Hubbry Logo
Verona ArenaVerona ArenaMain
Open search
Verona Arena
Community hub
Verona Arena
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Verona Arena
Verona Arena
from Wikipedia
Verona Arena at night in 2018

Key Information

Arena in Piazza Bra with Municipio at night
Inside Verona Arena

The Verona Arena is a Roman amphitheatre located in the historic center of Verona, an iconic symbol of the Venetian city alongside the figures of Romeo and Juliet. It stands as one of the grand structures that defined Roman architecture and is among the best-preserved ancient amphitheatres to have survived into the modern era. This remarkable state of preservation is largely due to systematic restoration efforts that began in the 16th century; as a result, despite numerous transformations over time, the Arena allows visitors to easily grasp the design of such buildings. These structures were meticulously engineered for their intended purpose yet possessed an essential, understated beauty.[1]

During the summer months, the Arena hosts the renowned Arena di Verona Festival, with opera seasons that have run uninterrupted since 1913,[note 1] while throughout the rest of the year, it serves as a venue for numerous international singers and musicians.

History

[edit]

Controversies surrounding the construction date

[edit]

The absence of written sources regarding the amphitheatre’s inauguration makes it challenging to establish a precise timeline, leading to past proposals of construction dates ranging from the 1st to the 3rd century. However, it has now been conclusively demonstrated that the Arena could not have been built after the 1st century. Notably, historian Pirro Marconi suggested a date between the second and third decades of the 1st century—spanning the late Augustan and early Tiberian periods—while more recently, Luigi Beschi leaned toward the mid-1st century.[2]

To more accurately date the Arena, scholars have compared it to the amphitheatre of Pula, which shares striking similarities with Verona’s in both stylistic and technical aspects. Additionally, both belong to the same geographical and cultural region. The resemblances are so pronounced that some hypothesize they may have been designed by the same architect and constructed by the same workforce.[2] The Pula amphitheatre is generally dated to the Augustan period, suggesting that the Arena of Verona was likely built around the same time.

Aerial view of the Arena.

Additional clues aiding in the dating process include the amphitheatre’s decorations and, most significantly, a life-sized tuff gladiator’s head encased in a helmet. This helmet features two round openings revealing the fighter’s eyes, with a visor composed of two sections meeting precisely at the face’s midline. The cheek guards, starting narrow at the ears, widen to cover the entire face except the eyes and appear to be fastened by two crossed straps beneath the chin. This helmet style emerged at the end of the Augustan era, around 10–20 AD, as it evolved significantly after 40 AD. This narrows the construction window to the late reign of Augustus and the early reign of Claudius. Given that statues were typically crafted at the end of a building’s construction, it is reasonable to infer that the Arena was completed by approximately 30 AD,[3] a conclusion supported by historian Pirro Marconi.

Thus, the amphitheatre likely formed part of the monumentalization efforts in Verona during the Julio-Claudian era, which included new constructions in the Forum of Verona and adjacent areas, as well as the renovation and embellishment of the city’s gateways. Both the Verona and Pula amphitheatres predate the construction of the Colosseum, representing pivotal developments in the evolution of such entertainment venues. They were instrumental in refining the construction techniques later employed to erect the largest amphitheatre of the Roman Empire in Rome.[1]

Ancient history

[edit]
Bust of Emperor Gallienus, who incorporated the Verona amphitheatre into the new city walls.

Much of the amphitheatre’s history in antiquity remains obscure, though some insights can be gleaned from events involving Roman Verona. The city played a role in the war between Vitellius and Vespasian, with the latter selecting Verona as a stronghold due to its surrounding open fields, ideal for deploying cavalry. However, the city walls had become inadequate, partly because the amphitheatre stood just outside them. To address this, Vespasian ordered the construction of a rampart and the excavation of the Adigetto, a long moat south of the city center that remained in use into the Middle Ages. This project confirms that by 69 AD, the amphitheatre was already built.

Emperor Gallienus faced prolonged conflicts to repel the 3rd-century barbarian invasions, employing Verona in his innovative elastic defense strategy, which relied on key cities such as Mediolanum, Verona, and Aquileia. In 265, he decided to refurbish Verona’s late Republican walls and construct a new 550-meter section of curtain wall to finally encompass the Arena, resolving the issue of its dominant position outside the earlier Republican defenses.[4] In 1874, Antonio Pompei conducted excavations around the Arena, uncovering the foundations of the Gallienus walls, which ran 5 meters from the amphitheatre. It was also discovered that these walls intersected the rainwater drainage channels, though the Arena remained usable for spectacles thanks to an alternative solution: a large central well, identified in the 18th century. However, the drainage system became less efficient, marking the beginning of the amphitheatre’s decline.[5]

Though unconfirmed, it is possible that the amphitheatre was used for the martyrdom of Christians. The Marquis Scipione Maffei speculated that Firmus and Rusticus were martyred here in 304, on the same occasion that Bishop Proculus asked to be martyred, but was instead mocked and sent away because he was old.[6]

Depiction of the Siege of Verona by Constantine I’s troops, from the Constantinian frieze on the south side of the Arch of Constantine in Rome. The relief on the right shows the walls enclosing the Arena, though the Arena itself is not visible.

In 312, Verona again played a leading role in the war between Constantine and Maxentius, when the latter barricaded himself in the city, and Constantine’s forces laid siege. The assault focused on the amphitheatre, which served as a bastion for the defenders due to its height surpassing the Gallienus walls. Two critical clashes of that campaign occurred in front of the Arena: the sortie by the besieged, enabling Ruricius Pompeianus to seek reinforcements, and the nocturnal battle, where Constantine faced attacks from both the defenders and arriving reinforcements yet emerged victorious.[7] This battle is documented in a panegyric to Constantine[8] and depicted in a relief on the Arch of Constantine, showing Verona under siege. In the square relief, Constantine is depicted on the left, shielded by a guard and crowned by Victory, while on the right, his army assaults the city as the defenders hurl arrows and javelins from the walls and towers. The rightmost section of the wall, lacking lower-level windows, likely represents the portion enclosing the Arena.[7]

The rise of Christianity and the subsequent end of gladiatorial games, coupled with the inefficiency of public institutions in maintaining the monument, were significant factors in its abandonment.[6]

The games

[edit]

Few documents detail the spectacles held in the Verona amphitheatre, with the only surviving literary record being a letter from Pliny the Younger:

Gaius Plinius to his friend Maximus.
You did well to promise our Veronese a gladiatorial show, for they have long loved, respected, and honored you. It was also from this city that your most beloved and virtuous wife hailed. It was fitting to dedicate some public work or spectacle to her memory—and what better than a spectacle, the most appropriate tribute for a funeral? Moreover, the request was so insistent that denying it would have seemed not steadfastness but harshness. I commend you further for your generosity and willingness in granting it; such acts also demonstrate magnanimity. I wish the African panthers you had purchased in great numbers had arrived on time, but though delayed by bad weather, you still earned gratitude, as their absence was no fault of yours. Farewell.
C. PLINIUS MAXIMO SUO S.
Recte fecisti quod gladiatorium munus Veronensibus nostris promisisti, a quibus olim amaris suspiceris ornaris. Inde etiam uxorem carissimam tibi et probatissimam habuisti, cuius memoriae aut opus aliquod aut spectaculum atque hoc potissimum, quod maxime funeri, debebatur. Praeterea tanto consensu rogabaris, ut negare non constans, sed durum videretur. Illud quoque egregie, quod tam facilis tam liberalis in edendo fuisti; nam per haec etiam magnus animus ostenditur. Vellem Africanae, quas coemeras plurimas, ad praefinitum diem occurrissent: sed licet cessaverint illae tempestate detentae, tu tamen meruisti ut acceptum tibi fieret, quod quo minus exhiberes, non per te stetit. Vale.

Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus, Epistularum, Book VI, 34

From this letter, it can be inferred that Pliny’s friend offered the Verona community a hunting spectacle, a venatio, as a funeral tribute to his wife. Pliny deems this choice particularly fitting, noting that such spectacles originated as funerary games of Etruscan or Campanian origin.[9]

Several funerary inscriptions of gladiators who died fighting in the Arena have also been discovered in Verona. The least informative is a damaged slab bearing the phrase [famil]ia gladiatoria;[10] a second mentions the secutor Aedonius, who fought eight times in Verona before being defeated and killed at the young age of twenty-six;[11][12] another pertains to a retiarius named Generosus, from the gladiatorial school of Alexandria, who fought twenty-seven times without defeat and died of natural causes;[12][13] yet another belongs to Pardon, a Dertonensis, who perished in his eleventh bout.[12]

The most intriguing inscription, however, belongs to a certain Glaucus:[14][note 2] From this, it appears that Glaucus made a vow to Nemesis, a deity revered by gladiators, for his safety, but to no avail. He warns readers not to place too much faith in Nemesis, as a gladiator’s fate also hinged on skill and chance. Glaucus, whose inscription features depictions of a retiarius’s weapons (indicating he was likely a retiarius),[15] must have been a skilled fighter, as his tomb was funded partly by his supporters.[12]

In a house in Verona, just outside the ancient Roman walls, a mosaic depicting gladiatorial games was uncovered, dating from the Flavian era to the early 2nd century. The mosaic features a central panel with geometric patterns, dolphins, and plant motifs within circles. Surrounding these are panels portraying gladiators, particularly the three central ones. As a purely decorative piece, it is unlikely to depict specific games held in the Verona amphitheatre, yet it includes inscriptions with gladiators’ names, possibly famous local figures. The mosaic shows a retiarius versus a secutor, with the retiarius on the ground and a referee intervening. Above, the gladiators’ names are nearly faded, but a V (for vicit, “he won”) appears over the secutor, and ISS—likely once MISS for missus, “spared”—over the retiarius. The central panel depicts a Thracian gladiator triumphing over a murmillo lying bloodied on the ground, with the referee raising the victor’s arm; the defeated gladiator’s name, Caecro, is visible. The third scene shows a retiarius defeating another gladiator, who rests his shield on the ground in surrender.[16]

The existence of a gladiatorial barracks in Verona is confirmed by an inscription housed at the Maffeian Lapidary Museum,[17] though some scholars suggest it may refer to an enclosed, open-air area for youths’ physical and recreational activities, not necessarily ruling out a barracks in the classical era.[18]

Medieval history

[edit]
Raterian Iconography, the oldest depiction of Verona, prominently featuring the amphitheatre still in excellent condition.

During the Romano-Germanic kingdom of Theodoric the Great, the Verona amphitheatre likely underwent maintenance work and hosted spectacles, leading several medieval chronicles to attribute its construction to Theodoric:[19][20]

In the same city, he built a vast house that astonishingly resembles the theatre of Romulus. It has a single entrance and exit, with circular steps allowing easy ascent despite its extraordinary height. It accommodates many thousands of men, who can see and hear one another. There is no certainty about its founder, as this building is still called the house of Theodoric today.

— Chronicon Gozecense, 12th century.

However, it was under Theodoric that the amphitheatre suffered its most severe damage. The discovery within the Theodoric walls of a block inscribed with the number LXIII from the amphitheatre indicates that much of the outer ring was demolished during the construction of this defensive wall, which extensively reused salvaged materials. This partial demolition was necessary both to procure building materials and to reduce the Arena’s height, deemed too vulnerable if captured during a siege. Nevertheless, the structure retained the functionality of its cavea and the ability to host spectacles, as the height reduction of about 12 meters affected only the upper gallery, not the seating tiers.[21]

Subsequent damage to the amphitheatre resulted from natural disasters, including the Adige flood of 589, the earthquake of 1116, and the catastrophic earthquake of January 3, 1117.[22] During the reign of Berengar, the first devastating invasions by the Hungarians forced defenders to bolster fortifications, using the Arena as a stronghold. In those years, Verona’s bishop Ratherius created the so-called Raterian Iconography, depicting Verona as it appeared in the mid-10th century, with its churches, gates, bridges, and walls. The Arena is shown with its outer ring still intact, accompanied by verses describing it as a labyrinth of dark galleries.[23][note 3]

On certain occasions, the Arena’s cavea was quarried for marble to support new constructions, particularly after the fire that ravaged the city in 1172.[24] In the 13th century, the first efforts to halt the amphitheatre’s destruction emerged through restorations and commitments outlined in the municipal statutes of 1228. During the communal and Scaliger periods, legal battles reminiscent of ancient gladiatorial games were held within the Arena: to settle uncertain trials, litigants could hire professional fighters, known as champions. These contests drew crowds cheering for their favored combatant, with the oiled, naked fighters determining the trial’s outcome through their strength.[25] Even Dante attended at least one such event, describing it in a canto of the Inferno:

As champions stripped and oiled are wont to do,
Watching for their advantage and their hold.
Before they come to blows and thrusts between them,
Thus, wheeling round, did every one his visage
Direct to me, so that in opposite wise
His neck and feet continual journey made.

— Dante Alighieri, Inferno - Canto Sixteen, vv. 22-27.

In 1278, at the behest of Alberto I della Scala, nearly 200 Cathar heretics captured in Sirmione by his brother Mastino I della Scala were burned at the stake within the Arena. It was also Alberto I who introduced regulations on the amphitheatre’s use: the 1276 statute decreed that prostitutes could reside solely within the Arena,[26] while the 1310 update mandated its closure and imposed fines for breaking the gates or relieving oneself inside.[27] These provisions seem contradictory—mentioning prostitutes inhabiting the arcades while simultaneously ordering closure—but this reflects a distinction, persisting until the 1800s, between the inhabited outer arcades and the enclosed inner cavea. Exceptions occurred, such as in 1382, when 25 days of festivities, including jousts and spectacles, were held inside for the wedding of Antonio della Scala to Samaritana da Polenta.[28]

In 1337, the city, indebted from a war against an anti-Veronese league, ceded the Arena’s rental income to the University of Citizens (a consortium of municipal creditors) with the consent of Mastino II della Scala. The monument would not be fully redeemed until 1586.[29]

Early modern history

[edit]
Engraving from the early 1800s.

In 1450, under the Venetian government, new statutes were compiled, including provisions for the Arena, with one particularly significant decree:

Since many crimes are committed in the Arena, and as it is a memorable building that brings honor to the city and should be kept clean, it is established that said Arena must remain closed, with the keys to its gates held in the city’s treasury by the treasurer. Anyone breaking the gates or wall shall be fined 25 lire, and the same penalty applies to anyone destroying a step, moving, or causing a stone to fall for removal from the Arena, and they must repair the damage at their own expense. Anyone bringing and unloading carts of earth, mud, or other materials into or around the Arena shall be fined 100 soldi and must remove the material at their own cost. The jurors of the surrounding districts and those residing in the Arena are obliged to report violations, with the accuser receiving half the fine.

— Statuti Veronesi, Book IV, Chap. 56

The same statute also reaffirmed that prostitutes were required to live in the Arena.[30] This is the earliest official document describing the building as memorable,[29] sparking its celebration by literati and a growing interest during the Renaissance in its critical and historical analysis. In Verona’s 1400s cultural milieu, architects and artists like Giovanni Maria Falconetto and Fra Giovanni da Verona rediscovered the Arena’s architectural significance, fundamentally shifting its medieval perception as a labyrinthine relic. Subsequently, figures such as Giovanni Caroto, Sebastiano Serlio, Antonio da Sangallo the Younger, Baldassarre Peruzzi, and Andrea Palladio studied and surveyed it,[31] proposing solutions to ensure its preservation.[32]

Survey of the surviving wing of the amphitheatre, from Verona illustrata by Scipione Maffei.

The amphitheatre thus began to hold great importance for the civic community. Indeed, Verona was the first city, as early as the 1500s, to initiate a series of efforts prioritizing the protection and restoration of antiquities.[31] A key step was the partial redemption of the mortgage from the University of Citizens, enabling the expulsion of prostitutes from the arcades in 1537, which were then leased to artisans and merchants. By the mid-16th century, amid widespread concern for the city and its main monument, a gradual renewal of Bra, the large square facing the amphitheatre, commenced. On May 24, 1568, a restoration of the amphitheatre—then in a state of neglect—was approved, based on a plan inspired by the studies of architects such as Caroto and Palladio.[31] The restoration, focusing on the cavea, began but was halted in 1575 due to a severe plague afflicting the Scaliger city. By 1586, however, the municipality fully redeemed the Arena from the University of Citizens.[33]

Further restoration resumed in 1651 but paused in 1682, with additional significant interventions in 1694 and 1699, including partial repairs to the seating tiers. In the early 1700s, major maintenance ceased to allow for archaeological excavations within the Roman amphitheatre. These began in 1710 with Ottavio Alecchi, who uncovered the central well and an elliptical channel facing the first step, noting it was once covered by stone slabs with central circular holes 7 cm in diameter.[34] In 1728, Marquis Scipione Maffei, a pivotal figure in the study and restoration of the monumental structure, published Degli Anfiteatri e singolarmente del Veronese, marking a significant shift toward a scientific and archaeological approach to the monument, prioritizing its preservation.[35] In this work, he criticized excavations in the cavea that altered its original internal configuration.[36] For this text, Maffei conducted thorough historical research and monument surveys, including excavations that yielded several finds. He identified key archaeological issues:[37] the division of the seating tiers into sections and wedges; the crowning of the upper interior with a loggia; the placement and height of the podium, which he calculated at 1.53 meters and later reconstructed; the purpose of underground conduits, which he argued could not have flooded the Arena; and the central well, previously thought to support the velarium, but which he interpreted as a rainwater drainage system.

From September 1728 to July 1729, significant efforts cleared a 120 cm layer of earth covering the arena floor, while from 1731 to 1735, the wing was restored and reinforced. Work resumed in 1761, with tasks including excavation, surveying the ellipse, the euripus, and the podium, as well as creating a model up to the second tier of vomitoria to accurately reposition the steps, initiating a thorough revision of prior, less rigorous efforts. These works halted in 1772 due to funding shortages, resumed in 1780, and stopped again three years later.[38]

Jousts

[edit]
Illustration of a spectacle within the Arena.

On February 26, 1590, the first documented joust took place inside the Arena,[39] despite the ordinance to keep the cavea closed not yet being lifted, though it was gradually falling into disuse. Its use remained exceptional until the 17th century, when the interior, alongside the exterior, began to be leased out. On May 29, 1622, a Giostra della Quintana was held inside, described by chroniclers for its participation of knights not only from Verona but also from abroad, including some from Sweden. Another memorable joust occurred on May 4, 1654.[39]

Daytime spectacles within the amphitheatre became immensely popular in the 18th century,[40] with the last joust held on November 20, 1716, in honor of the Elector of Bavaria, organized by Scipione Maffei, who lamented that Verona’s nobles no longer held such events there. From that year, contracts leasing the monument’s interior shifted from equestrian activities to troupes of actors and dancers, who erected stages within the arena. The first precisely documented performance was Maffei’s Merope, staged in July 1713 by Luigi Riccoboni’s company. Carlo Goldoni attended one such show in July 1733, leaving a description in his Memoirs of the setting and atmosphere, with nobles and the wealthy seated in chairs and the common folk on the tiers.[38]

Among occasional attractions, in January 1751, a rhinoceros stunned spectators, who could scarcely believe such a creature existed.[41] The most favored spectacle, however, was bull hunting, pitting a bull (or sometimes oxen) against dogs trained by butchers. In September 1786, Goethe visited Verona and marveled at the amphitheatre—the first major ancient monument he encountered—noting with surprise that the popular pallone game was not held inside.[41]

Contemporary history

[edit]
View of the Arena and Piazza Bra after the general leveling carried out in 1820.

In 1805, under French rule, Napoleon Bonaparte visited the amphitheatre on June 15, witnessing a bull hunt inside. During this visit, the government allocated funds for its restoration: Luigi Trezza was tasked with planning the work, aiming to replace missing steps, restore the podium, repair the most damaged vaults, refurbish staircases to the first and second tiers of vomitoria, and the larger stairs to the third tier, and seal cracks in the seating tiers. Trezza devised a stucco for the fissures—used until 1825—made of quicklime, crushed bricks, and iron filings.[42]

On January 1, 1807, the Deputation for Public Ornament was established, tasked with preserving the Arena. In 1816, following Verona’s transfer to the Kingdom of Lombardy–Venetia, it was renamed the Commission for Ornament. In 1817, excavations outside the amphitheatre traced the continuation of the channel aligned with its major axis, followed as far as Palazzo Ridolfi, as noted by an inscription there, and uncovered the foundations of the Gallienus walls, which intersected the channel.

The year 1820 marked a turning point as the municipality ordered the eviction of residents from the Arena, assigning 42 arcades for storage use. Evicting 36 tenants was a crucial step toward the monument’s reclamation and comprehensive restoration. This met fierce resistance from occupants, some of whom claimed centuries-long tenure passed down through generations.[43] That same year, Podestà Da Persico met with Austrian Emperor Francis I to outline the monument’s needs, prompting the municipality to develop a work plan.[43] The project focused on the exterior, demolishing houses too close to the Arena and excavating around it to expose its base, buried about two meters deep due to sediment from repeated floods until the construction of retaining walls.[44] The average level of the Bra was also lowered by about 70 cm, sloping gently from the Gran Guardia toward the Arena, and the Liston’s elevation was adjusted.[45] This transformed the square before the Arena and the Arena itself: lowering the square restored the monument’s proportions, while demolishing the New Mercy Hospital, fourteen houses toward San Nicolò, and military furnaces abutting the municipal walls, alongside the Gran Guardia’s completion, lent greater space and coherence to the ensemble.[46]

Piazza Bra after the creation of the central gardens in 1873.[47]

In 1866, Veneto joined the Kingdom of Italy, yet the Commission for Ornament persisted, renamed the Commission for Civic Ornament. In 1876, it was replaced by the Advisory Commission for Monument Conservation, established in each province of the kingdom. During this period, Count Antonio Pompei emerged as Verona’s most active figure in addressing restoration challenges, publishing essays between 1872 and 1877 aimed at reconstructing the amphitheatre’s original appearance. He also oversaw the restoration of the third tier of vomitoria, though uncertainties during the work prevented a full overhaul of the cavea.[48]

During World War II, the Superintendency for Monuments, led by architect Piero Gazzola, installed temporary buttresses inside and outside the wing to shield it from bombings. After the war, these were removed, and the wing was statically reinforced according to the design of engineer Riccardo Morandi: a post-tensioning system inserted 5 mm steel cables into holes drilled from above, aligned with the pillars, then filled with pressurized liquid cement. This reinforcement of the wing’s five vertical pillars occurred between 1953 and 1956.

Further interventions from 1954 to 1960 cleared remaining arcades of warehouses and shops, demolishing non-original structures such as partition slabs, wooden stairs, internal tiled roofs, and counter-walls. In 1955, about fifty wooden gates were replaced with the current iron ones. From 1957 to 1959, the lower ramps of four internal staircases were restored, arcade floors were paved with pebbles, central stone walkways were laid in the ambulacra, underground conduits and the central well were cleaned, the entire outer ring was restored, and cracks between the cavea’s steps were sealed. In 1960, the old central pit cover was demolished, a new slab was built, and an iron railing was installed along the top step to prevent spectators from falling, despite some controversy.[49]

The comet star in January 2007

Since 1984, during the Christmas season, a steel comet star designed by architect Rinaldo Olivieri, 70 meters high and 82 meters long, was placed in Piazza Bra, with its tail resting inside the Arena.[50] However, in January 2023, during routine dismantling, part of the star fell, causing irreparable damage to several steps;[51] consequently, from Christmas 2024, only the star’s “head” has been installed, with its traditional tail replaced by light beams.[52]

Performances and opera

[edit]

Bull hunting remained popular into the early 1800s, even earning Napoleon Bonaparte’s approval. Later that year, the Arena served as a detention camp for Austrian prisoners, who dismantled the comedy stage for firewood. In November 1807, Napoleon, revisiting Verona, observed the start of another bull hunt.[53]

In May 1815, marking Verona’s return to the Austrian Empire and a visit by Archduke Heinrich Johann Bellegarde, viceroy of the Kingdom of Lombardy–Venetia, a bull hunt was held, followed by corn distribution to the poor—a common blend of entertainment and charity. In March 1816, to celebrate Emperor Francis I and his wife Maria Ludovika, bull hunting was replaced by a jockey race, preceded by corn distribution via carts sent to parishes.[53]

On November 24, 1822, concluding the Congress of Verona, a grand choreography with a lyrical prelude, The Holy Alliance, was staged. The text was by Gaetano Rossi, with music composed and conducted by Gioachino Rossini: the spectacle opened with Fate summoning four chariots from different directions—those of Minerva (with allegories of arts, abundance, and happiness), Ceres (with nymphs and commerce), Neptune (with maritime spirits), and Mars (with strength, valor, and warriors). Four different dances unfolded as the chariots went around in circles, ensuring that all spectators could see the performance, culminating in a collective display around a statue of Concordia.[54]

In the 1800s, equestrian competitions, cycling races, hot air balloon displays, acrobatic gymnastics, comedies, and tombola games were highly popular. Notable events included the 1838 tombola attended by Emperor Ferdinand I, highlighted by thousands of colorful umbrellas opening during a downpour, and the 1857 event with Emperor Franz Joseph, featuring a widely enjoyed tombola and greasy pole spectacle. Rossini’s music returned to the Arena on July 31, 1842, following the success of his Stabat Mater at the Teatro Filarmonico ten days earlier. The first opera season occurred in 1856, with performances of Il Casino di Campagna and La fanciulla di Gand by Pietro Lenotti, the first act of Gaetano Donizetti’s L’elisir d’amore, and Rossini’s The Barber of Seville. The Arena also served civic purposes, hosting the November 16, 1866, celebration of Veneto’s annexation to the Kingdom of Italy in the presence of Victor Emmanuel II. After 1866, as Verona remained a military city, the army grew closer to the populace, occasionally staging carousel spectacles inside. Additionally, the first Sunday of June featured a fireworks display for the Albertine Statute celebration.[55]

From the early 1900s until the 1913 Aida that launched the Arena di Verona Festival, circus performances were the most successful shows. Since 1913, the Verona amphitheatre has become the world’s largest open-air opera venue, preserving its role as a space for popular entertainment while upholding the monument’s dignity. It has also occasionally hosted gladiators, wild beasts, and Christian persecutions for historical film productions.[56]

Other events

[edit]
Il Volo performing on the Arena stage in 2017.

In music, the Arena of Verona has historically hosted the finals of the Festivalbar, and since 2017, it has been the venue for the annual Power Hits Estate, an awards event organized by RTL 102.5.[57] It has also welcomed numerous pop concerts, leveraging the prestige of this unique open-air theatre, featuring a wide array of Italian and international artists. Zucchero Fornaciari holds the record for fourteen consecutive performances.[58]

The Verona amphitheatre hosted the final of the 1970 edition of the television program Games Without Borders.[59]

In sports, the Arena has served as the finish line for the final stage of the Giro d’Italia in the 1981, 1984, 2010, 2019, and 2022 editions. On May 23, 1988, at the twilight of the Cold War, it hosted a historic friendly volleyball match between the men’s national teams of the United States and the Soviet Union.[60] On August 15, 2023, it welcomed the opening match of the 2023 Women’s European Volleyball Championship between Italy and Romania.[61] In 2026, the Arena will host the closing ceremony of the Winter Olympics and the opening ceremony of the Winter Paralympics for the Milan-Cortina d’Ampezzo 2026.[62]

The amphitheatre in its urban context

[edit]

The Verona amphitheatre was constructed approximately 70–80 meters from the Republican city walls,[63] facing the southern corner of the city’s fortifications. This positioning indicates it was not part of the original city plan, much like the Theatrum Veronense. The mid-1st century BC, when the city was refounded within the Adige’s bend, was a time of civil wars, making it impractical to build such a massive structure near the walls, which would have compromised the defensive system. Thus, it is deduced that the amphitheatre was erected during a period of peace, likely coinciding with the onset of the imperial era.[64] Supporting this, in the 3rd century, amid the crisis, military anarchy, and barbarian invasions, Emperor Gallienus deemed it necessary to build a new wall incorporating the Arena.

Reconstruction of Verona in the Republican era, before the amphitheatre’s construction outside the city walls.
Reconstruction of Verona in the Imperial era, with the amphitheatre enclosed within the city walls.

Its location outside the walls suggests that the city’s interior was nearly fully developed.[65] This placement also necessitated a rethinking of road networks, as the amphitheatre drew tens of thousands from the city, countryside, and nearby towns, potentially overwhelming access gates (notably, the Via Postumia, entering at Porta Borsari, was already very busy). Consequently, Porta Leoni and Porta Borsari were refurbished, and two smaller exits were likely added near the amphitheatre. Its orientation further underscores its connection to the city despite its later construction: the major axis aligns with the urban grid’s cardines, and the minor axis parallels the decumani. This alignment facilitated linking the amphitheatre’s sewers to the city’s system.

Notably, its external position eased access from the countryside and other cities. Spectacles, held infrequently due to their high cost, naturally attracted audiences from beyond Verona.

Inscriptions

[edit]

Several inscriptions found near the amphitheatre, given its size, undoubtedly pertain to it. One, indecipherable, reads CON,[66] while another appears to be [...] ET DEDIT.[67] A complete inscription states:[68]

Nomine
Q(uinti) Domini Alpini
Licinia mater
signum Dianae et venatoriem et salientes t(estamento) f(ieri) i(ussit)

It records that a wealthy woman, in her son’s name, bequeathed funds to erect a statue of Diana, stage a hunting spectacle (venatio) in the Arena, and install salientes—possibly water conduits or fountains—within the amphitheatre.

Additionally, an original Arena step was found, inscribed with a seat number: I / LOC(US) IIII, LIN(EA) I,[69] meaning wedge one, step four, seat one.

Description

[edit]
Cross-section from the wing side showing stairs and passages, and a map of the amphitheatre with sewers marked.

The amphitheatre’s foundational layout is an ellipse forming the arena (the central performance space), likely traced on the ground at the project’s outset. The outer perimeter was derived by drawing a concentric line around this ellipse. This base ellipse was constructed using four circles: two smaller ones (along the major axis) derived by dividing the semi-major axis into five 25-foot segments, with two segments forming the radius at the axis’s ends, and a larger curve with a seven-part, 25-foot radius centered at the outer extension’s end.

The arena measures 75.68 m x 44.43 m (250 x 150 Roman feet), a round figure reflecting the simplicity of the base module, with a 5:3 ratio between the major and minor axes. The cavea spans 39.40 m (125 feet), while the amphitheatre’s maximum dimensions (major x minor axis) are 152.43 m x 123.23 m (520 x 420 Roman feet).[70] These dimensions rank the Arena eighth among Roman amphitheatres and fourth in Italy, following the Colosseum, the Campanian Amphitheatre, and the Amphitheatre of Milan.[71]

The amphitheatre was built on a slight artificial elevation (now below street level), with foundations of an opus caementicium plate. A 1.60 m height difference exists between the outermost ring and the podium base.[70] Rainwater drainage, critical for such a large structure, was managed by three annular sewers beneath the floors of concentric galleries supporting the first level. Two additional sewers along the major and minor axes channeled runoff to the Adige, one explored for about 100 meters. This sewer system was highly efficient, with a consistent two-meter height.[70] Constructed with sections of pebble masonry bound by mortar, interspersed with three horizontal brick rows, they were capped with large stone slabs—a technique mirrored in Verona’s civic sewer system.

External structure

[edit]
The wing of the Arena: this is how the original monumental façade appeared throughout the building.

The monument’s current appearance differs significantly from its original form, particularly due to the loss of the outer ring, which served as the true monumental facade—a role now filled by the inner front. The only surviving segment of this outer ring is the Ala (wing), comprising four arches. This ring had no major structural purpose but acted as a grand facade: its arches mirrored the hollow spaces beneath the cavea, while massive pillars completed the internal lines of force. The three-tiered arcades externally expressed the presence of two galleries and an upper portico, with architraves capping the internal vaults. This design aesthetically and spatially articulated the complex internal volumes.

Connections between the facade and the underlying structure are limited to shared foundations and the barrel vaults of the third gallery and the one above. The facade features three stacked tiers of arches, built entirely from well-squared blocks of red ammonitic limestone, a stone prevalent in the province of Verona. The first-tier arches stand 7.10 m high, the second 6.30 m, and the third 4.50 m, enhancing the vertical thrust when viewed from below. The first-tier pillars measure 2.30 m wide by 2.15 m deep (nearly square), topped by a pilaster ending in a Tuscan capital at the cornice level.[72] Arches rest on two semi-capitals, terminating on the pilaster just above its midpoint. Above the Tuscan capitals, a band of blocks bears the entrance numbers (LXIV to LXVII survive on the Ala, with others scattered around), followed by another identical band supporting the upper cornice. With 72 arches and entrances, the numbering—starting with I at the western entrance—suggests that sector’s prominence, proceeding counterclockwise.[73]

The second tier mirrors the first, save for its reduced height. The third tier varies slightly: Tuscan capitals persist without pilasters, and the cornice comprises a entablature with a frieze and additional cornice. Inside, brackets once supported portico beams, not the velarium,[37] as some scholars speculated (its weight would have required external brackets).

Using the same order across all tiers is typical of amphitheatres like those in Nîmes or Pula.

Internal structure

[edit]
Bird’s-eye view from Verona illustrata by Scipione Maffei.

From the amphitheatre’s interior, along the gallery axis, lies an opus caementicium mass 6.80 m from the cavea’s outer edge, followed by the first gallery (3 m wide, 3.60 m high), then the second (3.30 m wide, 9.10 m high) 11.18 m beyond, and the third (4.30 m wide, 8.15 m high) 14.45 m from the second.[74] Above the outermost gallery stood another of equal size, supporting the cavea’s portico.

These three concentric galleries divided the structure into four zones. From the arena to the first gallery lies the first tier of seating, the maenianum. The first annular corridor, the praecinctio, rested on the first gallery’s vault, separating the second seating tier between the first and second galleries. Above the second gallery’s vault was the second annular corridor, dividing the second and third tiers. Here, the 64 vomitoria staircases become more intricate and begin intersecting.[75] A third annular corridor separated the third and fourth tiers, followed by a portico aligned with the outermost gallery, its roof supported by a colonnade facing the cavea and brackets (still visible on the Ala) on the outer side.

The cavea of the Arena.

The grandest entrance, to the west toward Porta Borsari and the Via Postumia, features a central vault twice the height of others, reaching beneath the cavea’s tiers. The western sector was likely the most significant,[74] as evidenced by the differing staircase layouts: the western sector’s symmetrical spaces feature straight corridors leading directly to lower tiers, while the eastern sector’s irregular corridors channeled most spectators to upper tiers. The western entrance likely welcomed the procession inaugurating the games.[72]

Construction techniques and materials

[edit]
The Ala of the amphitheatre, built with cut stone from Valpolicella

The construction technique is standardized throughout, with materials undecorated beyond the architectural order on the exterior facade, though statues—some unearthed during excavations—are preserved at the Archaeological Museum at the Roman Theatre. The materials are consistent across the structure, reflecting its durability and limited renovations. The seating tiers, however, underwent repeated repairs due to constant wear and medieval quarrying; the Renaissance restoration further altered the original cavea layout, erasing corridors between sectors and complicating reconstruction of the 64 access staircases’ exact positions,[73] though all remain extant.

The outer facade and pillars were crafted from cut red ammonitic limestone from Valpolicella, a common Veronese calcareous stone, used in both pink and white variants creating a widespread dichromatism. Marble blocks were shaped to stack without mortar, with visible faces left unpolished for a rustication effect, speeding construction.[71]

Rubble masonry was used for the interior walls, with a mixed facing of bricks and pebbles: alternating courses of large pebbles and three rows of dark red bricks (one or one-and-a-half feet, about 8 cm thick), with mortar joints of 1–2 cm.[73] This technique dominates near entrances, while most of the structure comprises cementitious material poured into wooden formworks. The vaults are also opus caementicium of mortar and pebbles over wooden formworks, with board imprints still visible.

The sewers were constructed in mixed masonry, with pebble sections bound by mortar alternating with three brick rows, covered by large stone slabs. Beneath the arena lies a subterranean chamber (8.77 m wide, 36.16 m long) of unknown purpose.[76]

Capacity

[edit]
Zenithal depiction of how the velarium of the Verona amphitheatre might have been structured.

In the early 1st century, Verona was a major city, comparable to Mediolanum, strategically positioned at the plains’ edge of the Via Claudia Augusta, following the Adige to the Brenner Pass and Raetia. These factors influenced the amphitheatre’s size, accounting for Verona’s substantial population, its countryside, and likely nearby centers such as Vicetia and Brixia, which lacked amphitheatres.[1] Future demographic growth was also considered, as building such a costly structure required avoiding the need for a second venue (as in Pozzuoli) or expansion (as in Pula) due to miscalculation.[77]

Recent estimates for summer performances put the arena's capacity at 22000, though the stage occupies about a third of the seats, and the upper portico is gone. Thus, in Roman times, it likely held around 30000 spectators.[71][75][77]

Legends

[edit]

Over time, various legends have emerged about the Arena’s origins. In the Middle Ages, one story claims that a Veronese nobleman, condemned to death for a heinous crime, promised the city’s leaders he would build a vast edifice overnight to house all citizens and host spectacles, bargaining his soul with the devil to complete it between the evening and morning Hail Marys. That night, all the devils of Hell converged on Verona, but the nobleman repented, praying to the Holy Virgin, who granted a miracle: the sun came up two hours earlier. In the morning, at the first note of the Hail Mary, the demons all sank back into the ground, leaving the building, though well underway, incomplete: this is said to be the origin of the Ala.[78][79][80]

Other medieval legends attributed its construction to the Devil because of its immense size, considered impossible to build using human hands.[81] Additional tales credited King Theodoric, likely because he restored it and held numerous spectacles there.[19][20]

See also

[edit]

Filmography

[edit]
  • Verona Romana - Oltre il tempo, directed by Marcello Peres and Nicola Tagliabue (2015)

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Verona Arena is a situated in the historic centre of , , constructed around 30 AD during the reigns of emperors and . Originally designed for gladiatorial contests, venationes (animal hunts), and other public spectacles, the elliptical structure measures 140 metres in length by 100 metres in width and rises 31 metres in height, with a capacity of approximately 30,000 spectators in antiquity. One of the best-preserved ancient still in use, the Verona Arena forms a core component of the designated as the City of in 2000, exemplifying the city's continuous architectural evolution from Roman antiquity through medieval and Renaissance periods. Despite partial damage from earthquakes in the 12th and 13th centuries, which removed much of the outer ring of arches, the interior seating tiers and major structural elements remain intact, enabling its adaptation for contemporary events. Since 1913, the arena has hosted the Arena di Verona Opera Festival, the world's oldest and largest open-air opera event, drawing over 400,000 attendees annually across more than 50 performances featuring grand productions of works by composers such as and Puccini. This transformation underscores the amphitheatre's enduring functionality, shifting from imperial-era entertainments rooted in martial prowess to modern cultural spectacles emphasizing musical and theatrical artistry, while its robust pink and construction continues to withstand seasonal usage.

History

Construction Date Controversies

The construction of the Verona Arena is dated to the early AD, during the Roman imperial period, though no contemporary records or dedicatory inscriptions specify an exact year, leading to scholarly variation in proposed timelines. Numismatic evidence, including a recovered from the structure and dated by archaeologists to between 30 and 42 AD, anchors the build to the transition from Emperor Tiberius's reign (14–37 AD) to the early years of (41–54 AD). Debate persists among historians regarding whether the amphitheater predates —potentially aligning with late Augustan initiatives in Verona's urban expansion—or commenced under his rule, influenced by the site's preparation involving excavation of the Pastello hill and foundations typical of Julio-Claudian . Estimates thus range from circa 10–30 AD, reflecting Augustus's era of amphitheater proliferation in , to the more narrowly supported 30 AD based on stratigraphic correlations with regional Roman monuments. This range underscores the challenges of dating without epigraphic confirmation, as stylistic parallels with earlier structures like the Pula amphitheater (Augustan period) compete with coin-derived evidence. Later attributions to the (69–96 AD) have been refuted by archaeological consensus favoring pre-50 AD completion, given the arena's integration into Verona's pre-Gallienic and absence of post-Claudian masonry traits. The structure's robust tufo and construction, emblematic of early imperial , further supports this early chronology amid the empire's shift toward permanent entertainment venues.

Roman Period Construction and Initial Use

The Verona Arena was constructed in the early , with scholarly analysis placing its building between the second and third decades of that century, utilizing large blocks of local quarried from nearby areas. The amphitheater's elliptical design measured approximately 152 in length and 123 in width externally, featuring three superimposed orders of arches supported by robust piers, engineered to seat up to 25,000 spectators on graduated stone tiers. Built outside the contemporaneous city walls to facilitate access and crowd management, the structure incorporated subterranean passages and drains for efficient event operations, reflecting standard Roman amphitheatrical engineering adapted to Verona's terrain. Initial use of the Arena centered on gladiatorial combats, venationes involving wild animal hunts, and naumachiae or mock naval battles when the arena floor was flooded, serving as a venue for public entertainment funded by municipal or imperial patronage. These spectacles, integral to Roman civic life, drew large audiences to reinforce social hierarchies and imperial propaganda, with events likely occurring during festivals such as the or private funerary games. Archaeological traces, including related mosaics from depicting gladiatorial scenes datable to the late 1st century AD, attest to the Arena's active role in hosting such violent and theatrical displays shortly after completion. The facility's design, with radial vomitoria for spectator ingress and egress, enabled rapid turnover for multiple daily performances, underscoring its practical functionality in the imperial cult's entertainment apparatus.

Post-Roman Decline and Medieval Reuse

Following the deposition of the last Western Roman emperor in 476 AD, the Verona Arena experienced neglect amid the political fragmentation and economic contraction of , with its marble and limestone blocks increasingly repurposed as for constructing early Christian basilicas and defensive structures in Verona under Ostrogothic, Lombard, and Carolingian rule. This systematic stone removal accelerated the structure's deterioration, as the city's population dwindled and maintenance ceased, though the arena's robust tufo core preserved much of its elliptical form unlike more perishable wooden elements in other amphitheaters. By the , the arena transitioned to utilitarian reuse despite ongoing spoliation; its interior hosted public executions, judicial tournaments, and markets, adapting the Roman venue for communal and punitive functions under the emerging Veronese commune. Houses proliferated within the arena's cavity, sheltering residents amid , while external defensive walls were erected around the perimeter to integrate it into Verona's medieval fortifications during periods of inter-city conflict. Communal statutes imposed fines of 25 lire for damaging gates, walls, or steps, reflecting recognition of its enduring civic value even as quarrying persisted for local building needs. A catastrophic on January 3, 1117, with its epicenter near , inflicted severe structural damage, causing the near-total collapse of the outer ring—comprising 72 arches of pink and white —leaving only the southeastern ala intact. Subsequent seismic events, including one in 1183, exacerbated the ruin, with dislodged blocks scavenged for ecclesiastical and residential reconstruction, further eroding the facade while the inner and cavea withstood due to deeper foundations and radial vaulting. These , compounded by anthropogenic extraction, marked the nadir of the arena's physical integrity before later interventions, yet its repurposed role sustained partial occupation through the under lordship.

Renaissance to Modern Restorations

During the , renewed scholarly interest in classical antiquities led Veronese humanists, such as Ciriaco d'Ancona in the , to study the Arena and attribute its construction to the Augustan era, drawing parallels to ' descriptions. This period saw debates over the monument's origins, with some attributing it to mythical Roman kings or later figures like Theoderic, often influenced by fabricated inscriptions, such as one in 1526 by Ludovico Nogarola claiming construction in 250 BC by Quintus Lucius Flamineus. These efforts elevated the Arena's status as a symbol of Verona's ancient prestige, second only to the , and inspired local architects like , who in 1570 modeled the in his designs after the Arena's arches. Major restoration initiatives commenced in the mid-16th century under Venetian administration, prompted by a 1568 municipal to address structural decay from prior earthquakes and neglect. Works began in 1569 with the reconstruction of several vomitoria (access tunnels) to the cavea, followed in 1570 by the laying of the first stone for rebuilding the seating tiers, marking the inception of systematic consolidation that integrated missing steps and restored external arches using compatible materials. These interventions, spanning decades and involving local masons, stabilized the elliptical structure's surviving sectors, particularly the southeastern ala, and facilitated renewed use for public spectacles, though full completion extended intermittently into the 17th century. Restorations persisted through the 17th and 18th centuries with periodic maintenance to reinforce the cavea and perimeter walls, gradually restoring grandeur amid ongoing civic events. In the 18th century, advancements in lime-based mortars were tested and applied during repairs, reflecting evolving knowledge of compatible binding agents derived from Roman techniques, as documented in treatises on hydraulic limes. By the Napoleonic period around 1805, further consolidations enabled diverse uses, including a bullfight, while 19th-century efforts under Austrian and post-unification rule focused on mortar innovations and structural shoring to counter erosion and seismic risks, preparing the monument for expanded cultural functions without altering its ancient form.

20th-21st Century Preservation Efforts

In the aftermath of , during which Verona's historic fabric incurred significant damage from Allied bombings, the city's 1946 reconstruction plan prioritized preserving the original urban structure, including the Arena, through adherence to Italian restoration principles that emphasized respect for historical and material evidence. These efforts, overseen by figures such as Professor Piero Gazzola, the first President of ICOMOS and Verona's heritage supervisor, integrated destroyed elements while reusing original materials where feasible, ensuring the amphitheater's continuity within the urban ensemble without expansive industrialization or rail intrusions that had been curtailed by the city's medieval walls. By the early , preservation shifted toward addressing ongoing environmental degradation and structural vulnerabilities. In 2014, a €14 million (approximately $17.5 million) project was announced to reinforce the Arena against erosion caused by rain, wind, and , focusing on stabilizing the blocks and external arches to prevent further disintegration. Complementing this, a 2017 initiative funded by the Italian apparel firm at a cost of €13.5 million commissioned German engineering firms and Gerkan, Marg & Partners to design a covering; this three-year effort aimed to shield the structure from atmospheric damage and natural deterioration, enabling year-round use while folding away to maintain aesthetic integrity. Challenges persisted, as highlighted in 2018 by Superintendent Fabrizio Magani, who described the Arena as in "serious conservation distress" due to the tension between intensive event usage—hosting annual opera festivals and concerts—and the need for structural maintenance, underscoring the causal role of heavy foot traffic and exposure in accelerating wear on the ancient masonry. Recent interventions include the 2024 launch of a national Art Bonus program allocating €14 million for comprehensive restoration and enhancement works, combining public and private funding to repair and valorize the monument amid ongoing monitoring systems that track seismic responses to mitigate risks from Italy's tectonic activity. These projects temporarily closed the site from April 1 to 18, 2025, to facilitate unobstructed repairs. Managed by Italy's Ministry of Cultural Heritage and local authorities under UNESCO coordination, such measures reflect a pragmatic balance prioritizing empirical structural data over unchecked tourism demands.

Architectural Description

External Features and Perimeter

The Verona Arena features an elliptical plan, with internal dimensions measuring approximately 75.68 meters along the major axis and 44.44 meters along the minor axis, while the external perimeter originally encompassed axes of 152 meters by 123 meters. The outer facade was constructed primarily from locally quarried red ammonitic blocks, forming a robust enclosure that integrated with the urban landscape of ancient . Externally, the structure originally comprised three superimposed orders of arches, diminishing in height from bottom to top, supported by engaged columns and piers to distribute loads effectively. This design facilitated 72 radial entrances, each framed by an arch, allowing efficient crowd flow for events accommodating up to 25,000 spectators. The foundations employed , a Roman concrete technique, laid on a slight artificial to ensure stability on the site's terrain. Much of the external perimeter was demolished following a 12th-century earthquake, leaving only the northern "Ala" (wing) intact, which preserves two tiers of arches and exemplifies the original aesthetic of repetitive arcades pierced by rectangular openings. This surviving segment, approximately 60 meters long, integrates into the modern Piazza Bra, where the arena's perimeter abuts contemporary urban development, including arcaded walkways added in the . The external walls, where preserved, reach heights of about 20-25 meters, reflecting partial reconstruction efforts that prioritized structural integrity over full restoration of the upper tiers.

Internal Structure and Seating

The internal arena floor of the Verona Arena measures 75 meters in length by 44 meters in width, originally covered with sand to absorb blood from gladiatorial contests and surrounded by a podium wall approximately 1.7 meters high for separation and safety. This podium, constructed from stone blocks, elevated the performance space slightly above ground level and featured protective netting to shield spectators from wild animals or projectiles, with substructures likely housing service corridors though largely inaccessible today. Rising from the podium is the cavea, the tiered seating area composed of 44 rows of stone steps extending 39.4 meters outward from the arena edge, divided horizontally by three praecinctiones (walkways) into four sectors corresponding to Roman social hierarchies: the lower ima cavea for magistrates and elites, followed by sections for equestrians, citizens, and upper rows for women and the lower classes. The cavea's radial walls and inward-sloping vaults, supported by three concentric galleries with arch heights of 7 meters (lower), 6 meters (middle), and 4.5 meters (upper), facilitated structural integrity and acoustics while channeling spectators through vomitoria—square passageways accessed via ramps from 72 external archways numbered for order. Originally, the intact cavea accommodated up to 30,000 spectators on the stone steps, augmented by wooden benches in upper areas now lost, though the collapse of one external wing (ala) in the created a U-shaped profile, reducing modern event capacity to 13,000–15,000 seats amid temporary staging for operas and concerts. Restoration efforts, including 1805 stair reconstructions in the vomitoria, have preserved the core seating framework while adapting lower tiers for cushioned chairs during performances.

Construction Materials and Engineering Techniques

The Verona Arena was constructed primarily from local quarried in the valley, specifically Rosso Verona, a reddish variety containing visible ammonite fossils from formations. This stone was cut into well-squared blocks for the facade and structural elements, providing durability against seismic activity common in the region. Pink and white variants from the same quarries supplemented the red stone, creating visual contrast in the exterior facing. Engineering techniques employed standard Roman methods adapted to local materials, including an opus caementicium foundation layer on a slight artificial to ensure stability on the site's . The elliptical , measuring approximately 152 by 123 externally, relied on radial corridors supported by arches and vaults for efficient access and load distribution. The exterior facade incorporated three superimposed tiers of arches—reaching heights of about 7.1 for the first tier, 6.3 for the second, and 4.5 for the third—built without mortar in a dry-stone technique that enhanced resistance through blocks. Internally, vaulted niches known as arcovoli and radial barrel vaults formed a network beneath the cavea seating, distributing the weight of the earthen and stone tiers upward and outward. These concrete-reinforced vaults, cast using pozzolanic aggregates mixed with lime, allowed for the spanning of wide openings without excessive material use, exemplifying Roman advancements in compressive strength over tensile limits of stone. The absence of iron reinforcements, unlike some later structures, underscores reliance on geometric precision and material selection for longevity, as evidenced by the arena's survival through centuries of earthquakes and reuse.

Original Capacity and Modifications

The Verona Arena, built in the late 1st century AD, originally seated approximately 30,000 spectators across its multi-tiered structure, with the elliptical arena floor measuring roughly 80 meters by 45 meters. The design incorporated three main levels of external arches supporting vaulted corridors and radial seating, enabling efficient crowd flow and maximal occupancy for spectacles. The most impactful modification occurred after the earthquake of 3 January 1117, which demolished the outermost ring of the upper tier—originally comprising 72 arches—leaving only the northern ala of four arches standing. This destruction reduced the arena's height from about 30 meters and eliminated the top seating level, thereby lowering capacity, though precise post-event figures remain estimates based on surviving architecture. Later interventions, including 19th-century reinforcements with and 20th-century infills for stability, prioritized structural over capacity restoration, preserving the modified form without rebuilding the lost upper perimeter. Today, the arena's total seating potential stands at around 20,000, but operational capacity for performances typically ranges from 13,000 to 15,000, constrained by stage setups encroaching on the floor area.

Urban and Cultural Integration

Position in Verona's Cityscape

The Verona Arena occupies a central position in the historic core of , specifically within Piazza Bra, the city's largest public square. This location places it at the convergence of major pedestrian thoroughfares, serving as a focal point for both locals and visitors. The amphitheater's exterior walls form the eastern boundary of the piazza, with its monumental arches and stone facade dominating the urban vista and integrating seamlessly with the surrounding neoclassical and . Constructed around 30 AD, the Arena was initially situated just outside the Republican-era city walls, approximately 70-80 meters from their perimeter, to accommodate large crowds without straining intra-urban infrastructure. This peripheral placement reflected Roman urban planning principles, prioritizing accessibility via radial roads while minimizing disruption to the densely built republican core. By 265 AD, urban expansion led to the extension of the city walls, enveloping the structure and shifting its role from an extramural venue to an integral element of the fortified cityscape. Today, the Arena's elliptical form aligns with Verona's orthogonal road grid, underscoring its enduring adaptation to the evolving city layout. Flanked by the River to the east and key landmarks like the Ponte Pietra further north, it anchors the UNESCO-designated historic center, where red-tiled rooftops and bastioned fortifications frame its ancient profile against the modern skyline. This positioning enhances its visibility from elevated viewpoints, such as Castel San Pietro, reinforcing its status as a visual and cultural linchpin in Verona's layered urban fabric.

Surviving Inscriptions and Epigraphy

The Verona Arena preserves few original Roman inscriptions , a scarcity attributed to extensive stone spoliation following the devastating earthquakes of 1117 and 1172 CE, which prompted widespread reuse of materials in medieval . No dedicatory survives to identify the builders, patrons, or precise construction date, distinguishing the structure from amphitheaters like the , where such texts abound. This absence has compelled scholars to rely on architectural parallels, numismatic finds, and stratigraphic evidence for dating the arena to the late CE, likely during the Flavian or early Trajanic period. Renaissance antiquarians, including , propagated a purported ancient foundation inscription—reading "Q. L." followed by fragmentary text—claiming imperial , but modern analysis confirms it as a , inconsistent with authentic Roman epigraphic style and likely fabricated amid Verona's 16th-century quest to assert prestigious Roman origins. Verona's humanistic circles, centered on figures like Felice Feliciano, were notorious for inventing pseudo-antique inscriptions to elevate local heritage, further complicating the epigraphic record. Fragments of potential arena-related epigraphy, such as references to gladiatorial personnel or municipal officials, appear in the Maffeiano Lapidary Museum's collection of Veronese stones, though none derive directly from the structure itself and instead reflect broader Roman-era dedications in the territory. These include Latin texts honoring local elites or deities, indirectly attesting to the arena's role in public spectacles, but lack specificity to the monument. Later overlays, including 19th-century carved invoking , mar some blocks but hold no historical value for Roman usage. Overall, the epigraphic poverty underscores the arena's survival as a testament to durability rather than textual commemoration.

Archaeological Findings and Artifacts

Excavations within the archways (arcovoli) of the Verona Arena have primarily revealed evidence of late antique and medieval reuse rather than original Roman construction materials, highlighting the structure's transformation into workshops and burial sites after its primary function declined. Directed by Italy's Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio (ABAP), these investigations often occur during restoration or accessibility projects, yielding artifacts such as coins, fibulae, and human remains that inform on post-gladiatorial economic and funerary practices. In arcovolo 65, a late antique glass furnace emerged during February 2025 excavations preparatory to installing an accessibility elevator for the 2026 Milano-Cortina Olympic ceremonies. The furnace, used for melting scrap glass to produce blown objects, attests to recycling economies in the 4th–6th centuries AD, with recovered fragments indicating small-scale artisanal production within the disused amphitheater. A fibula brooch among the finds provides dating and cultural context, suggesting sustained human activity in the monument's undercroft. Burials uncovered in other arcovoli underscore funerary reuse. Under Arch 31, a single late antique interment (3rd–6th centuries AD) from December 2020 included 1st-century AD potsherds repurposed for paving and traces of burning consistent with a blacksmith's , pointing to mixed industrial-funerary functions. In arcovolo 10, three skeletons discovered in June 2021 yielded a 12th-century "Enrician" purse attached to a , minted in and linked to 11th-century imperial coinage, with pending to refine . Earlier probes in arcovoli 58–60, including 2013 efforts, exposed high medieval waste layers from butchery and a female burial, alongside a sestertius coin that some interpret as evidence of pre-Flavian construction phases, though this remains debated without corroborating structural data. Metalworking residues from these and recent digs further indicate the Arena's role as a multifunctional site through the early Middle Ages, with artifacts like slags and tools preserved for analysis at local museums.

Usage and Events

Ancient Spectacles and Gladiatorial Games

The Verona Arena, erected in the mid-1st century AD during the reign of Emperor (circa 40–42 AD, as evidenced by a discovered in 2013 excavations), functioned principally as a venue for munera gladiatoria and other amphitheatrales, mirroring the entertainment paradigm of Roman provincial amphitheaters. These spectacles encompassed armed combats between gladiators—slaves, prisoners, or volunteers trained in specialized fighting styles such as the (net-fighter) or (pursuer)—often staged to honor deceased elites or curry public favor with magistrates. Complementing these were venationes, brutal hunts pitting venatores against exotic beasts like lions, bears, and elephants imported from and , which underscored Rome's dominion over and distant territories. The arena's elliptical , with its central arena floor (approximately 80 by 45 meters) and tiered seating for up to 30,000 spectators, optimized visibility and acoustics for these mass events, which could span days and integrate theatrical reenactments of myths. Archaeological corroboration includes remnants of a nearby gladiatorial ludus (training barracks), now underlying Verona's town hall, and surviving inscriptions alluding to combatants and their patrons, indicative of routine gladiatorial activity. Funerary stelae for deceased fighters further attest to the lethal stakes, with gladiators facing high mortality rates despite occasional reprieves granted by the editor's thumb signal. While no records specify naumachiae (mock sea battles) in the Verona Arena—typically requiring flooded basins rather than standard amphitheaters—its hydraulic provisions for beast cages suggest adaptability for varied displays, including public executions (damnatio ad bestias). Politically, these games reinforced hierarchy: emperors and local elites sponsored them to distribute grain, avert unrest, and propagate imperial ideology, drawing from Verona's strategic role in northern Italy. Such entertainments persisted into , with the arena integrated into defensive walls under around 265 AD amid invasions. Christian emperors curtailed the practice; Honorius's edict of 404 AD prohibited gladiatorial munera empire-wide, followed by Theodosius II's 438 AD ban on venationes, though sporadic events likely continued until the due to entrenched traditions. The shift reflected evolving ethics, with pagan spectacles yielding to Christian prohibitions on bloodshed, though the structure's endurance attests to their cultural imprint.

Medieval Jousts and Early Modern Events

During the , following the decline of Roman spectacles, the Verona Arena adapted to new civic functions amid Verona's turbulent political landscape. Under the Scaliger dynasty's rule from approximately 1260 to 1387, the structure served as a for housing captives, a designated site for judicial duels, and a venue for expansive public festivals that drew local crowds for communal gatherings. The arena's interior spaces, damaged by the 1117 that felled much of the outer ring leaving only the "ala" () intact, were also utilized for practical purposes such as livestock and hosting medieval fairs, reflecting resource scarcity and everyday utility in a fortified urban setting. Occasional tournaments, including those organized by the Knights of , featured ritualized combats akin to jousting precursors, alongside public executions and displays of exotic animals imported for spectacle, which entertained and intimidated audiences in an era of feudal authority. Transitioning into the under Venetian Republic oversight after 1405, the arena underwent partial restorations around 1500, which rebuilt seating tiers and external arches using salvaged materials, enabling renewed large-scale events. Equestrian tournaments and games proliferated in the 16th and 17th centuries, capitalizing on the venue's elliptical layout suited to mounted displays. The first documented joust within the arena occurred in 1590, involving knights demonstrating horsemanship through charges and maneuvers, marking a revival of chivalric traditions in a post-medieval context. A more elaborate event followed on May 29, 1622, with the Giostra della Quintana—a quintain-tilting where participants rode at a pivoting dummy target to test agility and precision—which attracted knights from and neighboring territories, as detailed in period chronicles emphasizing the pageantry and competitive fervor. These gatherings, often tied to civic celebrations or noble patronage, included horse shows and mock combats, sustaining the arena's role as a multifunctional before its pivot toward theatrical and operatic uses.

Opera Festival Inception and Evolution

The Arena di Verona Opera Festival commenced on August 10, 1913, with the premiere of Giuseppe Verdi's Aida, organized to honor the centenary of the composer's birth. This inaugural production introduced innovative three-dimensional stage elements, diverging from traditional painted backdrops, and achieved immediate success, establishing the foundation for annual open-air opera performances in the Roman amphitheater. The festival's early years featured irregular scheduling due to , with performances resuming sporadically in the , including multiple stagings of Verdi's operas and other staples like . Post-World War II, it stabilized as a cornerstone of Italy's cultural calendar, expanding its repertoire while prioritizing grand-scale productions suited to the venue's acoustics and capacity, often without electronic amplification until the early 21st century. Over decades, the event evolved into a global attraction, drawing international opera luminaries and audiences; by the late , seasons typically encompassed five to six operas repeated over 40-50 evenings from June to September. Attendance surged in recent years, reaching 402,722 spectators in 2023 and peaking at 417,354 in 2024 across 50 performances, generating record revenues of €33.6 million, with approximately 57-61% of attendees from abroad. This growth reflects enhanced production values, digital outreach, and the festival's enduring appeal as a unique fusion of ancient architecture and operatic tradition.

Contemporary Concerts and Non-Opera Events

The Verona Arena has hosted a range of concerts outside its traditional programming since the late , capitalizing on its acoustics and capacity for up to 22,000 spectators in modern configurations. These events, primarily featuring rock, pop, and crossover genres, draw international and Italian artists, often scheduled in spring, summer, and autumn to complement the summer festival. Performances leverage the venue's elliptical design for immersive sound distribution, with staging adaptations to preserve the ancient stone structure. Prominent international rock acts have included , who performed two shows on June 4 and 5, 2006, during his The Dark Side of the Moon Live tour, presenting the full album The Dark Side of the Moon alongside classics like "," attended by approximately 22,000 per night. appeared on October 5, 2006, with for the Seeger Sessions Tour, delivering folk-influenced sets including "John Henry" and covers like "O Mary Don't You Weep." KISS staged a rock spectacle on May 13, 2008, emphasizing pyrotechnics and high-energy anthems suited to the arena's scale. performed on July 15, 2025, revisiting 1980s hits in a nod to the venue's evolving role in hosting legacy acts. Italian pop and rock dominate recent lineups, reflecting local audience preferences and logistical ease. In 2024, events included Il Volo's four-date run on May 9, 11, 12, and 13 with classics from their Tutti per uno tour; on May 14; Irama on May 15; Gazzelle on May 16; Antonello Venditti's anniversary show on May 19; Ludovico Einaudi's piano reinterpretation on July 10; the Music Awards on July 13 and 14; and Claudio Baglioni's four-night celebration on September 19–22. The 2025 season featured Jovanotti's sold-out PalaJova Tour across six dates in May (15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22); the Music Awards on September 12 and 13; a Pavarotti tribute on September 30; and solo shows by (September 21), (September 24), Geolier (September 27), (October 1), (October 5), Zucchero (October 7), and Irama (October 2). Beyond music, non-opera events have included sporting spectacles, such as stage finishes for the cycling race, which utilize the arena's central piazza for crowds and ceremonies. These diverse programming choices sustain year-round activity, with concerts often achieving high attendance through the venue's UNESCO-listed allure and Verona's tourism infrastructure. The Arena di Verona Opera Festival has experienced strong post-pandemic recovery in attendance, with the 2023 edition attracting 402,722 spectators, marking an increase of 59,584 from 2022 and generating significant revenue amid renewed interest in live performances. In 2024, the festival set records with 417,354 attendees across 50 evenings, yielding €33,619,825 in ticket sales—the highest to date—and comprising 57% Italian audiences alongside growing international participation. The 2025 season, featuring 52 performances including a new production of Nabucco directed by Stefano Poda, drew 404,715 spectators and achieved €35,619,000 in revenue, surpassing 2024 figures despite a slight dip in attendance, attributed to higher average ticket prices and sustained demand from younger and foreign demographics. Attendance trends indicate resilience and diversification, with foreign visitors and under-35 attendees rising notably in 2024, reflecting broader appeals through innovative programming like immersive operas and earlier start times for June shows to accommodate family audiences. Concurrently, non-opera events and Filarmonico seasons have boosted overall figures, with attendance doubling year-over-year by mid-2024. Recent developments include ongoing restoration and enhancement works, with partial closures from April 1 to 18, 2025, to improve structural integrity and visitor access. In August 2025, plans advanced for inclusive modifications, such as prefabricated structures set for installation starting November, enhancing safety and usability without altering the ancient fabric. The venue is also preparing for the closing ceremony, prompting functional upgrades including restroom renovations, walkway improvements, and safety enhancements estimated at €20 million to handle large crowds. These efforts, alongside the festival's centenary milestone programming through 2025, underscore the Arena's adaptation to modern logistical and cultural demands while preserving its historical role.

Legends, Depictions, and Controversies

Associated Myths and Folklore

A medieval legend attributes the Verona Arena's construction to a supernatural pact, reflecting popular awe at the scale of Roman engineering, which many contemporaries deemed beyond human capacity. In this tale, a prosperous Veronese nobleman, condemned to death for a serious crime, struck a deal with the devil on the eve of his execution: the demon would build the amphitheater overnight in exchange for the man's soul, ostensibly to demonstrate innocence or win a wager with authorities. The devil labored through the night, assembling the massive structure from local stone, but fled unfinished at the crow of the morning rooster—a common folkloric motif symbolizing the triumph of dawn over darkness—leaving one wing incomplete, which medieval observers linked to the Arena's actual missing ala (destroyed by earthquakes in 1117 and 1172 but mythologized as infernal sabotage). Variations of the legend circulated in Veneto folklore, with some accounts positing construction by giants or directly by the devil without a human intermediary, emphasizing the edifice's perceived otherworldly origins amid scarce knowledge of ancient techniques. These stories, rooted in Middle Ages oral traditions, underscore a causal pattern in European folklore where monumental survivals from antiquity were ascribed to demonic or mythical agency to explain engineering feats unachievable with medieval tools. Less prominent folklore includes sightings of a spectral maiden, purportedly a Roman-era performer who met a tragic end, appearing under full moons within the Arena—a tale evoking ghostly echoes of ancient spectacles but lacking the widespread of the diabolical narrative. Such myths persist in local storytelling, though empirical confirms the Arena's human Roman origins circa 30 AD, built using standard imperial and without intervention.

Representations in Art, Film, and Literature

The Verona Arena has been represented in numerous artistic works, especially engravings and sketches emphasizing its Roman architectural grandeur. In the early 19th century, British artist Joseph Mallord William Turner sketched the amphitheater during his Italian travels, producing detailed watercolors and drawings that highlight its elliptical form and surviving stone tiers against the urban backdrop of Verona. These were later adapted into engravings, such as one by William Miller, which circulated widely in travel literature and art publications. Italian artist Angelo Biasioli created an aquatint etching around 1820, depicting the Arena's interior and exterior with precise attention to its arched facades and seating remnants. Earlier, an 18th-century engraving by D. Valesi portrayed lively performances within the Arena, including musicians, fencers, and costumed figures, reflecting its historical use for spectacles. Nineteenth-century depictions often romanticized the structure's antiquity, as seen in a from showing spectators seated amid the ruins, underscoring its enduring presence in Verona's . Etchings and aquatints housed in collections like the further document the Arena's form through techniques that preserved its proportions—approximately 152 meters long and 123 meters wide—for scholarly and artistic study. Literary representations of the Verona Arena are sparse compared to its visual depictions, with the amphitheater rarely serving as a central motif in canonical works. While features prominently in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (c. 1597), set amid the city's feuding families, the Arena itself is not explicitly referenced, though the play's evocation of 's public spaces indirectly evokes such monumental structures. Travelogues from era, such as those by , describe 's Roman ruins including the Arena, praising its preservation as a testament to imperial engineering, but these accounts prioritize descriptive prose over narrative integration. In film and recorded media, the Arena primarily appears as a venue for productions rather than narrative settings. Giuseppe Verdi's was staged and filmed in 3D at the Arena in 2011, capturing the spectacle's scale with thousands of performers on its vast stage. Similarly, productions of (2019) and Puccini's have been recorded there, emphasizing the acoustic and visual drama of performing within ancient stone walls. Italian films like L'invenzione di noi due (2020) and the TV series Costanza have utilized the location for scenes, though the Arena functions more as atmospheric backdrop than plot driver. Adaptations of , such as Franco Zeffirelli's 1968 version, evoke Verona's historic essence but do not prominently feature the Arena.

Debates on Historical Accuracy

The exact date of the Verona Arena has been debated among historians due to the lack of direct epigraphic or literary evidence pinpointing its . Scholarly consensus situates the amphitheater's building in the first century AD, but precise attribution varies between the late Augustan (c. –14 AD) and the reign of (AD 37–41), based on stylistic comparisons with other Roman structures and the city's development under imperial patronage. During the , the Arena's architectural elements fueled discussions on the origins and purity of classical orders. Local antiquarians and architects, seeking to elevate Verona's antiquity, promoted the structure's robust, unadorned columns as the archetype of the , purportedly linking it to Etruscan or Italic traditions predating Greek influences. However, critiqued and refined this interpretation in his treatise on architecture, adapting the Arena's features—such as replacing wooden entablatures with stone ones derived from Roman models—to fit a more standardized "rustic" variant, highlighting tensions between local pride and empirical observation of surviving antiquities. Modern debates on historical accuracy often center on restoration practices and hypothetical reconstructions of lost sections, including the southern ala destroyed in the 1117 earthquake. Proposals for using original materials have clashed with purist views favoring minimal intervention to preserve the monument's of age, as excessive reconstruction risks fabricating an idealized past disconnected from verifiable evidence. These discussions underscore broader archaeological principles prioritizing empirical documentation over interpretive .

Modern Production and Cultural Disputes

In contemporary productions at the Arena di Verona, operas are staged on a grand scale to leverage the amphitheater's acoustics and capacity for up to 15,000 spectators, emphasizing spectacle with large choruses, elaborate sets, and traditional costumes rather than avant-garde reinterpretations common in European regietheater. The annual Opera Festival, running from June to September, prioritizes works by Verdi and Puccini, such as Aida, Nabucco, and Turandot, with productions often reusing sets from decades prior to maintain visual grandeur suited to the outdoor venue. Staging adheres closely to historical narratives, incorporating elements like elephant processions in Aida or massive ensembles in Aida's Triumphal March, drawing over 400,000 attendees annually in peak years before financial strains reduced programming. Cultural disputes have centered on the tension between operatic tradition and modern sensitivities over , particularly in the 2022 revival of Zeffirelli's 2002 production directed by Francesco Micheli. performed the title role using dark makeup to depict the Ethiopian princess , a practice rooted in 19th-century conventions for white singers portraying non-European characters, which the Arena defended as essential for visual authenticity in the amphitheater's scale rather than caricature. This sparked international backlash, with American withdrawing from her scheduled debut on July 14, 2022, citing the makeup as "unacceptable" and emblematic of , a view echoed in U.S. media but contested by the Arena's foundation, which emphasized Italy's historical context and lack of intent to offend. The controversy highlighted broader divides: progressive critics, often from Anglo-American perspectives, framed the makeup as perpetuating , leading to calls for projection or body paint alternatives, while Italian officials and traditionalists argued such changes undermine the opera's dramatic integrity and Verdi's intent, noting similar practices in global theaters until recent decades. Precedents include soprano Tamara Wilson's 2019 criticism of the same production, yet it continued without alteration, reflecting resistance to external pressures amid Italy's emphasis on cultural preservation over ideological revisions. By 2024, Netrebko returned for without reported makeup changes, signaling the Arena's prioritization of artistic continuity. Additional frictions involve logistical challenges exacerbating performer welfare, as seen in July 2025 when heatwaves exceeding 30°C caused singers to faint mid-performance in heavy period costumes during Nabucco and Aida, prompting debates on adapting traditional staging for climate realities without compromising visual traditions. These incidents underscore causal trade-offs in maintaining historical fidelity in an open-air venue, where modern interventions like lighter fabrics risk diluting the spectacle that defines the Arena's appeal.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.