Hubbry Logo
DevadasiDevadasiMain
Open search
Devadasi
Community hub
Devadasi
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Devadasi
Devadasi
Devadasi
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In India, a devadasi is a female artist who is dedicated to the worship and service of a deity or a temple for the rest of her life.[3][4] The dedication takes place in a ceremony that is somewhat similar to a marriage ceremony. In addition to taking care of the temple and performing rituals, these women also learn and practice classical Indian dances such as Bharatanatyam, Mohiniyattam, Kuchipudi, and Odissi. Their status as dancers, musicians, and consorts was an essential part of temple worship.

Key Information

Between the sixth and thirteenth centuries, Devadasis had a high rank and dignity in society and were exceptionally affluent as they were seen as the protectors of the arts. During this period, royal patrons provided them with gifts of land, property, and jewellery.[1] After becoming Devadasis, the women would spend their time learning religious rites, rituals and dances. Devadasis were expected to live a life of celibacy.[5]

During the period of British rule in the Indian subcontinent, kings who were the patrons of temples lost their power, thus the temple artist communities also lost their significance.[5] As a result, Devadasis were left without their traditional means of support and patronage and were now commonly associated with prostitution.[6][7][8] The practice of Devadasi was banned during British rule, starting with the Bombay Devadasi Protection Act in 1934. The colonial view of Devadasi practices remains debated as the British colonial government were unable to distinguish the Devadasis from non-religious street dancers.[9][10][11][12][13][14]

The Devadasi system is still in existence in rudimentary form, but under pressure from social activism at different times, some state governments have outlawed it, such as Andhra Pradesh with its 1988 Devdasis (Prohibition of Dedication) Act and Madras with its 1947 Devdasis Act.[15]

History

[edit]

The practice became significant when one of the great queens of the Somavamshi dynasty decided that in order to honour the gods, certain women who were trained in classical dancing, should be married to the deities.[16] The inception of the practice was one that was imbued with great respect as the women who were chosen to become devadasi or “Devidasi” were subject to two great honors: first, because they were literally married to the deity, they were to be treated as if they were the goddess Lakshmi herself, and second, the women were honored because they were considered to be "those great women who (could) control natural human impulses, their five senses and [could] submit themselves completely to God."[17] As they were married to an immortal, the women were considered to be auspicious. Their main duties, in addition to committing to a life without marriage (to a mortal, in the common, popular sense), were to take care of a temple and learn classical Indian dances, usually the Bharatanatyam, which they would perform at temple rituals. Patrons were considered to have higher status for their ability to financially sponsor Devadasis.[18][19]

According to temple worship rules, or Agamas, dance and music are the necessary aspects of daily puja for temple deities. Devadasis were known by various local terms such as Basavi in Karnataka, Matangi in Maharashtra, and Kalavantin in Goa and Damaon.[20] Devadasis were also known as Jogini, Venkatasani, Nailis, Muralis and Theradiyan. Devadasi is sometimes referred to as a caste (varna); however some question the accuracy of this usage. "According to the devadasi themselves there exists a devdasi 'way of life' or 'professional ethic' (vritti, murai) but not a devadasi jāti (sub-caste). Later, the office of devdasi became hereditary but it did not confer the right to work without adequate qualification" (Amrit Srinivasan, 1985). In Europe the term bayadere (from French: bayadère, from Portuguese: balhadeira, literally dancer) was occasionally used.[21][22]

Ancient and medieval period

[edit]

The definite origin of the Devadasi or Devidasi tradition is murky due to its early inception.[23] Many scholars have noted that the tradition has no basis in scriptures. A. S. Altekar states that, "the custom of association of dancing girls with temples is unknown to Jataka literature. It is not mentioned by Greek writers, and the Arthashastra, which describes in detail the life of Ganika, is silent about it."[1]

The tradition of female artists in temples is said to have developed during the 3rd century CE. A reference to such dancers is found in the Meghadūta of Kālidāsa, a classical poet and Sanskrit writer of the Gupta Empire.[1] An example of reference to a Devadasi in the 3rd century CE in South India is Madhavi found in the Silappadikaram.[24][25] Other sources include the works of authors such as Xuanzang, a Chinese traveller, and Kalhana, a Kashmiri historian. An inscription dated to the 11th century suggests that there were 400 Devadasis attached to the Thanjavur temple in South India. Similarly, there were 500 Devadasis at the Someshvara shrine of Gujarat.[1] Between the 6th and 13th centuries, Devadasis had a high rank and dignity in society and were exceptionally affluent as they were seen as the protectors of the arts. During this period royal patrons provided them with gifts of land, property, and jewellery.[1]

Devdasis in South India and the Chola Empire and Vijayanagara Empire

[edit]
Vellayi Gopuram in Srirangam; one of the temple gateways named after devadasi Vellayi in 14th century.[26]

The Chola empire supported the Devadasi system; in Tamil Devadasis were known as Devar Adigalar ("Deva" means "Divine" and "Adigalar" "Servants", i.e. "Servants of the Divine"). Both male and female Devadasas and Devadasis were dedicated to the service of Hindu temples and their deities. The Chola empire developed the tradition of music and dance employed during temple festivals.[27]

Inscriptions indicate that 400 dancers, along with their gurus and orchestras, were maintained by the Brihadisvara temple, Thanjavur,[28] with munificent grants including the daily disbursement of oil, turmeric, betel leaves, and nuts.[29] Nattuvanars were the male accompanists of the Devadasis during their performances. The Nattuvanars conducted the orchestra while the Devadasi performed her service. Inscriptions indicate that Nattuvanars taught the Chola queen and princess Kundavai.[29]

As the Chola empire expanded in wealth and size, more temples were built throughout the country. Soon other empresses and emperors started imitating the Chola empire and adopted Devadasi systems of their own.[citation needed]

Portuguese traveler Domingo Paes who visited Vijayanagara Empire in 16th century describes the presence of Devadasis in the empire.[30]

"The women begin to dance, while some of them place themselves in the circular galleries that I have said were (erected) at their gate of entrance. Who can fitly describe to you the great riches these women carry on their persons? - collars of gold with so many diamonds and rubies and pearls, bracelets also on their arms and on their upper arms, girdles below, and of necessity anklets on the feet. The marvel should be otherwise, namely that women of such a profession should obtain such wealth; but there are women among them who have lands that have been given to them, and litters, and so many maid-servants that one cannot number all their things. There is a woman in this city who is said to have a hundred thousand pardaos and I believe this from what I have seen of them. These women live in the best streets that there are in the city; it is the same in all their cities, their streets have the best rows of houses. They are very much esteemed, and are classed amongst those honored ones who are the mistresses of the captains; any respectable man may go to their houses without any blame attaching thereto. These women (are allowed) even to enter the presence of the wives of the king, and they stay with them and eat betel with them, a thing which no other person may do, no matter what his rank may be."

Natavalollu

[edit]

A community of Karnataka living in Andhra Pradesh, the Natavalollu were are also known as Nattuvaru, Bogam, Bhogam, and Kalavanthulu.

It was customary in the Krishna district of Tenali for each family to give one girl to the Devadasi system. These dancers were known as Devadasis. As part of a social reform, a written agreement was made to formally end the practice.

Ādapāpas were female attendants to the ladies of the families of Zamindars. Ādapāpas were not allowed to marry. In some places such as the Krishna and Godāvari districts, Ādapāpas were known as Khasa or Khasavandlu.[31]

Natavalollu/Kalawants were a community that was distributed throughout the state of Andhra Pradesh. They were also referred to as Devadasi, Bogamvallu, Ganikulu, and Sani. Kalavantulu means one who is engaged in art.[32] Davesh Soneji writes that, "By the early twenty-first century, large numbers of women in the Kalavanthulu community had converted to Christianity, because this promised them a stable monthly income as members of the new rehabilitation programs of these missions."[33]

Mahari Devadasi of Odisha

[edit]

In the eastern state of Odisha Devadasis were known colloquially as Maharis of the Jagannath temple complex. The term Devadasi referred to the women who danced inside the temple. Devadasi, or mahari, means "those great women who can control natural human impulses, their five senses and can submit themselves completely to God (Vachaspati)". Mahari is a contraction of Mahan Nari, translating to, "the woman belonging to God". Chaitanya had defined Devadasis as Sebayatas who served God through dance and music. Pankaj Charan Das, the oldest guru of Odissi classical dance and who comes from a Mahari family, defines Mahari as Maha Ripu-Ari, one who conquers the six main ripus – enemies.[34]

Unlike other parts of India, the Odia Mahari Devadasis were never sexually liberal and were expected to remain celibate upon becoming Devadasis. However, there are records of Odia Mahari Devadasi having relationships and children. It is said that the daughters of the Maharis of the Jagannath temple took to other professions such as nursing in the mid-20th century due to stigma attached to their inherent profession, as dance was frowned up during the colonial era.

The 1956 Orissa Gazette lists nine Devadasis and eleven temple musicians. By 1980, only four Devadasis were left – Harapriya, Kokilaprabha, Parashmani, and Shashimani. By 1998, only Shashimani and Parashmani were still alive. The daily ritualistic dance had stopped, although Shashimani and Parashmani served in a few of the yearly temple rituals such as Nabakalebara, Nanda Utsava, and Duara Paka during Bahuda Jatra.[34] The last of the Devadasis, Shashimani, died on 19 March 2015, at the age of 92.[35]

Yellamma Cult of Karnataka in South India

[edit]

In the southern Indian state of Karnataka the Devadasi system was practiced for over 10 centuries. Chief among them was the Yellamma cult.[36]

There are many stories about the origin of the Yellamma cult. The most popular story indicates that Renuka was the daughter of a Brahmin, who married the sage Jamadagni, and was the mother of five sons. She used to bring water from the Malaprabha river for the sage's worship and rituals. One day at the river she saw a group of youths engaged in water sports and forgot to return home in time for her husband's worship and rituals, which made Jamadagni question her chastity. He ordered their sons one by one to punish their mother, but four of them refused on one pretext or the other. The sage cursed them to become eunuchs and had Renuka beheaded by his fifth son, Parashurama. To everybody's astonishment, Renuka's head multiplied by tens and hundreds and moved to different regions. This miracle inspired her four eunuch sons as well as others to become her followers and worship her head.[37][full citation needed]

Colonial era

[edit]

Reformists and abolitionists

[edit]

Reformists and abolitionists considered the Devadasi a social evil due to their way of life, which had very widely degenerated into a system of prostitution.[38][full citation needed] The first anti-Nautch and anti-dedication movement began in 1882, even though the British colonial authorities officially maintained most brothels in India.[39] The Irish missionary Amy Carmichael was active in helping Devadasi women to escape their situation.

In later period[when?] the devadasis were equated with prostitutes and their children were again given away to temples. Stigma was attached to a particular caste of devadasis and they were seen as prostitutes. After a certain age they were left to fend for themselves.[40]

As the Devadasi were equated with prostitutes, they also became associated with the spread of the venereal disease syphilis in India. During the British colonial period many British soldiers were exposed to venereal diseases in brothels, and Devadasis were misunderstood to be responsible. In an effort to control the spread of venereal disease the British Government mandated that all prostitutes register themselves. Devadasis were required to register, as they were thought to be prostitutes by the British Government.[41]

In addition to obligatory registration, the British Government also established institutions known as Lock Hospitals where women were brought in order to be treated for venereal diseases. However, many of the women admitted to these hospitals, including many Devadasi, were identified through the registry and then forcibly brought to the hospitals. A number of these women were confined in the hospitals permanently.[41]

Today, Sitavva Joddati of Karnataka helps former Devadasi find a foothold in mainstream society. In 1982 she was made a Devadasi at age seven. In 1997 she began the non-governmental organisation MASS (Mahila Abhivrudhi-Samrakshana Sansthe) in the Belagavi district of Ghataprabha to help women like her escape the Devadasi system and live a life of dignity. Between 1997 and 2017 MASS helped over 4,800 Devadasis reintegrate into mainstream society. In 2018 she received the Padmashri award at age 43.[42][43][44]

Evolution of Bharatanatyam

[edit]

Rukmini Devi Arundale, a theosophist trained in ballet, sought to re-appropriate the Devadasi dance traditions in a context perceived respectably by Indian society which had by then adopted the western morales. She altered the dance repertoire to exclude pieces perceived as erotic in their description of a deity. She also systematized the dance in a way that incorporated the extension and use of space associated with dance traditions such as ballet. The product of this transformation was a new version of Bharatanatyam, which she taught professionally at the Kalakshetra school she established in Madras. Bharatanatyam is commonly seen as a very ancient dance tradition associated with the Natyashastra. However, Bharatanatyam as it is performed and known today is actually a product of Arundale's recent endeavour to remove the Devadasi dance tradition from the perceived immoral context associated with the Devadasi community and bring it into the upper caste performance milieu.[45] She also adopted a lot of technical elements of ballet into the modified form of Bharatanatyam. To give the dance form a measure of respect E Krishna Iyer and Rukmini Devi Arundale proposed a resolution at a 1932 meeting of the Madras Music Academy to rename Sadirattam to "Bharatanatyam" or Indian dance.[46]

Legislative Initiatives

[edit]

The first legal initiative to outlaw the Devadasi system dates back to the 1934 Bombay Devadasi Protection Act. This act pertained to the Bombay province as it existed in the British Raj. The Bombay Devadasi Protection Act made dedication of women illegal, whether consensual or not. In 1947, the year of Indian independence, the Madras Devadasi (Prevention of Dedication) Act outlawed dedication in the southern Madras Presidency. The Devadasi system was formally outlawed in all of India in 1988, although social and economic pressures on mostly Dalit families have ensured that the Devadasi system is still widely practiced illegally.[38][47]

Devadasi practices

[edit]

From the late medieval period until 1910, the Pottukattu or tali-tying dedication ceremony, was a widely advertised community event requiring the full cooperation of the local religious authorities. It initiated a young girl into the Devadasi profession and was performed in the temple by a priest.The dedication was a symbolic "marriage" of the pubescent girl to the temple's deity.

In the sadanku or puberty ceremonies, the Devadasi initiate began her marriage with an emblem of the god borrowed from the temple as a stand-in bridegroom. From then onward, the Devadasi was considered a nitya sumangali, a woman eternally free from the adversity of widowhood. She would then perform her ritual and artistic duties in the temple. The puberty ceremonies were not only a religious occasion, but also a community feast and celebration in which the local elites also participated.

Odisha

[edit]

The 1956 Orissa Gazette references Devadasis dances. They had two daily rituals. The Bahara Gaaunis would dance at the Sakaala Dhupa. After breakfast Lord Jagannatha would give Darshana to the bhaktas (the devotees). In the main hall, a Devadasi, accompanied by musicians and the Rajaguru (the court guru), would dance standing near the Garuda stambha (pillar). They would perform only pure dance, and could be watched by the audience. The Bhitara Gaunis would sing at the Badashinghara, the main ceremony for ornamenting and dressing the God. At bedtime, Lord Jagannatha would first be served by male Sebayatas, who would fan him and decorate him with flowers. After they left, a Bhitara Gaauni would then enter the room, stand near the door (Jaya Vijaya), sing Gita Govinda songs, and perhaps perform a ritualistic dance. Later she would come out and announce that the Lord has gone to sleep and the guard would close the main gate.[citation needed]

Social status

[edit]

A Devadasi was believed to be immune from widowhood and was called akhanda saubhagyavati ("woman who never separated from good fortune"). Since she was wedded to a divine deity, she was supposed to be one of the especially welcome guests at weddings and was regarded as a bearer of good fortune. At weddings, people would receive a string of the tali (wedding lock) prepared by her, threaded with a few beads from her own necklace. The presence of a Devadasi on any religious occasion in the house of a dvija member was regarded as sacred and she was treated with due respect, and was presented with gifts.[48]

Notable members from the Devadasi community

[edit]

Contemporary statistical data

[edit]

Indian National Commission for Women, which is mandated to protect and promote the welfare of women, collected information on the prevalence of Devadasi culture in various states. The government of Odisha stated that the Devadasi system is not prevalent in the state. In March 2015, Sasimani Debi, the last devadasi attached to Jagannath temple, died thus bringing the curtain down on the institution.[50]

Similarly, the government of Tamil Nadu wrote that this system has been eradicated and there are now no Devadasis in the state. Andhra Pradesh has identified 16,624 Devadasis within its state. The Karnataka State Women's University found more than 80,000 Devadasis in Karnataka in 2018; while a government study found 40,600 in 2008.[51] The government of Maharashtra did not provide the information as sought by the commission. However, the state government provided statistical data regarding the survey conducted by them to sanction a "Devadasi Maintenance Allowance". A total of 8,793 applications were received and after conducting a survey 6,314 were rejected and 2,479 Devadasis were declared eligible for the allowance. At the time of sending the information, 1,432 Devadasis were receiving this allowance.

According to a study by the Joint Women's Programme of Bangalore for National Commission for Women, girls who have to accept becoming a Devadasi, few reasons were provided, which included dumbness, deafness, poverty, and others.[52] The life expectancy of Devadasi girls is low compared to the average of the country, it is rare to find Devadasis older than fifty.[52]

[edit]
Year Title and description Medium
1810 Les bayadères, a French opera in three acts. Music by Charles-Simon Catel, libretto by Victor-Joseph Étienne de Jouy, based on Voltaire's L'éducation d'un prince. opera
1976 Bala a documentary on dance performance of Balasaraswati, directed by Satyajit Ray. A joint production of the Government of Tamil Nadu and the National Centre for the Performing Arts.[53] documentary
1984 Giddh. Movie portraying the theme of exploitation of young girls in the name of Devadasi tradition. Set in villages of Maharashtra and Karnataka. Starring Om Puri and Smita Patil.[54] movie
1987 Mahananda, a Hindi film on the life of a Devadasi in Maharashtra, Produced and directed by Mohan Kavia.[55] documentary
2000-2001 Krishnadasi. Television series on SunTV, based on Tamil novel Krishnadasi by Indra Soundar Rajan. TV series
2002-2006 Rudra Veenai. Television series on SunTV. A Devadasi lineage with a critical role in the story that revolves around a mysterious musical instrument. TV series
2009 Jogwa, a national award-winning Marathi feature film; a love story revolving around Dev Dasi. movie
2011 Sex, Death, and the Gods, a BBC Storyville documentary series directed by Beeban Kidron[56] documentary series
2011 Balasaraswati: Her Art and Life. A biography of Balasaraswati.[57][58] book
2012 Prostitutes of God. A controversial documentary on the lives of Devadasi sex workers. The Vice Guide to Travel[59] documentary
2016 Krishnadasi. Television series on Colors TV depicting the lives of Devadasis married to Krishna. documentary series
2016 Agnijal Television series on Star Jalsha. A Bengali romantic drama between a King and a Devadasi. TV series
2021 Shyam Singha Roy, Telugu supernatural drama-thriller that includes the sexual exploitation of young Devadasis in the late 1960s in West Bengal. Starring Nani and Sai Pallavi. movie
2024 The Shameless, Hindi-language thriller by Bulgarian director Konstantin Bojanov featuring a Devadasi protagonist played by Omara Shetty. movie

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Devadasi

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Devadasis were women or girls ritually dedicated to in temples, particularly in , where they performed sacred dances, music, and rituals as "servants of god," a practice with roots in ancient temple traditions but documented extensively through medieval inscriptions. The system originated around the CE, gaining prominence under dynasties like the Cholas, with dedicatory ceremonies resembling marriages to the , often involving young girls from specific communities who inherited the role hereditarily. Initially, devadasis held elevated social status, receiving land grants and patronage for their artistic contributions, which preserved classical forms like , but economic shifts and declining temple support transformed the institution into one marked by sexual exploitation and by the medieval and colonial periods. Controversies arose from the coercive dedication of minors, hereditary bondage, and , prompting abolition efforts; laws banning the practice were enacted in the 1920s and 1947, though enforcement remains challenged in rural areas where it persists as veiled sex work.

Etymology and Definition

Core Concept and Terminology

The term devadasi derives from , combining deva (god or ) and dāsi (female servant or slave), literally translating to "female servant of God." This nomenclature encapsulates the core religious role of devadasis as women ritually dedicated to temple service, often through a symbolic to a , committing them to lifelong devotion and prohibiting human matrimony. Historically rooted in Hindu temple traditions, devadasis were trained from childhood in classical such as sadir (an precursor to ), music, and performances to entertain and honor the during ceremonies. In practice, the devadasi system involved the ceremonial initiation (mudi tiyal or similar rites) of prepubescent girls, typically from lower socioeconomic or backgrounds, into temple service, where they received education in and scriptures while residing in temple complexes. This dedication was framed as a sacred , granting devadasis certain privileges like land grants (devadana) and exemption from widowhood norms, though it often perpetuated hereditary involvement and economic dependence on temple or patrons. Over time, the idealized spiritual service devolved in many regions into exploitation, with devadasis functioning as courtesans, but the foundational concept remained tied to divine servitude rather than secular . Regional terminology reflected similar concepts with local variations: in , tevaradiyāl denoted "servant of God"; in , basavi or jogin; in , maharis for temple dancers; and in , mathangi. These terms underscored the devadasi's intermediary role between the divine and human realms, emphasizing ritual purity and artistic proficiency over marital domesticity. Despite degenerative practices, primary historical accounts from inscriptions and texts like the Agamas portray devadasis as custodians of sacred knowledge and performers essential to temple .

Distinctions from Similar Practices

The Devadasi tradition differs from secular entertainment practices like performances, which involved itinerant dancers in northern and who specialized in forms such as for courtly or private audiences, lacking any ritual dedication to a or temple service. girls, often patronized by British colonial officers by the , emphasized performative spectacle over religious symbolism, and their status derived from artistic patronage rather than hereditary temple affiliation. In contrast, devadasis underwent ceremonial "marriage" to a god—typically or variants—and performed daily rituals like lamp lighting and festival dances within temple precincts, granting them initial social privileges such as land endowments and exemption from widowhood norms. Devadasis are also distinct from courtesan traditions like tawaifs in or ancient ganikas, who functioned in non-religious urban or royal settings with state taxation and training in , , and for elite clientele, without the theogamous (divine ) vow that defined devadasi identity. Tawaifs, emerging prominently under Mughal influence from the , prioritized secular refinement and economic independence through salami (gifts) from patrons, whereas devadasis' roles intertwined artistic expression—such as sadir —with priestly oversight and symbolic mediation between devotees and the divine, though both systems later faced with under colonial moral reforms. Among sacred dedications, classical devadasis of South Indian temples (e.g., in under Chola patronage from the 9th century) emphasized refined arts like and music, with communities like Isai Vellalars holding intermediate caste status and temple grants, setting them apart from lower-status regional variants such as joginis in , muralis in , or basavis in . These folk forms, tied to village goddesses like Yellamma, involved simpler rituals and more overt sexual obligations to local landlords or pilgrims from dedication ages as young as 8–10, without the institutionalized artistic lineages or urban temple economies of devadasi groups. While all entailed exploitation—evident in 20th-century surveys showing 80–90% of such women in poverty-driven sex work—the devadasi system's early epigraphic records (e.g., 10th-century Chola inscriptions) highlight endowments for dance training, underscoring a performative absent in cruder dedications.

Historical Origins

Ancient Roots in Vedic and Early Temple Traditions

The Devadasi system, entailing the ritual dedication of females to deities for temple service including dance and music, lacks direct attestation in the Vedic corpus (c. 1500–500 BCE), where worship centered on nomadic fire sacrifices (yajnas) rather than sedentary temple cults with iconographic deities. Precursor elements appear in references to ganikas (courtesans or skilled female performers versed in arts and entertainment), noted in texts like the Vajasaneyi Samhita as a recognized profession, potentially involving ritual or performative roles akin to later temple functions. These ganikas were secular figures, often patrons of learning and taxed by states, but their expertise in dance and song—echoing celestial apsaras in Vedic hymns—laid groundwork for institutionalized temple artistry as temple architecture proliferated post-Vedic, from the Mauryan era onward. Concrete early evidence emerges in South Indian (c. 300 BCE–300 CE), predating widespread northern temple traditions and reflecting proto-temple service in . The Pattinapalai describes Chola king (c. 2nd century BCE) dedicating captive women (konti-magalir) to a temple at Kaveripattinam for duties like sweeping, lamp-lighting, and possibly performative rites, marking an initial institutionalization of female temple servitude tied to royal patronage. Similarly, Maduraikkanchi (line 499) alludes to women associated with Madurai's temples engaging in dance and music, integrating performative elements into worship amid emerging urban temple complexes influenced by local Dravidian customs rather than pure Vedic orthodoxy. These references indicate devadasi-like roles as extensions of fertility and goddess worship, potentially rooted in pre-Aryan cults, though syncretized with incoming Sanskritic elements by the early centuries CE. By the Gupta period (c. 4th–6th centuries CE), as Puranic Hinduism formalized temple-based and icon worship, these practices evolved toward structured dedications, with archaeological evidence of temple constructions enabling permanent female ensembles. Literary works like the Silappatikaram (c. 5th century CE) detail temple dances (vettiyal and poduviyal), underscoring the symbolic role of such women in invoking divine presence through embodied ritual, distinct from Vedic austerity. However, systematic epigraphic records of devadasis as a class—complete with endowments for maintenance—appear only from the 9th century CE in South Indian inscriptions, suggesting gradual formalization from these nascent temple traditions rather than a Vedic genesis. This trajectory reflects causal shifts from itinerant Vedic rituals to localized, patronage-driven temple economies, where female performers bridged sacred and aesthetic domains.

Development in Medieval Empires


The Devadasi system gained institutional structure and royal endorsement during the medieval Chola Empire (c. 850–1279 CE), evolving from earlier temple service traditions into a formalized cadre of performers integrated into temple economies. Inscriptions at the Brihadisvara Temple in Thanjavur, constructed by Rajaraja Chola I (r. 985–1014 CE), record the dedication of approximately 400 to 450 devadasis, who were tasked with daily ritual dances and music to honor the deity. These women, designated as devaradiyar in Tamil epigraphy, originated from diverse regions and were transferred to serve the temple, reflecting the empire's centralized patronage of religious arts. Patronage extended beyond performance duties, with devadasis receiving tax-exempt land grants (devadana or inam) and endowments from kings and assemblies, ensuring hereditary succession through female heirs dedicated to the temple. Specific records, such as those from Parantaka Chola I (r. 907–955 CE), note individual devadasis constructing shrines, underscoring their economic agency within the system. Later Chola inscriptions, including one from 1499 CE at Tanjore, affirm the persistence of around 400 devadasis, highlighting sustained imperial investment in temple rituals amid expanding devotionalism. Under the (1336–1646 CE), the practice expanded across Deccan temples, with devadasis benefiting from continued land donations and royal titles that reinforced their nityasumangali (eternally auspicious) status. Inscriptions at sites like document dozens per temple receiving hereditary rights, tying property inheritance to the dedication of minor girls, which perpetuated the institution amid royal ceremonies and festivals. This era marked peak elaboration of devadasi roles in preserving classical forms like Bharatanatyam precursors, though increasing reliance on temple revenues foreshadowed later vulnerabilities.

Regional Variations

South Indian Traditions (Chola, Vijayanagara, and Beyond)

In the Chola Empire, spanning the 9th to 13th centuries CE, devadasis were formally integrated into temple service, as evidenced by royal inscriptions detailing their dedication and roles. Rajaraja Chola I (r. 985–1014 CE) dedicated around 400 devadasis to the Brihadisvara Temple in Thanjavur by 1004 CE, with records specifying their employment for ritual performances including dance and music. These women received endowments such as land grants (devadana) and village revenues to sustain their service, reflecting state patronage that elevated their economic status within temple hierarchies. Inscriptions from this period, increasing in frequency during imperial Chola rule, describe devadasis as talippar (dance experts) and patiyilar (temple servants), underscoring their specialized contributions to worship and artistic preservation. Official oversight regulated devadasi activities in royal temples, with Chola administrators enforcing discipline and preventing deviations from ritual duties. While primarily devoted to divine service through ceremonies like the talikuli (), historical analyses note that the system's structure sometimes facilitated informal relations with patrons or , though primary inscriptions emphasize sacred obligations over secular exploitation. This institutionalization under Chola rulers, building on earlier Sangam-era precedents, positioned devadasis as custodians of temple culture, blending devotion with performative arts. The Vijayanagara Empire (1336–1646 CE) extended and amplified Chola precedents, with devadasis central to temple economies and festivals in hubs like Hampi. Emperors patronized their training in forms antecedent to Bharatanatyam, employing them for daily rituals and processions at the Virupaksha Temple, where dances invoked divine presence and warded off malevolent forces. Land donations and tax exemptions sustained hundreds of devadasis, fostering communities skilled in Carnatic music and sculpture-inspired poses, as temple complexes expanded under rulers like Krishnadevaraya (r. 1509–1529 CE). Inscriptions and traveler accounts from the era highlight their autonomy, with some attaining advisory roles or marital alliances to nobility, though the practice retained its core dedication to deity over human unions. Post-Vijayanagara, under Nayak successors in and Tanjore (17th–18th centuries), devadasis upheld traditions in Shaiva and Vaishnava shrines, adapting to Maratha governance in where they performed sadir attam in courts and temples. The system persisted into the 19th century, with devadasis in temples like maintaining ritual dances amid colonial scrutiny, though British records increasingly framed them through moralistic lenses that overlooked endowments and artistic legacies. By the early , reform campaigns targeted perceived abuses, leading to bans like the Madras Devadasis Act of 1947, which dismantled formal temple ties while devadasi lineages influenced secular revival of classical dances. Despite declines, epigraphic evidence affirms their enduring role in sustaining South Indian performative heritage across these eras.

Eastern and Central Indian Forms (Odisha Maharis, Karnataka Yellamma)

In the eastern Indian state of , the Mahari tradition represented a localized form of devadasi service centered on the Temple in . Maharis, often drawn from non-Brahmin communities, were dedicated through specific rituals to perform sacred dances and music as part of temple worship, embodying a role that combined devotional service with artistic expression. Historical accounts indicate that prior to British annexation in 1803, Maharis held respected positions within the temple hierarchy, contributing to rituals tied to the deity's festivals and daily ceremonies, with their performances preserved in temple records as integral to dance precursors. Unlike more commercialized devadasi variants, the Mahari system emphasized hereditary transmission and ritual purity, though colonial-era reforms and post-independence abolition acts from the 1950s onward led to its decline, reducing the community to a few surviving practitioners by the late . The Mahari dedication ceremonies, documented in temple traditions, involved initiation rites such as the pashchimabadia or bahariabadia services, where girls underwent training in dance forms like mahar nrutya from childhood, often under the of temple endowments. By the 19th century, however, socio-economic shifts and anti-nautch campaigns eroded their status, framing them as remnants of feudal excess rather than cultural custodians, despite oral histories from former Maharis highlighting their agency in preserving temple lore amid marginalization. In regions associated with central and northern , the Yellamma cult featured devadasis known as Basavis (young initiates) or Jogatis (elder performers), dedicated primarily to the goddess Yellamma at temples like . This practice, rooted in Puranic traditions from around the 3rd to 6th centuries CE, involved pre-pubertal girls from lower castes—often communities—being ritually married to the through ceremonies like uddana or basavi kalyanam, after which they provided sexual services to devotees as a form of . Unlike the dance-oriented Maharis, Basavis and Jogatis focused on itinerant , carrying portable images and performing folk songs or possession rituals (aradhanai) during festivals, with economic sustenance derived from and client rather than temple grants. The Yellamma system's persistence into the modern era stemmed from entrenched caste dynamics and folk beliefs equating the women's bodies with the goddess's fertility, though government interventions, including the Karnataka Devadasis (Prohibition of Dedication) Act of 1982, criminalized new dedications and aimed at rehabilitation, reducing overt practice but leaving underground continuations in rural areas. Reports from the late 20th century estimate thousands of such women in northern Karnataka districts, highlighting health risks like HIV transmission and economic vulnerability, with reform efforts critiqued for overlooking voluntary elements claimed in some devotee testimonies.

Religious and Ritual Significance

Dedication Ceremonies and Temple Service

![19th-century depiction of a Tanjore sadir temple dancer][float-right]
The dedication of a girl as a devadasi typically occurred through the pottukattu , a ritual analogous to a Hindu , where she was symbolically wedded to the temple's . This involved tying a tali or pottu—a sacred —around the girl's by a or elder, signifying her lifelong commitment to divine service and prohibiting subsequent human . Performed in the temple precincts, it often included offerings, vows, and participation, with the girl, usually aged 5 to 10 years and pre-pubescent, being presented before the . In some traditions, such as those in by the 3rd century CE, parents initiated this during temple festivals like Mahapuja. Following dedication, the devadasi attained a status akin to a divine consort, residing in temple-provided accommodations and receiving grants of land or endowments for sustenance. Her primary temple service encompassed ritual performances to propitiate the , including daily morning duties such as sweeping the temple compound, bathing the idol, and offering prayers. Evening rituals featured singing lullabies (lalis), praise poems (heccharika), and simple movements before the . Devadasis specialized in sacred arts, executing votive dances in style—characterized by soft, expressive movements combining (narrative mime) and nrtta (abstract rhythm)—rooted in ancient texts like the Natyashastra. These performances, often accompanied by music on stringed instruments or recitation of hymns such as Saivite Tiruppadiham or Vaishnavite Tirupasuram, occurred during festivals, arati (lamp offerings), and special pujas, enhancing the temple's prestige. In South Indian temples under Chola patronage (circa 850–1300 CE), hundreds of devadasis might serve a single complex, trained rigorously by gurus in forms precursor to . While early accounts emphasize artistic and devotional roles, historical evolution saw these duties entwine with patronage systems that included non-ritual expectations.

Theological Justification and Symbolic Role

![Tanjore sadir temple dancer][float-right] The theological justification for the devadasi system rooted in traditions, particularly the Agamas, which prescribe dance and music as essential components of to invoke and maintain purity. These texts emphasize performative arts as a form of (devotion), where dedicated women served as intermediaries, offering aesthetic expressions to honor the directly. The dedication ceremony, often involving a symbolic marriage (kalyanam) to the temple's presiding god—typically performed around —framed devadasis as eternal consorts or brides of the divine, ensuring lifelong from human marriage to focus exclusively on sacred service. This rationale positioned their role as a sacred , preserving esoteric knowledge of and arts deemed vital for temple , though core Vedic scriptures provide no explicit endorsement, highlighting the tradition's basis in later sectarian Agamic and Puranic developments. Symbolically, devadasis embodied the (divine feminine energy) complementary to the deity's shiva aspect, their dances and songs during pujas, festivals, and processions acting as conduits for spiritual energy to permeate the temple space and devotees. As "handmaids of the gods," they represented the soul's unyielding devotion (ananya ), merging human artistry with cosmic harmony and facilitating the deity's darshan (vision) through embodied performance. This role underscored a of aesthetic worship, where physical grace mirrored divine lila (play), elevating temple rites beyond mere recitation to multisensory communion, with devadasis' trained lineages ensuring continuity of these symbolic acts as living icons of piety. In regional variants, such as those linked to Shaiva or Vaishnava cults, they further symbolized appeasement of fierce goddesses like Yellamma, channeling communal prasad (grace) through their perpetual service.

Artistic Contributions

Preservation and Innovation in Classical Dance Forms

Devadasis preserved classical dance forms, particularly Sadir Attam (also known as Dasi Attam), the ritualistic precursor to , through dedicated temple performances in from at least the Chola period onward. Upon dedication, typically in childhood, Devadasis received intensive training under gurus in dance techniques, hand gestures (mudras), facial expressions (), and accompanying music, often transmitted matrilineally to ensure unbroken continuity. This system maintained intricate repertoires tied to temple worship, including invocations to deities like and , preventing the loss of these arts amid regional disruptions such as invasions. In temple settings, Devadasis performed daily rituals and dances, refining footwork (nritta), narrative expression (), and rhythmic patterns (tala) over generations, which formed the technical foundation of surviving classical styles. Their adherence to texts like the allowed for the standardization of poses and sequences, with evidence from 19th-century accounts depicting elaborate solo presentations that influenced later revivals. Historical records, including temple inscriptions from the 10th-12th centuries, document grants for their performances, underscoring institutional support for this custodial role. While primarily preservers, Devadasis innovated within ritual constraints by adapting narratives from regional and composing new alarippus (opening items) and tillanas (pure dance sequences) to suit specific temple iconography and seasonal festivals. This involved integrating evolving compositions and poetic themes from bhakti saints, enhancing expressive depth without altering core sacred structures. Such adaptations, observed in variations like Chinna Melam in Tamil regions, contributed to stylistic diversity that later informed broader classical evolutions, though colonial-era reforms largely recast these elements for secular stages.

Influence on Music, Poetry, and Performing Arts

Devadasis exerted profound influence on Indian performing arts through their hereditary practice of sadir attam, a temple ritual dance form that formed the foundation of modern Bharatanatyam. Trained from childhood in temple precincts, they performed intricate mudras, expressions, and narratives drawn from Hindu mythology, preserving technical precision and spiritual devotion in the art. This dance, originally known as dasi attam or sadir natyam, emphasized rhythmic footwork (nritta), gestural storytelling (nritya), and pure abstraction, elements codified in ancient texts like the Natyashastra but refined through generations of Devadasi transmission. By the 20th century, reformers like E. Krishna Iyer and Rukmini Devi Arundale adapted sadir for stage presentation, rebranding it as Bharatanatyam to sanitize its associations and elevate it to national classical status, though this process marginalized the original Devadasi practitioners. In music, Devadasis were central to the Carnatic tradition, serving as hereditary vocalists, instrumentalists, and composers who accompanied their dances with live renditions of kritis and ragas. They maintained oral lineages of compositions by composers like , , and , often performing in multilingual repertoires that blended Telugu, Tamil, and lyrics. Notable figures such as (1855–1946), a Devadasi , edited and published 's works, ensuring their survival amid declining patronage, while T. (1918–1984), descended from a Devadasi lineage, exemplified interpretive depth in Carnatic vocals integrated with . Their recordings from the early preserved authoritative interpretations, countering Brahminical appropriation of the form. Devadasis' engagement with poetry manifested in their abhinaya interpretations, where they enacted verses from Tamil bhakti literature, such as the Tirumurai and Divya Prabandham, infusing with poetic nuance and emotional layers. As custodians of temple rituals, they recited and dramatized devotional hymns, bridging literary traditions with performative expression, though few composed original poetry themselves. This synthesis elevated poetry's role in multimedia temple performances, influencing subsequent classical recitals that prioritize lyrical content over mere abstraction. Their artistic ecosystem, supported by South Indian kingdoms until the , fostered innovations like accompaniment and thematic padams, which poetically explored divine love and human devotion.

Social and Familial Dynamics

Community Structure and Matrilineal Aspects

The Devadasi communities were hereditary occupational groups centered around temple service, primarily in , where women were dedicated to deities and trained in classical arts such as (formerly Sadir) and , with roles passing through female lines to ensure continuity of rituals and performances. These groups, such as the in , operated as endogamous networks of families, often including multiple generations of women—grandmothers, mothers, and daughters—who lived in temple-adjacent households and managed their affairs semi-autonomously, deriving income from temple honors, land grants (inam), and private patronage for performances. Men within these communities, typically kin like brothers or nattuvanars (hereditary dance teachers), supported training but held peripheral roles, as the core structure emphasized female custodianship of artistic and ritual knowledge. By the late 19th century, the tradition exhibited pronounced matrilineal features, with daughters inheriting the profession, associated properties, and temple service rights from their mothers, undergoing rigorous training in nritya (dance) and gita (song) under gurus to qualify for cash payments from temples or patrons. This succession prioritized female heirs, allowing Devadasis—legally equated to males under customary —to adopt girls if needed to perpetuate the line, while children often bore the mother's , reflecting traces of matrilocal amid broader patriarchal norms. , including from dedicated lands, followed matrilineal lines, granting women economic leverage uncommon for the , though quasi-matrilineal in practice due to alliances with upper-caste male patrons whose support bolstered but did not alter female-centric . These dynamics fostered community cohesion through shared artistic lineages, as seen in Thanjavur's temple-attached families during the 18th–19th centuries, but colonial revenue reforms and anti-nautch campaigns disrupted inheritance by severing temple ties, reducing matrilineal viability. Despite this, historical records indicate Devadasis maintained and cultural higher than contemporaneous non-elite women, underpinning their role as preservers of sacred repertoires.

Economic Independence and Patronage Systems

Devadasis historically received economic support through temple endowments, including inam land grants that conferred heritable to from temple lands, often passed down matrilineally to daughters rather than sons. These grants, documented in temple records from regions like Tanjore as early as the , provided a stable stream independent of , distinguishing devadasis from typical Hindu women who lacked property under patriarchal norms. Temple authorities allocated such lands to families in exchange for dedicating girls to service, ensuring generational economic ties to the institution. Royal patronage further bolstered their financial position, with kings during the (14th–16th centuries) and later rulers granting villages, jewelry, and cash stipends to prominent devadasis in exchange for performances at court. In return for dances and musical renditions, devadasis earned fees from elite patrons, including zamindars and British officials in the colonial era, supplementing temple income and enabling property accumulation. This patronage system, while reciprocal—devadasis contributed to cultural prestige—afforded them relative autonomy, as men in their communities often relied on women's earnings without inheritance claims. The interplay of these systems fostered economic independence, allowing devadasis to maintain households, fund artistic training, and avoid dependence on husbands, though revenues declined post-19th century with waning royal support and colonial land reforms. Scholarly analyses note that such arrangements elevated their above many caste-bound women, yet tied financial security to and performative obligations. Private donations from devotees also supplemented incomes, particularly for festivals, reinforcing a network that persisted until legal abolitions in the .

Evolution and Societal Changes

Pre-Colonial Respect and Autonomy

In the Chola dynasty (c. 850–1279 CE), Devadasis held esteemed positions in temple service, performing ritual dances, music, and maintenance duties, with historical inscriptions documenting over 400 attached to the Brihadishwara Temple in Thanjavur by the 11th century. Rulers like Rajaraja I (r. 985–1014 CE) provided land grants and financial endowments, enabling economic self-sufficiency and elevating their status above many laywomen through royal patronage. This system was institutionalized, with Devadasis often dedicating themselves or their daughters voluntarily, reflecting a degree of familial agency in religious devotion. Temple records from the period describe Devadasis as "ever-auspicious" women integral to sacred rites, underscoring their revered role rather than subservience. Evidence from Sucindram Temple inscriptions reveals Devadasis endowing structures like theatres and mandapas, demonstrating financial and active contributions to temple infrastructure. Such endowments, supported by inherited properties in some cases, allowed them to operate semi-independently, fostering matrilineal transmission of roles and skills within communities. During the (1336–1646 CE), this respect persisted, with Devadasis preserving classical arts under continued royal support, as noted in temple epigraphs emphasizing their perpetual service to deities. Their autonomy extended to legal privileges, including property rights uncommon for women in broader society, positioning them as cultural custodians rather than mere temple attendants. Inscriptions from this era, such as those in Thiruvizhimalai under (r. 1216–1256 CE), affirm oversight of temple resources, highlighting structured within the religious framework.

Colonial Disruptions and Missionary Critiques

The British colonial administration, influenced by Victorian moral standards, increasingly viewed the Devadasi system's ritual performances and dedications as tantamount to institutionalized prostitution, leading to targeted disruptions of temple-based patronage and performances from the late 19th century onward. This perspective culminated in the anti-Nautch movement, which began formally in 1882 with petitions from missionaries and Indian reformers against the employment of Devadasi dancers (nautch girls) at official functions and courts, resulting in restrictions on such entertainments by colonial officials. By the early 20th century, these efforts escalated into legislative measures, including the Indian Penal Code Amendment Act of 1924, which criminalized the dedication of minors to temples, and the Bombay Devadasi Protection Act of 1934, which prohibited further dedications and aimed to prevent exploitation under religious pretexts. Missionary critiques played a pivotal role in framing Devadasis as victims of a degraded Hindu practice, equating temple service with moral corruption and "temple prostitution" to underscore Christian ethical superiority over indigenous customs. Organizations such as the Church Missionary Society documented Devadasi dedications as exploitative rituals that perpetuated and child trafficking, with reports from the 1890s onward highlighting cases where girls as young as 8 were dedicated, often leading to hereditary involvement in sex work absent colonial intervention. These accounts, while empirically grounded in observed abuses, were selectively amplified to justify broader proselytization efforts, ignoring pre-colonial contexts where Devadasis held respected artistic roles supported by royal grants. The disruptions eroded traditional economic supports, as temples lost under reforms and direct British oversight, forcing many Devadasis into urban rings by the , with estimates from colonial records indicating a sharp decline in temple-affiliated performers from thousands in the to marginalized remnants post-1930s bans. Missionary-driven narratives, echoed in British administrative dispatches, prioritized abolition over rehabilitation, contributing to a causal shift from to socioeconomic vulnerability without addressing underlying dynamics or providing alternative livelihoods.

Early 20th-Century Movements and Key Reformers

In the 1920s, social reform campaigns intensified in the against the Devadasi system, framing it as institutionalized exploitation involving the dedication of young girls to temples, which frequently resulted in and loss of rights. These efforts built on late-19th-century anti-nautch agitations that targeted the aspects of Devadasi life but expanded to challenge the dedication practice itself, driven by Indian reformers concerned with and moral purity amid rising . Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddy, the first Indian woman legislator elected to the Madras Legislative Council in 1926, emerged as a pivotal figure by introducing the Devadasi (Prevention of Dedication) Bill in 1927, aiming to criminalize the dedication of minors and restore marriage rights to Devadasis. Though the bill failed initially due to opposition from temple authorities and some Devadasi groups who defended their hereditary privileges, Reddy's advocacy, rooted in her experiences as a former Devadasi family member and physician, highlighted the system's role in perpetuating child trafficking and illiteracy, garnering support from women's organizations and progressive nationalists. Her persistent through , including public speeches and resolutions, pressured colonial authorities and laid the foundation for later legislation, despite resistance from vested interests claiming cultural autonomy. Muvalur Ramamirthammal, an ex-Devadasi who converted to and joined the , amplified internal critiques by publishing Dasigalin Mosavalai (The Web of the Devadasi System) in 1936, a Tamil exposing the economic and familial pressures that trapped women in the practice. Her work, distributed widely in the 1930s, urged Devadasis to reject dedication and supported Reddy's earlier bills, contributing to a growing discourse among marginalized communities that prioritized abolition over romanticized preservation. Opposition persisted from groups like the Devadasi Association, led by figures such as Jeevaratnammal, who argued reforms threatened their economic base tied to temple patronage. These movements intersected with broader Dravidian and nationalist politics, where reformers like E.V. Ramasamy () critiqued the system's caste-based hierarchies, though implementation lagged until post-1940s laws; empirical accounts from the era document hundreds of dedications annually in regions like , underscoring the urgency reformers addressed.

Post-Independence Legislation and Enforcement

Following , the Madras Devadasis (Prevention of Dedication) Act of 1947 was enacted on , prohibiting the dedication of women to temples, declaring such acts void, and criminalizing related ceremonies with penalties of up to six months' imprisonment or a ₹500 fine; it also banned temple performances by devadasis as a livelihood. This law, inherited by after state reorganization, lacked specific rehabilitation measures or dedicated enforcement mechanisms, contributing to its obsolescence and non-implementation without supporting rules. Subsequent state-specific legislation expanded prohibitions. The Devadasis (Prohibition of Dedication) Act, 1982 (notified January 31, 1984, and amended in 2010), criminalized dedication ceremonies with up to three years' rigorous imprisonment and a ₹2,000 fine for participants, escalating to two to five years and ₹2,000–₹5,000 for guardians; it empowered magistrates to issue injunctions, appointed Devadasi Dedication Officers for and awareness, and mandated rehabilitation including counseling, , and income support. The Andhra Pradesh Devadasis ( of Dedication) Act, 1988 (rules framed in 2015), similarly voided dedications as unlawful, imposing two to three years' imprisonment and ₹2,000–₹3,000 fines, with harsher penalties for guardians (two to five years and up to ₹5,000), while excluding dedicated women from prosecution and providing for , , and . Maharashtra's Devdasi System (Abolition) Act, 2005, prohibited dedications with two to three years' imprisonment (up to five for family members), established control committees and prevention officers, recognized live-in relationships as valid marriages for devadasis, and outlined rehabilitation protocols, though without framed rules. Enforcement has proven consistently ineffective across states, hampered by absent or delayed rules (except in Andhra Pradesh), low public and police awareness, corruption, and socio-economic factors like poverty and caste norms enabling covert dedications during festivals. Conviction rates remain negligible—for instance, only one out of 45 registered cases in Karnataka and zero out of seven in Andhra Pradesh since 1988—with many prosecutions diverted to the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, and reliance on NGOs for rescues due to governmental inaction. Rehabilitation schemes, such as Karnataka's pensions (₹400 monthly as of 2007–08) and housing for 23,000 registered devadasis by 2012, or Andhra's Jeevana Jyothi financial aid, suffer from identification failures, fund misuse, and inadequate monitoring, allowing the practice to persist illegally in rural areas. Judicial interventions, including a 2014 Supreme Court directive to halt dedications at Karnataka's Uttangi Durga temple, have yielded limited systemic change amid entrenched cultural acceptance.

Contemporary Status and Persistence

Statistical Prevalence and Regional Hotspots (Post-2000 Data)

In , estimates of Devadasi prevalence post-2000 vary widely due to underreporting, migration to urban sex work, and inconsistent survey methodologies, with figures ranging from approximately 48,000 to 450,000 women and girls affected nationwide. A 2020 report by the cited over 200,000 Devadasis across the country, predominantly from and lower-caste communities in southern and western states. remains the primary hotspot, accounting for a significant portion; the state's 2007-2008 survey identified 46,660 Devadasis, more than double the 22,873 found in the 1993-1994 survey, reflecting both improved detection and ongoing dedications despite legal bans. By 2012, official registrations stood at 23,000 in , though entitlement certificate data suggested up to 100,000 affected women. Northern Karnataka districts exhibit the highest concentrations, driven by cultural entrenchment in rural, low-income areas bordering Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh, where 26-40% of female sex workers trace entry to Devadasi dedication. Stakeholder assessments in National Commission for Women consultations rated prevalence highest in districts like Bijapur and Bagalkot (score of 53/100), followed by Belgaum (51) and Bellary (44), with smaller clusters in Koppal, Bidar, and Kalaburagi (Gulbarga). Adjacent regions include Maharashtra's Sangli and Solapur districts (scores 55 and 54), and Andhra Pradesh's Chittoor and Nellore (41 and 38), where official registrations reached 17,000 by the early 2010s, with estimates up to 60,000.
District (State)Estimated Prevalence Score (Stakeholder Assessment)Notes on Hotspot Characteristics
Bijapur ()53High dedication rates tied to and ; significant migration to urban sex work.
Bagalkot ()53Up to 300 Devadasis per village reported; limited rehabilitation housing.
Belgaum ()5131% migrate to red-light areas like .
Sangli ()55Border "Devadasi belt" with cross-state trafficking.
Solapur ()54Linked to hotspots via shared cultural practices.
A third Karnataka survey, launched on September 15, 2025, targets comprehensive enumeration across 15 northern districts without a strict upper age limit, aiming to update rehabilitation lists; as of , approximately 15,000 women had enrolled, though progress is slowed by low awareness and documentation issues. These figures underscore enforcement gaps, as dedications continue clandestinely, often under economic duress, with 63.6% of surveyed Devadasis reporting forced entry via custom or family history.

Rehabilitation Programs and 2025 Karnataka Legislation

Rehabilitation programs for former Devadasis in have primarily focused on economic empowerment, skill , and social reintegration, with leading efforts through state initiatives. The State Women's Development Corporation administers the Devadasi Rehabilitation Programme, which provides financial assistance, , and vocational to identified ex-Devadasis, aiming to eradicate the practice by addressing poverty-driven dedications. Non-governmental efforts, such as ' projects in , target adolescent girls in Devadasi communities with education and awareness campaigns to prevent sexual exploitation and facilitate community exit. Despite these, implementation challenges persist, as noted by activists from the Karnataka State Devadasi Vimochana , who in 2024 urged stricter enforcement amid ongoing dedications in rural areas. The Devadasis (Prevention, Prohibition, Relief, and Rehabilitation) Act, 2025, enacted on August 20, 2025, replaces the ineffective 1982 legislation by integrating comprehensive rehabilitation with stringent prohibitions. The Act criminalizes the dedication of women or girls as Devadasis, imposing penalties of up to five years and fines for performers, abettors, or facilitators, while mandating taluk-level committees to identify, , and rehabilitate victims through counseling, medical aid, and livelihood support. A key innovation addresses intergenerational stigma by granting children of Devadasis rights from both parents, with provisions for DNA testing to establish paternity if denied, thereby enabling claims to paternal property. The legislation establishes Devadasi Rehabilitation Project Officers at district levels to oversee surveys, welfare schemes, and prevention drives, building on prior surveys like the third statewide assessment in that identified persistent prevalence despite the ban. It emphasizes preventive in high-risk communities and allocates funds for skill development, contrasting with earlier tokenistic criticized for failing to dismantle underlying socio-economic drivers. Early evaluations highlight the Act's potential to shift from mere suppression to holistic empowerment, though enforcement efficacy depends on inter-departmental coordination and judicial oversight.

Controversies and Scholarly Debates

Sacred Service vs. Systemic Exploitation

The Devadasi tradition has long been contested between interpretations emphasizing its origins as a form of sacred religious service and those highlighting systemic exploitation embedded in its practices. Proponents of the sacred service view, drawing from historical temple inscriptions and royal grants dating to the (circa 850–1279 CE), argue that Devadasis served as dedicated performers of ritual dances and music, such as Sadir (precursor to ), in temples like those in Tanjore, fulfilling devotional duties to deities without the constraints of conventional marriage or widowhood. These women, often from communities with artisanal or servile backgrounds, received land endowments known as devadana, which provided economic autonomy and elevated social status comparable to priests in some contexts, allowing them to own property and patronize arts independently. Scholarly analyses, such as those examining South Indian temple sculptures and texts from the 6th–9th centuries CE, portray this role as a culturally sanctioned to the divine, where sexual relations with patrons were framed as extensions of temple rather than commodified , preserving a lineage of artistic excellence. Critics, however, contend that even in its historical form, the system institutionalized exploitation by linking female dedication to sexual availability under religious pretext, as evidenced by colonial-era records and patterns of "sacred prostitution" documented in works like Priyadarshini Vijaisri's analysis of 19th-century South India, where Devadasis' services blurred into courtesanage for elite patrons, often without genuine voluntarism. This perspective gains traction from empirical observations of caste dynamics, where lower-caste girls (predominantly Dalit) were dedicated from ages 5–10, inheriting the role hereditarily and facing coercion tied to poverty and social obligation, as upper-caste men accessed them with impunity masked as ritual. While pre-colonial accounts suggest some agency through property rights and artistic patronage, first-principles examination reveals causal links to patriarchal control: dedication ceremonies ritually severed familial ties, rendering girls dependent on temple hierarchies prone to abuse, with little recourse against priests or donors who exploited the system's ambiguity between devotion and sexuality. In contemporary scholarly debates, the sacred service narrative is often critiqued for romanticizing a structure that, by the , had devolved into overt trafficking, with studies estimating that 63.6% of dedications stem from customary force rather than choice, perpetuating cycles of illiteracy, stigma, and commercial sex work. Defenders, including some cultural historians, counter that abolitionist critiques—amplified by influences from the 1880s onward—overlook the system's role in preserving indigenous dance forms against Victorian moral impositions, arguing that not all Devadasis experienced uniform coercion and that elite practitioners maintained relative autonomy until legal bans disrupted their livelihoods. Yet, causal realism underscores the empirical reality: across regions like and , post-1947 data reveals persistence driven by economic desperation, with over 80,000 affected in alone as of 2020, where "sacred" dedications yield no verifiable spiritual benefits but entrenched violations, including child sexual servitude. This tension highlights how initial religious intent, verifiable in early inscriptions, eroded under socioeconomic pressures, transforming venerated service into a mechanism of intergenerational exploitation disproportionately burdening marginalized castes.

Cultural Heritage Preservation vs. Human Rights Imperatives

Devadasis historically contributed to South Indian classical arts, particularly originating the Sadir dance form that evolved into , through temple performances involving intricate mudras, expressions, and music accompaniment. In pre-colonial eras, they enjoyed privileges such as land grants, literacy, and matrilineal inheritance, serving as nityasumangalis in royal courts and temples under dynasties like the Cholas (850–1300 CE). Preservation efforts in the decoupled these artistic elements from dedicatory practices; , inspired by devadasi performances in 1928, founded Kalakshetra Academy in 1936 to revive as a sanitized, respectable classical art accessible to non-devadasi practitioners, primarily Brahmins, thereby integrating it into India's national cultural repertoire. Opposing this heritage narrative, analyses emphasize the system's causal links to exploitation, with girls dedicated as young as age 4 facing coerced sexual servitude, trafficking, and intergenerational poverty, disproportionately affecting communities. Empirical evidence documents high rates (e.g., 26% of 's female sex workers via devadasi routes), prevalence (up to 20% in affected groups), and health declines from and abuse, violating international anti-slavery norms like the 1956 UN Supplementary Convention. Legal abolitions, including the 1947 Madras Devadasi Prevention Act and 1982 Act imposing 2–5 years imprisonment, underscore imperatives to prioritize individual dignity over ritual, with directives in 1997 mandating rehabilitation amid persistent non-enforcement. The debate pits cultural revivalists, who argue for recognizing devadasi legacies in arts without reinstating dedication, against abolitionists critiquing religious justifications as veils for patriarchal and caste-based coercion. While some devadasis invoked to resist 1940s reforms, post-independence evidence shows arts thriving independently, rendering preservation of the full system unnecessary and counterproductive to causal prevention of abuses like child trafficking (estimated 5,000–15,000 cases tied to rituals). Scholarly consensus favors targeted rehabilitation—education, pensions (e.g., Rs. 400/month in ), and enforcement—over romanticized retention, as empirical persistence correlates with socioeconomic vulnerabilities rather than inherent voluntarism.

Empirical Evidence on Voluntarism and Abuse Rates

Empirical studies and surveys indicate that Devadasi dedication was rarely voluntary, particularly among lower-caste families where economic desperation and social predominated. A survey of 375 Devadasis in Bangalore by the Joint Women’s Programme found that 63.6% of were dedicated due to entrenched , with 47.3% of respondents characterizing the act as forced and 56.5% noting that parents unilaterally made the decision without the child's input. Dedications typically occurred pre-puberty, rendering meaningful impossible, as corroborated by case studies where girls aged 9 to 15 were subjected to the practice amid familial or hereditary obligation. Qualitative analyses reinforce the coercive nature, with no quantitative data supporting widespread voluntarism; instead, poverty-driven family decisions and upper-caste pressures emerge as causal factors. For instance, in Karnataka's Devadasi belt, dedications served as a mechanism for economic survival, often involving false religious pretexts rather than individual choice. Historical degeneration of the system from artistic service to ritualized servitude further underscores systemic coercion over agency. Abuse rates within the Devadasi system were exceptionally high, encompassing physical, sexual, verbal, and socio-cultural forms. In the aforementioned Joint Women’s Programme survey, 67.8% of Devadasis reported experiencing abuse, with documented incidents including 452 cases of verbal abuse, 495 of socio-cultural stigmatization, and 395 of sexual exploitation. A study of 20 Devadasi sex workers in North Karnataka revealed that 100% had endured intimate partner violence, including physical beatings and forced sexual acts, often normalized as relational norms despite their severity.
Abuse TypeReported Incidents (from 375 Devadasis Survey)
Verbal452
Socio-cultural495
Sexual395
This table illustrates the prevalence of multiple abuse vectors, with sexual coercion manifesting in 40% of cases involving commercial sex work and 9.9% during village festivals. Health sequelae, such as elevated rates (estimated at 20% in some urban cohorts), stemmed directly from exploitative sexual demands without protective agency. Case evidence from regions like Bagalkot and depicts repeated rapes and familial , affirming as an inherent outcome of coerced dedication rather than incidental.

Notable Devadasis and Legacy Figures

Pioneers in Arts and Reform

Bangalore Nagarathnamma (1869–1950), a Carnatic vocalist from a Devadasi lineage, advanced musical scholarship by editing and publishing the complete works of composer in nine volumes between 1910 and 1940, ensuring preservation of his kritis amid declining patronage. She constructed a temple over Tyagaraja's in in 1941, dedicating it to foster performance by Devadasi women and challenging their marginalization post-reform. Opposing the 1947 Madras Devadasi Act's full abolition, she gathered signatures from over 300 Devadasis to argue for retaining artistic roles separate from exploitation, thereby advocating a reformed continuity of temple service traditions. T. (1918–1984), seventh-generation heir to a Devadasi family, dedicated as a child to Namasivaya temple, elevated through authentic renditions emphasizing and nritta, performing her debut recital in 1926 and gaining international acclaim with a 1940 U.S. tour. She resisted sanitization efforts by non-hereditary reformers, insisting on unaltered sadir elements like javali compositions depicting rasa, which preserved the form's emotional depth against moralistic dilutions. Her teachings influenced global dissemination, training disciples who maintained matrilineal transmission, countering the system's near-eradication by 1950s legislation. Veenai Dhanammal (1867–1938), matriarch of a Devadasi musical lineage tracing to 18th-century court performers, pioneered public concerts for women, establishing the Dhanammal school that shaped Carnatic vocal and instrumental styles through her daughters and granddaughters. Despite economic decline from anti-nautch campaigns starting 1892, she sustained private patronage and transmitted rare ragas, influencing reform-era artists by embodying pre-colonial artistic autonomy amid shifting social norms. R. Muthukannammal (born 1937), among the last 32 Devadasis serving Viralimalai Murugan temple until the 1950s, received in 2022 for sustaining sadir dance, performing original temple rituals and training successors to document unadulterated forms banned under post-independence laws. Her persistence highlights reform's incomplete separation of sacred arts from dedicatory practices, advocating recognition of hereditary expertise over sanitized revivals.

Modern Descendants and Activists

Sitavva Joddati, dedicated as a Devadasi at age seven in 1982 in , escaped the system in 1997 and has since advocated for the rehabilitation of affected women, assisting over 4,000 former Devadasis in reintegrating into mainstream society through education and economic support programs. Awarded the in 2022 for her social reform efforts, Joddati focuses on emancipating women from intergenerational exploitation in northern districts like Belagavi and Bagalkot, where the practice persists despite legal bans. Groups of former Devadasis and their descendants, organized under entities like Devadasi Vimochana Sangha, have staged protests, such as the three-day agitation at Freedom Park in Bengaluru on December 28, 2023, demanding inheritance rights for children born to Devadasis and improved enforcement of rehabilitation schemes. In 2024, members of Hakkugala Samiti and Devadasi Vimochana Sangha protested outside the , urging comprehensive rehabilitation to address ongoing stigma and poverty among Devadasi families. By September 2025, ex-Devadasis and activists pushed for an effective resurvey of their social and financial conditions, highlighting gaps in prior enumerations that excluded undocumented families and failed to capture descendants' needs amid the implementation. These efforts emphasize breaking cycles of , with descendants advocating for property from biological fathers, as enabled by the 2025 , to mitigate economic vulnerabilities in hotspots like .

References

  1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44144079
  2. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/rj430664g
  3. https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2019/vol5issue1/PartB/5-1-11-352.pdf
  4. https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE4/IJRPR25931.pdf
  5. https://brill.com/view/journals/ijgr/29/1/article-p102_102.xml
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26906086
  7. https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2883&context=jiws
  8. https://www.keker.com/Templates/media/images/news%2520items/Devadasi%2520Paper.pdf
  9. https://unframed.lacma.org/2013/05/15/devadasi-the-eternal-dancer
  10. https://doi-ds.org/doilink/07.2021-16411997/IJLLR/V2/I2/A1
  11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07407700802655232
  12. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/70bc69b5-a318-4e7d-9188-ed9c12c2e73e/content
  13. https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2013/varga_zsuzsanna.pdf
  14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27115835
  15. https://tidsskrift.dk/nnjlsr/article/download/111057/160142/227205
  16. https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2430&context=jiws
  17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27644180
  18. https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/essay/kathasaritsagara-cultural-study/d/doc1474015.html
  19. https://annejac.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Paper-2-7.pdf
  20. https://www.socialsciencejournal.in/assets/archives/2022/vol8issue2/8-2-27-152.pdf
  21. https://ncwapps.nic.in/pdfReports/Exploitation_of_Women_as_Devadasis_and_its_Associated_Evils_Report.pdf
  22. https://thedanceofsiva.com/a-short-note-on-devadasis-devaradiyars/
  23. https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2021/Sep/29/devadasis-women-who-shouldered-culture-and-tradition-2365029.html
  24. https://ijaer.org/admin/uploads/paper/file1/I%2B6D53W0Bth1823NFQVNkA==3.pdf
  25. https://nasa2000.livejournal.com/52482.html
  26. https://dancemagazine.com/la-bayadere-history/
  27. https://www.prathaculturalschool.com/post/devadasi-system
  28. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2013/jul/engpdf/50-54.pdf
  29. https://worldhistory.columbia.edu/content/minority-question-analysis-gender-reform-colonial-india-through-figure-mahari-devadasi-1868
  30. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=osu1499694454160469&disposition=inline
  31. https://cisindus.org/indic-varta-internal.php?vartaid=544
  32. https://borderlines-cssaame.org/posts/2021/5/24/the-lost-life-stories-of-mahari-devadasis-in-postcolonial-india
  33. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol20-issue2/Version-2/J020225055.pdf
  34. https://disco.teak.fi/asia/the-devadasi-institution/
  35. https://www.hinduismtoday.com/magazine/august-1993/1993-08-0a0adevadasis/
  36. https://www.prathaculturalschool.com/post/devadasis
  37. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/devadasi
  38. http://indianculture.gov.in/stories/sadir-attam-bharatanatyam
  39. https://www.desifaves.com/the-evolution-of-bharatanatyam-from-devadasis-to-the-global-stage/
  40. https://brill.com/view/journals/ijgr/29/1/article-p102_102.xml?language=en
  41. https://worlddanceheritage.org/bharathanatyam/
  42. https://priyasnadanaloga.com/dancing-through-time-a-comparative-exploration-of-sadir-and-bharatanatyam/
  43. https://abhinayaperformingarts.wordpress.com/2020/05/21/significance-of-devadasi-pramapara-in-development-of-bharatanatyam/
  44. https://www.thenewsminute.com/features/how-art-devadasis-was-appropriated-create-world-bharatanatyam-38808
  45. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2101003.pdf
  46. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/5c9cdcc2-c6f2-4e59-ac47-2689e2f42739/download
  47. https://enrouteindianhistory.com/the-devadasi-and-her-music/
  48. https://www.ijhsss.com/pluginAppObj/pluginAppObj_237_08/download.php?action=download
  49. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR23C3278.pdf
  50. https://cdn.angkordatabase.asia/libs/docs/The_Devadasis_Dance_Community_of_South_India_A_Leg.pdf
  51. https://ir.nbu.ac.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/7d55af85-8ae7-46b0-a808-cd02da1fff69/content
  52. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226768113.003.0001
  53. https://www.oberlinlibstaff.com/acceleratedmotion/primary_sources/texts/bharatanatyam/community_honor.pdf
  54. https://sathirdance.wordpress.com/2019/06/06/timeline-historical-and-social-events-concerning-devadasis-royalty-and-bharatanatyam/
  55. https://centreforequitystudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/8-Devadasis.pdf
  56. https://www.shankariasparliament.com/current-affairs/devadasi-system-in-mysore
  57. http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue22/ganapathy.htm
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42931375
  59. https://hospet.online/devadasi-preservers-of-art-in-vijayanagara-empire/
  60. https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2012/June/engpdf/127-128.pdf
  61. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/victorian-literature-and-culture/article/knowing-the-dancer-east-meets-west/8FB94C8BDD6B562AF2A264A400C6FAE3
  62. https://www.opindia.com/2020/11/devadasi-abolition-act-dravidian-movement-history/
  63. https://www.hinduismtoday.com/magazine/december-1993/1993-12-devadasis/
  64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4375001
  65. https://www.ejsss.net.in/article_html.php?did=9313&issueno=0
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373166340_Approaches_on_the_Devadasi_System_of_India_-_A_Review
  67. https://www.shanlaxjournals.in/wp-content/uploads/ash_v5n4_010.pdf
  68. https://www.insightsonindia.com/2023/09/15/muthulakshmi-reddys-efforts-to-abolish-the-devadasi-system/
  69. https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/dance/dr-muthulakshmi-reddy-a-rebel-with-a-cause/article23681989.ece
  70. https://hekint.org/2018/01/22/muthulakshmi-reddi-physician-activist-social-revolutionary/
  71. https://www.tnpscthervupettagam.com/articles-detail/famous-women-leaders-for-social-reformation-in-tamil-nadu?cat=gk-articles/1000
  72. https://www.nijresearch.in/wp-content/uploads/vol-3-no-1-001.pdf
  73. https://frontline.thehindu.com/arts-and-culture/india-at-75-epochal-moments-1947-madras-devadasis-prevention-of-dedication-act/article65720943.ece
  74. https://clpr.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Policy-Brief-on-Devadasi-Legislations.pdf
  75. https://auramag.in/why-does-the-devadasi-system-still-exist-after-75-years-of-independence/
  76. https://www.shankariasparliament.com/current-affairs/3rd-survey-of-devadasi-system
  77. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/devadasi-survey-likely-to-be-extended-by-a-month-owing-to-slow-progress/article70168113.ece
  78. https://kswdc.karnataka.gov.in/13/rehabilitation-of-devadasi-women-/en
  79. https://int.terredeshommes.nl/projects/children-empowerment-of-the-devadasi-system
  80. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/govt-urged-to-end-devadasi-system-by-effectively-implementing-rehabilitation-programmes/article68441719.ece
  81. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/karnataka-welfare-bills-pass-unanimously-in-council-3690100
  82. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_states/karnataka/2025/Bill54of2025KA.pdf
  83. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/bill-proposes-inheritance-rights-for-devadasi-children-outlaws-practice/articleshow/123286092.cms
  84. https://www.nls.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/NLSIU_The-Karnataka-Devadasi-Prevention-Prohibition-Relief-and-Rehabilitation-Bill-2025_July-26-2025.pdf
  85. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/karnataka-proposes-a-new-devadasi-legislation-with-clauses-on-paternity-test-right-to-property/article69841998.ece
  86. https://graam.org.in/karnataka-takes-a-historic-step-paternal-rights-secured-for-children-of-devadasis-under-new-2025-law/
  87. https://www.shankariasparliament.com/current-affairs/gs-i/3rd-survey-of-devadasi-system
  88. https://www.nls.ac.in/news-events/the-karnataka-devadasi-bill-2025-a-landmark-framework-by-centre-for-the-study-of-social-inclusion-nlsiu/
  89. https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/213.-Era-Gangwar.pdf
  90. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol24/iss1/8/
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382854546_DEVADASI_SYSTEM_-THE_SACRED_PROSTITUTION
  92. https://www.amazon.com/Recasting-Devadasi-Patterns-Prostitution-Colonial/dp/8173916446
  93. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447336365-007/html
  94. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0262728019872612
  95. https://www.apsarasarts.com/2024/04/08/remembering-rukmini-devi-arundale-whose-contested-reforms-shaped-modern-day-bharatanatyam/
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6166493/
  97. https://feminisminindia.com/2024/07/01/nagarathnamma-the-iconic-scholar-and-devadasi/
  98. https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/music/The-activist-behind-the-music/article14024691.ece
  99. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/tracking-indian-communities/celebrated-to-condemned-tracing-the-devadasi-story/
  100. https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/JYrbu0aBExY2O1BbNMIiEN/Tanjore-Balasaraswati-The-empress-of-Bharatanatyam.html
  101. https://asiasociety.org/life-was-art-dancer-balasaraswati
  102. https://lifestyle.livemint.com/how-to-lounge/movies-tv/veena-dhanammal-the-grand-matron-of-carnatic-music-111646833814260.html
  103. https://sriramv.com/2020/01/20/the-house-of-musical-wealth/
  104. https://thefederal.com/category/features/how-r-muthukannammal-tamil-nadus-last-devadasi-dancer-keeps-sadri-tradition-alive-113804
  105. https://medialit.in/thevoices/last-surviving-devadasi-r-muthukannammal-hopes-for-historic-recognition-of-sadir-dance-2/
  106. https://theprint.in/india/why-calls-for-fresh-survey-of-devadasis-have-ignited-both-hope-despair-in-karnataka/2708690/
  107. https://www.medboundtimes.com/medboundblog/sitavva-joddati-devadasi-social-reformer
  108. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/three-day-state-level-agitation-seeking-rights-for-devadasis-their-children-this-month-end/article67634842.ece
  109. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/rehabilitate-devadasis-and-bring-them-to-the-mainstream-of-society-state-govt-urged/article68686514.ece
  110. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/ex-devadasis-urge-an-effective-resurvey-on-their-social-and-financial-condition/article70045557.ece
  111. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/fresh-devadasi-survey-slowed-by-document-gaps-poor-planning/articleshow/123981989.cms
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.