Hubbry Logo
Centimetre–gram–second system of unitsCentimetre–gram–second system of unitsMain
Open search
Centimetre–gram–second system of units
Community hub
Centimetre–gram–second system of units
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Centimetre–gram–second system of units
Centimetre–gram–second system of units
from Wikipedia

The centimetre–gram–second system of units (CGS or cgs) is a variant of the metric system based on the centimetre as the unit of length, the gram as the unit of mass, and the second as the unit of time. All CGS mechanical units are unambiguously derived from these three base units, but there are several different ways in which the CGS system was extended to cover electromagnetism.[1][2][3]

The CGS system has mainly been supplanted by the MKS system based on the metre, kilogram, and second, which was in turn extended and replaced by the International System of Units (SI). In many fields of science and engineering, SI is the only system of units in use, but CGS is still prevalent in certain subfields.

In measurements of purely mechanical systems (involving units of length, mass, force, energy, pressure, and so on), the differences between CGS and SI are straightforward: the unit-conversion factors are all powers of 10 as 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 g = 1 kg. For example, the CGS unit of force is the dyne, which is defined as 1 g⋅cm/s2, so the SI unit of force, the newton (1 kg⋅m/s2), is equal to 100000 dynes.

In contrast, converting measurements of electromagnetic quantities — such as electric charge, electric and magnetic fields, and voltage — between CGS and SI systems is considerably more complex. This is because the form of the equations governing electromagnetic phenomena, including Maxwell's equations, depends on the system of units employed; electromagnetic quantities are defined differently in SI and in CGS. Moreover, several distinct versions of the CGS system exist, each defining electromagnetic units differently. These include the electrostatic (ESU), electromagnetic (EMU), Gaussian units, and Heaviside–Lorentz units. Gaussian units are the most widely used in modern scientific literature,[4] and the term “CGS units” is often understood to refer specifically to the CGS–Gaussian system.[5]

History

[edit]

The CGS system goes back to a proposal in 1832 by the German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss to base a system of absolute units on the three fundamental units of length, mass and time.[6] Gauss chose the units of millimetre, milligram and second.[7] In 1873, a committee of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, including physicists James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin recommended the general adoption of centimetre, gram and second as fundamental units, and to express all derived electromagnetic units in these fundamental units, using the prefix "C.G.S. unit of ...".[8]

The sizes of many CGS units turned out to be inconvenient for practical purposes. For example, many everyday objects are hundreds or thousands of centimetres long, such as humans, rooms and buildings. Thus the CGS system never gained wide use outside the field of science. Starting in the 1880s, and more significantly by the mid-20th century, CGS was gradually superseded internationally for scientific purposes by the MKS (metre–kilogram–second) system, which in turn developed into the modern SI standard.

Since the international adoption of the MKS standard in the 1940s and the SI standard in the 1960s, the technical use of CGS units has gradually declined worldwide. CGS units have been deprecated in favour of SI units by NIST,[9] as well as organisations such as the American Physical Society[10] and the International Astronomical Union.[11] SI units are predominantly used in engineering applications and physics education, while Gaussian CGS units are still commonly used in theoretical physics, describing microscopic systems, relativistic electrodynamics, and astrophysics.[12][13]

The units gram and centimetre remain useful as noncoherent units within the SI system, as with any other prefixed SI units.

Definition of CGS units in mechanics

[edit]

In mechanics, the quantities in the CGS and SI systems are defined identically. The two systems differ only in the scale of the three base units (centimetre versus metre and gram versus kilogram, respectively), with the third unit (second) being the same in both systems.

There is a direct correspondence between the base units of mechanics in CGS and SI. Since the formulae expressing the laws of mechanics are the same in both systems and since both systems are coherent, the definitions of all coherent derived units in terms of the base units are the same in both systems, and there is an unambiguous relationship between derived units:

  •   (definition of velocity)
  •   (Newton's second law of motion)
  •   (energy defined in terms of work)
  •   (pressure defined as force per unit area)
  •   (dynamic viscosity defined as shear stress per unit velocity gradient).

Thus, for example, the CGS unit of pressure, barye, is related to the CGS base units of length, mass, and time in the same way as the SI unit of pressure, pascal, is related to the SI base units of length, mass, and time:

1 unit of pressure = 1 unit of force / (1 unit of length)2 = 1 unit of mass / (1 unit of length × (1 unit of time)2)
1 Ba = 1 g/(cm⋅s2)
1 Pa = 1 kg/(m⋅s2).

Expressing a CGS derived unit in terms of the SI base units, or vice versa, requires combining the scale factors that relate the two systems:

1 Ba = 1 g/(cm⋅s2) = 10−3 kg / (10−2 m⋅s2) = 10−1 kg/(m⋅s2) = 10−1 Pa.

Definitions and conversion factors of CGS units in mechanics

[edit]
Quantity Quantity symbol CGS unit name Unit symbol Unit definition In SI units
length, position L, x centimetre cm 1/100 of metre 10−2 m
mass m gram g 1/1000 of kilogram 10−3 kg
time t second s 1 second 1 s
velocity v centimetre per second cm/s cm/s 10−2 m/s
acceleration a gal Gal cm/s2 10−2 m/s2
force F dyne dyn g⋅cm/s2 10−5 N
energy E erg erg g⋅cm2/s2 10−7 J
power P erg per second erg/s g⋅cm2/s3 10−7 W
pressure p barye Ba g/(cm⋅s2) 10−1 Pa
dynamic viscosity μ poise P g/(cm⋅s) 10−1 Pa⋅s
kinematic viscosity ν stokes St cm2/s 10−4 m2/s
wavenumber k kayser cm−1[14] or K cm−1 100 m−1

Derivation of CGS units in electromagnetism

[edit]

CGS approach to electromagnetic units

[edit]

The conversion factors relating electromagnetic units in the CGS and SI systems are made more complex by the differences in the formulas expressing physical laws of electromagnetism as assumed by each system of units, specifically in the nature of the constants that appear in these formulas. This illustrates the fundamental difference in the ways the two systems are built:

  • In SI, the unit of electric current, the ampere (A), was historically defined such that the magnetic force exerted by two infinitely long, thin, parallel wires 1 metre apart and carrying a current of 1 ampere is exactly 2×10−7 N/m. This definition results in all SI electromagnetic units being numerically consistent (subject to factors of some integer powers of 10) with those of the CGS-EMU system described in further sections. The ampere is a base unit of the SI system, with the same status as the metre, kilogram, and second. Thus the relationship in the definition of the ampere with the metre and newton is disregarded, and the ampere is not treated as dimensionally equivalent to any combination of other base units. As a result, electromagnetic laws in SI require an additional constant of proportionality (see Vacuum permeability) to relate electromagnetic units to kinematic units. (This constant of proportionality is derivable directly from the above definition of the ampere.) All other electric and magnetic units are derived from these four base units using the most basic common definitions: for example, electric charge q is defined as current I multiplied by time t, resulting in the unit of electric charge, the coulomb (C), being defined as 1 C = 1 A⋅s.
  • The CGS system variant avoids introducing new base quantities and units, and instead defines all electromagnetic quantities by expressing the physical laws that relate electromagnetic phenomena to mechanics with only dimensionless constants, and hence all units for these quantities are directly derived from the centimetre, gram, and second.

Alternative derivations of CGS units in electromagnetism

[edit]

Electromagnetic relationships to length, time and mass may be derived by several equally appealing methods. Two of them rely on the forces observed on charges. Two fundamental laws relate (seemingly independently of each other) the electric charge or its rate of change (electric current) to a mechanical quantity such as force. They can be written[12] in system-independent form as follows:

  • The first is Coulomb's law, , which describes the electrostatic force F between electric charges and , separated by distance d. Here is a constant which depends on how exactly the unit of charge is derived from the base units.
  • The second is Ampère's force law, , which describes the magnetic force F per unit length L between currents I and I′ flowing in two straight parallel wires of infinite length, separated by a distance d that is much greater than the wire diameters. Since and , the constant also depends on how the unit of charge is derived from the base units.

Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism relates these two laws to each other. It states that the ratio of the proportionality constants and must obey , where c is the speed of light in vacuum. Therefore, if one derives the unit of charge from Coulomb's law by setting then Ampère's force law will contain a factor . Alternatively, deriving the unit of current, and therefore the unit of charge, from Ampère's force law by setting or , will lead to a constant factor in Coulomb's law.

Indeed, both of these mutually exclusive approaches have been practiced by users of the CGS system, leading to the two independent and mutually exclusive branches of CGS, described in the subsections below. However, the freedom of choice in deriving electromagnetic units from the units of length, mass, and time is not limited to the definition of charge. While the electric field can be related to the work performed by it on a moving electric charge, the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the moving charge, and thus the work performed by the magnetic field on any charge is always zero. This leads to a choice between two laws of magnetism, each relating magnetic field to mechanical quantities and electric charge:

  • The first law describes the Lorentz force produced by a magnetic field B on a charge q moving with velocity v:
  • The second describes the creation of a static magnetic field B by an electric current I of finite length dl at a point displaced by a vector r, known as the Biot–Savart law: where r and are the length and the unit vector in the direction of vector r respectively.

These two laws can be used to derive Ampère's force law above, resulting in the relationship: . Therefore, if the unit of charge is based on Ampère's force law such that , it is natural to derive the unit of magnetic field by setting . However, if it is not the case, a choice has to be made as to which of the two laws above is a more convenient basis for deriving the unit of magnetic field.

Furthermore, if we wish to describe the electric displacement field D and the magnetic field H in a medium other than vacuum, we need to also define the constants ε0 and μ0, which are the vacuum permittivity and permeability, respectively. Then we have[12] (generally) and , where P and M are polarisation density and magnetisation vectors. The units of P and M are usually so chosen that the factors 𝜆 and 𝜆′ are equal to the "rationalisation constants" and , respectively. If the rationalisation constants are equal, then . If they are equal to one, then the system is said to be "rationalised":[15] the laws for systems of spherical geometry contain factors of 4π (for example, point charges), those of cylindrical geometry factors of 2π (for example, wires), and those of planar geometry contain no factors of π (for example, parallel-plate capacitors). However, the original CGS system used 𝜆 = 𝜆′ = 4π, or, equivalently, . Therefore, Gaussian, ESU, and EMU subsystems of CGS (described below) are not rationalised.

Various extensions of the CGS system to electromagnetism

[edit]

The table below shows the values of the above constants used in some common CGS subsystems:

System
Electrostatic[12] CGS
(ESU, esu, or stat-)
1 c−2 1 c−2 c−2 1 4π 4π
Electromagnetic[12] CGS
(EMU, emu, or ab-)
c2 1 c−2 1 1 1 4π 4π
Gaussian[12] CGS 1 c−1 1 1 c−2 c−1 4π 4π
Heaviside–Lorentz[12] CGS 1 1 c−1 1 1
SI 1 1 1

In the CGS systems c = 2.9979 × 1010 cm/s, and in the SI system c = 2.9979 × 108 m/s and b ≈ 107 A2/N = 107 m/H.

In each of these systems the quantities called "charge" etc. may be a different quantity; they are distinguished here by a superscript. The corresponding quantities of each system are related through a proportionality constant.

Maxwell's equations can be written in each of these systems as:[12][16]

System Gauss's law Ampère–Maxwell law Gauss's law for magnetism Faraday's law
CGS-ESU
CGS-EMU
CGS-Gaussian
CGS-Heaviside–Lorentz
SI

Electrostatic units (ESU)

[edit]

In the electrostatic units variant of the CGS system, (CGS-ESU), charge is defined as the quantity that obeys a form of Coulomb's law without a multiplying constant (and current is then defined as charge per unit time):

The ESU unit of charge, franklin (Fr), also known as statcoulomb or esu charge, is therefore defined as follows:[17]

two equal point charges spaced 1 centimetre apart are said to be of 1 franklin each if the electrostatic force between them is 1 dyne.

Therefore, in CGS-ESU, a franklin is equal to a centimetre times square root of dyne:

The unit of current is defined as:

In the CGS-ESU system, charge q therefore has the dimension of M1/2L3/2T−1.

Other units in the CGS-ESU system include the statampere (1 statC/s) and statvolt (1 erg/statC).

In CGS-ESU, all electric and magnetic quantities are dimensionally expressible in terms of length, mass, and time, and none has an independent dimension. Such a system of units of electromagnetism, in which the dimensions of all electric and magnetic quantities are expressible in terms of the mechanical dimensions of mass, length, and time, is traditionally called an 'absolute system'.[18]:3

ESU notation

[edit]

All electromagnetic units in the CGS-ESU system that do not have proper names are denoted by a corresponding SI name with an attached prefix "stat" or with a separate abbreviation "esu".[17] The franklin was introduced as a fourth ESU base unit; it is not strictly identical with the statcoulomb. (The unit of permittivity is also sometimes used as a fourth base unit.)

Electromagnetic units (EMU)

[edit]

In another variant of the CGS system, electromagnetic units (EMU), current is defined via the force existing between two thin, parallel, infinitely long wires carrying it, and charge is then defined as current multiplied by time. (This approach was eventually used to define the SI unit of ampere as well).

The EMU unit of current, biot (Bi), also known as abampere or emu current, is therefore defined as follows:[17]

The biot is that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross-section, and placed one centimetre apart in vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force equal to two dynes per centimetre of length.

Therefore, in electromagnetic CGS units, a biot is equal to a square root of dyne:

The unit of charge in CGS EMU is:

Dimensionally in the CGS-EMU system, charge q is therefore equivalent to M1/2L1/2. Hence, neither charge nor current is an independent physical quantity in the CGS-EMU system.

EMU notation

[edit]

All electromagnetic units in the CGS-EMU system that do not have proper names are denoted by a corresponding SI name with an attached prefix "ab" or with a separate abbreviation "emu".[17] The biot was introduced as a fourth EMU base unit; it is not strictly identical with the abampere. (The unit of permeability is also sometimes used as a fourth base unit.) EMU magnetic unit names formed from abampere, biot, or abvolt should not be used for Gaussian units; other names should be used instead, e.g., oersted, gilbert, erg per gauss, and maxwell (abtesla and abweber are rarely used even with EMU).

Practical CGS units

[edit]

The practical CGS system is a hybrid system that uses the volt and the ampere as the units of voltage and current respectively. Doing this avoids the inconveniently large and small electrical units that arise in the esu and emu systems. This system was at one time widely used by electrical engineers because the volt and ampere had been adopted as international standard units by the International Electrical Congress of 1881.[19] As well as the volt and ampere, the farad (capacitance), ohm (resistance), coulomb (electric charge), and henry (inductance) are consequently also used in the practical system and are the same as the SI units. The magnetic units are those of the emu system.[20]

The electrical units, other than the volt and ampere, are determined by the requirement that any equation involving only electrical and kinematical quantities that is valid in SI should also be valid in the system. For example, since electric field strength is voltage per unit length, its unit is the volt per centimetre, which is one hundred times the SI unit.

The system is electrically rationalised and magnetically unrationalised; i.e., 𝜆 = 1 and 𝜆′ = 4π, but the above formula for 𝜆 is invalid. A closely related system is the International System of Electric and Magnetic Units,[21] which has a different unit of mass so that the formula for 𝜆′ is invalid. The unit of mass was chosen to remove powers of ten from contexts in which they were considered to be objectionable (e.g., P = VI and F = qE). Inevitably, the powers of ten reappeared in other contexts, but the effect was to make the familiar joule and watt the units of work and power respectively.

The ampere-turn system is constructed in a similar way by considering magnetomotive force and magnetic field strength to be electrical quantities and rationalising the system by dividing the units of magnetic pole strength and magnetisation by 4π. The units of the first two quantities are the ampere and the ampere per centimetre respectively. The unit of magnetic permeability is that of the emu system, and the magnetic constitutive equations are B = (4π/10)μH and B = (4π/10)μ0H + μ0M. Magnetic reluctance is given a hybrid unit to ensure the validity of Ohm's law for magnetic circuits.

In all the practical systems ε0 = 8.8542 × 10−14 A⋅s/(V⋅cm), μ0 = 1 V⋅s/(A⋅cm), and c2 = 1/(4π × 10−9 ε0μ0). Maxwell's equations in free space are also the same in all the systems.

Maxwell's equations in the practical systems[22]
Name All systems
in vacuum
Gilbert systems
in matter
Ampere-turn systems
in matter
Gauss's law
Gauss's law for magnetism
Faraday's law of induction
Ampère–Maxwell equation

In the practical systems inductance is considered to be an electrical quantity and is defined by L = 10−8 NΦB/I.[23]

Other variants

[edit]

There were at various points in time about half a dozen systems of electromagnetic units in use, most based on the CGS system.[24] These include the Gaussian units and the Heaviside–Lorentz units.

Electromagnetic units in various CGS systems

[edit]
Conversion of SI units in electromagnetism to ESU, EMU, and Gaussian subsystems of CGS[25][17]
Quantity Symbol SI unit ESU unit Gaussian unit EMU unit
electric charge q 1 C ≘ (10−1 c) statC (Fr) ≘ (10−1) abC
electric current I 1 A ≘ (10−1 c) statA (Fr/s) ≘ (10−1) abA (Bi)
electric potential / voltage φ / V, E 1 V ≘ (108 c−1) statV (erg/Fr) ≘ (108) abV
electric field E 1 V/m ≘ (106 c−1) statV/cm (dyn/Fr) ≘ (106) abV/cm
electric displacement field D 1 C/m2 ≘ (4π × 10−5 c) statC/cm2 ≘ (4π × 10−5) abC/cm2
electric dipole moment p 1 Cm ≘ (10 c) statCcm ≘ (10) abCcm
electric flux Φe 1 C ≘ (4π × 10−1 c) statC ≘ (4π × 10−1) abC
permittivity ε 1 F/m ≘ (4π × 10−11 c2) cm/cm ≘ (4π × 10−11) s2/cm2
resistance R 1 Ω ≘ (109 c−2) statΩ (s/cm) ≘ (109) abΩ
resistivity ρ 1 Ωm ≘ (1011 c−2) statΩcm (s) ≘ (1011) abΩcm
capacitance C 1 F ≘ (10−9 c2) statF (cm) ≘ (10−9) abF
inductance L 1 H ≘ (109 c−2) statH (s2/cm) ≘ (109) abH
magnetic B field B 1 T ≘ (104 c−1) statT ≘ (104) G
magnetic H field H 1 A/m ≘ (4π × 10−3 c) statA/cm ≘ (4π × 10−3) Oe
magnetic dipole moment μ 1 Am2 ≘ (103 c) statAcm2 ≘ (103) erg/G
magnetic flux Φm 1 Wb ≘ (108 c−1) statWb ≘ (108) Mx
permeability μ 1 H/m ≘ ((4π)−1 × 107 c−2) s2/cm2 ≘ ((4π)−1 × 107) cm/cm
magnetomotive force 1 A ≘ (4π × 10−1 c) statA ≘ (4π × 10−1) Gi
magnetic reluctance 1 H−1 ≘ (4π × 10−9 c2) statH−1 ≘ (4π × 10−9) Gi/Mx

In this table, c = 29979245800 is the numeric value of the speed of light in vacuum when expressed in units of centimetres per second. The symbol "≘" is used instead of "=" as a reminder that the units are corresponding but not equal. For example, according to the capacitance row of the table, if a capacitor has a capacitance of 1 F in SI, then it has a capacitance of (10−9 c2) cm in ESU; but it is incorrect to replace "1 F" with "(10−9 c2) cm" within an equation or formula. (This warning is a special aspect of electromagnetism units. By contrast it is always correct to replace, e.g., "1 m" with "100 cm" within an equation or formula.)

Physical constants in CGS units

[edit]
Commonly used physical constants in CGS units[26]
Constant Symbol Value
atomic mass constant mu 1.660539069×10−24 g
Bohr magneton μB 9.274010066×10−21 erg/G (EMU, Gaussian)
2.780278273×10−10 statA⋅cm2 (ESU)
Bohr radius a0 5.291772105×10−9 cm
Boltzmann constant k 1.380649×10−16 erg/K
electron mass me 9.10938371×10−28 g
elementary charge e 4.80320471×10−10 Fr (ESU, Gaussian)
1.602176634×10−20 abC (EMU)
fine-structure constant α 0.007297352564
Newtonian constant of gravitation G 6.6743×10−8 dyncm2/g2
Planck constant h 6.62607015×10−27 ergs
reduced Planck constant ħ 1.054571817×10−27 ergs
speed of light c 2.99792458×1010 cm/s

Advantages and disadvantages

[edit]

Lack of unique unit names leads to potential confusion: "15 emu" may mean either 15 abvolts, or 15 emu units of electric dipole moment, or 15 emu units of magnetic susceptibility, sometimes (but not always) per gram, or per mole. With its system of uniquely named units, the SI removes any confusion in usage: 1 ampere is a fixed value of a specified quantity, and so are 1 henry, 1 ohm, and 1 volt.

In the CGS-Gaussian system, electric and magnetic fields have the same units, 4πε0 is replaced by 1, and the only dimensional constant appearing in the Maxwell equations is c, the speed of light. The Heaviside–Lorentz system has these properties as well (with ε0 equaling 1).

In SI, and other rationalised systems (for example, Heaviside–Lorentz), the unit of current was chosen such that electromagnetic equations concerning charged spheres contain 4π, those concerning coils of current and straight wires contain 2π and those dealing with charged surfaces lack π entirely, which was the most convenient choice for applications in electrical engineering and relates directly to the geometric symmetry of the system being described by the equation.

Specialised unit systems are used to simplify formulas further than either SI or CGS do, by eliminating constants through a convention of normalising quantities with respect to some system of natural units. For example, in particle physics a system is in use where every quantity is expressed by only one unit of energy, the electronvolt, with lengths, times, and so on all converted into units of energy by inserting factors of speed of light c and the reduced Planck constant ħ. This unit system is convenient for calculations in particle physics, but is impractical in other contexts.

See also

[edit]

References and notes

[edit]

General literature

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The (abbreviated CGS or cgs) is a coherent variant of the that defines its base units as the for length, the gram for mass, and the second for time. This system derives all other units directly from these three mechanical base units without additional scaling factors, making it suitable for scientific calculations in and related fields. The origins of the CGS system trace back to the early 1830s, when German mathematician , in collaboration with Wilhelm Weber, proposed a framework for and based on fundamental units of length, mass, and time to standardize geophysical and electromagnetic observations. In 1874, the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS) formally introduced the absolute CGS system as a three-dimensional coherent framework, replacing the with the to better suit laboratory-scale measurements in physics and engineering. This development built on earlier metric efforts and gained widespread adoption among 19th-century scientists, particularly in , where pioneers like James Clerk Maxwell utilized its units. The CGS system encompasses several variants tailored to specific domains, including the electrostatic system (CGS-ESU) for electric phenomena, the electromagnetic system (CGS-EMU) for magnetic and current-based measurements, and the Gaussian system, which combines elements of both for symmetrical treatment of electric and magnetic fields in . Derived units in these variants, such as the for (1 = 1 g·cm/s²) and the erg for (1 erg = 1 ·cm), were particularly convenient for expressing small-scale physical quantities in early experimental work. The system's electromagnetic units, including the gauss for magnetic flux , remain influential in certain legacy contexts like magnetostatics. Historically dominant in through the mid-20th century, the CGS system was gradually supplanted by the metre-kilogram-second (MKS) system in the and the (SI) following its formal adoption in 1960, due to the latter's practicality for larger-scale and international standardization. Today, while largely obsolete in most practical applications, CGS units persist in some , astronomy, and older scientific texts for their alignment with natural scales in atomic and electromagnetic theory.

Overview and Principles

Core Components and Base Units

The centimetre–gram–second (CGS) system of units establishes a coherent metric framework for mechanical measurements using three fundamental base units: the (cm) for , the gram (g) for , and the second (s) for time. These units were selected by the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS) in 1874 to form a three-dimensional system compatible with the emerging metric standards, emphasizing decimal scalability and practicality for laboratory-scale experiments where smaller magnitudes are common. The derives from the French centimètre, combining Latin centum ("hundred") with mètre (from Greek metron, "measure"), defined as one-hundredth of the to facilitate precise measurements of modest distances. The gram, originally the mass of one of at 4 °C, stems etymologically from Greek gramma ("small weight" or "letter"), providing a reproducible standard tied to . The second, retained from earlier astronomical conventions as 1/86,400 of the mean solar day, originates from Latin secundus ("following" or "second"), denoting the second division of the hour after the minute. This trio of base units enables the derivation of all mechanical quantities through algebraic combinations, eliminating the need for additional bases like or required in more expansive systems. For instance, emerges as cm/s, as cm/s², and as g/cm³, ensuring dimensional consistency across , dynamics, and . The system's metric foundation—rooted in decimal prefixes like centi- for 10^{-2}—promotes ease of scaling, while the gram's linkage to water's underscores a natural, reproducible basis for , historically proposed by the in 1795 and adapted into CGS for broader scientific utility. Key derived units exemplify this coherence in mechanical contexts. The dyne (dyn), unit of , is defined as the imparting an acceleration of 1 cm/s² to a 1 g , expressed as
1dyne=1gcm/s2.1 \, \mathrm{dyne} = 1 \, \mathrm{g \cdot cm / s^2}. The erg (erg), unit of or work, represents the work done by 1 dyne over 1 cm, or
1erg=1gcm2/s2.1 \, \mathrm{erg} = 1 \, \mathrm{g \cdot cm^2 / s^2}.
This unit derives directly from the base quantities, highlighting CGS's emphasis on absolute, non-empirical definitions for in gravitational and kinetic forms. For fluid dynamics, the poise (P), unit of dynamic viscosity, quantifies the in a as 1 dyne per square centimetre for a 1 cm/s across 1 cm, or
1poise=1dynes/cm2=1g/(cms).1 \, \mathrm{poise} = 1 \, \mathrm{dyne \cdot s / cm^2} = 1 \, \mathrm{g / (cm \cdot s)}.
Named after for his foundational work on , the poise integrates , time, and area to capture viscous resistance without invoking extraneous constants.

Relation to Other Unit Systems

The centimetre–gram–second (CGS) system is a variant of the , employing the for length, gram for mass, and second for time as its base units, in contrast to the meter-kilogram-second (MKS) system that underpins the (SI) with larger base magnitudes. This difference in scale makes CGS particularly suited for describing phenomena at microscopic levels, such as in , where the smaller units yield numerical values closer to unity for fundamental constants and quantities, facilitating theoretical calculations without excessive powers of ten. CGS qualifies as an absolute and coherent unit system, wherein derived units like force (dyne) and energy (erg) emerge directly as products or quotients of the base units, without arbitrary scaling factors or defined multiples, unlike some practical systems that introduce such conventions for convenience. The SI, while also coherent, extends the MKS framework into a four-dimensional system by incorporating an ampere base unit for electromagnetism, creating a unified structure that CGS approaches differently through its mechanical focus. In handling electromagnetism, CGS diverges notably from rationalized systems like SI, employing an unrationalized framework—often —where constants such as the appear explicitly in equations and factors of 4π4\pi reside in rather than in force laws, promoting symmetry between electric and magnetic fields but complicating some practical applications. This approach contrasts with SI's rationalization, which distributes 4π4\pi to simplify integral forms and integrates permeability and permittivity constants (μ0\mu_0 and ϵ0\epsilon_0) to enhance coherence across electrical engineering contexts.

Historical Context

Origins and Early Development

The –gram–second (CGS) system of units emerged in the amid growing demands for a coherent, absolute framework in physics, particularly to unify mechanical and electromagnetic phenomena without relying on arbitrary constants or non-metric units. This need arose from the limitations of earlier systems, such as the foot-pound-second (FPS) units prevalent in Britain, which complicated calculations in emerging fields like . Influenced by the French metric system established in the 1790s—based on natural standards like the for length and gram for mass—scientists sought a decimal-compatible alternative that prioritized simplicity and universality for theoretical work. The foundational proposal for CGS traces to , when German introduced an absolute system for magnetic measurements using the , gram, and second as base units, enabling direct expression of magnetic intensity without additional scaling factors. Gauss's approach, developed during his geomagnetic research at Göttingen University, emphasized units derived solely from mechanical principles to ensure consistency across physical domains. Wilhelm Weber, Gauss's collaborator, extended this in the 1830s and 1840s by defining electrical units within the same framework, laying the groundwork for a comprehensive CGS electromagnetic system that integrated current, charge, and potential. These German innovations addressed the practical challenges of precise instrumentation in early electrical experiments, promoting adoption among continental European physicists. By the 1870s, the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS) played a pivotal role in formalizing CGS for broader scientific use. A BAAS committee, including James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), recommended in 1873 the adoption of centimetre, gram, and second as base units, building on the metric-inspired absolute system to standardize electrical resistance and other quantities. Maxwell, in his 1873 treatise , explicitly employed CGS units to articulate his unified theory of , demonstrating how the system facilitated elegant formulations of electric and magnetic fields without dimensional inconsistencies. This work highlighted CGS's suitability for , influencing its rapid uptake in French and German academic communities during the late 1800s, where it became the preferred framework for laboratory and theoretical research in mechanics and . The system's international momentum grew with its inclusion in discussions at the 1881 International Electrical Congress in , where delegates endorsed BAAS's CGS-based definitions for key electrical units like the and , marking a key step toward global coherence despite ongoing debates over practical versus absolute measurements. This event, hosted under French auspices, underscored CGS's alignment with metric principles and its value for cross-border scientific collaboration, solidifying early adoption in European physics circles before broader standardization efforts in the .

Standardization and Key Milestones

The standardization of the centimetre–gram–second (CGS) system gained momentum through international scientific bodies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, building on James Clerk Maxwell's work for a coherent metric framework in . These bodies recognized CGS variants as foundational for absolute measurements, particularly in addressing the integration of electrical units into the metric framework to ensure consistency across scientific disciplines. The development of electrostatic units (ESU) and electromagnetic units (EMU) within the CGS framework occurred primarily in the late but saw formal refinements in the early to accommodate advancing electromagnetic theory. At the first International Electrical in in 1881, delegates adopted the CGS-EMU as the for practical , with ESU defined analogously for electrostatic phenomena, establishing these as complementary subsystems to the mechanical CGS base units. Key milestones in CGS evolution include the 1888 introduction by of —a hybrid of ESU and EMU that simplifies by setting the to unity in vacuum—widely adopted by American physicists for theoretical work in . Post-World War II, CGS persisted prominently in Soviet and U.S. physics literature, appearing in textbooks and research on due to its convenience in handling Gaussian formulations, even as practical engineering shifted toward other systems. The promotion of the (SI) by the 11th General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1960 marked the beginning of CGS's decline, as SI's metre-kilogram-second base with rationalized electrical units offered greater coherence for international standardization and technology. Despite this, CGS, particularly the Gaussian variant, retained niche applications in fields like , where its use facilitates compact expressions for phenomena involving vast scales and electromagnetic processes in stellar and cosmic contexts.

Mechanical Units

Definitions of Base and Derived Units

The –gram–second (CGS) system employs three base units for mechanical quantities: the (cm) for length, the gram (g) for mass, and the second (s) for time. These units form the foundation for all derived mechanical units, ensuring a coherent system where physical equations, such as Newton's second F=maF = ma, hold without additional scaling factors. Velocity in the CGS system is defined as the rate of change of displacement with respect to time, yielding the unit centimetre per second (cm/s). Acceleration, the rate of change of , is thus expressed in centimetres per second squared (cm/s²). , derived from F=maF = ma, is the product of and , resulting in the (dyn), defined as the force required to accelerate one gram by one centimetre per second squared, or 1dyn=1gcm/s21 \, \text{dyn} = 1 \, \text{g} \cdot \text{cm/s}^2. , the product of and , has the unit gram-centimetre per second (g·cm/s). Energy, or work, in CGS is the product of force and distance, defining the erg as the work done by one over one , equivalently 1erg=1dyncm=1gcm2/s21 \, \text{erg} = 1 \, \text{dyn} \cdot \text{cm} = 1 \, \text{g} \cdot \text{cm}^2/\text{s}^2. Power, the rate of energy transfer, is then energy per unit time, giving the unit erg per second (erg/s). Pressure is per unit area, leading to the (Ba), defined as one per square , or 1Ba=1dyn/cm21 \, \text{Ba} = 1 \, \text{dyn/cm}^2. Kinematic , area per unit time, uses the stokes (St), equivalent to one square per second (cm²/s).

Conversion Factors and Examples

The centimetre–gram–second (CGS) mechanical units relate to their International System of Units (SI) counterparts through simple power-of-ten factors, enabling direct conversions without complex multipliers. The base mass unit in CGS is the gram (g), defined as exactly 10310^{-3} kilograms (kg). The derived force unit, the dyne (dyn), equals the force needed to accelerate 1 g by 1 cm/s², corresponding to 10510^{-5} newtons (N). Similarly, the energy unit, the erg, represents 1 dyn·cm and converts to 10710^{-7} joules (J). These relations stem from the definitions of the centimetre as 10210^{-2} m and the gram as 10310^{-3} kg, preserving coherence within the system. Practical examples highlight the scale of CGS units in everyday mechanics. The standard acceleration due to gravity near Earth's surface is 980.665 cm/s² in CGS, equivalent to 9.80665 m/s² in SI. Thus, the gravitational force on a 1 g mass—such as a small paperclip—is approximately 981 dynes, demonstrating how CGS suits microscale or measurements where forces are modest. For a human-scale scenario, lifting a 1 kg mass (1000 g) against demands about 981,000 dynes, or roughly 9.81 , underscoring the need for prefixes to manage larger values intuitively. CGS accommodates scalability through standard metric prefixes, identical to those in SI, applied to base and derived units for expressing extreme ranges without altering the system's structure. For instance, a microgram (μg = 10610^{-6} g) quantifies minuscule masses like dust particles, while a megadyne (Mdyne = 10610^{6} dyn) handles substantial forces, such as those in mechanical engineering tests. This prefix system ensures consistency, as 1 kilodyne (kdyne = 10310^{3} dyn) equals 10210^{-2} N, maintaining easy traceability to SI equivalents. Users of CGS, especially when consulting older textbooks, often encounter pitfalls from inadvertently mixing units across systems, resulting in errors scaled by powers of 10. For example, treating a gram as equivalent to a in calculations can overestimate results by a factor of 1000, a frequent issue in legacy before widespread SI . Careful verification of unit consistency, as emphasized in guides, mitigates such risks.

Electromagnetic Units

Fundamental Approach to EM in CGS

The centimetre–gram–second (CGS) system treats electromagnetism by deriving all electrical and magnetic quantities directly from its mechanical base units of length (centimetre), mass (gram), and time (second), avoiding the introduction of independent base units for charge or current as required in the SI system. This approach ensures a seamless integration of mechanical and electromagnetic phenomena, where the speed of light cc arises naturally as a conversion factor between electric and magnetic units, reflecting the fundamental linkage between electrostatic and magnetostatic interactions. In the Gaussian variant of CGS units, the vacuum permittivity ϵ0\epsilon_0 and permeability μ0\mu_0 are both set to unity, simplifying the structure of Maxwell's equations by absorbing these constants into the definitions of fields and sources, thereby emphasizing the relativistic symmetry of electromagnetism. A key distinction from the SI system lies in the absence of extraneous constants like 4π4\pi or ϵ0\epsilon_0 in the core laws of . For instance, in the CGS electrostatic units (ESU), the force between two point charges q1q_1 and q2q_2 separated by distance rr is given simply by F=q1q2r2,F = \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}, where FF is in dynes, charges in statcoulombs, and rr in centimetres, eliminating the need for an explicit constant and facilitating cleaner theoretical derivations. This contrasts with SI, where the force law includes 1/(4πϵ0)1/(4\pi \epsilon_0), introducing geometric factors that can complicate symbolic manipulations in advanced calculations. The CGS electromagnetic framework is organized into three main subsystems to handle different aspects of the theory: the ESU system, which prioritizes electrostatic interactions by defining charge from ; the electromagnetic units (EMU) system, which bases magnetic quantities on the force between steady currents; and the Gaussian system, a hybrid that merges ESU for with EMU for , adjusted by factors of cc to ensure dimensional consistency and symmetry between E\mathbf{E} and B\mathbf{B} in . This structure allows flexibility for specialized applications while maintaining coherence with mechanical units. Historically, the derivation of electromagnetic equations in CGS traces back to James Clerk Maxwell's formulations, originally expressed in a non-metric system resembling , where the term introduced cc implicitly through empirical relations. The shift to CGS bases occurred in the late to align with the emerging metric standards for mechanics, with the Gaussian variant formalized around 1900 by and others to rationalize the equations for emerging theories like relativity, where cc's explicit presence underscores the unity of electric and magnetic phenomena.

Electrostatic Units (ESU)

The electrostatic units (ESU) subsystem within the –gram–second (CGS) system provides a framework for measuring electrostatic quantities by deriving them directly from the mechanical base units of length (), mass (gram), and time (second), with a focus on charge and its interactions. This approach ensures that electrostatic forces are expressed in terms of mechanical force (), emphasizing the unity between and without introducing additional fundamental constants for . The foundational unit in ESU is the statcoulomb (statC), the unit of electric charge, defined such that two point charges of one statcoulomb each, separated by one centimetre in vacuum, repel each other with a force of exactly one dyne. This definition implies that the charge has dimensions of =[F]1/2[L]=dyne1/2cm = [F]^{1/2} [L] = \mathrm{dyne}^{1/2} \cdot \mathrm{cm}, where FF is force and LL is length. Consequently, Coulomb's law in ESU simplifies to F=q1q2r2,F = \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}, where FF is in dynes, q1q_1 and q2q_2 are in statcoulombs, and rr is in centimetres; notably, the factor 1/(4πϵ0)1/(4\pi\epsilon_0) from SI units is absent, as the system's structure absorbs it into the unit definitions. Historically, the statcoulomb was also denoted simply as "esu" for charge. Derived units in ESU build on the statcoulomb to quantify related quantities. The statvolt (statV), the unit of , is the potential difference across which one of charge experiences a work of one erg (equivalent to one -); dimensionally, this yields [statV]=dyne1/2[\mathrm{statV}] = \mathrm{dyne}^{1/2}, or equivalently erg/statC\mathrm{erg}/\mathrm{statC}. The unit of strength is then one statvolt per centimetre (statV/cm), which corresponds to the force of one exerted on a charge of one , giving dimensions of dyne/statC\mathrm{dyne}/\mathrm{statC}. For , the statfarad (statF) is defined as the capacitance that stores one at a potential difference of one statvolt, resulting in dimensions of one centimetre, as [statF]=statC/statV=cm[\mathrm{statF}] = \mathrm{statC}/\mathrm{statV} = \mathrm{cm}. These derivations highlight the ESU's emphasis on geometric simplicity, where aligns directly with length scales in electrostatic configurations.

Electromagnetic Units (EMU)

The electromagnetic units (EMU) subsystem within the centimetre–gram–second (CGS) system defines electromagnetic quantities primarily through mechanical interactions, such as the force between current-carrying conductors, emphasizing magnetic and current-based measurements. This approach derives units from the base mechanical units of for length, gram for mass, and second for time, ensuring consistency with Newtonian while incorporating electromagnetic phenomena via empirical laws like Ampère's. Unlike the electrostatic units (ESU), which prioritize charge-based definitions, EMU focuses on current and , making it particularly suited for magnetostatics and early applications. The base unit of electric current in EMU is the abampere (symbol: abA or Bi), defined as the steady current that, maintained in two straight, parallel, infinitely long conductors spaced 1 cm apart in vacuum, produces a force of 2 dynes per centimetre of length between them. This definition aligns with , where the force per unit length between such conductors carrying currents I1I_1 and I2I_2 separated by distance dd is given by F/l=2I1I2/dF/l = 2 I_1 I_2 / d. One abampere equals 10 amperes in the (SI). The unit of electromotive force is the abvolt (abV), defined as the potential difference required to drive 1 abampere through a resistance of 1 abohm; it equals 10810^{-8} volts in SI. The maxwell (Mx) serves as the base unit of , representing the flux that, when linking a single-turn coil of 1 cm² area and changing at a rate of 1 maxwell per second, induces an electromotive force of 1 abvolt; 1 maxwell equals 10810^{-8} webers in SI. Derived units in EMU build upon these bases to quantify magnetic fields and related properties. The oersted (Oe) is the unit of magnetic field strength HH, defined as the field intensity exerting a force of 1 dyne on a unit magnetic pole in vacuum; it corresponds to approximately 79.58 amperes per metre in SI. The gauss (G) is the unit of magnetic flux density BB, equivalent to 1 maxwell per square centimetre, and equals 10410^{-4} teslas in SI. Resistance is measured in abohms (abΩ), where 1 abohm is the resistance carrying 1 abampere under 1 abvolt; it equals 10910^{-9} ohms in SI. In EMU notation, the "ab-" prefix denotes electromagnetic-derived units, such as the abfarad (abF) for capacitance, which equals 10910^9 farads in SI, highlighting the scale differences from SI due to the mechanical base. These units facilitate calculations in magnetostatics, where, for instance, Ampère's circuital law takes the form Hdl=4πI\oint \mathbf{H} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = 4\pi I for enclosed current II in abamperes, without additional constants in vacuum.

Gaussian and Heaviside-Lorentz Variants

The Gaussian units represent a hybrid variant of the CGS electromagnetic system that integrates elements from both the electrostatic (ESU) and electromagnetic (EMU) subsystems, achieving symmetry in Maxwell's equations by explicitly incorporating the speed of light cc into key formulas. In this system, the unit of electric charge is defined such that Coulomb's law takes the simple form F=q1q2r2F = \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2} dynes, mirroring the ESU convention, while magnetic interactions are scaled to blend with EMU through the relation where the emu unit of charge (biot or abcoulomb) equals cc times the esu unit of charge (statcoulomb), where cc is the speed of light in cm/s. A hallmark is the Lorentz force law, expressed as F=qE+qcv×B\mathbf{F} = q \mathbf{E} + \frac{q}{c} \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}, where c3×1010c \approx 3 \times 10^{10} cm/s ensures dimensional consistency between electric and magnetic contributions. For magnetism, the system employs the concept of a unit pole, defined such that the force between two unit magnetic poles separated by 1 cm is 1 dyne, leading to the unit of magnetic field strength BB and induction as the gauss. In Gaussian units, 1 gauss has dimensions of statcoulomb per (centimetre squared times centimetre per second), reflecting relations from the Biot-Savart law. The Heaviside-Lorentz units constitute a rationalized extension of the Gaussian system, designed to eliminate extraneous factors of 4π4\pi for enhanced symmetry in relativistic and quantum contexts. Proposed by Oliver Heaviside in 1885 and refined by Hendrik Lorentz, this variant modifies Gauss's approach by redefining units such that Gauss's law becomes E=ρ\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \rho instead of E=4πρ\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4\pi \rho, with corresponding adjustments to Ampère's law and other equations to remove the 4π4\pi in source terms. The Lorentz force retains the form F=qE+qcv×B\mathbf{F} = q \mathbf{E} + \frac{q}{c} \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}, as in Gaussian units, with the rationalization affecting field and source scalings instead; magnetic fields are scaled by 4π\sqrt{4\pi}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.