Hubbry Logo
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference2015 United Nations Climate Change ConferenceMain
Open search
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Community hub
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Map
Date30 November 2015 (2015-11-30)–
12 December 2015 (2015-12-12)
LocationLe Bourget in the suburbs of Paris, France
Also known asCOP21 (UNFCCC)
CMP11 (Kyoto Protocol)
ParticipantsParties to the UNFCCC
Previous event← Lima 2014
Next eventMarrakech 2016 →
WebsiteVenue site
UNFCCC site

The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, COP 21 or CMP 11 was held in Paris, France, from 30 November to 12 December 2015.[1] It was the 21st yearly session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the 11th session of the Meeting of the Parties (CMP) to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.[2]

The conference negotiated the Paris Agreement, a global agreement on the reduction of climate change, the text of which represented a consensus of the representatives of the 196 attending parties.[3] The agreement was due to enter into force when joined by at least 55 countries which together represented at least 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.,[4][5][6] a target reached on 4 November 2016.[7] On 22 April 2016 (Earth Day), 174 countries signed the agreement in New York,[8] and began adopting it within their own legal systems (through ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession).

According to the organizing committee at the outset of the talks,[9] the expected key result was an agreement to set a goal of limiting global warming to "well below 2 °C" Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels. The agreement calls for zero net anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions to be reached during the second half of the 21st century. In the adopted version of the Paris Agreement,[4] the parties will also "pursue efforts to" limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C.[3] The 1.5 °C goal will require zero emissions sometime between 2030 and 2050, according to some scientists.[3]

Prior to the conference, 146 national climate panels publicly presented a draft of national climate contributions (called "Intended Nationally Determined Contributions", INDCs). These suggested commitments were estimated to limit global warming to 2.7 °C by 2100.[10] For example, the EU suggested INDC is a commitment to a 40 percent reduction in emissions by 2030 compared to 1990.[11] The agreement establishes a "global stocktake" which revisits the national goals to "update and enhance" them every five years beginning 2023.[4] However, no detailed timetable or country-specific goals for emissions were incorporated into the Paris Agreement – as opposed to the previous Kyoto Protocol.

A number of meetings took place in preparation for COP21, including the Bonn Climate Change Conference, 19 to 23 October 2015, which produced a draft agreement.[12]

Background

[edit]
Global carbon dioxide emissions by country in 2015.
  1. China (29.5%)
  2. US (14.3%)
  3. EU (9.60%)
  4. India (6.80%)
  5. Russia (4.90%)
  6. Japan (3.50%)
  7. Other (31.4%)
Shows the top 40 CO2 emitting countries and related in the world in 1990 and 2012, including per capita figures. The data is taken from the EU Edgar database.

According to the organizing committee of the summit in Paris, the objective of the 2015 conference was to achieve, for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations, a binding and universal agreement on climate.[13] Pope Francis published an encyclical letter called Laudato si' intended, in part, to influence the conference. The encyclical calls for action against climate change: "Humanity is called to recognize the need for changes of lifestyle, production and consumption, in order to combat this warming or at least the human causes which produce or aggravate it."[14] The International Trade Union Confederation has called for the goal to be "zero carbon, zero poverty", and its general secretary Sharan Burrow has repeated that there are "no jobs on a dead planet".

Location and participation

[edit]
The heads of delegations from left to right: Enrique Peña Nieto, François Hollande, Angela Merkel, Michelle Bachelet

The location of UNFCCC talks is rotated by regions throughout United Nations countries. The 2015 conference was held at Le Bourget from 30 November[15] to 12 December 2015.

To some extent, France served as a model country for delegates attending COP21 because it is one of the few developed countries in the world to decarbonize electricity production and fossil fuel energy while still providing a high standard of living.[16] As of 2012, France generated over 90% of its electricity from zero carbon sources, including nuclear, hydroelectric, and wind.[citation needed]

The conference took place two weeks after a series of terrorist attacks in the 10th and 11th Arrondissements of Paris, as well as in Saint-Denis. Martial law was declared and national security was tightened accordingly, with 30,000 police officers and 285 security checkpoints deployed across the country until after the conference ended.[17]

The European Union and 195 nations (see list in reference)[18] were the participating parties.

Negotiations process

[edit]
COP 21: Heads of delegations

The overarching goal of the Convention is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to limit the global temperature increase. Since COP 17 this increase is set at 2 °C (3.6 °F) above pre-industrial levels.[19] However, Christiana Figueres acknowledged in the closing briefing at the 2012 Doha conference: "The current pledges under the second commitment period of the Kyoto protocol are clearly not enough to guarantee that the temperature will stay below 2 °C and there is an ever increasing gap between the action of countries and what the science tells us."

During previous climate negotiations, countries agreed to outline actions they intended to take within a global agreement, by 1 October 2015. These commitments are known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs.[20] Together, the INDCs would reduce global warming from an estimated 4–5 °C (by 2100) to 2.7 °C, and reduce emissions per capita by 9% by 2030, while providing hope in the eyes of the conference organizers for further reductions in the future that would allow meeting a 2 °C target.[21]

Think-tanks such as the World Pensions Council (WPC) argued that the keys to success lay in convincing officials in the U.S. and China, by far the two largest national emitters: "As long as policy makers in Washington and Beijing didn't put all their political capital behind the adoption of ambitious carbon-emission capping targets, the laudable efforts of other G20 governments often remained in the realm of pious wishes. Things changed for the better on 12 November 2014 when President Obama and General Secretary Xi Jinping agreed to limit greenhouse gases emissions."[22]

President Obama insisted on America's essential role in that regard: "We've led by example ... from Alaska to the Gulf Coast to the Great Plains ... we've seen the longest streak of private job creation in our history. We've driven our economic output to all time-highs while driving our carbon pollution down to its lowest level in nearly two decades. And then, with our historic joint announcement with China last year, we showed it was possible to bridge the old divide between developed and developing nations that had stymied global progress for so long ... That was the foundation for success in Paris."[23] Harvard University published a case study on one aspect of the negotiations, focussing on the protection of forests.[24]

Outcome

[edit]
Main article: Paris Agreement

On 12 December 2015, the participating 196 countries agreed, by consensus, to the final[25] global pact, the Paris Agreement, to reduce emissions as part of the method for reducing greenhouse gas. In the 12-page document,[4] the members agreed to reduce their carbon output "as soon as possible" and to do their best to keep global warming "to well below 2 degrees C".[26] In the course of the debates, island states of the Pacific, the Seychelles, but also the Philippines, their very existence threatened by sea level rise, had strongly voted for setting a goal of 1.5 °C instead of only 2 °C.[27][28] France's Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius, said this "ambitious and balanced" plan was an "historic turning point" in the goal of reducing global warming.[29] However, some others criticized the fact that significant sections are "promises" or aims and not firm commitments by the countries.[30]

On 4th June 2024, the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28) opened in Dubai, marking an important event in the timeline of the Paris Agreement. The conference concluded the global stocktake, a process evaluating the progress made on the Paris Agreement. The assessment exposed that the current attempts are insufficient to limit the global warming to the target of 1.5°C, highlighting the need for accelerated climate action. There were strong emphases on the need for more climate finance and collaboration to reach climate goals during the conference.[31]

Non-binding commitments, lack of enforcement mechanisms

[edit]

The Agreement will not become binding on its member states until 55 parties who produce over 55% of the world's greenhouse gas have ratified the Agreement. There is doubt whether some countries, especially the United States,[32] will agree to do so, though the United States publicly committed, in a joint Presidential Statement with China, to joining the Agreement in 2016.[3]

Each country that ratifies the agreement will be required to set a target for emission reduction or limitation, called a "nationally determined contribution", or NDC, but the amount will be voluntary.[33][34] There will be neither a mechanism to force[35] a country to set a target by a specific date nor enforcement measures if a set target is not met.[34][36] There will be only a "name and shame" system[37] or, as János Pásztor, the U.N. assistant secretary-general on climate change, told CBS News, a "name and encourage" plan.[38]

Some analysts have also observed that the stated objectives of the Paris Agreement are implicitly "predicated upon an assumption – that member states of the United Nations, including high polluters such as China, US, India, Canada, Russia, Indonesia and Australia, which generate more than half the world's greenhouse gas emissions, will somehow drive down their carbon pollution voluntarily and assiduously without any binding enforcement mechanism to measure and control CO2 emissions at any level from factory to state, and without any specific penalty gradation or fiscal pressure (for example a carbon tax) to discourage bad behaviour."[39]

Institutional investors' contribution to limiting fossil fuels

[edit]

Speaking at the 5th annual World Pensions Forum held on the sidelines of the COP21 Summit, Earth Institute Director Jeffrey Sachs argued that institutional investors would eventually divest from carbon-reliant firms if they could not react to political and regulatory efforts to halt climate change: "Every energy company in a pension fund's portfolio needs to be scrutinized from purely a financial view about its future, 'Why is this [a company] we would want to hold over a five- to 20-year period?'... If we continue to hold major energy companies that don't have an answer to a basic financial test, we are just gambling. We have to take a fiduciary responsibility – these are not good bets."[40]

Some US policy makers concurred, notably Al Gore, insisting that "no agreement is perfect, and this one must be strengthened over time, but groups across every sector of society will now begin to reduce dangerous carbon pollution through the framework of this agreement."[41]

Declarations of non-state parties

[edit]
Eiffel Tower illuminated in green in response to the One heart, One tree campaign

As is usual before such major conferences, major NGOs and groups of governments have drafted and published a wide variety of declarations they intend to seek a consensus on, at the Paris conference itself. These include at least the following major efforts:

  • ICLEI at its World Congress, launched the new Transformative Actions Program (TAP) intended to progress local and subnational action ahead of COP21[42] to build on its 2005 COP11 (Montreal summit) commitments,[43] Triple Bottom Line framework arising from that, and other local efforts.
    • European capital and large cities for climate action en route to COP 21 Declaration, adopted 26 March 2015 by "representatives of EU capitals and large cities of 28 EU Member States at the Mayors Meeting organized by Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris, and Ignazio Marino, Mayor of Rome, who argue that "urban areas exposed to climate change are also essential innovation testing zones",[44] which is the focus of the ICLEI mechanisms, metrics and 2005 declaration.
  • Private, corporate and private-public partnerships
    • At the World Summit of Regions for Climate (WSRC) in Paris 2014, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Founder of R20, invited a coalition of governments, businesses and investors to sign a draft "Paris Declaration" at World Climate Summit in Lima 2014, World Green Economy Summit 2015 in Dubai and COP21.[45]
    • The Shift Project by French business organizations.[46]
  • Indigenous peoples efforts include:
  • Women's Earth and Climate Action Network seeking "powerful submissions by worldwide women" sharing "stories, struggles, solutions and action plans ... [a] women's climate justice mobilization"[54]
  • Countries of the Mediterranean Sea. Dam Bridge, Strait of Gibraltar, S.A. (PPEGSA). The first draft PresaPuente adapting to climate change is designed to protect the Mediterranean from the imminent rising waters caused by the polar thaw. More than 24 countries, over 500 million people, more than 15,000 islands and thousands of kilometres of coast which can be saved from flooding.
  • Solar alliance: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced at the 2015 G-20 Summit that he, along with French President François Hollande, intends to propose creating an alliance of solar-rich countries similar to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).[55][56] Ahead of the climate summit, the two leaders sent written invitations to over 100 countries to join the coalition proposed to be called the International Agency for Solar Policy and Application (InSPA).[57]
  • A vast range of other activities[58] in preparation to influence the major decisions at the conference.

Financing

[edit]
Greenpeace activists, demanding 100% renewable energy at Climate March 2015 in Madrid

The conference was budgeted to cost €170m (US$186.87m at the time). The French government said that 20% of the cost would be borne by French firms such as EDF, Engie (formerly known as GDF Suez), Air France, Renault-Nissan and BNP Paribas.[59] Sponsors were among others BMW, Avery Dennison, Carbon Trade Exchange, Cool Effect, The Coca-Cola Company, the Climate Resources Exchange and Vattenfall.[60]

Demonstrations

[edit]

Around the world, 600,000 took part in demonstrations in favour of a strong agreement, such as the Global Climate March organized by 350.org (and other events such as Alternatiba, Village of Alternatives). Paris had a ban on public gatherings in the wake of recent terrorist attacks (state of emergency), but allowed thousands to demonstrate on 12 December against what they felt was a too-weak treaty.[61] There was also an illegal demonstration in Paris, including violent clashes between police and anarchists; ten policemen were injured and 317 people arrested.[62][63]

On 30 November, the first day of the conference, a "climate strike" was organised by students in over 100 countries; over 50,000 people participate.[64]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, designated as the 21st (COP 21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), took place in , , from November 30 to December 12, 2015, involving representatives from 195 parties and numerous observers. The conference sought to forge a successor to the by establishing a global framework for reducing , culminating in the adoption of the on December 12, which committed parties to pursue efforts limiting global temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, while aiming for 1.5°C through nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Negotiations at COP 21 addressed longstanding divisions between developed and developing nations over responsibility for emissions reductions and financial support, with developed countries pledging at least $100 billion annually by 2020 to aid adaptation and mitigation in poorer states. The resulting marked the first universal climate pact requiring all countries—unlike prior frameworks that exempted major developing emitters—to submit periodic NDCs, subject to transparency mechanisms including biennial reports and a every five years starting in 2023. Key achievements included near-universal , with 196 parties joining by 2021, and an emphasis on ratcheting up ambition over time, though the agreement's provisions remain largely non-binding, lacking enforceable penalties for non-compliance and relying on voluntary national actions. Critics, drawing from empirical assessments, contend that initial NDCs were insufficient to meet the temperature goals, projecting warming of 2.7–3.7°C by 2100 if unchanged, and that post-2015 global emissions continued rising, underscoring limitations in causal impact despite diplomatic momentum. The conference also highlighted involvement, with subnational entities and businesses pledging complementary actions, though their aggregate effect on emissions trajectories remains debated amid persistent reliance on fossil fuels.

Historical Context

Prior Climate Summits and Their Shortcomings

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was established at the 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, providing a framework for international cooperation on climate change but imposing no binding emission reduction targets on any nation. Subsequent conferences under the UNFCCC, such as COP3 in in 1997, produced the , which required Annex I (developed) countries to reduce by an average of 5% below 1990 levels during 2008–2012, while exempting developing nations from mandatory cuts. However, the protocol faced significant shortcomings: the , the world's largest emitter at the time, signed but did not ratify it, citing economic risks and the absence of commitments from major developing economies like and ; global CO2 emissions rose 44% from 1997 to 2012, driven largely by growth in non-Annex I countries. Efforts to extend or replace Kyoto faltered in later summits. COP15 in in aimed for a comprehensive, binding successor agreement with ambitious targets to limit warming to 2°C, but negotiations collapsed amid disputes over emission caps, financial aid for developing countries, and verification mechanisms, resulting only in the non-binding of voluntary pledges. Pledges under the accord projected global emissions to continue rising, with insufficient depth to alter trends; for instance, Annex I countries committed to limited reductions, while major emitters like offered non-verified intensity targets. Procedural chaos, including last-minute interventions by heads of state, underscored deeper issues of trust deficits between developed and developing blocs, where the former sought universal obligations and the latter demanded historical responsibility-based exemptions. Interim conferences, such as those in (2010), Durban (2011), and (2013), yielded incremental progress like technology mechanisms and a loose timeline for a 2015 deal, but failed to enforce Kyoto's second commitment period or impose meaningful penalties for non-compliance. Globally, CO2 emissions climbed from approximately 22 gigatons in 1990 to over 36 gigatons by 2015, reflecting unchecked industrialization in —accounting for 77% of net GHG growth since 1990—despite cumulative agreements, as economic development priorities trumped emission curbs in non-committed nations. These outcomes highlighted systemic flaws: reliance on differentiated responsibilities that absolved emerging giants, weak enforcement absent economic incentives like carbon pricing, and targets mismatched to causal drivers of emissions growth, such as fossil fuel-dependent poverty alleviation.

Scientific Claims and Uncertainties Leading to COP21

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), published between 2013 and 2014, concluded that it was extremely likely that human influence had been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century, attributing this primarily to increases in anthropogenic concentrations. The report estimated had increased by approximately 0.85°C over the period 1880–2012, with projections indicating further warming of 0.3–1.7°C by mid-century under various emissions scenarios, depending on mitigation efforts. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations, measured at , reached an annual mean exceeding 400 ppm by 2015, with a record annual increase of 3.05 parts per million that year, driven by emissions and reduced terrestrial uptake linked to El Niño conditions. Global surface temperatures in 2015 were reported as 0.87°C above the 1951–1980 baseline by NASA's GISTEMP analysis, marking it as the warmest year on record at the time and influenced by a strong El Niño event. These observations aligned with AR5's attribution of recent warming trends to human activities, though natural variability, including solar cycles and ocean oscillations, continued to modulate short-term trends. Significant uncertainties persisted, notably the observed slowdown in global surface warming rates from 1998 to around 2012–2014, often termed the "hiatus," which challenged the consistency of projections that had anticipated steady acceleration. This period saw surface temperatures rise more slowly than model ensembles predicted, prompting debates over internal variability, ocean heat uptake, and potential observational biases, with some analyses rejecting a true pause after for data adjustments and Arctic coverage. Equilibrium —the long-term temperature response to doubled CO2—remained estimated at a likely range of 1.5–4.5°C in AR5, unchanged from prior assessments despite instrumental records suggesting values toward the lower end, highlighting unresolved discrepancies between models and paleoclimate proxies. Comparisons between climate models and observations revealed systematic biases, such as models overestimating tropical tropospheric warming or failing to capture multidecadal variability, which fueled questions about the reliability of projections informing policy. These uncertainties underscored the challenges in quantifying feedbacks like cloud responses and aerosol effects, with AR5 acknowledging high confidence in overall anthropogenic forcing but medium confidence in regional projections and extreme event attribution. Critics, including some climate scientists, argued that institutional incentives in modeling communities may have downplayed model shortcomings, though mainstream assessments maintained that long-term trends supported the need for emissions reductions.

Event Details

Venue, Dates, and Organizational Setup

The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, designated as the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP 21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the 11th Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 11), convened from 30 November to 12 December 2015. The event was hosted by the French government in response to its selection as the host nation under UNFCCC procedures, which rotate presidency among regional groups. The primary venue was the Parc des Expositions at , located in a approximately 15 kilometers northeast of central . This expansive exhibition complex, typically used for air shows and trade fairs, was adapted to accommodate plenary sessions, negotiation rooms, and side events, with dedicated pavilions for UNFCCC bodies and observer organizations. Security measures were heightened due to the conference's scale and timing shortly after terrorist attacks in Paris on 13 2015, involving restricted access and extensive perimeter controls. Organizationally, the conference operated under the UNFCCC Secretariat's coordination, with Executive Secretary overseeing logistical and procedural support. , France's Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development, was elected President of COP 21/CMP 11 by acclamation, tasked with guiding negotiations and facilitating consensus among the 196 parties. A bureau of facilitators, appointed by Fabius, assisted in managing subsidiary bodies such as the Ad Hoc Working Group on the (APA) and technical expert groups. Pre-conference preparations included informal consultations and draft text iterations to streamline the agenda.

Attendance and Stakeholder Representation

The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference drew over 36,000 participants from governments, international organizations, , business, media, and other stakeholders. This total encompassed nearly 23,100 government officials representing UNFCCC Parties and observer states. Delegates came from 196 countries, reflecting broad national participation under the UNFCCC framework. A record-high contingent of more than 150 Heads of State and Government attended the opening Leaders Event on 30 November 2015, convened at the invitation of French President and UN Secretary-General . This high-level presence underscored the summit's political significance, with leaders from major emitters including the , , , and the delivering statements on national commitments. Observer stakeholders included approximately 9,400 representatives from UN bodies and agencies, 3,600 from intergovernmental organizations, 2,100 from business and industry sectors, and 1,400 media personnel. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), admitted as observers by the UNFCCC, provided input through side events and consultations, though their exact numbers were not separately tallied in aggregate reports; collectively, observer groups facilitated diverse perspectives from environmental advocates, research institutions, and indigenous representatives. The inclusion of business representatives, including from energy-intensive industries, highlighted tensions between economic interests and emission reduction goals during negotiations.

Negotiation Dynamics

Pre-COP Preparations and Draft Agendas

The preparations for the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) were conducted primarily through the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP), which focused on negotiating a post-2020 climate agreement, alongside submissions of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) by parties and informal political consultations led by the French presidency. These efforts aimed to streamline an initial 86-page Negotiating Text from February 2015 into a more concise draft for final negotiations in . From 1 to 11 June 2015, the Bonn Climate Change Conference hosted ADP session 2-9, where parties conducted first readings of draft text elements on , , , , capacity-building, and transparency. Negotiators initiated consolidation to reduce redundancies, entrusting ADP co-chairs Daniel Reifsnyder () and Ahmad Faisal Mohammad () with preparing a streamlined version incorporating party inputs. The session also advanced pre-2020 ambition discussions, though progress was limited by disagreements over procedural matters like the treatment of non-consensus proposals. Parties were encouraged to submit INDCs outlining post-2020 intentions, with an informal target of 31 2015 for early submissions to allow aggregate analysis, though a key deadline for inclusion in pre-COP synthesis reports was 1 October 2015. By 1 October, 147 parties, covering over 85% of global emissions, had submitted INDCs, providing a basis for assessing collective ambition against scientific benchmarks like limiting warming to 2°C above pre-industrial levels. A UNFCCC synthesis report released on 30 October analyzed these, projecting emissions trajectories insufficient to meet the 2°C goal without enhanced efforts. Informal ministerial consultations, initiated by COP21 President , supported technical preparations; for instance, a 20-21 July 2015 meeting in involved 46 parties discussing convergence on key issues like differentiation and . A second such consultation occurred on 5 May 2015, focusing on bridging gaps in draft elements. The culminating pre-COP technical session, ADP 2-11 from 19 to 23 October 2015 in , refined co-chairs' non-paper (ADP.2015.8.InformalNote) into a draft agreement and accompanying decision text totaling around 50 pages, with the core agreement draft at 28 pages. This version retained bracketed alternatives on contentious provisions, such as the long-term temperature goal (options for 1.5°C alongside 2°C), nationally determined contributions' legal form, and mobilization (e.g., $100 billion annually by 2020 scaling to higher figures). Over 2,400 participants, including government delegates and observers, debated these, advancing workstream 1 (post-2020 agreement) and workstream 2 (pre-2020 ambition), though developing countries criticized insufficient progress on means of like . The draft was transmitted to COP21 as the basis for negotiations, emphasizing consensus-building on legally binding elements versus flexibility in contributions.

Major Disputes During Talks

One of the central disputes concerned the application of (CBDR) and respective capabilities, with developing countries, represented by groups such as the G-77/China and (LMDCs), insisting on maintaining clear distinctions in mitigation obligations based on historical emissions and economic development needs, while developed nations like the and EU advocated for self-differentiation through nationally determined contributions (NDCs) that reflected current global emission realities, where emerging economies such as and India accounted for over half of annual CO2 emissions by 2015. This tension persisted through informal indabas from 6-8 December, as developing parties resisted provisions that would impose comparable transparency and review requirements on all nations without adequate support. Climate finance emerged as another key flashpoint, with developing countries demanding fulfillment of the $100 billion annual pledge from developed nations by 2020—comprising grants, not loans—and its scaling to trillions post-2020 with guarantees of predictability and new/additional resources, whereas developed parties, including the , sought to broaden the contributor base to include voluntary inputs from emerging economies and private sources, arguing that reallocation of existing alone could not suffice given rising costs estimated at up to $500 billion annually by 2030 for vulnerable states. Negotiations on balancing and reached partial agreement on 3 , but disputes over pre-2020 action and non-Annex I contributions delayed progress until a revised draft on 10 . The legal character of the agreement divided parties, as the prioritized a flexible, non-binding framework for NDCs to circumvent domestic ratification hurdles, opposed by LMDCs and the African Group who favored stronger, protocol-like obligations on developed countries for emission peaks and reductions, though compromises emerged in the hybrid structure adopted on 12 at 7:26 PM. Disputes over loss and damage intensified, with (SIDS) and (LDCs) pushing for a standalone mechanism under the agreement to address irreversible impacts like sea-level rise—projected to displace millions by 2050—independent of adaptation finance, while the and other developed nations rejected any provisions implying liability or compensation, resulting in Article 8's inclusion under the Warsaw International Mechanism without legal basis for claims. Ambition levels sparked contention on long-term goals, with AOSIS and over 100 vulnerable nations demanding a 1.5°C limit over the 2°C threshold favored by many developed parties, alongside net-zero emissions timelines; drafts oscillated between options until convergence on "well below 2°C" with efforts toward 1.5°C on 11-12 , though initial NDCs were projected to yield 2.7-3.5°C warming by 2100. Transparency frameworks also clashed, as developed sought uniform monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) every five years starting 2018, while developing groups called for differentiated systems with capacity-building support to avoid undue burdens on low-income states.

Resolution and Adoption of the Agreement

The final text of the was forwarded to the (COP) plenary session following consultations in the Paris Committee, convened under the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP). On December 12, 2015, COP21 President , serving as France's Foreign Minister, presented the adoption proposal (document FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1) to the plenary, which included the agreement text and an accompanying decision. Fabius declared the adoption after scanning the room for objections, stating, "I see the room, I see the reaction is positive – I hear no objection," and struck a gavel to formalize it, marking the conclusion of the two-week talks. The process adhered to UNFCCC consensus rules, requiring no formal vetoes from the 195 participating Parties, though it allowed post-adoption expressions of dissent. Nicaragua briefly sought to speak against the agreement's ambition during the plenary, citing insufficient commitments from developed nations, but Fabius proceeded without yielding the floor, effectively sidelining the objection to preserve momentum. This maneuver drew criticism for bypassing full debate, yet no invoked the consensus threshold to block adoption, reflecting diplomatic pressure to achieve a universal outcome amid from protracted disputes over differentiation, , and binding elements. The agreement was thus adopted as a protocol under Article 2 of the UNFCCC, entering into force on November 4, 2016, after by 55 Parties representing at least 55% of global . The adoption decision (1/CP.21) also encompassed 34 ancillary COP and CMP decisions on , , transparency, and , though these were secondary to the core agreement text, which emphasized nationally determined contributions (NDCs) without enforceable penalties for non-compliance. Critics, including some developing nations, argued the rushed resolution prioritized optics over rigor, as pre-submitted INDCs already projected warming exceeding 2°C by century's end based on contemporaneous analyses. Nonetheless, the plenary's applause and subsequent endorsements by leaders underscored the political achievement of securing near-universal buy-in after two decades of failed top-down mandates like the .

Primary Outcomes

Provisions of the Paris Agreement

The , adopted by consensus on December 12, 2015, at the 21st (COP21) to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), entered into force on November 4, 2016, following or acceptance by at least 55 parties accounting for at least 55 percent of total global . The establishes procedural obligations that are legally binding upon , such as the submission of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and participation in transparency and processes, while substantive emission reduction targets remain voluntary and domestically determined, with compliance enforced through a facilitative, non-adversarial mechanism rather than punitive measures. Article 2 outlines the agreement's central aim: to strengthen global response by limiting the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels while pursuing efforts to limit the increase to 1.5°C; enhancing , strengthening resilience, and reducing to climate-related hazards; and ensuring financial flows are consistent with a pathway toward low and climate-resilient development. This temperature goal is legally binding as a collective objective, though individual party contributions toward it are not enforceable internationally. Article 3 further specifies that global should peak as soon as possible, achieve balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks in the second half of the century, and reflect equity and . Under Article 4, all parties are required to prepare, communicate, and maintain successive NDCs that outline their post-2020 climate actions, with updates submitted every five years to represent a progression beyond previous efforts in ambition, reflecting the party's highest possible contribution. Parties must pursue implementation of these domestic measures, with developed countries expected to undertake economy-wide absolute emission reduction targets, while developing countries are encouraged to move toward such targets over time; long-term strategies for low-emission development are to be communicated by 2020 where possible. Article 6 enables international cooperation through mechanisms such as for internationally transferred outcomes and a new market-based mechanism to promote emission reductions, subject to corresponding adjustments to avoid double-counting. Adaptation provisions in Article 7 establish a global goal on adaptation to enhance , strengthen resilience, and reduce , requiring parties—particularly developing countries—to formulate and implement national adaptation plans, with periodic communication of adaptation efforts integrated into NDCs where appropriate. Article 8 recognizes the importance of addressing loss and damage associated with effects, continuing the Warsaw International Mechanism without assigning new legal obligations for compensation to parties. Financial commitments under Article 9 mandate that parties provide financial resources to assist parties with and , scaling up provision urgently and aiming for a balance between the two areas, building on the goal of mobilizing jointly USD 100 billion annually by 2020 from public and private sources; a new collective quantified goal is to be set from a floor of this amount for the post-2020 period. Articles 10 and 11 promote technology development and transfer, as well as capacity-building, through cooperative frameworks to support developing countries' access to climate-related technologies and enhance institutional capabilities, with developed countries taking the lead. Transparency is addressed in Article 13, requiring all parties to implement a framework for biennial reporting on greenhouse gas inventories, progress toward NDCs, climate impacts, and support provided or received, subject to international technical expert review and a capacity-building initiative for transparency, with flexibility for least developed countries and small island developing states. Article 14 institutes a global stocktake to assess collective progress toward the agreement's purpose every five years, beginning in 2023, drawing on the best available science to inform parties' future actions without prescribing binding outcomes. Article 15 establishes a compliance committee of 12 members to promote implementation and address questions of compliance in a transparent, non-adversarial, and assistive manner, explicitly excluding economic sanctions or trade measures.

Nationally Determined Contributions Framework

The Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) framework emerged as a cornerstone of the adopted at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), representing a departure from the top-down, legally binding emission targets of the toward a bottom-up, voluntary approach where each participating self-determines its climate mitigation and adaptation efforts. Under Article 4 of the Agreement, each Party commits to preparing, communicating, and maintaining successive NDCs that outline its intended contributions to reducing national and enhancing resilience to climate impacts, with an emphasis on achieving economy-wide targets where possible. These contributions must reflect each country's highest possible ambition, considering its national circumstances, and are required to be updated every five years to represent progressive enhancement toward the Agreement's long-term goals of limiting global temperature increase to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, while pursuing efforts to limit it to 1.5°C. In preparation for COP21, countries submitted Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), which served as precursors to formal NDCs and were intended to inform negotiations by demonstrating pre-ratification commitments. By October 31, 2015, 155 countries—representing nearly 90% of global —had submitted INDCs, covering mitigation targets, adaptation plans, and in some cases, finance and technology needs for developing nations. Upon ratification of the , these INDCs were converted into the first round of NDCs, establishing a public registry maintained by the UNFCCC to record and track submissions for transparency. The framework mandates that NDCs include quantifiable information on baseline scenarios, time frames, methodologies for emission accounting, and assumptions underlying the targets, though the specific targets remain non-binding in terms of enforcement, with compliance relying on , expert assessments, and a every five years starting in 2023. While the NDC approach aimed to foster universal participation by accommodating diverse national capacities—unlike the Kyoto Protocol's focus on developed countries' binding reductions—critics have noted its limitations in ensuring sufficient ambition, as aggregate INDCs submitted before COP21 were projected to yield only a 2.7–3.7°C warming trajectory if fully implemented, falling short of the 2°C goal due to gaps in stringency and implementation feasibility. Subsequent UNFCCC synthesis reports have confirmed that even updated NDCs as of leave a substantial emissions gap, with pledged reductions insufficient to meet temperature limits without accelerated action, highlighting the framework's dependence on voluntary escalation rather than mandatory penalties. Developing countries often condition portions of their NDCs on international support for finance, , and , underscoring causal dependencies on external aid for realization. The framework's review mechanisms, including biennial transparency reports and facilitative dialogues, are designed to encourage ratcheting up ambition through iterative feedback, though from post-2015 implementation shows varied compliance, with some nations strengthening targets while others lag due to economic priorities.

Long-Term Temperature Goals and Review Mechanisms

The , adopted at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, sets a long-term temperature goal under Article 2 to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, while pursuing efforts to limit the increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would substantially reduce risks and impacts of . To achieve this goal, parties commit to peaking global as soon as possible—acknowledging longer timelines for developing countries—and to undertake rapid reductions thereafter, aiming for a balance between anthropogenic emissions and removals by sinks in the second half of the century, guided by the best available science. These provisions build on the objective of the UNFCCC to stabilize concentrations at levels preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. The Agreement's review mechanisms center on a process established by Article 14, requiring parties to periodically assess collective progress toward the Agreement's purpose and long-term goals, with the first stocktake occurring in 2023 and subsequent ones every five years thereafter. This facilitative, iterative process evaluates advancements in mitigation, adaptation, and implementation of financial, technology, and capacity-building support, drawing on the latest scientific assessments, such as those from the . The stocktake outcomes inform parties in updating and enhancing their nationally determined contributions (NDCs), ensuring progressive ambition over time without prescribing specific emission targets. NDCs themselves must be prepared and communicated every five years, aligned with the stocktake cycle, and represent a progression beyond previous efforts while considering national circumstances. This ratcheting mechanism aims to bridge gaps between pledged actions and the emission pathways needed for the temperature goals, though empirical assessments indicate that initial NDCs submitted around fell short of required reductions, projecting warming exceeding 2°C under then-current policies. The transparency framework under Article 13 complements the stocktake by standardizing reporting on NDCs and support, enhancing accountability while accommodating flexibilities for developing countries.

Financial and Technical Commitments

Pledges for Climate Finance

At the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris, developed countries reaffirmed their collective commitment, originally established in 2009 at the Copenhagen conference and formalized at COP16 in Cancun in 2010, to mobilize jointly USD 100 billion annually by 2020 from a wide variety of sources, including public and private finance, to support mitigation and adaptation efforts in developing countries. This pledge was integrated into the Paris Agreement, which emphasized that developed nations should continue to take the lead in climate finance while encouraging voluntary contributions from other parties capable of doing so. Parties at COP21 decided to extend the USD 100 billion goal through 2025 in the context of meaningful actions and transparency, with a mandate to negotiate a new collective quantified goal on (NCQG) prior to 2025, aiming for at least the same level but potentially higher to reflect evolving needs. The agreement specified that should be scaled up from public sources, new, additional, and predictable, with balanced support for and , though it did not impose new binding individual country pledges beyond the collective target. The (GCF), designated as the world's largest dedicated climate fund and a key operating entity of the Financial Mechanism under the UNFCCC, featured prominently in discussions, with its board reporting on initial approvals of USD 168 million for projects and programs as of November 2015. While major GCF pledges had been secured earlier—totaling up to USD 9.3 billion equivalent by late 2014—COP21 saw additional contributions from subnational and developing entities, including EUR 1 million (approximately USD 1.05 million) from the City of announced on December 3, 2015, and USD 1 million from Viet Nam on December 4, 2015, signaling broader participation beyond traditional donors. These pledges aimed to bolster the GCF's initial resource mobilization, which by COP21 had drawn commitments from 49 countries, regions, and cities, though delivery timelines and grant-to-loan ratios remained points of contention in subsequent tracking. Specific bilateral or multilateral announcements at the conference included subnational pledges, such as 1 million euros from regional governments, highlighting efforts to involve non-state actors in finance mobilization. However, the overall framework prioritized the collective USD 100 billion target without detailed breakdowns of sources or recipients at the time, leading to later debates over whether mobilized funds qualified as new and additional or merely repackaged existing aid, with assessments tracking progress but facing criticism for methodological ambiguities.

Technology Transfer and Capacity Building Promises

At the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), parties to the UNFCCC adopted provisions in the aimed at facilitating technology development and transfer to developing countries, building on the existing Technology Mechanism established under the Cancun Agreements in 2010. Article 10 of the Agreement commits parties to promoting the enhanced development, deployment, diffusion, and transfer of environmentally sound technologies, particularly to developing nations, with a focus on accelerating for and . This includes establishing a technology framework to provide guidance to the Technology Mechanism, comprising the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN), which are tasked with analyzing barriers, providing policy recommendations, and supporting low-emission and climate-resilient technology actions. The framework emphasizes cooperation to realize the "full implementation" of such technologies, though without enforceable timelines or quantified transfer obligations, relying instead on voluntary sharing of experiences and best practices among parties. Capacity-building commitments under the Paris Agreement, outlined in Article 11, pledge to enhance the institutional and technical abilities of developing country parties—especially and —to implement the Agreement's goals, including through education, training, and institutional strengthening. A key outcome was the establishment of the Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT), funded via a trust fund administered by the World Bank, to build national capacities for monitoring, reporting, and verification of emissions and support, aligning with the Agreement's enhanced transparency framework. COP21 decisions further directed the creation of a capacity-building to address gaps in areas like Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) formulation and adaptation planning, with an emphasis on non-duplicative efforts and integration with existing mechanisms. These promises underscore a recognition of disparities in technical expertise between developed and developing nations, yet implementation remains contingent on voluntary contributions and lacks binding financial allocations specifically for capacity building, distinct from broader pledges. Despite these outlined commitments, analyses from groups at COP21 highlighted concerns that technology transfer provisions fell short of earlier demands for mandatory, no-strings-attached transfers, including intellectual property waivers, potentially limiting practical deployment in low-income contexts. The TEC and CTCN were reaffirmed as central to fulfilling these promises, with mandates to convene stakeholders for multi-stakeholder dialogues and provide targeted technical assistance requests from , though post-COP21 assessments have noted persistent challenges in scaling up due to shortfalls and coordination issues. Overall, the promises position technology and capacity support as cooperative pillars for achieving the Agreement's long-term goals, integrated with finance and transparency mechanisms, but their effectiveness hinges on subsequent party actions rather than prescriptive mandates.

Non-State Actor Involvement

Initiatives and Declarations by Subnational Entities

During the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), subnational entities including states, regions, and cities issued declarations and formed coalitions to pursue emissions reductions and adaptation measures, often in response to perceived delays in national-level agreements. These efforts emphasized voluntary commitments to align with the conference's aspirational goals of limiting global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. The was launched alongside COP21 on December 10, 2015, initiated by the U.S. state of and the German state of . This committed subnational governments to peak emissions as soon as possible, achieve per capita emissions below 2 metric tons of CO2 equivalent by 2050, and prioritize low-carbon . By the close of COP21, more than 100 regional governments had joined, representing jurisdictions with a combined exceeding 100 million and economies comparable to major national GDPs. Cities focused on the Compact of Mayors, a pre-existing initiative that gained momentum at COP21. On December 4, 2015, during the Climate Summit for Local Leaders in , over 400 mayors publicly committed to inventorying community , setting science-based reduction targets, and implementing actionable plans, with aggregate pledges projected to avoid up to 1.3 gigatons of CO2 equivalent annually by 2030—potentially closing 25% of the gap between national pledges and required reductions for a 2°C pathway. This built on earlier signatories and included transparent reporting protocols to track progress. Additionally, nearly 1,000 local leaders gathered at City Hall during COP21 to endorse the Paris City Hall Declaration, reinforcing the Compact of Mayors with pledges for ambitious emissions cuts, enhanced , and integration of climate actions into local planning. Parallel initiatives like RegionsAdapt emerged, focusing on subnational strategies, with initial signatories committing to vulnerability assessments and resilience-building projects. These subnational actions highlighted decentralized but relied on self-reported and lacked binding enforcement mechanisms akin to national frameworks.

Corporate and NGO Contributions Versus Real-World Constraints

At the 2015 COP21 conference, corporations participated through initiatives like the Paris Pledge for Action, under which over 1,000 businesses, investors, cities, and regions committed to aligning their strategies with the Paris Agreement's goals of limiting global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. These pledges emphasized voluntary actions such as improving energy efficiency, investing in low-carbon technologies, and advocating for supportive policies, with signatories including major firms from sectors like energy and finance. Similarly, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) contributed by providing technical expertise, organizing advocacy events, and pressuring negotiators for ambitious binding commitments, with groups like the influencing draft texts and side agreements on transparency. However, these contributions faced inherent real-world constraints that limited their practical impact. Corporate net-zero pledges emerging from or inspired by COP21 often suffered from ambiguity in scope, baselines, and timelines, with analyses of 35 major companies across high-emission industries revealing that many excluded significant indirect emissions or relied on unproven offsets rather than direct reductions. Economic realities, including the high costs of scaling intermittent renewables without adequate storage—where grid-scale battery deployment remained insufficient to replace baseload power—constrained implementation, as evidenced by continued corporate reliance on affordable, reliable sources amid rising global demand. For NGOs, whose advocacy focused on rapid decarbonization, constraints arose from geopolitical factors, such as developing nations' prioritization of poverty alleviation and industrialization over emission cuts, leading to persistent growth in global and gas use post-2015. By 2025, evaluations indicated that business commitments from COP21 had not significantly altered corporate emissions trajectories, with many firms delaying targets due to dependencies and regulatory inconsistencies across jurisdictions. NGO-driven declarations, while amplifying calls for and , overlooked causal barriers like the physics of in alternatives versus hydrocarbons, resulting in pledges that exceeded feasible deployment rates without massive, unsubsidized overhauls. These gaps highlight how non-binding, aspirational contributions clashed with empirical limits on technological maturity and economic incentives, contributing to global emissions rising approximately 1.1% annually on average from 2015 to 2022 despite heightened awareness.

Public and Media Dimensions

Demonstrations and Activism Around the Conference

Following the November 13, 2015, terrorist attacks in , which killed 130 people and prompted a , French authorities banned all public demonstrations nationwide, including a planned climate march on expected to draw up to 200,000 participants to pressure negotiators ahead of COP21. Organizers, including coalitions like Avancées pour la Justice Climatique et Sociale, shifted to indoor rallies and symbolic gestures, such as placing over 20,000 pairs of shoes at to represent absent marchers demanding urgent emissions cuts. Despite the prohibitions, small groups of activists clashed with police near on November 29, leading to the use of after protesters threw objects; around 200 people were briefly detained, though most were released without charges. In solidarity, an estimated 500,000 to 1 million people participated in over 2,000 climate marches worldwide on the same day, from to , calling for binding limits on global warming to 1.5°C rather than the 2°C threshold under discussion. During the conference (November 30 to December 11), activists adapted with permitted indoor events at venues like Le Centquatre-Paris, where thousands gathered for panels on climate justice, , and critiques of corporate influence. persisted, including a "red lines" human chain attempt symbolizing , which authorities dispersed, and an Indigenous-led paddle-out on the River protesting the dilution of protections in draft texts. On December 11, as the agreement neared finalization, thousands defied the ban for stationary protests outside the venue, waving banners decrying the deal as a "false solution" enabling continued expansion, with some labeling it a "death sentence for vulnerable communities." Groups like and emphasized non-violent, creative tactics, such as projecting messages on the and distributing leaflets inside the conference perimeter, to highlight gaps between pledges and real-world emissions trajectories. These efforts, while curtailed by security measures, amplified demands for stronger accountability mechanisms beyond voluntary nationally determined contributions.

Security Measures and Suppression of Dissent

In response to the Islamist terrorist attacks in on , 2015, which resulted in 130 deaths and hundreds injured, invoked Article 16 of its , declaring a that extended through the COP21 period from November 30 to December 12. This prompted unprecedented security protocols, including the deployment of 2,800 police officers and gendarmes specifically to safeguard the conference venue on Paris's northern outskirts, supplemented by 6,300 additional personnel patrolling central and surrounding areas. Border controls were reinstated nationwide, and a was enforced over the site, reflecting the French government's assessment of elevated risks from jihadist threats amid ongoing investigations into attack networks. The empowered authorities to prohibit all public assemblies, directly curtailing planned climate protests and marches that had been organized by environmental groups to coincide with the . This blanket ban, justified by Interior Minister as necessary to prevent gatherings that could become terrorist targets, effectively suppressed dissent-oriented activities, including symbolic actions like human chains and rallies demanding stronger emission cuts. Prior to the attacks, over 100,000 participants had registered for Paris-based demonstrations, but the decree shifted activism abroad, with parallel marches in cities like and drawing hundreds of thousands globally on November 29. Enforcement included preemptive detentions: at least 24 climate activists, including organizers from groups like , were placed under starting November 25, accused of intending to breach the assembly prohibition through preparatory meetings or logistics. Police raids targeted homes and offices suspected of planning, seizing materials under expanded search powers that bypassed judicial warrants. While proponents of the measures, including UNFCCC officials, emphasized their role in enabling the to proceed without disruption, critics from advocates contended the restrictions disproportionately limited non-violent expression, potentially eroding public input on climate policy legitimacy amid a forum ostensibly promoting global consensus. Defiance emerged in limited forms, such as the "red lines" action, where thousands gathered covertly in to protest perceived weaknesses in the emerging , drawing on networks to evade detection. No major incidents of or successful large-scale breaches occurred at the venue, underscoring the efficacy of the security apparatus, though the overall suppression shifted to indoor forums like side events and petitions, altering the dynamics of public pressure on negotiators. Reports of targeted harassment against skeptic voices were absent, with restrictions applied uniformly to pro-climate mobilization rather than oppositional critiques of alarmism or policy efficacy.

Criticisms from Diverse Perspectives

Doubts on Climate Science Projections and Alarmism

The IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), which informed projections for the 2015 , acknowledged a in global surface warming rates from 1998 to 2012, during which observed trends averaged 0.05 ± 0.15°C per decade against multimodel means of approximately 0.20°C per decade. Critics, including submissions to the UK Parliament's review of AR5, argued that this "hiatus" exposed systematic overestimation by CMIP5 models, which projected warming rates 100% higher over 20-year periods and 400% higher over 15-year periods ending around 2012, undermining confidence in near-term forecasts for 2016–2035 that required a 20% downward adjustment. This discrepancy persisted into 2015, with satellite-derived tropospheric temperature data showing models overpredicting tropical mid-tropospheric warming by factors exceeding 2:1 relative to observations from 1979 onward, a pattern analyzed in peer-reviewed assessments of model-observation mismatches. Uncertainty in equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)—the long-term warming from doubled atmospheric CO2—further fueled doubts, as AR5 retained a broad range of 1.5–4.5°C despite emerging evidence favoring lower values around 1.5–2.0°C from instrumental records and energy balance models. Transient climate response (TCR), more relevant for century-scale projections, was assessed at 1.0–2.5°C, with some studies indicating TCR below 1.5°C, implying milder outcomes under high-emission paths than alarmist narratives suggested. Climatologist , in December 2015 U.S. , emphasized that the post-1998 warming slowdown occurred amid 25% of cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions, pointing to overstated sensitivity or underestimated natural variability (e.g., ) as causal factors, rather than model deficiencies alone. Projections underpinning COP21 pledges, such as limiting warming to 1.5–2.0°C, relied heavily on , framed in AR5 as a high-emission baseline but criticized for implausible assumptions like coal consumption rising sixfold by 2100 amid stagnating global emissions trends observed by 2015. RCP8.5's socioeconomic inputs, including slow technological progress and unchecked population growth, diverged from data showing coal's plateau, rendering it an outlier rather than a credible business-as-usual for policy urgency. Such reliance amplified alarmist impact assessments, as models conditioned on high-forcing pathways projected extreme outcomes despite empirical shortfalls in replicating observed variability and regional patterns, like the absent tropical "hotspot." These concerns, raised by analysts at parallel events to COP21 (e.g., gatherings), highlighted a perceived lack of self-correction in , where chaotic influences and nonlinear feedbacks—admitted by IPCC as irreducible—were downplayed in favor of ensemble averages favoring higher warming. Critics contended that , by privileging tail-end risks over median projections aligned with lower sensitivity, justified commitments with potentially disproportionate economic costs, given historical precedents of unfulfilled dire forecasts (e.g., rapid sea-level rise submerging islands by 2015). Empirical prioritization over model consensus was advocated to temper policy responses, as unchecked projection errors risked eroding credibility amid ongoing debates on causal drivers beyond greenhouse gases.

Economic Burdens and Inefficiencies of Mandated Transitions

The Paris Agreement's nationally determined contributions (NDCs), intended to limit global warming, have been projected to impose substantial economic costs, with estimates for full implementation ranging from $819 billion to $1,890 billion annually by 2030, yet achieving only a marginal 1% reduction in the emissions needed for the 2°C target. These mandates, by requiring rapid decarbonization through subsidies and regulations, elevate energy prices and distort market signals, as evidenced by Europe's post-2015 surge in household electricity costs, which averaged 30-40% higher than in the by 2024 due to renewable integration mandates. Empirical analyses indicate that such transitions yield low returns on investment, with Bjørn Lomborg's Center calculating that Paris-compliant policies deliver benefits valued at mere cents per dollar spent when discounting future climate damages against immediate economic harms. Mandated shifts to intermittent renewables exacerbate inefficiencies, necessitating redundant fossil fuel backups and grid overhauls that inflate system costs without proportional emission cuts; for instance, Germany's program, accelerated post-Paris, has accrued expenses projected at 4.8 to 5.5 trillion euros from 2025 to 2049, including 2.3 trillion euros for fuel imports to compensate for and solar variability. This redundancy arises from renewables' low capacity factors—often below 25% for solar and 35% for onshore —requiring dispatchable power plants to maintain grid stability, thus perpetuating fossil dependence despite phase-out pledges; data from 2015-2024 show Germany's and gas generation rising during periods, undermining efficiency claims. Globally, McKinsey estimates cumulative investments of $275 trillion by 2050 for net-zero alignment, much of it for storage and transmission infrastructure to mitigate , yet real-world deployments reveal stranded assets and underutilized capacity, as seen in overbuilt solar farms idled during low-sunlight seasons. Economic burdens extend to deindustrialization and job displacement, with mandated transitions accelerating offshoring to low-regulation economies like China, where coal-powered manufacturing retains cost advantages; EU steel production fell 15% from 2015-2023 amid rising energy levies, correlating with a 20-30% hike in industrial electricity prices tied to carbon pricing and renewable levies. While proponents cite green job creation, net employment gains are illusory, as fossil sector losses—over 500,000 globally by 2020 per labor analyses—outpace renewable hires, which require subsidies averaging $50-100 per megawatt-hour to compete, diverting capital from productive uses. These inefficiencies, rooted in ignoring dispatchable energy's reliability premium, have fueled energy poverty, with 10-15% of EU households facing fuel poverty by 2025, a direct outcome of policy-driven price volatility rather than market-driven innovation.

Geopolitical Inequities and Enforcement Weaknesses

The , adopted at COP21 on December 12, 2015, enshrined the principle of (CBDR), requiring developed nations to undertake absolute economy-wide emission reduction targets while affording developing countries greater flexibility in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). This framework perpetuated inequities by classifying major emitters like and as developing, despite their rapid industrialization and current emission profiles, allowing them to prioritize economic growth over stringent cuts. Critics argue this differentiation imposes disproportionate burdens on Western economies, which bear historical responsibility but face deindustrialization risks, while enabling high-growth nations to expand use without equivalent accountability. China, the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter accounting for approximately 28% of global CO2 emissions in 2015, committed only to peaking emissions around 2030 and achieving carbon intensity reductions, commitments that permitted continued absolute emission increases through at least that decade. India, the third-largest emitter, pledged to reduce emission intensity by 33-35% below 2005 levels by 2030 alongside expanding non-fossil energy capacity, but without absolute caps, aligning with its developmental priorities amid rising coal reliance. Such provisions fueled geopolitical tensions, as developed nations like the and committed to deeper cuts and financial transfers—totaling $100 billion annually to developing countries by 2020—potentially subsidizing competitors' industrial expansion without reciprocal restraints. Enforcement mechanisms under the Agreement remain fundamentally weak, relying on voluntary NDCs, periodic transparency reporting, and a "name-and-shame" review process rather than binding penalties or sanctions for non-compliance. Absent coercive tools, major emitters have routinely underdelivered; for instance, global emissions continued rising post-2015, with many countries, including signatories, failing to meet even their flexible pledges due to the lack of repercussions. This structure exacerbates inequities, as non-binding commitments allow geopolitical rivals to renege or reinterpret obligations—evident in China's post-2030 coal buildout plans—while pressuring compliant developed states to escalate unilateral efforts, undermining the Agreement's collective efficacy.

Post-Conference Legacy

Global Emission Trajectories Since 2015

Global (CO2) emissions from fossil fuels and industrial processes, which constitute the majority of anthropogenic , have risen steadily since the 2015 , reaching successive record highs despite pledges to peak and reduce them. In 2015, global fossil CO2 emissions totaled approximately 35.7 Gt; by 2019, they had increased to 36.7 Gt, dipped to 34.9 Gt in 2020 due to , and rebounded to 37.0 Gt in 2021. Emissions continued climbing to 37.4 Gt in 2022 and an estimated 37.8 Gt in 2023, with preliminary 2024 data projecting a further 0.8% increase to around 38.1 Gt, primarily from expanded (2.4% rise) and (0.9% rise) use offsetting modest declines.
YearFossil CO2 Emissions (Gt)Annual Change (%)
201535.7+1.2
201936.7+1.0 (avg. 2015-19)
202034.9-4.9
202137.0+6.0
202237.4+1.0
202337.8+1.0
2024~38.1 (est.)+0.8
This trajectory reflects a deceleration in growth rates—from an average 1.7% annually in 2005–2014 to about 0.3–0.4% per year post-2015—but no absolute decline or peak, as emissions in developing , now over half of the global total (up from 40% in 2015), have driven net increases led by and . Total , including and others, followed a similar pattern, growing 0.32% annually from 2015–2024 versus faster pre-Paris rises, yet remaining incompatible with Paris temperature goals. The UN Environment Programme's 2024 Emissions Gap Report underscores that even full implementation of current nationally determined contributions (NDCs) would yield only a 5–10% reduction by 2030 from 2019 levels, far short of the 42% cut required for a 1.5°C pathway, highlighting enforcement gaps and reliance on voluntary commitments. Empirical data from sources like the IEA and Global Carbon Project, which draw on national inventories and satellite observations, indicate that economic growth in emerging markets and energy security priorities have outweighed mitigation efforts to date.

Evaluations of Effectiveness by 2025

By 2025, empirical assessments of the Paris Agreement's effectiveness, stemming from the 2015 COP21 conference, reveal a failure to deliver the required global emissions reductions to meet its temperature goals, with continuing to rise despite pledges from nearly 200 nations. The agreement's nationally determined contributions (NDCs) were intended to limit warming to well below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C, necessitating emissions to peak before 2025 and decline by 43% from 2019 levels by 2030; however, current policies project warming of 2.6–3.1°C by 2100 under updated NDCs, with unconditional pledges aligning with 3.2°C. Independent analyses, including those from the (IEA), confirm that under stated policies, trajectories lead to approximately 2.4°C warming, underscoring the gap between rhetoric and implementation. Global CO₂ emissions from fuels and increased from around 36 Gt in 2015 to a record 37.4 Gt in , reflecting a 0.8% rise that year amid slower but persistent growth, driven largely by demand in developing economies like and . Total reached 53.2 Gt CO₂-equivalent in , up 1.3% from 2023, with no evidence of the pre-2025 peak mandated for 1.5°C compatibility. Critics attribute this shortfall to the agreement's non-binding structure, absence of enforcement mechanisms, and exemptions for major emitters in developing nations, which have prioritized over cuts; for instance, current policies achieve only a 5.5% emissions reduction by 2030 against the 40–50% needed. While some evaluations credit the framework with fostering investments—reaching nearly $2 trillion annually by 2024, a 60% surge since —causal attribution remains contested, as cost declines in solar and predate and outpace policy mandates, with investments still comparable. Statistical modeling suggests the agreement exerted a modest downward pressure on emissions intensity but was insufficient to offset overall economic expansion, resulting in net increases. Geopolitical factors, including fragmented compliance and rising emissions from non-OECD countries (now over 60% of the total), further erode effectiveness, prompting calls for more robust, enforceable revisions in subsequent NDCs due in 2025. Sources like the UNEP Emissions Gap Report, while institutionally aligned with climate advocacy, transparently document these deficiencies through , though their projections assume high sensitivity to policy ambition without accounting for potential technological decoupling from emissions growth.

Influence on Subsequent Policy and Revisions

The , adopted at COP21 on December 12, 2015, established a flexible framework for national climate pledges known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which required initial submissions by 2020 and subsequent updates every five years to progressively enhance ambition in line with the goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. This ratcheting mechanism, outlined in Article 4, mandated that successive NDCs represent a progression beyond previous efforts, influencing over 190 parties to revise their emissions targets; for instance, by the 2020 update cycle, many developing nations incorporated stronger and measures, though aggregate ambition remained insufficient to meet the Agreement's temperature objectives according to UNFCCC assessments. Subsequent Conferences of the Parties built directly on this foundation, with COP24 in , , on December 15, 2018, finalizing the Paris Rulebook—a set of guidelines for NDC implementation, transparency in reporting, and accounting of emissions reductions—to address gaps in the original Agreement's operational details. COP26 in in 2021 further refined commitments through pledges like the Global Methane Pledge, targeting a 30% reduction by 2030, and agreements to phase down unabated power, which over 40 countries endorsed as extensions of Paris goals. The first at COP28 in on December 13, 2023, under Article 14, evaluated collective progress and urged tripling capacity by 2030, prompting parties to align their 2025 NDC revisions with accelerated transitions away from fossil fuels. At the national level, the Agreement spurred policy integrations, such as the European Union's 2020 , which embedded Paris-aligned net-zero emissions by 2050 into binding legislation like the package, emphasizing carbon pricing and renewables subsidies as core demand-pull instruments. In the United States, re-accession in February 2021 facilitated the of August 2022, allocating $369 billion for clean energy incentives tied to NDC enhancement goals. China's 2020 pledge for carbon neutrality by 2060 and peaking emissions before 2030 explicitly referenced Paris obligations, influencing domestic shifts toward electric vehicles and , though relies on non-binding . These examples illustrate how the Agreement's emphasis on bottom-up commitments catalyzed sector-specific regulations, yet revisions often reflected geopolitical compromises rather than unilateral ambition increases, with transparency frameworks from later COPs addressing inconsistencies in NDC accounting.

References

  1. https://unfccc.int/event/cop-21
  2. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cop21/
  3. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
  4. https://unfccc.int/most-requested/key-aspects-of-the-paris-agreement
  5. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09.pdf
  6. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/viewFile/640/427
  7. https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-0729.pdf
  8. https://unfccc.int/climate-action
  9. https://unfccc.int/process/the-convention/history-of-the-convention
  10. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-kyoto-protocol
  11. https://www.climateforesight.eu/articles/success-or-failure-the-kyoto-protocols-troubled-legacy/
  12. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/paris-global-climate-change-agreements
  13. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-deal-expert-view
  14. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8426835.stm
  15. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidcarlin/2022/11/17/why-copenhagen-fell-apart-and-the-lessons-it-offers-for-cop-27/
  16. https://unfccc.int/process/conferences/the-big-picture/milestones/outcomes-of-the-warsaw-conference
  17. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions
  18. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/chapter/chapter-2/
  19. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
  20. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
  21. https://www.noaa.gov/news/record-annual-increase-of-carbon-dioxide-observed-at-mauna-loa-for-2015
  22. https://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2016/20160120_Temperature2015.pdf
  23. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/hiatus-in-rise-of-earths-surface-air-temperature-likely-temporary/
  24. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/6/JCLI-D-21-0373.1.xml
  25. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2015/09/global-warming-hiatus-091715
  26. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL064888
  27. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf
  28. https://www.commerce.senate.gov/services/files/f739759e-3f1b-447e-a1eb-d42bbe70454e
  29. https://enb.iisd.org/paris-climate-change-conference-cop21/summary-report
  30. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2015-12-12/remarks-closing-cop21
  31. https://unfccc.int/news/cop-21cmp-11-information-hub-venue-and-logistics
  32. https://unfccc.int/news/laurent-fabius-reflections-on-the-paris-conference-and-implications-for-2016
  33. https://unfccc.int/news/laurent-fabius-convened-his-team-of-14-facilitators-to-ensure-the-success-of-cop21
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Conference-of-the-Parties-COP-21-was-attended-by-196-countries-Paris-France_fig1_349349155
  35. https://unfccc.int/news/record-number-leaders-attend-cop21-paris-climate-summit
  36. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10.pdf
  37. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/parties-non-party-stakeholders/non-party-stakeholders/overview/admitted-ngos
  38. https://enb.iisd.org/events/bonn-climate-change-conference-june-2015/summary-report-1-11-june-2015
  39. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/adp2/eng/4infnot.pdf
  40. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/07.pdf
  41. https://epthinktank.eu/2015/10/22/the-european-council-and-the-un-climate-change-conference-in-paris-2015-cop-21/
  42. https://unfccc.int/news/cop-21-ministerial-informal-consultations-in-paris
  43. https://hongkong.consulfrance.org/Second-informal-consultation
  44. https://unfccc.int/files/bodies/application/pdf/ws1and2%402330.pdf
  45. https://enb.iisd.org/events/bonn-climate-change-conference-october-2015/summary-report-19-23-october-2015
  46. https://www.carbonbrief.org/paris-2015-what-do-the-negotiating-alliances-want/
  47. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/10/the-six-key-road-blocks-at-the-un-climate-talks-in-paris
  48. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/12/12/world-leaders-make-history-with-climate-deal-in-paris
  49. https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-the-challenge-of-consensus-decision-making-in-un-climate-negotiations/
  50. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=xxvii-7-d&chapter=27&clang=_en
  51. https://www.unfccc.int/news/finale-cop21
  52. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf
  53. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  54. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs
  55. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/article6
  56. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/COP21-FAQs.pdf
  57. https://unfccc.int/NDCREG
  58. https://sustainability.yale.edu/explainers/yale-experts-explain-paris-climate-agreement
  59. https://www.wri.org/insights/what-effect-will-national-climate-plans-indcs-have-global-emissions-5-things-know
  60. https://unfccc.int/documents/619180
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02743-x
  62. https://unfccc.int/resource/ccsites/zimbab/conven/text/art02.htm
  63. https://unfccc.int/topics/global-stocktake
  64. https://unfccc.int/news/from-billions-to-trillions-setting-a-new-goal-on-climate-finance
  65. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/climate-finance-and-the-usd-100-billion-goal.html
  66. https://unfccc.int/topics/climate-finance/the-big-picture/climate-finance-in-the-negotiations
  67. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/rus/03a01r.pdf
  68. https://www.greenclimate.fund/news/paris-pledges-1-million-to-green-climate-fund
  69. https://www.greenclimate.fund/countries/viet-nam
  70. https://www.greenclimate.fund/about/resource-mobilisation/irm
  71. https://www.c2es.org/content/cop-21-paris/
  72. https://unfccc.int/ttclear/technology-mechanism.html
  73. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cp24_auv_cop_4_TF.pdf
  74. https://unfccc.int/topics/climate-technology/what-is-technology-development-and-transfer
  75. https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/cop_auv_template_4b_new__1.pdf
  76. https://fiftrustee.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/dfi/fiftrustee/fund-detail/cbit
  77. https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/events/Outcomes_from_the_Paris_Agreement-UNFCCC_0.pdf
  78. https://www.wri.org/insights/3-reasons-why-capacity-building-critical-implementing-paris-agreement
  79. http://www.g77.org/statement/getstatement.php?id=151130b
  80. https://unfccc.int/ttclear/misc_/StaticFiles/gnwoerk_static/brief10/8c3ce94c20144fd5a8b0c06fefff6633/57440a5fa1244fd8b8cd13eb4413b4f6.pdf
  81. https://unfccc.int/news/how-climate-technology-is-being-ramped-up
  82. https://www.theclimategroup.org/under2-coalition-decade-local-action-and-global-impact
  83. https://www.wri.org/insights/cop21-highlights-importance-city-actions-climate-fight
  84. https://www.ihobe.eus/en/news/under2-coalition-recognises-the-basque-countrys-leadership-in-climate-action
  85. https://archive.gov.ca.gov/archive/gov39/2017/09/17/news19956/index.html
  86. https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/press/announcing-the-collective-global-impact-of-the-compact-of-mayors-at-the-climate-summit-for-local-leaders-2/
  87. https://www.c40.org/news/compact-partners-announce-aggregate-emissions-impact-at-climate-summit-for-local-leaders/
  88. https://talkofthecities.iclei.org/cities-the-unsung-heroes-at-cop21/
  89. https://www.c40.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Paris-to-Belem-A-Decade-of-Local-Climate.pdf
  90. https://www.corporateleadersgroup.com/reports-evidence-and-insights/news-items/lappel-de-paris-paris-pledge-for-action
  91. https://unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action/cop21-business-action
  92. https://tesi.luiss.it/19915/1/075222_FINIGUERRA_ANNA.pdf
  93. https://ccsi.columbia.edu/news/corporate-net-zero-pledges-bad-and-ugly
  94. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.919
  95. https://gripe.polisci.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/121/2023/12/GRIPE_S10E04_Colgan_updated.pdf
  96. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/02/12/corporate-climate-commitments-empty-promises-or-profit-driven-strategy/
  97. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/18/cop21-climate-marches-paris-attacks
  98. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19112015/french-police-cancel-paris-climate-rallies/
  99. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/climate/2015-paris-climate-talks/silent-rally-activists-shoes
  100. https://qz.com/561141/parisians-couldnt-hold-their-climate-change-march-so-they-left-a-powerful-symbol-instead
  101. https://www.france24.com/en/20151129-climate-protesters-clash-with-police-paris-cop21
  102. https://www.latimes.com/nation/ct-photos-climate-change-protests-in-paris-20151129-photogallery.html
  103. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-34956825
  104. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-lists/see-hundreds-of-thousands-march-for-action-against-climate-change-22599/
  105. https://wagingnonviolence.org/2015/11/protest-ban-will-not-stop-creative-actions-cop21/
  106. https://psmag.com/news/red-lines-and-marches-at-close-of-paris-agreement/
  107. https://www.ienearth.org/indigenous-activists-protest-the-removal-of-indigenous-rights-from-the-paris-climate-pact-on-the-seine-river/
  108. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2015/dec/10/thousands-defy-paris-protest-ban-call-climate-action-in-pictures
  109. https://www.democracynow.org/2015/12/14/protest_in_paris_climate_justice_activists
  110. https://fsrn.org/2015/12/street-beat-climate-justice-activists-take-to-parisian-streets-despite-state-of-emergency/
  111. https://grist.org/climate-energy/climate-activists-in-paris-stage-peaceful-action-despite-official-ban-on-marches/
  112. https://climatenetwork.org/2015/11/18/plans-for-mobilizations-in-paris-cancelled-by-authorities-french-activists-more-determined-to-be-heard/
  113. https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/28/europe/cop21-tight-security-for-climate-summit
  114. https://www.rfi.fr/en/environment/20151129-paris-limits-traffic-beefs-security-cop21-climate-conference-begins
  115. https://www.amwa.net/article/cop-21-conference-will-proceed-although-climate-marches-cancelled
  116. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/nov/27/paris-climate-activists-put-under-house-arrest-using-emergency-laws
  117. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2015/11/30/paris-a-changing-climate-of-fear
  118. https://unfccc.int/news/security-at-cop21-presidency-statement
  119. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2015/dec/10/activists-to-defy-protest-ban-with-giant-civil-disobedience-against-paris-climate-pact
  120. https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2015/11/ban-public-assembly-hurts-legitimacy-paris-climate-talks
  121. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter09_FINAL.pdf
  122. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/47018/html/
  123. https://judithcurry.com/2018/09/17/a-test-of-the-tropical-200-300-mb-warming-rate-in-climate-models/
  124. https://issues.org/climate-change-scenarios-lost-touch-reality-pielke-ritchie/
  125. https://www.hoover.org/research/flawed-climate-models
  126. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/environment/once-a-fixture-climate-skeptics-say-they-are-being-stifled-in-paris-idUSKBN0TQ2F1/
  127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162520304157
  128. https://www.iea.org/reports/germany-2025
  129. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/paris-climate-accord-too-expensive-by-bjorn-lomborg-2017-12
  130. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/german-industry-lobby-says-energy-transition-risks-54-trillion-euro-burden-by-2025-09-03/
  131. https://climateinsider.com/2024/08/20/global-energy-transition-2050-mckinseys-insights-on-renewable-energy-and-infrastructure-needs/
  132. https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/china-abandons-paris-agreement-making-us-efforts-painful-and-pointless
  133. https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2021/01/22/clearing-the-airthe-us-india-china-and-the-paris-agreement/
  134. https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-indias-updated-paris-agreement-pledge-mean-for-climate-change/
  135. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/paris-agreement
  136. https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-foreignpolicy/failures-and-successes-of-the-paris-agreement/
  137. https://gga.org/the-paris-agreement-is-a-delusion/
  138. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2022
  139. https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022
  140. https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/17/965/2025/essd-17-965-2025.html
  141. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-global-co2-emissions-will-reach-new-high-in-2024-despite-slower-growth/
  142. https://ca1-eci.edcdn.com/reports/10-Years-Post-Paris-Emissions.pdf
  143. https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2023/the-changing-landscape-of-global-emissions
  144. https://www.theenergymix.com/emissions-growth-slows-5-fold-since-paris-deal-as-clean-energy-becomes-unstoppable/
  145. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2024
  146. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-data-explorer
  147. https://globalcarbonbudget.org/gcb-2024/
  148. https://climateanalytics.org/comment/the-iea-just-published-its-2024-world-energy-outlook-what-does-it-say
  149. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2025
  150. https://iiasa.ac.at/news/apr-2020/five-years-after-paris-agreement-gap-between-promises-and-implementation
  151. https://synertics.io/blog/149/key-insights-from-the-iea-world-energy-outlook-2024
  152. https://www.washington.edu/news/2025/10/17/the-paris-agreement-is-working-but-not-well-enough-to-offset-economic-growth/
  153. https://kogod.american.edu/news/how-good-is-the-paris-agreement
  154. https://www.wri.org/insights/assessing-2025-ndcs
  155. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/turning-promises-into-progress-why-ndcs-need-clear-implementation-plans/
  156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927822000594
  157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7890541/
  158. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/paris-climate-agreement-everything-you-need-know
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.