Hubbry Logo
Australian Financial ReviewAustralian Financial ReviewMain
Open search
Australian Financial Review
Community hub
Australian Financial Review
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Australian Financial Review
Australian Financial Review
Australian Financial Review
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) is an Australian compact daily newspaper with a focus on business, politics and economic affairs. The newspaper is based in Sydney, New South Wales, and has been published continuously since its founding in 1951. It is currently owned by Nine Entertainment. The AFR is published in tabloid format six times a week, and provides 24/7 coverage through its website and mobile app. In November 2019, the AFR reached 2.647 million Australians through both print and digital mediums according to Mumbrella.[3]

Key Information

The Australian Financial Review started as a print-only weekly newspaper in 1951, before changing to a bi-weekly in 1961, and a daily newspaper in 1963. The paper now publishes multiple magazines and a supplementary weekend paper, which was launched in 1995. In that same year, the AFR website was also released, which helped to expand its readership base across all media.[4] The AFR, along with most of Fairfax Media, was purchased by Nine Entertainment in 2018.[5]

History

[edit]

The Australian Financial Review newspaper started as a weekly publication in 1951, published by John Fairfax & Sons. The paper's main objective was to inform the Australian public on business life and news.[6]

In 1961, the AFR converted to a bi-weekly, and then established itself as the first daily newspaper by 1963.[7] Despite other newspapers claiming the title of the first daily national paper, Maxwell Newton was the editor in charge of taking the Financial Review from a bi-weekly to the first daily national paper.[8] During 1961–62, the AFR's primary competitor was The Australian Financial Times, which was in operation for less than 12 months. In the 1960s and 1970s, the AFR developed a strong readership amongst a specialist business audience due to its neutral stance on domestic government policies.[6] In the 1970s, despite the AFR's reputation as a national business daily, many saw it as the primary competitor for The Australian given its high proportion of readers in the AB demographic.[8]

In 1995, Fairfax launched the Australian Financial Review Magazine in response to its growing readership across a wide-ranging audience.[9] The magazine was published to cover topics other than business including leisure, politics, travel, sports, fashion, and other peripheral topics.[10] In December 2019, the magazine recorded an average issue readership of 326,000.[11] Since its launch in 1995, the AFR Magazine has won the 'Best Newspaper Inserted Magazine' (2013-2019), 'Newspaper Inserted Brand of the Year' (2019) and Mumbrella's 'Special Issue of the Year' (2019).[9]

The magazine's founding was followed by the launch of the AFR's website in the same year, which started as a free online source of financial news.[12]

In 1997, the AFR launched its Weekend Edition which extended the paper's publications into the weekend, with an explicit focus of targeting the growing readership base by providing news articles outside of the traditional finance setting.[9]

In 2016, the AFR launched mobile and iPad compatible applications to provide its digital subscribers more accessibility to its news platform. This was aimed at allowing cross-platform accessibility without having to download two separate applications across different device platforms.[13] The application carries similar features to the website including sections such as: Street Talk and Rear Window. The product management team decided to revamp the app due to the wide uptake of smartphones in the Australian market, and to improve their user-interface experience. The UTS Business School was the launch partner for the app, providing logistical advice on the app's delivery.[14] The app's subscription price is included in the 'all premium digital subscription' bundle.

The Australian Financial Review has grown its product offerings since its beginnings as a finance newsroom. It has consistently been well received by the journalism sector as one of the most high-quality newsrooms across Australia.[15] Since the 2000s, the AFR has launched BOSS (magazine for business leadership and strategy) and the Sophisticated Traveller magazine. In 2019, the Australian Financial Review recorded double-digit subscriber growth, as it continued to market its newspaper as the driver of Australian business-people's success and ambitions.[3] In 2020, due to the newspaper company's expansion efforts across different readership bases, the AFR reached 2.647m Australians a month.[3]

Evolution of paywall system

[edit]

The AFR first introduced its paywall in 2006, charging online users to view its articles – a payment model that had not yet been utilised by any other Australian newspaper firm.[16] The switch to a paywall was done because the newspaper company thought it could further monetise its niche business audience who could afford it.[17] Following this change, the AFR continued to adjust the pricing of its subscription due to low subscriber growth.[18]

In 2011, it newly introduced a freemium paywall in which only a small portion of articles were free. It has been noted that the AFR's website locks approximately 86% of its online content behind a paywall, higher than its closest competitor the National Business Review.[18] This was aimed at increasing its digital readership which in 2011 amounted to 6,000 subscribers.[19] In addition, it was later determined that the AFR's failures in attracting online subscribers was due to its paywall being too expensive. Its 2012 price of $59 AUD was notably higher than other international mastheads, including The New York Times which was priced at $37.84 AUD.[18] As a result, the AFR has since lowered its digital subscription price to $29.50 AUD.

Nine Entertainment merger

[edit]

The mega-cap deal that saw Nine Entertainment and Fairfax Media merge was inspired by initial chats between Hugh Marks (Nine CEO) and Nick Falloon (Fairfax chairman).[20] The pair discussed how the two companies' assets could synergise, improve efficiencies, save costs and increase scale. During the lead up to the merger, there were a few roadblocks. In 2016, the proposed merger was not feasible due to government legislation surrounding media ownership.[21] In addition, Nine Entertainment's board believed that its share price was undervalued and thus wanted to delay any acquisition until its fair value had been reflected. Amongst the delays in talks between the two parties, Fairfax had other suitors including private equity groups TPG Capital and Hellman & Friedman, which ended up walking away from the table.[22]

In 2018, Nine Entertainment's board re-entered into talks with Fairfax of a potential merger after its share price had jumped following an upbeat earnings report.[23] The proposed structure of the takeover was 0.3627 Nine shares plus $0.025 AUD per Fairfax share, composing a cash plus scrip deal. This represented a 21.9% takeover premium to Fairfax's last close, and valued Fairfax at $2313.8mm AUD.[5] Once the deal was made, it was reported that Fairfax's portfolio newspapers, including the AFR, would maintain independence from Nine's media groups. As part of the proposed deal, Hugh Marks took over corporate control of the combined group with Fairfax CEO, Greg Hywood, stepping down.

The combined entity in 2018 was forecasted to have approximately 6,000 employees (inclusive of all the duplicate roles made redundant), major resources across all media types including print, TV, radio and online; and $3 billion in revenue.[20]

The proposed merger was also put under review by the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) on antitrust measures.[24] It was announced in November 2018 that the ACCC would not oppose the merger. The investigation looked at the merger's impact on the online news industry's competition and involved contacting numerous stakeholders. It was noted that the merger would most likely reduce competition in the domestic media market, but that it was not in breach of the Competition and Consumer Act. The main point of divergence between the two business' assets was that Nine Entertainment's news assets provided mass market news coverage whereas Fairfax Media's news assets provided more specialist coverage.[25]

Despite the ACCC's ruling, there were a few stakeholders who voiced their concerns about the merger's impact on the Australian media industry's competitive landscape.[24] Union groups such as the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, and the Journalists' union warned the ACCC that the mega-cap takeover would threaten the editorial independence of Fairfax Media's portfolio newspaper companies. Former prime minister Paul Keating also voiced his criticisms labelling the ACCC's decision as "appalling", considering that a more concentrated media industry would reduce coverage of city-specific political issues.[26]

Partial phase-out of printed edition

[edit]

In October 2022, Nine announced that it would discontinue printing the Financial Review in Tasmania, with copies to instead be flown in from Melbourne on the following day.[27] The decision was subsequently reversed.[28]

In May 2024, printed editions of the Financial Review were discontinued in Western Australia, which Nine attributed to an increase in printing costs by its competitor Seven West Media, the owners of the only suitable printing press in Western Australia.[29]

Features and operations

[edit]

Newspaper sections

[edit]

Within the AFR's daily newspaper, regularly scheduled sections include:[30]

  • World – news and analysis on global companies and the international business environment.
  • Chanticleer – the long-running business opinion column (begun July 1974) that looks into individual companies in-depth, analysing their operations, management and board of directors.[31]
  • Accounting & Consulting – Targeted at senior executives and management, this section lays out lateral personnel movements within the finance sector, recent company news, and key participants in the industry
  • Education – provides information regarding professional development, the education sector, and news regarding company training
  • Companies & Markets – this section features in-depth analysis of the Australian business environment including equity markets, debt markets and the M&A industry
  • Legal Affairs – targeted at lawyers, this section provides coverage of the legal industry: its trends and news about the top law firms in Australia
  • Property – this section provides analysis of the Australian property market: house prices, commercial properties, developers, REITS, and others. Each major capital city has its own journalism team covering the respective property markets.
  • Life & Leisure – this two-day weekly insert focuses on more leisurely topics including fashion, travel, social media, jewellery, etc.

Products and operations

[edit]

Across the AFR group, the team does not only publish newspapers. Its range of operations is listed below:

  • The Australian Financial Review daily newspaper, founded in 1951, the paper aims to provide information regarding the Australian business landscape.
  • The Weekend Edition, delivered on Saturday, covers important business topics as well as general news and leisure-focused topics.
  • Afr.com, the AFR's news website, provides online access to a news database with topics including markets, politics, policy, property, and others.[32]
  • Sophisticated Traveller – Since 2004, this quarterly magazine has been targeting high net worth individuals, covering content regarding luxury travel.[33]
  • Australian Financial Review Magazine – Monthly inserted magazine providing content on high-profile business news, politics, fashion and luxury. The magazine was launched in 1995.[10]
  • BOSS - This magazine aims to deliver content to Australia's business seniors about company management, leadership and influential trends.
  • LUXURY – A quarterly magazine covering trends in the luxury industry including watches, jewellery, fashion, and others.

Financial Review Rich List

[edit]

The Financial Review Rich List aims to compile an annual ranking of the wealthiest Australian citizens. The list was first published in the BRW Magazine in 1984.[34] Since its beginnings, the compilation of the list and its publishing have been taken over by the AFR, now being published annually in the Australian Financial Review Magazine and on the afr.com. Along with the names of the richest people, the list explicates the person or family's net worth and provides a short summary on the business activities and sector they are engaged in. The valuations are conducted by utilising a mix of publicly available information and private consultations. In 2019, the cut-off for making the Rich List was $472m AUD. In 2020, the cut-off was raised to $540m AUD.[35]

Reporting

[edit]

Reporting stance

[edit]

During 1975 to 1983, when The Australian widely articulated its political stance on conservative liberalism, it had been noted that the AFR also promoted neo-liberalism through its news coverage and editorials, exerting influence on the business sphere of Australia and its elitist readership base.[36] The newspaper has also been labelled as one of the propagators of radical liberalism during the 1970s–80s, shaping the policy debate surrounding market deregulation at that time.[36] This was in line with the overarching political stance of all Fairfax Holdings owned newspapers, including The Sydney Morning Herald, which in the 1970s was also right-leaning in its political views.[37]

In the wake of the 1987 stock market crash, the Australian news media sector was blamed for overlooking corporate corruption and wrongdoings, while publishing mainly favourable news articles handed to them from corporate PR teams.[7] Also during this time, The National Times which was Australia's leading financial investigative journalism newspaper, shut down after the stock market crash. Therefore, during the 2000s, following the financial market failures and economic downturn of the 1990s, the AFR's reporting focus steered more towards business investigative journalism, scrutinising big corporations, government power and corruption.[7] This was viewed as the AFR making reparations for its lack of scrutiny over the corporate sector in the lead-up to the stock market crash.[citation needed]

One major factor that allowed the AFR to undertake deep corporate investigations was that it did not need advertising revenue to stay afloat – its cover price was sufficient. On the other hand, all other daily mastheads needed company advertising to stay profitable. This afforded the AFR's editors the flexibility to pursue and publish news articles that shed a negative light on major companies without needing to be concerned about its financial impacts.

During the controversial 2013 tax debate regarding taxes for "extraordinary" profits generated by mining companies, major mastheads from regions with high mining interests had almost fourfold the number of negative articles compared to positive articles. The Australian, the biggest national daily, had a large number of both positive and negative articles, but had a limited number of neutral articles. Out of all the daily mastheads, the AFR published the most articles surrounding the tax debate and also the most number of neutral articles.[38]

Endorsements

[edit]
Election Endorsement
2010 Coalition
2013 Coalition
2016 Coalition
2019 Coalition
2022 Coalition
2025 Coalition

Notable reporting

[edit]

In November 2023, the AFR joined with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, Paper Trail Media [de] and 69 media partners including Distributed Denial of Secrets and the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and more than 270 journalists in 55 countries and territories[39][40] to produce the 'Cyprus Confidential' report on the financial network which supports the regime of Vladimir Putin, mostly with connections to Cyprus, and showed Cyprus to have strong links with high-up figures in the Kremlin, some of whom have been sanctioned.[41][42] Government officials including Cyprus president Nikos Christodoulides[43] and European lawmakers[44] began responding to the investigation's findings in less than 24 hours,[43] calling for reforms and launching probes.[45][46]

Awards

[edit]

AFR has won the "Gold Lizzy" for Best Title at "The Lizzies", aka the IT Journalism Awards, many times, including in 2019,[47] 2021,[48] and 2022.[49] It has also won in other categories, including Best Business Coverage.[50][47][48]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Australian Financial Review

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Australian Financial Review (AFR) is a daily compact newspaper published in Sydney, Australia, specializing in business, finance, markets, politics, and economic affairs. Launched on 16 August 1951 as a weekly edition by John Fairfax & Sons Limited with an initial circulation of 13,000 copies priced at one shilling, it expanded to daily publication in 1957 and grew to a print circulation of 49,000 by the early 1970s while achieving profitability. Now owned by Nine Entertainment Co. following the 2018 merger with Fairfax Media, the AFR has evolved into a digital-first platform with a cross-platform readership of 3.5 million, positioning it as Australia's most-read premium business publication. It maintains a pro-market editorial stance, often favoring free enterprise and fiscal conservatism, which contrasts with biases observed in broader mainstream media outlets. The publication has influenced Australian economic discourse through features like its annual Rich List, initiated nearly 40 years ago, and events such as the Business Summit, while facing occasional criticism for content decisions including advertisements and cartoons perceived as insensitive.

History

Founding and Initial Development (1951–1970s)

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) was established on August 16, 1951, by John Fairfax and Sons Ltd. as a weekly tabloid published on Thursdays, priced at one per copy with an initial circulation of 13,000. Launched amid intensifying competition in Sydney's media market, particularly from emerging rivals like the family's publications, the AFR served as a defensive initiative to capture and financial readership, focusing on informed analysis of economic policies such as critiques of the federal "horror ." Its inaugural 28-page edition emphasized opinions and market developments, establishing an early reputation for substantive coverage under founding editor Jack Horsfall, whose tenure lasted less than a year. Publication frequency expanded under subsequent editors, including Lou Leck (1952–1954) and Harry Williams (1954 onward), before Maxwell Newton assumed the role of managing editor in 1960 when circulation stood at approximately 9,000. Newton, known for his rigorous approach, tightened editorial deadlines, bolstered staffing, and advocated for data-driven reporting, such as introducing seasonally adjusted economic statistics; this facilitated a shift to bi-weekly publication in 1961. By October 21, 1963, the AFR transitioned to Australia's first national daily financial newspaper, broadening its reach amid post-war economic expansion, mineral discoveries, and emerging capital markets. Through the 1960s and 1970s, the AFR cultivated a dedicated audience among business professionals and policymakers by maintaining a neutral stance on policies while consistently challenging protectionist measures, collusive industry practices, and economic insularity—positions that contrasted with prevailing regulatory orthodoxies. Coverage highlighted pivotal events, including finds, the 1961 Moonie oil strike, exports to in 1964, and the end of the first boom in 1970, alongside early scrutiny of computing's societal impacts. Innovations like the Pierpont column in 1972 and Chanticleer in 1974 enhanced its analytical depth, solidifying its role as a forum for pro-market during a period of debates and resource-driven growth.

Expansion Amid Economic Reforms (1980s–2000s)

During the 1980s and 1990s, Australia pursued extensive economic liberalization under the Hawke-Keating Labor governments (1983–1996), including the floating of the Australian dollar on December 9, 1983, financial deregulation following the 1981 Campbell Committee recommendations, tariff reductions, and tax reforms such as the introduction of dividend imputation and capital gains tax in 1985. These measures dismantled protectionist barriers, fostered a credit boom, and spurred corporate takeovers, though they contributed to asset price inflation and the early 1990s recession. The Australian Financial Review (AFR) provided detailed coverage of these shifts, exposing tax avoidance schemes like "bottom of the harbour" in 1980 and reporting on the 1987 stock market crash, which saw a 25% drop in Australian shares. This era's emphasis on market-oriented policies aligned with the AFR's pro-business focus, driving demand among executives and investors navigating deregulation's opportunities and risks. Circulation figures reflected the publication's growing influence amid these reforms. From 66,377 audited copies in September 1986, daily circulation rose 17.2% to 77,788 by September 1987, supported by heightened interest in financial markets post-deregulation. By May 1989, it stood at 74,055, before climbing to an average of 85,000 daily in the as the economy recovered from . The AFR documented key developments, including Paul Keating's "recession we had to have" in 1990, the privatization of the in 1991 (part of $30 billion in asset sales), and compulsory superannuation in 1992, which built a $3 trillion pool of domestic capital. Its reporting on the Reserve Bank of Australia's inflation-targeting framework adopted in 1993 further solidified its role as a for policy analysis. Into the 2000s, under the (1996–2007), reforms continued with the introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, 2000, and further privatization efforts, coinciding with a resources boom fueled by . AFR circulation peaked at 100,000 daily by 2000, with expanded international coverage reflecting 's integration into global markets. The publication maintained its expansion through in-depth analysis of these changes, including the 2008 global financial crisis response, though print growth tapered as digital shifts loomed. Overall, the AFR's readership surge—roughly 50% from the mid-1980s to 2000—stemmed directly from its authoritative dissection of reforms that transitioned from a protected to a competitive, export-oriented one, enhancing and living standards despite short-term dislocations like the 1990–1991 downturn.

Digital Transformation and Ownership Shifts (2010s–present)

In the early 2010s, the Australian Financial Review adapted to declining by implementing a digital paywall in November 2011, prioritizing subscription revenue over advertising-driven traffic growth. This strategy locked most premium content behind a barrier, with initial free samples including videos and new articles to attract subscribers, though it faced criticism for limiting accessibility. By , the publication temporarily lifted the during a summer promotion to boost digital sign-ups, demonstrating flexibility in tactics. A 2016 analysis confirmed the AFR's model as one of the strictest, restricting access to 86 percent of content to sustain paid readership among professionals. Fairfax Media, the AFR's parent company, accelerated digital investments amid structural declines in print advertising, closing major printing facilities in Tullamarine () and Chullora () by 2017, which freed up approximately $600 million in capital for online operations. Fairfax explored acquisitions of digital assets and divested non-core holdings, such as its stake in in December 2012 and U.S. agricultural media businesses in November 2012, to reduce and fund the shift. The AFR benefited from this refocus, maintaining its niche as a premium digital source for economic , though overall Fairfax revenues remained pressured by from free online alternatives. Ownership shifted decisively in 2018 when announced a merger with Co. on July 26, valuing the combined entity at A$4 billion, with Nine shareholders holding 51.1 percent and Fairfax 48.9 percent. The deal, approved by shareholders in November 2018, integrated the AFR into Nine's portfolio, ending the independent Fairfax brand while preserving editorial separation for key mastheads. This merger provided scale for digital investments, combining Nine's broadcast assets with Fairfax's publications to counter streaming and tech disruptions. Under Nine Publishing since late 2018, the AFR has strengthened its digital model by tightening paywalls to convert off-platform readers, achieving subscription growth distinct from broader Nine titles like . As of 2024, this approach has sustained the AFR's viability, with its business-focused content driving revenue amid industry-wide print contractions. No major ownership changes have occurred since, with retaining control through 2025.

Ownership and Governance

Pre-Merger Structure and Fairfax Control

Prior to the 2018 merger with , the Australian Financial Review (AFR) operated as a core asset within Fairfax Media's Metropolitan Media division, specializing in business, finance, and economic journalism across print and digital platforms. This division, which also included the Sydney Morning Herald and , generated $522.2 million in revenue and $44.1 million in underlying EBITDA for the ending June 25, 2017, supported by approximately 236,000 paid digital subscribers across its mastheads. AFR's masthead was valued at $40 million in intangible assets as part of the group's $824.7 million total, reflecting its established role in high-value financial reporting. Fairfax Media's structure evolved through reorganizations to emphasize digital integration and efficiency. In April 2013, the company consolidated its Australian publishing into the Australian Publishing Media division, grouping AFR under the Business Media unit alongside news and lifestyle operations, while centralizing support functions like , HR, and IT to reduce overheads without altering editorial control at the masthead level. By 2017, this had refined into the Metropolitan Media segment, prioritizing multiplatform strategies that drove 82% of certain divisional EBITDA from digital sources, though print circulation declines necessitated ongoing cost management. Fairfax's overall operations spanned additional segments like and Media, but Metropolitan Media's focus on urban audiences positioned AFR as a premium, subscription-driven product amid industry-wide revenue pressures, with group-wide revenue at $1,732.6 million for 2017, down 5% from the prior year. As a publicly listed entity on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX: FXJ), exercised control over AFR through mechanisms rather than direct family ownership, which had waned since the company's privatization in the late . The board of nine directors—majority independent and chaired by Nick Falloon—oversaw strategy, risk, and , supported by committees for audit, nominations, and people , while CEO Greg Hywood and key executives like CFO David Housego managed day-to-day operations via wholly-owned subsidiaries such as Publications Pty Limited. This framework ensured alignment with Fairfax's transformation goals, including the Executive Incentive Plan introduced in fiscal 2017 to tie compensation to performance metrics, though it preserved masthead-level editorial autonomy under editors-in-chief focused on content quality. With 5,122 full-time employees group-wide as of June 2017, control emphasized centralized decision-making for investments like digital subscriptions, enabling AFR to maintain its niche amid Fairfax's net debt of $118 million and broader push toward assets like the separation announced in February 2017.

Nine Entertainment Integration (2018–2023)

In July 2018, Nine Entertainment announced a merger with Fairfax Media, acquiring its mastheads including the Australian Financial Review (AFR) in a deal valued at A$4.2 billion, structured primarily as a Nine takeover with Nine shareholders holding 51.1% of the combined entity. The transaction received shareholder approval in November 2018 and Federal Court clearance, completing on December 7, 2018, thereby transferring AFR ownership to Nine Entertainment Co. Proponents argued the integration would generate scale to counter Google and Facebook's dominance, projecting A$50 million in annualized cost synergies through consolidated back-office functions, content distribution, and advertising sales over two years. Initial post-merger adjustments included redundancies affecting hundreds of roles across Nine and former Fairfax operations, including , as part of efficiency drives; by late 2018, these cuts targeted overlapping administrative and editorial support positions while sparing core journalism staff at AFR. Nine's , under CEO Hugh Marks, emphasized synergies between television reach and publishing credibility, enabling cross-promotion such as AFR content on Nine's broadcast and digital platforms like 9Now. For AFR, this facilitated expanded digital offerings, including integrated podcasts and data-driven , building on pre-merger digital subscriber growth to over 100,000 by 2019. The publication retained its tabloid format and daily focus on markets, , and corporate news, with Michael Stutchbury continuing to steer its pro-market orientation amid the transition. Nine publicly committed to preserving Fairfax's Charter of Editorial Independence, which mandated separation of editorial decisions from commercial influences and required board oversight; however, the Nine board did not formally execute the charter document, prompting criticism from the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance union and outlets like The Klaxon that this omission risked diluting safeguards against Nine's television-driven priorities, such as advertiser-friendly content. Observers, including , highlighted potential threats to , given Nine's majority control and historical TV focus, though no verified instances of direct interference in AFR's coverage emerged during the period. By 2020-2023, AFR adapted to Nine's ecosystem through shared revenue streams, such as bundling subscriptions with Stan streaming, while initiating selective print reductions—like ceasing physical distribution in by October 2022—to prioritize digital and events revenue, which grew amid broader publishing EBITDA improvements. This phase solidified AFR's position within Nine's diversified portfolio, contributing to the group's FY23 net debt reduction to A$339 million on wholly owned assets, though pressures persisted industry-wide.

Post-Merger Operations and Independence

Following the 2018 merger between and , the Australian Financial Review operated as part of Nine Publishing, which encompasses mastheads like and , while achieving synergies through shared back-office functions. The integration yielded annual cost savings of approximately A$50 million, primarily from eliminating duplicate roles in areas such as and IT, resulting in the elimination of 144 back-office positions announced in 2018. By August 2025, Nine's publishing division, including the AFR, reported revenue growth driven by digital subscriptions and events, positioning it to surpass the profitability of Nine's television operations within two years. Operational adjustments included the cessation of the AFR's print edition in in May 2024, prompted by a doubling of costs at a facility. Editorial independence for the AFR is enshrined in the Nine Publishing Charter of Editorial Independence, adopted post-merger and updated in September 2022, which extends Fairfax's prior commitments to mastheads including the AFR. The charter mandates that reporting remain free from commercial, political, or personal influences, including those of shareholders or board members, with masthead editors retaining sole authority over content selection, hiring, firing, and staff deployment within allocated budgets. Editors report to publishing management rather than Nine's board and are required to uphold the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance code of ethics alongside Australian Press Council standards. Pre-merger assurances from Nine emphasized no plans to merge newsrooms or reduce journalistic staff, aiming to preserve the AFR's focus on and financial coverage. Despite these formal safeguards, the merger raised concerns among critics about potential dilution of autonomy due to Nine's controlling stake and commercial priorities, with some advocacy groups like urging regulatory scrutiny until the charter's adoption. No widespread evidence of direct interference in AFR editorial decisions has emerged, though the publication's pro-market orientation has persisted amid Nine's broader interests. The charter's effectiveness relies on internal adherence, as Nine's board does not oversee daily processes.

Editorial Stance

Pro-Market and Economic Conservatism

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) has long advocated for free-market principles, emphasizing , fiscal restraint, and intervention as essential drivers of economic prosperity. Since the 1970s, its editorials have promoted , supporting policies that reduce barriers to competition and innovation while critiquing and excessive state involvement. This stance aligns with a broader endorsement of neoliberal reforms, such as those implemented in during the , which the publication credits with fostering growth through market liberalization. In recent years, the AFR has repeatedly called for to address structural economic challenges, arguing that sustained budget repair and reduced public spending are necessary to revive productivity and growth. For instance, a March 2025 urged governments to prioritize fiscal discipline over expansive interventions, warning that unchecked deficits erode incentives for private-sector efficiency. The publication has criticized policies veering toward , such as selective industrial support, as distorting markets and favoring vested interests over broad-based prosperity. It has also defended against rising , highlighting how open economies historically deliver higher incomes and consumer benefits compared to interventionist alternatives. The AFR's opposition to over-regulation is evident in its scrutiny of government actions that impede market dynamics, such as those exacerbating housing shortages or stifling competition in key sectors. Editorials have labeled increased state involvement—exemplified by recent expansions in subsidies and mandates—as a "dead-end policy road" that burdens productivity and favors inefficiency. In critiquing ' rhetoric in early 2023, the publication framed backlash against free markets as misguided, attributing economic successes like post-1980s growth to rather than centralized planning. This pro-market orientation extends to endorsements of disruption and , as seen in 2016 calls for businesses to embrace rather than resist , positioning the AFR as a to conservative resistance within industry. Analyses of the AFR's coverage, including from media evaluators, classify its editorial positions as right-center, with a consistent tilt toward policies favoring business interests and market mechanisms over redistributive or regulatory expansions. While acknowledging short-term political pressures, the publication maintains that long-term evidence—from Australia's era to global comparisons—validates free-market approaches for lifting living standards, rejecting alternatives lacking empirical support for superior outcomes.

Political Endorsements and Policy Influence

The Australian Financial Review upholds a tradition of endorsing one of Australia's major political parties in its pre-election , with a consistent preference for the Liberal-National based on assessments of economic . Prior to the federal on May 3, 2025, an AFR critiqued the incumbent Labor government's economic performance as unworthy of continuation, while deeming the the "least bad bet" despite flaws in its campaign presentation. Following Labor's victory, subsequent AFR commentary described the outcome as a voter shift toward dependency-oriented policies, contrasting with emphases on growth and self-reliance. AFR's policy influence manifests through editorials and analysis that prioritize market-driven reforms, including , fiscal restraint, and incentives for private-sector innovation over state-led interventions. This advocacy has historically shaped discourse on structural economic changes, such as those pursued in the liberalization era, by urging policymakers to favor competition and openness rather than subsidizing declining industries. Its readership among business executives and officials amplifies this role, informing debates on taxation, , and regulatory burdens that directly affect and growth trajectories. Unlike broader media outlets prone to interventionist biases, AFR's focus on empirical economic outcomes—such as metrics and balances—grounds its recommendations in over ideological priors.

Contrasts with Mainstream Media Bias

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) exhibits a right-center bias focused on pro-market and toward expansive intervention, setting it apart from the left-leaning orientations prevalent in Australian outlets such as the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH). Assessments by media watchdogs classify the AFR as Right-Center biased due to its consistent advocacy for free-market policies and selection of stories that align with center-right economic perspectives, while upholding high standards of factual accuracy. In contrast, the ABC faces recurrent accusations of systemic left-wing , with internal and external analyses revealing disproportionate coverage favoring progressive viewpoints on issues like climate policy and , often without equivalent scrutiny of conservative alternatives. This divergence manifests in the AFR's explicit critiques of institutional biases within taxpayer-funded media, where it has argued that the ABC's left-leaning culture renders bias correction futile, prioritizing instead structural reforms like efficiency drives modeled on private-sector examples. Unlike the ABC or SMH, which have been documented endorsing Labor-aligned policies in election coverage—such as the SMH's support for center-left coalitions in 2022—the AFR has historically backed governments since 1990, emphasizing fiscal discipline and over redistributive agendas. Such positions provide a to the broader media ecosystem's tilt, where left-leaning narratives dominate , as evidenced by audience trust surveys ranking the AFR as Australia's most credible newspaper amid declining overall media confidence. Even under shared ownership with the more progressively inclined SMH via , the AFR maintains editorial independence through its specialized business focus, avoiding the and regulatory advocacy that characterize sister publications' general news coverage. This distinction arises from the AFR's audience of corporate decision-makers, fostering rigorous economic analysis over ideological conformity, and enabling coverage that challenges consensus views on topics like and trade policy without deference to prevailing left-academic influences.

Content and Features

Daily Sections and Specialized Coverage

The Australian Financial Review's daily sections emphasize business, economic, and financial reporting, updated in real time across its print and digital editions. The Markets section delivers coverage of equity markets, commodities, currencies, and fixed income, including pre-open analysis for the ASX 200 and responses to global events like rallies or decisions. The Companies section focuses on sector-specific developments in industries such as banking, resources, and technology firms, detailing corporate earnings, boardroom changes, and strategic shifts, as seen in reporting on Bank's cultural metrics. Politics provides daily scrutiny of government policies, regulatory reforms, and bipartisan negotiations affecting commerce, exemplified by coverage of overhauls. Opinion features editorials, columns, and analysis from contributors including economists and industry executives, often critiquing and regulatory excess while promoting market-oriented solutions. The Wealth section addresses personal and institutional investing, superannuation rules, and tax implications, with practical guidance on portfolio strategies and retirement planning. Regular columns like offer unverified but influential insights into dealmaking, private equity maneuvers, and executive hires, drawing from anonymous sources in Australia's corporate underbelly. Specialized coverage extends beyond core business news to targeted domains. Property reports daily on commercial leasing, residential booms, and infrastructure projects, tracking metrics like vacancy rates and yield shifts in and . Technology examines , cybersecurity threats, and venture funding, highlighting Australian startups and global tech giants' local impacts. Work and Careers analyzes , talent shortages, and workplace reforms, while Life and Luxury covers affluent consumer sectors including , , and fine dining as economic indicators. Weekly supplements like Smart Investor deepen wealth coverage with fund performance data and investment theses, complementing daily updates without overlapping signature annual products.

Signature Products like the Rich List

The is an annual publication ranking the 200 wealthiest individuals and families resident in by estimated , serving as a flagship product of the Australian Financial Review (AFR) for tracking national wealth concentration and economic trends. First compiled in under the auspices of the AFR's predecessor publications, it originated as the BRW Rich 200 before rebranding to align with the AFR's identity following media consolidations. The 2025 edition, marking its 42nd iteration, reported aggregate wealth exceeding $667 billion, with mining magnate retaining the top position at $38.1 billion for the sixth consecutive year, reflecting sustained commodity-driven fortunes amid global resource demand. Net worth estimates in the Rich List derive from publicly available data, including shareholdings, private company valuations, assets, and market analyses, cross-verified by AFR journalists against financial disclosures and economic indicators; however, the opaque nature of private wealth holdings introduces inherent estimation variances, as acknowledged in editorial notes on methodological challenges like illiquid assets. The list has chronicled pivotal shifts, such as the post-2000 mining boom elevating resource tycoons and the 2020s tech surge diversifying entrants, with total rising 11% to $625 billion in 2024 from $563 billion the prior year, underscoring accelerated accumulation in sectors like and . Its influence extends to policy discourse, informing debates on inequality and taxation, though critics from left-leaning outlets have contested its focus on aggregate gains without adjusting for or demographic factors. Complementing the flagship Rich List, the AFR produces the Young Rich List, an annual ranking of the 50 wealthiest Australians under 40, published in the November edition of AFR Magazine and now in its 21st year as of 2024. This list captured $41.7 billion in combined wealth in 2024, dominated by tech founders like Canva co-founders Melanie Perkins and Cliff Obrecht at $14 billion, highlighting generational wealth transfer via innovation in software and fintech amid Australia's venture capital maturation. AFR Boss, a quarterly insert focused on executive and corporate , features parallel rankings such as the Young Executives list, which spotlights emerging C-suite talent, and historical sister products like the Rich Bosses ranking, which in 2010 profiled 50 top-paid leaders but has evolved amid scrutiny over disparities. These products collectively bolster the AFR's brand as a data-driven on elite , with annual editions driving subscription spikes and event tie-ins, though their reliance on self-reported or estimated figures warrants reader caution regarding potential underreporting in family trusts.

Digital Innovations and Supplementary Offerings

The Australian Financial Review maintains a robust digital presence through its website, afr.com, which delivers 24/7 , live market coverage, and an exceeding 1 million articles spanning the past 25 years, accessible across devices for subscribers. This platform integrates real-time updates and content, enhancing the timeliness of financial reporting beyond print editions. The AFR mobile app, available on and Android, enables users to access news, insights, and a digital replica of the daily , with features for on-the-go reading and article sharing. A redesigned Android app launched in April 2023 expanded these capabilities, incorporating seamless playback directly from articles, columns, and newsletters to streamline consumption. Supplementary offerings include over 16 subscriber-exclusive newsletters, such as Before the Bell for overnight market snapshots at 6 a.m., The Brief for daily overviews, and Market Wrap at 5 p.m., alongside specialized editions like Inside and Wealth Generation. These provide curated, time-specific digests that extend core coverage into niche areas, fostering habitual engagement among professionals. Podcasts form a key audio extension, with series like The Fin, a weekly analysis of major business, market, and political stories by AFR journalists, and Chanticleer, featuring unvarnished insights from columnists Tony Boyd and James Thomson on corporate . Additional programs, including How I Made It on and 15 Minutes with the Boss on , are integrated into the app and platforms like and , offering in-depth audio narratives that complement textual reporting. The AFR Live events series supplements with hybrid in-person and virtual summits, such as the annual Business Summit, Cyber Summit, and Future of Finance forum, convening leaders for discussions on , , and markets. These events, including the Crypto & Digital Assets Summit held in , generate exclusive insights and networking, with proceedings often amplified through afr.com for broader digital dissemination. Digital subscribers also gain online access to supplementary magazines like AFR Magazine and , blending , wealth, and topics in extended formats.

Operations and Business Model

Publishing and Distribution Evolution

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) was established on August 16, 1951, as a weekly tabloid published on Thursdays by John Fairfax & Sons, comprising 28 pages and priced at one , with an initial circulation of 13,000 copies aimed at countering emerging publications. By 1962, it expanded to twice-weekly publication to meet growing demand for timely financial coverage. On October 21, 1963, the AFR transitioned to daily publication, becoming Australia's first national daily newspaper after evolving from its weekly and bi-weekly formats over 12 years, which enabled broader distribution across the country and solidified its role in national economic discourse. This shift maintained the compact tabloid format while extending print runs to weekdays, later incorporating editions for six issues per week, with distribution leveraging Fairfax's established network to reach business audiences nationwide. The introduction of afr.com in 1996 marked the onset of digital publishing, providing online access to content alongside print editions and facilitating 24/7 availability, though print remained the primary distribution channel into the early 21st century. Distribution evolved further post-2018 merger with , emphasizing integrated print-digital models, but faced challenges from rising costs; in May 2024, Nine ceased Perth print editions effective May 22—ending seven decades of Western Australian print distribution—after printer doubled fees via a new contract, redirecting subscribers to digital replicas while preserving print for premium magazines like AFR Magazine. This regional pivot reflects broader industry pressures on print logistics, prioritizing scalable digital dissemination for sustained national reach.

Paywall Implementation and Subscription Dynamics

The Australian Financial Review has operated a digital since the mid-2000s, requiring payment for access to most online articles as a means to monetize its specialized and financial reporting amid declining print . This model evolved with pricing adjustments, including a reduction in subscription costs to stimulate uptake while maintaining barriers to free access, reflecting a balance between exclusivity for professional audiences and broader revenue potential. By 2020, digital-only subscriptions dominated, comprising 87 percent of the AFR's subscriber base, with paid access generating 48 percent of total revenue—a shift driven by the premium value placed on in-depth and executive insights over commoditized news. Current offerings include tiered digital packages, such as unlimited access via app and for approximately $70 monthly after promotional discounts, often bundled with newsletters and events to enhance perceived value. Subscription dynamics have emphasized growth through targeted strategies, including paywall tightening implemented in 2023–2024 to convert casual off-platform readers—such as those arriving via or search engines—into paying users by limiting free article views. This approach, distinct from softer metered models at sister publications like , yielded measurable gains, contributing to Nine Publishing's overall digital subscription revenue increase of 15 percent in fiscal year 2025. Across Nine's mastheads, including the AFR, paying digital subscribers reached over 510,000 by mid-2025, up 5 percent year-over-year, with subscriptions accounting for 32 percent of wholly owned and demonstrating resilience against volatility. The AFR's focus on niche, high-value content—such as proprietary lists and investigative scoops—has sustained conversion rates among professionals, even as total revenue dipped 6 percent to $341 million in the same period due to print declines.

Staff, Leadership, and Integration Challenges

In July 2024, Michael Stutchbury stepped down as editor-in-chief of the Australian Financial Review after serving in the role for 13 years, the longest tenure in the publication's history, amid a broader executive shake-up at parent company . James Chessell, previously executive editor of and , was appointed as his successor, assuming leadership on August 12, 2024. This transition occurred against the backdrop of Nine's efforts to restructure amid declining advertising revenue and competition from digital platforms. The 2018 merger between and , which brought the AFR under Nine's umbrella as part of a $4 billion deal creating Australia's largest media company, prompted immediate operational integrations aimed at eliminating redundancies. In December 2018, Nine announced the elimination of 144 back-office positions to achieve cost savings and reduce duplicated functions across the combined entity. These measures reflected challenges in harmonizing legacy print-focused operations with Nine's broadcast and digital assets, contributing to ongoing staff attrition as the company navigated a shift toward subscription-based models and reduced print distribution. Subsequent economic pressures exacerbated staffing issues, with Nine citing "economic headwinds" and the termination of revenue-sharing deals like the one with Meta as factors in a June 2024 announcement to cut 200 jobs across its publishing division, including the AFR. This led to up to 85 voluntary redundancies by August 2024, marking one of the largest talent exoduses in decades for senior journalists at the AFR, SMH, and , with affected staff including prominent business reporters. Nine staff responded by passing a no-confidence motion against then-CEO Mike Sneesby, highlighting tensions over the pace and impact of these reductions. Integration difficulties persisted, as evidenced by Nine's 2025 executive reshuffle to streamline operations further, underscoring persistent challenges in aligning teams with broader corporate cost-control imperatives amid stagnant digital growth.

Notable Reporting

Investigative Scoops and Exposés

The Australian Financial Review has produced several high-impact investigative reports exposing corporate misconduct and regulatory lapses, often leading to official inquiries and personnel changes. A landmark scoop involved the 2023 revelation that employees had improperly shared confidential briefings on multinational tax reforms with select clients, enabling those clients to preemptively restructure operations to minimize tax liabilities. This reporting, initiated by AFR journalists including Edmund Tadros and Jonathan Shapiro, detailed how PwC accessed over 100 sensitive documents from Treasury consultations starting in 2015, with internal firm communications showing deliberate dissemination to high-value clients like and . The exposé triggered a inquiry, the suspension of involved partners, and the eventual of PwC Australia's CEO Tom Seymour in June 2023, alongside regulatory penalties exceeding AUD 100 million by mid-2024. In July 2024, investigative journalist Neil Chenoweth published a series uncovering systemic flaws in the ATO's handling of multinational profit-shifting, highlighting how tech giants like Amazon and exploited rules to report minimal Australian despite billions in local revenue. Drawing on leaked internal ATO data and whistleblower accounts, the reports exposed delays in enforcement actions and inadequate audits, contributing to an estimated AUD 5-10 billion annual revenue shortfall for the government. This work earned a nomination for the 2024 Kennedy Awards in the category and prompted calls for ATO leadership reforms. AFR's collaborative efforts within the have also yielded exposés on union corruption, such as the 2024-2025 investigation into the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union's (CFMEU) ties to and bid-rigging in infrastructure projects. Co-reported with , Sydney Morning Herald, and , the probe revealed inflated wage deals and infiltration by outlaw motorcycle gangs, leading to the federal government's placement of the union's construction division under administration in August 2024 and subsequent police probes. This series secured nominations for the 2025 Walkley Awards in .

Coverage of Major Economic Scandals

The Australian Financial Review has extensively documented major economic scandals in , often highlighting systemic failures in , regulatory oversight, and within the financial sector. Its reporting on the 2001 collapse of , Australia's largest corporate failure at the time with a shortfall exceeding $5.3 billion, revealed chronic under-reserving, aggressive expansion, and inadequate board oversight that left policyholders and builders uninsured. Coverage included detailed accounts from the subsequent hearings, exposing internal disarray such as unrecorded liabilities and questionable acquisitions, which contributed to the insurer's provisional on March 15, 2001. This scrutiny underscored causal links between unchecked growth and , influencing post-collapse reforms like enhanced requirements for insurers. In the lead-up to and during the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (–), the AFR provided ongoing analysis of misconduct cases, including fees-for-no-service charges totaling hundreds of millions and conflicted financial advice that prioritized commissions over client interests. The commission's final report in February , chaired by , documented over 4,000 submissions and led to $10 billion in remediation, with AFR reporting linking these issues to profit-driven cultures at institutions like AMP, whose CEO resigned amid the fallout. The publication's pre-inquiry exposés amplified public pressure, revealing patterns of where bodies like ASIC failed to enforce , ultimately prompting legislative changes such as the Banking Executive Accountability in 2018. More recently, the AFR's investigative journalism, particularly by reporter Neil Chenoweth, exposed the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal, where the firm misused confidential government briefings on multinational tax avoidance to advise clients, undermining Treasury's proposed reforms. This coverage detailed how PwC shared over 100 pages of sensitive documents starting in 2015, leading to the departure of its Australian CEO and fines exceeding $100 million, while highlighting conflicts in the "Big Four" accounting model's self-regulation. Follow-up reporting tracked ongoing probes into partners and the firm's internal cover-up attempts, emphasizing empirical evidence of ethical lapses driven by client revenue incentives over public duty. Such work has informed debates on audit independence, with the scandal's total costs, including reputational damage, estimated in the hundreds of millions.

Contributions to Policy and Market Transparency

The Australian Financial Review has influenced Australian economic policy through sustained editorial advocacy for market-oriented reforms, notably contributing to the intellectual groundwork for liberalizing the in the early 1980s. Under Treasurer in the 1990s, the publication played a key role in articulating arguments for further , helping shift public and policymaker consensus toward flexible exchange mechanisms that enhanced effectiveness. This stance aligned with broader efforts to dismantle capital controls, culminating in the 1983 float of the Australian dollar, which the AFR supported via reporting that highlighted the inefficiencies of fixed rates amid global pressures. In advancing market transparency, the AFR's investigative reporting on corporate governance failures has prompted regulatory and judicial responses strengthening accountability. Its coverage of the 2007 Centro Properties Group scandal—revealing directors' failure to detect $3 billion in misclassified short-term debt—amplified scrutiny that led to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) successfully prosecuting the board in 2011 for breaches of continuous disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act. The Federal Court's ruling established precedents elevating directors' duties in financial reporting reviews, influencing subsequent ASIC guidance and corporate practices to mitigate reclassification errors. The AFR's persistent exposés on misconduct in banking and further drove transparency reforms by fueling public demand for systemic overhaul. Pre-royal commission reporting on issues like mis-selling and fee gouging built pressure that contributed to the 2017 establishment of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Industry, which uncovered widespread abuses and yielded 76 recommendations adopted into law, including bans on conflicted and heightened penalties for breaches. Post-commission, the AFR's analysis of ongoing compliance gaps, such as in auditing firms' conflicts during scandals like PwC's tax leak affair, has sustained calls for stricter oversight of , informing Treasury reviews into non-audit services and . These efforts underscore the AFR's role in bridging market revelations with policy evolution, though outcomes depend on enforcement amid competing interests from regulated entities.

Awards and Accolades

Journalism and Reporting Honors

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) has garnered significant recognition for its , particularly in exposing corporate misconduct, labor union , and failures, earning multiple top-tier honors from independent Australian media bodies. These awards underscore the publication's role in advancing accountability through detailed reporting on financial scandals, often drawing on leaked documents and insider sources. In 2023, AFR reporters Neil Chenoweth and Edmund Tadros received the Gold Walkley—the highest accolade in Australian journalism—for their exposé on the () tax leaks scandal, which revealed the firm's misuse of confidential government information for client advantage, leading to regulatory probes and executive resignations. This investigation also secured them the Walkley for and marked their fourth win that year, highlighting the depth of sourcing in a story initially dismissed as implausible. The following year, workplace correspondent David Marin-Guzman won the 2024 Gold Walkley for the "Building Bad" series, a collaborative effort with and Sydney Morning Herald that documented systemic corruption and safety violations in the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union's (CFMEU) construction division, prompting a federal government intervention and administrator appointment on August 14, 2024. This reporting built on prior AFR coverage of union misconduct, emphasizing from site inspections and whistleblower accounts over institutional denials. At the 2025 Kennedy Awards, the AFR team of Mark Di Stefano and Chenoweth earned the Excellence in Journalism prize for their sustained coverage of political and corporate intersections, including influence peddling in . Separately, in the same awards, —contributing across AFR and other Nine outlets—was named Journalist of the Year for multifaceted investigations into and graft. In regional honors, Marin-Guzman's CFMEU work also clinched the 2025 Gold Quill—the top Victorian journalism award—for breaking the "Building Bad" story, validating the AFR's focus on causal links between union practices and construction site hazards through data-driven analysis. Additional category wins include best business story at the 2024 Walkleys for Brad Thompson and Peter Ker's reporting on industry disruptions.
  • Walkley Awards Highlights:
    • Gold Walkley (2023): tax leaks.
    • Investigative Journalism (2023): Chenoweth and Tadros.
    • Gold Walkley (2024): CFMEU "Building Bad".
    • Best Business Story (2024): Thompson and Ker.
These honors reflect the AFR's emphasis on verifiable evidence over narrative conformity, though nominations in 2025 for broader categories indicate ongoing scrutiny of its methods amid competitive media landscapes.

Hosted Industry Recognition Programs

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) hosts multiple annual awards programs that recognize excellence across business, innovation, leadership, and education sectors, often in partnership with its BOSS magazine brand. These initiatives, which began evolving in the early 2000s, aim to highlight high-performing individuals, companies, and institutions based on criteria such as innovation, governance, and workplace culture, with nominations and judging involving industry panels. The BOSS Young Executives Awards, launched over two decades ago and now in its 22nd year as of 2025, honor emerging leaders aged 35 or younger for demonstrating and community impact; past winners include experts in and supply chains, with the 2023 cohort announced on July 21. Other prominent programs include the BOSS Most Innovative Companies list, which celebrates Australian firms disrupting traditional models through technological and strategic advancements. The BOSS Best Places to Work awards, evaluating small, medium, and large organizations across sectors, named management consultancy Empact Group as the overall winner for 2025, alongside nine sector-specific recipients. The Financial Review BOSS Director Awards, focusing on chairs and directors for enhancing investor value and , held its inaugural event in 2025 with winners selected by peers and announced on May 29. Specialized awards extend to emerging fields like the AI Awards, which in 2025 spotlighted innovators shaping applications. In education, the Higher Education Awards, open to public and private institutions offering Australian Qualifications Framework levels from associate degrees upward, evaluate contributions to teaching, research, and industry partnerships. Additionally, the BOSS Best Business Schools ranking named the as the top performer for 2024, assessing factors like and research output. These programs generate through sponsorships, entries, and event attendance while reinforcing AFR's role in Australian enterprise, though selections rely on subjective panel assessments rather than purely quantitative metrics.

Criticisms and Controversies

Accusations of or Right-Leaning

Critics from left-leaning perspectives have accused the Australian Financial Review (AFR) of displaying a right-leaning through its emphasis on free-market economics, , and favorable coverage of conservative-leaning policies. , which analyzes patterns, classified the AFR as Right-Center biased in 2023, citing story selection that prioritizes interests and editorials supporting right-of-center positions on fiscal matters, while maintaining high factual accuracy in reporting. Such accusations often center on the publication's pro-business orientation, interpreted by detractors as undue favoritism toward corporate elites and resistance to progressive reforms like stronger labor protections or taxes. For instance, a 2023 in Red Flag, a socialist outlet, described the AFR's content as oriented toward "the Australian ruling class," arguing its framing of economic issues dismisses working-class concerns in favor of and . This view echoes broader critiques from union-affiliated commentators who contend the AFR underplays avoidance scandals while amplifying arguments against government intervention, as seen in its coverage of mining sector disputes during the 2010s resource boom. Accusations of elite bias have also arisen from perceived coziness with political and business insiders. In February 2021, journalists from the AFR—owned by —along with sister publications, publicly objected to the company's hosting of a Liberal Party fundraiser, prompting Nine to halt corporate political donations amid claims of compromised independence and alignment with center-right interests. Left-leaning online forums, including discussions in 2025, have labeled the AFR as "pure right-wing conservative " for its endorsement of policies like retention, which benefit property investors and high-income earners. These claims contrast with defenses that the AFR's economic focus inherently reflects market realities rather than ideological slant, though empirical studies on Australian media slant, such as a analysis by economists, positioned the AFR moderately right of center relative to parliamentary baselines on policy coverage. Despite such ratings, accusations persist among progressive critics who view the publication's readership—predominantly affluent professionals—as reinforcing an for elite viewpoints.

Responses to Regulatory and Political Pressures

The Australian Financial Review, as part of , participated in a coordinated media on October 21, 2019, against federal secrecy laws that threatened journalistic sources and whistleblowers. Major Australian newspapers, including the AFR, redacted their front pages with black bars symbolizing , under the "" campaign organized by the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance. This action responded to the Espionage and Foreign Interference Act (2018) and insufficient protections in proposed journalist shield laws, which critics argued could criminalize public interest reporting on matters with penalties up to 20 years imprisonment. The highlighted concerns over overreach, with AFR's blackout edition featuring the headline "Tell us the truth" to underscore demands for reforms balancing security and press freedom. In response to the Australian Labor government's proposed Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill introduced in 2024, the AFR published editorials condemning it as a to democratic discourse and an enabling mechanism for . The bill empowered the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to fine digital platforms up to 5% of global revenue for failing to counter "," defined broadly to include content deemed harmful to electoral processes or , without clear exemptions for traditional media or . AFR opinion pieces argued that such measures, ostensibly aimed at foreign interference and conspiracy theories, risked subjective enforcement by regulators, potentially chilling investigative reporting on or corporate —areas central to the publication's mandate. The newspaper advocated for voluntary industry codes over statutory penalties, citing precedents like the failed 2021 attempt withdrawn amid industry backlash. The AFR has navigated Australia's stringent defamation regime, which imposes a reverse onus on defendants to prove defenses, through legal defenses and settlements rather than . In a notable 2020-2021 case, former mining executive sued the AFR and columnist Joe Aston over articles alleging misleading statements in political donations; the ruled in Palmer's favor, awarding damages and highlighting how uniform defamation laws across jurisdictions amplify litigation risks for national publishers. , AFR's parent, responded by appealing elements of the verdict and publicly critiquing the laws' on , where scrutiny of high-profile figures often invites suits regardless of factual accuracy. This reflects a pattern of contesting claims in while funding legal reforms, such as those proposed by the Australian Commission in 2020 to introduce protections akin to the UK's, though federal inaction persists. Amid broader political scrutiny of media ownership post the 2018 Nine-Fairfax merger, the AFR defended its against accusations of commercial influence on content. The Australian Communications and Media (ACMA) reviewed Nine's compliance with broadcasting codes in 2020, examining potential advertiser sway over news, but found no breaches warranting fines. The publication countered by emphasizing structural separations between editorial and commercial teams, as stipulated in merger undertakings to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), which required divestitures and independence safeguards to prevent monopolistic control over business news.

Internal and External Debates on Objectivity

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) has faced external scrutiny over its perceived right-center bias, with analysts pointing to editorial endorsements of conservative governments and story selection favoring free-market policies. Media Bias/Fact Check rated the publication Right-Center in its assessment, attributing this to positions such as backing Scott Morrison's Coalition in the 2019 federal election, while crediting it with high factual accuracy based on a clean record of sourcing from outlets like Reuters. This perception aligns with broader critiques from left-leaning commentators who view AFR's emphasis on business interests as skewing coverage toward elite perspectives, potentially undermining impartiality in political reporting. A notable controversy arose in March 2021 when an AFR profile of journalist , amid coverage of the Brittany Higgins alleged rape scandal, prompted accusations of bias and partiality. Critics, including in , labeled the piece a "hit job" for deploying descriptors like "difficult" and "spiky" against female reporters, while data revealed only 18% of AFR front-page bylines from April 2020 to March 2021 were by women, compared to 82% by men—figures that fueled claims of an internal "boys' club" culture compromising objective scrutiny of government accountability. The incident highlighted tensions between AFR's financial focus and demands for balanced representation in bylines, with detractors arguing such patterns reflect systemic preferences over neutral sourcing. Internally, AFR leadership has countered such critiques by reaffirming commitments to factual reporting and , distancing the publication from opinion-driven narratives. In April 2021, following subscriber backlash to the Maiden article, Michael Stutchbury published a response acknowledging reactions but defending the outlet's role in scrutinizing journalistic , such as reporters attending protests, as distinct from objective coverage. Earlier assertions, including a 1991 emphasizing the paper's efforts to handle public issues objectively despite errors, underscore a self-perceived standard of independence within Nine Entertainment's ownership structure. These defenses often frame debates as misunderstandings between rigorous —which prioritizes market realities—and subjective accusations of slant, with AFR frequently critiquing biases in public broadcasters like the ABC to highlight its own contrasts.

References

  1. https://www.afr.com/
  2. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-australian-financial-review/
  3. https://www.mediaweek.com.au/how-the-australian-financial-review-went-from-a-shilling-to-industry-staple/
  4. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/how-the-financial-review-went-from-spoiler-to-agenda-setter-20210805-p58g75
  5. https://www.nineforbrands.com.au/media-release/the-financial-review-remains-australias-most-read-premium-business-title-3/
  6. https://www.afr.com/about-us/products-and-services
  7. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/06/no-campaign-cartoon-ad-newspaper-indigenous-voice-to-parliament
  8. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/afr-amends-defends-apologises-for-criticised-cartoon-20200608-p550k4
  9. https://www.afr.com/about-us/timeline
  10. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/horsfall-launched-financial-review-with-perfect-timing-20210914-p58rml
  11. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/celebrating-50-years-20010816-j85t0
  12. https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/newton-maxwell-15829
  13. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/how-oil-fever-and-the-computer-age-changed-australia-in-the-1960s-20210809-p58hci
  14. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/how-the-1950s-paved-the-way-for-modern-australia-20210809-p58hcg
  15. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/australia-s-story-of-business-led-prosperity-20210812-p58i43
  16. https://www.afr.com/politics/financial-review-tops-for-circulation-growth-19871127-k2ikd
  17. https://www.afr.com/politics/circulation-figures-19890531-k3emi
  18. https://insidestory.org.au/how-the-afrs-disastrous-paywall-delivered-the-goods/
  19. https://mumbrella.com.au/fin-launches-summer-digital-content-giveaway-131807
  20. https://theconversation.com/why-some-newspaper-paywalls-are-simply-unsustainable-59577
  21. https://www.afr.com/chanticleer/fairfax-media-survives-five-years-of-structural-change-20170222-guj10m
  22. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/trade-me-sale-lightens-fairfax-load-20121218-j1cl7
  23. https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0020121113e8bdstfjz?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqcuGyJwA0ywvgGWX_9gDSRyb6NCYFaf_8XdABrgU3Uy6JFkQFLnHA3e&gaa_ts=68fe9032&gaa_sig=X3lO9KVvEgu305xiQMgigBmZhputES7s4undJwDuW4E5w9DsVu34cycwG5U4ssU87KR0mHM6iTKHYRXCjL1Dpg%253D%253D
  24. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/fairfax-media-and-nine-entertainment-to-merge-20180726-h135hn
  25. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/nov/19/fairfax-media-shareholders-approve-nine-takeover-bid
  26. https://www.economist.com/business/2018/07/27/australias-fairfax-media-and-nine-entertainment-will-merge
  27. https://www.inma.org/blogs/value-content/post.cfm/nine-publishing-drives-subscription-growth-by-tightening-paywalls
  28. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-25/nine-entertainment-to-acquire-fairfax-media-in-1-6-billion-deal
  29. https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/F/ASX_FXJ_2017.pdf
  30. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/fairfax-media-firsthalf-net-profit-falls-54pc-20180221-h0we4d
  31. https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130404/pdf/42f1lfw5rzspsw.pdf
  32. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/fairfax-to-merger-with-nine-to-fight-facebook-and-google-20180726-h136hl
  33. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-44961971
  34. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/fairfax-media-and-nine-entertainment-merger-approved-by-federal-court-20181126-h18dlc
  35. https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-will-not-oppose-nine-fairfax-merger
  36. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-03/nine-fairfax-merger-leads-to-another-round-of-redundancies/10576540
  37. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/inside-the-deal-how-nine-entertainment-and-fairfax-media-became-suitors-20181123-h189m9
  38. https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20191002/pdf/4493s29f56jv72.pdf
  39. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/behind-the-fairfaxnine-merger-this-masthead-is-on-a-streak-20180726-h136g2
  40. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/sep/14/i-want-fairfax-papers-to-retain-independence-after-merger-nine-boss-says
  41. https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/media/2018/07/28/fairfax-journalists-surprised-nine-merger/15327000006613
  42. http://www.theklaxon.com.au/home-nine-fairfax-independence-charter-a-sham-ecscp/
  43. https://rsf.org/en/fairfax-nine-merger-threatens-media-pluralism-australia
  44. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/world/australia/nine-fairfax-merger.html
  45. https://www.nineforbrands.com.au/media-release/the-australian-financial-review-is-a-fully-integrated-cross-platform-superbrand/
  46. https://www.nineforbrands.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/NEC-2023-Annual-Report-web.pdf
  47. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/nine-s-publishing-to-out-earn-free-to-air-television-in-two-years-20250804-p5mk9e
  48. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jul/26/fairfax-nine-takeover-australias-oldest-media-empire-ends-with-4bn-merger
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/may/09/nines-afr-print-edition-to-cease-in-wa-after-sevens-press-doubles-production-price
  50. https://www.afr.com/nine-publishing-charter-of-editorial-independence
  51. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/who-killed-neoliberalism-20231128-p5ena1
  52. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/this-book-changed-the-world-the-west-needs-to-read-it-again-20241002-p5kf8g
  53. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/govern-as-fiscal-conservatives-to-revive-economic-growth-20250328-p5ln9u
  54. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/liberal-party-must-beware-the-siren-song-of-economic-nationalism-20251005-p5n03m
  55. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/market-economy-critics-don-t-have-a-better-way-to-lift-incomes-20230919-p5e5vl
  56. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/we-must-protect-australia-s-free-and-open-economy-20240526-p5jgnf
  57. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/the-week-australia-travelled-further-down-the-dead-end-policy-road-20240409-p5fie5
  58. https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/jim-chalmers-joins-the-global-backlash-against-free-markets-20230129-p5cg8n
  59. https://www.afr.com/opinion/australia-must-shed-its-business-conservatism-20160315-gnj9b7
  60. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/australia-s-glorious-history-of-policy-failure-20230621-p5di8r
  61. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/coalition-may-be-least-bad-bet-of-worst-election-campaign-ever-20250501-p5lvok
  62. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/australia-has-chosen-the-labor-way-of-dependency-20250504-p5lwd2
  63. https://www.afr.com/opinion
  64. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/the-economic-giant-the-political-class-tried-to-ignore-20250722-p5mgrh
  65. https://www.theactionexchange.com/journal/afr-intelligence-reach-australias-most-influential-business-audience
  66. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/left-wing-bias-proves-it-is-clearly-their-abc-20210111-p56taq
  67. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/memo-to-hugh-marks-doge-like-efficiency-s-the-fix-for-abc-s-news-bias-20250311-p5lik5
  68. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/who-s-backing-who-every-newspaper-s-pick-for-prime-minister-20250501-p5lvup.html
  69. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/financial-review-australia-s-most-trusted-newspaper-brand-20240620-p5jnd4
  70. https://www.quora.com/What-Australian-media-is-right-or-left-wing
  71. https://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/26/crikey-bias-o-meter-the-newspapers/
  72. https://www.afr.com/markets
  73. https://www.afr.com/politics
  74. https://www.afr.com/technology
  75. https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury
  76. https://www.afr.com/topic/afr-smart-investor-1mu8
  77. https://www.afr.com/rich-list/australia-s-wealthiest-200-revealed-fortunes-blow-past-667b-20250509-p5lxxb
  78. https://www.afr.com/rich-list/rich-list-2025-20250520-p5m0r6
  79. https://www.afr.com/rich-list/australia-s-10-richest-people-revealed-20240521-p5jfe4
  80. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/06/07/hjpj-j07.html
  81. https://www.afr.com/young-rich/a-20m-reno-and-three-panic-rooms-at-home-with-a-tech-founder-20250828-p5mqmo
  82. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/afr-young-rich-special-why-bumper-year-australias-40-4zjhc
  83. https://muckrack.com/sally-patten/articles
  84. https://www.afr.com/technology/download-the-afr-s-new-android-app-20230328-p5cvw3
  85. https://www.afr.com/podcast/the-fin
  86. https://www.afr.com/podcast/chanticleer
  87. https://podcasts.apple.com/au/channel/financial-review/id6443256507
  88. https://live.afr.com/cryptosummit/
  89. https://www.mi-3.com.au/09-05-2024/afr-goes-digital-only-western-australia-after-seven-doubles-printing-costs
  90. https://www.adnews.com.au/adnews/financial-review-slashes-paywall-prices
  91. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/afr-grows-digitial-subscriptions-13pc-20200226-p544ia
  92. https://subscribe.afr.com/
  93. https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/australia-nine-entertainment-full-year-results-2025-1236499316/
  94. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/nine-shares-jump-premier-league-deal-helps-stan-add-200-000-subscribers-20250826-p5mq05.html
  95. https://company-announcements.afr.com/asx/nec/ebf1e60a-8ec7-11f0-a482-6e440358bbe4.pdf
  96. https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/jul/22/michael-stutchbury-resigns-afr-editor-in-chief-australian-financial-review-ntwnfb
  97. https://www.9news.com.au/national/afr-new-editor-in-chief-james-chessell-michael-stutchbury/aea1ef56-3755-459c-813e-6f0c0bde84ce
  98. https://www.adnews.com.au/news/james-chessell-replaces-michael-stutchbury-at-australian-financial-review
  99. https://www.afr.com/about-us/editorial-team
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/jun/28/nine-job-cuts-200-publishing-smh-the-age-afr
  101. https://www.theguardian.com/media/article/2024/aug/20/senior-journalists-leave-sydney-morning-herald-age-and-afr-in-decades-biggest-talent-exodus
  102. https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/australia-nine-entertainment-restructure-1236274768/
  103. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/afr-wins-top-journalism-awards-20240315-p5fct0
  104. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/ato-expose-earns-award-nomination-for-afr-s-chenoweth-20240730-p5jxmg
  105. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/financial-review-journalists-nominated-for-five-walkley-awards-20251016-p5n347
  106. https://impactagency.com.au/highlights-from-the-2025-kennedy-awards/
  107. https://www.afr.com/companies/a-tale-of-disarray-at-hih-20011213-ka61a
  108. https://www.afr.com/companies/the-hih-royal-omission-20021212-ka3b6
  109. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/why-this-was-australia-s-most-significant-corporate-collapse-20220322-p5a6qz
  110. https://www.afr.com/topic/banking-royal-commission-hql
  111. https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/how-a-royal-commission-sank-a-175-year-old-financial-giant-20240201-p5f1km
  112. https://www.icij.org/inside-icij/2023/10/behind-the-scenes-of-the-pwc-tax-leak-scandal-with-neil-chenoweth/
  113. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/management/the-pwc-scandal-was-bad-the-cover-up-is-worse-20250522-p5m1e5
  114. https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/tax-watchdog-launches-new-probe-into-current-and-former-pwc-partners-20251014-p5n2i9
  115. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/financial-review-the-paper-that-shaped-australia-20131125-iysoy
  116. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/bleeding-sore-why-the-a-float-40-years-ago-was-such-a-big-deal-20231204-p5eox3
  117. https://www.afr.com/companies/how-asic-nailed-the-centro-board-20110627-iagr3
  118. https://www.smh.com.au/business/asic-wins-case-against-centro-directors-20110627-1gmk5.html
  119. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/business-spectator/balancing-the-scales-on-centro/news-story/a2512f2c8c06a2ebc4be27e996ade40e
  120. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-05/banking-royal-commission-five-years-on-asic/103423072
  121. https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/the-story-behind-australia-s-worst-accounting-scandal-20220325-p5a7uj
  122. https://www.promarket.org/2023/07/19/australian-pwc-scandal-reeks-of-regulatory-capture/
  123. https://www.walkleys.com/awards/walkley-winners-archive/
  124. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/financial-review-wins-at-the-kennedy-awards-20250815-p5mncq
  125. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/nov/24/from-crazy-to-walkley-australian-financial-reviews-pwc-tax-leaks-scoop-takes-top-journalism-prize
  126. https://medium.com/the-walkley-magazine/spotlight-on-2023-gold-walkley-winners-14ca1d259d78
  127. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/afr-s-marin-guzman-wins-walkley-for-building-bad-report-20241119-p5krzg
  128. https://www.walkleys.com/awards/walkleys/
  129. https://kennedyfoundation.org.au/award-winners-1
  130. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-03-22/abc-news-reporters-recognised-at-quill-awards/105084896
  131. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/financial-review-wins-gold-quill-award-20250322-p5llmu
  132. https://www.afr.com/lists-and-awards
  133. https://lists.afr.com/events/young-executives-2025/
  134. https://www.afr.com/lists-and-awards/boss-young-executives
  135. https://www.nineforbrands.com.au/media-release/afr-boss-names-winners-of-2023-boss-young-executives-awards/
  136. https://www.afr.com/lists-and-awards/most-innovative-companies
  137. https://www.afr.com/lists-and-awards/best-places-to-work
  138. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/workplace/boss-best-places-to-work-20250409-p5lqil
  139. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/leaders/director-awards-20250528-p5m31m
  140. https://lists.afr.com/directorawards/
  141. https://lists.afr.com/events/ai-awards-2025/
  142. https://live.afr.com/higheredawards/
  143. https://www.afr.com/lists-and-awards/best-business-schools
  144. https://redflag.org.au/article/topsy-turvy-world-australian-financial-review
  145. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/feb/12/independent-always-nine-ends-political-donations-after-outrage-over-liberal-fundraiser
  146. https://www.reddit.com/r/australian/comments/1htbw77/can_anyone_tell_me_which_way_the_afr_leans/
  147. http://andrewleigh.org/pdf/MediaSlant.pdf
  148. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/world/australia/news-media-protest-secrecy-government-right-to-know.html
  149. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/australianz/australian-newspapers-redact-front-pages-to-protest-media-restrictions
  150. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/the-government-s-misinformation-bill-is-a-betrayal-of-democracy-20241001-p5keuo
  151. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/aston-verdict-shows-defamation-laws-have-pole-vaulted-original-purpose-20210202-p56yns
  152. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/media-regulator-scrutinises-broadcasters-over-commercial-influence-20200116-p53s5v.html
  153. https://www.theguardian.com/media/commentisfree/2021/apr/09/australian-financial-review-betrayed-by-numbers-after-samantha-maiden-misfire
  154. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/apr/02/afr-hit-job-on-samantha-maiden-backfires-spectacularly
  155. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/female-journalists-painted-as-subjective-and-emotional-experts-say/kndr8qyox
  156. https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/financial-review-responds-to-criticism-20210405-p57gmp
  157. https://www.afr.com/politics/strike-a-matter-of-public-importance-19910215-k49ie
  158. https://www.afr.com/policy/why-emma-alberici-poses-a-danger-to-the-abcs-impartiality-20180220-h0wcwn
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.