Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Cockchafer
View on Wikipedia
| Common cockchafer | |
|---|---|
| Female | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Coleoptera |
| Suborder: | Polyphaga |
| Infraorder: | Scarabaeiformia |
| Family: | Scarabaeidae |
| Genus: | Melolontha |
| Species: | M. melolontha
|
| Binomial name | |
| Melolontha melolontha Linnaeus, 1758
| |
The common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), also colloquially known as the Maybug,[1][a] Maybeetle,[3] or doodlebug,[4] is a species of scarab beetle belonging to the genus Melolontha. It is native to Europe, and it is one of several closely-related and morphologically similar species of Melolontha called cockchafers, alongside Melolontha hippocastani (the forest cockchafer).
The cockchafer develops via metamorphosis, in which the beetle undergoes stages of eggs, larvae, pupae and adults.
The mating behaviour is controlled by pheromones. The males usually swarm during the mating season while the females stay put and feed on leaves.[5] The leaves release green leaf volatiles when they are fed on by females, which the male can sense and thus locate the female for mating opportunity.[6][7] The larvae use both the plant volatiles and CO2 to locate the plant root for food.[8]
This species is an important and nutritious food source for many species. The adults and larvae feed on plants, and are regarded as agricultural pests of crops such as grasses and fruit trees. Adults have harmful effects for the crop when they aggregate in large groups. The larvae can cause severe damage and kill the plant by gnawing the plant roots.[9]
Distribution
[edit]Cockchafers are prevalent across Europe, including in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. They are particularly prevalent in temperate regions with suitable soil conditions for larval development. However, they have also been reported in parts of Asia, including Turkey and the Caucasus region. Geographical barriers, climatic conditions, and ecological factors may limit their dispersal to other continents.[10]
Description
[edit]Adults
[edit]Adults of M. melolontha reach sizes of 25 to 30 millimetres (1 to 1+1⁄4 inches) in length.[5] Behind their heads they have a black pronotum covered with short hairs. This black coloration distinguishes them from their close relative M. hippocastani, whose pronotum is brown. The top of their bodies have hard, brown elytra and a black thorax, while their underside is black and partly white on the sides. They have a dark head with two antennae with ten segments each. Male cockchafers have seven "leaves" on their antennae, whereas the females have only six.[5]
Larvae
[edit]Larvae have 3 stages of development over the course of 3–4 years. In the first stage, they are 10–20 mm long, then grow to 30–35 mm in the second year of development, and finally reach their full size of 40–46 mm in their final year of development before emerging.[5] In some areas of Eastern Europe the larvae develop for a fourth year. They have white bodies that curve into an arc with a black coloration at the abdomen and long, hairy, and well developed legs.[5] They have large orange heads with strong, grabbing mandibles. On their heads they have 2 small antennae which they use to smell and taste their surroundings while underground.[8]
Food resources
[edit]Cockchafer feeds on deciduous plant and fruit tree leaves, including oaks, maple, sweet chestnut, beech, plum, and walnut trees. The feeding behaviour of larvae can cause severe damage to the plants. They feed on both the small roots of field plants such as grain, grass, tree, beet roots and the large part of crop rootlets. Larvae can gnaw the root for 30 cm each day, which quickly kills the plant.[9]
Life cycle
[edit]
Adults appear at the end of April or in May and live for about five to seven weeks. After about two weeks, the female begins laying eggs, which she buries about 10 to 20 cm deep in the earth. She may do this several times until she has laid between 60 and 80 eggs. Most typically, the female beetle lays its eggs in fields. The preferred food for adults is oak leaves, but they will also feed on conifer needles.
The larvae, known as "chafer grubs" or "white grubs", hatch four to six weeks after being laid as eggs. They feed on plant roots, for instance potato roots. The grubs develop in the earth for three to four years, in colder climates even five years, and grow continually to a size of about 4–5 cm, before they pupate in early autumn and develop into an adult cockchafer in six weeks.[5]
The cockchafer overwinters in the earth at depths between 20 and 100 cm. They work their way to the surface only in spring.
Because of their long development time as larvae, cockchafers appear in a cycle of every three or four years; the years vary from region to region. There is a larger cycle of around 30 years superimposed, in which they occur (or rather, used to occur) in unusually high numbers (10,000s).
Enemies
[edit]Predators
[edit]The European mole is a natural predator of cockchafers. Moles are known to feed on cockchafer larvae. They can detect them using their keen sense of smell and specialised digging behaviour. This predation can help regulate cockchafer populations in mole-inhabited areas. [11]
M. melolontha adults are predated by ground beetles and ants. Larvae are predated by click beetles while underground. Starlings, crows, and gulls also predate M. melolontha larvae, often after a field has been plowed.[5]
Parasites
[edit]Dexia rustica is a parasitic fly that uses M. melolontha larvae as their hosts. D. rustica eggs hatch underground and look for cockchafer larvae to hibernate within over the winter. Their presence will ultimately kill the beetle larvae in the spring. One to six fly larva can parasitise a single host.[5]
Behaviour
[edit]Mating behaviour
[edit]
Males leave the soil when the temperature is favourable in April or May. Sexual dimorphism is observed as male beetles, at dusk, will begin to swarm and locate around groups of trees at forest edges.[5] On the other hand, females will stay in place and feed on leaves until they reach sexual maturity. Males primarily fly around the branches looking for females to mate with.[6][7] This behaviour occurs for several hours until darkness for about 10-20 days.[5] These swarms typically have minimal damage to the trees, but they are occasionally harmful in cherry or plum orchards because of their consumption of blossoms. Once the females have matured and mated, they return to the fields to lay their eggs in the soil. Only a third of females will survive this trip, but any survivors will make a second, and occasionally third, swarming trip and return to the field to lay eggs again.[5]
Green leaf volatiles (GLVs) are a series of saturated and monounsaturated six-carbon aldehydes, alcohols, and esters released by vascular plants in response to stresses.[12] GLVs have been found to act as a kairomone, which is a compound released by an organism that only benefits the receiver.[6][7] This enhances the attractiveness of toluquinone, a sex pheromone in scarab beetles. Only male M. melolontha are attracted to GLVs, using its release to identify leaves that female beetles are feeding on. Females have the ability to detect GLV, but any change in behaviour that it may cause is unclear.[6][7] M. melolontha males are more sensitive to lower GLV concentrations, possibly due to the anatomical differences between male and female antennae.[7] Due to this phenomenon, sexual dimorphism can be observed in flight behaviour. During swarming behaviour, males will hover around the foliage while females remain on twigs and branches to feed. Males then use GLVs to identify which leaves have females that they can mate with.[7] GLVs are being investigated as a possible pest control technique to attract males and prevent mating.[5]
Pest behaviour
[edit]Though adults can damage some fruit trees, M. melolontha larvae are the primary agricultural pests.[5] Larva hatch from their eggs 4–6 weeks after being laid and develop into adults over the course of 3–4 years. Immediately after hatching, larvae will gnaw on small roots. It will continue feeding on roots, particularly grasses, cereals, and other crops, during its three larval stages, only pausing to burrow deep into the soil for winter hibernation.[5]
In their first stage, M. melolontha larvae identify roots by CO2 release. They will only do damage at extreme densities.[5] In their second stage, larva will cause the most damage to crops.[8] In their third stage, larva will do less but still severe damage to crops. They most prominently use structures on their antennae called pore plates to smell. This structure is a thin layer of cells that covers a number of sensory units consisting of dendrite bundles. These and other olfactory organs on the head of the larva can identify CO2 and plant volatiles. They've also been found to push their heads into the walls of their burrows and probe with their antennae, likely to taste the soil with bristle-like sensilla.[8]
Pest control and history
[edit]
Middle Ages
[edit]In the Middle Ages, pest control was rare, and people had no effective means to protect their harvest. This gave rise to events that seem bizarre from a modern perspective. In 1320, for instance, cockchafers were brought to court in Avignon and sentenced to withdraw within three days onto a specially designated area, otherwise they would be outlawed. Subsequently, since they failed to comply, they were collected and killed. Similar animal trials also occurred for many other animals in the Middle Ages.[13]
19th century
[edit]Both the grubs and adults have a voracious appetite and thus have been and sometimes continue to be a major problem in agriculture and forestry. In the pre-industrialised era, the main mechanism to control their numbers was to collect and kill the adult beetles, thereby interrupting the cycle. They were once very abundant: in 1911, more than 20 million individuals were collected in 18 km2 of forest.[1] Collecting adults was an only moderately successful method.
In some areas and times, cockchafers were served as food. A 19th-century recipe from France for cockchafer soup reads: "roast one pound of cockchafers without wings and legs in sizzling butter, then cook them in a chicken soup, add some veal liver and serve with chives on a toast". A German newspaper from Fulda from the 1920s tells of students eating sugar-coated cockchafers. Cockchafer larvae can also be fried or cooked over open flames, although they require some preparation by soaking in vinegar in order to purge them of soil in their digestive tracts.[14] A cockchafer stew is referred to in W. G. Sebald's novel The Emigrants.
In Sweden the peasants looked upon the grub of the cockchafer as furnishing an unfailing prognostic whether the ensuing winter will be mild or severe; if the animal has a bluish hue (a circumstance which arises from its being replete with food), they affirm it will be mild, but if it is white, the weather will be severe: and they carry this so far as to foretell, that if the anterior be white and the posterior blue, the cold will be most severe at the beginning of the winter. Hence they call this grub Bemärkelse-mask—prognostic worm.[15]
Modern times
[edit]Only with the modernisation of agriculture in the 20th century and the invention of chemical pesticides did it become possible to effectively combat the cockchafer. Combined with the transformation of many pastures into agricultural land, this has resulted in a decrease of the cockchafer to near-extinction in some areas in Europe in the 1970s.
Since the 1970s, agriculture has generally reduced its use of pesticides. Because of environmental and public health concerns (pesticides may enter the food chain and thus also the human body) many chemical pesticides have been phased out in the European Union and worldwide. In recent years, the cockchafer's numbers have been increasing again, causing damage to agricultural use of over 1,000 square kilometres (400 sq mi) of land all over Europe (0.001% of land).
Due to legal provisions from the European Union for the sustainable use of pesticides, aerial treatment, which had been used to successfully control M. melolontha populations, is now banned.[16] Light traps have been successful in attracting M. melolontha adults, particularly males, when put at height (4 m). If a peak swarming time can be identified, shaking isolated trees and collecting feeding adults can reduce population, though it is time consuming.[16] Azadirachtin is a chemical that inhibits maturation feeding and egg development, but low persistence and difficulty spraying it high enough in trees prevents widespread use.[16] Soil tilling has been a historically successful method, particularly in early June when larvae are first hatching.[17] Pre-cropping is also a promising possibility, with buckwheat being of particular interest because it can reduce grub weight and population density before the crop of interest is planted.[16] Sex pheromones have been used for mass trapping, mating disruption, and "Attract and Kill" methods. The unlikelihood of developing resistance due to the sex pheromones being produced by the beetles makes this a promising method of pest control.[5]
Entomopathogens
[edit]Entomopathogenic organisms—organisms that produce disease in insects—are an active area of research for the control of M. melolontha grub populations.[18] Entomopathogenic fungi is currently being studied as a way to control M. melolontha grub populations. Beauveria brongniartii has been found to work on the Melolontha species, and B. bassiana has been successful with other agricultural pests. There have been difficulties with determining the best strategy to apply the fungi to the fields.[18] Entomopathogenic nematodes have been found to be particularly successful ways of reducing populations, particularly when larvae are in the first and second stage.[17] entomopathogenic bacteria from the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis are also being investigated, but they have been difficult to apply to fields as opposed to laboratory settings.[19] The focus on entomopathogenic bacteria has been on their symbiosis with entomopathogenic nematodes and their ability to act together as a larval control strategy.[17] Poor results with the application of these methods have stemmed intensive research into the gut enzymes and microbiome of M. melolontha to determine if they are acting as defense against entomopathogenic organisms.[19]
Intestinal components and microbiome
[edit]The gut enzymes and microbiota of M. melolontha larvae allow them to exploit a variety of ecological niches unique to their phylogenetic family. These are low energy foods such as grass roots and rotting organic matter in the soil.[20] There are two major compartments in the scarabaeid larvae intestinal tract. The first is a tubular midgut that secretes hydrolytic enzymes for macromolecule breakdown, and the second is a bulbous hindgut used for fermentation. High bacterial diversity between individuals of M. melolontha in the intestinal tract reflects the diversity of food sources.[21]
In the midgut, glucose is broken down and absorbed by the epithelium. It has been shown that proteolytic breakdown of toxins is a common resistance mechanism for agricultural pests.[19] Proteolytic activity of enzymes in the midgut is hypothesised to increase resistance to entomopathogenic bacteria in the beetle larvae. Trypsin-like enzymes from the midgut of M. melolontha have been found to break down certain bacterial toxins and inactivate them.[19]
The hindgut has a high density of bacteria that ferment recalcitrant residues such as cellulose, with the byproducts being absorbed by the beetle.[21] Acetate is a major product of this fermentation, suggesting that much of the bacteria in the hindgut is homoacetogenic. High abundance of species in the bacterial genus Desulfovibrio in the hindgut suggests that sulphate reduction is an important process, but the source of this sulphate in the diet is unknown.[21]
Some research on the M. melolontha microbiome has been focused on increasing the entomopathogenic properties of nematodes used as pest control due to their symbiosis.[20] Bacteria such as Xenorhabdus nematophila are transported by nematodes and released into the insect's midgut. The bacteria will release lytic enzymes and other antimicrobial substances to decrease competition from the beetle's native microbiome. This creates an optimal environment for nematode development. Bacterial species in the midgut of M. melolontha such as Pseudomonas chlororaphis have been found to fight back, acting as antagonists to entomopathogenic bacteria. These bacteria have been identified differentially in different larval stages, with P. chlororaphis usually being found in the third and final larval stage.[20]
Ecological impact
[edit]Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and plant type have a considerable impact on the existence and behaviour of cockchafers in wooded environments. It indicates that cockchafer populations are strongly influenced by climatic conditions, with warmer temperatures and higher humidity level favouring their occurrence. Additionally, specific vegetation types, including deciduous trees and shrubs, provide suitable habitats for cockchafers, facilitating their survival and reproduction within forest stands.[11]
Etymology
[edit]The name "cockchafer"[22] derives from the late-17th-century usage of "cock"[23] (in the sense of expressing size or vigour) + "chafer"[24] which simply means an insect of this type, referring to its propensity for gnawing and damaging plants. The term "chafer" has its root in Old English ceafor or cefer, of Germanic origin and is related to the Dutch kever, all of which mean "gnawer" as it relates to the jaw. As such, the name "cockchafer" can be understood to mean "large plant-gnawing beetle" and is applicable to its history as a pest animal.
In culture
[edit]Children since antiquity have played with cockchafers. In ancient Greece, boys caught the insect, tied a linen thread to its feet and set it free, amusing themselves to watch it fly in spirals. English boys in Victorian times played a very similar game by sticking a pin through one of its wings.[25] Nikola Tesla recalls that as a child he made one of his first "inventions", an "engine" made by harnessing four cockchafers in this fashion.[26]
Cockchafers appear in the fairy tales "Thumbelina" by Hans Christian Andersen and "Princess Rosette" by Madame d'Aulnoy.

The cockchafer is featured in a German children's song similar to the English Ladybird, Ladybird:
|
Maikäfer, flieg! |
Cockchafer, fly! |
The verse dates back to the Thirty Years' War in the first half of the 17th century, in which Pomerania was pillaged and suffered heavily. Since World War II, it is associated in Germany with the closing months of that war as well, when Soviet troops advanced into eastern Germany.
According to one source, the dumbledore in Thomas Hardy's 1899 poem An August Midnight[27] is a cockchafer.[28] However, in his novel The Mayor of Casterbridge, Hardy uses the dialect word dumbledore to mean a bumble bee.[29]

There have been four Royal Navy ships named HMS Cockchafer.
See also
[edit]- Red-headed cockchafer, native to Australia
Explanatory notes
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c "Common Cockchafer". Bug Life.
- ^ Marren, Peter; Mabey, Richard (2010). Bugs Britannica. Chatto & Windus. ISBN 978-0-7011-8180-2.
- ^ "Cockchafer | insect". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
- ^ "7 things you never knew about the cockchafer". Discover Wildlife. 8 April 2014. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Huiting, H. F., Moraal, L. G., Griepink, F. C., & Ester, A. (2006), Biology, control and luring of the cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha: literature report on biology, life cycle and pest incidence, current control possibilities and pheromones, Praktijkonderzoek Plant & Omgeving
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d Reinecke, Andreas; Ruther, Joachim; Tolasch, Till; Francke, Wittko; Hilker, Monika (2002-06-01). "Alcoholism in cockchafers: orientation of male Melolontha melolontha towards green leaf alcohols". Naturwissenschaften. 89 (6): 265–269. Bibcode:2002NW.....89..265R. doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0314-2. ISSN 0028-1042. PMID 12146792. S2CID 25772038.
- ^ a b c d e f Reinecke, Andreas; Ruther, Joachim; Hilker, Monika (April 2005). "Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of Melolontha melolontha to saturated and unsaturated aliphatic alcohols". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 115 (1): 33–40. Bibcode:2005EEApp.115...33R. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00274.x. ISSN 0013-8703. S2CID 84471627.
- ^ a b c d Eilers, Elisabeth J.; Talarico, Giovanni; Hansson, Bill S.; Hilker, Monika; Reinecke, Andreas (2012-07-25). "Sensing the Underground – Ultrastructure and Function of Sensory Organs in Root-Feeding Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) Larvae". PLOS ONE. 7 (7) e41357. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...741357E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041357. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3405142. PMID 22848471.
- ^ a b Fraval, A. (1998). "HYPP Zoology".
- ^ "Melolontha melolontha (Linnaeus, 1758)". www.gbif.org. Retrieved 2024-03-21.
- ^ a b Marzena, Niemczyk (June 2017). "Effect of environmental factors on occurrence of cockchafers (Melolontha spp.) in forest stands".
- ^ Matsui, Kenji; Engelberth, Jurgen (2022-10-31). "Green Leaf Volatiles—The Forefront of Plant Responses Against Biotic Attack". Plant and Cell Physiology. 63 (10): 1378–1390. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcac117. ISSN 0032-0781. PMID 35934892.
- ^ Barton, K.: Verfluchte Kreaturen: Lichtenbergs "Proben seltsamen Aberglaubens" und die Logik der Hexen- und Insektenverfolgung im "Malleus Maleficarum", in Joost, U.; Neumann, A. (eds): Lichtenberg-Jahrbuch 2004, p. 11ff, Saarbrücken 2004 (SDV Saarländische Druckerei und Verlag), ISBN 3-930843-87-0. In German.
- ^ Cooking cockchafer with old-timey Europeans 11 February 2016 www.bugsfeed.com accessed 30 May 2021
- ^ De Geer, iv. 275–6. Kirb. and Sp. Introd., i. 33.
- ^ a b c d Malusá, Eligio; Tartanus, Małgorzata; Furmanczyk, Ewa M.; Łabanowska, Barbara H. (2020-12-01). "Holistic approach to control Melolontha spp. in organic strawberry plantations". Organic Agriculture. 10 (1): 13–22. Bibcode:2020OrgAg..10S..13M. doi:10.1007/s13165-020-00295-2. ISSN 1879-4246.
- ^ a b c Woreta, Danuta (2015-03-01). "Control of cockchafer Melolontha spp. grubs – a review of methods". Folia Forestalia Polonica. 57 (1): 33–41. doi:10.1515/ffp-2015-0005. ISSN 2199-5907.
- ^ a b Tartanus, Malgorzata; Furmanczyk, Ewa M.; Canfora, Loredana; Pinzari, Flavia; Tkaczuk, Cezary; Majchrowska-Safaryan, Anna; Malusá, Eligio (February 2021). "Biocontrol of Melolontha spp. Grubs in Organic Strawberry Plantations by Entomopathogenic Fungi as Affected by Environmental and Metabolic Factors and the Interaction with Soil Microbial Biodiversity". Insects. 12 (2): 127. doi:10.3390/insects12020127. ISSN 2075-4450. PMC 7912822. PMID 33540558.
- ^ a b c d Wagner, Wolfgang; Möhrlen, Frank; Schnetter, Wolfgang (July 2002). "Characterization of the proteolytic enzymes in the midgut of the European Cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)". Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 32 (7): 803–814. doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(01)00167-9. PMID 12044497.
- ^ a b c Skowronek, Marcin; Sajnaga, Ewa; Pleszczyńska, Małgorzata; Kazimierczak, Waldemar; Lis, Magdalena; Wiater, Adrian (2020-01-16). "Bacteria from the Midgut of Common Cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha L.) Larvae Exhibiting Antagonistic Activity Against Bacterial Symbionts of Entomopathogenic Nematodes: Isolation and Molecular Identification". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21 (2): 580. doi:10.3390/ijms21020580. ISSN 1422-0067. PMC 7013910. PMID 31963214.
- ^ a b c Egert, Markus; Stingl, Ulrich; Dyhrberg Bruun, Lars; Pommerenke, Bianca; Brune, Andreas; Friedrich, Michael W. (August 2005). "Structure and Topology of Microbial Communities in the Major Gut Compartments of Melolontha melolontha Larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71 (8): 4556–4566. Bibcode:2005ApEnM..71.4556E. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.8.4556-4566.2005. ISSN 0099-2240. PMC 1183286. PMID 16085849.
- ^ cockchafer (n.) www.etymonline.com accessed 30 May 2021
- ^ cock (n.1) www.etymonline.com accessed 30 May 2021
- ^ chafer (n.) www.etymonline.com accessed 30 May 2021
- ^ Martin, William (1866). "Peter Parley's annual: A Christmas and New Year's present for young people". Retrieved 2017-05-27.
- ^ Tesla, Nikola (1919). "My Inventions". Electrical Experimenter. Retrieved 2023-03-29.--
- ^ Collected poems of Thomas Hardy, 1923, p154
- ^ Brown, Joanna Cullen, Review of Thomas Hardy: Cent Poèmes. Anthologie bilingue (Les Editions de L'Aire, Vevey, 2008) by Eric Christen, Françoise Baud, The Hardy Society Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Autumn 2008), pp. 87
- ^ Cook, John D. (22 September 2011). "Thomas Hardy and Harry Potter". www.johndcook.com. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
External links
[edit]- Der Maikäfer Archived 2004-06-09 at the Wayback Machine, from the Senckenberg Museum in Frankfurt (in German)
Cockchafer
View on GrokipediaTaxonomy and Systematics
Principal Species and Variants
The genus Melolontha, within the family Scarabaeidae, encompasses around 20 species of beetles commonly referred to as cockchafers, though the term principally denotes the European species Melolontha melolontha (common cockchafer) and Melolontha hippocastani (forest cockchafer).[8] These two represent the primary species of economic and ecological significance in Europe due to their larval root-feeding habits that can damage forests and agriculture.[9] M. melolontha is characterized by a body length of 20-30 mm, light brown coloration, and a slender pygidium, distinguishing it from M. hippocastani, which has a shorter, knob-shaped pygidium.[10] M. melolontha, described by Linnaeus in 1758, is the archetypal cockchafer, widespread across temperate Europe where it emerges in May and June, feeding on tree foliage as adults.[3] Its larvae, known as white grubs, develop over 3-4 years in soil, consuming organic matter and plant roots.[5] In contrast, M. hippocastani, named by Fabricius in 1801, has a similar life cycle but prefers forest habitats and is noted for outbreaks damaging broadleaf trees.[11] A third European species, Melolontha pectoralis, exists but is less commonly associated with the cockchafer designation and has restricted distribution.[12] No subspecies are recognized for M. melolontha, with morphological variation limited to regional color and size differences attributable to environmental factors rather than genetic divergence.[13] Recent taxonomic additions, such as Melolontha arunachalensis and Melolontha lachungensis described in 2023 from India, expand the genus but do not alter the focus on European principals for cockchafer references.[14]Morphology
Adult Form
The adult cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha, measures 20-34 mm in length, exhibiting a robust, convex body with a heavy-set appearance.[8][15] The head is dark, often black, and the pronotum is shiny black, covered in short, closely set hairs.[13] The elytra are reddish-brown or dull brown, ribbed, and the abdomen is blackish dorsally.[3][16] Legs are reddish, adapted for walking, while the antennae are lamellate, forming a fan-like structure with males possessing seven terminal segments (lamellae) and females six, aiding in pheromone detection during mating.[3] Ventrally, the body features fine, short pubescence, denser on the thorax sides and abdomen.[1] The overall coloration and pubescence provide camouflage among foliage where adults aggregate.[13]Larval Form
The larvae of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), commonly called grubs, exhibit a characteristic C-shaped posture typical of scarab beetle larvae. They possess a soft, creamy-white to dull white body, a hardened brown head capsule equipped with strong mandibles for root feeding, and three pairs of well-developed thoracic legs that are often yellowish and hairy.[17] [4] The body lacks prolegs, and the raster (anal plate) features two rows of short spines arranged in a V-pattern, aiding identification from similar species.[13] Development proceeds through three instars over 3 to 4 years in the soil, with first-instar larvae hatching at approximately 5-6 mm in length after a 4- to 6-week egg stage.[13] [17] Subsequent molts occur in late summer or autumn, with second- and third-instar grubs growing progressively larger, reaching 40-45 mm by maturity; third instars dominate the damage phase due to their size and feeding intensity.[4] Overwintering happens 2-3 times, with grubs burrowing deeper (up to 1 meter) in colder periods to avoid freezing, resuming activity in spring when soil temperatures rise above 10°C.[17] [13] Grubs primarily feed on decaying organic matter and live roots in the upper soil layers (0-20 cm initially, deeper later), targeting grasses, clover, cereals, and crop seedlings, which can lead to turf wilting and plant death at high densities (e.g., >20 grubs per square meter).[17] Early instars detect roots via carbon dioxide gradients, preferring fine feeder roots, while later stages consume coarser structures, contributing to agricultural losses estimated at significant pasture degradation in outbreak years.[13] Prior to pupation in late summer of the final year, mature grubs cease feeding and form an earthen cell at 20-50 cm depth.[4]Distribution and Habitat Preferences
Geographic Range
The common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) is native to Europe, where it occurs widely across temperate regions suitable for its soil-dwelling larvae. Its distribution spans from the British Isles and Iberian Peninsula in the west to the Ural Mountains in the east, and from southern Scandinavia southward to the northern Mediterranean basin, including countries such as France, Germany, Austria, Poland, and Turkey.[2][18] This range aligns with Palaearctic patterns for the genus Melolontha, though M. melolontha predominates in European arable and forested landscapes.[1] Populations exhibit synchronized outbreaks in Central Europe, with documented infestations tied to historical agricultural monitoring since the 19th century, reflecting stable endemic presence rather than recent expansions. No verified established populations exist outside Europe, despite occasional misidentifications with similar scarab beetles like North American June bugs (Phyllophaga spp.).[2] The species' range limits are influenced by climatic factors, with absences in extreme northern or arid southern zones due to unsuitable overwintering conditions for larvae at depths of 20–100 cm.[19]Environmental Conditions
The common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) inhabits temperate regions characterized by mild climatic conditions, particularly valley floors where temperatures are favorable for development.[20] Larvae develop in soft, shaded soils with adequate moisture, often in agricultural grasslands or forest edges, where soil structure supports burrowing and root access.[13] Adults emerge from the soil in late spring, typically after the cumulative mean daily air temperature exceeds 355 degree-days, signaling warming conditions above approximately 10–15°C.[21] [18] Soil pH influences grub abundance, with populations observed in acidic conditions (pH 4.5–5.0) and a positive correlation between higher pH values (measured in water or CaCl₂) and grub density in some forest stands.[22] Preferred soils are typically loamy or sandy, providing drainage while retaining moisture essential for larval survival and oviposition; dense shrub layers reduce egg cluster density by limiting access.[23] Optimal larval growth occurs at soil temperatures of 20–25°C, with development slowing below 15°C.[24] Humidity and proximity to open spaces also affect occurrence, with edge effects enhancing grub presence in forest habitats.[25]Life Cycle
Developmental Phases
The cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) exhibits holometabolous development, progressing through egg, larval, pupal, and adult stages over a 3- to 4-year cycle synchronized across populations in infested areas.[26][2] Approximately 98% of the life cycle occurs underground as egg, larva, or pupa.[26] Egg stage. Females deposit 60-80 oval eggs (initially 2 mm long, swelling to 3 mm via water absorption) in soil batches of 10-30 at depths of 5-20 cm, primarily in May to June.[17] Eggs hatch after 4-6 weeks into first-instar larvae, with embryonic development influenced by soil temperature and moisture.[27][13] Larval stage. Hatched larvae (L1 instar) are C-shaped, whitish grubs 5-10 mm long with brown heads and strong mandibles, initially feeding on soil organic matter before targeting plant roots.[17] Three instars occur over 3-4 years: L1 grows to 10-20 mm by first autumn; L2 to 30-35 mm by second autumn; L3 reaches 40-46 mm by third spring, burrowing deeper (up to 1 m) and causing root damage.[17] Larvae overwinter 2-3 times, resuming activity in spring when soil warms above 10°C.[13] Pupal stage. In late spring or early summer of the final year, third-instar larvae form earthen cells 20-30 cm deep and pupate; the pupa measures 25-35 mm, initially whitish turning reddish-brown.[17] This stage lasts 1.5-2 months under optimal conditions (soil temperature 15-20°C), though it may extend to 10 months during drought or cold.[1] Pupae remain immobile and vulnerable to soil disturbance. Adult stage. New adults (25-30 mm long) eclose in summer but remain in pupal cells until the following spring (April-May), emerging en masse when soil reaches 12-15°C for swarming flights.[28] Adults live 4-8 weeks, feeding minimally on foliage while prioritizing reproduction; post-oviposition, they die, completing the cycle.[18]Reproductive Processes
Adult Melolontha melolontha engage in mating shortly after emergence in late April to May, with peak activity in late May to early June. Males undertake swarming flights in the evening, orienting toward females in the tree canopy via detection of sex pheromones emitted by females and synergized with green leaf volatiles (such as (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol) released from foliage damaged by female feeding.[13][29] These cues enable males' large antennae to locate receptive females, facilitating copulation primarily among branches.[13] Internal fertilization occurs during this period, after which males cease flying and die within weeks, while females persist briefly for oviposition.[13] Post-mating, gravid females descend at dusk to suitable ground sites, burrowing 10-20 cm into soft, moist soils—preferentially sandy or loamy with adequate humidity—to deposit eggs.[13] Eggs, pearly white and spherical at 2-3 mm diameter, are laid in batches of 12-30, often in clusters within a small cavity that the female then covers.[1] Oviposition typically spans one or two phases separated by about two weeks, influenced by soil conditions and female endocrine responses to environmental factors like temperature and moisture.[13] Each female produces 40-100 eggs total across depositions, though actual fecundity varies with habitat quality.[23] Hatching occurs after 4-6 weeks under favorable conditions (soil temperature 10-15°C), yielding C-shaped larvae that initiate the subterranean phase.[13]Feeding Ecology
Larval Feeding
The larvae of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), commonly referred to as white grubs, are C-shaped, subterranean feeders that primarily consume live plant roots rather than decaying organic matter.[13] They exhibit polyphagous and largely indiscriminate feeding, gnawing on small fibrous roots of grasses, grains, beets, trees, clover, dandelions, meadow herbs, fruit trees, forest trees, and vines.[13][18] Younger instars (10-20 mm in length) initially target finer roots during the first autumn after hatching, while larger second- and third-instar grubs (up to 40-46 mm) progress to thicker roots, escalating consumption intensity.[17][18] Feeding occurs actively from mid-April to October in the second year of the larval stage, with grubs burrowing through soil at depths of 0-20 cm during the growing season and up to 60 cm during winter hibernation; they can relocate up to 30 cm per day while foraging on rootlets.[13][18] Juveniles acquire symbiotic gut bacteria for cellulose digestion by ingesting parental excrement shortly after hatching, enabling efficient breakdown of root tissues.[13] This prolonged root herbivory, spanning 3-4 years across three instars, severs vascular tissues, impairs water and nutrient uptake, and causes retarded growth, wilting, or death in affected plants, with peak damage often manifesting in the year following adult swarming.[18][17] In agricultural contexts, dense populations can devastate grasslands, cereals, and orchards by depleting root systems, weakening trees, and leading to crop failure.[13][17]Adult Consumption
Adult cockchafers (Melolontha melolontha) primarily feed on the leaves and flowers of deciduous trees and shrubs during their brief adult phase in late spring. Preferred host plants include oak (Quercus spp.), beech (Fagus sylvatica), maple (Acer spp.), sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa), plum (Prunus domestica), walnut (Juglans spp.), and other fruit trees, with occasional consumption of larch (Larix spp.) needles and vine leaves.[3][17][18] Feeding behavior involves chewing irregular holes or skeletonizing leaves, typically at dusk or night, though damage remains limited compared to larval root feeding due to the adults' short lifespan of 4-6 weeks and relatively low population densities. In regions like the UK, adult defoliation rarely reaches destructive levels, affecting canopy but not threatening tree health.[3][4] Experimental studies indicate that food source quality influences adult survival, weight gain, and fecundity; oak and beech leaves support higher relative weight gains and longer lifespans than lower-quality options like pine needles, with females showing greater sensitivity to diet variations. For instance, adults fed European larch needles exhibited intermediate weight gains relative to those on deciduous foliage.[30][31]Behavioral Patterns
Swarming and Mating
Adult cockchafers (Melolontha melolontha) emerge from the soil in spring, typically from late April to early June in Central Europe, initiating a brief adult phase lasting 4–6 weeks focused on reproduction.[2] Males exhibit pronounced swarming behavior, forming aggregations and engaging in mass flights primarily at dusk, often near forest edges, tree canopies, and open meadows, with activity peaking in calm, warm conditions above 15°C.00835-5) [32] These flights can extend up to 2–3 km from emergence sites, driven by orientation toward host plants rather than random dispersal.[2] Swarming is male-biased, with females remaining largely stationary on foliage to feed on oak, beech, and other deciduous leaves, minimizing their flight activity post-emergence.[33] [34] Male attraction relies on a multimodal cue system: feeding by females induces emission of green leaf volatiles (GLVs) from damaged foliage, such as (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, functioning as a kairomone that simulates host plant signals and draws swarming males.[29] [33] Toluquinone, a compound potentially released from female defensive glands, further enhances this as a sex-specific attractant, eliciting oriented landings and upwind flight in field assays.[29] While some observations suggest supplementary female pheromones during feeding, empirical evidence prioritizes plant-derived volatiles over volatile pheromones for primary mate location.00835-5) Upon arrival at aggregation sites, males perform courtship displays, including wing fanning and tactile interactions, before copulation on leaves or branches; mating duration is typically short, lasting minutes, after which males may seek additional partners.[29] Females, having mated once or multiply, cease feeding soon after and descend to soil for oviposition, depositing 20–30 eggs in clusters 5–20 cm deep in moist, humus-rich substrates, though this marks the transition from mating to egg-laying.[34] Swarming intensity correlates with population density, with historical outbreaks in Europe documenting flights numbering thousands per hectare, amplifying defoliation risks during peak activity.[35]Dispersal Mechanisms
The primary dispersal mechanism of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) is active flight by adults, which emerge from soil pupal chambers in spring and take to the air primarily during evening hours to seek mates, foliage for feeding, and suitable oviposition sites.[2] Flight occurs in swarms, producing a distinctive loud buzzing noise from rapid wing beats, facilitating aggregation along forest edges or open areas.[1] This behavior enables short-range relocation, with adults typically covering distances of up to 2-3 kilometers from emergence points before settling.[2] [36] Larval stages exhibit negligible active dispersal, limited to crawling within the upper soil layers over distances of mere centimeters to meters during feeding or vertical migration for overwintering.[1] Eggs are laid in clusters near adult aggregation sites, relying on parental mobility rather than independent larval spread. Passive transport via soil movement or animal activity occurs rarely and does not significantly contribute to population expansion.[2] Genetic analyses reveal moderate gene flow across populations, implying occasional dispersal events exceeding typical flight ranges, possibly aided by wind or human-mediated soil translocation, though direct evidence remains sparse.[37] Overall, the species' limited mobility restricts outbreak propagation to local scales, with synchronized life cycles amplifying densities in favorable habitats without widespread migration.[38]