Hubbry Logo
AnabantiformesAnabantiformesMain
Open search
Anabantiformes
Community hub
Anabantiformes
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Anabantiformes
Anabantiformes
Anabantiformes
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Anabantiformes
Temporal range: Eocene–present
Climbing perch (Anabas testudineus)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Clade: Percomorpha
Order: Anabantiformes
Li, Dettaï, Cruaud, Couloux, Desoutter-Meniger & Lecointre, 2009[1]
Type species
Anabas testudineus
(Bloch, 1792) [3]
Suborders and families[2]

See text

Synonyms

The Anabantiformes /ænəˈbæntɪfɔːrmiːz/, is an order of bony fish (Teleostei) proposed in 2009.[1] They are collectively known as labyrinth fish,[4] are an order of air-breathing freshwater ray-finned fish with three suborders, eight families, and at least 350 species.[5][6] This order is the sister group to the Synbranchiformes, with both comprising the monophyletic clade Anabantaria. Anabantaria is a sister group to the Carangiformes, with the clade comprising both being a sister clade to the Ovalentaria.[7] This group of fish are found in Asia and Africa, with some species introduced to North America.

These fish are characterized by the presence of teeth on the parasphenoid.[7] The snakeheads and the anabantoids are united by the presence of the labyrinth organ, which is a highly folded suprabranchial accessory breathing organ. It is formed by vascularized expansion of the epibranchial bone of the first gill arch and used for respiration in air.[8][7]

Ombilinichthys yamini is one of the few anabantiform fossils.[9]

Many species are popular as aquarium fish - the most notable are the Siamese fighting fish and several species of gouramies.[8] In addition to being aquarium fish, some of the larger anabantiforms (such as the giant gourami[10]) are also harvested for food in their native countries.[8][11]

Taxonomy

[edit]

There are three suborders and eight families currently recognized within the order Anabantiformes:[5][12]

Alternative systematics

[edit]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Below shows the phylogenetic relationships among the Anabantiform families after Collins et al. (2015), here including the Nandoidei as Anabantiforms:[15][failed verification]

Anabantiformes

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Anabantiformes

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Anabantiformes are an order of ray-finned fishes (class , infraclass Teleostei) within the percomorph group, renowned for their air-breathing adaptations and collectively termed labyrinth fishes due to the specialized respiratory structures in many taxa. This order, established through phylogenetic analyses of molecular and genomic data, includes three suborders—, Channoidei, and Nandoidei—and eight families: Aenigmachannidae, Anabantidae, Badidae, Channidae, Helostomatidae, Nandidae, Osphronemidae, and Pristolepididae, encompassing about 287 . Predominantly freshwater dwellers, Anabantiformes species are native to tropical and subtropical regions of and , with some extending into southern Asia and a few tolerating brackish conditions; notable examples include the aggressive snakeheads ( spp.) in the Channidae and the colorful gouramis ( spp.) in the Osphronemidae. These fishes thrive in low-oxygen environments like stagnant ponds, swamps, and slow rivers, where their accessory breathing mechanisms provide a survival advantage. A key innovation in the suborder Anabantoidei is the labyrinth organ, a highly vascularized, folded suprabranchial chamber derived from gill arches that extracts oxygen from gulped air, supplementing gill respiration and enabling tolerance to hypoxia. Members of Channoidei, such as snakeheads, employ alternative air-breathing strategies involving suprabranchial diverticula, while Nandoidei taxa exhibit varied respiratory efficiencies. Anabantiformes display diverse morphologies, from the amphibious climbing perches (Anabas) capable of overland travel to the leaf-mimicking leaffishes (Monocirrhus), and many are popular in aquaculture and the aquarium trade for their striking appearances and behaviors.

Description

Morphology

Anabantiformes display considerable diversity in body morphology, reflecting adaptations to various freshwater environments. The body shape ranges from elongated and cylindrical in snakeheads of the family Channidae, such as species, featuring large scales that are cycloid or ctenoid, a large mouth with protruding lower jaw and depressible canine-like teeth, long dorsal and anal fins without spines, and paired suprabranchial chambers serving as the air-breathing organ, which facilitate movement through vegetated habitats, to laterally compressed forms in families like Nandidae and Osphronemidae, enhancing maneuverability in dense aquatic vegetation. Scales in this order are typically ctenoid, providing a rough texture, though scales occur in some taxa. The dorsal and anal fins are often elongated in males of families, such as and , forming extended rays that contribute to the overall . Pelvic fins in Anabantiformes vary across families; they are reduced or jugular-positioned in Channidae, aiding in precise positioning during ambushes, while in Anabantidae and Osphronemidae, they are more developed and thoracic. Some Anabantoidei, particularly in Osphronemidae, possess thread-like pectoral fins that extend beyond the body, enhancing sensory capabilities. The skull is robust, featuring teeth on the parasphenoid bone, a diagnostic trait that supports feeding mechanics by opposing other dental elements during prey processing. Size variation within the order is pronounced, spanning from diminutive species in the genus Badis (family Badidae), which rarely exceed 6 cm in standard length, to large predators like (family Channidae), capable of reaching 1.5 m total length. The labyrinth organ, a key structural feature unique to Anabantiformes, consists of paired suprabranchial chambers derived from modified gill arches, forming intricate bony lamellae lined with vascularized . This organ provides a structural basis for supplemental air-breathing in low-oxygen environments.

Physiology

Anabantiformes exhibit bimodal respiration, combining aquatic gas exchange through gills with aerial oxygen uptake facilitated by the labyrinth organ, a highly vascularized suprabranchial chamber that enhances oxygen absorption from atmospheric air. This organ consists of thin respiratory epithelium folded into intricate bony plates, providing an extensive surface area for efficient gas diffusion during air-breathing events, which become essential in oxygen-poor aquatic environments. The transition between respiratory modes allows these fish to supplement gill-based oxygen extraction—typically responsible for carbon dioxide excretion—with aerial respiration, enabling survival in habitats where dissolved oxygen levels drop below 1 mg/L. This physiological strategy confers remarkable tolerance to hypoxia, with species like the (Betta splendens) exhibit developmental plasticity in labyrinth organ size in response to low-oxygen conditions. In the Channidae subfamily, such as Channa argus, aerial respiration via the suprabranchial chamber reduces overall oxygen consumption by approximately 22-24% during emersion, mitigating metabolic stress and extending survival out of water to over 20 hours. These also exhibit resilience to , thriving in waters with elevated CO2 levels (up to 20 mmHg) common in stagnant tropical habitats, through downregulated metabolic rates that limit anaerobic reliance and . Some Channidae species, including Channa argus, can aestivate by burrowing into mud during seasonal droughts, entering a state of metabolic depression that conserves energy and allows prolonged survival—up to several days—until rehydration. Sensory adaptations in Anabantiformes are tailored to low-visibility environments, with an enhanced system comprising neuromasts that detect subtle water vibrations and pressure gradients, aiding navigation and prey detection in murky, sediment-laden waters. This mechanosensory array, distributed along the body flanks and head, provides hydrodynamic cues equivalent to a "distant touch," crucial for orienting in turbid conditions where visual cues are obscured. Metabolic adjustments enable Anabantiformes to withstand environmental fluctuations, including ranges of 20-30°C and variations from 4 to 8, by modulating activities and expressions that maintain cellular . For instance, species like spp. exhibit elevated heat-shock protein responses at upper thermal limits, preventing protein denaturation, while acid-base regulatory mechanisms buffer shifts through transport. These tolerances support their persistence in variable tropical freshwater systems, where diurnal swings and acidic runoff from vegetation are common. Predominantly freshwater inhabitants, though some species tolerate brackish conditions, Anabantiformes maintain through active uptake across gills and , countering osmotic water influx and ionic dilution via Na+/K+-ATPase pumps in chloride cells. Gills predominate in sodium and chloride absorption, linked to excretion, while the skin contributes auxiliary uptake, particularly during aerial phases when gill function is reduced. This dual-site strategy ensures plasma concentrations remain stable (around 150 mM Na+), preventing in dilute media.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic distribution

Anabantiformes exhibit a disjunct native distribution across and , reflecting their primary freshwater origins in tropical and subtropical regions. In , the family Channidae, including genera such as Parachanna, is predominantly found in West and Central African river systems, extending northward to the River basin in and . Additionally, the family Anabantidae is native to , with genera such as Ctenopoma and Microctenopoma in the and Sandelia in southern African coastal rivers. In , the order spans from the through to , with families like Osphronemidae inhabiting river basins such as the in , , , and . Endemism patterns are particularly pronounced within the suborder in , where high species diversity occurs in regions like and the , contributing to localized radiations among labyrinth fishes. Within the suborder Nandoidei, certain species of Badidae are restricted to the of , underscoring regional isolation in peninsular freshwater systems. Introduced populations of snakeheads ( spp.), which are aggressive predators in Asian and African freshwaters, have established beyond their native ranges, notably in where argus has colonized the and its tributaries in and since 2004, posing risks as an invasive predator. Similar introductions of species have occurred in parts of , leading to ecological concerns due to their adaptability and predatory impact. The fossil record of Anabantiformes dates to the Eocene epoch, with early channid remains reported from deposits in and , suggesting an Asian origin around 48 million years ago followed by dispersals that shaped their current disjunct pattern, potentially linked to Gondwanan vicariance influences. Biogeographic barriers such as the have driven in channids through vicariance in the Eastern Himalayan hotspot, while the dynamic paleogeography of facilitated diversification among anabantoids via Pleistocene sea-level fluctuations and island connectivity.

Habitat preferences

Anabantiformes exhibit a strong preference for lentic aquatic environments, including slow-flowing rivers, swamps, paddies, and lakes characterized by dense cover. These habitats provide shelter and opportunities amid thick aquatic , which are essential for species in the suborder , such as gouramis and bettas. In contrast, members of the Channidae family, like snakeheads, favor similar stagnant or sluggish waters but often associate with muddy substrates rather than heavy . These fishes thrive in warm, low-oxygen conditions typical of stagnant waters, with temperatures ranging from 24–30°C and dissolved oxygen levels often below 5 mg/L due to stagnation and organic decay. Water is generally acidic to neutral (4.0–7.5), particularly in blackwater habitats stained by from swamps and leaf litter, which many , including various bettas, preferentially inhabit for their and reduced predation visibility. Their accessory air-breathing organs enable survival in these hypoxic environments, allowing exploitation of niches unavailable to gill-breathers. Microhabitat selection varies by subfamily: Anabantoidei species are predominantly surface-dwellers, utilizing weed beds and floating vegetation for ambush predation and nest-building, while Channidae tend toward benthic zones, burrowing into soft for concealment and . In floodplain systems, many Anabantiformes undertake seasonal migrations during floods to access nutrient-rich inundated areas, dispersing overland or via connected waterways to exploit temporary habitats. During dry seasons, species like snakeheads demonstrate by burrowing into moist cocoons, estivating for weeks or months until rains refill water bodies. Habitat loss poses a severe threat to Anabantiformes, primarily through and drainage of wetlands in , where swamp conversion for and plantations has fragmented critical lentic ecosystems. These activities exacerbate seasonal droughts and degrade water quality, contributing to population declines in endemic species across hotspots.

Behavior

Locomotion and respiration

Anabantiformes primarily utilize labriform propulsion for locomotion, relying on oscillatory movements of the pectoral fins to generate and enable precise maneuvering at low speeds. This style is particularly effective in vegetated or structurally complex habitats, allowing for agile turns and station-holding without significant body undulation. In contrast, members of the family Channidae, known as snakeheads, exhibit specialized terrestrial capabilities, crawling overland for short distances using cyclic oscillations of the axial body combined with pectoral fin support to traverse moist substrates between water bodies. Air breathing in Anabantiformes involves routine surfacing to gulp atmospheric oxygen, with the frequency of these events varying based on dissolved oxygen levels in the water; for instance, in the paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis), gulping occurs approximately once per minute under standard laboratory conditions, increasing during hypoxia. In species like Ctenopoma muriei, breathing becomes more frequent and spatially synchronous as oxygen decreases, serving as an obligatory mechanism for buoyancy and equilibrium maintenance. Some species, such as croaking gouramis (Trichopsis spp.), produce audible croaking or chirping sounds during rapid pectoral fin movements associated with surfacing, potentially linked to the mechanics of air intake. Escape responses in Anabantiformes typically include rapid darting motions or seeking refuge in dense vegetation to evade predators, behaviors enhanced by their labriform swimming efficiency. The climbing perch () demonstrates an advanced escape strategy by walking short distances on land, employing uniaxial rotations of the opercular covers for propulsion and traction on substrates, which facilitates movement away from desiccating pools or threats. In oxygen-poor environments, these reduce ventilation rates to conserve energy, minimizing the metabolic costs of aqueous respiration and associated ionoregulatory demands while relying more heavily on aerial oxygen uptake via the labyrinth organ. Many Anabantiformes exhibit crepuscular patterns in air-breathing activity, surfacing more actively and when predation risk from aerial hunters is lower, often favoring shallow, vegetated microhabitats during the day to balance respiratory needs with safety. This temporal and spatial strategy reduces exposure during frequent gulps, linking locomotion directly to survival in hypoxic, predator-rich aquatic systems.

Feeding ecology

Anabantiformes species predominantly exhibit carnivorous diets, feeding on , crustaceans, small , and other invertebrates. In the family Channidae, snakeheads such as Channa consume , frogs, , earthworms, and tadpoles, reflecting their opportunistic predatory nature. Similarly, species in the genus , including Betta splendens, primarily ingest , insect larvae, and small crustaceans. Within the family Osphronemidae, diets are more varied and often omnivorous; for instance, the Osphronemus goramy incorporates aquatic weeds, algae, detritus, , and frogs. Foraging strategies differ by family and habitat. Channidae employ ambush predation, remaining stationary among vegetation or substrate to surprise prey, which enhances their efficiency in shallow waters. Air-breathing taxa like Betta species frequently engage in surface feeding, targeting insects and floating matter accessible at the water-air interface, facilitated by their labyrinth organ. These methods position Anabantiformes as mid-level predators in freshwater ecosystems, controlling invertebrate and small fish populations, though snakeheads often act as apex predators in Asian wetlands due to their size and aggression. Ontogenetic and seasonal variations influence feeding ecology. Juveniles across families, such as in Nandidae, are largely planktivorous, relying on before shifting to more diverse prey as adults. In tropical regions, seasons increase insectivory, as flooding enhances the availability of terrestrial and larvae falling into bodies. Economically, species hold significant value in Indian aquaculture, farmed extensively for human consumption due to their fast growth and market demand. As invasives, however, they disrupt native ecosystems by overpredating local prey, leading to declines in .

Social interactions

Social interactions in Anabantiformes are characterized by a range of agonistic and behaviors that facilitate access and . Territoriality is particularly pronounced among males, especially during breeding periods, where individuals aggressively defend spaces against intruders through displays and physical confrontations. For instance, in Betta splendens, males exhibit intense territorial , including opercular flaring and biting, to establish dominance over limited aquatic territories, a historically exploited in staged fights in . Females in this species display lower levels of , focusing more on guarding rather than overt . In other anabantoids like Trichogaster trichopterus (blue gourami), Colisa lalia (), and Macropodus opercularis (paradise fish), territoriality emerges within 7 days in group settings, peaking at intermediate population densities such as six individuals per tank, where defense of personal space reduces . Hierarchy formation is common in group-living anabantoids, establishing dominance ranks through ritualized displays that minimize injury. In gouramis such as T. trichopterus and C. lalia, hierarchies develop within 3-5 days, involving behaviors like chasing, butting, and -tugging, with dominant individuals suppressing subordinates via opercle spreading ( flaring) and sigmoid posturing. Rank stability varies, but aggression often decreases over time as pecking orders solidify, particularly in unisexual groups where females may show higher aggression rates per interaction than males. In species like the samurai gourami (Sphaerichthys vaillanti), dominant pairs harass subordinates, leading to stress-induced paling in lower-ranked fish to avoid conflict. Schooling behavior is uncommon in Anabantiformes but occurs loosely among juveniles in certain families. Juveniles of Pristolepis marginata (Malabar leaffish, Pristolepididae) form temporary shoals for protection, exhibiting coordinated movements in vegetated habitats before dispersing as adults. This contrasts with the solitary or territorial tendencies of most adults in the order. Interspecific interactions often involve predation, with some Anabantiformes acting as predators on smaller and . Dwarf gouramis (Trichogaster lalius) employ ballistic water-shooting to stun prey, demonstrating specialized hunting tactics that extend to opportunistic predation on conspecifics or other in shared habitats. Certain , such as leaf fishes in Nandidae (e.g., Monocirrhus polyacanthus), engage in camouflage-based interactions with plants, mimicking structures to prey while evading detection by larger predators, effectively using the environment for symbiotic concealment. Communication in Anabantiformes relies heavily on visual and acoustic signals to convey dominance or intent during contests. Visual cues include rapid color changes and erections; for example, male B. splendens flare covers and intensify body coloration to intimidate rivals. Acoustic signals are prominent in species like the croaking (Trichopsis vittata), where males produce low-frequency croaks via pectoral tendon plucking during lateral displays, aiding in territorial disputes without physical contact; these sounds vary by sex and size, with larger sonic muscles enabling more intense calls in males. Such multimodal signaling enhances interaction efficiency in turbid freshwater environments.

Reproduction

Mating systems

Mating systems in Anabantiformes are diverse but predominantly feature polygynous or promiscuous strategies within the suborder , where males often court and spawn with multiple females during a breeding cycle. In species like the climbing perch (), a single male may engage in repeated spawning bouts with one or more females, with matings occurring at intervals of 2-10 minutes over several hours, facilitating polygamic reproduction. This system contrasts with the more pair-oriented behaviors observed in some Channoidei, such as snakeheads ( spp.), where courtship typically involves stable male-female pairs exhibiting synchronized chasing and body touching prior to spawning. Courtship rituals in are elaborate and male-driven, often centered on nest construction to attract females. In (Betta splendens), males build bubble nests by blowing air bubbles coated in oral and , which serve as a visual and structural signal during prespawning displays; these displays include lateral and frontal posturing to entice the female toward the nest. Similarly, in (Osphronemus goramy), males construct nests from plant fibers like palm leaves, arranging them in a basket-like structure over several days, accompanied by aggressive chasing, opercular flaring, and to court receptive females. Chasing and gentle nipping behaviors are common across these displays, escalating as the female approaches the nest, with males in exhibiting up to 678 aggressive or courtship bouts per spawning session to secure . In croaking gourami (Trichopsis vittata), courtship involves vocalizations and fin displays by males, who are typically larger and heavier than females, to initiate pairing. Sexual dimorphism in Anabantiformes supports these mating dynamics, with males generally exhibiting brighter coloration, elongated fins, and more vibrant patterning to enhance visibility during . In paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis), adult males possess extended dorsal, caudal, and anal fins along with intense red and blue hues, distinguishing them from the duller, shorter-finned females and aiding in mate attraction. Honey gourami (Trichogaster chuna) males display striking red-orange body tones with lemon-yellow dorsals, a dimorphism that intensifies during breeding to signal readiness. Females in these species often exercise choice based on male nest quality and display vigor; for instance, in , receptive females preferentially approach males with well-constructed bubble nests, indicating male fitness and territory stability. Hermaphroditism is absent in Anabantiformes, with all species exhibiting gonochoristic sex determination. Breeding in many Anabantiformes is seasonal, triggered by environmental cues such as rains and flooding, which increase water levels and oxygen availability in habitats. In regions like and , species including gouramis and snakeheads initiate courtship and spawning during the period (typically to ), when rising waters provide optimal conditions for nest building and egg dispersal. This timing aligns with heightened resource availability post-flooding, enhancing in these air-breathing fishes. Alternative mating strategies occur in some Channidae, where subordinate males may employ sneaking tactics to intercept spawnings from established pairs, though such behaviors are less documented than in nest-building . In striped snakehead ( striatus), while primary courtship involves paired chasing, opportunistic intrusions by non-territorial males can contribute to fertilization during group spawnings under captive conditions.

Parental care

Parental care in Anabantiformes is diverse but predominantly involves male or biparental investment in and protection, reflecting plesiomorphic traits ancestral to the order Anabantiformes, with variations or losses in some lineages. In the family Osphronemidae, many species are bubble-nest builders, where males construct floating nests from mucus-coated air bubbles often anchored beneath vegetation or artificial substrates; adhesive eggs are deposited into these nests post-spawning, providing a protected aerial environment that enhances oxygenation. In Channidae (Channoidei), biparental care is common, with both parents guarding floating or substrate-adhered eggs and newly hatched fry against predators until the young are free-swimming. Substrate spawning occurs in Nandidae (Nandoidei), where eggs are laid directly on the bottom or attached to surfaces without nest construction, with parental guarding varying among species—absent in some such as certain Nandus and present (e.g., male guarding of eggs on walls) in others like Nandus nebulosus. Mouthbrooding represents another key strategy, primarily paternal in some Osphronemidae such as the chocolate gourami (Sphaerichthys osphromenoides), where males collect fertilized eggs into their oral cavity for incubation lasting 12–16 days until hatching. Contrary to reports in some literature, Helostomatidae like the kissing gourami (Helostoma temminckii) do not exhibit mouthbrooding; instead, they broadcast floating eggs with no oral incubation by either parent. Guarding behaviors are common across caring species, with males or pairs actively fanning eggs or nests to maintain oxygen flow and remove debris, while aggressively defending against predators; such actions significantly boost hatching success, reaching over 90% under parental care compared to about 62% without it. Fry development proceeds rapidly post-hatching, with larvae becoming free-swimming and capable of independent feeding within 1–2 weeks, though the labyrinth organ matures over several additional weeks, a vulnerable phase marked by high mortality rates exceeding 50% in the absence of continued parental protection. Without care, and fry drops sharply due to predation and poor oxygenation, underscoring the adaptive value of these plesiomorphic behaviors in hypoxic habitats.

Taxonomy and evolution

History of classification

The taxonomic history of Anabantiformes reflects a progression from morphological groupings based on the distinctive organ to molecular phylogenies that redefined the order's boundaries and . In the early 19th century, and first recognized the labyrinth fishes as a cohesive assemblage within , designating them "poissons à pharyngiens labyrinthiformes" in their seminal work Histoire naturelle des poissons, which included both the true labyrinth fishes and the snakeheads (Channidae) due to the shared accessory breathing . This initial classification emphasized the suprabranchial organ as a key synapomorphy, placing the group within the broader perciform framework prevalent at the time. By the mid-19th century, refinements separated the Channidae into distinct categories, often as a separate suborder (Channoidei) or even an independent order (Channiformes) within , highlighting morphological divergences such as differences in body form and scale patterns beyond the labyrinth organ. The Anabantoidei were retained as a suborder of , focused on the air-breathing gouramis and allies, with classifications like those of Bleeker (1877) delineating families based on anatomical features of the and jaws. These early schemes underscored the labyrinth organ's role but struggled with the group's placement amid the expansive , sometimes linking it loosely to labroid fishes via pharyngeal jaw specializations. Mid-20th-century revisions, particularly in the and , reinforced the separation of labyrinth fishes as a specialized perciform lineage, with emphasis on functional morphology of air-breathing adaptations. and Liem (1983) offered the inaugural cladistic phylogeny of , partitioning it into five families (Anabantidae, Helostomatidae, Belontiidae, Osphronemidae, and Luciocephalidae) based on labyrinth organ ontogeny, jaw mechanics, and breeding behaviors, while excluding Channidae as more basal. This morphological framework solidified as monophyletic within but questioned close ties to Channoidei. Molecular data from the and early began hinting at a broader encompassing , Channoidei, and related taxa like Nandidae, challenging prior separations. Chen et al. (2003) provided early molecular evidence using mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal genes, recovering and Channoidei as sister groups within a larger acanthomorph , overturning some morphological doubts about their unity. These findings positioned the assemblage within , shifting from traditional perciform confines toward a more inclusive framework influenced by genomic markers. The order Anabantiformes was formally proposed in 2009 by Li et al., who analyzed the nuclear RNF213 gene across acanthomorphs and identified a well-supported (clade F) uniting , Channoidei, and Nandioidei, elevated to ordinal rank based on this molecular evidence complemented by morphological traits like the labyrinth organ's variations. Prior to this, the components were variably synonymized under Labroidei or dispersed within in morphological schemes, but the 2009 synthesis marked a toward integrating molecular data for higher-level fish taxonomy. Subsequent adoptions, such as by Betancur-R et al. (2013), refined and affirmed this structure within a comprehensive bony phylogeny.

Current taxonomy

The order Anabantiformes is currently divided into three suborders: , Channoidei, and Nandioidei, encompassing a total of 8 families, 26 genera, and 287 valid species. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5501477/ The suborder includes three families: Anabantidae (climbing gouramis; 4 genera, 33 species), Helostomatidae (kissing gouramis; 1 genus, 1 species), and Osphronemidae (gouramis and bettas; 14 genera, 141 species), representing the majority of anabantiform diversity with approximately 175 species. The suborder Channoidei comprises two families: Aenigmachannidae (gollum snakeheads; 1 genus, 1 species) and Channidae (snakeheads; 2 genera, 59 species), totaling about 60 species. The family Aenigmachannidae was erected in to accommodate the highly specialized, subterranean snakehead-like fishes discovered in , .https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73129-6 The suborder Nandioidei consists of three families: Nandidae (leaffishes; 1 genus, 8 species), Badidae (chameleonfishes; 2 genera, 36 species), and Pristolepididae (glass leaffishes; 1 genus, 6 species), with roughly 50 species.
SuborderFamiliesGeneraSpecies
Anabantidae, Helostomatidae, Osphronemidae19175
ChannoideiAenigmachannidae, Channidae360
NandioideiNandidae, Badidae, Pristolepididae450
Total826287
Many anabantiform species face conservation challenges, with several listed as threatened on the ; for instance, Badis tuivaiei (Badidae) is classified as Endangered due to restricted range and habitat degradation in , .https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/166951/1155155 https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp In aquaria, hybridization is prevalent, especially within the genus (Osphronemidae), where crosses between species and wild/domestic strains have produced diverse ornamental varieties, complicating conservation efforts for pure lineages.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/441838_DNA_Barcoding_and_Phylogenetics_of_Betta_cf_anabatoides_Based_on_Mitochondrial_Cytochrome_c_oxidase_subunit_I_and_Cytochrome_b_Genes

Phylogenetic relationships

The Anabantiformes form a monophyletic order that is the sister group to the (swamp eels), with the two orders together comprising the Anabantaria clade within the . This relationship is robustly supported by analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences, highlighting shared evolutionary history among these primarily freshwater air-breathing fishes. In broader phylogenetic context, the Anabantaria is positioned within the series of , where it shows close affinities to lineages such as Gobiiformes (gobies) and Kurtiformes (nursefishes), although the precise interrelationships among these groups remain pending further genomic data. This placement underscores the complex diversification of percomorph fishes in tropical and subtropical freshwater and marginal marine habitats. Internally, Anabantiformes exhibit a basal position for the suborder (labyrinth gouramies), with the suborders Channoidei (snakeheads) and Nandioidei (leaffishes and allies) more derived, as resolved in multilocus molecular phylogenies. A key analysis by Collins et al. (2015) using 257 acanthomorph taxa demonstrated that Nandioidei is paraphyletic if lineages such as Pristolepididae are excluded, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive sampling for accurate resolution. Fossil evidence for Anabantiformes includes a well-preserved climbing perch (Anabantidae) from the late () of central , representing one of the earliest records of the group and supporting dispersal from African origins across via tectonic connections. This find, combined with younger records from and , indicates an Eocene-Oligocene radiation tied to paleogeographic changes in . Molecular markers, including (e.g., and 12S rRNA) and nuclear genes (e.g., and ), consistently confirm the of Anabantiformes across studies. The diagnostic labyrinth organ, enabling aerial respiration, has evolved convergently in Anabantiformes and unrelated air-breathing groups like and some catfishes, reflecting parallel adaptations to oxygen-poor waters rather than shared ancestry.

References

  1. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3
  2. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/OrdersSummary.php?order=Anabantiformes
  3. https://etyfish.org/anabantiformes/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/anabantidae
  5. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/channa-striata.html
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023066926
  7. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/taxgroup/fish/docs/SnakeheadRiskAssessment.pdf
  8. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Anabas-testudineus
  9. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Betta-splendens.html
  10. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Channa-nox
  11. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12103
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371740848_Feeding-Related_Skull_Structures_of_Climbing_Perch_Anabas_testudineus_Anabantidae
  13. https://www.seriouslyfish.com/species/badis-badis/
  14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13357
  15. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.029223
  16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30873616/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4212271/
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372975538_Physico-chemical_Parameters_and_Freshwater_Fish_Diversity_of_Sip_River_Madhya_Pradesh_India
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9644288/
  20. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/656307
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2095927319301811
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5606936/
  23. https://www.fisheriesjournal.com/archives/2024/vol12issue4/PartA/12-3-18-765.pdf
  24. https://www.fishbase.se/FieldGuide/FieldGuideSummary.php?genusname=Osphronemus&speciesname=goramy&c_code=764
  25. https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/3/100
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299140896_The_labyrinth_fishes_Teleostei_Anabantoidei_Channoidei_of_Sumatra_Indonesia
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8360206_Evolutionary_and_biogeographic_patterns_of_the_Badidae_Teleostei_Perciformes_inferred_from_mitochondrial_and_nuclear_DNA_sequence_data
  28. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Ecological-Risk-Screening-Summary-Northern-Snakehead.pdf
  29. https://fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=431
  30. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/seasonal-meso-and-microhabitat-selection-northern-snakehead-channa-argus-potomac-river
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313759284_Eocene_actinopterygian_fishes_from_Pakistan_with_the_description_of_a_new_genus_and_species_of_channid_channiformes
  32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzs.12324
  33. https://borea.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/pdfs/Hubert-et-al-dna-2015-0018.pdf
  34. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/55/3/374/1667762
  35. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/where-do-snakeheads-live
  36. https://bioflux.com.ro/docs/2023.2626-2636.pdf
  37. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jez.b.23223
  38. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2024-11/ecological-risk-screening-summary-northern-snakehead.pdf
  39. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.88948
  40. https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2004/1251/report.pdf
  41. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.70154
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7671134/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230006340_Air-breathing_behaviour_of_the_African_anabantoid_fish_Ctenopoma_muriei
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1095643314002438
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227792851_Habitat_use_by_the_African_anabantid_fish_Ctenopoma_muriei_Implications_for_costs_of_air_breathing
  46. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/5144
  47. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/4768
  48. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Osphronemus-goramy
  49. https://www.ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT25APR1354.pdf
  50. https://bettafish.org/care/food-feeding/
  51. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.89026
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10472067/
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373408235_Biological_features_distribution_and_conservation_of_the_near-threatened_Gangetic_leaf_fish_Nandus_nandus_Hamilton_1822_A_review
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6511912/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9334006/
  56. https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/OAS/article/view/4664/4335
  57. https://aquadiction.world/species-spotlight/samurai-gourami/
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289725491_Studies_on_the_reproductive_behaviour_of_the_common_catopra_Pristolepis_marginata_Jerdon_Nandidae-Perciformes_under_captive_conditions
  59. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/224/24/jeb243477/273833/Short-range-hunters-exploring-the-function-and
  60. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1943&context=honors
  61. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jez.2734
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09524622.2022.2086174
  63. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0032945212040169
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273056405_Breeding_Behavior_and_Parental_Care_of_the_Induced_Bred_Striped_Murrel_Channa_striatus_Under_Captive_Conditions
  65. https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/OAS/article/view/4501/4173
  66. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.90746
  67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.23223
  68. https://www.lakeforest.edu/news/a-study-of-female-courtship-behavior-and-mating-preferences-in-betta-splendens
  69. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11146
  70. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086417050085
  71. https://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/50.4/401.pdf
  72. https://www.tfhdigital.com/tfh/february_2015?article_id=1148033
  73. https://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/features/bornean-leaffish-nandus-nebulosus/
  74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-024-01530-5
  75. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Helostoma_temminkii/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790308005526
  77. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00005654
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631069105000703
  79. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0060293
  80. https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp
  81. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12171
  82. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-peabody-museum-of-natural-history/volume-65/issue-1/014.065.0101/Phylogenetic-Classification-of-Living-and-Fossil-Ray-Finned-Fishes-Actinopterygii/10.3374/014.065.0101.full
  83. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00928-9
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.