Hubbry Logo
NATO Joint Military SymbologyNATO Joint Military SymbologyMain
Open search
NATO Joint Military Symbology
Community hub
NATO Joint Military Symbology
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
NATO Joint Military Symbology
NATO Joint Military Symbology
from Wikipedia
Example symbols
An unidentified hostile motorized anti-tank division
1 DPLeg
Wyszków
Polish 1st Legions Infantry Division
of Operational Group Wyszków
3 PPCLI
1 CMBG
3rd Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry
of 1 Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group
4 Pz
XXIV
4th Panzer Division of XXIV Army Corps
82 Abn
82nd Airborne Division Artillery Brigade

NATO Joint Military Symbology is the NATO standard for military map symbols. Originally published in 1986 as Allied Procedural Publication 6 (APP-6), NATO Military Symbols for Land Based Systems, the standard has evolved over the years and is currently in its fifth version (APP-6E). The symbols are designed to enhance NATO's joint interoperability by providing a standard set of common symbols. APP-6 constituted a single system of joint military symbology for land, air, space and sea-based formations and units, which can be displayed for either automated map display systems or for manual map marking. It covers all of the joint services and can be used by them.

History

[edit]

The first basic military map symbols began to be used by western armies in the decades following the end of the Napoleonic Wars. During World War I, there was a degree of harmonisation between the British and French systems, including the adoption of the colour red for enemy forces and blue for allies; the British had previously used red for friendly troops because of the traditional red coats of British soldiers. However, the system now in use is broadly based on that devised by the US Army Corps of Engineers in 1917. The infantry symbol of a saltire in a rectangle was said to symbolise the crossed belts of an infantryman, while the single diagonal line for cavalry was said to represent the sabre belt. With the formation of NATO in 1949, the US Army system was standardized and adapted, with different shapes for friendly (blue rectangle), hostile (red diamond) and unknown (yellow quatrefoil) forces.[1]

APP-6A was promulgated in December 1999. The NATO standardization agreement that covers APP-6A is STANAG 2019 (edition 4), promulgated in December 2000. APP-6A replaced APP-6 (last version, July 1986), which had been promulgated in November 1984 (edition 3 of STANAG 2019 covered APP-6), and was replaced in turn by Joint Symbology APP-6(B) (APP-6B) in 2008 (STANAG 2019 edition 5, June 2008) and NATO Joint Military Symbology APP-6(C) (APP-6C) in 2011 (STANAG 2019 edition 6, May 2011).

The U.S. is the current custodian of APP-6A, which is equivalent to MIL-STD-2525A.

Symbol sets

[edit]

The APP-6A standard provides common operational symbology along with details on their display and plotting to ensure the compatibility, and to the greatest extent possible, the interoperability of NATO land component command, control, communications, computer, and intelligence (C4I) systems, development, operations, and training. APP-6A addresses the efficient transmission of symbology information through the use of a standard methodology for symbol hierarchy, information taxonomy, and symbol identifiers.

APP-6A recognises five broad sets of symbols, each set using its own SIDC (Symbol identification coding) scheme:

  • Units, equipment, and installations
  • Military operations (tactical graphics)
  • METOC (meteorological and oceanographic)
  • Signals intelligence
  • MOOTW (military operations other than war)

Units, equipment, and installations consist of icons, generally framed, associated with a single point on the map. All sorts of graphical and textual modifiers may surround them, specifying categories, quantities, dates, direction of movement, etc.

Tactical graphics represent operational information that cannot be presented via icon-based symbols alone: unit boundaries, special area designations, and other unique markings related to battlespace geometry and necessary for battlefield planning and management. There are point, line and area symbols in this category.

Meteorological and oceanographic symbology is the only set not under the standard's control: rather, they are imported from the symbology established by the World Meteorological Organization.

The signals intelligence and military operations other than war symbology sets stand apart from Units, Equipment, and Installations although they obey the same conventions (i.e., they consist of framed symbols associated to points on the map). They do not appear in APP-6A proper, having been introduced by MIL-STD-2525B.

Symbol composition

[edit]

Most of the symbols designate specific points, and consist of a frame (a geometric border), a fill, a constituent icon, and optional symbol modifiers. The latter are optional text fields or graphic indicators that provide additional information.

The frame provides a visual indication of the affiliation, battle dimension, and status of an operational object. The use of shape and colour is redundant, allowing the symbology to be used under less-than-ideal conditions such as a monochrome red display to preserve the operator's night vision. Nearly all symbols are highly stylised and can be drawn by persons almost entirely lacking in artistic skill; this allows one to draw a symbolic representation (a GRAPHREP, Graphical report) using tools as rudimentary as plain paper and pencil.

The frame serves as the base to which other symbol components and modifiers are added. In most cases a frame surrounds an icon. One major exception is equipment, which may be represented by icons alone (in which case the icons are coloured as the frame would be).

The fill is the area within a symbol. If the fill is assigned a colour, it provides an enhanced (redundant) presentation of information about the affiliation of the object. If colour is not used, the fill is transparent. A very few icons have fills of their own, which are not affected by affiliation.

The icons themselves, finally, can be understood as combinations of elementary glyphs that use simple composition rules, in a manner reminiscent of some ideographic writing systems such as Chinese. The standard, however, still attempts to provide an "exhaustive" listing of possible icons instead of laying out a dictionary of component glyphs. This causes operational problems when the need for an unforeseen symbol arises (particularly in MOOTW), a problem exacerbated by the administratively centralised maintenance of the symbology sets.

When rendering symbols with the fill on, APP-6A calls for the frame and icon to be black or white (as appropriate for the display). When rendering symbols with the fill off, APP-6A calls for a monochrome frame and icon (usually black or in accordance with the affiliation colour). NATO symbols can also be rendered with fill off using a frame coloured according to affiliation and a black icon,[2] though this is not defined in any APP-6 standard.

Allegiance and affiliation

[edit]

APP-6 colour representation

[edit]

The concept of affiliation does not appear in the original APP-6 as these were not introduced until APP-6A. Instead, the original APP-6 described a series of "colour representations" with the purpose of distinguishing friendly and enemy elements.

  • Multi-colour representation:
    • Blue or black for friendly icons
    • Red for enemy icons
    • Green for man-made obstacles (friendly or enemy)
    • Yellow for chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear events
    • Other colours to be established in a map legend
  • Tri-colour representation:
    • Blue or black for friendly icons
    • Red for enemy icons
    • Green or yellow for man-made obstacles (friendly or enemy) and for chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear events
  • Two colour representation:
    • Blue, green, or black for friendly icons
    • Red for enemy icons
  • One colour representation:
    • Single line border for friendly icons
    • Double line border for enemy icons, and unbordered icons were labeled with "EN" to the lower right corner

APP-6A affiliation

[edit]

Affiliation refers to the relationship of the tracker to the operational object being represented. The basic affiliation categories are unknown, friend, neutral, and hostile. In the ground unit domain, a yellow quatrefoil frame is used to denote unknown affiliation, a blue rectangle frame to denote friendly affiliation, a green square frame to denote neutral affiliation, and a red diamond frame to denote hostile affiliation.[3]: 11  In the other domains (air and space, sea surface and subsurface, etc.), the same color scheme is used.

Style Friendly Hostile Neutral Unknown
Fill on
Monochrome (for digital media)
Monochrome (for print media)

The full set of affiliations is:

  • Pending (P)
  • Unknown (U)
  • Assumed friend (A)
  • Friend (F)
  • Neutral (N)
  • Suspect (S) (assumed hostile)
  • Hostile (H)
  • Exercise pending (G)
  • Exercise unknown (W)
  • Exercise assumed friend (M)
  • Exercise friend (D)
  • Exercise neutral (L)
  • Exercise suspect (J)
  • Exercise hostile (K)

There are no "assumed neutral" and "exercise assumed neutral" affiliations.

These colors are used in phrases such as "blue on blue" for friendly fire, blue force tracking, red teaming, and Red Cells.

Battle dimension

[edit]

Battle dimension defines the primary mission area for the operational object within the battlespace. An object can have a mission area above the Earth's surface (i.e., in the air or outer space), on it, or below it. If the mission area of an object is on the surface, it can be either on land or sea. The subsurface dimension concerns those objects whose mission area is below the sea surface (e.g., submarines and sea mines). Some cases require adjudication; for example, an Army or Marine helicopter unit is a maneuvering unit (i.e., a unit whose ground support assets are included) and is thus represented in the land dimension. Likewise, a landing craft whose primary mission is ferrying personnel or equipment to and from shore is a maritime unit and is represented in the sea surface dimension. A landing craft whose primary mission is to fight on land, on the other hand, is a ground asset and is represented in the land dimension.

Closed frames are used to denote the land and sea surface dimensions, frames open at the bottom denote the air/space dimension, and frames open at the top denote the subsurface dimension.

Dimension Friendly Hostile Neutral Unknown
Air and space
Ground
Sea surface
Subsurface

An unknown battle dimension is possible; for example, some electronic warfare signatures (e.g., radar systems) are common to several battle dimensions and would therefore be assigned an "Unknown" battle dimension until further discrimination becomes possible. Special forces may operate in any dimension.

The full set of battle dimensions is, in ascending order of distance from Earth center:

  • Special forces (F)
  • Sea subsurface (U)
  • Sea surface (S)
  • Ground (G)
  • Air (A)
  • Space (P)
  • Other (X)
  • Unknown (Z)

The mnemonic for this ordering is "Fuss-Gap".

The letter in parentheses is used by the symbol identification coding (SIDC) scheme – strings of 15 characters used to transmit symbols.

The space and air battle dimensions share a single frame shape. In the ground battle dimension, two different frames are used for the friendly (and assumed friendly) affiliations in order to distinguish between units and equipment. The SOF (special operations forces) are assigned their own battle dimension because they typically can operate across several domains (air, ground, sea surface and subsurface) in the course of a single mission; the frames are the same as for the ground (unit) battle dimension.[4]: 47–48  The other battle dimension, finally, seems to be reserved for future use (there are no instances of its use as of 2525B Change 1).

Status

[edit]

The status of a symbol refers to whether a warfighting object exists at the location identified (i.e., status is "present") or will in the future reside at that location (i.e., status is "planned, anticipated, suspected," or "on order"). Regardless of affiliation, present status is indicated by a solid line and planned status by a dashed line. The frame is solid or dashed, unless the symbol icon is unframed, in which case the icon itself is drawn dashed. Planned status cannot be shown if the symbol is an unframed filled icon.

Icon placement

[edit]

The icon is the innermost part of a symbol which, when displayed, provides an abstract pictorial or alphanumeric representation of an operational object. The icon portrays the role or mission performed by the object. APP-6A distinguishes between icons that must be framed or unframed and icons where framing is optional.[3]: 39–43  APP-6A defined a standard octagon boundary within each map symbol frame. This octagon is not actually shown when symbols are drawn or rendered but, with a few defined exceptions, all icons inside the frame would also fit inside these octagons. APP-6C modified some symbol frames from previous editions of the standard. From top to bottom, here is the symbol boundary shown inside the APP-6C frames of space elements, air elements, land units, land equipment and surface sea elements, and sub-surface sea elements.

Unit symbols

[edit]

Unit icon modifiers

[edit]

Unit symbols can be used independently as well as in combinations. There are also some symbols that cannot appear by themselves, but can only be used to modify other unit symbols:

Modifier meaning Friendly Hostile Neutral Unknown Notes
Airborne In APP-6 was including air assault and paratrooper forces; since APP-6A is specifically parachute forces
Parachute Symbol used in APP-6, not used in APP-6A and later editions
Airmobile
Airmobile with organic lift
Amphibious
Motorized
Mountain
Cannon or gun system equipped
Wheeled and cross-country capable

Unit basic icons

[edit]

Land unit icons require a frame.

Unit type[5] Friendly Hostile Neutral Unknown Notes
Air defence Evocative of a protective dome
Ammunition Stylised breech-loaded, rimmed cartridge or shell
Anti-tank Representing a concentrated, piercing action
Armour Stylized tank treads
Artillery A cannonball
Rotary-wing aviation Blurred, spinning helicopter blades
Fixed wing aviation Air screw
Bridging Topographical map symbol for a bridge
Combat service support
Combined manoeuvre arms Introduced in APP-6C for an organization of infantry and armour; it is a hybrid of the two symbols
Engineer Letter E on its side. Possibly: Stylised bridge
Electronic ranging Simplified parabolic antenna
Electronic warfare
Explosive ordnance disposal
Fuel, or petroleum, oil, and lubricants (POL) Simplified funnel
Hospital Derivative of the medical symbol below superimposed with "H"
HQ unit This is the HQ unit, not the HQ itself. An HQ's physical position is represented by an empty rectangle with a line extending down from bottom left.
Infantry Evocative of the crossed bandoliers of Napoleonic infantry
Maintenance Stylised wrench
Medical Evocative of the Red Cross symbol
Meteorological
Missile Simplified missile
Mortar Projectile with a vertical arrow symbolizing mortar's high arc trajectory
Military police
Navy Anchor
CBRN defence Simplified crossed retorts, the principal elements in the insignia of the U.S. Army Chemical Corps
Ordnance Derived from crossed cannon behind a disc
Radar Stylised lightning flash and parabolic dish
Psychological operations Electronic schematic symbol for loudspeaker, evocative of propaganda
Reconnaissance or cavalry Inspired by the cavalry's sabre strap
Signals Simplified lightning flash, evocative of radio signals (likewise used in the radar symbol above)
Special forces
Special operations forces
Supply
Topographical Stylised sextant
Transportation Simplified wheel
Unmanned air vehicle Flying wing silhouette

Modified unit icons

[edit]

Some of the most common combinations are:

Modified symbol Meaning
Mountain infantry; examples: Italy's Alpini, Germany's Gebirgsjäger, France's Chasseurs Alpins, Poland's Podhale Rifles, US 86th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, Ukraine's 128th Transcarpathian Brigade
Parachute infantry; examples: 82nd Airborne Division (United States), Fallschirmjäger_(Wehrmacht) (Germany), e.g. 26th Fallschirmjäger Regiment [de], VDV (Russia), PLAAF Airborne Corps (China), Parachute Regiment (UK), Paratroopers Brigade "Almogávares" VI (Spain)
Airmobile infantry; examples: 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Jägerregiment 1, 25th Airborne Brigade (Ukraine)
Mechanized infantry; examples: US 3rd Infantry Division (equipment example: M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle), Ukraine's 93rd Kholodnyi Yar Brigade
Mechanized infantry equipped with infantry fighting vehicles; equipment examples: M2 Bradley, BMP-3, ZBD-04, Kurganets-25, Dardo IFV
Amphibious mechanized infantry; example: 1st Marine Regiment (United States) when amphibious assault vehicle units are attached.
Mechanized infantry (wheeled-"medium"); equipment examples: 3rd Brigade (US 2nd Infantry Division), Stryker, GTK Boxer, ZSL-08, Patria AMV, Mowag Piranha, BTR-80 (with machine gun turrets)
Mechanized infantry (wheeled-"medium") equipped with wheeled infantry fighting vehicles; equipment examples: BTR-90, Bumerang, ZBL-08, Freccia, VBTP-MR Guarani (with autocannon turrets)
Tank destroyer; equipment examples: B1 Centauro, AMX 10 RC, ZTL-11, M1128 mobile gun system
Wheeled armoured reconnaissance; equipment examples: Fennek, VBL, BRDM-2, ASLAV
Armoured engineers; equipment examples: M60A1 AVLB, Bergepanzer BPz3.
Combat engineers in mechanized engineer section carriers. Also engineers mounted in IFVs such as Bradley or Warrior.
Armoured artillery; equipment examples: M109 howitzer, PzH 2000, PLZ-05, 2S19 Msta, 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV, AS90
Mountain artillery; equipment example: OTO Melara Mod 56
Multiple rocket launcher; equipment example: M270 MLRS
Wheeled multiple rocket launcher; equipment examples: HIMARS, Pinaka, BM-27 Uragan, BM-30 Smerch, PHL-03, PHL-16, Astros II MLRS
Self-propelled anti-aircraft artillery; equipment examples: FlaKPz Gepard, 9K22 Tunguska, Type 95 SPAAA, PGZ-09
Missile air defence; equipment examples: S-300, S-400, 9K37 Buk, MIM-104 Patriot, Roland
Attack helicopter; equipment examples: AH-64 Apache, AH-1 Cobra, Eurocopter Tiger, Mil Mi-28, Kamov Ka-50, CAIC Z-10, Agusta A129 Mangusta
Medium transport helicopter; equipment examples: CH-46 Sea Knight, UH-60 Blackhawk, Mi-17 Hip
Theatre level fuel supply unit
Supply and transportation unit

Unit size indicators

[edit]

Above the unit symbol, a symbol representing the size of the unit can be displayed:[4]: 57 

Symbol Name Typical No. of personnel No. of subordinate units Typical rank of leader (Commonwealth and US)

250,000–1,000,000+ Several army groups

120,000–500,000 Several armies or air forces
  • Commonwealth: Field marshal
  • US: General of the Army or general

Army[b]
Air force
100,000 2–4 fighting corps (5–10 fighting divisions) and support troops (often organized in divisions or brigades) General

Corps 30,000–90,000 2–4 fighting divisions and support troops (often organized in brigades or groups) Lieutenant general

Division 10,000–20,000 Nominally several brigades and/or regiments Major general

2,000–10,000 Several battalions or Commonwealth regiments.

500–3,000 3–7 battalions (usually of the same arm)

300–1,000 2–6 companies, batteries, U.S. troops, or Commonwealth squadrons, etc.

60–250 2–5 platoons/troops

Staffel[8] or echelon[9]
(level of hierarchy unique to Germany)
50–90 2 platoons/troops or 6–10 sections Captain or staff captain

25–40 3–5 squads, sections, or fighting vehicles

Section 7–13 2–3 fireteams

Squad 5–10 1–2 fireteams
  • Commonwealth: Corporal or sergeant
  • US: Sergeant or staff sergeant

Fireteam 3–5 n/a

The typical commander ranks shown in the table are for illustration. Neither the actual rank designated for a particular unit's commander, nor the rank held by the incumbent commander alters the appropriate symbol. For example, units are periodically commanded by an officer junior to the authorised commander grade, yet a company under the command of a lieutenant (U.S.) or captain (Commonwealth) is still indicated with two vertical ticks. Likewise, some peculiar types of companies and detachments are authorised a major, lieutenant colonel (personnel services companies) or colonel (some types of judge advocate detachments); the company or detachment is nevertheless indicated with, respectively, one vertical tick or three dots.

While in Commonwealth armies, the regiment as a tactical formation does not normally exist, in some cases a regimental sized (i.e. larger than battalion and smaller than brigade) task force may exist where the operational requirement exists. These formations may be commanded by colonels.

Note that, for brigades and higher, the number of Xs corresponds to the number of stars in the United States military's insignia for the typical general officer grade commanding that size unit. For example, a division is capped with XX and is usually commanded by a major general the American insignia for which is two stars.

Equipment icons

[edit]

Equipment icons are "frame optional".

Equipment symbol (framed) (unframed) Equipment type
Bridge (e.g. AVLB)

Installation icons

[edit]
Installation symbol Installation type
Bridge production

Symbol modifiers

[edit]

APP-6A stops with field AB. MIL-STD-2525B and 2525B Change 1 add a number of other modifiers.

Positions of the various graphic modifiers around the symbol (itself field A). MIL-STD-2525B Change 1 fails to specify where to place fields AD, AE, and AF.

Graphic modifiers

[edit]
  • Echelon (field B) Identifies command level (see Unit sizes, above).
  • Task force (field D) Identifies a unit as a task force. It may be used alone or in combination with echelon, like so:
Type Icon
Combat team or
Company group

Battlegroup
Regimental combat team or
Marine expeditionary unit (MEU)

Brigade group or
Brigade combat team or
Marine expeditionary brigade (MEB)

Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF)
  • Frame shape modifier (field E) A short textual modifier that completes the affiliation, battle dimension, or exercise description of an object ("U", "?", "X", "XU", "X?", "J" or "K"). It is treated as a graphic modifier, however.
  • Direction of movement (field Q) A fixed-length arrow that identifies the direction of movement or intended movement of an object. It emanates from the symbol's centre except in the ground domain, where it is hooked to a short offset, straight down from the symbol's base centre (see diagram).
  • Mobility indicator (field R) Depicts the mobility of an object. It is used only with equipment.
  • Headquarters staff or offset location (field S) Identifies a unit as a headquarters, or indicates the object's actual location on the map when it has been shifted away in order to declutter the display. It goes straight down from the symbol's centre left, then angles towards the actual location (see diagram).
  • Feint/dummy (field AB) Identifies a unit intended to draw the enemy's attention away from the area of the main attack, or a decoy designed to fool enemy intelligence. It consists of a dashed chevron, placed above the frame, like the echelon graphic modifier (the standard is unclear as to how the two combine graphically).
  • Installation (field AC) Identifies a particular symbol as an installation. It sits atop the frame.
  • Auxiliary equipment (field AG) Indicates the presence of a towed sonar array (used exclusively in the sea surface or subsurface battle dimensions). It sits below the frame, like field R.
  • Area of uncertainty (field AH) Indicates the area where an object is most likely to be, based on the object's last report and the reporting accuracy of the sensor that detected it. This can take various forms, such as an ellipse, a bounding box, or lines indicating probable bearing and distance.
  • Dead reckoning trailer (field AI) Identifies where an object should be located at present, given its last reported course and speed. This can take the form of a dotted line (extending from the symbol to the dead-reckoned position) or a dotted circle (bounding the zone the object may have reached since, when the direction of movement is unknown or uncertain).
  • Speed leader (field AJ) Depicts the speed and direction of movement of an object. It is identical to the direction of movement indicator except that its length is variable (and there is no arrow head).
  • Pairing line (field AK) Connects two objects.

Feints/dummies and installations

[edit]

Source:[4]: 288 

Feint/dummy Installations

Mobility and auxiliary equipment

[edit]

Source:[4]: 163–164 

Wheeled
(limited
cross-country)
Wheeled
cross-country
Tracked Half-tracked Towed Railway






Snowmobile Sled Pack animals Barge Amphibious  





 
  Short towed array (typ. sonar) Long towed array (typ. sonar)
 

Text modifiers

[edit]
  • Quantity (field C) Identifies the number of equipment items present.
  • Reinforced or reduced (field F) Displays (+) for reinforced, (-) for reduced, (±) for reinforced and reduced.
  • Staff comments (field G)
  • Additional information (field H)
  • Evaluation rating (field J) A letter-and-number reliability and credibility rating, assigned by intelligence.
  • Combat effectiveness (field K)
  • Signature equipment (field L) Used for hostile equipment; "!" indicates a detectable electronic signature.
  • Higher formation (field M) Number or title of higher echelon command.
    • field M of this company symbol shows that it belongs to the 42nd Armored Infantry Battalion:
  • Hostile (enemy) (field N) "ENY" denotes hostile equipment.
  • IFF/SIF (field P) IFF/SIF Identification modes and codes.
  • SIGINT mobility indicator (field R2) "M" for Mobile, "S" for Static, "U" for Uncertain.
  • Unique designation (field T)
    • field T shows this is Alpha Company:
  • Type (field V)
  • Date/time group (DTG) (field W) Indicates the symbol's date and time stamp.
  • Altitude/height/depth (field X)
  • Location (field Y) Location in degrees, minutes, and seconds (or in UTM or other applicable display format).
  • Speed (field Z) Velocity as set forth in MIL-STD-6040.
  • Special C2 headquarters (field AA)
  • Platform type (field AD) "ELNOT" (electronic intelligence notation) or "CENOT" (communications intelligence notation)
  • Equipment teardown time (field AE) In minutes.
  • Common identifier (field AF) Example: "Hawk" for a Hawk SAM system.

Other information

[edit]

APP-6 organization chart of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF):

Structure of the 1st MEF (click to enlarge)

A quick reference chart for friendly icons:

Quick guide to military symbology

MIL-STD-2525A

[edit]

APP-6A, Military Symbols for Land Based Systems was developed directly from MIL-STD-2525A, Common Warfighting Symbology. MIL-STD 2525A was the American standard for military symbols. The custodian of APP-6 is the United States. APP-6(A) remained unchanged as work on harmonizing it with ADatP-3, NATO Message Text Formatting System was carried out. In 1999, APP-6 was moved from the Army Service Board to the Joint Service Board. With this move, APP-6 was placed under the Information Exchange Requirements Harmonization/Message Text Format Working Group. The IERH/MTFWG then formed the Joint Symbology Panel to provide configuration management of APP-6 with the US custodian as the chairman. With the ratification and promulgation of APP-6(B) in 2008, the named was changed to NATO Military Symbology to better reflect the nature of the publication. In 2011, with the introduction of APP-6(C), the named was changed to NATO Joint Military Symbology. The US military required new symbols to support ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, so the pace of change between APP-6 and MIL-STD-2525 remained uneven until 2009. In 2009, a new chairman for DOD Symbology Standardization Management Committee was appointed, and the two configuration management organizations began to work together. The two organizations held joint meetings with full participation on both sides. The goal of both groups is to develop comprehensive joint military symbology that is common to both organizations to the greatest extent possible. APP-6(C) began the process of changing the format of the publications and introduced new symbol identification codes. MIL-STD-2525D[10] has carried that one step further with more symbols and more symbol sets derived from recent NATO and US operations. MIL-STD-2525D will serve as the base document for APP-6(D) as the two documents move closer together.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
NATO Joint Military Symbology is a standardized system of graphical symbols designed to represent units, equipment, installations, control measures, activities, and environmental factors in a clear, consistent manner for (C2) across and partner nations. Codified primarily in the Allied Procedural (APP)-6, it provides a common to enhance interoperability, , and decision-making in multinational joint operations. The symbology originated with APP-6 in 1986 as a framework for land-based systems but has evolved through multiple editions, with APP-6(D) published in October 2017 and APP-6(E) in 2023 to incorporate advancements in digital displays and expanded domains. It aligns closely with the U.S. Department of Defense's MIL-STD-2525D, which serves as a base document to ensure compatibility between standards and national implementations. This alignment facilitates the exchange of operational information in simulations, tactical graphics, and real-time C2 systems. At its core, the system employs a building block approach to construct symbols, consisting of a bounding frame (typically an ), an icon representing the primary entity, fills indicating affiliation (e.g., friendly in blue, hostile in red), and modifiers/amplifiers for details such as echelon, mobility, or direction of movement. Symbols are categorized by domain—land, air, sea surface, subsurface, space, and —and include specialized sets for meteorological/oceanographic data, chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear incidents, and . Each symbol is uniquely identified by a Symbol Identification (SIDC), a numeric string of 20 characters (extendable to 30 with national modifiers) that supports automated generation and data exchange in digital environments. This symbology is applicable to both analog (hand-drawn maps) and digital formats, promoting a that overlays symbols on geospatial data for rapid comprehension. It extends beyond traditional combat representations to encompass sustainment, , and control measures like minefields or airspace corridors, thereby supporting the full spectrum of NATO operations from planning to execution. Ongoing updates ensure adaptability to emerging threats, such as cyber activities, while maintaining with prior versions.

Introduction and History

Definition and Purpose

NATO Joint Military Symbology is a standardized system of graphical symbols used by and allied forces to represent military units, equipment, installations, control measures, activities, and operational information on maps, overlays, displays, and other media. This symbology employs icons, modifiers, amplifiers, and frames, often within a bounding , to create a common that supports functions across multinational operations. It implements NATO's STANAG 2019 and APP-6 standards, ensuring compatibility and a consistent appearance for symbols in both manual and automated systems. The primary purpose of this symbology is to facilitate rapid communication of tactical situations and operational data, enabling clear depiction of the for planning, execution, and assessment of joint military operations. It promotes among member nations and partner forces by providing a unified framework that transcends service branches and national boundaries, thereby supporting coordinated actions in diverse environments. Additionally, it aids in the timely acquisition of , target engagement, and by allowing symbols to be observed and interpreted faster than textual descriptions alone. Key benefits include reduced ambiguity in processes, minimized risk of , and enhanced through standardized representations of entities such as friendly, hostile, neutral, and unknown forces. The system extends across operational levels from strategic to tactical and covers domains including land, air, sea surface, subsurface, space, , and meteorological/oceanographic activities, thereby enabling integration with digital mapping and C2 systems. This broad scope ensures that multinational forces can maintain effective coordination without interference, fostering operational success in complex joint environments.

Historical Development

The development of NATO Joint Military Symbology originated from the need for unified mapping and communication during , when Allied forces employed varied national symbols that hindered on shared battlefields. Post-war, as was established in 1949, early efforts in the 1950s focused on harmonizing military procedures, including symbology, through the Military Agency for Standardization to facilitate operations among member nations. This culminated in the initial formalization under STANAG 2019, which laid the groundwork for consistent symbol use across land-based systems. A key milestone came with the publication of APP-6, "Military Symbols for Land Based Systems," in July 1986, which established the first comprehensive standard for symbology, primarily for land operations but applicable to air and naval contexts in scenarios. This was followed by revisions in the to address post-Cold War operational demands, leading to APP-6(A) in December 1999, which introduced color coding for affiliations, digital display compatibility, and a unified system for land, air, and sea symbols to support emerging computer-based systems. Further enhancements appeared in APP-6(B) in June 2008, expanding tactical graphics and modifiers for more precise representation of units and equipment in multinational exercises. Major updates continued with APP-6(C) promulgated on 24 May 2011, incorporating symbols for the space domain to reflect evolving threats and technologies in networked warfare. The most recent iteration at the time, APP-6(D), was released on 16 October 2017, integrating lessons from operations in and , as well as hybrid warfare scenarios, with expanded sets for multi-domain operations including electronic warfare, unmanned systems, and the cyber domain. In parallel, U.S. developments influenced NATO standards; the 's FM 101-5-1, "Operational Terms and Graphics," published on 30 September 1997, provided a foundational symbology framework that informed the initial MIL-STD-2525 in 1994, evolving into MIL-STD-2525D by 10 June 2014 to align closely with APP-6(C) for joint . Subsequent updates include APP-6(E) under STANAG 2019 Edition 8, promulgated in October 2023, which further refines symbology to address contemporary challenges in multi-domain operations. In 2025, the U.S. Army updated FM 1-02.2, "Military Symbols," effective January 2025, to further synchronize with APP-6(D), emphasizing symbols for in response to contemporary multi-domain challenges like great-power competition. This evolution underscores NATO's ongoing commitment to adaptability, ensuring symbology remains a vital tool for seamless allied coordination.

Fundamental Components

Symbol Composition

NATO Joint Military Symbology employs a standardized modular framework for constructing symbols, ensuring across allied forces in operations. The core structure revolves around distinct frame shapes tailored to entity types: units and installations are depicted using a frame, while utilizes a frame. This differentiation facilitates rapid identification on maps and displays. The status of an entity is conveyed through the frame's fill: a filled frame indicates present or active elements, whereas an open (unfilled) frame signifies planned, anticipated, suspected, or destroyed status, providing essential operational without altering the symbol's core shape. Within this frame, a central represents the primary function or type of the entity, serving as the visual anchor. Amplifiers and modifiers—such as textual labels for strength, direction, or echelon—are positioned around the frame's edges in designated sectors to avoid overlap and maintain clarity; each sector accommodates only one modifier, limited to three characters for brevity. Color application enhances the symbol's informational density by denoting affiliation, with standard NATO colors integrated into frames and icons: blue for friendly forces, red for hostile, green for neutral, and yellow for unknown. These colors adapt to monochrome environments by substituting black or white outlines, ensuring visibility across varied media. Affiliation indicators, such as frame filling patterns, further refine this by overlaying on the base colors to signal battle dimensions like assumed friendly or pending status. Symbols are assembled in distinct layers—beginning with the frame, followed by the central icon, and culminating in peripheral modifiers—to support and rendering efficiency in both digital interfaces and printed formats. This layered approach, governed by a bounding as a spatial reference, allows consistent sizing and placement regardless of resolution or medium. Underpinning the entire system is a prerequisite principle, which mandates that all components combine seamlessly without visual or informational interference, promoting uniformity in joint multinational exercises as outlined in STANAG 2019.

Allegiance and Affiliation Indicators

In NATO Joint Military Symbology, allegiance and affiliation of entities are primarily denoted through a combination of frame colors, shapes, and amplifiers, allowing operators to quickly identify the side or relationship of units, equipment, or installations on maps and displays. The standard , established in APP-6 and refined in subsequent editions, uses for friendly forces, for hostile, for neutral, and for unknown, with these colors applied to frames and fills to enhance visibility in both digital and manual formats. alternatives are provided for black-and-white printing or displays, substituting for , neon green for neutral, yellow unchanged, and black outlines with text labels such as "ENY" for hostile to maintain clarity. Early versions of APP-6 relied heavily on frame shapes to indicate affiliation, with a for hostile, square for neutral, for friendly, for assumed friend, and for unknown, often without color to ensure compatibility across printing methods. The APP-6A edition introduced color integration into frames for improved distinction, while standardizing the basic frame structure (e.g., for units) and adding amplifiers like question marks in the frame's E-field for assumed statuses or half-filled frames for pending affiliation, where the entity's side remains unconfirmed. Echelon indicators, such as size symbols (e.g., III for ), are integrated with these affiliation elements to denote both hierarchy and relationship without altering the core frame. Sub-affiliations extend these indicators to specific categories, such as civilian or non-combatant entities, which use purple or black fills within neutral green frames or unframed icons, often with function codes like 2.X.3.4.1 for refugees to differentiate from military forces. This supports interoperability with non-NATO forces by aligning with standards like STANAG 2019, ensuring symbols remain recognizable in multinational operations. In APP-6(D) and APP-6(E) (2023), enhancements include dedicated rectangle-framed icons for cyber entities (e.g., web servers or jammers) using the same color scheme, with green question marks proposed for assumed neutral in hybrid operations to address uncertainties in non-state or ambiguous threats.
AffiliationColor (Primary)Frame Shape (APP-6/APP-6A)Special IndicatorMonochrome Alternative
FriendlyBlueCircle/Rectangle (assumed)NoneCyan or black outline
HostileRedDiamond"ENY" labelBlack with "ENY"
NeutralGreenSquareNoneNeon green
UnknownYellowQuatrefoilNoneYellow
PendingYellowHalf-filledQuestion mark or hourglassBlack with "?"
CivilianPurple/BlackUnframed or green squareFunction codeMagenta or black

Battle Dimensions and Status

In NATO Joint Military Symbology, battle dimensions denote the primary operational domains—land, air, sea, space, and cyberspace—in which military entities function, enabling clear depiction of multi-domain operations on maps and displays. These dimensions are primarily indicated by distinct frame shapes around the base icon, with additional modifier icons for specificity when needed. Land serves as the default domain, using a closed rectangle frame to represent ground-based units, equipment, and installations without additional domain markers. Air domain symbols employ a vertical rectangle frame open at the bottom (pentagon-like), often incorporating wing-shaped icons for aircraft or missiles to signify aerial operations. Sea surface uses a closed rectangle frame similar to land but with anchor or hull icons for naval vessels, while subsurface entities like submarines feature specialized inverted triangle frames open at the top. Space operations are marked by frames open at the bottom, augmented with orbit path or satellite icons, and cyberspace relies on network node or electromagnetic spectrum symbols within a dedicated symbol set (e.g., 10 or 25). For multi-domain overlays, symbols combine elements, such as adding a cyber network modifier to a land unit icon, to illustrate integrated effects across environments. Status indicators provide critical context on an entity's operational readiness and location certainty, modifying the base symbol's fill and outline to avoid ambiguity in dynamic battlespaces. Present status is shown with solid lines and full fills, confirming an entity's confirmed existence and capability. Planned or anticipated entities use dashed lines, indicating future positioning or intent without current presence. Denied or suspected status employs dotted lines or a crossed-out overlay, signaling unconfirmed or inaccessible information, often paired with amplifiers like "?" for uncertainty. Echelon levels—higher for command oversight or lower for subordinate elements—are denoted by vertical lines above or below the frame, respectively, to hierarchy without altering the core icon. Activity states further refine entity conditions, focusing on motion, damage, or exercise contexts through targeted modifiers. Moving status adds a direction arrow or trailing line to the , with the orientation indicating and path for units in transit. Destroyed or neutralized entities receive an "X" overlay or red amplifier, while simulated elements in scenarios use dashed outlines or joker indicators to distinguish from real operations. These elements integrate seamlessly as modifiers to base icons, where dimensions dictate frame , status adjusts line styles and fills, and activity adds directional or overlay , ensuring symbols remain compact yet informative. Frame colors from allegiance schemes briefly enhance status visibility, such as solid blue fills for friendly present forces. The APP-6(E) standard (2023), building on APP-6(D) ratified in 2017, expanded cyber and representations with dedicated icons and codes, reflecting doctrines that emphasize multi-domain integration in response to evolving threats.
Battle DimensionFrame ShapeRepresentative Modifier IconExample Application
Land (Default) (closed) iconGround unit symbol for battalion
Air open bottomWing silhouette in air
Sea Surface (closed) or hullNaval on
Sea SubsurfaceInverted triangle (open top) at depth
open bottomOrbit path/satelliteSpace-based sensor platform
with symbol set 10 or 25Network nodeCyber attack unit
This table illustrates key visual distinctions, drawn from standardized symbol sets for interoperability.

Symbol Placement and Sizing

Icon Placement Rules

In NATO Joint Military Symbology, as standardized in APP-6(E) (October 2025) and harmonized with MIL-STD-2525E (August 2023), the primary function icon is positioned at the center of the symbol's main sector within a vertical bounding octagon frame, ensuring it represents the core entity such as a unit or equipment without obstruction. Secondary icons, when used, are offset to adjacent sectors to maintain visual hierarchy and prevent overlap with the central element. This central placement aligns with the symbol's anchor point, typically the center of mass or location, facilitating accurate geospatial representation on maps. Modifier positions follow a standardized orientation around the frame, starting from the top to promote readability and consistency across displays. At the 12 o'clock position (Sector 1), echelon indicators are placed to denote unit size or . The 3 o'clock position (Sector 3) accommodates quantity indicators, limited to a maximum of nine characters for equipment symbols or three in digital formats. Direction of movement or capability modifiers occupy the 6 o'clock position (Sector 2), often depicted as an extending from the frame. Finally, the 9 o'clock position (Sector 4) is reserved for staff or headquarters indicators, extending leftward to signify command . Only one modifier per sector is permitted to avoid clutter. Spacing standards enforce a minimum 1:1 aspect ratio for the bounding frame, with icons scaled to fit the main sector without exceeding its boundaries, except for full-frame icons that may touch the edges. Minimum element dimensions include a dot diameter of 0.15 times the frame height (L), and overall frame sizes range from 1.0L to 1.5L for optimal visibility. In overlays, symbols align via anchor points for hierarchical stacking—vertically for subordinate units or horizontally for adjacent elements—while avoiding overlap through offset lines or proportional spacing along lines of advance. Digital considerations emphasize vector-based rendering to support scalability across zoom levels in systems, with Symbol Identification Codes (SIDC) enabling automated placement and exchange. and modifiers remain proportional during resizing, and amplifiers outside the frame can be adjusted for screen resolution, ensuring legibility in electronic displays without loss of standardization.

Unit Size and Strength Indicators

In NATO Joint Military Symbology, unit size indicators denote the organizational scale of a military unit, using standardized or graphic elements placed above the symbol frame to convey echelons from small teams to large formations. These indicators, defined in APP-6(E) and aligned with MIL-STD-2525E, ensure across forces by providing a visual for command levels without relying on textual labels alone. For instance, "I" represents a , while "XXXX" signifies a division, allowing users to quickly assess hierarchy and scale. The following table illustrates common unit size indicators, with placement consistently above the frame for clarity:
IndicatorUnit Size ExampleDescription
ISmallest tactical element, typically 8-12 personnel.
IIPlatoon/TroopBasic maneuver unit, around 20-50 personnel.
IIICompany-level formation, approximately 100-200 personnel.
XMid-level command, 300-800 personnel.
XXLarger tactical unit, 1,000-2,000 personnel.
XXXBrigade echelon, 3,000-5,000 personnel.
XXXXDivisionDivisional command, 10,000-15,000 personnel.
XXXXXCorps-level operations, 20,000-45,000 personnel.
XXXXXXArmy group or field army, over 50,000 personnel.
These symbols are encoded in field B of the Symbol Identification Code (SIDC), using a 2-character numeric code for echelon to ensure compactness on maps and overlays. Strength indicators overlay symbol to reflect operational capacity, with no mark denoting full strength, a diagonal slash (/) for reduced strength, and an "X" for destroyed or non-operational status. Percentages, such as "50%" in field K of the SIDC, provide quantitative detail for partial effectiveness, particularly useful for assessing degraded units in dynamic scenarios. These modifiers, optional for most symbols but mandatory in detailed reporting, integrate with color coding— for full, for reduced, and for destroyed—to enhance visual discrimination. Echelon integration links subordinate units to higher commands through vertical lines or frame amplifiers extending from the parent symbol, illustrating chain-of-command relationships on situation maps. For example, a symbol (II) may connect via a line to a frame (III), with the higher echelon's indicator positioned above to denote oversight. This method, governed by STANAG 2356, uses oblique strokes or abbreviations in field M to list ascending echelons, such as "2/3/5" for //. In APP-6(E), variations accommodate special operations forces (SOF) with dedicated size indicators, such as abbreviated codes (e.g., "SO" prefix) and purple framing to distinguish covert units without altering core Roman numeral structures. These additions support niche echelons like task forces or detachments, maintaining compatibility while addressing SOF's unique organizational fluidity. Standardized proportions ensure legibility across media, with unit size symbols scaled to one-third the height of the bounding frame (0.33L, where L is the frame dimension) and amplifiers not exceeding 0.4L to prevent overlap. Echelon lines extend precisely one frame height for higher commands, promoting uniform rendering in digital and analog applications.

Primary Symbol Categories

Unit Symbols

Unit symbols in NATO Joint Military Symbology represent organizational entities composed primarily of personnel, such as military units ranging from small teams to large commands, distinguishing them from equipment or fixed installations. These symbols consist of a rectangular frame enclosing a functional icon, with optional amplifiers for size, mobility, and other attributes, as standardized in the APP-6 series (latest APP-6(E), 2023) and implemented in MIL-STD-2525D (2014). The design promotes interoperability across NATO forces by providing a visual shorthand for unit roles, enabling rapid situational awareness in joint operations. Basic icons for units are categorized by function: maneuver units for direct combat, combat support units for enabling fires and protection, and (CSS) units for and sustainment. Maneuver icons include , depicted as two vertical lines representing soldiers; armor, shown as parallel tracks symbolizing a ; and , combining the infantry icon with track lines. (p. 18, 97-98) Combat support icons feature as a circle with a line () or chevron (mortar), and air defense as a vertical line with branches ( launcher). (p. 92, 102) CSS icons represent functions like medical (cross) or supply (box with arrow). (p. 103, 193-200) Unit hierarchy spans from tactical to strategic levels, indicated by amplifiers such as or bars flanking the frame. Fire teams use "I" or a single bar (echelon I); squads use "II" or double bars (II); platoons use "III" or triple bars (III); companies/batteries/troops use "IV" or quadruple bars (IV); battalions/squadrons use "V" or an "X" (V); brigades use "VI" or "XXX" (VI); divisions use "VII" or "XX" (VII); use "VIII" or "XXX" (VIII); armies use "IX" or "XXXX" (IX); and theater commands use "X" or a "V" Roman numeral (X). (p. 106, 178; Section 5.3.6.1, Table D-III p. 171) This scaling ensures symbols convey both function and echelon without ambiguity. Branch-specific modifiers adapt base icons to denote capabilities, such as airborne units with added wings or parachutes, or mechanized units with track or wheel symbols beneath the icon. (p. 98, 104) Composite units, like combined arms battalions or task forces, integrate multiple icons or use a headquarters icon with a task force amplifier (e.g., a diamond or "TF" label) to indicate mixed maneuver, support, and CSS elements. (p. 24, 98, 105) Updates in the APP-6 series, including APP-6(E) (2023), address emerging capabilities, including icons for unmanned systems: unmanned aerial systems (UAS) use a winged diamond or propeller shape, unmanned ground systems feature a track with a "U" overlay, and unmanned underwater vehicles employ a silhouette with drone modifiers. (p. 150, 181, 332, 494-564) task forces employ a icon (rectangle with diagonal line) augmented by a "JTF" or joint modifier (e.g., SIDC 12-10-00) to signify multinational or multi-service commands. (p. 98, 107, 172) Examples illustrate application: a friendly appears as a blue frame with lines over tracks and quintuple bars or "X" (SIDC 10-12-11-02). (p. 24, 104, 178) A hostile air defense battery uses a red frame enclosing a icon with quadruple bars (SIDC 10-13-03-00, echelon IV). (p. 18, 102) Affiliation indicators, such as for friendly or red for hostile, are applied to the unit frame as per standard rules. (p. 18)

Equipment Symbols

Equipment symbols in NATO Joint Military Symbology represent discrete military assets such as individual weapons, vehicles, and systems, rather than organized groups of personnel or installations. These symbols are constructed using a diamond-shaped frame to denote , distinguishing them from unit symbols that employ rectangular frames and include echelon sizing indicators for organizational scale. The frame is typically filled or outlined based on affiliation—blue for friendly, for hostile—and centered within a bounding for digital displays. This structure ensures clarity in systems, allowing rapid identification of specific platforms without implying . Base icons for equipment are categorized by operational domain, providing stylized representations of the asset type. For ground equipment, such as tanks, the icon features a outline with track marks to indicate armored vehicles, often subdivided into light, medium, or heavy variants based on . Air equipment uses icons, with depicted as streamlined profiles for jets and bombers, while rotary-wing helicopters incorporate rotor blades. Naval equipment employs hull s for surface vessels or , and missiles across domains are shown as arrowhead shapes to signify launchers or projectiles. These icons are standardized using 20-character numeric Symbol Identification Codes (SIDC), such as 10-07-07-01 for tanks or 10-11-01-01 for , enabling consistent rendering in mapping software. Modifiers refine the base icon to convey platform details or operational context, applied as overlays or amplifiers within the symbol fields. Platform-specific modifiers include rotary-wing indicators (e.g., blades atop the silhouette) for helicopters versus fixed-wing profiles for jets, ensuring differentiation in mixed-domain scenarios. Quantity is indicated via alphanumeric text in a dedicated field, limited to nine characters (e.g., "2" for two assets) or sometimes small dots for multiples in analog representations. Battle dimension icons may be briefly referenced for air or sea equipment to specify the operational environment. Representative examples illustrate practical application: a hostile tank symbol consists of a red-filled diamond frame with track marks and an "ENY" amplifier for enemy designation, while a friendly radar uses a blue diamond frame enclosing an antenna icon to denote surveillance equipment. These examples highlight how affiliation colors and textual modifiers enhance situational awareness on maps. Updates in the APP-6 series, including APP-6(E) (2023), have incorporated symbols for emerging technologies, with MIL-STD-2525D including dedicated icons for unmanned systems such as drones (coded as 10-12-19-00 for unmanned aerial vehicles) to reflect their growing role in operations. While hypersonic weapons lack unique icons in the 2014 edition, they are represented using general missile arrowheads with speed or range amplifiers, aligning with post-2020 interoperability needs in NATO exercises.

Installation Symbols

Installation symbols in NATO Joint Military Symbology depict fixed facilities, bases, and that support operations, distinguishing them from mobile units or equipment through their static representation within rectangular or octagonal frames similar to those used for units. These symbols facilitate clear visualization of logistical and operational hubs on maps and overlays, ensuring across forces. The symbology emphasizes the grouped, non-mobile nature of installations, with icons placed centrally within frames to denote affiliation via color or line style—such as blue for friendly or red for hostile. Base icons form the core of installation symbology, including the airfield represented by parallel lines evoking runways to signify or air bases critical for support. The command post icon features a or pennant, indicating control centers or unspecified command facilities that coordinate operations. Depots are symbolized by stacked boxes or rectangular enclosures, denoting storage and supply facilities like depots or warehouses essential for sustainment. These icons are standardized under codes such as 10 for installations, ensuring consistent depiction across analog and digital systems. Modifiers enhance installation symbols to convey specific attributes, with fortified variants incorporating wall-like lines or defensive overlays to represent hardened structures such as bunkers or protected sites. Temporary installations use tent-shaped icons to indicate non-permanent setups like field camps, while dual-use facilities may combine icons with neutral or indicators to highlight shared infrastructure. These modifiers are applied via standard identity designator codes (SIDC), allowing precise customization without altering the base frame. Illustrative examples include the , framed in green with an and to depict a harbor or under neutral control, facilitating maritime logistics without implying . In contrast, a hostile employs a frame enclosing a solid or barred structure, signaling an enemy fortified position that requires caution in . Such examples underscore the symbology's role in rapidly communicating installation threats and capabilities. Expansions in the APP-6 series, including APP-6(E) (2023), address emerging domains, introducing symbols for cyber infrastructure such as nodes or web servers depicted with networked or server icons, vital for information operations. Space launch sites are represented by rocket or production icons, reflecting facilities for orbital assets and reflecting NATO's adaptation to multidomain warfare. Installations maintain a fixed character in this symbology, lacking inherent mobility symbols unless modified for temporary status, though battle dimension indicators can briefly note planned or destroyed conditions.

Symbol Modifiers

Graphic Modifiers

Graphic modifiers in NATO Joint Military Symbology consist of non-textual visual elements, such as lines, shapes, and patterns, that augment the basic frame and icon to denote specific attributes like , structure, or attachment. These modifiers enable rapid visual interpretation in operational environments, adhering to standardized placement to maintain clarity and avoid overlap with core symbol components. Defined in standards like APP-6(C) and its evolutions up to APP-6(E) (as of 2023), they are positioned within or around the rectangular or octagonal frame, typically in designated sectors to preserve . Key types of graphic modifiers include those for feints and dummies, installations, mobility, and auxiliary . Feints and dummies are represented by dashed inverted "V" patterns, indicating deceptive or simulated ; for instance, a dummy unit features the standard unit with the dashed inverted V indicator to signify non-real assets. Installations use outline shapes resembling buildings or shaded blocks added inside the frame, such as a solid shaded area for fortified positions, distinguishing fixed from mobile units. Mobility indicators attach or track to the frame's base or sides, specifying whether is wheeled or tracked; these are derived from entity subtypes and placed externally to the main . Auxiliary modifiers depict attachments via connecting lines, as in towed where a links to a with a dashed line, illustrating operational dependencies. Placement follows precise rules to ensure uniformity: modifiers occupy sectors 1 (above the icon) or 2 (below the icon) within the bounding , centered geometrically and limited to one per sector without extending beyond frame edges; for example, the dashed inverted is placed across the symbol. This sectoral approach, using points for alignment, supports both manual plotting and digital rendering. The evolution of these modifiers reflects refinements across APP-6 versions for emerging threats, with APP-6(E) maintaining while adapting to new operational needs. In APP-6(C), enhancements introduced hatched patterns for denied areas, such as restricted zones marked with cross-hatching to indicate minefields or no-go regions. APP-6(D) further updated electronic warfare representations, incorporating jammer icons—often specialized shapes like barrage emitters—integrated as frame modifiers to denote signal interference capabilities. In digital implementations, these elements are rendered as , leveraging points (e.g., one for simple outlines, three for complex lines) to facilitate in systems.
Modifier TypeGraphical RepresentationPlacementExample Application
Feints/DummiesDashed inverted "V" across frameMain sector or perimeter indicatorDummy infantry unit with dashed inverted V
InstallationsBuilding outline or shaded blockInside frame, sector 1 or 2Fortified command post with outline shape
MobilityAttached wheels or tracksBase or sides of frameTracked armored vehicle with track icons
Auxiliary (Towed)Line connecting iconsExternal to main frameArtillery piece linked to towing

Textual Modifiers

Textual modifiers in NATO Joint Military Symbology consist of alphanumeric annotations that provide supplementary details to the graphical elements of a symbol, enabling precise identification and contextualization without relying on visual icons. These modifiers are essential for conveying operational specifics such as unit identity, temporal information, operational strength, and , as defined in standards like APP-6(D), APP-6(E), and its aligned implementation MIL-STD-2525D. They complement the primary by adding layers of information in a standardized manner, ensuring clarity in joint multinational operations. The primary types of textual modifiers include name or identification labels, date-time groups, strength indicators, and higher formation designations. Name/ID modifiers, often using fields like T (unique designation), specify entity identifiers such as "1st Armd" for the First Armored Division or "Task Force Alpha" for a task-organized unit, limited to up to 30 characters to maintain conciseness. Date-time groups (DTG), typically in Field W, follow the format DDHHMMSSZMONYYYY (e.g., "08140000Z NOV2025" for 1400 Zulu on November 8, 2025), with a maximum of 16 characters to denote event timing or status updates. Strength modifiers, such as those in Field C, quantify personnel or equipment, for example numeric counts like "5" for the number of items, generally restricted to 6-9 characters. Higher formation indicators, like Field M, denote parent commands (e.g., "III CORPS" for the Third Corps), supporting up to 21 characters to link the symbol to broader organizational structures. Abbreviations are standardized across NATO, such as "INF" for infantry or "ARMD" for armored, to ensure interoperability. Placement of textual modifiers follows strict positional guidelines to avoid obscuring the symbol's frame or . Modifiers are positioned relative to the bounding or frame: name/ID and higher formation often above the frame (centered or left-aligned), while date-time and strength are placed below (right-aligned for amplifiers). In the symbol's internal sectors, such as Sector 1 or 2, text is aligned to prevent overlap with the icon, with amplifiers external to the frame for in digital displays. These positions can adjust based on symbol type—for instance, in unit symbols, strength may integrate with size indicators from echelon notations. Rules governing textual modifiers emphasize uniformity and readability to support rapid interpretation in high-stress environments. All text must be in uppercase sans-serif fonts for legibility, with no rotation allowed, and limited to 3-5 characters per field (e.g., 5 for strength) to prevent clutter—longer entries like full DTGs are abbreviated where possible. Only essential modifiers are applied, with prioritization (e.g., date-time before secondary IDs), and multiple fields are separated by slashes or spaces. Standardization ensures multinational compatibility, drawing from APP-6(D) and APP-6(E) sector definitions. For example, a unit symbol might display "TF ALPHA / III CORPS" above the frame and "081400Z / 5" below, integrating name, higher formation, date-time, and strength without exceeding spatial limits. Equipment symbols could include serial numbers like "SN: 12345" in a dedicated field. In digital implementations, APP-6(D) and APP-6(E) incorporate support via encoding to accommodate multinational languages and scripts, facilitating text modifiers in non-Latin alphabets for allied forces. This enhances in systems, where symbols are rendered dynamically without loss of textual fidelity.

Standards and Specifications

NATO APP-6 Series

The APP-6 series represents the foundational Allied Procedural Publications for joint military symbology, initiated with the original APP-6 in July 1986 as a core document defining standardized symbols for land-based formations and units in joint operations. This initial version established a unified system compatible with both manual plotting and automated map displays, replacing earlier STANAG 2019 editions and emphasizing monochrome icons to ensure clarity in basic tactical representations. Subsequent revisions expanded the scope and functionality to reflect evolving operational needs. APP-6(A), promulgated in December 1999, introduced color coding for improved discrimination between entity types and affiliations, while broadening coverage to include air and sea-based systems for greater joint applicability. APP-6(B), released in June 2008, incorporated tactical graphics such as boundaries, zones, and control measures to support mission planning and execution. APP-6(C), published in May 2011, enhanced multi-domain integration by refining symbol structures for air, land, maritime, and space elements, with improved modularity for digital systems. APP-6(D), published in October 2017, addressed contemporary threats by adding symbols for cyber operations, space assets, hybrid warfare scenarios, and unmanned systems, including specific icons for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and other autonomous platforms to depict reconnaissance and sensor capabilities. The most recent iteration, APP-6(E) from 2023, further refines these elements for enhanced interoperability in multi-domain environments, with over 1,000 symbols organized hierarchically for efficient use in command and control. XML schemas are integrated to facilitate digital implementation, enabling automated generation and exchange of symbols across NATO systems. APP-6 symbology is mandatory for all NATO exercises and operations, ensuring consistent situational awareness among member nations. In 2025, NATO's Coalition Warrior Interoperability eXercise (CWIX 25) tested interoperability across more than 570 capabilities in multi-domain scenarios to confirm seamless data sharing and symbol rendering in joint environments. The series includes detailed annexes featuring color plates for visual reference and comprehensive symbol dictionaries that outline construction rules, modifiers, and usage guidelines. These elements collectively support precise, unambiguous communication in complex operations.

MIL-STD-2525

MIL-STD-2525 is the primary U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) standard for developing and displaying joint military symbology in systems, establishing rules for graphical representations of units, equipment, installations, and activities. First published on September 30, 1994, the standard provides a common framework using building blocks like symbol frames, amplifiers, and modifiers to ensure consistent depiction across DoD platforms. It is directly derived from 's APP-6 series to support in joint U.S.- operations, synthesizing land, air, and sea symbologies into a unified system. The standard has undergone multiple revisions to incorporate technological advancements and operational feedback. Key versions include MIL-STD-2525A, released December 15, 1996, which refined early symbology sets; MIL-STD-2525B, issued January 30, 1999, with Change 1 on July 1, 2005, enhancing graphics and automation coding; MIL-STD-2525C on November 17, 2008, expanding symbol sets for multi-domain use; MIL-STD-2525D on June 10, 2014, with Change Notice 1 on August 2, 2018, focusing on all-domain operations; and the current MIL-STD-2525E, approved December 31, 2022, and promulgated August 3, 2023, which further standardizes symbology for digital systems. These updates address evolving requirements, such as improved rendering in software and integration with emerging technologies. Unique to MIL-STD-2525 are extensions tailored to U.S. military needs, including specialized symbols for forces (e.g., icons denoting units) and nuclear capabilities (e.g., modifiers for strategic assets). Change notices enable swift amendments, such as those in 2018 for D, without full republication, allowing rapid adaptation to doctrinal shifts. The standard maintains close alignment with APP-6(E), sharing core symbol structures for over 90% of elements to promote seamless coalition operations. It is incorporated into U.S. Army doctrine via Field Manual 1-02.2, Military Symbols, updated January 2025, which applies MIL-STD-2525E symbology to depict operations in contested environments.

Interoperability and Digital Implementations

NATO Joint Military Symbology promotes among allied forces through agreements like STANAG 2019, which establishes common symbology requirements for data exchange in multinational operations. This harmonization ensures that symbols from MIL-STD-2525E and APP-6(E) are consistently interpreted across member states, facilitating seamless in joint environments. validates these standards annually during large-scale exercises, such as Steadfast Defender, where participating forces test symbology integration to confirm operational compatibility and rapid sharing. In digital implementations, symbology is encoded using XML schemas derived from MIL-STD-2525E and APP-6(E), enabling integration with geographic information systems (GIS). Esri's ArcGIS platform supports these through Styled Layer Descriptor (SLD) files and dictionary styles. Tools like the U.S. Joint Battle Command-Platform (JBC-P) utilize this symbology for real-time tactical displays, allowing units to overlay standardized symbols on maps for enhanced battlefield visualization. Similarly, NATO Joint Command systems leverage these formats for multinational coordination, while open-source libraries such as Milsymbol (JavaScript) and the military-symbol Python module provide accessible implementations for custom software development. Recent updates address challenges in emerging technologies, including schema refinements for (VR) and (AR) rendering to support immersive training and operations. Looking ahead, AI-assisted tools are advancing symbol generation and recognition for real-time operations, with neuro-symbolic approaches enabling automated creation of compliant icons from operational data to accelerate decision-making in dynamic environments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.