Hubbry Logo
Circadian rhythmCircadian rhythmMain
Open search
Circadian rhythm
Community hub
Circadian rhythm
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Circadian rhythm
Circadian rhythm
from Wikipedia

Circadian rhythm
Features of the human circadian biological clock based on a person who goes to sleep at 10 PM
Pronunciation
FrequencyRepeats roughly every 24 hours

A circadian rhythm (/sərˈkdiən/), or circadian cycle, is a natural oscillation that repeats roughly every 24 hours. Circadian rhythms can refer to any process that originates within an organism (i.e., endogenous) and responds to the environment (is entrained by the environment). Circadian rhythms are regulated by a circadian clock whose primary function is to rhythmically co-ordinate biological processes so they occur at the correct time to maximize the fitness of an individual. Circadian rhythms have been widely observed in animals, plants, fungi and cyanobacteria and there is evidence that they evolved independently in each of these kingdoms of life.[1][2]

The term circadian comes from the Latin circa, meaning "around", and dies, meaning "day". Processes with 24-hour cycles are more generally called diurnal rhythms; diurnal rhythms should not be called circadian rhythms unless they can be confirmed as endogenous, and not environmental.[3]

Although circadian rhythms are endogenous, they are adjusted to the local environment by external cues called zeitgebers (from German Zeitgeber (German: [ˈtsaɪtˌɡeːbɐ]; lit.'time giver')), which include light, temperature and redox cycles. In clinical settings, an abnormal circadian rhythm in humans is known as a circadian rhythm sleep disorder.[4]

History

[edit]

The earliest recorded account of a circadian process is credited to Theophrastus, dating from the 4th century BC, probably provided to him by report of Androsthenes, a ship's captain serving under Alexander the Great. In his book, 'Περὶ φυτῶν ἱστορία', or 'Enquiry into plants', Theophrastus describes a "tree with many leaves like the rose, and that this closes at night, but opens at sunrise, and by noon is completely unfolded; and at evening again it closes by degrees and remains shut at night, and the natives say that it goes to sleep."[5] The mentioned tree was much later identified as the tamarind tree by the botanist H. Bretzl, in his book on the botanical findings of the Alexandrian campaigns.[6]

The observation of a circadian or diurnal process in humans is mentioned in Chinese medical texts dated to around the 13th century, including the Noon and Midnight Manual and the Mnemonic Rhyme to Aid in the Selection of Acu-points According to the Diurnal Cycle, the Day of the Month and the Season of the Year.[7]

In 1729, French scientist Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan conducted the first experiment designed to distinguish an endogenous clock from responses to daily stimuli. He noted that 24-hour patterns in the movement of the leaves of the plant Mimosa pudica persisted, even when the plants were kept in constant darkness.[8][9]

In 1896, Patrick and Gilbert observed that during a prolonged period of sleep deprivation, sleepiness increases and decreases with a period of approximately 24 hours.[10] In 1918, J. S. Szymanski showed that animals are capable of maintaining 24-hour activity patterns in the absence of external cues such as light and changes in temperature.[11]

In the early 20th century, circadian rhythms were noticed in the rhythmic feeding times of bees. Auguste Forel, Ingeborg Beling, and Oskar Wahl conducted numerous experiments to determine whether this rhythm was attributable to an endogenous clock.[12] The existence of circadian rhythm was independently discovered in fruit flies in 1935 by two German zoologists, Hans Kalmus and Erwin Bünning.[13][14]

In 1954, an important experiment reported by Colin Pittendrigh demonstrated that eclosion (the process of pupa turning into adult) in Drosophila pseudoobscura was a circadian behaviour. He demonstrated that while temperature played a vital role in eclosion rhythm, the period of eclosion was delayed but not stopped when temperature was decreased.[15][14]

The term circadian was coined by Franz Halberg in 1959.[16] According to Halberg's original definition:

The term "circadian" was derived from circa (about) and dies (day); it may serve to imply that certain physiologic periods are close to 24 hours, if not exactly that length. Herein, "circadian" might be applied to all "24-hour" rhythms, whether or not their periods, individually or on the average, are different from 24 hours, longer or shorter, by a few minutes or hours.[17][18]

In 1977, the International Committee on Nomenclature of the International Society for Chronobiology formally adopted the definition:

Circadian: relating to biologic variations or rhythms with a frequency of 1 cycle in 24 ± 4 h; circa (about, approximately) and dies (day or 24 h). Note: term describes rhythms with an about 24-h cycle length, whether they are frequency-synchronized with (acceptable) or are desynchronized or free-running from the local environmental time scale, with periods of slightly yet consistently different from 24-h.[19]

Ron Konopka and Seymour Benzer identified the first clock mutation in Drosophila in 1971, naming the gene "period" (per) gene, the first discovered genetic determinant of behavioral rhythmicity.[20] The per gene was isolated in 1984 by two teams of researchers. Konopka, Jeffrey Hall, Michael Roshbash, and their team showed that the per locus is the centre of the circadian rhythm, and that loss of per stops circadian activity.[21][22] At the same time, Michael W. Young's team reported similar effects of per, and that the gene covers 7.1-kilobase (kb) interval on the X chromosome and encodes a 4.5-kb poly(A)+ RNA.[23][24] They went on to discover the key genes and neurones in Drosophila circadian system, for which Hall, Rosbash, and Young received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2017.[25]

Joseph Takahashi discovered the first mammalian circadian clock mutation (clockΔ19) using mice in 1994.[26][27] However, recent studies show that deletion of clock does not lead to a behavioral phenotype (the animals still have normal circadian rhythms), which questions its importance in rhythm generation.[28][29]

The first human clock mutation was identified in an extended Utah family by Chris Jones, and genetically characterized by Ying-Hui Fu and Louis Ptacek. Affected individuals are extreme 'morning larks' with 4-hour advanced sleep and other rhythms. This form of familial advanced sleep phase syndrome is caused by a single amino acid change, S662➔G, in the human PER2 protein.[30][31]

Criteria

[edit]

To be called circadian, a biological rhythm must meet these three general criteria:[32]

  1. The rhythm has an endogenously derived free-running period of time that lasts approximately 24 hours. The rhythm persists in constant conditions, i.e. constant darkness, with a period of about 24 hours. The period of the rhythm in constant conditions is called the free-running period and is denoted by the Greek letter τ (tau). The rationale for this criterion is to distinguish circadian rhythms from simple responses to daily external cues. A rhythm cannot be said to be endogenous unless it has been tested and persists in conditions without external periodic input. In diurnal animals (active during daylight hours), in general τ is slightly greater than 24 hours, whereas, in nocturnal animals (active at night), in general τ is shorter than 24 hours.[citation needed]
  2. The rhythms are entrainable. The rhythm can be reset by exposure to external stimuli (such as light and heat), a process called entrainment. The external stimulus used to entrain a rhythm is called the zeitgeber, or "time giver". Travel across time zones illustrates the ability of the human biological clock to adjust to the local time; a person will usually experience jet lag before entrainment of their circadian clock has brought it into sync with local time.
  3. The rhythms exhibit temperature compensation. In other words, they maintain circadian periodicity over a range of physiological temperatures. Many organisms live at a broad range of temperatures, and differences in thermal energy will affect the kinetics of all molecular processes in their cell(s). In order to keep track of time, the organism's circadian clock must maintain roughly a 24-hour periodicity despite the changing kinetics, a property known as temperature compensation. The Q10 temperature coefficient is a measure of this compensating effect. If the Q10 coefficient remains approximately 1 as temperature increases, the rhythm is considered to be temperature-compensated.

Origin

[edit]

Circadian rhythms allow organisms to anticipate and prepare for precise and regular environmental changes. They thus enable organisms to make better use of environmental resources (e.g. light and food) compared to those that cannot predict such availability. It has therefore been suggested that circadian rhythms put organisms at a selective advantage in evolutionary terms. However, rhythmicity appears to be as important in regulating and coordinating internal metabolic processes, as in coordinating with the environment.[33] This is suggested by the maintenance (heritability) of circadian rhythms in fruit flies after several hundred generations in constant laboratory conditions,[34] as well as in creatures in constant darkness in the wild, and by the experimental elimination of behavioral—but not physiological—circadian rhythms in quail.[35][36]

What drove circadian rhythms to evolve has been an enigmatic question. Previous hypotheses emphasized that photosensitive proteins and circadian rhythms may have originated together in the earliest cells, with the purpose of protecting replicating DNA from high levels of damaging ultraviolet radiation during the daytime. As a result, replication was relegated to the dark. However, evidence for this is lacking: in fact the simplest organisms with a circadian rhythm, the cyanobacteria, do the opposite of this: they divide more in the daytime.[37] Recent studies instead highlight the importance of co-evolution of redox proteins with circadian oscillators in all three domains of life following the Great Oxidation Event approximately 2.3 billion years ago.[1][4] The current view is that circadian changes in environmental oxygen levels and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the presence of daylight are likely to have driven a need to evolve circadian rhythms to preempt, and therefore counteract, damaging redox reactions on a daily basis.

The simplest known circadian clocks are bacterial circadian rhythms, exemplified by the prokaryote cyanobacteria. Recent research has demonstrated that the circadian clock of Synechococcus elongatus can be reconstituted in vitro with just the three proteins (KaiA, KaiB, KaiC)[38] of their central oscillator. This clock has been shown to sustain a 22-hour rhythm over several days upon the addition of ATP. Previous explanations of the prokaryotic circadian timekeeper were dependent upon a DNA transcription/translation feedback mechanism.[citation needed]

A defect in the human homologue of the Drosophila "period" gene was identified as a cause of the sleep disorder FASPS (Familial advanced sleep phase syndrome), underscoring the conserved nature of the molecular circadian clock through evolution. Many more genetic components of the biological clock are now known. Their interactions result in an interlocked feedback loop of gene products resulting in periodic fluctuations that the cells of the body interpret as a specific time of the day.[39]

It is now known that the molecular circadian clock can function within a single cell. That is, it is cell-autonomous.[40] This was shown by Gene Block in isolated mollusk basal retinal neurons (BRNs).[41] At the same time, different cells may communicate with each other resulting in a synchronized output of electrical signaling. These may interface with endocrine glands of the brain to result in periodic release of hormones. The receptors for these hormones may be located far across the body and synchronize the peripheral clocks of various organs. Thus, the information of the time of the day as relayed by the eyes travels to the clock in the brain, and, through that, clocks in the rest of the body may be synchronized. This is how the timing of, for example, sleep/wake, body temperature, thirst, and appetite are coordinately controlled by the biological clock.[42][43]

Importance in animals

[edit]

Circadian rhythmicity is present in the sleeping and feeding patterns of animals, including human beings. There are also clear patterns of core body temperature, brain wave activity, hormone production, cell regeneration, and other biological activities. In addition, photoperiodism, the physiological reaction of organisms to the length of day or night, is vital to both plants and animals, and the circadian system plays a role in the measurement and interpretation of day length. Timely prediction of seasonal periods of weather conditions, food availability, or predator activity is crucial for survival of many species. Although not the only parameter, the changing length of the photoperiod (day length) is the most predictive environmental cue for the seasonal timing of physiology and behavior, most notably for timing of migration, hibernation, and reproduction.[44]

Effect of circadian disruption

[edit]

Mutations or deletions of clock genes in mice have demonstrated the importance of body clocks to ensure the proper timing of cellular/metabolic events; clock-mutant mice are hyperphagic and obese, and have altered glucose metabolism.[45] In mice, deletion of the Rev-ErbA alpha clock gene can result in diet-induced obesity and changes the balance between glucose and lipid utilization, predisposing to diabetes.[46] However, it is not clear whether there is a strong association between clock gene polymorphisms in humans and the susceptibility to develop the metabolic syndrome.[47][48]

Effect of light–dark cycle

[edit]

The rhythm is linked to the light–dark cycle. Animals, including humans, kept in total darkness for extended periods eventually function with a free-running rhythm. Their sleep cycle is pushed back or forward each "day", depending on whether their "day", their endogenous period, is shorter or longer than 24 hours. The environmental cues that reset the rhythms each day are called zeitgebers.[49] Totally blind subterranean mammals (e.g., blind mole rat Spalax sp.) are able to maintain their endogenous clocks in the apparent absence of external stimuli. Although they lack image-forming eyes, their photoreceptors (which detect light) are still functional; they do surface periodically as well.[page needed][50]

Free-running organisms that normally have one or two consolidated sleep episodes will still have them when in an environment shielded from external cues, but the rhythm is not entrained to the 24-hour light–dark cycle in nature. The sleep–wake rhythm may, in these circumstances, become out of phase with other circadian or ultradian rhythms such as metabolic, hormonal, CNS electrical, or neurotransmitter rhythms.[51]

Recent research has influenced the design of spacecraft environments, as systems that mimic the light–dark cycle have been found to be highly beneficial to astronauts.[unreliable medical source?][52] Light therapy has been trialed as a treatment for sleep disorders.

Arctic animals

[edit]

Norwegian researchers at the University of Tromsø have shown that some Arctic animals (e.g., ptarmigan, reindeer) show circadian rhythms only in the parts of the year that have daily sunrises and sunsets. In one study of reindeer, animals at 70 degrees North showed circadian rhythms in the autumn, winter and spring, but not in the summer. Reindeer on Svalbard at 78 degrees North showed such rhythms only in autumn and spring. The researchers suspect that other Arctic animals as well may not show circadian rhythms in the constant light of summer and the constant dark of winter.[53]

A 2006 study in northern Alaska found that day-living ground squirrels and nocturnal porcupines strictly maintain their circadian rhythms through 82 days and nights of sunshine. The researchers speculate that these two rodents notice that the apparent distance between the sun and the horizon is shortest once a day, and thus have a sufficient signal to entrain (adjust) by.[54]

Butterflies and moths

[edit]

The navigation of the fall migration of the Eastern North American monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) to their overwintering grounds in central Mexico uses a time-compensated sun compass that depends upon a circadian clock in their antennae.[55][56] Circadian rhythm is also known to control mating behavioral in certain moth species such as Spodoptera littoralis, where females produce a specific pheromone that attracts and resets the male circadian rhythm to induce mating at night.[57]

Other synchronizers of circadian rhythms

[edit]

Although light is the primary synchronizer of the circadian rhythm through the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), other environmental signals also influence the biological clock. Feeding plays a key role in regulating peripheral clocks found in the liver, muscles, and adipose tissues. Time-restricted feeding can adjust these clocks by modifying light signals. Additionally, physical activity affects the circadian phase, notably by adjusting melatonin production and body temperature. Temperature itself is an important synchronizer, capable of modifying cellular circadian rhythms. Finally, stress and the release of glucocorticoids influence the expression of clock genes, potentially disrupting biological cycles. Integrating these factors is essential for understanding circadian rhythms beyond simple light regulation.[58]

In plants

[edit]
Sleeping tree by day and night

Plant circadian rhythms tell the plant what season it is and when to flower for the best chance of attracting pollinators. Behaviors showing rhythms include leaf movement (Nyctinasty), growth, germination, stomatal/gas exchange, enzyme activity, photosynthetic activity, and fragrance emission, among others.[59] Circadian rhythms occur as a plant entrains to synchronize with the light cycle of its surrounding environment. These rhythms are endogenously generated, self-sustaining and are relatively constant over a range of ambient temperatures. Important features include two interacting transcription-translation feedback loops: proteins containing PAS domains, which facilitate protein-protein interactions; and several photoreceptors that fine-tune the clock to different light conditions. Anticipation of changes in the environment allows appropriate changes in a plant's physiological state, conferring an adaptive advantage.[60] A better understanding of plant circadian rhythms has applications in agriculture, such as helping farmers stagger crop harvests to extend crop availability and securing against massive losses due to weather.

Light is the signal by which plants synchronize their internal clocks to their environment and is sensed by a wide variety of photoreceptors. Red and blue light are absorbed through several phytochromes and cryptochromes. Phytochrome A, phyA, is light labile and allows germination and de-etiolation when light is scarce.[61] Phytochromes B–E are more stable with phyB, the main phytochrome in seedlings grown in the light. The cryptochrome (cry) gene is also a light-sensitive component of the circadian clock and is thought to be involved both as a photoreceptor and as part of the clock's endogenous pacemaker mechanism. Cryptochromes 1–2 (involved in blue–UVA) help to maintain the period length in the clock through a whole range of light conditions.[59][60]

Graph showing two pairs of rhythmic timeseries, peaking at alternating times of day, over six, 24-hour cycles.
Graph showing timeseries data from bioluminescence imaging of circadian reporter genes. Transgenic seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana were imaged by a cooled CCD camera under three cycles of 12h light: 12h dark followed by 3 days of constant light (from 96h). Their genomes carry firefly luciferase reporter genes driven by the promoter sequences of clock genes. The signals of seedlings 61 (red) and 62 (blue) reflect transcription of the gene CCA1, peaking after lights-on (48h, 72h, etc.). Seedlings 64 (pale grey) and 65 (teal) reflect TOC1, peaking before lights-off (36h, 60h, etc.). The timeseries show 24-hour, circadian rhythms of gene expression in the living plants.

The central oscillator generates a self-sustaining rhythm and is driven by two interacting feedback loops that are active at different times of day. The morning loop consists of CCA1 (Circadian and Clock-Associated 1) and LHY (Late Elongated Hypocotyl), which encode closely related MYB transcription factors that regulate circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis, as well as PRR 7 and 9 (Pseudo-Response Regulators.) The evening loop consists of GI (Gigantea) and ELF4, both involved in regulation of flowering time genes.[62][63] When CCA1 and LHY are overexpressed (under constant light or dark conditions), plants become arrhythmic, and mRNA signals reduce, contributing to a negative feedback loop. Gene expression of CCA1 and LHY oscillates and peaks in the early morning, whereas TOC1 gene expression oscillates and peaks in the early evening. While it was previously hypothesised that these three genes model a negative feedback loop in which over-expressed CCA1 and LHY repress TOC1 and over-expressed TOC1 is a positive regulator of CCA1 and LHY,[60] it was shown in 2012 by Andrew Millar and others that TOC1, in fact, serves as a repressor not only of CCA1, LHY, and PRR7 and 9 in the morning loop but also of GI and ELF4 in the evening loop. This finding and further computational modeling of TOC1 gene functions and interactions suggest a reframing of the plant circadian clock as a triple negative-component repressilator model rather than the positive/negative-element feedback loop characterizing the clock in mammals.[64]

In 2018, researchers found that the expression of PRR5 and TOC1 hnRNA nascent transcripts follows the same oscillatory pattern as processed mRNA transcripts rhythmically in A. thaliana. LNKs binds to the 5'region of PRR5 and TOC1 and interacts with RNAP II and other transcription factors. Moreover, RVE8-LNKs interaction enables a permissive histone-methylation pattern (H3K4me3) to be modified and the histone-modification itself parallels the oscillation of clock gene expression.[65]

It has previously been found that matching a plant's circadian rhythm to its external environment's light and dark cycles has the potential to positively affect the plant.[66] Researchers came to this conclusion by performing experiments on three different varieties of Arabidopsis thaliana. One of these varieties had a normal 24-hour circadian cycle.[66] The other two varieties were mutated, one to have a circadian cycle of more than 27 hours, and one to have a shorter than normal circadian cycle of 20 hours.[66]

The Arabidopsis with the 24-hour circadian cycle was grown in three different environments.[66] One of these environments had a 20-hour light and dark cycle (10 hours of light and 10 hours of dark), the other had a 24-hour light and dark cycle (12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark), and the final environment had a 28-hour light and dark cycle (14 hours of light and 14 hours of dark).[66] The two mutated plants were grown in both an environment that had a 20-hour light and dark cycle and in an environment that had a 28-hour light and dark cycle.[66] It was found that the variety of Arabidopsis with a 24-hour circadian rhythm cycle grew best in an environment that also had a 24-hour light and dark cycle.[66] Overall, it was found that all the varieties of Arabidopsis thaliana had greater levels of chlorophyll and increased growth in environments whose light and dark cycles matched their circadian rhythm.[66]

Researchers suggested that a reason for this could be that matching an Arabidopsis's circadian rhythm to its environment could allow the plant to be better prepared for dawn and dusk, and thus be able to better synchronize its processes.[66] In this study, it was also found that the genes that help to control chlorophyll peaked a few hours after dawn.[66] This appears to be consistent with the proposed phenomenon known as metabolic dawn.[67]

According to the metabolic dawn hypothesis, sugars produced by photosynthesis have potential to help regulate the circadian rhythm and certain photosynthetic and metabolic pathways.[67][68] As the sun rises, more light becomes available, which normally allows more photosynthesis to occur.[67] The sugars produced by photosynthesis repress PRR7.[69] This repression of PRR7 then leads to the increased expression of CCA1.[69] On the other hand, decreased photosynthetic sugar levels increase PRR7 expression and decrease CCA1 expression.[67] This feedback loop between CCA1 and PRR7 is what is proposed to cause metabolic dawn.[67][70]

In Drosophila

[edit]
Key centers of the mammalian and Drosophila brains (A) and the circadian system in Drosophila (B)

The molecular mechanism of circadian rhythm and light perception are best understood in Drosophila. Clock genes are discovered from Drosophila, and they act together with the clock neurones. There are two unique rhythms, one during the process of hatching (called eclosion) from the pupa, and the other during mating.[71] The clock neurones are located in distinct clusters in the central brain. The best-understood clock neurones are the large and small lateral ventral neurons (l-LNvs and s-LNvs) of the optic lobe. These neurones produce pigment dispersing factor (PDF), a neuropeptide that acts as a circadian neuromodulator between different clock neurones.[72]

Molecular interactions of clock genes and proteins during Drosophila circadian rhythm

Drosophila circadian rhythm is through a transcription-translation feedback loop. The core clock mechanism consists of two interdependent feedback loops, namely the PER/TIM loop and the CLK/CYC loop.[73] The CLK/CYC loop occurs during the day and initiates the transcription of the per and tim genes. But their proteins levels remain low until dusk, because during daylight also activates the doubletime (dbt) gene. DBT protein causes phosphorylation and turnover of monomeric PER proteins.[74][75] TIM is also phosphorylated by shaggy until sunset. After sunset, DBT disappears, so that PER molecules stably bind to TIM. PER/TIM dimer enters the nucleus several at night, and binds to CLK/CYC dimers. Bound PER completely stops the transcriptional activity of CLK and CYC.[76]

In the early morning, light activates the cry gene and its protein CRY causes the breakdown of TIM. Thus PER/TIM dimer dissociates, and the unbound PER becomes unstable. PER undergoes progressive phosphorylation and ultimately degradation. Absence of PER and TIM allows activation of clk and cyc genes. Thus, the clock is reset to start the next circadian cycle.[77]

PER-TIM model

[edit]

This protein model was developed based on the oscillations of the PER and TIM proteins in the Drosophila.[78] It is based on its predecessor, the PER model where it was explained how the PER gene and its protein influence the biological clock.[79] The model includes the formation of a nuclear PER-TIM complex which influences the transcription of the PER and the TIM genes (by providing negative feedback) and the multiple phosphorylation of these two proteins. The circadian oscillations of these two proteins seem to synchronise with the light-dark cycle even if they are not necessarily dependent on it.[80][78] Both PER and TIM proteins are phosphorylated and after they form the PER-TIM nuclear complex they return inside the nucleus to stop the expression of the PER and TIM mRNA. This inhibition lasts as long as the protein, or the mRNA is not degraded.[78] When this happens, the complex releases the inhibition. Here can also be mentioned that the degradation of the TIM protein is sped up by light.[80]

In mammals

[edit]
A variation of an eskinogram illustrating the influence of light and darkness on circadian rhythms and related physiology and behavior through the suprachiasmatic nucleus in humans

The primary circadian clock in mammals is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (or nuclei) (SCN), a pair of distinct groups of cells located in the hypothalamus. Destruction of the SCN results in the complete absence of a regular sleep–wake rhythm. The SCN receives information about illumination through the eyes. The retina of the eye contains "classical" photoreceptors ("rods" and "cones"), which are used for conventional vision. But the retina also contains specialized ganglion cells that are directly photosensitive, and project directly to the SCN, where they help in the entrainment (synchronization) of this master circadian clock. The proteins involved in the SCN clock are homologous to those found in the fruit fly.[81]

These cells contain the photopigment melanopsin and their signals follow a pathway called the retinohypothalamic tract, leading to the SCN. If cells from the SCN are removed and cultured, they maintain their own rhythm in the absence of external cues.[82]

The SCN takes the information on the lengths of the day and night from the retina, interprets it, and passes it on to the pineal gland, a tiny structure shaped like a pine cone and located on the epithalamus. In response, the pineal secretes the hormone melatonin.[83] Secretion of melatonin peaks at night and ebbs during the day and its presence provides information about night-length.

Several studies have indicated that pineal melatonin feeds back on SCN rhythmicity to modulate circadian patterns of activity and other processes. However, the nature and system-level significance of this feedback are unknown.[84]

The circadian rhythms of humans can be entrained to slightly shorter and longer periods than the Earth's 24 hours. Researchers at Harvard have shown that human subjects can at least be entrained to a 23.5-hour cycle and a 24.65-hour cycle.[85]

Humans

[edit]
When eyes receive light from the sun, the pineal gland's production of melatonin is inhibited, and the hormones produced keep the human awake. When the eyes do not receive light, melatonin is produced in the pineal gland and the human becomes tired.

Early research into circadian rhythms suggested that most people preferred a day closer to 25 hours when isolated from external stimuli like daylight and timekeeping. However, this research was faulty because it failed to shield the participants from artificial light. Although subjects were shielded from time cues (like clocks) and daylight, the researchers were not aware of the phase-delaying effects of indoor electric lights.[86][dubiousdiscuss] The subjects were allowed to turn on light when they were awake and to turn it off when they wanted to sleep. Electric light in the evening delayed their circadian phase.[87] A more stringent study conducted in 1999 by Harvard University estimated the natural human rhythm to be closer to 24 hours and 11 minutes: much closer to the solar day.[88] Consistent with this research was a more recent study from 2010, which also identified sex differences, with the circadian period for women being slightly shorter (24.09 hours) than for men (24.19 hours).[89] In this study, women tended to wake up earlier than men and exhibit a greater preference for morning activities than men, although the underlying biological mechanisms for these differences are unknown.[89]

Biological markers and effects

[edit]

The classic phase markers for measuring the timing of a mammal's circadian rhythm are:

For temperature studies, subjects must remain awake but calm and semi-reclined in near darkness while their rectal temperatures are taken continuously. Though variation is great among normal chronotypes, the average human adult's temperature reaches its minimum at about 5:00 a.m., about two hours before habitual wake time. Baehr et al.[92] found that, in young adults, the daily body temperature minimum occurred at about 04:00 (4 a.m.) for morning types, but at about 06:00 (6 a.m.) for evening types. This minimum occurred at approximately the middle of the eight-hour sleep period for morning types, but closer to waking in evening types.

Melatonin is absent from the system or undetectably low during daytime. Its onset in dim light, dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO), at roughly 21:00 (9 p.m.) can be measured in the blood or the saliva. Its major metabolite can also be measured in morning urine. Both DLMO and the midpoint (in time) of the presence of the hormone in the blood or saliva have been used as circadian markers. However, newer research indicates that the melatonin offset may be the more reliable marker. Benloucif et al.[90] found that melatonin phase markers were more stable and more highly correlated with the timing of sleep than the core temperature minimum. They found that both sleep offset and melatonin offset are more strongly correlated with phase markers than the onset of sleep. In addition, the declining phase of the melatonin levels is more reliable and stable than the termination of melatonin synthesis.

Other physiological changes that occur according to a circadian rhythm include heart rate and many cellular processes "including oxidative stress, cell metabolism, immune and inflammatory responses,[93] epigenetic modification, hypoxia/hyperoxia response pathways, endoplasmic reticular stress, autophagy, and regulation of the stem cell environment."[94] In a study of young men, it was found that the heart rate reaches its lowest average rate during sleep, and its highest average rate shortly after waking.[95]

In contradiction to previous studies, it has been found that there is no effect of body temperature on performance on psychological tests. This is likely due to evolutionary pressures for higher cognitive function compared to the other areas of function examined in previous studies.[96]

Outside the "master clock"

[edit]

More-or-less independent circadian rhythms are found in many organs and cells in the body outside the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the "master clock". Indeed, neuroscientist Joseph Takahashi and colleagues stated in a 2013 article that "almost every cell in the body contains a circadian clock".[97] For example, these clocks, called peripheral oscillators, have been found in the adrenal gland, oesophagus, lungs, liver, pancreas, spleen, thymus, and skin.[98][99][100] There is also some evidence that the olfactory bulb[101] and prostate[102] may experience oscillations, at least when cultured.

Though oscillators in the skin respond to light, a systemic influence has not been proven.[103] In addition, many oscillators, such as liver cells, for example, have been shown to respond to inputs other than light, such as feeding.[104]

Light and the biological clock

[edit]
CircadianLux light that support circadian rhythm indoors
CircadianLux light at the JCCPA that support circadian rhythm indoors

Light resets the biological clock in accordance with the phase response curve (PRC). Depending on the timing, light can advance or delay the circadian rhythm. Both the PRC and the required illuminance vary from species to species, and lower light levels are required to reset the clocks in nocturnal rodents than in humans.[105] Light systems designed to support circadian rhythms, such as the CircadianLux ceiling round, can dynamically adjust lighting levels based on metrics such as melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (M-EDI), aiming to better support the biological clock[106].

Enforced longer or shorter cycles

[edit]

Various studies on humans have made use of enforced sleep/wake cycles strongly different from 24 hours, such as those conducted by Nathaniel Kleitman in 1938 (28 hours) and Derk-Jan Dijk and Charles Czeisler in the 1990s (20 hours). Because people with a normal (typical) circadian clock cannot entrain to such abnormal day/night rhythms,[107] this is referred to as a forced desynchrony protocol. Under such a protocol, sleep and wake episodes are uncoupled from the body's endogenous circadian period, which allows researchers to assess the effects of circadian phase (i.e., the relative timing of the circadian cycle) on aspects of sleep and wakefulness including sleep latency and other functions - both physiological, behavioral, and cognitive.[108][109][110][111][112]

Studies also show that Cyclosa turbinata is unique in that its locomotor and web-building activity cause it to have an exceptionally short-period circadian clock, about 19 hours. When C. turbinata spiders are placed into chambers with periods of 19, 24, or 29 hours of evenly split light and dark, none of the spiders exhibited decreased longevity in their own circadian clock. These findings suggest that C. turbinata do not have the same costs of extreme desynchronization as do other species of animals.

Human health

[edit]
A short nap during the day does not affect circadian rhythms.

Foundation of circadian medicine

[edit]

The leading edge of circadian biology research is translation of basic body clock mechanisms into clinical tools, and this is especially relevant to the treatment of cardiovascular disease.[113][114][115][116] Timing of medical treatment in coordination with the body clock, chronotherapeutics, may also benefit patients with hypertension (high blood pressure) by significantly increasing efficacy and reduce drug toxicity or adverse reactions.[117] 3) "Circadian Pharmacology" or drugs targeting the circadian clock mechanism have been shown experimentally in rodent models to significantly reduce the damage due to heart attacks and prevent heart failure.[118] Importantly, for rational translation of the most promising Circadian Medicine therapies to clinical practice, it is imperative that we understand how it helps treat disease in both biological sexes.[119][120][121][122]

Causes of disruption to circadian rhythms

[edit]

Indoor lighting

[edit]

Lighting requirements for circadian regulation are not simply the same as those for vision; planning of indoor lighting in offices and institutions is beginning to take this into account.[123] Animal studies on the effects of light in laboratory conditions have until recently considered light intensity (irradiance) but not color, which can be shown to "act as an essential regulator of biological timing in more natural settings".[124]

Blue LED lighting suppresses melatonin production five times more than the orange-yellow high-pressure sodium (HPS) light; a metal halide lamp, which is white light, suppresses melatonin at a rate more than three times greater than HPS.[125] Depression symptoms from long term nighttime light exposure can be undone by returning to a normal cycle.[126]

Airline pilots and cabin crew

[edit]

Due to the nature of work of airline pilots, who often cross several time zones and regions of sunlight and darkness in one day, and spend many hours awake both day and night, they are often unable to maintain sleep patterns that correspond to the natural human circadian rhythm; this situation can easily lead to fatigue. The NTSB cites this as contributing to many accidents,[127] and has conducted several research studies in order to find methods of combating fatigue in pilots.[128]

Effect of drugs

[edit]

Studies conducted on both animals and humans show major bidirectional relationships between the circadian system and abusive drugs. It is indicated that these abusive drugs affect the central circadian pacemaker. Individuals with substance use disorder display disrupted rhythms. These disrupted rhythms can increase the risk for substance abuse and relapse. It is possible that genetic and/or environmental disturbances to the normal sleep and wake cycle can increase the susceptibility to addiction.[129]

It is difficult to determine if a disturbance in the circadian rhythm is at fault for an increase in prevalence for substance abuse—or if other environmental factors such as stress are to blame. Changes to the circadian rhythm and sleep occur once an individual begins abusing drugs and alcohol. Once an individual stops using drugs and alcohol, the circadian rhythm continues to be disrupted.[129]

Alcohol consumption disrupts circadian rhythms, with acute intake causing dose-dependent alterations in melatonin and cortisol levels, as well as core body temperature, which normalize the following morning, while chronic alcohol use leads to more severe and persistent disruptions that are associated with alcohol use disorders (AUD) and withdrawal symptoms.[130]

The stabilization of sleep and the circadian rhythm might possibly help to reduce the vulnerability to addiction and reduce the chances of relapse.[129]

Circadian rhythms and clock genes expressed in brain regions outside the suprachiasmatic nucleus may significantly influence the effects produced by drugs such as cocaine.[131] Moreover, genetic manipulations of clock genes profoundly affect cocaine's actions.[132]

Consequences of disruption to circadian rhythms

[edit]

Disruption

[edit]

Disruption to rhythms usually has a negative effect. Many travelers have experienced the condition known as jet lag, with its associated symptoms of fatigue, disorientation and insomnia.[133]

A number of other disorders, such as bipolar disorder, depression, and some sleep disorders such as delayed sleep phase disorder (DSPD), are associated with irregular or pathological functioning of circadian rhythms.[134][135][136][137]

Disruption to rhythms in the longer term is believed to have significant adverse health consequences for peripheral organs outside the brain, in particular in the development or exacerbation of cardiovascular disease.[138][139]

Studies have shown that maintaining normal sleep and circadian rhythms is important for many aspects of brain and health.[138] A number of studies have also indicated that a power-nap, a short period of sleep during the day, can reduce stress and may improve productivity without any measurable effect on normal circadian rhythms.[140][141][142] Circadian rhythms also play a part in the reticular activating system, which is crucial for maintaining a state of consciousness. A reversal[clarification needed] in the sleep–wake cycle may be a sign or complication of uremia,[143] azotemia or acute kidney injury.[144][145] Studies have also helped elucidate how light has a direct effect on human health through its influence on the circadian biology.[146]

Relationship with cardiovascular disease

[edit]

One of the first studies to determine how disruption of circadian rhythms causes cardiovascular disease was performed in the Tau hamsters, which have a genetic defect in their circadian clock mechanism.[147] When maintained in a 24-hour light-dark cycle that was "out of sync" with their normal 22 circadian mechanism they developed profound cardiovascular and renal disease; however, when the Tau animals were raised for their entire lifespan on a 22-hour daily light-dark cycle they had a healthy cardiovascular system.[147] The adverse effects of circadian misalignment on human physiology has been studied in the laboratory using a misalignment protocol,[148][149] and by studying shift workers.[113][150][151] Circadian misalignment is associated with many risk factors of cardiovascular disease. High levels of the atherosclerosis biomarker, resistin, have been reported in shift workers indicating the link between circadian misalignment and plaque build up in arteries.[151] Additionally, elevated triacylglyceride levels (molecules used to store excess fatty acids) were observed and contribute to the hardening of arteries, which is associated with cardiovascular diseases including heart attack, stroke and heart disease.[151][152] Shift work and the resulting circadian misalignment is also associated with hypertension.[153]

Obesity and diabetes

[edit]

Obesity and diabetes are associated with lifestyle and genetic factors. Among those factors, disruption of the circadian clockwork and/or misalignment of the circadian timing system with the external environment (e.g., light–dark cycle) can play a role in the development of metabolic disorders.[138]

Shift work or chronic jet lag have profound consequences for circadian and metabolic events in the body. Animals that are forced to eat during their resting period show increased body mass and altered expression of clock and metabolic genes.[154][152] In humans, shift work that favours irregular eating times is associated with altered insulin sensitivity, diabetes and higher body mass.[153][152][155]

Cognitive effects

[edit]

Reduced cognitive function has been associated with circadian misalignment. Chronic shift workers display increased rates of operational error, impaired visual-motor performance and processing efficacy which can lead to both a reduction in performance and potential safety issues.[156] Increased risk of dementia is associated with chronic night shift workers compared to day shift workers, particularly for individuals over 50 years old.[157][158][159]

Society and culture

[edit]

In 2017, Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael W. Young, and Michael Rosbash were awarded Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine "for their discoveries of molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian rhythm".[160][161]

Circadian rhythms was taken as an example of scientific knowledge being transferred into the public sphere.[162]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Circadian rhythms are endogenous biological processes that display an endogenous, entrainable oscillation of about 24 hours, regulating a wide array of physiological, behavioral, and metabolic functions in nearly all organisms, from microorganisms to humans, and are primarily synchronized by external cues such as and . These rhythms, derived from the Latin circa diem meaning "about a day," enable organisms to anticipate and adapt to daily environmental changes, coordinating activities like sleep-wake cycles, release, body fluctuations, and feeding patterns. At the core of mammalian circadian regulation is the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a small cluster of neurons in the hypothalamus that functions as the master biological clock, receiving light input directly from the retina via the retinohypothalamic tract to synchronize rhythms across the body. This central pacemaker interacts with peripheral clocks in individual tissues and organs, such as the liver, heart, and muscles, which maintain their own oscillatory mechanisms but are coordinated by the SCN to ensure systemic harmony. Molecularly, circadian rhythms are driven by interconnected transcriptional-translational feedback loops involving core clock genes like BMAL1, CLOCK, PER, and CRY, where proteins accumulate and degrade in a cyclic manner to generate the approximately 24-hour periodicity; this mechanism was elucidated through pioneering work by researchers Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash, and Michael W. Young, who received the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries. External factors known as zeitgebers, including light, temperature, meal timing, and social cues, entrain these internal clocks, with light being the dominant signal that suppresses melatonin production from the pineal gland during the day and promotes it at night to facilitate sleep. Circadian rhythms play a critical role in maintaining health by optimizing energy , immune function, cognitive performance, and cardiovascular stability, with disruptions—such as those caused by , , exposure to artificial light, or sleeping primarily during daylight hours (e.g., from 5 a.m. to 2 p.m.)—leading to circadian misalignment by conflicting with the natural light-dark cycle, similar to shift work disorder or delayed sleep-wake phase disorder, and associated with poor sleep quality as well as increased risks of metabolic disorders including and , cardiovascular disease, mood disturbances including depression, and certain cancers. In humans, these rhythms influence nearly every organ system, from the endocrine regulation of and to gastrointestinal and reproductive cycles, underscoring their evolutionary conservation across for survival advantages in predictable daily environments. Research continues to explore therapeutic interventions, such as timed light exposure and chronopharmacology, to mitigate circadian misalignment and its associated pathologies.

Fundamentals

Definition and Criteria

A circadian rhythm is an endogenous that displays an endogenous, self-sustained with a periodicity of approximately 24 hours, generated by internal molecular mechanisms within cells and tissues, and capable of being synchronized or entrained by external environmental cues known as zeitgebers, such as light-dark cycles. These rhythms coordinate physiological and behavioral functions to align with the daily environmental cycle driven by . Unlike directly driven responses to external stimuli, circadian rhythms persist autonomously, reflecting an adaptive internal timing system present in nearly all organisms from to humans. True circadian rhythms are distinguished by specific empirical criteria that confirm their endogenous nature. First, they exhibit a free-running period under constant environmental conditions (e.g., constant or ), where the rhythm continues without external timing cues, typically lasting about 24 hours but varying slightly by species or individual (e.g., 23-25 hours in humans). Second, they demonstrate temperature compensation, meaning the period length remains relatively stable across a range of physiological temperatures, quantified by a low (Q10) of approximately 1 (typically 0.85 < Q10 < 1.15), preventing significant alterations from thermal fluctuations. Third, these rhythms show persistence across generations, underpinned by a genetic basis, as supported by twin studies estimating for traits like and hormone rhythms at 40-50%. Circadian rhythms differ from other biological oscillations in their temporal scale. Ultradian rhythms have periods shorter than 24 hours, often ranging from 20 minutes to several hours, and include processes like or pulsatile hormone secretion. In contrast, infradian rhythms extend beyond 24 hours, encompassing cycles such as the menstrual period (about 28 days) or seasonal breeding patterns. Observable manifestations of circadian rhythms include the sleep-wake cycle, where peaks during the day and sleepiness rises at night under normal light entrainment, and rhythmic hormone release, such as the peak of production in the evening to promote onset.

Endogenous Generation and Periodicity

Circadian rhythms are generated by endogenous pacemakers that function as self-sustaining oscillators, capable of maintaining rhythmic activity independent of external environmental cues. In mammals, the primary pacemaker resides in the (SCN) of the , a small cluster of approximately 20,000 neurons that coordinates timing across the body through neural and hormonal signals. These SCN neurons exhibit autonomous oscillatory properties, with individual cells acting as coupled oscillators that collectively produce a coherent ~24-hour , even when isolated . Similar self-sustained oscillators are found in peripheral tissues and non-mammalian organisms, such as the KaiC protein-based clock in , underscoring the intrinsic nature of these biological timers. The periodicity of circadian rhythms is characteristically close to 24 hours, derived from the Latin "circadian" meaning "about a day" (circa diem), though the exact length varies slightly among individuals and . In humans, the endogenous free-running period typically averages around 24.2 hours, with a range of approximately 23.5 to 25 hours, reflecting genetic and physiological differences. This near-24-hour cycle ensures alignment with the solar day under normal conditions but reveals its intrinsic length when external zeitgebers are absent. For instance, studies have shown that African-American individuals may exhibit slightly shorter periods compared to other groups, highlighting population-level variations. Free-running experiments, conducted in controlled environments devoid of time cues, demonstrate the persistence and drift of these endogenous rhythms. Pioneering bunker studies by Jürgen Aschoff in the isolated human subjects in underground facilities without access to light-dark cycles or clocks, revealing periods often exceeding 24 hours—typically 25 hours or more—leading to a gradual phase drift relative to . In one such experiment lasting 24 days, physiological markers like body temperature, urine output, and sleep-wake cycles maintained rhythmicity but desynchronized from external 24-hour time, confirming the self-sustained nature of the human pacemaker. These findings established that without entrainment, circadian rhythms free-run at their intrinsic pace, often resulting in sleep-wake misalignment over time. A defining feature of circadian oscillators is temperature compensation, which maintains period stability across a wide range of physiological temperatures, typically from 10°C to 30°C, with a quality factor (Q10) near 1—indicating minimal period change despite doubled reaction rates at higher temperatures. This mechanism, first rigorously demonstrated in by Colin Pittendrigh in the 1950s, counters the general temperature sensitivity of biochemical reactions, ensuring reliable timing in fluctuating environments. In the SCN, compensation involves balanced adjustments in clock protein interactions and degradation rates, preventing period lengthening or shortening with temperature shifts.

Historical Development

Early Observations

The earliest recorded observations of daily biological rhythms trace back to ancient times. In the 4th century BCE, the Greek philosopher and naturalist , in his work Enquiry into Plants, described rhythmic movements in various , including the opening and closing of flowers and the lifting and lowering of leaves in response to day-night transitions. These accounts, building on earlier reports like those from Androsthenes during Alexander the Great's campaigns—who described daily leaf movements of the tamarind tree (Tamarindus indica) folding at night—highlighted predictable diurnal patterns in plant behavior but did not yet distinguish between external influences and internal drivers. Scientific inquiry advanced significantly in the with Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan's pioneering experiment on the sensitive plant . By isolating the plant in constant darkness, de Mairan observed that its leaves continued to exhibit opening during the subjective day and closing at night with a period close to 24 hours, persisting for several days without light cues. He presciently suggested this rhythm mirrored the sleep-wake cycles of bedridden humans, implying a shared endogenous mechanism independent of external environmental signals. In the , further plant studies refined these insights, while initial explorations extended to animals and s. Augustin Pyramus de Candolle's 1832 observations on confirmed a free-running period of approximately 22-23 hours in constant conditions and demonstrated that the rhythm could invert when light-dark cycles were reversed, establishing the capacity for synchronization to environmental zeitgebers. Concurrently, early chronobiological notes on human patterns emerged, with Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland in 1797 documenting 24-hour variations in bodily functions like pulse and temperature, and Julien-Joseph Virey in 1814 observing lowest heart rates in the early morning hours, linking these to . Observations of movements in flowers, such as diurnal opening in heliotropic species, paralleled these findings and reinforced the ubiquity of daily cycles across organisms. Prior to de Mairan's demonstration of persistence in constant conditions, a common misconception held that these rhythms were passive, direct responses to environmental cues like or changes, rather than driven by internal oscillators. This view persisted in some early interpretations, attributing plant "sleep" solely to external stimuli, until experiments revealed the autonomous of the cycles.

Key Discoveries and Nobel Recognition

In 1959, Franz Halberg coined the term "circadian" to describe biological rhythms approximately 24 hours in duration that persist endogenously, deriving it from the Latin words circa (about) and dies (day), thereby emphasizing the self-sustained nature of these internal clocks. Halberg's work laid foundational terminology and promoted the emerging field of , which integrates the study of biological timekeeping across organisms. Concurrently, in the 1950s and 1960s, Colin Pittendrigh advanced understanding of circadian systems through experiments on fruit flies, demonstrating how light-dark cycles entrain internal rhythms and proposing that organisms possess multiple coupled oscillators to coordinate diverse physiological processes. A major breakthrough came in 1971 when Seymour Benzer and Ronald Konopka isolated three mutants in Drosophila melanogaster that disrupted normal 24-hour rhythms: one arrhythmic mutant lacking any detectable periodicity, a short-period mutant with a ~19-hour cycle, and a long-period mutant with a ~28-hour cycle. These mutations, all mapping to the same locus on the X chromosome, indicated a single gene—later named period (per)—controls the core oscillator underlying eclosion and locomotor activity rhythms, providing the first genetic evidence for a molecular clock mechanism. Building on this genetic foundation, , , and elucidated the molecular basis of circadian rhythms in the 1980s and 1990s, identifying the period gene's protein product (PER) and the interacting timeless (TIM) protein, which form a feedback loop to regulate daily oscillations. Their discoveries revealed how PER and TIM accumulate at night to inhibit their own , ensuring a self-sustaining ~24-hour cycle conserved across species. For these contributions, Hall, Rosbash, and Young were awarded the 2017 in Physiology or Medicine, recognizing the profound impact of their work on understanding , , and disease.

Evolutionary Origins

In Microorganisms

Circadian rhythms in microorganisms represent some of the most primitive forms of biological timekeeping, primarily studied in prokaryotes like and extending to unicellular eukaryotes such as . These rhythms enable single-celled organisms to anticipate daily environmental changes, optimizing metabolic processes in the absence of complex neural or tissue-based synchronization. In , circadian oscillations are driven by post-translational mechanisms rather than the transcription-translation feedback loops prevalent in higher organisms, highlighting their ancient and conserved evolutionary role. The foundational discovery of circadian rhythms in prokaryotes occurred in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus in 1998, when researchers identified rhythmic gene expression persisting under constant light conditions, demonstrating an endogenous ~24-hour cycle independent of external cues. This finding established cyanobacteria as a model for microbial clocks. At the core of the cyanobacterial system are the kaiA, kaiB, and kaiC proteins, which form a post-translational oscillator through cyclic phosphorylation of KaiC, driven by ATP hydrolysis and modulated by KaiA activation and KaiB sequestration, resulting in robust ~24-hour rhythms observable even in vitro. Recent analyses of ancestral Kai proteins suggest the self-sustained ~24-hour oscillations emerged around 2.3 billion years ago, coinciding with the Great Oxidation Event and Snowball Earth glaciations, enhancing adaptation to fluctuating oxygen levels. These rhythms confer adaptive advantages, particularly for photosynthetic , by temporally coordinating to align carbon fixation and energy production with daylight hours, thereby maximizing . Additionally, the clock facilitates against diurnal stressors like ultraviolet (UV) radiation by scheduling and antioxidant defenses during low-light periods, reducing oxidative damage from generated during . Circadian-like oscillations have been documented in other prokaryotes beyond cyanobacteria, such as the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where gene expression exhibits ~20.5-hour rhythms under aerobic conditions, influenced by oxygen levels and suggesting a broader distribution of prokaryotic timekeeping mechanisms. In unicellular algae, such as Gonyaulax polyedra and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, endogenous circadian rhythms regulate bioluminescence, motility, and cell division, with periods adjustable by environmental zeitgebers like light. These microbial clocks likely originated around 2.5 billion years ago, coinciding with the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis in cyanobacteria during the Great Oxidation Event, which imposed daily redox fluctuations that selected for temporal organization of metabolism. This prokaryotic foundation underscores the deep evolutionary conservation of circadian systems, with core elements persisting into eukaryotic lineages.

Conservation Across Eukaryotes

Circadian rhythms exhibit remarkable conservation across eukaryotic organisms, from unicellular algae to multicellular animals, plants, and fungi, with genomic evidence suggesting that core components of the transcription-translation feedback loops likely trace back to early eukaryotic evolution, potentially the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) around 1-1.8 billion years ago. Genomic evidence supports this, as core clock components and transcription-translation feedback loops (TTFLs) are present in diverse eukaryotic lineages, with structural similarities in protein domains such as PAS (PER-ARNT-SIM) enabling analogous functions despite sequence divergence. For instance, functional homologs of animal clock genes like CLOCK and BMAL1 are seen in the fungal White Collar complex (WC-1 and WC-2), which share PAS domain motifs and activate clock gene transcription; similarly, PERIOD (PER) and CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) have counterparts in plant CRY1/CRY2 photoreceptors and fungal FREQUENCY (FRQ), all contributing to negative feedback regulation. In fungi, the Neurospora crassa exemplifies this conserved architecture through its FRQ-WC feedback loop, where the WC complex (WC-1/WC-2) transcriptionally activates the frq gene during the subjective day, and accumulating FRQ protein represses WC activity via direct interaction and phosphorylation-mediated degradation, generating ~22-hour oscillations. This loop adapts to environmental fluctuations, including availability, by partitioning metabolic processes—such as promoting during the day and at night—and gating responses to via pathways like GCN2, which modulates histone acetylation under limitation to fine-tune clock robustness. Such adaptations highlight how fungal clocks, evolutionarily akin to those in and animals, integrate daily cycles to optimize growth and stress tolerance. The persistence of these mechanisms confers evolutionary advantages by enabling anticipatory timing, allowing eukaryotes to preempt daily environmental shifts like light exposure or resource scarcity, thereby enhancing survival and fitness. For example, clock-regulated coordinates ~25% of the Neurospora genome and similar proportions in , synchronizing physiological processes to external cycles and reducing waste during mismatched conditions. This selective pressure, evident from the broad distribution across eukaryotic supergroups, underscores the clock's role in adapting to a rotating , with genomic phylogenies tracing its origins to pre-LECA diversification.

Molecular Mechanisms

Core Clock Genes and Proteins

The core circadian clock is driven by a set of conserved genes and their protein products that form the molecular basis for rhythm generation across diverse organisms. These components include the period (per), timeless (tim), clock (Clk), cycle (cyc)/brain and muscle ARNT-like 1 (Bmal1), and (cry) genes, which encode proteins essential for timing mechanisms. The PERIOD (PER) protein, first identified in Drosophila through mutations in the per gene, accumulates in a rhythmic manner and functions as a key repressor of clock gene transcription. Similarly, the TIMELESS (TIM) protein, discovered as a partner to PER in flies, stabilizes PER and facilitates its nuclear entry to inhibit transcription. In contrast, the CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) or BMAL1 proteins form a heterodimeric complex that acts as a transcriptional activator, binding to promoter elements to drive expression of per, tim, and cry genes. (CRY) proteins, encoded by cry genes, serve as repressors by interacting with PER and TIM (or their mammalian orthologs) to suppress CLK-CYC/BMAL1 activity, thereby closing the feedback loop. These core components exhibit remarkable conservation across species, with orthologs performing analogous roles in insects, mammals, and . In Drosophila, the PER-TIM complex represses CLK-CYC, while in mammals, PER1-3 and CRY1-2 proteins inhibit the CLOCK-BMAL1 heterodimer, maintaining similar activator-repressor dynamics. Plants utilize related mechanisms, with genes like TOC1 acting as evening-phase components and CCA1/LHY as morning-phase repressors that bind to promoters analogous to E-boxes, underscoring evolutionary preservation of clock architecture. Mutations in these genes disrupt circadian rhythmicity, highlighting their indispensable roles. For instance, the per^0 null mutation in Drosophila abolishes PER protein function, resulting in complete arrhythmicity of locomotor behavior under constant conditions, as the flies lose the ability to sustain rhythmic gene expression. Similar loss-of-function effects in tim, Clk, cyc/Bmal1, and cry mutants lead to diminished or absent rhythms, confirming these proteins as foundational elements of the clock.

Transcription-Translation Feedback Loops

The transcription-translation feedback loop (TTFL) constitutes the core oscillatory mechanism of the mammalian , generating approximately 24-hour rhythms through cyclic . In this model, a positive limb drives transcription, while a negative limb provides repression, with post-translational modifications ensuring the appropriate timing for sustained oscillations. The positive limb involves the heterodimerization of CLOCK and BMAL1 proteins, which bind to canonical enhancer sequences (CACGTG) in the promoters of target genes, including Per1, Per2, Per3, Cry1, and Cry2, thereby activating their transcription primarily during the subjective day. These mRNAs are translated into PER and CRY proteins that accumulate in the . In the negative limb, PER and CRY proteins form hetero-oligomeric complexes that translocate to the nucleus during the subjective night, where they directly interact with and inhibit the transcriptional activation potential of the CLOCK-BMAL1 complex, repressing their own transcription and resetting the cycle. To prevent indefinite accumulation and achieve a ~24-hour periodicity, the levels of PER and CRY proteins are tightly regulated by timed degradation. of PER by kinases 1ε (CK1ε) and 1δ (CK1δ) creates recognition sites for E3 ligases, such as FBXL3, leading to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, which peaks in the early subjective day and allows renewed CLOCK-BMAL1 activity. This delayed , combined with the time required for transcription, translation, and nuclear entry, contributes to the circadian period length. A simplified mathematical representation of the PER protein dynamics within the TTFL can be expressed as: d[PER]dt=ktranskdeg[PER]\frac{d[PER]}{dt} = k_{trans} - k_{deg}[PER] where ktransk_{trans} represents the rate of PER synthesis, which is activated by CLOCK-BMAL1 levels and modulated by the , and kdegk_{deg} is the degradation rate influenced by and ubiquitination; this illustrates the balance leading to oscillatory behavior when embedded in the full loop. For enhanced stability and robustness against perturbations, the primary TTFL is interlocked with secondary loops. Notably, REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ nuclear receptors, also induced by CLOCK-BMAL1 via E-boxes, bind to response elements (ROREs) in the Bmal1 promoter to repress its transcription in an antiphase manner to Per and Cry, thereby fine-tuning the amplitude and phase of the core oscillator. These auxiliary loops buffer the system, ensuring persistent rhythms even under varying cellular conditions.

Entrainment and Synchronization

Role of Light as Zeitgeber

Light serves as the primary , or time-giver, for entraining circadian rhythms to the external 24-hour day-night cycle by resetting the internal clock through phase shifts. This entrainment occurs via the (PRC), which describes the magnitude and direction of phase shifts induced by exposure depending on its timing relative to the circadian phase. For instance, in the early subjective night the clock, while in the late subjective night or early subjective day advances it, allowing gradual alignment with local . For practical application in humans, morning bright light exposure, such as sunlight obtained by opening curtains or taking an outdoor walk, is the strongest aid to shift the circadian rhythm earlier through phase advance, promoting natural evening tiredness and morning alertness. In humans, a typical PRC to a 1-hour of bright white shows maximum advances of about 1-2 hours when administered near the end of the habitual episode and of similar magnitude in the biological evening. In mammals, light detection for circadian entrainment is mediated primarily by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which express the photopigment and project to the (SCN), the master circadian pacemaker. These ipRGCs respond maximally to short-wavelength blue light around 480 nm, integrating signals from and cones for sustained responses during prolonged exposure. In contrast, in , the (CRY) acts as the principal circadian photoreceptor, absorbing blue light (peaking at approximately 450 nm) to directly inhibit the TIM protein in the clock feedback loop, thereby resetting the rhythm. The capacity for light-driven entrainment has practical limits, typically allowing phase shifts of no more than 1-3 hours per day to avoid prolonged transients or desynchronization. Rapid transmeridian travel, such as in , exemplifies this constraint, where the SCN and peripheral clocks temporarily misalign with the new light-dark cycle, leading to symptoms until re-entrainment occurs over several days. Light intensity and spectral composition further modulate efficacy; blue-enriched light (450-480 nm) is particularly potent, suppressing nocturnal production in a dose-dependent manner at intensities as low as 40 , with peak sensitivity at 460 nm. In contrast, for evening or nighttime lighting to aid sleep, warm colors such as red, amber, and orange are recommended because their longer wavelengths minimally interfere with the circadian rhythm by not significantly suppressing melatonin production.

Non-Photic Synchronizers

Non-photic synchronizers, also known as secondary zeitgebers, are environmental and behavioral cues that entrain circadian rhythms independently of , primarily influencing peripheral clocks and, to a lesser extent, the central (SCN). These cues play a supportive role in , particularly under conditions where exposure is limited or irregular, such as in or constant environments. Unlike the dominant photic entrainment, non-photic signals often act through metabolic, social, thermal, or arousal-related pathways, helping to align physiological processes across tissues. Feeding and fasting cycles serve as potent non-photic zeitgebers that entrain peripheral circadian clocks in tissues like the liver and via nutrient-sensing pathways. Meal timing regulates the expression of core clock genes such as Per2 and Rev-erbα through activation of SIRT1, a NAD+-dependent deacetylase that modulates and clock protein stability, and AMPK, an energy sensor that phosphorylates clock components in response to availability. For instance, time-restricted feeding, such as consuming meals within an 8-10 hour window starting early in the day, enhances SIRT1 and AMPK activity, improving insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake while resetting peripheral rhythms to align with feeding schedules; this effect is evident in models where restricted feeding shifts hepatic clock phases by up to 4-6 hours independently of the SCN. In humans, early consumption similarly boosts SIRT1-AMPK interactions, promoting metabolic and reducing postprandial glucose excursions compared to late or skipped meals. Social cues from conspecifics or scheduled human interactions can entrain circadian rhythms by conveying temporal information through sensory modalities like olfaction, vibration, or auditory signals. In social animals such as honeybees, exposure to colony activity synchronizes individual clocks to the group phase, overriding conflicting light-dark cycles; this non-contact entrainment occurs via volatile pheromones and vibrations, stabilizing rhythms after 48 hours of exposure and demonstrating social cues' potency in collective synchronization. In mammals, including , social interactions with active conspecifics induce phase shifts in locomotor activity, mediated by pathways. For humans, scheduled social events like work shifts act as weak but cumulative zeitgebers, influencing sleep-wake cycles and onset in environments with dim light, though their effects are less robust than in highly social species and often require consistent repetition to entrain rhythms. Temperature cycles function as zeitgebers with varying efficacy across organisms, exerting stronger entrainment in poikilotherms than in homeotherms due to differences in . In poikilotherms like and , daily fluctuations, often of low (1–2°C), directly synchronize clocks by altering enzymatic rates in feedback loops, producing phase-dependent advances or delays of up to several hours. Homeotherms, such as mammals and birds, exhibit weaker responses because of physiological compensation mechanisms that maintain stable core body , buffering direct clock effects; however, low- cycles (e.g., 3-5°C variations) can still entrain peripheral tissues , as shown in chick pineal cells where Q10 values near 1 indicate temperature-compensated periodicity (22-25 hours) across 34-40°C. This compensation ensures stability despite environmental changes, preventing desynchronization in species. Exercise and states of arousal, including stress-induced activity, induce phase shifts in circadian rhythms primarily through neurochemical signaling, acting as non-photic entrainers that are phase-dependent and most effective in the evening or nocturnal periods. Physical activity, such as moderate-to-intense treadmill running or wheel access in rodents, advances the circadian phase by 30-50 minutes when performed in the evening, suppressing melatonin synthesis acutely and altering its onset timing via sympathetic activation; these shifts diminish after repeated bouts but facilitate adaptation to phase delays like those in jet lag. The underlying mechanisms involve serotonin (5-HT) modulation of SCN neuronal firing and locomotor entrainment, where elevated 5-HT during arousal inhibits photic inputs and promotes non-photic phase advances, as seen in hamster models. Additionally, glucocorticoid signaling, such as cortisol release during exercise, coordinates peripheral clock alignment by binding to receptors that regulate Per and Cry genes, enhancing synchronization in tissues like the adrenal gland and muscle.

Circadian Rhythms in Organisms

In Plants

In plants, the circadian clock is primarily studied in the Arabidopsis thaliana, where it operates through transcription-translation feedback loops (TTFLs) involving core genes such as TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1), LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), and CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1). These components form a central loop in which CCA1 and LHY accumulate in the morning to repress evening-phased genes like TOC1, which in turn represses their transcription later in the day, ensuring rhythmic over approximately 24 hours. Repression is further mediated by the evening complex (EC), a tripartite consisting of EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3), ELF4, and LUX ARRHYTHMO (LUX), which binds to evening elements in target promoters to inhibit transcription of clock and output genes during the night. This architecture allows plants to anticipate daily environmental changes, coordinating physiological processes with light-dark cycles. Circadian outputs in plants regulate key adaptive traits, including stomatal opening, hypocotyl elongation, and volatile emissions. Stomatal apertures, which facilitate and , exhibit diurnal rhythms driven by the clock, with openings peaking in the morning to maximize while minimizing water loss during midday heat. elongation in seedlings is gated by the clock, restricting growth to dawn and early morning to optimize capture during de-etiolation. Floral volatile emissions are timed to coincide with activity, such as diurnal peaks in scent release from petals that attract specific , enhancing by synchronizing with pollinator rhythms. Entrainment of the plant clock relies on environmental cues, with light serving as the primary through photoreceptors like and cryptochromes. , particularly phytochrome A and B, sense red and far-red light to phase-advance or delay the clock, integrating shade avoidance and photoperiod signals into rhythmic outputs. Cryptochromes respond to blue light, shortening the period under high-intensity illumination and stabilizing morning-phased clock components like CCA1. entrainment involves ELF3, which acts as a thermosensor in the EC to modulate clock phase and , enabling adaptation to diurnal fluctuations by adjusting repression of target genes. Agriculturally, plant circadian rhythms influence flowering time through interactions with , where clock genes like LHY and CCA1 gate the expression of floral integrators such as FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), promoting bloom under long-day conditions to align reproduction with favorable seasons. This regulation has implications for optimization, as synchronizing clock function with environmental cues—via breeding or chronoculture practices like timed applications—can enhance efficiency, stress tolerance, and accumulation, potentially increasing productivity in staple crops like and .

In Invertebrates

Circadian rhythms in invertebrates are exemplified by the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, which serves as a primary model organism due to its genetic tractability and conserved molecular mechanisms. In Drosophila, approximately 150 clock neurons in the brain coordinate daily rhythms, with the small ventral lateral neurons (s-LNv) acting as key pacemakers that drive behavioral outputs through neuropeptide signaling. The molecular clock in Drosophila relies on a transcription-translation feedback loop involving core clock genes. The PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm during the night, forming a complex that enters the nucleus to inhibit the transcription factors CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC), which activate per and tim expression. Light entrainment occurs via CRYPTOCHROME (CRY), which binds to the PER-TIM complex upon illumination, marking it for degradation and resetting the clock. These rhythms manifest in behaviors such as eclosion (adult emergence from the pupal case), which peaks at dawn in a , and locomotor activity, which shows bimodal patterns with activity bouts at dawn and dusk. Drosophila also exhibits sleep-like rest states during the night, characterized by reduced movement and increased arousal thresholds, regulated by the same clock neurons. In other , circadian clocks support and . Migratory monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) use antennal circadian clocks to time-compensate their sun orientation, enabling accurate southward flight during seasonal migration; disrupting these antennal clocks impairs directional accuracy. Similarly, honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers rely on an internal to adjust their sun for and to time visits to rewarding flowers based on solar position, with period gene expression rhythms correlating to activity. Drosophila's advantages as a model include its short generation time (about 10 days), enabling rapid genetic screens, and the use of forward and to identify over 20 clock genes, providing insights into conserved mechanisms across species.

In Vertebrates and Mammals

In vertebrates, circadian rhythms are orchestrated by a hierarchical system of clocks, with the (SCN) serving as the central master clock located in the anterior of the . This nucleus coordinates daily physiological and behavioral rhythms across the body through a combination of neural projections to other brain regions and hormonal signals, such as those influencing release from the and from the adrenal glands. In mammals, the SCN comprises approximately 20,000 neurons that function as coupled oscillators, maintaining robust ~24-hour periodicity even when isolated . Peripheral circadian clocks in mammals operate in various tissues, including the liver, heart, kidney, and pancreas, where they exhibit semi-autonomous oscillations driven by the same core clock genes as the SCN but can be entrained by the master clock via systemic signals like glucocorticoids and feeding cues. These peripheral oscillators regulate local processes, with rhythmic expression affecting roughly 5-20% of the transcriptome in tissues such as the liver, where thousands of genes cycle to control metabolism and detoxification. Although capable of independent operation under certain conditions, such as in organ explants, peripheral clocks typically align with the SCN to ensure organism-wide coherence. Variations in circadian organization appear across vertebrate classes, adapting to specific ecological needs. In fish, autonomous circadian clocks within the retina regulate local photoreceptor responses and release, facilitating visual adaptation to diurnal light cycles without reliance on the brain's central pacemaker. Amphibians demonstrate peripheral clock involvement in physiology, where circadian rhythms drive melanophore movements that cause daily color changes for and , as observed in species like the toad Bufo ictericus. In humans, the intrinsic free-running period of the circadian system averages approximately 24.2 hours under constant conditions, slightly longer than the solar day and necessitating daily entrainment for alignment with the environment. Genetic variations, such as missense mutations in the PER2 gene (e.g., S662G), underlie familial advanced phase , shortening the circadian period and advancing sleep-wake timing by several hours, as identified in affected pedigrees.

Physiological Importance

Regulation of Behavior and Metabolism

Circadian rhythms profoundly influence the sleep-wake cycle through the orchestrated release of key hormones. , synthesized by the , exhibits a peak secretion during the night, promoting onset and maintenance by suppressing alertness and lowering core body temperature. In contrast, levels, regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, rise sharply in the early morning, enhancing vigilance and energy mobilization to facilitate awakening. These hormonal oscillations ensure adaptive alignment of rest and activity with environmental light-dark cycles. The also governs metabolic processes, particularly the handling of glucose and , to optimize . Core clock genes like BMAL1 drive rhythmic expression of metabolic enzymes in peripheral tissues such as the liver and adipose, synchronizing nutrient uptake and storage with daily feeding patterns. Disruption of BMAL1, as seen in adipocyte-specific mice, leads to and impaired due to deregulated and fat accumulation. Similarly, global BMAL1 deficiency results in loss of circadian rhythms and altered glucose tolerance, underscoring the clock's role in preventing metabolic dysregulation. Behavioral patterns, including locomotor activity, are temporally structured by the circadian system, distinguishing nocturnal species that are active at night from diurnal ones active during the day. The coordinates these rhythms, ensuring activity aligns with optimal environmental conditions for and survival. further exemplifies this control, with the clock gene PER2 in modulating uncoupling protein 1 expression to generate heat rhythmically, particularly during the active phase. Interactions between the and immune function enable timed inflammatory responses, preventing excessive tissue damage. Clock genes such as BMAL1 in macrophages regulate the daily oscillation of cytokine production, peaking during the rest phase to confine to periods of lower activity. This cross-talk ensures that immune vigilance synchronizes with behavioral and metabolic states, maintaining overall physiological balance.

Effects of Disruption

Disruption of circadian rhythms, such as through or , leads to acute physiological and cognitive impairments. For example, sleep schedules involving primarily daytime sleep, such as from 5 a.m. to 2 p.m., conflict with the natural light-dark cycle as the primary zeitgeber, producing circadian misalignment similar to shift work or delayed sleep-wake phase disorder. This misalignment typically reduces sleep quality and increases risks of metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, mood disturbances, and other health problems. , characterized by grogginess and reduced alertness upon awakening, is exacerbated by circadian misalignment, with the most severe cognitive deficits occurring when waking aligns with the biological night due to an endogenous circadian rhythm in performance. Impaired , including deficits in , formation, and executive function, arises from desynchronized neural processes, as disruptions in the signaling impair tonic and phasic alertness. Mood alterations, such as increased and depressive symptoms, stem from desynchronized and rhythms; elevated during inappropriate times heightens stress responses, while blunted melatonin secretion disrupts emotional regulation. Seasonal variations in daylight can also disrupt circadian synchronization, particularly in winter with shorter days and earlier darkness. This leads to phase delays in the biological clock relative to the sleep-wake cycle, resulting in daytime lethargy and hypersomnia, as well as non-restorative sleep and potential nighttime insomnia, creating a vicious cycle of further misalignment. Such disruptions are evident in seasonal affective disorder (SAD), where reduced morning light exposure delays melatonin onset and exacerbates sleepiness, especially in higher latitudes. Chronic circadian disruption imposes broader health risks, particularly elevating cancer incidence. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies involving circadian disruption as a probable (Group 2A), based on limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in experimental animals linking suppressed to tumorigenesis. Immune suppression is another key consequence, as misalignment reduces activity and pro-inflammatory production, increasing vulnerability to infections and potentially aiding cancer progression. Animal models illustrate these effects mechanistically. In mice exposed to constant light, tumor growth rates accelerate due to altered host and inflammatory responses that favor an obesogenic environment conducive to . Special cases highlight adaptive variations and vulnerabilities. animals, such as and ptarmigan, often exhibit constant activity without overt circadian rhythms during polar day or night, maintaining health through flexible entrainment to non-photic cues like social interactions, avoiding typical disruption penalties. In contrast, disruption causes navigation errors in ; discordant antennal and circadian clocks in monarchs impair time-compensated sun orientation, leading to misdirected migration paths.

Human Applications and Health

Circadian Medicine and Chronotherapy

Circadian medicine encompasses therapeutic approaches that leverage the body's endogenous 24-hour rhythms to optimize treatment outcomes, particularly by aligning interventions with variations in and physiological processes. A foundational aspect is the circadian variability in , where enzymes such as and transporters like ATP-binding cassette proteins exhibit rhythmic expression, influencing drug absorption, distribution, , and by up to several-fold over the day. This 24-hour fluctuation can significantly affect therapeutic and toxicity; for instance, clinical studies have demonstrated that timing antihypertensive medications in the evening reduces cardiovascular events by aligning with nocturnal dips. Chronotherapy, the administration of treatments at specific times to match circadian biology, has shown promise in by exploiting rhythmic variations in tumor and host detoxification capacity. In liver clock-driven , drugs like 5-fluorouracil exhibit peak tolerability during the rest phase when catabolic enzymes such as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase are most active. Randomized clinical trials in metastatic patients using chronomodulated infusions of , , and 5-fluorouracil reported nearly doubled objective response rates and up to five-fold reductions in severe toxicities compared to constant-rate delivery. These gains, observed in international multicenter studies, underscore chronotherapy's potential to improve the by 20-50% in terms of survival and side effect profiles, though outcomes vary by patient and tumor type. Light therapy serves as a non-pharmacological chronotherapeutic tool, particularly for mood disorders linked to circadian misalignment. For seasonal affective disorder (SAD), morning administration of bright light (typically 10,000 lux for 30 minutes) advances the circadian phase, mimicking natural dawn to counteract winter-induced delays and alleviate depressive symptoms. Additionally, morning bright light exposure, such as natural sunlight obtained by opening curtains or taking an outdoor walk, is the strongest aid to shift the circadian rhythm earlier, promoting natural evening tiredness and morning alertness. Dawn simulation, which gradually increases light intensity over 30-60 minutes upon waking, achieves remission rates comparable to or exceeding traditional bright light therapy, with response rates up to 60% in controlled trials. This approach resets the suprachiasmatic nucleus clock via intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, enhancing serotonin signaling and sleep-wake regulation. Recent advances post-2020 have expanded circadian medicine through targeted clock modulation and behavioral interventions. Small-molecule stabilizers like M54 selectively enhance CRY1 activity, countering mutations associated with familial and potentially treating by lengthening circadian periods in preclinical models. Similarly, selective CRY1/CRY2 agonists, such as compounds 11 and 12, have been developed to fine-tune amplitude for sleep-wake disorders, showing promise in cellular assays for phase adjustment without broad . Time-restricted eating (TRE), confining caloric intake to a 8-10 hour window, aligns feeding with active phases to restore peripheral clocks disrupted in ; pilot clinical trials in patients with and reported 3-5% , improved insulin sensitivity, and reduced over 12 weeks, outperforming unrestricted diets. These strategies highlight circadian medicine's shift toward precision timing for enhanced metabolic and neurological health.

Societal Impacts and Interventions

Modern lifestyles often disrupt circadian rhythms through various societal factors, leading to widespread misalignment between internal biological clocks and external environmental cues. , which affects approximately 20% of the , exemplifies a major disruptor by forcing individuals to work during typical hours, thereby desynchronizing their circadian systems and increasing risks of disturbances and metabolic issues. Atypical sleep schedules, such as sleeping from 5 a.m. to 2 p.m., are also common in modern lifestyles and result in circadian misalignment by shifting the major sleep period to daylight hours, similar to that seen in shift work or delayed sleep phase disorder, potentially increasing risks for metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, and mood issues. Indoor environments further exacerbate this by limiting natural light exposure; most people spend over 90% of their time indoors, where artificial lighting lacks the intensity and spectral composition of , suppressing production and delaying circadian phase. To minimize this suppression, warm-colored lighting such as red, amber, and orange is recommended for evening or nighttime use, as their longer wavelengths have minimal impact on melatonin production and circadian alignment. Similarly, long-haul induces in most travelers crossing multiple time zones, causing transient , , and due to rapid shifts in zeitgebers like light and meal timing. To mitigate these disruptions, societal interventions emphasize environmental and behavioral adjustments. policies, such as implementing forward-rotating shift schedules—progressing from day to evening to night—facilitate easier circadian compared to backward rotations, reducing and improving alertness among workers. Blue-light-blocking glasses, worn in the evening, have shown evidence of advancing onset and stabilizing circadian rhythms by filtering short-wavelength light from screens and LEDs, particularly beneficial for evening shift workers or those with delayed phases. Other interventions for individuals with atypical or delayed sleep patterns include chronotherapy, which gradually adjusts sleep timing, and morning bright light therapy to advance the circadian phase. Mobile applications promoting , like those tracking light exposure and suggesting timed routines, help users align behaviors with their circadian clocks, with tools such as Timeshifter providing personalized plans for shift workers to minimize desynchronization. Cultural practices also influence circadian alignment, as seen in fasting, where the shift from daytime to nocturnal eating delays the circadian rhythm of core body temperature and hormones like , potentially altering architecture and increasing daytime sleepiness during the holy month. Historically, the profoundly reshaped human circadian rhythms by introducing artificial lighting and rigid work schedules, extending wakefulness into the night and reducing average duration from segmented patterns to consolidated blocks, a change that persists in contemporary 24-hour societies. At the policy level, international organizations advocate for protections against circadian disruptions from night work. The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies night shift work as a probable , prompting guidelines that recommend limiting consecutive night shifts and providing recovery periods to safeguard worker health. For , protocols from bodies like the include fatigue risk management systems, such as scheduled in-flight rest, strategic light exposure, and hydration strategies, to help airline crews adjust circadian rhythms during irregular schedules and reduce severity.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.