Hubbry Logo
XmasXmasMain
Open search
Xmas
Community hub
Xmas
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Xmas
Xmas
Xmas
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Illustration of a woman in a gingham dress standing in front of a large Christmas wreath
A 1922 advertisement in Ladies' Home Journal for Biberman Bros.: "Give her a L'Aiglon for Xmas"

Xmas (also X-mas) is a common abbreviation of the word Christmas. It is sometimes pronounced /ˈɛksməs/, but Xmas, and variants such as Xtemass, originated as handwriting abbreviations for the typical pronunciation /ˈkrɪsməs/. The 'X' comes from the Greek letter Chi, which is the first letter of the Greek word Christós (Ancient Greek: Χριστός, romanized: Khristós, lit. 'anointed, covered in oil'), which became Christ in English.[1] The suffix -mas is from the Latin-derived Old English word for Mass.[2][3]

There is a common misconception that the word Xmas stems from a secularizing tendency to de-emphasize the religious tradition of Christmas,[4][5] by taking the 'Christ' out of "Christmas". Nevertheless, the term's usage dates back to the 16th century, and corresponds to Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican liturgical use of various forms of chi-rho monogram.[6] In English, "X" was first used as a scribal abbreviation for "Christ" in 1100; "X'temmas" is attested in 1551, and "Xmas" in 1721.[7]

Style guides and etiquette

[edit]

The term Xmas is deprecated by some modern style guides, including those at The New York Times,[8] The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage, The Times, The Guardian, and the BBC.[9] Millicent Fenwick, in the 1948 Vogue's Book of Etiquette, states that Xmas' should never be used" in greeting cards.[10][11] The Cambridge Guide to Australian English Usage states that the spelling should be considered informal and restricted to contexts where concision is valued, such as headlines and greeting cards.[12] The Christian Writer's Manual of Style, while acknowledging the ancient and respectful use of Xmas in the past, states that the spelling should never be used in formal writing.[13]

History

[edit]

Use in English

[edit]
"Xmas" used on a Christmas postcard, 1910

Early use of Xmas includes Bernard Ward's History of St. Edmund's college, Old Hall (originally published c. 1755).[14] An earlier version, X'temmas, dates to 1551.[14] Around 1100 the term was written as Xp̄es mæsse in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.[1] Xmas is found in a letter from George Woodward in 1753.[15] Lord Byron used the term in 1811,[16] as did Samuel Coleridge (1801)[9] and Lewis Carroll (1864).[16] In the United States, the fifth American edition of William Perry's Royal Standard English Dictionary, published in Boston in 1800, included in its list of "Explanations of Common Abbreviations, or Contraction of Words" the entry: "Xmas. Christmas."[17] Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. used the term in a letter dated 1923.[16]

Since at least the late 19th century, Xmas has been in use in various other English-language nations. Quotations with the word can be found in texts first written in Canada,[18] and the word has been used in Australia,[12] and in the Caribbean.[19] Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage stated that modern use of the term is largely limited to advertisements, headlines and banners, where its conciseness is valued. The association with commerce "has done nothing for its reputation", according to the dictionary.[16]

In the United Kingdom, the former Church of England Bishop of Blackburn, Alan Chesters, recommended to his clergy that they avoid the spelling.[9] In the United States, in 1977 New Hampshire Governor Meldrim Thomson sent out a press release saying that he wanted journalists to keep the "Christ" in Christmas, and not call it Xmas—which he called a "pagan" spelling of 'Christmas'.[20]

Use of X for 'Christ'

[edit]
For the article about the χρ symbol, see Chi Rho.
The Chi-Rho is a Christian symbol representing Christ.

The abbreviation of Christmas as Xmas is a source of disagreement among Christians who observe the holiday.

The December 1957 News and Views published by the Church League of America, a conservative organization co-founded in 1937 by George Washington Robnett,[21] attacked the use of Xmas in an article titled "X=The Unknown Quantity". The claims were picked up later by Gerald L. K. Smith, who in December 1966 claimed that Xmas was a "blasphemous omission of the name of Christ" and that "'X' is referred to as being symbolical of the unknown quantity". Smith further argued that the Jewish people had introduced Santa Claus to suppress New Testament accounts of Jesus, and that the United Nations, at the behest of "world Jewry", had "outlawed the name of Christ".[22] There is, however, a well documented history of use of Χ (actually the Greek letter chi) as an abbreviation for "Christ" (Χριστός) and possibly also a symbol of the cross.[23][unreliable source?][24][unreliable source?] The abbreviation appears on many Orthodox Christian religious icons.

Dennis Bratcher, writing for Christian website The Voice, states "there are always those who loudly decry the use of the abbreviation 'Xmas' as some kind of blasphemy against Christ and Christianity".[25] Among them are evangelist Franklin Graham and former CNN contributor Roland S. Martin. Graham stated in an interview:

[F]or us as Christians, this is one of the most holy of the holidays, the birth of our savior Jesus Christ. And for people to take Christ out of Christmas. They're happy to say merry Xmas.[26] Let's just take Jesus out. And really, I think, a war against the name of Jesus Christ.[27]

Roland Martin likewise relates the use of Xmas to his growing concerns of increasing commercialization and secularization of one of Christianity's highest holy days.[28] Bratcher posits that those who dislike abbreviating the word are unfamiliar with a long history of Christians using X in place of "Christ" for various purposes.

The word Christ and its compounds, including Christmas, have been abbreviated in English for at least the past 1,000 years, long before the modern Xmas was commonly used. Christ was often written as 'Xρ' or 'Xt'; there are references in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as far back as 1021. This 'X' and 'P' arose as the uppercase forms of the Greek letters χ (Ch) and ρ (R) used in ancient abbreviations for Χριστος (Greek for "Christ").[1] The Chi-Rho, an amalgamation of the two Greek letters rendered as '☧' (Unicode character U+2627 ☧ CHI RHO) is a symbol often used to represent Christ in Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox Christian Churches.[29]

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) and the OED Supplement have cited usages of X- or Xp- for 'Christ-' as early as 1485. The terms Xtian and less commonly Xpian have also been used for 'Christian'. The OED further cites usage of Xtianity for 'Christianity' from 1634.[1] According to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage, most of the evidence for these words comes from "educated Englishmen who knew their Greek".[16]

In ancient Christian art, χ and χρ are abbreviations for Christ's name.[30] In many manuscripts of the New Testament and icons, 'Χ' is an abbreviation for Χριστος,[31] as is XC (the first and last letters in Greek, using the lunate sigma);[32] compare IC for Jesus in Greek.

Other uses of X(t) for 'Chris(t)-'

[edit]

Other proper names containing the name 'Christ' besides those mentioned above are sometimes abbreviated similarly, either as X or Xt, both of which have been used historically,[33] e.g., Xtopher or Xopher for 'Christopher', or Xtina or Xina for the name 'Christina'.[citation needed]

In the 17th and 18th centuries, Xene and Exene were common spellings for the given name 'Christine'.[citation needed] The American singer Christina Aguilera has sometimes gone by the name "Xtina". Similarly, Exene Cervenka has been a noted American singer-songwriter since 1977.

This usage of 'X' to spell the syllable kris (rather than the sounds ks) has extended to xtal for 'crystal', and on florists' signs to xant for 'chrysanthemum',[34][user-generated source] even though these words are not etymologically related to Christ: crystal comes from a Greek word meaning 'ice' (and not even using the letter χ), and chrysanthemum comes from Greek words meaning 'golden flower', while Christ comes from a Greek word meaning 'anointed'.

[edit]
  • In the animated TV series Futurama, Christmas is referred to just as "Xmas", in speech and writing.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Xmas

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Xmas is an abbreviation for , the Christian observance of Christ's birth on , where the "X" derives from the Greek letter chi (Χ), the initial letter of Χριστός (Christos, meaning "anointed one"), and "-mas" stems from the masse, referring to a liturgical . This first appeared in written English around 1021 CE, when an Anglo-Saxon scribe employed it in a to conserve space, building on early Christian use of symbolic abbreviations like the Chi-Rho monogram for Christ. By the , Xmas gained wider currency in print, including religious calendars and advertisements, without altering its Christocentric meaning. Although some contemporary Christians decry Xmas as a secular erasure of "Christ" from the holiday—fueled by perceptions of commercialization—historical evidence confirms its origins in tradition, not anti-religious intent, rendering such objections empirically unfounded. In practice, Xmas functions interchangeably with Christmas across secular and sacred contexts, prized for brevity in signage, cards, and media, while preserving the underlying reference to Christ's nativity amid evolving cultural observances of gift-giving, feasting, and customs assimilated into the feast.

Etymology and Origin

Linguistic Roots

The "X" in "Xmas" originates from the Greek letter chi (Χ), the first letter of Χριστός (Christós), the Greek term for "Christ" or "anointed one." This usage stems from ancient scribal practices in early Christian manuscripts, where sacred names () were routinely abbreviated—such as contracting Christos to Χ or ΧΡ (chi-rho)—as a of reverence rather than secular or omission. The suffix "-mas" derives from the mæsse, denoting a liturgical or Eucharistic feast, which combined with "Christ" to form Crīstesmæsse by the late , referring to the commemorating Christ's birth. This element reflects Latin influence via ecclesiastical terminology, where missa (dismissal or ) entered through , linking "Xmas" etymologically to a religious observance rather than a generic . These roots trace to Greek Christos (from chrio, "to anoint") and Latin Christus, adapted into English abbreviations that preserved theological symbolism in written form, distinct from later print conventions.

Early Christian Symbolism

The abbreviation "X" in early Christian symbolism originates from the Greek letter chi (Χ), the first letter of Χριστός (Christos), denoting Christ. This letter formed the basis of the Chi-Rho monogram (☧), an overlapping of chi and rho (P), the initial letters of the Greek term for Christ, serving as one of the earliest Christograms. The symbol's adoption predates widespread use of the cross, functioning as a coded emblem amid persecution and later as a public declaration of faith. The Chi-Rho gained prominence through Emperor Constantine I, who reportedly envisioned it alongside the words "In hoc signo vinces" before the on October 28, 312 AD, leading to its placement on military standards as a of victory under Christ's protection. Early and artifacts employed such Christograms to abbreviate sacred names, combining utility in production—where materials like were scarce—with theological intent to honor Christ's presence without fully spelling the name, thereby evoking reverence. This practice mirrored Jewish traditions of handling divine names cautiously, though adapted to Greek Christian contexts where chi alone increasingly symbolized the as crux decussata, an X-shaped form interpreted as Christ's salvific instrument. In continuity from New Testament-era Greek texts to medieval illuminated manuscripts, the "X" retained explicit representation of Christ, as seen in abbreviations over-lined in codices to denote sanctity. Scribes in monastic scriptoria used these to save space while infusing pages with devotional power, preserving the symbol's piety rather than diminishing it; for instance, the lavish Chi-Rho page in the 9th-century exemplifies this tradition, where the monogram initiates the Gospel of Matthew with intricate artistry underscoring Christ's centrality. The theological rationale emphasized the abbreviation's role in invoking divine mystery, akin to shorthand for the ineffable, ensuring the symbol's sacred efficacy across eras.

Historical Usage

Medieval and Pre-Modern Examples

The earliest documented abbreviation akin to "Xmas" dates to approximately 1021 in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, where a scribe recorded "XPmas" for "Christes Maesse" amid an entry on historical events, employing the shorthand to economize on scarce parchment amid resource constraints in manuscript production. This instance reflects broader scribal conventions in Anglo-Saxon England, where such contractions conserved space without altering liturgical meaning. In medieval monastic scriptoria and scholarly codices, abbreviations like "XPmas" or variants proliferated for frequently invoked terms tied to the mass, as copyists prioritized efficiency in transcribing repetitive calendars and ; these practices stemmed from practical necessities rather than symbolic innovation, with evidence from surviving insular manuscripts demonstrating consistent application across religious texts. By the late medieval period, such notations appeared in continental European liturgical works, facilitating the condensation of feast-day references in breviaries and homiliaries. Pre-modern printed precedents emerged in the , including "Xmas" in Bernard Ward's History of St. Edmund's College, Old Hall (circa ), an ecclesiastical chronicle that adapted manuscript traditions to early modern typography, and Samuel Taylor Coleridge's 1799 letter employing "Xstmas" in personal correspondence, predating mechanized printing's dominance and illustrating transitional usage in English scholarly and literary circles. These examples underscore the abbreviation's persistence in contexts valuing brevity, from handwritten annals to nascent printed almanacs, without evidence of ideological intent.

Emergence in English Language

The abbreviation "Xmas" for "Christmas" entered English usage as a scribal shorthand, rooted in the Greek chi (Χ), the initial letter of Χριστός (Christos), which early Christian scribes employed to conserve space in manuscripts. In English contexts, an early form appeared in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle entry for 1021, denoting "Xp̄es Mæsse" as a variant for Christmas Mass. This practice persisted into the printing era, where hand-set type remained laborious and costly, prompting abbreviations in religious texts to reduce expenses. By the mid-18th century, "Xmas" gained traction in printed English materials, with records indicating its use as early as amid expanding and periodical publications. The saw further integration into dictionaries and print media, facilitated by efficiencies and the proliferation of newspapers and books, though instances remained infrequent before 1800 compared to full spellings. The later formalized "Xmas" as a recognized , reflecting its normalization in written English by the late . In the , "Xmas" standardized in , holiday cards, and signage for its brevity, particularly in commercial contexts where space constraints favored concise forms, without evoking religious contention at the time. Usage peaked mid-century in mass-produced media, underscoring its practical adoption over theological implications.

Religious Perspectives

Affirmative Views in

In early Christian tradition, the letter "X" derives from the Greek chi (Χ), the initial letter of Χριστός (Christos), serving as a shorthand for Christ. This usage appears in patristic-era abbreviations and symbols, such as the Chi-Rho monogram (☧), which superimposes chi and rho (the first two letters of Christos) and was employed by Christians as early as the second century in manuscripts and inscriptions. Early Church practices incorporated such —sacred name abbreviations—to denote reverence for Christ's name, with "X" invoking his presence without diminishing theological significance. Theological scholars affirm that "Xmas" aligns with this heritage, functioning as an efficient abbreviation that retains Christ's centrality rather than erasing it. Reformed theologian , via , emphasized the "long and sacred history" of "X" symbolizing Christ, tracing its continuity from Greek manuscripts to medieval liturgical texts. Catholic sources, including U.S. Catholic, describe "Xmas" as preserving a " from the early church," where the abbreviation honors Greek scriptural roots without altering . Catholic diocesan commentary further supports its compatibility, noting "Xmas" as a "thoroughly Christian " used for centuries in religious contexts to center the holiday on Christ. perspectives, as in Holy Joys publications, highlight its invention by for abbreviating "Christ," "," and "" in historical church documents, underscoring no inherent conflict with faith. Empirical instances include its appearance in pre-20th-century hymnals and biblical commentaries without accompanying doctrinal censure, reflecting broad acceptance among scholars.

Objections from Conservative Christians

Conservative Christians, especially evangelicals and traditionalists, contend that substituting "Xmas" for "Christmas" diminishes the holiday's explicit Christocentric focus, replacing the sacred name "Christ"—derived from the Greek Christos meaning "anointed one"—with an ambiguous symbol that fails to invoke reverence for . This objection stems from a first-principles view that the celebration commemorates the of Christ, whose name Scripture commands to honor distinctly, as in Philippians 2:10, where "at the name of every knee should bow." In their assessment, abbreviating the term risks casual irreverence, particularly amid broader cultural shifts away from biblical literacy, where fewer recognize the historical Chi-Rho symbolism and instead associate "X" with secular or profane connotations like the algebraic unknown or "X-rated" content. This perspective links "Xmas" usage to accelerating , arguing it normalizes the excision of overt Christian references in public life, correlating with data showing declining and religious identification in Western societies. For instance, Lifeway Research surveys indicate that only 47% of attend church during the season, with evangelicals viewing such linguistic shifts as symptomatic of a post-Christian that prioritizes inclusivity over doctrinal fidelity. Critics maintain this erosion is not coincidental but causally reinforced by media and commercial influences that favor neutral terminology to accommodate non-believers, thereby diluting the evangelistic potential of . Prominent figures like evangelist Franklin Graham have explicitly decried "Xmas" as an assault on Christ's name, framing it within a larger "war on Christmas" driven by cultural antipathy toward Christianity's exclusive claims. Similarly, actors and commentators aligned with conservative Christianity, such as Kirk Cameron, echo this by insisting on retaining "Christ" to preserve the holiday's theological integrity against perceived dilutions. These voices prioritize scriptural fidelity over historical etymology, cautioning that in an era of waning faith—evidenced by Pew Research finding 76% of Christians affirming core Christmas story elements in 2017, down from prior years—abbreviations like "Xmas" contribute to a generational drift from honoring Jesus explicitly.

Modern Usage and Contexts

Commercial and Secular Applications

The abbreviation "Xmas" gained prominence in commercial advertising during the , valued for its brevity in space-constrained formats like print ads, , and catalogs. Advertisers adopted it alongside other like "nite" for "night," facilitating efficient promotion of and products. Historical examples include a 1920 Murad Cigarettes advertisement urging consumers to "give Xmas than ," tying the term to seasonal gifting without religious emphasis. Following World War II, amid expanding mass consumerism and holiday marketing booms, "Xmas" appeared routinely in retail promotions, such as 1960s Barclaycard campaigns featuring illustrated "Xmas" themes to evoke festive spending. By the late 20th century, it permeated signage for department stores and supermarkets, enabling compact displays like "Big Xmas Sale" banners that prioritized sales messaging over full spelling. This practical usage aligned with broader commercialization, where the holiday season drove retail revenue through abbreviated, eye-catching promotions. In contemporary , "Xmas" persists in product titles and listings on platforms like Amazon, optimizing search terms and descriptions for items such as artificial trees and storage bags labeled "Xmas ." Such applications extend to digital ads and email campaigns, where character limits favor the shorter form while preserving the winter festive connotation. In diverse markets, this secular phrasing supports inclusive by focusing on universal rather than doctrinal specifics, though its adoption stems primarily from logistical efficiency rather than deliberate neutrality.

Editorial and Stylistic Guidelines

The Associated Press Stylebook, a primary reference for journalistic writing, explicitly prohibits abbreviating "Christmas" as "Xmas" under any circumstances, mandating the full term to ensure precision and prevent misinterpretation. This guideline, confirmed in the Stylebook's holiday-specific entries and social media clarifications as recently as 2018 and reiterated in 2024 updates, prioritizes formal clarity over brevity, particularly in contexts involving religious or cultural reporting. In book and , where space constraints are less acute than in newsprint, style authorities like adopt a more flexible approach to abbreviations generally, permitting them in informal or explanatory contexts while favoring full spellings for readability and to avoid symbolic ambiguity. Historical from the reinforced this preference in religious texts and formal correspondence, where compositors' guides and publishing conventions emphasized spelling out "Christmas" to preserve reverence, even as abbreviated forms emerged in commercial print by the 1820s. Major publishers, including , apply "Xmas" sparingly in practice, consistently opting for "Christmas" in titles, indexes, and prose to prioritize empirical readability over abbreviation convenience, as evidenced in comprehensive works like the 2020 Oxford Handbook of Christmas. This restraint aligns with broader stylistic traditions valuing tradition and audience comprehension, often requiring contextual explanation for any abbreviation to mitigate perceptions of casualness.

Controversies

Claims of Secular Erasure

Critics, particularly conservative and media figures, have claimed that widespread use of "Xmas" in commercial, public, and secular contexts symbolizes and advances the erasure of Christ's explicit role in the holiday, facilitating its transformation into a generic winter festival. This perspective gained prominence in the "War on " discourse during the 2000s, where coverage spotlighted retailers like Target and adopting "Xmas" in advertising alongside "Happy Holidays" greetings, interpreting these as coordinated efforts to neutralize Christian terminology amid broader cultural shifts. In 2005, Fox News host John Gibson's book The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday Is Worse Than You Thought argued that such abbreviations, promoted by secular elites and litigious groups, intentionally dilute religious observance by replacing "Christ" with an impersonal symbol, exacerbating what he described as a deliberate assault on public expressions of faith. Proponents of this view, including subsequent segments, link "Xmas" to patterns like the avoidance of Nativity scenes in civic displays, citing empirical declines: a 2017 survey reported that only 55% of Americans then celebrated primarily as a religious , down from 59% in 2013, while opposition to government-permitted Nativity scenes rose to 26% from 20%. These claims extend to advocacy by atheist organizations, whose campaigns reinforce the abstraction critiqued in "Xmas"; for instance, erected billboards in 2013 declaring "Christmas is better without the Christ" and in 2016 urging people to "skip church" for a merrier , actions seen by conservative observers as emblematic of intent to normalize Christ-omitted variants like "Xmas" in public life. Right-leaning sources, such as a 2021 opinion piece, frame such developments—including rebrandings like Black Lives Matter's "Black Xmas" initiative—as extensions of left-leaning that prioritize inclusivity over Christian heritage, dismissing counterarguments of benign abbreviation as overlooking causal patterns in eroding religious visibility. This stance highlights perceived biases in mainstream institutions, where secular preferences often prevail despite historical Christian dominance of the .

Historical and Linguistic Defenses

The abbreviation "Xmas" originates from the Greek letter chi (Χ), the initial letter of Χριστός (Christos), transliterated in English as "X" to denote "Christ." This usage stems from early Christian scribal practices, where "X" served as a for "Christ" in religious manuscripts dating back to at least the , predating any secular connotations. The Chi-Rho monogram, superimposing chi (Χ) and rho (Ρ)—the first two letters of Christos—emerged as a prominent Christian symbol by the , employed in devotional contexts such as Emperor Constantine's military standards following his reported vision in 312 CE. The earliest recorded application to appears in an from 1021, rendering it as "XPmas" or similar forms to conserve space in handwritten texts. Linguistic evidence from philological sources, including the , confirms "Xmas" as a contraction rooted exclusively in Christian , with no documented secular invention or intent to obscure religious meaning. Historical records trace all instances to abbreviations, such as those in medieval English religious publications, where "X" explicitly symbolized Christ to reduce printing costs while maintaining doctrinal fidelity. Claims of secular erasure lack empirical support, as the term's evolution reflects devotional efficiency rather than dilution; the "X" embeds Christ's name, countering notions of removal. From a first-principles perspective, the preserves the causal link to Christian origins through symbolic continuity with Greek scriptural traditions, where chi's form inherently evokes Christ without phonetic alteration. Modern sensitivities interpreting "X" as a generic placeholder arise from historical ignorance, not the term's intrinsic design, as evidenced by its uninterrupted use in and scholarship. Even among those advocating the full "" for evangelistic clarity—citing risks of misperception in contemporary multicultural settings—scholars uniformly affirm the abbreviation's ancient Christian pedigree, rejecting narratives of anti-religious . This consensus underscores "Xmas" as a legitimate, heritage-laden variant rather than a vehicle for erasure.

Cultural Impact

In Media and Advertising

In the mid-20th century, "Xmas" appeared in some holiday advertisements and print promotions as a space-efficient , often evoking a lighthearted, secular tone amid product pitches for items like televisions and . This usage aligned with broader commercial efforts to emphasize festivity over explicit religious observance, as seen in era-specific campaigns that prioritized consumer appeal through whimsical imagery rather than theological depth. Post-1980s, faith-based media outlets shifted toward the full term "" in titles and narratives to underscore religious significance amid cultural pushback against secular dilutions, exemplified by the growing output of productions like those from Pure Flix that highlight Nativity themes and Christian doctrine. In contrast, secular advertising from brands such as has trended toward neutral phrasing like "holiday" campaigns to broaden market reach, though "Xmas" persists in select retail promotions for its brevity and non-denominational vibe. Contemporary depictions in , such as Hallmark Channel's lineup of over 40 annual specials, frequently blend "" branding with commercial motifs of romance, family reunions, and gift exchanges, thereby amplifying the holiday's economic dimensions while nodding to . This pattern in media reinforces a causal dynamic where promotional narratives prioritize viewer and spending incentives, with empirical viewership data showing sustained popularity for such formulaic content during peak broadcasts.

Broader Societal Debates

A 2018 Lifeway Research survey found that 42% of American consider the use of "Xmas" offensive, reflecting perceptions among some that the abbreviation diminishes the religious significance of the holiday by substituting a symbol for "Christ." This sentiment aligns with broader tensions over holiday nomenclature, where "Xmas" is often invoked in discussions of versus tradition, particularly among evangelicals who report higher discomfort with neutral or abbreviated terms—up to 65% in related LifeWay polling on emphasizing in observances. Such views tie into data showing 31% of U.S. adults bothered by the perceived decline in religious emphasis during commemorations, per a 2017 analysis. In the 2020s, "Xmas" has echoed in institutional debates over inclusive versus traditional labeling, such as calendar disputes pitting "Christmas break" against "winter break." For instance, in October 2025, the Sumner County Schools board in voted 6-1 to retain "Christmas Break" after heated deliberations, with proponents arguing that neutral alternatives erode without advancing genuine inclusivity. Similar controversies, documented in local reporting from districts across the U.S., frame abbreviations or secular renamings as symbolic compromises for , often criticized by parents and conservatives for prioritizing non-Christian sensibilities over majority Christian demographics. Empirical studies reveal no direct causal link between "Xmas" usage and declines in , as broader —evident in Gallup data showing "strongly religious" celebrations dropping from 50% in the to 35% by 2019—correlate more with cultural shifts like rising unaffiliated populations than terminological changes alone. Critics, however, argue that repeated symbolic dilutions in public spaces contribute to gradual erosion of Christian observance, a viewpoint substantiated by consistent polling on perceived "wars" against traditions, though belief in such conflicts has waned to 23% overall by 2024 per . This debate underscores causal realism in cultural dynamics: while terms like "Xmas" lack proven erosive power in isolation, their normalization in inclusive policies may reinforce narratives of marginalization among religious adherents.

References

  1. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Xmas
  2. https://www.dictionary.com/e/xmas-christogram/
  3. https://www.vox.com/2014/12/14/7374401/jesus-xmas-christmas
  4. https://www.crivoice.org/symbols/xmasorigin.html
  5. https://www.reviewofreligions.org/41290/why-is-christmas-sometimes-shortened-to-xmas/
  6. https://www.news-journalonline.com/story/news/2023/12/06/xmas-vs-christmas-why-offensive-origins-history-greek-chi-means-christ/71810050007/
  7. https://www.premierchristianity.com/opinion/dont-worry-about-shortening-christmas-to-xmas-it-isnt-blasphemous/870.article
  8. https://www.whychristmas.com/customs/christmas-or-xmas
  9. https://uscatholic.org/articles/202111/what-is-the-x-in-xmas/
  10. https://earlychristianhistory.net/text-types.html
  11. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Christmas
  12. https://worship.calvin.edu/resources/articles/chi-rho
  13. https://aleteia.org/2017/07/28/the-miraculous-story-behind-the-chi-rho-symbol/
  14. https://earlychurchhistory.org/christian-symbols/the-chi-rho-symbol/
  15. https://www.gotquestions.org/Chi-Rho-symbol.html
  16. https://www.visittrinity.ie/blog/symbolism-in-the-book-of-kells-the-chi-rho-page/
  17. https://www.carladesantisediting.com/blog-parchment-to-pdf/whats-wrong-with-the-abbreviation-xmas-it-has-noble-origins
  18. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4097755.stm
  19. https://biblestudiesforlife.lifeway.com/keeping-x-in-christmas/
  20. https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/xmas-origin
  21. https://christmasphere.com/meaning-and-history-of-xmas/
  22. https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/why-is-x-used-when-it-replaces-christ-in-christmas
  23. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256282/don-t-be-afraid-to-write-merry-xmas-inside-the-thousand-year-old-christian-tradition
  24. https://holyjoys.org/christians-x-mas/
  25. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-12-12-vw-16376-story.html
  26. https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2015/12/23/when-santa-sold-cigarettes/
  27. https://home.barclays/news/2016/12/from-the-archives-1960s-barclaycard-christmas-adverts/
  28. https://www.amazon.com/Christmas/s?k=Christmas%2BItems
  29. https://www.amazon.com/christmas/s?k=christmas
  30. https://writingexplained.org/ap-style/holidays
  31. https://x.com/APStylebook/status/1077547441443012608
  32. https://mediablog.prnewswire.com/2024/12/10/ap-style-dec-2024/
  33. https://www.latimes.com/socal/glendale-news-press/news/tn-gnp-xpm-2011-12-31-tn-gnp-0101-a-word-please-holiday-grammar-tips-for-the-new-year-story.html
  34. https://dokumen.pub/the-oxford-handbook-of-christmas-9780198831464-0198831463.html
  35. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/12/war-on-christmas-short-history-101222
  36. https://www.amazon.com/War-Christmas-Liberal-Christian-Holiday/dp/1595230165
  37. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/12/12/americans-say-religious-aspects-of-christmas-are-declining-in-public-life/
  38. https://www.atheists.org/2013/12/press-release-atheists-nobody-needs-christ-at-christmas/
  39. https://www.atheists.org/2016/12/atheists-billboards-say-skip-church-for-a-merrier-christmas/
  40. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/blms-radical-christmas-wish-list
  41. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/12/18/war-on-christmas-525273
  42. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/xmas_v
  43. https://research.lifeway.com/2018/12/12/why-x-mas-actually-keeps-christ-in-christmas/
  44. https://www.facebook.com/groups/951998221479788/posts/2925257310820526/
  45. https://retrodee.wordpress.com/2020/12/14/5-strange-holiday-ads-from-the-fabulous-50s/
  46. https://www.faithonview.com/the-rise-of-faith-based-films-a-new-era-for-christmas-classics/
  47. https://www.coca-colacompany.com/media-center/groundbreaking-digital-experience-and-films-fuse-holiday-heritage-with-cutting-edge-tech
  48. https://www.hallmarkchannel.com/christmas
  49. https://www.mentalfloss.com/holidays/christmas/hallmark-christmas-movie-history
  50. https://wordandway.org/2018/12/11/survey-less-americans-want-more-christ-this-christmas/
  51. https://fox17.com/news/local/vote-today-on-christmas-vs-winter-break-naming-in-tennessee-school-district
  52. https://www.route-fifty.com/management/2019/12/when-schools-try-tweak-winter-break-families-fight-back/162014/
  53. https://news.gallup.com/poll/272378/americans-celebrating-secular-christmas.aspx
  54. https://today.yougov.com/entertainment/articles/51143-falling-share-of-americans-think-there-is-a-war-on-christmas
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.