Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Mantis
View on Wikipedia
| Mantis | |
|---|---|
| Mantis religiosa | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Superorder: | Dictyoptera |
| Order: | Mantodea Burmeister, 1838 |
| Families | |
|
See text | |
| Synonyms | |
| |
Mantises are an order (Mantodea) of insects that contains over 2,400 species in about 460 genera in 33 families. The largest family is the Mantidae ("mantids"). Mantises are distributed worldwide in temperate and tropical habitats. They have triangular heads with bulging eyes supported on flexible necks. Their elongated bodies may or may not have wings, but all mantodeans have forelegs that are greatly enlarged and adapted for catching and gripping prey; their upright posture, while remaining stationary with forearms folded, resembling a praying posture, has led to the common name praying mantis.
The closest relatives of mantises are termites and cockroaches (Blattodea), which are all within the superorder Dictyoptera. Mantises are sometimes confused with stick insects (Phasmatodea), other elongated insects such as grasshoppers (Orthoptera), or other more distantly related insects with raptorial forelegs such as mantisflies (Mantispidae). Mantises are mostly ambush predators, but a few ground-dwelling species are found actively pursuing their prey. They normally live for about a year. In cooler climates, the adults lay eggs in autumn, then die. The eggs are protected by their hard capsules and hatch in the spring. Females sometimes practice sexual cannibalism, eating their mates after copulation.
Mantises were considered to have supernatural powers by early civilizations, including ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, and Assyria. A cultural trope popular in cartoons imagines the female mantis as a femme fatale. Mantises are among the insects most commonly kept as pets.
Etymology
[edit]The name mantodea is formed from the Ancient Greek words μάντις (mantis) meaning "prophet", and εἶδος (eidos) meaning "form" or "type". It was coined in 1838 by the German entomologist Hermann Burmeister.[3][4] The name "mantid" properly refers only to members of the family Mantidae, which was, historically, the only family in the order. The other common name, praying mantis, applied to any species in the order[5] (though in Europe mainly to Mantis religiosa), comes from the typical prayer-like posture these mantises adopt when their forelegs are folded.[6][7] The vernacular plural "mantises" (used in this article) was originally confined largely to the US, with "mantids" predominantly used as the plural in the UK and elsewhere, until the family Mantidae was further split in 2002; at present, only some 75 out of 430 known genera are mantids, the rest are in 28 other families, and therefore no longer "mantids".[8][9]
Taxonomy and evolution
[edit]
Over 2,400 species of mantis in about 430 genera are recognized.[10] They are predominantly found in tropical regions, but some live in temperate areas.[11][12] The systematics of mantises have long been disputed. Mantises, along with stick insects (Phasmatodea), were once placed in the order Orthoptera with the cockroaches (now Blattodea) and ice crawlers (now Grylloblattodea). Kristensen (1991) combined the Mantodea with the cockroaches and termites into the order Dictyoptera, suborder Mantodea.[13][14]
Phylogeny
[edit]External
[edit]Evolutionary relationships based on Evangelista et al. 2019 are shown in the cladogram:[15]
| Dictyoptera |
| ||||||
Internal
[edit]One of the earliest classifications splitting an all-inclusive Mantidae into multiple families was that proposed by Beier in 1968, recognizing eight families,[16] though it was not until Ehrmann's reclassification into 15 families in 2002[9] that a multiple-family classification became universally adopted. Klass, in 1997, studied the external male genitalia and postulated that the families Chaeteessidae and Metallyticidae diverged from the other families at an early date.[17] However, as previously configured, the Mantidae and Thespidae especially were considered polyphyletic,[18] so the Mantodea have been revised substantially as of 2019 and now includes 29 families.[19]
| Cladogram of extant Mantodea families[20][19] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fossil mantises
[edit]
Mantises are thought to have evolved from cockroach-like ancestors.[21] Some of the earliest confidently identified mantis fossils date to the Early Cretaceous,[18] although the Jurassic taxon Lovec was identified in 2024 from the Karabastau Formation.[1] Fossils of the group are rare: by 2022, 37 fossil species are known.[18][22] Fossil mantises, including one from Japan with spines on the front legs as in modern mantises, have been found in Cretaceous amber.[23] Most fossils in amber are nymphs; compression fossils (in rock) include adults. Fossil mantises from the Crato Formation in Brazil include the 10 mm (0.39 in) long Santanmantis axelrodi, described in 2003; as in modern mantises, the front legs were adapted for catching prey. Well-preserved specimens yield details as small as 5 μm through X-ray computed tomography.[18] Extinct families and genera include:
Similar insects in the Neuroptera
[edit]Because of the superficially similar raptorial forelegs, mantidflies may be confused with mantises, though they are unrelated. Their similarity is an example of convergent evolution; mantidflies do not have tegmina (leathery forewings) like mantises, their antennae are shorter and less thread-like, and the raptorial tibia is more muscular than that of a similar-sized mantis and bends back farther in preparation for shooting out to grasp prey.[24]
Biology
[edit]Anatomy
[edit]Mantises have large, triangular heads with a beak-like snout and mandibles. They have two bulbous compound eyes, three small simple eyes, and a pair of antennae. The articulation of the neck is also remarkably flexible; some species of mantis can rotate their heads nearly 180°.[7] The mantis thorax consists of a prothorax, a mesothorax, and a metathorax. In all species apart from the genus Mantoida, the prothorax, which bears the head and forelegs, is much longer than the other two thoracic segments. The prothorax is also flexibly articulated, allowing for a wide range of movements of the head and fore limbs while the remainder of the body remains more or less immobile.[25][26] Mantises also are unique to the Dictyoptera in that they have tympanate hearing, with two tympana in an auditory chamber in their metathorax. Most mantises can only hear ultrasound.[27]
Mantises have two spiked, grasping forelegs ("raptorial legs") in which prey items are caught and held securely. In most insect legs, including the posterior four legs of a mantis, the coxa and trochanter combine as an inconspicuous base of the leg; in the raptorial legs, however, the coxa and trochanter combine to form a segment about as long as the femur, which is a spiky part of the grasping apparatus (see illustration). Located at the base of the femur is a set of discoidal spines, usually four in number, but ranging from none to as many as five depending on the species. These spines are preceded by a number of tooth-like tubercles, which, along with a similar series of tubercles along the tibia and the apical claw near its tip, give the foreleg of the mantis its grasp on its prey. The foreleg ends in a delicate tarsus used as a walking appendage, made of four or five segments and ending in a two-toed claw with no arolium.[25][28]
Mantises can be loosely categorized as being macropterous (long-winged), brachypterous (short-winged), micropterous (vestigial-winged), or apterous (wingless). If not wingless, a mantis has two sets of wings: the outer wings, or tegmina, are usually narrow and leathery. They function as camouflage and as a shield for the hindwings, which are clearer and more delicate.[25][29] The abdomen of all mantises consists of 10 tergites, with a corresponding set of nine sternites visible in males and seven visible in females. The abdomen tends to be slimmer in males than females, but ends in a pair of cerci in both sexes.[25]
Vision
[edit]
Mantises have stereo vision.[30][31][32] They locate their prey by sight; their compound eyes contain up to 10,000 ommatidia. A small area at the front called the fovea has greater visual acuity than the rest of the eye, and can produce the high resolution necessary to examine potential prey. The peripheral ommatidia are concerned with perceiving motion; when a moving object is noticed, the head is rapidly rotated to bring the object into the visual field of the fovea. Further motions of the prey are then tracked by movements of the mantis's head so as to keep the image centered on the fovea.[28][33] The use of stereoscopic vision differs from humans or primates because they specifically utilize this vision for capturing and spotting prey.[34] The eyes are widely spaced and laterally situated, affording a wide binocular field of vision and precise stereoscopic vision at close range.[35] The dark spot on each eye that moves as it rotates its head is a pseudopupil. This occurs because the ommatidia that are viewed "head-on" absorb the incident light, while those to the side reflect it.[36]
As their hunting relies heavily on vision, mantises are primarily diurnal. Many species, however, fly at night and may then be attracted to artificial lights. They have good night vision.[37] Male mantises in the family Liturgusidae are more frequently collected at night, suggesting greater nocturnal activity or attraction to light sources. This pattern likely extends to other mantis families, where males are also more commonly observed during nighttime surveys.[38] Nocturnal flight is especially important to males in locating less-mobile females by detecting their pheromones. Flying at night exposes mantises to fewer bird predators than diurnal flight would. Many mantises also have an auditory thoracic organ that helps them avoid bats by detecting their echolocation calls and responding evasively.[39][40]
Diet and hunting
[edit]
Mantises are generalist predators of arthropods.[11] The majority of mantises are ambush predators that only feed upon live prey within their reach. They either camouflage themselves and remain stationary, waiting for prey to approach, or stalk their prey with slow, stealthy movements.[41] Larger mantises sometimes eat smaller individuals of their own species,[42] as well as small vertebrates such as lizards, frogs, fish, and particularly small birds.[43][44][45]
Most mantises stalk tempting prey if it strays close enough, and will go further when they are especially hungry.[46] Once within reach, mantises strike rapidly to grasp the prey with their spiked raptorial forelegs.[47] Some ground and bark species pursue their prey in a more active way. For example, members of a few genera such as the ground mantises Entella, Ligaria, and Ligariella run over dry ground seeking prey, much as tiger beetles do.[25] Some mantis species such as Euantissa pulchra can discriminate between different types of prey, and approach spiders mimicking non-aggressive ant species much more than spiders that mimick aggressive ant species.[48]
The fore gut of some species extends the whole length of the insect and can be used to store prey for digestion later. This may be advantageous in an insect that feeds intermittently.[49] Chinese mantises live longer, grow faster, and produce more young when they are able to eat pollen.[50]
Antipredator adaptations
[edit]Mantises are preyed on by vertebrates such as frogs, lizards, and birds, and by invertebrates such as spiders, large species of hornets, and ants.[51] Some hunting wasps, such as some species of Tachytes, also paralyze some species of mantis to feed their young.[52] Generally, mantises protect themselves by camouflage, most species being cryptically colored to resemble leaves or other backgrounds, both to avoid predators and to better snare their prey.[53] Those that live on uniformly colored surfaces such as bare earth or tree bark are dorsoventrally flattened so as to eliminate shadows that might reveal their presence.[54] The species from different families called flower mantises are aggressive mimics: they resemble flowers convincingly enough to attract prey that come to collect pollen and nectar.[55][56][57] Some species in Africa and Australia are able to turn black after a molt towards the end of the dry season; at this time of year, bush fires occur and this coloration enables them to blend in with the fire-ravaged landscape (fire melanism).[54]

When directly threatened, many mantis species stand tall and spread their forelegs, with their wings fanning out wide. The fanning of the wings makes the mantis seem larger and more threatening, with some species enhancing this effect with bright colors and patterns on their hindwings and inner surfaces of their front legs. If harassment persists, a mantis may strike with its forelegs and attempt to pinch or bite. As part of the bluffing (deimatic) threat display, some species may also produce a hissing sound by expelling air from the abdominal spiracles. Mantises lack chemical protection, so their displays are largely bluff. When flying at night, at least some mantises are able to detect the echolocation sounds produced by bats; when the frequency begins to increase rapidly, indicating an approaching bat, they stop flying horizontally and begin a descending spiral toward the safety of the ground, often preceded by an aerial loop or spin. If caught, they may slash captors with their raptorial legs.[54][58][59]
Mantises, like stick insects, show rocking behavior in which the insect makes rhythmic, repetitive side-to-side movements. Functions proposed for this behavior include the enhancement of crypsis by means of the resemblance to vegetation moving in the wind. However, the repetitive swaying movements may be most important in allowing the insects to discriminate objects from the background by their relative movement, a visual mechanism typical of animals with simpler sight systems. Rocking movements by these generally sedentary insects may replace flying or running as a source of relative motion of objects in the visual field.[60] As ants may be predators of mantises, genera such as Loxomantis, Orthodera, and Statilia, like many other arthropods, avoid attacking them. A variety of arthropods, including some early-instar mantises, exploit this behavior and mimic ants to evade their predators.[61]
-
Adult female Iris oratoria performs a bluffing threat display, rearing back with the forelegs and wings spread and mouth opened.
-
The jeweled flower mantis, Creobroter gemmatus: the brightly colored wings are opened suddenly in a deimatic display to startle predators.
-
The grass mantis Schizocephala bicornis mimics dry grass to both avoid predators and to approach unwitting prey
Reproduction and life history
[edit]The mating season in temperate climates typically takes place in autumn,[62][63] while in tropical areas, mating can occur at any time of the year.[63] To mate following courtship, the male usually leaps onto the female's back, clasping her thorax and wing bases with his forelegs. He then arches his abdomen to deposit and store sperm in a special chamber near the tip of the female's abdomen. The female lays between 10 and 400 eggs, depending on the species. Eggs are typically deposited in a froth mass-produced by glands in the abdomen. This froth hardens, creating a protective capsule, which together with the egg mass is called an ootheca. Depending on the species, the ootheca can be attached to a flat surface, wrapped around a plant, or even deposited in the ground.[62] Despite the versatility and durability of the eggs, they are often preyed on, especially by several species of parasitoid wasps. In a few species, mostly ground and bark mantises in the family Tarachodidae, the mother guards the eggs.[62] The cryptic Tarachodes maurus positions herself on bark with her abdomen covering her egg capsule, ambushing passing prey and moving very little until the eggs hatch.[13] An unusual reproductive strategy is adopted by Brunner's stick mantis from the southern United States: no males have ever been found in this species, and the females breed parthenogenetically.[11] The ability to reproduce by parthenogenesis has been recorded in at least two other species, Sphodromantis viridis and Miomantis sp., although these species usually reproduce sexually.[64][65][66] In temperate climates, adults do not survive the winter and the eggs undergo a diapause, hatching in the spring.[14]
As in closely related insect groups in the superorder Dictyoptera, mantises go through three life stages: egg, nymph, and adult (mantises are among the hemimetabolous insects). For smaller species, the eggs may hatch in 3–4 weeks as opposed to 4–6 weeks for larger species. The nymphs may be colored differently from the adult, and the early stages are often mimics of ants. A mantis nymph grows bigger as it molts its exoskeleton. Molting can happen five to 10 times before the adult stage is reached, depending on the species. After the final molt, most species have wings, though some species remain wingless or brachypterous ("short-winged"), particularly in the female sex. The lifespan of a mantis depends on the species; smaller ones may live 4–8 weeks, while larger species may live 4–6 months.[11][26]
-
Mantis religiosa mating (brown male, green female)
-
Stagmomantis carolina laying ootheca
-
Recently laid M. religiosa ootheca
-
Hatching from the ootheca
-
Sphodromantis lineola molting
Sexual cannibalism
[edit]
Sexual cannibalism is common among most predatory species of mantises in captivity. It has sometimes been observed in natural populations, where about a quarter of male–female encounters result in the male being eaten by the female.[67][68][69] Around 90% of the predatory species of mantises exhibit sexual cannibalism.[70] Adult males typically outnumber females at first, but their numbers may be fairly equivalent later in the adult stage,[14] possibly because females selectively eat the smaller males.[71] In Tenodera sinensis, 83% of males escape cannibalism after an encounter with a female, but since multiple matings occur, the probability of a male's being eaten increases cumulatively.[68]
The female may begin feeding by biting off the male's head (as they do with regular prey), and if mating has begun, the male's movements may become even more vigorous in its delivery of sperm. Early researchers thought that because copulatory movement is controlled by a ganglion in the abdomen, not the head, removal of the male's head was a reproductive strategy by females to enhance fertilization while obtaining sustenance. Later, this behavior appeared to be an artifact of intrusive laboratory observation. Whether the behavior is natural in the field or also the result of distractions caused by the human observer remains controversial. Mantises are highly visual organisms and notice any disturbance in the laboratory or field, such as bright lights or moving scientists. Chinese mantises that had been fed ad libitum (so that they were not hungry) actually displayed elaborate courtship behavior when left undisturbed. The male engages the female in a courtship dance, to change her interest from feeding to mating.[72] Under such circumstances, the female has been known to respond with a defensive deimatic display by flashing the colored eyespots on the inside of her front legs.[73]
The reason for sexual cannibalism has been debated; experiments show that females on poor diets are likelier to engage in sexual cannibalism than those on good diets.[74] Some hypothesize that submissive males gain a selective advantage by producing offspring; this is supported by a quantifiable increase in the duration of copulation among males which are cannibalized, in some cases doubling both the duration and the chance of fertilization. This is contrasted by a study where males were seen to approach hungry females with more caution, and were shown to remain mounted on hungry females for a longer time, indicating that males that actively avoid cannibalism may mate with multiple females. The same study also found that hungry females generally attracted fewer males than those that were well fed.[75] The act of dismounting after copulation is dangerous for males, for it is the time that females most frequently cannibalize their mates. An increase in mounting duration appears to indicate that males wait for an opportune time to dismount a hungry female, who would be likely to cannibalize her mate.[73] Experiments have revealed that the sex ratio in an environment determines the male copulatory behavior of Mantis religiosa, which in turn affects the cannibalistic tendencies of the female. This supports the sperm competition hypothesis because the polyandrous treatment recorded the highest copulation duration time and lowest cannibalism. This further suggests that dismounting the female can make males susceptible to cannibalism.[76]
Relationship with humans
[edit]In culture, literature and art
[edit]
One of the earliest mantis references is in the ancient Chinese dictionary Erya, which gives its attributes in poetry, where it represents courage and fearlessness, and a brief description. A later text, the Jingshi Zhenglei Daguan Bencao (transl. "Great History of Medical Material Annotated and Arranged by Types, Based upon the Classics and Historical Works") from 1108, gives accurate details of the construction of the egg packages, the development cycle, anatomy, and the function of the antennae. Although mantises are rarely mentioned in Ancient Greek sources, a female mantis in threat posture is accurately illustrated on a series of fifth-century BC silver coins, including didrachms, from Metapontum in Lucania.[77] The 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia Suda described the insect called "mantis" (μάντις) as a pale green, clumsy, and slow-moving locust, adding that some people observed its movements for the purpose of augury.[78] In addition, the Suda mentions the phrase "arouraia mantis" (Ἀρουραία μάντις), explaining that it was a proverbial expression used to mock people who were sluggish and ineffectual but still treated as if they had wisdom or insight.[79] He translates Zenobius 2.94 with the words seriphos (maybe a mantis) and graus, an old woman, implying a thin, dried-up stick of a body.[80]
Mantises are a common motif in Luna Polychrome ceramics of pre-Columbian Nicaragua, and are believed to represent a deity or spirit called "Madre Culebra".[81]
Western descriptions of the biology and morphology of the mantises became more accurate in the 18th century. Roesel von Rosenhof illustrated and described mantises and their cannibalistic behavior in the Insekten-Belustigungen (Insect Entertainments).[82]

In the early 1900s, people in the United States Ozarks region referred to them as Devil's horses.[83]
Aldous Huxley made philosophical observations about the nature of death while two mantises mated in the sight of two characters in his 1962 novel Island (the species was Gongylus gongylodes). The naturalist Gerald Durrell's humorously autobiographical 1956 book My Family and Other Animals includes a four-page account of an almost evenly matched battle between a mantis and a gecko. Shortly before the fatal dénouement, Durrell narrates:
he [Geronimo the gecko] crashed into the mantis and made her reel, and grabbed the underside of her thorax in his jaws. Cicely [the mantis] retaliated by snapping both her front legs shut on Geronimo's hindlegs. They rustled and staggered across the ceiling and down the wall, each seeking to gain some advantage.[84]
M. C. Escher's woodcut Dream depicts a human-sized mantis standing on a sleeping bishop.[85]
A cultural trope imagines the female mantis as a femme fatale. The idea is propagated in cartoons by Cable, Guy and Rodd, LeLievre, T. McCracken, and Mark Parisi, among others.[86][87][88][89] It ends Isabella Rossellini's short film about the life of a praying mantis in her 2008 Green Porno season for the Sundance Channel.[90][91]
The Deadly Mantis is a 1957 American science fiction monster film, with a giant mantis threatening mankind.[92]
Martial arts
[edit]
Two martial arts separately developed in China have movements and fighting strategies based on those of the mantis.[93][94] As one of these arts was developed in northern China, and the other in southern parts of the country, the arts are today referred to (both in English and Chinese) as 'Northern Praying Mantis'[95] and 'Southern Praying Mantis'.[94] Both are very popular in China, and have also been exported to the West in recent decades.[94][95][96][97]
In mythology and religion
[edit]According to local beliefs in Africa, this insect brings good luck.[98] The mantis was revered by the southern African Khoi and San in whose cultures man and nature were intertwined; for its praying posture, the mantis was even named Hottentotsgot ("god of the Hottentots") in the Afrikaans language that had developed among the first European settlers.[99] However, at least for the San, the mantis was only one of the manifestations of a trickster-deity, ǀKaggen, who could assume many other forms, such as a snake, hare or vulture.[100] Several ancient civilizations did consider the insect to have supernatural powers; for the Greeks, it had the ability to show lost travelers the way home; in the Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead, the "bird-fly" is a minor god that leads the souls of the dead to the underworld; in a list of 9th-century BC Nineveh grasshoppers (buru), the mantis is named necromancer (buru-enmeli) and soothsayer (buru-enmeli-ashaga).[82][101] Some pre-Columbian cultures in western Nicaragua have preserved oral traditions of the mantis as "Madre Culebra", a powerful predator and symbol of female symbolic authority.[81]
As pets
[edit]Mantises are among the insects most widely kept as pets.[102][103] Because the lifespan of a mantis is only about a year, people who want to keep mantises often breed them. In 2013 at least 31 species were kept and bred in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and the United States.[104] In 1996 at least 50 species were known to be kept in captivity by members of the Mantis Study Group.[105]
For pest control
[edit]Naturally occurring mantis populations provide plant pest control.[106] Gardeners who prefer to avoid pesticides may encourage mantises in the hope of controlling insect pests.[107] However, mantises do not have key attributes of biological pest control agents; they do not specialize in a single pest insect, and do not multiply rapidly in response to an increase in such a prey species, but are general predators. They therefore have "negligible value" in biological control.[107]
Two species, the Chinese mantis and the European mantis, were deliberately introduced to North America in the hope that they would serve as pest controls for agriculture; they have spread widely in both the United States and Canada.[108]
Robotics
[edit]In 2016, the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence had produced a prototype robot inspired by the forelegs of the praying mantis, with front legs that allow the robot to walk, climb steps, and grasp objects. The multi-jointed leg provides dexterity via a rotatable joint. Future models may include a more spiked foreleg to improve the grip and ability to support more weight.[109]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Vršanský, Peter (2024). "Late Mesozoic cockroaches s.l. from the Karabastau Formation in Kazakhstan" (PDF). AMBA Projekty. 14 (1): 1–700.
- ^ BéThoux, Olivier; Wieland, Frank (May 2009). "Evidence for Carboniferous origin of the order Mantodea (Insecta: Dictyoptera) gained from forewing morphology". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 156 (1): 79–113. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00485.x.
- ^ Essig, Edward Oliver (1947). College entomology. Macmillan Company. pp. 124, 900. OCLC 809878.
- ^ Harper, Douglas. "mantis". Online Etymology Dictionary.
- ^ Bullock, William (1812). A companion to the London Museum and Pantherion (12th ed.).
- ^ Partington, Charles Frederick (1837). The British Cyclopædia of Natural History. Vol. 1. W. S. Orr.
- ^ a b "Praying Mantis". National Geographic Society. 10 September 2010. Archived from the original on 11 January 2010. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- ^ Bragg, P. E. (1996). "Mantis, Mantid, Mantids, Mantises". Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 1:4.
- ^ a b Ehrmann, R. 2002. Mantodea: Gottesanbeterinnen der Welt. Natur und Tier, Münster.
- ^ Otte, Daniel; Spearman, Lauren. "Mantodea Species File Online". Retrieved 17 July 2012.
- ^ a b c d Hurd, I. E. (1999). "Ecology of Praying Mantids". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H.; Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 43–49. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ Hurd, I. E. (1999). "Mantid in Ecological Research". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H.; Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ a b Costa, James (2006). The Other Insect Societies. Harvard University Press. pp. 135–136. ISBN 978-0-674-02163-1.
- ^ a b c Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Vol. 4. Springer. pp. 3033–3037. ISBN 978-1-4020-6242-1.
- ^ Evangelista, D.A.; Wipfler, B.; O., Bethoux; Donath, A.; Fujita, M.; Kohli, M.K.; Legendre, F.; Liu; Machida; Misof; Peters; Podsiadlowski; Rust; Schuette; Tollenaar; Ware; Wappler; Zhou; Meusemann; Simon (23 January 2019). "An integrative phylogenomic approach illuminates the evolutionary history of cockroaches and termites (Blattodea)". Proc. R. Soc. B. 286 (1895). doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.2076. PMC 6364590. PMID 30963947.
- ^ Beier, M. (1968). "Ordnung Mantodea (Fangheuschrecken)". Handbuch der Zoologie. 4 (2): 3–12.
- ^ Klass, Klaus-Dieter (1997). The external male genitalia and phylogeny of Blattaria and Mantodea. Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut. ISBN 978-3-925382-45-1.
- ^ a b c d Martill, David M.; Bechly, Günter; Loveridge, Robert F. (2007). The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil: Window into an Ancient World. Cambridge University Press. pp. 236–238. ISBN 978-1-139-46776-6.
- ^ a b Schwarz CJ, Roy R (2019) The systematics of Mantodea revisited: an updated classification incorporating multiple data sources (Insecta: Dictyoptera) Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) International Journal of Entomology 55 [2]: 101–196.
- ^ Grimaldi, David (28 July 2003). "A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)". American Museum Novitates (3412): 1–47. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2003)412<0001:AROCMA>2.0.CO;2. hdl:2246/2838. S2CID 56007623.
- ^ Li, Xinran (30 August 2019). "Disambiguating the scientific names of cockroaches". Palaeoentomology. 2 (4): 390–402. Bibcode:2019Plegy...2..390L. doi:10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.4.13. ISSN 2624-2834. S2CID 202789239.
- ^ Terríquez-Beltrán, J.; Riquelme, F.; Varela-Hernández, F. (31 October 2022). "A new species of mantis (Insecta: Mantodea: Amelidae) from the Miocene Amber-Lagerstätte in Mexico". Historical Biology. 35 (11): 2127–2134. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2134782. ISSN 0891-2963. S2CID 253280592.
- ^ Ryall, Julian (25 April 2008). "Ancient Praying Mantis Found in Amber". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 29 April 2008. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
- ^ Boyden, Thomas C. (1983). "Mimicry, predation and potential pollination by the mantispid, Climaciella brunnea var. instabilis (Say) (Mantispidae: Neuroptera)". Journal of the New York Entomological Society. 91 (4): 508–511. JSTOR 25009393.
- ^ a b c d e Roy, Roger (1999). "Morphology and Taxonomy". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H.; Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 21–33. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ a b Siwanowicz, Igor (2009). Animals Up Close. Dorling Kindersley. pp. 38–39. ISBN -978-1-405-33731-1.
- ^ Yager, David; Svenson, Gavin (1 July 2008). "Patterns of praying mantis auditory system evolution based on morphological, molecular, neurophysiological, and behavioural data". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 94 (3). Oxford University Press: 541–568. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.00996.x.
- ^ a b Corrette, Brian J. (1990). "Prey capture in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis: coordination of the capture sequence and strike movements" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 148 (1): 147–180. Bibcode:1990JExpB.148..147C. doi:10.1242/jeb.148.1.147. PMID 2407798.
- ^ Kemper, William T. "Insect Order ID: Mantodea (Praying Mantises, Mantids)" (PDF). Missouri Botanical Garden. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
- ^ Nityananda, Vivek; Tarawneh, Ghaith; Rosner, Ronny; Nicolas, Judith; Crichton, Stuart; Read, Jenny (2016). "Insect stereopsis demonstrated using a 3D insect cinema". Scientific Reports. 6 18718. Bibcode:2016NatSR...618718N. doi:10.1038/srep18718. PMC 4703989. PMID 26740144.
- ^ Rossel, S (1983). "Binocular stereopsis in an insect". Nature. 302 (5911): 821–822. Bibcode:1983Natur.302..821R. doi:10.1038/302821a0. S2CID 4264254.
- ^ Rossel, S (1996). "Binocular vision in insects: How mantids solve the correspondence problem". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 93 (23): 13229–13232. Bibcode:1996PNAS...9313229R. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.13229. PMC 24075. PMID 11038523.
- ^ Simmons, Peter J.; Young, David (1999). Nerve Cells and Animal Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. p. 8990. ISBN 978-0-521-62726-9.
- ^ Nityananda, V.; Tarawneh, G.; Rosner, R.; Nicolas, J.; Crichton, S.; Read, J. (2016). "Insect stereopsis demonstrated using a 3D insect cinema". Scientific Reports. 6 18718. Bibcode:2016NatSR...618718N. doi:10.1038/srep18718. PMC 4703989. PMID 26740144.
- ^ Howard, Ian P.; Rogers, Brian J. (1995). Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford University Press. p. 646. ISBN 978-0-19-508476-4.
- ^ Zeil, Jochen; Al-Mutairi, Maha M. (1996). "Variations in the optical properties of the compound eyes of Uca lactea annulipes" (PDF). The Journal of Experimental Biology. 199 (7): 1569–1577. doi:10.1242/jeb.199.7.1569. PMID 9319471.
- ^ Robert (5 July 2023). "Can Praying Mantis See in the Dark?". Insects Authority. Retrieved 16 February 2024.
- ^ Bragg, P.E. (2010). "A review of the Liturgusidae of Borneo (Insecta: Mantodea)". Sepilok Bulletin. 12: 21–36.
- ^ Yager, David (1999). "Hearing". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H.; Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 101–103. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ Grimaldi, David; Engel, Michael S. (2005). Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. p. 257. ISBN 978-0-521-82149-0.
- ^ Ross, Edward S. (February 1984). "Mantids – The Praying Predators". National Geographic. 165 (2): 268–280. ISSN 0027-9358. OCLC 643483454.
- ^ Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. p. 1509. ISBN 978-1-4020-6242-1.
- ^ Grimaldi, David; Engel, Michael S. (2005). Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. p. 254. ISBN 978-0-521-82149-0.
- ^ Nyffeler, Martin; Maxwell, Michael R.; Remsen, J. V. Jr. (2017). "Bird predation by praying mantises: a global perspective". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 129 (2): 331–344. doi:10.1676/16-100.1. S2CID 90832425.
- ^ Battison, Roberto; et al. (2018). "The fishing mantid: predation on fish as a new adaptive strategy for praying mantids (Insecta: Mantodea)". Journal of Orthoptera Research. 27 (2): 155–158. doi:10.3897/jor.27.28067.
- ^ Gelperin, Alan (July 1968). "Feeding behaviour of the praying mantis: a learned modification". Nature. 219 (5152): 399–400. Bibcode:1968Natur.219..399G. doi:10.1038/219399a0. PMID 5667084. S2CID 10951932.
- ^ Prete, F. R.; Cleal, K. S. (1996). "The predatory strike of free ranging praying mantises, Sphodromantis lineola (Burmeister). I: Strikes in the mid-sagittal plane". Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 48 (4): 173–190. doi:10.1159/000113196. PMID 8886389.
- ^ Ramesh, Aparajitha; Vijayan, Sajesh; Sreedharan, Sreethin; Somanathan, Hema; Uma, Divya (2016). "Similar yet different: differential response of a praying mantis to ant-mimicking spiders". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 119 (1): 158–165. doi:10.1111/bij.12793.
- ^ Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. p. 116. ISBN 978-1-4020-6242-1.
- ^ Beckman, Noelle; Hurd, Lawrence E. (2003). "Pollen feeding and fitness in praying mantids: the vegetarian side of a tritrophic predator". Environmental Entomology. 32 (4): 881–885. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-32.4.881.
- ^ Iyer, Geetha (13 August 2011). "Down to earth". Frontline Magazine. 28 (17).
- ^ Fabre, Jean-Henri (1921). More Hunting Wasps. Dodd, Mead.
- ^ Gullan, P. J.; Cranston, P. S. (2010). The Insects: An Outline of Entomology (4th ed.). Wiley. p. 370. ISBN 978-1-118-84616-2.
- ^ a b c Edmunds, Malcolm; Brunner, Dani (1999). "Ethology of Defenses against Predators". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H.; Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 282–293. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ Cott, Hugh (1940). Adaptive Coloration in Animals. Methuen. pp. 392–393.
- ^ Annandale, Nelson (1900). "Observations on the habits and natural surroundings of insects made during the 'Skeat Expedition' to the Malay Peninsula, 1899–1900". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 69: 862–865.
- ^ O'Hanlon, James C.; Holwell, Gregory I.; Herberstein, Marie E. (2014). "Pollinator deception in the orchid mantis". The American Naturalist. 183 (1): 126–132. Bibcode:2014ANat..183..126O. doi:10.1086/673858. PMID 24334741. S2CID 2228423.
- ^ Yager, D.; May, M. (1993). "Coming in on a wing and an ear". Natural History. 102 (1): 28–33.
- ^ "Praying Mantis Uses Ultrasonic Hearing to Dodge Bats". National Geographic Society. 19 November 2002. Archived from the original on 21 May 2006. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- ^ O'Dea, J. D. (1991). "Eine zusatzliche oder alternative Funktion der 'kryptischen' Schaukelbewegung bei Gottesanbeterinnen und Stabschrecken (Mantodea, Phasmatodea)". Entomologische Zeitschrift. 101 (1–2): 25–27.
- ^ Nelson, Ximena J.; Jackson, Robert R. (2006). "Innate aversion to ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and ant mimics: experimental findings from mantises (Mantodea)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 88 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00598.x.
- ^ a b c Ene, J. C. (1964). "The distribution and post-embryonic development of Tarachodes afzelli (Stal) (Mantodea: Eremiaphilidae)". Journal of Natural History. 7 (80): 493–511. doi:10.1080/00222936408651488.
- ^ a b Michael, Maxwell. R. (1999). "Mating Behavior". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H.; Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ Bragg, P.E. (1987) A case of parthenogenesis in a mantis. Bulletin of the Amateur Entomologists' Society, 46 (356): 160.
- ^ Bragg, P. E. (December 1989). "Parthenogenetic mantid named". Bulletin of the Amateur Entomologists' Society. 48 (367). Mantis Study Group: 242. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- ^ Dickie, S. (1996) Parthenogenesis in mantids. Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 1: 5.
- ^ Lawrence, S. E. (1992). "Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantid, Mantis religiosa: a field study". Animal Behaviour. 43 (4): 569–583. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81017-6. S2CID 53199427.
- ^ a b Hurd, L. E.; Eisenberg, R. M.; Fagan, W. F.; Tilmon, K. J.; Snyder, W. E.; Vandersall, K. S.; Datz, S. G.; Welch, J. D. (1994). "Cannibalism reverses male-biased sex ratio in adult mantids: female strategy against food limitation?". Oikos. 69 (2): 193–198. Bibcode:1994Oikos..69..193H. doi:10.2307/3546137. JSTOR 3546137.
- ^ Maxwell, Michael R. (1998). "Lifetime mating opportunities and male mating behaviour in sexually cannibalistic praying mantids". Animal Behaviour. 55 (4): 1011–1028. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0671. PMID 9632486. S2CID 26887566.
- ^ Wilder, Shawn M.; Rypstra, Ann L.; Elgar, Mark A. (2009). "The importance of ecological and phylogenetic conditions for the occurrence and frequency of sexual cannibalism". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 40: 21–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120238.
- ^ "Do Female Praying Mantises Always Eat the Males?". Entomology Today. 22 December 2013. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ Liske, E.; Davis, W. J. (1984). "Sexual behaviour of the Chinese praying mantis". Animal Behaviour. 32 (3): 916–918. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80170-0. S2CID 53144893.
- ^ a b Lelito, Jonathan P.; Brown, William D. (2006). "Complicity or conflict over sexual cannibalism? Male risk taking in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis". The American Naturalist. 168 (2): 263–269. Bibcode:2006ANat..168..263L. doi:10.1086/505757. PMID 16874635. S2CID 32185318.
- ^ Liske, E.; Davis, W. J. (1987). "Courtship and mating behaviour of the Chinese praying mantis, Tenodera aridifolia sinenesis". Animal Behaviour. 35 (5): 1524–1537. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(87)80024-6. S2CID 53191218.
- ^ Maxwell, Michael R.; Gallego, Kevin M.; Barry, Katherine L. (2010). "Effects of female feeding regime in a sexually cannibalistic mantid: fecundity, cannibalism, and male response in Stagmomantis limbata (Mantodea)". Ecological Entomology. 35 (6): 775–787. Bibcode:2010EcoEn..35..775M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01239.x. S2CID 85923330.
- ^ Prokop, P; Václav, R (2005). "Males Respond to the Risk of Sperm Competition in the Sexually Cannibalistic Praying Mantis, Mantis religiosa". Ethology. 111 (9): 836–848. Bibcode:2005Ethol.111..836P. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01113.x.
- ^ Bodson, Liliane (2014). Campbell, Gordon Lindsay (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 557–558. ISBN 978-0-19-958942-5.
- ^ Suda, mu, 169
- ^ Suda, mu, 169
- ^ Erasmus, Desiderius; Fantazzi, Charles (1992). Adages: Iivii1 to Iiiiii100. University of Toronto Press. pp. 334–335. ISBN 978-0-8020-2831-0.
- ^ a b McCafferty, Geoffrey; McCafferty, Sharisse (1 April 2020). "Praying to the Predator: Symbols of Insect Animism on Luna/El Menco Polychrome from Pre-Columbian Pacific Nicaragua". Latin American and Latinx Visual Culture. 2 (2): 28–46. doi:10.1525/lavc.2020.220004. S2CID 225959388.
- ^ a b Prete, Frederick R.; Wells, Harrington & Wells, Patrick H. (1999). "The Predatory Behavior of Mantids: Historical Attitudes and Contemporary Questions". In Prete, Fredrick R.; Wells, Harrington; Wells, Patrick H. & Hurd, Lawrence E. (eds.). The Praying Mantids. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 3–8. ISBN 978-0-8018-6174-1.
- ^ Randolph, Vance (31 July 2012). Ozark Magic and Folklore. Courier Corporation. ISBN 978-0-486-12296-0.
- ^ Durrell, Gerald (2006) [1956]. My Family and Other Animals. Penguin Books. pp. 204–208. ISBN 978-0-14-193609-3.
- ^ Emmer, Michele; Schattschneider, Doris (2007). M.C. Escher's Legacy: A Centennial Celebration. Springer. p. 66. ISBN 978-3-540-28849-7.
- ^ Wade, Lisa (29 November 2010). "Shoddy Research and Cultural Tropes: The Praying Mantis". The Society Pages. Retrieved 9 October 2015.
- ^ "Praying Mantises Cartoons and Comics". CartoonStock. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
- ^ Parisi, Mark. "Praying Mantis Cartoons". Off the Mark. Archived from the original on 25 September 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
- ^ McCracken, T. "Praying Mantis Should Be Gay". McHumor Cartoons. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
- ^ Rossellini, Isabella (2008). "Green Porno". Sundance Channel. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
- ^ Rossellini, Isabella (2009). "Green Porno: a series of short films by Isabella Rossellini" (Press Kit). Sundance Channel. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
- ^ Imdb
- ^ "History of Praying Mantis Kung Fu". Praying Mantis Kung Fu Academy. Archived from the original on 1 October 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
- ^ a b c Hagood, Roger D. (2012). 18 Buddha Hands: Southern Praying Mantis Kung Fu. Southern Mantis Press. ISBN 978-0-9857240-1-6.
- ^ a b Funk, Jon. "Praying Mantis Kung Fu". Praying Mantis Kung Fu. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ Barnes, Bryan. "Northern Praying Mantis Kung Fu". Shantung Northern Praying Mantis Kung Fu. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
- ^ Orum, Pete. "Chow Gar". Southern Mantis Kung Fu. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
- ^ Is a Praying Mantis Good Luck?, Reference.com, 11 April 2020
- ^ "Insek-kaleidoskoop: Die 'skynheilige' hottentotsgot". Mieliestronk.com. Archived from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 9 October 2015.
- ^ "Siyabona Africa: Kruger National Park: San". Siyabona Africa. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- ^ "Mantid". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
- ^ "Pet bugs: Kentucky arthropods". University of Kentucky. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ Van Zomeren, Linda (16 March 2011). "European Mantis". Keeping Insects. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ Breeding Reports: 1st July 2013–1st October 2013 (PDF). UK Mantis Forums Newsletter (Newsletter). UK Mantis Forums. October 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ Bragg, P.E. [editor] (1996) Species in culture. Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 1: 2–3.
- ^ Zhang, Wei; Ricketts, Taylor H.; Kremen, Claire; Carney, Karen; Swinton, Scott M. (2007). "Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture". Ecological Economics. 64 (2). International Society for Ecological Economics (Elsevier): 253–260. Bibcode:2007EcoEc..64..253Z. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024. ISSN 0921-8009. S2CID 32112906.
- ^ a b Doutt, R. L. "The Praying Mantis (Leaflet 21019)" (PDF). University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ "Praying and Chinese Mantises". New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Retrieved 26 August 2015.
- ^ Cardona, Ramon; Touretzky, David. "Leg Design for a Praying Mantis Robot". Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
External links
[edit]- Mantis Study Group – Information on mantises, phylogenetics and evolution.
- Mantodea Species File
Mantis
View on GrokipediaEtymology and Overview
Etymology
The term "mantis" derives from the Ancient Greek word μάντις (mántis), meaning "prophet," "seer," or "soothsayer," a name inspired by the insect's characteristic posture with its forelegs folded in a manner suggestive of prayer or divination.[6][7] This etymology reflects early observations of the insect's vigilant stance, evoking images of a diviner or oracle in Greek culture.[8] In English, the common name "praying mantis" emerged in the 17th century, directly alluding to the raised forelegs that resemble hands clasped in prayer, a descriptor that has persisted alongside the simpler "mantis."[6] Similar linguistic variations appear in other languages, such as the French "mante religieuse," which translates to "religious mantis" and emphasizes the pious connotation of the posture.[9] The term entered scientific nomenclature through Carl Linnaeus, who in his 1758 Systema Naturae classified the European species as Gryllus (Mantis) religiosus, later simplified to Mantis religiosa, with "religiosa" underscoring the religious imagery of its pose.[10][11] This binomial naming formalized the Greek root in taxonomy, influencing subsequent classifications within the order Mantodea.[7]General Characteristics
Mantises are predatory insects in the order Mantodea, encompassing approximately 2,500 species across 29 families and over 460 genera, with a cosmopolitan distribution but highest diversity in tropical and subtropical regions.[12] These insects typically feature elongated bodies measuring 1 to 15 cm in length, adapted for agile movement and ambush hunting.[13] A defining trait is their raptorial forelegs, which are enlarged and spined for grasping prey, often held in a prayer-like posture that aids in camouflage among vegetation.[14] Mantises inhabit warm, vegetated environments such as forests, gardens, meadows, and shrubs, where they perch on foliage or flowers to await prey.[14] As generalist predators, they contribute to ecosystem balance by consuming herbivorous insects, including agricultural pests, though their impact is moderated by cannibalistic tendencies.[14] The order's diversity includes remarkable adaptations for crypsis, such as the orchid mantis (Hymenopus coronatus), which mimics flower petals to lure pollinators, and dead-leaf mantises (Deroplatys spp.), which resemble decaying foliage to blend into leaf litter.[15]Taxonomy and Evolution
Classification and Phylogeny
Mantises are classified in the order Mantodea, which belongs to the superorder Polyneoptera within the subclass Pterygota of the class Insecta.[16] The order encompasses over 2,500 described species distributed across approximately 29 families, with many more likely undiscovered, especially in understudied tropical habitats.[2] The family Mantidae is the largest, comprising about 1,261 species or roughly 50% of the total mantis diversity, while other notable families include Empusidae, known for their ornate, flower-mimicking forms, and Tarachodidae, which features slender, twig-like species.[17] Phylogenetic analyses position Mantodea as the sister group to Blattodea (encompassing cockroaches and termites), with the two orders together forming the higher taxon Dictyoptera.[18] Molecular clock estimates date this divergence to between 200 and 300 million years ago during the Permian period.[19] Within Mantodea, molecular and morphological studies reveal a basal split, with early-diverging lineages such as Mantoididae and Metallyticidae branching off before the core group of "higher mantises," reflecting adaptations to predatory lifestyles across diverse clades.[20] Recent phylogenetic research has advanced understanding of mantis evolution, including the description of new species like Sinaiella azadi from central Iran in 2025, expanding the known range of the genus Sinaiella into Armenia and highlighting ongoing taxonomic discoveries in Western Asia.[21] Additionally, a 2023 genomic study on the orchid mantis (Hymenopus coronatus) uncovered genetic mechanisms, such as expansions in pigmentation-related gene families, driving its pink, flower-like camouflage as an evolutionary innovation for predatory mimicry.[15]Fossil Record
The fossil record of mantises (order Mantodea) is notably sparse, reflecting challenges in preserving their predominantly soft-bodied structures, with only about 38 species described across the Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras. Most known fossils originate from Cretaceous amber deposits, such as those in Myanmar, Lebanon, and Spain, which have yielded exceptionally preserved specimens revealing details of wing venation and raptorial forelimbs. These amber inclusions, dating from approximately 100 to 110 million years ago, include genera like Santanmantis from Brazil's Crato Formation, highlighting early predatory adaptations.[22][23] The earliest confidently identified mantis fossils date to the Late Jurassic, specifically the Kimmeridgian stage (~157–152 million years ago) of the Karabastau Formation in southern Kazakhstan. Notable among these is Juramantis initialis Vršanský, 2002, a basal mantodean that already exhibits specialized raptorial forelegs adapted for grasping prey, suggesting that key predatory traits had evolved by this time. These compression fossils from Karatau indicate that mantises originated in tropical to subtropical environments during the Jurassic, with no substantial morphological innovations appearing in later records—their basic body plan, including elongated bodies and folded wings, remains remarkably conserved to the present day.[22][24] While some researchers have suggested possible extensions of mantodean lineage to the Permian based on wing venation similarities in certain dictyopteran fossils like those of the Strephocladidae, this interpretation remains debated, as such forms are often classified as stem-group relatives rather than true crown Mantodea. The record's gaps are exacerbated by the insects' fragile exoskeletons and terrestrial habits, limiting preservation outside amber or fine-grained sediments; recent analyses, including a 2024 systematic review by Vršanský et al., have refined classifications of Jurassic taxa from high-latitude deposits, underscoring the group's early diversification amid Mesozoic climatic shifts.[25][26]Similar Taxa
Mantidflies (family Mantispidae) in the order Neuroptera are among the insects most commonly confused with praying mantises due to their raptorial forelegs, which are modified for grasping prey in a manner strikingly similar to those of mantises.[27] These forelegs feature spiny tibiae and femora that fold together to capture small insects, enabling mantidflies to ambush prey much like mantises.[28] However, mantidflies belong to a different insect order, Neuroptera, characterized by net-veined wings with intricate, lace-like venation that contrasts with the simpler, often leathery forewings of mantises.[29] Additionally, mantidflies undergo complete metamorphosis (holometabolous), with larvae that typically parasitize spider egg sacs, differing from the incomplete metamorphosis (hemimetabolous) of mantises, where nymphs resemble miniature adults.[30] A notable example is Climaciella brunnea, the brown wasp mantidfly, which not only possesses raptorial forelegs but also adopts mantis-like coloration and posture to mimic praying mantises, deterring potential predators through Batesian mimicry.[31] This species further enhances its disguise by resembling paper wasps in yellow-and-black patterning, combining traits from multiple unrelated groups for protection.[27] Other elongated insects, such as stick insects (order Phasmatodea), may be superficially mistaken for mantises due to their slender, twig-like bodies adapted for camouflage, but they lack raptorial forelegs entirely and are herbivorous rather than predatory.[32] Similarly, some orthopterans like grasshoppers exhibit elongated bodies and can blend into vegetation, yet they possess powerful hind legs for jumping and do not have the grasping forelimbs characteristic of mantises.[33] These superficial resemblances arise from evolutionary convergence, where raptorial foreleg adaptations have independently evolved in distantly related predatory insect lineages, including Mantodea and Neuroptera, as a response to similar selective pressures for capturing prey.[34] Such convergences highlight how unrelated groups can develop analogous structures for ambush predation, aiding in distinguishing true mantises from mimics or similarly shaped taxa.[35]Biology
Anatomy and Morphology
The body of a praying mantis is divided into three thoracic segments: the prothorax, mesothorax, and metathorax. The prothorax is notably elongated and highly mobile, featuring a pronotum that is divided into an anterior prozone and a posterior metazone by the supracoxal sulcus, allowing for flexible neck movement and supporting the raptorial forelegs.[36] The mesothorax and metathorax are shorter, with the mesothorax bearing the forewings and the metathorax supporting the hindwings and walking legs.[36] The head is triangular in shape, equipped with large compound eyes positioned laterally to provide a wide field of vision, and three ocelli for additional light detection.[36] This structure, combined with the mobility afforded by the elongated prothorax, enables 180-degree head rotation to track potential prey.[36] Raptorial forelegs are a defining morphological adaptation for predation, consisting of an elongated coxa, spined femur, and tibia that form a grasping "basket." The femur features rows of spines—discoidal, anteroventral (typically 10–12), and posteroventral (4–5)—while the tibia has anteroventral (7–8) and posteroventral (12–14) spines, creating a folding mechanism to secure prey.[36] These spines vary in size and shape across species, with enlarged, sclerotized forms in some (e.g., Metallyticus splendidus) enhancing strike power, supported by 17 extrinsic and up to 15 intrinsic muscles for rapid extension and flexion.[37] Many mantis species possess wings adapted for flight, with leathery forewings (tegmina) covering the abdomen and membranous hindwings folded beneath for short-distance dispersal.[36] Sexual dimorphism is evident in wing length, where males typically have longer, fully functional wings extending beyond the abdomen to aid in mate location, while females often have shorter wings. Camouflage is achieved through integument variations, including leaf-like expansions on the pronotum (e.g., in Phyllocrania paradoxa), flower-mimicking elongations on eyes or legs (e.g., Hymenopus coronatus), and bark-resembling textures or colors across the body surface.[36]Vision and Sensory Systems
Praying mantises possess two large compound eyes, each comprising approximately 9,000 ommatidia, which provide a wide field of view and enable detailed visual processing.[38] These ommatidia function as individual photoreceptive units, allowing the mantis to detect movement and form images across a nearly 180-degree horizontal panorama per eye. Unlike many insects, mantises exhibit trichromatic color vision, with photoreceptors sensitive to ultraviolet (peaking around 350 nm), blue (around 450 nm), and green (around 520 nm) wavelengths, a capability that facilitates discrimination of environmental cues such as camouflage patterns.[39] A key feature of mantis vision is stereopsis, the ability to perceive depth through binocular disparity, which is rare among invertebrates and supports accurate distance estimation for approaching objects up to about 60 cm. This 3D vision is enhanced by a specialized foveal region in each eye, characterized by higher photoreceptor density and smaller inter-ommatidial angles (less than 1° in adults), enabling high-acuity fixation and smooth tracking of targets.[40] The overlapping binocular field, spanning up to 70° frontally, integrates these inputs to triangulate prey position rapidly.[41] Beyond vision, mantises rely on antennae equipped with sensilla for chemoreception, detecting olfactory and gustatory cues essential for locating mates and food sources.[42] Mechanoreceptors distributed on the legs, including hair sensilla and chordotonal organs, sense vibrations and substrate movements, supplementing visual detection in low-light or cluttered environments.[43] Neural processing in the mantis brain, particularly in the optic lobes and central complex, handles motion detection and stereoscopic integration through dedicated projection neurons that respond to binocular disparities and changing visual stimuli.[44] This circuitry enables precise 3D targeting, where motion cues trigger predatory responses by computing relative image shifts across the eyes.[45]Diet and Predation
Mantises are obligate carnivores, primarily feeding on other insects such as flies, moths, crickets, grasshoppers, and beetles, which form the bulk of their diet due to their abundance in natural habitats.[46] However, they exhibit opportunistic predation, occasionally capturing small vertebrates including lizards, frogs, small birds like hummingbirds, and even fish when opportunities arise, with over 147 documented cases of bird predation across various species worldwide.[47][48] As sit-and-wait ambush predators, mantises rely on cryptic camouflage to blend into foliage, bark, or flowers, remaining motionless to lure unsuspecting prey within striking range; certain species, like the orchid mantis, employ aggressive mimicry by resembling blossoms to attract pollinators.[49] Once prey is detected, they execute a rapid raptorial strike using their specialized forelegs, achieving speeds up to 730 mm/s in some species to capture targets with high precision.[50] Following capture, mantises initiate extraoral digestion by regurgitating digestive enzymes from their salivary glands onto the prey, which liquefies internal tissues for easier consumption; they then chew and ingest the softened material, with the midgut facilitating nutrient absorption.[51] This process allows efficient extraction of proteins and other nutrients, enabling mantises to process meals exceeding 100% of their body mass without significant waste production.[52] In their ecosystems, mantises serve as apex predators within microhabitats like gardens and shrublands, exerting top-down control on insect populations and contributing to natural pest management by preying on agricultural nuisances such as aphids, leafhoppers, and invasive species like the spotted lanternfly.[53][54] Their predatory efficiency underscores their role in maintaining biodiversity balance, though as generalists, they do not discriminate between pest and beneficial insects.[55]Defense and Antipredator Adaptations
Praying mantises employ a range of antipredator strategies to evade detection and deter threats from predators such as birds, bats, geckos, and larger arthropods. A primary defense is cryptic camouflage through background matching and disruptive coloration, allowing them to blend seamlessly with their surroundings. For instance, Amazonian bark mantises in the Liturgusidae family exhibit color morphs—white, green, and grey—that closely match whitish trunks, bryophyte patches, and greenish-brown bark, respectively, resulting in low chromatic and achromatic contrasts (e.g., 2.20–2.84 just noticeable differences for color matching). Disruptive patterns further break up their body outline, with intermediate edge disruption values (GabRat 0.20–0.40) enhancing concealment against avian visual predators. Field experiments confirm this efficacy, as camouflaged models were detected over three to five times slower by human observers simulating birds.[56] When camouflage fails and predators approach, mantises deploy deimatic or startle displays to startle attackers and create an opportunity for escape. These displays involve sudden revelation of hidden conspicuous features, such as eye-spots on the wings or hindlegs, which are phylogenetically conserved across mantis lineages and were observed in 31 of 58 studied species (across 58 genera, approximately 13% of total extant genera). Originating around 60 million years ago following the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction, these displays have contributed to diversification in species-rich clades, though they show no direct correlation with body size or primary camouflage type. In species like those in the genus Sphodromantis, eye-spots mimic larger threats, eliciting reflexive recoils from predators.[57] Threat postures form another key behavioral adaptation, often triggered post-attack by tactile stimuli such as pinching or poking. Mantises raise their forelegs, pronotum, and sometimes wings and abdomen to appear larger and more intimidating, and may rock or sway their body to further deter threats like geckos; for example, Archimantis latistyla lifts its pronotum and tilts its abdomen upward, while Hierodula majuscula exposes dark femoral patches. These displays are sexually dimorphic in responsiveness, with females more likely to perform them than males in species like Pseudomantis albofimbriata. Accompanying sounds enhance the display in some taxa; Mantis religiosa produces defensive stridulation via an abdomino-alar mechanism, where teeth on metathoracic wing veins rub against the coxa, generating variable broadband hisses (spectral peaks at 5–20 kHz) to deter predators.[58][59][60] Chemical defenses are rare among mantises, which generally lack potent toxins, but some species secrete irritants or mimic chemical cues for protection. Juvenile orchid mantises (Hymenopus coronatus) release volatile compounds that mimic floral scents, deceiving predators like the oriental hornet into perceiving them as flowers rather than prey. Escape behaviors complement these tactics; when threatened by bats, flying mantises execute evasive dives, abruptly halting wingbeats and dropping altitude to disrupt echolocation tracking, with responses timed to pulse repetition rates above 50 Hz for optimal evasion.[61][62] The bold ambush predation style of mantises imposes evolutionary trade-offs, heightening their vulnerability to larger predators due to prolonged exposure during hunting. Starved individuals prioritize energy acquisition by increasing attentive behaviors like prey monitoring and strikes, elevating predation risk, whereas satiated mantises reduce such activities in favor of grooming or mating, reflecting a state-dependent balance between foraging gains and survival costs. This internal state modulation underscores how antipredator adaptations must navigate conflicts with predatory demands in a high-risk lifestyle.[63]Reproduction and Life Cycle
Sexual dimorphism in mantises is pronounced, with females typically larger and heavier than males to support egg production, while males exhibit enhanced locomotion and sensory adaptations for mate location.[64] This size difference influences reproductive roles, as females allocate energy to ootheca development and males prioritize mobility for dispersal.[65] Courtship involves males approaching females guided by airborne sex pheromones, followed by elaborate displays such as wing fluttering, antennal movements, and cautious advances to avoid aggression.[66][67] Mating often includes a risk of sexual cannibalism, where the female may consume the male, though this is more common in laboratory settings than in the wild.[68] Oviposition occurs primarily in late summer or fall, with females extruding a frothy secretion that hardens into protective egg cases known as oothecae, which are attached to twigs, stems, or other substrates.[5] Each ootheca contains 10 to 400 eggs, depending on species and environmental conditions; for example, the eremic mantis Blepharopsis mendica averages about 32 eggs per case.[54] Eggs overwinter within the ootheca and hatch in spring after an incubation period of several weeks to months, triggered by warmer temperatures.[69] Mantises undergo incomplete metamorphosis, progressing through egg, nymph, and adult stages without a pupal phase. Nymphs emerge from the ootheca as miniature versions of adults and undergo 6 to 10 instars, molting periodically to grow; the nymphal period lasts several months, varying by species and sex.[5] Adults, which eclose in summer, have a lifespan of 3 to 6 months, during which they focus on reproduction before dying in colder months.[54] Recent research in 2025 on the bordered mantis Stagmomantis limbata demonstrates that nymphs exhibit color plasticity, changing from green to brown (or vice versa) post-molting in response to background cues, enhancing camouflage against predators during development.[70] Parental care is generally absent in mantises, with females providing no post-oviposition protection beyond the ootheca's structure; however, the hardened casing offers some defense against environmental hazards and parasitoids.[69] In some species, females may guard oothecae briefly, but this is rare and not widespread.[54]Sexual Cannibalism
Sexual cannibalism, the consumption of males by females during or immediately after mating, is a documented behavior in many mantis species, though its frequency varies widely. In laboratory settings, rates can reach up to 30% or higher, particularly when females are hungry, as experimental pairings with low mate access and starved females result in cannibalism in nearly 80% of cases over extended observation periods. In the wild, however, occurrences are generally lower, ranging from 13% to 31% of observed matings, as seen in field studies of species like Mantis religiosa and Tenodera sinensis. This disparity arises because natural conditions often provide females with alternative prey, reducing the likelihood of targeting mates. Triggers include female hunger, which heightens predatory responses, and male behavioral errors, such as overly aggressive or poorly timed approaches during courtship, where males must cautiously signal to avoid eliciting an attack.[71][72][73] The primary benefit to females is nutritional gain, which directly supports egg production and enhances reproductive output. In Tenodera sinensis, females that cannibalize males produce significantly more eggs in their first ootheca—up to 88 eggs compared to 38 in non-cannibalized females—and lay additional oothecae with greater viability, equivalent to the boost from consuming similarly sized prey like crickets. This nutrient transfer includes male-derived amino acids incorporated into eggs at rates over 38%, improving offspring quality. For males, the behavior may represent a form of terminal investment, where their body materials contribute to higher offspring fitness, potentially offsetting the loss of future mating opportunities despite the fatal cost.[74][75] Evolutionary hypotheses frame sexual cannibalism as an adaptive foraging strategy for females in nutrient-scarce environments, where males serve as a high-value, accessible prey item during vulnerable mating periods. Another perspective involves sexual selection, where bolder males that successfully navigate risky courtships may sire more offspring, favoring traits like cautious signaling or physical prowess to evade attack. However, the behavior is not universal across mantis species; it varies by ecology and is absent or rare in many, challenging notions of it as an obligatory trait. Detailed observations in Tenodera sinensis reveal that cannibalism often occurs post-copulation, allowing sperm transfer before consumption, and is modulated by female condition—well-fed individuals rarely engage in it. This phenomenon has been amplified in popular media, fostering misconceptions that it is inevitable or emblematic of all mantis matings, whereas scientific evidence shows it as a context-specific adaptation rather than a rule.[76][75][71]Relationship with Humans
Cultural and Religious Significance
In ancient Greek culture, the praying mantis derived its name from the word mantis, meaning "prophet" or "seer," reflecting beliefs in its supernatural abilities to foretell events or guide the lost.[77] This association stemmed from the insect's poised stance, interpreted as a gesture of divination. In Chinese tradition, the praying mantis symbolizes courage, precision, and martial prowess, serving as the inspiration for the Northern Praying Mantis style of kung fu. Developed in the 16th century by Wang Lang, this martial art mimics the insect's swift, calculated strikes and defensive postures observed during combat with larger foes.[78] The mantis emblem embodies strategic patience and unyielding determination in the face of adversity.[79] Among the San people of southern Africa, particularly the Kalahari Bushmen, the praying mantis holds profound spiritual reverence as an incarnation of God and the oldest symbol of divinity. In their folklore, it appears as the trickster deity ǀKaggen, a shape-shifter who acts as a messenger between the human and spiritual worlds, conveying wisdom and mediating creation myths.[80] Encounters with the mantis are seen as omens or calls to introspection.[81] The praying mantis features prominently in literature and art, often symbolizing contemplation or the natural world's intricacies. In Jean-Henri Fabre's Souvenirs Entomologiques (translated as Fabre's Book of Insects), detailed observations of the mantis's predatory habits and "prayer-like" posture blend scientific insight with poetic reflection on instinct and survival.[82] Modern fables, inspired by Aesop's moral tales, recast the mantis as a teacher of resilience, as in Little Ant and the Mantis, where it imparts lessons on maintaining positivity amid hardship.[83] In Japanese art, ukiyo-e prints by masters like Kitagawa Utamaro depict the mantis alongside grasshoppers or under the moon, capturing its elegance and transience in works such as Ehon mushi erami (Picture Book of Selected Insects).[84] In various Indigenous beliefs, the praying mantis is sacred, representing stillness, patience, and mindfulness. Native American traditions view it as a pre-creation being that embodies the cycle of life and divine protection, encouraging balance and awareness.[85] Similarly, some South African Indigenous groups regard its posture as a conduit for ancestral spirits and blessings.[86] In 2025, Iranian researcher Mahmood Kolnegari described a new praying mantis species, Sinaiella azadi sp. nov., from the Zagros Mountains, naming it after the Persian word for "freedom" to symbolize the Iranian people's ongoing struggle for liberty amid political repression. This discovery, published in Zootaxa, highlights the insect's cryptic camouflage and draws global attention to biodiversity in the region.[87]Practical Uses and Interactions
Praying mantises are popular as exotic pets, particularly among insect enthusiasts, due to their striking appearance and predatory behavior. Species such as Sphodromantis lineola, the African mantis, are favored for their ease of care and manageable size, reaching 6-8 cm in length.[88] These mantises thrive in terrariums at least three times their body length in height and twice in width to allow for molting and movement, with temperatures maintained between 70-80°F (21-27°C) and relative humidity of 50-70% achieved through regular misting.[89][90] They require live prey, such as fruit flies or small crickets, to mimic their natural carnivorous diet and stimulate hunting instincts.[91] In agriculture, praying mantises are employed for biological pest control, where they are released to prey on common garden pests like aphids and mosquitoes. Their efficacy is notable in controlled environments such as greenhouses, where they help reduce pest populations without chemical interventions, provided pesticide use is minimized to avoid harming the mantises.[92][93] However, limitations arise in open fields, as mantises do not distinguish between pests and beneficial insects, potentially disrupting ecosystems, and their impact on flying pests like mosquitoes is reduced due to preferences for larger, slower-moving prey.[94] Historically, mantis egg cases, known as Sang Piao Xiao in Traditional Chinese Medicine, have been used since ancient times, as documented in the Shennong Bencao Jing (circa 200-250 AD), to treat conditions like frequent urination and enuresis by tonifying kidney yang and restraining essence.[95] In modern contexts, mantises are bred for educational purposes, with commercial kits allowing students and families to observe their life cycles from egg case hatching to adulthood, promoting awareness of entomology and ecology.[96] Interactions between humans and mantises are generally benign, though occasional bites can occur if the insect feels threatened, such as when handled roughly; these bites are harmless, causing at most a minor pinch or slight redness without venom or infection risk.[97] A 2025 study explored feeding adult black soldier flies (Hermetia illucens) to mantis species like Tenodera sinensis and Sphodromantis lineola as a sustainable alternative to traditional prey, noting high initial acceptance but ultimate incompatibility as a sole diet due to nutritional deficiencies leading to reduced survival and reproduction.[98]Inspirations in Science and Technology
The praying mantis (order Mantodea) has inspired advancements in robotics and machine vision due to its sophisticated visual and locomotor adaptations. Researchers have drawn from the insect's unique binocular vision, which enables stereopsis for 3D depth perception despite its compound eyes, to develop more efficient artificial vision systems for robots. This form of vision relies on overlapping fields of view between the left and right eyes, allowing precise distance estimation critical for predation and navigation.[99] In 2024, engineers at the University of Virginia created stereoscopic artificial compound eyes that mimic the praying mantis's spatiotemporal perception capabilities. These bioinspired sensors integrate a wide field of view with binocular overlap, enabling 3D localization of objects in dynamic environments with lower computational demands than traditional stereo cameras. The system uses curved, multi-lens arrays to replicate the mantis's foveal regions, achieving depth accuracy within 5% error at distances up to 1 meter, which could enhance robotic applications in cluttered or low-light settings. Published in Science Robotics, this work demonstrates how mantis-like vision reduces energy use for machine perception by prioritizing motion parallax cues.[99][100] Earlier studies on mantis vision, such as those from Newcastle University, revealed a motion-based stereopsis mechanism that activates 3D perception only for moving objects, simplifying neural processing compared to vertebrate binocular vision. This discovery, detailed in a 2018 Current Biology paper, used miniature 3D glasses on mantises to confirm that they detect depth via interocular velocity differences, a cue absent in static scenes. Such findings have informed robotic vision algorithms that incorporate motion-triggered depth mapping, potentially simplifying hardware complexity for autonomous drones and manipulators.[101] Beyond vision, the praying mantis's jumping mechanics have guided designs for agile robotics. Juvenile mantises achieve precise, targeted leaps—covering distances up to 10 times their body length in under 0.1 seconds—by exchanging angular momentum among three body segments: the thorax, abdomen, and legs. A seminal 2015 study in Current Biology analyzed high-speed footage showing how mantises counter-rotate their abdomen to stabilize mid-air orientation, preventing unwanted spin and ensuring accurate landings. This tri-segmental control strategy has inspired jumping robots that use distributed actuators to mimic momentum transfer, improving stability in small-scale platforms for search-and-rescue operations.[102] The mantis's raptorial forelegs and adaptive hind legs have also influenced landing and gripping technologies. In a 2025 Biomimetics paper, researchers developed a multi-quadrupole landing gear for micro aerial vehicles, emulating the mantis's passive leg adaptation to irregular surfaces via compliant, spine-like structures that distribute load and enhance grip. Prototypes demonstrated a 30% increase in stability on rough terrains compared to rigid designs, with applications in planetary rovers. Additionally, the insect's spined forelegs have informed soft robotic grippers that use compliant hooks for delicate object handling, though these remain in early prototyping stages.[103]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/praying_mantis