Hubbry Logo
Redback spiderRedback spiderMain
Open search
Redback spider
Community hub
Redback spider
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Redback spider
Redback spider
from Wikipedia

Redback spider
Adult female red back spider
Adult male (considerably smaller than female)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Infraorder: Araneomorphae
Family: Theridiidae
Genus: Latrodectus
Species:
L. hasselti
Binomial name
Latrodectus hasselti
Synonyms[1]

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti), also known as the Australian black widow,[2][3][4] is a species of highly venomous spider believed to originate in Australia, but which is now found in Southeast Asia, Japan and New Zealand.[1] It has also been found in packing crates in the United States with colonies elsewhere outside Australia.[5] It is a member of the cosmopolitan genus Latrodectus, the widow spiders. The adult female is easily recognised by her spherical black body with a prominent red stripe on the upper side of her abdomen and an hourglass-shaped red/orange streak on the underside. Females usually have a body length of about 10 millimetres (0.4 in), while the male is much smaller, being only 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) long.

Mainly nocturnal, the female redback lives in an untidy web in a warm sheltered location, commonly near or inside human residences. It preys on insects, spiders and small vertebrates that become ensnared in its web. It kills its prey by injecting a complex venom through its two fangs when it bites, before wrapping them in silk and sucking out the liquefied insides. Often, it first squirts its victim with what resembles 'superglue' from its spinnerets, immobilising the prey by sticking the victim's limbs and appendages to its own body. The redback spider then trusses the victim with silk. Once its prey is restrained, it is bitten repeatedly on the head, body and leg segments and is then hauled back to the redback spider's retreat. Sometimes a potentially dangerous victim can be left to struggle for hours until it is exhausted enough to approach safely.[5] Male spiders and spiderlings often live on the periphery of the female spiders' web and steal leftovers. Other species of spider and parasitoid wasps prey on this species. The redback is one of a number of arachnids that usually display sexual cannibalism while mating.

After mating, sperm is stored in the spermathecae, organs of the female reproductive tract, and can be used up to two years later to fertilise several clutches of eggs. Each clutch averages 250 eggs and is housed in a round white silken egg sac. The redback spider has a widespread distribution in Australia, and inadvertent introductions have led to established colonies in New Zealand, the United Arab Emirates, Japan[6] and greenhouses in Belgium[citation needed].

The redback is one of the few spider species that can be seriously harmful to humans, and its liking for habitats in built structures has led it to being responsible for a large number of serious spider bites in Australia. Predominantly neurotoxic to vertebrates, the venom gives rise to the syndrome of latrodectism in humans; this starts with pain around the bite site, which typically becomes severe and progresses up the bitten limb and persists for over 24 hours. Sweating in localised patches of skin occasionally occurs and is highly indicative of latrodectism. Generalised symptoms of nausea, vomiting, headache, and agitation may also occur and indicate severe envenomation. An antivenom has been available since 1956.

Taxonomy and naming

[edit]

Common names

[edit]

The common name "redback" is derived from the distinctive red stripe along the dorsal aspect of its abdomen. Other common names include red-striped spider,[7] red-spot spider, jockey spider,[8] Murra-ngura spider, Kapara spider and the Kanna-jeri spider.[9]

History

[edit]

Before DNA analysis, the taxonomy of the widow spider genus Latrodectus had been unclear—changes in the number of species reflect the difficulty of using morphology to determine subdivisions within the genus.[10] Substantial interest in their systematics was most likely prompted by the medical importance of these venomous spiders.[10] Swedish arachnologist Tamerlan Thorell described the redback spider in 1870[11] from specimens collected in Rockhampton and Bowen in central Queensland.[12] He named it Latrodectus hasseltii in honour of colleague A.W.M. van Hasselt.[13] In the same paper, he named a female from Cape York with an all-black abdomen L. scelio,[11][12] now regarded as the same species. These specimens are in the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet in Stockholm.[14] Between 1872 and 1972, all subsequent authors spelled the species name as hasselti, and that altered spelling is maintained today.[1]

German arachnologist Friedrich Dahl revised the genus in 1902 and named L. ancorifer from New Guinea,[15] which was later regarded as a subspecies of the redback. Another subspecies, L. h. aruensis, was described by Norwegian entomologist Embrik Strand in 1911. Subspecies indica (of L. scelio) had been described by Eugène Simon in 1897, but its origin is unclear.[14] Frederick Octavius Pickard-Cambridge questioned Dahl's separating species on what he considered minor anatomical details but Dahl dismissed Pickard-Cambridge as an "ignoramus".[14] Pickard-Cambridge was unsure whether L. hasselti warranted species status, though he confirmed scelio and hasselti as a single species,[12] other researchers such as Ludwig Carl Christian Koch noting the differences to be inconsistent.[7] The redback was also considered by some to be conspecific with the katipō (L. katipo), which is native to New Zealand,[16] though Koch regarded them as distinct.[7]

Reviewing the genus Latrodectus in 1959, arachnologist Herbert Walter Levi concluded that the colour variations were largely continuous across the world and were not suitable for distinguishing the individual species. Instead, he focused on differences in the morphology of the female sexual organs, and revised the number of recognised species from 22 to 6. This included reclassifying the redback and several other species as subspecies of the best-known member of the group, the black widow spider (Latrodectus mactans), found in North America and other regions.[10] He did not consider the subspecies L. h. ancorifer, L. h. aruensis and L. h. indicus distinct enough to warrant recognition.[14] Subsequently, more reliable genetic studies have split the genus into about 30 species, and the redback has no recognised subspecies in modern classifications.[10][17]

Placement

[edit]

A member of the genus Latrodectus in the family Theridiidae, the redback belongs in a clade with the black widow spider,[10] with the katipō as its closest relative.[18] A 2004 molecular study supports the redback's status as a distinct species, as does the unique abdomen-presenting behaviour of the male during mating.[10] The close relationship between the two species is shown when mating: the male redback is able to successfully mate with a female katipō producing hybrid offspring. However, the male katipō is too heavy to mate with the female redback, as it triggers a predatory response in the female when it approaches the web, causing the female to eat it.[19] There is evidence of interbreeding between female katipō and male redbacks in the wild.[18][20]

Description

[edit]
A juvenile female, showing typical white banding

The adult female redback has a body around 1 centimetre (0.4 in) long, with slender legs, the first pair of which are longer than the rest.[21] The round abdomen is a deep black (occasionally brownish), with a red (sometimes orange) longitudinal stripe on the upper surface and an hourglass-shaped scarlet streak on the underside.[22] Females with incomplete markings or all-black abdomens occasionally occur.[23] The cephalothorax is much smaller than the abdomen, and is black.[21] Redback spiderlings are grey with dark spots,[7] and become darker with each moult.[24] Juvenile females have additional white markings on the abdomen.[22] The bright scarlet red colours may serve as a warning to potential predators.[25] Each spider has a pair of venom glands, one attached to each of its chelicerae[26] with very small fangs.[27] Small compared to the female,[28] the male redback is 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) long and is light brown, with white markings on the upper side of the abdomen and a pale hourglass marking on the underside.[22]

Another species in Australia with a similar physique, Steatoda capensis, has been termed the "false redback spider", but it is uniformly black (or plum), and does not display the red stripe.[29]

Behaviour

[edit]
Female in its web

Web

[edit]

The redback is mainly nocturnal;[30] the female remains concealed during the day, and spins her web during the night,[7] usually remaining in the same location for most of her adult life.[31] Classified as a gum-footed tangle web, the web is an irregular-looking tangle of fine but strong silk. Although the threads seem random, they are strategically placed for support and entrapment of prey.[32] The rear portion of the web forms a funnel-like retreat area where the spider and egg sacs are found. This area has vertical, sticky catching threads that run to ground attachments.[22] The vertical strands act as trip wires to initially alert the spider to the presence of prey or threats. They also snare and haul prey into the air when weaker horizontal strands that hold them down, known as guy lines, break when prey thrash around.[33] These webs are usually placed between two flat surfaces, one beneath the other.[34] The female spends more time in the funnel and less time moving around during cooler weather.[35] The individual web filaments are quite strong, able to entangle and hold small reptiles.

Prey

[edit]
Female with a lizard it has captured

Redbacks usually prey on insects, but can capture larger animals that become entangled in the web, including trapdoor spiders, small lizards,[22][36] and even on rare occasion snakes.[37] One web was recorded as containing a dead mouse.[38] The woodlouse (Porcellio scaber) is a particularly common food item.[39] Developing spiderlings need size-appropriate prey, and laboratory studies show that they are willing to consume common fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster), mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor), muscoid flies and early nymphs of cockroaches.[40] Food scraps and lighting attract insect prey to areas of human activity, which brings the redbacks.[23] Once alerted to a creature becoming ensnared in a trap line, the redback advances to around a leg's length from its target, touching it and squirting a liquid glutinous silk over it to immobilise it. It then bites its victim repeatedly on the head, body and leg joints and wraps it in sticky and dry silk. Unlike other spiders, it does not rotate its prey while wrapping in silk, but like other spiders, it then injects a venom that liquefies its victim's innards. Once it has trussed the prey, the redback takes it to its retreat and begins sucking out the liquefied insides, generally 5 to 20 minutes after first attacking it.[35] Redback spiders do not usually drink, except when starved.[25]

Commonly, prey-stealing occurs where larger females take food items stored in other spiders' webs.[22] When they encounter other spiders of the same species, often including those of the opposite sex, they engage in battle, and the defeated spider is eaten.[7] If a male redback is accepted by a female, it is permitted to feed on the victims snared in the female's web.[7] Baby spiders also steal food from their mother, which she tries to prevent. They also consume sticky silk as well as small midges and flies. Spiderlings are cannibalistic, more active ones sometimes eating their less active siblings.[35]

Life cycle

[edit]
Redback spiderlings

Spiderlings hatch from their eggs after about 8 days and can emerge from the egg sac as early as 11 days after being laid, although cooler temperatures can significantly slow their development so that emergence does not occur for months.[40] After hatching they spend about a week inside the egg sac, feeding on the yolk and molting once.[41] Baby spiders appear from September to January (spring to early summer).[30] Male spiders mature through five instars in about 45–90 days.[31][42] Females mature through seven–eight instars in about 75–120 days.[31][42] Males live for up to six or seven months, while females may live between two and three years.[22] Laboratory tests have shown that redbacks may survive for an average of 100 days, and sometimes over 300 days without any food, those starved at 10 °C (50 °F) faring better than those kept without food at 25 °C (77 °F). Spiders are known to reduce their metabolic rates in response to starvation, and can distend their abdomens to store large amounts of food.[25] Redbacks can survive temperatures from below freezing point to 40 °C (104 °F), though they do need relatively warm summers, with temperatures of 15 to 25 °C (59 to 77 °F) for two to three months, to survive and breed.[43]

Redback spiderlings cohabit on the maternal web for several days to a week, during which time sibling cannibalism is often observed.[41] They then leave by being carried on the wind. They follow light and climb to the top of nearby logs or rocks before extending their abdomens high in the air and producing a droplet of silk.[35] The liquid silk is drawn out into a long gossamer thread that, when long enough, carries the spider away. This behaviour is known as ballooning or kiting. Eventually, the silken thread will adhere to an object where the young spider will establish its own web.[22] They sometimes work cooperatively, climbing, releasing silk and being carried off in clusters.[35] Juvenile spiders build webs,[30] sometimes with other spiders.[35]

Reproduction

[edit]
Female (right) with egg sac, note the male at left (circled)

Before a juvenile male leaves its mother's web, it builds a small sperm web on which it deposits its sperm from its gonads and then collects it back into each of its two palps (copulatory organs), because the gonads and palps are not internally connected.[31] After it moults into its last instar, it sets off wandering to seek a female. The male spider does not eat during this period.[42] How males find females is unclear, and it is possible they may balloon like juveniles.[35] A Western Australian field study found that most males took 6 to 8 weeks to travel around 3 to 3.5 metres (9.8 to 11.5 ft) with occasional journeys of over 8 m (26 ft), but that only around 11–13% successfully found a mate.[42] They are attracted by pheromones, which are secreted by unmated sexually mature female redback spiders onto their webs and include a serine derivative (N-3-methylbutyryl-O-(S)-2-methylbutyryl-L-serine).[44] This is thought to be the sole method by which males assess a female's reproductive status, and their courtship dismantles much of the pheremone-marked web.[45]

During mating, the male redback attempts to copulate by inserting one of its palps into one of the female's two spermathecae, each of which has its own insemination orifice. It then tries and often succeeds in inserting the other palp into the female's second orifice.[31] The redback spider is one of only two animals known where the male has been found to actively assist the female in sexual cannibalism. In the process of mating, the much smaller male somersaults to place his abdomen over the female's mouthparts. In about two of three cases, the female fully consumes the male while mating continues. Males which are not eaten die of their injuries soon after mating.[46] Sacrifice during mating is thought to confer two advantages to the species. The first is the eating process allows for a longer period of copulation and thus fertilisation of more eggs. The second is females which have eaten a male are more likely to reject subsequent males.[47] Although this prohibits future mating for the males, this is not a serious disadvantage, because the spiders are sufficiently sparse that less than 20% of males ever find a potential mate during their lifetimes, and in any case, the male is functionally sterile if he has used the contents of both of his palps in the first mating.[31]

Some redback males have been observed using an alternative tactic that also ensures more of their genetic material is passed on. Juvenile female redbacks nearing their final moulting and adulthood have fully formed reproductive organs, but lack openings in the exoskeleton that allow access to the organs. Males will bite through the exoskeleton and deliver sperm without performing the somersault seen in males mating with adult females. The females then moult within a few days and deliver a clutch of fertilised eggs.[48][49]

Once the female has mated, the sperm is stored in one or both of her spermathecae.[50] The sperm can be used to fertilise several batches of eggs, over a period of up to two years (estimated from observations of closely related species),[31][51] but typically restarts the female's pheromone production advertising her sexual availability about three months after mating.[52] A female spider may lay four to ten egg sacs,[13] each of which is around 1 cm (0.39 in) in diameter and contains on average around 250 eggs,[22] though can be as few as 40 or as many as 500.[13] She prepares a shallow concave disc around 3 mm (18 in) in diameter before laying eggs into it over a period of around five minutes before laying more silk to complete the sac, which becomes spherical, the whole process taking around one and a quarter hours.[53] She can produce a new egg sac as early as one to three weeks after her last.[22]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]
A distribution map of the records of redback spider specimens reported to the Atlas of Living Australia as of September 2013

The redback spider is widespread across Australia. The current distribution reported by the World Spider Catalogue includes Southeast Asia and New Zealand.[1] Colonies and individuals have been found elsewhere, including Japan,[54][55] England, Belgium, the United Arab Emirates and Iran.[56][43][57][58] It was believed at one time that the redback may have been introduced to Australia, because when it was first formally described in 1870, it appeared to be concentrated around sea ports.[10][59] However, an earlier informal description (1850) from the Adelaide Hills is now known, and names in Australian Aboriginal languages also show that it was present well before European settlement. Its original range is thought to be a relatively small arid part of South Australia and Western Australia.[56] Its spread has been inadvertently aided by modern buildings, which often provide habitats conducive to redback populations.[23] The close relationship between the redback and the New Zealand katipō also supports the native status of both in their respective countries.[35]

Outside urban areas, the redback is more often found in drier habitats ranging from sclerophyll forest to desert, even as harsh as the Simpson Desert.[23] It became much more common in urban areas in the early decades of the 20th century,[60] and is now found in all but the most inhospitable environments in Australia and its cities.[23] It is particularly common in Brisbane, Perth and Alice Springs.[61] It is wide spread throughout urban Australia, with most suburban backyards in the city of Canberra (for instance) having one or more nesting females in such places as firewood piles, stored brick stacks and around unused or restoring motor vehicles as well as generally behind the shed - as observed since at least the 1970s and probably earlier. The redback spider is commonly found in close proximity to human residences. Webs are usually built in dry, dark, sheltered sites, such as among rocks, in logs, tree hollows, shrubs, old tyres, sheds, outhouses, empty tins and boxes, children's toys or under rubbish or litter.[7][22][62] Letterboxes and the undersurface of toilet seats are common sites.[23] Populations can be controlled by clearing these habitats,[63] squashing the spiders and their egg sacs,[29] and using pesticide in outhouses.[63] The CSIRO Division of Entomology recommends against the use of spider pesticides due to their toxicity, and because redbacks are rapid recolonists anyway.[29]

Spiders in the French territory of New Caledonia in the Pacific were identified as L. hasselti in 1920, based on morphology. Their behaviour differs from Australian redbacks, as they do not engage in sexual cannibalism and are less prone to biting humans. The first recorded envenomation in New Caledonia was in 2007.[64]

Introductions

[edit]

The redback spider's affinity for human-modified habitat has enabled it to spread to several countries via international shipping and trade. Furthermore, its tolerance to cold means that it has the ability to colonise many temperate countries with a winter climate cooler than Australia. This is concerning due to the risks to people being bitten who are unaware of its venomous nature, and also to the conservation of local threatened insect species that the redback might prey upon.[43]

Redback spiders are also found in small colonies in areas of New Zealand. They are frequently intercepted by quarantine authorities, often among steel or car shipments.[43] They were introduced into New Zealand in the early 1980s,[65] and now are found around Central Otago (including Alexandra, Bannockburn and near Wānaka) in the South Island and New Plymouth in the North Island.[43][57][58] Authorities in the United Arab Emirates warn residents and visitors of redback spiders, which have been present since 1990.[66] Colonies have also been established in greenhouses in Belgium[citation needed], and isolated observations indicate possible presence in New Guinea, the Philippines, and India.[43] Some redbacks were found in Preston, Lancashire, England, after a container of parts arrived from Australia; some may have escaped into the countryside before pest controllers could destroy them.[67] One redback was found in a back garden in Dartford in Kent.[68] Two females were discovered in the Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas in 2010.[69]

There is an established population of redback spiders in Osaka, Japan,[43][70][71] thought to have arrived in cargoes of wood chips.[72] In 2008, redback spiders were found in Fukuoka, Japan. Over 700 have been found near the container terminal in Hakata Bay, Fukuoka City.[73] Dispersal mechanisms within Japan are unclear, but redbacks are thought to have spread by walking or by being carried on vehicles.[71] In September 2012, after being bitten a woman was hospitalised in the Higashi Ward of Fukuoka City.[74] Signs warning about redback spiders have been posted in parks around the city.[73]

Predators and parasitoids

[edit]

The black house spider (Badumna insignis), the cellar spider (Pholcus phalangioides) and the giant daddy-long-legs spider (Artema atlanta) are known to prey on the redback spider,[75] and redbacks are often absent if these species are present in significant numbers.[76] Agenioideus nigricornis, a spider wasp, is a parasitoid of the adult redback.[77] Other wasps of the families Eurytomidae and Ichneumonidae parasitise redback eggs, and mantid lacewings (Mantispidae) prey on redback eggs.[77]

Bites to humans

[edit]

Incidence

[edit]

The redback spider has been historically responsible for more envenomations requiring antivenom than any other creature in Australia. However, by 2017 the spider was blamed for only 250 envenomations requiring antivenom annually.[78][79] Estimates of the number of people thought to be bitten by redback spiders each year across Australia range from 2,000 to 10,000.[80][81] The larger female spider is responsible for almost all cases of redback spider bites. The smaller male was thought to be unable to envenomate a human, although some cases have been reported; their rarity is probably due to the male's smaller size and proportionally smaller fangs, rather than its being incapable of biting or lacking potent venom.[82] The bite from both juvenile and mature females appears to have similar potency. The male bite usually only produces short-lived, mild pain.[82] Most bites occur in the warmer months between December and April, in the afternoon or evening.[82][83] As the female redback is slow-moving and rarely leaves her web, bites generally occur as a result of placing a hand or other body part too close to the spider, such as when reaching into dark holes or wall cavities. Bites often also occur when a hidden spider is disturbed in items such as clothes, shoes, gloves, building materials, garden tools or children's outdoor toys.[84][85]

A 2004 review reported 46% of bites occurring on distal extremities of the limbs, 25% on proximal areas of limbs (upper arms and thighs), 21% on the trunk, and 7% on the head or neck.[85] In some cases the same spider bites a victim multiple times.[86][87] Historically, victims were often bitten on the genitalia, though this phenomenon disappeared as outhouses were superseded by plumbed indoor toilets.[88][89] Conversely, bites on the head and neck have increased with use of safety helmets and ear muffs.[84] Precautions to avoid being bitten include wearing gloves and shoes while gardening, not leaving clothes on the floor, and shaking out gloves or shoes before putting them on. Also, children can be educated not to touch spiders.[90][91]

Venom

[edit]
The distinctive red stripe of the adult female

The redback and its relatives in the genus Latrodectus are considered dangerous, alongside funnel-web spiders (Atrax and Hadronyche), mouse spiders (Missulena), wandering spiders (Phoneutria) and recluse spiders (Loxosceles).[92][93] Venom is produced by holocrine glands in the spider's chelicerae (mouth parts).[94] Venom accumulates in the lumen of the glands and passes through paired ducts into the spider's two hollow fangs.[94][95] The venom of the redback spider is thought to be similar to that of the other Latrodectus spiders. It contains a complex mixture of cellular constituents, enzymes and a number of high-molecular-weight toxins, including insect toxins and a vertebrate neurotoxin called alpha-latrotoxin, which causes intense pain in humans.[94][95]

In vertebrates, alpha-latrotoxin produces its effect through destabilisation of cell membranes and degranulation of nerve terminals, resulting in excessive release of neurotransmitters, namely acetylcholine, norepinephrine and GABA. Excess neurotransmitter activity leads to clinical manifestations of envenomation,[96] although the precise mechanisms are not well understood.[61] Acetylcholine release accounts for neuromuscular manifestations, and norepinephrine release accounts for the cardiovascular manifestations.[97] Female redbacks have an average of around 0.08–0.10 mg of venom, and experiments indicate that the median lethal dose (LD50) for mice at room temperature is 10–20% of this quantity (0.27–0.91 mg/kg based on the mass of the mice used), but that it is considerably deadlier for mice kept at lower or higher temperatures.[98] Pure alpha-latrotoxin has an LD50 in mice of 20–40 μg/kg.[99]

The specific variant of the vertebrate toxin found in the redback was cloned and sequenced in 2012, and was found to be a sequence of 1180 amino acids,[100] with a strong similarity to the equivalent molecule across the Latrodectus mactans clade.[101] The syndromes caused by bites from any spiders of the genus Latrodectus have similarities;[102] there is some evidence there is a higher incidence of sweating, and local and radiating pain with the redback, while black widow envenomation results in more back and abdominal pain,[88] and abdominal rigidity is a feature common with bites from the west coast button spider (Latrodectus indistinctus) of South Africa.[103]

One crustacean-specific and two insect-specific neurotoxins have been recovered from the Mediterranean black widow (L. tredecimguttatus), as have small peptides that inhibit angiotensin-1-converting enzyme;[a] the venom of the redback, although little-studied, likely has similar agents.[100][106]

Antivenom

[edit]
An antibody digested by pepsin yields two fragments: a F(ab')2 fragment and a pFc' fragment. Redback spider antivenom contains purified F(ab')2 derived from IgG in hyperimmune horse plasma.[107]

Redback antivenom was developed by Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, then a government body involved with discovering antivenoms for many venomous Australian creatures. Production involves the milking of venom from redbacks and repeatedly inoculating horses with non-lethal doses. The horse immune systems makes polyclonal antibodies.[108] Blood plasma, containing the antibodies, is extracted by plasmapheresis.[109] The plasma is treated with pepsin, and the active F(ab')2 fragments are separated and purified.[110] Each vial contains 500 units of redback antivenom in approximately 1.5 ml,[111] which is enough to inactivate 5 mg of redback spider venom in a test tube.[112] The antivenom has been safely administered to women in various stages of pregnancy.[111] Redback antivenom has been widely used in Australia since 1956, although evidence from controlled studies for its effectiveness has been lacking. Recent trials show antivenom has a low response rate little better than placebo, and any effect is less than might be achieved with optimal use of standard analgesics.[2][113][114] Further studies are needed to confirm or refute its effectiveness.[103] It appears clinically active against arachnidism caused by Steatoda spiders;[80][115][116][117] however, as these cases are often mild and the evidence of its effectiveness is limited, this treatment is not recommended.[103] Similarly, the antivenom has been reported as effective with bites of L. katipo, and L. tredecimguttatus.[80] Animal studies also support its use against envenomation from other widow spiders, having successfully been tested against venom from L. mactans, L. hesperus, and L. tredecimguttatus (synonym L. lugubris).[80][118][119]

Signs and symptoms

[edit]

Envenomation from a redback spider bite produces a syndrome known as latrodectism. A small but significant percentage of people bitten develop significant pain or systemic symptoms.[120] The diagnosis is made from the clinical condition, often based on the victim being aware of a bite and ideally with identification of the spider. Laboratory tests are rarely needed and there is no specific test for the venom or latrodectism.[103]

The redback's small size means that swelling or puncture marks at the bite site are uncommon. The bite may be painful from the start, but more often only feels like a pinprick or mild burning sensation.[85] Within an hour, a more severe local pain may develop with local sweating and sometimes piloerection (goosebumps)—these three symptoms together are a classic presentation of redback spider envenomation.[121] Pain, swelling and redness can spread proximally up a limb or away from the bite site[57][85][103] and regional lymph nodes may become painful.[88] Some subjects with delayed symptoms may present with a characteristic sweating and pain in the lower limbs,[121] generally below the knees,[103] or a burning sensation in the soles of the feet. This may eventuate even if the person was bitten somewhere else on their body.[121]

Around one in three subjects develops systemic symptoms;[103] after a number of hours, or rarely, delayed for more than 24 hours.[83][122] Symptoms typically include nausea, vomiting, abdominal or chest pain, agitation, headache, generalised sweating and hypertension.[103][121] Other non-specific systemic effects such as malaise and lethargy are also common. Rarely, other effects are reported such as neurological manifestations, fever and priapism (uncontrolled erection of the penis).[2] Severe pain usually persists for over 24 hours after being bitten. Symptoms of envenomation may linger for weeks or even months.[61] Rare complications include localised skin infection, seizure, coma, pulmonary oedema, or respiratory failure.[83] Children, the elderly, or those with serious medical conditions are at much higher risk of severe effects resulting from a bite.[96] Infants have died within hours of a bite, but adult fatalities have taken up to 30 days.[123]

Children and infants may be unable to report being bitten, making it difficult to associate their symptoms with a spider bite.[120] Symptoms seen in infants include inconsolable crying, refusing to feed and a general erythematous rash.[124][b] Muscle aches and pains, and neck spasm are often seen in children over four years of age.[61]

Unlike those of some other spiders, redback bites do not necrose.[127] Latrodectism has been misdiagnosed as various medical conditions including acute hepatitis, sepsis, testicular torsion or an acute abdomen.[61]

Treatment

[edit]

Treatment is based on the severity of the envenomation. The majority of cases do not require medical care, and patients with localised pain, swelling and redness usually require only local application of ice and simple oral analgesia such as paracetamol. Pressure immobilisation of the wound site is not recommended. Keeping the victim still and calm is beneficial.[57][128]

Hospital assessment is recommended if simple pain relief does not resolve local pain, or systemic symptoms occur.[129][130] Opioid analgesics may be necessary to relieve pain.[103] Antivenom has been historically given for adults suffering severe local pain or systemic symptoms consistent with latrodectism, which include pain and swelling spreading proximally from site, distressing local or systemic pain, chest pain, abdominal pain, or excessive sweating (diaphoresis).[131] A significant proportion of bites will not result in envenomation or any symptoms developing; around 2–20% of bite victims have been treated with antivenom.[c][81] In an Australian study of 750 emergency hospital admissions for spider bites where the spider was definitively identified, 56 were from redbacks. Of these, 37 had significant pain lasting over 24 hours. Only six were treated with the antivenom.[133]

The antivenom manufacturer's product information recommends one vial, although more has been used.[112] Past guidelines indicated two vials, with a further two vials recommended if symptoms did not resolve within two hours, however recent guidelines state "antivenom is sometimes given if there is a history, symptoms and signs consistent with systemic envenoming, and severe pain unresponsive to oral analgesics ... however recent trials show antivenom has a low response rate little better than placebo, and any effect is less than might be achieved with optimal use of standard analgesics."[131][2] The antivenom can be given by injection intramuscularly (IM) or intravenously (IV). The manufacturer recommends IM use, with IV administration reserved for life-threatening cases.[134] In January 2008 toxicologist Geoffrey Isbister suggested IM antivenom was not as effective as IV antivenom,[82][135] after proposing that IM antivenom took longer to reach the blood serum.[136] Isbister subsequently found the difference between IV and IM routes of administration was, at best, small and did not justify routinely choosing one route over the other.[137]

These concerns led two handbooks to recommend IV in preference to IM administration in Australian practice.[138][130][d] Despite a long history of usage and anecdotal evidence of effectiveness, there is a lack of data from controlled studies confirming the antivenom's benefits.[103] In 2014 Isbister and others conducted a randomized controlled trial of intravenous antivenom versus placebo for Redback envenomation, finding the addition of antivenom did not significantly improve pain or systemic effects, while antivenom resulted in acute hypersensitivity reactions in 3.6 per cent of those receiving it.[113] The question of abandoning the antivenom on the basis of this and previous studies came up in the Annals of Emergency Medicine in 2015 where White and Weinstein argued that if the recommendations in the 2014 Isbister et al. paper were followed it would lead to abandonment of antivenom as a treatment option, an outcome White and Weinstein considered undesirable. Authors of the 2014 Isbister et al. paper responded in the same issue by suggesting patients for whom antivenom is considered should be fully informed "there is considerable weight of evidence to suggest it is no better than placebo", and in light of a risk of anaphylaxis and serum sickness, "routine use of the antivenom is therefore not recommended".[114]

Before the introduction of antivenom, benzodiazepines and intravenous calcium gluconate were used to relieve symptoms of pain and distress,[24][140] although calcium is not recommended as its benefit has not been shown in clinical trials.[141]

Studies support the safety of antivenom, with around a 5% chance of an acute reaction, 1–2% of anaphylaxis and 10% chance of a delayed reaction due to serum sickness.[103] Nevertheless, it is recommended that an injection of adrenaline be ready and available in case it is needed to treat a severe anaphylactic reaction,[134] and also that the antivenom from the vial be administered diluted in a 100 ml bag of intravenous solution for infusion over 30 minutes.[142] While it is rare that patients report symptoms of envenomation lasting weeks or months following a bite,[82] there are case reports from the 1990s in which antivenom was reported to be effective in the relief of chronic symptoms when administered weeks or months after a bite.[143][144] However, in the vast majority of cases, it is administered within 24 hours.[83]

Prognosis

[edit]

According to NSW Health, redback spider bites were considered not life-threatening but capable of causing severe pain and systemic symptoms that could continue for hours to days.[2][145] In almost all cases, symptoms resolve within a week.[120] Fatalities are extremely unlikely.[146] In 2016, the death of a bushwalker from a redback spider bite was widely reported. In this case, the death occurred from secondary infection; and the man in question had just recovered from a serious car accident.[147] Apart from that, there have been no deaths due to redback bite since the introduction of antivenom.[e][148] Before this, redback spider bites had been implicated in at least 14 deaths in Australia, however these cases cannot be definitively linked to the redback bite as the sole cause.[132][149]

Bites to animals

[edit]

Redback spider bites are difficult to diagnose in pets unless witnessed. Dogs appear to have some resistance. They are at serious risk only if bitten many times, and rarely need antivenom. Cats are likely to be more susceptible and require antivenom, which can reverse symptoms very quickly. Guinea pigs, horses and camels are very susceptible. As with humans, the symptoms are predominantly autonomic in nature alongside pain at the bite site. Dogs may also suffer vomiting and diarrhea, muscle tremors or clonic contractions, and abdominal wall rigidity, while cats may salivate excessively, protrude their tongue or be overexcitable.[150]

Historical treatment of bites

[edit]

Most traditional or historical first-aid treatments for redback spider bites are either useless or dangerous.[151] These include making incisions and promoting bleeding, using ligatures, applying alkaline solutions,[152] providing warmth,[153] and sucking the venom out.[62] In modern first aid, incising, sucking, applying bandages and tourniqueting are strongly discouraged.[154] In 1893, the Camperdown Chronicle reported that a doctor noticed that a severely ill benumbed victim got much better overnight following treatment using injections of strychnine and cocaine;[16] strychnine had been popular as a snake bite antidote, but it was not effective.[155] As of 2011, administration of magnesium sulphate was reported to have had some benefit though evidence of effectiveness is weak.[103]

Cultural influence

[edit]

Indigenous Australians in New South Wales mixed the spiders' bodies with the venom of snakes and pine tree gum to form a broth used to coat spear tips.[156] Slim Newton drew popular attention to redbacks with his song "The Redback on the Toilet Seat", which won the Golden Guitar at the first Country Music Awards of Australia in 1973.[157][158] Newton recalled an occasion when a friend used his outside toilet where the light globe had blown and reported he was lucky there was not a redback spider on the toilet seat. The phrase inspired him to write the song.[159] A sculpture of an impossibly large redback, one of Australia's big things, was built in 1996 at Eight Mile Plains, Queensland.[160] The Angels 1991 album Red Back Fever takes its name from the spider.[161][162] Matilda Bay Brewing Company produces a wheat beer called Redback,[163] with the distinctive red stripe as the logo.[164] The redback formerly appeared in the name and emblem of the South Australia cricket team.[165][166] The Airborne Redback, an Australian ultralight trike, was also named after the spider.[167] Redback Boots is an Australian workboot manufacturing company,[168] which uses the spider in its name and logo.[169] In 2006 a redback spider postage stamp was designed as part of a "Dangerous Australians" stamp series, but was withheld from general circulation by Australia Post due to concerns that the realistic depiction would scare people opening their letter boxes.[170] In 2012 an episode of the children's TV show Peppa Pig in which the title character picks up and plays with a spider was banned from Australian television due to fears that it would encourage children to pick up and play with redback spiders.[171]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti), also known as the Australian black widow, is a venomous native to and belonging to the family , closely related to the black widow spiders found elsewhere. Females are typically black with a prominent red or orange longitudinal stripe on the upper and an hourglass-shaped marking on the underside, measuring about 1 cm in body length, while smaller light brown males, around 3-4 mm, have less distinct red markings and white abdominal patterns. Distributed across and introduced to , the Redback thrives in a wide range of habitats, particularly disturbed urban and suburban areas, where it constructs tangled, sticky webs in sheltered, dry spots such as sheds, mailboxes, under rocks, or in rubbish piles. These sedentary spiders are primarily ground-dwelling carnivores, preying on insects, small vertebrates like , and even engaging in by stealing food from other spiders' webs. Reproduction involves dramatic , with males performing a onto the female's during mating, often resulting in their death and consumption by the female. Females produce up to 10 sacs containing about 250 eggs each over their 2-3 year lifespan, with spiderlings hatching after 2-4 weeks and exhibiting cannibalistic behavior among siblings; males mature in roughly 90 days and live only 6-7 months. The female's bite is medically significant, causing intense local pain, sweating, nausea, and systemic symptoms that can persist for days, though fatalities have been rare since the introduction of in the 1950s, with over 250 cases treated annually in . First aid involves applying an to the bite site and seeking prompt medical attention, as the spider has become more prevalent in human-modified environments since European settlement.

Taxonomy and nomenclature

Common names

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) is primarily known in Australia by its common name "redback" or "red-back spider," a term reflecting the prominent red stripe on the female's dorsal abdomen. This name emerged among early European settlers who observed the spider's distinctive coloration in urban and rural environments, where human structures provided ideal habitats, increasing its visibility and commonality compared to pre-settlement distributions. Internationally, particularly in regions outside , it is frequently called the "Australian black widow," a designation highlighting its close relation to the North American black widow () within the genus , sharing similar black body morphology, potent neurotoxic venom, and widow spider behaviors. In , where the species was introduced in the early 20th century, the redback is often misidentified as the native katipo (Latrodectus katipo), leading to occasional confusion in public reports and conservation efforts due to overlapping appearances, habitats, and even documented hybridization between the two. Among Indigenous Australian communities, regional Aboriginal names include "Kapara," used in some traditional languages to refer to the . Other colloquial English names recorded in encompass " spider," possibly alluding to the red marking's resemblance to a jockey's cap, as well as "red-striped spider" and "red-spot spider."

Etymology and history

The scientific name Latrodectus hasselti derives from the genus , a New Latin term combining the Latin word latro (meaning "robber" or "bandit") and the dḗktēs (meaning "biter"), often interpreted as "stealthy biter" or "biting in secret" in reference to the spider's potent, concealed . The specific epithet hasselti honors A. W. M. van , a Dutch arachnologist and colleague of the describer who provided key specimens for study. The redback spider was formally described in 1870 by Swedish arachnologist Tamerlan Thorell in his publication Remarks on Synonyms of European Spiders, based on female specimens collected from and Bowen in , . These early collections in the mid-19th century, amid growing European interest in Australian , marked the beginning of systematic documentation of the species, which was initially noted for its morphological similarities to other widow spiders. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, L. hasselti was often confused with the North American black widow (), leading to its classification as a , L. mactans hasselti, due to shared venomous traits and hourglass markings. This taxonomic uncertainty persisted until mid-20th-century revisions confirmed its status as a distinct species, reflecting broader advancements in arachnological studies of the genus across the .

Phylogenetic classification

The redback spider, Latrodectus hasselti, is classified in the kingdom Animalia, Arthropoda, class Arachnida, order Araneae, Theridiidae, Latrodectus, and hasselti./Latrodectus-hasselti-Thorell.pdf) Within the Latrodectus, which comprises around 30 of spiders distributed worldwide, L. hasselti belongs to the mactans , a group that also includes North American black widows such as L. mactans and L. hesperus, as well as from , the , and the . This is distinguished from the geometricus , which encompasses like the brown widow (L. geometricus). Phylogenetic analyses based on , particularly the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, place L. hasselti as sister to other Australasian widow spiders. The closest relative to L. hasselti is the New Zealand endemic Latrodectus katipo, with pairwise genetic divergence of approximately 4.9% in COI sequences. Applying a standard arthropod molecular clock rate of 2.3% sequence divergence per million years to this value yields an estimated divergence time of around 2 million years ago, consistent with post-Gondwanan dispersal events from to . Relations to other global black widows, such as those in the , reflect deeper divergences within the mactans clade, estimated at 3–5 million years ago based on similar clock-calibrated analyses. Genetic studies affirm L. hasselti's Australian origin, with low intraspecific variation across native ranges indicating long-term establishment on the . However, hybridization with L. katipo has been documented in natural overlapping areas in , including fertile hybrids, though appears limited.

Physical description

Adult female

The adult female redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) is characterized by a body length of approximately 8–10 mm, with the globular comprising the majority of this size, often resembling a in overall form. The is notably smaller and more compact, measuring about 4–5 mm in length and 3–4 mm in width, while the abdomen can reach 6–7 mm in length and up to 6 mm in width. Her legs are slender and elongated, with the first pair typically the longest, contributing to a total leg span of 20–40 mm, which aids in web navigation and prey handling. In terms of coloration, the female's body is predominantly jet-black, providing effective in dark microhabitats, though occasional brownish variants occur. A prominent red or orange longitudinal stripe runs dorsally along the upper , often broadest anteriorly and tapering posteriorly, sometimes appearing broken or irregular. Ventrally, an hourglass-shaped red or orange marking is usually present on the underside of the , though this feature may fade or become less distinct with age in some individuals. The female possesses eight simple eyes arranged in two nearly equal rows of four on the , enabling detection of movement but limited . Her bear short fangs connected to potent glands that facilitate prey subduing despite their modest size. At the posterior end of the abdomen, she has six spinnerets—three pairs—that produce a variety of types for web construction, egg sac formation, and other functions. In contrast to the much smaller adult male, the female's robust build supports her longer lifespan and higher yield.

Adult male

Adult male redback spiders (Latrodectus hasselti) exhibit pronounced , being significantly smaller and less robust than females, with a body length typically ranging from 3 to 4 mm. Their overall build is more slender and elongated, featuring a narrower and compared to the globular form of females, which contributes to their agile, wandering lifestyle in search of mates. The legs are proportionally longer relative to body size, aiding in mobility across surfaces and webs. In terms of coloration, adult males possess a light brown base color on the and legs, providing in natural environments, with subtle white or pale markings often present on the dorsal surface of the . The may display a less pronounced dorsal red stripe and a paler ventral hourglass-shaped marking compared to the vivid red hourglass of females, though these patterns can vary in intensity. This subdued patterning helps males blend into leaf litter or bark while avoiding detection during mate-searching. Reproductive structures in adult males are prominently developed, including bulbous pedipalps that serve as primary organs for transfer during . These enlarged, club-like appendages, located at the front of the , become filled with prior to copulation and are inserted sequentially into the female's , often following a characteristic maneuver. The less robust overall physique of males, lacking the heavy glands and egg-producing capacity of females, underscores their specialized role in .

Juveniles and variations

Juvenile redback s (Latrodectus hasselti) are significantly smaller than adults, typically measuring 1 to 5 mm in body length at hatching and growing progressively larger through successive molts. They exhibit lighter coloration compared to the glossy black of mature females, starting with a pale, whitish or greyish sheen that aids in and heat reflection. This initial pale appearance often includes prominent white or yellowish markings on the , which serve as additional patterns and are gradually lost as the spider matures. Development proceeds through multiple instars, with males typically reaching maturity at the fifth instar and females at the seventh or eighth instar, depending on environmental conditions and . During these stages, the spiders darken with each molt; juvenile females transition from brown or tan tones with dark spots to developing the characteristic and marking on the , which become more defined toward maturity. The dorsal stripe and ventral pattern emerge gradually post-emergence from the egg sac, intensifying over molts rather than appearing abruptly after maturity. Variations in juvenile appearance can arise from factors such as age, , and developmental stage. For instance, consumption of large quantities of prey like fly larvae may cause the pale coloration to shift toward a dull brownish-orange hue. Younger juveniles often display more extensive white abdominal markings and lighter overall tones, which fade as they approach forms, where females lose these extra patterns entirely. These changes highlight the adaptive morphological progression from vulnerable spiderlings to the more distinctive morphology.

Distribution and habitat

Native distribution

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) is endemic to and exhibits a broad native range across all mainland states and territories, including , Victoria, , , , the , and the Australian Capital Territory. Populations are less common in due to the island's cooler climate, but have been recorded there. Within its native range, the species occupies diverse habitats, from urban and suburban environments to rural landscapes, encompassing dry woodlands, arid deserts, and coastal regions. It particularly favors sheltered microhabitats that provide protection from environmental extremes, such as crevices under rocks, loose bark on trees, fallen logs, and debris piles. The redback's current widespread distribution reflects a post-colonial expansion facilitated by human activities, with its origins traced to or adjacent Western Australian deserts, from where it spread across the continent. This dispersal was aided by increased availability of suitable sheltered sites in modified landscapes, such as settlements and infrastructure developments.

Introduced populations

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) has established populations outside its native Australian range primarily through human-mediated dispersal, with confirmed colonies in since the early 1980s, introduced via shipments of grapes and other cargo. In , the species was first detected in in 1995 and has since spread to multiple sites, including urban and modified dune ecosystems, where it has adapted to local conditions despite originating from arid habitats. Populations are also established in parts of , such as , and in as a key Pacific Island location, facilitated by international shipping and trade routes that inadvertently transport spiders in containers and goods. Establishment in these non-native regions is driven by anthropogenic factors, including the transport of live spiders or egg sacs in cargo such as shipping containers, vehicles, and imported produce, which provide sheltered microhabitats during long-distance movement. Once introduced, redback spiders demonstrate rapid adaptation to new climates through behavioral flexibility and a realized niche shift, allowing persistence in human-modified environments like urban areas and coastal dunes, even in regions with higher humidity than their native arid preferences. In 2025, a notable incident at the Kansai Expo site in highlighted ongoing invasion risks, where approximately 70 redback spiders, including nests and eggs in visitor areas, were removed by teams since April, leading to public safety warnings and designation reinforcements as an invasive alien species. As of 2025, no established populations have been reported in or the , with detections limited to isolated interceptions without sustained breeding.

Behavior

Web building and microhabitats

The redback spider, Latrodectus hasselti, constructs irregular, tangled snare webs rather than orb-shaped ones, consisting of a funnel-like upper retreat made of strong, thickened and vertical sticky "gumfoot" lines extending to the ground for prey capture. These gumfoot lines are adorned with adhesive droplets that anchor to substrates like soil or structures, allowing the spider to detect vibrations from ensnared prey via specialized setae on its legs. The retreat, often conical and tubular, serves as a secure hiding place and measures about 5-20 cm², with egg sacs suspended within it. Female redbacks typically build their webs at night in sheltered locations, starting by producing a structural framework and then extending tensioned strands downward to form the trap lines, which they reinforce and pull taut. The process involves intermittent renewal of the sticky globules on the gumfoot lines to maintain adhesiveness, and entire webs are often rebuilt following disturbances such as or physical disruption. Juveniles may cooperatively construct communal networks before dispersal. Redbacks select microhabitats that provide dryness, shelter from wind and rain, and proximity to prey cues, favoring undisturbed sites in both natural and human-modified environments. Common locations include crevices like letterboxes, under rocks or logs, machinery, tool sheds, junk piles, and low-growing , with a noted to urban areas near human habitations for warmth and food availability. These sites tolerate temperatures from below freezing to 41°C, though webs thicken in cooler conditions below 10°C for added insulation.

Foraging and prey

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) is an that relies on its irregular, tangled web to capture prey. Positioned within a silken retreat attached to the web, the spider detects vibrations from struggling or other animals ensnared in the sticky threads, prompting it to emerge and subdue the victim. Upon arrival, it assesses the prey through tactile exploration before enveloping it in layers of viscous silk produced by modified aggregate glands, which acts like a "super glue" to immobilize even larger or more active captives. The spider then delivers multiple bites to the prey's head, body, and leg joints, injecting that paralyzes and begins the digestive process. The diet of L. hasselti primarily consists of such as flies, , and beetles, which comprise the majority of captured items, with beetles alone accounting for 60-70% of the prey in some studies. It also preys on other spiders, including conspecifics, and occasionally small vertebrates like (e.g., fence skinks, representing about 8% of prey items by count and 17% by in urban habitats) and frogs that become trapped in the web. occurs among juveniles, where spiderlings may consume siblings, enhancing survival in resource-scarce conditions. Once subdued, the redback spider feeds by injecting into the prey, which liquefy the internal tissues over 5-20 minutes, allowing the spider to ingest the resulting nutrient-rich fluid from multiple entry points on the body. This external digestion leaves behind a desiccated , and the process extracts nearly all available nutrients. Females exhibit remarkable tolerance, surviving up to 212 days (about 7 months) without by entering a quiescent state, during which metabolic activity slows but recovery is possible upon refeeding.

Activity patterns

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) exhibits primarily nocturnal activity patterns, with adult females typically remaining hidden in retreats during daylight hours and emerging at or night to tend their webs and capture prey. This behavior reduces exposure to diurnal predators and aligns with peak activity under cooler evening temperatures. However, in warm weather conditions above 20°C, females may display crepuscular or even diurnal if prey is abundant, demonstrating flexibility in response to environmental cues. Seasonally, redback spider activity peaks during the Australian spring and summer months from to , coinciding with higher temperatures and increased breeding efforts. Populations expand notably in these warmer periods due to accelerated development and dispersal, while winter brings reduced metabolic rates and minimal web maintenance, with spiders becoming quiescent in protected retreats such as under bark or in structures to conserve energy. Juvenile spiderlings, hatching from sacs 2–4 weeks post-laying, disperse shortly after their first molt—typically within 14 days—via ballooning on threads carried by currents, a process that contributes to seasonal range expansion during milder weather. Environmental factors significantly influence activity levels; redbacks show heightened in humid conditions, which support greater prey availability, particularly in coastal or urban settings where relative often exceeds 60%. In urban environments, artificial lights draw moths and other to buildings at night, indirectly boosting redback activity by concentrating prey near web sites and enhancing overall encounter rates. These patterns tie into broader life cycle dynamics, where activity rhythms support survival through varying reproductive phases.

Reproduction and life cycle

Mating and sexual cannibalism

Males of the redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) cease feeding upon reaching maturity and embark on a risky search for receptive females, often wandering significant distances across habitats. This mate-searching phase is fraught with high mortality, estimated at around 80% due to predation, , and environmental hazards before locating a female's web. Upon detecting a potential mate's web, males are guided by airborne pheromones and silk-borne chemical cues released by virgin females, which facilitate discrimination between suitable and unsuitable webs. Once on the female's web, courtship begins with the male producing distinctive vibrations by plucking and drumming on the strands, signaling his presence and identity to reduce the risk of attack. These vibrational signals can last for hours, with median durations of 277–281 minutes, during which the male may also perform additional tactile displays to appease the . If accepted, copulation involves the male inserting one of his paired palps sequentially; critically, during the second insertion, the male executes a characteristic , deliberately positioning his dorsum adjacent to the 's fangs, thereby exposing his . Sexual cannibalism frequently follows this positioning, occurring in approximately 65% of observed matings, where the female begins consuming the male's abdomen mid-copulation. This behavior provides nutritional benefits to the female, enhancing her fecundity, while also conferring reproductive advantages to the male: cannibalized males achieve longer copulations (median 25 minutes versus 11 minutes for survivors), leading to greater sperm transfer and higher paternity shares (fertilizing about 235 eggs per clutch compared to 115 for non-cannibalized males). Consequently, only about 35% of males survive mating, though survivors may attempt to mate with additional females, albeit with reduced success due to palp damage; this self-sacrificial strategy is under sexual selection as it maximizes the male's fitness despite the high personal cost. In cases of survival, a novel male trait—an abdominal constriction developed during courtship—can prolong endurance and improve post-cannibalism viability, with constricted males showing 89% survival after simulated wounding compared to 11% in non-constricted individuals.

Egg production and development

Female redback spiders (Latrodectus hasselti) typically produce 3–10 egg sacs over the summer months following , with each sac containing approximately 250 eggs. These sacs are pear-shaped or spherical, constructed from fluffy white , and suspended within the female's retreat in the web for protection. The eggs are laid in batches using stored sperm from a single , which can sustain reproduction for up to two years, with intervals of 1–3 weeks between successive sacs. The eggs undergo incubation within the sac for 30–40 days, depending on , with development arresting below 25°C. occurs synchronously, as spiderlings emerge together after the first molt inside the sac, cutting an exit hole with their fangs. Upon emergence, the spiderlings cluster briefly, feeding initially on reserves and often consuming inviable eggs or siblings, contributing to high rates of within . Maternal care is limited to guarding the egg sacs by suspending them in a protected retreat site within the web, where the female remains vigilant for several weeks until . No further care is provided post-dispersal, as spiderlings balloon away on threads shortly after emerging.

Growth and lifespan

Redback spider juveniles emerge from the egg sac after hatching and undergo a series of molts to reach . Females typically complete 6 to 8 molts over 75 to 120 days, while males mature more rapidly after 4 to 6 molts in 45 to 90 days, with development times varying by and .14[293:TBOCTL]2.0.CO;2) Adult female redback spiders have a lifespan of 2 to 3 years in the wild, whereas males survive only about 6 to 7 months after maturing. In conditions, females can live beyond 300 days post-maturity, and both sexes demonstrate extended survival under controlled environments with stable resources.14[293:TBOCTL]2.0.CO;2) Factors such as food availability significantly influence , with subadult and redbacks enduring up to 160 to 300 days of at lower temperatures like 10°C, enabling survival through periods of prey in dry seasons. Predation reduces overall lifespan in natural settings, while optimal temperatures around 25°C accelerate development but shorten compared to cooler conditions.

Ecological interactions

Predators

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) has few documented natural predators, largely due to its potent neurotoxic venom and warning coloration that deter potential threats. predators include various birds, , and small mammals that consume spiders as part of their diet and may occasionally target redbacks, particularly when they are exposed in urban or garden habitats. For example, small such as fence skinks (Cryptoblepharus spp.) have been observed preying on redbacks, though such interactions are rare given the spider's defensive capabilities. Invertebrate predators are more commonly observed and include larger spiders like huntsman spiders (Sparassidae family), which can overpower redbacks during direct encounters outside the web. Centipedes (Chilopoda) and scorpions (Scorpiones) also consume spiders, including redbacks, using their venomous forcipules or stings to subdue them, often in moist microhabitats where webs are built low to the ground. The most frequently reported invertebrate predators, however, are daddy-long-legs spiders (Pholcus phalangioides) and white-tailed spiders (Lampona spp.), which actively invade redback webs to wrap and kill the occupant. Predation dynamics often involve redbacks being vulnerable when their webs are exposed or when they venture out, as their defensive proves ineffective against certain predators like daddy-long-legs spiders, which use long legs to maintain distance while binding the victim with . Larger predators such as birds or typically strike quickly to avoid , while hunters exploit the redback's sedentary web-building . These interactions help regulate redback populations in natural and urban environments, though the spider's adaptability limits overall predation pressure.

Parasitoids

The redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) is subject to parasitism primarily by certain hymenopteran wasps that target either adult spiders or their egg sacs. Among these, the spider-hunting wasp Agenioideus nigricornis (family Pompilidae) serves as a key of adult redbacks. The female wasp locates a host in its web, delivers a paralyzing sting to immobilize the spider without killing it immediately, then drags the paralyzed individual to a nearby burrow or crevice. There, she lays a single egg on the spider's abdomen, seals the entrance, and departs; the hatches within days and feeds externally on the still-living host over several weeks, eventually consuming vital tissues and causing death. This interaction represents the first documented case of a pompilid wasp parasitizing redbacks, observed across multiple sites in . Parasitism of redback egg sacs is more common and involves wasps from the families and Eurytomidae, such as Gelis spp. () and Philolema latrodecti (Eurytomidae). These wasps locate suspended egg sacs within the spider's web and insert their to lay multiple eggs directly into the sac, where larvae hatch and feed internally on developing spider embryos. The larvae complete development inside the sac, pupate, and emerge as adults after 1–2 weeks, fully destroying in the process. rates vary but are generally low; for instance, studies on related widow spiders ( spp.) report emergence from 0.4–6.1% of sacs, with up to 13–17 wasps emerging per infested sac in some cases. Specific data for redbacks indicate similar patterns, with P. latrodecti confirmed as a in Australian populations. In addition to wasps, other parasites affect redbacks with comparatively minor ecological impact. Mites occasionally infest egg sacs, potentially feeding on eggs or fungal contaminants, though they rarely cause significant mortality compared to wasp parasitoids. Nematodes have been noted as occasional internal parasites in various spider species, including widow spiders, but no high-impact cases are documented for L. hasselti, and their role remains limited.

Medical significance

Bites to humans

Redback spiders typically bite humans defensively when their webs or hiding places are disturbed, such as when a person places a hand on outdoor furniture, in sheds, or near rubbish bins where the spiders often reside. The female redback, responsible for nearly all medically significant bites due to her larger size, injects through her fangs, which are capable of easily penetrating , unlike the much shorter fangs of males that cannot. Bites most commonly occur on the limbs, particularly the hands and forearms, during warmer months when spider activity peaks. In , redback spider bites are estimated to affect between 2,000 and people annually, though many cases go unreported or do not require hospitalization. Hospital admissions for redback envenoming numbered around 283 in 2017–18, representing a significant portion of spider bite-related presentations, with incidence higher in summer due to increased outdoor activity and spider presence. Prior to the introduction of in the 1950s, fatalities were rare but occurred occasionally; none have been recorded since. Initial symptoms of a redback bite often begin with a sharp pinprick sensation at the site, followed rapidly by intense burning pain that develops within 5–10 minutes and may radiate along the affected limb. Local reactions include swelling, redness, and sometimes piloerection or mild around the puncture marks, which are visible in only about 5% of cases. Sweating may occur locally near the bite site shortly after onset.

Venom effects

The venom of the redback spider (Latrodectus hasselti) is a complex mixture primarily composed of neurotoxins, peptides, and enzymes that target the . The main active component is α-latrotoxin, a large presynaptic neurotoxin with a molecular weight of approximately 130 kDa, which accounts for the majority of its vertebrate-specific toxicity. This toxin binds to receptors such as neurexins, latrophilins, and protein tyrosine phosphatase σ on synaptic terminals, forming oligomeric pores that trigger calcium influx and massive of neurotransmitters, including , norepinephrine, and glutamate. Supporting peptides, such as low-molecular-weight latrodectins (around 7-9 kDa), co-purify with α-latrotoxin and potentiate its effects without direct toxicity on their own. The physiological impacts of redback spider in humans result in , a syndrome driven by overload and subsequent depletion at neuromuscular junctions and autonomic synapses. Initial effects include intense localized pain at the bite site due to overstimulation, often radiating to the affected limb or trunk within hours. Systemic manifestations arise from disruption, featuring profuse sweating (often asymmetric or regional), , , piloerection, , and ; muscle involvement leads to spasms, fasciculations, and rigidity, particularly in the and limbs. Severity of venom effects varies by individual factors, with children and the elderly experiencing more pronounced symptoms due to physiological vulnerabilities, such as immature or compromised cardiovascular systems. Unlike necrotic araneism from spiders like the (Loxosceles spp.), redback venom induces no or tissue necrosis, focusing instead on neuroexcitatory disruption without destruction.

Antivenom and treatment

The redback spider was developed in 1956 by the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (now Seqirus) in as the first specific treatment for envenomation by Latrodectus hasselti. It is an equine-based product derived from the plasma of horses immunized with venom from female redback spiders, containing purified immunoglobulin fragments that neutralize key neurotoxic components such as α-latrotoxin. Each vial delivers 500 units, sufficient to neutralize approximately 5 mg of venom, and is administered either intramuscularly for severe local symptoms or intravenously (diluted 1:10 in saline) over 20-30 minutes for systemic envenoming, with the same dosing for adults and children. Standard treatment begins with first aid using an applied to the bite site to reduce local pain and swelling, while avoiding pressure immobilization bandaging, which can exacerbate symptoms unlike in neurotoxic snake or funnel-web envenomations. prioritizes multimodal analgesia, starting with (15 mg/kg, maximum 1 g) and ibuprofen (10 mg/kg, maximum 400 mg), escalating to opioids such as (0.1 mg/kg, maximum 5 mg) or for moderate to severe cases unresponsive to initial therapy. is reserved for patients with persistent severe pain, systemic features (e.g., muscle spasms, ), or inadequate response to analgesia after consultation with a poisons center; one to three vials may be given, with observation for 1-2 hours post-administration to monitor for reactions. Hospitalization is typically not required for mild cases but is advised for recipients or those with systemic involvement to allow monitoring in a facility equipped for . In the 2020s, research has advanced toward synthetic and humanized alternatives to equine to minimize risks like (occurring in up to 10% of cases). A 2020 study identified a recombinant human monoclonal IgG that neutralizes proline-rich toxins in redback , demonstrating potential for safer, in preclinical models. Similarly, 2024 investigations into human antibodies against α-latrotoxin from related widow spiders suggest cross-neutralizing efficacy, paving the way for non-equine options. Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration-approved guidelines, updated through 2024 by state health departments, now recommend a staged approach over routine use, reflecting from trials like RAVE-II (2014) showing limited additional benefit for pain resolution beyond analgesia in many patients.00515-0/abstract)

Prognosis

With prompt medical treatment, including analgesia and when indicated, most redback spider bite symptoms resolve within 24 to 48 hours, though localized pain and systemic effects like sweating or muscle cramps may persist for 3 to 5 days. Full recovery typically occurs within days to weeks, with studies reporting 100% resolution without lasting adverse effects in observed cases. The fatality rate is less than 1% with administration, as the venom's neurotoxic effects are effectively managed in clinical settings. Complications are uncommon but can include antivenom-related reactions in under 5% of recipients and 5 to 14 days post-treatment in up to 16% of cases. Rare severe outcomes, such as or , have been documented, primarily in untreated envenomations. Without prompt care, risks increase, potentially leading to prolonged or spasms lasting months. is exceptionally rare and not a typical long-term effect in treated patients. In , no confirmed deaths from redback spider bites have occurred since the introduction of in 1956, reflecting effective medical interventions and widespread awareness. Redback spider bites to animals are less commonly documented than those to humans, but they can cause significant , particularly in pets. The , containing α-latrotoxin, affects the and muscles, leading to symptoms such as pain, vomiting, diarrhea, restlessness, muscle tremors, cramping, agitation, increased heart rate, and in severe cases, or respiratory distress. Cats are particularly susceptible and may experience severe outcomes including breathing difficulties, cardiac issues, and potentially , with clinical signs appearing within 8 hours and average time around 115 hours if untreated. Dogs show greater resistance and are seldom at lethal risk unless bitten multiple times, exhibiting gastrointestinal disturbances, generalized tremors, abdominal rigidity, and , from which healthy individuals typically recover. Small animals face higher risks due to their size. is challenging without witnessing the bite, as symptoms overlap with other conditions. For wildlife, redback spiders prey on small vertebrates like and occasionally birds or mice that become entangled in their webs, using to immobilize and kill these animals efficiently, though specific envenomation effects beyond predation are not well-studied. Veterinary treatment for envenomated pets involves supportive care, , and in severe cases, ; immediate consultation with a or poison hotline (e.g., 1300 869 738 in ) is recommended.

Historical and cultural aspects

Historical bite treatments

Australian Aboriginal communities have long incorporated traditional healing practices for managing from venomous bites, including the application of plant-based poultices and incantations to provide relief. For instance, heated leaves from vines such as were placed on sting sites to alleviate , while general methods for bites involved sucking the and applying warmed animal skins, reflecting a holistic approach that integrated spiritual elements like incantations with physical remedies. These practices, developed over millennia, emphasized immediate intervention to draw out toxins and soothe symptoms, though specific documentation for redback spider bites remains limited. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, colonial settlers in relied on a range of improvised remedies for redback spider bites, often adapted from European traditions or local experimentation, but these proved highly ineffective and occasionally harmful. Common approaches included applying tobacco juice from cigar smoke or pipes directly to the bite to numb pain, rubbing potassium permanganate solutions into the wound to disinfect and reduce swelling—as reported in cases from 1897 where symptoms subsided overnight—and excising the bite site with tools like glass shards to drain , a method noted in 1937 incidents involving multiple bites. Additional techniques, such as tight ligatures made from hair or grass strings combined with suction and incision, were frequently employed but failed to prevent severe or fatalities, contributing to at least 14 documented deaths before modern interventions. The shift toward effective treatments began in the 1930s with early venom research on Latrodectus hasselti at institutions like the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, which explored properties and antiserum preparation techniques. These efforts culminated in the 1950s under Saul Wiener at the Serum Laboratories, where he developed the first redback spider using adsorbed onto aluminum to produce neutralizing antibodies, leading to its commercial release in 1956. Prior to widespread availability, the last untreated deaths from redback bites occurred in 1955, after which no fatalities have been recorded in .

Cultural depictions

The redback spider has become a prominent symbol of peril in Australian , often depicted in humorous yet cautionary songs and ballads that highlight the hazards of rural life. A quintessential example is Slim Newton's 1973 novelty song "The Redback on the Toilet Seat," which won the inaugural Golden Guitar Award at Australia's Country Music Awards in Tamworth and vividly illustrates the spider's lurking danger in outhouses through its catchy lyrics about an unexpected bite. Similarly, traditional folk tunes like "The Spider by the Gwydir" portray the redback as a vicious threat, embedding it in oral traditions that warn of environmental risks while infusing them with wry humor. In media, the redback spider frequently appears in documentaries and films to underscore Australia's unique wildlife dangers. David Attenborough's narration in the BBC's "Life in the Undergrowth" (2005) showcases the spider's mating behaviors and web-building prowess, emphasizing its predatory efficiency. National Geographic's "Deadly Cousin: The Redback Spider" (2011) explores its venomous kinship to the black widow, using dramatic footage to highlight its notoriety. Short films like the National Film and Sound Archive's "Redback" (year not specified in source) offer a comedic inversion by presenting the story from the spider's perspective, critiquing human invasiveness. The spider's global profile surged in 2025 when approximately 70 redbacks were discovered and removed from the Osaka Kansai Expo site in , prompting safety warnings and heightened international awareness of its invasive potential. Symbolically, the redback embodies Australia's dual themes of resilience against natural hazards and the perilous beauty of its . In , it represents fierce female power and the interplay of , passion, and mortality, as seen in Del Kathryn Barton's 2016 dual-screen film "Red," where embodies the spider's cannibalistic mating ritual to explore gendered dynamics. While no major Indigenous Australian myths center on the redback, local traditions reflect practical taboos through its use in weapon preparation, such as mixing crushed spiders with to tip spears in , underscoring a cultural respect for its toxicity. Overall, the spider's imagery in and reinforces national narratives of confronting threats with stoic humor and creativity.

References

  1. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Latrodectus
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.