Hubbry Logo
CheminformaticsCheminformaticsMain
Open search
Cheminformatics
Community hub
Cheminformatics
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Cheminformatics
Cheminformatics
Cheminformatics
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cheminformatics (also known as chemoinformatics) refers to the use of physical chemistry theory with computer and information science techniques—so called "in silico" techniques—in application to a range of descriptive and prescriptive problems in the field of chemistry, including in its applications to biology and related molecular fields. Such in silico techniques are used, for example, by pharmaceutical companies and in academic settings to aid and inform the process of drug discovery, for instance in the design of well-defined combinatorial libraries of synthetic compounds, or to assist in structure-based drug design. The methods can also be used in chemical and allied industries, and such fields as environmental science and pharmacology, where chemical processes are involved or studied.[1]

History

[edit]

Cheminformatics has been an active field in various guises since the 1970s and earlier, with activity in academic departments and commercial pharmaceutical research and development departments.[2][page needed][citation needed] The term chemoinformatics was defined in its application to drug discovery by F.K. Brown in 1998:[3]

Chemoinformatics is the mixing of those information resources to transform data into information and information into knowledge for the intended purpose of making better decisions faster in the area of drug lead identification and optimization.

Since then, both terms, cheminformatics and chemoinformatics, have been used,[citation needed] although, lexicographically, cheminformatics appears to be more frequently used,[when?][4][5] despite academics in Europe declaring for the variant chemoinformatics in 2006.[6] In 2009, a prominent Springer journal in the field was founded by transatlantic executive editors named the Journal of Cheminformatics.[7]

Background

[edit]

Cheminformatics combines the scientific working fields of chemistry, computer science, and information science—for example in the areas of topology, chemical graph theory, information retrieval and data mining in the chemical space.[8][page needed][9][page needed][10][11][page needed] Cheminformatics can also be applied to data analysis for various industries like paper and pulp, dyes and such allied industries.[12]

Applications

[edit]

Storage and retrieval

[edit]
Main article: Chemical database

A primary application of cheminformatics is the storage, indexing, and search of information relating to chemical compounds.[citation needed] The efficient search of such stored information includes topics that are dealt with in computer science, such as data mining, information retrieval, information extraction, and machine learning.[citation needed] Related research topics include:[citation needed]

File formats

[edit]
Main article: Chemical file format

The in silico representation of chemical structures uses specialized formats such as the Simplified molecular input line entry specifications (SMILES)[13] or the XML-based Chemical Markup Language.[14] These representations are often used for storage in large chemical databases.[citation needed] While some formats are suited for visual representations in two- or three-dimensions, others are more suited for studying physical interactions, modeling and docking studies.[citation needed]

Virtual libraries

[edit]

Chemical data can pertain to real or virtual molecules. Virtual libraries of compounds may be generated in various ways to explore chemical space and hypothesize novel compounds with desired properties. Virtual libraries of classes of compounds (drugs, natural products, diversity-oriented synthetic products) were recently generated using the FOG (fragment optimized growth) algorithm.[15] This was done by using cheminformatic tools to train transition probabilities of a Markov chain on authentic classes of compounds, and then using the Markov chain to generate novel compounds that were similar to the training database.

Virtual screening

[edit]
Main article: Virtual screening

In contrast to high-throughput screening, virtual screening involves computationally screening in silico libraries of compounds, by means of various methods such as docking, to identify members likely to possess desired properties such as biological activity against a given target. In some cases, combinatorial chemistry is used in the development of the library to increase the efficiency in mining the chemical space. More commonly, a diverse library of small molecules or natural products is screened.

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)

[edit]
Main article: Quantitative structure–activity relationship

This is the calculation of quantitative structure–activity relationship and quantitative structure property relationship values, used to predict the activity of compounds from their structures. In this context there is also a strong relationship to chemometrics. Chemical expert systems are also relevant, since they represent parts of chemical knowledge as an in silico representation. There is a relatively new concept of matched molecular pair analysis or prediction-driven MMPA which is coupled with QSAR model in order to identify activity cliff.[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cheminformatics

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cheminformatics, also known as chemoinformatics, is an interdisciplinary field that integrates principles from chemistry, , and to manage, analyze, and interpret large volumes of chemical data, enabling the storage, retrieval, and of molecular and behaviors. This discipline focuses on representing chemical structures in digital formats, such as graphs or fingerprints, to facilitate tasks like similarity searching, , and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. The term "cheminformatics" was coined in to describe the application of techniques to chemical problems, building on earlier methods that date back to the mid-20th century. It gained prominence in the during the late 1990s and early 2000s, driven by the explosion of and the need for efficient data handling in pipelines. Key components include management systems, algorithms for generation, and approaches for property prediction, all of which address the vast chemical space estimated to contain over 10^60 possible molecules. In practice, cheminformatics plays a pivotal role in by supporting virtual of compound libraries, identifying potential leads through modeling, and optimizing absorption, distribution, , excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profiles using rules like . Beyond pharmaceuticals, it extends to for polymer property prediction and development, where it aids in archiving reaction pathways and extracting trends from spectroscopic data. Challenges in the field include standardizing representations of complex structures like stereoisomers and tautomers, as well as integrating heterogeneous data sources such as , which holds over 119 million compounds as of 2025. Overall, cheminformatics enhances in chemical research by transforming into actionable insights, fostering across disciplines.

History

Origins and Early Developments

The origins of cheminformatics trace back to the late , when early computational efforts focused on storing and searching chemical structures in digital . In 1957, Louis C. Ray and Russell A. Kirsch at the National Bureau of Standards developed the first for substructure searching, treating chemical structures as labeled graphs to enable automated retrieval of molecular records from punched-card systems. This work laid the groundwork for handling chemical data computationally, addressing the growing volume of chemical literature that manual indexing could no longer manage efficiently. During the 1960s, the field advanced through pioneering applications in structure elucidation, property prediction, and synthesis planning, driven by the advent of accessible computing. The project, initiated in 1965 by , , and at , produced the first for inferring molecular structures from data, employing heuristic rules to generate and evaluate possible structures. Concurrently, Corwin Hansch and Toshio Fujita introduced quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis in 1964, correlating with physicochemical descriptors using models, which formalized the quantitative prediction of chemical properties. That same year, the (CAS) launched the CAS REGISTRY system under a National Science Foundation contract, creating a unique numbering scheme for chemical substances to support indexing and avoid duplication in abstracts. The late 1960s and 1970s saw further consolidation with tools for synthetic design and database expansion. In 1969, E.J. Corey and W. Todd Wipke published the first computer-assisted system (OCSS), which used graph-based to generate pathways for complex molecules, marking a shift toward automated in . The establishment of the Journal of Chemical Documentation in 1961 (later renamed the Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences in 1975) provided a dedicated forum for these emerging methods, reflecting the field's transition from computations to a structured . By the , these foundations enabled widespread adoption of substructure search systems like DARC and MACCS, though the term "cheminformatics" would not be coined until 1998.

Evolution and Modern Milestones

The evolution of cheminformatics built upon its early foundations in chemical documentation and computational searching, transitioning in the early and toward quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling and molecular similarity techniques. In 1962, Corwin Hansch and colleagues introduced Hansch analysis, a foundational QSAR method using multiple to correlate molecular descriptors with , marking a shift toward predictive modeling in . By 1965, H.L. Morgan's canonicalization algorithm enabled unique graph-based representations of molecules, facilitating the (CAS) Registry System for systematic chemical indexing. The saw further advancements in similarity searching, with Adamson and Bush's 1973 method employing fragment bit-strings to compare molecular structures, influencing library design in pharmaceutical research. The 1980s and 1990s accelerated progress with three-dimensional ( and combinatorial chemistry's rise. In 1988, Richard Cramer's Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) pioneered 3D QSAR by aligning molecules in a lattice to compute steric and electrostatic fields, revolutionizing ligand-based . The term "chemoinformatics" was coined in 1998 by Frank K. Brown, emphasizing its role in managing chemical data for . Christopher Lipinski's 1997 "Rule of Five" provided guidelines for drug-likeness based on physicochemical properties, guiding compound selection in . The decade's explosion in combinatorial libraries necessitated diversity analysis, with methods like those from David Weininger advancing substructure searching via SMILES notation. Entering the 2000s, open-source tools and public databases transformed cheminformatics into a collaborative field. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) launched in 2000, offering modular libraries for molecular manipulation and cheminformatics workflows. Open Babel (2001) and RDKit (2003) followed, enabling seamless file format interconversion and descriptor calculations, respectively, and democratizing access for researchers. PubChem's 2004 debut as a free repository has grown to over 100 million compounds as of 2024, spurring data-driven discoveries, while (2010) integrated bioactivity data from literature, supporting . The (InChI), standardized in 2005, ensured unambiguous structure representation across systems. Modern milestones since the 2010s emphasize (AI) and (ML) integration, addressing challenges in . The adoption of (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles in 2016 enhanced , exemplified by initiatives like NFDI4Chem. In 2018, generative adversarial (GANs) were applied to de novo molecule design, enabling exploration of vast chemical spaces beyond traditional enumeration. By the early , graph neural (GNNs) improved molecular property prediction, as in the 2017 Message Passing Neural Network (MPNN) framework for reaction prediction. Recent advancements include AI-driven ultra-large virtual libraries, with models from 2023 generating billions of synthesizable compounds for target identification. These developments, rooted in movements like the Blue Obelisk, have accelerated hit-to-lead optimization, reducing timelines. In 2024, large language models began integrating into cheminformatics for automated chemical reasoning and synthesis planning.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Cheminformatics, also known as chemoinformatics, is defined as the application of methods to address chemical problems, particularly through the manipulation and analysis of structural chemical . The term was introduced in 1998 by Frank K. Brown, who described it as "the mixing of those resources to transform data into and into knowledge for the intended purpose of making better decisions faster in the area of drug lead identification and ." This field emphasizes the use of techniques to handle chemical data, distinguishing it from broader by its focus on rather than purely physical simulations. The scope of cheminformatics encompasses the collection, storage, retrieval, analysis, and visualization of chemical data, including molecular structures, properties, spectra, and bioactivities. It involves representing chemical entities in digital formats suitable for database management and machine processing, enabling tasks such as similarity searching and property prediction. Core activities include developing algorithms for substructure matching and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling, which integrate chemical structures with biological or physicochemical outcomes to support decision-making in . This scope extends beyond small molecules to polymers and materials, but remains centered on applications to chemistry. Originally emerging to accelerate by streamlining data handling in pharmaceutical pipelines, cheminformatics now intersects with multiple disciplines, including bioinformatics and , to facilitate , compound library design, and predictive . Its boundaries are fluid, overlapping with in molecular modeling while prioritizing scalable over quantum-level calculations. By providing open standards for chemical data interchange, such as SMILES and InChI notations, the field promotes interoperability across databases like , which contains over 119 million compounds as of 2025. This interdisciplinary approach enhances efficiency in handling vast chemical datasets, reducing experimental costs and time in discovery processes.

Interdisciplinary Nature

Cheminformatics is inherently interdisciplinary, bridging chemistry with and to manage and interpret chemical information. At its core, it applies computational methods to chemical structures and properties, enabling chemists to leverage algorithms for data processing and modeling. This integration draws from for database design and retrieval, while incorporating statistical techniques to derive meaningful insights from large datasets. Such convergence allows for the development of tools that address complex chemical problems beyond traditional experimental approaches. The field intersects with and , particularly in , where chemical is fused with biological targets to predict molecular interactions and therapeutic outcomes. For instance, cheminformatics facilitates systems by linking small molecules to broader biological networks, enhancing applications in and . In and , it combines chemical expertise with analytics to model properties like or reactivity, requiring among chemists, biologists, and computational experts. These intersections underscore cheminformatics' role in translating raw chemical into actionable across scientific domains. Open-source tools and databases further amplify this interdisciplinary character by enabling seamless data sharing and joint research efforts. Resources like , with millions of molecular records, allow chemists to pose domain-specific questions while computer scientists provide scalable algorithms for analysis, fostering innovations in areas such as ontology-based via technologies. This collaborative framework not only accelerates discovery but also promotes accessibility, uniting diverse expertise to tackle multifaceted challenges in chemical research.

Chemical Data Representation

Molecular Structures and Descriptors

Molecular structures in cheminformatics are primarily represented using symbolic notations and graph-based models to encode the connectivity and of atoms in a . The Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES), introduced in 1988, is a widely adopted string-based representation that uses linear notation to describe molecular topology, such as C1CC1 for . These representations facilitate computational processing for tasks like similarity searching and property prediction. Graph representations model molecules as nodes (atoms) connected by edges (bonds), enabling the application of and algorithms, such as graph neural networks, to capture structural features. Molecular descriptors are numerical values derived from these structural representations, quantifying physicochemical, topological, or properties to enable quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling and . They transform qualitative chemical information into quantifiable features, with hundreds reported in the literature, ranging from simple counts to complex multidimensional metrics. Descriptors are classified by dimensionality based on the structural information required for their calculation: 0D (no structural information beyond composition), 1D (linear sequences), 2D (topological connectivity), and 3D (spatial ). This classification, formalized in seminal works, aids in selecting appropriate descriptors for specific applications like . 0D descriptors, also known as constitutional descriptors, capture bulk molecular properties without considering atom connections, such as molecular weight, atom counts (e.g., number of carbon or hydrogen atoms), and frequencies. These are computationally inexpensive and serve as baseline features in QSAR models, often correlating with or . For instance, the number of donors is a key 0D descriptor used in for drug-likeness assessment. 1D and 2D descriptors incorporate connectivity and topology. 1D descriptors include fragment counts, like the number of aromatic rings or rotatable bonds, derived from linear molecular formulas. 2D descriptors, such as topological indices, quantify graph invariants; the , introduced in , measures molecular branching by summing the shortest path lengths between all atom pairs. Other examples include the Balaban index for graph balance and molecular fingerprints like Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints (ECFP), which encode substructural patterns as bit vectors for similarity computations. These are essential for database searching and diversity analysis in . 3D descriptors require conformational information and account for spatial arrangement, including shape and electrostatic properties. Examples encompass surface-area metrics (e.g., solvent-accessible surface area), quantum-chemical descriptors like HOMO/LUMO energies from , and pharmacophore-based features such as those from Volsurf software, which map interaction fields. These enable predictions of binding affinity in protein-ligand interactions but demand conformer generation, increasing computational cost. Higher-dimensional descriptors (4D–6D) extend this by incorporating dynamic aspects, like multiple conformations or time-dependent simulations, as in GRID molecular interaction fields developed in 1985. The Handbook of Molecular Descriptors by Todeschini and Consonni (2000) provides a comprehensive , emphasizing that descriptor selection should be guided by performance evaluation rather than intuition, with applications in where fingerprints like MACCS keys have demonstrated high efficacy in identifying active compounds. Recent advances integrate descriptors with , such as using ECFP in random forests for activity prediction, achieving accuracies over 80% in benchmark datasets for inhibitors.

Graph and Vector Representations

In cheminformatics, molecules are commonly represented as graphs to capture their structural topology, where atoms serve as nodes and chemical bonds as edges. This graph-based approach encodes the connectivity and valence of atoms, often augmented with node features such as atomic number, hybridization, and degree, as well as edge features like bond order and stereochemistry. The adjacency matrix defines the graph's structure, while feature matrices provide additional chemical attributes, enabling algorithms to process molecules as relational data suitable for tasks like property prediction and similarity searching. Such representations preserve the inherent graph-like nature of molecular structures, facilitating the application of graph theory and machine learning techniques. Seminal developments in graph representations trace back to early efforts in , with Harold L. Morgan's 1965 work introducing unique machine-readable descriptions of molecular graphs via canonical labeling algorithms, which laid the foundation for systematic of substructures. Modern implementations, such as those in the RDKit toolkit, build on this by generating attributed molecular graphs from formats like SMILES (Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System), introduced by Weininger in 1988 for linear notation of graph structures. These graphs are particularly valuable in for modeling interactions in protein-ligand complexes and enabling de novo molecule generation through graph editing operations. For 3D extensions, spatial coordinates are incorporated as node positions, enhancing representations for conformational analysis, though 2D graphs remain dominant due to their simplicity and sufficiency for many topological tasks. Vector representations transform molecular graphs or structures into fixed-length numerical vectors, often called molecular descriptors or , to enable efficient computational processing and integration. Structural fingerprints, such as the MACCS keys (166 predefined substructure bits) developed in the , provide binary vectors indicating the presence of specific functional groups, while topological fingerprints like Daylight fingerprints use path-based hashing to encode connectivity up to a defined . A widely adopted method is the Extended-Connectivity Fingerprint (ECFP), or Morgan fingerprint, introduced by Rogers and Hahn in 2010, which iteratively hashes circular neighborhoods around atoms to produce dense bit vectors (typically 1024–4096 bits) that capture substructural features with low collision rates. These vectors facilitate similarity metrics like Tanimoto coefficients for . Advanced vector representations leverage graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn continuous from molecular graphs, embedding high-dimensional structural information into low-dimensional latent spaces. Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs), pioneered by Gilmer et al. in 2017, propagate information across graph edges to generate node and graph-level vectors, outperforming traditional fingerprints in predictive accuracy for properties like and on benchmarks such as QM9 and MoleculeNet datasets. Self-supervised pretraining on large chemical corpora further refines these embeddings, as in the model by Rong et al. (2020), which uses motif prediction to yield transferable vectors for downstream tasks. Unlike fixed fingerprints, GNN-derived vectors adapt to specific datasets, offering superior expressiveness for complex cheminformatics applications while maintaining computational tractability.

Storage and Management

Chemical Databases and Repositories

Chemical databases and repositories serve as foundational in cheminformatics, enabling the systematic storage, retrieval, and analysis of vast quantities of chemical structures, properties, and associated . These resources facilitate tasks such as similarity searching, , and predictive modeling by providing standardized access to molecular information from diverse sources, including experimental measurements, patents, and literature. In cheminformatics workflows, they support the integration of chemical data with computational tools, promoting and collaboration in and . One of the most prominent repositories is , managed by the (NCBI) at the U.S. (NIH). It aggregates chemical data from over 1,000 sources, offering freely accessible information on structures, physical properties, biological activities, safety data, patents, and literature citations. As of 2025, PubChem contains approximately 119 million unique compounds and 322 million substances, making it the largest open globally. Its role in cheminformatics includes enabling structure-based searches and integration with bioinformatics tools for high-throughput analysis. ChEMBL, maintained by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory's (EMBL-EBI), focuses on bioactive molecules with drug-like properties, curating data on chemical structures, bioactivities, and genomic targets to aid computational . The database integrates manually extracted information from , patents, and deposited datasets, supporting applications in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling and for target prediction. In its 2023 release (ChEMBL 33), it encompassed over 2.4 million unique compounds, more than 20.3 million bioactivity measurements across 17,000 targets, and data from 1.6 million assays; by 2025 (ChEMBL 36), the compound count exceeded 2.8 million with 17,803 targets. Seminal developments in ChEMBL have emphasized its evolution as a platform for translating genomic data into therapeutic insights. ChemSpider, developed and hosted by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), provides a free database that aggregates data from hundreds of sources, emphasizing spectral data, synthetic routes, and property predictions. It supports text and substructure searches over more than 130 million structures, serving as a key resource for compound identification and verification in cheminformatics pipelines. Launched in 2007, ChemSpider has grown to include experimental properties and annotations, facilitating integration with publishing workflows and applications. For , the offers a curated collection of commercially available compounds in ready-to-dock formats, prioritizing purchasable molecules for structure-based . Managed by the Shoichet Laboratory at the , ZINC includes over 230 million compounds, with updates ensuring 3D conformer availability and vendor sourcing details. It plays a critical role in cheminformatics by enabling large-scale ligand enumeration and diversity analysis, with its open-access model supporting reproducible campaigns. Other notable repositories include , a bioinformatics and cheminformatics resource combining detailed pharmacological data on over 19,000 drug entries with target interactions, sequences, and pathways, primarily for . BindingDB curates experimentally determined binding affinities for small molecules and proteins, holding 3.2 million data points across 1.4 million compounds and 11,400 targets, which is essential for affinity-based QSAR and models. Specialized databases like the Structural Database (CSD) focus on crystallographic data for over 1.37 million small-molecule crystal structures as of 2025, underpinning conformer generation and property prediction in cheminformatics.
DatabaseManager/OrganizationPrimary FocusApproximate Size (2023–2025)
NCBI/NIHGeneral chemical structures and bioactivities119M compounds, 322M substances
EMBL-EBIBioactive drug-like molecules and targets2.8M compounds, >20M bioactivities
ChemSpiderStructure search with properties and spectra>130M structures
UCSF Shoichet LabCommercially available compounds for screening>230M purchasable compounds
DrugBank Inc.Drugs, targets, and pharmacological data>19,000 drugs, comprehensive target info
BindingDBBindingDB ProjectProtein-small molecule binding affinities1.4M compounds, 3.2M binding data points
These repositories often interoperate through standardized formats like SMILES and InChI, ensuring seamless data exchange in cheminformatics applications while addressing challenges like and through curation and validation protocols.

File Formats and Interchange Standards

In cheminformatics, file formats and interchange standards are essential for representing, storing, and exchanging chemical structures, properties, and data across software tools, databases, and research workflows. These formats ensure by providing standardized ways to encode molecular connectivity, , coordinates, and metadata, facilitating tasks such as database integration, , and collaborative . Without such standards, data silos would hinder applications, as diverse tools from different vendors often require compatible input/output mechanisms. Connection table formats, such as the MDL MOLfile and its multi-molecule extension, the Structure-Data File (SDF), are among the most widely used for small organic molecules. The MOLfile V2000 specification, developed by MDL Information Systems (now part of ), organizes data into sections for atom counts, bond counts, atom coordinates, bond connections, and optional properties, allowing representation of 2D or 3D structures with up to 999 atoms and 999 bonds. SDF extends this by concatenating multiple MOLfiles with metadata fields, making it ideal for compound libraries; for example, distributes millions of compounds in SDF format for bulk download. These formats prioritize simplicity and compatibility, supporting and basic , though they lack native handling of isotopes or advanced reactions without extensions. Line notation systems like SMILES (Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System) offer compact, human-readable representations of molecular topology without coordinates. Introduced by Daylight Chemical Information Systems in 1988, SMILES uses ASCII strings to denote atoms (e.g., 'C' for carbon), bonds (e.g., '=' for double), branches (parentheses), and rings (numbers), with algorithms ensuring unique strings for identical structures. The OpenSMILES specification, an open extension ratified in 2016, standardizes features like and , enabling seamless parsing in tools like RDKit and Open Babel. SMILES is particularly valued for web transmission and database indexing due to its brevity—for instance, is simply "CCO"—but it omits 3D geometry unless extended with variants like SMILES+3D. For unambiguous identification and interchange, the (InChI) serves as a hashed string standard developed by IUPAC and NIST. Released in 2005 and maintained by the InChI Trust, InChI encodes layered information on connectivity, hydrogen atoms, isotopes, , and tautomers into a non-proprietary string (e.g., InChI=1S/C2H6O/c1-2-3/h3H,2H2,1H3 for ), with an InChIKey hash for compact searching. Unlike format-specific representations, InChI prioritizes canonical uniqueness across software, supporting over 100 million compounds in databases like , and is recommended for documentation and data exchange to avoid ambiguity from vendor-specific formats. XML-based standards like Chemical Markup Language (CML) provide a flexible, extensible framework for rich chemical data, including spectra, reactions, and semantics. Initiated in 1998 by the Murray-Rust group and now at version 3, CML uses XML schemas to tag elements such as molecules (<molecule>), atoms (<atom>), bonds, and properties, allowing integration with other XML standards like for equations. It supports validation via online services and dictionaries for controlled vocabularies, making it suitable for publishing and archiving complex datasets in journals; for example, a CML document can embed SMILES alongside 3D coordinates and metadata. CML's strength lies in its with web technologies, though its verbosity limits use in high-throughput computing compared to binary formats. Other specialized formats complement these for broader applications: the (PDB) format, standardized since 1971 by the wwPDB, handles macromolecular structures with atomic coordinates and is widely used in cheminformatics for protein-ligand interactions; the (CIF) from the IUCr encodes crystal structures with symmetry and metadata for . Interchange often relies on conversion tools like Open Babel, which supports over 100 formats, ensuring data flow between ecosystems while preserving fidelity. Adoption of these standards has grown with open-source initiatives, reducing proprietary barriers in global research.

Core Techniques

Similarity and Substructure Searching

Similarity searching in cheminformatics is a fundamental technique for identifying molecules in large databases that share structural features with a query , facilitating tasks such as lead identification in and scaffold hopping. This approach relies on representing molecules as compact descriptors, most commonly binary fingerprints, which encode the presence or absence of predefined substructural fragments. Widely adopted fingerprint types include path-based Daylight fingerprints, which capture topological paths up to a specified length (e.g., 7 bonds) and hash them into a fixed-length bit string (typically or 2048 bits), and circular fingerprints like extended connectivity fingerprints (ECFP), which iteratively expand neighborhoods around each atom to account for connectivity and . These representations enable efficient of similarity scores, with the Tanimoto coefficient (also known as ) serving as the de facto standard metric due to its robustness in ranking molecules by structural overlap. The Tanimoto coefficient measures the intersection over union of two fingerprint bit sets, providing a value between 0 (no similarity) and 1 (identical). It is calculated as: T(A,B)=∣A∩B∣∣A∪B∣=ca+b−cT(A, B) = \frac{|A \cap B|}{|A \cup B|} = \frac{c}{a + b - c} where aa is the number of bits set in fingerprint AA, bb in BB, and cc in their intersection. This metric outperforms alternatives like the Dice coefficient or cosine similarity in large-scale evaluations, as it minimizes ranking differences across diverse chemical spaces and is less sensitive to fingerprint density variations. For instance, in comparative studies on datasets like PubChem, Tanimoto-based searches with ECFP fingerprints achieve significant enrichment factors in virtual screening. Other metrics, such as the Soergel distance (1 - Tanimoto), offer equivalent performance in some contexts but are less commonly implemented. Substructure searching, in contrast, focuses on exact matching of a query substructure within target molecules, enabling the identification of compounds containing specific functional groups or pharmacophores. Query patterns are typically specified using (SMARTS), an extension of the Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) that incorporates logical operators, wildcards, and for flexible substructure definition. This method models molecules as undirected graphs and solves the , where the query graph must be embedded into the target graph while preserving atom types and bond orders. Seminal algorithms for substructure searching include Ullmann's procedure from , which uses a compatibility matrix to prune infeasible mappings through iterative refinement, reducing the search space from the factorial complexity of naive enumeration. A more efficient successor is the VF2 introduced in 2004, which employs feasibility rules to extend partial matches incrementally, avoiding exhaustive . Benchmarks on molecular datasets like demonstrate VF2's superiority, with median search times of 0.04 ms per query versus 0.1 ms for Ullmann, and up to 1000-fold speedups on complex patterns involving rings or . Both algorithms scale to databases exceeding 10 million compounds when combined with indexing techniques, such as fragment-based prefiltering, ensuring practical utility in cheminformatics workflows.

Predictive Modeling and QSAR

Predictive modeling in cheminformatics encompasses computational techniques that forecast molecular properties, bioactivities, and behaviors based on chemical structures, enabling efficient screening and optimization in and materials design. These models leverage statistical and algorithms to correlate structural descriptors with experimental outcomes, reducing the need for costly wet-lab experiments. By integrating vast datasets from chemical databases, predictive modeling supports and property prediction, with applications spanning absorption, distribution, , , and (ADMET) profiling. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling represents a cornerstone of predictive modeling, establishing mathematical relationships between molecular structures and biological activities or physicochemical properties. Originating from the work of Hansch and Fujita in the , QSAR initially employed to link substituent effects—quantified via Hammett constants (σ) for electronic effects, partition coefficients (π) for hydrophobicity, and steric factors (ρ)—to biological responses in sets of congeners. This approach, formalized in their seminal 1964 paper, revolutionized by demonstrating how subtle structural modifications influence potency, as exemplified in predictions for phenylalkylamine derivatives. Over time, QSAR evolved to include nonlinear models and diverse descriptors, adhering to validation principles for transparency, reproducibility, and defined applicability domains to ensure reliable extrapolations. Contemporary QSAR integrates techniques, such as random forests, support vector machines, and deep neural networks, to handle high-dimensional data from large-scale assays like those in or . Descriptors range from 2D topological indices (e.g., ) and fingerprints (e.g., ECFP) to 3D features, enabling for simultaneous prediction of multiple endpoints, as seen in Tox21 toxicity models achieving AUC values exceeding 0.85. In predictive modeling, matched molecular pair analysis complements QSAR by quantifying property changes from targeted substitutions, guiding library design with interpretable rules. These advancements have improved model accuracy—for instance, graph convolutional networks in QSAR yielding R² > 0.8 for predictions—while addressing challenges like data imbalance through techniques such as .

Advanced Methods

Virtual Screening and Library Design

Virtual screening (VS) is a computational technique in cheminformatics that evaluates large compound libraries to identify potential bioactive molecules likely to interact with a , thereby prioritizing candidates for experimental testing and accelerating . This approach reduces the time and cost associated with by filtering millions of compounds based on predicted binding affinity or similarity to known actives. VS encompasses both ligand-based methods, which rely on chemical similarities without target structure knowledge, and structure-based methods, which incorporate the three-dimensional structure of the target protein. Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) employs molecular docking to predict how small molecules fit into a target's , assessing interactions such as hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic contacts. A foundational method in SBVS is the program, introduced in 1982, which uses geometric matching to align ligands with receptor sites, identifying feasible binding orientations within 1 Å of experimental structures in test cases like heme-myoglobin complexes. Modern docking tools, such as and Glide, build on this by incorporating scoring functions to rank poses by estimated binding energy, enabling efficient screening of libraries exceeding 1 billion compounds. Ligand-based virtual screening (LBVS) leverages known active compounds to query databases, often using pharmacophore models that define essential spatial arrangements of features like hydrogen bond donors and aromatic rings. A seminal contribution to LBVS is the 1992 framework for 3D database searching, which aligns molecular conformations to pharmacophores derived from active ligands, facilitating the discovery of structurally diverse hits. Common metrics include Tanimoto similarity on molecular fingerprints (e.g., ECFP) or shape-based overlays, with enhancements improving enrichment rates in prospective studies. Chemical library design in cheminformatics focuses on generating focused or diverse sets of synthesizable compounds optimized for VS, ensuring coverage of relevant chemical space while adhering to criteria like for drug-likeness. Methods include reaction-based enumeration using SMARTS patterns to combine reactants, as implemented in open-source tools like RDKit, which can produce libraries of tens of thousands of compounds, such as diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) lactam sets with 24,698 members exhibiting high scaffold diversity. Diversity is quantified via metrics like scaffold entropy or consensus diversity plots integrating fingerprints and physicochemical properties (e.g., molecular weight, logP), guiding the selection of novel, non-redundant subsets for screening. Integrating VS with library design enhances hit rates; for instance, de novo library generation followed by pharmacophore-based screening has yielded nanomolar inhibitors for protein-protein interactions, as demonstrated in prospective campaigns where VS enriched actives significantly over random selection. Tools like workflows automate this pipeline, from enumeration to docking rescoring, supporting iterative refinement to bias libraries toward target-specific features while maintaining synthetic feasibility. Recent advances, including AI-accelerated docking, have screened ultra-large libraries (>10^9 compounds) to identify leads for targets like proteases, underscoring the synergy in modern cheminformatics.

Machine Learning Applications

Machine learning (ML) has revolutionized cheminformatics by enabling the analysis and generation of molecular data at scales unattainable through traditional methods. Advanced techniques, particularly (DL) architectures such as graph neural networks (GNNs), transformers, and generative models, have become central to predicting molecular properties, designing novel compounds, and optimizing drug candidates. These methods leverage representations like molecular graphs and SMILES strings to capture complex chemical relationships, outperforming classical descriptors in tasks involving high-dimensional data. For instance, GNNs treat molecules as graphs where atoms are nodes and bonds are edges, allowing end-to-end learning of structural features without manual . In molecular property prediction, GNNs and transformers have demonstrated superior performance over traditional ML models like random forests or support vector machines. The Message Passing Neural Network (MPNN), introduced by Gilmer et al., uses iterative to aggregate neighborhood information, achieving state-of-the-art results on quantum chemistry benchmarks such as QM9 for like energy and dipole moments. Building on this, models like ChemProp employ directed message passing GNNs to predict ADMET (absorption, distribution, , , ) , offering up to 10-fold faster while maintaining high accuracy on datasets like MoleculeNet. Transformers, adapted for chemistry via self-attention mechanisms, excel in sequence-based tasks; ChemBERTa, pretrained on 77 million SMILES from , improves property prediction on benchmarks by capturing long-range dependencies, with attention visualizations aiding interpretability. These approaches have improved accuracy in QSAR tasks compared to non-DL baselines. Generative models represent a transformative application, enabling de novo molecular design by sampling novel structures conditioned on desired properties. Variational autoencoders (VAEs) encode molecules into continuous latent spaces for optimization; the work by Gómez-Bombarelli et al. uses SMILES-based VAEs to generate drug-like molecules, achieving 73-79% validity rates and outperforming genetic algorithms in optimizing metrics like QED (quantitative estimate of drug-likeness) and SAS (synthetic accessibility score) on ZINC datasets. Generative adversarial networks (GANs), as in MolGAN by De Cao and Kipf, directly generate molecular graphs, producing nearly 100% valid compounds on QM9 while incorporating for property control, though susceptible to mode collapse. Recent extensions, such as diffusion models in PoLiGenX, generate pose-aware ligands with minimal steric clashes, accelerating by enriching libraries with high-affinity candidates. These generative techniques have facilitated the discovery of compounds with improved potency, as seen in cases where more synthesizable molecules are proposed via retrosynthesis integration. Beyond prediction and generation, ML enhances cheminformatics in reaction prediction and toxicity assessment. Transformer-based models like Graphormer handle both graph and inputs for retrosynthesis, outperforming GNNs in low-data regimes by leveraging pretraining on large corpora. In toxicity forecasting, AttenhERG uses attentive fingerprint GNNs to predict hERG inhibition with interpretable atom-level contributions, achieving top accuracy on benchmark datasets. Overall, these applications have shortened timelines; for example, ML-driven pipelines in projects like CardioGenAI redesign molecules to mitigate while preserving bioactivity, demonstrating practical impact in pharmaceutical workflows. Challenges remain in data scarcity and generalizability, but ongoing pretraining on massive databases continues to advance reliability.

Applications

Drug Discovery and Development

Cheminformatics plays a pivotal role in and development by enabling the computational analysis, prediction, and optimization of chemical compounds to identify potential therapeutics efficiently. It integrates data with biological assays to streamline processes from target identification to clinical candidate selection, reducing experimental costs and time. For instance, cheminformatics tools facilitate the management of vast chemical libraries, such as those in or , allowing researchers to prioritize compounds with desirable properties. In hit identification, is a core application, where cheminformatics methods like molecular docking and ligand-based similarity searching evaluate millions of compounds against biological targets. Structure-based , often using tools like or GOLD, simulates protein-ligand interactions to predict binding affinities. Ligand-based methods, relying on descriptors like ECFP fingerprints, further enable similarity searches in chemical spaces exceeding 10^60 possible drug-like molecules. For example, gigascale screenings have identified subnanomolar hits, such as in the discovery of the MALT1 inhibitor SGR-1505 through of 8.2 billion compounds using physics-based and methods. This approach has accelerated discoveries, such as the SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitor screening of 1.3 billion compounds via deep learning-enhanced docking. During lead optimization, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling correlates molecular structures with pharmacological activities to guide structural modifications. Techniques such as 3D-QSAR and 4D-QSAR, which incorporate conformational dynamics, have been used to design glucose inhibitors for b by predicting binding affinities. Seminal rules like , derived from cheminformatics analysis of oral drugs, assess drug-likeness based on molecular weight, logP, hydrogen bond donors, and acceptors, widely influencing modern efforts. Recent integrations of , including deep neural networks, enhance QSAR accuracy by learning from large datasets, as in the rapid design of DDR1 kinase inhibitors in 21 days. Cheminformatics also supports ADMET (absorption, distribution, , , and ) prediction to filter leads early, minimizing late-stage failures that affect up to 40% of candidates. Models using (PSA) and topological descriptors predict , with PSA thresholds below 140 Ų indicating good absorption. Machine learning-driven tools like METAPRINT forecast metabolic liabilities, while QSAR identifies reactive substructures, as in flagging "frequent hitters" in screening libraries. These predictions have been instrumental in developing clinical candidates like SGR-1505 for MALT1 in B-cell malignancies (as of 2025) via gigascale . Overall, the integration of cheminformatics with and has transformed , enabling generative models to explore novel chemical spaces and reducing timelines from years to months in select cases. As of 2025, quantum-enhanced cheminformatics promises further precision in simulating molecular interactions for complex diseases.

Materials Science and Other Fields

Cheminformatics plays a pivotal role in by enabling the prediction and design of materials with tailored properties through computational analysis of molecular structures and datasets. In design, for instance, models are applied to explore vast chemical spaces for applications in , high-performance batteries, and lightweight composites, allowing researchers to optimize properties like conductivity and mechanical strength without exhaustive synthesis. Similarly, for catalysts, cheminformatics facilitates the identification of efficient, eco-friendly variants by integrating graph neural networks (GNNs) to predict reactivity and selectivity, as demonstrated in informatics-driven approaches to . benefit from multi-scale modeling techniques that combine quantum chemical calculations with cheminformatics descriptors to forecast behaviors such as optical and thermal properties. Seminal contributions in this domain include early materials informatics frameworks that bridged cheminformatics with property prediction, such as Yosipof et al.'s 2016 work on quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) for diverse classes, which laid groundwork for data-driven discovery. More recently, Toyao et al. (2020) advanced catalysis informatics by applying to descriptor-based screening of thousands of catalysts, achieving high accuracy in predicting performance metrics like turnover frequency. These methods emphasize conceptual shifts from trial-and-error experimentation to predictive modeling, reducing development timelines and costs in materials engineering. Beyond , cheminformatics extends to agrochemistry, where it accelerates the discovery of protection agents like herbicides and . Virtual of large libraries, such as Enamine’s REAL database containing billions of compounds, employs tools like fastROCS for shape-based similarity searches to identify hits with pesticidal activity, enhancing the efficiency of . In lead optimization, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, including artificial neural networks, predict and environmental ; a notable example is the development of , a semi-synthetic , where ANN-based QSAR guided structural modifications to improve potency while minimizing ecological impact. Generative models like REINVENT further enable de novo design of novel agrochemicals by sampling chemical spaces constrained by target properties. In and , cheminformatics supports the assessment of chemical risks by predicting toxicity and environmental fate. Structural feature analysis via tools like ToxiM forecasts potential hazards to ecosystems, enabling proactive regulation of pollutants. For instance, QSAR models on platforms such as OCHEM predict biodegradability and persistence in media like and , aiding in the evaluation of remediation strategies. High-impact work includes Sharma et al. (2017), which integrated cheminformatics for multi-endpoint toxicity prediction, influencing regulatory frameworks like EU REACH by providing validated alternatives to . These applications underscore cheminformatics' role in sustainable chemistry, balancing innovation with safety across fields.

Tools and Software

Open-Source Toolkits

Open-source toolkits form the backbone of accessible cheminformatics, enabling the manipulation, , and visualization of chemical structures through freely available, community-maintained software. These libraries and frameworks democratize access to advanced tools, supporting tasks from file format conversion and descriptor generation to substructure searching and predictive modeling. By fostering collaboration and extensibility, they have accelerated research in , materials design, and beyond, with widespread adoption in academic, industrial, and open-science projects. RDKit stands as one of the most popular open-source cheminformatics platforms, offering a robust C++ core with Python, , C#, and wrappers for handling molecular data. It provides comprehensive functionality for tasks such as SMILES , 2D/3D conformer generation, fingerprint computation for similarity analysis, and integration with pipelines for QSAR modeling. Originally developed by Greg Landrum in 2006 and released under the BSD license, RDKit has evolved through contributions from a global community, supporting numerous file formats and emphasizing high performance for large-scale datasets. Its versatility has made it integral to workflows in pharmaceutical , with benchmarks showing efficient processing of millions of compounds. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK), a modular Java library, excels in representing chemical concepts like atoms, bonds, and reactions, while supporting I/O operations, structural depiction, and advanced analyses such as stereochemistry handling and property prediction. Released under the LGPL license since 2001, CDK originated from the Obelisk movement to standardize open cheminformatics and has been cited in over 2,000 publications for its role in bioinformatics integrations and educational tools. It includes algorithms for substructure searching and , making it suitable for both standalone applications and embedded use in larger systems. Open Babel functions as a cross-platform chemical toolbox, specializing in the conversion and manipulation of molecular data across more than 110 formats, including SMILES, SDF, and PDB. Under the GNU GPL license since 2004, it supports descriptor calculations, , and basic 3D geometry optimization, often serving as a lightweight bridge between incompatible software ecosystems. Its and C++ facilitate and , with applications in pipelines where is critical. Additional toolkits extend these capabilities; Surge is a fast open-source chemical graph generator for enumerating all non-isomorphic constitutional isomers from a given molecular formula, outputting structures in SMILES or SDF formats. It employs the canonical generation path method and integrates the Nauty package for efficient automorphism group computation, enabling rapid generation even for complex formulas. For instance, the Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT) builds on RDKit and Open Babel to provide Python-based modules for ligand-based , modeling, and docking simulations. Similarly, the KNIME Cheminformatics extension leverages RDKit and CDK within a visual environment, enabling no-code integration for and in cheminformatics. These resources, often benchmarked for accuracy and speed, continue to evolve through open contributions, ensuring relevance to emerging challenges like AI-driven molecular design.

Commercial Platforms

Commercial platforms in cheminformatics provide solutions that enable advanced chemical , molecular modeling, , and , often integrated into broader and workflows. These platforms are developed by specialized companies and are widely adopted in pharmaceutical, , and chemical industries due to their robust performance, user-friendly interfaces, and support for large-scale computations. Unlike open-source alternatives, commercial tools typically offer dedicated , regular updates, and seamless integration with enterprise systems, facilitating collaborative environments. One of the leading providers is Chemaxon Ltd., which offers the JChem suite for search, database management, and property prediction, alongside Marvin for interactive editing and visualization. These tools support cheminformatics tasks such as similarity searching, substructure matching, and reaction prediction, serving over 1 million users in . Chemaxon's platforms emphasize scalability for handling millions of compounds and integration with electronic lab notebooks. Acquired by Certara in 2024, Chemaxon now enhances Certara's Phoenix and D360 platforms for pharmacokinetic modeling and . BIOVIA, a Dassault Systèmes brand, delivers the Pipeline Pilot platform, a visual programming environment for building scientific workflows that integrate cheminformatics with data analytics and machine learning. Pipeline Pilot supports tasks like compound registration, ADMET prediction, and high-throughput screening, enabling users to automate complex analyses across chemical and biological datasets. Complementing this, BIOVIA Discovery Studio provides molecular visualization, simulation, and modeling capabilities, used in target identification and lead optimization. These tools are deployed in over 2,000 organizations globally, emphasizing interoperability with laboratory information management systems. Schrödinger Inc. offers the interface as a central hub for its computational platform, incorporating cheminformatics modules for ligand design, free energy calculations, and . The suite leverages physics-based simulations alongside for accurate property predictions, accelerating hit-to-lead processes in . Schrödinger's tools process diverse molecular datasets efficiently, supporting applications from small-molecule therapeutics to materials , and are licensed to major pharmaceutical firms for their predictive reliability. The (MOE) from Chemical Computing Group (CCG) is an integrated platform for molecular modeling, cheminformatics, and simulations, featuring tools for protein-ligand interactions, modeling, and QSAR analysis. MOE's Scientific Vector Language (SVL) allows custom scripting for advanced workflows, making it suitable for structure-based and virtual libraries. Widely used in academia and industry, MOE handles 3D molecular manipulations and docking with high precision, contributing to numerous peer-reviewed studies in . Other notable platforms include OpenEye Scientific's toolkits, now under , which provide high-performance libraries for molecular generation, conformer searching, and shape-based screening, optimized for . BioSolveIT's SeeSAR focuses on structure-based design with real-time affinity predictions, while PerkinElmer's (now ) ChemDraw and ChemOffice+ Cloud enable chemical structure drawing, database querying, and collaborative reporting. These platforms collectively drive innovation by offering specialized features tailored to cheminformatics challenges, with ongoing developments like AI integration enhancing their capabilities.

Challenges and Future Directions

Current Limitations

Despite significant advancements, cheminformatics faces persistent challenges in and , which undermine the reliability of predictive models and analyses. High-quality, annotated datasets are often scarce, heterogeneous, and biased, stemming from diverse sources such as experimental results, chemical databases, and clinical trials, leading to inconsistencies in formats and completeness that complicate integration and model . For instance, the lack of verified negative —inactive compounds in assays—biases quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and limits their generalizability in . Additionally, many datasets, like those in MoleculeNet, contain errors or hypothetical structures, with only a tiny fraction of large collections such as ZINC representing synthesized compounds, exacerbating inaccuracies in applications. Computational limitations further constrain the field's scalability, particularly in handling ultra-large chemical spaces and complex simulations. Tasks like molecular docking and demand resources, but access to such infrastructure remains limited for smaller institutions due to costs and software licensing barriers, hindering large-scale analyses and the exploration of synthetically modified biologics such as antibody-drug conjugates. issues compound this, as inconsistent molecular notations (e.g., SMILES versus InChI) and non-standardized data exchange protocols violate principles, impeding seamless collaboration across databases and tools. In resource-constrained regions, additional barriers include poor connectivity and restricted database access, amplifying global disparities in cheminformatics adoption. The "black-box" nature of advanced AI and models in cheminformatics poses critical interpretability challenges, eroding trust in predictions for high-stakes applications like . Deep neural networks often obscure underlying decision mechanisms, making it difficult to validate chemical feature recognition, such as from SMILES strings, and raising accountability concerns in regulatory contexts. Ethical and regulatory hurdles, including data privacy, rights, and compliance with protocols like the for natural products research, further complicate deployment, necessitating interdisciplinary expertise that is often lacking between chemists and computational . Moreover, the absence of robust, domain-specific benchmarks—beyond flawed sets like MoleculeNet—limits of model performance, calling for standardized metrics tailored to tasks like prediction. One of the most prominent emerging trends in cheminformatics is the deep integration of (AI) and (ML), which is transforming molecular property prediction, , and de novo drug design. Techniques such as graph neural networks (GNNs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and generative adversarial networks (GANs) enable the generation of novel chemical structures with desired properties, surpassing traditional rule-based methods in efficiency and accuracy. For instance, GNNs like Attentive FP and capture intricate molecular topologies by modeling atoms as nodes and bonds as edges, achieving superior performance in tasks like scaffold hopping and bioactivity forecasting. Advancements in molecular representation methods further amplify this trend, shifting from simplistic fingerprints and SMILES strings to AI-driven embeddings that incorporate 3D geometries, multimodal (e.g., spectra and images), and semantic relationships. Transformer-based models, such as Mol-BERT and MOLFORMER, treat molecules as "languages" to learn contextual features, facilitating applications in lead optimization and retrosynthesis planning. These representations address limitations in exploring vast chemical spaces, with multimodal approaches like MoleSG integrating structural and functional for more robust predictions. However, challenges persist, including issues and the need for better to underrepresented chemical scaffolds. Quantum computing represents another frontier, poised to revolutionize simulations of complex molecular interactions that classical methods struggle with, such as accurate free energy calculations and quantum mechanical property evaluations. Early applications focus on hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for and materials design, potentially accelerating the modeling of protein-ligand binding by orders of magnitude. While still nascent as of 2025, prototypes demonstrate feasibility in optimizing small-molecule reactions, hinting at broader adoption in cheminformatics workflows. The rise of analytics, fueled by expansive open-access repositories like and , is enabling scalable, collaborative cheminformatics platforms that support and multi-omics integration. These databases, with containing over 119 million compounds and over 2.8 million distinct compounds as of 2025, power ML models for predicting and across diverse datasets. Additionally, sustainability-focused trends leverage ML to design greener synthetic routes, minimizing waste and environmental impact in chemical processes. Multi-scale modeling techniques, combining quantum, , and continuum approaches, are also gaining traction for holistic system simulations in and .

References

  1. https://www.acs.org/careers/chemical-sciences/fields/cheminformatics.html
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/chemoinformatics
  3. https://cacm.acm.org/research/cheminformatics/
  4. https://www.drugdesign.org/chapters/cheminformatics/
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39558165/
  6. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.126.3278.814
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11533634/
  8. https://www.cas.org/about/cas-history
  9. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.166.3902.178
  10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-7743(08)61090-7
  11. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/c160017a018
  12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(73)90058-1
  13. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00226a005
  14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-6147(00)02004-23
  15. https://www.rdkit.org/
  16. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
  17. https://www.iupac.org/inchi/
  18. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01212
  19. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01789
  20. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-024-00922-0
  21. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi1401s18
  22. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-025-00978-6
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3884755/
  24. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1603
  25. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44386-025-00017-2
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11032954/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3809149/
  28. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802612804910278
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359644617304695
  30. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01193a005
  31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.010
  32. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-020-00460-5
  33. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci60017a018
  34. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00057a005
  35. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100050t
  36. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02907
  37. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/
  38. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/52/D1/D1180/7337608
  39. https://www.chemspider.com/
  40. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed100697w
  41. https://zinc.docking.org/
  42. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00675
  43. https://go.drugbank.com/
  44. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/34/suppl_1/D668/1132926
  45. https://www.bindingdb.org/
  46. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/44/D1/D1045/2502601
  47. https://www.iucr.org/news/newsletter/volume-33/number-3/csd-data-and-software-update-may-2025
  48. https://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug05/Kappler/ctfile.pdf
  49. https://www.inchi-trust.org/about-the-inchi-standard/
  50. https://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smiles.html
  51. http://opensmiles.org/opensmiles.html
  52. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1758-2946-5-7
  53. https://www.xml-cml.org/spec/
  54. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ci990052b
  55. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci9800211
  56. https://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.finger.html
  57. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-015-0069-3
  58. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1758-2946-4-13
  59. https://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html
  60. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/321921.321925
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd4128
  62. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/14/11488
  63. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01062a035
  64. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/cs/d0cs00098a
  65. https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1897/01-171
  66. https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(21)01020-8
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10380192/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6470506/
  69. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00363
  70. https://www.mdpi.com/2813-2998/2/2/17
  71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-X
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X24000563
  73. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-022-00315-6
  74. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-025-01061-w
  75. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09885
  76. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00572
  77. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11973
  78. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c02070
  79. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05905-z
  80. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.202000028
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6146447/
  82. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012188625088
  83. https://ir.schrodinger.com/press-releases/news-details/2025/Schrdinger-to-Present-Phase-1-Clinical-Data-on-MALT1-Inhibitor-SGR-1505-at-EHA-Annual-Congress-and-International-Conference-on-Malignant-Lymphoma/default.aspx
  84. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600047
  85. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b04186
  86. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/chemistry/articles/10.3389/fchem.2023.1292027/full
  87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9205-8
  88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00880
  89. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201300030
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10577930/
  91. https://www.rdkit.org/docs/Overview.html
  92. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-020-00456-1
  93. https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit
  94. https://cdk.github.io/
  95. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci025584y
  96. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-017-0220-4
  97. https://riojournal.com/article/124884/
  98. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1758-2946-3-33
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9034616/
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4475766/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8206202/
  102. https://github.com/MysterionRise/cheminformatics-toolkit-benchmark
  103. https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/industry-reports/cheminformatics-market
  104. https://www.certara.com/chemaxon/
  105. https://www.certara.com/pressrelease/certara-completes-acquisition-of-chemaxon/
  106. https://www.3ds.com/products/biovia
  107. https://www.3ds.com/products/biovia/scientific-informatics
  108. https://www.schrodinger.com/platform/
  109. https://www.schrodinger.com/platform/products/maestro/
  110. https://www.chemcomp.com/
  111. https://www.eyesopen.com/cheminformatics-modeling-toolkits
  112. https://ir.revvity.com/news/investor-news/news-details/2020/PerkinElmer-Brings-ChemDraw-Software-to-the-Cloud-Enhancing-Search-and-Collaboration-Workflows-11-10-2020/default.aspx
  113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-025-00978-6
  114. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC03921A
  115. https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJBAS/2024/5.2.19
  116. https://www.pistoiaalliance.org/eventdetails/persistent-challenges-in-cheminformatics/
  117. https://www.embl.org/news/updates-from-data-resources/chembl-36/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.