Hubbry Logo
Fly-killing deviceFly-killing deviceMain
Open search
Fly-killing device
Community hub
Fly-killing device
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Fly-killing device
Fly-killing device
Fly-killing device
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A fly-killing device is used for pest control of flying insects, such as houseflies, wasps, moths, gnats, and mosquitoes.

Flyswatter

[edit]
A typical flyswatter

A flyswatter (or fly-swat, fly swatter[1]) usually consists of a small rectangular or round sheet of a lightweight, flexible, vented material (usually thin metallic, rubber, or plastic mesh) around 10 cm (4 in) across, attached to a handle about 30 to 60 cm (1 to 2 ft) long made of a lightweight material such as wire, wood, plastic, or metal. The venting or perforations minimize the disruption of air currents, which are detected by an insect and allow escape, and also reduces air resistance, making it easier to hit a fast-moving target.

A flyswatter is ideally lightweight and stiff, allowing quick acceleration to overcome the fast reaction time of the fly (six to ten times faster than a human),[2] while also minimizing damage caused by hitting other objects. The flyswatter usually works by mechanically crushing the fly against a hard surface, after the user has waited for the fly to land somewhere. However, users can also injure or stun an airborne insect mid-flight by whipping the swatter through the air at an extreme speed.

History

[edit]

The abeyance of insects by use of short horsetail staffs and fans is an ancient practice, dating back to the Egyptian pharaohs.[citation needed][disputed – discuss] The earliest flyswatters were in fact nothing more than some sort of striking surface attached to the end of a long stick. An early patent on a commercial flyswatter was issued in 1900 to Robert R. Montgomery who called it a fly-killer. [3] Montgomery sold his patent to John L. Bennett, a wealthy inventor and industrialist who made further improvements on the design.[4]

The origin of the name "flyswatter" comes from Dr. Samuel Crumbine, a member of the Kansas board of health, who wanted to raise public awareness of the health issues caused by flies. He was inspired by a chant at a local Topeka softball game: "swat the ball". In a health bulletin published soon afterwards, he exhorted Kansans to "swat the fly". In response, a schoolteacher named Frank H. Rose created the "fly bat", a device consisting of a yardstick attached to a piece of screen, which Crumbine named "the flyswatter".[5]

Fly gun

[edit]
A fly gun

The fly gun (or flygun), a derivative of the flyswatter, uses a spring-loaded plastic projectile to mechanically "swat" flies. Mounted on the projectile is a perforated circular disk, which, according to advertising copy, "won't splat the fly". Several similar products are sold, mostly as toys or novelty items, although some maintain their use as traditional fly swatters.[citation needed]

Another gun-like design consists of a pair of mesh sheets spring loaded to "clap" together when a trigger is pulled, squashing the fly between them. In contrast to the traditional flyswatter, such a design can only be used on an insect in mid-air.

Bug-A-Salt is the brand of plastic gun used to kill soft-bodied insects by shooting them with particles of table salt.

Fly bottle

[edit]
Three fly bottles from Central Europe, beginning of the 20th century

A fly bottle or glass flytrap is a passive trap for flying insects. In the Far East, it is a large bottle of clear glass with a black metal top with a hole in the middle. An odorous bait, such as pieces of meat, is placed in the bottom of the bottle. Flies enter the bottle in search of food and are then unable to escape because their phototaxis behavior leads them anywhere in the bottle except to the darker top where the entry hole is.[6]

A European fly bottle is more conical, with small feet that raise it to 1.25 cm (0.5 in), with a trough about a 2.5 cm (1 in) wide and deep that runs inside the bottle all around the central opening at the bottom of the container. In use, the bottle is stood on a plate and some sugar is sprinkled on the plate to attract flies, who eventually fly up into the bottle. The trough is filled with beer or vinegar, into which the flies fall and drown.[7] In the past, the trough was sometimes filled with a dangerous mixture of milk, water, and arsenic or mercury chloride.[8]

Variants of these bottles are the agricultural fly traps used to fight the Mediterranean fruit fly and the olive fly, which have been in use since the 1930s. They are smaller, without feet, and the glass is thicker for rough outdoor usage, often involving suspension in a tree or bush. Modern versions of this device are often made of plastic, and can be purchased in some hardware stores. They can also be improvised from disposable plastic drink bottles.

Disposable fly traps

[edit]

Disposable fly traps are small "use and throw away" fly traps. The traps are disposable plastic bags containing some attractant, generally made of flavoring agents that are non-toxic. Water and direct sunlight are used to activate the attractant, which emits a smell to lure the flies. Insects enter the trap and drown in the water inside.

Glue board

[edit]

A glue board is a capture device with a strong adhesive. A small card covered in sticky adhesive is situated in an enclosure so that when the flies come into contact with it, they stick to it and die. A reusable glue board may be renewed through the use of vegetable oil, and then the removal of the oil with dishwashing detergent and a rinse of water. Alternatively, the card is disposed of and completely replaced periodically.

Flypaper

[edit]
"flypaper" redirects here. For other uses, see flypaper (disambiguation).
Fly capture tape

Flypaper (also known as a fly ribbon, fly strip, fly capture tape, or fly catcher) is a fly-killing device made of paper coated with a sweetly fragrant, but extremely sticky and sometimes poisonous substance that traps flies and other flying insects when they land upon it. Fly paper is considered a pest control device, and is subject to regulation in many countries. In the United States of America, the device may be subject to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.[9]

Toxicity

[edit]

The poisons used in some types of flypaper could potentially be toxic to humans and other animals. Historically, metallic arsenic (a well-known toxin to humans) was used in flypaper.[10] Arsenic extracted by soaking flypaper in water has been used by several convicted murderers, among them Lyda Southard, Frederick Seddon, Florence Maybrick,[11] and the Angel Makers of Nagyrév.[12]

Most modern brands of flypaper contain no poison, but only a non-toxic adhesive such as rosin.

Effectiveness

[edit]

Flypaper is as effective as many other methods involving insecticides or bug zappers.[13] However, a twisted strip of flypaper hanging from the ceiling is considered by many to be aesthetically less acceptable than some other methods, and so flypaper is not as commonly used as it once was.[citation needed] Some formulas for flypaper also have a slight but potentially disagreeable odor. Handling and disposing of flypaper can be awkward because it is so sticky, though vegetable oil can commonly be used to remove the adhesive.[citation needed] Flypaper loses its effectiveness over time when it dries up or becomes covered with dust, and it should be replaced regularly.[citation needed] Consideration should also be given to positioning, as it may be more or less effective in different areas of a room.[citation needed]

Bug vacuum

[edit]

A bug vacuum (bug vac, aspirator, or suck-a-bug)[14] is a type of small but powerful portable vacuum cleaner, usually with internal batteries. The motor starts quickly and generates strong suction, trapping the flying insect inside the device. The insect may be captured on an adhesive internal surface, or simply held inside the device until it dehydrates and dies.

Some bug vacuums feature non-lethal designs which keep trapped insects inside, but do not otherwise harm them, allowing their later release. These devices are popular with entomologists and persons who wish to avoid the killing of insects.[14]

A related device powered by mouth suction is called a pooter, and is used by entomologists and students to capture small organisms for study.[15][16]

Fan-based trap

[edit]

This design uses a continuously running electric fan to suck in flying insects (especially mosquitos and gnats, which are weak fliers), which are then trapped by a fine mesh grid or bag. Unable to escape the constant airflow, the insects quickly dehydrate and die.[17] Some variant designs use carbon dioxide, ultraviolet light, or chemical scent to attract insects to the trap.[17][18] Other designs rely on the natural carbon dioxide or scents emitted by people, pets, or livestock to attract pests, and simply collect flying insects as they wander close enough to be sucked in.[19][17] In addition, the continuous breeze produced by a common electric fan has been found to discourage mosquitos from landing and biting, even without trapping or killing the insects.[20]

Bug zapper

[edit]
Main article: Bug zapper

A bug zapper electric grid (fly zapper) kills insects by electrocution from high voltage on adjacent metallic grids. Bug zappers are generally small appliances intended for use in a fixed location, as distinguished from hand held electric flyswatters.

Electric flyswatter

[edit]
An electric flyswatter

An electric flyswatter (sometimes called mosquito bat, racket zapper,[21] or zap racket) is a battery-powered, handheld bug zapper that resembles a tennis racket invented by Tsao-i Shih in 1996.[22] The handle contains a battery-powered high-voltage generator. The circuit is a minimalist self-oscillating voltage booster, that is small, low-cost, composed of very few components, and continuing to operate when the battery is depleted to a fraction of its original voltage, a so-called Joule thief circuit.[23]

The flyswatter generates a voltage of between 500 and 3,000 volts (V) when a button switch is held down; the voltage is applied between two grid or mesh electrodes. When the body of a fly bridges the gap between the electrodes, a current passes through the fly. A capacitor attached to the electrodes discharges during the spark, and this initial discharge usually stuns or kills the fly. If the button is kept depressed, the continuous current will rapidly kill and incinerate a small fly.

In some swatters, an inner expanded metal or wire grid mesh is sandwiched between two outer arrays of rods, designed so that fingers are not able to poke through and bridge the electrodes, while small insects can. Other swatters have an array of rods, with high voltage between any rod and its neighbor.

Most electric flyswatters conform to electrical safety standards for humans:

  • A limit on the net charge stored in the capacitor: A discharge of less than 45 microcoulombs (μC) is considered safe, even in the unlikely scenario that the current from a flyswatter would be flowing from one arm to the other arm, partly through the heart.[24] For example, the capacitor of a 1000 V flyswatter should be less than 45 nanofarads (nF). Due to this precaution for human safety, the initial shock is usually inadequate to kill larger insects, but will still stun them for long enough that they can be disposed of.
  • A limit on the current after the initial discharge: The maximal continuous current of most flyswatters is less than 5 milliamperes (mA). This current is safe, even when flowing from one arm to the other arm of a human.[25]

An advantage over conventional flyswatters is that the electrical models do not have to crush the fly against a surface to kill it, avoiding the smeared mess this can create.[26] Electric swatters kill insects when airborne, not resting on a surface. Insects on a surface will start flying as the swatter approaches, so it can strike them.

  • Three layer grid close up: mesh and rods oppositely charged
    Three layer grid close up: mesh and rods oppositely charged
  • Closeup view of single layer grid: odd and even rods oppositely charged
    Closeup view of single layer grid: odd and even rods oppositely charged
  • Maximum charge: 45 μC
    Maximum charge: 45 μC

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Fly swatters.
Look up fly-killing device in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fly-killing device

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A fly-killing device is an apparatus designed to capture, trap, or destroy flying insects, particularly house flies (Musca domestica), to mitigate their role as vectors for diseases such as typhoid, , and in human environments. These devices range from simple manual tools to automated systems, providing non-chemical options that are essential in residential, commercial, and agricultural settings where chemical insecticides may be restricted or undesirable. The development of dedicated fly-killing devices accelerated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, driven by growing awareness of flies' risks during campaigns. The fly swatter, a foundational manual device consisting of a wire-mesh or fabric head attached to a handle, was patented in by Robert R. Montgomery under the name "Fly-Killer," marking the first purpose-built tool for efficient mechanical swatting over improvised methods like rolled newspapers. This invention gained widespread adoption following the 1910 "Swat the Fly" initiative led by Dr. Samuel Crumbine, which mobilized communities, including Boy Scouts, to reduce fly populations and curb disease outbreaks. Key types of fly-killing devices include mechanical fly swatters for direct physical elimination, traps such as sticky ribbons, tubes, and window stickers that exploit flies' resting behaviors to entangle them, (UV) light traps that lure with 360–370 nm wavelengths and capture them on glue boards, and electric zappers that deliver a high-voltage shock to kill upon contact. Baited traps, often incorporating food attractants, further enhance capture rates by mimicking sources. These categories emphasize pesticide-free mechanisms, with UV traps and systems dominating commercial applications due to their . Effectiveness depends on device type, placement, and environmental factors; for example, UV traps perform best when positioned 10 cm above the ground in open housings, reducing captures by up to 50% if elevated or enclosed improperly, while black glue boards in these traps can further halve efficacy compared to clear ones. Sticky traps offer economical, low-maintenance control but may attract additional flies if carcasses accumulate visibly. Overall, integrating multiple devices with practices—such as screening and —provides comprehensive fly suppression, as no single method eliminates populations entirely. Modern advancements, including LED-enhanced UV systems, continue to refine these tools for improved attraction and safety.

History

Early methods

In ancient civilizations, flies were recognized as significant pests associated with filth and disease, though the understanding of their role as vectors predated modern . In , textual and archaeological evidence from around 3500 BCE depicts flies as both symbolic emblems of resilience—awarded as pendants to warriors for their tenacity—and practical nuisances linked to decay and infection in daily life. Similarly, Greek and Roman writers, including and , described flies breeding in waste and contributing to , observing their presence in wounds and corpses as harbingers of illness, even if causal links were not fully articulated. These observations underscored early efforts to mitigate fly infestations in urban and agricultural settings across the Mediterranean and . Early manual techniques for fly control relied on simple, non-technological approaches. Hand-clapping was employed in ancient to dispel and malevolent influences, a practice rooted in folk traditions dating back to the (circa 1000 BCE), where rhythmic sounds disrupted fly swarms around food and living spaces. In and , rudimentary swatters made from woven branches, , or palm fibers—known as —emerged around the same period; these tools, often crafted from local materials like roots and in Daoist contexts, allowed for targeted striking without contaminating surfaces. Repulsion methods included burning aromatic herbs such as or and generating smoke from damp wood or , techniques documented in Egyptian and Greek records from the 1st millennium BCE to deter flies from homes and . Basic trapping innovations, such as honey-baited earthen pots or jars sometimes covered with perforated lids to lure flies into sticky confinements where they drowned or adhered, originated in around 2400 BCE and were later adapted in medieval between the 12th and 15th centuries from earlier Near Eastern customs for protecting food stores during warm seasons. Early adhesives derived from tree resins, such as pine pitch boiled into a tacky substance, were smeared on surfaces or traps to immobilize flies, with evidence from archaeological sites indicating their use in European apothecaries and farms since the . Flies held cultural and ritual importance, intertwining with spiritual practices. In ancient , flies symbolized protection and were invoked in rituals to ward off evil, as seen in amulets and tomb inscriptions from (circa 2686–2181 BCE). During the (1347–1351), amid widespread fear of contagion, communities targeted flies through intensified and to curb perceived disease spread, though the plague's primary vectors were fleas; these efforts reflected a broader medieval emphasis on purging insect "miasmas" in plague-stricken areas like and . Such rudimentary methods persisted until the , when mechanical innovations began to emerge.

Modern inventions

The modern era of fly-killing devices began with the development of the wire-mesh flyswatter in the early , marking a shift toward more efficient, mass-producible tools for . In 1905, Dr. Samuel J. Crumbine, secretary of the Kansas State Board of Health, popularized the device through the "Swat the Fly" campaign, which encouraged public participation in reducing fly populations to curb diseases like typhoid and . This initiative built on an earlier 1900 patent by Robert R. Montgomery for a wire-screen fly killer (U.S. No. 640,790), featuring a lightweight frame with fine mesh to prevent flies from escaping upon impact, replacing ineffective methods like newspapers or heavy bats. The campaign's emphasis on gained renewed urgency after , as returning soldiers heightened awareness of fly-borne illnesses, leading to widespread adoption and a decline in related outbreaks in the U.S. Parallel advancements in adhesive technologies led to the commercialization of flypaper in the late , providing a passive, low-cost alternative to manual swatting. Originating in around 1861 with a German baker's simple molasses-coated paper strips, flypaper evolved through chemical refinements, including attractants like sugars and resins, to enhance stickiness without manual intervention. By the late 1880s, U.S. production scaled up significantly, with companies like the Tanglefoot Company in , manufacturing coated ribbons for household use following a 1887 , capitalizing on urban fly infestations in growing cities. This industrialization made flypaper a staple in homes and businesses, contributing to early integrated approaches to before widespread . The 1920s and 1930s saw the emergence of electric fly-killing devices, introducing automation to pest control. The first practical bug zapper was patented in 1932 by William F. Folmer and Harrison L. Chapin (U.S. Patent No. 1,852,923), featuring a high-voltage grid energized by electricity to electrocute attracted insects, an improvement over manual traps. Post-World War II innovations incorporated ultraviolet (UV) light, with research confirming insects' attraction to UV wavelengths (peaking at 365 nm); fluorescent blacklight tubes became common in the 1950s, boosting efficacy by drawing flies from greater distances without relying solely on ambient light. These devices became common in commercial settings, aligning with post-war public health standards. Recent decades have focused on portable and intelligent technologies, emphasizing within (IPM) frameworks that prioritize non-chemical methods. Battery-powered vacuums emerged in the 1990s, with designs like the centrifugal trap (U.S. No. 6,226,919, issued 2001) enabling handheld to capture and contain flies alive or dead, reducing mess and chemical use in homes and greenhouses. In the , smart UV traps incorporated sensors for real-time monitoring, such as IoT-enabled devices with cameras and environmental detectors to optimize light activation and log , supporting IPM by enabling targeted interventions over broad spraying. These advancements reflect a broader trend toward eco-friendly, -driven .

Manual striking devices

Flyswatter

The flyswatter, a handheld manual striking device, originated from early improvised tools such as rolled newspapers or fabric paddles used to kill flies. An early commercial design was patented in 1900 by Robert R. Montgomery of , featuring a wire frame strung with horsehair or fine wires to swat without damaging surfaces. However, the modern screened wire mesh flyswatter emerged in 1905 when Frank H. Rose, a schoolteacher from Weir, , attached a piece of to a yardstick, creating a lightweight, effective tool. This invention was popularized by Dr. Samuel J. Crumbine, secretary of the State Board of Health, who coined the term "flyswatter" during his statewide "Swat the Fly" campaign to reduce fly-borne diseases. Over time, the design evolved to incorporate durable, materials for better handling and . Contemporary flyswatters typically feature frames made of aluminum or molded for reduced weight and resistance, paired with or mesh heads. The often follows a standard weave with approximately 18 vertical by 14 horizontal strands per inch, resulting in hole sizes of 1-2 mm, which balances air permeability to minimize wind resistance and escape prevention during impact. Ergonomic grips, such as rubberized or contoured handles, enhance one-handed control and comfort during repeated use. In practice, the flyswatter is employed by targeting flies at rest on walls, ceilings, or other surfaces, using a swift overhead or sidearm swinging motion that generates air displacement to momentarily stun the before direct contact. This technique leverages the device's vented design to allow rapid acceleration with less aerodynamic drag, increasing the chances of successful strikes against agile . The tool's advantages include its low cost—typically under $5 per unit—lack of chemical residues, and high portability, making it suitable for indoor and outdoor settings. Notably, flyswatters were promoted in U.S. campaigns during the 1910s, such as extensions of Crumbine's initiative, to combat the spread of and other diseases transmitted by houseflies, contributing to significant reductions in infection rates.

Fly gun

The fly gun, a mechanical projectile device designed for targeted insect extermination at a distance, emerged in the early 20th century as a novel alternative to close-range swatting. Invented by Dr. Claude L. Bunten, a Wyoming-based dentist, the original "Bulls-Eye" model was patented in 1924 (U.S. Patent No. 1,484,930) and resembled a small handgun or pistol, featuring a wooden frame with metal components for durability in household use. This design utilized rubber bands stretched across a frame to propel small projectiles, such as No. 6 lead shot (approximately 2.79 mm in diameter), allowing users to aim at flies perched on walls or ceilings from several feet away. A later improvement, the "Sharpshooter" variant patented in 1937 (U.S. Patent No. 2,092,301), incorporated adjustable sights and a tubular magazine holding multiple rounds for repeated firing without reloading after each shot. These devices were manufactured in Rawlins, Wyoming, starting in the late 1920s and continuing intermittently until the 1970s under various owners. The mechanism relied on simple compression loading: users pulled back a carrier arm to tension the rubber band, loading a single pellet into a launch groove aligned with the barrel, then squeezed a trigger to release the elastic force, propelling the shot at speeds sufficient for short-range impact (up to 0.117 foot-pounds of energy). Effective range was limited to 1-3 meters, with built-in aiding precision for targets like flies on high surfaces, eliminating the need for ladders or climbing in Victorian-style homes or farm settings. Historical accounts describe its popularity in the and for indoor , particularly in rural American households and tents, where it appealed to users' "hunting instincts" by turning fly elimination into a game-like activity. Production peaked before but waned post-1940s as chemical insecticides, such as those dispensed by Flit guns introduced in 1928, offered safer and more efficient mass-killing alternatives without manual aiming. By the mid-20th century, the fly gun had largely faded from common use, though collector interest persists. Modern replicas draw inspiration from these early designs but incorporate pneumatic enhancements for reliability. For instance, the Bug-A-Salt Shred-Er, launched in , uses 12-gram CO2 cartridges to power rapid successive shots of table salt granules, achieving similar 1-3 meter ranges while minimizing mess compared to lead pellets. Despite these advancements, fly guns retain inherent limitations, including variable accuracy dependent on user skill—historical users reported consistent hits only up to 6-8 feet under ideal conditions, with many achieving lower success rates (often under 50% for moving targets) due to the devices' low and sensitivity to tension. Misfires posed minor risks of , such as denting soft surfaces, though the projectiles were generally harmless to or hard materials; this, combined with the labor-intensive reloading, contributed to their decline against simpler traps and sprays.

Adhesive traps

Flypaper

Flypaper is a type of adhesive trap consisting of narrow strips of paper or cardboard coated with a sticky substance designed to entangle flying upon contact. The adhesive typically comprises or polyisobutylene resins mixed with oils such as naphthenic or , or rosin-based adhesives, often combined with attractants like to draw in flies. Some formulations incorporate synthetic pheromones, such as (Z)-9-tricosene (muscalure), to enhance attraction specifically for houseflies. In 19th-century versions, the adhesive included toxic cobalt chloride dissolved in with added , which not only stuck but also poisoned the . To apply flypaper, the strips are unrolled or unfolded and suspended vertically from ceilings, windowsills, or doorways using hooks or tape, allowing them to hang freely in areas with fly activity. Placement near light sources, such as windows, leverages the positive phototaxis of houseflies, which are drawn toward brighter areas. The traps remain effective for up to two weeks or until saturated with insects, after which they should be replaced to maintain trapping efficiency. Early flypaper posed significant health risks due to its cobalt chloride content, which could cause heavy metal poisoning if ingested, leading to gastrointestinal distress, and skin contact might result in irritation or . Modern formulations avoid such toxins, using non-toxic natural and in bases, though the adhesive can still cause mild irritation or allergic upon prolonged contact and may require solvents like for removal. Ingestion of small amounts is generally low-risk but can lead to or gastrointestinal upset. Flypaper is particularly effective against houseflies in low-infestation environments, capturing them through physical entanglement as they land on the sticky surface, often reducing populations in confined spaces. However, it is less successful against faster-moving species like blowflies, which may evade the trap more readily due to their agility.

Glue boards

Glue boards are flat, passive traps designed primarily for capturing flying such as flies and flies by providing a sticky surface upon which they land. Typically constructed from or bases coated with a non-drying, petroleum-based , these boards measure around 8 by 10 inches for smaller units, though larger variants up to 22 by 5 inches are common for integration with light traps. To enhance versatility, many designs feature perforations or folds that allow the board to be shaped into a tent-like , protecting the adhesive from direct contact while directing toward the sticky interior; they are often positioned adjacent to (UV) lights in commercial systems to boost attraction. Attractants on glue boards commonly include UV-reflective surfaces, such as or coatings that mimic wavelengths appealing to flies, drawing them into landing range without the need for chemical lures in basic models. In more advanced setups, these boards are paired with UV lamps emitting at 350-370 nm to simulate daylight, significantly increasing fly approach rates; for instance, glue boards under UV light have been shown to capture up to twice as many house flies as alternatives in controlled tests. This passive design leverages the adhesive technology akin to that in traditional flypaper, ensuring long-term stickiness without evaporation. For deployment, glue boards are placed indoors in areas like kitchens or food preparation zones, or outdoors near entry points such as doors and windows, at heights of 1.5 to 6 feet to intercept flight paths. They require minimal maintenance beyond periodic checks, with replacement recommended every 1 to 3 months depending on environmental factors and catch volume—full boards should be discarded hygienically to prevent secondary . In dusty settings, boards are ideally enclosed or positioned away from to preserve adhesive efficacy. Glue boards demonstrate high effectiveness for monitoring and controlling fruit flies in enclosed spaces, where sticky surfaces can capture a substantial portion of low-flying populations, though exact rates vary by setup; for house flies, field studies report captures of tens of thousands of individuals across multiple traps over weeks, with white boards outperforming colored ones by 30-50% in attraction. Limitations include reduced stickiness from dust accumulation, which can halve capture efficiency in contaminated environments, and lower performance against larger or faster-flying species compared to active traps. Overall, they serve as a hygienic, non-toxic option for , particularly in sensitive areas like homes and commercial kitchens.

Container traps

Fly bottle

The fly bottle, also known as a flytrap, is a passive container trap designed to capture flying such as house flies and fruit flies through a one-way entry mechanism. Originating in 19th-century , early versions were typically handblown vessels, often onion-shaped or jar-like, approximately quart-sized, featuring a narrow neck or inverted that allowed flies to enter but hindered escape. Modern adaptations use or jars with either an inverted cone-shaped —commonly fashioned from a cut top or —or a perforated lid to create the entry point, maintaining the simple, reusable structure for indoor or outdoor placement. Flies are attracted to the bait placed at the bottom of the bottle, which exploits their olfaction to mimic natural decay odors. Common baits include mixtures of , fermenting , or , with volatile compounds like those in drawing fruit flies and sugary liquids attracting house flies. These attractants simulate rotting , prompting flies to investigate and enter the trap voluntarily. Once inside, the narrow opening prevents escape, and flies either drown in the shallow liquid bait or become trapped without it, unable to navigate back through the funnel or perforations due to their flight patterns and the design's geometry. To maintain effectiveness, the trap requires weekly emptying and rinsing to remove accumulated insects and refresh the bait, preventing overflow and odor buildup. Fly bottles are valued for their low cost, with DIY versions constructible for under $2 using recycled jars, bottles, and household ingredients, making them accessible for sanitation in homes and small-scale settings.

Disposable fly traps

Disposable fly traps are single-use, baited pouch or bag devices designed primarily for outdoor use in areas with high fly infestations, such as farms, stables, or near sites. These traps typically feature a durable construction with a capacity of 1 to 2 gallons, incorporating specialized entry ports or a pop-top cap that permits flies to enter while preventing escape. Commercial examples, like the ! Disposable Fly Trap developed by Sterling International in , include an integrated water-activated bait pouch that dissolves upon hydration to release attractants. This design allows for mess-free deployment and disposal, capturing up to 20,000 flies per trap in standard models or 40,000 in larger "" variants. The bait in these traps consists of protein-based lures formulated to mimic animal waste and decaying organic matter, key attractants for filth flies like house flies and blow flies. Key ingredients include putrescent whole egg solids (18.0%), yeast (5.5%), trimethylamine (2.8%), and indole (0.2%), combined with sucrose (42.1%) to enhance appeal, all encased in a water-soluble pouch. Once activated by adding 1 to 2 quarts of water, the lure remains effective for about 30 days, drawing flies from up to 20-30 feet away before the trap requires replacement. This composition ensures targeted attraction without pesticides, relying on the flies' natural feeding behavior. Deployment involves hanging the trap 20 to 30 feet from occupied areas using the included cord or wire, ideally near garbage, , or to intercept flies at their breeding sources. Upon entering through the ports to feed, flies become trapped in the solution, where they drown or dehydrate due to the humid, inescapable environment. These traps evolved from traditional bottle methods but prioritize convenience for large-scale outdoor control. Amid growing concerns over plastic pollution, biodegradable disposable fly traps have emerged in the 2020s, utilizing eco-friendly materials like plant-based polymers for the bag while maintaining the same bait and entry mechanisms to minimize environmental waste.

Suction devices

Bug vacuum

A bug vacuum is a portable suction device designed for the live capture of flying insects such as houseflies, allowing for optional killing or release to minimize harm to non-target species. These handheld tools typically feature a lightweight, ergonomic body with an extended nozzle for precise targeting, often up to 24 inches in reach, and a transparent collection chamber that enables users to observe captured insects without opening the device. The chamber is equipped with fine mesh filters or screens to prevent escapes while permitting airflow, ensuring insects remain contained during use. Operation involves activating a trigger or to generate , drawing flies into the chamber via a small motor—commonly 7.4V in electric models—that produces negative pressure around 0.4 kPa, sufficient for capturing small flying pests without excessive force. Battery-powered variants, such as those with 4000 mAh lithium-ion packs, offer 30-45 minutes of runtime on a 2-3 hour charge, making them suitable for indoor spot treatments. Some designs incorporate a low-voltage electrified grid in the chamber for instant killing on contact, which can be disabled for catch-and-release; alternatively, users may transfer captured flies to a separate of soapy to drown them humanely. Non-electric models, like piston-driven ones, rely on manual compression for , eliminating battery needs while providing similar containment. The primary advantages of bug vacuums include their non-toxic, chemical-free operation, which avoids residues and supports in homes or sensitive environments. They enable the selective release of beneficial , such as pollinators, reducing ecological impact compared to broad-spectrum killers. These devices excel in indoor settings for targeted removal of flies, offering quiet, mess-free control without swatting or zapping. Modern iterations often include LED lights along the nozzle for improved visibility in low-light areas, aiding precise aiming without relying on external attractants. Bug vacuums gained popularity in the early as part of a shift toward humane and organic methods, with early handheld models marketed for small-scale applications like home fly removal. Developed amid growing interest in non-chemical alternatives, they addressed limitations of manual striking tools by providing a gentler, more effective means of capture for elusive flying . Today, examples include the BugZooka for battery-free use and the Lentek Cordless Bug Catcher for powered convenience, both emphasizing portability and ease for everyday pest encounters.

Fan-based trap

Fan-based traps are stationary devices designed to attract and capture flying , including house flies, by using a low-speed fan to draw them into a contained killing chamber. These traps typically feature a compact box-like structure, often measuring around 13 inches in diameter and up to 22 inches in height, housing the fan and attractants within a durable enclosure suitable for indoor or covered outdoor use. A representative example is the Dynatrap series, introduced in 2006 and employs a powerful yet quiet fan to pull insects through entry points into a retention basket where they dehydrate and die. The mechanism relies on a combination of lures and to target flies effectively. (UV) LED lights (360–370 nm) attract visually from up to 1 acre (primarily mosquitoes), while a (TiO2) coating generates trace amounts of (CO2) to simulate human breath, enhancing the draw. The integrated fan, operating at low speeds for energy efficiency, creates a gentle downdraft that exhausts flies into the chamber without the need for chemicals or zapping sounds; many models maintain noise levels below 30 decibels, making them suitable for quiet indoor environments like kitchens or bedrooms. Once captured, flies are retained on sticky pads or in a basket, preventing escape. These traps can reduce populations of certain flying in enclosed or semi-enclosed spaces, though effectiveness varies by ; for house flies, capture rates are lower (e.g., ~3% in controlled tests compared to ~66% for standard glue traps), with better results for mosquitoes. For optimal performance, maintenance involves emptying the catch basket or replacing sticky pads every 15-30 days, depending on insect density, to prevent clogging and ensure airflow continuity. As of 2025, these devices continue to be used in residential and commercial settings as part of . A notable DIY variant of fan-based traps emerged in early 2025, created by a Chinese individual who attached a net to a household fan and placed a UV light behind it to attract and capture mosquitoes. This low-cost, homemade alternative draws insects toward the light, after which the fan pulls them into the net for retention, demonstrating a simple adaptation similar to commercial models but without advanced features like TiO2 coatings. Videos of the device in action, showing it collecting numerous mosquitoes, went viral on social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), garnering significant engagement across posts and shares. While primarily designed for mosquitoes, the mechanism holds potential applicability for capturing house flies in similar setups.

Electrocution devices

Bug zapper

A , also known as an electric insect killer, is a stationary device designed for area-wide control of flying through . It features an enclosed (UV) light source, typically fluorescent bulbs emitting UV-A wavelengths between 315 and 400 nanometers, which attracts insects toward a surrounding high-voltage grid. The grid operates at 2,000 to 4,000 volts, generated by a and circuit, and is protected by an outer to contain debris and prevent direct access. Outdoor models, introduced via in , incorporate weatherproof enclosures to withstand environmental exposure while maintaining functionality in patios or gardens. In operation, such as flies are drawn to the UV , which mimics natural attractants visible in their , prompting them to fly toward the device. Upon contacting the inner electrified grid, the completes an electrical circuit, resulting in an arc discharge that instantly vaporizes its body through intense heat and current. This process produces a characteristic "zap" sound and leaves remains that collect in a removable for cleaning. The design ensures rapid elimination without chemicals, targeting activity when UV attraction is effective. While bug zappers can kill over 1,000 per night in typical outdoor settings, their effectiveness against mosquitoes is limited, with house flies showing stronger attraction to UV light. Controlled studies indicate that only about 0.2% to 4% of total kills are target biting pests, with the majority being non-pest . Research indicates that up to 13,000 may be electrocuted over multiple nights, yet fewer than 50 are biting pests such as mosquitoes. Overall, these devices preferentially eliminate beneficial like beetles, moths, and pollinators, potentially disrupting local ecosystems. For safety, modern bug zappers include grounded frames and protective outer grids spaced at least 1/4 inch from the high-voltage elements to minimize shock risk from accidental contact. They should be placed 15 to 25 feet away from activity areas, such as seating or dining spaces, to avoid drawing toward people, and hung 5 to 7 feet above ground level for optimal interception. Additionally, electrocution of pathogen-carrying flies can release viable microorganisms into the air, potentially increasing transmission risk; traps should be used in well-ventilated areas and cleaned regularly to mitigate this. Indoor variants further reduce emissions and electrical hazards through sealed components.

Electric flyswatter

The electric flyswatter is a portable, battery-operated device designed for manually targeting and of flying such as flies and mosquitoes, featuring a handheld racket-like structure that allows users to swing it directly at pests. Invented in the mid-1990s by Taiwanese inventor Tsao-i Shih, it combines the physical action of a traditional flyswatter with an integrated high-voltage grid to deliver an immediate lethal shock upon contact. In terms of design, the device typically consists of a frame shaped like a tennis racket, with the head measuring approximately 12 by 6 inches to provide a broad striking area, connected to an ergonomic handle for comfortable gripping. The racket's grid is composed of three layers of fine —two outer grounded layers and a central high-voltage layer—spaced closely to create an while preventing direct human contact with live wires. It is powered by 2 to 3 AA batteries, generating a high-voltage output ranging from 700 to 3,000 volts through a simple circuit that steps up the low battery voltage via capacitors and transformers. Operation involves pressing a on the handle to activate the high-voltage circuit, charging the central to electrocute any that touches it during a swing, resulting in instant without physical crushing. features, such as the triple-mesh configuration and insulated handle, minimize the risk of accidental shocks to users, though the device includes warnings against use near or by children. The circuit pulses only when activated, conserving battery power during non-use. For usage, the electric flyswatter is swung like a conventional swatter toward visible , achieving high effectiveness with near-instant kills on direct contact due to the disrupting the pest's . A set of AA batteries typically provides 1 to 2 weeks of intermittent use, depending on frequency, before replacement is needed, making it suitable for both indoor and outdoor applications. It is particularly favored for picnics and , where portability allows quick targeting of individual flies without relying on stationary traps. Compared to manual swatters, its primary advantages include the absence of insect remains or mess from crushing, as the electrocution vaporizes or disintegrates the pest on impact, and greater reliability in killing tougher insects like mosquitoes that might survive a simple strike. This mess-free operation enhances user convenience, especially in food-preparation areas or during social gatherings outdoors.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8617729/
  2. https://extension.psu.edu/house-flies
  3. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/pesticide-registration-manual-chapter-13-devices
  4. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/731447
  5. https://patents.google.com/patent/US640790A/en
  6. https://www.vectothor.com/new-led-technology/
  7. https://thomaspestservices.com/blog/post/pests-in-folklore-and-mythology-ancient-egypt
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275024324_Insects_in_ancient_Pharaonic_Egypt_a_review_of_fauna_their_mythological_and_religious_significance_and_associated_diseases
  9. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/15250/15250-h/15250-h.htm
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284576621_History_of_Insect_Repellents
  11. https://www.ancient-origins.net/weird-facts/pepi-ii-slaves-0016752
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359710780_Archaeological_Adhesives
  13. https://nilescribes.org/2021/02/28/fly-symbolism-ancient-egypt/
  14. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1540/medieval-cures-for-the-black-death/
  15. https://gizmodo.com/an-ode-to-flypaper-the-perfect-tech-that-asks-for-noth-1844444239
  16. https://987thegrand.com/did-you-know-flypaper-was-invented-in-grand-rapids/
  17. https://home.howstuffworks.com/bug-zapper.htm
  18. https://www.rentokil.com/us/about/blog/innovation/the-evolution-of-pest-control
  19. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6226919B1/en
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/161
  21. http://theinventors.org/library/inventors/blflyswatter.htm
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/27/magazine/who-made-that-fly-swatter.html
  23. https://www.khi.org/articles/flies-and-infectious-disease/
  24. https://news.prairiepublic.org/show/dakota-datebook-archive/2022-05-25/swat-the-fly
  25. https://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/1990-B62-Bulls-Eyes-and-Sharpshooters.pdf
  26. https://www.fieldandstream.com/stories/guns/handguns/blast-from-past-sharpshooter-fly-gun
  27. https://www.bugasalt.com/products/shred-er-co2-cartridge
  28. https://www.sentonpharm.com/fly-glue-can-effectively-stick-flies-product/
  29. https://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/128978/Fly-Paper-Ingredients
  30. https://academic.oup.com/ee/article-pdf/2/4/555/18276376/ee2-0555.pdf
  31. https://chestofbooks.com/reference/Henley-s-20th-Century-Formulas-Recipes-Processes-Vol2/Fly-Papers-and-Fly-Poisons.html
  32. https://theranchpestcontrol.com/blogs/home/where-to-hang-fly-paper
  33. https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Tech_Articles/Ross-BestPractice-Fly-Control-EN-18.pdf
  34. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp33.pdf
  35. https://www.blackflag.com/Products/Indoor-Products/Fly-Paper-4pk.aspx
  36. https://images.thdstatic.com/catalog/pdfImages/4f/4f359ba0-b672-44fc-9227-0859e25976af.pdf
  37. https://www.poison.org/articles/use-pest-strips-as-directed-212
  38. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/home-and-landscape/flies/
  39. https://dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/environmental-health-protection/structural-pest-control/house-flies-other-filth-flies.html
  40. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/jear/article/view/9530/10099
  41. https://www.domyown.com/what-is-the-actual-size-of-flypod-glue-boards-qa-81791.html
  42. https://www.extermpro.com/how-to-properly-use-glue-traps-for-insects-and-risks/
  43. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2035&context=usdaarsfacpub
  44. https://schoolipm.tamu.edu/2016/02/14/spn-glue-boards/
  45. https://www.catchmaster.com/blogs/news/how-long-do-glue-traps-last
  46. https://www.catchmaster.com/pages/frequently-asked-questions
  47. https://victoriancollections.net.au/items/4f9f7e0c2162ef083857f976
  48. https://peabodyhsi.wordpress.com/2020/09/10/catching-flies-with-honey-and-ale/
  49. https://www.sciencebuddies.org/stem-activities/make-homemade-fly-trap
  50. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1103
  51. https://www.dendroboard.com/threads/diy-fruit-fly-trap.64757/
  52. https://www.rescue.com/latest-buzz/company-culture/rescue-retrospective-part-1/
  53. https://www.rescue.com/products/traps/disposable-fly-trap/
  54. https://www.valleyvet.com/ct_detail.html?pgguid=7c4c8f87-f132-4ea0-9be3-98285bb30d8a
  55. https://www.valleyvet.com/ct_library_info.html?product=7c4c8f87-f132-4ea0-9be3-98285bb30d8a&showText=1
  56. https://paulbhardware.com/rescue-ftd-db12-fly-trap-solid-musty-ftd
  57. https://www.homedepot.com/p/RESCUE-Outdoor-Disposable-Fly-Trap-FTD-DB12/100083352
  58. https://skorter.com/products/skorter-eco-friendly-disposable-fly-trap-outdoor-bag
  59. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/the-best-bug-killing-gear/
  60. https://www.homedepot.com/p/Lentek-Cordless-Bug-Catcher-Vacuum-with-Charging-Stand-Chemical-Free-Indoor-Outdoor-Insect-Trap-BV01/317841693
  61. https://www.amazon.com/Handheld-Cordless-Rechargeable-Catcher-Portable/dp/B0BYDCRRQG
  62. https://gardening.org/use-a-handheld-vacuum-to-control-garden-insects/
  63. https://attra.ncat.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/bugvacuums.pdf
  64. https://www.sonictechnologyproducts.com/bugbuster
  65. https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Bound-Bug-Vacuum-Catcher/dp/B0CVJR5MQ2
  66. https://trimaxlocks.com/shop/bugzooka/bugzooka-wb100/
  67. https://www.dynatrap.com/dynatrap-one-acre-led-mosquito-and-insect-trap-black-dt2030
  68. https://www.webstaurantstore.com/dynatrap-dt1775-insect-trap/903DT1775.html
  69. https://www.dynatrap.com/press-releases/woodstream-acquires-dynamic-solutions-worldwide-maker-of-dynatrap-insect-traps
  70. https://www.reviewed.com/home-outdoors/content/dynatrap-mosquito-and-insect-trap-review
  71. https://www.amazon.com/Indoors-Mosquito-Catcher-Refills-Kitchen/dp/B0FKN2ZJSB
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6884328/
  73. https://www.lowes.com/pd/Zevo-Zevo-Flying-Insect-Trap-Refill/5013244169
  74. https://en.as.com/videos/man-in-china-turns-ventilator-into-a-mosquito-killing-machine-v/
  75. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAnIFPnozVQ
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4867860/
  77. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1962439A/en
  78. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/09/12/bug-zappers-mosquito-repellent/
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336686502_Experimental_Study_for_the_Effect_of_Electrocuting_Insect_Trap_Bug_Zapper_on_the_Spread_and_Viability_of_Microorganisms_Carried_by_Musca_domestica_House_Fly
  80. https://buzbug.com/blogs/news/5-mistakes-avoid-when-using-bug-zappers
  81. https://www.telegram.com/story/lifestyle/2020/09/09/thomas-column-electric-flyswatter-worlds-best-invention/42414275/
  82. https://www.amazon.com/FOBELISK-Bug-Zapper-Electric-Batteries/dp/B07RQP31ZQ
  83. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5519963A/en
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4441306/
  85. https://www.homedepot.com/p/Aspectek-2-Pack-Electric-Fly-Swatter-3000-Volt-2-in-1-Mosquito-Zapper-New-HR28A8/327195313
  86. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/executioner-electric-fly-swatter-review/
  87. https://www.amazon.com/Electric-Swatter-1500mAh-Rechargeable-Mosquito/dp/B0CYZH4X6G
  88. https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/home-products/g64245739/best-fly-swatters/
  89. https://thanoshome.com/does-electric-fly-swatter-work/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.