Hubbry Logo
CannibalismCannibalismMain
Open search
Cannibalism
Community hub
Cannibalism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cannibalism
Cannibalism
Cannibalism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A slug, Arion vulgaris, eating a dead individual of the same species

Cannibalism is the act of consuming another individual of the same species as food. Cannibalism is a common ecological interaction in the animal kingdom and has been recorded in more than 1,500 species.[1] Human cannibalism is also well documented, both in ancient and in recent times.[2]

The rate of cannibalism increases in nutritionally poor environments as individuals turn to members of their own species as an additional food source.[3] Cannibalism regulates population numbers, whereby resources such as food, shelter and territory become more readily available with the decrease of potential competition. Although it may benefit the individual, it has been shown that the presence of cannibalism decreases the expected survival rate of the whole population and increases the risk of consuming a relative.[3] Other negative effects may include the increased risk of pathogen transmission as the encounter rate of hosts increases.[4] Cannibalism, however, does not—as once believed—occur only as a result of extreme food shortage or of artificial/unnatural conditions, but may also occur under natural conditions in a variety of species.[1][5][3]

At the ecosystem level, cannibalism is most common in aquatic settings, with a cannibalism rate of up to 0.3% amongst fish.[6][7] Cannibalism is not restricted to carnivorous species: it also occurs in herbivores and in detritivores.[vague][5] Sexual cannibalism normally involves the consumption of the male by the female individual before, during or after copulation.[3] Other forms of cannibalism include size-structured cannibalism and intrauterine cannibalism. Behavioral, physiological and morphological adaptations have evolved to decrease the rate of cannibalism in individual species.[3]

Benefits

[edit]

In environments where food availability is constrained, individuals can receive extra nutrition and energy if they use members of their own species, also known as conspecifics, as an additional food source. This would, in turn, increase the survival rate of the cannibal and thus provide an evolutionary advantage in environments where food is scarce.[8] For example, female Fletcher's frogs lay their eggs in ephemeral pools that lack food resources. Therefore, in order to survive, tadpoles within the same clutch are forced to consume each other and exploit their conspecifics as the only available source of nutrition. A study conducted on another amphibian, the wood frog, tadpoles showed that those that exhibited cannibalistic tendencies had faster growth rates and higher fitness levels than non-cannibals.[9] An increase of size and growth would give them the added benefit of protection from potential predators such as other cannibals and give them an advantage when competing for resources.[3]

The nutritional benefits of cannibalism may allow for the more efficient conversion of a conspecific diet into reusable resources than a fully herbaceous diet; as herbaceous diets may consist of excess elements which the animal has to expend energy to get rid of.[10] This facilitates faster development; however, a trade-off may occur as there may be less time to ingest these acquired resources. Studies have shown that there is a noticeable size difference between animals fed on a high conspecific diet which were smaller compared to those fed on a low conspecific diet.[10] Hence, individual fitness could only be increased if the balance between developmental rate and size is balanced out, with studies showing that this is achieved in low conspecific diets.[10]

In some insects, cannibalism is used to control population. In confused flour beetles, population density is lowered by cannibalism when crowding occurs.[11]

Cannibalism regulates population numbers and benefits the cannibalistic individual and its kin as resources such as extra shelter, territory and food are freed, thereby increasing the fitness of the cannibal[8] by lowering crowding effects. However, this is only the case if the cannibal recognizes its own kin as this will not hinder any future chances of perpetuating its genes in future generations. The elimination of competition can also increase mating opportunities, allowing further spread of an individual's genes.[12]

Costs

[edit]

Animals which have diets consisting of predominantly conspecific prey expose themselves to a greater risk of injury and expend more energy foraging for suitable prey as compared to non-cannibalistic species.[3]

Predators often target younger or more vulnerable prey.[13] However, the time necessitated by such selective predation could result in a failure to meet the predator's self-set nutritional requirements.[14] In addition, the consumption of conspecific prey may also involve the ingestion of defense compounds and hormones, which have the capacity to impact the developmental growth of the cannibal's offspring.[10] Hence, predators normally partake in a cannibalistic diet in conditions where alternative food sources are absent or not as readily available.

Failure to recognize kin prey is also a disadvantage, provided cannibals target and consume younger individuals. For example, a male stickleback fish may often mistake their own "eggs" for their competitor's eggs, and hence would inadvertently eliminate some of its own genes from the available gene pool.[3] Kin recognition has been observed in tadpoles of the spadefoot toad, whereby cannibalistic tadpoles of the same clutch tended to avoid consuming and harming siblings, while eating other non-siblings.[15]

The act of cannibalism may also facilitate trophic disease transmission within a population, though cannibalistically spread pathogens and parasites generally employ alternative modes of infection.[4]

Diseases transmitted through cannibalism

[edit]

Cannibalism can potentially reduce the prevalence of parasites in the population by decreasing the number of susceptible hosts and indirectly killing the parasite in the host.[16] It has been shown in some studies that the risk of encountering an infected victim increases when there is a higher cannibalism rate, though this risk drops as the number of available hosts decreases.[16] However, this is only the case if the risk of disease transmission is low.[4] Cannibalism is an ineffective method of disease spread as cannibalism in the animal kingdom is normally a one-on-one interaction, and the spread of disease requires group cannibalism; thereby it is rare for a disease to have evolved to rely solely on cannibalism to spread. Usually there are different means of transmission, such as with direct contact, maternal transmission, coprophagy, and necrophagy with different species.[4] Infected individuals are more likely to be consumed than non-infected individuals, thus some research has suggested that the spread of disease may be a limiting factor to the prevalence of cannibalism in the population.[16]

Some examples of diseases transmitted by cannibalism in mammals include the human disease Kuru which is a prion disease that degenerates the brain.[4] This disease was prevalent in Papua New Guinea where tribes practiced endocannibalism in cannibalistic funeral rituals and consume the brains infected by these prions.[17] It is a cerebellar dysfunctional disease which has symptoms including a broad-based gait and decreased motor activity control; however, the disease has a long incubation period and symptoms may not appear until years later.[17]

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease is another prion disease which is usually caused by feeding contaminated bovine tissue to other cattle.[18] It is a neurodegenerative disease and could be spread to humans if the individual were to consume contaminated beef. The spread of parasites such as nematodes may also be facilitated by cannibalism as eggs from these parasites are transferred more easily from one host to another.[4]

Other forms of diseases include sarcocystis and iridovirus in reptiles and amphibians; granulosus virus, chagas disease, and microsporidia in insects; stained prawn disease, white pot syndrome, helminthes and tapeworms in crustaceans and fish.[4]

Foraging dynamics

[edit]

Cannibalism may become apparent when direct competition for limited resources forces individuals to use other conspecific individuals as an additional resource to maintain their metabolic rates.[3] Hunger drives individuals to increase their foraging rates, which in turn decreases their attack threshold and tolerance to other conspecific individuals. As resources dwindle, individuals are forced to change their behaviour which may lead to animal migration,[19] confrontation, or cannibalism.[3]

Cannibalism rates increase with increasing population density as it becomes more advantageous to prey on conspecific organisms than to forage in the environment.[3] This is because the encounter rate between predator and prey increases, making cannibalism more convenient and beneficial than foraging within the environment. Over time, the dynamics within the population change as those with cannibalistic tendencies may receive additional nutritional benefits and increase the size ratio of predator to prey.[20] The presence of smaller prey, or prey which are at a vulnerable stage of their life cycle, increases the chances of cannibalism occurring due to the reduced risk of injury.[21] A feedback loop occurs when increasing rates of cannibalism decreases population densities, leading to an increased abundance of alternative food sources; making it more beneficial to forage within the environment than for cannibalism to occur.[3] When population numbers and foraging rates increase, the carrying capacity for that resource in the area may be reached, thus forcing individuals to look for other resources such as conspecific prey.

Sexual cannibalism

[edit]
Not to be confused with Vorarephilia, a paraphilia.
Main article: Sexual cannibalism

Sexual cannibalism is present largely in spiders and other invertebrates, including gastropods.[3] This refers to the killing and consumption of conspecific sexual partners during courtship, and during or after copulation. Normally, it is the female which consumes the conspecific male organism, though there have been some reported cases of the male consuming the adult female, however, this has only been recorded under laboratory conditions.[3][22][23] Sexual cannibalism has been recorded in the female redback spider, black widow spider, praying mantis, and scorpion, among others.

In most species of spiders, the consumption of the male individual occurs before copulation and the male fails to transfer his sperm into the female.[3] This may be due to mistaken identity such as in the case of the orb weaving spider which holds little tolerance to any spider which is present in its web and may mistake the vibrations for those of a prey item.[3] Other reasons for male consumption before mating may include female choice and the nutritional advantages of cannibalism.[24] The size of the male spider may play a part in determining its reproductive success as smaller males are less likely to be consumed during pre-copulation; however, larger males may be able to prevent the smaller ones from gaining access to the female.[24] There exists a conflict of interest between males and females, as females may be more inclined to turn to cannibalism as a source of nutritional intake while the male's interest is mostly focused on ensuring paternity of the future generations.[3] It was found that cannibalistic females produced offspring with greater survival rates than non-cannibalistic females, as cannibals produced greater clutches and larger egg sizes.[25] Hence, species such as the male dark fishing spider of the family Dolomedes self-sacrifice and spontaneously die during copulation to facilitate their own consumption by the female, thereby increasing the chance of survivorship of future offspring.[26]

Sexual dimorphism has been theorised to have arisen from sexual selection as smaller males were captured more easily than larger males; however, it is also possible that sexual cannibalism only occurs due to the difference in size between male and females.[3] Data comparing female and male spider body length shows that there is little support for the prior theory as there is not much correlation between body size and the presence of sexual cannibalism. Not all species of spiders which partake in sexual cannibalism exhibit size dimorphism.[3]

The avoidance of sexual cannibalism is present in males of certain species to increase their rate of survival, whereby the male uses cautionary methods to lower the risk of his consumption.[3] Male orb weaving spiders would often wait for females to moult or to finish eating before attempting to initiate mating, as the females are less likely to attack.[3] Males which are vulnerable to post-copulation consumption may gather mating thread to generate a mechanical tension which they could use to spring away after insemination, while other spiders such as the crab spider may tangle the female's legs in webs to reduce the risk of the female capturing him.[3] Male choice is common in mantids whereby males were observed to choose fatter females due to the reduced risk of attack and were more hesitant to approach starved females.[27]

Size-structured cannibalism

[edit]
Nematode of the order Mononchida eating another Mononchid

Size-structured cannibalism is cannibalism in which older, larger, more mature individuals consume smaller, younger conspecifics. In size-structured populations, (where populations are made of individuals of various sizes, ages, and maturities), cannibalism can be responsible for 8% (Belding's ground squirrel) to 95% (dragonfly larvae) of the total mortality,[1] making it a significant and important factor for population[28] and community dynamics.[29]

Size-structured cannibalism has commonly been observed in the wild for a variety of taxa. Vertebrate examples include chimpanzees, where groups of adult males have been observed to attack and consume infants.[30][31][32]

Filial cannibalism

[edit]
Main article: Filial cannibalism

Filial cannibalism is a specific type of size-structured cannibalism in which adults eat their own offspring.[33] Although most often thought of as parents eating live young, filial cannibalism includes parental consumption of stillborn infants and miscarried fetuses as well as infertile and still-incubating eggs. Vertebrate examples include pigs, where cannibalistic piglet savaging occurs at a rate of about 0.3% and is considered to be an abnormal behavior. However, consumption by the sow of already dead piglets that were stillborn or accidentally crushed occurs at a much higher rate and is considered normal.[34][35]

Filial cannibalism is particularly common in teleost fishes, appearing in at least seventeen different families of teleosts.[36] Within this diverse group of fish, there have been many, variable explanations of the possible adaptive value of filial cannibalism. One of these is the energy-based hypothesis, which suggests that fish eat their offspring when they are low on energy as an investment in future reproductive success.[33] This has been supported by experimental evidence, showing that male three-spined sticklebacks,[33][37][38] male tessellated darters,[39] and male sphinx blenny fish[40] all consume or absorb their own eggs to maintain their physical conditions. In other words, when males of a fish species are low on energy, it might sometimes be beneficial for them to feed on their own offspring to survive and invest in future reproductive success.

Another hypothesis as to the adaptive value of filial cannibalism in teleosts is that it increases density-dependent egg survivorship. In other words, filial cannibalism simply increases overall reproductive success by helping the other eggs make it to maturity by thinning out the numbers. Possible explanations as to why this is so include increasing oxygen availability to the remaining eggs,[41] the negative effects of accumulating embryo waste,[42] and predation.[42]

In some species of eusocial wasps, such as Polistes chinensis, the reproducing female will kill and feed younger larvae to her older brood. This occurs under food stressed conditions in order to ensure that the first generation of workers emerges without delay.[43] Further evidence also suggests that occasionally filial cannibalism might occur as a by-product of cuckoldry in fish. Males consume broods, which may include their own offspring, when they believe a certain percentage of the brood contains genetic material that is not theirs.[37][44]

It is not always the parent that cannibalizes the offspring; in some spiders, mothers have been observed to feed themselves to their brood as the ultimate provision from mother to children, known as matriphagy.[45]

The dinosaur Coelophysis was once suspected to practice this form of cannibalism but this turned out to be wrong, although Deinonychus may have done so. Skeletal remains from subadults with missing parts are suspected of having been eaten by other Deinonychus, mainly full-grown adults.

Infanticide

[edit]
Main articles: Infanticide (zoology) and Child cannibalism § Infanticidal cannibalism

Infanticide is the killing of a non-adult animal by an adult of the same species. Infanticide is often accompanied by cannibalism. It is often displayed in lions; a male lion encroaching on the territory of a rival pride will often kill any existing cubs fathered by other males; this brings the lionesses into heat more quickly, enabling the invading lion to sire his own young. This is an example of cannibalistic behaviour in a genetic context.

In many species of Lepidoptera, such as Cupido minimus and the Indianmeal moth, the first larvae to hatch will consume the other eggs or smaller larvae on the host plant, decreasing competition.[46][47]

Intrauterine cannibalism

[edit]
Further information: Oophagy

Intrauterine cannibalism is a behaviour in some carnivorous species, in which multiple embryos are created at impregnation, but only one or two are born. The larger or stronger ones consume their less-developed siblings as a source of nutrients.

In adelphophagy or embryophagy, the fetus eats sibling embryos, while in oophagy it feeds on eggs.[48][49]

Adelphophagy occurs in some marine gastropods (calyptraeids, muricids, vermetids, and buccinids) and in some marine annelids (Boccardia proboscidia in Spionidae).[50]

Intrauterine cannibalism is known to occur in lamnoid sharks[51] such as the sand tiger shark, and in the fire salamander,[52] as well as in some teleost fishes.[49] The Carboniferous period chimaera, Delphyodontos dacriformes, is suspected of having practiced intrauterine cannibalism, also, due to the sharp teeth of the recently born (or possibly aborted) juveniles, and the presence of fecal matter in the juveniles' intestines.[53]

Protection against cannibalism

[edit]

Animals have evolved protection to prevent and deter potential predators such as those from their own kind.[3] Many amphibian eggs are gelatinous and toxic to decrease edibility. Often, adults would lay their eggs in crevices, holes, or empty nesting sites to hide their eggs from potential conspecific predators which tend to ingest the eggs for an additional nutritional benefit or to get rid of genetic competition. In amphibians, the development of non-aquatic egg deposition has helped increase the survival rates of their young by the evolution of viviparity or direct development.[3] In bees, worker policing occurs to prohibit worker reproduction, whereby workers cannibalize other worker laid eggs.[54] Queen laid eggs have a different scent than worker laid eggs, allowing workers to differentiate between the two, allowing them to nurture and protect queen laid eggs rather than cannibalising them.[54] Parental presence at nesting sites is also a common method of protection against infanticide committed by conspecific individuals, whereby the parent exhibits defensive displays to ward off potential predators. Parental investment in newborns are generally higher during their early stages of development whereby behaviours such as aggression, territorial behaviour, and pregnancy blocking become more apparent.[3]

Morphological plasticity helps an individual account for different predation stresses, thereby increasing individual survival rates.[55] Japanese brown frog tadpoles have been shown to exhibit morphological plasticity when they are in a high stress environment where cannibalism between tadpoles and more developed individuals were present. Shifting their morphology plays a key role in their survival, creating bulkier bodies when put into environments where more developed tadpoles were present, to make it difficult for the individuals to swallow them whole.[55] Diet shifts between different stages of development have also evolved to decrease competition between each stage, thereby increasing the amount of food availability so that there is a decreased chance that the individuals will turn to cannibalism as an additional food source.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cannibalism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cannibalism, also known as anthropophagy, is the practice of consuming the flesh, organs, or other tissues of individuals from one's own , a behavior documented in both societies and over 1,500 . In humans, it encompasses a range of motivations and contexts, from ritualistic incorporation of the deceased to desperate survival measures during famines or disasters, and rarely, pathological acts driven by severe mental disorders. While often sensationalized, anthropological evidence reveals it as a complex phenomenon shaped by cultural, environmental, and psychological factors, with practices varying widely across history and geography. Human cannibalism is broadly classified into two mutually exclusive forms: , involving the consumption of deceased kin or group members, typically for spiritual or mourning purposes to ensure the soul's integration with ancestors, and , the eating of outsiders or enemies, often as an act of warfare, revenge, or power acquisition. Nutritional or survival cannibalism occurs under extreme , as seen in historical cases like the 1609-1610 famine at , where colonists resorted to consuming human remains, including a 14-year-old girl whose bones showed cut marks from butchering. Ritual examples include the of , who practiced endocannibalism until the mid-20th century, inadvertently spreading the disease kuru through infected brain tissue consumed in funerary rites. In contrast, exocannibalism featured in South American groups like the Tupinambá, who ritually ate war captives to absorb their strength. Pathological cannibalism, though exceedingly rare, is linked to psychotic disorders such as or cultural syndromes like among , where individuals experience an irresistible urge to consume human flesh amid delusions of transformation into a cannibalistic monster. Archaeological evidence suggests cannibalism dates back at least 800,000 years, with early hominins like showing signs of defleshing and consumption, possibly for nutritional or aggressive reasons. Today, cannibalism is universally in most societies and legally prosecuted as or when involving , reflecting ethical, health, and legal prohibitions against it.

Definition and Scope

Definition

Cannibalism is defined biologically as the act of one individual consuming another of the same , either in part or whole, and is observed as a response to environmental pressures across diverse animal groups including , , , birds, and mammals. In anthropological terms, it refers specifically to anthropophagy, or the consumption of human flesh by humans, which has occurred in various societies for nutritional, , or survival purposes. This behavior encompasses , where the consumed individual is from within the same —often for affectionate or reasons involving kin—and , where the victim is an outsider, typically selected for nutritional gain or to symbolize dominance in conflict. The term "cannibalism" entered English in the late 18th century, derived from the Spanish "caníbal," a variant of "Carib," the name of an indigenous West Indian people whom Christopher Columbus described as ferocious man-eaters in the 1490s. An earlier Greek equivalent, "anthropophagia," meaning "man-eating," combines "anthrōpos" (human) and "phagein" (to eat), with "anthropophagi" denoting mythical or reported human-eaters in classical texts. Self-consumption, or autocannibalism, represents a rare variant where an individual ingests its own body tissues, distinct from inter-individual acts but aligned with broader intraspecific feeding. Cannibalism is distinguished from necrophagy, the feeding on carrion or corpses not killed by the consumer, which may involve conspecifics but emphasizes decomposition rather than active predation or ritual. Similarly, scavenging broadly entails consuming dead , often from different , without the species-specific focus of cannibalism. Non-consumptive analogs, such as —where one individual steals food resources from another of the same or related without direct —highlight competitive intraspecific interactions that parallel cannibalism's resource acquisition but avoid tissue consumption. Cannibalism occurs in a of carnivorous and noncarnivorous taxa, from to mammals.

Types and Classifications

Cannibalism can be classified in various ways based on , , and biological occurrence, with distinctions often drawn between humans and other animals. In animals, a primary exists between opportunistic (or facultative) cannibalism, which occurs sporadically under conditions like scarcity or high , and cannibalism, which is a necessary part of the life cycle in certain species. Opportunistic cannibalism is far more common, enabling individuals to exploit conspecifics as a resource when alternative is limited, as seen in spadefoot toad tadpoles that consume kin to accelerate during pond . cannibalism, though rarer, is exemplified by intrauterine cannibalism in sand tiger sharks, where embryos routinely devour siblings to ensure survival. Another key classification in animals pertains to the age or developmental stage of participants, particularly versus larval or juvenile cannibalism. Size-structured cannibalism predominates, with larger s or older juveniles preying on smaller conspecifics, a prevalent in with overlapping generations. In , for instance, larval cannibalism is widespread, often involving the consumption of eggs or younger larvae by older ones, as documented in 75% of reported cases among noncarnivorous . Adult-larval interactions are less frequent but occur, such as in coleopteran larvae where larger individuals cannibalize smaller peers. Taxonomically, cannibalism is most prevalent among arthropods, particularly insects like beetles (Coleoptera) and moths (Lepidoptera), which together account for the majority (about 60%) of documented cannibalistic species among noncarnivorous insects, followed by fish (teleosts) and amphibians where it facilitates growth or competition management. In contrast, it is rarer in mammals, typically limited to opportunistic or filial instances, such as rodents consuming malformed offspring. This distribution reflects ecological pressures, with higher incidence in taxa facing intense intraspecific competition. In humans, classifications often center on social boundaries, distinguishing (consumption within the group, such as kin in contexts) from (consumption of outsiders, like enemies in warfare). Subtypes based on motivation include gastronomic cannibalism for nutritional purposes, as in survival scenarios; medicinal cannibalism, historically practiced in from the 16th to 18th centuries using human remains like mummified flesh or skull moss for treating ailments such as and bruising; and ritualistic cannibalism tied to cultural or spiritual beliefs, such as endocannibalistic mourning practices among the of . Human cannibalism further divides into autocannibalism, the self-consumption of one's own body parts, ranging from benign habits like nail-biting to pathological cases involving deliberate ingestion of excised tissue, and allocannibalism, the consumption of other humans. Autocannibalism is typically non-lethal and isolated, often linked to psychological conditions rather than nutritional intent. These typologies underscore the diverse drivers of cannibalism, from survival imperatives to acts.

Cannibalism in Humans

Cultural and Ritual Practices

Cannibalism has been incorporated into various cultural and practices across societies, often serving symbolic purposes such as honoring the deceased, acquiring divine or power, or reinforcing social bonds. These practices, known as (consumption within one's group) or (consumption of outsiders), were typically embedded in funerary, sacrificial, or medicinal rites rather than driven by nutritional needs. Anthropological evidence highlights their role in maintaining cosmological balance, communal identity, and . Among the of , formed a central part of funerary rites until the mid-20th century, where relatives consumed the bodies of deceased kin to absorb their qualities and ensure spiritual continuity. Women and children primarily ate the brains and other tissues, viewing it as an act of compassion and mourning; this practice, distinct from neighboring groups' of enemies, contributed to the spread of kuru, a disease transmitted through infected brain matter. Fieldwork by anthropologists like Shirley Lindenbaum and Robert Glasse in the 1960s documented how the ritual reinforced kinship ties but declined rapidly due to Australian colonial administration and missionary interventions by the 1950s. In Mesoamerican societies, particularly the , ritual often culminated in cannibalism to channel divine energy and sustain the . Victims, selected as embodiments of gods like Huitzilopochtli, were sacrificed at temples such as the , with their hearts offered to the sun and flesh distributed among elites for communal consumption during festivals, symbolizing the transfer of vital force. Archaeological findings from excavations (1978–2007) confirm over 126 sacrificial remains, supporting codices that describe these acts as repayments to deities for creation and fertility. Scholars emphasize the religious and political dimensions, rejecting exaggerated colonial accounts of mass scale. Amazonian tribes, such as the Tupi of and the Uitoto of and , practiced in warrior rituals to appropriate enemies' strength and purify the . Among the Tupi, captives were ritually executed and consumed to avenge the dead and integrate their essence, a process documented in 16th-century ethnographic reports and later analyses. The Uitoto's "bai" involved men eating portions of slain foes to gain prowess, linking warfare to against malevolent forces. These practices underscored and intergroup conflict. In 16th- and 17th-century , medicinal cannibalism was widespread among physicians and apothecaries, who prescribed human remains for healing based on humoral theory and Paracelsian alchemy. Powdered Egyptian mummy (mumia), distilled skull moss (), and human fat were used to treat ailments like and bruising; for instance, King Charles II reportedly consumed distilled human skulls in his "King's Drops" elixir. This "corpse medicine" drew from ancient Roman and traditions but waned by the 18th century amid Enlightenment and ethical shifts. The decline of these ritual practices accelerated through European colonization, missionary proselytization, and from the onward, as indigenous groups faced , disease epidemics, and legal prohibitions. In and Amazonia, colonial authorities and Christian missions suppressed and by the mid-20th century, replacing them with Western burial norms; similar pressures ended European medicinal uses. While isolated revivals occur in some contemporary spiritual or occult contexts, anthropological records show most traditional forms have persisted only in modified, non-consumptive symbolic rituals.

Survival and Historical Instances

Cannibalism has been documented in various historical survival scenarios where extreme forced individuals or groups to consume to avoid , often in the context of famines, expeditions, or disasters. These instances, driven by necessity rather than cultural or pathological motives, highlight the desperate measures taken amid resource scarcity. Archaeological and eyewitness evidence, including survivor testimonies and skeletal analyses, corroborates such practices in several well-known cases. One of the most infamous examples is the , a group of 81 American pioneers who became stranded in the Sierra Nevada mountains during the winter of 1846–1847 due to heavy snowfall and delayed travel. Trapped for months without adequate food, the party resorted to eating hides, bones, and eventually the bodies of deceased members after their supplies depleted. Of the original group, only 46 survived, with rescuers discovering evidence of cannibalism, including kettles containing human remains and survivor admissions of consuming flesh from the dead. Archaeological excavations at the Alder Creek site have uncovered cut marks on bones consistent with butchering for food, though direct evidence at the main camp remains limited to historical accounts. Similarly, the Franklin Expedition of 1845, led by Sir John Franklin, aimed to navigate the but ended in tragedy for all 129 crew members amid Arctic ice and harsh conditions. Skeletal remains from , examined in the 1980s and 2010s, show cut marks and tool incisions indicating systematic dismemberment and consumption of bodies, including attempts to extract marrow from bones. Inuit oral histories reported to explorer John Rae in 1854 described scenes of cannibalism among the starving sailors, and recent DNA analysis of a officer's jawbone confirmed signs of perimortem violence and defleshing. This evidence suggests end-stage desperation as , , and decimated the crew. Famine-induced cannibalism also occurred during the Ukrainian of the early 1930s, a man-made event under Soviet policies that killed millions. Isolated reports from survivors and official records document at least 2,505 convictions for cannibalism between 1932 and 1933, often involving the consumption of children or the deceased amid widespread desperation. Eyewitness accounts describe families eating the dead to survive, with medical personnel noting cases of moral collapse leading to such acts. In the Chinese Great Famine of 1959–1961, resulting from the policies, extreme hunger led to documented survival cannibalism in rural areas. Archival records and survivor testimonies reveal instances where villagers consumed corpses or killed for food, with official reports noting hundreds of cases in provinces like and . Historian Frank Dikötter's analysis of declassified documents estimates that such acts, though not the primary cause of the 45 million deaths, underscored the famine's apocalyptic scale. A modern parallel is the 1972 crash of in the , where 16 of 45 passengers survived 72 days by eating the frozen bodies of the deceased. The group, including a rugby team, faced subzero temperatures and avalanches; initial resistance to cannibalism gave way to necessity after failed, with survivors later describing it as a rational choice akin to receiving a transplant. No legal actions were taken against them upon rescue. In survival contexts, modern legal systems generally do not prosecute acts of cannibalism involving the dead under necessity defenses, recognizing the absence of criminal intent. precedents, such as the 1884 case, established that necessity cannot justify for food, but consuming already deceased bodies—as in the or Donner cases—has led to no convictions, viewing it as a non-criminal response to imminent peril.

Pathological and Criminal Cases

Pathological cannibalism in humans refers to instances where individuals engage in the consumption of due to severe mental disorders, deviant sexual impulses, or criminal intent, distinct from cultural or survival contexts. These cases often involve underlying psychiatric conditions such as or paraphilic disorders, where cannibalistic acts serve as expressions of , self-preservation delusions, or sadistic gratification. Forensic analyses indicate that such behaviors are exceedingly rare, typically emerging in isolation without broader social endorsement, and are prosecuted under existing laws rather than specific cannibalism statutes. One of the most infamous examples is that of , an American active in the 1990s, who murdered 17 men and boys between 1978 and 1991, engaging in and cannibalism as part of his ritualistic crimes. Dahmer preserved body parts and consumed portions of his victims, driven by a desire for control and possession, as evidenced by police discoveries of human remains in his apartment, including evidence consistent with cannibalistic consumption. Convicted in 1992 on 15 counts of first-degree intentional homicide, Dahmer's case highlighted the intersection of sexual deviance and extreme violence, with psychiatric evaluations revealing borderline personality traits and alcohol dependency but no formal succeeding. Another notable case is that of in , who in 2001 killed and partially consumed Bernd Brandes after the latter explicitly ed via online communication, filming the act as part of a shared fantasy. Meiwes was initially convicted of in 2004 and sentenced to 8.5 years, but upon retrial in 2006, he received a life sentence for , as courts determined the consent did not negate criminal liability for the killing. Psychological profiles of pathological cannibals often reveal links to , where acts may represent delusional self-defense against perceived threats of annihilation, or to paraphilias such as combined with sadistic personality disorders exhibiting psychopathic traits. In , these urges are assessed through structured interviews and diagnostic criteria, distinguishing impulsive psychotic episodes from premeditated paraphilic behaviors; for instance, schizophrenia-linked cases tend to involve disorganized, reactive cannibalism, while paraphilia-driven ones feature ritualistic planning. A review of five documented cases underscores that cannibalism rarely occurs in isolation but as a symptom of profound , with no single profile dominating but common comorbidities including . Legally, cannibalism itself is not explicitly criminalized in most jurisdictions, including the and , where such acts are prosecuted under statutes or corpse laws. In the U.S., cases like Dahmer's fall under first-degree charges, with necessity defenses rejected even in survival scenarios, emphasizing that or postmortem consumption does not mitigate liability for the underlying killing. German similarly lacks a dedicated cannibalism offense, as seen in the Meiwes trial, where the focus was on despite victim , leading to convictions under Section 211 of the Criminal Code. Post-2000 incidents remain rare and frequently tied to drug-induced rather than chronic . The face-eating attack, in which Rudy Eugene assaulted and partially consumed the face of homeless man Ronald Poppo before being shot by police, exemplifies this pattern; toxicology revealed marijuana but no , with experts attributing the behavior to cannabis-exacerbated leading to violent, cannibalistic-like aggression. Such events underscore the role of substance-induced states in transient cannibalistic outbursts, often without prior history, and are handled as or attempts under standard criminal codes. More recent examples include the 2024 case of Jason Thornburg, a convicted of three people and consuming parts of their bodies as part of ritualistic acts, resulting in a death sentence in December 2024. In , the upheld a death sentence in October 2024 for a man convicted of and partially consuming his mother's body, classifying it as pathological cannibalism driven by .

Cannibalism in Animals

Benefits and Evolutionary Advantages

Cannibalism in animals often provides significant nutritional benefits, particularly in environments where prey is scarce or nutrient-poor. By consuming conspecifics, predators can rapidly acquire high-quality proteins and other essential nutrients that support survival, growth, and reproduction. For instance, in wolf spiders (Pardosa prativaga), cannibalism allows individuals to remedy nutritional imbalances, leading to efficient nutrient utilization and comparable growth rates to those achieved on alternative insect prey, despite lower overall consumption volumes. Similarly, in lady beetles (Harmonia axyridis), cannibalism enhances survivorship and accelerates development time, with larvae feeding on conspecifics raised on higher-quality diets showing particularly shortened early instar durations. In spiders, individuals recycle their own silk webs by consuming them, reclaiming a large portion of the proteins for reuse in web reconstruction, which conserves energy in nutrient-limited conditions. Beyond individual nutrition, cannibalism serves as a mechanism for population regulation, helping to maintain stable densities by reducing for resources. In flour beetles (Tribolium confusum), cannibalism of eggs and pupae by adults and larvae acts as a density-dependent process, accounting for up to tenfold variations in across strains and preventing in confined habitats like stored . This behavior stabilizes community dynamics in , where higher densities trigger increased cannibalistic rates, thereby curbing growth and promoting long-term persistence without external controls. Reproductive advantages also arise from cannibalism, especially in contexts involving nutrient transfer to mates or offspring. Sexual cannibalism, such as in praying mantises, can enable females to allocate male-derived nutrients to egg production, enhancing . From an evolutionary perspective, cannibalism aligns with theory, where individuals preferentially avoid consuming relatives to maximize while gaining benefits from non-kin. By targeting unrelated conspecifics, cannibals secure nutritional gains that improve personal reproduction without diminishing the propagation of shared genes through kin, as seen in various arthropods where refined reduces the fitness costs of indiscriminate feeding. This selective pressure fosters adaptive cannibalistic strategies that balance direct and indirect fitness components across populations.

Costs and Ecological Disadvantages

Cannibalism in animals often imposes significant costs on perpetrators, as capturing and subduing conspecifics—typically of similar size and defensive capabilities—requires greater effort than preying on heterospecifics. In , for instance, this predation is energetically demanding due to the need for prolonged pursuits and higher metabolic rates to overcome resistance, making it viable only under severe resource scarcity. A study of livebearing across 17 found cannibalism rare in the wild (<0.3% incidence), attributing this to the high energy expenditure outweighing nutritional gains except in dense, food-limited conditions. Beyond direct energy demands, cannibals face elevated risks of injury from counterattacks by victims, which can lead to wounds, reduced mobility, or death. This hazard arises because conspecific prey are often evenly matched in strength and agility, unlike smaller or weaker alternative prey. Cannibalism also incurs kin selection penalties, where accidental consumption of relatives diminishes the cannibal's inclusive fitness by reducing average genetic relatedness within the population. Kin recognition mechanisms evolve to mitigate this, as eating close kin lowers the net reproductive value of the act compared to non-kin predation. In cannibalistic arthropods like the predatory mite Amblyseius herbicolus, hunger modulates kin discrimination, but errors still impose fitness costs by eroding shared genetic benefits. At the level, cannibalism can drive , including boom-bust cycles, by creating density-dependent feedback that amplifies fluctuations in abundance. In size-structured models of populations, intense cannibalism destabilizes dynamics, leading to cyclic oscillations or chaotic patterns as cohorts are disproportionately culled during high-density phases. For cannibalistic salamanders like the , contributes to chronic reproductive failure and declines, with nest rates dropping to zero in affected sites, exacerbating boom-bust tendencies under environmental stress. Behavioral trade-offs further compound these disadvantages, as individuals may avoid high-risk areas to evade cannibals, thereby limiting access to optimal resources and altering use. In marine crabs, detection of chemical cues from injured conspecifics prompts reduced activity and shifts away from vulnerable zones, potentially lowering overall energy intake. Similarly, often restrict movements to refuges, forgoing productive feeding grounds and stunting growth in cannibal-prone environments.

Health and Disease Risks

Diseases Transmitted via Cannibalism

Cannibalistic acts can facilitate the transmission of infectious agents by allowing direct ingestion of contaminated tissues from conspecifics, often bypassing typical immune defenses or environmental degradation of pathogens. Among diseases, kuru exemplifies transmission in humans through ritual practiced by the of , where consumption of infected brain tissue led to epidemics until the practice ceased in the 1950s. In animals, in sheep spreads via ingestion of infected placental material by lambs shortly after birth, a form of that qualifies as intraspecific tissue consumption and enables from dam to . Bacterial pathogens can also propagate through cannibalism in reptile populations, where persists as a in reptilian guts. Viral transmission is similarly amplified in dense populations, as seen with in rabbits, where contact with infected material may sustain outbreaks beyond primary vectors. Parasitic risks are heightened by cannibalism, particularly for trematodes in hosts; in systems involving intermediate hosts and paratenic dragonfly nymphs, cannibalism among nymphs aggregates and transfers trematode larvae (such as Halipegus occidentalis) to larger, more mobile predators, increasing overall parasite abundance and transmission success to definitive hosts like frogs. Similarly, in , cannibalism transmits protozoan parasites like Sarcocystis spp., where ingestion of infected muscle tissue directly infects the predator. Key mechanisms include direct tissue consumption, which delivers high loads orally and evades external inactivation, and indirect oral-fecal during group feeding on remains, particularly in social or aggregated where multiple individuals share victims. These pathways parallel human cases like kuru but underscore broader ecological roles in animal populations.

Physiological and Genetic Impacts

Cannibalism in can exacerbate the of and toxins, such as mercury, by facilitating the transfer of contaminants through the consumption of conspecifics that have already accumulated these substances from lower trophic levels. In species like the (Lates niloticus), cannibalism on juveniles forms part of the piscivorous diet that influences trophic position and total mercury (THg) concentrations in adults, with observed in . Similarly, in (Perca fluviatilis), piscivorous behavior including cannibalism in lakes contributes to mercury , resulting in concentrations that may exceed safe thresholds for physiological tolerance and correlate with and reduced swimming performance. In isolated island populations of , such as those in the Gallotia, populations exhibit low due to small effective population sizes, with cannibalistic predation observed primarily by large males on immatures. Endemic Gallotia species on the show elevated coefficients, increasing susceptibility to environmental stressors and lowering overall population viability. Cannibalism induces hormonal disruptions in surviving juveniles through chronic stress responses, particularly elevated cortisol levels that alter growth trajectories in affected animals. In fish like juvenile African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), the threat of conspecific aggression triggers sustained release, inhibiting signaling and leading to stunted development and reduced body mass compared to unstressed cohorts. This stress-mediated hormonal imbalance in cannibalism-prone environments impairs somatic growth and metabolic efficiency, with elevations persisting post-threat and correlating with 20-35% lower final weights in juveniles. Long-term fitness in can be compromised by imbalances associated with cannibalistic diets, which alter metabolic profiles. In species like the cotton bollworm (), cannibalism shifts metabolic profiles toward imbalanced protein and intake, leading to reductions in growth and reproductive output. These nutritionally triggered metabolic alterations, observed in polyphenic , lead to heritable reductions in and , with cannibal-fed larvae showing up to 15% lower lifetime fitness due to effects on utilization pathways.

Behavioral Contexts

Sexual Cannibalism

refers to the consumption of a mate by one partner, typically the , during or immediately after copulation, a predominantly observed in certain arthropods where it plays a role in and the of sexual size dimorphism. In many cases, this act provides direct nutritional benefits to the , enhancing her reproductive output while potentially imposing costs on the male's future opportunities. The is thought to arise from , where female foraging gains clash with male survival interests, leading to exaggerated traits like female-biased size differences that facilitate cannibalism. A classic example occurs in black widow spiders (Latrodectus spp.), where females often consume males post-copulation, utilizing the male's body as a source to nourish ovarian development and increase production. This behavior is not universal but frequent enough to contribute to the extreme seen in these species, with females significantly larger than males, aiding in overpowering them during mating. Similarly, in praying mantises (Mantodea), females may decapitate and eat males during copulation, with studies showing that such cannibalism boosts female fecundity by providing proteins essential for . For instance, cannibalistic females in species like Pseudomantis albofimbriata produce up to 40% more s compared to non-cannibalistic ones, directly linking the behavior to enhanced . To mitigate the risk of being cannibalized, males in various insect and arachnid species employ strategies such as offering nuptial gifts—nutritious prey items or glandular secretions—that distract or satisfy the female, serving as an alternative to self-sacrifice. In the spider Pisaura mirabilis, for example, males present silk-wrapped prey during courtship, which reduces the likelihood of sexual cannibalism by occupying the female's chelicerae and providing equivalent nutritional value without male death. These gifts not only prolong copulation time, allowing greater sperm transfer, but also align with sexual selection by favoring males that can procure high-quality offerings. Evolutionarily, sexual cannibalism is far more prevalent among , particularly in and arachnids with high female nutritional demands during reproduction, than in vertebrates, where it is extremely rare, with isolated cases reported primarily in some snakes and, more recently, in certain species such as frogs. This pattern underscores its ties to life-history traits such as short adult lifespans and for mates in invertebrates, promoting dimorphism and cannibalistic tendencies as adaptive outcomes of .

Size-Structured and Filial Cannibalism

Size-structured cannibalism occurs when larger individuals within a prey upon smaller conspecifics, often reflecting hierarchical dynamics influenced by body size differences. In many , such as water striders ( family), adults frequently cannibalize larvae due to their size advantage, with cannibalism rates increasing as size disparities grow. This behavior is particularly prevalent in species like Gerris odontogaster, where larger individuals dominate food resources and reduce by eliminating smaller juveniles. Such size-based predation can maintain structure by favoring faster-growing individuals while limiting density-dependent mortality among smaller cohorts. Filial cannibalism, in contrast, involves parents consuming their own , typically as a strategy to optimize under resource constraints. In fishes, such as the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps), males often partially eat their eggs to replenish energy reserves depleted during prolonged guarding, thereby enhancing survival for both themselves and remaining . Similarly, in the sunfish ( macrochirus), filial cannibalism allows parents to recoup nutritional investments when environmental conditions limit future breeding opportunities. Among , the maritime earwig (Anisolabis maritima) exhibits this behavior, with mothers consuming nymphs to sustain themselves during food scarcity, ensuring higher overall brood viability. In birds, filial cannibalism manifests under stressful conditions, such as food shortages exacerbated by environmental changes. For instance, in ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis) colonies, adults frequently attack and consume chicks, with infanticide rates peaking after the peak hatching period when resource competition intensifies. Egg cannibalism in glaucous-winged gulls (Larus glaucescens) similarly rises with increasing sea surface temperatures during El Niño events, providing adults with a critical energy source—up to 627 kJ per egg—amid reduced marine productivity and prolonged foraging. These forms of cannibalism often serve adaptive purposes, particularly in unpredictable environments where must be balanced against survival risks. By consuming offspring, parents can redirect limited resources toward future or bolstering the fitness of surviving young, as seen across taxa from to birds. This mitigates the costs of prolonged care in variable habitats, preventing total reproductive failure while enhancing long-term parental condition.

Reproductive and Developmental Cannibalism

Intrauterine Cannibalism

Intrauterine cannibalism refers to the consumption of embryos or eggs by developing within the mother's reproductive tract or egg mass, a phenomenon observed in various viviparous and ovoviviparous species. This behavior manifests through distinct mechanisms, including adelphophagy, where embryos directly consume their siblings, and , where embryos or larvae feed on unfertilized eggs. In sharks such as the sand tiger shark (Carcharias taurus), adelphophagy occurs early in gestation, with the largest embryo in each developing teeth to devour smaller siblings and remaining eggs, often resulting in only one or two pups per uterus at birth. Similarly, is prevalent in certain lamnoid sharks, where embryos ingest nutrient-rich eggs produced by the mother, supplementing yolk reserves. In , oophagy often involves larvae consuming unfertilized trophic eggs laid by workers or within the colony's brood chamber, providing essential nutrition during development. For instance, in the (Anoplolepis gracilipes), workers produce unfertilized eggs that serve as the primary food source for larvae, enabling rapid colony growth in resource-scarce environments. This form of intrauterine-like cannibalism in egg masses or nests supports larval survival without external , though it is more brood-focused than strictly embryonic. Evolutionarily, intrauterine cannibalism enhances the fitness of surviving by intensifying nutrient , favoring the development of larger, more robust individuals capable of higher post-birth survival rates. In sand tiger sharks, this strategy reduces the number of but equips survivors with substantial size and reserves, mitigating predation risks in competitive marine ecosystems.31259-X) The process selects for aggressive, dominant embryos, promoting genetic quality and adaptive traits like rapid growth. Outcomes of intrauterine cannibalism typically include a drastically reduced or size, but with markedly improved viability and condition of the progeny. litters, for example, average only two pups despite multiple fertilized eggs, yet these offspring emerge at lengths up to 1 meter, conferring a significant survival advantage. In insects like , consumption of trophic eggs sustains larval development, leading to healthier pupae and workers that bolster resilience, though over-reliance may limit reproductive output in queenless scenarios. Overall, this cannibalistic mechanism balances reproductive investment by prioritizing quality over quantity.

Infanticide and Parental Cannibalism

Infanticide and parental cannibalism encompass the post-birth killing and, in some cases, consumption of by parents, serving as mechanisms to reallocate resources amid environmental constraints or to enhance reproductive opportunities. This behavior is documented across diverse taxa, where parents assess offspring viability and adjust investment accordingly to maximize fitness returns. In Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), maternal often targets deformed, sickly, or pups, with mothers consuming them to balance litter size against available metabolic reserves, particularly under nutritional stress or high litter demands. For instance, females on suboptimal diets exhibit elevated rates of pup cannibalism, effectively redirecting to surviving and preventing drain from non-viable young. Similarly, in avian species such as the (Ciconia nigra), parents engage in by killing and eating chicks up to approximately 10 days old, typically during periods of food scarcity to reduce brood size and focus provisioning on stronger nestlings. Motivations for these acts include responses to environmental stressors like food shortages, which prompt resource conservation, as well as strategies tied to dynamics. In gray langur monkeys (Semnopithecus entellus), takeover infanticide by newly dominant males targets unrelated infants to shorten interbirth intervals in females, facilitating quicker conception and enhancing the male's access. This accelerates female return to , providing a reproductive advantage to the infanticidal male. Sex differences are pronounced, with more frequently observed in males across mammals and other taxa, often as a paternity assurance tactic to eliminate non-kin offspring and redirect female resources toward the male's progeny. In species with promiscuous mating systems, such male-driven aligns with pressures, contrasting with female , which typically responds to immediate viability cues rather than paternity uncertainty. The evolutionary consequences of and parental cannibalism lie in optimizing , whereby sacrificing lower-quality boosts the survival and of higher-quality ones, thereby elevating overall parental fitness under limiting conditions. This selective reallocation can enhance lifetime reproductive output, as demonstrated in models where improves energy efficiency for future breeding attempts.

Ecological and Adaptive Dynamics

Foraging and Population Effects

Cannibalism serves as an alternative strategy in environments with scarce resources, allowing individuals to exploit conspecifics when traditional prey is limited. In low-resource habitats, such as nutrient-poor aquatic systems, cannibalism can supplement energy intake and enhance survival rates for cannibals. For instance, modeling studies on communities demonstrate that cannibalistic predation on juveniles becomes more prevalent under limitation, enabling predators to overcome metabolic deficits and maintain persistence. This shifts foraging from external resources to internal population members, effectively turning the group into a self-sustaining source during . Population models incorporating cannibalism reveal its role in density-dependent regulation, which curbs overpopulation and stabilizes dynamics in species like the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). In these models, filial cannibalism by parents reduces clutch sizes but is offset by improved egg survivorship at higher densities, as crowding increases predation risk on remaining offspring; this compensation prevents explosive growth and maintains equilibrium. Such mechanisms act as a natural check, where rising densities trigger intensified cannibalistic interactions, reducing recruitment and fostering balanced age distributions over time. In stickleback populations, this density feedback has been shown to enhance long-term viability by mitigating starvation risks during peak abundances. Spatial patterns of cannibalism often concentrate in confined habitats like intertidal tide pools, creating "hotspots" where high densities and limited escape options amplify encounters. analyses of rock pool ecosystems indicate elevated cannibalism rates due to gape-limited predation and resource overlap, with up to 20-30% of trophic links involving conspecific consumption in these isolated microcosms. These hotspots emerge from tidal cycles that trap organisms, intensifying interactions and leading to patchy distributions of predation pressure. Over the long term, cannibalism reshapes population age structures by disproportionately affecting juveniles, resulting in skewed demographics with fewer young individuals and prolonged adult dominance. Theoretical frameworks for size-dependent cannibalism predict that this selective pressure flattens age pyramids, reducing variability in cohort sizes and dampening cyclic fluctuations in overall abundance. At the level, such alterations influence by promoting coexistence in multi-species ; for example, cannibalism can suppress dominant ' recruitment, creating niches for subordinates and enhancing community stability without eroding overall diversity. These effects underscore cannibalism's macro-scale role in sustaining ecological balance.

Protections and Anti-Cannibalism Strategies

Animals have evolved a variety of morphological adaptations to reduce the risk of cannibalism by conspecifics, including aposematic coloration that signals unpalatability. In poison dart frogs (Dendrobatidae), bright warning colors advertise the presence of toxic skin alkaloids, which deter potential predators and may similarly discourage conspecific attacks by indicating the high cost of consumption. These visual signals enhance survival in environments where intraspecific predation occurs, as the conspicuous patterns make individuals more noticeable but reinforce avoidance through learned associations with . Behavioral strategies also play a crucial role in anti-cannibalism defenses, often involving social recognition and grouping to minimize individual vulnerability. In , kin mediated by chemical cues such as cuticular hydrocarbons allows larvae to discriminate between related and unrelated eggs, reducing cannibalistic tendencies toward close relatives and thereby preserving . For instance, in like Formica ants, larvae preferentially avoid consuming eggs from their own colony, a likely facilitated by colony-specific pheromonal profiles that signal relatedness. Similarly, schooling in dilutes the risk of being targeted by larger conspecific cannibals, as groups confuse or overwhelm potential attackers, a mechanism observed in species like Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) where shoaling reduces encounter rates with predatory individuals. Chemical defenses provide another layer of protection against cannibalism, with many species secreting toxins that render them unpalatable or harmful to conspecifics. For example, in migratory locusts (Locusta migratoria), nymphs produce the anticannibalistic phenylacetonitrile under crowded conditions, which deters attacks by conspecifics and reduces cannibalism rates. These glandular products create a noxious barrier that can cause discomfort or upon , extending anti-predator efficacy to intraspecific interactions where size disparities might otherwise favor cannibalism. The of these anti-cannibalism strategies involves significant trade-offs, balancing the benefits of defense against energetic or ecological costs relative to cannibalism prevalence in the population. In invasive (Rhinella marina) larvae, stronger inducible defenses against older cohort cannibals, such as accelerated growth or behavioral changes, incur higher metabolic costs that reduce overall fitness when cannibal pressure is low, highlighting context-dependent selection. Such trade-offs ensure that defenses evolve only where cannibalism frequency justifies the investment, as excessive protection in low-risk environments could divert resources from growth or .

References

  1. https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/cannibalism
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10328901/
  3. https://www.si.edu/stories/survival-cannibalism-historic-jamestown
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10685673/
  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10816-024-09676-3
  6. https://www.etymonline.com/word/cannibalism
  7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/anthropophagy
  8. https://www.amentsoc.org/insects/glossary/terms/necrophagous/
  9. https://publish.illinois.edu/maxallen/files/2022/07/Allen-2022-Cannibalism-in-Bears.pdf
  10. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1973&context=jrr
  11. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/692734
  12. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(19)31259-X
  13. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144833
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.12868
  15. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673608609071/fulltext
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4162732/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2735506/
  18. https://www.mesoweb.com/es/articulos/sub/Sacrifice.pdf
  19. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-gruesome-history-of-eating-corpses-as-medicine-82360284/
  20. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/donner-party-survivors-were-rescued-on-this-day-in-1847-after-weeks-of-frigid-conditions-starvation-andeventuallycannibalism-180985983/
  21. https://archive.umt.edu/montanan/s06/digg.shtml
  22. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/franklins-doomed-arctic-expedition-ended-gruesome-cannibalism-180956054/
  23. http://sites.coloradocollege.edu/hfricke/wp-content/blogs.dir/81/files/2012/10/Final-Days-of-the-Franklin-Expedition-New-Skeletal-Evidence.pdf
  24. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dna-reveals-identity-of-officer-on-the-lost-franklin-expedition-and-his-remains-show-signs-of-cannibalism-180985154/
  25. https://www.unr.edu/nevada-today/news/2022/ukraine-horror-past-terror-future
  26. https://courses.bowdoin.edu/history-2203-fall-2020-dlasarte/
  27. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/sites/projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/cbdb/files/hedging_desperation_how_kinship_networks_reduced_cannibalism_in_historical_china.pdf
  28. https://www.academia.edu/75916663/Great_Leap_into_Famine_A_Review_Essay_
  29. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20231213-society-of-the-snow-the-horrifying-story-of-the-1972-andes-plane-crash-is-also-one-of-survival-and-generosity
  30. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/cannibalism
  31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31157920/
  32. https://www.cureus.com/articles/198171-wendigo-psychosis-and-psychiatric-perspectives-of-cannibalism-a-complex-interplay-of-culture-psychology-and-history
  33. https://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/07/us/clues-to-a-dark-nurturing-ground-for-one-serial-killer.html
  34. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1991/07/26/convicted-milwaukee-child-molester-believed-to-have-slain-at-least-17/7a70784c-2657-4759-aa3e-ca94bc351b5f/
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/09/us/question-of-self-control-may-decide-dahmer-case.html
  36. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding
  37. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna4104727
  38. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/31/world/german-court-convicts-internet-cannibal-of-manslaughter.html
  39. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Psychopathological-Profile-of-Cannibalism%253A-A-of-Raymond-L%25C3%25A9ger/f0b5ab7d27bcf4b1f08f6ad451c195e51678359b
  40. https://www.livescience.com/65643-cannibalism-pathology-case-study.html
  41. https://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/13/findlaw.analysis.leavitt.cannibalism/
  42. https://www.theguardian.com/law/shortcuts/2015/dec/16/eating-people-is-wrong-but-is-it-against-the-law
  43. https://www.livescience.com/21276-marijuana-bath-salts-cannibal-attack.html
  44. https://thegrio.com/2012/07/09/miami-zombie-attack-linked-to-cannabis-induced-psychosis/
  45. https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/serial-killer-jason-thornburg-fort-worth-murders/
  46. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/case-of-cannibalism-bombay-hc-upholds-death-sentence-for-man-who-killed-and-ate-mothers-body/articleshow/113847919.cms
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16903066/
  48. https://academic.oup.com/ee/article/29/6/1173/380954
  49. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/43/1/169/6869242
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28568492/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4936037/
  52. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-pdf/47/10/667/653210/47-10-667.pdf
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9109233/
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.12973
  55. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/724819
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2189571/
  57. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673668904820/fulltext
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5133396/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10562597/
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3131250/
  61. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4325
  62. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10522874
  63. https://academic.oup.com/etc/article/42/4/873/7729520
  64. https://bmcgenomdata.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12863-014-0121-8
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004452311530005X
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10376385/
  67. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jai/article/download/35905/21789
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1095643305002199
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7764302/
  70. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/9/1470
  71. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/7/3/1787
  72. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/19/4/710/201821
  73. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/12/6/691/462596
  74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00025.x
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9900337/
  76. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/285664
  77. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0588
  78. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3082
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347283800074
  80. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=math-pubs
  81. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/discover-fish/species-profiles/sand-tiger-shark/
  82. http://www.elasmo-research.org/education/topics/lh_intrauterine_cannibalism.htm
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3645029/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5422973/
  85. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01314909
  86. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/baby-sand-tiger-sharks-devour-their-siblings-while-still-in-the-womb-46192985/
  87. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.925749/full
  88. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523095016.htm
  89. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ancient-megalodon-shark-teeth-cannabilism-womb
  90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21235935/
  91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2628993/
  92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24750263.2024.2314625
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1689922/
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4448612/
  95. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5034/1/5034.pdf
  96. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01846.x
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6033428/
  98. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2003.2555
  99. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/668080
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9825868/
  101. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2010.2295
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8641868/
  103. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade6155
  104. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1426
  105. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2100765118
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.