Hubbry Logo
DiplocynodonDiplocynodonMain
Open search
Diplocynodon
Community hub
Diplocynodon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Diplocynodon
Diplocynodon
Diplocynodon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Diplocynodon
Temporal range: Paleocene - Middle Miocene, 59.2–13.8 Ma[1]
Diplocynodon ratelii
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Archosauria
Clade: Pseudosuchia
Clade: Crocodylomorpha
Clade: Neosuchia
Clade: Eusuchia
Subfamily: †Diplocynodontinae
Brochu, 1999
Genus: †Diplocynodon
Pomel, 1847
Species
  • †D. darwini (Ludvig, 1877)
  • †D. deponiae (Frey, Laemmert & Riess, 1987)[2][3]
  • †D. elavericus Martin, 2010
  • †D. gervaisi
  • †D. hantoniensis (Wood, 1846)
  • †D. levantinicum Huene & Nikoloff, 1963
  • †D. kochi (Venczel & Codrea, 2022)[4]
  • †D. muelleri (Kälin, 1936)[5]
  • †D. ratelii Pomel, 1847 (type)
  • †D. tormis
  • †D. ungeri (Prangner, 1845)
Synonyms
  • Baryphracta Frey, Laemmert & Riess, 1987[2][3]
  • Enneodon Pranger, 1845
  • Hispanochampsa Kälin, 1936[6][5]
  • Saurocainus

Diplocynodon is an extinct genus of eusuchian, either an alligatoroid crocodilian or a stem-group crocodilian, that lived during the Paleocene to Middle Miocene in Europe. Some species may have reached lengths of 3 metres (9.8 ft),[7] while others probably did not exceed 1 metre (3.3 ft).[8] They are almost exclusively found in freshwater environments.[9] The various species are thought to have been opportunistic aquatic predators.[10]

In the nineteenth century, D. steineri was named from Styria, Austria and D. styriacus was named from Austria and France. A third Austrian species, Enneodon ungeri, was placed in its own genus. The Austrian and French species of Diplocynodon were synonymized with E. ungeri in 2011, and because the name Diplocynodon has priority over Enneodon, the species is now called D. ungeri.[11] Other genera have recently been found to be synonymous with Diplocynodon. Hispanochampsa muelleri of Spain was determined to be synonymous with Diplocynodon in 2006,[5] and Baryphracta deponaie of Germany was confirmed to be synonymous with Diplocynodon in 2012.[3]

Well preserved specimens have been found in the Messel Pit and the Geiseltal lignite deposit in Germany. Most articulated Diplocynodon specimens from these localities contain gastroliths. In the Eocene epoch, the German sites were either a swampy freshwater lake (Messel Pit) or a peat bog swamp (Geiseltal).

Species

[edit]
Species
Species Age Location Unit Notes Images

D. darwini

Lutetian

Germany

Messel pit

All specimens are from Messel pit of Germany. Synonyms are: D. ebertsi and D. hallense.

D. darwini from Messel pit, Hesse, Germany, 48 million years old
Skull of D. hantoniensis
Diplocynodon cf. ratelii

D. deponaie[2][3]

Middle Eocene

Germany

Messel pit

Synonyms are: Baryphracta deponaie.

D. elavericus[12]

Middle Priabonian

France

Domérat

All specimens came from Allier, Massif Central of France.

D. gervaisi

Earliest Rupelian

France

Ronzon

Synonyms are: Saurocainus gervaisi.

D. hantoniensis

Early Priabonian

United Kingdom

Headon Hill Formation

All specimens came from Hordwell, southern England. D. cf. hantoniensis is known from the Oligocene of Dordogne, France.

D. levantinicum[7] Oligocene (Chattian) Bulgaria Maritsa Formation

D. kochi

Eocene (Priabonian)

Romania

Cluj Limestone Formation

D. muelleri[5]

Middle Rupelian

Spain

El Talladell

More than 100 are known, all from Lleida Province, Catalonia. Synonyms are: Hispanochampsa muelleri, D. guerini and D. marini.

D. ratelii

France

Saint-Gérand-le-Puy*

D. ratelii is the type species of Diplocynodon. Most of the specimens came from Allier, Massif Central of France. Synonyms are: D. gracile.

D. tormis

Late Bartonian

Spain

Salamanca

D. ungeri[11]

Middle Miocene

Synonyms are: Enneodon ungeri, D. steineri, and D. styriacus (see text).

*Locality and/or horizon of the type specimen.

Phylogeny

[edit]

Diplocynodon is one of the basal-most members of the superfamily Alligatoroidea. Diplocynodon's placement within Alligatoroidea can be shown in the cladogram below, based on a 2018 tip dating study by Lee & Yates that simultaneously used morphological, molecular (DNA sequencing), and stratigraphic (fossil age) data.[13]

Crocodylia

Below is a more detailed cladogram of Diplocynodon:[14]

Diplocynodon

Diplocynodon deponiae

Diplocynodon darwini

Diplocynodon hantoniensis

Diplocynodon ratelii

Diplocynodon tormis

Diplocynodon muelleri

In a 2025 study, Jules D. Walter and colleagues argue that many character states previously thought to be diagnostic for alligatoroids were actually much more widespread. In their analysis several genera traditionally viewed as basal alligatoroids, among them Diplocynodon, were found to not only fall outside of Alligatoroidea but to not even be true crocodilians, instead representing derived non-crocodilian eusuchians.[15]

Palaeobiology

[edit]

Osteohistological analysis of D. hantoniensis suggests that it had a similar pattern of growth to the modern American alligator, exhibiting a determinate, seasonally-controlled rate of growth. Additionally, D. hantoniensis was allometrically very similar to American alligators, with the femoral length and femoral circumference scaling in a similar fashion in both species.[16]

CT scans of D. tormis reconstruct internal structures of its snout and a portion of its brain, with implications for its sensory and cognitive capabilities. The relative sizes of the olfactory bulbs overlap with alligatoroids and fall short of true crocodiles, adding to anatomical evidence for a closer relationship to alligatoroids. The optic lobes and reptile encephalization quotient are proportionally smaller than other medium-sized crocodilians, though this could be influenced by incomplete preservation at the back of the skull.[17]

Palaeoecology

[edit]

Based on skull shape analysis of the crocodylians known from the Lutetian site of Geiseltal, Diplocynodon was a small generalist carnivore that partitioned its resources with the larger Asiatosuchus.[18] According to enamel δ13C values from specimens from the Late Oligocene site of Enspel, the Diplocynodon living in the palaeoenvironment fed primarily on aquatic vertebrates.[19]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Diplocynodon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Diplocynodon is an extinct genus of basal alligatoroid crocodilian within the family Diplocynodontidae, known exclusively from fossil remains across Europe and spanning from the Late Paleocene to the Middle Miocene (approximately 58 to 11 million years ago). The genus comprises 12 valid species and represents one of the longest temporal ranges for any specific crocodile genus in the fossil record. Taxonomically, Diplocynodon belongs to the subfamily Diplocynodontinae within , part of the larger clade , and is distinguished from more derived alligatoroids by primitive features such as confluent dentary alveoli and a linear frontoparietal suture. Phylogenetic analyses place it as a basal member of , often sister to more crownward groups like Alligatorinae, based on cranial and postcranial morphology from multiple specimens. The genus was first described by Auguste Pomel in 1847, with the D. ratelii from French Eocene deposits. Fossils of Diplocynodon have been recovered from over 300 localities, primarily in Western and , including , , , , , and , with rarer occurrences in such as and . The temporal distribution shows abundance in the Eocene and early , with scarcer late and Middle records, reflecting adaptations to changing and environments. Notable species include D. remensis from the Late Paleocene of , D. hantoniensis from the Eocene of the Isle of Wight, D. tormis from the of , and D. kochi from Eocene deposits in , the latter representing the first diplocynodontid in a marine-influenced setting. Morphologically, Diplocynodon species were small to medium-sized crocodylians, typically measuring 1.5 to 2.5 meters in total length, with brevirostrine (short, broad) snouts, robust skulls, and bipartite ventral osteoderms indicative of a freshwater lifestyle similar to modern caimans. Key diagnostic traits include a foramen aëreum on the quadrate and a distinct dorsoventral step on the frontal bone, supporting its ecological role as an ambush predator in Paleogene riverine and lacustrine habitats. While primarily freshwater dwellers, recent findings suggest some tolerance for brackish or marginal marine conditions, as evidenced by D. kochi fossils. The genus' persistence through climatic shifts underscores its adaptability in Europe's Cenozoic ecosystems.

Taxonomy

Etymology

The genus name Diplocynodon derives from the Greek roots diplo- ("double"), kyn- ("dog"), and -odon ("tooth"), alluding to the characteristic enlarged fourth maxillary tooth that resembles the prominent canine dentition seen in canids, with "double" possibly referring to the paired nature of such enlarged teeth in the upper and lower jaws. This name was coined by French paleontologist Auguste Pomel in 1847, based on fossil material recovered from deposits in , marking the initial recognition of the as a distinct extinct crocodilian . The subfamily Diplocynodontinae was formally established by paleontologist Christopher A. Brochu in 1999 as a stem-based within , named after the Diplocynodon to emphasize the shared derived dental features, such as the distinctive arrangement and enlargement of posterior maxillary teeth, that define its members.

Classification

Diplocynodon is an extinct of eusuchian crocodylian, historically classified within the superfamily and assigned to the Diplocynodontinae. The genus name, derived from Greek diploos (double) and kuōn (dog) combined with odous (tooth), reflects its distinctive featuring paired tooth-like structures. The initial taxonomic placement of Diplocynodon was established by Pomel in , who described the D. ratelii from Eocene fossils in the , , recognizing it as a primitive alligator-like form. This early classification highlighted its eusuchian characteristics, including a eusuchian-, while noting resemblances to modern alligators. Key revisions occurred in Brochu's 1999 comprehensive phylogenetic study of , which refined Diplocynodon's position as a basal alligatoroid, supported by shared derived traits such as a procoelous vertebral centrum and specific cranial sutures, placing it near the base of the diverging early from other alligatoroids. This analysis incorporated multiple species and emphasized its role as an early European representative of the group. Ongoing taxonomic debates have intensified with 2025 phylogenetic analyses using expanded morphological datasets, which recover Diplocynodon outside as a stem-crocodylian, potentially aligning it with stem-group eusuchians or even non-crown Crocodylia members. These findings are driven by cranial morphology, including a brevirostrine , a notch between the and , and confluent third and fourth dentary alveoli—traits more plesiomorphic and akin to North American basal forms like Borealosuchus—challenging its traditional alligatoroid status and its late European origins. However, the consensus as of November 2025 maintains its placement as a basal alligatoroid based on verified morphology.

Description

Skull and Dentition

The skull of Diplocynodon exhibits a brevirostrine morphology, with a short and broad rostrum featuring a dorsally projected external naris and a smooth premaxillary surface lateral to the naris. The quadrates are robust, with a small, ventrally reflected medial hemicondyle. A large sulcus is present on the surangular lateral to the . A linear frontoparietal suture positioned between the supratemporal fenestrae serves as a diagnostic cranial trait for the . Dentition in Diplocynodon is distinctly heterodont, with anterior teeth conical and carinated for piercing, while posterior teeth transition to bulbous forms adapted for crushing. A key autapomorphy is the enlarged fourth maxillary tooth, which is prominently caniniform, often accompanied by a similarly enlarged fifth tooth; this configuration is evident across species such as D. hantoniensis and D. darwini. In comparison, modern alligators (Alligator spp.) display less pronounced posterior bulbosity, with a more uniformly conical dentition suited to a broader predatory range. Occlusion pits on the maxilla, typically positioned posterior to the sixth and seventh alveoli, further distinguish the genus from other basal alligatoroids. Specimens of Diplocynodon show cranial variation primarily in size, with lengths ranging from approximately 23 cm in smaller individuals (e.g., D. kochi) to 37.5 cm in larger forms (e.g., D. hantoniensis), reflecting ontogenetic and interspecific differences. The suborbital fenestra is notably long in some , extending to the eighth maxillary alveolus, while dentary length varies slightly, reaching only the third or fourth alveolus. Confluent dentary alveoli represent another genus-level diagnostic feature, shared with select other eusuchians but combined uniquely in Diplocynodon.

Postcranial Skeleton

The postcranial skeleton of Diplocynodon is characterized by a vertebral column adapted for flexibility in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. Presacral vertebrae exhibit procoelous centra, with anterior concavities and posterior convexities facilitating spinal movement, while the first sacral vertebra is concave anteriorly and flat posteriorly, and the second sacral is nearly flat anteriorly with slight posterior concavity. Cervical vertebrae typically include hypapophyses extending along the ventral surface, and dorsal vertebrae lack prominent ventral features, contributing to a streamlined axial structure. Caudal vertebrae are elongated, featuring a ventral sulcus, low ridges, and chevron tuberosities for muscle attachment, supporting tail propulsion. Osteoderms form a continuous dorsal armor across the vertebral column and body, resembling that of modern crocodylians, with rectangular dorsal osteoderms bearing a medial and undulating anterior margins for overlapping articulation, and bipartite ventral osteoderms exhibiting pitted ornamentation without keels. In D. hantoniensis, the comprises 9 cervical, 15 dorsal, and 2 sacral vertebrae, with an undetermined number of caudals, indicating a moderately elongated body. For D. levantinicum, preserved cervical centra show smooth surfaces, small nutritional foramina, and horizontal parapophyses, while caudal fragments display broad posterior condyles. The features shortened, robust limbs suited for semi-aquatic locomotion, with forelimbs shorter than hindlimbs. The is sigmoidal with a straight deltopectoral crest and prominent muscle scars for M. teres major and M. latissimus dorsi, while the has a large process and subquadrangular proximal articulation. The is longer than the , sigmoidal in outline, with scars for M. pubo-ischio-femoralis, and the broader proximally with attachments for M. flexor tibialis internus. Phalanges are dumbbell-shaped with triangular proximal articulations and distal condyles, suggesting reduced digit length consistent with in crocodylians, though specific counts are not preserved. The pelvic girdle is robust, with the ilium featuring a rounded dorsal margin and occupying half its lateral surface, and the forming a medially directed with flexor muscle scars, supporting weight-bearing during terrestrial ambulation. The tail is reinforced by osteoderms and elongated caudals, enabling lateral undulation for aquatic propulsion, with transverse processes that are short and chevron facets positioned posteriorly. Overall, Diplocynodon exhibits a compact build, with total body lengths estimated at 1–3 meters based on skeletal proportions and -to-body ratios of approximately 1:7. In D. hantoniensis, lengths up to 375 mm correlate with this moderate size, emphasizing adaptations for versatile movement across habitats.

Species

Valid Species

The genus Diplocynodon includes 12 valid as of 2023, recognized based on distinct cranial and dental morphologies from European Cenozoic deposits spanning the late to Middle . Recent 2025 phylogenetic analyses reclassify the genus as stem-group crocodylians rather than basal alligatoroids, potentially affecting future species assignments. The , Diplocynodon ratelii (Pomel, 1847), originates from the Middle Eocene (Lutetian) of , specifically the lacustrine limestones near Saint-Gérand-le-Puy in the department. The type specimen (MNHN.F AC 9648) consists of a nearly complete and partial , diagnosed primarily by 18 maxillary alveoli, a relatively short dentary ending at the fourth alveolus, and confluent external nares separated by a thin septum. Diplocynodon darwini (Lydekker, 1886) is known from the Early Eocene (Ypresian) of , with the type specimen (NHMUK PV R 3369) comprising a partial from the London Clay Formation at Sheppey. It is distinguished by 18 maxillary alveoli similar to the , but with a more elongate rostrum and enlarged fourth maxillary tooth forming a prominent caniniform. Diplocynodon hantoniensis (Wood, 1846) comes from the Late Eocene (–) of southern , particularly the Basin, where individuals reached up to 3 meters in total length. The type material includes a (NHMUK PV OR 40010) from the Barton Clay, diagnosed by four autapomorphies including the retention of an ectopterygoid–pterygoid flexure into adulthood, a deeply incised ventral margin of the jugal, and a quadrate with a broad medial shelf. Diplocynodon tormis (Antunes, 1987) is recorded from the Middle Miocene (Astaracian) of northeastern , near Ribarroja del Turia. The type specimen (MPV 1987/1) is an incomplete exhibiting a short dentary terminating at the third alveolus, 17 maxillary alveoli, and robust, bulbous posterior teeth adapted for crushing. Diplocynodon muelleri (de Stefano, 1903) hails from Eocene and localities in , such as the Messel Pit (Lutetian) and Basin (Rupelian). The type specimen (HLMD Me 101) is a partial characterized by unique palatal morphology, including a broad pterygoid surface with prominent ridges and a reduced suborbital . The remaining seven valid species—D. buetikonensis, D. deponiae, D. elavericus, D. kochi, D. levantinicum, D. remensis, and D. ungeri—extend the genus's temporal range from the late (D. remensis, Cernay, ) to the early Miocene (D. ungeri, Sansan, Austria), each diagnosed by variations in alveolar counts (typically 17–18), fenestral proportions, and jaw adductor insertions, with type specimens preserved in institutions such as the MNHN () and NHMUK ().

Synonyms and Invalid Names

Several historical names proposed for European fossils of basal alligatoroids have been recognized as junior synonyms of species within the genus Diplocynodon, reflecting early taxonomic confusion due to fragmentary material and morphological overlap. For instance, Alligator darwini Ludwig, 1877, Crocodilus ebertsi Ludwig, 1877, and Diplocynodon hallense Kuhn, 1938, are all junior synonyms of D. darwini, based on shared diagnostic features such as rostral proportions and dental morphology. Similarly, Crocodilus gracilis Vaillant, 1872, is a junior synonym of D. ratelii Lartet, 1851, as determined by comparative analysis of symphyseal and palatal characters. The genus Hispanochampsa Kälin, 1936, was erected for remains from but later reassigned to Diplocynodon, with H. muelleri becoming D. muelleri comb. nov. due to its placement within Diplocynodontinae via cladistic analysis emphasizing quadrate and pterygoid features. Other proposed genera, such as Baryphracta Frey, Laemmert, and Riess, , have been synonymized under Diplocynodon, with B. deponiae reclassified as D. deponiae based on revised skull reconstructions. A number of names are considered invalid or nomina dubia owing to inadequate type material or lack of distinguishing autapomorphies. Diplocynodon gervaisi Gervais, 1859, is a due to the absence of an original diagnosis and reliance on non-diagnostic fragments. Likewise, D. styriacus Hofmann, 1887, and D. steineri Hofmann, 1887, from deposits in , , are nomina dubia or junior synonyms of D. ungeri Pruner von Prangner, 1845, as their holotypes consist of isolated osteoderms and vertebrae lacking genus-level specificity; under ICZN priority, Enneodon ungeri (the original combination for Styrian material) is itself a junior synonym of D. ungeri. Additional rejected taxa include D. guerini Bataller, 1941 (lacking diagnostic traits), D. stuckeri Weigelt, 1930 (too fragmentary). These taxonomic resolutions stem largely from Brochu's (1999) comprehensive review of , which reduced the recognized species count from over 20 to 7 valid ones through synonymies and exclusions of undiagnostic names, emphasizing cladistic character scoring for European and fossils. Subsequent studies, such as those by Piras and Buscalioni (2006) and Walter et al. (2025), have further refined these assignments using phylogenetic datasets and new specimen examinations.

Fossil Record

Discovery History

The genus Diplocynodon was established in 1847 by French paleontologist Nicolas Auguste Pomel based on crocodile-like fossils collected from early (MN2) deposits at Saint-Gérand-le-Puy in the department of central , marking the initial recognition of this extinct alligatoroid . These type specimens, attributed to the species D. ratelii, consisted primarily of cranial and dental remains, highlighting the genus's distinctive double-row . Subsequent major discoveries in the late 19th and early 20th centuries expanded knowledge of Diplocynodon's diversity and preservation. In 1875, the first significant vertebrate fossil from Germany's Messel Pit—an Eocene (Lutetian) deposit near —was a partial of D. darwini, noted for its exceptional soft-tissue preservation due to anoxic lake-bottom conditions that prevented decay and scavenging. Excavations at the nearby Geiseltal lignite mines (also Lutetian, ) yielded numerous well-preserved Diplocynodon , including a rare example with eggs, providing insights into reproductive behavior amid the site's environment. In the English Basin, late Eocene () coastal exposures like Hordle Cliff and Barton produced numerous cranial and postcranial fossils of D. hantoniensis starting in the mid-19th century, contributing to early understandings of the genus's postcranial anatomy. Recent excavations in the 2020s have further enriched the fossil record, particularly in Spanish localities. Discoveries from the Duero Basin, including detailed cranial scans of D. tormis, have provided new data on inner skull structures from Middle Eocene sites. Overall, over 300 localities have yielded Diplocynodon remains across , with many comprising well-preserved skulls that facilitate taxonomic and phylogenetic studies.

Temporal and Geographic Distribution

Diplocynodon fossils are known from the late to the middle , spanning approximately 59 to 13.8 million years ago. The genus exhibits its peak diversity during the Eocene epoch (56–33.9 Ma), with at least five species documented across , including D. tormis from , D. darwini and D. deponiae from , D. elavericus from , and D. hantoniensis from . Earlier records include the oldest species, D. remensis, from late deposits in , while later occurrences extend into the early to middle , represented by species such as D. ratelii in and and D. ungeri in and . Geographically, Diplocynodon is restricted to , with no confirmed records from despite its affiliation with the alligatoroid clade. Fossils have been recovered primarily from western and , including (e.g., Mont de Berru in the late Paleocene and Massif Central in the late Eocene), (e.g., Messel Pit and Geiseltal in the Eocene), the ( Basin in the late Eocene), (e.g., middle Eocene and early Miocene sites), (middle Miocene), and the (early Miocene). Eastern extensions include records from (late Eocene Cluj Limestone Formation), (late Oligocene), and (middle Eocene). Over 300 localities have yielded remains, underscoring its widespread but continental distribution. Stratigraphically, key occurrences are associated with lacustrine and fluvial deposits from the and . Notable formations include the Ypresian Messel Formation in , yielding well-preserved Eocene specimens, and the Eocene–Oligocene transition layers in the and . Miocene records, such as those from the Aquitanian– of France's Saint-Gérand-le-Puy and Spain's Els Casots, highlight the genus's persistence into younger strata.

Phylogeny

Evolutionary Relationships

Diplocynodon occupies a basal position within , the superfamily encompassing extant alligators and caimans. This placement is supported by shared morphological traits with modern alligators, including procoelous vertebrae—a key synapomorphy of , the larger clade containing Alligatoroidea—and quadrate features such as an expanded ventral process and broad pterygoid contact that facilitate jaw mechanics typical of alligatoroids. Cladistic analyses of morphological data have reinforced this basal alligatoroid affinity. In particular, the extensive character matrix developed by Brochu (1999), incorporating 164 traits across , recovers Diplocynodon as monophyletic and as the to crown-group (encompassing Alligatorinae and Caimaninae), with a close relationship to the Eocene Baryphracta deponiae.

Recent Phylogenetic Analyses

In the early 2000s, phylogenetic analyses solidified the placement of Diplocynodon within , with Brochu's (2004) comprehensive study of alligatorine relationships using a matrix of approximately 167 morphological characters across 40 taxa confirming the genus as a basal member of the , supported by synapomorphies such as the configuration of the pterygoid flanges and choanal morphology. This parsimony-based resolved Diplocynodon as to more derived alligatoroids, highlighting its role in early diversification in . Subsequent studies built on this foundation, incorporating additional species and refined scorings to affirm the of Diplocynodontinae as a basal alligatoroid . Methodological advancements in post-2010 analyses have expanded character matrices to over 150 entries, often exceeding 180, to capture subtle cranial and postcranial variations, with recent works integrating for internal anatomy like neurovascular canals and endocranial features. For instance, a 2022 re-evaluation of D. levantinicum employed a 187-character matrix across 105 taxa, analyzed via maximum parsimony (both unweighted and implied weighting) with and without molecular constraints, recovering Diplocynodontinae as monophyletic and basal within with moderate support (bootstrap values around 60% in constrained runs). approaches, though less common in early studies, have appeared in broader crocodylian phylogenies, such as a 2021 dataset reappraisal using extended implied weighting to handle , which placed Diplocynodon species consistently at the base of but noted polytomies indicating unresolved interspecific relationships. These methods reveal discrepancies between parsimony (favoring basal alligatoroid placement) and (yielding lower posterior probabilities, often below 0.7, due to in fossils), underscoring the genus's transitional morphology. A significant shift occurred in 2025 with Walter et al.'s expanded phylogeny, which incorporated scorings for 219 morphological characters across 128 taxa, including newly digitized D. remensis specimens, reclassifying Diplocynodon outside crown Crocodylia as a non-alligatoroid stem eusuchian closely allied with North American Borealosuchus. This parsimony analysis with molecular scaffolding achieved higher resolution through spatiotemporal constraints, suggesting a single transatlantic dispersal event and challenging prior alligatoroid consensus by emphasizing shared plesiomorphic traits like elongated snouts and ventral armor. The implications extend to subfamily-level taxonomy, proposing Diplocynodontinae as a stem-group rather than a derived alligatoroid radiation, potentially requiring revision of European Paleogene crocodylian biogeography. Ongoing debates highlight the need for integrated Bayesian total-evidence models to reconcile these placements.

Paleobiology

Growth and Ontogeny

Osteohistological studies of Diplocynodon hantoniensis from the late Eocene of the demonstrate determinate growth, characterized by the presence of an external fundamental system (EFS) in the cortex of five femoral specimens, signaling the cessation of peripheral bone deposition at skeletal maturity. This pattern mirrors that of modern alligatoroids such as Alligator mississippiensis, where growth halts upon reaching adulthood rather than continuing indeterminately. Growth lines, including lines of arrested growth (LAGs) and annuli, are evident in the bone tissue, with cyclical growth marks (CGMs) numbering 4 to 25 per specimen, indicative of seasonal periodicity in growth similar to extant caimans and alligators. Body size in Diplocynodon varied ontogenetically, with estimated total lengths ranging from 1.2 meters in subadults to 3.4 meters in mature individuals, falling within the size spectrum of living American alligators. Growth rates decelerated over time, comparable to those in A. mississippiensis, where subadult stages exhibit annual increments of approximately 10-15 cm, based on femoral circumference and CGM spacing analyses. Bone microanatomy transitions from highly vascularized, rapidly depositing tissue in juveniles to more compact, remodeled cortex in adults, reflecting a shift from fast early growth to slower maturation. Intraspecific variation in maturity is observed across specimens, with some reaching the EFS at smaller femoral sizes (e.g., 5.5 cm diameter), potentially suggesting individual or subtle dimorphic differences in life history, though not conclusively tied to . Overall, these features highlight a conservative growth strategy in early alligatoroids, emphasizing determinate, seasonally modulated development adapted to temperate environments.

Diet and Predatory Behavior

Diplocynodon displayed opportunistic carnivory, targeting a range of prey including and small vertebrates in aquatic and semi-aquatic habitats. This feeding strategy is supported by its dental morphology, characterized by enlarged caniniform teeth in the anterior and dentary, which were adapted for grasping and holding slippery or struggling prey such as . Direct evidence comes from coprolites attributed to crocodilians at the Eocene Messel site, which contain scales alongside fragments of bones, indicating a diet that incorporated both aquatic and terrestrial elements. The predatory behavior of Diplocynodon likely involved tactics, with individuals lurking in freshwater settings to launch sudden attacks on passing prey. This inference arises from the broad, robust rostrum shape observed in multiple species, a feature shared with modern alligatoroids that facilitates lateral strikes and stability during lunges in shallow water. Stable isotope analyses from Messel further corroborate a piscivorous component, with δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N values in Diplocynodon bones reflecting consumption of and other aquatic organisms. As a higher-order consumer in Eocene ecosystems, Diplocynodon occupied an apex predatory role locally, particularly in lacustrine environments like Messel, where isotopic signatures place it at elevated trophic levels above primary producers and herbivores. of scavenging is suggested by the inclusion of partially digested fragments in associated coprolites, pointing to opportunistic feeding on carrion alongside active .

Paleoecology

Habitats and Environments

Diplocynodon primarily inhabited freshwater environments such as lakes, rivers, and swamps across during the and periods. Fossils from the Eocene Messel Pit in indicate a subtropical lake formed in a volcanic crater, surrounded by dense forests with warm, humid conditions that supported diverse aquatic life. Similarly, remains from the Early Miocene Els Casots site in the reveal a lacustrine-palustrine system with permanent water bodies in a forested, humid . In the Early Miocene Ahníkov sites of the , over 200 specimens suggest swampy areas with shallow lakes and flooding rivers, ideal for juvenile crocodilians. Although most records point to freshwater settings, some fossils occur in shallow marine deposits, such as the late Eocene Viștea Limestone Formation in , , where packstone and layers with preserved Diplocynodon remains, possibly indicating coastal incursions or postmortem transport. These habitats reflect the genus's preference for warm, stable aquatic ecosystems, with evidence of ambush predation in both inland and marginal marine waters. The distribution of Diplocynodon correlated with major climatic shifts, from the warm greenhouse conditions of the and —characterized by tropical to subtropical forests—to the cooling trends of the late and , marking a transition to an icehouse world with the onset of glaciation. This cooling reduced suitable habitats, leading to a contraction of the genus's range from widespread European occurrences in the to restriction in by the late . Preservation of Diplocynodon fossils benefited from exceptional lagerstätten conditions, such as the anoxic bottom waters of the Eocene Messel Pit lake, which minimized scavenging and decay, allowing for complete skeletons and even impressions. At the middle Eocene Geiseltal site in , rapid burial in coastal swamp deposits with spring waters neutralized acidic conditions, preserving articulated specimens including rare eggs. These biases favor discoveries from low-oxygen, fine-grained sedimentary environments over more dynamic fluvial settings.

Biotic Interactions

In the middle Eocene Geiseltal Fossil-Lagerstätte of , Diplocynodon coexisted with the larger-bodied Asiatosuchus in shared freshwater basins through resource partitioning facilitated by differences in body size and skull morphology. Geometric morphometric analysis of 28 crocodylian skulls from the site, compared to 218 extant species, revealed that Diplocynodon occupied a distinct morphospace, likely targeting smaller aquatic prey such as and amphibians, while Asiatosuchus pursued larger vertebrates, thereby minimizing direct and enabling high crocodylian diversity in the assemblage. This partitioning was supported by the warm Eocene climate, which promoted specialized diets and reduced overlap in prey preferences among sympatric taxa including Boverisuchus. Predation dynamics involving Diplocynodon are inferred from its morphology and size, suggesting it acted as an opportunistic predator within its size class, targeting available terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates that ventured near water bodies. In the same Geiseltal community, Diplocynodon's smaller adult size relative to terrestrial planocraniids like Boverisuchus implies potential vulnerability to predation by these larger crocodyliforms during ontogenetic stages or in overlapping habitats. Diplocynodon played a dominant role in Eocene freshwater guilds across , forming a key component of diverse crocodylian assemblages in lacustrine and fluvial systems, where it was often the most abundant alligatoroid. Its abundance declined through the and into the , coinciding with a cooling climate that restricted its range to southern European refugia, and the radiation of immigrant crocodyloids such as , which engaged in brief before Diplocynodon's local extinctions. This shift altered community structures, with crocodyloids supplanting basal alligatoroids like Diplocynodon in warming subtropical niches during the late .

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9653056/
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068315002298
  3. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/amphibian-and-reptile-science/articles/10.3389/famrs.2023.1217025/full
  4. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/188/2/579/5525732
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/new-species-of-diplocynodon-crocodylia-alligatoroidea-from-the-late-eocene-of-the-massif-central-france-and-the-evolution-of-the-genus-in-the-climatic-context-of-the-late-palaeogene/1FEB6A21CB84ACC865489D7A97A10525
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268989217_Crocodilian_remains_from_the_late_Palaeocene_of_Mont_de_Berru_Marne_France_and_the_early_evolution_of_alligatoroids_in_Europe
  7. http://www.paleofile.com/Eusuchia/Diplocynodon.asp
  8. https://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/diplocynodon/
  9. https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1015278
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233497701_Taxonomic_clarification_of_Diplocynodon_POMEL_1847_Crocodilia_from_the_Miocene_of_Styria_Austria
  11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1999.10011201
  12. https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Phylogenetics-taxonomy-and-historical-biogeography-of/9984229290502771
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248686963_A_new_species_of_Diplocynodon_Crocodylia_Alligatoroidea_from_the_Late_Eocene_of_the_Massif_Central_France_and_the_evolution_of_the_genus_in_the_climatic_context_of_the_Late_Palaeogene
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-07653-4
  15. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14167
  16. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/7818d60a-1914-48e5-b3b6-ceb7418ce5c8/Walter-JD_PhD_Final.pdf
  17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-07653-4
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631068319300879
  19. https://commondescentpodcast.com/2023/03/04/episode-160-the-messel-pit/
  20. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/palaios/article-abstract/30/6/446/325147/RARE-IN-SITU-PRESERVATION-OF-ADULT-CROCODYLIAN
  21. https://fr.pensoft.net/article/133743/
  22. http://www.geology.cz/bulletin/fulltext/1803_Chroust_210411.pdf
  23. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2006.3613
  24. https://doc.rero.ch/record/15681/files/PAL_E1171.pdf
  25. https://peerj.com/articles/12094/
  26. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/advance-article/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syaf058/8242158
  27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joa.14231
  28. https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/species/alligator/distribution_growth_texas_coast/index.phtml
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260139755_Reappraisal_of_the_Morphology_and_Phylogenetic_Relationships_of_the_Middle_Eocene_Alligatoroid_Diplocynodon_deponiae_Frey_Laemmert_and_Riess_1987_Based_on_a_Three-Dimensional_Specimen
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5FEA0984419D7F9F3CCA282C613084F0/S0094837300019126a.pdf/stable_isotopic_evidence_for_fossil_food_webs_in_eocene_lake_messel.pdf
  31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12549-024-00633-2
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018214004027
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280531321_Rare_in_situ_preservation_of_adult_crocodylian_with_eggs_from_the_Middle_Eocene_of_Geiseltal_Germany
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/evidence-for-prey-preference-partitioning-in-the-middle-eocene-highdiversity-crocodylian-assemblage-of-the-geiseltalfossillagerstatte-germany-utilizing-skull-shape-analysis/717771502180E87AA6FE3E8966955D72
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227629751_First_European_evidence_for_transcontinental_dispersal_of_Crocodylus_Late_Neogene_of_Southern_Italy
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.