Hubbry Logo
Coma (comet)Coma (comet)Main
Open search
Coma (comet)
Community hub
Coma (comet)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Coma (comet)
Coma (comet)
Coma (comet)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Structure of Comet Holmes in infrared, as seen by an infrared space telescope

The coma is the nebulous envelope around the nucleus of a comet, formed when the comet passes near the Sun in its highly elliptical orbit. As the comet warms, parts of it sublimate;[1] this gives a comet a diffuse appearance when viewed through telescopes and distinguishes it from stars. The word coma comes from the Greek κόμη (kómē), which means "hair" and is the origin of the word comet itself.[2][3]

The coma is generally made of ice and comet dust.[1] Water composes up to 90% of the volatiles that outflow from the nucleus when the comet is within 3–4 au (280–370 million mi; 450–600 million km) from the Sun.[1] The H2O parent molecule is destroyed primarily through photodissociation and to a much smaller extent photoionization.[1] The solar wind plays a minor role in the destruction of water compared to photochemistry.[1] Larger dust particles are left along the comet's orbital path while smaller particles are pushed away from the Sun into the comet's tail by light pressure.

On 11 August 2014, astronomers released studies, using the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) for the first time, that detailed the distribution of HCN, HNC, H2CO, and dust inside the comae of comets C/2012 F6 (Lemmon) and C/2012 S1 (ISON).[4][5] On 2 June 2015, NASA reported that the ALICE spectrograph on the Rosetta space probe studying comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko determined that electrons (within 1 km (0.62 mi) above the comet nucleus) produced from photoionization of water molecules by solar radiation, and not photons from the Sun as thought earlier, are responsible for the liberation of water and carbon dioxide molecules released from the comet nucleus into its coma.[6][7]

Size

[edit]
Comet 17P/Holmes, 2007/11/02

Comas typically grow in size as comets approach the Sun, and they can be as large as the diameter of Jupiter, even though the density is very low.[2] About a month after an outburst in October 2007, comet 17P/Holmes briefly had a tenuous dust atmosphere larger than the Sun.[8] The Great Comet of 1811 also had a coma roughly the diameter of the Sun.[9] Even though the coma can become quite large, its size can actually decrease about the time it crosses the orbit of Mars around 1.5 AU from the Sun.[9] At this distance the solar wind becomes strong enough to blow the gas and dust away from the coma, enlarging the tail.[9]

X-rays

[edit]
Tempel 1 in X-ray light by Chandra

Comets were found to emit X-rays in late-March 1996.[10] This surprised researchers, because X-ray emission is usually associated with very high-temperature bodies. Thomas E. Cravens was the first to propose an explanation in early 1997.[11] The X-rays are thought to be generated by the interaction between comets and the solar wind: when highly charged ions fly through a cometary atmosphere, they collide with cometary atoms and molecules, "ripping off" one or more electrons from the comet. This ripping off leads to the emission of X-rays and far ultraviolet photons.[12]

Observation

[edit]

With a basic Earth-surface based telescope and some technique, the size of the coma can be calculated.[13] Called the drift method, one locks the telescope in position and measures the time for the visible disc to pass through the field of view.[13] That time multiplied by the cosine of the comet's declination, times .25, should equal the coma's diameter in arcminutes.[13] If the distance to the comet is known, then the apparent size of the coma can be determined.[13]

In 2015, it was noted that the ALICE instrument on the ESA Rosetta spacecraft to comet 67/P, detected hydrogen, oxygen, carbon and nitrogen in the coma, which they also called the comet's atmosphere.[14] Alice is an ultraviolet spectrograph, and it found that electrons created by UV light were colliding and breaking up molecules of water and carbon monoxide.[14]

Hydrogen gas halo

[edit]
Artificially colored far-ultraviolet image (with film) of Comet Kohoutek (Skylab, 1973)

OAO-2 ('Stargazer') discovered large halos of hydrogen gas around comets.[15] Space probe Giotto detected hydrogen ions at distance of 7.8 million km away from Halley when it did a close flyby of the comet in 1986.[16] A hydrogen gas halo was detected to be 15 times the diameter of Sun (12.5 million miles). This triggered NASA to point the Pioneer Venus mission at the Comet, and it was determined that the Comet was emitting 12 tons of water per second. The hydrogen gas emission has not been detected from Earth's surface because those wavelengths are blocked by the atmosphere.[17] The process by which water is broken down into hydrogen and oxygen was studied by the ALICE instrument aboard the Rosetta spacecraft.[18] One of the issues is where the hydrogen is coming from and how (e.g. Water splitting):

First, an ultraviolet photon from the Sun hits a water molecule in the comet's coma and ionises it, knocking out an energetic electron. This electron then hits another water molecule in the coma, breaking it apart into two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen, and energising them in the process. These atoms then emit ultraviolet light that is detected at characteristic wavelengths by Alice.[18]

A hydrogen gas halo three times the size of the Sun was detected by Skylab around Comet Kohoutek in the 1970s.[19] SOHO detected a hydrogen gas halo bigger than 1 AU in radius around Comet Hale–Bopp.[20] Water emitted by the comet is broken up by sunlight, and the hydrogen in turn emits ultra-violet light.[21] The halos have been measured to be ten billion meters across, many times bigger than the Sun.[21] The hydrogen atom are very light so they can travel a long distance before they are themselves ionized by the Sun.[21] When the hydrogen atoms are ionized they are especially swept away by the solar wind.[21]

Composition

[edit]
C/2006 W3 (Christensen) – emitting carbon gas (infrared image)

The Rosetta mission found carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, ammonia, methane and methanol in the Coma of Comet 67P, as well as small amounts of formaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen cyanide, sulfur dioxide and carbon disulfide.[22]

The four top gases in 67P's halo were water, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and oxygen.[23] The ratio of oxygen to water coming off the comet remained constant for several months.[23]

Coma spectrum

[edit]
Three coma spectra compared

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Coma (comet)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The coma of a is the diffuse, gaseous and dusty atmosphere that envelops the 's solid nucleus, forming a nebulous as the approaches the Sun and becoming one of its most distinctive visible features. This transient envelope arises from the sublimation of volatile ices within the nucleus, releasing a mixture of gases and fine dust particles into space, and it typically develops when the enters the inner Solar System, within a few astronomical units of the Sun. The formation of the coma begins as solar radiation heats the nucleus, causing ices such as water, , and to transition directly from solid to gas without melting, a process known as sublimation. This creates high-velocity jets that propel dust grains outward, forming an expanding envelope where gas molecules and dust interact through collisions in the inner region before dispersing further. The coma's activity peaks near perihelion, the point of closest solar approach, and can exhibit localized structures like jets or arcs due to uneven surface heating and nucleus rotation, influencing the overall morphology observed from . In terms of composition, is dominated by (H₂O), which often constitutes 70-90% of the gas phase, alongside (CO), (CO₂), (CH₄), (CH₃OH), and trace like (HCN) and (NH₃). The dust component includes silicates, organic refractories (CHON particles), , and sometimes icy grains, forming fluffy, low-density aggregates with particle sizes ranging from submicron to centimeters and a typical size distribution power-law index of approximately -2.6. Photochemical reactions in the coma produce daughter such as hydroxyl (OH), cyanide (CN), and radicals (NH₂), while the gas and dust abundances show variability across comets, with about 25-30% exhibiting depletion in carbon-chain molecules like C₂ and C₃, reflecting diverse formation environments in the early Solar System; similar depletions have been observed in interstellar comets such as 2I/Borisov as of 2020. The coma's size varies with heliocentric distance and comet activity, typically extending from a few thousand kilometers near the nucleus to hundreds of thousands of kilometers in at 1 AU, sometimes rivaling the scale of the Sun itself, though its density remains extremely low (around 10⁻⁹ g/cm³). As the coma expands, it serves as the source material for the comet's tails—one ion tail of charged gases pushed by and a dust tail curved by —making it crucial for studying cometary evolution and Solar System origins. Observations reveal that the coma's brightness and extent are influenced by factors like nucleus size (usually 1-10 km across) and rate, with missions such as Deep Impact and providing in-situ data confirming its heterogeneous nature and role in delivering volatiles to planets.

Definition and Formation

Definition and Overview

The coma of a is defined as the nebulous, gaseous and dusty envelope that forms around the comet's solid icy nucleus as it approaches the Sun, resulting from the sublimation of ices into vapors driven by solar heating. This atmosphere, often appearing hazy or fuzzy in telescopic views, can extend significantly from the nucleus and is a key indicator of cometary activity. In the overall of a , occupies a central position, surrounding the nucleus and serving as the source material for the subsequent formation of the dust tail and ion tail, which extend away from the Sun due to and interactions. Enveloping and portions of the tails is an invisible envelope composed of neutral atoms released from processes, which is detectable primarily through observations but contributes to the comet's extended halo. Cometary comae have been observed since ancient times, with records from Chinese astronomers dating back over two millennia, including detailed illustrations of comet appearances and tails that likely encompassed the coma as the bright, nebulous head. Modern understanding advanced significantly through space missions, such as the European Space Agency's Giotto spacecraft, which in 1986 provided the first close-up images of Comet Halley's nucleus and coma during a flyby at about 600 km distance. Similarly, the Rosetta mission, arriving at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014, offered unprecedented in-situ data on the coma's dynamic evolution as the comet orbited the Sun. Comet activity, including coma development, is fundamentally tied to their highly elliptical orbits around the Sun, where the closest approach—known as perihelion—intensifies solar radiation and triggers the release of volatiles from the nucleus.

Formation Process

The of a comet forms primarily through the sublimation of volatile ices in the nucleus as it approaches the Sun, where solar radiation provides the necessary energy to transition these ices directly from solid to gas phase, releasing both gas molecules and entrained dust particles into space. The key volatiles involved include water ice (H₂O), (CO), and (CO₂), each with distinct sublimation temperature thresholds that determine the onset of activity at different heliocentric distances. For instance, CO sublimes at approximately 25 K, enabling early in the outer Solar System, while CO₂ follows at around 80 K, and H₂O requires about 200 K, which typically occurs closer to the Sun. Solar heating intensifies this process as the comet nears perihelion, where insolation increases dramatically, raising surface temperatures and accelerating sublimation rates from the sunlit facets of the nucleus. The released gas molecules expand outward at thermal velocities, typically around 500 m/s for H₂O, creating an initial isotropic flow that carries fine dust particles away from the nucleus surface. This entrainment of dust by the gas flow forms the visible , with the gas production driving the overall expansion. As the evolves, its density decreases with distance from the nucleus, initially following an due to the radial outflow from a point-like source, though interactions with the begin to shape the outer regions, setting the stage for tail formation without dominating the near-nucleus dynamics. Observations from the mission to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (2014–2016) revealed asymmetric patterns, with heterogeneous activity from different nucleus facets influenced by local illumination, composition variations, and diurnal cycles, leading to non-uniform coma development.

Physical Characteristics

Size and Extent

The coma of a comet represents a dynamic of gas and surrounding the nucleus, with its spatial dimensions typically ranging from about 10,000 km to 100,000 km in diameter for active comets near perihelion, though it diminishes to near invisibility at greater heliocentric distances beyond 5 AU where substantially decreases. This variability underscores the coma's transient nature, expanding as solar heating intensifies and contracting as the comet recedes from the Sun. For instance, during its 1997 passage, Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1) exhibited an exceptionally large coma extending 2–3 million km, one of the most extensive observed, reflecting its high activity level at approximately 1 AU from the Sun. The extent of the coma is governed by several key factors, including the heliocentric distance rr, where the outgassing rate scales inversely with r−2r^{-2} due to the quadratic decrease in solar flux, alongside the intrinsic activity of the nucleus and the overall rate of volatile sublimation. Closer to the Sun, heightened insolation drives more vigorous ejection of material, leading to a larger coma as particles expand outward at speeds of 0.5–1 km/s; conversely, at larger distances, reduced input limits expansion, often rendering the coma compact or undetectable. Nucleus properties, such as surface composition and , further modulate this by influencing the uniformity and intensity of . Observers measure the coma's size primarily through its from ground-based telescopes, which can be converted to physical extent using the comet's distance, though resolution is limited for distant objects. encounters provide precise in-situ imaging; the Deep Impact mission in 2005, for example, resolved the coma of Comet 9P/Tempel 1 to roughly 50,000 km near perihelion at 1.5 AU, revealing a nearly isotropic distribution during approach. Recent observations of the interstellar comet 2I/Borisov, analyzed through 2023, documented its expansion from an initial compact state to over 10,000 km as it neared perihelion at 2 AU in late 2019, with persistent asymmetries indicating anisotropic release influenced by its .

Morphology and

The morphology of a cometary is approximately spherical in the vicinity of the nucleus, where gas and emissions expand isotropically from sublimating surface ices, but it transitions to asymmetric structures farther out due to the influence of solar and the , which accelerate and deflect particles away from the sunward direction. These asymmetries often manifest as enhanced on the dayside and elongated tails or fans on the antisunward side, with the degree of distortion depending on and ejection . Prominent features such as jets—narrow, collimated streams of material—and arcs or spiral segments arise from localized active regions on the rotating nucleus, where uneven illumination and drive non-uniform . The of molecules in the coma follows a radial profile well-approximated by the Haser model, given by n(r)≈n0(Rnr)2exp⁡(−r−Rnλ)n(r) \approx n_0 \left( \frac{R_n}{r} \right)^2 \exp\left( -\frac{r - R_n}{\lambda} \right), where n0n_0 is the production rate normalized density, RnR_n is the nucleus radius, rr is the distance from the nucleus center, and λ\lambda is the scale length typically on the order of 10510^5 km, reflecting the balance between radial expansion and losses. Near the nucleus, densities peak at approximately 101010^{10} molecules per cm³ for moderately active comets, decreasing rapidly outward as material disperses. Temperature gradients in the coma arise primarily from adiabatic expansion of the outflowing gas, with inner regions maintaining kinetic temperatures of 300–500 due to initial heating from sublimation and photolytic processes, while cooling to around 100 occurs farther out as expansion dominates over radiative heating. Measurements from the mission's ROSINA instrument in 2014–2015 revealed significant density variations in of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, including pronounced day-night asymmetries driven by solar illumination patterns on the irregular nucleus, with densities up to an higher on the illuminated dayside compared to the shadowed nightside.

Composition

Gaseous Composition

The gaseous composition of a comet's coma primarily consists of volatile molecules released from the nucleus through sublimation, with (H₂O) dominating near the Sun at 60–80% of the total gas production. (CO) typically accounts for 10–20%, and (CO₂) for 5–10%, though these fractions vary among comets and with heliocentric distance as more volatile species like CO become prominent farther out. Trace primary volatiles include (CH₄) at ~0.5–2%, (NH₃) at ~1–3%, and (HCN) at ~0.1–0.2% relative to H₂O. Photodissociation by solar further modifies , breaking down parent molecules into daughter species such as hydroxyl (OH) from H₂O and atomic hydrogen (H), which contribute to the extended neutral envelope and influence the overall chemistry. These products form through sequential processes: H₂O → OH + H, followed by OH → O + H, with the resulting atoms and radicals driving additional reactions in the inner . Isotopic ratios in cometary gases provide clues to their origins, with the deuterium-to-hydrogen (D/H) ratio in measured at approximately 5.3 × 10^{-4} in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by the Rosetta mission—about three times the terrestrial value of 1.56 × 10^{-4}. This elevated ratio suggests the water formed in the cold, outer regions of the early solar nebula, preserving primordial signatures from the or . The production rates of these gases scale with solar proximity, with active comets exhibiting water production rates Q(H₂O) in the range of 10^{28}–10^{30} molecules s^{-1}, as observed in bright apparitions like C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE), where rates peaked at 5.27 × 10^{30} s^{-1} near perihelion. These rates decrease with increasing heliocentric distance, following power-law dependencies such as Q(H₂O) ∝ r^{-2.5} pre-perihelion. In 2025, observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS detected HCN in its coma at 2.33 AU from the Sun, contributing to understanding of molecular abundances in interstellar comets. Recent analyses, including ALMA data compiled in 2025, of HCN and (H₂S) in comets have refined abundance estimates beyond Halley-era measurements (1986), revealing enhanced SO and SO₂ relative to H₂S (by factors of ~2–5) and depleted OCS/H₂S ratios (~0.1–0.3), consistent with interstellar inheritance and post-formation processing. HCN abundances remain typical at ~0.2% relative to H₂O across sampled comets.

Dust Content

The dust particles in a cometary coma are primarily composed of refractory silicates such as and , complex organic materials, and minor ice components, reflecting the primordial building blocks of the solar system. These particles exhibit diverse morphologies, including compact grains and highly porous aggregates with porosities reaching up to 80%, which contribute to their low densities typically ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 g/cm³. Particle sizes span from sub-micron scales to approximately 1 mm, with a power-law size distribution often characterized by an index of around -3 to -4, allowing smaller grains to dominate the total surface area while larger ones account for much of the mass. The abundance of relative to gas in is quantified by the , which generally falls between 0.5 and 4 for actively sublimating , though values exceeding 4 have been inferred for some long-period objects with depleted volatiles. In situ measurements from the mission at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko highlighted the organic richness of these particles, with the COSIMA instrument detecting that organics constitute nearly 50% of the mass, intermixed with and hydrated phases. This organic fraction underscores the role of as a carrier of complex carbon-bearing compounds, potentially linking cometary material to interstellar grains. Dust ejection and dynamics within the coma begin with entrainment by gas drag from sublimating volatiles, accelerating particles to initial velocities of 1–100 m/s depending on size and . As particles move outward, solar becomes dominant for smaller grains, governed by the parameter β—the ratio of radiation pressure force to gravitational force—which surpasses 1 for particles smaller than about 1 μm, effectively repelling them and shaping the coma's distribution. The GIADA instrument on further characterized these dynamics at 67P, identifying both compact ( ~2 g/cm³) and fluffy ( ~0.4 g/cm³) populations, with post-mission analyses (2016–2024) refining models of to include sodium-enriched silicates in certain aggregates.

Observational Methods

Ground-Based and Space Observations

Ground-based observations of the cometary coma primarily rely on optical and near-infrared telescopes to image structures like jets and measure overall brightness through photometry. The Very Large Telescope (VLT) at the European Southern Observatory, equipped with the Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) instrument, has been instrumental in capturing high-resolution images of coma dynamics. During the 2021 perihelion passage of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on November 2, these observations generated simultaneous maps of dust and gas distributions, revealing evolving jet structures and chemo-morphological changes in the coma over multiple nights. Photometric monitoring from ground-based facilities, such as those using narrowband filters, tracks the coma's brightness variations to infer activity levels and dust production rates, as demonstrated in pre-perihelion campaigns for various Jupiter-family comets. Space-based missions have enabled unprecedented in-situ and remote imaging of the coma, bypassing terrestrial limitations. The European Space Agency's Giotto spacecraft conducted the first close flyby of a comet's inner coma during its encounter with 1P/Halley on March 13-14, 1986, approaching within 596 km and using its multi-color camera to capture images of dust particles and gas interactions at high resolution. NASA's Deep Impact mission in 2005 targeted comet 9P/Tempel 1, where the impactor's collision at 10 km/s ejected material that expanded into the coma; onboard spectrometers and imagers observed the plume's evolution, revealing enhanced dust and gas release over hours post-impact. The Rosetta mission provided the most detailed study from 2014 to 2016, orbiting comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and employing the Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System (OSIRIS) to image the coma at distances as close as 10 km, documenting non-isotropic dust jets and their seasonal variations tied to the nucleus rotation. Earth's atmosphere poses significant challenges for ground-based studies, particularly in the ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) regimes, where absorption by water vapor, ozone, and other molecules obscures key emissions from coma gases like water and carbon dioxide, limiting observations to visible wavelengths unless adaptive optics or high-altitude sites are used. Space observatories circumvent these issues but face constraints such as mission duration, typically restricted to flybys or brief orbits, preventing long-term monitoring. Recent advancements include Hubble Space Telescope imaging of active comets, such as the 2025 observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS, which resolved its coma structure at 277 million miles from Earth, and James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) spectroscopy of cometary atmospheres, often benchmarked against historical data from missions like Deep Impact's 2010 flyby of 103P/Hartley 2 to study volatile distributions.

Spectroscopic Analysis

Spectroscopic analysis of the cometary coma involves examining the emitted and absorbed across various wavelengths to determine the chemical and physical properties of the gas and envelope surrounding the nucleus. In the ultraviolet-visible range, detects radicals such as OH and through their prominent emission lines, which arise from of parent molecules like H2O and HCN in the solar radiation field. These observations reveal fluorescence processes, including the bands of C2 molecules, which produce characteristic green emission features in the optical spectrum due to electronic transitions excited by solar UV photons. Additionally, forbidden lines from atomic ions, such as [OI] at 5577 and 6300/6364 , indicate low-density conditions in the coma where collisional de-excitation is minimal, allowing metastable transitions to emit. Infrared spectroscopy targets vibrational bands of parent volatiles, with the ν3 ro-vibrational band of H2O near 2.7 μm and CO2 bands around 4.3 μm providing direct measures of their abundances and excitation states in the inner coma. These features, observed via instruments like VIRTIS on , show rotational temperatures reflecting the gas , typically ranging from 20–50 K in the near-nucleus region. Radio wavelength spectroscopy, particularly with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), maps molecules like HCN through hyperfine transitions near 88.6 GHz, revealing their spatial distribution and production rates in the extended coma. Key diagnostics from high-resolution spectra include Doppler shifts, which trace the radial expansion of the at velocities around 0.5–1 km/s, derived from line centroids in species like CO and HCN. Linewidths, dominated by thermal , yield kinetic temperatures of 50–100 K for the neutral gas, with broader profiles indicating higher velocities or in the inner . Recent advancements, such as (VLT) Multi-Unit (MUSE) observations of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during its 2021 perihelion, have enabled chemo-morphological mapping, resolving spatial variations in and C2 emissions across to reveal asymmetric and fragmentation influences. These integral-field datasets highlight evolving spectral features, such as enhanced ion lines near active regions, providing insights into dynamic processes beyond uniform radial models.

Notable Phenomena

X-ray Emission

The unexpected discovery of emission from a comet occurred in March 1996 when the ROSAT X-ray satellite detected soft X-rays from (C/1996 B2) during its close approach to Earth. These observations revealed an emission morphology elongated along the Sun-comet axis, with the X-ray brightness increasing as the comet approached the Sun, suggesting a link to solar activity. Subsequent observations of Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1) in 1997 further confirmed this phenomenon, showing similar solar-driven variability. The primary mechanism responsible for this X-ray emission is charge exchange between highly charged heavy ions in the solar wind—such as oxygen (O^{6+}) and neon (Ne^{7+})—and neutral molecules in the cometary coma, primarily water (H_2O) and hydroxyl (OH). During these interactions, electrons are captured by the ions from the neutral gases, exciting the ions and leading to the emission of soft X-rays in the energy range of 0.3–2 keV as the ions relax to lower energy states. This process occurs predominantly in the extended coma, with no detectable X-ray emission originating from the comet nucleus itself, as the nucleus lacks the necessary neutral gas density. The luminosity from cometary comae typically ranges from 10^{14} to 10^{15} erg s^{-1}, depending on the flux and composition of the incoming , as well as the rate of the . For instance, observations of Hyakutake yielded luminosities between 4 × 10^{15} and 16 × 10^{15} erg s^{-1}, with variations correlating directly with enhancements. This emission intensity underscores the efficiency of charge exchange, where a significant fraction of the 's is converted into s within . Confirming the charge exchange model, NASA's provided definitive evidence in 2000 through spectroscopy of C/1999 S4 (LINEAR), detecting emission lines from oxygen and nitrogen ions consistent with interactions. More recent observations in the 2010s and 2020s, including those of Comet 46P/Wirtanen in 2018 using , have further validated this mechanism across multiple comets, revealing variability tied to conditions and refining models of ion-neutral collision cross-sections. These studies have also highlighted how spectra can probe composition and cometary gas abundances, enhancing our understanding beyond earlier limitations.

Hydrogen Gas Halo

The gas halo in a comet's is an expansive, invisible envelope of neutral atoms generated by the of (H₂O) and hydroxyl (OH) molecules under solar ultraviolet radiation. This process breaks down H₂O into OH and H, followed by further dissociation of OH into H and O, with the resulting atoms receiving excess that propels them outward at velocities of approximately 20-30 km/s, far exceeding the expansion speeds of other cometary gases. As a result, the atoms form a diffuse cloud that vastly outpaces the denser inner , extending radially to distances of 10⁶ to over 10⁸ km from the nucleus. For instance, observations of (1970 II) revealed a neutral extending to about 3 × 10⁷ km during perihelion, while Comet Hale-Bopp exhibited a halo exceeding 1 AU (∼1.5 × 10^8 km) in radius. Densities within the halo decrease rapidly with distance, typically ranging from 10⁴ to 10⁶ atoms per cubic centimeter in the outer regions, reflecting the atoms' ballistic trajectories and minimal collisional interactions in the low-pressure environment. Detection of the hydrogen halo relies on ultraviolet spectroscopy and imaging, primarily through the resonant scattering of solar Lyman-α radiation at 121.6 nm by the neutral hydrogen atoms, as this wavelength is absorbed by Earth's atmosphere and requires space-based observatories. The Solar Wind Anisotropies (SWAN) instrument aboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) has been instrumental in mapping these halos, providing daily full-sky images that isolate cometary emissions from the interplanetary hydrogen background. Notable examples include SWAN's imaging of the hydrogen coma around Comet C/2013 R1 (Lovejoy), which extended over several months in 2013-2014, and more recent observations of long-period comets like C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) in 2024-2025. The halo serves as a key tracer for a comet's production rate, as the number of H atoms directly correlates with the of H₂O, enabling estimates of volatile loss and nucleus activity without interference from dust. SWAN data from 2I/Borisov in 2019 demonstrated production rates peaking at around 10^{27} molecules per second near perihelion, underscoring the halo's role in probing extrasolar materials, while 2023-2025 observations of dynamically new comets have revealed consistent scaling laws for halo brightness with heliocentric distance, filling gaps in understanding the invisible scale of cometary envelopes.

References

  1. https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/comets/facts/
  2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0183-6
  3. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/11/aa36959-19/aa36959-19.html
  4. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Comet_Interceptor/What_types_of_comets_are_there
  5. https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2014/08/Anatomy_of_a_comet_-_Infographic
  6. https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2023/11/Structure_of_a_comet
  7. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Giotto_overview
  8. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Rosetta/Mission_complete_Rosetta_s_journey_ends_in_daring_descent_to_comet
  9. https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/comets/en/
  10. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Rosetta/Getting_to_know_Rosetta_s_comet
  11. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/files/291633875/2207.04800v1.pdf
  12. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aag3161
  13. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022JE007329
  14. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2016/05/aa28085-16/aa28085-16.html
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647976/
  16. https://www.aanda.org/component/article?access=doi&doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201629900
  17. https://www.eso.org/public/spain/news/eso9933/?lang
  18. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2006/03/aa3833-05/aa3833-05.html
  19. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023LPICo2851.2369K/abstract
  20. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ab621b
  21. https://pages.astro.umd.edu/~farnham/publications/JFC_review.pdf
  22. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/abc17b/pdf
  23. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/462/Suppl_1/S2/2633355
  24. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2015/06/aa26132-15/aa26132-15.html
  25. https://sci.esa.int/web/rosetta/-/55117-first-measurements-of-comets-water-ratio
  26. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abd698/pdf
  27. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.20530
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8793767/
  29. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/10/aa34751-18/aa34751-18.html
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220009318/downloads/2022-06-01_CHEMICAL_AND_PHYSICAL_PROPERTIES_OF_COMETARY_DUST.pdf
  31. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/508/2/1719/6369366
  32. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/469/Suppl_2/S712/4670835
  33. https://www.mps.mpg.de/Rosetta-A-Comet-s-List-of-Ingredients
  34. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/461/4/3410/2608558
  35. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2015/11/aa26208-15/aa26208-15.html
  36. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13979
  37. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/499301/pdf
  38. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Rosetta/Giotto_s_brief_encounter
  39. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-deep-impact-produced-deep-results/
  40. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/rosettas-comet-imaging-the-coma/
  41. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1999ASPC..164..149F
  42. https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/comets/3i-atlas/
  43. https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2023/123/01H00RXDHK2NTRKTPVXXEQHS62
  44. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2016.0252
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032063305001406
  46. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2113315118
  47. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/03/aa36713-19/aa36713-19.html
  48. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2015/11/aa26303-15/aa26303-15.html
  49. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/462/Suppl_1/S170/2633384
  50. https://www.almaobservatory.org/en/press-releases/alma-confirms-comets-forge-organic-molecules-in-their-dusty-atmospheres/
  51. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2023/04/aa45672-22/aa45672-22.html
  52. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/474/1/1099/4569214
  53. https://www.mpe.mpg.de/987071/Discovery-of-cometary-X-rays
  54. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2002ASPC..262....3L
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103597957626
  56. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/312615
  57. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/96GL03780
  58. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full/2004/47/aa1008/aa1008.right.html
  59. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/477/1/361/12202674/361_1_online.pdf
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103502969654
  61. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/305566/fulltext/
  62. https://chandra.harvard.edu/press/00_releases/press_072700.html
  63. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/ac2aac
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103514004886
  65. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.06855
  66. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.00985
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103525001927
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103518302264
  69. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ab86be
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.