addressing gender ideology, the USCCB's Committee on Doctrine released the "Doctrinal Note on the Moral Limits to Technological Manipulation of the Human Body" on March 20, 2023, arguing that interventions such as puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for gender dysphoria do not resolve psychological distress but instead mutilate the body, undermine human dignity, and contradict the inseparability of body and soul. This position aligns with empirical evidence from medical reviews, such as those from the Cass Report in the UK (2024), which found insufficient evidence for the efficacy and safety of youth gender transitions, prompting the USCCB to advocate for therapeutic approaches focused on holistic mental health rather than ideological affirmation. These pressures manifest in threats to religious liberty, as documented in the USCCB's 2025 Annual Report on the State of Religious Liberty, which details how gender ideology has compelled Catholic entities—hospitals, schools, and agencies—to participate in or facilitate procedures and policies endorsing gender transitions, often under federal regulations like those from the Department of Health and Human Services. For instance, proposed legislation such as the Equality Act has been critiqued by the USCCB for forcing Catholic providers to perform gender-affirming care, eroding conscience protections and prioritizing ideological conformity over First Amendment rights; the report anticipates potential relief in 2025 from shifts in administrative policy but warns of ongoing litigation in public schools where parental rights clash with mandates for gender accommodation. Secularism exacerbates these challenges by fostering moral relativism, which the USCCB counters through catechetical efforts to reinforce belief in objective truth and God, as outlined in resources like "Confronting Secularism Today," emphasizing communal witness over isolated individualism. Internally, the USCCB grapples with ideological divisions among its membership, where progressive-leaning bishops occasionally advocate for softer engagements with cultural issues—such as emphasizing over doctrinal rigor—while a majority upholds orthodox stances, as evidenced by consistent elections favoring doctrinally conservative figures since 2019. These tensions, heightened during debates on Eucharistic coherence and political endorsements in 2021-2022, have not fractured core policy but underscore causal pressures from academia and media biases that amplify dissenting voices within the episcopate, often framing traditional teachings as obstacles to dialogue. Despite this, the conference's unified statements on life and family issues demonstrate resilience, prioritizing empirical fidelity to Church over accommodation to transient ideologies.

Financial Operations

Revenue Streams and Budgeting

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) derives its revenue primarily from diocesan assessments, national collections, and government grants, with total revenues, support, and gains amounting to $245.8 million in fiscal year 2023. Diocesan assessments, totaling $12.4 million (5% of revenue), fund core operational activities such as administrative functions and pastoral initiatives, with each of the approximately 176 U.S. dioceses and eparchies contributing a fixed annual share approved by the bishops. These assessments have remained stable at around $12.35 million in recent years, with no increase approved for the 2025 operating budget. National collections, raised through parish-level appeals for specific causes, contributed $84.2 million (34% of revenue) in 2023, supporting restricted programs like and domestic anti-poverty efforts. Government contracts and grants formed the largest stream at $129.6 million (53% of revenue), almost entirely allocated to migration and refugee services through the USCCB's Migration and Refugee Services division, which subcontracts with partner agencies. Smaller sources included investment income ($2.7 million), royalties ($3.0 million), and other contributions like bequests and publication sales, totaling under 7% combined.
Revenue CategoryAmount (FY 2023)Percentage
Government contracts/$129.6 million53%
National collections$84.2 million34%
Diocesan assessments$12.4 million5%
Other (s, royalties, etc.)$19.6 million8%
The USCCB's budgeting process involves annual approval by the Administrative Committee and full body of bishops, focusing on unrestricted funds from assessments and a quasi-endowment draw (5.5% of year-end balance) to cover operations, while restricted revenues like and collections are earmarked for program expenses. In 2023, operating expenses of $247.7 million exceeded revenues by $2 million, resulting in a deficit offset by nonoperating gains that increased net assets to $304.9 million. Audited consolidated , prepared under U.S. , ensure oversight, with program services comprising 94% of expenditures, predominantly migration-related.

Expenditure Priorities and Oversight

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) allocates the majority of its expenditures to program services, with migration and assistance comprising the largest category. In 2023, total operating expenses reached $247.7 million, of which $130.5 million—over 52%—was directed toward Migration and Refugee Services, including $117.2 million in subrecipient contracts for direct aid such as resettlement and legal support. This priority reflects substantial reliance on federal government contracts and , which accounted for $129.6 million in revenue that year, funding operational costs like staff salaries, travel, and professional services tied to migrant programs. Other significant allocations included $82.0 million for National Collections, primarily and donations supporting global relief, domestic alleviation, and Catholic Campaign for Human Development initiatives; $11.0 million for communications, , and advocacy efforts; and $9.0 million for pastoral activities such as doctrinal formation and liturgical resources. Administrative and general expenses totaled $12.0 million in 2023, covering salaries, office operations, and overhead, representing about 5% of total spending. These priorities align with the USCCB's mission to address human needs, though critics, including analyses from independent Catholic outlets, have questioned whether heavy migration-focused outlays—often exceeding direct program efficiency benchmarks—divert resources from core ecclesiastical functions like evangelization or priestly support, especially given that diocesan assessments contribute only $12.4 million annually to the overall . Functional expense classifications in audited reports emphasize pass-through , where 83% of migrant program disbursements go directly to subrecipients rather than internal retention, mitigating concerns over profit motives but highlighting dependency on volatile appropriations. Financial oversight is maintained through the USCCB's Finance and Accounting Services Office, directed by a responsible for budgeting, monitoring, and safeguarding resources in line with and U.S. . Annual consolidated , including supplemental schedules for affiliates like , undergo independent audits by firms such as LLP, which issued unqualified opinions for 2023 confirming no material misstatements and fair presentation of accounts. These audits assess compliance with grant terms, internal controls over federal awards, and expense allocations, with public disclosure mandated for transparency; however, the absence of a dedicated external oversight board beyond episcopal plenary assemblies has drawn scrutiny for potentially limiting in politically sensitive spending areas. Diocesan finance councils provide indirect input via assessments, but ultimate authority rests with the bishops' conference, ensuring alignment with pastoral priorities while exposing operations to federal Single Audit Act requirements for grant-funded programs.

Funding Controversies and Reforms

The Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD), the USCCB's primary anti-poverty initiative launched in , has faced persistent criticism for allocating funds to organizations engaged in activities incompatible with Catholic doctrine, such as support for , contraception, or advocacy. Investigations by groups like the Lepanto Institute revealed that, from 2020 to 2021, over 30% of CCHD grantees violated Catholic moral teachings on life and family issues, prompting defunding of specific recipients but no systemic overhaul. In , the program's executive director resigned amid financial irregularities, including promises of grants exceeding available funds by millions, leading to staff reductions and diocesan bishops reconsidering participation in annual collections that generated about $8 million yearly. Critics, including prominent Catholic lay organizations, have urged its dissolution, arguing it prioritizes progressive activism over genuine poverty alleviation aligned with Church principles. USCCB's Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) has drawn scrutiny over its reliance on federal grants, which comprised over 95% of its budget—approximately $129.6 million in 2023—for resettling refugees and aiding unaccompanied minors. Detractors contend this dependency incentivizes lax enforcement of immigration laws and indirect support for human trafficking networks, as subcontractors have included groups facilitating border crossings without adequate vetting. Audited statements confirm MRS expended more than it received annually, refuting profit allegations, yet conservatives argue the arrangement compromises ecclesiastical independence by tying advocacy to government contracts. Funding suspensions in early 2025 under the Trump administration triggered USCCB lawsuits claiming unlawful disruption, alongside layoffs of over 50 staff, highlighting vulnerability to policy shifts. A 2023 class-action , O'Connell v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, accused the conference of misleading donors to the collection—intended for the pope's charitable works—by diverting portions to Vatican administrative costs amid scandals like those involving Cardinal Becciu. The alleged and breach of fiduciary duty, seeking restitution for contributions totaling millions annually from U.S. dioceses. While USCCB maintained transparency in financial reports, the case underscored donor concerns over accountability in transatlantic fund transfers. In response, USCCB implemented biennial ideological reviews of CCHD grantees starting in the , defunding non-compliant organizations, though enforcement gaps persisted per independent audits. Annual independent financial audits, mandated since the conference's canonical establishment, ensure compliance, with 2023 statements disclosing $200 million in total revenue primarily from diocesan assessments and collections. Budget reforms in included 20% staff cuts in justice and peace departments to address deficits exceeding $10 million, prioritizing core operations over expansive programs. These measures, coupled with ad hoc committees on fiscal best practices, aim to enhance transparency amid declining collections post-clergy scandals, though critics maintain deeper structural changes are needed to align expenditures with doctrinal priorities.

Leadership Roster

Presidents

The president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is elected by acclamation or ballot from among the bishops at the conclusion of the annual plenary assembly, typically serving a single three-year term (with the first term, 1966–1971, lasting five years). The president chairs the Administrative , oversees conference operations between plenary sessions, appoints committee members, and serves as the primary public voice and representative of the bishops in engagements with government officials, other religious bodies, and the . The role emphasizes coordination on pastoral priorities such as , , , and , while adhering to canonical norms that limit national conferences' authority to advisory and administrative functions rather than doctrinal legislation without Vatican approval.
PresidentTermSee
John F. Dearden1966–1971
Cardinal John Krol1971–1974
Joseph L. Bernardin1974–1977
John R. Quinn1977–1980
Timothy M. Dolan2010–2013New York
Joseph E. Kurtz2013–2016Louisville
Cardinal Daniel N. DiNardo2016–2019Galveston-Houston
José H. Gomez2019–2022
Timothy P. Broglio2022–2025Military Services, USA
![Archbishop Gomez.jpg][float-right] The election process requires a two-thirds majority on the second if no candidate achieves it initially, with nominees limited to active bishops under 75 who have previously served as committee chairs. Terms commence immediately following the electing plenary and conclude at the end of the successor's election assembly. As of October 2025, the bishops are preparing to elect Broglio's successor during the November plenary, with candidates including Paul S. Coakley of among nominees.

Vice-Presidents

The of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is elected by the member bishops to a three-year, non-renewable term as one of four principal officers, alongside the president, , and . This role entails assisting the president in overseeing conference operations, representing the USCCB in ecumenical and interreligious dialogues, and chairing sessions in the president's absence. The position is customarily a precursor to the presidency, with the often ascending upon the president's term conclusion, though bylaws do not mandate this succession. Elections for president and occur biennially during the USCCB's plenary assembly, typically in ; the president is selected first by simple majority from a slate of 10 nominees, after which the is chosen by plurality from the remaining candidates. Terms commence at the assembly's close, with the 2025 plenary set to elect successors to the current officers amid ongoing discussions of conference priorities. The following table lists vice presidents serving since 2010:
NameDiocese/ArchdioceseTerm
2022–2025
Allen H. Vigneron2019–2022
José H. Gomez2016–2019
Daniel N. DiNardoGalveston-Houston2013–2016
Joseph E. KurtzLouisville2010–2013
Archbishop Lori, a canon lawyer with prior USCCB roles in religious liberty and efforts, assumed office succeeding Vigneron, who had chaired the Committee on Doctrine. DiNardo and Gomez, both later presidents, exemplified the trajectory from to leading the conference during periods of doctrinal and focus.

Notable Committee Leaders

Most Reverend James Massa, of , serves as chairman of the Committee on Doctrine, which evaluates theological documents and addresses deviations from Catholic teaching, such as approving critiques of certain moral theologies in 2023. Bishop Daniel E. Thomas of Toledo chairs the Committee on Pro-Life Activities, guiding the USCCB's advocacy against , , and related policies, with his term spanning November 2024 to November 2027; the committee has coordinated annual statements and legal interventions, including opposition to expanded laws. Bishop Kevin C. Rhoades of the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend leads the Committee for Religious Liberty, which defends ecclesiastical exemptions from mandates infringing on , such as vaccine requirements during the era and nondiscrimination laws conflicting with Church doctrine on marriage. Bishop Thomas John Paprocki of , chairs the Committee on Canonical Affairs and Church Governance, focusing on ecclesiastical law reforms and handling cases of clerical misconduct under canon norms. Historically prominent figures include Archbishop of , who as former chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty spearheaded lawsuits against the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate in 2012, establishing precedents for religious exemptions upheld by the in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014). Bishop Michael F. Burbidge of Arlington, , chaired the Pro-Life Activities Committee starting in 2022, emphasizing fetal protection legislation amid state-level referenda. These leaders exemplify the USCCB's committee structure, where chairs are elected for three-year terms to align episcopal priorities with magisterial fidelity.

Criticisms and Debates

Allegations of Political Partisanship

Conservative critics have accused the USCCB of exhibiting partisan bias toward Democratic immigration policies, primarily due to its Migration and Refugee Services (MRS) division's dependence on federal grants exceeding $129.6 million in 2023 for resettling refugees and aiding migrants, which they argue creates financial incentives to advocate for lax enforcement and expanded legal pathways rather than prioritizing border security. Such funding, critics contend, constitutes over half of the USCCB's operational budget in related areas and influences lobbying efforts, including the Justice for Immigrants campaign launched in 2004 to promote comprehensive reform with amnesty provisions, positioning the conference as an advocate for positions that align more closely with liberal agendas on open borders despite Catholic teachings emphasizing ordered migration. These allegations intensified under the Trump administration, with Vice President JD Vance publicly criticizing the USCCB in January 2025 for opposing executive actions on deportations and raids, claiming the bishops' stance undermined national sovereignty and prioritized institutional interests over the . The USCCB's January 2025 guidelines on , which discouraged military involvement in deportations and emphasized humane treatment, drew further rebuke from conservative Catholics who viewed them as selectively applying moral urgency to migrant while downplaying risks of unchecked inflows, such as and cultural strain, thereby echoing partisan divides rather than neutral doctrine. In September 2025, the bishops' committee on migration decried intensified enforcement disrupting life, reinforcing perceptions of alignment against Republican-led measures. From the opposing perspective, progressive Catholic outlets have alleged USCCB partisanship toward Republicans through its doctrinal emphasis on as a preeminent evil, exemplified by the 2021 debate over a Eucharistic coherence document targeting pro-choice politicians like President Biden, which critics framed as selective moralism ignoring GOP shortcomings on or . This focus, they argue, tacitly endorses conservative platforms by elevating one issue in voter guides and public statements, despite the conference's formal policy against endorsing candidates, as reaffirmed in July 2025 amid IRS rule changes. The USCCB maintains that its positions derive from consistent magisterial teaching on human dignity, not electoral favoritism, though detractors on both sides cite internal episcopal divisions—evident in elections of presidents like Gomez—as evidence of underlying ideological fractures influencing policy priorities.

Disputes Over Doctrinal Fidelity and Implementation

The Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has faced internal divisions over the consistent application of Catholic on the , particularly regarding the reception of Holy Communion by public figures who support policies conflicting with Church teaching on . In June 2021, the USCCB voted 179-83 to draft a document on "The Meaning of Eucharistic Communion in the Life of the Church," aimed at clarifying doctrinal standards for worthiness to receive the amid public advocacy for , which the Church classifies as a grave . Proponents, including Joseph Naumann of Kansas City in , argued that permitting Communion for such politicians creates scandal and undermines doctrinal integrity, citing provisions that bar those conscious of grave sin from the without repentance. Opponents, such as Cardinal Blase Cupich of , contended that the initiative risked politicizing the and overstepping individual bishops' authority on pastoral discernment, emphasizing mercy over uniform enforcement. The Vatican intervened via a letter from Cardinal Luis Ladaria, prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, urging avoidance of national policies that could appear targeted, which delayed and softened the final document approved in November 2021, focusing on general teaching rather than specific cases like President . These debates reflect broader tensions within the USCCB on implementing papal directives amid doctrinal fidelity, notably Pope Francis's 2021 , which restricted the Extraordinary Form of the (Traditional Latin Mass) to promote liturgical unity. The USCCB president, José Gómez, acknowledged the document's intent to safeguard the Novus Ordo Missae as the "unique expression" of the but deferred implementation to individual dioceses, leading to uneven application and criticism from traditionalist factions. Bishops like those in Arlington, Virginia, initially permitted limited continuations, while others, such as in , faced backlash in 2025 for abrupt restrictions, prompting accusations of overly rigid enforcement that alienated faithful attached to the older rite and questioned the 's empirical basis for claimed divisions. A leaked 2025 Vatican report reportedly identified "major cracks" in ' foundations, including overstated risks of doctrinal , fueling USCCB discussions on balancing obedience with pastoral realities. Concerns over have further highlighted disputes, with USCCB committee chairman Bishop Kevin Rhoades warning in 2024 that decentralized listening processes risk "doctrinal fragmentation" if they prioritize subjective experiences over immutable teachings. During the Synod on Synodality (2021–2024), progressive voices within the conference advocated broader inclusion in discernment, echoing interpretations of (2016) that allow mitigated culpability for irregular unions, while critics argued this dilutes objective moral norms on marriage indissolubility. The USCCB's promotion of through resources like pastoral frameworks avoided explicit endorsement of controversial footnotes permitting Communion in select cases, yet internal variances in application—some bishops granting dispensations, others upholding traditional barriers—have perpetuated perceptions of inconsistent fidelity. These frictions underscore a causal divide: stricter adherence to doctrinal absolutes versus adaptive implementation, with empirical data from synodal consultations revealing U.S. Catholics' desires for unity amid tensions over authority and orthodoxy.

Administrative and Financial Accountability Issues

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has encountered significant criticisms regarding the transparency and oversight of its financial operations, particularly in managing national collections such as the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). Established in 1969 as an anti-poverty initiative, the CCHD has faced accusations of funding organizations engaged in activities contrary to Catholic moral teachings, including support for pro-abortion advocacy and Marxist-aligned groups, dating back to the 1980s. In response to such scrutiny, the USCCB conducted a 2010 "Review and Renewal" process, which acknowledged policy violations and pledged enhanced ideological screening and accountability measures for grantees. Despite these reforms, the program's financial reporting has drawn further rebuke; for instance, CCHD has not published its annual grants list since 2021, despite prior commitments to transparency, leaving donors without visibility into fund allocation. Financial strains intensified in recent years, culminating in the resignation of longtime CCHD director Ralph McCloud in April 2024 amid questions about the program's sustainability and management. The 2023 annual report revealed expenditures exceeding collections by $11.4 million, following a $5.7 million deficit in 2022, with assets plummeting from $55 million to near depletion by mid-2024. These shortfalls contributed to broader USCCB layoffs in June 2024, including CCHD staff, as the conference grappled with declining contributions—from $20 million in 2016 to $4 million by 2020—partly attributed to donor backlash over funding controversies. USCCB officials have defended the cuts as necessary for fiscal prudence, asserting that overall conference finances remain stable per 2023 audits, though closed-door plenary discussions in June 2024 highlighted ongoing deliberations about CCHD's viability without resolving transparency deficits. Another focal point of financial accountability concerns involves the annual collection, which the USCCB promotes in parishes to support papal charities. A class-action filed in 2020 by donor Mark O'Connell accused the USCCB of fraudulent solicitation by portraying the funds as aiding the needy and Pope's direct works, while allegedly allowing Vatican misappropriation into speculative investments and non-charitable uses, amassing hundreds of millions without adequate safeguards. The USCCB contested the claims, arguing that promotional materials accurately described support for the Holy See's mission and that donors assume risks in giving. As of April 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected the USCCB's motion to dismiss, permitting the case to proceed and underscoring unresolved questions about donor protections and inter-institutional fund flows. Administratively, these financial lapses have intersected with broader challenges, including limited enforcement mechanisms for internal oversight. Critics, including Catholic groups, contend that the USCCB's —lacking binding over member bishops—hampers rigorous audits and corrective actions, as evidenced by persistent non-compliance findings in related diocesan financial transparency studies, where over 60% of dioceses failed to post comprehensive data online as of 2017. While the USCCB has issued guidelines like the 2013 Diocesan Financial Issues document emphasizing fraud prevention and council involvement, implementation varies, fueling calls for centralized reforms to mitigate risks estimated in the millions annually across U.S. Catholic entities.

References

  1. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann431-459_en.html
  2. https://www.usccb.org/about
  3. https://www.usccb.org/about/usccb-timeline-1917-2017
  4. https://www.usccb.org/about/leadership
  5. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/catholic-social-teaching/seven-themes-of-catholic-social-teaching
  6. https://www.usccb.org/about/usccb-mission
  7. https://www.usccb.org/resources/NRB-History-5-17-2011.pdf
  8. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/bishops-and-catholic-politicians
  9. https://www.norwichdiocese.org/Stay-Informed/All-Diocesan-Articles/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/321/USCCB-President-Issues-Statement-On-Course-of-Action-Responding-to-Moral-Failures-of-Judgement-on-the-Part-of-Church-Leaders
  10. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/us-bishops-elect-new-conference-president-and-vice-president-november-plenary-assembly
  11. https://www.ncronline.org/opinion/ncr-voices/who-will-be-next-president-us-bishops-conference
  12. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/whos-next-to-lead-at-the-usccb
  13. https://www.usccb.org/offices/general-secretariat/usccb-committees
  14. https://www.usccb.org/committees/doctrine
  15. https://www.usccb.org/committees/divine-worship
  16. https://www.usccb.org/committees/catholic-education
  17. https://www.usccb.org/prolife
  18. https://www.usccb.org/committees/migration
  19. https://www.usccb.org/offices
  20. https://www.usccb.org/about/bishops-and-dioceses
  21. https://www.britannica.com/topic/US-Conference-of-Catholic-Bishops
  22. https://www.usccb.org/listen-teach-send-regional-workshops
  23. https://catholicdos.org/usccb-responsibilities
  24. https://www.usccb.org/about/a-brief-history-of-usccb
  25. https://www.catholicherald.com/article/national/usccb-arose-out-of-national-crisis/
  26. https://guides.lib.cua.edu/c.php?g=1414334&p=10477576
  27. https://www.thearda.com/us-religion/history/timelines/entry?etype=1&eid=318
  28. https://www.catholicherald.com/article/national/world-war-i-brought-catholics-bishops-into-mainstream-of-u-s-society/
  29. https://findingaids.lib.catholic.edu/repositories/2/resources/216
  30. https://lib.cua.edu/wordpress/newsevents/18036/
  31. https://www.worldwar1centennial.org/index.php/communicate/press-media/wwi-centennial-news/2541-a-fighting-chance-for-veterans-the-catholic-church-catholic-university-and-world-war-i.html
  32. https://paulist.org/the-conversation/the-paulists-and-the-first-world-war/
  33. https://www.usccb.org/resources/NCWC-USCCB-townhallfinal.pdf
  34. https://findingaids.lib.catholic.edu/repositories/2/resources/204
  35. https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/recap-us-bishops-fall-plenary-baltimore
  36. https://www.usccb.org/about/mission-directive
  37. https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2024/11/u-s-bishops-vote-to-prioritize-evangelizing-the-unaffiliated-disaffiliated-and-youth/
  38. https://www.usccb.org/jubilee2025
  39. https://www.usccb.org/resources/information-jubilee-2025
  40. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Jubilee%20Information%20Sheet_0.pdf
  41. https://www.usccb.org/resources/jubilee-bishops-usccb-resource-packet-english
  42. https://www.usccb.org/resources/jubilee-teenagers-usccb-resource-packet-english
  43. https://www.usccb.org/resources/jubilee-2025-introductory-video
  44. https://www.usccb.org/prolife/pastoral-plan-pro-life-activities
  45. https://www.usccb.org/resources/ethical-religious-directives-catholic-health-service-sixth-edition-2016-06_0.pdf
  46. https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/us-bishops-approve-new-guidelines-pastoral-ministry-native-peoples
  47. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Indigenous%2520Pastoral%2520Framework%2520-June%25202024-Final%2520Text.pdf
  48. https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/general-instruction-of-the-roman-missal
  49. https://www.usccb.org/committees/divine-worship/policies/guidelines-for-the-publication-of-liturgical-books
  50. https://archden.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/USCCB-Sing-To-The-Lord.pdf
  51. https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/frequently-asked-questions/guidelines-for-altar-servers
  52. https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/frequently-asked-questions/guidelines-for-televising-the-liturgy
  53. https://www.usccb.org/committees/catholic-education/catholic-education-tool-kit
  54. https://www.usccb.org/committees/catholic-education/usccb-federal-assistance-advisorycommission-faac
  55. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Doctrinal%2520Elements%2520of%2520A%2520Curriculum%2520Framework.pdf
  56. https://www.usccb.org/committees/catholic-education/catholic-schools-statistics-and-background
  57. https://www.usccb.org/committees/catholic-education/catholic-education-newsletter
  58. https://www.usccb.org/committees/pro-life-activities/respect-life-catholic-education
  59. https://www.usccb.org/committees/clergy-consecrated-life-vocations/priestly-formation
  60. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/vocations/priesthood/priestly-life-and-ministry/national-plan-for-the-ongoing-formation-of-priests
  61. https://www.usccb.org/committees/evangelization-catechesis/evangelization-and-catechesis-mandate
  62. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/how-we-teach/catechesis/adult-faith-formation/our-hearts
  63. https://www.usccb.org/committees/laity-marriage-family-life-and-youth/lay-ecclesial-ministry
  64. https://www.usccb.org/upload/chaste-living.pdf
  65. https://www.usccb.org/resources/sharing-catholic-social-teaching-challenges-and-directions
  66. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/catholic-social-teaching/two-feet-of-love-in-action
  67. https://www.usccb.org/offices/public-affairs/catholic-health-care-social-services-and-humanitarian-aid
  68. https://www.usccb.org/committees/catholic-campaign-human-development
  69. https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/bishops-grants-seek-bring-gospel-poor-vulnerable-and-oppressed-us-and-overseas
  70. https://www.usccb.org/national-collection/catholic-relief-services-collection
  71. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/global-issues/international-assistance
  72. https://www.usccb.org/catholic-giving/opportunities-for-giving/emergency-collections-and-disaster-relief
  73. https://www.usccb.org/committees/migration/migrants-refugees-and-travelers
  74. https://www.usccb.org/offices/resettlement-services/refugees
  75. https://www.cathstan.org/us-world/usccb-lays-off-a-third-of-migration-staff-after-trumps-suspension-of-refugee-resettlement-program
  76. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/04/07/usccb-bishops-refugee-resettlement-funding/
  77. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/is-migration-padding-the-usccb-bottom
  78. https://www.usccb.org/offices/migration-refugee-services/human-trafficking
  79. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/abortion/living-the-gospel-of-life
  80. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/upload/forming-consciences-for-faithful-citizenship.pdf
  81. https://www.usccb.org/committees/pro-life-activities/political-action-and-legal-reform-evangelium-vitae
  82. https://www.usccb.org/respectlife
  83. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/catholic-social-teaching/life-and-dignity-of-the-human-person
  84. https://www.usccb.org/committees/pro-life-activities/life-matters-catholic-response-death-penalty
  85. https://www.usccb.org/topics/promotion-defense-marriage/faqs-meaning-marriage-sexual-difference
  86. https://www.usccb.org/resources/pastoral-letter-marriage-love-and-life-in-the-divine-plan.pdf
  87. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/love-and-sexuality/married-love-and-the-gift-of-life
  88. https://www.usccb.org/topics/marriage-and-family-life-ministries/pastoral-framework-marriage-and-family-life-ministry
  89. https://www.usccb.org/committees/laity-marriage-family-life-and-youth/research-findings
  90. https://www.usccb.org/topics/promotion-defense-marriage/between-man-and-woman-questions-and-answers-about-marriage-and
  91. https://www.usccb.org/topics/natural-family-planning/love-and-sexuality
  92. https://www.usccb.org/committees/laity-marriage-family-life-youth/homosexuality
  93. https://www.usccb.org/committees/pro-life-activities/human-sexuality-materials
  94. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/natural-family-planning/catholic-teaching/upload/Human-Sexuality-from-God-s-Perspective-Humanae-Vitae-25-Years-Later.pdf
  95. https://www.usccb.org/topics/promotion-defense-marriage/church-teaching
  96. https://www.usccb.org/committees/religious-liberty
  97. https://richmonddiocese.org/religious-freedom-is-a-basic-human-right-say-bishop-rhoades-and-bishop-zaidan/
  98. https://www.usccb.org/committees/religious-liberty/religious-freedom-week
  99. https://www.usccb.org/committees/religious-liberty/fortnight-freedom-homilies
  100. https://www.usccb.org/resources/9-libertas-ecclesiae
  101. https://www.usccb.org/prolife/life-matters-conscience-protection-health-care
  102. https://www.usccb.org/offices/public-affairs/six-things-everyone-should-know-about-hhs-mandate
  103. https://www.usccb.org/news/2011/usccb-urges-rescission-hhs-contraceptive-mandate-criticizes-inexplicably-narrow
  104. https://www.usccb.org/committees/religious-liberty/hhs-mandate
  105. https://www.usccb.org/news/2016/usccb-president-reacts-supreme-court-hhs-mandate-decision
  106. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/forming-consciences-for-faithful-citizenship-part-one
  107. https://www.usccb.org/resources/economicjusticeforall
  108. https://www.usccb.org/resources/catholic-framework-economic-life
  109. https://www.usccb.org/committees/domestic-justice-and-human-development/economic-justice-and-domestic-poverty-0
  110. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/catholic-social-teaching/option-for-the-poor-and-vulnerable
  111. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/catholic-social-teaching/the-dignity-of-work-and-the-rights-of-workers
  112. https://www.usccb.org/committees/domestic-justice-and-human-development
  113. https://www.usccb.org/offices/government-relations
  114. https://www.usccb.org/resources/letter-congress-regarding-fiscal-year-2026-transportation-housing-and-urban-development
  115. https://www.usccb.org/resources/letter-119th-congress-regarding-medicaid-february-27-2025
  116. https://www.usccb.org/resources/letter-senate-support-palliative-care-and-hospice-education-and-training-act
  117. https://www.usccb.org/resources/letter-congress-maternal-health-may-8-2024
  118. https://usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/economic-justice-economy/upload/catholic-framework-economic-life.pdf
  119. https://www.usccb.org/committees/domestic-justice-and-human-development/criminal-justice-restorative-justice
  120. https://www.usccb.org/committees/domestic-justice-and-human-development/death-penalty-capital-punishment
  121. https://www.usccb.org/news/2019/chairman-bishops-committee-domestic-justice-and-human-development-issues-statement-death
  122. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/bishop-oconnell-welcomes-new-executive-actions-promoting-parental-choice-education
  123. https://www.usccb.org/offices/catholic-education/public-policy
  124. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/immigration/catholic-teaching-on-immigration-and-the-movement-of-peoples
  125. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/immigration/churchteachingonimmigrationreform
  126. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/immigration/frequently-asked-questions-comprehensive-immigration-reform
  127. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/executive-actions-will-subject-vulnerable-families-and-children-grave-danger-says-bishop
  128. https://www.usccb.org/committees/migration/resettlement-services
  129. https://www.usccb.org/resources/USRAPexplainer.pdf
  130. https://www.usccb.org/offices/public-affairs/refugees
  131. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/count-commitment-all-us-stand-you-challenging-hour-says-archbishop-broglio
  132. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/human-dignity-not-dependent-persons-citizenship-or-immigration-status
  133. https://www.usccb.org/resources/special-pastoral-message-immigration-november-12-2025
  134. https://www.usccb.org/committees/migration/immigration
  135. https://www.usccb.org/committees/international-justice-and-peace/mandate-and-goals-committee-international-justice-and
  136. https://www.usccb.org/committees/international-justice-and-peace/war-peace
  137. https://www.usccb.org/resources/harvest-justice-sown-peace
  138. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/solidarity-bishops-and-faithful-africa-amidst-ongoing-conflicts
  139. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/global-issues/middle-east/israel-palestine
  140. https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/statement-us-bishops-international-justice-and-peace-chairman-continued-violence-holy
  141. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/global-issues/europe/ukraine
  142. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/get-involved/get-more-information/international-justice-and-peace-legislation
  143. https://www.detroitcatholic.com/news/religious-freedom-fosters-peace-usccb-committee-chairs-say-in-joint-statement
  144. https://www.usccb.org/committees/international-justice-and-peace/human-rights
  145. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256025/us-bishops-approve-voting-guide-that-calls-abortion-preeminent-priority
  146. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/forming-consciences-for-faithful-citizenship-part-two
  147. https://www.usccb.org/resources/voter-education-and-voter-registration
  148. https://www.usccb.org/resources/dos-and-donts-guidelines-during-election-season
  149. https://www.usccb.org/sjp/forming-consciences-faithful-citizenship
  150. https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/forming-consciences-for-faithful-citizenship-introductory-letter
  151. https://www.usccb.org/offices/child-and-youth-protection/charter-protection-children-and-young-people
  152. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Charter-for-the-Protection-of-Children-and-Young-People-2018-final%25281%2529.pdf
  153. https://www.usccb.org/news/2018/statement-national-review-board-calls-lay-leadership-amid-sexual-abuse-crisis
  154. https://www.usccb.org/sites/default/files/issues-and-action/child-and-youth-protection/upload/The-Nature-and-Scope-of-Sexual-Abuse-of-Minors-by-Catholic-Priests-and-Deacons-in-the-United-States-1950-2002.pdf
  155. https://www.usccb.org/news/2011/john-jay-college-reports-no-single-cause-predictor-clergy-abuse
  156. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6026962/
  157. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/us-bishops-secretariat-child-and-youth-protection-releases-annual-report
  158. https://www.usccb.org/resources/2024-annual-report-implementation-charter-protection-children-and-young-people
  159. https://www.usccb.org/news/2018/us-conference-catholic-bishops-administrative-committee-statement-sex-abuse-scandals
  160. https://www.attorneygeneral.gov/report/
  161. https://www.usccb.org/news/2018/president-us-bishops-conference-and-committee-chairman-response-pennsylvania-grand-jury
  162. https://www.usccb.org/news/2020/statement-holy-sees-report-theodore-mccarrick-most-reverend-jose-h-gomez-archbishop-los
  163. https://www.snapnetwork.org/twenty_years_post_dallas_the_limitations_of_the_charter
  164. https://www.usccb.org/resources/2022-annual-report-implementation-charter-protection-children-and-young-people
  165. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/us-bishops-considering-dallas-charter
  166. https://www.usccb.org/committees/communications/covid-19
  167. https://www.usccb.org/news/2020/usccb-statements-coronavirus-covid-19
  168. https://archbishopgomez.org/blog/united-states-conference-of-catholic-bishops-presidential-address-2020
  169. https://catholicvote.org/report/part-1-covid-and-the-catholic-church/
  170. https://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/stories/survey-of-bishops-reveals-how-pandemic-has-shaken-diocesan-parish-life/
  171. https://www.ncronline.org/news/shutdown-religious-services-pandemic-prompts-varied-responses
  172. https://www.usccb.org/moral-considerations-covid-vaccines
  173. https://www.usccb.org/news/2020/us-bishop-chairmen-pro-life-and-doctrine-address-ethical-concerns-new-covid-19-vaccines
  174. https://www.usccb.org/news/2021/us-bishop-chairmen-doctrine-and-pro-life-address-use-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine
  175. https://www.usccb.org/resources/covid-19-vaccines-moral-ethical-concerns
  176. https://www.usccb.org/news/2020/bishop-chairmen-issue-statement-rationing-protocols-health-care-professionals-response
  177. https://www.usccb.org/resources/backgrounder-covid-19-relief-meets-needs-poor-vulnerable-january-2021
  178. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Doctrinal%2520Note%25202023-03-20.pdf
  179. https://www.usccb.org/resources/USCCB_2025_Religious_Liberty_Annual_Report.pdf
  180. https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/how-we-teach/catechesis/catechetical-sunday/enlisting-witnesses/confronting-secularism-today
  181. https://www.ncronline.org/news/conservatives-still-rule-us-bishops-conference
  182. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/a-crowded-field-in-the-usccbs-open-race
  183. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Issued%20FY23%20USCCB%20FS_08.16.2024.pdf
  184. https://catholiccourier.com/articles/us-bishops-focus-on-advancing-core-mission-priorities/
  185. https://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=63287
  186. https://www.usccb.org/about/financial-reporting
  187. https://www.usccb.org/resources/DFM_distribute_publish_06.22.2022_1.pdf
  188. https://www.lepantoin.org/wp/catholic-campaign-for-human-development-closes-all-communication-refuses-to-answer-questions/
  189. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/cchd-head-resigns-program-facing
  190. https://www.lepantoin.org/wp/prominent-catholics-to-us-bishops-shut-down-controversial-campaign/
  191. https://firstthings.com/the-usccb-should-reject-federal-funds/
  192. https://thedialog.org/national-news/audited-financial-statements-prove-catholic-bishops-migration-and-refugee-services-did-not-make-profit-from-federal-funds/
  193. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/usccb-files-lawsuit-unlawful-suspension-us-refugee-admissions-program
  194. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/23-7173/23-7173-2025-04-25.html
  195. https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/at-usccb-demonstrators-say-cchd-evangelizes
  196. https://www.usccb.org/offices/general-secretariat/usccb-officers
  197. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/02/obituaries/john-cardinal-dearden-80-dies-leading-liberal-voice-in-church.html
  198. https://gcatholic.org/dioceses/org/conference-107
  199. https://natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives2/1996d/112296/112296b.htm
  200. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1977/11/16/archbishop-quinn-is-selected-to-head-catholic-conference/75ae2667-b669-42d8-b6f4-522a9d062176/
  201. https://www.stlouisreview.com/story/obituary-archbishop-john-r-quinn/
  202. https://www.usccb.org/news/2010/us-bishops-elect-archbishop-dolan-new-president-archbishop-kurtz-vice-president-bishop
  203. https://archny.org/about/cardinal-dolan/
  204. https://www.usccb.org/news/2016/cardinal-dinardo-elected-usccb-president-us-bishops-archbishop-gomez-elected-vice
  205. https://archgh.org/dinardo
  206. https://www.usccb.org/about/timothy-p-broglio
  207. https://www.usccb.org/resources/most-reverend-timothy-p-broglio-jcd-president-united-states-conference-catholic-bishops
  208. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/us-bishops-fall-plenary-assembly-meet-november-10-13
  209. https://www.usccb.org/news/2022/us-bishops-vote-new-conference-president-and-vice-president-plenary-assembly
  210. https://www.usccb.org/news/2019/us-bishops-vote-usccb-president-and-vice-president-annual-general-assembly-baltimore
  211. https://adoremus.org/2013/12/us-bishopsrsquo-november-2013-meeting-151-special-reportnbsp/
  212. https://www.usccb.org/about/william-e-lori
  213. https://www.usccb.org/about/allen-h-vigneron-archbishop-detroit
  214. https://www.usccb.org/committees/doctrine/who-we-are
  215. https://www.usccb.org/prolife/commitee-members-consultants-and-staff
  216. https://www.chicagocatholic.com/u.s./-/article/2022/11/15/archbishops-broglio-lori-elected-usccb-s-next-president-vice-president
  217. https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2025/02/07/u-s-bishops-conference-lays-off-50-amid-migrant-funding-uncertainty/
  218. https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2025/02/05/the-church-and-the-government-how-the-u-s-funds-the-usccb/
  219. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/01/26/vance-knocks-conference-catholic-bishops/77956648007/
  220. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/261507/catholic-bishops-issue-immigration-reform-guidance-safeguard-communities-in-humane-way
  221. https://www.wgcu.org/section/immigration/2025-09-14/us-catholic-bishops-decry-trumps-immigration-raids-upending-church-life
  222. https://www.ncronline.org/opinion/editorial/editorial-us-bishops-made-bad-deal-gop
  223. https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/catholic-church-maintains-its-stance-not-endorsing-or-opposing-political-candidates
  224. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/265279/us-catholic-bishops-church-will-not-endorse-political-candidates-despite-irs-shift
  225. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-catholic-bishops-approve-steps-toward-possible-rebuke-of-biden
  226. https://www.usccb.org/news/2021/us-bishops-conference-president-responds-holy-fathers-apostolic-letter-motu-proprio-use
  227. https://www.ncregister.com/news/charlotte-bishop-liturgy-controversy
  228. https://catholicvote.org/vatican-correspondent-reports-major-cracks-in-basis-of-traditionis-custodes/
  229. https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/us-bishop-church-needs-decentralization-not-doctrinal-fragmentation
  230. https://www.usccb.org/resources/us-bishop-warns-against-doctrinal-fragmentation
  231. https://www.usccb.org/topics/marriage-and-family-life-ministries/apostolic-exhortation-amoris-laetitia
  232. https://www.cathstan.org/us-world/synod-report-for-u-s-shows-growth-tensions-and-deep-desire-to-rebuild-the-body-of-christ
  233. https://www.lepantoin.org/wp/us-bishops-to-take-up-anti-poverty-collection-despite-lack-of-transparency/
  234. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/260655/catholic-campaign-for-human-development-spent-over-11-dollars-4-cents-million-more-than-its-budget
  235. https://www.ncregister.com/cna/cna-24178-usccb-layoffs
  236. https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2024/06/bishops-conference-defends-funding-cuts-to-justice-peace-and-development
  237. https://www.cathstan.org/us-world/bishops-mull-the-future-of-cchd-with-financial-concerns-looming
  238. https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/catholic-church-class-action-alleges-donation-embezzlement/
  239. https://becketfund.org/case/oconnell-v-united-states-conference-of-catholic-bishops/
  240. https://peterspenceclassaction.com/dc-court-of-appeals-rejects-usccb-motion-to-dismiss-lawsuit/
  241. https://www.votf.org/content/votf-study-reveals-wide-disparity-online-financial-transparency-us-roman-catholic-dioceses/
  242. https://www.usccb.org/resources/Diocesan-Financial-Issues-July-2013.pdf
  243. https://catholicreview.org/trust-but-verify-to-reduce-parish-embezzlement-risk-say-experts/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.