Hubbry Logo
Colored smokeColored smokeMain
Open search
Colored smoke
Community hub
Colored smoke
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Colored smoke
Colored smoke
Colored smoke
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Colored smoke is a kind of smoke created by an aerosol of small particles of a suitable pigment or dye.

Red Arrows air display team
A U.S. Navy parachutist at the 2005 X Games
Red smoke carried by a landing parachutist of the UK Lightning Bolts Army Parachute Display Team

Colored smoke can be used for smoke signals, often in a military context. It can be produced by smoke grenades, or by various other pyrotechnical devices. The mixture used for producing colored smoke is usually a cooler-burning formula based on potassium chlorate oxidizer, lactose or dextrin as a fuel, and one or more dyes, with about 40-50% content of the dye. About 2% sodium bicarbonate may be added as a coolant, to lower the burning temperature. Coloured smoke was first used in 1967 during an American burnout competition by a small contestant, as a means to wow the crowd.[citation needed]

Smoke released from aircraft was originally based on a mixture of 10-15% dye, 60-65% trichloroethylene or tetrachloroethylene, and 25% diesel oil, injected into the exhaust gases of the aircraft engines. Most commonly, teams now use specifically prepared liquid dyes and only gas oil, light mineral oil or a food grade white oil without harmful chlorinated solvents.

Mixtures

[edit]

Some mixtures used for production of colored smokes contain these dyes:

Red
Orange
Yellow
Green
Blue
Violet
Raspberry

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Colored smoke

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Colored smoke is a visible produced by the of specialized pyrotechnic compositions that incorporate organic , which are vaporized by and condense into fine particles capable of to create distinct colors such as , , , violet, and . These compositions typically consist of an oxidizer (like ), a (such as or ), the itself, and often a cooling agent (e.g., or magnesium carbonate) to minimize dye decomposition during burning. The process generates smoke where 90-95% of the dye remains intact, attaching to gaseous byproducts to form the colored cloud, though 5-10% may break down into potentially hazardous compounds like polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. In military applications, colored smoke serves as a signaling and marking tool, deployed via grenades or cartridges to identify positions, obscure movements, or simulate chemical agents in exercises, with formulations optimized for reliability in various colors. Civilian uses include daytime fireworks displays, where it provides vibrant without relying on light emission; and shows for atmospheric lighting; and or events to enhance scenic backdrops. Traditional recipes, reliant on chlorinated oxidizers, have raised toxicity concerns due to carcinogenic byproducts like , prompting development of safer alternatives using nitrogen-rich compounds such as guanidinium-5,5'-azotetrazolate paired with dyes to achieve similar color intensity without .

Fundamentals

Definition and properties

Colored smoke is a visible formed by the suspension of fine particles or droplets containing pigments or dyes, which scatter and selectively absorb visible to produce distinct colors, setting it apart from colored flames that arise from excited gas emissions or colored gases that consist of molecular vapors without particulate matter. This nature allows the smoke to remain suspended in air for , primarily through mechanisms. The particles in colored smoke typically range in size from 0.1 to a few microns, with an average mass median of approximately 1 micron, which is optimal for visibility via the —the scattering of light by particles comparable in size to the wavelength of visible light (around 0.4–0.7 microns). Other key properties include the duration of the colored emission, which generally persists for seconds to several minutes depending on the generation method and ambient conditions; density, often achieving concentrations of 1,000–18,000 mg/m³ for effective obscuration or signaling; and dispersion patterns that form stable, slowly settling plumes due to the fine and low settling velocity, enabling controlled spread in wind or still air. In contrast to white smoke, which scatters all visible wavelengths roughly equally to appear neutral or grayish, colored smoke derives its hue from chromophores within the dyes that absorb specific wavelengths, allowing the scattered light of complementary colors to dominate the observed appearance—for instance, a red dye absorbs green-blue light, enhancing red scattering. A broad spectrum of colors is achievable, including red, green, blue, yellow, and purple, by tailoring the dyes to target different absorption bands across the visible range (400–700 nm).

Chemical mechanisms

The production of colored smoke primarily relies on the or of pyrotechnic mixtures that generate sufficient to sublime volatile organic dyes, such as azo compounds, into vapor form. These vapors then condense into fine particles upon cooling in the atmosphere, forming colored particulates that mix with the white generated from the primary reaction. The core mechanism involves an that volatilizes the dyes without complete , allowing them to deposit onto smoke aerosols or exist as independent colored particles. Oxidizers, such as (KClO₃), supply oxygen to sustain the reaction, while fuels like sugars (e.g., or ) provide the combustible material to generate and gaseous products. This combination enables a controlled, smoldering process that avoids an open flame, often moderated by coolants or flame retardants to maintain temperatures suitable for sublimation without . The reaction produces , , , and other gases that form the smoke base, into which the vapors integrate. The color in the smoke arises from the interaction of visible with the dye molecules in the particles, primarily through selective absorption of specific wavelengths and , which enhances visibility. For instance, azo dyes, such as those used for red smoke, absorb in the green-blue (around 450-550 nm), reflecting or transmitting red wavelengths to produce the observed hue. A simplified representation of the basic smoke generation process is: KClO3+C12H22O11 (dye)→heat+gases (e.g., CO2,H2O)+colored vapor→aerosol particles\text{KClO}_3 + \text{C}_{12}\text{H}_{22}\text{O}_{11} \ (dye) \rightarrow \text{heat} + \text{gases (e.g., CO}_2, \text{H}_2\text{O)} + \text{colored vapor} \rightarrow \text{aerosol particles} This exothermic decomposition releases energy to sublime the dye, which then condenses. Color stability is influenced by temperature thresholds, typically 200-500°C for effective dye sublimation, above which dyes may decompose, and by particle aggregation, which can alter optical properties and lead to faster settling or color fading through coagulation. Maintaining optimal particle size prevents excessive clumping, preserving the uniform dispersion and vibrancy of the smoke cloud.

Production methods

Pyrotechnic formulations

Pyrotechnic formulations for colored smoke typically consist of an oxidizer, fuel, coolant or moderator, and a primary colorant in the form of a sublimable organic dye, often with a binder for structural integrity. A common base uses (KClO₃) as the oxidizer at 20-35% by mass, providing oxygen for combustion while generating heat to vaporize the dye. Fuels such as , dextrose, , or comprise 15-25%, serving to sustain the burn at controlled temperatures around 100-300°C to minimize flame and maximize smoke density. Coolants like (8-18%) help regulate the reaction by decomposing to produce , which aids in smoke dispersion and prevents excessive heat that could degrade the dye. Binders, including or polymers (1-2%), ensure cohesion during casting or pressing into devices. Color-specific additives are organic dyes selected for their ability to sublimate into fine particles that condense in the air to form visible colored aerosols, typically incorporated at 27-40% by weight. For smoke, dyes such as Smoke Yellow 6 are used, producing bright hues through stable vaporization. Violet smoke employs anthraquinone-based dyes like 1,4-diaminoanthraquinone, which yield deep tones when combined with the base mixture. formulations often include a blend with Solvent Green 3 (62%), while smoke relies on 1-methylaminoanthraquinone (Disperse Red 9) at around 40%. These dyes are chosen for their low melting points (typically 150-250°C) and high sublimation efficiency, ensuring prolonged smoke output without charring. Proportions of dye (5-40% depending on intensity) are optimized to balance color vividness and , with tested via measurements and chromatic under standardized conditions. Preparation of these formulations emphasizes and uniformity to achieve consistent burning. Ingredients are first weighed precisely and ground to fine powders (particle sizes of 10-100 µm for oxidizer and fuel) using non-sparking mills to prevent accidental ignition. Dry mixing occurs in inert atmospheres, such as under , to avoid moisture absorption or premature reactions, followed by incorporation of the and binder. For solvent-based methods, 0.2-0.3 /kg of acetone is added to form a dough-like paste, which is then dried at 60°C for 24-36 hours, ground again, and granulated or pelletized for even . Polymer-bonded variants involve mixing of with additives at 60°C, into molds, and curing for 5 days to yield solid charges with tensile strengths above 700 kPa. of dyes prior to mixing, using compactors and separators, ensures uniform distribution and prevents clumping during burning. Variations in formulations allow for adjustments in smoke intensity and duration, such as slow-burn mixtures for sustained output versus burst types for rapid deployment. Slow-burn compositions target rates of 0.1-0.5 cm/min, achieved by finer particle sizes and higher coolant content (up to 19% sodium bicarbonate), while burst formulations use coarser oxidizer (22-25% KClO₃) and sulfur or lactose fuels (4-13%) for rates up to 2.0 cm/min. Efficacy is evaluated through burning rate, smoke obscuration (optical density >1.0), and color fastness, ensuring the formulation meets operational standards without excessive residue. Historical mixtures, like those in early grenades, integrated sulfur (fuel) with potassium chlorate and bicarbonate at similar ratios, expanded through testing for dye stability and environmental release.

Non-pyrotechnic alternatives

Liquid methods generate colored smoke by vaporizing carrier fluids infused with dyes through nebulizers or specialized fog systems, avoiding entirely. In aerobatic applications, smoke oils composed of bases blended with solvent-soluble liquid dyes are atomized and heated indirectly via exhaust or electric elements to produce vivid, continuous colored plumes in red, blue, green, or other hues. These formulations use non-toxic, high-solubility dyes to ensure even dispersion and color stability during flight. In theatrical settings, glycol-based fluids can incorporate food-grade pigments for subtle tinting in low-heat vaporizers, though standard practice limits dye addition to prevent equipment damage, opting instead for clear fluids. Dry powder dispersions create colored smoke effects by mechanically propelling fine, pre-colored particles into the air using systems, such as pneumatic cannons or blowers. Materials like , cornstarch, or silica particles coated with inert pigments (e.g., dioxide-based colors) are loaded into reservoirs and released at controlled pressures to form dense, particulate clouds mimicking . This technique is common in events and , where 50-100 grams of can yield a visible burst covering several meters. Emerging technologies expand non-pyrotechnic options, including LED-illuminated white smoke, where neutral fog from glycol or oil vaporizers is directed through programmable LED arrays to simulate colors via light scattering. White smoke particles reflect RGB wavelengths, producing apparent hues like or orange without physical dyes, ideal for dynamic stage effects. Chemical foggers represent another advancement, employing reactions of metal alkoxides or chlorides (e.g., vanadium oxytrichloride) with atmospheric moisture to form colored oxide particulates, such as orange vanadium pentoxide aerosols, dispersed via . For white bases, fog from ammonia-hydrogen chloride reactions can theoretically incorporate dispersed dyes, though practical colored variants remain experimental. These alternatives offer enhanced , allowing precise adjustment of output volume and direction through variable pumps or valves, and eliminate generation, minimizing hazards compared to traditional pyrotechnic bases. A typical theatrical setup might use a delivering 20-50 psi to atomize fluids or propel powders, enabling on-demand bursts for performances. However, they often exhibit shorter durations, with clouds dissipating in 10-30 seconds due to rapid or , limiting sustained effects relative to methods.

Historical development

Early inventions

In non-Western contexts, early pyrotechnic innovations in during the laid foundational groundwork for later colored effects, as alchemists developed gunpowder-based initially for ceremonial and warding purposes, though vivid hues from dyes or salts emerged centuries later. These rudimentary explosive devices, combining saltpeter, , and , represented an initial exploration of smoke and fire manipulation that influenced global . In , during the 1300s, pyrotechnicians discovered methods to produce colored smoke in using chemical additives. The marked significant milestones in with the advent of synthetic dyes, enabling experiments in colored smoke signals by chemists seeking aids. dyes, first isolated in the 1820s and synthesized commercially by in 1856 with , allowed for stable pigmentation that could be incorporated into smoke-producing mixtures, building on earlier attempts from the . By the late , these innovations culminated in initial military applications of pyrotechnic principles, though widespread adoption of colored smoke for signaling occurred later.

20th-century advancements

During , advancements in smoke technology were spurred by the need for screening and signaling on the battlefield. The precursor to modern (HC) smoke compositions was developed by Captain E.F. Berger, using a mixture of and to produce dense white smoke for obscuration, with initial deployment around 1916. By 1918, Allied forces, including British units, experimented with colored smoke signals, such as devices bursting into trails of yellow or purple smoke to mark positions or end barrages, marking an early adaptation for visual distinction beyond white screening smokes. In the , the U.S. Army's Service focused on refining colored smoke formulations for signaling, with patents and developments in incorporating anthraquinone-based dyes to achieve stable and hues in pyrotechnic mixtures. These dyes, such as 1,4-diaminoanthraquinone derivatives, were dispersed via combustion of or similar fuels, providing reliable color output for aerial spotting and ground communication, though production remained limited until wartime demands. World War II saw significant expansions in colored smoke technology, particularly by British forces, who introduced "smoke candle" devices in the early 1940s for persistent obscuration and marking. These candles generated long-lasting colored smokes in red, green, and yellow, enhancing tactical signaling during operations like air support coordination. Production scaled massively, with Allied factories manufacturing millions of smoke grenades and candles, including approximately 3.9 million M18 colored smoke units produced by the U.S. since introduction during WWII. Post-war, and declassified formulations facilitated a shift to applications, including adoption in commercial , where pyrotechnic companies adapted anthraquinone-dyed mixtures for safe, colorful displays at public events.

Applications

Military and signaling uses

Colored smoke grenades serve critical roles in signaling, enabling ground-to-air and ground-to-ground communication through prearranged color codes that convey tactical information. For instance, smoke often signals distress or enemy positions, indicates safe or friendly areas, while or violet may denote directional guidance, zones, or target marking, depending on operational orders. These signals are deployed via hand-thrown grenades like the M18 series, which produce visible plumes lasting 50-90 seconds and detectable up to 1,500 meters vertically, facilitating coordination with or adjacent units during or . In screening and deception operations, colored smoke generates dense clouds to obscure troop movements, equipment repositioning, or extraction maneuvers, enhancing survivability in contested environments. The M18 grenade, standard since the mid-20th century and widely adopted by forces through the 1970s for its reliable dissemination of , , , or violet smoke, exemplifies this application, creating obscuration volumes effective over short ranges while minimizing detection compared to white smoke. These formulations prioritize high visibility for allies alongside tactical concealment, with characteristics like color stability and cloud volume optimized for military efficacy. For training simulations, non-toxic colored smoke variants replicate conditions without health hazards, deployed through handheld pots, shells, or mortar rounds to simulate signaling and screening scenarios. Developments since the early , including replacements in M18 formulations, have reduced while maintaining performance, allowing safe use in exercises for marking simulated targets or obscuring mock advances. In modern conflicts of the , particularly , smoke has been used for visual identification in complex terrain, such as subterranean operations in Gaza where it aids in identifying entrances and other access points. Post-2000 applications in urban and irregular engagements leverage variants for rapid visual identification amid complex terrain, filling gaps in electronic signaling during close-quarters combat. As of 2025, military developments include deployment of smoke canisters for enhanced screening.

Civilian and entertainment uses

Colored smoke has become a popular tool in and to create atmospheric effects and enhance visual drama. Photographers often use smoke bombs to add vibrant backdrops and motion to portraits, weddings, and shoots, with cool-burning varieties allowing safe handheld use for up to 90 seconds of dense, colored clouds. In film and television, professional-grade smoke grenades produce controlled plumes in multiple colors, enabling effects like instant color walls or slow-building atmospheres. Music video creators frequently employ these for budget-friendly, non-toxic enhancements that simulate or add surreal elements without compromising air quality. In civilian events and festivals, colored smoke bombs are widely used for celebratory displays, particularly in gender reveal parties that gained traction in the , where pink or blue plumes dramatically announce the baby's sex during outdoor gatherings. At concerts and sports events, they integrate with to amplify visual spectacles, such as bursts of colored fog during performances, though often via safer CO2-based alternatives to comply with venue restrictions. Pyrotechnic shows, including daytime fireworks displays, incorporate colored smoke cakes and aerial shells for multicolored effects visible in bright conditions, as demonstrated in celebrations and public festivals, where regulations mandate licensed operators and prohibit use near flammable materials or in enclosed spaces. Industrial applications of smoke include temporary marking in , where smoke markers indicate for precise pesticide application and , ensuring even distribution across fields. In search-and-rescue operations, such as locating lost hikers, orange or other vivid smoke signals provide clear position markers visible from afar, aiding ground-to-air communication without relying on electronic devices. Since 2020, platforms have popularized colored smoke effects through , with trends showcasing creative setups and party enhancements that inspire amateur and professional uses alike.

Safety and environmental considerations

Health and handling risks

Colored smoke produced by pyrotechnic devices poses significant risks primarily due to fine particulates and chemical vapors generated during . Short-term exposure can lead to respiratory irritation, including coughing, throat discomfort, and , with heightened effects in individuals with pre-existing conditions such as or . These particulates, often in the range, can penetrate deep into the lungs, exacerbating and potentially impairing lung function. The dyes used in colored smoke formulations contribute to toxicity concerns, particularly older azo compounds that may release carcinogenic aromatic amines upon or environmental breakdown. Azo dyes have demonstrated genotoxic potential , with some exhibiting mutagenic and allergic properties that could provoke systemic reactions upon . smoke studies have highlighted inadequate data on long-term effects but noted moderate symptoms like and from low-level exposures to similar dye-laden smokes. Direct contact with colored smoke or its components can cause skin and eye hazards, ranging from chemical irritation to thermal burns during device ignition. Dyes such as benzanthrone derivatives are known photosensitizers that induce dermal toxicity, including rashes or allergic dermatitis upon prolonged exposure. Eye contact may result in tearing, redness, and temporary vision impairment due to irritant vapors, while hot pyrotechnic residues pose burn risks to unprotected skin. Safe handling of colored smoke devices requires adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols to minimize exposure. Operators should wear respirators or masks to filter particulates, nitrile gloves to prevent skin absorption, and safety goggles to shield eyes from irritants and sparks. Long-sleeved clothing and pants are recommended to cover skin, with operations conducted in well-ventilated outdoor areas to dilute airborne concentrations. Storage guidelines emphasize keeping devices in cool, dry environments away from moisture, heat sources, or ignition risks to prevent premature reactions or degradation. Acute incidents involving colored smoke exposure have been linked to respiratory distress in crowd settings, such as festivals or sporting events where are used. For instance, inhalation during indoor or enclosed pyrotechnic displays has triggered exacerbations, with emergency visits increasing due to irritant-induced flares similar to those observed in broader events. Such cases underscore the need for controlled dispersal to avoid high-concentration plumes affecting sensitive populations. Mitigation efforts since the early have focused on reformulating dyes to reduce impacts, including a transition toward water-soluble variants that minimize persistence and . These changes, implemented in some and commercial , aim to lower the release of persistent toxic amines while maintaining color efficacy, though ongoing assessments are recommended.

Regulatory and ecological impacts

The production and use of colored smoke are governed by stringent regulatory frameworks to address environmental hazards from persistent dyes and by-products. In the , regulation restricts the use of certain hazardous substances in , including azo dyes and other colorants that may release carcinogenic aromatic amines, requiring registration, evaluation, and authorization for high-risk chemicals. Similarly, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees fireworks chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act and classifies spent pyrotechnics as potentially under the (RCRA) if they exhibit characteristics like ignitability or from dyes and metals. Since the 1990s, bans on certain chlorinated compounds, such as , in pyrotechnic formulations have been implemented to prevent the formation of persistent organic pollutants like , a known produced during of chlorine donors like . Ecological impacts of colored smoke primarily stem from dye residues and particulates that contaminate and , leading to long-term disruption. Organic dyes volatilized in can deposit as residues, accumulating in sediments and , where they inhibit microbial activity and bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms, altering food webs. For example, studies on military smoke grenades have shown that anthraquinone-based dyes persist in environments, contributing to in water bodies and affecting and essential to aquatic health. , particularly birds, experiences disorientation and physiological stress from colored plumes, which reduce visibility and introduce fine particulates that irritate respiratory systems and exacerbate habitat avoidance during displays. Waste from spent pyrotechnics is managed as hazardous material under the , which regulates transboundary movements to prevent export to developing nations lacking proper disposal infrastructure, ensuring environmentally sound treatment to avoid further and . In the 2020s, regulatory pressures have spurred innovation toward biodegradable alternatives, with formulations replacing traditional dyes and oxidizers with non-toxic, nitrogen-rich compounds like guanidinium-5,5'-azotetrazolate combined with organic colorants, eliminating halogenated by-products and enhancing environmental safety. As of 2024, U.S. Department of Defense projects have advanced low-smoke, high-purity colored signal flares, while a 2023 study highlighted high toxicities of common military pyrotechnic dyes for inhalation and endocrine disruption, spurring further eco-friendly research. These developments align with broader efforts under programs like the U.S. Environmental Quality Technology Program to reduce perchlorate and heavy metal use in pyrotechnics. Additionally, colored smoke combustion contributes to climate change through CO2 emissions; U.S. fireworks displays alone release approximately 60,340 metric tons of CO2 annually, equivalent to the emissions from over 12,000 gasoline-powered vehicles for a year. Local spikes, such as a 17% increase in CO2 concentrations during major events, underscore the need for low-emission alternatives to mitigate greenhouse gas accumulation.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK224729/
  2. https://phys.org/news/2020-06-non-toxic-alternative.html
  3. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA003827.pdf
  4. https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-chemistry-flexbook-2.0/section/15.11/primary/lesson/colloids-chem/
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.202007489
  6. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140238258A1/en
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9331285/
  8. https://patents.google.com/patent/FR3117111A1/en
  9. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA637604.pdf
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK224724/
  11. https://novaspecialties.com/colored-aerobatic-smoke/
  12. https://www.bigclive.com/smoke.htm
  13. https://looksolutionsusa.com/how-to-make-colored-fog/
  14. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA158783.pdf
  15. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0704052.pdf
  16. https://www.npr.org/2024/07/04/nx-s1-5027826/fireworks-history-ancient-china-revolutionary-america
  17. https://www.wowstem.org/post/ancient-chemistry-fireworks-in-china
  18. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/chemistry/colourful-chemistry-artificial-dyes
  19. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA277838.pdf
  20. https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/202653-what-is-the-significance-of-flare-colors/
  21. http://ww2data.blogspot.com/2017/04/british-explosive-ordnance-smoke.html
  22. https://www.chemistryviews.org/safer-dye-for-pyrotechnic-smoke-signals/
  23. https://rdl.train.army.mil/catalog-ws/view/100.ATSC/281D394F-2572-4719-9761-D64FF79E5C26-1385476058812/tc3_23x30wc1.pdf
  24. https://jpeoaa.army.mil/Project-Offices/PM-CCS/Organizations/PdD-Combat-Armaments-and-Protection-Systems/Products/Grenades/Smoke-Grenades/
  25. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA477977.pdf
  26. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA608283.pdf
  27. https://www.army.mil/article/288356/subterranean_operations_israeli_defense_force_lessons_from_gaza
  28. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/military-to-deploy-homegrown-infrared-smoke-canisters-next-year-dapa/ar-AA1sd9wo
  29. https://www.respiratorytherapyzone.com/smoke-bombs-safe-breathe/
  30. https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/AirQuality/Fireworks.html
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231020303022
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2661223/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333023104_Toxicity_of_Azo_Dyes_in_Pharmaceutical_Industry
  34. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/5582/chapter/7
  35. https://smokeinvasion.com/blogs/smoke-bombs/a-comprehensive-guide-to-using-smoke-bombs-safely
  36. https://www.osha.gov/pyrotechnics/display
  37. https://www.safetytech.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SDS-Other-Smoke-Bombs-%25C2%25A9.pdf
  38. https://www.orionsignals.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SAR-Orange-Smoke-Signal.pdf
  39. https://lemaitreltd.com/products/pyrotechnics/prostage-ii/smoke-coloured-smoke/smoke-effects/sds-all-smokes-and-smoke-mines/
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123019588
  41. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/evaluating-existing-substances/the-chemicals-management-plan-substance-groupings-initiative-aromatic-azo-benzidine-based-substances-draft-t.html
  42. https://echa.europa.eu/substances-restricted-under-reach
  43. https://www.epa.gov/hwpermitting/safe-handling-storage-and-treatment-waste-fireworks
  44. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Final%2520Rule%2520-%2520Amendments%2520to%2520Fireworks%2520Regulations%2520-%2520September%252026%25202018%2520%25281%2529.pdf
  45. https://nrc.canada.ca/en/stories/new-research-quantifies-environmental-risks-military-smoke-grenades
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653521023171
  47. https://earth.org/environmental-impact-of-fireworks/
  48. https://www.basel.int/theconvention/overview/tabid/1271/default.aspx
  49. https://s3.us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com/sepub-demo-0001-124733793621-us-gov-west-1/s3fs-public/2024-09%252FWP19-1255%2520Project%2520Outbrief.pdf
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10058345/
  51. https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/macroscope/fireworks-go-green
  52. https://www.climatewatch.com/p/fireworks-carbon-footprint
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.