Hubbry Logo
ZarahemlaZarahemlaMain
Open search
Zarahemla
Community hub
Zarahemla
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Zarahemla
Zarahemla
Zarahemla
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Zarahemla (/ˌzærəˈhɛmlə/)[1] is a land in the Book of Mormon that for much of the narrative functions as the capital of the Nephites, their political and religious center. Zarahemla has been the namesake of multiple communities in the United States, has been alluded to in literature that references Mormonism, and has been portrayed in artwork depicting Book of Mormon content.

Key Information

Most adherents of the Latter Day Saint movement regard the Book of Mormon as a translation of a genuinely historical text from the ancient Americas (a belief that mainstream academic archaeology does not corroborate). Some adherents have speculated about where Zarahemla would have been located or attempted to find archaeological evidence of it. Such attempts have been unsuccessful.

Zarahemla is described as being near the mouth of a prominent river which the Book of Mormon calls the Sidon River and this river is described as flowing northward into the sea. The book further describes Zarahemla as being south of the Land of Bountiful and immediately south of a "narrow neck of land" that separates the southern land (which includes Zarahemla) from a northern land. Zarahemla is described as being north of the Land of Nephi and the Land of Nephi is described as being north of the Land of First Inheritance. Narrow "strips of wilderness" are described as surrounding Zarahemla on the west, east and south of the River Sidon. The Book of Mormon claims Zarahemla has significant ore deposits full of gold, silver, and copper.

Background

[edit]

The Book of Mormon, published in 1830, is one of the central scriptures of Mormonism,[2] also called the Latter Day Saint movement.[3] Founder Joseph Smith said that an angel of the Christian God directed him to uncover metal plates inscribed with the history of a Christian people in the ancient Americas and that by miraculous means he translated them, producing the Book of Mormon.[4] Most in the Latter Day Saint movement regard the Book of Mormon as being genuinely ancient and historical.[5] Mainstream academic archaeology considers Book of Mormon historicity implausible and unproven.[6]

Setting

[edit]

In the Book of Mormon, the "land of Zarahemla" is populated by the "people of Zarahemla", so called for Zarahemla, their ruler at the time of the Nephites' encounter with them.[7][a] Zarahemla is identified as a descendant of Mulek, who according to the Book of Mormon is a son of the biblical king Zedekiah.[9][b] 350 years earlier, around the same time as the Nephites' ancestor Lehi's flight from Jerusalem, Mulek had led a group from Jerusalem, guided by God, to the same new continent as the Nephites.[11]

When the Nephite king Mosiah[c] leads a group of Nephite refugees, in response to divine direction, out from the land of Nephi and into the land of Zarahemla, encountering the people of Zarahemla, they and the Nephites unite their societies, and Mosiah becomes king of them all.[12] Zarahemla becomes the second capital city of the Nephites.[13] Literary scholar Jared Hickman calls it "the Nephite home base for the rest of the narrative" after the Nephites migrate there.[14] The Nephites who remain in the land of Nephi, rather than follow Mosiah to the land of Zarahemla, never reappear in the Book of Mormon, and the land of Nephi becomes Lamanite territory.[15]

A temple features in the narrative as the apparent geographic, ceremonial, and societal center of Zarahemla.[16]

Narrative

[edit]

When the Nephite king Mosiah leads Nephite refugees, in response to divine direction, out from the land of Nephi, they encounter a city inhabited by a people called the "people of Zarahemla", the name of their ruler, in a place called the "land of Zarahemla".[7] Zarahemla is identified as a descendant of Mulek, narrated to be a son of the biblical king Zedekiah; Mulek

According to the Book of Mormon, the Nephite Mosiah and his followers "discovered that the people of Zarahemla came out from Jerusalem at the time that Zedekiah king of Judah, was carried away captive into Babylon" (about 587 B.C.).[17] The people descended from a group led by Mulek, a son of the biblical king Zedekiah, who left Jerusalem at the time of the Babylonian conquest and also crossed the ocean and arrived at the same continent as the party led by Lehi.[18] The book of Omni in the Book of Mormon tells how Zarahemla and his people came to settle the land of Zarahemla in the New World. Mosiah and his refugee people presumably united with the people of Zarahemla sometime between 279 and 130 B.C. "Mosiah was appointed to be their king."[19] Mosiah thereafter presided in the land of Zarahemla over a people called collectively "the Nephites". The Land of Zarahemla was the Nephite capital for many years.

Notable Book of Mormon descendants of the leader Zarahemla include Ammon the venturer and Coriantumr the dissenter. Ammon led a quest in search of a colony that had left the land of Zarahemla in order to resettle a city named Lehi-Nephi.[20] The dissenter Coriantumr led the Lamanites in battle against the Nephites in the first century B.C.[21]

At some point before Mosiah discovered Zarahemla, the people of Zarahemla had discovered Coriantumr (not to be confused with the later Nephite dissenter of the same name). According to the Book of Mormon, Coriantumr was the last of a destroyed nation called the Jaredites. Coriantumr stayed with the people of Zarahemla "for the space of nine moons" (Omni 1:21) before dying and being buried by them (Omni 13:21).

Benjamin succeeded his father Mosiah as the second Nephite king of Zarahemla. King Benjamin was victorious in driving Lamanites enemies from the Zarahemla region.[22]

At the time of the crucifixion of Christ, the Book of Mormon records that "there were exceedingly sharp lightnings, such as never had been known in all the land. And the city of Zarahemla did take fire."[23] "And it came to pass that there was a voice heard among all the inhabitants of the earth ... 'because of their iniquity and abominations ... that great city Zarahemla have I burned with fire, and the inhabitants thereof ... I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God.'" (3 Nephi, 9: 1, 2, 3, 15.) The Book of Mormon indicates that "the great city of Zarahemla" was rebuilt sometime in the first century A.D.[24] As his doomed nation retreated northward from their enemies, the 4th century prophet and historian Mormon recorded that Nephite "towns, and villages, and cities were burned with fire."[25] The Book of Mormon does not indicate whether the city of Zarahemla survived to be occupied by Lamanites after the destruction of the Nephite nation.

Cultural reception

[edit]

Namesakes

[edit]

In 1841, Joseph Smith dictated a revelation instructing Latter-day Saints in Iowa to establish a city across the Mississippi River from Nauvoo, Illinois and name it after Zarahemla.[26] A settlement of Latter-day Saints, located across the Mississippi River from Nauvoo and south of Montrose, Iowa, was called Zarahemla.[27] The Zarahemla Stake[d] in Iowa was abandoned in 1842.[29] In the nineteenth century, Blanchardville, Wisconsin was called Zarahemla.[30] In 1850, under the direction of Zenas H. Gurley, Latter Day Saints who lived there and were unaffiliated with Brigham Young's Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints organized into the Yellowstone Branch.[31] Zarahemla was the location of the Reorganization's first or second conference, held in 1853.[32] The congregation at Zarahemla dissolved in 1860.[33]

Zarahemla, Utah is named after the city from the Book of Mormon.[34] The second book in author Gary Stewart's Gabe Utley detective series, published in 1986, is titled The Zarahemla Vision.[35] Its narrative is set in Salt Lake City and involves the apparent kidnapping of the LDS Church president.[36] As part of appropriating Mormon themes of revelation and ideas about indigenous resurgence, Kanaka Maoli author Matthew Kaopio's 2005 novel Written in the Sky invokes the name Zarahemla to allude to the Book of Mormon.[37] One of the novel's characters, Dr. Owlfeathers, is from the nonexistent Zarahemla University.[38]

Speculating locations

[edit]

Responding to their belief in the Book of Mormon's ancient historicity, Latter-day Saints throughout the nineteenth century believed archaeological evidence would emerge to corroborate the Book of Mormon; many regarded scholarship on the ancient Americas as vindication of the book.[39] There has been no actual archaeological discovery of Zarahemla.[40]

In 1842, Latter-day Saint newspaper the Times and Seasons associated Zarahemla with the ruins of Quiriguá.[41] Artist George M. Ottinger opined that the Maya city-state Palenque was one and the same as Zarahemla.[42] In an elaborate geography constructed from the Book of Mormon's text, Latter-day Saints George Reynolds and Janne M. Sjödahl supposed Zarahemla was located along the Magdalena River in Colombia.[39] In a retrospective on Book of Mormon historicity apologetics, Brant Gardner states that anthropological evidence indicates that "any facile equation of the Nephites with the Maya (or claim that the Nephites influenced the Maya) cannot work".[43]

Benjamin Cluff, then president of Brigham Young Academy, from 1900 to 1901 led an expedition, mostly comprising students, to try to discover evidence of the city of Zarahemla in Colombia, in accord with Reynolds and Sjödahl's proposed geography.[44] Six of the group reached the Magdalena, but they turned back after learning that civil conflict had destabilized the region, ending their expedition.[45]

Margarito Bautista in his 1936 La evolución de Mexico: sus verdaderos progenitores y su origen: el destino de America y Europa expressed his belief that Book of Mormon peoples were the ancestors of indigenous Mexicans, and he superimposed Zarahemla onto the region north of Panama, somewhere in Guatemala, Honduras, or southern Mexico.[46]

In 2021, a group of Mormons called the Heartland Research Group believed they had found the location of Zarahemla outside Montrose, Iowa and searched the soil for evidence of human habitation using lidar.[47] They also took core samples with the aim of using carbon dating to identify evidence of fires.[48] The Heartland Research Group holds to what has been called the "Heartland model", a belief among certain Mormons that the events of the Book of Mormon took place specifically in the Heartland of the United States, the emergence of which coincided with growth in LDS Church membership in Central and South America.[49] Religion Dispatches reports that the Heartland model movement rests on American nationalism and espouses white supremacy and Euro-American colonialism.[50]

Destruction of Zarahemla (1888) by George M. Ottinger

Visual art

[edit]

George M. Ottinger's oil painting Destruction of Zarahemla took cues for its composition from Benjamin West's Death on a Pale Horse and for its visualization of Zarahemla from archaeological illustrations, including a Maya stelae resembling one from Quiriguála.[51] The horses, chariot, clouds, and fleeing crowd also resemble those of Nicolas Poussin's paintings The Conversion of St. Paul and The Death of Hippolytus.[52] It was published in December 1888 as an illustration in The Story of the Book of Mormon.[53]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Alexander, Thomas G.; Bitton, Davis (2019). Historical Dictionary of the Latter-day Saints. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements (4th ed.). Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-5381-2071-2.
  • Amos, Kelsey (2016). "Hawaiian Futurism: Written in the Sky and Up Among the Stars". Extrapolation. 57 (1–2): 197–220. doi:10.3828/extr.2016.11.
  • Austin, Michael (2024). The Testimony of Two Nations: How the Book of Mormon Reads, and Rereads, the Bible. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 9780252045356.
  • Barlow, Philip L. (2004). "Space Matters: A Geographical Context for the Reorganization's Great Transformation". John Whitmer Historical Association Journal. 24: 21–39. JSTOR 43201043.
  • Bingman, Margaret (1978). Encyclopedia of the Book of Mormon. Herald Publishing House. ISBN 0-8309-0199-X.
  • Brady, Margaret K. (Fall 1987). "The Zarahemla Vision. By Gary Stewart". Western American Literature. 22 (3): 238–239. doi:10.1353/wal.1987.0098.
  • Bowman, Matthew (2021). "Biblical Criticism, the Book of Mormon, and the Meanings of Civilization". Journal of Book of Mormon Studies. 30: 62–89. ISSN 2374-4766. JSTOR 10.5406/jbookmormstud2.30.2021.0062.
  • Bushman, Richard Lyman (2008). Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/actrade/9780195310306.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-531030-6.
  • Carmack, Noel A. (2008). "'A Picturesque and Dramatic History': George Reynolds's Story of the Book of Mormon". Brigham Young University Studies. 47 (2): 115–141. ISSN 0007-0106. JSTOR 43044637.
  • Dunstan, Adam; Hawvermale, Erica (2022). "The Anthropology of Mormonism: An Emerging Field" (PDF). Journal of the Mormon Social Science Association. 1: 177–207. doi:10.54587/JMSSA.0107.
  • Eliason, Eric A. (2023). "Nameways in Latter-day Saint History, Custom, and Folklore". In Oaks, Dallin D.; Baltes, Paul; Minson, Kent (eds.). Perspectives on Latter-day Saint Names and Naming: Names, Identity, and Belief. Routledge. pp. 70–100. doi:10.4324/9781003325000-5. ISBN 9781000850451.
  • Gardner, Brant A. (2021). "A Personal Perspective on Book of Mormon Historicity and Apologetics". Journal of Book of Mormon Studies. 30: 142–164. ISSN 2374-4766. JSTOR 10.5406/jbookmormstud2.30.2021.0142.
  • Givens, Terryl L. (2002). By the Hand of Mormon: The American Scripture that Launched a New World Religion. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019513818X.001.0001. ISBN 9780195138184.
  • Givens, Terryl L. (2009). "The Book of Mormon". In Marcus, Greil; Sollors, Werner (eds.). A New Literary History of America. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. pp. 192–196. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1msswhj.44. ISBN 978-0-674-0-3594-2. JSTOR j.ctv1msswhj.44.
  • Hardy, Grant (2010). Understanding the Book of Mormon: A Reader's Guide. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199745449.
  • Hardy, Grant, ed. (2023). The Annotated Book of Mormon. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190082222.
  • Hickman, Jared (2022). "The Book of Mormon as Amerindian Apocalypse". In Townsend, Colby (ed.). Envisioning Scripture: Joseph Smith's Revelations in Their Early American Contexts. Signature Books. pp. 269–302. ISBN 978-1-56085-447-0.
  • Ishikawa, Nancy Hiles (1979). "Alice Smith Edwards: The Little Princess". Journal of Mormon History. 6: 61–74. JSTOR 23286016.
  • Jones, Glen Nelson (January 2016). "Search for Zarahemla, 1900: Expeditioneer Parley Pratt Nelson". Journal of Mormon History. 42 (1): 199–238. doi:10.5406/jmormhist.42.1.0199. JSTOR 10.5406/jmormhist.42.1.0199.
  • Kahlert, Robert Christian (2016). Salvation and Solvency: The Socio-economic Policies of Early Mormonism. Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte. Vol. 133. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110473476. ISBN 9783110470208.
  • Kelty, Daniel M. (Fall–Winter 2011). "The History of Zarahemla (Blanchardville): Headquarters of the Reorganization, 1852–60". John Whitmer Historical Association Journal. 31 (2): 88–102. JSTOR 43200527.
  • Kimball, Stanley B. (Winter 1978). "Nauvoo West: The Mormons of the Iowa Shore". Brigham Young University Studies. 18 (2): 132–142. JSTOR 43040752.
  • Mason, Patrick Q. (September 3, 2015). Barton, John (ed.). "Mormonism". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.75. ISBN 978-0-19-934037-8.
  • Nash, Paul D. (2017). Slavery and Silence: Latin America and the U. S. Slave Debate. University of Pennsylvania Press. doi:10.9783/9780812294309. ISBN 9780812294309.
  • Noyce, David (December 9, 2021). "Latest from Mormon Land: Iowa John and the Next Crusade—Searching for Zarahemla". Salt Lake Tribune.
  • Pulido, Elisa Eastwood (2020). The Spiritual Evolution of Margarito Bautista: Mexican Mormon Evangelizer, Polygamist Dissident, and Utopian Founder, 1878–1961. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190942106.001.0001. ISBN 9780190942106.
  • Ricks, Stephen D. (2012). "'Build a House to My Name': The Idea of the Temple in Mormon History". In Cusack, Carole; Norman, Alex (eds.). Handbook of New Religions and Cultural Production. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Brill. pp. 17–37. doi:10.1163/9789004226487_003. ISBN 978-90-04-22187-1.
  • Robertson, Breanne (Spring 2022). "Poster Children of the Sun: George M. Ottinger's Mesoamerican History Paintings and Latter-day Saint Identity in the U. S.–Mexico Borderlands". American Art. 36 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1086/719437.
  • Rushing, Ty (December 6, 2021). "Archeological Search Underway in SE Iowa for Ancient Mormon City". Iowa Starting Line.
  • Seriac, Hannah (December 15, 2021). "Mormon Group Digging for Scriptural City of Zarahemla in Iowa Is a Portrait of Religious Nationalism". Religion Dispatches.
  • Sorensen, John L. (1992). "Book of Mormon Peoples". In Ludlow, Daniel H. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. Macmillan. pp. 191–195. ISBN 0028796055.
  • Stoker, Hendrik G.; Derengowski, Paul (2018). "Joseph Smith's Plain and Precious Truths Restored". In die Skriflig. 52 (3). a2352. doi:10.4102/ids.v52i3.2352. ISSN 1018-6441.
  • Vicarel, Jo An (July 1986). "Stewart, Gary. The Zarahemla Vision". Library Journal. 111 (12): 114. ISSN 0363-0277.
  • Vogel, Dan (1986). Indian Origins and the Book of Mormon. Signature Books. ISBN 0-941214-42-7.
  • Woods, Fred E. (2003). "Scripture Note: Doctrine and Covenants 125". Religious Educator. 4 (1): 87–88.

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Zarahemla

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Zarahemla is a city, land, and people described in the Book of Mormon, a scriptural text central to the Latter-day Saint movement, where it functions as the primary political and religious center for the after their merger with the Mulekites around the . Named after Zarahemla, the leader of the Mulekite colony said to have originated from fugitives under Mulek, the site emerged as a hub for governance, with King Mosiah relocating the Nephite records there and his son Benjamin delivering a seminal address to the unified populace. The Book of Mormon narrative depicts Zarahemla as enduring cycles of prosperity, internal strife, and warfare, including the establishment of Alma's congregation, the rise of judges replacing kings, and prophetic ministries amid Lamanite conflicts, before its fiery destruction amid continent-wide upheavals coinciding with Christ's circa AD 34. The text references Zarahemla over 160 times, underscoring its narrative centrality as a symbol of covenant-keeping and . While believers propose locations across the Americas—from to the Valley—based on textual and limited artifact correlations, no empirical archaeological or historical evidence confirms Zarahemla's existence as an ancient settlement, with mainstream scholarship attributing the to 19th-century composition lacking verifiable ties to pre-Columbian civilizations. This absence persists despite excavations at candidate sites, highlighting a divide between faith-based interpretations and grounded in material records.

Scriptural Description

Etymology and Biblical Parallels

The name Zarahemla in the Book of Mormon is proposed by several linguists and scholars specializing in Semitic languages to derive from Hebrew roots zeraʿ ("seed" or "descendants") and ḥemlâ or ḥemlāh ("compassion," "pity," or "grace"), yielding a meaning such as "seed of compassion" or "protected seed." This etymology aligns with ancient Near Eastern naming conventions where compound names often conveyed theological or familial significance, as seen in Hebrew personal names combining roots for divine attributes. Critics of this interpretation argue the name may instead reflect 19th-century adaptations of biblical terms like "Jerusalem," potentially indicating derivation from English or European linguistic influences rather than ancient Hebrew. Supporting evidence for the Hebrew-derived meaning includes contextual wordplay in the text, where Zarahemla appears alongside themes of , redemption, and seminal lineage—such as the Mulekites' loss of yet reception of through integration with the (Omni 1:14–17; Mosiah 25:1–7). These associations recur in passages emphasizing pity toward the "seed" of Mulek, paralleling usage of zeraʿ for posterity under divine favor (e.g., Genesis 13:16) and ḥemlâ in contexts of sparing the vulnerable (e.g., 54:8, implying merciful withholding of judgment). Biblical parallels to Zarahemla emphasize its role as a post-exilic refuge mirroring 's centrality before and after destruction. The Mulekites, descendants of Mulek (claimed as a son of Judah's King who escaped the Babylonian conquest of circa 587 BC), establish Zarahemla as their settlement after fleeing the city's fall, evoking exile motifs where remnants of Judah seek promised lands amid loss (2 Kings 25:1–7; 52:8–11). Unlike the biblical record, which states Zedekiah's sons were executed without naming survivors, the narrative posits Mulek's flight as a hidden thread of continuity, paralleling understated biblical survivals like Jehoiachin's release from captivity (2 Kings 25:27–30). Thematically, Zarahemla's integration of Mulekite and Nephite societies under kings like Mosiah I reflects restoration patterns akin to post-exilic Judah's rebuilding under and , where disparate Israelite groups reunite around sacred records and temple functions (Ezra 1–6; Omni 1:18; Mosiah 2:1–7). This convergence underscores motifs of extended to a "scattered ," contrasting Jerusalem's with Zarahemla's provisional , though later destructions (e.g., by fire under Amulon, Helaman 16:6–11) echo prophetic warnings of conditional covenants (Jeremiah 7:1–15). Such parallels, drawn by Book of Mormon authors like Nephi and Alma, invoke Exodus and return-from-captivity archetypes to frame Zarahemla as a type of renewed covenant community.

Mulekite Origins and Early History

According to the , the Mulekites—descendants of Mulek, identified as a son of King of Judah—originated from a group that departed shortly after its destruction by Babylonian forces in 587 BC. This account specifies that Mulek escaped execution, contrasting with the biblical record in 2 Kings 25:7, which states that Nebuchadnezzar "slew the sons of before his eyes" without naming survivors. The narrative in Omni 1:15–16 asserts that the group, numbering initially among 's contemporaries, was "led...by the hand of the Lord" across the ocean to a land they named Zarahemla, though they carried no sacred records or scriptures. Upon arrival, the Mulekites established settlements in Zarahemla but rapidly declined in religious observance due to the absence of records, leading to a corruption of their language and a denial of their Creator. By the time of their discovery circa 200 BC by the Nephite king Mosiah I, they had grown numerous through natural increase but had endured repeated wars and contentions with surrounding peoples, resulting in significant losses and societal weakening. Their leader, Zarahemla—a direct descendant of Mulek—provided an oral genealogy tracing back to Zedekiah, but no written history preserved their early migrations or conflicts. No external archaeological or historical evidence corroborates the escape of Mulek or the Mulekite migration, with biblical texts and Babylonian chronicles indicating Zedekiah's royal family was fully subjugated. Scholarly analyses within Latter-day Saint contexts emphasize the Mulekites' pre-Nephite presence in the Americas, suggesting their larger population influenced subsequent cultural and political dynamics, though these remain interpretive based solely on the Book of Mormon's internal claims.

Integration with Nephite Society

The people of Zarahemla, descendants of Mulek (a son of , king of Judah), had migrated from following its destruction circa 587 BC but arrived without scriptural records, leading to a corrupted and loss of religious knowledge. Upon their discovery by Mosiah (a Nephite leader who had fled southward from the land of Nephi around 200 BC), Zarahemla, the titular head of the group, recounted their orally to Mosiah, who then transcribed it for preservation. The two groups united politically, with the more numerous but disorganized people of Zarahemla willingly submitting to Mosiah's kingship, recognizing the value of Nephite records and ; this marked the initial integration, establishing Zarahemla as the unified capital. and teachers were appointed among the combined population to instruct in Nephite religious traditions, facilitating cultural and doctrinal assimilation. Religious integration progressed through shared scriptural teachings, as the Mulekites, previously lacking knowledge of their Creator, adopted Nephite practices including and temple worship under subsequent kings like Benjamin. Despite this, Mulekite ethnic identity endured within Nephite society, evidenced by figures like (a Mulekite envoy sent northward circa 121 BC) and distinctions in later records between "Nephites" and "people of Zarahemla." Politically, the transitioned smoothly across generations, with Mosiah's descendants ruling the amalgamated society until the shift to judges around 92 BC.

Role in Book of Mormon Narrative

Discovery by Mosiah I

According to the , Mosiah, a Nephite king descended from the original colonizer Nephi, received divine warning amid rising wickedness and Lamanite threats in the land of Nephi, prompting him to lead approximately 200–300 followers northward through the wilderness. After an unspecified duration of travel, his group encountered inhabitants of Zarahemla, a settlement established by descendants of Mulek, purportedly a son of Judah's who escaped the Babylonian destruction of circa 587 B.C. The people of Zarahemla, numbering greater than Mosiah's party, lacked metal plates or sacred records, resulting in a language and societal decline marked by intertribal conflicts and reduced cultural sophistication. Mosiah instructed them in the Nephite and religious traditions, fostering their of Nephite teachings and scriptures. Zarahemla's inhabitants presented Mosiah with a large engraved stone detailing the final Jaredite survivor, Coriantumr, who had lived among them briefly before dying after nine months; using seer stones or interpreters, Mosiah translated the inscription, revealing Coriantumr's witness of Jaredite destruction. The groups subsequently united, with Mosiah appointed king over the merged population in Zarahemla, establishing it as the new Nephite political circa 200 B.C. This integration preserved Mulekite lineage distinctions while subordinating them under Nephite governance and record-keeping.

Political and Religious Center Under Nephite Rule

Following the merger of the Nephite refugees under Mosiah I with the Mulekite inhabitants of circa 200 B.C., the city emerged as the unified political capital for the combined population. Mosiah I, previously a Nephite leader, was consecrated king over both groups after demonstrating superior records and religious knowledge to the recordless Mulekites, establishing Nephite governance centered in . This shift marked as the seat of royal authority, displacing the prior Mulekite leadership under himself. Under subsequent Nephite monarchs, Zarahemla solidified as the administrative hub, with King Benjamin—Mosiah I's son—reigning from the city and defending it against Lamanite incursions around 124 B.C. Benjamin convened assemblies at a temple constructed in Zarahemla, modeled after Solomon's, where he delivered addresses emphasizing covenant renewal and kingship's divine basis, attended by tens of thousands. His son, Mosiah II, inherited the throne circa 124 B.C., translating Mulekite records and centralizing judicial reforms that transitioned governance from to elected judges by 92 B.C., with Alma the Younger as the first chief judge residing in Zarahemla. This evolution positioned the city as the core of Nephite legal and executive functions, including military mustering and taxation. Religiously, Zarahemla functioned as the primary worship center under Nephite oversight, hosting Alma the Elder's baptisms and the establishment of congregations following his flight from the land of Nephi circa 145 B.C. The temple served as a focal point for prophetic sermons, such as those by King Benjamin and later Alma the Younger, who preached to assembled multitudes. Nephite high priests administered ordinances there, fostering doctrinal unity amid Mulekite integration, though the city's prominence also amplified internal dissent, as seen in early church divisions addressed by Alma. This dual role persisted until escalating wars shifted power dynamics southward.

Major Events and Conflicts

Following the establishment of judgeship in Zarahemla around 92 BC, the city became a focal point for internal dissent and external during the inaugural conflicts of the Nephite-Lamanite wars. Amlici, a seeking kingship, rallied supporters in Zarahemla, leading to civil unrest that escalated when his forces allied with Lamanite armies crossing the Sidon River; the ensuing battle near Zarahemla resulted in heavy Nephite casualties, including the death of chief judge Alma's sons, but Nephite forces under Alma repelled the attackers after two days of fighting. Subsequent decades saw recurring threats from Lamanite incursions and domestic factions. In approximately 64 BC, "king-men"—Nephite elites favoring monarchical rule and Lamanite alliance—seized control of Zarahemla amid ongoing wars, prompting to march on the city, suppress the rebellion, and execute its leaders for treason after they refused to defend the government. Around , further internal strife erupted when Pahoran's brother Pacumeni displaced him as chief judge; a Nephite named Coriantumr then invaded, captured Zarahemla, murdered Pacumeni, and pursued Pahoran, but Nephite general Moronihah recaptured the city shortly thereafter. The rise of secret combinations, such as the originating among Nephite dissenters in Zarahemla, exacerbated instability through assassinations and guerrilla tactics, repeatedly menacing the city and contributing to societal breakdown by the late . Zarahemla's ultimate destruction occurred amid widespread cataclysms in –34, fulfilling prophecies of the Lamanite; the city was engulfed in flames, likely intensified by tempests, earthquakes, and vapor emissions that darkened the skies for three days, leaving survivors to interpret it as for accumulated wickedness and rejection of prophets. This event preceded Christ's appearance to the remaining inhabitants, marking the end of Zarahemla as a Nephite stronghold.

Proposed Locations and Geography

Mesoamerican Models

The Mesoamerican models for position the city within the pre-Columbian cultural sphere of , primarily southern and , as part of limited geography interpretations that confine events to a compact region of approximately 500 by 200 miles. These theories, developed since the mid-20th century, emphasize correlations between scriptural descriptions—such as Zarahemla's location north of a "narrow strip of wilderness" (Mosiah 1:1, Omni 1:22) separating it from the land of Nephi, proximity to the flowing northward to an eastern sea, and its status as a populous urban center—and Mesoamerican topography, hydrology, and settlement patterns. Proponents argue that the serves as the "narrow neck of land" (Alma 22:32), with Zarahemla in the northern lowlands, facilitating travel times and military campaigns described in the text, such as the 20-day journey from Zarahemla to the land of Nephi (Mosiah 7:4). John L. Sorenson, an anthropologist and emeritus professor at Brigham Young University, advanced a foundational model in his 1985 book An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon, identifying Zarahemla with the Grijalva River valley in Chiapas, Mexico, near modern sites like Chiapa de Corzo. This area features a polycentric cluster of prehispanic settlements with earthen pyramids, defensive works, and evidence of dense populations around 600 BC to AD 200, aligning with Zarahemla's portrayal as a Mulekite-founded city integrated into Nephite society, later destroyed by fire circa 34 AD (Helaman 16:6, 3 Nephi 8:8). Sorenson correlates the Sidon River with the Grijalva, noting its northward flow through a valley flanked by highlands, consistent with references to headwaters near Manti (Alma 43:22) and battles along its banks (Alma 2:15–17). Other variants, such as those by F. Richard Hauck, propose nearby Kaminaljuyu in Guatemala's highlands or the Usumacinta River basin, citing volcanic activity and flood-prone rivers matching destruction narratives. These models address scriptural directional anomalies—such as "east sea" references amid a west-oriented —by positing a local "Mormon directional system" rotated 90–180 degrees relative to modern cardinal points, derived from ancient Mesoamerican conventions where "east" denoted rising terrain or cultural heartlands rather than absolute azimuths. Supporting parallels include Mesoamerica's writing systems, traces, and usage (Helaman 3:7–11), which exceed North American analogs during the proposed timeframe. However, correlations remain inferential, relying on textual typology rather than onomastic or epigraphic matches, as no Mesoamerican artifact bears the name "Zarahemla" or directly attests Semitic influences. LDS-affiliated research institutions like the Institute have refined these proposals through GIS mapping and surveys revealing undergrowth sites, yet independent archaeologists view them as unverified apologetic constructs amid broader Olmec-Maya cultural contexts.

North American Heartland Theories

The North American Heartland theories propose that the primary setting for events, including the city of Zarahemla, lies within the eastern and , contrasting with Mesoamerican models by emphasizing a limited geography aligned with 19th-century revelations to . Proponents identify Zarahemla as a central Nephite city situated along the , often pinpointed near Montrose in , directly across from . This placement draws from scriptural descriptions of Zarahemla as a major political and religious hub in the land southward, bordered by the river Sidon—interpreted as the —and proximate to areas of ancient earthen mound complexes associated with the Hopewell culture (circa 200 BCE–500 CE). Key advocates, including Rod Meldrum and the Heartland Research Group, argue that this location fulfills textual criteria such as Zarahemla's position "in the center of the land" (Omni 1:22, Mosiah 1:18), its vulnerability to invasions from the west and , and its role as a refuge after the destruction of other cities. They cite 125:3 (January 1841), in which Smith received instruction to organize a stake and name settlements in after Zarahemla, interpreting this as divine confirmation of the site's ancient significance rather than mere symbolic nomenclature. Supporting geographical correspondences include the Des Moines Rapids as a akin to defensive features in the narrative, and the surrounding floodplains suitable for large-scale agriculture described in Alma 1:29 and Helaman 11:20. Empirical claims within the model reference Hopewell-era artifacts, such as copper implements and fortifications near the proposed site, which proponents link to Nephite metallurgy (1 Nephi 18:25, 2 Nephi 5:15) and military earthworks (Alma 48–50). In 2021, the Heartland Research Group initiated non-invasive surveys using ground-penetrating radar and LiDAR near Montrose, reporting anomalies suggestive of buried structures, including potential temple foundations and defensive ditches, though results remain preliminary and unpeer-reviewed. The Zarahemla Centric Heartland Model further refines this by modeling travel times and riverine navigation to match narrative journeys, such as Mosiah I's discovery expedition (Omni 1:12–14), positing the Mississippi's bends as the headwaters of Sidon per Alma 22:29. These theories prioritize internal scriptural consistency, Joseph Smith's documented statements on North American antiquities (e.g., his 1843 identification of Zelph's mound in as a "white Lamanite" warrior's burial), and rejection of Mesoamerican models due to mismatches in climate, flora (e.g., no cement houses in tropical highlands per Helaman 3:7–11), and the single Hill Cumorah in New York. Critics within Latter-day Saint scholarship note the absence of direct inscriptions or artifacts bearing names, and the Hopewell culture's timeline overlaps only partially with proposed Nephite periods, but Heartland proponents counter that diffusion of populations and limited literacy explain evidentiary gaps.

Other Historical Speculations

Some proponents of Book of Mormon geography have advanced South American models, positing Zarahemla in northern regions such as or , where Andean river systems like the Magdalena are likened to the described as flowing near the city. These theories draw on similarities between Incan or pre-Incan urban centers and the narrative's accounts of large populations and fortifications, suggesting migrations from southward aligned with textual hints of southward expansions. However, such identifications lack direct artifactual or epigraphic evidence tying specific sites to Mulekite or Nephite cultures, and geological mismatches—such as the absence of matching cataclysmic events around 33–34 AD—undermine their viability. Hemispheric theories represent another speculative framework, distributing events across both North and , with Zarahemla variably placed in transitioning to South American lands for later narratives. Advocates, including early 20th-century scholars, argued this accommodates broader population movements and diverse climates mentioned, but the model conflicts with the text's implication of a confined "land southward" traversable on foot within days or weeks, rendering transcontinental spans implausible under first-principles scrutiny of travel logistics and unified political control. No empirical data, such as shared or inscriptions, corroborates these expansive correlations. Fringe speculations occasionally link Zarahemla to locales or metaphorical interpretations, such as equating it with Near Eastern sites via Mulekite seafaring routes, though textual details of transoceanic voyages from around 588 BC preclude viable evidence for such identifications absent navigational records or genetic markers. These alternatives, often advanced in non-peer-reviewed forums, prioritize narrative parallels over archaeological or topographic fidelity, highlighting the absence of consensus or verifiable anchors across all proposed settings.

Historicity and Archaeological Evidence

Claims of Corroboration

Proponents of the North American Heartland model for geography identify the site of Zarahemla in southeastern Iowa, near Montrose, across the from , citing alignments with ancient Hopewell culture earthworks, population estimates, and riverine geography described in the text. The Heartland Research Group, a Latter-day Saint-affiliated team, initiated geophysical surveys in using , ground-penetrating radar, magnetometry, and core across approximately 200 acres to detect subsurface structures, claiming preliminary findings of anomalous features such as potential pits and altered layers consistent with pre-Columbian occupation around 300–400 AD, the approximate timeframe of Nephite Zarahemla. These efforts reference accounts of a large Nephite army of 30,000 men originating from Zarahemla around AD 320, arguing compatibility with Hopewell mound-builder demographics and fortifications in the Valley. In the Mesoamerican limited geography model, Zarahemla is proposed near the in , , or northern , where apologists correlate it with prehispanic urban complexes exhibiting traits like centralized political structures, defensive ditches, and metallurgy residues that parallel textual references to ore processing and crowded cityscapes. John L. Sorenson, a key proponent, mapped Zarahemla to sites with evidence of Classic Maya-era populations supporting the narrative's scale of refugees and migrations, though without direct artifactual links to Mulekite or Nephite nomenclature. Some 19th-century claims, attributed to via Times and Seasons articles, suggested Zarahemla ruins in , based on reports of overgrown stone cities, but these have been contested as unsubstantiated or editorially influenced rather than prophetic. Broader apologetic arguments invoke general archaeological parallels, such as the use of cement in Mesoamerican architecture matching Omni 1:15's description of Zarahemla's structures, or defensive earthworks akin to those at Nephite battle sites, with FAIR estimating that 58% of Book of Mormon cultural items, including urban planning elements, find tentative analogs in New World excavations. These claims emphasize cumulative circumstantial evidence over direct inscriptions, arguing that absence of Hebrew-derived artifacts reflects limited literacy or cultural assimilation rather than non-existence. However, such interpretations originate from faith-promoting organizations and have not garnered endorsement from secular archaeologists, who require verifiable inscriptions or DNA linkages for historicity.

Lack of Empirical Verification

No physical artifacts bearing the name Zarahemla or inscriptions in , as described in the for official records, have been discovered in the despite extensive archaeological surveys across proposed Nephite territories. Similarly, no structural remains—such as the large-scale urban centers, temples, or defensive fortifications central to Zarahemla's role as a Nephite capital—align with the site's narrative scale, including populations exceeding tens of thousands and events like the 34 AD destruction by fire. The Smithsonian Institution, a leading authority on American archaeology, has repeatedly affirmed that "archaeologists see no direct connection between the archaeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book," emphasizing the absence of empirical links to Book of Mormon claims, including major settlements like Zarahemla. This position stems from decades of excavations revealing pre-Columbian cultures with distinct material profiles—lacking evidence of wheeled vehicles, draft animals like horses or elephants, or advanced metallurgy matching the text's descriptions of Zarahemla's era (circa 200 BC to 34 AD)—without any verifiable correlation to Semitic influences or Hebrew-derived names. Proposed models, including Mesoamerican limited geography theories tying Zarahemla to sites near the or Usumacinta Valley, fail to produce confirmatory evidence such as directional warfare patterns, , or coinage systems alluded to in the , as stratigraphic data and artifact assemblages instead reflect indigenous Mesoamerican developments unrelated to the Book's timeline or cultural markers. North American Heartland hypotheses, suggesting locations in or , similarly encounter mismatches, with mound-builder cultures showing no textual literacy, alphabetic scripts, or urban densities consistent with Zarahemla's depicted sophistication. Mainstream attributes the absence to the improbability of such a populous, literate Hebrew-derived leaving no detectable trace amid millennia of documented indigenous histories.

Methodological Critiques of Apologetics

Critics of Mormon apologetics contend that efforts to archaeologically validate Zarahemla and related Book of Mormon narratives rely on confirmation bias, selectively emphasizing ambiguous parallels—such as generalized cultural traits like pyramid structures or cement usage—while minimizing disconfirming evidence from broader Mesoamerican or North American records. For example, Mesoamerican models propose sites like El Cayo (Chiapas, Mexico) for Zarahemla based on loose matches in urban scale and riverine location, yet excavations reveal timelines and population densities inconsistent with textual descriptions of a major Mulekite-Nephite center hosting hundreds of thousands. Similarly, Heartland proponents link Zarahemla to areas near Montrose, Iowa, citing Doctrine and Covenants 125:3's modern reference, but provide no pre-Columbian artifacts or inscriptions corroborating Mulekite origins or Nephite governance. The limited geography model, central to most apologetic frameworks since the , is faulted for flexibility: it constricts events to small regions (e.g., 200-500 square miles) to evade the absence of expected pan-hemispheric traces from wars involving millions, yet requires directional reorientations (e.g., "narrow neck" as an skewed 90 degrees) and ignores explicit textual indicators of expansive lands bounded by seas. Scholars like Deanne G. Matheny argue this approach lacks predictive , as models retroactively adapt to new data rather than generating testable hypotheses, such as unique inscriptions or absent in verified digs. Apologetic trait comparisons, compiling lists of 200+ elements (e.g., defensive earthworks, scribal traditions), are critiqued for methodological looseness: traits are drawn from disparate eras and cultures, applicable to Andean or Southeast Asian contexts, without controlling for diffusion or coincidence, leading to overinterpretation of non-unique features. LDS anthropologist Dee F. Green labeled such 1960s efforts "pseudo-archaeology" for bypassing rigorous stratigraphic analysis and peer scrutiny outside faith-affirming circles. Anachronistic elements tied to Zarahemla-era events, like steel swords or chariots, prompt semantic redefinitions (e.g., "horse" as deer), but critics highlight this as textual distortion contradicting claims of precise divine translation, with no supporting faunal or metallurgical evidence from proposed locales. Overall, these methods presuppose , inverting scientific norms by fitting evidence to scripture rather than deriving models from independent data, resulting in no consensus among LDS archaeologists on Zarahemla's location and zero discoveries of named Nephite artifacts despite decades of targeted surveys. This contrasts with , where 55% of place-names yield verifiable correlates through or ostraca, underscoring apologetics' reliance on probabilistic correlations over empirical anchors.

Cultural and Theological Impact

Namesakes in Mormon History

In early Mormon history, the name Zarahemla was applied to a settlement in established by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a gathering place across the from . The area, located in Lee County approximately one mile west of the river, saw initial settlement by Saints as early as May 1839, serving as a temporary refuge amid in . On March 10, 1841, dictated a revelation—recorded as Section 125—directing Church members in to "build up a city and call the name thereof Zarahemla," explicitly linking the name to the land and emphasizing its role in gathering and stake organization. Originally organized as the Stake of in 1839, the ecclesiastical unit was renamed the Zarahemla Stake by August 1841 to align with the revelation's directive, reflecting the Saints' intent to evoke scriptural precedents for and redemption. The settlement functioned as a key outpost, with Church leaders like visiting for preaching and refuge, including stays on nearby Dundee Island; by August 1841, it hosted significant gatherings of Iowa-based Saints. However, ongoing conflicts and the broader Nauvoo exodus limited its growth; most residents departed by 1843, and the community dissolved entirely after 1846 as westward migration intensified, leaving no physical traces today. No other major enduring namesakes from Zarahemla appear in documented Church history, though minor branches and temporary outposts occasionally adopted the name in reference to the Iowa site or Book of Mormon geography during the 1840s. The choice of Zarahemla underscored early Latter-day Saint efforts to integrate scriptural nomenclature into their American expansion, paralleling the ancient city's role as a Nephite capital and refuge for Mulekites.

Influence on Doctrine and Worship

The narratives surrounding Zarahemla in the exemplify doctrines of unification and covenant renewal, as the Mulekite survivors, lacking records and priesthood authority, integrated with the through and acceptance of Mosiah's translated brass plates and stone records. This merger, occurring circa 200–187 BC, underscores the theological emphasis on scriptural continuity and priestly , with Alma the Elder establishing church branches in Zarahemla following the of over 200 Mulekites. Alma the Younger's ministry in Zarahemla further shaped worship practices, reforming apostate tendencies among the around 83 BC by ordaining priests and teachers, enforcing , and combating priestcraft through centralized leadership under a . These accounts serve as a doctrinal model for church and , highlighting the causal role of prophetic correction in restoring communal adherence to law adapted with Christ-centered teachings. The of Zarahemla, interpreted as connoting "seed of " or , influences theological symbolism, linking the land to acts of , such as granting refuge to converted in parallel narratives of relocation and protection. In Latter-day Saint practice, a , 1841, revelation directed the establishment of a gathering city named Zarahemla in , across from Nauvoo, reflecting the doctrine of modern assembling in named scriptural locales to facilitate temple ordinances and communal worship. This directive, though partially realized as a stake rather than a full city due to westward migration, reinforced the pattern of drawing on geography for inspirational naming in worship centers.

Representations in Art and Media

Visual depictions of Zarahemla, the Nephite capital described in the , emerge mainly within Latter-day Saint artistic traditions, often illustrating scriptural events such as its destruction or baptisms nearby. George M. Ottinger's 1888 engraving and oil painting Destruction of Zarahemla portrays the city's cataclysmic burning as recounted in 3 Nephi 8, showing flames engulfing structures and figures in distress amid the chaos of divine judgment. Ottinger's contemporaneous work Baptism of Limhi includes Zarahemla visible in the distant landscape, contextualizing the immersion of Limhi's people as per Alma 25. In media, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has produced official video series adapting narratives, featuring Zarahemla as a setting for key sermons and assemblies. Episodes in the "Book of Mormon Videos" collection (released starting 2019) depict King Benjamin addressing his people at Zarahemla's temple, emphasizing service to through mutual aid (Mosiah 2-5), and Alma the Younger preaching repentance amid the city's populace (Alma 5). Earlier productions include a 1965 church filmstrip illustrating Mosiah's discovery of Zarahemla (Omni 1:12-19), used for instructional purposes in Latter-day Saint settings. Independent films bearing the name Zarahemla, such as the 2007 release directed by Cardon, incorporate the location thematically but diverge into fictional narratives blending modern and scriptural elements, rather than direct adaptations. Discussions in 2006 and 2013 speculated on potential feature films like " Movie Volume 2: Zarahemla," focusing on Alma-era events, though no such production has materialized. These representations generally align with faith-promoting interpretations, visualizing Zarahemla as a fortified urban center without archaeological analogs.

References

  1. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/gs/zarahemla?lang=eng
  2. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/triple-index/zarahemla-city-of-1?lang=eng
  3. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/book-of-mormon-stories-2024/17-king-benjamin?lang=eng
  4. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/mosiah/25?lang=eng
  5. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/sacred-text-about-zarahemla/
  6. https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/mormons-and-archaeology-an-outside-view/
  7. https://wheatandtares.org/2017/04/28/book-of-mormon-archaeology-my-perspective/
  8. https://askgramps.org/where-was-zarahemla-and-bountiful-located/
  9. https://scripturecentral.org/evidence/book-of-mormon-evidence-wordplay-on-zarahemla
  10. https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/evidences/Source:Ricks:Tvedtnes:The_Hebrew_Origin_of_Some_Book_of_Mormon_Place_Names:JBMS_6:2:The_name_Zarahemla_probably_derives_from_the_Hebrew_zera%25E2%2580%2598-hemla_h
  11. https://scripturecentral.org/archive/books/book-chapter/the-hebreworiginofthreebookofmormonplace-names
  12. http://etherscave.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-name-zarahemla-howlers-29.html
  13. https://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/52705-zarahemla-revisiting-the-seed-of-compassion/
  14. https://rsc.byu.edu/book/jerusalem-zarahemla
  15. https://scripturecentral.org/archive/books/book/jerusalem-zarahemla-literary-and-historical-studies-book-mormon
  16. https://rsc.byu.edu/jerusalem-zarahemla/exodus-pattern-book-mormon
  17. https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/the-mulekites
  18. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/gs/mulek?lang=eng
  19. https://scripturecentral.org/archive/periodicals/magazine-article/mulekites
  20. https://www.jefflindsay.com/bme6.shtml
  21. https://scripturecentral.org/knowhy/why-should-readers-pay-close-attention-to-the-mulekites
  22. https://bookofmormonstudynotes.blog/2020/04/30/ammon-was-a-mulekite/
  23. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/omni/1?lang=eng
  24. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2011/10/book-of-mormon-time-line?lang=eng
  25. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2004/01/book-of-mormon-times-at-a-glance-chart-1-ether-and-1-nephi-through-mosiah?lang=eng
  26. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/book-of-mormon-teacher-manual/chapter-18?lang=eng
  27. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/mosiah?lang=eng
  28. https://rsc.byu.edu/book-mormon-mosiah-salvation-only-through-christ/lessons-zarahemla-churches
  29. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/battle-of-zarahemla-87-bc/
  30. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/hel/1?lang=eng
  31. https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/Mesoamerican_Model_of_Book_of_Mormon_geography
  32. https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/book-of-mormon-geographies
  33. https://scripturecentral.org/archive/books/book-chapter/book-mormon-mesoamerican-record
  34. https://byustudies.byu.edu/online-book/charting-the-book-of-mormon/1046
  35. https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/conference/august-2012/from-the-east-to-the-west-the-problem-of-directions-in-the-book-of-mormon
  36. https://scripturecentral.org/archive/media/chart/plausible-locations-mesoamerica-book-mormon-places
  37. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/the-lost-city-zarahemla/
  38. https://zarahemla.site/zarahemla-location
  39. https://iowastartingline.com/2021/12/06/archeological-search-underway-in-se-iowa-for-ancient-morman-city/
  40. https://zchm.theholyscriptures.info/
  41. https://www.mormonmatters.org/a-south-american-setting-for-book-of-mormon/
  42. https://www.deseret.com/2010/5/27/20117554/the-fight-over-book-of-mormon-geography/
  43. https://fairlatterdaysaints.org/conference_home/august-2013/heartland-as-hinterland-the-mesoamerican-core-and-north-american-periphery-of-book-of-mormon-geography
  44. https://mrm.org/the-book-of-mormon-and-new-world-geography
  45. https://bookofmormonism.com/2023/03/24/nearly-surround-by-water-why-the-mesoamerican-and-heartland-geography-models-fail/
  46. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/lidar-from-zarahemla/
  47. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/did-joseph-smith-identify-zarahemla-in-guatemala/
  48. https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/archive/publications/archaeological-evidence-and-the-book-of-mormon
  49. https://scripturecentral.org/archive/periodicals/journal-article/archaeology-relics-and-book-mormon-belief
  50. https://mit.irr.org/book-of-mormon-archaeology-full
  51. https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/book-of-mormon-archaeology-the-myths-and-the-alternatives/
  52. https://www.mormonstories.org/home/truth-claims/the-book-of-mormon/archaeology-and-the-book-of-mormon/
  53. https://mrm.org/smithsonian
  54. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/pros-cons-of-book-of-mormon-geography-theories/
  55. https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/critique-of-a-limited-geography-for-book-of-mormon-events/
  56. https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/simply-implausible-dna-and-a-mesoamerican-setting-for-the-book-of-mormon/
  57. https://www.dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/Dialogue_V04N02_73.pdf
  58. https://packham.n4m.org/hamblin.htm
  59. https://bhroberts.org/records/0BGYbQ-gF3Dwc/deanne_g_matheny_argues_that_the_reference_to_various_plants_animals_metals_and_tents_in_the_book_of_mormon_are_anachronisms
  60. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/place/zarahemla-iowa-territory
  61. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/church-historians-press/jsp-revelations/dc-125-1841_03_10_005?lang=eng
  62. https://bookofmormonevidence.org/iowa-or-zarahemla-stake-beginning-middle-and-continuation-in-nauvoo/
  63. https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/sites/default/files/archive-files/pdf/black/2021-07-21/insight_dc_125.pdf
  64. https://mormonplaces.byu.edu/data/entities/481245
  65. https://rsc.byu.edu/living-book-mormon-abiding-its-precepts/almas-reform-zarahemla-model-activation
  66. https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/they-were-moved-with-compassion-alma-274-5313-toponymic-wordplay-on-zarahemla-and-jershon/
  67. https://doctrineandcovenantscentral.org/historical-context/dc-125/
  68. https://bookofmormonartcatalog.org/catalog/destruction-of-zarahemla/
  69. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12051810/
  70. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12051830/
  71. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1L-kCMrbaQ
  72. https://www.deseret.com/2007/10/12/20092560/film-review-zarahemla-is-well-different/
  73. https://bycommonconsent.com/2006/06/21/thoughts-on-mormon-art-and-the-impending-production-of-the-book-of-mormon-movie-volume-ii-zarahemla/
  74. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufYsRyWC9Uw
  75. https://bookofmormonartcatalog.org/catalog/zarahemla/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.